Abstract
Candida glabrata has emerged as an important nosocomial pathogen, yet little is known about its epidemiology. We prospectively followed 98 patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit and the bone marrow transplant unit of a university hospital. Samples from environmental surfaces and the hands of hospital personnel were also cultured. Patients with newly acquired C. glabrata strains were compared to controls who were culture negative for C. glabrata. C. glabrata was recovered from multiple sites from 24 patients and three environmental surfaces. Sixteen patients (17%) acquired C. glabrata after admission to the study units. Significant risk factors for the nosocomial acquisition of C. glabrata were prolonged duration of hospitalization in the unit and prior antimicrobial use. Strain delineation by restriction enzyme analysis revealed 28 different strains of C. glabrata; three strain types were common to nine patients. The environmental isolates were of the same strain type and common to five patients (four patients with newly acquired strains). These results suggest the possibility of exogenous nosocomial acquisition of C. glabrata, including the possible acquisition from the hospital environment. Transmission may be by indirect contact since identical strains of C. glabrata were recovered from patients who were geographically and temporally associated.
Candida species are ubiquitous organisms (26). An increasing incidence of nosocomial infections caused by Candida species has been noted in neutropenic patients as well as in other immunocompromised patients such as patients in intensive care and postsurgical patients (5, 6, 13, 20, 38, 39). The changing patterns and the increasing incidence of disseminated Candida infection have also been evident in large autopsy series (5). The high mortality rate associated with bacterial infections has declined with the early empiric administration of antibiotics, while fungal infections have increasingly become important in causing morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Candida is now the fourth most common organism recovered from cultures of blood from hospitalized patients (3, 4). Although Candida albicans is the most common fungal species isolated from blood, Candida glabrata ranks fourth among the Candida species isolated from blood (and ranks third among patients who have undergone surgery). The mortality rate from C. glabrata infection is as high as that from C. albicans infections (2–4, 20, 21). C. glabrata is of special importance not only because of a recent increase in its frequency but also because of its innately reduced susceptibility to antifungal agents, specifically, the azoles (10, 12, 20, 36, 41).
A clear understanding of the epidemiology of Candida infection and colonization has been difficult because of a lack of a reliable typing system for the evaluation of strain relatedness. Previous typing systems have relied on phenotypic differences within a Candida species which may not reflect true strain differences (8, 24, 37). Recent advances in the use of molecular biology-based techniques have enabled investigators to develop typing systems with greater sensitivities. These techniques have been widely used to study diverse groups of organisms including bacteria, viruses, and fungi (1, 8, 9, 15, 22, 24, 31, 34). Molecular typing of Candida by DNA fingerprinting has the capability of differentiating closely related strains which may have phenotypic similarities (8, 9, 18, 34).
In this prospective study, we used restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, a form of molecular typing, to delineate the different strains of C. glabrata. This will further clarify the patient and hospital reservoirs of infection and the modes of Candida transmission between high-risk patients. A knowledge of the epidemiology of nosocomial colonization and infection is essential for the prevention of the further spread of C. glabrata and nosocomial infection.
(This work was presented in part at the 92nd General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, New Orleans, La., 26 to 30 May 1992.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Harper Hospital is a 900-bed tertiary-care teaching hospital in Detroit, Mich. Patients admitted to one medical intensive care unit (MICU) and bone marrow transplant unit (BMTU) were studied. The MICU is an eight-bed private-room unit. Patients hospitalized in the MICU were transferred midway during the study period to a separate 10-bed unit with four open beds and six private beds located on a different floor. The same hospital personnel continued to care for patients in each MICU. The BMTU is a 24-bed private-room unit with a hospital staff separate from that for the MICU. Patients were occasionally transferred between the BMTU and the MICU, depending on the severity of illness. House staff and medical students rotate between Harper Hospital and four other Wayne State University hospitals.
We prospectively studied all patients who provided informed consent and were hospitalized in the BMTU or the MICU during a 10-month study period. Demographic and clinical data, including date of hospitalization, date of discharge, age, gender, ward, and medical service were recorded. The presence of urinary catheterization and indwelling vascular catheter placement (with dates and sites) was also recorded. A careful record of bed assignments was kept, as were the patients’ movements within the hospital before discharge. Exposure to antibiotics and antifungal agents (duration, route, type, and indication) and cytotoxic and immunosuppressive agents was also evaluated.
We defined colonization and infection according to established criteria. Colonization was indicated when Candida species were isolated from a site in the absence of signs or symptoms of infection; infection was diagnosed when the organism was isolated from a normally sterile body site, concurrent with accompanying signs and symptoms of infection. Death was considered related to C. glabrata if the patient died within 72 h after obtaining a culture-positive sample from a normally sterile body site, the clinical profile was consistent with systemic infection, and no other evident reason for death was ascertained. The scale of McCabe and Jackson (23), in which class 1 is a nonfatal underlying disease, class 2 is an ultimately fatal disease (50% chance of death within 5 years), and class 3 is a rapidly fatal disease (50% chance of death within 2 months), was used to categorize the severity of illness.
Specimens were obtained from all patients. All specimens were plated on Sabouraud dextrose agar (Difco, Detroit, Mich.); clinical specimens were also plated on blood agar. Samples were obtained for culture when the patients were admitted to the study unit and then weekly for patients in the BMTU and biweekly for patients in the MICU until discharge from the unit. Oropharyngeal, rectal, and urine samples from all patients were cultured. Specimens from other sites such as wounds, vagina, skin, and blood were also taken when it was clinically indicated. The dates that samples were obtained, the sampling sites, and colony counts of cultures positive for yeast were recorded. Oropharyngeal and rectal specimens were obtained with a sterile cotton swab. Urine samples were obtained through clean-catch voiding or were taken from syringe-aspirated catheters. Fifty hand samples from 25 hospital personnel in both units obtained by producing an impression with the hands on a petri dish with Sabouraud dextrose agar (Difco) were cultured (27, 30, 42). Fifty samples from selected environmental surfaces and 10 samples of patient food from the study units were cultured by using Rodac plates with Sabouraud dextrose agar (Falcon, Oxnard, Calif.). Environmental samples from the surfaces, food, and hands were cultured at the beginning of the study and at 3-month intervals. Surfaces in a second MICU (MICU-II) were also assessed by culture when the location of the unit was changed during the study period and before any patients were hospitalized in the new unit.
All patients with positive C. glabrata cultures were compared to control patients from whom no yeast species were recovered at any time during the study period. All patients hospitalized in the MICU and the BMTU during the study period were evaluated. Dichotomous variables were compared by using the chi-square test or two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were compared by the Mann-Whitney U test. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate independent risk factors for C. glabrata colonization (14, 19).
Candida species were identified by germ tube and chlamydospore formation, morphology, and the Yeast API 20C method (Sherwood Medical, Plainview, N.Y.). Strains were initially isolated on Sabouraud dextrose agar (Difco) and were stored frozen at −70°C until analysis. Control strains of C. glabrata were strains obtained from 10 patients located in geographically separate hospitals and C. glabrata ATCC 2001 (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Md.).
Isolates were evaluated for molecular relatedness by restriction enzyme analysis (REA) of genomic DNA. The method used to prepare and analyze the DNA for comparison of the molecular relatedness of strains has been published and described previously in detail (33, 34). For electrophoresis, DNA was digested with the restriction endonuclease EcoRI or MspI (BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.) by following the recommendations of the manufacturer. The DNA was then run on a 0.7% agarose gel at 30 V for 16 h. The gel was stained in a solution of 0.5 μg of ethidium bromide per ml and was destained in water before being photographed.
Differentiation of isolates by REA was achieved by visual comparison of the more variable bands. As has been published previously (33, 34), strains were considered different if there were two or more bands differences between isolates. The variations in these patterns formed the basis for our groups. All isolates were initially digested with MspI and typed. Afterward, those isolates that were similar by MspI digestion were then submitted to separate EcoRI digestion and were further delineated into groups.
RESULTS
During the study period, we followed 98 patients (51 men and 47 women) with 106 admissions hospitalized in the BMTU or the MICU. Six patients had two admissions each, and one patient had three admissions. Patients with positive C. glabrata cultures ranged in age from 19 to 88 years (mean age, 47.0 years). Patients in the MICU were hospitalized for a mean of 21 days (range, 7 to 57 days) and in the BMTU for a mean of 32 days (range, 10 to 65 days) (Table 1). Twenty-four patients (24.5%) were culture positive for C. glabrata at some point during their hospital stay. Of the 24 patients, only C. glabrata was isolated from 7 patients, whereas both C. glabrata and other Candida species were isolated simultaneously or consecutively from 17 of the patients during their hospital stay. The combination of C. glabrata and C. albicans was the most common for 11 (65%) of the 17 patients; the remaining 6 patients were colonized with C. glabrata and either C. parapsilosis, C. kefyr, C. tropicalis, or C. lusitaniae. For four of the remaining six patients three different Candida species were isolated during their hospital stay. Candida species other than C. albicans were isolated from 15 patients. Thus, 65 of the 98 study patients were colonized with Candida species, with an overall colonization ratio of 1:2.3 for non-C. albicans to C. albicans.
TABLE 1.
Demographic and risk factor characteristics of patients and controls for the acquisition of C. glabrata
Characteristic | Patients with newly acquired C. glabrata (n = 16) | All patients infected or colonized with C. glabrata (n = 24) | Patients not infected or colonized with Candida species (n = 33) |
---|---|---|---|
Mean age (yr [range]) | 45.9 (19–88) | 47.0 (19–88) | 49.1 (5–85) |
Sex (no. of males/no. of females) | 3/13 | 4/20 | 20/11 |
Mean duration in unit (days) | 18.8 | 17.6 | 7.6a |
Mean duration in study (days [range]) | 35.6 (7–89) | 33.0 (7–89) | 39.1 (4–101) |
No. (%) of patients with prior antibiotic therapy | 16 (100) | 16 (67) | 20 (65)a |
No. (%) of patients with prior antifungal therapy | 8 (50) | 8 (33) | 16 (52) |
No. of patients receiving prior systemic antifungal therapy | 7 (3 flz)b | 7 (3 flz) | 7 (2 flz) |
No. (%) of patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy | 10 (63) | 15 (63) | 23 (74) |
No. (%) of patients with granulocytopenia | 9 (56) | 13 (54) | 14 (45) |
No. (%) of patients with the following underlying illness: | |||
Malignancy | 11 (67) | 16 (66) | 21 (68) |
Cardiac disease | 2 (13) | 2 (8) | 6 (19) |
Neurologic disease | 1 (6) | 1 (4) | 5 (16) |
P < 0.001; significant in multivariate analysis.
Values in parentheses are numbers of patients receiving fluconazole (flz).
Demographic and risk factors for patients and controls are summarized in Table 1. There were no differences between patients colonized with C. glabrata and controls with regard to fluconazole administration. Of the 24 patients colonized with C. glabrata, 16 (66%) had an underlying hematological malignancy. Regarding the 16 patients with a newly acquired C. glabrata colonization, 11 had either leukemia (n = 9) or lymphoma (n = 2). There were no significant differences in the demographic data between patients and controls in BMTU or MICU admissions.
A total of 736 samples were cultured during the study. Six-hundred twenty-six were from patients, 60 were from the environment, and 50 were from hospital personnel. A total of 425 samples from all sources were culture positive. Of 626 samples from patients, 400 (68%) were positive for yeast during the study period. There were a mean of 6.4 samples per patient in the yeast-positive group and a mean of 4.0 samples per patient in the yeast-negative group. The majority of the positive cultures grew C. albicans (226 isolates; 56.6%), followed by C. glabrata (102 isolates; 26%), C. lusitaniae (32 isolates; 8%), C. tropicalis (18 isolates; 4.5%), C. kefyr (9 isolates; 2.2%), and C. parapsilosis (8 isolates; 2%).
We recovered a total of 102 C. glabrata isolates from 24 patients, this accounted for 26% of all Candida species recovered. The distribution of C. glabrata by site of isolation is presented in Table 2. Sixteen of the 24 patients culture positive for C. glabrata had negative initial cultures and C. glabrata was isolated only after admission to the study unit. Of these, eight were in the BMTU, five were in the first MICU (MICU-I), and three were in MICU-II. Thirteen of the 24 patients colonized with C. glabrata were located in the BMTU, 6 were in MICU-I, and 5 were in MICU-II (Table 3). No positive hand samples from hospital staff or samples of the food given to patients were positive for C. glabrata by culture.
TABLE 2.
Distribution of C. glabrata isolates by site of isolation and as a percentage of all Candida species in the study
Body site | No. of C. glabrata isolates | Total no. of Candida isolates | % of total |
---|---|---|---|
Oropharynx | 17 | 128 | 13 |
Stool or rectum | 44 | 142 | 31 |
Urine | 32 | 72 | 44 |
Vagina | 7 | 39 | 18 |
Blood | 0 | 4 | 0 |
Wound | 2 | 13 | 18 |
Sputum | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Total | 102 | 400 | 25.5 |
TABLE 3.
Patient and environmental distribution of C. glabrata isolates, strain types, and room numbersa
Unit | Total no. of patients in study | No. of patients positive for C. glabrata | Patients with newly acquired strains
|
Environmental isolates
|
No. of patients colonized with C. glabrata upon transfer to study unit | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of patients | Room no. | Strain typeb | No. of isolates | Room no. | Strain type | ||||
MICU-I | 21 | 6 | 5 | 26, 27, 28, 31 | 10, 15, 18, 23, 24 | 2 | 26 | 01 | 1 |
MICU-II | 23 | 5 | 3 | 27, 31, 33 | 01, 02, 19, 25 | 0 | 2 | ||
BMTU | 54 | 13 | 8 | 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 12, 13, 19, 20, 22 | 01, 02, 06, 07, 08, 09, 20 | 1 | 3 | 01 | 5 |
Refer to Fig. 2 for descriptions of the different strain types.
One strain was common to five patients and three environmental surfaces.
C. glabrata was recovered from 3 of the 50 environmental surface samples that were cultured. Two isolates were recovered simultaneously from different surfaces in the same room in MICU-I and one isolate was recovered in the BMTU. The colonized environmental surfaces were those that were frequently touched by hospital personnel or that were in open contact with patients: a monitor panel and a bedside tray in the same room in MICU-I and the bed rail of one patient room in the BMTU. No common source (vehicle) was identified. The most commonly recovered organisms from the environmental surfaces evaluated were C. albicans (eight isolates), C. lusitaniae and C. parapsilosis (2 isolates each), and C. guilliermondii (one isolate). Additionally, 32% of the 25 personnel whose hand samples were cultured carried C. parapsilosis on their hands.
REA was performed with 115 isolates of C. glabrata: 102 isolates recovered from 24 study patients, 3 isolates recovered from environmental surfaces, and the 10 control strains. REA revealed 28 different patterns (strain types) among the isolates. Figure 1 demonstrates the RFLP patterns for the most frequently encountered strain types (types 01, 04, 05, and 12), comprising 41% of all C. glabrata isolates. These four types were common to 10 patients and the three environmental isolates. Strains of types 01 and 02 were similar except that the double bands found between the 9.4- and 22-kb range were different for both the two types. It is as noteworthy, that, published previously (34), most of the differences among the C. glabrata isolates are generally detected in the higher-molecular-size ranges of 9.4 to 23.1 kb.
FIG. 1.
Agarose gel electrophoresis of chromosomal DNA of C. glabrata with the restriction enzyme MspI. Lane O, bacteriophage lambda digested with EcoRI, used as a control; lanes A to G and J to N, clinical isolates from 12 separate patients; lanes H and I, environmental isolates; lane A, strain type 12; lanes B, D, F, G, H, and I, strain type 02; lane C, strain type 01; lane E, strain type 03; lanes J, K, L, and N, strain type 04; lane M, strain type 05.
Overall, group 01 consisted of eight isolates from five different patients and 3 environmental samples, group 04 consisted of nine isolates from two patients, group 05 consisted of seven isolates from a single patient at various times, and group 12 consisted of five isolates from two patients. The isolates from the remaining patients and controls were distinctly different strain types with unique RFLP patterns.
Patients with newly acquired C. glabrata strains and strains with identical types were temporally and geographically associated in BMTU rooms 3, 12, 13, and 20 for strain type 01 and in rooms 19 and 22 for strain type 07 (Fig. 2). Additionally, patients in rooms 4, 5, 7, 10, and 13 were also colonized with newly acquired strains of C. glabrata. Patients in MICU-I colonized with newly acquired strains were found in rooms 26, 27, 28, and 31 (Table 3; Fig. 2). We found no environmental isolates or shared strains in MICU-II, although one patient transferred from MICU-I was colonized in MICU-II with a strain that was of the same type as the environmental isolates in MICU-I. In addition, patients in rooms 27, 31, and 33 in MICU-II were also colonized with newly acquired strains of C. glabrata. Evaluation of isolates colonizing different body sites of an individual patient revealed that 14 (58%) of 24 patients were colonized with the same strain type at multiple anatomical sites. For five patients two different strains of C. glabrata were recovered from different sites or at different times, and for two patients three different strain types were isolated. For 17 (70%) of the 24 patients, C. glabrata was isolated with at least another Candida species. Prospective longitudinal cultures of samples from 12 patients showed carriage of the same strain in 8 patients (75%).
FIG. 2.
Schematic floor plan of the MICU and the BMTU. Circled numbers denote patients with newly acquired C. glabrata isolates. Squared numbers denote environmental samples culture positive for C. glabrata. The numbers 01 to 27 denote the separate strain types isolated from patients and the environment. The numbers 1 to 24 and 25 to 34 in the upper right-hand corner of each box denote patient room numbers.
There was only one clinical infection with C. glabrata, and this occurred in a diabetic patient with fungal pyelonephritis and urinary obstruction. Nine of the 24 patients whose samples were culture positive for C. glabrata died. However, no deaths were directly attributed to C. glabrata.
It is also of interest that among the 24 patients infected or colonized with C. glabrata, 13 also had episodes of bacteremia. The most commonly isolated organisms included Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 4), enterococcus (n = 2), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 1), group C Streptococcus (n = 1), and viridans group streptococcus (n = 1). Additionally, seven patients had bacteremia caused by gram-negative organisms. The association between C. glabrata colonization and bacteremia has not been observed in previously published reports describing the nosocomial epidemiology of several of the Candida species from this same population of patients (29, 30, 35).
DISCUSSION
Candida species are important opportunistic pathogens causing nosocomial infections because of their ability to infect seriously ill hospitalized patients (5, 11, 20, 25, 28, 38). In the past, C. albicans accounted for approximately 80 percent of all isolated fungi causing nosocomial infections (3, 4). Most published studies on nosocomial Candida acquisition have evaluated C. albicans, but few studies have evaluated the Candida species other than C. albicans.
Most reports describing the epidemiology of nosocomial C. glabrata infections have been retrospective and have identified risk factors for Candida infections, but few studies have evaluated independent risk factors associated with nosocomial C. glabrata acquisition. In the present study, a multivariate prospective case-control analysis and a molecular biology-based analysis of C. glabrata demonstrated that patients with newly acquired C. glabrata colonization or infection had longer durations of hospitalization and more frequent prior antimicrobial use compared with those for patients from whom Candida species were not recovered. There were no differences between patients from whom C. glabrata was isolated and controls. These results are similar to the findings noted in earlier epidemiological studies of C. albicans, C. lusitaniae, and C. parapsilosis (13, 20, 29, 30, 35).
Little is known about the hospital reservoirs of C. glabrata, but as with C. albicans, probable sources include a complex interaction of environmental and human reservoirs (16, 35). The unique role of the environment as a potential reservoir for Candida species is further suggested by findings in the present study in which identical strains of C. glabrata were isolated from the environment prior to the new acquisition of C. glabrata by patients in the BMTU, thereby suggesting the potential acquisition of the organism from the hospital environment. The significance of this observation is that fungal organisms isolated from the inanimate hospital environment were previously considered to contribute negligibly to nosocomial fungal infections. Although infecting strains can be cultured from environmental surfaces, it is believed that the environment becomes passively contaminated with organisms from patients, as was demonstrated in our prior study (35) and again in this study. The results of this study suggest that C. glabrata may be similar to C. albicans and not unlike other nosocomial pathogens that can potentially be acquired directly or indirectly from contaminated environmental surfaces.
Previous understanding of the pathogenesis of C. glabrata acquisition, colonization, and infection indicates that the organisms are endogenously acquired exclusively from the patient’s own flora. What has not been previously studied is the mechanism by which and the extent to which hospitalization contributes to colonization with C. glabrata. Two studies have implicated carriage on the hands of hospital personnel as a possible source of outbreaks (17, 35).
Many of these previous epidemiological reports have been hampered by the lack of an adequate typing system for the delineation of the Candida species. In our prior studies (33–35) we have used a contour-clamped homogeneous electric field as our optimal strain delineation system. However, we have previously demonstrated that for C. glabrata, REA (RFLP analysis) had a greater sensitivity in detecting subtle strain-to-strain variations; thus, this methodology was chosen to investigate our isolates in this study (34). For the most part, lack of strain typing and the lack of prospective surveillance cultures have made it difficult to delineate the epidemiology of C. glabrata colonization and infection.
Initially, 67% of the patients were culture negative for C. glabrata and possibly acquired the organism while in the study unit. The isolation of identical strains of C. glabrata from patients who were geographically and temporally associated suggests that a route of transmission may be indirect contact between patients. The epidemiology of the nosocomial acquisition of C. glabrata may therefore be similar to the epidemiology of C. albicans, methicillin-resistant staphylococci, multidrug-resistant enterococci, and gram-negative bacilli (35, 42).
One important mechanism for nosocomial infection seems to be the transient carriage from colonized or infected patients on the hands of personnel (35, 42). The role of carriage by personnel in the dissemination not only of C. glabrata but also of other Candida species remains to be clarified. Although C. glabrata was not recovered from the hands of hospital personnel in this study, transient carriage is suggested by the isolation of C. glabrata on environmental surfaces in contact with hands. Perhaps more frequent culturing of samples from the hands of hospital personnel or the use of liquid medium for the recovery of yeast may have improved the rates of detection of C. glabrata. In addition, our culture methods for the detection of yeast may have missed low numbers of yeast in some patients. C. glabrata seemed to be transmitted between patients in adjacent beds within the study units. Proximity to a patient with infection or colonization increased the risk of acquisition. As in earlier studies (28, 32, 35), results of longitudinal cultures showed that over time patients (75%) in the present study generally carried a C. glabrata strain of the same type. There was minimal diversity among strains from individual patients. This finding is in contrast to the results described for the nosocomial acquisition of C. albicans, in which there was considerable strain diversity (35). Moreover, in this study, more than one Candida species was isolated from 71% of patients with culture positive for C. glabrata. The most frequent combination was C. glabrata and C. albicans for approximately 70% of the patients. This again is in contrast to the findings previously described for C. albicans since more than one Candida species was identified in only 39% of patients infected or colonized with C. albicans (38).
In contrast to the epidemiology of C. albicans, no C. glabrata isolates were identified in the food given to the hospitalized patients. Another interesting finding in this study is the high degree of bacteremia (54%) in patients with C. glabrata colonization. Although the microbiology of bacteremia was diverse, most of the pathogens isolated are those generally found in the gastrointestinal tract or skin of hospitalized patients.
In conclusion, the findings of this prospective study suggest that the nosocomial acquisition of C. glabrata is not uncommon and may be due to the exogenous acquisition of the Candida species. In addition, we have been able to demonstrate that two-thirds of the patients demonstrated C. glabrata colonization after hospitalization and that the two major risk factors were prolonged duration of hospitalization and prior antimicrobial use. Additionally, we have also shown that when C. glabrata was isolated from patients, it was frequently accompanied by a second Candida species (usually C. albicans) and it was infrequently the only species of yeast colonizing the patients. Further prospective studies are needed to define more clearly the reservoirs of infection as well as the mode of transfer and the measures for preventing spread.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This study was supported in part by the William Beaumont Research Institute.
REFERENCES
- 1.Allardet-Servent A, Bouziges N, Carles-Nurit M, Bourg G, Gouby A, Ramuz M. Use of low-frequency-cleavage restriction endonucleases for DNA analysis in epidemiological investigations of nosocomial bacterial infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:2057–2061. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.9.2057-2061.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bailey J E, Kliegman R M, Annable W L, et al. Torulopsis glabrata sepsis appearing as necrotizing enterocolitis and endophthalmitis. Am J Dis Child. 1984;183:965–966. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1984.02140480067020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Banerjee, S. N., T. G. Emori, D. H. Culver, R. P. Gaynes, W. R. Jarvis, T. Horan, et al. 1991. Secular trends in nosocomial primary blood stream infections in the United States. Am. J. Med. 91(Suppl. 3B):86S–89S. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 4.Beck-Sague C M, Jarvis T R the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. 1980–1990. Secular trends in the epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections in the United States. J Infect Dis. 1993;167:1247–1251. doi: 10.1093/infdis/167.5.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bodey, G. P. 1986. Candidiasis in cancer patients. Am. J. Med. 77(Suppl. 4D):13–19. [PubMed]
- 6.Bross J, Talbot G H, Maislin G, Hurwitz S, Strom B L. Risk factors for nosocomial candidemia: a case-control study in adults without leukemia. Am J Med. 1989;87:614–620. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(89)80392-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Conly J, Rennie R, Johnson J, Farah S, Hellman L. Disseminated candidiasis due to amphotericin-B-resistant Candida albicans. J Infect Dis. 1992;165:761–764. doi: 10.1093/infdis/165.4.761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dembry L M, Vazquez J A, Zervos M J. DNA analysis in the study of the epidemiology of nosocomial candidiasis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994;5:48–53. doi: 10.1086/646817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Eisenstein B I, Engleberg N C. Applied molecular genetics: new tools for microbiologist and clinicians. J Infect Dis. 1986;153:416–430. doi: 10.1093/infdis/153.3.416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fox R, Neal K R, Leen C L S, et al. Fluconazole resistant Candida in AIDS. J Infect Dis. 1991;22:201–204. doi: 10.1016/0163-4453(91)91767-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hadfield T, Smith M, Winn R, Rinaldi M, Guerra C. Mycoses caused by Candida lusitaniae. Rev Infect Dis. 1987;9:1006–1012. doi: 10.1093/clinids/9.5.1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hickey W, Sommerville L, Schoen F. Disseminated Candida glabrata: report of a uniquely severe infection and a literature review. Am J Clin Pathol. 1983;80:724–727. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/80.5.724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Horn R, Wong B, Kiehn T E, Armstrong D. Fungemia in a cancer hospital: changing frequency, earlier onset, and results of therapy. Rev Infect Dis. 1985;7:646–655. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.5.646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hosmer D W, Jr, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York, N.Y: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Howell S A, Noble W C. Typing tools for the investigation of epidemic fungal infection. Epidemiol Infect. 1990;105:1–9. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800047580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hunter P R, Harrison G A J, Fraser C A M. Cross infection and diversity of Candida albicans strain carriage in patients and nursing staff on an intensive care unit. J Med Vet Mycol. 1990;28:317–325. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Isenberg H D, Tucci V, Cintron F, Singer C, Weinstein G S, Tyras D. Single source outbreak of Candida tropicalis complicating coronary bypass surgery. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:2426–2428. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.11.2426-2428.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Khattak M W, Burnie J P, Mathews R C, Oppenheim B A. Clamped homogeneous electric field gel electrophoresis typing of Torulopsis glabrata isolates causing nosocomial infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:2211–2215. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.8.2211-2215.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kleinbaum D G, Kupper L L, Morgenstern H. Epidemiologic research: principles and quantitative methods. New York, N.Y: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Komshian S V, Uwaydah A, Sobel J D, Crane L R. Fungemia caused by Candida species and Torulopsis glabrata in hospitalized patients. Frequency, characteristics, and evaluation of factors influencing outcome. Rev Infect Dis. 1989;3:379–390. doi: 10.1093/clinids/11.3.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lecciones J A, Lee J W, Navarro E E, et al. Vascular catheter-associated fungemia in patients with cancer analysis of 155 episodes. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;14:875–883. doi: 10.1093/clinids/14.4.875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lee W L, Burnie J, Matthews R. Fingerprinting Candida albicans. J Immunol Methods. 1986;93:177–182. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(86)90186-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McCabe W R, Jackson G C. Gram negative bacteremia. I. Etiology and ecology. Arch Intern Med. 1962;110:847–855. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Merz W G. Candida albicans strain delineation. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990;3:321–334. doi: 10.1128/cmr.3.4.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Merz W G, Karp J E, Schron D, Saral R. Increased incidence of fungemia caused by Candida krusei. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;24:581–584. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.4.581-584.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Odds F C. Ecology and epidemiology of candidiasis. In: Odds F C, editor. Candida and candidosis. A review and bibliography. 2nd ed. London, United Kingdom: Balliere Tindall; 1988. p. 89. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Phelps M, Ayliffe G A J, Babb J R. An outbreak of candidiasis in a special care baby unit: the use of a resistogram typing method. J Hosp Infect. 1986;7:13–20. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(86)90021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Reagan D R, Pfaller M A, Hollis R J, Wenzel R P. Characterization of the sequence of colonization and nosocomial candidemia using DNA fingerprinting and a DNA probe. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:2733–2738. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.12.2733-2738.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sanchez V, Vazquez J A, Barth-Jones D, Sobel J D, Zervos M J. Nosocomial acquisitions of Candida parapsilosis: an epidemiological study. Am J Med. 1993;94:577–582. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90207-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sanchez V T, Vazquez J A, Jones D, Dembry L M, Sobel J D, Zervos M J. Epidemiology of nosocomial infection with Candida lusitaniae. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:3005–3008. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.3005-3008.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Scherer S, Stevens D A. Application of DNA typing methods to epidemiology and taxonomy of Candida species. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:675–679. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.4.675-679.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Soll D R, Staebell M, Langtimm C, Pfaller M, Hicks J, Rao T V G. Multiple Candida strains in the course of a single systemic infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:1448–1459. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.8.1448-1459.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vazquez J A, Beckley A, Sobel J D, Zervos M J. Comparison of restriction enzyme analysis versus pulsed-field gradient gel electrophoresis as a typing system for Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:962–967. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.5.962-967.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vazquez J A, Donabedian S, Beckley A, Sanchez V, Sobel J D, Zervos M J. Comparison of restriction enzyme analysis versus pulsed-field gradient gel electrophoresis as a typing system for Torulopsis glabrata and Candida species other than C. albicans. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:2021–2030. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.2021-2030.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vazquez J A, Sanchez V, Dmuchowski C, Dembry L, Sobel J D, Zervos M J. Nosocomial acquisition of Candida albicans: an epidemiologic study. J Infect Dis. 1993;168:195–201. doi: 10.1093/infdis/168.1.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Warnock D, Burke J, Cope N J, Johnson E, Von Fraunhofer N, Williams E. Fluconazole resistance in Candida glabrata. Lancet. 1988;i:1310. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)92919-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Warnock D, Speller D C, Day K J, Farrell A J. Resistogram method for differentiation of strains of Candida albicans. J Appl Bacteriol. 1979;46:571–578. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1979.tb00857.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wey S B, Motomi M, Pfaller M A, Wolsen R F, Wenzel R P. Risk factors for hospital-acquired candidemia: a matched case-control study. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:2249–2253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wingard J, Merz W, Saral R. Candida tropicalis: a major pathogen in immunocompromised patients. Ann Intern Med. 1979;91:529–543. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-91-4-539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wingard J R, Merz W G, Rinaldi M G, Johnson T R, Karp J E, Saral R. Increase in Candida krusei infection among patients with bone marrow transplantation and neutropenia treated prophylactically with fluconazole. N Eng J Med. 1991;18:1274–1277. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199110313251803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wingard J R, Merz W G, Rinaldi M G, Miller C B, Karp J E, Saral R. Association of Torulopsis glabrata infections with fluconazole prophylaxis in neutropenic bone marrow transplant patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:1847–1849. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.9.1847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zervos M J, Dembinski S, Mikesell T, Schaberg D R. High-level resistance to gentamicin in Streptococcus faecalis: risk factors and evidence for exogenous acquisition of infection. J Infect Dis. 1986;153:1075–1082. doi: 10.1093/infdis/153.6.1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]