Skip to main content
Journal of Fungi logoLink to Journal of Fungi
. 2023 Jul 31;9(8):814. doi: 10.3390/jof9080814

Phylogenetic and Morphological Evidence Reveal Five New Species of Boletes from Southern China

Fan Zhou 1,2,3, Yang Gao 1,2,3, Hai-Yan Song 1,4,*, Hai-Jing Hu 1,2,3, Wen-Juan Yang 1,2,3, Wei Zhang 1,2,3, Li-Yu Liao 1,2,3, Yi Fang 5, Lin Cheng 5, Dian-Ming Hu 1,2,3,*
Editor: Samantha C Karunarathna
PMCID: PMC10455384  PMID: 37623585

Abstract

Fungi of the order Boletales are extremely important in both ecology and economy, since most of them are ectomycorrhizal fungi, which play vital roles in maintaining forest ecosystems, water and soil protection, vegetation restoration and so on. Although previous studies have shown that this order has a very high species diversity in China, there are few reports on the species diversity of boletes in Jiangxi Province, China. Based on morphological (macroscopic and microscopic morphological characteristics) and phylogenetic analyses (ITS, LSU, and TEF1-α sequences), in this study, the wild boletes in Jiangxi Province were investigated, and five new species are described: Austroboletus albus, Xanthoconium violaceipes, Xanthoconium violaceofuscum, Xerocomus rutilans and Xerocomus subsplendidus. Descriptions and hand drawings of the new species are presented.

Keywords: Boletaceae, boletales, diversity, five new taxa, morphology, phylogeny, taxonomy

1. Introduction

The order Boletales is one of the largest groups of Basidiomycota and most of them are not only ectomycorrhizal fungi but also edible fungi. They are economically and ecologically important [1]. They could form mycorrhizal relationships with more than ten families of plants, including Betulaceae, Dipterocarpaceae, Fagaceae, Pinaceae and Salicaceae, which play vital roles in maintaining forest ecosystems, water and soil protection, vegetation restoration, and contributing to the diversification of both fungi and their host plants [2].

In the past few decades, over 500 species of Boletales, including nearly 100 new species, have been reported from China [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Before the 21st century, taxonomy relied primarily on morphological and chemotaxonomic characters, which led to the problem of homonyms and synonyms [29,30,31]. With the rapid development of molecular technology, molecular methods have been continuously applied to the taxonomy, systematics, phylogeny and biogeography of macrofungi, and the classification of boletes has made unprecedented progress. Since 2016, more than 100 new species from China have been described [1,2,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45], but few of them have been reported in Jiangxi Province [2,36,38,44,46,47].

Jiangxi has the second highest forest coverage in China, which is dominated by evergreen broad-leaved forests with a subtropical warm and humid monsoon climate and abundant rainfall. The climatic conditions and vegetation types are very suitable for the growth and reproduction of macrofungi. It is predicted that there are more than 12,000 species of fungi in Jiangxi Province, including more than 1000 species of macrofungi [48].

Until 2016, 659 species had been reported in Jiangxi Province [49], and there are many macrofungi waiting to be discovered. In this study, five new species of boletes were collected and described during the investigation of the macrofungi in Wuyishan National Nature Reserve in Jiangxi Province.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

In this study, 140 boletes specimens were collected in Jiangxi Province. All specimens were completely dug out with a shovel after taking photos of the habitat and related characteristics of the basidiomata, then a part of the context was cut from the connection between pileus and stipe and dried with silica gel to extract DNA, and the remaining specimens were dried at 41–56 °C by a food-grade fruit dryer.

2.2. Morphological Studies

Twelve specimens of five new boletes species were stored in the Herbarium of Fungi of Jiangxi Agricultural University (HFJAU). The macroscopic morphological characteristics mainly come from field records and photographs of basidiomata. Color codes were obtained from Kornerup & Wanscher [50]. Micromorphological descriptions were based on dried materials rehydrated in 5% KOH and stained with ammoniacal Congo red. Freehand sections were performed by using a Nikon SMZ1270 (NIKON Corporation, Japan) stereomicroscope, following the standard method described in previous studies [19,22,51,52]. Microstructures were observed with a Nikon Y–TV55 (NIKON Corporation, Japan) compound microscope. Basidiospores with special structure were examined with a ZEISS EVO18 (GER) scanning electron microscope (SEM).

The number of measured basidiospores is given as n/m/p, which means that the measurements were created on n basidiospores from m basidiomata of p collections. Dimensions of basidiospores are given as (a)b–c(d), where the range b–c represents a minimum of 90% of the measured values (5th to 95th percentile), and extreme values (a and d), whenever present (a < 5th percentile, d > 95th percentile), are in parentheses. Q represents the ratio of length/width of the spores. Qm refers to the average Q of basidiospores ± sample standard deviation [53].

2.3. DNA Extraction, Amplification, and Sequencing

Whole-genome DNA was extracted from approximately 0.5 g of dried specimens by optimized CTAB method [54,55]. The primer pairs ITS1/ITS4 were used to amplify the ITS region [56], LR0R/LR5 were used to amplify the large subunit ribosomal region (nrLSU) [57,58] and TEF1-983F/TEF1-1567R were used to amplify the translation elongation factor 1-α region (TEF1-α) [24,59].

The PCR reaction was under the following conditions: 94 °C for 4 min, then 35 cycles of 94 °C for 60 s (50 °C for ITS, 53 °C for nrLSU and TEF1-α) for 40 s, and 72 °C for 80 s, followed by a final extension step of 72 °C for 8 min [24].

PCR products were detected by NanoDrop One (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 1% agarose gels, and then sequenced by TSINGKE Biological Technology (Hunan, China) using the same primers used for PCR amplification.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analyses

Sequences obtained by sequencing were visualized and edited with BioEdit v7.0.9 [60], and then submitted to NCBI online website for Nucleotide BLAST search (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, (accessed on 3 October 2022)) to determine which genus the specimens belonged to. Based on BLAST results, all available nrLSU and TEF1-α sequences were downloaded from NCBI, and were used to identify the relationships among all of our samples and known related species in the GenBank, and to evaluate the variability of the TEF1-α intron region by single-gene analysis and a later polygene phylogenetic analysis [31]. The data ultimately used for phylogenetic analysis are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Names, voucher numbers, localities and corresponding GenBank accession numbers of the sequences used in phylogenetic analyses in this study. Sequences in bold were generated in this study.

Species Voucher Locality GenBank Accession No.
ITS LSU TEF1-α
Austroboletus
Austroboletus aff. fusisporus HKAS53461 China KF112486 KF112214
Austroboletus aff. rostrupii G4357 Guyana KJ786636
Austroboletus albus HFJAU12001 China ON207028 ON207254 ON221310
Austroboletus albus HFJAU12002 China ON207029 ON207255 ON221311
Austroboletus albidus ShiSF238 China MT154756
Austroboletus albovirescens HKAS:59624 China KF112485 KF112217
Austroboletus albovirescens HKAS74743 China KT990527 KT990730
Austroboletus amazonicus 2032 AMV Colombia KF937309 KF714510
Austroboletus amazonicus 1839 AMV Colombia KF937307 KF714508
Austroboletus appendiculatus KCS 1401-CAL_1304 India KX530028
Austroboletus asper Perth 06658407 Australia KP242216 KP242277
Austroboletus asper MEL:2104343 Australia KP242174 KP242260
Austroboletus asper MEL:2300520 Australia KP242186 KP242253
Austroboletus austrovirens BRI:AQ0796003 Australia KP242212 KP242228
Austroboletus austrovirens BRI:AQ0795791 Australia KP242211 KP242225
Austroboletus brunneisquamus FHMU5875 China MZ855494 MW506828
Austroboletus brunneisquamus FHMU5876 China MZ855495 MW506829 MW512637
Austroboletus dictyotus HKAS59804 China JX901138
Austroboletus dictyotus HKAS53450 China KF112487 KF112215
Austroboletus festivus FLOR 51599 Brazil KY886202 KY888001
Austroboletus festivus FLOR 51601 Brazil KY886203 KY888000
Austroboletus festivus AMV1881 Colombia KT724086 KT724095
Austroboletus fusisporus JXSB0351 China MK765810
Austroboletus fusisporus HKAS75207 China JX889719 JX889720 JX889718
Austroboletus gracilis 112/96 USA DQ534624 KF030425
Austroboletus gracilis NAMA 2017-106 USA MH979242
Austroboletus gracilis Mushroom Observer#310751 Mexico MH167935
Austroboletus lacunosus BRI:AQ0795789 Australia KP242162 KP242271
Austroboletus lacunosus REH9146 Australia JX889669 JX889709
Austroboletus mucosus TH6300 Guyana AY612798
Austroboletus mutabilis BRI:AQ0554121 Australia KP242192 KP242241
Austroboletus mutabilis BRI:AQ0557644 Australia KP242196 KP242237
Austroboletus neotropicalis NY181457 Costa Rica JQ924301 JQ924334
Austroboletus niveus AD-C 54948 Australia KP242220 KP242280
Austroboletus niveus Perth 6660703 Australia KP242217 KP242279
Austroboletus niveus MEL2053830 Australia KC552016 KC552058 KC552099
Austroboletus niveus REH9487 Australia JX889668 JX889708
Austroboletus novae-zelandiae PDD:105097 New Zealand MH594051
Austroboletus novae-zelandiae MEL:2370154 Australia KP242175 KP242256
Austroboletus occidentalis MEL2300518 Australia KC552017 KC552059 KC552100
Austroboletus olivaceobrunneus HKAS92428 China MT110363
Austroboletus olivaceoglutinosus Xu132 China MT154753 MW165263
Austroboletus rarus BRI:AQ0794045 Australia KP242197 KP242236
Austroboletus rarus BRI:AQ0807888 Australia KP242200
Austroboletus rionegrensis INPA 78693 Brazil KY886201
Austroboletus roseialbus Dodd Australia KY872653 KY872650
Austroboletus roseialbus REH10024 Australia KY872652 KY872651
Austroboletus rostrupii BRI:AQ0807886 Australia KP242163 KP242270
Austroboletus rostrupii BRI:AQ0796694 Australia KP242179 KP242258
Austroboletus rostrupii TH8189 Guyana JN168683
Austroboletus sp. MEL:2382826 Australia KP242213 KP242283
Austroboletus sp. BRI:AQ0794258 Australia KP242182 KP242255
Austroboletus sp. BRI:AQ0794222 Australia KP242215 KP242234
Austroboletus sp. MEL2305143 New Caledonia KC552018 KC552060 KC552101
Austroboletus sp. HKAS57756 China KF112383 KF112212
Austroboletus sp. OR0891 Thailand MH614706
Austroboletus sp. LAM 0479 Malaysia KY091070
Austroboletus sp. DD9852 North America AY612797
Austroboletus subflavidus CFMR BZ-3178 BOS-625 Belize MK601716 MK721070
Austroboletus subflavidus JBSD130772 Dominican Republic MT581526 MT580903
Austroboletus subflavidus CFMR:DR2859 Dominican Republic MT581523 MT580901
Austroboletus subflavidus CFMR:BOTH-3463 USA MT581521 MT580900
Austroboletus subvirens KPM-NC-0017836 Japan JN378518 JN378458
Austroboletus subvirens MEL:2382920 Australia KP012789
Austroboletus viscidoviridis Perth 7588682 Australia KP242219 KP242282
Austroboletus viscidoviridis BRI:AQ0554020 Australia KP242189 KP242243
Austroboletus yourkae BRI:AQ1024215 Australia MZ358814
Austroboletus yourkae NY02072669 Australia MZ358815
Mucilopilus castaneiceps HKAS50338 China KT990555 KT990755
Mucilopilus castaneiceps HKAS71039 China KT990547 KT990748
Xanthoconium
Xanthoconium affine NY00815399 USA / KT990661 KT990850
Xanthoconium affine NY01193907 USA / KT990660 KT990849
Xanthoconium affine BD217 USA / HQ161854
Xanthoconium fusciceps N.K.Zeng2941 China / KY271035
Xanthoconium fusciceps N.K.Zeng2483 China / KY271034 KY271046
Xanthoconium porophyllum HKAS90217 China / KT990662 KT990851
Xanthoconium porophyllum GDGM 30303 China / KC561775
Xanthoconium purpureum NY00720964 USA / KT990663 KT990852
Xanthoconium purpureum MICH:KUO-07061405 USA / MK601816 MK721170
Xanthoconium separans Mushroom Observer #282660 USA / MH244206 MH347319
Xanthoconium separans DPL 2704 USA / KF030329 KF030431
Xanthoconium separans MICH KUO-06201002 USA / MK601723 MK721077
Xanthoconium sinense N.K.Zeng1583 China / KY271032 KY271044
Xanthoconium sinense HKAS77758 China / KT990665 KT990854
Xanthoconium sinense N.K.Zeng1575 China / KY271031 KY271043
Xanthoconium stramineum 3518 USA / KF030353 KF030428
Xanthoconium violaceipes HFJAU12004 China / OQ146964 OQ162207
Xanthoconium violaceipes HFJAU12005 China / OQ146965 OQ162208
Xanthoconium violaceipes HFJAU12006 China / OQ146966 OQ162209
Xanthoconium violaceofuscum HFJAU12007 China / OQ146967 OQ162210
Xanthoconium violaceofuscum HFJAU12008 China / OQ146968 OQ162211
Tylopilus argillaceus HKAS90201 China / KT990588 KT990783
Tylopilus plumbeoviolaceus MB06-056 USA / KF030350 KF030439
Xerocomus
Xerocomus ferrugineus MICH KUO-08100701 USA / MK601820 MK721174
Xerocomus fraternus HKAS69291 China / KT990683 KT990871
Xerocomus fraternus HKAS52526 China / KT990682 KT990870
Xerocomus fulvipes HKAS52556 China / KT990672 KT990860
Xerocomus fulvipes HKAS76666 China / KF112390 KF112292
Xerocomus illudens MB03-055 USA / JQ003705
Xerocomus illudens DD9854 USA / AY612840
Xerocomus lentistipitatus PDD 107806 New Zealand / OP141603
Xerocomus lentistipitatus JAC14153 New Zealand / OP141550
Xerocomus lentistipitatus JAC10917 New Zealand / OP141509
Xerocomus magniporus HKAS:58000 China / KF112392 KF112293
Xerocomus microcarpoides HKAS54753 China / KT990680 KT990868
Xerocomus microcarpoides HKAS53374 China / KT990679 KT990867
Xerocomus perplexus MB00-005 USA / JQ003702 KF030438
Xerocomus piceicola HKAS76492 China / KT990684 KT990872
Xerocomus piceicola HKAS55452 China / KT990685
Xerocomus puniceiporus HKAS80683 China / KU974141 KU974138
Xerocomus rugosellus HKAS58865 China / KF112389 KF112294
Xerocomus rugosellus HKAS68292 China / KT990686 KT990873
Xerocomus rutilans HFJAU12012 China / OQ146972 OQ162215
Xerocomus rutilans HFJAU12013 China / OQ146973 OQ162216
Xerocomus squamulosus JAC10883 New Zealand / OP141507
Xerocomus squamulosus PDD95686 New Zealand / JQ924327
Xerocomus subparvus HKAS53387 China / KF112397 KF112297
Xerocomus subparvus HKAS50295 China / KT990667
Xerocomus subparvus HKAS55384 China / KT990687 KT990874
Xerocomus subtomentosus KM168813 UK / KC215223 KC215249
Xerocomus subsplendidus HFJAU12009 China / OQ146969 OQ162212
Xerocomus subsplendidus HFJAU12010 China / OQ146970 OQ162213
Xerocomus subsplendidus HFJAU12011 China / OQ146971 OQ162214
Xerocomus subtomentosus KM167686 UK / KC215222 KC215248
Xerocomus subtomentosus Xs1 Germany / AF139716 JQ327035
Xerocomus velutinus HKAS68135 China / KT990673 KT990861
Xerocomus velutinus HKAS52575 China / KF112393 KF112295
Xerocomus sp. HKAS67749 China / KT990676 KT990864
Xerocomus sp. HKAS76853 China / KF112394 KF112296
Xerocomus sp. HKAS75076 China / KF112387 KF112290
Xerocomus sp. HKAS57339 China / KT990674 KT990862
Xerocomus sp. HKAS57765 China / KT990675 KT990863
Xerocomus sp. HKAS74927 China / KF112395 KF112291
Xerocomus sp. HKAS90207 China / KT990677 KT990865
Xerocomus yunnanensis HKAS68420 China / KT990690 KT990877
Xerocomus yunnanensis HKAS68282 China / KT990691 KT990878
Phylloporus bellus HKAS56763 China / JQ967196 JQ967153
Phylloporus leucomycelinus HKAS74678 USA / JQ967206 JQ967163

/” means the data is not applied in this study, “—“ means the data is missing.

Sequence datasets were aligned on the online website MAFFT version 7 (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/, (accessed on 6 October 2022)) [61], the concatenation of the sequences of the two or three genes was completed in PhyloSuite [62]. The gene fragments of some taxa that could be found or sequenced were regarded as missing data. The intron regions of protein-coding genes were retained in the final analyses [27]. These datasets were then analyzed using RAxML version 8 [63] and MrBayes v3.2 [64] for maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI), respectively. For ML analyses, under GTRGAMMAI model [65], nonparametric bootstrap analysis with 1000 repetitions [66] was used to determine the statistical support of phylogeney. For BI analyses, substitution models of partition in the datasets were determined using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) implemented in PartitionFinder 2 [67]. Two or four MCMC runs and trees were sampled every 1000 generations. At the end of the runs, the average deviation of split frequencies was below 0.01. Other parameters were kept at their default settings. Trees were summarized, and posterior probabilities (PPs) were calculated after discarding the first 25% of generations as burn-in. Figtree v1.4.4 was used for visualization of phylogenetic analysis results. Branches that received bootstrap support for maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) greater than or equal to 50% (BS) and 0.95 (PP) are shown above.

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Phylogenetic Results

For Austroboletus, six new sequences (two of ITS, two of nrLSU, two of TEF1-α) from two collections were generated. For the combined dataset, HKY + I + G, TIM + I + G and TRNEF + G were evaluated as best-fit substitution models for the ITS, nrLSU and TEF1-α partitions, respectively. The ITS dataset consisted of 43 taxa and 1097 characters. The nrLSU dataset included 60 taxa and 926 characters. The TEF1-α dataset comprised 23 accessions and 623 characters. The combined nuclear dataset (ITS + nrLSU + TEF1-α) contains 126 sequences with 2646 nucleotide sites, and the alignment was deposited in TreeBASE (S30554). The maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylograms have no conflict in topology, the ML trees with both BS and PP values are shown in Figure 1, the green background represents the new species identified in this study, the blue represents other known species of the genus, and the red represents the outgroup.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Austroboletus inferred from the combined nuclear dataset (ITS + nrLSU + TEF1-α). Bootstrap frequencies ≥ 50% and posterior probabilities ≥ 0.95 are shown above supported branches. New sequences are shown in bold. The different colors are for decoration. The green background represents the sequence of new species discovered in this study, the red background represents the outer group, and the blue background represents other known species of this genus used in this study.

For Xanthoconium, ten new sequences (five of nrLSU, five of TEF1-α) were generated. For the combined datasets, TRNEF + I + G and TRNEF + G were the best-fit substitution models for the nrLSU and TEF1-α partitions, respectively. The nrLSU dataset included 23 taxa and 883 characters. The TEF1-α dataset comprised 20 accessions and 633 characters, and the alignment was deposited in TreeBASE (S30556). The Maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylograms have no conflict in topology, the ML trees with both BS and PP values are shown in Figure 2, the green background represents the new species identified in this study, the blue represents other known species of the genus, and the red represents the outgroup.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Xanthoconium inferred from the combined nuclear dataset (nrLSU + TEF1-α). Bootstrap frequencies ≥ 50% and posterior probabilities ≥ 0.95 are shown above supported branches. New sequences are shown in bold. Different colors are used to highlight different contents. The green background represents the new species identified in this study, the blue represents other known species of the genus, and the red represents the outgroup.

For Xerocomus, ten new sequences (five of nrLSU, five of TEF1-α) were generated. For the combined dataset, TRN + I + G and TRNEF + I + G were the best-fit substitution models for the nrLSU and TEF1-α partitions, respectively. The nrLSU dataset included 45 taxa and 897 characters. The TEF1-α dataset comprised 36 accessions and 619 characters, and the alignment was deposited in TreeBASE (S30557). The Maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylograms have no conflict in topology, the ML trees with both BS and PP values are shown in Figure 3, the green background represents the new species identified in this study, the blue represents other known species of the genus, and the red represents the outgroup.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Xerocomus inferred from the combined nuclear dataset (nrLSU + TEF1-α). Bootstrap frequencies ≥ 50% and posterior probabilities ≥ 0.95 are shown above supported branches. New sequences are shown in bold. Different colors are used to highlight different contents. The green background represents the new species identified in this study, the blue represents other known species of the genus, and the red represents the outgroup.

3.2. Taxonomy

Austroboletus albus F. Zhou, H.Y. Song and D.M. Hu, sp. nov. (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Habitat of Austroboletus albus. (a): HFJAU12001. (b,c): HFJAU12002 (Holotype). Bars = 1 cm. Photos by F. Zhou.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

SEM of basidiospores from dried specimen of Austroboletus albus (HFJAU12002, Holotype). (a): Mag = 1.00k×, scale bars = 10 μm. (b): Mag = 3.00k×, scale bars = 2 μm. (c): Mag = 4.00k×, scale bars = 1 μm.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Austroboletus albus (HFJAU12002, Holotype). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia. (c) Cheilocystidia. (d) Pileipellis. Scale bars = 10 μm. Drawings by F. Zhou.

Mycobank: MB844812.

Etymology—Latin “albus” refers to the color of pileus, which is white.

Diagnosis: Austroboletus albus is characterized by a gray-green reticulate texture pileus, emerald green when young, white to pale brown when mature and an uneven stipe, similar to a gully, covered with obvious white to yellowish white reticulation, subfusiform to amygdaliform basidiospores measuring 13–17 × 6.5–7.5 μm, surface with intricate reticulum or irregular pits, becoming shorter to nearly smooth toward both poles, yellow to golden yellow in KOH.

Holotype: China. Jiangxi Province: Shangrao City, Yanshan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, 117°42′56″ E, 27°48′57″ N, elev. 900 m, 23 August 2021, F. Zhou, HFJAU12002 (WYS215).

Description: Basidiomata are small to medium-sized. Pileus 2–5 cm diam, hemispherical when young, becoming convex to subhemispherical with maturity, surface dry, emerald green when young, and white (5A1) to pale brown (4A2) when mature, with gray-green (26B3) reticulate texture, margin decurved, marginal veil white (5A1), serrated to irregular. Context is 0.5–1.6 cm in thickness in the center of the pileus, white (5A1), no change when injured. Hymenophore adnate to slightly depressed around the stipe; pores circular to angular, 1–2 per mm, white (7A1) when young and pinkish white (11A2) to pink (12B3) when old; tubes up to 1.3 cm long, pinkish (9A2), no change in color when injured. Stipe 4–12 × 0.5–1.1 cm, central, cylindrical to clavate, solid; surface dry, uneven, similar to a gully, covered with obvious white (3A1) to yellowish white (1A2) reticulation. Context is white (2A1), no change when injured; basal mycelium white (2A1). Odor indistinct.

Basidia 30–40 × 10.5–12.5 μm, thin-walled, clavate, four-spored; sterigmata 2–5 μm long. Basidiospores [40/2/2] (12–)13–17(–17.5) × (6–)6.5–7.5(–8.5) μm, Q = (1.63–)1.75–2.2(–2.5), Qm = 2.10 ± 0.21, including ornamentation, subfusiform to amygdaliform and slightly angular; surface with intricate reticulum or irregular pits becomes shorter to nearly smooth toward the both poles and yellow to golden yellow in KOH. Hymenophoral trama boletoid is composed of thin- to slightly thick-walled hyphae, 3–8 μm wide and hyaline in KOH. Cheilocystidia are 36–67 × 7.4–10.3 μm, subfusiform to subfusoid-mucronate, sometimes narrowly mucronate, rostrate, thin-walled and hyaline to grayish brown in KOH. Pleurocystidia are absent. Pileipellis is a trichoderm 65–160 μm thick, composed of hyaline to grayish yellow in KOH, thin-walled, and 3–7.5 μm diam; terminal cells are 22–60 × 3–10 μm, clavate or subterete, with an obtuse apex. Pileus trama is composed of thin-walled hyphae 4–11 μm in diameter. Clamp connections are absent in all tissues.

Habitat: Solitary or group on the wet ground under mixed forests of Fagaceae (Fagus longipetiolata) and Pinaceae (Tsuga chinensis and Pinus massoniana).

Distribution: Jiangxi Province, China.

Additional specimens examined: China, Jiangxi Province: Shangrao City, Yanshan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, 117°42′54″ E, 27°48′59″ N, elev. 1050 m, 23 August 2021, F. Zhou, HFJAU12001 (WYS222).

Xanthoconium violaceipes F. Zhou, H.Y. Song and D.M. Hu, sp. nov. (Figure 7 and Figure 8).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Habitat of Xanthoconium violaceipes. (a,b) HFJAU12004. (c) HFJAU12005. (d,e) HFJAU12006 (Holotype). Photos by F. Zhou.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Xanthoconium violaceipes (HFJAU12006, Holotype). (a) Basidia. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Pleurocystidia. (d) Cheilocystidia. (e) Pileipellis. (f) Stipitipellis scale bars = 10 μm. Drawings by F. Zhou.

Mycobank: MB847090.

Etymology—Latin “violaceipes” refers to the color of stipe, which is purple.

Diagnosis: Xanthoconium violaceipes have a hemispherical to convex to applanate pileus, purple-black to purple when young, brownish green when mature, a obvious dark purple stripes, slightly interwoven near the pileus. Basidiospores measure approximately 12.5–16.5 × 4–5.5 μm, ellipsoid to subfusiform to cylindrical, pileipellis is 60–156 μm thick and stipitipellis is 55–110 μm thick.

Holotype: China, Jiangxi Province: Shangrao City, Yanshan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, 117°45′44″ E, 27°50′1″ N, elev. 1880 m, 23 August 2022, F. Zhou, HFJAU12006 (WYS642).

Description: Basidiomata are medium-sized to large. Pileus 1–10 cm in diameter, initially hemispherical, becomes convex to applanate with maturity, surface is dry, purple-black (11F1) to purple (11B3) when young, brownish green (30B6–30E6) when mature, margin is lighter and deeper in the center. Context is 0.3–0.7 cm in thickness in the center of the pileus, white (1A1) and does not change when injured. Hymenophore adnate around the stipe are quite crowded; pores are circular to angular, 2–3 per mm, white (1A1) when young and yellow (1A5) to yellow-brown (1B5) when old; tubes up to 1 cm long are white (2A1) to pale brown (2B2) and do not change in color when injured. Stipe 2–10.5 × 0.6–1.5 cm, central, cylindrical, solid; surface dry, with obvious dark purple (16D3) stripes, slightly interwoven near the pileus; context is white (16A1) to light pink (16A2), no reaction when bruised; basal mycelium white. Odor indistinct.

Basidia are 20–36 × 11.5–16 μm, thin-walled, clavate and four-spored; sterigmata are 3–7 μm long, colorless to hyaline in KOH. Basidiospores [40/2/2] (11.5–)12.5–16.5(–17) × (3.5–)4–5.5(–6) μm, Q = (2.18–)2.27–3.33(–3.71), Qm = 3.00 ± 0.35, ellipsoid to subfusiform to cylindrical, slightly thick-walled (up to 0.5 μm), golden yellow in KOH, smooth. Hymenophoral trama are composed of subparallel hyphae 5–12 μm broad, colorless to hyaline in 5% KOH. Cheilocystidia are 35–55 × 8–12 μm, clavate to subfusiform, rarely mucronate, rostrate, thin-walled and colorless to hyaline in KOH. Pleurocystidia are 45–80 × 21–24 μm, clavate and cystiform. Pileipellis is a trichoderm 60–156 μm thick, composed of hyaline hyphae in KOH, thin-walled, and 4–13 μm in diameter; terminal cells are 14–46.5 × 8–18.5 μm, clavate to pyriform or cystidioid, with obtuse apex. Pileus trama is composed of thin-walled hyphae 5–12 μm in diameter. Stipitipellis is 55–110 μm thick, clavate with an obtuse apex, terminal cells (18–25 × 5–11 μm), and colorless in KOH. Stipe trama is composed of parallel hyphae 5–10 μm wide. Clamp connections are absent in all tissues.

Habitat: Scattered on soil in subtropical forests of Fagaceae, including Lithocarpus spp., Castanopsis spp. and Quercus spp.

Distribution: Jiangxi Province, China.

Additional specimens examined: China, Jiangxi Province: Shangrao City, Yanshan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, 117°45′42″ E, 27°50′3″ N, elev. 1750 m, 1 August 2021, F. Zhou, HFJAU12004 (WYS121); Shangrao City, Yanshan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, 117°45′44″ E, 27°50′3″ N, elev. 1840 m, 23 August 2022, F. Zhou, HFJAU12005 (WYS619).

Xanthoconium violaceofuscum F. Zhou, H.Y. Song and D.M. Hu, sp. nov. (Figure 9 and Figure 10).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Habitat of Xanthoconium violaceofuscum. (a) HFJAU12008. (b,c) HFJAU12007 (Holotype). Photos by F. Zhou.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Xanthoconium violaceofuscum (HFJAU12007, Holotype). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia. (c) Pileipellis. (d) Pleurocystidia. (e) Cheilocystidia. (f) Stipitipellis scale bars = 10 μm. Drawings by F. Zhou.

Mycobank: MB847089.

Etymology—Latin “violaceofuscum” refers to the color of pileus, which is purple-brown.

Diagnosis: Xanthoconium violaceofuscum is characterized by purplish brown pileus, surface normally densely covered with dark reddish brown tomentose scales, and the context of pileus is pale purple, changing to blue first, then black when injured, the tubes are purplish brown to yellow to yellowish brown, change from blue to black, and has a cylindrical or clavate stipe, purple-brown to black when young and black when mature. Basidiospores are 7–9 × 3.7–5 μm, ellipsoid to subfusiform and golden yellow in KOH.

Holotype: China, Jiangxi Province: Shangrao City, Yanshan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, 117°45′43″ E, 27°50′29″ N, elev. 1700 m, 27 August 2022, F. Zhou, HFJAU12007 (WYS717).

Description: Basidiomata are medium-sized to large. Pileus is 3–13 cm diameter, hemispherical to subhemispherical to applanate, surface is dry, purplish brown (7C2), surface is normally densely covered with dark reddish brown (7E3) tomentose scales. Context are up to 1.5 cm in thickness in the center, pale purple (7B2), change to blue (19B5) first, then black (7E1) when injured. Hymenophore adnate around the stipe, scattered; pores circular to angular, 1–2 per mm, purplish brown (7D4) when young and yellow (5B5) to yellowish brown (5D5) when old; tubes are up to 1.5 cm long, purplish brown (7D4) to yellow (5B5) to yellowish brown (5D5), change to blue (19B5) to black (7E1) when injured. Stipe is 3.5–7 × 1–3 cm, central, cylindrical or clavate, solid; surface is dry, purple-brown (7E3) to black (7E1) when young and black (6F1) when mature. Context is pale purple-brown (6D2), changes to black (6F1) when bruised; basal mycelium is purple-gray (6D1). Odor indistinct.

Basidia are 22–34 × 7.5–13 μm, thin-walled, clavate and four-spored; sterigmata are 2–6 μm long. Basidiospores are [40/2/2] 7–9(–11.5) × (3.5–)3.7–5(–6) μm, Q = (1.67–)1.75–2.29(–2.36), Qm = 1.97 ± 0.19, ellipsoid to subfusiform, thin-walled and golden yellow in KOH, smooth. Hymenophoral trama is composed of subparallel hyphae 6–10 μm broad, yellowish white to hyaline in 5% KOH. Cheilocystidia are 37.5–64 × 7–10 μm, subfusiform to subfusoid-mucronate, sometimes narrowly mucronate, rostrate, thin-walled, hyaline to grayish brown in KOH. Pleurocystidia are 33–118 × 12–23 μm, clavate or cystiform. Pileipellis is a trichoderm 30–65 μm thick, composed of hyaline to grayish yellow in KOH, thin-walled, 7–12 μm in diameter; terminal cells are 30–65 × 10–13.5 μm, clavate or subterete, with an obtuse apex. Pileus trama is composed of thin-walled hyphae 7–12 μm in diameter. Stipitipellis ca. is 150 μm thick, with clavate and cystiform terminal cells (37–74 × 8–15.5 μm), colorless and sometimes yellowish brown in KOH. Stipe trama is composed of parallel hyphae 6–12 μm wide. Clamp connections are absent in all tissues.

Habitat: Scattered on soil in subtropical forests of Fagaceae, including Lithocarpus spp., Castanopsis spp. and Quercus spp.

Distribution: Currently only known from Jiangxi Province, China.

Additional specimens examined: China, Jiangxi Province: Shangrao City, Yanshan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, 117°45′13″ E, 27°50′14″ N, elev. 1550 m, 27 August 2022, F. Zhou, HFJAU12008 (WYS724).

Xerocomus rutilans F. Zhou, H.Y. Song and D.M. Hu, sp. nov. (Figure 11 and Figure 12).

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Habitat of Xerocomus rutilans. (a,b) HFJAU12012. (c,d) HFJAU12013(Holotype). Photos by F. Zhou.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Xerocomus rutilans. (HFJAU12013, Holotype). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Cheilocystidia. (c) Pileipellis. (d) Basidia. (e) Pleurocystidia. (f) Stipitipellis Scale bars = 10 μm. Drawings by F. Zhou.

Mycobank: MB847091.

Etymology—Latin “rutilans” refers to the color of pileus, which is ochre.

Diagnosis: The pileus of Xerocomus rutilans is purple to ochre when young, brownish yellow when mature, the pores are yellow when young and yellowish brown when old and the stipes are covered with white tomentose scales, ellipsoidal to elongated to fusiform basidiospores measuring 8.5–11.5 × 4–5.5 μm, pale yellow to yellow brown in KOH.

Holotype: China, Jiangxi Province: Shangrao City, Yanshan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, 117°46′52″ E, 27°59′31″ N, elev. 430 m, 27 August 2022, F. Zhou, HFJAU12013 (WYS693).

Description: Basidiomata are medium-sized to large. Pileus is 2.9–9 cm in diameter, initially hemispherical, becomes convex to applanate with maturity and the surface is dry, purple (11A2) to ochre (9B4) when young, brownish yellow (5B6) when mature. Context is up to 1 cm in thickness in the center of the pileus, white (5A1) and does not change when injured. Hymenophore adnate to slightly depressed around the stipe, quite crowded; pores iiragular, 2–3 per mm, yellow (2A6) when young and yellowish brown (5C6) when old, slightly higher around the stipe; tubes are up to 1 cm long, golden (2A7) to yellowish brown (5C6) and do not change in color when injured. Stipe is 4–9 × 1–3 cm, central, cylindrical, solid, dry and covered with white (2A1) tomentose scales; context is white (2A1) and has no reaction when bruised; basal mycelium is white (1A1). Odor indistinct.

Basidia are 26–45 × 9–11.5 μm, thin-walled, clavate and four-spored; sterigmata are 3.5–6 μm long. Basidiospores are [40/2/2] (8–)8.5–11.5(–12) × (3.5–)4–5.5(–6) μm, Q = (1.83–)2–2.56(–2.75), Qm = 2.27 ± 0.23, ellipsoidal to elongated to fusiform, thin-walled, pale yellow to yellow-brown in KOH, smooth. Hymenophoral trama is composed of subparallel hyphae 5–13 μm broad, colorless to hyaline in KOH. Cheilocystidia are 22–36 × 9–12 μm, common, clavate to subclavate, thin-walled and hyaline to grayish brown in KOH. Pleurocystidia are 28–48 × 8–11 μm, common, clavate to subfusiform or cystidioid. Pileipellis is a trichoderm 60–140 μm thick composed of hyaline to yellow hyphae in KOH, thin-walled, and 6–11 μm in diameter; terminal cells 26–81 × 6–10 μm, clavate to cylindrical. Pileus trama is composed of thin-walled hyphae 5–12 μm in diameter. Stipitipellis is up to 100 μm thick, with clavate to ventricose terminal cells (25–47 × 7–16 μm), hyaline to grayish brown in KOH. Stipe trama is composed of parallel hyphae 4–12.5 μm wide. Clamp connections are absent in all tissues.

Habitat: Solitary or group on the wet ground under mixed forests of Fagaceae (Fagus longipetiolata) and Pinaceae (Tsuga chinensis and Pinus massoniana).

Distribution: Jiangxi Province, China.

Additional specimens examined: China, Jiangxi Province: Shangrao City, Yanshan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, 117°46′50″ E, 27°59′25″ N, elev. 400 m, 6 July 2022, F. Zhou, HFJAU12012 (WYS531).

Xerocomus subsplendidus F. Zhou, H.Y. Song and D.M. Hu, sp. nov. (Figure 13 and Figure 14).

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Habitat of Xerocomus subsplendidus. (a,b) HFJAU12009. (c,d) HFJAU12010 (Holotype). (e,f) HFJAU12011. Photos by F. Zhou.

Figure 14.

Figure 14

Xerocomus subsplendidus. (HFJAU12010, Holotype). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia. (c) Pileipellis. (d) Cheilocystidia. (e) Pleurocystidia. (f) Stipitipellis Scale bars = 10 μm. Drawings by F. Zhou.

Mycobank: MB847092.

Etymology—Latin “subsplendidus” refers to the color of pileus, which is yellowish brown.

Diagnosis: Xerocomus subsplendidus has a subhemispherical to applanate to infundibulate pileus, and the surface is always covered with yellowish brown tomentose when young, cracking into brown to dark brown scales with age, always has a crooked stipe, covered with pale brown to reddish brown tomentose in the upper part, and pores and tubes change to blue when injured, has ellipsoid to subfusiform to cylindrical; basidiospores are 9–15.5 × 4–5.5 μm, pale yellow to yellow-brown in KOH.

Holotype: China, Jiangxi Province: Shangrao City, Yanshan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, 117°46′7″ E, 27°50′36″ N, elev. 1750 m, 27 August 2022, F. Zhou, HFJAU12010 (WYS704).

Description: Basidiomata are small to medium-sized. Pileus is 2.2–5.6 cm in diameter, subhemispherical to applanate to infundibulate, initially earth-yellow (6B5) to yellowish brown (6B7), and brown (6C7) to dark brown (6E5) later and have lighter margins; surface dry, always covered with yellowish brown (6C5) tomentose when young, cracking into brown (6A4) to dark brown (6E5) scales with age. Context is white (6A1), up to 0.8 cm in thickness in the center of the pileus, and does not change when injured. Hymenophore is slightly depressed and decurrent around the apex of the stipe, quite scattered; pores are irregular, 1 per mm or less, yellow (3A6), changes to blue (22D5) when bruised; tubes are up to 1 cm long, golden (2A6) to yellowish brown (2D7), changes to blue (22D5) when injured. Stipe is 2.5–5 × 0.4–0.7 cm, central, cylindrical or crooked, solid; covered with pale brown (2B3) to reddish brown (9B4) tomentose in the upper part; context is white (3A1) to pale brown (3A2), no reaction when bruised; basal mycelium white. Odor indistinct.

Basidia are 27–38.5 × 9–11 μm, thin-walled, clavate and four-spored; sterigmata are 3–7 μm long. Basidiospores are [60/3/3] 9–15.5(–16) × 4–5.5(–6) μm, Q = (1.82–)2–3.11(–3.56), Qm = 2.40 ± 0.32, ellipsoid to subfusiform to cylindrical, pale yellow to yellow-brown in KOH and smooth. Hymenophoral trama is composed of subparallel hyphae 5–13 μm broad, colorless to hyaline in KOH. Cheilocystidia are 39–65 × 8.5–12 μm, lanceolate, clavate to ventricose, thin-walled and hyaline to grayish brown in KOH. Pleurocystidia are 31–82 × 10–13 μm, common, similar to cheilocystidia. Pileipellis is a trichoderm 70–230 μm thick composed of hyaline hyphae in KOH, thin-walled, 5–13 μm in diameter; terminal cells are 27.5–54.5 × 10–16 μm, clavate or cystidioid. Pileus trama is composed of thin-walled hyphae 5–12 μm diam. Stipitipellis is 45–140 μm thick, with clavate to pyriform terminal cells (18–28.5 × 8.5–15 μm) and hyaline to grayish brown in KOH. Stipe trama is composed of parallel hyphae 6–18 μm wide. Clamp connections are absent in all tissues.

Habitat: Solitary or group on the wet ground under mixed forests of Fagaceae (Fagus longipetiolata) and Pinaceae (Tsuga chinensis and Pinus massoniana).

Distribution: Jiangxi Province, China.

Additional specimens examined: China, Jiangxi Province: Shangrao City, Yanshan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, 117°45′56″ E, 27°50′22″ N, elev. 1700 m, 23 August 2021, F. Zhou, HFJAU12009 (WYS232); Shangrao City, Yanshan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, 117°45′43″ E, 27°50′29″ N, elev. 1740 m, 27 August 2022, F. Zhou, HFJAU12011 (WYS718).

4. Discussion

The macro and micromorphology of Austroboletus albus conforms to the characteristics of Austroboletus. It shared similar morphological characteristics with A. subflavidus, A. albidus and A. roseialbus. However, A. subflavidus has larger basidia [27–49(51) × 12–19 μm] and basidiospores [(13.1)15.9 ± 1.15(19.5) × (5.5)7.0 ± 0.58(8.7) μm], slightly shorter and coarser stipe [(2.9)4.5–7.5(10.2) × (0.4)0.6–1.8(2.0) cm], pileus surface often cracks with matures [68]; A. albidus can be easily differentiated by wider basidia (28–39 × 14–20 μm), shorter stipe (4–7 × 0.4–0.6 cm), and the color of pileus is white to cream when young, cream to grayish yellow when mature, covered with light orange to brownish nubby squamules [2]; A. roseialbus has smaller basidiospores (11.2–14 × 6.3–7 μm), wider basidia (28–35 × 10–14 μm), shorter stipe (7–8 cm), and the color of the pileus is whitish with obvious pale pink tinges [69].

Phylogenetically, the specimens we collected formed an independent clade with strong support (BS = 100%, PP = 1), and were closed to A. albovirescens (HKAS:59624 and HKAS74743) [1,2,31] with high statistical support (BS = 100%, PP = 1). However, A. albovirescens was described by Li and Yang [2], which is characterized by the matte green to gray-green pileus, the ornamentation of basidiospores with unequal pits, and the ixocutis pileipellis. Meanwhile, they formed a large clade with A. mutabilis (BS = 100%, PP = 1), a species recorded in Australia [70]. However, A. mutabilis can be easily distinguished by shorter basidiospores (11.9–14.7 × 4.9–7 µm) and basidia (25–35 × 10–13 µm), and the color of the pileus is dark red to brownish red when young, soon fading to brownish orange, becoming orangish yellow, then eventually yellowish.

Morphologically, Xa. violaceipes is similar to Boletus violaceofuscus and Xa. separans. Howener, B. violaceofuscus has longer and narrower basidia [(29)32–40(43) × 10.5–13.5 μm], smaller pleurocystidia [(47)52–60 × 7–10 μm] and longer cheilocystidia [(26)37–67 × 7–10 μm], slightly larger basidiospores [(14.0)15.5 ± 0.8(17.8) × (5.0)5.6 ± 0.3(6.2) μm], larger stipitipellis terminal cells [20–40 × (4)8–15(18) μm] with rare tw- spored and four-spored basidia [71]. Xa. separans can be easily distinguished by larger pileus [60–200(220) mm] and stipe [60–150 × 10–30 mm], longer basidia [(27)32–41(43) × 10–12 μm], smaller pleurocystidia [(52)55–70 × 11–14 μm] and larger cheilocystidia [(24)30–65(80) × 8–15(18) μm] [71].

Based on the phylogenetic analyses, the collections of Xa. violaceipes are clustered on one branch within Xanthoconium with 100% bootstrap support, and sister to Xa. separans with 82% statistical support, but they have a long genetic distance.

Morphologically, Xa. violaceofuscum has similar pileus and stipe colors to Boletus violaceofuscus [3,71]. However, B. violaceofuscus has larger basidiospores [(14.0)15.5 ± 0.8(17.8) × (5.0)5.6 ± 0.3(6.2) μm] and basidia [(29)32–40(43) × 10.5–13.5 μm], has smaller pleurocystidia [(47)52–60 × 7–10 μm], and the tubes are white or whitish at first, stipe has net–like ornamentation and at the base has white tomentum, has a few two-spored and four-spored basidia in stipitipellis, and the flesh is white.

In phylogenetic analyses, the collections of Xa. violaceofuscum are clustered on an independent branch within Xanthoconium with 100% bootstrap support.

Morphologically, Xerocomus rutilans is similar to Aureoboletus zangii [1,72] by its bright yellow hymenophore and reddish gray to grayish red pileus color. However, Au. zangii can be distinguished by its fox-red to English-red stipe, viscid pileus and stipe. Au. zangii has shorter basidia [20–30 μm], larger cheilocystidia (24–51 × 9–16 μm) and pleurocystidia [40–68(77) × 11.5–18 μm].

Phylogenetically, the samples of Xerocomus rutilans are clustered into an unique branch within Xerocomus with high statistical support (BS = 100%), and related to X. rugosellus [1,3] with 50% bootstrap support. However, X. rugosellus is characterized by the slowly bluing hymenophore and context when injured, wider basidia (12–15 μm), and t larger basidiospores [(12)14–15.5(18) × (4.5)5–5.5(7) μm] and pleuro- and cheilocystidia (45–80 × 10–14 μm).

Morphologically, Xerocomus subsplendidus is similar to X. fraternus, X. subparvus and X. yunnanensis [1]. However, X. fraternus can be distinguished by the changes in pileus and stipe context when injured, pileus context changing from cream to yellowish and staining bluish slowly when injured, stipe context cream on upper part, staining pale blue slowly when injured, and lower part pale red-brown near stipe base; X. fraternus has shorter basidiospores [(8.5)9.5–12(13) μm], and the shape of pileipellis terminal cells is subcylindrical. X. subparvus has cream to yellowish pileus context and a red tinge near pileipellis, staining bluish slowly or indistinctly when injured, context of the stipe is pale yellow at the upper part, staining bluish slowly when injured and pale brown to pale-red brown at the lower part; X. subparvus has smaller basidiospores [(8.5)9–10.5(11.5) × (3)3.5–4(4.5) μm], and the shape of pileipellis terminal cells is subcylindrical. X. yunnanensis is characterized by the tubes staining red-brown slowly when young and becoming bluish when mature on injury, the fresh yellow context of pileus near the pileipellis, and the white to yellowish context of stipe, bluing indistinctly when cut [1]; X. yunnanensis has smaller basidiospores [(9)10–11.5(13) × 4–4.5(5) μm], and the terminal cells of pileipellis are tapered or bullet-shaped.

According to our phylogeny, the sequences of Xerocomus subsplendidus form an independent branch within Xerocomus with 100% bootstrap support, and are sistered to Xerocomus sp. (voucher: HKAS90207, HKAS 74927 and HKAS 75076) with 58% statistical support, but they have a long genetic distance.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Liu Kun, Jia (Kunming Institute of Botany, CAS) and Li Rong, Liu for their help, and the rangers at the Wuyishan Nature Reserve in China, for their help in fieldwork.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.Z. and D.-M.H.; Methodology, F.Z., H.-Y.S., W.-J.Y. and W.Z.; Performing the experiment, F.Z.; Formal analysis, F.Z.; Resources, F.Z., Y.G., L.-Y.L., Y.F., L.C. and H.-J.H.; Writing—original draft preparation, F.Z.; Writing—review and editing, D.-M.H. and Y.G.; Supervision, D.-M.H.; Project administration, D.-M.H.; Funding acquisition, D.-M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, Table 1 (Submitted on 30 December 2022)). All new taxa were deposited in MycoBank (https://www.mycobank.org/).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

Funds for research were provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 32060014, NSFC 32070023, NSFC 32160010, and NSFC 32160673), the earmarked fund for Jiangxi Agriculture Research System (2023), and the Forestry Science and Technology Innovation Project of Jiangxi Forestry Bureau of China (Innovation Special [2022] No. 9).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Wu G., Li Y.C., Zhu X.T., Zhao K., Han L.H., Cui Y.Y., Li F., Xu J.P., Yang Z.L. One hundred noteworthy boletes from China. Fungal Divers. 2016;81:25–188. doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0375-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li Y.C., Yang Z.L. The Boletes of China—Tylopilus s.l. Springer Nature; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Beijing Science Press; Beijing, China: 2021. p. 418. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chiu W.F. The Boletes of Yunnan. Mycologia. 1948;40:199–231. doi: 10.1080/00275514.1948.12017700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Teng S.C. Fungi of China. Science Press; Beijing, China: 1963. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yeh K.W., Chen Z.C. The Boletes of Taiwan (I) Taiwania. 1980;25:166–184. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bi Z., Lu D., Zheng G. Basidiomycetes from Dinghu Mountain of China. II. Some species of Boletaceae (1) Acta Bot. Yunnanica. 1982;4:55–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bi Z., Li T., Zheng G., Li C. Basidiomycetes from Dinghu Mountain of China. III. Some species of Boletaceae (2) Acta Mycol. Sin. 1984;3:199–206. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ying J.Z., Ma Q.M. New taxa and records of the genus Strobilomyces in China. Acta Mycol. Sin. 1985;4:95–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zang M. Notes on the Boletales from eastern Himalayas and adjacent of China. Acta Bot Yunnanica. 1985;7:383–401. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ying J.Z. New species of the genus Xerocomus from China. Acta Microbiol. Sin. Suppl. 1986;1:309–315. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zang M. Notes on the Boletales from eastern Himalayas and adjacent of China (2) Acta Bot Yunnanica. 1986;8:1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bi Z., Li T. New taxon and new records of the genus Suillus from Guangdong. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 1990;9:20–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bi Z.S., Zheng G.Y., Li T.H., Wang Y.Z. Macrofungus Flora of the Mountainous District of North Guangdong. Guangdong Science and Technology Press; Guangdong, China: 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zang M. Sinoboletus, a new genus of Boletaceae from China. Mycotaxon. 1992;45:223–227. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bi Z.S., Zheng G.Y., Li T.H. The Macrofungus Flora of China’s Guangdong Province. Chinese University Press; Hong Kong, China: 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zang M., Li B., Xi J., Zhang D. Fungi of Hengduan Mountains. Science Press; Beijing, China: 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zang M., Li T., Petersen R. Five new species of Boletaceae from China. Mycotaxon. 2001;80:481–488. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zang M. Flora Fungorum Sinicorum. Boletaceae (I) Volume 22. Science Press; Beijing, China: 2006. p. 215. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li Y.C., Feng B., Yang Z.L. Zangia, a new genus of Boletaceae supported by molecular and morphological evidence. Fungal Divers. 2011;49:125–143. doi: 10.1007/s13225-011-0096-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang M., Li T.H., Bau T., Song B. A new species of Xerocomus from Southern China. Mycotaxon. 2012;121:23–27. doi: 10.5248/121.23. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zang M. Flora Fungorum Sinicorum. Boletaceae (II) Volume 44. Science Press; Beijing, China: 2013. p. 152. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zeng N.K., Liang Z.Q., Yang Z.L. Boletus orientialbus, a new species with white basidioma from subtropical China. Mycoscience. 2013;55:159–163. doi: 10.1016/j.myc.2013.07.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li Y.C., Li F., Zeng N.K., Cui Y.Y., Yang Z.L. A new genus Pseudoaustroboletus (Boletaceae, Boletales) from Asia as inferred from molecular and morphological data. Mycol. Prog. 2014;13:1207–1216. doi: 10.1007/s11557-014-1011-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li Y.C., Santana B.O., Zeng N.K., Feng B., Yang Z.L. Molecular phylogeny and taxonomy of the genus Veloporphyrellus. Mycologia. 2014;106:291–306. doi: 10.3852/106.2.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang M., Li T.H., Song B. A new slender species of Aureoboletus from southern China. Mycotaxon. 2014;128:195–202. doi: 10.5248/128.195. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wu G., Zhao K., Li Y.C., Zeng N.K., Feng B., Halling R.E., Yang Z.L. Four new genera of the fungal family Boletaceae. Fungal Divers. 2015;81:1–24. doi: 10.1007/s13225-015-0322-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cui Y.Y., Feng B., Wu G., Xu J.P., Yang Z.L. Porcini mushrooms (Boletus sect. Boletus) from China. Fungal Divers. 2015;81:189–212. doi: 10.1007/s13225-015-0336-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zeng N.K., Tang L.P., Li Y.C., Tolgor B., Zhu X.T., Zhao Q., Yang Z.L. The genus Phylloporus (Boletaceae, Boletales) from China: Morphological and multilocus DNA sequence analyses. Fungal Divers. 2012;58:73–101. doi: 10.1007/s13225-012-0184-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Snell W. The genera of the Boletaceae. Mycologia. 1941;33:415–423. doi: 10.1080/00275514.1941.12020835. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Horak E. Revision of Malaysian Species of Boletales s.l. (Basidiomycota) Described by EJH Corner (1972, 1974) Volume 51. Forest Research Institute Malaysia; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 2011. p. 283. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wu G., Feng B., Xu J.P., Zhu X.T., Li Y.C., Zeng N.K., Hosen M.I., Yang Z.L. Molecular phylogenetic analyses redefine seven major clades and reveal 22 new generic clades in the fungal family Boletaceae. Fungal Divers. 2014;69:93–115. doi: 10.1007/s13225-014-0283-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Qi L.L., Fu Y.P., Wang F.J., Song B., Li Y. Suillus foetidus (Boletales, Basidiomycota), a new species from northeast China. Phytotaxa. 2016;260:167–175. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.260.2.6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liang Z.Q., Chai H., Jiang S., Ye Z.K., Zeng N.K. The genus Xanthoconium (Boletaceae, Boletales) in tropical China. Phytotaxa. 2017;295:246–254. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.295.3.5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Qi L.L., Fu Y.P., Lang N., Bai X., Li Y. A new species of Gomphidius from Northeast China. Phytotaxa. 2017;316:181–188. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.316.2.7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chai H., Liang Z.Q., Xue R., Jiang S., Luo S.H., Wang Y., Wu L.L., Tang L.P., Chen Y., Hong D., et al. New and noteworthy boletes from subtropical and tropical China. MycoKeys. 2019;46:55–96. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.46.31470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fang J.Y., Wu G., Zhao K. Aureoboletus rubellus, a new species of bolete from Jiangxi Province, China. Phytotaxa. 2019;420:72–78. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.420.1.5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xue R.O.U., Liang Z.Q., Chai H.U.I., Jiang S., Tang L.P., Fu Y.Q., Fan Y.G., Wu L.L., Zeng N.K. The Suillus spraguei complex (Suillaceae, Boletales): New taxon, new hosts and amended descriptions. Phytotaxa. 2019;401:239–256. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.401.4.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang M., Li T.H., Wang C.Q., Zeng N.K., Deng W.Q. Phylogenetic overview of Aureoboletus (Boletaceae, Boletales), with descriptions of six new species from China. MycoKeys. 2019;61:111–145. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.61.47520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Han L.H., Wu G., Horak E., Halling R.E., Xu J., Ndolo E.S.T., Sato H., Fechner N., Sharma Y.P., Yang Z.L. Phylogeny and species delimitation of Strobilomyces (Boletaceae), with an emphasis on the Asian species. Persoonia. 2020;44:113–139. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2020.44.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang Y.I., Su M.S., Jiang S., Xue R.O.U., Wu L.L., Xie H.J., Zhang Y.Z., Liang Z.Q., Zeng N.K. The genus Hourangia in China and a description of Aureoboletus erythraeus sp. nov. Phytotaxa. 2020;472:87–106. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.472.2.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Huang C., Zhang M., Wu X.L., Wu G., Xu J.P., Yang Z.L., Li Y.C. Cyanescent Gyroporus (Gyroporaceae, Boletales) from China. MycoKeys. 2021;81:165–183. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.81.65660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jiang S., Mi H.X., Xie H.J., Zhang X., Chen Y., Liang Z.Q., Zeng N.K. Neoboletus infuscatus, a new tropical bolete from Hainan, southern China. Mycoscience. 2021;62:205–211. doi: 10.47371/mycosci.2021.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang M., Xie D.C., Wang C.Q., Deng W.Q., Li T.H. New insights into the genus Gyroporus (Gyroporaceae, Boletales), with establishment of four new sections and description of five new species from China. Mycology. 2022;13:223–242. doi: 10.1080/21501203.2022.2094012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhou F., Gao Y., Song H.Y., Hu H.J., Li S.X., Liu J.H., Hu D.M. Retiboletus atrofuscus (Boletaceae, Boletales), a new species from China. Arch. Microbiol. 2022;204:381. doi: 10.1007/s00203-022-03006-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen X.N., Zhang M., Li T.H., Zeng N.K. A new species of Heimioporus (Boletaceae) from southern China. Phytotaxa. 2019;415:179–188. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.415.4.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zeng N.K., Liang Z.Q., Wu G., Li Y.C., Yang Z.L. The genus Retiboletus in China. Mycologia. 2016;108:363–380. doi: 10.3852/15-072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhao K., Zhang F.M., Zeng Q.Q., Han L.H., Li Y.C. Tylopilus jiangxiensis, a new species of Tylopilus s. str. from China. Phytotaxa. 2020;434:281–291. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.434.3.6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Huo G.H., Yan J.Q., Zhang L.P., Hu D.M. Illustrated Handbook of Macrofungi in Jiangxi. Jiangxi Science And Technology Press; Nanchang, China: 2020. p. 296. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhang J., Song H., Hu D. A Checklist of Macrofungi in Jiangxi Province. Biol. Disaster Sci. 2016;39:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kornerup A., Wanscher J.H. Taschenlexikon der Farben 3. Muster-Schmid; Northeim, Germany: 1981. p. 242. Aufl. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zeng N.K., Cai Q., Yang Z.L. Corneroboletus, a new genus to accommodate the southeastern Asian Boletus indecorus. Mycologia. 2012;104:1420–1432. doi: 10.3852/11-326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hosen I., Feng B., Wu G., Zhu X.-T., Li Y.-C., Yang Z.L. Borofutus, a new genus of Boletaceae from tropical Asia: Phylogeny, morphology and taxonomy. Fungal Divers. 2013;58:215–226. doi: 10.1007/s13225-012-0211-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zeng N.K., Chai H., Jiang S., Xue R., Wang Y., Hong D., Liang Z.Q. Retiboletus nigrogriseus and Tengioboletus fujianensis, two new boletes from the south of China. Phytotaxa. 2018;367:45–54. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.367.1.5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Doyle J. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 1987;19:11–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Huang J.C., Ge X.J., Sun M. Modified CTAB Protocol Using a Silica Matrix for Isolation of Plant Genomic DNA. BioTechniques. 2000;28:432–434. doi: 10.2144/00283bm08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.White T.J., Bruns T.D., Lee S.B., Taylor J.W., Innis M.A., Gelfand D.H., Sninsky J. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. Volume 31. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 1990. pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Vilgalys R., Gonzalez D. Organization of ribosomal DNA in the basidiomycete Thanatephorus praticola. Curr. Genet. 1990;18:277–280. doi: 10.1007/BF00318394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.James T.Y., Kauff F., Schoch C.L., Matheny P.B., Hofstetter V., Cox C.J., Celio G., Gueidan C., Fraker E., Miadlikowska J., et al. Reconstructing the early evolution of Fungi using a six-gene phylogeny. Nature. 2006;443:818–822. doi: 10.1038/nature05110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rehner S.A., Buckley E. A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-α sequences: Evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia. 2005;97:84–98. doi: 10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hall T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999;41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Katoh K., Standley D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013;30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhang D., Gao F., Jakovlić I., Zou H., Zhang J., Li W.X., Wang G.T. PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020;20:348–355. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Stamatakis A. RAxML Version 8: A Tool for Phylogenetic Analysis and Post-Analysis of Large Phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ronquist F., Teslenko M., Mark P.V.D., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A., Huelsenbeck J. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012;61:539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:2688–2690. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Joseph F. Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the Bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lanfear R., Frandsen P.B., Wright A.M., Senfeld T., Calcott B. PartitionFinder 2: New Methods for Selecting Partitioned Models of Evolution for Molecular and Morphological Phylogenetic Analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016;34:772–773. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gelardi M., Angelini C., Costanzo F., Ercole E., Ortiz-Santana B., Vizzini A. Outstanding Pinkish Brown-Spored Neotropical Boletes: Austroboletus subflavidus and Fistulinella gloeocarpa (Boletaceae, Boletales) from the Dominican Republic. Mycobiology. 2020;49:24–45. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2020.1843221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Fechner N., Bonito G., Bougher N.L., Lebel T., Halling R.E. New species of Austroboletus (Boletaceae) in Australia. Mycol. Prog. 2017;16:769–775. doi: 10.1007/s11557-017-1314-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Halling R.E., Osmundson T.W., Neves M.A. Austroboletus mutabilis sp. nov. from northern Queensland. Muelleria. 2006;24:31–36. doi: 10.5962/p.291583. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Simonini G., Floriani M., Binder M., Besl H. Two close extraeuropean Boletes: Boletus violaceofuscus and Boletus separans. Micol. E Veg. Mediterr. 2001;16:148–170. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Shi X.F., Liu P.G. Aureoboletus zangii (Boletaceae), a new species from China. Mycotaxon. 2013;123:451–456. doi: 10.5248/123.451. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, Table 1 (Submitted on 30 December 2022)). All new taxa were deposited in MycoBank (https://www.mycobank.org/).


Articles from Journal of Fungi are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES