Abstract
Assembly of ribosomes in bacteria is highly efficient, taking ~2-3 min, but this makes the abundance of assembly intermediates very low, which is a challenge for mechanistic understanding. Genetic perturbations of the assembly process create bottlenecks where intermediates accumulate, facilitating structural characterization. We use cryo-electron microscopy, with iterative subclassification to identify intermediates in the assembly of the 50S ribosomal subunit from E. coli. The analysis of the ensemble of intermediates that spans the entire biogenesis pathway for the 50 S subunit was facilitated by a dimensionality reduction and cluster picking approach using PCA-UMAP-HDBSCAN. The identity of the cooperative folding units in the RNA with associated proteins is revealed, and the hierarchy of these units reveals a complete assembly map for all RNA and protein components. The assembly generally proceeds co-transcriptionally, with some flexibility in the landscape to ensure efficiency for this central cellular process under a variety of growth conditions.
Subject terms: Structural biology, Biochemistry
Ribosome biogenesis is complex but efficient process in bacteria. Here the authors use cryo-electron microscopy and iterative hierarchical subclassification to identify intermediates in the assembly of the 50 S ribosomal subunit from E. coli.
Introduction
Ribosome biogenesis is a complex but efficient process in rapidly growing bacteria. Assembly of a functional 70S ribosome completes in ~2–3 min1,2 and involves the participation of 3 rRNAs, over 50 r-proteins, and dozens of assembly factors3–6. In vitro, reconstitution using various subsets of large subunit (50 S, LSU) proteins with rRNAs resulted in the Nierhaus assembly map7–9, embodying the cooperativity and dependency for binding of LSU r-proteins to 23S rRNA. Critically absent from the Nierhaus map is the underlying folding of the rRNA that creates the binding sites for the r-proteins. In addition, the relationship of the observed cooperativity in vitro to the co-transcriptional assembly in cells remains to be determined.
The structure of the complete 50S subunit provides very few clues to the assembly pathway. The 23S rRNA secondary structure is organized into 6 domains based on phylogenetic analysis of secondary structure10, but these domains are highly interdigitated in the complete subunit. Using a genetic depletion of the ribosomal large subunit protein bL1711, a series of thirteen intermediates were identified using cryo-EM for the later stages of assembly, which was later expanded to 42 intermediates by further subclassification12. Analysis of this set of particles revealed a set of five assembly blocks11, but the blocks did not specifically correspond to domains in the standard secondary structure10,13. In addition, the assembly blocks provided evidence for both parallel and sequential folding of RNA elements. The earliest intermediate that was discovered in the data revealed ordered density approximately encompassing the solvent side half of the 50S subunit. Genetic manipulation of assembly factors, such as SrmbB, ObgE, and RbgA14–16, revealed additional details pertaining to the mechanism of late-stage assembly of the inter-subunit cleft of the 50S subunit. However, our understanding of LSU assembly is largely limited to the late stages. Furthermore, whether the principles of assembly are generalizable and how assembly pathways are related under diverse conditions of stress remains unclear.
DeaD is a cold shock protein in E. coli, with several annotated functions involving mRNA stability and association with the 50S ribosomal subunit17–19. The deletion strain ∆deaD, has a severe growth defect at low temperatures, and the sucrose gradient profile for this strain shows significant accumulation of a pre-50S peak17. Cryo-EM analysis of the pre-50S peak from the ∆deaD strain revealed the earliest intermediate yet identified, consisting of domain I and three associated r-proteins. The analysis of this data was facilitated by an improved workflow for heterogeneous reconstruction using template-free ab-initio classification and iterative subclassification in CryoSPARC20. Further, we also developed a new toolbox of unsupervised feature extraction and electron density segmentation to identify assembly blocks based on single voxel behavior across a set of maps, which enables the subsequent cooperativity and dependency analysis.
Overall, we generated a set of 21 pre-50S density maps from the ∆deaD dataset, and we applied our segmentation and dependency analysis method to identify 10 cooperative assembly blocks. The set of blocks was organized into a block dependency map that demonstrated, for the first time, the integrated interdependency of the organization of rRNA helices and protein binding. The process by which the exit tunnel is formed was revealed during the assembly of the solvent half of the subunit, which then serves as a scaffold for 50S maturation. With the folding blocks of the entire subunit in hand, we revisited the previously reported bL17-depletion and ∆srmB datasets11,15. Remarkably, prior datasets are consistent with the block dependency derived from the ∆deaD dataset, which implies a unified early assembly pathway and a malleable maturation landscape in 50S biogenesis.
Results
Iterative ab-initio subclassification reveals new LSU assembly intermediates
The ΔdeaD strain grown at 19 °C had a severe growth defect (Supplementary Table 1) that resulted in the accumulation of pre-50S particles in the sucrose gradient profile (Supplementary Fig. 1) The whole cell and pre-50S fraction proteomic data showed that a lack of DeaD at low-temperature results in a defect of ribosome assembly without alteration of r-protein expression (Supplementary Fig. 2a). The pre-50S fractions purified via sucrose gradient from the ΔdeaD strain were subjected to quantitative proteomic mass spectrometry and RNA mass spectrometry analysis for RNA modification. The intermediates showed non-stoichiometric protein composition (Supplementary Fig. 3) and partial RNA modification (Supplementary Fig. 4), implying a heterogeneous composition of the assembly intermediates. Subsequently, single-particle cryo-EM data collection and analysis was applied using a similar approach to an iterative subclassification strategy previously reported12. We developed a robust implementation for iterative ab-initio subclassification, expanding on our previous approach12, using CryoSPARC to identify heterogeneous populations of assembly 50S subunits, as described in the methods. Analysis using this protocol resulted in 21 distinct particle maps for the ∆deaD dataset, shown in Fig. 1a.
To compare with prior results, we re-analyzed two previously reported datasets using this updated protocol, one with intermediates from the depletion of bL1711 and one with intermediates from a ΔsrmB strain15, resulting in 32 and 11 distinct particle maps, respectively, shown in Fig. 1b, c. The combined set of 64 maps was compared to identify similar classes of particles among the three individual sets of maps. The Euclidean distance matrix was calculated for the total set of 64 maps, thresholded at intensity 1.00. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering was performed using this matrix, which grouped the maps into 6 major classes (Fig. 1d), with the class distributions for the three datasets shown in Fig. 1e–g. Some of the new maps align well with the B, C, and E classes previously observed in the bL17 depletion strain11,12, while the D-class is only observed in the bL17 dataset. Two new classes observed in the ΔdeaD dataset were labeled as preB and G.
The newly discovered preB1 and preB2 classes, exclusively found in the ΔdeaD dataset, represent the earliest intermediates observed among all in vivo studies of ribosome assembly, corresponding roughly to ~600 nucleotides of domain I and domain I + III of 23S rRNA, respectively. There is a new class related to the previous C class that is primarily observed in the ΔdeaD dataset (25% of the particles in Fig. 1e, metadata in Supplementary Table 2), which we assign to the new G class that lacks a large portion of domain II helices, as well as uL13, bL20, and bL21. The ΔdeaD particles mainly consist of the early B, C, and G classes. The E class, which is well-characterized in previous studies focusing on the late assembly process, only represents a small fraction of the particles. Thus, the ∆deaD dataset exhibited the largest breadth of early intermediates, ranging from the smallest intermediate yet observed to mature states and numerous in-between.
Unsupervised voxel-based segmentation of density maps from ∆deaD intermediates reveals ten early assembly blocks
We developed a novel procedure to segment the maps using the dimensional reduction tools PCA21 and UMAP22, in combination with the HDBSCAN23,24 algorithm for cluster identification (see Methods). Application of these tools to the ∆deaD cryo-EM dataset of LSU intermediates identified ten early assembly blocks as a basis set for the experimental maps (Fig. 2). Briefly, the set of 21 maps from ∆deaD was aligned and resampled to the same grid, thresholded at 99th percentile intensity, and the resulting 21 × 114,392 matrix of voxels with intensity above threshold in any dataset was used to generate 21 principal components. Plotting the first two principal components, PC1 and PC2, showed distinguishable features, but the clusters are not readily separated (Supplementary Fig. 5a). Some features can be extracted by thresholding a given PC at 1σ, such as the positive elements of PC2 as the base region or the negative elements of PC3 as domain I. (Supplementary Fig. 5b–d). In general, the desired contiguous density segments would be linear combinations of the PCs, but there is no straightforward method to solve for those segments. In addition, features in higher PCs are noisy and hard to identify, and voxels in these PCs cannot be unambiguously assigned to a single structural feature (Supplementary Fig. 6). Direct application of UMAP on the voxel intensities suffered from similar shortcomings in identifying contiguous segments (Supplementary Discussion 3, Supplementary Table 5). In contrast, subjecting the PCA reconstructed data to dimensionality reduction using UMAP gave rise to readily interpretable groups of voxels, as shown in Fig. 2a (Supplementary Fig. 7).
Finally, HDBSCAN was used to resolve and identify clusters of voxels in the UMAP representation in an unsupervised manner (Fig. 2a). The resulting clusters correspond to contiguous regions of density that serve as a basis set for the 21 maps from the ∆deaD dataset, as shown in Fig. 2b–k. The sequential application of PCA-UMAP-HDBSCAN analysis provides the cleanest, most intuitive segmentation of the set of density maps for 50S assembly, and this approach could be a powerful and general template for analyzing sets of maps from heterogeneous cryo-EM datasets.
To facilitate a comparison of the set of clusters emerging from the PCA-UMAP-HDBSCAN analysis, we first assigned numerical values to the occupancy of each cluster for a set of predefined RNA helices and r-protein volumes from the structure of the 50S subunit11–13 (Fig. 2c). This occupancy analysis reveals that nearly all RNA and protein elements are uniquely assigned to a single cluster, confirming that these clusters can be used as a convenient basis set of assembly blocks. To understand the relationship among the newly defined blocks and to compare distinct features across individual maps, we performed a new occupancy analysis of the 21 intermediate maps based on the 10 basis blocks, resulting in a 10 × 21 matrix shown in Fig. 3a. The block names were based on prominent RNA or protein features, Figs. 2a–c and 3a.
Mapping assembly block dependency for early 50S assembly
A folding block is operationally defined as a set of voxel intensities that are correlated across the 21 maps and are thus considered to be a cooperative assembly unit. The composition of the blocks is shown in Fig. 3a (Supplementary Fig. 7 and detailed discussion in SI), superimposed on the protein binding dependencies from the original Nierhaus map. The dependency among the blocks is evaluated by first making a scatterplot for each pair of rows of the occupancy matrix, then inferring the dependency using a quadrant analysis (Supplementary Fig. 8 and Methods). A similar approach was recently reported for a cryo-EM-based mechanistic study for bacterial small subunit assembly25. The uL1 base block was omitted from the dependency analysis, as it only occurred once in the ∆deaD dataset. After pruning the redundant edges in the dependency graph (Methods), the most direct dependencies between blocks are retained, and they are shown in colored bold arrows in Fig. 3b.
The assembly Core is a prerequisite for all subsequent assembly blocks and is the sole precursor to the consolidation of the bL20 or uL23 blocks, which constitute domain I–III, respectively, providing strong support for the natural 5′−3′ co-transcriptional direction of assembly. The uL3 block represents a significant portion of domain VI and can be organized by either the core + bL20 (in early B classes) or the core + uL23 (in G classes). We do not have evidence of direct folding of the uL3 on the assembly core, likely due to the rapid folding kinetics of the bL20 and uL23 blocks. The association of domains I–III and VI forms the majority of the solvent half of the 50 S subunit, and this group serves as the scaffold for the final assembly of the CP, the stalks, and ultimately the peptidyl transferase center (PTC). There are three small blocks consisting entirely of RNA, including the H55–59/106 block, which is part of domain III; the H63 block, which is part of domain IV; and the H33–35 block, which is part of domain II. Finally, there is a large block corresponding to the CP and the uL2 block which is part of domain IV. (Fig. 2l, detailed block descriptions in SI). The remaining parts of the 50 S subunit that are not represented by the 10 blocks correspond to the last folding steps forming the active site, which has been informed by previous work on the bL17 depletion strain. Moreover, the newly identified assembly blocks subdivided previously reported assembly, which illuminated key features of early 50S assembly (Supplementary Fig. 9).
Placing RNA helices in the early stages of the assembly map
The comprehensive assembly map shown in Fig. 3b includes both the r-proteins and the rRNA helices defined in the secondary structure. The well-known Nierhaus assembly map established the basis for thermodynamic cooperativity among the LSU proteins binding to the 23 S rRNA7–9. For the first time, it is possible to intertwine RNA secondary structure elements with the LSU proteins to produce an RNA-protein assembly map. This is particularly revealing for the earliest stages of assembly, and it is now clear that assembly primarily proceeds in the 5′−3′ direction, consistent with a co-transcriptional organization of the folding blocks26.
The minimal requirement for CP formation
The dependency graph in Fig. 3b shows that the minimal requirement for CP formation is the assembly core docked with the bL20 block. The deaD-B-a5 particle, composed of the assembly core, the bL20 block, and a partially formed uL3 block, is the smallest intermediate containing ordered density for the CP. The volume for deaD-B-a6 is larger than for deaD-B-a5 where the uL3 block is not formed at all. It appears that the CP formation only requires the assembly core and bL20 block, which is consistent with the dependency graph. The bL20 block represents a continuous primary sequence from domain I to domain II except for H38cp and H42–44 (base for L7/12 stalk). Once the H38bd is formed, the H38cp will recruit corresponding proteins, 5S, and part of domain V (H81–88) and form an intact CP (Supplementary Fig. 10d).
Formation of exit tunnel in early intermediates
The discovery of early intermediates reveals the layer-by-layer formation of the exit tunnel from the solvent side towards the inter-subunit side, which finally forms the PTC. We split the exit tunnel (ET) into two parts: ETsolvent and ETPTC (Supplementary Fig. 11). It is more relevant to discuss the ETPTC formation in the bL17 depletion dataset since they contain more mature structures, while the less mature set of ΔdeaD intermediates, allows a focus on the ETsolvent formation. By analyzing the structure of the secM and vemP peptide trapped on a translating ribosome27,28, we generated a list of 50 S contacts in each of the assembly blocks within 5 Å of the trapped peptide (Supplementary Table 3).
From the assembly blocks, we can easily assign the resolved residues of ETsolvent into the assembly core, bL20, uL23 block, and H33-35 block. Intermediates that do not contain all three of these blocks, namely the preB, G and B (except deaD-B-a6) class and part of the early C class, do not have a fully structured ETsolvent. In the dependency graph, we know the formation of H33–35 is dependent on the bL20 block and H55–58, which implies that H55–58 is also a prerequisite for ETsolvent formation. For example, though the matured base region formed in the G class intermediates, none have the bL20 block formed, and so they never have the H33–35 block formed, resulting in incomplete ETsolvent formation. All of the C classes have the H55–59, uL23 block, and bL20 blocks, and they only need the H33–35 formation to complete the ETsolvent during the maturation.
These results differ significantly from the Steinberg analysis of the evolution of the 23 S rRNA from the primordial PTC29, in which domain I (assembly core), domain II (bL20 block), and domain III (uL23 block) form after PTC formation, in the evolutionary sense. Presumably, the folding of the proto-ribosome was organized around the PTC, and there was likely an important stage in evolution after insertion of the domains into the proto-PTC, where the assembly process was reorganized from forming the PTC first to forming the ETsolvent first as a scaffold on which to build the PTC.
Different perturbations reshape the ribosome assembly landscape
Given the observed dependencies in Fig. 3b, a set of 29 possible combinations of allowable structures can be enumerated, and of these, 14 were observed in the ∆deaD dataset. These structures can be organized into a putative assembly pathway, connecting similar structures according to the dependencies, as shown in Fig. 4a. We also calculated the block occupancy for ∆srmB and bL17 datasets (Supplementary Fig. 12). With the occupancy matrix, we validate the quadrant analysis across the three datasets, using ∆deaD thresholding criteria (Supplementary Fig. 13). The quadrant analysis matched the ∆deaD results. Across the ∆deaD, ∆srmB, and bL17 datasets, 21 of the 29 possible structures are observed, and there are no combinations that violate the dependencies based on the ∆deaD data alone (Fig. 3b). Comparing different datasets on the pathway, the ∆deaD intermediates are distributed earlier than the other two, and there are few intermediates containing CP blocks.
The ∆srmB and bL17 datasets populate intermediates not observed in the ∆deaD dataset, but the dependencies are consistent with those observed within the ∆deaD dataset, which implies a universal block-wise parallel pathway for the assembly mechanism (Fig. 4a). Interestingly, the ∆deaD and ∆srmB datasets share a similar assembly path that proceeds through the unique G class, which is not observed in the bL17-depletion strain. We showed that ∆srmB intermediates are also depleted of uL13, resulting in a defect in the bL20 block formation. Since the bL20 block is essential for the formation of the CP block, in the ∆srmB dataset, there are accordingly fewer intermediates with the CP block formed at the very beginning, flowing through the right side of the landscape in Fig. 4b (∆srmB pathway in Supplementary Fig. 14). In contrast, bL17 is at the bottom of the mature 50 S and is thought to play an important role in the blocks of the base region (uL2 block, uL3 block, H33–35 and H63 block), so the bL17-depletion intermediates have defects in the base blocks’ formation, the CP forms earlier intermediates that accumulate with an incomplete base region, and mostly transition through the left part of the assembly landscape in Fig. 4c, which led to unique D classes in the bL17-depletion assembly pathway. Although there is no knowledge of the substrate for DeaD during ribosome assembly, the ∆deaD strain shares many intermediates with the ∆srmB strain, which implies the two helicases operate on substrates that are present at similar times during assembly.
Continuous learning of 50S folding dependency with new datasets
We have shown that the essential features of the early stage 50 S assembly pathways for datasets from different perturbations can be represented using segments derived from the ∆deaD dataset alone. As the field progresses, additional information will become available through novel perturbations and improved methods for data analysis, and it becomes interesting to consider how the segmentation analysis differs when additional datasets are included. Performing the PCA-UMAP-HDBSCAN analysis on the three combined datasets with 64 intermediate density maps revealed a set of 18 assembly blocks (namely, blk01 to blk18, Supplementary Fig. 15, Supplementary Table 4). To compare to the 10 ∆deaD blocks, occupancy analysis was performed for the new set of blocks (Supplementary Fig. 16), revealing 8 blocks that were perfectly aligned in common. (Supplementary Fig. 17a–d, f–h). Interestingly, a small segment was separated from the bL20 block from ∆deaD that corresponded to uL13 and H25 (Supplementary Fig. 17e). The depletion of uL13 was a feature of intermediates in the ∆srmB strain, implying that the site of action of SrmB may be related to H25. In a similar manner, bL17 was segmented out from the uL3 block owing to including bL17-depletion dataset (Supplementary Fig. 17i). Further, new blocks were identified in the 3-dataset analysis, such as H67–69 and the uL10/uL11 stalks (Supplementary Fig. 18c, d), that are important in late assembly stages and are not present in the early intermediates from ∆deaD datasets. The blk14 even includes a non-native density for assembly factor YjgA (Supplementary Fig. 18g), which is also a feature of a subset of bL17-depletion intermediates, capturing the distinct dumbbell shape of the assembly factor surrounded by bL31 and H74/80/93 as a docking site for YjgA. The PCA-UMAP-HDBSCAN approach can robustly identify distinct and common features, for both native and non-native density, in a complex assembly landscape and provides for continuous learning of the ribosome biogenesis pathway with increased spatiotemporal resolution as more observations are included using different perturbations.
Discussion
Through our analysis of ribosome assembly within a bacterial strain perturbed by the deletion of ∆deaD and low temperature, we identified a diverse set of intermediates that span the entire pathway for assembly of the 50 S subunit in vivo. The series of intermediates discovered in the dataset include the earliest particles composed roughly of domain I at the 5′ ends of the subunit, proceeding with the assembly of the solvent portion of the peptide exit tunnel prior to assembly of the inter-subunit face and PTC.
To systematically investigate the assembly process in a relatively unbiased way, we developed a novel quantitative segmentation tool that can be readily applied to a set of density maps and used the resulting segments to develop an assembly pathway for the entire subunit. In contrast to arbitrary definitions of structural elements, particularly rRNA, based on primary or secondary structure, the assembly blocks generated by PCA-UMAP were exclusively based on the dataset itself. This approach resulted in a more precise set of structural elements throughout the 50S biogenesis pathway. This segmentation can be readily applied to other datasets resulting from different perturbations, providing a unifying set of intermediates across datasets with differing fluxes through the pathway.
These data and the subsequent analysis provide a comprehensive view of the overall assembly of the 50 S subunit that integrates a significant body of data from decades of research into a coherent assembly map containing all r-proteins and RNA helical elements. This is the first time that the assembly dependency of helices, both within the same domain and across different domains, has been demonstrated through tertiary interactions. For instance, the formation of H33–35 requires not only the other majority of domain II helices in bL20 blocks but also H55–59 and H106 in domain III. Additionally, the existence of H55–59 and H106 is necessary for the formation of H63 from domain IV.
There are similarities and important distinctions to the nucleolar pre-60S intermediates identified in yeast30,31. The earliest yeast intermediate identified corresponds to domains I/II, onto which either domain III or VI can assemble. These intermediates correspond roughly to the core/L20 block followed by the uL23 block or uL3 block, respectively, in the present work. In addition to these states, we observe earlier intermediates corresponding to the domain I alone (Core) and domains I/III (Core/uL23 block) in comparison to yeast. Subsequent addition of domains occurs in a different order, with domain V assembling prior to domain IV in yeast, while the reverse is observed in the bacterial work where the active site in domain V is always the last to form. Perhaps most striking is the nearly complete absence of assembly factors in the present set of intermediates, compared to over 20 clearly resolved factors in the yeast intermediate structures. The reasons for this are not entirely clear, but this observation implies that the many known factors in bacteria must be transiently associated with the intermediates in such a way that they are not kinetically stable for purification. Overall, the rough correspondence of the domain assembly order is consistent with the sequence and functional conservation of ribosomes between kingdoms, but many details have been re-engineered during evolution.
Two other studies have recently appeared describing a similar range of intermediates from very different experimental approaches. Intermediates resulting from time points in an in vitro reconstitution of E. coli 50S subunits were recently identified, showing a remarkably similar range of structures to the present work32. The implied rough order of domain assembly is Domain I followed by either II/VI or III/VI, and the earliest domain I intermediate is smaller by one protein and a helix, representing the earliest intermediate observed thus far32. That work is particularly important due to its connection to the significant body of work on protein dependence in in vitro reconstitution33. Our laboratory recently published a similar set of intermediates resulting from co-transcriptional ribosome synthesis using the iSAT system34. Perhaps what is most remarkable is that very similar overall pathways emerge from three entirely different systems: in vitro reconstitution32, iSAT34, and cellular intermediates, in the present work. There are many interesting differences among the datasets that provide a striking level of detail on this complex assembly process. Nevertheless, the concordance provides strong validation that the observations are pertinent to the assembly process and not an artifact of any particular experimental approach.
In the analysis of the ∆deaD intermediates accumulated at low temperatures, we have developed a novel segmentation method for the analysis of related sets of electron density maps, and we have used the segmentation to develop a hierarchy of assembly steps that are embodied by the set of maps and provide a putative mechanistic order for assembly. Further, this analysis has proven to be applicable to other datasets, and the dependencies observed in the ∆deaD data set are consistent with intermediates observed in other independent datasets, even though they are not observed in the ∆deaD data set. This approach should prove to be powerful as a platform moving forward to integrate mechanistic information as the as-yet mysterious roles of the bacterial assembly factors are elucidated.
Methods
Bacterial strains and plasmid construction
Strains BW25113 E. coli (WT) and BW25113 (ΔdeaD) from the Keio Knockout Collection were purchased from the E.coli Genetic Stock Center35. The pHSL-deaD, homoserine lactone (HSL) -inducible DeaD expression plasmid was generated by Gibson cloning from pHSL-rplQ11, replacing the coding region of rplQ with deaD coding sequence in pHSL. The ΔdeaD-pHSL-deaD strain was obtained by transformation of pHSL-deaD into strain ΔdeaD.
Cell growth and sucrose gradient purification for ribosome particles
WT, ΔdeaD, and ΔdeaD-pHSL-deaD strains were inoculated in LB medium and grown overnight, then diluted into fresh LB at 20 °C. Either 0 or 2.5 nM HSL was added into the ΔdeaD-pHSL-deaD strain during cell culture. Cells were harvested at OD600 ~0.4 by centrifugation at 4000×g for 15 min, followed by lysis in Buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 6 mM β-mercaptoethanol) and 20 U/ml DNase I (Sigma) by a mini bead beater using 0.1-mm zirconia/silica beads (3 × 60 s pulses with 1 min on ice in between). Insoluble cell debris and beads were then removed by two centrifugation steps: 31,000×g for 10 min, transferring the supernatant to a new tube, and then again 31,000×g for 90 min. The clarified cell lysates (10 A260 units) were loaded onto a 33 mL 10–40 % w/v sucrose gradient (50 mM Tris-HCl 7.8, 100 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM MgCl2, 6 mM β-mercaptoethanol) then centrifuged in a Beckman SW32 rotor at 80,000×g for 16 h at 4 °C. Gradients were fractionated using a Brandel gradient fractionator. Based on the UV 254 nm trace, gradient fractions corresponding to the pre-50S peak were collected and combined. To prepare the fractions for cryo-EM analysis, 3× volumes of buffer A were added prior to concentration in a 100 kDa cutoff concentrator (Amicon) 3 times to eliminate sucrose and to equilibrate to buffer A.
Cryo-EM sample preparation and data collection
The purified pre-50S sample was diluted to 0.6 mg/ml with buffer A, and 3 µL of the sample was applied to a plasma-cleaned gold grid in the cold room. Grids were manually frozen in liquid ethane, and single-particle cryo-EM data was collected on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Titan Krios electron microscope operating at 300 keV equipped with a Gatan K2 Summit detector using the Leginon software36, with a pixel size of 1.31 Å at 22,500× magnification. A dose of 33–35 e/Å2 across 50 frames was used for a dose rate of ~5.8 e/pix/s. To overcome problems of the preferred orientation of particles on the grid and facilitate image classification, data was collected using a tilt angle of −20°[ 37. A total of 1031 micrographs were collected.
Electron microscopy micrograph processing
Data pre-processing, including motion correction and CTF estimation, was performed within the Appion pipeline38. Frames were aligned using MotionCor239, and the contrast transfer function (CTF) for all micrographs was estimated with CTFFind4.140. The aligned frame sums were then imported into Relion. A total of 322,187 particles from the dataset were picked with auto-picking in RELION3. The particles were extracted in a 160 × 160 × 160 box with a bin of 2. Next, 2D classification and manual class curation were used to remove 30 S subunits and 70 S ribosomes, as well as other spurious particles that clearly did not belong to assembling LSUs. The curated particles from selected classes were further cleaned with 3D classification using a C-class 50 S intermediate as a template12. After 3D classification from RELION, classes that did not produce an interpretable map were eliminated. The resulting 273,729 particles were exported and analyzed in CryoSPARC320. Particle stacks for bL17-depletion and ∆srmB were prepared using the same procedure on previously acquired micrographs11,15, resulting in 123,804 and 273,620 particles, respectively.
Iterative classification with ab-initio reconstruction in CryoSPARC and hierarchical analysis
For each dataset, the resulting particle stacks were imported to CryoSPARC and directly subjected to ab-initio reconstruction, requesting for 4 classes using default parameters. Each resulting interpretable class (Supplementary Fig. 19) was subjected to another round of ab-initio reconstruction using the same parameters. This procedure was performed iteratively until the particle number in a class was less than 2000, in which case the 3D reconstruction would result in low-resolution maps. All reconstructions with fewer than 2000 particles were subjected to ab-initio reconstruction, requesting 1 class prior to 3D refinement in CryoSPARC. An example of this workflow, and the resulting reconstruction, is shown in SI for the ∆deaD dataset. All refined density maps were aligned and resampled to the same 50S ribosome reference (bL17-depletion dataset E) in ChimeraX. All maps with a resolution below 10 Å were discarded, and the remaining resampled density maps were thresholded at intensity 1.00. Pairwise difference maps were calculated for the binarized (thresholded at 1.00) maps, the sum of the difference map A-B and difference map B-A for hierarchical clustering using the Ward linkage. Maps were displayed with the resulting dendrogram, and pairs of maps with a difference of <10 kDa were merged into one class. The value of 10 kDa was defined previously as a valid merging criterion, as it represents the average molecular weight of all proteins and rRNA helices constituting the LSU12. This step is important as similar classes can emerge from hiding at various stages of the iterative subclassification12. The merged particles were next subjected to an ab-initio reconstruction and 3D refinement to produce the final map for the class. (Supplementary Data 1, Supplementary Fig. 20) Finally, a hierarchical clustering analysis was performed across all three datasets in the same way to allow a ready comparison of maps from the different datasets.
Segmentation using PCA-UMAP-HDBSCAN with ∆deaD intermediates and three datasets
The 21 resampled ∆deaD intermediate maps were thresholded at 99 percentile intensity, and the set of 114,392 voxels with nonzero intensity in at least one map resulted in a 21 × 114,392 intensity array. Principle component analysis (PCA in Scikit-Learn)21,41 was performed on this array, giving PCA transformed matrix of the same dimensions. UMAP22 analysis was performed on the PCA matrix using 2 components with 100 nearest neighbors using the Canberra metric, resulting in a 2 × 114,392 matrix, projecting each voxel above the intensity threshold into a UMAP1,2 space. The hyperparameters, including distance metrics and numbers of nearest neighbors and PC inputs for UMAP, are carefully explored (Supplementary Figs. 21–25, see detailed discussion in SI). The combination of PCA-UMAP compared to UMAP only showed better stability (Supplementary Fig. 26). In the UMAP1,2 space, HDBSCAN (min_cluster_size = 100, min_samples = 100)23,24 was performed to assign voxels to individual clusters, resulting 9 blocks representing contiguous regions of density in Cartesian space, and one noise block. The 9 blocks were considered assembly blocks, corresponding to a basis set of voxels that have correlated intensities in the input set of 21 maps. Blocks were named according to salient structural or compositional features. The CP and uL1 base blocks were further separated with another round of HDBSCAN (min_cluster_size = 10, min_samples = 10). All resulting assembly blocks were cleaned by dust filtering in ChimeraX42 prior to use in occupancy analysis. (See SI for algorithm parameters discussion). Similarly, 64 intermediates from three datasets generated a 64 × 140,545 matrix. PCA and UMAP were performed direct on the first dimension of the matrix. HDBSCAN (min_cluster_size = 200, min_samples = 10) was performed to extract 18 assembly blocks.
Occupancy and dependency analysis
The Occupancy of each assembly block was calculated for each of the density maps thresholded at intensity 1.00. Briefly, the number of voxels above the threshold is counted in each block and then normalized to the total number of voxels in the block. The occupied fraction for each block is then normalized to the core block occupancy in each density map.
The dependency between any pair of blocks (i,j) was obtained by quadrant analysis of a scatter plot of the occupancy for block i on the x-axis and block j on the y-axis (Supplementary Fig. 4a). The dashed binarization lines for the horizontal and vertical directions were calculated by the following Eq. (1),
1 |
* threshold line is defined in Supplementary Fig. 27
The x and y binarization lines divide the scatter plot into four quadrants: QI = lower left, QII = lower right, QIII = upper left, QIV = upper right. To infer the relationship between block i and j, the number of points in each quadrant was counted for the scatter plot. The relationship between block i and j falls into one of three scenarios (Supplementary Fig. 4a). With points only in QI and/or QIV, blocks i and j are correlated. With dots in both QII/QIII, blocks i and j are not correlated. With dots only in QI/QII/QIV or QII/QIV, block j should depend on block j (red scatter plots in Supplementary Fig. 4b). With dots in only QI/QIII/QIV or QIII/QIV, block i should depend on block j. (blue scatter plots in Supplementary Fig. 4b). If block i depends on block j, an arrow from j to i will be drawn in the dependency map. The comprehensive dependency plot is now ready for pruning with defined rules (Supplementary Fig. 28) with network package43.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the NIH GM-136412 (to J.R.W) and NIH U54 AI170855, and the Hearst Foundations Developmental Chair (to D.L.).
Author contributions
K.S.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Formal Analysis, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review & Editing, Visualization. N.L.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Data Curation, Writing—Review & Editing. J.N.R.G.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review & Editing. X.D.:Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing—Review & Editing, Visualization. D.L.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—Review & Editing, Resources. J.R.W.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Data Curation, Writing—Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Processed quantitative mass spectrometry data for RNA and protein are included in Supplementary Data 2. All 64 electron density maps for pre-50S intermediates were deposited on EMDB, dead-B-a1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40517], dead-B-a2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40519], dead-B-a3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40520], dead-B-a4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40524], dead-B-a5[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40526], dead-B-a6[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40528], dead-B-b1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40530], dead-C-a1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40532], dead-C-a2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40534], dead-C-a3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40536], dead-C-a4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40538], dead-C-a5[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40540], dead-C-b1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40542], dead-C-b2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40544], dead-E-a1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40546], dead-G1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40548], dead-G2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40550], dead-G3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40552], dead-G4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40555], dead-preB1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40551], dead-preB2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40549], rl17-B-b1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40309], rl17-B-b2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40311], rl17-B-b3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40313], rl17-B-b4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40511], rl17-C-b1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40314], rl17-C-b2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40315], rl17-C-b3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40317], rl17-C-b4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40319], rl17-C-b5[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40321], rl17-C-b6[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40323], rl17-D-a1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40327], rl17-D-a2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40329], rl17-D-a3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40331], rl17-D-b1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40333], rl17-D-b2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40512], rl17-D-b3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40514], rl17-D-b4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40516], rl17-E-a1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40518], rl17-E-a2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40521], rl17-E-a3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40523], rl17-E-a4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40525], rl17-E-a5[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40527], rl17-E-b1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40529], rl17-E-b10[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40531], rl17-E-b2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40533], rl17-E-b3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40535], rl17-E-b4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40537], rl17-E-b5[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40539], rl17-E-b6[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40541], rl17-E-b7[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40543], rl17-E-b8[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40545], rl17-E-b9[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40547], srmb-B-a1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40316], srmb-B-a2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40318], srmb-C-a1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40320], srmb-C-a2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40322], srmb-C-a3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40324], srmb-C-a4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40325], srmb-C-a5[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40328], srmb-E-a1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40330], srmb-E-a2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40332], srmb-E-a3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40513], srmb-G1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40515]. Detailed information is included in the supplementary information (Supplementary Table 2).
Code availability
The code for volume curation (alignment and resample), hierarchical analysis, PCA-UMAP-HDBSCAN, occupancy analysis, and quadrant-dependency analysis can be found at: https://github.com/ks277/2022_50S_landscape_paper [![DOI] (https://zenodo.org/badge/563964313.svg)] (https://zenodo.org/badge/latestdoi/563964313).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-40859-w.
References
- 1.Chen SS, Sperling E, Silverman JM, Davis JH, Williamson JR. Measuring the dynamics of E. coli ribosome biogenesis using pulse-labeling and quantitative mass spectrometry. Mol. Biosyst. 2012;8:3325–3334. doi: 10.1039/c2mb25310k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lindahl L, Jaskunas SR, Dennis PP, Nomura M. Cluster of genes in Escherichia coli for ribosomal proteins, ribosomal RNA, and RNA polymerase subunits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1975;72:2743–2747. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.7.2743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Britton RA. Role of GTPases in bacterial ribosome assembly. Annu Rev. Microbiol. 2009;63:155–176. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Karbstein K. Role of GTPases in ribosome assembly. Biopolymers. 2007;87:1–11. doi: 10.1002/bip.20762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shajani Z, Sykes MT, Williamson JR. Assembly of bacterial ribosomes. Annu Rev. Biochem. 2011;80:501–526. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062608-160432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wilson DN, Nierhaus KH. The weird and wonderful world of bacterial ribosome regulation. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007;42:187–219. doi: 10.1080/10409230701360843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Herold M, Nierhaus KH. Incorporation of six additional proteins to complete the assembly map of the 50 S subunit from Escherichia coli ribosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 1987;262:8826–8833. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)47489-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rohl R, Nierhaus KH. Assembly map of the large subunit (50S) of Escherichia coli ribosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1982;79:729–733. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.3.729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Roth HE, Nierhaus KH. Assembly map of the 50-S subunit from Escherichia coli ribosomes, covering the proteins present in the first reconstitution intermediate particle. Eur. J. Biochem. 1980;103:95–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1980.tb04292.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Noller HF, et al. Secondary structure model for 23S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981;9:6167–6189. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.22.6167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Davis JH, et al. Modular assembly of the bacterial large ribosomal subunit. Cell. 2016;167:1610–1622.e1615. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rabuck-Gibbons JN, Lyumkis D, Williamson JR. Quantitative mining of compositional heterogeneity in cryo-EM datasets of ribosome assembly intermediates. Structure. 2022;30:498–509.e494. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2021.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Petrov AS, et al. Secondary structure and domain architecture of the 23S and 5S rRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:7522–7535. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nikolay R, et al. Snapshots of native pre-50S ribosomes reveal a biogenesis factor network and evolutionary specialization. Mol. Cell. 2021;81:1200–1215.e1209. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rabuck-Gibbons JN, et al. SrmB rescues trapped ribosome assembly intermediates. J. Mol. Biol. 2020;432:978–990. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Seffouh A, et al. Structural consequences of the interaction of RbgA with a 50S ribosomal subunit assembly intermediate. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:10414–10425. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Charollais J, Dreyfus M, Iost I. CsdA, a cold-shock RNA helicase from Escherichia coli, is involved in the biogenesis of 50S ribosomal subunit. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:2751–2759. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vakulskas CA, et al. Global effects of the DEAD-box RNA helicase DeaD (CsdA) on gene expression over a broad range of temperatures. Mol. Microbiol. 2014;92:945–958. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ojha S, Jain C. Dual-level autoregulation of the E. coli DeaD RNA helicase via mRNA stability and Rho-dependent transcription termination. RNA. 2020;26:1160–1169. doi: 10.1261/rna.074112.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Punjani A, Rubinstein JL, Fleet DJ, Brubaker M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:290–296. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pearson K. LIII On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 1901;2:559–572. doi: 10.1080/14786440109462720. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Melville, J. Umap: uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. Preprint at arXiv10.48550/arXiv.1802.03426 (2018).
- 23.Campello, R. J., Moulavi, D. & Sander, J. in Pacific-Asia conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 160–172 (Springer).
- 24.Campello RJ, Moulavi D, Zimek A, Sander J. Hierarchical density estimates for data clustering, visualization, and outlier detection. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data. 2015;10:1–51. doi: 10.1145/2733381. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sun, J., Kinman, L. F., Jahagirdar, D., Ortega, J. & Davis, J. H. KsgA facilitates ribosomal small subunit maturation by proofreading a key structural lesion. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.10.1038/s41594-023-01078-5 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.French SL, Miller OL., Jr. Transcription mapping of the Escherichia coli chromosome by electron microscopy. J. Bacteriol. 1989;171:4207–4216. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.8.4207-4216.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Su, T. et al. The force-sensing peptide VemP employs extreme compaction and secondary structure formation to induce ribosomal stalling. Elife10.7554/eLife.25642 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Zhang, J. et al. Mechanisms of ribosome stalling by SecM at multiple elongation steps. Elife10.7554/eLife.09684 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 29.Bokov K, Steinberg SV. A hierarchical model for evolution of 23S ribosomal RNA. Nature. 2009;457:977–980. doi: 10.1038/nature07749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sanghai ZA, et al. Modular assembly of the nucleolar pre-60S ribosomal subunit. Nature. 2018;556:126–129. doi: 10.1038/nature26156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kater L, et al. Visualizing the assembly pathway of nucleolar pre-60S ribosomes. Cell. 2017;171:1599–1610 e1514. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Qin B, et al. Cryo-EM captures early ribosome assembly in action. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:898. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36607-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.(!!! INVALID CITATION!!! 12-14).
- 34.Dong X, et al. Near-physiological in vitro assembly of 50S ribosomes involves parallel pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:2862–2876. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Baba T, et al. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2006;2:2006.0008. doi: 10.1038/msb4100050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Carragher B, et al. Leginon: an automated system for acquisition of images from vitreous ice specimens. J. Struct. Biol. 2000;132:33–45. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.2000.4314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tan YZ, et al. Addressing preferred specimen orientation in single-particle cryo-EM through tilting. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:793–796. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lander GC, et al. Appion: an integrated, database-driven pipeline to facilitate EM image processing. J. Struct. Biol. 2009;166:95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zheng SQ, et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:331–332. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rohou A, Grigorieff N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 2015;192:216–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pedregosa F, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011;12:2825–2830. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pettersen EF, et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 2021;30:70–82. doi: 10.1002/pro.3943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hagberg, A. & Conway, D. NetworkX: Network Analysis with Python. URL: https://networkx.github.io (2020).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Processed quantitative mass spectrometry data for RNA and protein are included in Supplementary Data 2. All 64 electron density maps for pre-50S intermediates were deposited on EMDB, dead-B-a1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40517], dead-B-a2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40519], dead-B-a3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40520], dead-B-a4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40524], dead-B-a5[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40526], dead-B-a6[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40528], dead-B-b1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40530], dead-C-a1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40532], dead-C-a2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40534], dead-C-a3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40536], dead-C-a4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40538], dead-C-a5[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40540], dead-C-b1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40542], dead-C-b2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40544], dead-E-a1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40546], dead-G1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40548], dead-G2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40550], dead-G3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40552], dead-G4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40555], dead-preB1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40551], dead-preB2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40549], rl17-B-b1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40309], rl17-B-b2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40311], rl17-B-b3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40313], rl17-B-b4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40511], rl17-C-b1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40314], rl17-C-b2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40315], rl17-C-b3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40317], rl17-C-b4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40319], rl17-C-b5[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40321], rl17-C-b6[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40323], rl17-D-a1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40327], rl17-D-a2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40329], rl17-D-a3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40331], rl17-D-b1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40333], rl17-D-b2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40512], rl17-D-b3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40514], rl17-D-b4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40516], rl17-E-a1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40518], rl17-E-a2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40521], rl17-E-a3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40523], rl17-E-a4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40525], rl17-E-a5[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40527], rl17-E-b1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40529], rl17-E-b10[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40531], rl17-E-b2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40533], rl17-E-b3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40535], rl17-E-b4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40537], rl17-E-b5[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40539], rl17-E-b6[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40541], rl17-E-b7[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40543], rl17-E-b8[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40545], rl17-E-b9[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40547], srmb-B-a1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40316], srmb-B-a2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40318], srmb-C-a1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40320], srmb-C-a2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40322], srmb-C-a3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40324], srmb-C-a4[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40325], srmb-C-a5[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40328], srmb-E-a1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40330], srmb-E-a2[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40332], srmb-E-a3[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40513], srmb-G1[https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-40515]. Detailed information is included in the supplementary information (Supplementary Table 2).
The code for volume curation (alignment and resample), hierarchical analysis, PCA-UMAP-HDBSCAN, occupancy analysis, and quadrant-dependency analysis can be found at: https://github.com/ks277/2022_50S_landscape_paper [![DOI] (https://zenodo.org/badge/563964313.svg)] (https://zenodo.org/badge/latestdoi/563964313).