Skip to main content
Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin logoLink to Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin
. 2022 Sep 18;13(3):446–460. doi: 10.34172/apb.2023.056

An Overview of Nanostructured Lipid Carriers and its Application in Drug Delivery through Different Routes

Shadab Khan 1,*, Ajay Sharma 1, Vikas Jain 1,*
PMCID: PMC10460807  PMID: 37646052

Abstract

Nanostructured Lipid Carriers (NLC) are nano-sized colloidal drug delivery system that contains a lipid mixture consisting of both solid and liquid lipids in their core. This Lipid-Based Nanosystem is introduced as a biocompatible, non-toxic, and safe nano-drug delivery system as compared to polymeric or metallic nanoparticles. Due to its safety, stability, and high drug loading capacity compared to other lipid-based nanocarriers, NLC gained the attention of researchers to formulate safe and effective drug carriers. The ability to increase drug solubility and permeability while encapsulating the drug in a lipidic shell makes them an ideal carrier for drug delivery through difficult-to-achieve routes. Surface modification of NLC and the use of various additives result in drug targeting and increased residence time. With such qualities, NLCs can be used to treat a variety of diseases such as cancer, infections, neurodegenerative diseases, hypertension, diabetes, and pain management. This review focuses on the recent developments being made to deliver the drugs and genes through different routes via these nanocarriers. Here, we also discuss about historical background, structure, types of NLC and commonly employed techniques for manufacturing lipid-based nanocarriers.

Keywords: Drug delivery systems, Lipids, nanoparticles, Drug carriers, Permeability, Oral, Ophthalmic, Intransal

Introduction

An effective drug delivery system is required to deliver drugs safely and effectively. Various carrier systems are being explored but there is a constant search for biocompatible, biodegradable, and stable carrier system with the ability to target specific organs. Fabricating materials for the carrier system are responsible for such properties. Lipids offered biocompatibility and biodegradability which is difficult to achieve with different materials. When these lipid-based systems are used as nanosized carriers they provide such properties which are difficult to attain in their bulk counterparts. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) are evolved as a novel drug delivery carrier.

NLC has several advantages such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, non-immunogenicity, high drug loading capacity, better stability, controlled drug release, and easy preparation technique with scale-up ability. The advantages offered by these carriers make them ideal carrier for drug delivery. Potential cytotoxicity and chances of irritation due to surfactants are major drawbacks.1

Scioli Montoto et al2 reviewed many articles regarding solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and NLC by searching original publications in English in different databases. They found different therapeutic fields for which nanocarriers are prepared such as cancer, central nervous system (CNS) targeting (neurodegenerative diseases, psychosis, migraine, epilepsy, and depression), Antimicrobials, skin disorders, wounds, injuries, diabetes, antioxidants, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and antihypertensives. The majority of formulations were developed to be delivered through the parenteral route followed by the oral route, cutaneous and transdermal route, nasal route, ocular route, and pulmonary and rectal route. This review focused on the different routes employed for the delivery of drugs, the historical background for the development of NLC along with structure and types of NLC, and different commonly employed manufacturing techniques.

Need for nanostructured lipid carriers

More than 50 years ago AD Bangham discovered “swollen phospholipids” as a model of the cell membrane, which was later termed liposome.3 From there on the spontaneous rearrangement of lipids to form nano colloidal particles have been constantly explored and evolved. Liposomes are established as drug delivery carriers in coming years with excellent properties to deliver drugs safely with increasing bioavailability and reducing toxicity.4 In 1995 with the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of liposomal doxorubicin a new era of lipid-based nanomedicine has been begun. Liposomes provide a safe and effective biodegradable platform for drug delivery. Vesicle-based lipid nanosystem did not meet expectations as a versatile drug carrier due to physiological stability, complex nature of nanomedicine, and cost of such medicine leading to a search for new lipid systems.5 Nanoemulsion is among the low-cost alternatives to the vesicle-based system but it is not effective in providing enough stability and safety to drugs.6

Due to the shortcomings related to the earlier lipid-based nanosystem, a new class of lipid-based particulate systems emerged as an alternative by combining the advantage offered by liposome, nanoemulsion, and Polymer nanoparticles.1 In the early 1990s Müller et al independently developed SLNs with different methods, first-generation lipid nanoparticles as a cost-effective and versatile drug delivery system. These lipid-based nanosystems are mainly developed for cosmetics.7,8 SLN are solid lipid cores enclosed in lipidic and surfactant shells which can encapsulate the drug in a solid lipid matrix core. SLN has several advantages that make them suitable drug carriers for lipophilic drugs. They are physiologically more stable than other lipid-based nanosystems and contain biodegradable material for their fabrication, as well as a scalable fast, and effective manufacturing process.9 With a solid lipid core they can be stored for a long time in an aqueous condition which is impossible with liposomes.10 As solid lipid nanoparticle contains the organized solid lipid core, they have low drug loading capacity, which is a major drawback for efficient drug delivery. Initial burst release and stability issues on long-term storage are also a disadvantage of SLN such as the polymeric transition to crystalline form and drug leakage.11

In 1999 a new second-generation lipid nanoparticle emerged to overcome problems associated with the SLN. NLC is a nanocarrier that has advantages of previous lipidic nanoparticles along with a high drug loading capacity and increased stability than SLN.12 NLCs have made an entry into the cosmetic market in 2005 due to the properties they offered and now there are around 40 cosmetics products are there in the market. Due to the inherent qualities of NLC and their efficient encapsulation capacity this system has yet to hit the market as a drug delivery system.13 Figure 1 contains different types of lipids-based nanocarriers.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Evolution of lipid based nanocarriers

Structure of nanostructured lipid carriers

NLCs as the name suggest are nanosized multiparticulate system in the size range of 50 nm to 500 nm. The particle size distribution of NLC depends on nanoparticles’ manufacturing process and composition. Colloidal in nature this particle resembles the structure of SLN with the main variation being in the core of these nanoparticles.14 Unlike SLN which contains a solid lipid core in which lipid is arranged in a highly organized fashion, NLC contains lipid liquid along with a solid lipid core which forms an unorganized drug matrix. With this unorganized nature, more drugs can be loaded in the core in addition to stability issues encountered on long-term storage of SLN due to crystallization and drug expulsion is also rectified with NLC.11 NLC’s core is made up of solid lipid and liquid lipid in a 70:30 to 99.9:0.1 ratio, which distorts the NLC core. As the lipophilic molecule is more soluble in liquid lipid and the imperfection caused due to blends of lipid more space is available for drug incorporation in these nanocarriers.15 All materials used for the formulation of NLC should be considered generally regarded as safe (GRAS), as they should be non-toxic and biocompatible. Choice of lipid in NLC should also be made depending upon drug-lipid compatibility. Along with lipids which are used in a binary mix of solid and liquid lipids, one or a combination of surfactants are used within the range of 1.5% to 5% (w/v) to stabilize the nanosystem.16 Surfactant forms a coat around the NLC core. Choice of lipid and surfactant plays an important role in determining particle size and physicochemical properties of NLC. The type and number of surfactants is a crucial formulation parameter as using more than one surfactant results in less particle size and crystallinity than a single surfactant system. Two different surfactant results in a more stable system.17

Variation in lipid content and formulation parameters results in a change in core structure and arrangement of solid lipid and liquid lipid. Three possible variations are classified by Muller et al as three different types of NLC. In the first type (imperfect crystal type), lipid content is low which results in deformation in solid lipid crystalline structure. Different fatty acid triglycerides can be used to modify the imperfection and structure of nanoparticles. Due to the fact, that lipophilic drugs are more soluble in liquid lipid, an increase in lipid concentration results in high drug incorporation. In the second type (Multiple types or oil-in-fat-in-water O/F/W carrier), they contain a high quantity of oil which results in a nano oil-based compartment within the particle resulting in a tiny packet of drug solubilized in liquid lipid. High liquid lipid solubility results in low drug leakage as well as slow drug release from this type of nanoparticles. The third type (Amorphous or non-crystalline type) is formed by blending solid and liquid lipid in a certain way to avoid crystallization of the core. This approach results in low drug expulsion due to the crystallization of the solid core.1820 Figure 2 contains different categories of NLC.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Types of nanostructured lipid carriers

Methods of Preparation

There have been several methods reported for preparing NLCs. Various preparation methods are as follows:

  1. Hot high-pressure homogenization technique

  2. Cold high-pressure homogenization technique

  3. High speed/shear homogenization technique

  4. Microemulsion

  5. Solvent diffusion and evaporation technique

  6. Hot melt extrusion

  7. Solvent injection technique

Hot high-pressure homogenization

High-pressure homogenization is an energy-intensive and scalable technique to produce nano-sized colloidal systems (NLC, SLN, and nanoemulsions). It uses the top-down approach for the miniaturization of microemulsion particles to nano-size with the help of applied pressure.21 In this method, solid lipid was melted, then liquid lipid was added to form a heated lipid phase. Surfactants with or without cosurfactants are added to water to form an aqueous phase. Then the preheated lipid phase is mixed with the heated aqueous phase under constant stirring to create a microemulsion. This hot microemulsion is subjected to a high-pressure homogenizer for size reduction. Various homogenization cycles can be utilized based on the desired particle size. This nanoemulsion is cooled to be converted into NLC.22,23 Intermediate pressure (1000 bar) for long-time results in small particle size of NLC with less than 100 nm.24 This process is not preferred for drugs or materials which degrade at high temperatures. Figure 3 depicts systematic steps to formulate NLC.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Hot high-pressure homogenization

Cold high-pressure homogenization

Similar to hot high-pressure homogenization this process involves a mixture of lipid phase with a cold aqueous solution maintained at a temperature of approximately in the range of 2C to 6C with constant stirring. This coarse NLC suspension is homogenized with a high-pressure homogenizer at low temperatures. This process is suitable for drugs and materials which cannot be exposed to high temperatures.25

High-speed homogenization

This method of NLC preparation is identical to hot high-pressure homogenization. In this process, high pressure is replaced with a high shear rate. The lipid phase is prepared by mixing liquid lipid in melted solid lipid and the aqueous phase is prepared by mixing surfactant in water. This heated lipid and the aqueous phase are homogenized with a homogenizer at high rotation per minute (rpm) for a long time (10-30 minutes). The resulting solution is cooled at room temperature to form NLC.26,27 Speed of homogenization linearly affects the particle size of nanocarriers.28 Liquid nanoemulsion before cooling can also be sonicated for 5 minutes using an ultrasonic probe followed by cooling to further reduce the particle size of NLC.29 In some literature melt emulsification method was described in which the same technique was employed with low-speed homogenization and increased sonication time.30,31 Figure 4 shows a flowchart of steps required to formulate NLC through high-speed homogenization.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

High speed homogenization

Microemulsion

In the microemulsion technique, the liquid lipid is added to the molten solid lipid. The resultant solution is mixed with an aqueous phase to form a microemulsion. This microemulsion is rapidly cooled with cold water to form NLC dispersion system. The difference in microemulsion and water dictates the particle size of NLC. This is a simple technique to prepare NLC but requires a high amount of surfactant and cosurfactant.32

Solvent diffusion and evaporation technique

In this technique, the liquid lipid is added to molten solid lipid which is dissolved in either a single or combination of organic solvents at high temperature. This lipid solution is then added to an aqueous solution containing surfactant with stirring This prepared dispersion is ultrasonicated to produce oil in water nanoemulsion which is cooled down with low stirring until the organic solvent is evaporated.33 This technique is low energy-intensive and avoids physical stress due to high pressure or shear, but due to the use of organic solvent, an additional step is required to remove the residual toxic solvent.21 Figure 5 shows solvent diffusion or solvent evaporation technique for the preparation of NLC.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Solvent diffusion and evaporation technique

Hot melt extrusion technique

The hot melt extrusion technique involves raw material pumping into a barrel, followed by sonication to obtain NLC. In this technique drug and solid lipid, the mixture was introduced in an extruder barrel using the volumetric feeder. Liquid lipid and aqueous solutions were added through a peristaltic pump at extrusion temperature. This mixture was extruded at component melt temperature to form a pre-emulsion. The resultant hot pre-emulsion is further sonicated to reduce NLC particle size.34 Figure 6 shows the steps to prepare NLC by hot melt extrusion technique.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Hot melt extrusion technique

Solvent injection technique

In this technique, the lipid phase is dissolved in a water-miscible solvent or their mixture with aid of heat to melt solid lipid. The resultant organic phase is rapidly injected into an aqueous phase containing surfactant or buffer solution with constant stirring. The solvent is diffused due to lipid precipitation and lipid nanocarrier formation. Particle size depends on solvent diffusion and emulsifier content.21 Figure 7 shows steps to prepare NLC by hot melt extrusion technique.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Solvent injection technique

Advantages of NLC

Drug delivery using NLC

NLC have the inherent ability to deliver drugs safely and effectively through different routes. NLC can be employed to treat various ailments that require either localized drug delivery or targeted drug delivery. Along with the application of NLC for the delivery of drugs through different routes, these nanocarriers are also explored for the delivery of genetic material for gene therapy. Following are the examples of different routes employed for drug delivery using NLC.

Delivery through oral route

The oral route is the most preferred route for drug delivery due to the convenience it provides. Drug delivery through the oral route is primarily considered by every formulator due to better patient compliance, easy administration without pain as in the parenteral route, and without assistance with low cost. But several hurdles make drug delivery through the route of choice difficult. Low solubility and permeability are the major challenges along with low stability in the harsh gastric environment leading to the delivery of drugs through a different route or use of carrier system. NLC provides one solution to deliver drugs efficiently through the oral route.35 There are several physiological challenges in the delivery of drug molecules through the oral route. pH gradient across the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) fluid is one of the major hurdles for drug stability as the drug molecule has to pass from the acidic environment in the stomach (pH 1.5-3.5) to the basic condition in the intestine (pH 5-8). Gastric and intestinal enzymes and secretions such as pepsin, bile, trypsin, etc. lead to further degradation of the drug in GIT. Along with this, sticky mucus covering the entire GIT makes the situation worse for the drug to penetrate this physiological barrier. Epithelial barrier, p-glycoprotein efflux pump in the gut wall, and first-pass metabolism make the oral delivery of most of the drug challenging task.36,37

Lipid-based nanocarriers when delivered orally can be absorbed through various mechanisms such as transcellular transport, M cell-mediated transport, carrier-mediated transport, or by mucoadhesion. Unlike small and hydrophilic molecule which follows the paracellular pathway along the tight junction of enterocytes in the intestine, lipophilic drug and nanocarriers are transported through transcellular pathways. Transcellular absorption of the drug as well as nanocarriers is carried by endocytosis which can be occurred via phagocytosis through M cells. These M cells are the third most abundant cell type in the intestine and they are present in gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) or Payer’s Patch. M cells do not contain a thick layer of mucus and are present to detect antigen and deliver molecules through the lymphatic system. Endocytosis is generally favored for naturally occurring molecules and the product made with the natural molecule, Thus NLC which contains lipid is favored for delivery of drugs through endocytosis.36,38 Gastric lipase and pancreatic lipase result in the breakdown of dietary triglyceride as well as triglyceride present in the lipid-based formulation, into di- and monoglycerides and fatty acids. The presence of exogenous lipid in the small intestine stimulates the secretion of bile salt, phospholipid, and cholesterol which arrange or make micelle or vesicular complex with exogenous lipid and facilitate absorption of these complexes.39 Attempts are being made to formulate NLC with bile salt such as sodium glycocholate, which increases many-fold increase in bioavailability.40 Formulation of NLC which forms a complex with bile salt and is uptake by the lymphatic system result in bypassing first-pass metabolism, which is a major hurdle for oral delivery of drugs with extensive hepatic metabolism.

Another mechanism by which drug absorption will be increased is mucoadhesion. Mucoadhesion due to adherence of nanocarriers results in higher residence time of the drug in the GIT tract and an increase in time for the drug to be solubilized and absorbed through GI lining. Nanocarrier has a general tendency of adherence to the mucus layer on epithelial surface but a coating of the mucoadhesive layer further increases the mucoadhesion of NLC.41 Chitosan a natural mucoadhesive polysaccharide is frequently used to coat NLC particles, this coating results in double bioavailability than non-coated NLC.42 Various other materials are used to increase bioavailability and to sustain the release of the drug.

As nearly half of the drugs being developed in recent years have low water solubility and the majority of nanomedicine that are being marketed or in the development phase are being delivered through the parenteral route. The parenteral route is not suitable for chronic conditions in which self-administration is preferred and conditions in which nontargeting is required such as hypertension, diabetes, infections, and chronic pain management. The oral route is also preferred in conditions that need local delivery of drugs in gastric conditions and drugs which are needed to be targeted to the liver.43 Table 1 contains different NLC formulations which are administered through oral route

Table 1. Drug delivery through oral route by NLC .

Drug Purpose Solid lipid Liquid lipid Surfactants Formulation method Outcome Ref.
Nisoldipine Increase oral bioavailability of the hypertensive agent Trimyristin Oleic acid Egg lecithin E 80 and poloxamer 188 Hot homogenization technique followed by ultrasonication Drug loaded in NLC showed a prolonged drug release rate. Oral bioavailability increased by 2.46 and 1.09-fold in respect to suspension and SLN in rats. 44
Sulforaphane Increase oral efficacy of anticancer agent Precirol ATO 5 Vitamin E Poloxamer 188 and tween 80 Melt emulsification method followed by ultrasonication Optimized NLC show higher ex vivo drug permeability, improved cytotoxicity. Drug release is increased by more than 2-fold. 5-fold increase in relative bioavailability in comparison to suspension during in vivo studies in albino Wistar rats. 45
Insulin Evaluate the impact of surfactant on peptide protection in gastric environment Stearic acid Peceol and oleic acid Kolliphor RH 40, Brij L23, tegosoft PC41, and tegosolve 90 MB Solvent diffusion method PEG ether (Brij l23) shows the highest and PEG ester (tegosoft PC41 and tegosolve 90 MB) shows the lowest protection from GI proteases. 46
Rifabutin Oral delivery of antimycobacterial drug in Crohn’s disease Precirol ATO 5 Oleic acid Tween 80 and epikuron 145 Hot high shear homogenization technique In vitro, cellular studies show efficient macrophage uptake, increased permeation, and selective release in macrophages. NLC helped in achieving therapeutic concentration at a fast rate. 26
Quetiapine Fumarate Increase bioavailability of antipsychotic a and reduce hepatic metabolism by lymphatic drug targeting Precirol ATO 5 Oleic acid Poloxamer 188 and phospholipon 90 G Hot emulsification and ultrasonication technique Pharmacokinetic study on rats shows an approximately 4-fold increase in AUC in rats than suspension. The experiment also shows lymphatic uptake of quetiapine fumarate in rats. 47
Lopinavir Deliver antiretroviral drug orally Compritol 888 ATO Oleic acid Poloxamer 188 and Tween 80 Hot high shear homogenization technique Optimized NLC formulation shows higher cellular uptake in caco-2 cell line and 7-fold increase bioavailability in rats than drug suspension. 27
Cedrol Increase bioavailability of antileishmanial drug Compritol 888 ATO Triolein Pluronic F68 and soya lecithin Hot melt emulsification ultrasonication method In vivo studies show 2-fold increase in selectivity index (CC50/IC50) in both wild and drug-resistant leishmania and 2 to 3 fold and 3 to 5 fold increase of bioavailability in wild and drug-resistant leishmania respectively. 48
Adefovir dipivoxil Oral delivery of antiviral drug for hepatitis B Precirol ATO 5 Capmul MCM Cremophor RH40 and pluronic F68 Solvent emulsification diffusion technique In vivo, studies in Swiss albino mice demonstrate high uptake of the drug by liver cells, which will make NLC an appropriate liver targeting carrier. 49
Amphotericin B Preparation of enteric-coated NLC for stability of antiviral drug in gastric pH Glyceryl monostearate Castor oil and
labrasol
Tween 80, cremophor RH40 and PEG400 Hot high-pressure homogenization Eudragit L100-55 coated nanoparticle shows a more than 4-fold increase in solubility than the free drug. Uncoated particle shows high drug solubility but is susceptible to acid degradation. 22
Fluconazole Local delivery of antifungal drug for oral Candiasis by mucoadhesion Stearic acid Oleic acid Pluronic F127 and lecithin Emulsification and sonication technique Optimized NLC were coated with chitosan results in sustained release of drug with prolonged antifungal effect due to mucoadhesion of NLC particles. 50
Berberine Selenium coated NLC of antidiabetic phytomedicine for type 2 diabetes Precirol ATO 5 Oleic acid Tween 80 Hot melt dispersion and homogenization technique Coating resulted in a 6.63-fold enhancement of oral bioavailability in rats than a solution with sustained release of the drug. 51

Delivery through transdermal route

Skin is a choice for drug delivery in many localized skin diseases and infections as well as delivery of drugs in a sustained and controlled fashion for the management of pain or wound healing. Skin being an easily accessible organ with a large surface area makes drug delivery through this route achievable without pain and undesired systemic side effects. Drug delivery through this route is mainly divided into dermal for localized effect and transdermal for deep skin penetration.52 Skin is a metabolically active organ with the main function of protecting the body from external dangers. Skin act as a barrier for external microorganisms, chemicals, or other molecules which try to enter the body and may create harm. This barrier function of the skin makes it difficult for therapeutically active molecules to directly enter the body.

Anatomically skin is divided into the Epidermis, which contains an outer layer termed as stratum corneum with keratinized cells. And inner layer of the dermis and subcutaneous fat tissue. The outermost layer which is stratum corneum is the main barrier that is less permeable to avoid water and electrolyte loss. Brick and mortar-based multilayered arrangement of flattened corneocytes with extracellular lipid make penetration of large molecules impossible ( > 500 Da).53 Along with a less penetrable outer layer, other defensive features such as low skin pH, the presence of metabolizing enzymes make the situation difficult for many drugs.54

Percutaneous absorption of a drug or other molecules is possible through pathways: First, the Transepidermal pathway includes diffusion of lipophilic solute through intercellular lipid domains or intracellular permeation of solute through imperfections in corneocytes. Second, the transappendageal pathway includes penetration of solute through the shunt pathway created by the hair follicles and sweat glands.55 As the transepidermal pathway favors drugs through the intercellular lipid domain present in the skin, lipophilic drug or carrier systems that have lipoidal properties are extensively explored. Conventional liposomes fail to permeate the skin barrier, deformable liposomes or flexible liposomes are being explored.54 SLNs are initially explored for cosmetic and pharmaceutical dermal applications. Second generation NLC with higher drug loading capacity and stability proved a carrier system for cosmetic preparation and many finished cosmetic preparations are marketed all over the world. Drug delivery by NLC through the skin has yet to reach its full potential.56

NLCs-based topical formulations result in deeper skin penetration and sustained drug release with less systemic side effects and skin irritation.57–60 Various skin permeation enhancers can also be used to increase penetration of NLC in the skin.61 NLC also helps in decreasing wound healing time by delivering drugs at a sustained rate.58,62 NLC enhances the drug delivery through increased skin permeation due to its smaller size. NLC due to the occlusive nature of small size particle increase hydration in the skin layer and elasticity which result in better drug permeation because of less water evaporation from the skin surface. NLC also provides stability and protection to a drug molecule. Deeper penetration of NLC into the skin layer results in slow drug release which gave a prolonged effect with less frequent application.8 Table 2 contains various examples of NLC which are delivered through the transdermal route.

Table 2. Drug delivery through transdermal route by NLC .

Drug Purpose Solid lipid Liquid lipid Surfactant Formulation method Outcome Ref.
Tacrolimus Immuno-suppressive agent transdermal delivery for atopic dermatitis Glyceryl palmitostearate Propylene glycol monocaprylate Lecithin and Polysorbate 80 Hot high-pressure homogenization technique NLC shows deeper penetration than nanoemulsion, with double the amount of drug in porcine ear hair follicle than nanoemulsion and approximately 4-fold increase from marketed preparation. 57
Recombinant human thrombomodulin Angiogenesis factor loaded NLC for diabetic wound healing Precirol ATO 5 Miglyol 812 Poloxamer 188 Hot homogenization technique Sustained drug release is seen in comparison to solution. Better chronic wound healing and reduce systemic concentration results in less carcinogenic effect due to human growth factor. 58
Celastrol and Indomethacin Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and reduced systemic side effects Precirol ATO 5 Labrasol ALF Cremophor RH 40 Hot homogenization technique NLC showed sustained drug release due to deep penetration by trans follicular pathway and small size. Cytokine’s expression and inflammatory response is also reduced in NLC based gel 59
Capsaicin Local delivery for chronic pain management Glyceryl monostearate Cetyl alcohol Isopropyl myristate High shear homogenization followed by high pressure homogenization Chilli extract loaded NLC gel shows more sustained drug release with less irritation suitable for chronic pain management 60
Pranoprofen Topical delivery of NSAID for analgesic effect Precirol ATO 5 Labrasol and Castor oil Tween 80 Hot high-pressure homogenization technique Various permeation enhancers are evaluated for skin penetration and retention. NLC with linoleic acid show better retention and sustain drug release than simple NLC 61
Cinnamon oil For treatment of multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa burn wound infection Precirol ATO 5 Labrafac lipophile WL 1349 Tween 80 High speed homogenization technique followed by sonication Cinnamon oil loaded NLC show promising result in accelerated wound healing with antimicrobial property in rats in comparison to untreated mouse 62
Lidocaine and prilocaine Topical anaesthesia and analgesia Compritol 888 ATO, Precirol ATO 5 and glyceryl monostearate -- Soya lecithin and
Dimethyl dioctadecyl ammonium bromide
Solvent diffusion method A dual drug is more effective than a single drug. Due to smaller particle size SLN show, high skin ex vivo penetration but NLC shows a better in vivo analgesic effect due to rapid drug release than SLN. 63
5-Fluorouracil For the treatment of skin cancers and actinic keratosis Precirol ATO 5 Labrasol Poloxamer 188 and Solutol HS15 Hot homogenization technique NLC loaded gel show high skin retention than non-NLC loaded gel. NLC shows initial burst release followed by sustained drug release. 64
Methotrexate Treatment of psoriasis using NLC loaded gel Compritol 888 Capmul MCM -- High Speed homogenization technique NLC gel shows the approximately 2-fold drug deposition in human cadaver skin than plain drug gel. Psoriatic area and inflammatory cytokines are reduced more rapidly than plain gel in imiquimod-induced psoriasis in mice. 65
Transcriptional transactivator peptide modified lidocaine Transdermal delivery of drug for local anaesthesia Soybean phospholipids Labrafac PG Cremophor ELP and tween 80 Solvent Evaporation Technique Transdermal flux was higher than the plain drug and NLC. In vivo studies show anaesthesia enhanced transdermal delivery of drug by reducing the pain threshold in mice. 66

Delivery through nasal route

Conventionally, nasal route is used to deliver drugs for the treatment of local conditions such as nasal congestion, rhinitis, sinusitis, and allergic condition. High drug permeability, high blood flow, comparability low enzymes, and ability to bypass first-pass metabolism result in a faster and higher drug delivery rate through this route. Due to easily accessible sites with the ability to deliver the drug directly to the brain bypassing the blood-brain barrier result in increased attention towards these routes of drug delivery for the nose to brain drug targetting.67 Anatomically nasal cavity is divided into two chambers by the nasal septum. Among different regions of the nasal cavity respiratory and olfactory region is important for drug delivery. The respiratory region is rich in blood supply and drug delivery to the systemic circulation is indirectly achieved via the lungs.68 Olfactory region contains olfactory receptor neurons, supporting cells, and basal cells. Drug delivery to the brain can be possible through nerves or through supporting cells via a transcellular pathway. There is another trigeminal pathway through which drugs can reach the brain quickly.69

Certain limitations hinder the drug delivery through this route. Enzymatic degradation of a certain drug in the nasal cavity along with solubility and permeability are common problems associated with different routes also. One of the major hurdles is low contact or residence time of the drug due to rapid inward and outward drug flow and mucociliary clearance of the drug in regular intervals. Along with this, the sensitive nature of nasal mucosa creates local irritation if the drug is not isotonic and has different pH.70

NLC are nanosized biocompatible carriers that can deeply penetrate nasal mucosa and show sustained drug release. With the ability to deliver the drug in the nasal mucosa, these carriers are frequently investigated to deliver the drug into the brain. As NLC have several advantages over conventional liposome and SLNs make them suitable carriers. Along with the inherent advantages, good stability and ability to be incorporated into various gelling and bioadhesives make them more effective in nasal drug delivery.69,71 Management of various CNS-related conditions non-invasively such as glioblastoma, migraine, epilepsy, meningitis, etc along with quick delivery of the drug into the systemic circulation is possible through NLC.31,7174 Table 3 shows nasal application of drug delivery by NLC.

Table 3. Drug Delivery through Nasal route by NLC .

Drug Purpose Solid lipid Liquid lipid Surfactant Formulation method Outcome Ref.
Almotriptan malate Nasal delivery of antimigraine drug Compritol Labrafil Tween 80 and lauroglycol Hot homogenization and ultrasonication technique In sheep nasal mucosa, chitosan-coated NLC showed enhanced mucoadhesion and high drug permeability, in vivo study shows high Cmax than the solution and oral marketed formulation in albino rabbits 72
Lorazepam Nasal delivery of drug for status epilepticus Glyceryl monostearate Oleic acid Tween 80 and pluronic F127 Solvent diffusion and evaporation method Chitosan-based NLC show a sustained in vitro drug release rate as well as better in vivo result in convulsion model rats. 73
Mosapride citrate Nasal delivery of prokinetic agent for GERD Stearic acid isopropyl myristate L-alpha lecithin and Lutrol F127 Melt–emulsification low temperature–solidification technique Drug loaded NLC show 3-fold increase in drug permeation in sheep nasal mucosa and increased gastric emptying rate and bioavailability in comparison to a drug suspension and marketed oral preparation. 74
Oleuropein Phytochemical loaded NLC for treatment of meningitis Tefose Capmul Poloxamer 188, polysorbate 80, and soy lecithin Melt emulsification and ultrasonication method High permeation of drugs is seen in the nasal mucosa. Initial burst release followed by sustained release is shown in in vitro studies. 31
Carbamazepine For fast action of anti-epileptic drug through nose-to-brain targeting Precirol ATO 5 Capmul MCM Tween 80 and span 20 Microemulsion technique followed by probe sonication Thermosensitive in situ gel using poloxamer 407 (P407), poloxamer 188 (P188), and the mucoadhesive polymer were used. NLC-based gel exhibits greater drug diffusion in sheep nasal mucosa and anticonvulsant activity in MES model rats than non-NLC-based gel and drug dispersion. 75
Flibanserin Nose-to-brain delivery of seratonergic agent Glyceryl behenate Sweet almond oil L-phosphatidyl choline and gelucire 44/14 High speed homogenization followed by sonication Optimized formulation shows better drug release. In vivo assessment shows high plasma and brain drug concentration than raw drug. 76
Escitalopram and Paroxetine Nose to brain drug delivery for treatment of depression Precirol ATO 5 Lauroglycol 90 Tween 80 High Pressure Homogenization Technique In vivo assays of NLC shows similar systemic drug with respect to i.v. drug administration. Borneal encapsulation result in five-time greater brain drug concentration with less systemic exposure. 77

Delivery through parenteral route

The Parenteral Route is the most effective method of delivering drugs directly into the systemic circulation. It is the preferred route for the drug with a narrow therapeutic index and poor bioavailability. For emergency treatment of unconscious patients, the parenteral route is the only choice. One of the most discouraging characteristics of the parenteral route is injection of drug cause pain and discomfort with the need for assistance.78 NLC has several advantages that make it a suitable carrier system for drug delivery. NLC can encapsulate water-insoluble lipophilic drugs to deliver them to the desired size. NLC showed a sustained drug release profile which reduces the injection frequency.79,80 With surface modification, it is possible to target several organs and tumor cells. Which helps develop a safe and effective formulation of drugs with high toxicity and low therapeutic index. Employment of NLC is suitable for treating various carcinomas, infections, and diseases that involve targeting drugs to the brain such as neurodegenerative diseases.8084 Table 4 shows examples of NLC system which are delivered specifically by the parenteral route.

Table 4. Drug delivery through parenteral route by NLC .

Drug Purpose Solid lipid Liquid lipid Surfactant Formulation method Outcome Ref.
Miltefosine Prolong drug release of anticancer drug Stearic acid Oleic acid Tween 80 Microemulsion technique In vitro and in vivo studies in tumor bearing mice show sustained drug release with increased blood circulation and reduction in clearance rate as well as increased hemolytic properties with respect to free drug in mouse. 79
Carvacrol Anti-leishmanial NLC for increasing systemic residence time with less toxicity Stearic acid Beeswax Poloxamer 188 Microemulsion technique In vitro results show initial burst release followed by sustained drug release unlike free drug which show quick release. In vivo results show increased half-life and low clearance of drug loaded in NLC with less cytotoxicity. 80
Doxorubicin Delivery of pH sensitive anticancer drug coupled with tocopherol succinate through amide and hydrazone conjugate Compritol Docosahexaenoic acid Tween 80 Emulsion ultrasonication technique pH sensitive hydrazone bond shows controlled release from NLC. In vivo studies show better pharmacokinetic profile and reduced tumor growth with decrease in drug induced toxicity in mice. 84
Resveratrol RBC membrane coated NLC containing rabies virus glycoprotein and triphenylphosphine cation molecule for antioxidant delivery to neuronal mitochondria for Alzheimer's disease Cetyl palmitate Oleic acid and cholesterol Tween 80 Modified emulsification ultrasonication method RBC encapsulation result in higher biocompatibility and sustained drug release. in vivo studies in mice shows dual modified NLC can cross BBB and deliver antioxidant to specifically to neuronal mitochondria. 81
Sesamol Delivery of antioxidant and neuroprotective agents to patients suffering from ischemic stroke Cetyl palmitate Oleic acid Polaxomer 188 and Tween 80 High pressure homogenization Sesamol loaded intravenous injection of NLC show reduced cytotoxicity, cellular damage and oxidative stress in rats, while free Sesamol failed. 82

Delivery through ophthalmic route

The eye is one of the most sensitive and challenging organs for drug delivery. Drugs with low bioavailability or potential systemic toxicity which are needed for chronic ocular diseases like diabetic retinopathy, ocular infections, or other conditions which need long-term therapy are preferred for ocular drug delivery. Conventional ocular therapy needs frequent dosing which leads to patient discomfort.85 Systemic administration of drugs for ophthalmic use is not preferred due to the blood ocular barrier. As the eye is exposed to the outer environment and is a sensitive organ several barriers make ocular delivery of drugs the most challenging task for formulators.86

Anatomically eye is divided into two segments: The first anterior segment covering one-third part of the eye consists of cornea and lens assembly and the Second posterior segment covering a two-third portion of the eye consist of the retina and vitreous humor. There is a precorneal barrier, static barrier, and dynamic barrier due to the cornea, sclera, and retina making a blood-aqueous barrier and blood-retinal barrier.87 Along with that surface removal of the drug due to lachrymal fluid secretion in the eye as well as blinking makes drug delivery difficult. Epithelial barrier on the outer corneal layer limits entry of hydrophilic drugs and macromolecules.88

NLC is a promising carrier for ocular administration because of its biocompatible nature. Penetration in the eye is favored due to the small size, non-toxic, non-immunogenic, and lipidic nature of NLCs.89 NLC formulation for ocular delivery contains a non-ionic surfactant. This formulation protects the drug from chemical degradation. Mucoadhesion along with small particle size act as a drug depot in the eye resulting in improved trans corneal diffusion and cellular uptake. Depot formation of NLC show sustained release of drug with less frequent administration.90 Table 5 shows the employment of NLC based system for the delivery of drugs through the ophthalmic route.

Table 5. Drug delivery through ophthalmic route by NLC .

Drug Purpose Solid lipid Liquid lipid Surfactant Formulation method Outcome Ref.
Nepafenac Treatment of inflammation following cataract surgery Glycerine monostearate Miglyol 812N Cremophor EL and soy lecithin High speed homogenization followed by ultra-probe sonication NLC loaded shows high gelation temperature than normal hydrogel. Sustained in vitro drug release is obtained by NLC loaded gel with no cytotoxicity in human corneal epithelial cells and high cellular penetration. 83
Ciprofloxacin Antibacterial agent loaded NLC for treatment of Bacterial Endophthalmitis Precirol ATO 5 Oleic acid Tween 80 and poloxamer 188 High speed homogenization technique Gellan gum is used as a gelling agent in drug-loaded NLC in situ gel. Transcorneal permeability and flux is improved in vitro studies. NLC show higher residence time which results in sustained drug release. 91
Baicalin pH and temperature sensitivity ophthalmic gel Compritol 888 ATO Miglyol 812N Cremophor EL and soy lecithin Melt emulsification and ultra-sonication technique The combination of carboxymethyl chitosan and poloxamer 407 (F127) crosslinked by genipin is used for dual pH and thermosensitive applications. semi Interpenetrating polymer networks hydrogel show high corneal permeation due to precorneal retention of baicalin than normal eye drops. 30
Dexamethasone Treatment of dry eye disease Cholesterol Labrafac lipophile WL1349 Tween 80 Solvent diffusion technique NLC shows cellular internalization in human corneal epithelial cells and corneal distribution in the porcine cornea. In ex vivo study ELISA show 5-fold reduction in TNF α production with reference to dexamethasone solution. 92
Palmitoylethanolamide Treatment of diabetic retinopathy Compritol 888 ATO Miglyol 812 Lutrol F68 High shear homogenization Drug-loaded NLC shows the high retinal distribution in rat eye following a single instillation. Topical administration of NLC inhibits retinal TNF α in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. 93

NLC as a gene delivery system

Development in the field of medicine, biotechnology, and genetic engineering results in a better understanding of complex diseases and their treatment, which is not possible with the conventional approach. Delivery of RNA and DNA is explored for the treatment and immunization of genetic or acquired diseases. Direct transfer of genetic material in the cell is a difficult task because of the susceptibility of degradation, hydrophilic nature, and negative charge of this large size molecule. This challenging task of delivering genetic material can be accompanied by the utilization of vectors for gene delivery into cells.94 Viral vectors are frequently used for gene transfection but due to the risk associated with a viral vector, a recently wide range of non-viral vectors are being explored.

Non-viral vectors show less immunogenicity, better flexibility, and low cytotoxicity. Target-specific gene delivery can be accomplished by non-viral surface and structural modification. Gold nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, polymeric nanoparticles, liposomes, dendrimers, and SLNs are widely investigated for gene delivery. Lipid-based nanoparticles proved to better alternative due to better biocompatibility.95 NLC being one of the lipid carriers with inherent advantages such as stability and better drug loading capacity than its counterpart draws the attention of researchers for gene delivery.

NLC can be incorporated into different formulations for the delivery of genetic material through different routes due to its relatively stable nature than other nano vectors.96 Apart from systemic delivery of gene inhalation and transdermal route is also explored for the site-specific delivery and reduced toxicity as in lung cancer.97,98 Mainly cationic lipid or positively charged nanocarriers are utilized but due to inherent cytotoxicity or nanotoxicity, thus further investigations are needed to make NLC an effective gene carrier.99 Neutral NLC tends to show lower toxicity than cationic NLC.100

A wide range of diseases like cancer and multi-drug resistant cancer, severe infections, AIDS, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease can be treated with the use of gene therapy.101 Gene therapy not only involves the delivery of DNA but also RNA for expression in a host cell, small interfering RNA (siRNA), messenger RNA (mRNA), and microRNA (miRNA) are the types of genes that are used in gene therapy. With the approval, of the COVID-19 vaccine based on lipid nanoparticles with enclosed mRNA, the gene delivery system is also being explored for the new future mRNA-based vaccine.102 Gene therapy and vaccination are different domains but due to the delivery of RNA in a host cell is involved we have summarized both in one section. Table 6 gives a brief account of the utilization of NLC for gene delivery.

Table 6. NLC as a gene delivery system .

Gene loaded Drug loaded Route of administration Purpose Outcome Ref.
EGFR-specific siRNA duplexes Paclitaxel Inhalation and i.v. Treatment of lung cancer with chemo and gene therapy Effective transfer of siRNA and drug is seen in cancer cells. In vivo studies show inhalation results in higher distribution in lungs while iv administration failed to reach lung with tumor. 97
Enhanced green fluorescence protein pDNA Temozolomide i.v. Gliomatosis cerebri combination therapy A 4-fold decrease in IC50 value was seen with higher gene transfection efficiency. In vivo results show 3-time higher tumor inhibition by co loaded NLC than plain drug. 103
Fluorescent AF488- 231 siRNA - Topical Localized delivery for wound healing Collagen scaffold loaded with gene encapsulated NLC show siRNA delivery at sustained rate and downregulation ERK-1 protein was seen 98
 Zika virus antigens encoding rvRNA - i.m. Single low dose vaccine for zika virus A stable two-vialed vaccine is prepared and optimized to provide immunogenicity in lowest dose. NLC loaded rvRNA provides protection against zika virus in mice. 104
TNF-α siRNA Tacrolimus Topical Treatment of Psoriasis Cellular transfection studies show presence of RNA in cytosol. 7-fold reduction of cytokine TNF-α expression in mice is shown in in vivo studies. 105
siRNAs (MMP3, CCL12, and HIF1A) Prostaglandin E Inhalation Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis In vivo studies show inhalation in animal model of mice results in reduced body mass which is indicator of reduction in pulmonary fibrosis. Lung delivery is achieved with low tissue damage and mortality is seen. 106
Plasmid-enhanced green fluorescent protein pDNA Paclitaxel i.v. Targeted lung cancer therapy Cationic surface modified NLC with transferrin was prepared. High gene transfection and enhanced antitumor activity with low cytotoxicity is confirmed in in vitro and in vivo studies. 107

Conclusion

NLCs are made possible by combining nanotechnology with lipids as a structural material. NLC are a versatile platform for drug delivery via various routes. These nanocarriers have drawn the interest of researchers from all over the world. Partially crystallized lipidic nanocarriers have high drug loading and stability than their predecessors such as liposomes, nanoemulsions, and SLNs. These nanocarriers are biodegradable, biocompatible, safe, and effective with high drug loading capacity. These nanocarriers can also be employed for active or passive drug targeting to different organs or tumor cells. NLC has proven its worth in the cosmetics industry, but its potential in the pharmaceutical industry has yet to be fully explored. NLC can be useful in diseases whose management is difficult, such as cancer, infections, neurodegenerative diseases, localized drug delivery as well as genetic diseases which conventional carrier systems cannot achieve. More research is required in this area to shift these interesting nanocarriers from lab to market. There is a need to evaluate the toxicity profile of such nanocarriers and solve the problems associated with nanomedicines such as complexity in formulation and characterization. Lack of sufficient clinical studies and data results in a slow development of these nanocarriers.

Competing Interests

None.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

References

  • 1.Jaiswal P, Gidwani B, Vyas A. Nanostructured lipid carriers and their current application in targeted drug delivery. Artif Cells NanomedBiotechnol. 2016;44(1):27–40. doi: 10.3109/21691401.2014.909822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Scioli Montoto S, Muraca G, Ruiz ME. Solid lipid nanoparticles for drug delivery: pharmacological and biopharmaceutical aspects. Front Mol Biosci. 2020;7:587997. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.587997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bangham AD, Standish MM, Watkins JC. Diffusion of univalent ions across the lamellae of swollen phospholipids. J Mol Biol. 1965;13(1):238–52. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(65)80093-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sercombe L, Veerati T, Moheimani F, Wu SY, Sood AK, Hua S. Advances and challenges of liposome assisted drug delivery. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:286. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Flühmann B, Ntai I, Borchard G, Simoens S, Mühlebach S. Nanomedicines: the magic bullets reaching their target? Eur J Pharm Sci. 2019;128:73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2018.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yukuyama MN, Kato ET, Lobenberg R, Bou-Chacra NA. Challenges and future prospects of nanoemulsion as a drug delivery system. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(3):495–508. doi: 10.2174/1381612822666161027111957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Müller RH, Shegokar R, Keck CM. 20 years of lipid nanoparticles (SLN and NLC): present state of development and industrial applications. Curr Drug Discov Technol. 2011;8(3):207–27. doi: 10.2174/157016311796799062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chauhan I, Yasir M, Verma M, Singh AP. Nanostructured lipid carriers: a groundbreaking approach for transdermal drug delivery. Adv Pharm Bull. 2020;10(2):150–65. doi: 10.34172/apb.2020.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Martins S, Sarmento B, Ferreira DC, Souto EB. Lipid-based colloidal carriers for peptide and protein delivery--liposomes versus lipid nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2007;2(4):595–607. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Thi TTH, Suys EJA, Lee JS, Nguyen DH, Park KD, Truong NP. Lipid-based nanoparticles in the clinic and clinical trials: from cancer nanomedicine to COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccines (Basel) 2021;9(4):359. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9040359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ghasemiyeh P, Mohammadi-Samani S. Solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers as novel drug delivery systems: applications, advantages and disadvantages. Res Pharm Sci. 2018;13(4):288–303. doi: 10.4103/1735-5362.235156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Müller RH, Alexiev U, Sinambela P, Keck CM. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC): the second generation of solid lipid nanoparticles. In: Dragicevic N, Maibach HI, eds. Percutaneous Penetration Enhancers Chemical Methods in Penetration Enhancement. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2016. p. 161-85. 10.1007/978-3-662-47862-2_11. [DOI]
  • 13.Olechowski F, Müller RH, Pyo SM. BergaCare SmartLipids: commercial lipophilic active concentrates for improved performance of dermal products. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2019;10:2152–62. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.10.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Puri A, Loomis K, Smith B, Lee JH, Yavlovich A, Heldman E, et al. Lipid-based nanoparticles as pharmaceutical drug carriers: from concepts to clinic. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2009;26(6):523–80. doi: 10.1615/critrevtherdrugcarriersyst.v26.i6.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Borges A, de Freitas V, Mateus N, Fernandes I, Oliveira J. Solid lipid nanoparticles as carriers of natural phenolic compounds. Antioxidants (Basel) 2020;9(10):998. doi: 10.3390/antiox9100998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Elmowafy M, Al-Sanea MM. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) as drug delivery platform: advances in formulation and delivery strategies. Saudi Pharm J. 2021;29(9):999–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2021.07.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Karn-Orachai K, Smith SM, Phunpee S, Treethong A, Puttipipatkhachorn S, Pratontep S, et al. The effect of surfactant composition on the chemical and structural properties of nanostructured lipid carriers. J Microencapsul. 2014;31(6):609–18. doi: 10.3109/02652048.2014.911374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Haider M, Abdin SM, Kamal L, Orive G. Nanostructured lipid carriers for delivery of chemotherapeutics: a review. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(3):288. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12030288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sharma A, Baldi A. Nanostructured lipid carriers: a review. J Dev Drugs. 2018;7(1):191. doi: 10.4172/2329-6631.1000191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nandvikar N, Lala R, Shinde A. Nanostructured lipid carrier: the advanced lipid carriers. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2019;10(12):5252–65. doi: 10.13040/ijpsr.0975-8232.10(12).5252-65. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Duong VA, Nguyen TT, Maeng HJ. Preparation of solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers for drug delivery and the effects of preparation parameters of solvent injection method. Molecules. 2020;25(20):4781. doi: 10.3390/molecules25204781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nimtrakul P, Sermsappasuk P, Tiyaboonchai W. Strategies to enhance oral delivery of amphotericin B: a comparison of uncoated and enteric-coated nanostructured lipid carriers. Drug Deliv. 2020;27(1):1054–62. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2020.1785050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Patil GB, Patil ND, Deshmukh PK, Patil PO, Bari SB. Nanostructured lipid carriers as a potential vehicle for carvedilol delivery: application of factorial design approach. Artif Cells NanomedBiotechnol. 2016;44(1):12–9. doi: 10.3109/21691401.2014.909820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mendes M, Basso J, Silva J, Cova T, Sousa J, Pais A, et al. Biomimeting ultra-small lipid nanoconstructs for glioblastoma treatment: a computationally guided experimental approach. Int J Pharm. 2020;587:119661. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Duong VA, Nguyen TT, Maeng HJ, Chi SC. Data on optimization and drug release kinetics of nanostructured lipid carriers containing ondansetron hydrochloride prepared by cold high-pressure homogenization method. Data Brief. 2019;26:104475. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rouco H, Diaz-Rodriguez P, Gaspar DP, Gonçalves LMD, Cuerva M, Remuñán-López C, et al. Rifabutin-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers as a tool in oral anti-mycobacterial treatment of Crohn’s disease. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2020;10(11):2138. doi: 10.3390/nano10112138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Khan AA, Mudassir J, Akhtar S, Murugaiyah V, Darwis Y. Freeze-dried lopinavir-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers for enhanced cellular uptake and bioavailability: statistical optimization, in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(2):97. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11020097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mulia K, Safiera A, Pane IF, Krisanti EA. Effect of high speed homogenizer speed on particle size of polylactic acid. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1198(6):062006. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1198/6/062006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ajiboye AL, Nandi U, Galli M, Trivedi V. Olanzapine loaded nanostructured lipid carriers via high shear homogenization and ultrasonication. Sci Pharm. 2021;89(2):25. doi: 10.3390/scipharm89020025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yu Y, Feng R, Li J, Wang Y, Song Y, Tan G, et al. A hybrid genipin-crosslinked dual-sensitive hydrogel/nanostructured lipid carrier ocular drug delivery platform. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2019;14(4):423–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2018.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Palagati S, Sv S, Kesavan BR. Application of computational tools for the designing of oleuropein loaded nanostructured lipid carrier for brain targeting through nasal route. Daru. 2019;27(2):695–708. doi: 10.1007/s40199-019-00304-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li Q, Cai T, Huang Y, Xia X, Cole SPC, Cai Y. A review of the structure, preparation, and application of NLCs, PNPs, and PLNs. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2017;7(6):122. doi: 10.3390/nano7060122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shamma RN, Aburahma MH. Follicular delivery of spironolactone via nanostructured lipid carriers for management of alopecia. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:5449–60. doi: 10.2147/ijn.s73010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shadambikar G, Marathe S, Ji N, Almutairi M, Bandari S, Zhang F, et al. Formulation development of itraconazole PEGylated nano-lipid carriers for pulmonary aspergillosis using hot-melt extrusion technology. Int J Pharm X. 2021;3:100074. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2021.100074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Khan S, Baboota S, Ali J, Khan S, Narang RS, Narang JK. Nanostructured lipid carriers: an emerging platform for improving oral bioavailability of lipophilic drugs. Int J Pharm Investig. 2015;5(4):182–91. doi: 10.4103/2230-973x.167661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Plaza-Oliver M, Santander-Ortega MJ, Lozano MV. Current approaches in lipid-based nanocarriers for oral drug delivery. Drug DelivTransl Res. 2021;11(2):471–97. doi: 10.1007/s13346-021-00908-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhu Q, Chen Z, Paul PK, Lu Y, Wu W, Qi J. Oral delivery of proteins and peptides: challenges, status quo and future perspectives. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11(8):2416–48. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Reinholz J, Landfester K, Mailänder V. The challenges of oral drug delivery via nanocarriers. Drug Deliv. 2018;25(1):1694–705. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2018.1501119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kalepu S, Manthina M, Padavala V. Oral lipid-based drug delivery systems–an overview. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2013;3(6):361–72. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2013.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yang G, Wu F, Chen M, Jin J, Wang R, Yuan Y. Formulation design, characterization, and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of nanostructured lipid carriers containing a bile salt for oral delivery of gypenosides. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:2267–80. doi: 10.2147/ijn.s194934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tan SLJ, Billa N. Improved bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs through gastrointestinal muco-adhesion of lipid nanoparticles. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(11):1817. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liang J, Liu Y, Liu J, Li Z, Fan Q, Jiang Z, et al. Chitosan-functionalized lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles for oral delivery of silymarin and enhanced lipid-lowering effect in NAFLD. J Nanobiotechnology. 2018;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12951-018-0391-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Giardiello M, Liptrott NJ, McDonald TO, Moss D, Siccardi M, Martin P, et al. Accelerated oral nanomedicine discovery from miniaturized screening to clinical production exemplified by paediatric HIV nanotherapies. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13184. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dudhipala N, Janga KY, Gorre T. Comparative study of nisoldipine-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers and solid lipid nanoparticles for oral delivery: preparation, characterization, permeation and pharmacokinetic evaluation. Artif Cells NanomedBiotechnol. 2018;46(sup2):616–25. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2018.1465068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Soni K, Rizwanullah M, Kohli K. Development and optimization of sulforaphane-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers by the Box-Behnken design for improved oral efficacy against cancer: in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo assessments. Artif Cells NanomedBiotechnol. 2018;46(sup1):15–31. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2017.1408124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shahzadi I, Fürst A, Knoll P, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) for oral peptide drug delivery: about the impact of surface decoration. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(8):1312. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13081312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Agarwal S, HariKumar SL, Negi P, Upadhyay N, Garg R. Quetiapine fumarate loaded nanostructured lipid carrier for enhancing oral bioavailability: design, development and pharmacokinetic assessment. Curr Drug Deliv. 2021;18(2):184–98. doi: 10.2174/1567201817999200728135119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kar N, Chakraborty S, De AK, Ghosh S, Bera T. Development and evaluation of a cedrol-loaded nanostructured lipid carrier system for in vitro and in vivo susceptibilities of wild and drug resistant Leishmania donovani amastigotes. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017;104:196–211. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.03.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Abd El-Halim SM, Abdelbary GA, Amin MM, Zakaria MY, Shamsel-Din HA, Ibrahim AB. Stabilized oral nanostructured lipid carriers of adefovir dipivoxil as a potential liver targeting: estimation of liver function panel and uptake following intravenous injection of radioiodinated indicator. Daru. 2020;28(2):517–32. doi: 10.1007/s40199-020-00355-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Elkomy MH, Elmowafy M, Shalaby K, Azmy AF, Ahmad N, Zafar A, et al. Development and machine-learning optimization of mucoadhesive nanostructured lipid carriers loaded with fluconazole for treatment of oral candidiasis. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2021;47(2):246–58. doi: 10.1080/03639045.2020.1871005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yin J, Hou Y, Yin Y, Song X. Selenium-coated nanostructured lipid carriers used for oral delivery of berberine to accomplish a synergic hypoglycemic effect. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:8671–80. doi: 10.2147/ijn.s144615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lasoń E. Topical administration of terpenes encapsulated in nanostructured lipid-based systems. Molecules. 2020;25(23):5758. doi: 10.3390/molecules25235758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mohd Nordin UU, Ahmad N, Salim N, Mohd Yusof NS. Lipid-based nanoparticles for psoriasis treatment: a review on conventional treatments, recent works, and future prospects. RSC Adv. 2021;11(46):29080–101. doi: 10.1039/d1ra06087b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hua S. Lipid-based nano-delivery systems for skin delivery of drugs and bioactives. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:219. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jain S, Patel N, Shah MK, Khatri P, Vora N. Recent advances in lipid-based vesicles and particulate carriers for topical and transdermal application. J Pharm Sci. 2017;106(2):423–45. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Müller RH, Petersen RD, Hommoss A, Pardeike J. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) in cosmetic dermal products. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007;59(6):522–30. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Savić V, Ilić T, Nikolić I, Marković B, Čalija B, Cekić N, et al. Tacrolimus-loaded lecithin-based nanostructured lipid carrier and nanoemulsion with propylene glycol monocaprylate as a liquid lipid: Formulation characterization and assessment of dermal delivery compared to referent ointment. Int J Pharm. 2019;569:118624. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hsueh YS, Shyong YJ, Yu HC, Jheng SJ, Lin SW, Wu HL, et al. Nanostructured lipid carrier gel formulation of recombinant human thrombomodulin improve diabetic wound healing by topical administration. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(9):1386. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13091386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kang Q, Liu J, Zhao Y, Liu X, Liu XY, Wang YJ, et al. Transdermal delivery system of nanostructured lipid carriers loaded with celastrol and indomethacin: optimization, characterization and efficacy evaluation for rheumatoid arthritis. Artif Cells NanomedBiotechnol. 2018;46(sup3):S585–S97. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2018.1503599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Anantaworasakul P, Anuchapreeda S, Yotsawimonwat S, Naksuriya O, Lekawanvijit S, Tovanabutra N, et al. Nanomaterial lipid-based carrier for non-invasive capsaicin delivery; manufacturing scale-up and human irritation assessment. Molecules. 2020;25(23):5575. doi: 10.3390/molecules25235575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Rincón M, Calpena AC, Fabrega MJ, Garduño-Ramírez ML, Espina M, Rodríguez-Lagunas MJ, et al. Development of pranoprofen loaded nanostructured lipid carriers to improve its release and therapeutic efficacy in skin inflammatory disorders. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2018;8(12):1022. doi: 10.3390/nano8121022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wen MM, Abdelwahab IA, Aly RG, El-Zahaby SA. Nanophyto-gel against multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa burn wound infection. Drug Deliv. 2021;28(1):463–77. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2021.1889720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.You P, Yuan R, Chen C. Design and evaluation of lidocaine- and prilocaine-coloaded nanoparticulate drug delivery systems for topical anesthetic analgesic therapy: a comparison between solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers. Drug Des DevelTher. 2017;11:2743–52. doi: 10.2147/dddt.s141031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Rajinikanth PS, Chellian J. Development and evaluation of nanostructured lipid carrier-based hydrogel for topical delivery of 5-fluorouracil. Int J Nanomedicine. 2016;11:5067–77. doi: 10.2147/ijn.s117511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Agrawal YO, Mahajan UB, Mahajan HS, Ojha S. Methotrexate-loaded nanostructured lipid carrier gel alleviates imiquimod-induced psoriasis by moderating inflammation: formulation, optimization, characterization, in-vitro and in-vivo studies. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:4763–78. doi: 10.2147/ijn.s247007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wang Y, Wang S, Shi P. Transcriptional transactivator peptide modified lidocaine-loaded nanoparticulate drug delivery system for topical anesthetic therapy. Drug Deliv. 2016;23(9):3193–9. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2016.1160459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Alagusundaram M, Chengaiah B, Gnanaprakash K, Ramkanth S, Chetty CM, Dhachinamoorthi D. Nasal drug delivery system-an overview. Int J Res Pharm Sci. 2010;1(4):454–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Alnasser S. A review on nasal drug delivery system and its contribution in therapeutic management. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2019;12(1):40–5. doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2019.v12i1.29443. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Costa CP, Moreira JN, Sousa Lobo JM, Silva AC. Intranasal delivery of nanostructured lipid carriers, solid lipid nanoparticles and nanoemulsions: a current overview of in vivo studies. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11(4):925–40. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ghori MU, Mahdi MH, Smith AM, Conway BR. Nasal drug delivery systems: an overview. Am J Pharmacol Sci. 2015;3(5):110–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Jnaidi R, Almeida AJ, Gonçalves LM. Solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers as smart drug delivery systems in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(9):860. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12090860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Salem LH, El-Feky GS, Fahmy RH, El Gazayerly ON, Abdelbary A. Coated lipidic nanoparticles as a new strategy for enhancing nose-to-brain delivery of a hydrophilic drug molecule. J Pharm Sci. 2020;109(7):2237–51. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2020.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Taymouri S, Minaiyan M, Ebrahimi F, Tavakoli N. In-vitro and in-vivo evaluation of chitosan-based thermosensitive gel containing lorazepam NLCs for the treatment of status epilepticus. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2020;14(2):148–54. doi: 10.1049/iet-nbt.2019.0156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hammad RW, Sanad RAB, Abdelmalk NS, Aziz RL, Torad FA. Intranasal surface-modified mosapride citrate-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (MOS-SMNLCs) for treatment of reflux diseases: in vitro optimization, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetic studies. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2018;19(8):3791–808. doi: 10.1208/s12249-018-1142-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Deshkar SS, Jadhav MS, Shirolkar SV. Development of carbamazepine nanostructured lipid carrier loaded thermosensitive gel for intranasal delivery. Adv Pharm Bull. 2021;11(1):150–62. doi: 10.34172/apb.2021.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Fahmy UA, Ahmed OAA, Badr-Eldin SM, Aldawsari HM, Okbazghi SZ, Awan ZA, et al. Optimized nanostructured lipid carriers integrated into in situ nasal gel for enhancing brain delivery of flibanserin. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:5253–64. doi: 10.2147/ijn.s258791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 77.Silva S, Bicker J, Fonseca C, Ferreira NR, Vitorino C, Alves G, et al. Encapsulated escitalopram and paroxetine intranasal co-administration: in vitro/in vivo evaluation. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:751321. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.751321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gulati N, Gupta H. Parenteral drug delivery: a review. Recent Pat Drug DelivFormul. 2011;5(2):133–45. doi: 10.2174/187221111795471391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Yu G, Ali Z, Sajjad Khan A, Ullah K, Jamshaid H, Zeb A, et al. Preparation, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor potential of miltefosine-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:3255–73. doi: 10.2147/ijn.s299443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 80.Galvão JG, Santos RL, Silva A, Santos JS, Costa AMB, Chandasana H, et al. Carvacrol loaded nanostructured lipid carriers as a promising parenteral formulation for leishmaniasis treatment. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2020;150:105335. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Han Y, Chu X, Cui L, Fu S, Gao C, Li Y, et al. Neuronal mitochondria-targeted therapy for Alzheimer’s disease by systemic delivery of resveratrol using dual-modified novel biomimetic nanosystems. Drug Deliv. 2020;27(1):502–18. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2020.1745328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hassanzadeh P, Atyabi F, Dinarvand R, Dehpour AR, Azhdarzadeh M, Dinarvand M. Application of nanostructured lipid carriers: the prolonged protective effects for sesamol in in vitro and in vivo models of ischemic stroke via activation of PI3K signalling pathway. Daru. 2017;25(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40199-017-0191-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Yu S, Tan G, Liu D, Yang X, Pan W. Nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC)-based novel hydrogels as potential carriers for nepafenac applied after cataract surgery for the treatment of inflammation: design, characterization and in vitro cellular inhibition and uptake studies. RSC Adv. 2017;7(27):16668–77. doi: 10.1039/c7ra00552k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lages EB, Fernandes RS, Andrade MMS, Paiyabhroma N, de Oliveira RB, Fernandes C, et al. pH-sensitive doxorubicin-tocopherol succinate prodrug encapsulated in docosahexaenoic acid-based nanostructured lipid carriers: an effective strategy to improve pharmacokinetics and reduce toxic effects. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;144:112373. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Grassiri B, Zambito Y, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Strategies to prolong the residence time of drug delivery systems on ocular surface. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;288:102342. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2020.102342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Vaneev A, Tikhomirova V, Chesnokova N, Popova E, Beznos O, Kost O, et al. Nanotechnology for topical drug delivery to the anterior segment of the eye. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(22):12368. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Bhattacharjee A, Das PJ, Adhikari P, Marbaniang D, Pal P, Ray S, et al. Novel drug delivery systems for ocular therapy: with special reference to liposomal ocular delivery. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019;29(1):113–26. doi: 10.1177/1120672118769776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Seyfoddin A, Shaw J, Al-Kassas R. Solid lipid nanoparticles for ocular drug delivery. Drug Deliv. 2010;17(7):467–89. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2010.483257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Qamar Z, Qizilbash FF, Iqubal MK, Ali A, Narang JK, Ali J, et al. Nano-based drug delivery system: recent strategies for the treatment of ocular disease and future perspective. Recent Pat Drug DelivFormul. 2019;13(4):246–54. doi: 10.2174/1872211314666191224115211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.González-Fernández FM, Bianchera A, Gasco P, Nicoli S, Pescina S. Lipid-based nanocarriers for ophthalmic administration: towards experimental design implementation. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(4):447. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13040447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Youssef A, Dudhipala N, Majumdar S. Ciprofloxacin loaded nanostructured lipid carriers incorporated into in-situ gels to improve management of bacterial endophthalmitis. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(6):572. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12060572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kumari S, Dandamudi M, Rani S, Behaeghel E, Behl G, Kent D, et al. Dexamethasone-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers for the treatment of dry eye disease. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(6):905. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13060905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Puglia C, Santonocito D, Ostacolo C, Maria Sommella E, Campiglia P, Carbone C, et al. Ocular formulation based on palmitoylethanolamide-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers: technological and pharmacological profile. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2020;10(2):287. doi: 10.3390/nano10020287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Al-Dosari MS, Gao X. Nonviral gene delivery: principle, limitations, and recent progress. AAPS J. 2009;11(4):671–81. doi: 10.1208/s12248-009-9143-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Riley MK, Vermerris W. Recent advances in nanomaterials for gene delivery-a review. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2017;7(5):94. doi: 10.3390/nano7050094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Pardi N, Tuyishime S, Muramatsu H, Kariko K, Mui BL, Tam YK, et al. Expression kinetics of nucleoside-modified mRNA delivered in lipid nanoparticles to mice by various routes. J Control Release. 2015;217:345–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Garbuzenko OB, Kuzmov A, Taratula O, Pine SR, Minko T. Strategy to enhance lung cancer treatment by five essential elements: inhalation delivery, nanotechnology, tumor-receptor targeting, chemo- and gene therapy. Theranostics. 2019;9(26):8362–76. doi: 10.7150/thno.39816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Tezgel Ö, DiStasio N, Laghezza-Masci V, Taddei A-R, Szarpak-Jankowska A, Auzély-Velty R, et al. Collagen scaffold-mediated delivery of NLC/siRNA as wound healing materials. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2020;55:101421. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101421. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Xue HY, Liu S, Wong HL. Nanotoxicity: a key obstacle to clinical translation of siRNA-based nanomedicine. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2014;9(2):295–312. doi: 10.2217/nnm.13.204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Wang H, Liu S, Jia L, Chu F, Zhou Y, He Z, et al. Nanostructured lipid carriers for microRNA delivery in tumor gene therapy. Cancer Cell Int. 2018;18:101. doi: 10.1186/s12935-018-0596-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Sung YK, Kim SW. Recent advances in the development of gene delivery systems. Biomater Res. 2019;23:8. doi: 10.1186/s40824-019-0156-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Tenchov R, Bird R, Curtze AE, Zhou Q. Lipid nanoparticles─from liposomes to mRNA vaccine delivery, a landscape of research diversity and advancement. ACS Nano. 2021;15(11):16982–7015. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c04996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Chen Z, Lai X, Song S, Zhu X, Zhu J. Nanostructured lipid carriers based temozolomide and gene co-encapsulated nanomedicine for gliomatosis cerebri combination therapy. Drug Deliv. 2016;23(4):1369–73. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2015.1038857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Erasmus JH, Khandhar AP, Guderian J, Granger B, Archer J, Archer M, et al. A nanostructured lipid carrier for delivery of a replicating viral rna provides single, low-dose protection against Zika. Mol Ther. 2018;26(10):2507–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Viegas JSR, Praça FG, Caron AL, Suzuki I, Silvestrini AVP, Medina WSG, et al. Nanostructured lipid carrier co-delivering tacrolimus and TNF-α siRNA as an innovate approach to psoriasis. Drug DelivTransl Res. 2020;10(3):646–60. doi: 10.1007/s13346-020-00723-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Garbuzenko OB, Ivanova V, Kholodovych V, Reimer DC, Reuhl KR, Yurkow E, et al. Combinatorial treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using nanoparticles with prostaglandin E and siRNA(s) Nanomedicine. 2017;13(6):1983–92. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2017.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Shao Z, Shao J, Tan B, Guan S, Liu Z, Zhao Z, et al. Targeted lung cancer therapy: preparation and optimization of transferrin-decorated nanostructured lipid carriers as novel nanomedicine for co-delivery of anticancer drugs and DNA. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:1223–33. doi: 10.2147/ijn.s77837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin are provided here courtesy of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES