The authors regret to make some minor changes in the published articles particularly in the Tables. Author would like to correct abbreviations and annotations Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4. The abbreviations IV in Tables 1 and 2 on page 5 and in Tables 3 and 4 on page 8. IV should be replaced with DV, whereas independent variable as an annotation for IV should be replaced with dependent variable as an annotation for DV. The corrected Tables as presented after corrections as follows;
Table 1.
Indicates the moderation of SDR on the relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitudes in TC1 at the pre-test.
| Variables | Coeff. | se | t | p | LLCI | ULCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DV: Preservation | ||||||
| Constant | .4524 | 1.4174 | .3192 | .7504 | -2.3653 | 3.2701 |
| Knowledge | .3369 | .3455 | .9750 | .3323 | -.3500 | 1.0237 |
| SDR | -.0041 | .0470 | -.0870 | .9309 | -.0975 | .0893 |
| Int_1 | .0022 | .0038 | .5734 | .5679 | -.0054 | .0098 |
| Age | .1595 | .1201 | 1.3281 | .1877 | -.0792 | .3982 |
| DV: Utilization | ||||||
| Constant | .5467 | 1.7393 | .3143 | .7540 | -2.9109 | 4.0043 |
| Knowledge | -.7118 | .4240 | -1.6788 | .0968 | -1.5546 | .1311 |
| SDR | .0313 | .0577 | .5425 | .5889 | -.0833 | .1459 |
| Int_1 | .0132 | .0047 | 2.8020 | .0063 | .0038 | .0226 |
| Age | -.3901 | .1474 | -2.6472 | .0097 | -.6831 | -.0972 |
Note: Int_1 = Interaction effect, DV = Dependent variables, p = probability, SDR = Social Desirability Responding, LLCI = Lower limit confidence interval, ULCI = Upper limit confidence interval, TC1 = One of the teacher college in the treatment group
Table 2.
Indicates the moderation of SDR on the relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitudes in TC2 at the pre-test.
| Variables | Coeff. | se | t | p | LLCI | ULCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DV: Preservation | ||||||
| Constant | .2536 | 1.5699 | .1615 | .8722 | -2.8827 | 3.3900 |
| Knowledge | .6135 | .3979 | 1.5417 | .1281 | -.1815 | 1.4084 |
| SDR | -.0346 | .0659 | -.5245 | .6017 | -.1662 | .0971 |
| Int_1 | .0043 | .0095 | .4507 | .6537 | -.0148 | .0234 |
| Age | -.0469 | .2124 | -.2207 | .8261 | -.4711 | .3774 |
| DV: Utilization | ||||||
| Constant | 1.9385 | 1.9486 | .9948 | .3236 | -1.9543 | 5.8312 |
| Knowledge | -.7169 | .4939 | -1.4516 | .1515 | -1.7036 | .2697 |
| SDR | .0937 | .0818 | 1.1457 | .2562 | -.0697 | .2570 |
| Int_1 | .0346 | .0118 | 2.9179 | .0049 | .0109 | .0582 |
| Age | -.1500 | .2636 | -.5689 | .5714 | -.6766 | .3767 |
Note: Int_1 = Interaction effect, DV = Dependent variables, p = probability, SDR = Social Desirability Responding, LLCI = Lower limit confidence interval, ULCI = Upper limit confidence interval, TC2 = One of the teacher college in the comparison group
Table 3.
Indicates the moderation of SDR on the relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitudes in the comparison groups at the post-test.
| Variables | Coeff. | se | t | p | LLCI | ULCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DV: Preservation | ||||||
| Constant | -.0954 | .9495 | -.1005 | .9201 | -1.9723 | 1.7815 |
| Knowledge | .0800 | .0358 | 2.2348 | .0270 | .0092 | .1507 |
| SDR | -.0051 | .0068 | -.7523 | .4531 | -.0185 | .0083 |
| Int_1 | .0004 | .0002 | 2.5121 | .0131 | .0001 | .0008 |
| Age | .0067 | .0173 | .3861 | .7000 | -.0275 | .0409 |
| DV: Utilization | ||||||
| Constant | -.0073 | 1.1563 | -.0063 | .9950 | -2.2931 | 2.2786 |
| Knowledge | .0154 | .0436 | .3532 | .7245 | -.0708 | .1016 |
| SDR | -.0146 | .0083 | -1.7729 | .0784 | -.0310 | .0017 |
| Int_1 | .0000 | .0002 | .1882 | .8510 | -.0004 | .0005 |
| Age | -.0008 | .0211 | -.0358 | .9715 | -.0424 | .0409 |
Note: Int_1 = Interaction effect, DV = Dependent variables, p=probability, SDR = Social Desirability Responding, LLCI = Lower limit confidence interval, ULCI = Upper limit confidence interval.
Table 4.
Indicates the moderation of SDR on the relationship between environmental knowledge and EA in the treatment study groups at the post-test.
| Coeff. | se | t | p | LLCI | ULCI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DV: Preservation | ||||||
| Constant | .0494 | .8079 | .0611 | .9513 | -1.5448 | 1.6435 |
| Knowledge | .1177 | .0307 | 3.8355 | .0002 | .0572 | .1783 |
| SDR | -.0064 | .0057 | -1.1101 | .2684 | -.0177 | .0049 |
| Int_1 | .0002 | .0001 | 1.6018 | .1109 | -.0001 | .0005 |
| Age | .0020 | .0122 | .1605 | .8727 | -.0221 | .0260 |
| DV: Utilization | ||||||
| Constant | -.0164 | .9390 | -.0175 | .9861 | -1.8692 | 1.8364 |
| Knowledge | -.1562 | .0357 | -4.3772 | .0000 | -.2266 | -.0858 |
| SDR | .0047 | .0067 | .7030 | .4830 | -.0085 | .0178 |
| Int_1 | -.0001 | .0002 | -.5417 | .5887 | -.0004 | .0002 |
| Age | .0002 | .0142 | .0139 | .9889 | -.0278 | .0282 |
Note: Int_1 = Interaction effect, DV = Dependent variables, p = probability, SDR = Social Desirability Responding, LLCI = Lower limit confidence interval, ULCI = Upper limit confidence interval.
The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.