Skip to main content
Environmental Microbiology Reports logoLink to Environmental Microbiology Reports
. 2023 Feb 14;15(3):206–215. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.13137

Activity and abundance of methanotrophic bacteria in a northern mountainous gradient of wetlands

Sigmund Jensen 1,, Henri MP Siljanen 2, Peter Dörsch 3
PMCID: PMC10464705  PMID: 36786058

Abstract

Methane uptake and diversity of methanotrophic bacteria was investigated across six hydrologically connected wetlands in a mountainous forest landscape upstream of lake Langtjern, southern Norway. From floodplain through shrubs, forest and sedges to a Sphagnum covered site, growing season CH4 production was insufficiently consumed to balance release into the atmosphere. Emission increased by soil moisture ranging 0.6–6.8 mg CH4 m−2 h−1. Top soils of all sites consumed CH4 including at the lowest 78 ppmv CH4 supplied, thus potentially oxidizing 17–51 nmol CH4 g−1 dw h−1, with highest Vmax 440 nmol g−1 dw h−1 under Sphagnum and lowest Km 559 nM under hummocked Carex. Nine genera and several less understood type I and type II methanotrophs were detected by the key functional gene pmoA involved in methane oxidation. Microarray signal intensities from all sites revealed Methylococcus, the affiliated Lake Washington cluster, Methylocaldum, a Japanese rice cluster, Methylosinus, Methylocystis and the affiliated Peat264 cluster. Notably enriched by site was a floodplain Methylomonas and a Methylocapsa‐affiliated watershed cluster in the Sphagnum site. The climate sensitive water table was shown to be a strong controlling factor highlighting its link with the CH4 cycle in elevated wetlands.

INTRODUCTION

Methane released into the atmosphere accumulates by ~20 Tg (million tonnes) each year trapping an increasing amount of terrestrial radiation (Figure 1). CH4 contributes ~15% to global warming and is the most important greenhouse gas after CO2 (Conrad, 2009; Dean et al., 2018) and water vapour (Mitchell, 1989). Growing evidence suggests that warming is amplified at high elevation such as in mountainous subalpine environments (Pepin et al., 2015). The warming reduces frost and snow and intensifies rain, flooding and drought, impacting local ecosystems and organisms including the major source of water for large human populations in lower elevation regions (IPCC, 2021). Realizing that CH4 increases in the atmosphere early made it necessary to understand the natural processes causing the source‐ and sink imbalance (Cicerone & Oremland, 1988).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Global warming, wetland methane cycle and study sites. CH4 in peatlands is produced by methanogenic archaea (1), consumed by a filter of methanotrophic bacteria (2), photodegraded with hydroxyl radicals (3) and consumed from the atmosphere by methanotrophs in soils. Numbers represent millions of tonnes per year and are estimated averages, including 440 from other sources (IPCC, 2021; Reay et al., 2018). The warming result as CH4 reemit  infrared radiation temporarily stored as molecular bound rotational and vibrational energy (Mitchell, 1989). Owing to the accumulation of greenhouse gases over the last 100–150 years, the global temperature has increased by 1.1°C with CH4 contributing ~15%, during its atmospheric lifetime of ~10 years (IPCC, 2021). The study sites are seen located upstream of lake Langtjern forming a hydrologically connected gradient in the watershed (60°22′20″ N, 09°43′50″ E). Features of interest were edited onto a map downloaded from The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (www.nve.no/english/). Flo, floodplain; Shr, shrubs; Pin, pine; Sed, sedges; Hum, hummocks and Sph, Sphagnum

Wetlands capture carbon with more than half of it stored north of 45° latitude in habitats such as boreal peatlands of mire fens and bogs (Reay et al., 2018). Wetlands are also the largest natural source of atmospheric CH4 (Conrad, 2009; Figure 1). Annually ~230 Tg of CH4 (22%) arise from wetlands (Reay et al., 2018). Their standing waters limit gas diffusion and oxygen and other electron acceptors like sulfate are typically low (Conrad, 2009). In the waterlogged peat layers organic matter degradation produces acetate, methanol, hydrogen and CO2 fuelling methanogenic Archaea that release CH4 (Cicerone & Oremland, 1988; Figure 1). Acetate is additionally provided in plant root exudates (Le Mer & Roger, 2001). Peat pore water can be supersaturated in CH4 (>1 vol%), which escapes by diffusion, bubbles, and through air‐filled aerenchyma spaces within plants (Dean et al., 2018; Le Mer & Roger, 2001; Reay et al., 2018). Field chamber measurements of CH4 in mountainous wetlands in Czechia (Urbanová et al., 2013), the Swiss Alps (Cheema et al., 2015), Alaska (Sebacher et al., 1986), the Qinghai‐Tibetan Plateau (Hirota et al., 2004) and Australia (McDaniel et al., 2021) revealed emissions of 0.3–15 mg CH4 m−2 h−1 similar to northern low‐land wetlands of Swedish mires (Nilsson et al., 2001) and a Finnish lake nearshore littoral zone (Siljanen et al., 2011).

Estimates suggest more than 80% of wetland CH4 never reaches the atmosphere (Le Mer & Roger, 2001; Figure 1). Wetlands are inhabited by a unique group of aerobic bacteria that can use CH4 as their sole carbon and energy source (Hanson & Hanson, 1996). The methanotrophs function as an effective filter capturing CH4 before it is released into the atmosphere (Galchenko et al., 1989). In periods of droughts and lowered water table CH4 may be sourced from the ~1.87 ppmv (~0.0002 vol%, ~3.5 nM dissolved) that diffuses into soil from the overlying atmosphere. Altogether soil methanotrophs consume up to ~30 Tg atmospheric CH4 yr−1 (Reay et al., 2018; Figure 1). Measurements on the drier mountainous soils revealed low (Sebacher et al., 1986; Urbanová et al., 2013) to slightly negative fluxes and in flask incubations a potential sink (McDaniel et al., 2021) similar in magnitude to low‐land wetlands (Siljanen et al., 2011).

The gene pmoA encoding for the beta subunit of the CH4‐oxidizing enzyme particulate methane monooxygenase (pMMO) is widely used as a functional marker for detecting methanotrophs in environmental samples (Dumont & Murrell, 2005). In the microarray it provides a fast and cost‐effective method to probe for predefined groups of pmoA in multiple samples (Bodrossy et al., 2003) with results comparable to pyrosequencing (Kip et al., 2011). Phylogeny with the pmoA reflects very well that of the 16S rRNA (Kolb et al., 2003) and the clustering of taxa (Tsuji et al., 1990) corresponds to the phenotypic groupings of Whittenbury et al. (1970) still forming the taxonomic foundation for methanotrophs in many ecosystems (Kalyuzhnaya et al., 2019). Most methanotrophs group as type I (Gammaproteobacteria), some as type II (Alphaproteobacteria) and a few as the phyla Verrucomicrobia (Op den Camp et al., 2009) and NC10 (Ettwig et al., 2010). There are many less understood taxa several only known by molecular detection. Three type II genera equipped with only the soluble methane monooxygenase lack pmoA (Dedysh et al., 2000; Vekeman et al., 2016; Vorobev et al., 2011). Among these, the wetland inhabitant Methylocella (Dedysh, 2011; Theisen & Murrell, 2005) prefer acetate over CH4 (Nazaries et al., 2013).

By the year 2100 wetland CH4 emissions are predicted to increase by 33%–60% because of increased temperature and precipitation causing less frost and longer periods of emissions changes intensified by latitude and altitude (Dean et al., 2018; Pepin et al., 2015). Altered temperature and hydrology may cause the peat to start decomposing shifting wetland functioning from sink to source of greenhouse gases (Salimi et al., 2021). Microorganisms are highly sensitive to perturbation (Cavicchioli et al., 2019), but CH4 oxidation at conditions adapted to by methanotrophic bacteria cannot be compensated for by other microbial groups (Ho et al., 2013).

Our aim was to investigate the CH4 sink strength associated with methanotrophs in a hydrologically connected gradient of northern boreal mountainous wetlands to facilitate understanding on scaling the fluxes to larger areas and predict the response of these complex wetlands to global warming. We measured CH4 emission, potential CH4 oxidation and probed for pmoA genes in six wetland sites of peatland mires in a west facing slope at 516–532 m altitude covering 400 m upstream the lake Langtjern (Figure 1). At this elevation of a typical southern Norway landscape, an array of taxa was found inhabiting net CH4 emitting peat soils.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Although numerous studies have characterized the source sink strength associated with soil methanotrophic bacteria, our study is new in combining flux rates, oxidation and taxonomy across a mountainous gradient of wetlands. In natural wetlands like Langjern, seasonally stable communities may be expected with CH4 emitted to the atmosphere as the remains of a flux that bypass and sustain methanotrophs.

CH4 field emission

Methane fluxes were measured throughout two growing seasons using field chambers (Rochette & Bertrand, 2008) inserted into sites varying by wetland type, vegetation cover, water table, dissolved CH4, peat depth and pH 4.0–4.7 (Table 1; Supplementary information S1) indicating an acidic environment consistent with many peat‐accumulating wetlands. Gas chromatography (Agilent GC‐7890A; California, USA) throughout spring, summer and autumn revealed all sites released CH4 into the atmosphere (Figure 2A). Emission was highest from the floodplain at 6.8 ± 1.2 mg CH4 m2 h−1 (Figure 2A) similar to for example the Swiss Alpine fens (Cheema et al., 2015) and Swedish mires (Nilsson et al., 2001). The Flo site water table frequently raised to above the surface causing flood and a generally shallow oxic zone for CH4 oxidation. Methane emission is further facilitated by escape through roots and aerenchyma of plants like Carex and Eriophorum although O2 carried deeper by roots aid oxidation. Site Flo emitted more than twice the CH4 from any other site. Towards the drier sites, emissions fell with water table and pore water CH4 to near zero in the forest which is paludified becoming converted into  peatland (Figure 2A, Table 1). Overall, the sites growing season emission accumulated to 8.4 ± 1.2 g CH4 m2 yr−1.

TABLE 1.

Overview of the wetlands vegetation and soils

Vegetation cover a grasses (Flo) shrubs (Shr) pine (Pin) sedges (Sed) sedges (Hum) sphagnum (Sph)
Peat dept (cm) 177 110 59 102 232 110
Water table (cm) b 0.4 (12−+30) 7.0 (25‐0) 20.3 (40‐13) 8.9 (26‐2) 11.1 (34‐3) 9.8 (24‐3)
Dissolved CH4 (μM) b 135 (30‐260) 57 (12‐160) 11 (2‐24) 38 (8‐212) 48 (11‐115) 42 (1‐162)
pH 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.0 4.7
DOC (mg L−1) 22.9 24.0 71.1 17.0 29.5 14.9
Total C (%) 48.4 55.2 51.0 52.5 52.5 51.7
Total N (%) 1.3 2.8 2.1 2.9 2.6 2.3
C/N 39 20 24 18 20 23
Vmax (nmol g−1 dw h−1) b 185 (28) 171 (25) 116 (15) 197 (33) 188 (28) 440 (84)
Km (nM) b 2490 (749) 722 (395) 883 (360) 772 (504) 559 (355) 1254 (657)
Shannon 1.83 2.04 2.33 2.61 2.74 1.84
a

Indicated dominant with largest bog being hummocked (detailed in Supplementary S1).

b

Below surface, brackets enclose min max values of six replicates and standard error of three replicates.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

(AB) Sites methane flux rates and soils potential CH4 oxidation. (A) Flux rates are averaged over two 160 days growing seasons from May to October. Gas samples were collected weekly from five chambers per site, 1, 15, 30 and 45 min after chamber deployment. The rates were estimated by linear or quadratic slope changes over time (Rochette & Bertrand, 2008). (B) Potential oxidation in the sites topsoil. Equivalent to 0.5–1.5 g dw soil was dispersed in 24 ml distilled water and incubated at 15°C in triplicate 120 ml flasks continuously stirred for aeration. Methane was injected for desired initial mixing ratio (here 78 ppmv). Headspace measurements were performed using a gas chromatographic robotic system (Molstad et al., 2007). Rates were estimated by linear regression of ln transformed concentrations over 24–30 h (Jensen et al., 1998). For boxes of the plot that do not share the same letter, corresponding means are significantly different in Kruskal–Wallis multiple comparisons (p ≤ 0.05).

CH4 oxidation potential

Cores down to 80 cm depth were collected from each site, sectioned and subsampled to flasks for gas chromatography (Supplementary Information S1). Stirred as slurries at 15°C all depths consumed CH4 and as expected mostly in the topsoil (data not shown). Triplicate topsoil 0–20 cm samples (Flo 0–10 cm) collected the following summer confirmed the oxidation (Figure 2B). As seen for other soils (Jensen et al., 1998) CH4 appeared to be consumed at a log linear scale reaching no observed threshold. Within the 24–30 h rate estimation period, the lowest initial 78 ppmv supplied fell to 1 ppmv by, for example, the hummocked Carex site sample. Potential oxidation was highest for the Sphagnum soil (51 ± 6 nmol CH4 g−1 dw h−1) and lowest for the Flo soil (17 ± 0.6 nmol CH4 g−1 dw h−1; Figure 2B). Rates compare to those observed in a sub‐alpine Australian bog (McDaniel et al., 2021) and a Finnish wetland including overall flux pattern confirming that hydrology affects methanotrophic activity and community composition (Siljanen et al., 2011). The relatively low rate observed for site Flo might reflect oxidation by methanotrophs associated with the S. cuspidatum lawns in the aboveground plant parts (Raghoebarsing et al., 2005) not included in the oxidation assay here. Increasing the flasks headspace initial CH4 concentration from 78 to about 5000 ppmv suggested highest potential CH4 oxidation for the Sph soil (Vmax 440 ± 84 nmol g−1 dw h−1) and lowest half saturation (Km 559 ± 355 nM) for the Hum soil (Table 1; Supplementary information S1).

Methanotrophs abundant in all sites

DNA was extracted from ~0.3 g topsoil using the FastDNA spin kit for soil with method of Pan et al. (2010) and pmoA sequences amplified in two rounds using primers A189/A682 and A189/mb661 for increased yield and specificity (Siljanen et al., 2011; Supplementary information S1). The recovered sequence types were displayed as a semi‐quantitative profile using a pmoA microarray (Bodrossy et al., 2003). Of the 135 applied probes, 55 were positive (Figure 3). A striking observation was the many poorly understood methanotrophs detected. Among signals affiliated with pmoA from type I methanotrophs were Methylococcus (probe ib453) and Methylocaldum (probe MclG281) from hot springs, a Japanese rice cluster Methylogaea (probe JRC4‐432) from paddy soil (Knief, 2015) and especially an until recently uncultured organic soil cluster OSC more broadly defined as freshwater cluster LW21, relatively abundant in samples from every site (Figure 3). These are all of type Ib (formerly type X), a poorly characterized group requiring more attention (Deng et al., 2013). The most abundant LW21, was first detected in Lake Washington sediment (Auman et al., 2000) and has been found in, for example, Lake Constance sediment (Pester et al., 2004), in soils of the Finnish wetland (Siljanen et al., 2011) and in the Swiss alpine fen soils where T‐RFLP of pmoA transcript sequences indicated activity (Cheema et al., 2015). LW21 predominate bogs and some typical well‐drained and aerobic so‐called upland soils (Knief, 2015). A Methylococcus‐affiliated but spiral and microaerophilic LW21 morphotype ‘Candidatus Methylospira mobilis’ was enriched (Danilova et al., 2016) and isolated (Oshkin et al., 2019) from a Sphagnum dominated peat bog in the Tver region of north‐western Russia. Its helical cell shape and up to 6.0 μm s−1 velocities suggests adaptation to move through relatively viscous, partially decomposed plant debris and biofilm, to become enriched in the high methane low oxygen interphase (Danilova et al., 2016). Whether LW21 includes the novel type I methanotrophs found to be transcriptionally active in peat soil of the Moor House Nature Reserve in northern England (Chen et al., 2008) remains unclear. Clearer it seems that the role of type I methanotrophs in peatlands have been underestimated.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Abundance of soil methanotrophic taxa assessed using the pmoA microarray of Bodrossy et al. (2003). Every new taxon is named adopting mostly Knief (2015). The probes target species, groups of species and genera as well as higher taxonomic groups of methanotrophs and related bacteria. Numbers at the end of the probe names refer to the relative positions on the pmoA gene of Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). A value of 1.0 indicates maximum achievable signal for an individual probe, a value of 0.1 indicates that about 10% of the total PCR product hybridized to that probe (Stralis‐Pavese et al., 2004). Values are normalized to the positive control probe mtrof173. To enhance identification blastn was used with the Entrez query ‘pmoA Methylo* not [uncultured]’. This version of the array cover most of the diversity among type I and type II methanotrophs except Methylocella, Methyloferula, Methyloceanibacter, Crenothrix, and NC10 Methylomirabilis and Verrucomicrobia (Abell et al., 2009; Siljanen et al., 2011).

Likewise, apparently little influenced by environmental variation, well‐characterized type II methanotrophs co‐occurred with a poorly understood lineage of pmoA sequences (Figure 3). This Peat264 cluster dominated signals from such as Methylosinus (probes Msi423 and MsS475) and Methylocystis (probe Mcy413). The ubiquity of type II methanotrophs in the Langtjern samples was supported by the general probe II509 signal. Detected in a Moor House blanket bog peat (McDonald & Murrell, 1997) and since detected there (Chen et al., 2008), associated with Sphagnum mosses from a Dutch peat bog (Kip et al., 2011) and, for example, in the Finnish wetland soil (Siljanen et al., 2011) including oak forest soil (Radajewski et al., 2002), Peat264 has been suggested a cluster of widespread persistence in peatlands. No cultured representative or metagenome has been reported leaving the Peat264 physiology poorly understood. Using blastn with the probe sequence, its 23 nucleotides exactly matched more than 100 pmoA sequences including PCR amplicons from Moor House peat core sections and enrichment cultures (McDonald & Murrell, 1997). The closest cultured isolates matched 18/19 nucleotide positions and belonged to Methylocystis of species including M. bryphila H2s from the Teufelssee peat‐bog lake in north‐eastern Germany (Belova et al., 2013). M. bryophila H2s prefers CH4 and methanol and in the absence of one‐carbon compounds grows slowly on acetate (Belova et al., 2013). Methylocystis/Methylosinus dominated the microarray and clone library gene and transcript sequences of both pmoA and 16S rRNA at Moor House, suggesting type II to be largely responsible for the CH4 oxidation in situ (Chen et al., 2008) possibly indicating a distinction compared to the less pmoA type II transcript activity detected in mountainous soil (Cheema et al., 2015). Methylocystis are among the most abundant and metabolically active methanotrophs in northern wetlands (Dedysh, 2011; McDonald & Murrell, 1997).

Methanotrophs enriched by site

The probe signals were clustered to better understand the environmental variation. Linear ordination was used as detrended analysis indicated a homogeneous dataset of relatively low standard deviation. As shown by nonmetric multidimensional scaling (Figure 4), taxa (dots) scattered such that most of the variation (first axis) separated communities of Flo, Shr and Sph from Pin, Sed and Hum (squares). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated significantly different species composition patterns between the two groups (F (1,328) = 8.807, p = 0.003). Similarity percentages analysis (SIMPER) demonstrated communities of the former three separated from the latter owing to a higher abundance of especially Methylomonas (probe Mm531), water shed cluster (probe Wsh1‐566) and a lower abundance of several taxa the most contributing to the dissimilarities being Methylosinus and Peat264. This seems to agree with the hypothesis of type I being more active at high CH4 concentration (copiotrophic) while type II fit more within the stress tolerator (oligotrophic) categories (Ho et al., 2013). Adding environmental variables (Figure 4), the strongest community structure relationship was observed for the water table which together with pore water CH4, emission, and total N was driving differences between the two groups. Within group differences were driven by peat depth, pH and dissolved organic carbon. Influence on physiology was indicated by including Km, Vmax and CH4 emission (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Non‐metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) using probe signal to display methanotrophic community structure across sites. Sites are shown as six open squares. Taxa are shown as shaded dots representing all 55 positive probes. The shading indicates probe signal intensity reflecting taxon abundance. Environmental variables, emission, oxidation, Km and Vmax was added onto the two‐dimensional Bray‐Curtis distance representation of the communities using envfit. Arrow directions indicate increasing correlation of taxa with that variable. Strongest correlation was found with water table distance below surface (r 2 = 0.63, p = 0.17).

Methylomonas has been shown to assimilate CH4 into phospholipid fatty acids in a Dutch floodplain soil (Bodelier et al., 2013) and is probably also oxidizing CH4 at Langtjern. Also using 13CH4, 10%–15% of the carbon consumed by peat soil accumulated in a Sphagnum specific sitosterol (Raghoebarsing et al., 2005). Methylocapsa or Methylocella (93% 16S rRNA gene identity) was suggested to be involved in both the efficient recycling of CH4 and the high organic carbon burial. However, no pmoA or mmoX was recovered and the status as a methanotrophic symbiont appears unclear (Dedysh, 2011). Nonetheless, Sphagnum is an important peat‐forming plant abundant or interspersed in all sites at Langtjern. The Sph sample was enriched in a poorly understood water shed cluster intriguingly also affiliated with Methylocapsa. Moreover, an upland soil cluster USCα, that is, RA14 (Holmes et al., 1999) genome draft revealed a widespread Methylocapsa‐like methanotroph (Pratscher et al., 2018) growing on atmospheric CH4 possibly supported by H2 and CO as well as polyhydroxybutyrate (Tveit et al., 2019). In blastn, the probe Wsh1‐566 sequence did not produce exact matches with cultured representatives but matched sequences from a US bottom land watershed (Ogram et al., 2006) and by one mismatch to sequences of a Moor House peat cluster (Chen et al., 2008). The MHP cluster has been more frequently detected in soils with higher CH4 supply such as peatlands and wetlands than in upland soils (Knief, 2015). MHP form a sister clade with a California Jasper Ridge soil clade (Horz et al., 2005) and the USCα (Knief, 2015), none of which were detected at Langtjern.

Similar to such as Finnish fen habitats (Peltoniemi et al., 2016), a higher diversity of methanotrophs associated with the drier sites (Table 1, Figure 4). These taxa included Methylomicrobium/Methylosarcina, Methylobacter, another Japanese Rice cluster, type Id methanotrophs, Methylocystis, Methylosinus and Methylocapsa. The Shannon diversity of these samples (Table 1) approached the Finnish wetland soil (Siljanen et al., 2011). Drainage from a slope and sand/rock may enrich for type II methanotrophs in wetland soils (McDaniel et al., 2021). At Langtjern, the forest site was relatively steep, and the hummocks raised above the surrounding site. The Pin‐site had the lowest water table, relatively low CH4 affinity and the strongest microarray signal (Methylosinus probe Msi423). In pairwise comparisons site Hum revealed the most dissimilar methanotrophic community (Tukey HSD p < 0.085). Type II methanotrophs fix N2 (Hanson & Hanson, 1996) and the Hum and Pin soils were enriched in organic matter and nitrogen (Table 1, Figure 4). Their ammonium oxidizers (probe PS5‐226) and putative methanotrophs (probe ARC529) are strongly site enriched signals (Figure 3).

CH4 oxidation and methanotroph identity

Our study is limited to aerobic methanotrophs and previously sequenced pmoA genes. Relevant but undetected is the potential for anaerobic CH4 oxidation. Its rate was only included in fluxes from the field as O2 levels in the flasks never dropped below 16% vol/vol. In the boggy Australian site, 16S rRNA gene sequences affiliated with the nitrite‐reducing Methylomirabilis (mismatching pmoA) that dwarfed those of type I and II methanotrophs (McDaniel et al., 2021). The other methanotrophs that would be undetected are Methylocella (Dedysh et al., 2000) and Methyloferula (Vorobev et al., 2011) as they lack pmoA but are present in wetland soils (Dedysh, 2011; Theisen & Murrell, 2005). It is unclear how much CH4 is consumed by Methylocella as they may use acetate (Dedysh, 2011) and less CH4 oxidation by these methanotrophs was suggested at Moor House where pmoA transcripts were more abundant than mmoX transcripts (Chen et al., 2008). In Dutch Sphagnum moss and Qinghai‐Tibetan peatlands, the mmoX gene sequences were also found low (Deng et al., 2013; Kip et al., 2011).

The soil CH4 sink should be considered a net effect of CH4 consumption and production processes, which may occur either simultaneously or separated in time and space (Dunfield, 2007). Given that water table exerts major control on wetland CH4 fluxes by stimulating methanogenesis and inhibiting methanotrophy (Le Mer & Roger, 2001; Nazaries et al., 2013) survival based on CH4 as the sole carbon and energy source may risk starvation. Atmospheric CH4 consumption was early reported for peat soil, through a drought period in the Great Dismal Swamp wetland, Virginia USA (Harriss et al., 1982). At Langtjern, oxidation of atmospheric CH4 by type Id, USCγ (Knief et al., 2003), JR2 (Knief, 2015) or any second pmoA copy detected seems low because of their faint signals at strength of 2.9%–1.0% of the reference value for positive detection, which is close to the detection limit of the array (5%). Instead, the more abundant type II, Wsh1‐566 and Peat264 methanotrophs might be involved. Recently, transcriptomics has revealed species of conventional Methylosinus and Methylocystis as well as type I methanotrophs such as Methylosarcina to consume CH4 with ‘high affinity’ for 2 weeks (Cai et al., 2016) following the previously used incubation of paddy soil at elevated CH4 concentration (Bender & Conrad, 1992) to mimick the in situ flush feeding expected from fluctuations in the soil water table. Evidence is growing for the facultative lifestyle and niche flexibility of methanotrophs (Bay et al., 2021).

CONCLUSIONS

The wetlands at Langtjern suggest Norwegian mountainous landscapes interspersed with wetlands are a considerable source of CH4 into the atmosphere. However, the scale of this source is unclear, especially across the whole boreal region, as the output of the CH4 cycle vary by the complexity of the terrain and conditions such as moisture, plant cover, nutrients and other factors regulating peat soil organismal activity. The Langtjern methanotrophs structured into communities apparently reflecting adaptation. Abundance was indicated higher of type I in wetter high‐CH4 sites and higher of type II in drier low‐CH4 sites more likely with a potential for sustained atmospheric oxidation. Which methanotrophs primarily drive the boreal mountainous wetlands sink strength is unclear. Specifically, whether indicator methanotrophs or distinct methanotrophic communities exist in these environments is unknown. For example, representative host‐associations could exist beyond Sphagnum. As climate change progresses, higher altitude soils may destabilize faster, providing foresight into future changes of corresponding soils at lower altitude (Pepin et al., 2015). Since microorganisms respond quickly to environmental change (Cavicchioli et al., 2019) and poorly characterized taxa are less predictable, slight changes in surface peat hydrology can have large consequences for the CH4 flux.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We have no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

Appendix S1: Supporting Information

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was financed by the Norwegian Research Council through project 165139/S30/sib. H.S. acknowledges funding by Finnish Academy (No. 337550, 342362) and S.J. acknowledge funding by Norwegian Academy of Science and Statoil (No. 6146). We thank Trygve Fredriksen for sample collection and Marc Dumont for comments on the manuscript.

Jensen, S. , Siljanen, H.M.P. & Dörsch, P. (2023) Activity and abundance of methanotrophic bacteria in a northern mountainous gradient of wetlands. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 15(3), 206–215. Available from: 10.1111/1758-2229.13137

REFERENCES

  1. Abell, G.C.J. , Stralis‐Pavese, N. , Sessitsch, A. & Bodrossy, L. (2009) Grazing affects methanotroph activity and diversity in an alpine meadow soil. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 1, 457–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Auman, A.J. , Stolyar, S. , Costello, A.M. & Lidstrom, M.E. (2000) Molecular characterization of methanotrophic isolates from freshwater lake sediment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 5259–5266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bay, S.K. , Dong, X. , Bradley, J.A. , Leung, P.M. , Grinter, R. , Jirapanjawat, T. et al. (2021) Trace gas oxidizers are widespread and active members of soil microbial communities. Nature Microbiology, 6, 246–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Belova, S.E. , Kulichevskaya, I.S. , Bodelier, P.L.E. & Dedysh, S.N. (2013) Methylocystis bryophila sp.nov., a facultatively methanotrophic bacterium from acidic Sphagnum peat, and emended description of the genus Methylocystis (ex Whittenbury et al. 1970) Bowman et al.1993. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 63, 1096–1104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bender, M. & Conrad, R. (1992) Kinetics of CH4 oxidation in oxic soils exposed to ambient air or high CH4 mixing ratios. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 101, 261–270. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bodelier, P.L.E. , Meima‐Franke, M. , Hordijk, C.A. , Steenbergh, A.K. , Hefting, M.M. , Bodrossy, L. et al. (2013) Microbial minorities modulate methane consumption through niche partitioning. The ISME Journal, 7, 2214–2228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bodrossy, L. , Stralis‐Pavese, N. , Murrell, J.C. , Radajewski, S. , Weilharter, A. & Sessitsch, A. (2003) Development and validation of a diagnostic microbial microarray for methanotrophs. Environmental Microbiology, 5, 566–582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cai, Y. , Zheng, Y. , Bodelier, P.L.E. , Conrad, R. & Jia, Z. (2016) Conventional methanotrophs are responsible for atmospheric methane oxidation in paddy soils. Nature Communications, 7, 11728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cavicchioli, R. , Ripple, W.J. , Timmis, K.N. , Azam, F. , Bakken, L.A. , Baylis, M. et al. (2019) Scientists' warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 17, 569–586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheema, S. , Zeyer, J. & Henneberger, R. (2015) Methanotrophic and methanogenic communities in Swiss Alpine fens dominated by Carex rostrata and Eriophorum angustifolium . Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 81, 5832–5844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, Y. , Dumont, M.G. , McNamara, N.P. , Chamberlain, P.M. , Bodrossy, L. , Stralis‐Pavese, N. et al. (2008) Diversity of the active methanotrophic community in acidic peatlands as assessed by mRNA and SIP‐PLFA analyses. Environmental Microbiology, 10, 446–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cicerone, R.J. & Oremland, R.S. (1988) Biogeochemical aspecs of atmospheric methane. Global Biogechem Cycles, 2, 299–327. [Google Scholar]
  13. Conrad, R. (2009) The global methane cycle: recent advances in understanding the microbial processes involved. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 1, 285–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Danilova, O.V. , Suzina, N.E. , Kamp, J. , Svenning, M.M. , Bodrossy, L. & Dedysh, S.N. (2016) A new cell morphotype among methane oxidizers: a spiral‐shaped obligately microaerophilic methanotroph from northern low‐oxygen environments. The ISME Journal, 10, 2734–2743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dean, J.F. , Middelburg, J.J. , Röckmann, T. , Aerts, R. , Blauw, L.G. , Egger, M. et al. (2018) Methane feedbacks to the global climate system in a warmer world. Reviews of Geophysics, 56, 207–250. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dedysh, S.N. (2011) Cultivating uncultured bacteria from northern wetlands: knowledge gained and remaining gaps. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2, 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dedysh, S.N. , Liesack, W. , Khmelenina, V.N. , Suzina, N.E. , Trotsenko, Y.A , Semrau, J.D. et al. (2000) Methylocella palustris gen. nov., sp.nov., a new methane‐oxidizing acidophilic bacterium from peat bogs representing a novel sub‐type of serine pathway methanotrophs. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 50, 955–969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Deng, Y. , Cui, X. , Lüke, C. & Dumont, M.G. (2013) Aerobic methanotroph diversity in Riganqiao peatlands on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 5, 566–574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dumont, M.G. & Murrell, J.C. (2005) Community‐level analysis: key genes of aerobic methane oxidation. Methods in Enzymology, 397, 413–427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dunfield, P.F. (2007) The soil methane sink. In: Reay, D.S. , Hewitt, C.N. , Smith, K.A. & Grace, J. (Eds.) Greenhouse Gas Sinks. Wallingford, UK: CABI, pp. 152–170. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ettwig, K.F. , Butler, M.K. , Le Paslier, D. , Pelletier, E. , Mangenot, S. , Kuypers, M.M.M. et al. (2010) Nitrite‐driven anaerobic methane oxidation by oxygenic bacteria. Nature, 464, 543–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Galchenko, V.F. , Lein, A. & Ivanov, M. (1989) Biological sinks of methane. In: Andreae, M.O. & Schimel, D.S. (Eds.) Exchange of trace gases between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere. UK: John Wiley and Sons Chichester, pp. 59–71. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hanson, R.S. & Hanson, T.E. (1996) Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiological Reviews, 60, 439–471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Harriss, R.C. , Sebacher, D.I. & Day, F.P. (1982) Methane flux in the Great Dismal Swamp. Nature, 297, 673–674. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hirota, M. , Tang, Y. , Hu, Q. , Hirata, S. , Kato, T. , Mo, W. et al. (2004) Methane emissions from different vegetation zones in a Qinghai – Tibetan plateau wetland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36, 737–748. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ho, A. , Kerckhof, F.‐M. , Luke, C. , Reim, A. , Krause, S. , Boon, N. et al. (2013) Conceptualizing functional traits and ecological characteristics of methane‐oxidizing bacteria as life strategies. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 5, 335–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Holmes, A.J. , Roslev, P. , McDonald, I.R. , Iversen, N. , Henriksen, K. & Murrell, J.C. (1999) Characterization of methanotrophic bacterial populations in soils showing atmospheric methane uptake. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65, 3312–3318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Horz, H. , Rich, V. , Avrahami, S. & Bohannan, J.J.M. (2005) Methane‐oxidizing bacteria in a California upland grassland soil: diversity and response to simulated global change. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71, 2642–2652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. IPCC . (2021) Climate change 2021: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Working Group II contribution to AR6. Available at: www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-ii/
  30. Jensen, S. , Priemé, A. & Bakken, L. (1998) Methanol improves methane uptake in starved methanotrophic microorganisms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64, 1143–1146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kalyuzhnaya, M.G. , Gomez, O.A. & Murrell, J.C. (2019) The methane‐oxidizing bacteria (methanotrophs). In: McGenity, T.J. (Ed.) Taxonomy, genomicis and ecophysiology of hydrocarbon‐degrading microbes. Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Springer, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, pp. 245–278. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kip, N. , Dutilh, B.E. , Pan, Y. , Bodrossy, L. , Neveling, K. , Kwint, M.P. et al. (2011) Ultra‐deep pyrosequencing of pmoA amplicons confirms the prevalence of Methylomonas and Methylocystis in Sphagnum mosses from a Dutch peat bog. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 3, 667–673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Knief, C. (2015) Diversity and habitat preferences of cultivated and uncultivated aerobic methanotrophic bacteria evaluated based on pmoA as molecular marker. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, 1346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Knief, C. , Lipski, A. & Dunfield, P.F. (2003) Diversity and activity of methanotrophic bacteria in different upland soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 6703–6714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kolb, S. , Knief, C. , Stubner, S. & Conrad, R. (2003) Quantitative detection of methanotrophs in soil by novel pmoA‐targeted real‐time PCR assays. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 2423–2429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Le Mer, J. & Roger, P. (2001) Production, oxidation, emission, and consumption of methane by soils: a review. European Journal of Soil Biology, 37, 25–50. [Google Scholar]
  37. McDaniel, M.D. , Hernández, M. , Dumont, M.G. , Ingram, L.J. & Adams, M.A. (2021) Disproportionate CH4 sink strength from an endemic, sub‐alpine Australian soil microbial community. Microorganisms, 9, 606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. McDonald, I.R. & Murrell, J.C. (1997) The particulate methane monooxygenase gene pmoA and its use as a functional gene probe for methanotrophs. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 156, 205–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mitchell, J.F. (1989) The “greenhouse” effect and climate change. Reviews of Geophysics, 27, 115–139. [Google Scholar]
  40. Molstad, L. , Dörsch, P. & Bakken, L.R. (2007) Robotized incubation system for monitoring gases (O2, NO, N2O, N2) in denitrifying cultures. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 71, 202–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nazaries, L. , Murrell, J.C. , Millard, P. , Baggs, L. & Singh, B.K. (2013) Methane, microbes and models: fundamental understanding of the soil methane cycle for future predictions. Environmental Microbiology, 15, 2395–2417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nilsson, M. , Mikkelä, C. , Sundh, I. , Granberg, G. , Svensson, B.H. & Ranneby, B. (2001) Methane emission from Swedish mires: national and regional budgets and dependence on mire vegetation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106, 20847–20860. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ogram, A.V. , Castro, H.F. , Stanley, E. , Chen, W. & Prenger, J. (2006) Distribution of methanotrophs in managed and highly disturbed watersheds. Ecological Indicators, 6, 631–794. [Google Scholar]
  44. Op den Camp, H.J.M. , Islam, T. , Stott, M.B. , Harhangi, H.R. , Hynes, A. , Schouten, S. et al. (2009) Environmental, genomic and taxonomic perspectives on methanotrophic Verrucomicrobia. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 1, 293–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Oshkin, I.Y. , Miroshnikov, K.K. , Danilova, O.V. , Hakobyan, A. , Liesack, W. & Dedysh, S.N. (2019) Thriving in wetlands: ecophysiology of the spiral‐shaped methanotroph Methylospira mobilis as revealed by the complete genome sequence. Microorganisms, 7, 683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pan, Y. , Bodrossy, L. , Frenzel, P. , Hestnes, A.G. , Krause, S. , Lüke, C. et al. (2010) Impacts of inter‐ and intralaboratory variations on the reproducibility of microbial community analyses. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76, 7451–7458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Peltoniemi, K. , Laiho, R. , Juottonen, H. , Bodrossy, L. , Kell, D.K. , Minkkinen, K. et al. (2016) Responses of methanogenic and methanotrophic communities to warming in varying moisture regimes of two boreal fens. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 97, 144–156. [Google Scholar]
  48. Pepin, N. , Bradley, R.S. , Diaz, H.F. , Baraer, M. , Caceres, E.B. , Forsythe, N. et al. (2015) Elevation‐dependent warming in mountain regions of the world. Nature Climate Change, 5, 424–430. [Google Scholar]
  49. Pester, M. , Friedrich, M.W. , Schink, B. & Brune, A. (2004) pmoA‐based analysis of methanotrophs in a littoral lake sediment reveals a diverse and stable community in a dynamic environment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70, 3138–3142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Pratscher, J. , Vollmers, J. , Wiegand, S. , Dumont, M.G. & Kaster, A.K. (2018) Unravelling the identity, metabolic potential and global biogeography of the atmospheric methane‐oxidizing upland soil cluster α. Environmental Microbiology, 20, 1016–1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Radajewski, S. , Webster, G. , Reay, D.S. , Morris, S.A. , Ineson, P. , Nedwell, D.B. et al. (2002) Identification of active methylotroph populations in an acidic forest soil by stable‐isotope probing. Microbiology, 148, 2331–2342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Raghoebarsing, A.A. , Smolders, A.J.P. , Schmid, M.C. , Rijpstra, W.I.C. , Wolters‐Arts, M. , Derksen, J. et al. (2005) Methanotrophic symbionts provide carbon for photosynthesis in peat bogs. Nature, 436, 1153–1156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Reay, D.S. , Smith, P. , Christensen, T.R. , James, R.H. & Clark, H. (2018) Methane and global environmental change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 165–192. [Google Scholar]
  54. Rochette, P. & Bertrand, N. (2008) Soil‐surface gas emissions. In: Carter, M.R. & Gregorich, E.G. (Eds.) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 851–863. [Google Scholar]
  55. Salimi, S. , Almuktar, S.A. & Scholz, M. (2021) Impact of climate change on wetland ecosystems: a critical review of experimental wetlands. Journal of Environmental Management, 286, 112160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sebacher, D.I. , Harriss, R.C. , Bartlett, K.B. , Sebacher, S.M. & Grice, S.S. (1986) Atmospheric methane sources: Alaskan tundra bogs, an alpine fen, and a subarctic boreal marsh. Tellus, 38B, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  57. Siljanen, H.M.P. , Saari, A. , Krause, S. , Lensu, A. , Abell, G.C.J. , Bodrossy, L. et al. (2011) Hydrology is reflected in the functioning and community composition of methanotrophs in the littoral wetland of a boreal lake. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 75, 430–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Stralis‐Pavese, N. , Sessitsch, A. , Weilharter, A. , Reichenauer, T. , Reising, J. , Csontos, J. et al. (2004) Optimization of diagnostic microarray for application in analysing landfill methanotroph communities under different plant covers. Environmental Microbiology, 6, 347–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Theisen, A.R. & Murrell, J.C. (2005) Facultative methanotrophs revised. Journal of Bacteriology, 187, 4303–4305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Tsuji, K. , Tsien, H.C. , Hanson, R.S. , DePalma, S.R. & LaRoche, S. (1990) 16S ribosomal RNA sequence analysis for determination of phylogenetic relatlonship among methylotrophs. Journal of General Microbiology, 136, 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Tveit, A.T. , Hestnes, A.G. , Robinson, S.L. , Schintlmeister, A. , Dedysh, S.N. , Jehmlich, N. et al. (2019) Widespread soil bacterium that oxidizes atmospheric methane. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116, 8515–8524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Urbanová, Z. , Bárta, J. & Picek, T. (2013) Methane emissions and methanogenic archaea on pristine, drained and restored mountain peatlands, Central Europe. Ecosystems, 16, 664–667. [Google Scholar]
  63. Vekeman, B. , Kerckhof, F.M. , Cremers, G. , de Vos, P. , Vandamme, P. , Boon, N. et al. (2016) New Methyloceanibacter diversity from North Sea sediments includes methanotroph containing solely the soluble methane monooxygenase. Environmental Microbiology, 18, 4523–4536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Vorobev, A.V. , Baani, M. , Doronina, N.V. , Brady, A.L. , Liesack, W. , Dunfield, P.F. et al. (2011) Methyloferula stellata gen. nov., sp. nov., an acidophilic, obligately methanotrophic bacterium possessing only a soluble methane monooxygenase. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 61, 2456–2463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Whittenbury, R. , Phillips, K.C. & Wilkinson, J.G. (1970) Enrichment, isolation and some properties of methane utilizing bacteria. Journal of General Microbiology, 61, 205–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix S1: Supporting Information


Articles from Environmental Microbiology Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES