4-1BB is an inducible receptor expressed on activated T cells, while its ligand, 4-1BBL, is mainly expressed in antigen-presenting cells and macrophages [1, 2]. To the best of our knowledge, ligand-mediated transactivation of 4-1BB is responsible for the survival and immune effector functions of T cells. However, there have been reports of 4-1BBL also being expressed in T cells [3, 4]. As 4-1BB has only one known ligand, 4-1BBL, this coexpression of 4-1BB and 4-1BBL on T cells raises questions about cis-interactions among the proteins and their potential role in T-cell activation and immune function. Therefore, to investigate whether 4-1BB and 4-1BBL signals are necessary to suppress tumor growth, we designed an experiment as shown in Fig. 1a. In vivo administration of the 3H3 clone strongly triggers 4-1BB signals along with no or minor 4-1BBL signals, TKS-1 induces a mild agonistic effect on 4-1BBL with blockade of 4-1BB signals, 17B5 blocks both 4-1BB and 4-1BBL signals, and coadministration of 3H3 and TKS-1 enhances both 4-1BB and 4-1BBL signals [5–7]. C57BL/6 mice received mAbs intraperitoneally every 5 days starting from 9 days after MC38 tumor injection (Fig. 1a). Compared to rat IgG treatment, 17B5 treatment did not affect the tumor growth rate, but it did increase mortality (Fig. 1b). While TKS-1 treatment alone was ineffective, the combination treatment of 3H3 and TKS-1 effectively suppressed tumor growth (Fig. 1b). The percentage and absolute number of tumor-specific pGP70+CD8+ T cells were significantly higher in the inguinal tumor-draining lymph nodes (iTDLNs) of mice treated with 3H3 alone or with TSK-1 in combination with 3H3 than in those treated with rat IgG, TKS-1, or 17B5 alone (Fig. 1c, d). The results suggest that the combination of 3H3 and TKS-1 enhances tumor-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in MC38 tumor-bearing mice.
To evaluate the effects of 3H3 and TKS-1 on self-tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cells, pmel-1 Thy1.1+CD8+ T cells were activated with mouse gp100 (mgp100) peptide in vivo after they were transfected into C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 1e). At Day 7, pmel-1 CD8+ T cells in IgG-, TKS-1- or 17B5-treated mice showed comparable percentages and numbers, suggesting incomplete division in the draining lymph node (Fig. 1f, g). However, after >10 divisions, the percentages and absolute numbers of pmel-1 CD8+ T cells decreased in 3H3-treated mice and even further in 3H3 plus TSK-1-treated mice (Fig. 1f, g) compared with those on Day 5 (Supplementary Fig. 1). Notably, in a similar setting, the transcriptome analysis showed that TKS-1 treatment further upregulated the expression of genes involved in cell division, the type I IFN-related response, and T-cell activation, proliferation, and migration in 4-1BB-stimulated pmel-1 CD8+ T cells (Supplementary Fig. 2). After >10 divisions of CD8+ T cells, CD62L and CCR7 were downregulated, and sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor 1 was upregulated, enabling the migration of T cells from lymphoid organs [8–10]. Thus, we propose that 3H3 treatment enhances self-peptide-stimulated pmel-1 CD8+ T-cell division, possibly by amplifying TCR signaling [11, 12], and that TKS-1 treatment further accelerates the differentiation of 4-1BB-stimulated pmel-1 CD8+ T cells, leading to enhanced pmel-1 CD8+ T-cell migration from TDLNs.
In the B16-F10 melanoma mouse model (Fig. 1h), flow cytometry analysis 7 days after Ab treatment showed that 3H3 treatment increased, the proportion of CFSE-negative pmel-1 CD8+ T cells, whereas the addition of TKS-1 decreased the proportion of these cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes (Supplementary Fig. 3). Moreover, 3H3 treatment significantly increased the percentages of both endogenous Thy1.1−CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and transferred pmel-1 Thy1.1+CD8+ TILs in the gated CD45+ cells, and coinjection of TKS-1 further significantly increased the percentage of pmel-1 Thy1.1+CD8+ TILs but not Thy1.1−CD8+ TILs (Fig. 1i). Moreover, due to the increase in the percentage of CD45+ TILs following 3H3 plus TKS-1 treatment, the percentages of pmel-1 Thy1.1+CD8+ TILs in tumor tissues were found to be significantly increased (Fig. 1i).
Reports suggest that 4-1BBL is expressed not only by APCs but also by activated T cells [3, 4]. However, it is not clear whether TKS-1 acts on APCs or T cells. To investigate, CFSE-labeled pmel-1 Thy1.1 + CD8 + T cells were transferred to WT, 4-1BB−/−, and 4-1BBL−/− B6 mice, which were then immunized with mgp100 peptide and injected with mAbs (Fig. 1j). 3H3 treatment increased total TDLN cell numbers in WT but not 4-1BB−/− and 4-1BBL−/− B6 mice, while coadministration of TKS-1 with 3H3 decreased total TDLN cell numbers in WT mice and increased them in 4-1BB−/− and 4-1BBL−/− B6 mice (Fig. 1k). 3H3 treatment increased the pmel-1 Thy1.1+CD8+ T-cell percentage and number in all mouse types, while coinjection of TKS-1 decreased the percentage in WT mice, increased it in 4-1BB−/− mice, and did not significantly change it in 4-1BBL−/− mice (Fig. 1k, middle panel). 3H3 increased pmel-1 Thy1.1+CD8+ T cell numbers in WT and 4-1BB−/− mice but not in 4-1BBL−/− mice, while coadministration of TKS-1 reduced pmel-1 Thy1.1+CD8+ T cell numbers in WT mice, increased them in 4-1BB−/− mice, and did not significantly affect them in 4-1BBL−/− mice (Fig. 1k; right panel). Peripheral 4-1BB deficiency unexpectedly increased pmel-1 CD8+ T cell numbers following coinjection of 3H3 and TKS-1, but the cause of this T-cell hyperresponsiveness was not clear. Nonetheless, peripheral 4-1BBL deficiency reduced the number of 4-1BB-stimulated pmel-1 Thy1.1+CD8+ T cells and impaired the effects of TKS-1, indicating that peripheral 4-1BBL enhances the migration of 4-1BB-stimulated pmel-1 CD8+ T cells following TKS-1 treatment.
Next, we investigated whether 4-1BB or 4-1BBL deficiency in pmel-1 CD8+ T cells affects the migration of 4-1BB-stimulated pmel-1 CD8+ T cells from the lymph nodes after TKS-1 treatment. CFSE-labeled pmel-1 Thy1.1+CD8+ T cells from WT, 4-1BB−/−, and 4-1BBL−/− mice were transferred to WT B6 mice (Fig. 1l). The recipient mice were immunized with mgp100 peptide and injected with mAbs as previously described. The analysis confirmed the previous findings on total cell numbers, percentages, and pmel-1 CD8 + T-cell counts in B6 recipient mice treated with 3H3 or 3H3 plus TKS-1 after transferring WT pmel-1 CD8+ T cells (Fig. 1j, k). However, 4-1BB−/− pmel-1 CD8+ T cells were hardly detected in TDLNs due to their low survival rates, resulting in the loss of the effects of 3H3 or 3H3 plus TKS-1 (Fig. 1m, n; [13, 14]). After transferring 4-1BBL−/− pmel-1 CD8+ T cells to WT mice, 3H3 alone significantly increased TLDN cell numbers and the percentages and absolute counts of pmel-1 CD8+ T cells, while coinjection of TKS-1 completely abrogated its effects (Fig. 1n). Furthermore, the absolute count of 4-1BBL−/− pmel-1 CD8+ T cells was one-third of that of WT pmel-1 CD8+ T cells in 3H3-treated mice (Fig. 1n; last panel).
Coculturing increasing ratios of WT CD8+ T cells with WT and 4-1BBL−/− Thy1.1+CD8+ T cells resulted in a minimal effect on the survival and proliferation of WT Thy1.1+CD8+ T cells but a lower overall survival of Thy1.1+CD8+ T cells when T cells lacked 4-1BBL (Supplementary Fig. 4), suggesting that the trans interaction of 4-1BB and 4-1BBL between CD8+ T cells has a negligible effect on their survival and that the cis-interaction of 4-1BB and 4-1BBL in CD8+ T cells is necessary to support activated CD8+ T-cell survival.
Overall, our results suggest that the expression of endogenous 4-1BB in CD8+ T cells is indispensable for their survival during cellular division and that the expression of endogenous 4-1BBL is also necessary to maintain the survival of dividing CD8+ T cells and to enhance the migration of 4-1BB-stimulated CD8+ T cells after TKS-1 treatment.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank the Flow Cytometry Core Facility and Animal Sciences Branch at the National Cancer Center Research Institute for technical support. This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (2022R1A2C1005463 [BKC], 2022R1C1C1010078 [SHK], and 2022R1C1C1003152 [CH] from MSIT) and by the National Cancer Center of Korea (NCC) grant funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare (NCC-2212450 [CH]).
Author contributions
EJC, RS, KTN and BKC were involved in the project design and performed and analyzed the experiments. RS, CH, SHK, KHK, BMP, DHS, SH, and EJC were involved in designing and performing the animal experiments. YHK, BKC and BSK were involved in developing the methodology and in study conceptualization. KTN, BSK and BKC wrote the manuscript draft, and BKC supervised the execution of the study.
Data availability
The RNA-seq data have been deposited in the ArrayExpress database at EMBL-EBI under the accession number E-MTAB-13053.
Competing interests
YHK and BSK are employed by Eutilex, and BKC is employed by Innobationbio. BSK has equity ownership in Eutilex. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
These authors contributed equally: Eunjung Cho, Rohit Singh.
Contributor Information
Ki Taek Nam, Email: kitaek@yuhs.ac.
Beom K. Choi, Email: magetin@gmail.com
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41423-023-01056-3.
References
- 1.Etxeberria I, Glez-Vaz J, Teijeira Á, Melero I. New emerging targets in cancer immunotherapy: CD137/4-1BB costimulatory axis. ESMO Open. 2020;4:e000733. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cheuk AT, Mufti GJ, Guinn BA. Role of 4-1BB:4-1BB ligand in cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Gene Ther. 2004;11:215–26. doi: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dawicki W, Watts TH. Expression and function of 4-1BB during CD4 versus CD8 T cell responses in vivo. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34:743–51. doi: 10.1002/eji.200324278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Eun SY, Lee SW, Xu Y, Croft M. 4-1BB ligand signaling to T cells limits T cell activation. J Immunol. 2015;194:134–41. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shuford WW, Klussman K, Tritchler DD, Loo DT, Chalupny J, Siadak AW, et al. 4-1BB costimulatory signals preferentially induce CD8+ T cell proliferation and lead to the amplification in vivo of cytotoxic T cell responses. J Exp Med. 1997;186:47–55. doi: 10.1084/jem.186.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zheng G, Wang B, Chen A. The 4-1BB costimulation augments the proliferation of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2004;173:2428–34. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.4.2428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bang BR, Kim SJ, Yagita H, Croft M, Kang YJ. Inhibition of 4-1BBL-regulated TLR response in macrophages ameliorates endotoxin-induced sepsis in mice. Eur J Immunol. 2015;45:886–92. doi: 10.1002/eji.201445174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim SH, Singh R, Han C, Cho E, Kim YI, Lee DG, et al. Chronic activation of 4-1BB signaling induces granuloma development in tumor-draining lymph nodes that is detrimental to subsequent CD8+ T cell responses. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18:1956–68. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-00533-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Benechet AP, Menon M, Xu D, Samji T, Maher L, Murooka TT, et al. T cell-intrinsic S1PR1 regulates endogenous effector T-cell egress dynamics from lymph nodes during infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:2182–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516485113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nolz JC. Molecular mechanisms of CD8(+) T cell trafficking and localization. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72:2461–73. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-1835-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shah K, Al-Haidari A, Sun J, Kazi JU. T cell receptor (TCR) signaling in health and disease. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:412. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00823-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Esensten JH, Helou YA, Chopra G, Weiss A, Bluestone JA. CD28 costimulation: from mechanism to therapy. Immunity. 2016;44:973–88. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.04.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Takahashi C, Mittler RS, Vella AT. Cutting edge: 4-1BB is a bona fide CD8 T cell survival signal. J Immunol. 1999;162:5037–40. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.162.9.5037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhou AC, Wagar LE, Wortzman ME, Watts TH. Intrinsic 4-1BB signals are indispensable for the establishment of an influenza-specific tissue-resident memory CD8 T-cell population in the lung. Mucosal Immunol. 2017;10:1294–309. doi: 10.1038/mi.2016.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The RNA-seq data have been deposited in the ArrayExpress database at EMBL-EBI under the accession number E-MTAB-13053.