Skip to main content
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation logoLink to Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
. 2022 Dec 22;38(9):1981–1991. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac338

Genetic spectrum of CAKUT and risk factors for kidney failure: a paediatric multicentre cohort study

Jia-Lu Liu 1,2,#, Xiao-Wen Wang 3,#, Cui-Hua Liu 4,#, Duan Ma 5, Xiao-Jie Gao 6, Xiao-Yun Jiang 7, Jian-Hua Mao 8, Guang-Hua Zhu 9, Ai-Hua Zhang 10, Mo Wang 11, Xi-Qiang Dang 12, Jie-Qiu Zhuang 13, Yu-Feng Li 14, Hai-Tao Bai 15, Rui-Feng Zhang 16, Tong Shen 17, Yun-Li Bi 18, Yu-Bo Sun 19,20, Xiang Wang 21,22, Bing-Bing Wu 23, Jing Chen 24,25, Jia Rao 26,27, Xiao-Shan Tang 28,29, Qian Shen 30,31,, Hong Xu 32,33,; for the Chinese Children Genetic Kidney Disease Database, ‘Internet Plus’ Nephrology Alliance of the National Center for Children's Care
PMCID: PMC10468753  PMID: 36549658

ABSTRACT

Background

Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) are the leading cause of kidney failure in children with phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity. Our objective was to describe the genetic spectrum and identify the risk factors for kidney failure in children with CAKUT.

Methods

Clinical and genetic data were derived from a multicentre network [Chinese Children Genetic Kidney Disease Database (CCGKDD)] and the Chigene database. A total of 925 children with CAKUT who underwent genetic testing from 2014 to 2020 across China were studied. Data for a total of 584 children were obtained from the CCGKDD, including longitudinal data regarding kidney function. The risk factors for kidney failure were determined by the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

A genetic diagnosis was established in 96 of 925 (10.3%) children, including 72 (8%) with monogenic variants, 20 (2%) with copy number variants (CNVs) and 4 (0.4%) with major chromosomal anomalies. Patients with skeletal abnormalities were more likely to have large CNVs or abnormal karyotypes than monogenic variants. Eighty-two patients from the CCGKDD progressed to kidney failure at a median age of 13.0 years (95% confidence interval 12.4–13.6) and 24 were genetically diagnosed with variants of PAX2, TNXB, EYA1, HNF1B and GATA3 or the 48,XXYY karyotype. The multivariate analysis indicated that solitary kidney, posterior urethral valves, bilateral hypodysplasia, the presence of certain variants and premature birth were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions

The genetic spectrum of CAKUT varies among different subphenotypes. The identified factors indicate areas that require special attention.

Keywords: children, congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract, human genetics, kidney failure, risk factors

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract


KEY LEARNING POINTS.

What is already known about this subject?

  • Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) are the leading cause of kidney failure in children.

  • Few analyses, including genetic diagnoses and detailed analyses of the clinical phenotypes, have been performed on large cohorts to determine the risk factors for kidney failure.

What this study adds?

  • Children present a wide genetic spectrum and complicated genotype–phenotype correlations among different CAKUT subphenotypes.

  • A solitary kidney; posterior urethral valves; bilateral hypodysplasia; variants in PAX2, TNXB, EYA1, HNF1B and GATA3 and the 48, XXYY karyotype; and premature birth are associated with an increased risk of kidney failure during childhood.

What impact this may have on practice or policy?

  • Patients with skeletal abnormalities may benefit more from a CNV analysis and karyotype testing. The identified factors indicate areas that require special attention in children with CAKUT.

INTRODUCTION

Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) occur in 3–6 per 1000 live births [1] and are the most common causes of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and kidney failure (29–40%) in children, as reported in different registries [2, 3]. CAKUT has a multifactorial aetiology involving genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors [4, 5]. This disorder is characterized by high phenotypic variability between patients and the co-occurrence of different anomalies and extrarenal manifestations within the same individual [5, 6]. Monogenic and copy number variants (CNVs) involved in syndromic CAKUT may also lead to isolated CAKUT [7].

The prognosis of CAKUT is mainly related to the extent of nephron number reduction and the associated risk of kidney failure [7]. Several studies have explored risk factors associated with kidney failure [8–12]. One large study showed that a solitary kidney and renal hypodysplasia (RHD) associated with the posterior urethral valve (PUV) are independent risk factors [12]. In univariate analyses of genetic risk factors for CAKUT associated with kidney failure, certain variant carriers experienced worse outcomes [9, 10, 13].

Few multivariate analyses including genetic diagnosis have been performed on large cohorts of children with CAKUT to determine the risk factors for kidney failure [11, 14]. The aim of this study was to describe the genetic spectrum of different CAKUT phenotypes and evaluate risk factors for kidney failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design and participants

Patients diagnosed with CAKUT based on kidney imaging studies who were genetically tested before the age of 18 years included in the Chinese Children's Genetic Kidney Disease Database (CCGKDD) and Chigene database between 2014 and 2020 were recruited. Data on demographics, genetic diagnosis, genetic test methods, CAKUT and extrarenal phenotypes were collected for further analysis.

The study consisted of two parts and the outline is illustrated in Supplementary Fig. S1. We evaluated the correlations between clinical presentation patterns (sex, family history, genetic test methods, categories of CAKUT and extrarenal anomalies) and genetic abnormalities in part 1. In part 2, the risk factors associated with kidney failure were evaluated in patients from the CCGKDD, including genotypes, CAKUT phenotypes and birth history.

The CCGKDD is a national multicentre registration network (www.ccgkdd.com.cn) that shares genotypes and phenotypes of inherited kidney diseases in children in China [15]. Patients with CAKUT were from 15 paediatric nephrology centres across China, where the physicians utilized the same standardized diagnostic and classification approaches after receiving standardized training from the ‘Internet Plus’ Nephrology Alliance of National Center for Children's Care. The Chigene database is a local Chinese database that contains whole exome sequencing (WES) data for ≈40 000 individuals (including 15 000+ trios) sequenced by the Chigene Translational Medical Research Centre (www.chigene.org). The Institutional Review Board of the Children's Hospital of Fudan University approved and monitored this study (no. 2018286).

Clinical diagnosis

Seven CAKUT categories were analysed. The first six were derived from one large study focusing on kidney outcome [12] as follows: (A) solitary kidney, (B) unilateral RHD, (C) bilateral RHD, (D) RHD associated with PUV, (E) multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK), (F) horseshoe kidney and (G) others. The ‘others’ included ectopic kidney and other outflow abnormalities [16], such as vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO), ureterovesical junction obstruction (UVJO), duplex collecting system and hydronephrosis, which are rare but may also affect kidney function.

The solitary kidney comprises kidney agenesis and the ‘empty renal fossa’ on imaging studies that may result from a multicystic kidney [12]. RHD is characterized by varying degrees of defective kidney formation. Only a kidney biopsy can help distinguish this, therefore renal hypoplasia and dysplasia were placed in the same category. MCDK was diagnosed by ultrasound evidence of a kidney with parenchyma completely substituted by large cysts of varying size, with an absence of function of that kidney determined by kidney scintigraphy [12]. Patients with symptoms indicating VUR, such as acute pyelonephritis, a history of recurrent or febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) or CKD of unknown aetiology, underwent a micturating cystourethrogram.

A prenatal diagnosis was made through a foetal ultrasound examination (oligohydramnios or variations in gross morphology of the kidney, ureter or bladder) [17]. Initial symptoms included UTI, gross haematuria, foamy or cloudy urine, abnormal urination (polyuria/nocturia, urge incontinence) and flank or abdominal pain. Asymptomatic patients may be detected incidentally when imaging methods are used for a different issue.

Kidney function was evaluated using the serum creatinine level and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). eGFR was calculated using the updated Schwartz equation [18]. The severity of CKD was classified by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines [19]. Kidney failure was defined as GFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m2 or treatment with kidney replacement therapy.

Patients with CKD stage 1 attended follow-up every 6 months, CKD stage 2–5 attended every 3 months and extrarenal manifestations were evaluated simultaneously.

Genetic sequencing and data analysis

Targeted exome sequencing (TES), proband-WES and trio-WES were performed for genetic testing. Low-coverage whole genome sequencing (WGS), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction were used for CNV analysis and identification.

Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid was isolated from blood lymphocytes. Exome sequencing, variant burden analysis and decision making regarding identified variants were performed using a previously reported strategy [15]. Exome capture was performed using the Agilent ClearSeq Inherited Disease Kit for TES or the Agilent SureSelect All Exon Human V5 Kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), xGen Exome Research Panel v1.0 (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA) or SeqCap EZ Exome Enrichment Kit v2.0 (Roche NimbleGen, Pleasanton, CA, USA) for exome sequencing, followed by next-generation sequencing using the Illumina HiSeq or Illumina NovaSeq 6000 sequencing platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Sequence reads were mapped onto the human reference genome (NCBI build 37/hg19) with the Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (v.0.5.9-r16). The raw data generated by different platforms that met minimum quality standards were retained for further analysis, with mean coverage ≥20×, ≥90% target coverage region and having base call quality scores ≥Q20. Variant interpretation was performed using the same strategy (Supplemental Fig. S2) by nephrologists, molecular geneticists with domain expertise in inherited kidney diseases and bioinformaticians according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines [20]. Variants classified as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP) or variant of uncertain significance (VUS) were confirmed using Sanger sequencing. Candidate CNVs were annotated by analysing the genes contained in the CNVs and the CNV intervals themselves with the databases Decipher, ClinVar, ClinGen and Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. CNVs overlapping known disease‐associated regions were detected according to the ACMG guidelines for CNV calling [21].

Genetic test methods included TES, proband-WES, proband-WES + CNV, trio-WES and trio-WES + CNV.

Statistical analysis

Continuous data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR). All categorical data are presented as numbers and percentages.

To determine differences between groups according to genetic diagnoses, categorical variables were analysed using the chi‐squared test or Fisher's exact test.

Statistical analyses of survival and multivariate analyses of factors associated with kidney survival were performed. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves were calculated and analysed using the univariate logrank test. Differences in the severity of the disease at presentation were considered, including sex, genetic diagnosis, CAKUT phenotypes and premature birth. The survival function and the median time to kidney failure were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. We used the date of birth as the starting point and the last point of the survival analysis was the age at progression to kidney failure or the last available observation. The patients who reached the last available follow-up without showing kidney failure were right-censored. The number of at-risk patients is listed by time point in the figures. The median outcome-free age was reported with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Baseline variables considered clinically relevant or univariately related to outcomes were entered into a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. Considering the number of events available, the variables included were carefully chosen to ensure the simplicity of the final model. No patient died before developing kidney failure (no competing risks). Final Cox proportional hazards analysis was adjusted for genetic diagnosis, CAKUT phenotype and premature birth. The baseline parameters were tested one by one for the proportional hazard assumption. The assumption validity was assessed by the log-minus-log survival function. For the assumption to hold, the log-log plot should show the separate lines as approximately parallel. No violation was observed. The association between predictors and outcomes in the Cox proportional regression model was expressed as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI.

All analyses were performed using SPSS version 19 statistical software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) with default settings. P < .05 was set as the level of statistical significance.

RESULTS

Cohort characteristics

A total of 925 unrelated children with CAKUT were recruited; 584 patients were from the CCGKDD and had detailed clinical data available and 341 patients were from the Chigene database (Supplementary Fig. S1). Most cases were sporadic [n = 890 (96.2%)] and isolated to the urinary tract [n = 656 (70.9%)] (Table 1).

Table 1:

Baseline characteristics of 925 participants with CAKUT by genetic diagnosis.

Genetic risk factors Positive genetic diagnoses
Characteristics All (N = 925) Positive (n = 96) Negative (n = 829) P-
value
Monogenic variants (n = 72) CNVs and major chromosomal anomalies (n = 24) P-
value
Male 538 (58.2) 57 (59.4) 481 (58.0) .276 41 (56.9) 16 (66.7) .401
Positive family history 35 (3.8) 9 (9.4) 26 (3.1) .007a 5 (6.9) 4 (16.7) .221a
Genetic test methods .015a <.001a
 TES 44 (4.8) 6 (6.3) 38 (4.6) 6 (8.3) 0 (0)
 Proband-WES 157 (17.0) 11 (11.5) 146 (17.6) 11 (15.3) 0 (0)
 Proband-WES + CNV 267 (28.9) 19 (19.8) 248 (29.9) 9 (12.5) 10 (41.7)
 Trio-WES 343 (37.1) 40 (41.7) 303 (36.6) 39 (54.2) 1 (4.2)
 Trio-WES + CNV 114 (12.3) 20 (20.8) 94 (11.3) 7 (9.7) 13 (54.2)
CAKUT subphenotypes <.001a .079a
 Group A: solitary kidney 95 (10.3) 13 (13.5) 82 (9.9) 13 (18.1) 0 (0)
 Group B: unilateral renal hypodysplasia 174 (18.8) 13 (13.5) 161 (19.4) 10 (13.9) 6 (25)
 Group C: bilateral renal hypodysplasia 207 (19.1) 44 (45.8) 163 (19.7) 34 (47.2) 10 (41.7)
 Group D: renal hypodysplasia associated with PUV 21 (2.3) 0 (0) 21 (2.5) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Group E: MCDK 79 (8.5) 3 (3.1) 76 (9.2) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Group F: horseshoe kidney 26 (2.8) 3 (3.1) 23 (2.8) 2 (2.8) 1 (4.2)
 Group G: othersb 323 (34.9) 20 (20.8) 303 (36.6) 13 (18.1) 7 (29.2)
VUR 242 (26.2) 12 (12.5) 230 (27.7) 8 (11.1) 4 (16.7)
UVJO 3 (0.3) 0 (0) 3 (0.4) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Hydronephrosis 33 (3.6) 1 (1.0) 32 (3.9) 1 (1.4) 0 (0)
PUJO 4 (0.4) 1 (1.0) 3 (0.4) 0 (0) 1 (4.2)
Duplex collecting system 31 (3.4) 4 (4.2) 27 (3.3) 2 (2.8) 2 (8.3)
Ectopic kidney 10 (1.1) 2 (2.1) 8 (1.0) 2 (2.8) 0 (0)
Extrarenal anomalies c 269 (29.1) 62 (64.6) 207 (25.0) <.001 48 (66.7) 14 (58.3) .460
Behavioural and cognitive abnormalities 67 (7.2) 12 (12.5) 55 (6.6) .036 6 (8.3) 6 (25) .067a
Congenital heart disease 64 (6.9) 14 (14.6) 50 (6.0) .002 9 (12.5) 5 (20.8) .329a
Skeletal anomalies 54 (5.8) 10 (10.4) 44 (5.3) .043 4 (5.6) 6 (25) .014a
Genito-reproductive 34 (3.7) 6 (6.3) 28 (3.4) .154a 4 (5.6) 2 (8.3) .638a
Motor retardation 35 (3.8) 5 (5.2) 30 (3.6) .39a 4 (5.6) 1 (4.2) 1.000a
Central nervous system 30 (3.2) 3 (3.1) 27 (3.3) 1.00a 1 (1.4) 2 (8.3) .153a
Lung and diaphragm 2 (0.2) 1 (1.0) 1 (0.1) .197a 1 (1.4) 0 (0) 1.000a
Face 23 (2.5) 10 (10.4) 13 (1.6) <.001a 8 (11.1) 2 (8.3) 1.000a
Ocular 37 (4.0) 22 (22.9) 15 (1.8) <.001a 20 (27.8) 2 (8.3) .055a
Hearing 23 (2.5) 10 (10.4) 13 (1.6) <.001a 9 (12.5) 1 (4.2) .443a
External ear 28 (3.0) 11 (11.5) 17 (2.1) <.001a 10 (13.9) 1 (4.2) .281a
Gastrointestinal tract 27 (2.9) 8 (8.3) 19 (2.3) .01 7 (9.7) 1 (4.2) .675a
Diabetes mellitus 4 (0.4) 2 (2.1) 2 (0.2) .05a 2 (2.8) 0 1.000a

Values presented as n (%).

a

Fisher's exact test.

b

Group G: others (VUR, UVJO, hydronephrosis, PUJO, duplex collecting system, ectopic kidney).

c

One patient may have different extrarenal phenotypes.

Genotype–phenotype relationship in 925 patients with CAKUT

A genetic diagnosis was established for 96 of 925 (10.3%) children, including 72 (7.8%) with monogenic variants, 20 (2.2%) with CNVs and 4 (0.4%) with major chromosomal anomalies (Fig. 1, Table 1). Clinical phenotypes subdivided into seven CAKUT categories and variant types in each of the 96 genetically diagnosed patients are summarized in Supplementary Fig. S3. In total, 381 of 925 patients underwent a CNV analysis. The likelihood of establishing a genetic diagnosis was higher for patients who had a positive family history (25.7%) and extrarenal features (23.0%) (Table 1). For extrarenal manifestations, the two highest genetic diagnosis rates were ocular (59.5%) and hearing (43.5%) abnormalities (Table 1). Trio-WES with CNV analysis showed the highest genetic diagnostic rate (17.5%; Table 1). Although patients with skeletal abnormalities were more likely to have large CNVs or abnormal karyotypes than monogenic variants, the differences in the categories of genetic diagnosis in patients with and without extrarenal abnormalities were not statistically significant (Table 1).

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Genotype–phenotype relationship in 925 children with CAKUT. (A) The genetic spectrum varies among different CAKUT subphenotypes. (B) The percentage and number of patients in whom the genetic diagnosis was established in more than one patient. (C) The clinical diagnostic spectrum of patients with genetic diagnosis. BRHD, bilateral renal hypodysplasia; DS, duplex collecting system; EK, ectopic kidney; HD, hydronephrosis; HSK, horseshoe kidney; SK, solitary kidney; URHD, unilateral renal hypodysplasia.

The genetic spectrum varies among different CAKUT subphenotypes (Fig. 1A). A genetic diagnosis was identified in 13.7% of group A (solitary kidney), 7.5% of group B (unilateral RHD), 21.3% of group C (bilateral RHD), 3.8% of group E (MCDK) and 11.5% of group F (horseshoe kidney), respectively. A genetic diagnosis was not established for patients in group D with RHD associated with PUV and UVJO.

Figure 1B illustrates the percentage and number of patients in whom the genetic diagnosis was established in more than one patient. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in PAX2 and 17q12 deletion classified according to ACMG guidelines were the top-two common causes.

Details of the genetic diagnosis are provided in Supplementary Table S1 (P/LP nucleotide variants) and Supplementary Table S2 (P/LP copy number variants). Two loci, chromosome 17q12 (all deletions) and chromosome 1q21.1 (all deletions), explained 10 of the 20 (50%) patients who carried a known CNV (Supplementary Table S3). Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY) was the most common chromosomal abnormality (three patients). Eleven genetic disorders accounted for 66 of the 96 (68.9%) patients with a genetic diagnosis (Fig. 1B). The clinical diagnostic spectrum of patients with a genetic diagnosis is presented in Fig. 1C. Genotype–phenotype correlations determined that 17q12 loci were all identified in RHD and all COL4A1 variants were identified in VUR. Diagnostic variants of PAX2, GATA3, HNF1B, SALL1, KMT2D and TNXB were detected in different CAKUT subphenotypes.

Fifty-six identified variants were classified as VUS (Supplementary Table S3). In 2.1% of patients (19 of 925) we detected variants in 16 disease-causing genes known to cause monogenic non-CAKUT diseases (NPHP1, UMOD, WT1, EBP, ERCC8, DYNC2H1, RYR2, INSL3, SON, ERCC8, YY1, AVPR2, GATA6, WDR19, COL4A3 and DMD) (Supplementary Table S4). In these patients, no CAKUT-causing variants were identified.

Genotype–phenotype relationships in 584 children with CAKUT from the CCGKDD who had a detailed clinical history

Information on kidney function was available for 584 children from the CCGKDD. The characteristics are shown in Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. S4. For the 72 of 584 (12.3%) patients who had a genetic diagnosis, we analysed the detailed clinical data (the time point at which the first symptom was observed to the age at the last follow-up and the age at diagnosis of kidney failure) after subdivision into seven CAKUT subphenotypes to explore genotype–phenotype correlations (Supplementary Fig. S4). Overall, 128 patients (21.9%) were prenatally diagnosed and 287 patients (49.1%) were diagnosed after they presented with a UTI prompting imaging studies. The number of children with a family history [28 patients (4.8%)] or parental consanguinity [2 patients (0.3%)] was relatively limited.

Table 2:

Characteristics of 584 patients from the CCGKDD who had a detailed clinical history by CAKUT subphenotypes.

Category (n) Gender, n (%) Genetic
diagnosis,
n (%)
Genetic diagnosis with certain variantsa, n (%) Premature birth, n (%) CKD 5 at last follow-up, n (%)
Female Male
Group A (23): solitary kidney 9 (39.1) 14 (60.9) 4 (17.4) 4 (17.4) 1 (4.3) 7 (30.4)
Group B (112): unilateral renal hypodysplasia 18 (16.1) 94 (83.9) 13 (11.6) 7 (6.3) 7 (6.3) 10 (8.9)
Group C (135): bilateral renal hypodysplasia 47 (34.8) 88 (65.2) 38 (28.1) 25 (18.5) 22 (16.3) 57 (42.2)
Group D (19): renal hypodysplasia associated with PUV 0 (0) 19 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) 6 (31.6) 4 (21.1)
Group E (7): MCDK 3 (42.9) 4 (57.1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Group F (10): horseshoe kidney 6 (60.0) 4 (40.0) 1 (10) 0 (0) 1 (10.0) 0 (0)
Group G (278): othersb 139 (50.0) 139 (50.0) 16 (5.8) 1 (0.4) 10 (3.6) 4 (1.4)

aGenetic diagnosis with certain variants: PAX2, TNXB, EYA1, HNF1B, GATA3 and 48,XXYY.

b

Group G: others (vesicoureteral reflux, ureterovesical junction obstruction, hydronephrosis, pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction, duplex collecting system, ectopic kidney).

During a median follow-up of 4.7 years (IQR 1.4–7.4), kidney function was abnormal in 216 patients (37.0%). Eighty‐two (14.0%) patients progressed to kidney failure at a median age of 13.0 years (95% CI 12.4–13.6). Kidney survival probabilities were greater for categories E and F (no events) than for categories G (4), D (4), A (7), B (10) and C (57).

The patients with genetic disorders showed worse outcomes (Fig. 2A). Of the 82 patients who progressed to kidney failure, 24 were genetically diagnosed with P/LP variants of PAX2, TNXB, EYA1, HNF1B and GATA3 or the 48,XXYY karyotype (Supplementary Fig. S4). Thirty-seven patients had the above variants and they had worse outcomes than the other 547 patients (χ2 = 18.01, P < .001) (Fig. 2B). The median age at the diagnosis of kidney failure was 10.0 years (95% CI 6.0–14.0) for patients with certain variants described above and 13.0 years (95% CI 11.5–14.5) for others.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Kaplan‒Meier kidney survival curves for 584 children with CAKUT from the CCGKDD stratified according to (A) categories of genetic diagnosis; (B) the presence of certain variants (PAX2, TNXB, EYA1, HNF1B, GATA3 and 48,XXYY); (C) sex and (D) preterm or term birth.

Sex did not influence the outcome (Fig. 2C). The prognosis was significantly poorer for patients with premature birth (Fig. 2D).

Adjusted survival curves based on the Cox regression model

The multivariate Cox regression analysis showed solitary kidney; PUV; bilateral RHD; P/LP variants of PAX2, TNXB, EYA1, HNF1B and GATA3 or the 48,XXYY karyotype; and premature birth were independent risk factors for kidney failure (Table 3). A solitary kidney, PUV and bilateral RHD predicted worse outcomes independent of other covariates. After controlling for certain genetic diagnoses and premature birth, a significantly different clinical course was observed in CAKUT subphenotypes (Fig. 3).

Table 3:

Univariable/multivariable Cox regression analysis of probable explaining factors for progression of kidney failure in children with CAKUT from the CCGKDD.

Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis
Variable HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value
Genetic diagnosis with certain variantsa 2.754 1.686–4.497 <.001 1.742 1.060–2.864 .029
CAKUT categoryb <.001 <.001
Posterior urethral valves 18.550 4.631–74.309 <.001 12.185 2.942–50.461 .001
Solitary kidney 11.546 3.356–39.722 <.001 9.123 2.600–32.010 .001
Bilateral hypodysplasia 12.859 4.602–35.932 <.001 10.042 3.544–28.455 <.001
Unilateral hypodysplasia 3.524 1.081–11.493 .037 3.032 0.924–9.949 .067
MCDK, horseshoe kidney, and othersc
Premature birth 3.766 2.099–6.758 <.001 2.844 1.531–5.282 .001

aGenetic diagnosis with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants of PAX2, TNXB, EYA1, HNF1B, GATA3 and 48,XXYY.

bThe reference level for the effect estimates associated with the CAKUT categories (solitary kidney, bilateral hypodysplasia, unilateral hypodysplasia and posterior urethral valves) includes multicystic kidney, horseshoe kidney and others.

c

Others: vesicoureteral reflux, ureterovesical junction obstruction, hydronephrosis, pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction, duplex collecting system and ectopic kidney.

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Survival probabilities of 584 children with CAKUT from the CCGKDD stratified by CAKUT subphenotypes after adjustment for the presence of certain variants (PAX2, TNXB, EYA1, HNF1B, GATA3 and 48,XXYY) and premature birth.

DISCUSSION

In this study, an in-depth analysis of the phenotypes and genotypes of 925 children with CAKUT was performed. The genetic spectrum varies among different CAKUT subphenotypes. To the best of our knowledge, this multivariate analysis is the first to include the genetic diagnosis and detailed clinical phenotype in a large cohort of children with CAKUT for the risk factors for kidney failure.

A genetic diagnosis was established for 10.3% of the children. The genetic diagnostic rate (21.3%) was higher for patients with bilateral RHD. Although the rate was relatively low (5.0%), genetic diagnoses were detected in 12 of 242 patients with VUR. The same diagnostic genes were obtained for different CAKUT subphenotypes. P/LP variants in PAX2 and 17q12 were common causes, similar to previous findings [22, 23].

To date, 50 different monogenic causes [24] and 6 CNVs (17q12, 22q11.2, 1q21, 16p11.2, 4p16.1-p16.3, 16p11.3) [25] have been described as major causes of CAKUT. Table 4 and Supplementary Table S5 summarize the molecular genetic studies (>60 participants) of CAKUT and show the variability in the detection rate of genetic causes due to the differences in methodology, study design and population [9, 10, 22, 23, 26–30]. Literature also reinforces our results, suggesting that genetic analysis of CAKUT genes is highly recommended for patients with a family history and syndromic CAKUT [31] and necessitates surveillance for the possible clinical features associated with genetic defects [6, 22, 23]. In this study, CNV analysis and karyotype testing increased the diagnostic yield of genetic testing by 2.6%. Patients, especially those with skeletal abnormalities, may benefit more from a CNV analysis and karyotyping.

Table 4:

Summary of molecular genetic studies (>60 participants) of CAKUT.

ID Year Country Family (patients) Positive familial history, % Sex (male), % Extrarenal phenotypes, % CAKUT cohort CAKUT exclusion 2–3 diagnoses, % Methods Gene number Causative variants, % Causative CNV, % Causative variants (patients) Reference
1 2006 European 99 (100) 12 59 23 RHD RHD with PUV or primary bladder abnormalities NA TES 5 20 ND TCF2 (8), PAX2 (7), EYA1 (2), SIX1 (2), SALL1 (1) 25
2 2014 World-wide 650 (749) 21 55 0 Isolated CAKUT (288 VUR, 120 RHD, 90 solitary kidney) Syndromic CAKUT 21 TES 12 6 ND BMP7 (1), CDC5L (1), CHD1L (5), EYA1 (3), GATA3 (2), HNF1B (6), PAX2 (5), RET (3), ROBO2 (4), SALL1 (9), SIX2 (1), SIX5 (1) 24
3 2016 Worldwide 453 10 61 14 132 duplex collecting system, 103 PUJO, 60 PUV, 53 VUR NA 43 TES 208 1 ND PAX2 (3), HNF1B (1), UMOD (1), SIX5 (1) 26
4 2017 France 204 30 57 39 Bilateral or unilateral associated with either extrarenal defects or familial history PUV 35 TES 330 18 ND HNF1B (9), PAX2 (9), EYA1 (5), GATA3 (4), ANOS1 (2), CHD7 (1), KIF14 (2), PBX1 (4) 27
5 2017 USA 62 (112) 16 56 31 Isolated and syndromic without a known diagnosis, 23% RHD, 19% solitary kidney, 16% PUV, 15% VUR Syndromic CAKUT in which an underlying genetic aetiology was known and individuals with non-syndromic and non-familial forms of VUR NA WES (20 trio-WES) NA 5 6.50 EYA1 (1), HNF1B (1), PAX2 (1), FOXP1 (1) 28
6 2018 Worldwide 232 (319) 17 59 25 CAKUT and cryptorchidism NA 17 WES 404 14 NA 22 different monogenic genes 21
7 2019 Japan 66 NA 76 41 Bilateral renal lesions, extrarenal complications or a family history VUR alone and chromosome aberrations NA TES, MLPA, aCGH, NGS NA 21 6 HNF1B (7), PAX2 (4), EYA1 (1), CHD7 (1), EP300 (1) 8
8 2020 Korea 94 5 83 34 Sever CAKUT (solitary kidney, RHD, MCDK, bilateral VUR and PUV) Unilateral VUR, unilateral obstructive uropathy 29 TES 60 7 6.40 HNF1B (2), PAX2 (2), EYA1 (1), UPK3A (1), FRAS1 (1) 9
9 2022 China 925 4 58 29 CAKUT NA 31 TES, WES, low-coverage WGS, MLPA, aCGH 174 8 2 This study This study

aCGH, array comparative genomic hybridization; MPLA, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

This study illustrates the association between genotypes and other risk factors for kidney failure in a multicentre paediatric cohort with a wide variety of CAKUT subphenotypes utilizing the same diagnostic and classification approaches. Accurately stratifying patients with CAKUT at risk for progression could enable earlier targeted treatment to stabilize kidney decline and reduce future adverse outcomes.

A study of 66 patients with CAKUT found the kidney prognosis varied for each genetic variant; 10-year kidney survival was 86% for the HNF1B variant group, 38% for the PAX2 variant group and 100% for the other gene variant group (P = .08) [9]. A study of 94 patients revealed that patients with variants of HNF1B, PAX2, EYA1 and FRAS1 progressed to kidney failure [10]. Our previous study of 379 children with primary VUR revealed that PAX2 or TNXB variant carriers had worse outcomes [13]. A recent study found HNF1B and PAX2 were responsible for the majority of diagnoses in CAKUT patients with early-onset CKD [32]. These findings all indicate the necessity of classifying different genes. Therefore we analysed the genes that have been reported or progressed to kidney failure in this cohort rather than all molecular diagnoses. Patients carrying PAX2, TNXB, EYA1, HNF1B or GATA3 variants or with the 48,XXYY karyotype had a shorter predicted kidney survival. Knowing the differences in the kidney prognosis related to the genetic variants is beneficial because these gene variants generally have a high detection rate.

Bilateral RHD was reported to be associated with a higher risk of kidney failure [12, 33]. CAKUT subphenotypes have a more significant impact on prognosis. Survival data stratified by CAKUT subgroups showed a significantly poorer outcome for patients assigned to the solitary kidney, PUV and RHD groups, consistent with published data [12]. Isolated VUR and other urinary tract anomalies, such as duplicated collecting systems, represented a relatively good prognosis.

Another important prognostic indicator for progression to kidney failure is premature birth, since extreme prematurity has been shown to correlate with low nephron number in autopsy studies [34]. The univariate analysis by Isert et al. [11] produced similar results, showing prematurity is associated with CKD stage ≥2.

This study has several limitations. First, the family chose whether genetic testing was performed, and triplicate samples were not available for every family. Because the pathogenicity must be further classified, VUS was categorized as no genetic diagnosis, which may lead to the underestimation of genetic data. Second, our cohort had a higher proportion of patients with kidney failure due to the focus of the Nephrology Alliance of National Center, and the selection of certain genetic diagnoses as a composite predictor variable is exploratory, which may affect the results applicable to the general population. Finally, our findings are potentially limited by other factors, such as inhibition of the renin–angiotensin system, management of hypertension and surgical intervention.

In conclusion, the genetic spectrum varies among different CAKUT subphenotypes. Patients with skeletal abnormalities may benefit more from a CNV analysis and karyotyping. Patients with PAX2, TNXB, EYA1, HNF1B or GATA3 variants or the 48,XXYY karyotype had a shorter predicted kidney survival. A solitary kidney, PUV, bilateral hypodysplasia and premature birth are associated with an increased risk of kidney failure during childhood. Close follow-up visits in accordance with the identified factors are recommended. Prospective studies are needed to investigate the applicability of these results.

Supplementary Material

gfac338_Supplemental_File

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank all the families and our coordinators from the Chigene Translational Medical Research Center WuXiNextCODE and MyGenostics for sequencing technology support.

Contributor Information

Jia-Lu Liu, Department of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Kidney Development and Pediatric Kidney Disease Research Center, Shanghai, China.

Xiao-Wen Wang, Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Wuhan Children's Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Cui-Hua Liu, Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University/Henan Children's Hospital/Zhengzhou Children's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.

Duan Ma, Key Laboratory of Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Ministry of Education, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Xiao-Jie Gao, Department of Nephrology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

Xiao-Yun Jiang, Department of Pediatric, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhongshan University, Guangzhou, China.

Jian-Hua Mao, Department of Nephrology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Guang-Hua Zhu, Department of Nephrology, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Ai-Hua Zhang, Department of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Mo Wang, Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Xi-Qiang Dang, Department of Pediatrics, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Jie-Qiu Zhuang, Department of Pediatrics, Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Yu-Feng Li, Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Hai-Tao Bai, Department of Pediatric, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

Rui-Feng Zhang, Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Xuzhou Children's Hospital, Xuzhou, China.

Tong Shen, Department of Pediatrics, Xiamen Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Xiamen, China.

Yun-Li Bi, Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.

Yu-Bo Sun, Shanghai Kidney Development and Pediatric Kidney Disease Research Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.

Xiang Wang, Shanghai Kidney Development and Pediatric Kidney Disease Research Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.

Bing-Bing Wu, Clinical Genetic Center, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.

Jing Chen, Department of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Kidney Development and Pediatric Kidney Disease Research Center, Shanghai, China.

Jia Rao, Department of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Kidney Development and Pediatric Kidney Disease Research Center, Shanghai, China.

Xiao-Shan Tang, Department of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Kidney Development and Pediatric Kidney Disease Research Center, Shanghai, China.

Qian Shen, Department of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Kidney Development and Pediatric Kidney Disease Research Center, Shanghai, China.

Hong Xu, Department of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Kidney Development and Pediatric Kidney Disease Research Center, Shanghai, China.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFC2500202) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC-81873593, NSFC81800602, NSFC82070686), a grant (20184Y0176) from the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning Youth Research Program, a grant (SHDC2020CR2064B) from the Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Hospital Development Center and a grant (EK2022ZX01) from the Key Development Program of Children's Hospital of Fudan University.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

H.X. and Q.S. were responsible for the concept and management. J.L.L., X.W.W. and C.H.L. participated in the execution and coordination. J.L.L. drafted the manuscript. J.L.L., X.W.W., C.H.L., D.M., X.J.G., X.Y.J., J.H.M., G.H.Z., A.H.Z., M.W., X.Q.D., J.Q.Z., Y.F.L., H.T.B., R.F.Z., T.S., Y.L.B., Y.B.S., X.W., B.B.W., J.C., J.R. and X.S.T. conducted data acquisition, analysis and interpretation.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplementary material.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Yosypiv IV. Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract: a genetic disorder? Int J Nephrol 2012;2012:909083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Harada R, Hamasaki Y, Okuda Yet al. Epidemiology of pediatric chronic kidney disease/kidney failure: learning from registries and cohort studies. Pediatr Nephrol 2022;37:1215–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Shen Q, Fang X, Man Xet al. Pediatric kidney transplantation in China: an analysis from the IPNA Global Kidney Replacement Therapy Registry. Pediatr Nephrol 2021;36:685–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Nicolaou N, Renkema KY, Bongers EMet al. Genetic, environmental, and epigenetic factors involved in CAKUT. Nat Rev Nephrol 2015;11:720–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Westland R, Renkema KY, Knoers N.. Clinical integration of genome diagnostics for congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2021;16:128–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Seltzsam S, Wang C, Zheng Bet al. Reverse phenotyping facilitates disease allele calling in exome sequencing of patients with CAKUT. Genet Med 2022;24:307–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Knoers N, Antignac C, Bergmann Cet al. Genetic testing in the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease: recommendations for clinical practice. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022;37:239–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Matsell DG, Catapang M.. Predicting outcomes and improving care in children with congenital kidney anomalies. Pediatr Nephrol 2020;35:1811–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ishiwa S, Sato M, Morisada Net al. Association between the clinical presentation of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) and gene mutations: an analysis of 66 patients at a single institution. Pediatr Nephrol 2019;34:1457–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ahn YH, Lee C, Kim NKDet al. Targeted exome sequencing provided comprehensive genetic diagnosis of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. J Clin Med 2020;9:751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Isert S, Muller D, Thumfart J.. Factors associated with the development of chronic kidney disease in children with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Front Pediatr 2020;8:298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Sanna-Cherchi S, Ravani P, Corbani Vet al. Renal outcome in patients with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Kidney Int 2009;76:528–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Liu JL, Shen Q, Wu MYet al. Responsible genes in children with primary vesicoureteral reflux: findings from the Chinese Children Genetic Kidney Disease Database. World J Pediatr 2021;17:409–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hays T, Thompson MV, Bateman DAet al. The prevalence and clinical significance of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract in preterm infants. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e2231626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Rao J, Liu X, Mao Jet al. Genetic spectrum of renal disease for 1001 Chinese children based on a multicenter registration system. Clin Genet 2019;96:402–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Murugapoopathy V, Gupta IR.. A primer on congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tracts (CAKUT). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020;15:723–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Wiles K, Chappell L, Clark Ket al. Clinical practice guideline on pregnancy and renal disease. BMC Nephrol 2019;20:401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Schwartz GJ, Munoz A, Schneider MFet al. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;20:629–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Inker LA, Astor BC, Fox CHet al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2014;63:713–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale Set al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015;17:405–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AMet al. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet Med 2020;22:245–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Knoers N, Renkema KY.. The genomic landscape of CAKUT; you gain some, you lose some. Kidney Int 2019;96:267–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. van der Ven AT, Connaughton DM, Ityel Het al. Whole-exome sequencing identifies causative mutations in families with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. J Am Soc Nephrol 2018;29:2348–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kohl S, Habbig S, Weber LTet al. Molecular causes of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT). Mol Cell Pediatr 2021;8:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Verbitsky M, Westland R, Perez Aet al. The copy number variation landscape of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Nat Genet 2019;51:117–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hwang DY, Dworschak GC, Kohl Set al. Mutations in 12 known dominant disease-causing genes clarify many congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Kidney Int 2014;85:1429–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Weber S, Moriniere V, Knuppel Tet al. Prevalence of mutations in renal developmental genes in children with renal hypodysplasia: results of the ESCAPE study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:2864–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Nicolaou N, Pulit SL, Nijman IJet al. Prioritization and burden analysis of rare variants in 208 candidate genes suggest they do not play a major role in CAKUT. Kidney Int 2016;89:476–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Heidet L, Moriniere V, Henry Cet al. Targeted exome sequencing identifies PBX1 as involved in monogenic congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017;28:2901–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Bekheirnia M, Bekheirnia N, Bainbridge Met al. Whole-exome sequencing in the molecular diagnosis of individuals with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract and identification of a new causative gene. Genet Med 2017;19:412–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Cocchi E, Nestor JG, Gharavi AG.. Clinical genetic screening in adult patients with kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020;15:1497–510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Domingo-Gallego A, Pybus M, Bullich Get al. Clinical utility of genetic testing in early-onset kidney disease: seven genes are the main players. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022;37:687–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wuhl E, van Stralen KJ, Verrina Eet al. Timing and outcome of renal replacement therapy in patients with congenital malformations of the kidney and urinary tract. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;8:67–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Rodriguez MM, Gomez AH, Abitbol CLet al. Histomorphometric analysis of postnatal glomerulogenesis in extremely preterm infants. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2004;7:17–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

gfac338_Supplemental_File

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplementary material.


Articles from Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES