Abstract
A 33-year-old male with severe COVID-19 required prolonged veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Following decannulation, he developed an Enterococcus faecium empyema. Tube thoracostomy and broad-spectrum antibiotics were initiated, followed by an unsuccessful attempt at pleural irrigation with saline, given the patient had an increased risk of bleeding due to the concomitant requirement for systemic anticoagulation. Subsequently, intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and recombinant human Dornase alfa (DNase) were safely administered with the resolution of empyema. Enterococcus faecium is an uncommon cause of pleural empyema and, to our knowledge, has not previously been reported to be associated with COVID-19 or ECMO.
Keywords: vv ecmo, veno-venous ecmo, anticoagulation, enterococcus faecium, pleural empyema, covid-19, ecmo
Introduction
The complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections have been well-described over the past several years, including pleural effusion, pneumothorax, and rarely empyema, which is associated with a significantly increased rate of morbidity and mortality [1]. Empyemas are typically associated with organisms such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Bacteroides fragilis; rarely, bacteria such as Enterococcus faecium have been documented in such cases [2-5].
The usual management of pleural empyema requires both antibiotic therapy and drainage [6]. When drainage cannot be readily achieved with tube thoracostomy, the use of adjuncts such as pleural saline irrigation or the addition of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and recombinant human Dornase alfa (DNase) may be required [7,8]. The safety of the latter treatment modality has not been well documented in patients who are systemically anticoagulated. Here we present a case of Enterococcus faecium empyema in a patient with COVID-19 after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). He ultimately required intrapleural tPA/DNase while systemically anticoagulated after saline irrigation, which was unsuccessful.
Case presentation
A 33-year-old Hispanic male with morbid obesity presented with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19. He was intubated 10 days after symptom onset and subsequently placed on veno-venous ECMO after failing to improve despite maximum ventilator support, prone positioning, neuromuscular blockade, and inhaled pulmonary vasodilators. His treatment included remdesivir, dexamethasone, and tocilizumab. His course was complicated by right heart failure requiring mechanical support, acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis, and a superior vena cava thrombus. During his hospitalization, he was successfully treated for multiple nosocomial infections, including bacteremia with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and ampicillin-sensitive Enterococcus faecalis, as well as ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP) secondary to Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae. He was decannulated after 130 days while still requiring mechanical ventilator support via tracheostomy.
Sixteen days after decannulation, the patient developed respiratory distress as well as signs concerning an emerging infection. Vancomycin and meropenem were initiated, and a CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was obtained that demonstrated a right pleural effusion with concern for empyema (Figures 1A, 1B).
Figure 1. A computed tomography scan of the pleural empyema before and after drainage.
Figures 1A and 1B were taken prior to the insertion of the pigtail catheter. Figures 1C and 1D were taken after six days of treatment with tPA/DNase. Arrows point to the location of the empyema.
Pleural sampling was grossly purulent and consistent with empyema (Table 1).
Table 1. Pleural effusion cytology results.
| Pleural Fluid Analysis | |
| Color | Red |
| Appearance | Cloudy |
| Cell Count | 154,900 |
| Red Blood Cells/mcL | 287,000 |
| Nucleated Cells/mcL | 155,260 |
| Segmented Neutrophils (%) | 78.2 |
| Mononuclear Cells (%) | 21.8 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | <5 |
| Protein (g/dL) | 4.9 |
| Lactate Dehydrogenase (U/L) | >200 |
A 14-French chest tube was placed, and pleural irrigation with normal saline was initially attempted without success. Subsequently, in the setting of systemic anticoagulation, intrapleural TPA/Dornase was initiated with close monitoring; the patient demonstrated radiographic improvement after a total of six days of therapy (Figures 1C, 1D). Pleural fluid cultures and sensitivities revealed an ampicillin-sensitive Enterococcus faecium, and he was continued on a six-week course of ampicillin with the resolution of the empyema.
Discussion
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been extensively used during the COVID-19 pandemic. The CESAR (conventional ventilatory support vs. extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure) and EOLIA (ECMO to rescue lung injury in severe ARDS) trials showed that early evaluation and initiation of ECMO were associated with significant improvement in patient outcomes compared to conventional management [9,10]. Bleeding and thrombotic complications are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality associated with ECMO, and in patients who are anticoagulated, the utilization of thrombolytic medications is typically avoided [11,12]. Intrapleural empyema has not been directly associated with ECMO patients, and to our knowledge, no cases have been reported in which a patient who required ECMO support after COVID-19 subsequently developed an Enterococcus faecium intrapleural empyema.
Enterococcus faecium is a gram-positive, facultative anaerobic cocci that is a commensal gastrointestinal organism and rarely associated with intrapleural infections [13]. A study of 110 serious infections due to the Enterococcus genus over the course of one year across six hospitals found only 4% of those infections were located in the respiratory tract [14]. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are among the most common culture-identified organisms in patients with hospital-acquired empyema [15]. Apart from morbid obesity, our patient did not have any additional comorbidities such as alcoholism, diabetes, or gastroesophageal reflux disease that would put him at higher risk for gastrointestinal microbiota-associated empyema [16]. Prior reports of Enterococcus faecium empyema have primarily been associated with fistulization between the gastrointestinal system and the pleural space; however, our patient had none [3,5]. Our patient did have Enterococcus faecaelis bacteremia earlier in his hospitalization while on ECMO, which resolved with the administration of ampicillin; however, this empyema revealed the first Enterococcus faecium-positive culture.
Standard treatment of empyema consists of broad-spectrum empiric antibiotics to cover common organisms and pleural drainage via tube or catheter; in approximately one-third of patients, surgical intervention may be required [17]. The pleural irrigation trial (PIT) showed that the addition of saline irrigation in addition to standard management resulted in a radiographically significant reduction in pleural fluid volume [8]. This approach is both affordable and safe for patients who are systemically anticoagulated. The MIST2 (second multicentre intrapleural sepsis trial) trial demonstrated that the utilization of tPA and DNase was associated with a decreased length of hospital stay and a reduction in the need for surgical intervention; however, the majority of the patient population in that study was not systemically anticoagulated [7]. To the best of our knowledge, no large randomized controlled trials have been conducted that compare intrapleural saline irrigation (PIT) to tPA/DNase administration (MIST2). Our patient was originally trialed with the PIT protocol but failed to improve. After the administration of tPA/DNase, there was radiographic evidence of the resolution of the empyema. In patients with a high risk for bleeding, such as anticoagulation, thrombolytics are typically avoided as there is little data available regarding safety [18,19]. Our patient did not experience any significant adverse events, suggesting that intrapleural fibrinolytics may be a reasonable option, when necessary, for patients who require systemic anticoagulation.
Conclusions
Enterococcus faecium is an unusual cause of empyema that has not been previously reported in association with ECMO or COVID-19. The use of intrapleural tPA/DNase for patients with complicated empyema that fails to improve with tube thoracostomy and pleural irrigation is reasonable even in the setting of a concomitant requirement for systemic anticoagulation.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study
References
- 1.Loculated empyema and SARS-CoV-2 infection: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Ayad S, Gergis K, Elkattawy S, Mirza N, Abdelazeem B, Patel L, Remolina C. Eur J Case Rep Intern Med. 2021;8:2706. doi: 10.12890/2021_002706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aerobic and anaerobic microbiology of empyema. A retrospective review in two military hospitals. Brook I, Frazier EH. Chest. 1993;103:1502–1507. doi: 10.1378/chest.103.5.1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gastropleural fistula: An uncommon etiology of vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium empyema. Patil S, Chen C, Patel T, Winterton B, Oba Y. Chest. 2021;160:0. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pleural empyema due to Enterococcus species: an uncommon etiology. Mohanty S, Bhuniya S. Respir Med Case Rep. 2021;32:101375. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2021.101375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Empyema caused by a colopleural fistula: a case report. Lian R, Zhang G, Zhang G. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:0. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Medical and surgical management of empyema. Godfrey MS, Bramley KT, Detterbeck F. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;40:361–374. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1694699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection. Rahman NM, Maskell NA, West A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:518–526. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1012740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pleural irrigation trial (PIT): a randomised controlled trial of pleural irrigation with normal saline versus standard care in patients with pleural infection. Hooper CE, Edey AJ, Wallis A, et al. Eur Respir J. 2015;46:456–463. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00147214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, et al. Lancet. 2009;374:1351–1363. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61069-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1965–1975. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bleeding and thrombotic complications in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Thomas J, Kostousov V, Teruya J. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2018;44:20–29. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-hemostatic complications. Murphy DA, Hockings LE, Andrews RK, Aubron C, Gardiner EE, Pellegrino VA, Davis AK. Transfus Med Rev. 2015;29:90–101. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2014.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pleural infection: a retrospective study of clinical outcome and the correlation to known etiology, co-morbidity and treatment factors. Meyer CN, Armbruster K, Kemp M, Thomsen TR, Dessau RB. BMC Pulm Med. 2018;18:160. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0726-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.An analysis of 110 serious enterococcal infections. Epidemiology, antibiotic susceptibility, and outcome. Patterson JE, Sweeney AH, Simms M, Carley N, Mangi R, Sabetta J, Lyons RW. Medicine (Baltimore) 1995;74:191–200. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199507000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Sasse SA. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9363160/ Curr Opin Pulm Med. 1996;2:320–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.The microbiology of pleural infection in adults: a systematic review. Hassan M, Cargill T, Harriss E, et al. Eur Respir J. 2019;54 doi: 10.1183/13993003.00542-2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.The clinical course and management of thoracic empyema. Ferguson AD, Prescott RJ, Selkon JB, Watson D, Swinburn CR. QJM. 1996;89:285–289. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/89.4.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.The use of intrapleural thrombolytic or fibrinolytic therapy, or both, via indwelling tunneled pleural catheters with or without concurrent anticoagulation use. Gilbert CR, Wilshire CL, Chang SC, Gorden JA. Chest. 2021;160:776–783. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Safety and efficacy of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase for complicated pleural effusions secondary to abdominal pathology. Majid A, Ochoa S, Chatterji S, et al. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14:342–346. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-594BC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

