Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2023 Aug 2;14(4):e01073-23. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01073-23

Powering up antifungal treatment: using small molecules to unlock the potential of existing therapies

Rebecca S Shapiro 1,✉,#, Aleeza C Gerstein 2,3,✉,#
Editor: Joseph Heitman4
PMCID: PMC10470729  PMID: 37530533

ABSTRACT

Fungal pathogens are increasingly appreciated as a significant infectious disease challenge. Compared to bacteria, fungal cells are more closely related to human cells, and few classes of antifungal drugs are available. Combination therapy offers a potential solution to reduce the likelihood of resistance acquisition and extend the lifespan of existing antifungals. There has been recent interest in combining first-line drugs with small-molecule adjuvants. In a recent article, Alabi et al. identified 1,4-benzodiazepines as promising molecules to enhance azole activity in pathogenic Candida spp. (P. E. Alabi, C. Gautier, T. P. Murphy, X. Gu, M. Lepas, V. Aimanianda, J. K. Sello, I. V. Ene, 2023, mBio https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00479-23). These molecules have no antifungal activity on their own but exhibited significant potentiation of fluconazole in azole-susceptible and -resistant isolates. Additionally, the 1,4-benzodiazepines increased the fungicidal activity of azoles that are typically fungistatic to Candida spp., inhibited filamentation (a virulence-associated trait), and accordingly increased host survival in Galleria mellonella. This research thus provides another encouraging step on the critical pathway toward reducing mortality due to antimicrobial resistance.

KEYWORDS: antifungal therapy, antifungal resistance, mycology, antimicrobial combinations, drug screening

COMMENTARY

Fungal pathogens pose an immense and often underappreciated threat to human health (1), with 150 million life-threatening fungal infections and 1.5 million annual deaths from fungal disease (2, 3). The WHO recently released the first Fungal Priority Pathogens List, an acknowledgment of the immense global challenge that fungi pose (4) and highlighting four critical fungal pathogens that cause life-threatening invasive mycoses: Candida albicans, Candida auris, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Aspergillus fumigatus. Invasive fungal infections pose a significant threat, particularly among people with chronic medical conditions or immunodeficiencies, including cancer and transplant patients, those living with HIV/AIDS, and diabetics. As the population of vulnerable individuals is increasing, so too has the incidence of fungal infections (5). This became uniquely salient during the COVID-19 pandemic, where large populations of high-risk, hospitalized individuals, along with corticosteroid use, enabled fungal diseases to proliferate rapidly. This caused a rapid increase in disease burden globally (6), including a devastating mucormycosis outbreak in India (7).

Antifungal treatments for invasive fungal infections are primarily limited to three major classes of drugs: polyenes, azoles, and echinocandins (8). These limited antifungals suffer from important concerns including patient side effects, drug interactions, limited spectrum of action, and poor bioavailability. One major hurdle associated with antifungal drug development is the close evolutionary relationship between eukaryotic fungi and their human hosts, limiting our ability to identify clinically effective, non-toxic therapeutics. Indeed, polyenes, the oldest class of drugs, have exhibited relatively low levels of resistance emergence (9, 10), but are associated with severe side effects, including renal toxicity (11). Azoles are the largest drug class and are currently the most commonly administered. They have a broad spectrum of activity and can be orally administered with fewer side effects. Unfortunately, azole resistance seems to be increasing over time among diverse species (12, 13), and isolates of many of the non-C. albicans species have intrinsically high levels of azole resistance, including Nakaseomyces glabrata (formerly Candida glabrata), Pichia kudriavzevii (formerly Candida krusei), and C. auris (14, 15). Furthermore, azole drugs are fungistatic against many important pathogens and primarily inhibit cell growth rather than kill susceptible cells (8, 16). Antifungal drug tolerance, the ability of a subpopulation to grow slowly under fungistatic drug pressure, is a distinct drug response phenotype from drug resistance, and it has recently been proposed as having potential involvement in recalcitrant infections from drug-susceptible isolates that are not cleared following standard courses of treatment (17). The newest class of drugs, the echinocandins, is very effective against the majority of important human fungal pathogens (except C. neoformans and Fusarium spp. (18, 19)). They unfortunately suffer from poor oral bioavailability, and must be administered intravenously (20), which limits their use in some resource-poor settings (21). Combined, these limitations underscore the urgent need to develop new therapies with novel mechanisms of action or to use alternative treatment approaches to extend the utility of existing drugs.

Although there are finally some new drugs in the antifungal pipeline (22), the identification and development of new antimicrobial drugs is a long and difficult process. There has thus been a strong push to evaluate methods to maximize the use of existing therapeutics that have already been approved. Combination therapy pairs multiple drugs with similar pharmacokinetics, unpaired toxicity, and minimal potential for cross-resistance (23). This strategy has been used to successfully reduce mortality from many diverse illnesses such as HIV and malaria (23) and Gram-negative bacteria (24). Combination therapy offers potential improvements over monotherapy in a number of important regards, including synergistic interactions, a reduction of toxicity (due to lower dosing of individual drugs), a shorter duration of treatment, and the potential for rejuvenation or reuse of antibiotics that are no longer employed due to high rates of resistance (25). Combination therapy from the front-line antifungals is rarely employed clinically; however, excepting the use of amphotericin B and flucytosine to treat cryptococcal meningitis (26). Antifungal drug combinations have been limited due to the potential for antagonistic behavior and increased toxicity, and in vitro results have not always been recapitulated in vivo. Ultimately, it is difficult and expensive to conduct clinical trials for antifungals, limiting the availability of clinical results to inform combination therapy in practice (27 - 29).

Nevertheless, as a promising approach to overcome the limitations of the existing antifungal monotherapies, researchers have recently turned to exploring combination therapy with small molecules and adjuvants. In broad terms, an adjuvant is any substance (or combination thereof) that can increase the potency or efficacy of a drug. One promising class of adjuvants is small molecules, low molecular weight organic compounds that are small enough to diffuse across cell membranes. Small molecules can work to enhance the host immune response, or to enhance the efficacy of existing antifungal drugs in multiple ways: they can increase drug availability in the cell through increasing drug entry or decreasing degradation; they can target the same biological pathway, typically at different stages; or, they can target different proteins in parallel pathways that influence the same cellular process (30). Multiple approaches have been developed to efficiently screen small molecule collections for compounds that exhibit synergistic behavior with antifungal drugs (most commonly azoles), yielding promising targets and results (31 - 34).

In their recent study, Alabi et al. (35) identified a novel set of molecules with synergistic behavior to azoles for combination antifungal therapy. They performed a small molecule screen that identified novel 1,4-benzodiazepines that demonstrated no antifungal activity on their own, but that were able to uniquely potentiate the activity of azole antifungals. These powerful potentiators significantly enhanced fluconazole activity, and rendered the fungistatic azoles fungicidal against C. albicans and other closely related Candida pathogens. Critically, the synergistic activity of the 1,4-benzodiazepines and azoles was demonstrated in azole-susceptible, -resistant, and -tolerant C. albicans isolates, suggesting an important application of these drugs in treating otherwise recalcitrant infections.

While the precise mechanism by which the 1,4-benzodiazepines potentiate azole activity remains to be fully elucidated, evidence from Alabi et al. suggests a role for lipid homeostasis, as cells treated with both compounds displayed an increase in lipid droplets in the fungal cell. Lipid droplets are known to play an important role in the cellular response to stress, including nutrient, oxidative, ER, and others (36). It is known that stress responses are vital for fungal cells to tolerate antifungal drug treatment. The connection between 1,4-benzodiazepines and the fungal stress response is reminiscent of other compounds that have synergistic activity with antifungal agents and target stress response pathways (37). Indeed, pharmacological inhibitors of key stress response factors, including the molecular chaperone Hsp90 and the protein kinase calcineurin, have previously been shown to have promising activity as potentiators of antifungal activity against Candida pathogens (38, 39).

In addition to their synergistic activity with azoles, Alabi et al. also identified a role for the 1,4-benzodiazepines in impairing the ability of C. albicans to transition from yeast to filamentous growth morphologies. This transition is critical for C. albicans virulence, as filamentous cells express numerous virulence factors (40), and strains that are unable to transition between states have reduced virulence in animal models of infection (41). Alabi et al., used Galleria mellonella moth larvae as a tractable model of C. albicans infection and found that treatment with 1,4-benzodiazepines provided a modest improvement in survival for fungal-infected larvae. There is burgeoning interest in the development of such “antivirulence” compounds as therapies for fungal infections, and the yeast-to-filamentous growth transition in C. albicans is a prime target for such therapeutics (42). It is suggested that compounds targeting microbial virulence should exert a weaker selection pressure than conventional antimicrobials that impair viability, resulting in decreased frequency of resistance. Further, studies in bacterial pathogens suggest that antivirulence compounds can act synergistically with anti-bacterial agents and potentiate the activity of these antibiotics amongst drug-resistant strains (43). This is consistent with the phenotypes observed by Alabi et al., which suggest that targeting virulence may be a similarly powerful strategy to not only reduce fungal pathogenicity but to enhance the activity of existing antifungal agents.

This study builds upon a growing body of literature highlighting the need to identify novel compounds to potentiate existing antifungal drugs. In addition to chemical screening approaches such as those employed by Alabi et al., other strategies may further enhance our understanding of how to optimally deploy antifungal treatments. Chemical-genetic and genetic interaction screens are highly complementary to drug screening and can identify new fungal pathways to target for combination therapeutics (44, 45). Compelling research in bacterial and fungal species has exploited genetic interaction studies to identify combinations of mutations that synergize to impair microbial fitness (45 - 47), and identify mutations that sensitize drug-resistant strains to antimicrobial agents (45, 48 - 50). These strategies can ultimately be translated to predict novel combinations of drugs that target the identified genes or pathways, which may act as therapies against microbial infections. Leveraging the pleiotropic effects associated with resistance is another innovative way to uncover combination therapies against drug-resistant pathogens. Research in bacterial species has found that the evolution of resistance to specific antibiotics renders cells more highly susceptible to other classes of antibiotics, and proposes that we can leverage this “collateral sensitivity” to better exploit combinations of existing antimicrobials to treat resistant infections (51, 52).

With the challenges associated with new antifungal drug development and increasing rates of clinical antifungal resistance, it is clear that to combat antifungal resistance we need to maximize the use of existing approved antifungals. Combination therapy with small molecules such as the 1,4-benzodiazepines identified by Alabi et al. represents a promising avenue for much-needed novel treatment strategies.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

R.S.S. and A.C.G. are CIFAR Azrieli Global Scholars in the Fungal Kingdom: Threats and Opportunities Program. Authorship was decided to be listed in reverse alphabetical order to compensate for "A" coming first and "R" typically being late in alphabetized lists.

Contributor Information

Rebecca S. Shapiro, Email: shapiror@uoguelph.ca.

Aleeza C. Gerstein, Email: Aleeza.gerstein@umanitoba.ca.

Joseph Heitman, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA .

REFERENCES

  • 1. Fisher MC, Gurr SJ, Cuomo CA, Blehert DS, Jin H, Stukenbrock EH, Stajich JE, Kahmann R, Boone C, Denning DW, Gow NAR, Klein BS, Kronstad JW, Sheppard DC, Taylor JW, Wright GD, Heitman J, Casadevall A, Cowen LE. 2020. Threats posed by the fungal kingdom to humans, wildlife, and agriculture. mBio 11:e00449-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00449-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Brown GD, Denning DW, Gow NAR, Levitz SM, Netea MG, White TC. 2012. Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Sci Transl Med 4:165rv13. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele RO, Denning DW. 2017. Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal diseases-estimate precision. J Fungi (Basel) 3:57. doi: 10.3390/jof3040057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. WHO fungal priority pathogens list to guide research, development and public health action. 2022. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240060241. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Vallabhaneni S, Mody RK, Walker T, Chiller T. 2016. The global burden of fungal diseases. Infect Dis Clin North Am 30:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2015.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hoenigl M, Seidel D, Sprute R, Cunha C, Oliverio M, Goldman GH, Ibrahim AS, Carvalho A. 2022. COVID-19-associated fungal infections. Nat Microbiol 7:1127–1140. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01172-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hoenigl M, Seidel D, Carvalho A, Rudramurthy SM, Arastehfar A, Gangneux J-P, Nasir N, Bonifaz A, Araiza J, Klimko N, Serris A, Lagrou K, Meis JF, Cornely OA, Perfect JR, White PL, Chakrabarti A, ECMM and ISHAM collaborators . 2022. The emergence of COVID-19 associated mucormycosis: a review of cases from 18 countries. Lancet Microbe 3:e543–e552. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00237-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lee Y, Puumala E, Robbins N, Cowen LE. 2021. Antifungal drug resistance: molecular mechanisms in Candida albicans and beyond. Chem Rev 121:3390–3411. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Vincent BM, Lancaster AK, Scherz-Shouval R, Whitesell L, Lindquist S. 2013. Fitness trade-offs restrict the evolution of resistance to amphotericin B. PLoS Biol 11:e1001692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pfaller MA, Espinel-Ingroff A, Canton E, Castanheira M, Cuenca-Estrella M, Diekema DJ, Fothergill A, Fuller J, Ghannoum M, Jones RN, Lockhart SR, Martin-Mazuelos E, Melhem MSC, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Pappas P, Pelaez T, Peman J, Rex J, Szeszs MW. 2012. Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for amphotericin B, flucytosine, and itraconazole and Candida spp. as determined by CLSI broth microdilution. J Clin Microbiol 50:2040–2046. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00248-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Chandrasekar P. 2011. Management of invasive fungal infections: a role for polyenes. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:457–465. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Fisher MC, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Berman J, Bicanic T, Bignell EM, Bowyer P, Bromley M, Brüggemann R, Garber G, Cornely OA, Gurr SJ, Harrison TS, Kuijper E, Rhodes J, Sheppard DC, Warris A, White PL, Xu J, Zwaan B, Verweij PE. 2022. Tackling the emerging threat of antifungal resistance to human health. Nat Rev Microbiol 20:557–571. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00720-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Turnidge JD, Castanheira M, Jones RN. 2019. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997-2016. Open Forum Infect Dis 6:S79–S94. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Geddes-McAlister J, Shapiro RS. 2019. New pathogens, new tricks: emerging, drug-resistant fungal pathogens and future prospects for antifungal therapeutics. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1435:57–78. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Borman AM, Johnson EM. 2021. Name changes for fungi of medical importance, 2018 to 2019. J Clin Microbiol 59:e01811-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01811-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Shapiro RS, Robbins N, Cowen LE. 2011. Regulatory circuitry governing fungal development, drug resistance, and disease. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 75:213–267. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00045-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Berman J, Krysan DJ. 2020. Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi. Nat Rev Microbiol 18:319–331. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0322-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, Clancy CJ, Marr KA, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Reboli AC, Schuster MG, Vazquez JA, Walsh TJ, Zaoutis TE, Sobel JD. 2016. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis 62:e1–50. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Denning DW. 2003. Echinocandin antifungal drugs. Lancet 362:1142–1151. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14472-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Liu X, Liu D, Pan Y, Li Y. 2020. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics variability of echinocandins in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Pharm Ther 45:1207–1217. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Africa CWJ, Abrantes P. 2016. Candida antifungal drug resistance in sub-saharan African populations: a systematic review. F1000Res 5:2832. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10327.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. McCarty TP, Pappas PG. 2021. Antifungal pipeline. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:732223. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.732223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hill JA, Cowen LE. 2015. Using combination therapy to thwart drug resistance. Future Microbiol 10:1719–1726. doi: 10.2217/fmb.15.68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Schmid A, Wolfensberger A, Nemeth J, Schreiber PW, Sax H, Kuster SP. 2019. Monotherapy versus combination therapy for multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 9:15290. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51711-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Coates ARM, Hu Y, Holt J, Yeh P. 2020. Antibiotic combination therapy against resistant bacterial infections: synergy, rejuvenation and resistance reduction. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 18:5–15. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1705155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Day JN, Chau TTH, Lalloo DG. 2013. Combination antifungal therapy for cryptococcal meningitis. N Engl J Med 368:2522–2523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1305981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Campitelli M, Zeineddine N, Samaha G, Maslak S. 2017. Combination antifungal therapy: a review of current data. J Clin Med Res 9:451–456. doi: 10.14740/jocmr2992w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Shao P-L, Huang L-M, Hsueh P-R. 2007. Recent advances and challenges in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 30:487–495. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Johnson MD, Perfect JR. 2007. Combination antifungal therapy: what can and should we expect? Bone Marrow Transplant 40:297–306. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Spitzer M, Robbins N, Wright GD. 2017. Combinatorial strategies for combating invasive fungal infections. Virulence 8:169–185. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1196300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Iyer KR, Camara K, Daniel-Ivad M, Trilles R, Pimentel-Elardo SM, Fossen JL, Marchillo K, Liu Z, Singh S, Muñoz JF, Kim SH, Porco JACuomo CA, Williams NS, Ibrahim AS, Edwards JEAndes DR, Nodwell JR, Brown LE, Whitesell L, Robbins N, Cowen LE. 2020. An oxindole efflux inhibitor potentiates azoles and impairs virulence in the fungal pathogen Candida auris. Nat Commun 11:6429. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20183-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Wambaugh MA, Denham ST, Ayala M, Brammer B, Stonhill MA, Brown JC. 2020. Synergistic and antagonistic drug interactions in the treatment of systemic fungal infections. Elife 9:e54160. doi: 10.7554/eLife.54160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Robbins N, Spitzer M, Yu T, Cerone RP, Averette AK, Bahn Y-S, Heitman J, Sheppard DC, Tyers M, Wright GD. 2015. An antifungal combination matrix identifies a rich pool of adjuvant molecules that enhance drug activity against diverse fungal pathogens. Cell Rep 13:1481–1492. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.10.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Revie NM, Iyer KR, Maxson ME, Zhang J, Yan S, Fernandes CM, Meyer KJ, Chen X, Skulska I, Fogal M, Sanchez H, Hossain S, Li S, Yashiroda Y, Hirano H, Yoshida M, Osada H, Boone C, Shapiro RS, Andes DR, Wright GD, Nodwell JR, Del Poeta M, Burke MD, Whitesell L, Robbins N, Cowen LE. 2022. Targeting fungal membrane homeostasis with imidazopyrazoindoles impairs azole resistance and biofilm formation. Nat Commun 13:3634. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31308-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Alabi PE, Gautier C, Murphy TP, Gu X, Lepas M, Aimanianda V, Sello JK, Ene IV. 2023. Small molecules restore azole activity against drug-tolerant and drug-resistant Candida isolates. mBio:e0047923. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00479-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Olzmann JA, Carvalho P. 2019. Dynamics and functions of lipid droplets. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 20:137–155. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0085-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Iyer KR, Robbins N, Cowen LE. 2022. The role of Candida albicans stress response pathways in antifungal tolerance and resistance. iScience 25:103953. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Cowen LE, Singh SD, Köhler JR, Collins C, Zaas AK, Schell WA, Aziz H, Mylonakis E, Perfect JR, Whitesell L, Lindquist S. 2009. Harnessing Hsp90 function as a powerful, broadly effective therapeutic strategy for fungal infectious disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:2818–2823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813394106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Cruz MC, Goldstein AL, Blankenship JR, Del Poeta M, Davis D, Cardenas ME, Perfect JR, McCusker JH, Heitman J. 2002. Calcineurin is essential for survival during membrane stress in Candida albicans. EMBO J 21:546–559. doi: 10.1093/emboj/21.4.546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kumamoto CA, Vinces MD. 2005. Contributions of hyphae and hypha-co-regulated genes to Candida albicans virulence. Cell Microbiol 7:1546–1554. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00616.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Rooney PJ, Klein BS. 2002. Linking fungal morphogenesis with virulence. Cell Microbiol 4:127–137. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2002.00179.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Kalimuthu S, Alshanta OA, Krishnamoorthy AL, Pudipeddi A, Solomon AP, McLean W, Leung YY, Ramage G, Neelakantan P. 2022. Small molecule based anti-virulence approaches against Candida albicans infections. Crit Rev Microbiol 48:743–769. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2021.2025337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Rezzoagli C, Archetti M, Mignot I, Baumgartner M, Kümmerli R. 2020. Combining antibiotics with antivirulence compounds can have synergistic effects and reverse selection for antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Biol 18:e3000805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Xue A, Robbins N, Cowen LE. 2021. Advances in fungal chemical genomics for the discovery of new antifungal agents. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1496:5–22. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Halder V, McDonnell B, Uthayakumar D, Usher J, Shapiro RS. 2021. Genetic interaction analysis in microbial pathogens: unravelling networks of pathogenesis, antimicrobial susceptibility and host interactions. FEMS Microbiol Rev 45:fuaa055. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuaa055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Cheng AA, Ding H, Lu TK. 2014. Enhanced killing of antibiotic-resistant bacteria enabled by massively parallel combinatorial genetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:12462–12467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400093111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Usher J, Haynes K. 2019. Attenuating the emergence of anti-fungal drug resistance by harnessing synthetic lethal interactions in a model organism. PLoS Genet 15:e1008259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Klobucar K, French S, Côté J-P, Howes JR, Brown ED, Whiteley M. 2020. Genetic and chemical-genetic interactions map biogenesis and permeability determinants of the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. mBio 11:mBio doi: 10.1128/mBio.00161-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Mount HO, Revie NM, Todd RT, Anstett K, Collins C, Costanzo M, Boone C, Robbins N, Selmecki A, Cowen LE. 2018. Global analysis of genetic circuitry and adaptive mechanisms enabling resistance to the azole antifungal drugs. PLoS Genet 14:e1007319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Bhatnagar K, Hinz A, Kohlman M, Wong A. 2020. An sRNA screen for reversal of quinolone resistance in Escherichia Coli. G3 (Bethesda) 10:79–88. doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Imamovic L, Sommer MOA. 2013. Use of collateral sensitivity networks to design drug cycling protocols that avoid resistance development. Sci Transl Med 5:204ra132. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Lázár V, Pal Singh G, Spohn R, Nagy I, Horváth B, Hrtyan M, Busa-Fekete R, Bogos B, Méhi O, Csörgő B, Pósfai G, Fekete G, Szappanos B, Kégl B, Papp B, Pál C. 2013. Bacterial evolution of antibiotic hypersensitivity. Mol Syst Biol 9:700. doi: 10.1038/msb.2013.57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES