Abstract
The molecular etiology of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has been extensively investigated to identify new therapeutic targets. Although anti-inflammatory treatments are not effective for patients with IPF, damaged alveolar epithelial cells play a critical role in lung fibrogenesis. Here, we establish an organoid-based lung fibrosis model using mouse and human lung tissues to assess the direct communication between damaged alveolar type II (AT2)-lineage cells and lung fibroblasts by excluding immune cells. Using this in vitro model and mouse genetics, we demonstrate that bleomycin causes DNA damage and activates p53 signaling in AT2-lineage cells, leading to AT2-to-AT1 transition-like state with a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Among SASP-related factors, TGF-β plays an exclusive role in promoting lung fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation. Moreover, the autocrine TGF-β-positive feedback loop in AT2-lineage cells is a critical cellular system in non-inflammatory lung fibrogenesis. These findings provide insights into the mechanism of IPF and potential therapeutic targets.
Subject terms: Adult stem cells, Respiratory tract diseases, Transforming growth factor beta
IPF is a progressive disease with few inflammatory pathology. Here, using alveolar organoid technology, the authors identified autocrine TGF-β-positive feedback in AT2-lineage cells as a core mechanism of inflammation-independent lung fibrogenesis.
Introduction
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common type of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and is a chronic progressive disease with a poor prognosis of less than 5 years after diagnosis1–3. Molecular details of the etiology of IPF have been investigated to develop a new treatment approach, as there are only two approved anti-IPF drugs, nintedanib and pirfenidone; neither of which can completely halt the disease progression1. The hallmarks of IPF pathogenesis are epithelial damage and abnormal activation of fibroblasts for proliferation and differentiation into myofibroblasts, leading to the accumulation of excessive extracellular matrix proteins and scar formation in parenchymal tissue. These mesenchymal tissue malformations ultimately cause alveolar structural destruction, decreased lung compliance, and disrupted gas exchange function4–6. Although the pathogenic significance of immune cells, such as monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, and several types of T cells in lung fibrosis has been reported7,8, the role of inflammation in IPF is controversial because anti-inflammatory treatment is not effective or rather harmful for patients with IPF according to the PANTHER-IPF clinical trial9. Additionally, compared to those of patients with non-IPF lung fibrosis, such as fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and collagen vascular disease-associated lung fibrosis, lungs of patients with IPF show fewer inflammatory pathologies despite more severe fibrosis2,6,10,11. Therefore, in clinical situations, inflammatory events may not be a good target for the treatment of IPF, and the non-inflammatory fibrosis process is worth evaluating.
The alveolar epithelium is composed of two types of epithelial cells: alveolar type I (AT1) cells, which are responsible for gas exchange, and alveolar type II (AT2) cells, which produce surfactants and function as tissue stem cells. If the alveolar epithelium is damaged, AT2 cells undergo self-renewal and differentiate into AT1 cells to regenerate lost alveolar epithelial cells12. Currently, there is growing evidence that non-inflammatory disorders of AT2 cells can cause lung fibrosis. Mutations in genes predominantly expressed in AT2 cells, such as surfactant protein C (SFTPC), surfactant protein A2, and ABCA3, have been associated with human lung fibrosis, including IPF13. In mouse models, dysfunction/stress of AT2 cells serves as an initiating event in lung fibrosis. Induction of telomerase deficiency14, Sin3a knockout15, endoplasmic reticulum stress16,17, dysregulated autophagy18, and mechanical stretching stress19 in AT2-lineage cells result in the development of lung fibrosis; however, whether there is direct communication between dysfunctional AT2 cells and (myo)fibroblasts remains unclear.
The mechanism of non-inflammatory AT2-derived lung fibrogenesis has not been investigated in detail because of technical limitations. When using only in vivo fibrosis model, even with an Sftpc-creER driver that can genetically and specifically manipulate AT2 cells, the influence of immune cells is not completely excluded unless the lung tissue is isolated from the animal. Additionally, this in vivo fibrosis formation requires considerable time over several weeks, regardless of the induction methods, which makes it difficult to estimate whether AT2 cells directly or indirectly induce fibrosis. Therefore, it is desirable to develop a new experimental method to model lung fibrosis with minimal cell components such as profibrotic-stimulated AT2-lineage cells and naïve lung fibroblasts.
In this study, we aimed to clarify the causal relationship among epithelial injury, inflammation, and myofibroblast differentiation using an in vitro lung fibrosis organoid model for mice and humans, which recapitulates cell-cell interaction between damaged AT2-lineage cells and lung fibroblasts. We further modulated p53 and TGF-β signaling in vivo and in vitro, showing that the TGF-β-positive feedback loop in AT2-lineage cells is a critical cellular system in lung fibrogenesis. These data demonstrate that the initial induction of non-inflammatory lung fibrosis, including IPF, could be regulated by direct communication between damaged AT2-lineage cells and lung fibroblasts with no contribution from immune cells.
Results
Ex vivo and in vitro lung fibrosis models recapitulating inflammation-independent myofibroblast differentiation
To elucidate the temporal sequence of lung fibrosis, we generated a BLM-induced lung fibrosis model using an Acta2-DsRed mouse line, which exhibits fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation by expressing DsRed fluorescent protein, and examined the fibrosis phenotype on days 0 to 21 (Fig. 1a). We found that epithelial injury, defined as positivity for the DNA double-strand break marker γH2AX, was the initial event after BLM injection (day 2) (Fig. 1b), followed by the appearance of infiltrated immune cells (days 4–7) (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1a). Thereafter, DeRed+ myofibroblasts (day 7–) and collagen accumulation (day 14–) became evident (Fig. 1a, d).
To model epithelial injury and inflammation-independent fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation, we used two culture systems: ex vivo lung-lobe culture (Fig. 1e, see Methods) and in vitro feeder-free alveolar organoid culture assays (Fig. 1h). On ex vivo culture day 2, γH2AX-expressing damaged cells appeared in BLM-treated lobes and frequently merged with the AT2 cell marker, SFTPC (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 1b). On day 12, SFTPC and γH2AX expression was lost, and DsRed+ myofibroblasts were increased in the subpleural area of BLM-treated lobes (Fig. 1e). Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) revealed a sixfold increase in Acta2 expression in BLM-treated lobes (Fig. 1f), indicating that BLM-mediated AT2 cell dysfunction may induce myofibroblasts without inflammation. Hematopoietic cells in the ex vivo culture were measured using FACS with an anti-CD45 antibody, confirming that the amount of hematopoietic cells was negligible on day 12 (Fig. 1g). To exclude the possibility that BLM directly induces fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation, we performed a primary culture of FACS-sorted PDGFRα+EPCAM−CD45−CD31−LYVE1−CD146− lung fibroblasts and confirmed that BLM administration to fibroblasts did not increase Acta2 expression (Supplementary Fig. 1c). These data suggest that BLM-induced DNA damage in AT2 cells, and not in fibroblasts, could be the initial trigger for inflammation-independent fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation.
Subsequently, we developed an alveolar organoid culture system for a lung fibrosis model (Fig. 1h and Supplementary Fig. 1d, see Methods), which is a constructive approach that allowed us to determine the minimum cell components to induce fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation. Similar to the in vivo and ex vivo BLM-treated lung lobes (Fig. 1b, e), the majority of cells in BLM-treated alveolar organoids showed γH2AX expression (Fig. 1i, j), indicating epithelial DNA damage. To assess the capacity of AT2 cells to induce fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation, we co-cultured BLM-treated alveolar organoids with naïve lung fibroblasts isolated from Acta2-DsRed mice at 24 h after BLM treatment (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 2, see Methods). If fibroblasts differentiate into myofibroblasts, DsRed fluorescence is observed in the surrounding organoid-containing gel. As expected, fluorescence microscopy revealed an increase in DsRed fluorescence in fibroblasts co-cultured with BLM-treated alveolar organoids (Supplementary Movies 1 and 2). These DsRed+ myofibroblasts co-cultured with BLM-treated organoids were more and larger than those co-cultured with control organoids, although the cell number itself did not differ (Fig. 2b), indicating that fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation was directly induced by BLM-treated AT2 cells. Thereafter, we evaluated the sensitivity of the Acta2-DsRed reporter under our culture conditions with TGF-βs (a mixture of recombinant TGF-β1, -β2, and -β3) as a potent profibrotic factor at different concentrations (Fig. 2c), and determined that the reporter assay was able to detect recombinant TGF-βs as low as 1 pg mL−1 and showed a dose-dependent increase within 100 pg mL−1 (Fig. 2d). Collectively, we successfully established a protocol for alveolar organoid culture in a lung fibrosis model with sufficient sensitivity to detect low-dose profibrotic factors, which can recapitulate inflammation-independent epithelial-mesenchymal profibrotic interactions.
Profibrotic significance of p53 signaling in AT2-lineage cells
To explore the cell signaling pathways that enforce the profibrotic state of AT2 cells downstream of DNA damage, we performed bulk RNA-seq of BLM-treated and non-treated alveolar organoids from four independent mice. Pathway analysis revealed that the p53 signaling pathway, which is a well-known stress response pathway regulating cellular senescence, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis was markedly enriched in BLM-treated organoids (Fig. 3a, b). Treatment with BLM impeded organoid growth, with more apoptotic cells and fewer proliferative cells (Supplementary Fig. 3a–d). In contrast, canonical AT2 or AT1 markers, such as Sftpc, Abca2, Pdpn, and Hopx, decreased, suggesting that the cell state of AT2 cells is altered by DNA damage (Fig. 3b). The expression of the Trp53 gene was not changed; however, the p53 protein level and its acetylated form increased in BLM-treated organoids (Fig. 3c), suggesting the activation of p53 signaling. These damaged organoids were well stained with p21Waf1/Cip1 and senescence-associated β-galactosidase, although other major senescent markers, such as p16INK4A and p19ARF, were not increased (Fig. 3c–e and Supplementary Fig. 3e). Taken together, the stress of DNA damage in AT2-lineage cells could stimulate the p53 signaling pathway via post-translational modifications and enforce the senescence state of AT2 cells.
Recently, the role of p53 signaling in AT2-lineage cells for fibrosis development has been proposed15,20; however, the mechanism underlying fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation induced by p53-active AT2 cells remains elusive. We first used alveolar organoids cultured with Nutlin-3a, a chemical activator of p53 signaling, instead of BLM for 24 h, and subsequently co-cultured with Acta2-DsRed lung fibroblasts for the lung fibrosis model (Fig. 3f). Notably, an increase in the DsRed-positive area, but not in the cell number, surrounding Nutlin-3a-treated organoids was detected, similar to that of BLM-treated ones, suggesting that activation of the p53 signaling pathway is sufficient for profibrotic AT2 cells. To confirm the profibrotic role of p53 in vivo, we generated BLM-induced lung fibrosis model animals using an AT2-specific p53 conditional knockout mouse line, SftpcCreERT2; Trp53flox/flox; Rosa26mTmG (hereafter p53-cKO). As expected, p53-cKO mice were more resistant to BLM-induced lung fibrosis than the control, showing less body weight loss (Supplementary Fig. 4a), less collagen deposition, and milder mCT-based fibrotic changes on day 21 (Fig. 4a, b). Immunostaining for α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA, encoded by Acta2), GFP (AT2-lineage cells), and p21Waf1/Cip1 (a senescence marker) showed fewer αSMA+ myofibroblasts and p21+GFP+ cells in the mutant lungs on day 7, suggesting that p53-cKO mice are resistant to the induction of fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation and cellular senescence in AT2-lineage cells (Fig. 4a, b). We further performed ex vivo BLM-treated lobe culture and found that Acta2 gene expression was suppressed in p53-cKO lobes compared to that in the control, indicating that resistance to fibrosis in the mutant is not related to immune cells (Supplementary Fig. 4b). To directly demonstrate that p53-null AT2 cells are not profibrotic even after BLM treatment, alveolar organoid culture was performed using p53-null AT2 cells isolated from lungs of p53-cKO mice. Acta2-reporter activity was remarkably suppressed by p53 ablation in AT2 cells despite considerable DNA damage due to BLM (Fig. 4c, d). These data demonstrate that p53 signaling in AT2-lineage cells plays an indispensable role in fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation by regulating the interaction of AT2-lineage cells with lung fibroblasts.
It has been suggested that Sirtuin, a histone deacetylase, may be involved in susceptibility to lung fibrosis21,22. As SIRT1 is a negative regulator of p53 and as we observed a marginal decrease in SIRT1 protein levels in BLM-treated alveolar organoids (Supplementary Fig. 4c), we generated AT2-specific Sirt1 conditional knockout and overexpression mouse lines (SftpcCreERT2; Sirt1flox/flox and SftpcCreERT2; Rosa26CAG-LSL-Sirt1-P2A-eGFP) (Supplementary Fig. 4d, e). To evaluate the role of SIRT1 in AT2-lineage cells during lung fibrosis, we intratracheally administered BLM to these mice. However, neither knockout nor overexpression of Sirt1 influenced the severity of the lung fibrosis phenotype (Supplementary Fig. 4f), suggesting that SIRT1 in AT2-lineage cells is dispensable in the pathogenesis of BLM-induced lung fibrosis.
TGF-β-positive feedback loop in AT2- lineage cell is crucial for lung fibrogenesis
To identify the secretion factors expressed downstream of p53 signaling in AT2-lineage cells that directly induce fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation, we evaluated the expression of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) factors23,24 in alveolar organoids two days after BLM treatment (culture day 9). We found that compared to BLM-treated normal alveolar organoids, BLM-treated p53-null organoids showed reductions in several SASP genes: Tgfb1, Tgfb2, Tgfb3, Ccn2 (a gene of CTGF), Pdgfa, Pdgfb, Vegfa, Vegfc, Csf2, Cxcl12, and Ccl3 (Fig. 5a). To validate the profibrotic capacity of these factors, we cultured Acta2-DsRed lung fibroblasts with recombinant proteins (10 ng/mL each). We found that only TGF-β isoforms (β1, β2, and β3) upregulated Acta2 and Col1a1, although the expression of Cthrc1, another myofibroblastic marker25, was enhanced by CTGF, PDGF, and TGF-β isoforms (Supplementary Fig. 5a). Using a BLM-induced lung fibrosis model, we confirmed increased gene expression of all TGF-β isoforms in AT2-lineage cells in vivo using PLISH, a single molecular RNA in situ hybridization26 (Fig. 5b). Given that integrin αVβ6 activates latent TGF-β1 and -β327,28, we evaluated the ratio of integrin αVβ6+ cells in AT2-lineage cells using FACS. This quantitative analysis determined that 20% of AT2-lineage cells expressed αVβ6 even on day 0, and increased to 50% on day 7, which was validated using mean fluorescence intensity analysis (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Fig. 5b). qRT-PCR also confirmed BLM or Nutlin-3a-induced increases in the expression of TGF-β isoforms and integrins in wild-type alveolar organoids and non-significant changes in p53-null alveolar organoids (Supplementary Fig. 5c, d). Based on these observations, we expected that p53 signaling activates latent TGF-β in AT2-lineage cells by increasing their integrin αVβ6 expression. To test this hypothesis, we aimed to inhibit fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation in our culture assay by adding a neutralizing antibody against integrin αVβ6. The neutralizing antibody successfully suppressed Acta2-reporter activity (Fig. 5d). These data are consistent with a previous study on Sin3a-cKO mice, in which p53-enriched AT2-lineage cells show upregulation of Tgfb1, Tgfb3, Itgav, and Itgb6 (Supplementary Fig. 5e)15.
To elucidate whether TGF-β signaling plays an exclusive role in fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation in our alveolar organoid culture, we inhibited TGF-β signaling in lung fibroblasts using pharmacology and genetics. Lung fibroblasts were incubated with culture supernatants collected from the BLM-treated alveolar organoids. We found that the increase in the expressions of myofibroblast-related genes by the BLM-treated organoid supernatant was suppressed by the addition of SB431542, an ALK5 inhibitor (Fig. 5e). We further prepared Tgfbr2-null lung fibroblasts from PdgfraCreERT2; Tgfbr2flox/flox mice and cultured them with BLM-treated organoid supernatants. Consistent with the pharmacological assay, Tgfbr2-null lung fibroblasts did not respond to the supernatant (Fig. 5e). Furthermore, to evaluate additional BLM-treated AT2-derived profibrotic factors, we cultured fibroblasts and treated with organoid supernatant with or without low-dose TGF-βs (10 pg mL−1). As shown in Supplementary Fig. 5f, only additive, but not synergistic, changes in the expressions of myofibroblast-related genes were observed.
A time lag between p53 activation (day 7) and upregulation of profibrotic TGF-β-related genes (day 9) prompted us to evaluate whether TGF-β isoforms and integrins are direct targets of p53. Therefore, we performed ChIP-seq analysis using an anti-p53 antibody for BLM-treated alveolar organoids to determine the direct targets of p53. We observed peaks upstream p53 target genes, such as Cdkn1a (Fig. 6a). However, there were no apparent differences between control- and BLM-treated-alveolar organoids in the binding of p53 to TGF-β isoforms and integrins (Fig. 6a), suggesting that p53 does not directly induce these profibrotic factors. However, the direct p53 target genes identified by our ChIP-seq analysis included several TGF-β-related genes (Fig. 6b). We identified 329 genes that were the direct targets of p53 and upregulated in our RNA-seq data, including genes that have been reported to have a potential to activate TGF-β signaling, such as Areg29, Cdkn1a30, Ltbp231, Pdgfc32, and Tgfa33 (Fig. 6c and Supplementary Data 4). These data suggest that p53 indirectly upregulates profibrotic factors by inducing these candidate factors.
Cell-autonomous TGF-β-positive feedback loop in AT2-lineage cells is crucial for lung fibrogenesis
Next, we investigated whether AT2-lineage cells were targets of TGF-β. We prepared a BLM-induced lung fibrosis model using SftpcCreERT2; Rosa26mTmG mice to trace AT2-lineage cells during the development of fibrosis. Immunostaining showed phosphorylated SMAD2/3 in GFP+, Krt8+ AT2-lineage cells and αSMA+ myofibroblasts (triangles in Fig. 7a and Supplementary Fig. 6a), suggesting that the canonical TGF-β-SMAD pathway is activated in AT2-lineage cells in BLM-induced lung fibrosis. In addition, when using BLM-treated alveolar organoids, we confirmed the accumulation of phosphorylated SMAD2 on western blotting (Fig. 7b). As our feeder-free alveolar organoid assay contained only AT2-derived cells, TGF-β signaling was activated in an autocrine manner. To explore the pathogenic significance of autocrine TGF-β signaling in fibrosis, we generated an AT2-specific Tgfbr2 conditional knockout mouse line, SftpcCreERT2; Tgfbr2flox/flox (hereafter Tgfbr2-cKO), to disturb TGF-β signaling in AT2-lineage cells and prepared a BLM-induced lung fibrosis model. Similar to the phenotype of p53-cKO mice (Fig. 4), Tgfbr2-cKO mice showed resistance to BLM-induced lung fibrosis with less body weight loss (Supplementary Fig. 6b), less deposition of collagen, smaller fibrotic lesion area on day 21, and fewer myofibroblasts on day 7 (Fig. 7c, d), which was consistent with the results of the ex vivo lung-lobe culture (Supplementary Fig. 6c) and a previous report using Nkx2.1-cre driver34. To observe the interaction between AT2 cells and lung fibroblasts, a co-culture assay was performed using Tgfbr2-null AT2 cells isolated from Tgfbr2-cKO lungs. We found that Acta2-reporter activity was comparable between BLM-treated and non-treated organoids of Tgfbr2-null AT2 cells (Fig. 7e), demonstrating that autocrine TGF-β signaling in AT2 cells plays a crucial role in fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation in BLM-induced lung fibrosis. We then investigated whether TGF-β treatment enforces the profibrotic state of AT2 cells. In our alveolar organoid culture for the lung fibrosis model, exogenous TGF-β treatment increased myofibroblast formation (Fig. 7f and Supplementary Fig. 7a) and the expression of TGF-β-related genes including integrins was enhanced in AT2 cells (Supplementary Fig. 7b), which is also observed in other cell types as a TGF-β-integrin crosstalk35. However, these genes did not respond to BLM treatment in Tgfbr2-null alveolar organoids (Supplementary Fig. 7c). Furthermore, both an ALK5 inhibitor (SB431542) and a neutralizing antibody for integrin αVβ6 decreased the expression of the profibrotic gene set in BLM-treated wild-type alveolar organoids (Supplementary Fig. 7d). Collectively, TGF-β exposure in AT2 cells enhanced their profibrotic potential by inducing TGF-β-related gene expression, which further activated TGF-β signaling in AT2 cells in an autocrine manner. This autocrine positive-feedback loop of TGF-β signaling could amplify the profibrotic potential of AT2-lineage cells and may be a key cellular system in the development of lung fibrosis. In contrast, we found that treatment of fibroblasts with TGF-βs also resulted in upregulated expression of TGF-β isoforms, particularly Tgfb1 (Supplementary Fig. 7e), indicating that the TGF-β positive-feedback loop is a common cell response not only in AT2 cells but also in fibroblasts, which may contribute to maintaining the profibrotic state in both cells and accelerate the TGF-β signal interaction even without immune cells.
Autocrine TGF-β signaling is sufficient to convert AT2 cells into profibrotic AT2-to-AT1 transition-like cell state
Recently, several groups have reported a unique alveolar epithelial cell state called PATS/DATP/KRT8+ transitional cells (hereafter PATS cells), which are an intermediate cell population from the differentiation of AT2 to AT1 cells in the regenerating lung20,36,37. PATS cells demonstrate a feature of cellular senescence, including activation of p53 signaling. PATS cells are expected to be involved in lung fibrogenesis because their marker genes largely overlap with the major upregulated genes in the alveolar epithelium of mouse BLM-induced fibrotic lungs and human IPF lungs20. However, to date, no direct evidence showing the profibrotic function of PATS/PATS-like cells has been provided. To confirm this, we first examined whether AT2-lineage cells with an activated autocrine TGF-β signaling loop are equivalent to PATS cells. We quantified the expression of PATS- and TGF-β-related genes in integrin αVβ6-positive AT2-lineage cells as TGF-β-signaling-active cells because high expression of integrin αVβ6 can be a hallmark of the signaling loop. These cells were collected from BLM-treated lungs on day 7 and compared with integrin αVβ6-negative cells (Fig. 8a). As expected, most of these genes, including Cldn4, Krt8, Tgfb1, and Tgfb2, were upregulated in integrin αVβ6-positive AT2-lineage cells in vivo. Thus, we determined that these integrin αVβ6-positive cells were in the PATS-like cell state. We then assessed whether PATS-like cells also appear in BLM-treated alveolar organoids and play a role in the profibrotic function. Alveolar organoids derived from SftpcCreERT2; Rosa26mTmG mice showed increased expression of PATS- and TGF-β-related genes following BLM treatment, implying that BLM-treated AT2 cells became PATS-like cells (Fig. 8b). In contrast, p53-null alveolar organoids did not show increased expression of these genes, which is consistent with a previous report that p53-cKO within AT2-lineage cells dysregulates the AT2-to-PATS transition during lung regeneration20. Additionally, Tgfbr2-null organoids also demonstrated tolerance to the transition into a PATS-like cell state following BLM treatment (Fig. 8b). These observations suggest that p53 and TGF-β signaling in AT2-lineage cells cooperate to induce the PATS-like transitional cell state following DNA damage.
Notably, the expression of profibrotic genes (Tgfb1, Tgfb2, Tgfb3, and Itgb6) was further downregulated in Tgfbr2-null organoids compared with that in p53-null organoids following BLM treatment (Supplementary Fig. 8a), implying that autocrine TGF-β signaling is more important than p53 signaling in determining the profibrotic potential. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that the cellular system of autocrine TGF-β signaling with positive feedback in AT2-lineage cells is independent of p53 signaling. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the activation of p53 signaling in Tgfbr2-null AT2 cells. BLM treatment into Tgfbr2-null alveolar organoids upregulated not only γH2AX but also total p53, its acetylated form, and downstream p21Waf1/Cip1 expressions (Fig. 8c and Supplementary Fig. 8b). In vivo, the number of p21Waf1/Cip1-expressing AT2-lineage cells in BLM-treated Tgfbr2-cKO mice increased to a level comparable to that of control mice (Fig. 8d). Nevertheless, the expression of the major PATS marker KRT8 was decreased and that of the AT2 marker SFTPC was increased in p21Waf1/Cip1-expressing AT2-lineage cells in Tgfbr2-cKO mice (Supplementary Fig. 8c). These results indicate that p53 signaling activation does not convert AT2 cells into profibrotic PATS-like cells in the Tgfbr2-null background. To determine whether exogenous TGF-β is sufficient to make AT2 cells profibrotic even without p53 signaling, p53-null alveolar organoids were incubated with recombinant TGF-βs, and the expression of TGF-β-related genes was examined at culture days 7 and 9. Except for Tgfb2, these genes were markedly upregulated by day 9, and Tgfb1, Itgav, and Itgb6 showed rapid responses by day 7 (Fig. 8e). In addition, most PATS-related genes, such as Cldn4 and Krt8, were upregulated in TGF-β-treated p53-null alveolar organoids (Supplementary Fig. 8d). Therefore, TGF-β signaling in AT2 cells is sufficient to promote the acquisition of the PATS-like cell state with profibrotic potential via the positive-feedback loop. We determined that p53 signaling is required to activate TGF-β-related gene expression as a trigger; however, it does not contribute to the subsequent autocrine TGF-β signaling loop in AT2(-lineage) cells.
Profibrotic TGF-β-positive feedback loop is evolutionally conserved in human AT2 cells
Lastly, we developed a human alveolar organoid culture for a lung fibrosis model to validate that p53/TGF-β signaling-active AT2 cells directly induce fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation, even in humans. We collected normal lung tissue from three patients who underwent partial pulmonary resection for suspected early-stage lung cancer with no ILD or emphysema on their presurgical chest CT images. HTII-280+ human AT2 cells were sorted and cultured to create alveolar organoids (Fig. 9a). Similar to mouse alveolar organoids, BLM-treated human alveolar organoids showed obvious accumulation of γH2AX, p53, and p21WAF1/CIF1 in the nuclei (Fig. 9b) and successfully activated the fluorescent reporter of Acta2-DsRed mouse lung fibroblasts (Fig. 9c), suggesting that human alveolar organoids became p53-active and profibrotic following BLM treatment. Reflecting this profibrotic effect, TGFB1 and ITGAV were upregulated in BLM-treated organoids (Fig. 9d). We further analyzed the transcriptome data of lung epithelial cells from patients with IPF deposited by a previous publication38, and confirmed p53 signaling enrichment and TGF-β-related gene upregulation (Supplementary Fig. 9a, b). In human lung fibrosis and in vitro culture of human AT2 cells, alveolar-basal intermediates (ABI) (hereafter ABI cells) have been reported as a functionally homologous cell type of PATS-like cells owing to their transcriptome similarity37,39–41. We evaluated the markers of ABI-related genes and found that BLM-treated human alveolar organoids showed upregulation of KRT17, TP63, SOX9, and EPHB2 (Fig. 9d), suggesting the induction of an ABI-like cell state following BLM treatment in AT2-lineage cells. Furthermore, consistent with mouse organoids, incubation with recombinant TGF-βs was sufficient to induce profibrotic human alveolar organoids and to increase fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation (Fig. 9e, f). TGF-β treatment upregulated TGF-β-related genes, TGFB1, ITGAV, and ITGB6, and ABI-related genes, KRT17 and EPHB2 (Fig. 9g). However, these organoids were negative for p21WAF1/CIP1 staining (Supplementary Fig. 9c), suggesting that TGF-β treatment induced the ABI-like profibrotic cell state in human AT2 cells without p53 signaling activation. Thereafter, we reanalyzed the dataset of single-cell RNA-seq in human IPF lungs25 using CellChat algorism to infer cell–cell communication networks based on receptor-ligand interactions42. Consistent with our results, lung ABI cells in IPF lungs can be affected by TGF-β signaling in an autocrine manner (Fig. 9h and Supplementary Fig. 9d). These observations suggest an evolutionarily conserved profibrotic function of the TGF-β feedback loop in AT2 cells of mouse and human lung fibrosis.
Discussion
In this study, we aimed to determine the mechanism of non-inflammatory lung fibrogenesis by establishing an ex vivo lung tissue culture assay and an in vitro alveolar organoid model for lung fibrosis to recapitulate fibrogenesis in vitro and exclude the involvement of immune cells. In the alveolar organoid model, we reproduced the epithelial–mesenchymal interaction with the minimum components, AT2 cells and lung fibroblasts, and successfully visualized the epithelial damage-driven fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation process. Our method using primary AT2 cells, which are tissue stem cells of the alveolar epithelium, would be an alternative to other in vitro fibrosis models using pluripotent stem cell-derived AT2 cells43,44 and is superior because of its easy approach for in vivo validation with mouse genetics. We demonstrated that DNA damage by BLM activates p53 signaling in AT2 cells to induce TGF-β-related profibrotic gene expression, which initiates a positive-feedback loop for TGF-β signaling within AT2 cells. We propose that the autocrine TGF-β signaling loop is a core cellular system that amplifies the profibrotic character of AT2 cells in non-inflammatory lung fibrogenesis, changing the cell state into PATS-like in mice or ABI-like in humans to enhance the secretion of TGF-β ligands and integrin αVβ6 (Fig. 10).
Although anti-inflammatory treatments are ineffective in human IPF9,45, the pathogenic involvement of inflammation remains controversial. Several lines of evidence for circulating monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages have been reported in mice. Genetic or pharmacological depletion of circulating monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages can suppress BLM-induced pulmonary fibrosis until day 2146,47. Additionally, several studies using the BLM-induced mouse lung fibrosis model suggested that lung macrophages/monocytes can be an origin of TGFβ1 ligand48,49. However, in human IPF lungs, bulk RNA-seq data of tissue-resident and monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages showed no obvious upregulation of all isoforms of TGFβ38, while the expression of SPP1 (a gene of osteopontin) was increased, and that could enhance the “TGF-β1-induced” fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation50,51. This is supported by the fact that the macrophage depletion could also decrease the severity of the “TGF-β1-induced” lung fibrosis model using an adenoviral vector, in which TGF-β1 ligands are already supplied from infected cells without BLM-induced epithelial DNA damage46,47. These previous studies suggest that the major role of monocytes/macrophages in lung fibrosis is to enhance the effect of TGF-β1 ligands in the extracellular space, rather than to produce them. Thus, an initial supply of TGF-β ligands from AT2-lineage cells is an important initiator for lung fibrogenesis, which is also supported by a previous study reporting that the artificial selective expression of TGF-β1 at the alveolar epithelium in ex vivo lung specimens was sufficient to induce IPF-like fibrotic lung pathology52. Additionally, we expect that these damaged AT2-lineage cells may induce an inflammatory microenvironment that can further progress the subsequent fibrosis process. This idea is supported by our two findings:1) the timing of AT2 injury preceded that of inflammation (Fig. 1), and 2) RNA-seq and SASP analysis of BLM-treated alveolar organoids showed enrichment of inflammatory signaling, such as interferons, TNFα, and IL-6 (Figs. 3a, 5a).
Cellular senescence of AT2-lineage cells via p53 signaling is involved in lung fibrosis15,20; however, there is no direct evidence showing that p53-active AT2 cells directly induce myofibroblast differentiation. In this study, we provided direct evidence that p53-active AT2 cells can activate TGF-β signaling in lung fibroblasts to induce their myofibroblast differentiation. Using Tgfbr2-null alveolar organoids, we showed that AT2 cells possess a positive-feedback system of TGF-β signaling that is indispensable for the expression of TGF-β-related factors under autocrine TGF-β signaling. Notably, exogenous TGF-β was sufficient for inducing profibrotic AT2 cells, even in a p53-null background. This result suggests that p53 signaling is the initiator of TGF-β signaling. Once the TGF-β-positive-feedback loop is activated, the profibrotic characteristic is accelerated without p53 signaling. Consistent with this, even in the stretch-induced lung fibrosis model, AT2-specific knockout of Tgfbr2 showed a marked anti-fibrotic effect, despite the enrichment of p53 signaling in the AT2-lineage cells (Supplementary Fig. 10a)19. Here, we propose that the TGF-β-positive-feedback loop in AT2-lineage cells is a fundamental and critical cellular system in the development of inflammation-independent lung fibrogenesis.
Clinically, pirfenidone and nintedanib are the only options for IPF pharmaceutical treatment; however, the target of these drugs is lung fibroblasts and not epithelial cells53. We treated our BLM-treated alveolar organoids with these two drugs and found that they did not suppress myofibroblast differentiation (Supplementary Fig. 10b). As expected, corticosteroid treatment was also ineffective in the co-culture assay. According to our findings, the TGF-β-positive feedback loop in AT2-lineage cells is an important target as a new therapeutic approach for non-inflammatory lung fibrogenesis. However, TGF-β1 knockout mice are known to exhibit systemic inflammation54, and systemic administration of an integrin αVβ6-neutralizing antibody was ineffective in a recent clinical trial for IPF55. In contrast, the use of neutralizing antibodies targeting only TGF-β2 and/or β3, which can be activated by integrin-independent mechanisms, suppressed mouse BLM-induced lung fibrosis without causing systemic inflammation56. In addition, cellular signaling cascades from TGF-β receptors to TGF-β-related gene expression/translation in AT2-lineage cells would be promising therapeutic targets. To apply these TGF-β signaling suppression strategies in clinical practice, organ, cell type, and isoform specificities may be key points for success.
In this study, we could not establish a co-culture system of alveolar organoids with immune cells, such as monocytes. Future studies should evaluate whether co-culturing alveolar organoids with immune cells can further promote myofibroblast formation.
Methods
Detailed list of the materials used in this study is summarized in Supplementary Data 1 and Supplementary Data 3.
Mouse lines
All mice (male, 8–12 week-old) were bred and housed in a specific pathogen-free mouse facility at constant temperature (18–23 °C) and humidity (40–60%) in sterilized plastic cages. A 12h-light/12h-dark cycle was used. SftpcCreERT2 (B6.129S-Sftpctm1(cre/ERT2)Blh/J) (#028054)57, Rosa26mTmG (B6.129(Cg)-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm4(ACTB-tdTomato,-EGFP)Luo/J) (#007676)58, Tgfbr2flox/flox (B6;129-Tgfbr2tm1Karl/J) (#012603)59, Acta2-DsRed (C.FVB-Tg(Acta2-DsRed)1Rkl/J) (#031159)60, and Sirt1flox/flox (B6.129-Sirt1tm3Fwa/DsinJ) (#029603)61 mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. PdgfracreERT2 mice were kindly gifted by Dr. Brigid Hogan and Dr. Christina E. Barkauskas62. Trp53flox/flox (C57BL/6N-Trp53<em1Rbrc>) (#RBRC09921) mice were provided from RIKEN-BRC. Sirt1 conditional overexpression mice (Rosa26CAG-LSL-Sirt1-P2A-eGFP) (Accession No. CDB0120E: https://large.riken.jp/distribution/mutant-list.html) were newly established with CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in C57BL/6 mice zygotes at RIKEN-BDR as described previously63. All mice were maintained on a C57BL/6 background. To label lineage cells, mice were injected with Tamoxifen (0.25 mg per g body weight) in peanuts oil 3 times on alternative days and these mice were used for all experiments three weeks after the last injection.
Mouse phenotyping and cell preparation
Detailed protocols and procedures for the following methods are summarized in Supplementary Information: Induction of lung fibrosis by intratracheal administration of bleomycin; Assessment of lung mCT; Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of mouse lungs; Preparation of mouse primary cells and FACS sorting; Preparation of human primary AT2 cells; and MACS sorting.
Culture of alveolar organoids
Sorted AT2 cells (GFP+ cells from SftpcCreERT2: Rosa26mTmG mouse lung cells or EPCAM+MHCII+CD31−CD45− from wild-type mouse lung cells64; HTII-280+ in humans65) were mixed in culture medium and the equal volume of growth factor-reduced Matrigel (Corning) and 20000 cells per 20 μL gel-containing drops were placed on the bottom of plates. The drops were incubated for 20 min at 37 °C to solidify the gels, and 400 μL or 2 mL of medium was added to each well in 24-well or 6-well plates, respectively. The composition of culture media is described in Supplementary Data 166. Medium was changed every 3 days. Y27632 (10 μM) was included in the medium for the first 3 days of the sorting or passaging to increase cell viability. On day 7 in mice and day 14 in humans, a passage was performed (mouse: 5000 cells per 20 μL gel-containing drop; human: 10000 cells per 20 μL gel-containing drop) and used for experiments from day 6 in mice and day 10 in humans. Before administration of specific drugs or growth factors, washing using DPBS (3 min at room temperature) was performed twice. BLM was used at a concentration of 100 μM. Organoids were imaged using IX83 fluorescent microscope (Olympus). To evaluate organoid sizes, two organoid-containing drops per mouse were quantified. The size of the top 20 spheres in each drop was measured, which was repeated for three independent mice.
Single-/co-culture of mouse fibroblasts
Sorted primary fibroblasts (PDGFRα+EPCAM-CD31-CD45-CD146-LYVE1-) from mouse lungs were cultured67. For single culture in 96-well plates, 2000 cells in 200 μL of a basic medium containing 2% FBS with or without specific drugs, growth factors, or chemokines were used in each well. For co-culture with mouse/human alveolar organoids or empty gel in 24-well plates, 15,000 cells in 350 μL basic medium or equal dose of organoid culture supernatant (both with 2% FBS) were used in each well. Organoid supernatant was collected after centrifugation (1000 g, 10 min). On day 3 of (co-)culture, DsRed fluorescence of the (myo)fibroblasts was imaged with/without staining of Hoechst 33342 (Dojindo). For the live imaging, CellDiscoverer 7 (Carl Zeiss) was used.
Ex vivo culture of mouse lung lobes
Mice were sacrificed by carbon dioxide and perfused with 5 mL of a saline solution through the right ventricle. After three times of BAL using 0.8 mL sterile PBS, 0.8 mL of BLM (700 μM) or PBS (as a control) was intratracheally injected and the trachea was tied with a string. Then the lobes were incubated for 30 min and the peripheral area was cut into about 5 mm × 5 mm size. The specimens were cultured in a basic medium containing 2% FBS with/without BLM (100 μM) for 24 h. On the next day, the medium was changed into a fresh basic medium containing 2% FBS after washing it with DPBS twice. Sampling was done on days 2 and 12.
Other methods
Detailed protocols and procedures for the following methods are summarized in Supplementary Information: Bulk RNA-seq of mouse alveolar organoids; Total RNA isolation, cDNA preparation, and quantitative RT-PCR: Preparation of lung or organoid sections; Collagen staining of lung sections and the quantification; Immunohistochemistry; Staining of senescence-associated β-galactosidase; Proximity ligation in situ hybridization (PLISH); Hydroxyproline assay; Western blotting; ChIP-seq; and Reanalysis of datasets of single-cell RNA-seq.
Statistics and reproducibility
All results are presented as mean ± standard error from a minimum of three independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired Student’s t test (two-tailed) for comparisons between two groups or using a one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction for comparisons between more than two groups. The exact P values are provided in Source Data file and differences with P < 0.05 are considered significant. Experiments for section staining were repeated independently with similar results at least three times. The representative micrograghs are presented in each figure.
Study approval
We handled the mice in accordance with the ethics guidelines of the institute, and all the experimental procedures using animals have been approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of RIKEN Kobe Branch (K2020-020). The use of human lung samples has been also approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine (B2056707). Informed consent has been obtained from all the patients.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Brigid Hogan for kindly providing PdgfraCreERT2 mice, Dr. Hiroshi Mizuma for his technical support during mCT imaging, and RIKEN-BRC for supplying Trp53flox/flox mice. Regarding RNA-seq analysis, we also thank Laboratory for Phyloinformatics at RIKEN-BDR and the members: Dr. Kaori Tatsumi (for library preparation and quality check) and Dr. Shigehiro Kuraku (for on-site supervision). We also thank Dr. Shogo Nakayama for his advice on reanalyzing the scRNA-seq dataset.
Author contributions
Y.E. and M.M. conceived the project. Y.E., A.O., S.B., and A.Y. conducted experiments and processed data. Y.E., H.K., T.F., and M.M. analyzed data and interpreted results. Y.E., O.N., and Mi.Ka. conducted bulk RNA-seq and ChIP-seq using alveolar organoids and analyzed the data. D.H., Y.T., Y.M., and T.N. obtained human lung specimens. T.F., Mi.Ki., and T.A. generated Sirt1-OE mice. Y.E. and M.M. wrote the original manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the submission.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Funding
This manuscript received support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Early-Career Scientists (20K17238) (Y.E.); for Challenging Exploratory Research (19K22630) (M.M.); Okamoto Foundation for lung fibrosis (2019) (Y.E.); G-7 Foundation (2020) (M.M. and Y.E.); and Special Postdoctoral Researcher Program of RIKEN (Y.E.).
Data availability
The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials, including Source Data. The raw images are available in the System Science of Biological Dynamics (SSBD) repository (URL: https://ssbd.riken.jp/repository/288/; 10.24631/ssbd.repos.2023.04.288). Our original sequencing data in this study are available at NCBI GEO under the accession numbers GSE211531 (RNA-seq) and GSE231445 (ChIP-seq). Previously published sequencing data that were reanalyzed are available under the accession number GSE13858519. GSE13291015, and GSE13277125. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
T.F. is an employee of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, but there is no financial competing interest in this study. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-40617-y.
References
- 1.Raghu G, et al. Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. an official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018;198:e44–e68. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201807-1255ST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Travis WD, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: update of the international multidisciplinary classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013;188:733–748. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201308-1483ST. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fujisawa, T. et al. Nationwide cloud-based integrated database of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias for multidisciplinary discussion. Eur. Respir. J. 53, 10.1183/13993003.02243-2018 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 4.Sgalla G, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: pathogenesis and management. Respir. Res. 2018;19:32. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0730-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mei Q, Liu Z, Zuo H, Yang Z, Qu J. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an update on pathogenesis. Front. Pharm. 2021;12:797292. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.797292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martinez FJ, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2017;3:17074. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shenderov, K., Collins, S. L., Powell, J. D. & Horton, M. R. Immune dysregulation as a driver of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J. Clin. Investig.131, 10.1172/JCI143226 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Heukels P, Moor CC, von der Thusen JH, Wijsenbeek MS, Kool M. Inflammation and immunity in IPF pathogenesis and treatment. Respir. Med. 2019;147:79–91. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Clinical Research, N. et al. Prednisone, azathioprine, and N-acetylcysteine for pulmonary fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:1968–1977. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Enomoto Y, et al. Features of usual interstitial pneumonia in patients with primary Sjogrens syndrome compared with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir. Investig. 2014;52:227–235. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2014.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Leslie, K. O. & Wick, M. R. Practical Pulmonary Pathology—A Diagnostic Approach. (Elsevier Inc., 2011).
- 12.Barkauskas CE, et al. Type 2 alveolar cells are stem cells in adult lung. J. Clin. Investig. 2013;123:3025–3036. doi: 10.1172/JCI68782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kaur A, Mathai SK, Schwartz DA. Genetics in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis pathogenesis, prognosis, and treatment. Front. Med. 2017;4:154. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu T, et al. Telomerase reverse transcriptase ameliorates lung fibrosis by protecting alveolar epithelial cells against senescence. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:8861–8871. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yao C, et al. Senescence of alveolar type 2 cells drives progressive pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2021;203:707–717. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202004-1274OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lawson WE, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress enhances fibrotic remodeling in the lungs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:10562–10567. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107559108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Borok Z, et al. Grp78 loss in epithelial progenitors reveals an age-linked role for endoplasmic reticulum stress in pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020;201:198–211. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201902-0451OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li X, et al. Autophagy reprograms alveolar progenitor cell metabolism in response to lung injury. Stem Cell Rep. 2020;14:420–432. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wu H, et al. Progressive pulmonary fibrosis is caused by elevated mechanical tension on alveolar stem cells. Cell. 2020;180:107–121 e117. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kobayashi Y, et al. Persistence of a regeneration-associated, transitional alveolar epithelial cell state in pulmonary fibrosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2020;22:934–946. doi: 10.1038/s41556-020-0542-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liang, J. et al. The ZIP8/SIRT1 axis regulates alveolar progenitor cell renewal in aging and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Clin Investig.132, 10.1172/JCI157338 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 22.Zeng Z, et al. Activation and overexpression of Sirt1 attenuates lung fibrosis via P300. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017;486:1021–1026. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.03.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cuollo, L., Antonangeli, F., Santoni, A. & Soriani, A. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) in the challenging future of cancer therapy and age-related diseases. Biology9, 10.3390/biology9120485 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Hansel, C., Jendrossek, V. & Klein, D. Cellular senescence in the lung: the central role of senescent epithelial cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21, 10.3390/ijms21093279 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Tsukui T, et al. Collagen-producing lung cell atlas identifies multiple subsets with distinct localization and relevance to fibrosis. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1920. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15647-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nagendran, M., Riordan, D. P., Harbury, P. B. & Desai, T. J. Automated cell-type classification in intact tissues by single-cell molecular profiling. Elife7, 10.7554/eLife.30510 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 27.Munger JS, et al. The integrin alpha v beta 6 binds and activates latent TGF beta 1: a mechanism for regulating pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. Cell. 1999;96:319–328. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80545-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Annes JP, Rifkin DB, Munger JS. The integrin alphaVbeta6 binds and activates latent TGFbeta3. FEBS Lett. 2002;511:65–68. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)03280-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Minutti CM, et al. A macrophage-pericyte axis directs tissue restoration via amphiregulin-induced transforming growth factor beta activation. Immunity. 2019;50:645–654.e646. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lv X, et al. The cell cycle inhibitor P21 promotes the development of pulmonary fibrosis by suppressing lung alveolar regeneration. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2022;12:735–746. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.07.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sideek, M. A., et al. A central bioactive region of LTBP-2 stimulates the expression of TGF-beta1 in fibroblasts via Akt and p38 signalling pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci.18, 10.3390/ijms18102114 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Lee JI, et al. Role of Smad3 in platelet-derived growth factor-C-induced liver fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2016;310:C436–C445. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00423.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Madala SK, et al. Inhibition of the alphavbeta6 integrin leads to limited alteration of TGF-alpha-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2014;306:L726–L735. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00357.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li M, et al. Epithelium-specific deletion of TGF-beta receptor type II protects mice from bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2011;121:277–287. doi: 10.1172/JCI42090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Margadant C, Sonnenberg A. Integrin-TGF-beta crosstalk in fibrosis, cancer and wound healing. EMBO Rep. 2010;11:97–105. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Choi J, et al. Inflammatory signals induce AT2 cell-derived damage-associated transient progenitors that mediate alveolar regeneration. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27:366–382.e367. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Strunz M, et al. Alveolar regeneration through a Krt8+ transitional stem cell state that persists in human lung fibrosis. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3559. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17358-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Reyfman PA, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of human lung provides insights into the pathobiology of pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019;199:1517–1536. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201712-2410OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Adams TS, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals ectopic and aberrant lung-resident cell populations in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaba1983. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Habermann AC, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals profibrotic roles of distinct epithelial and mesenchymal lineages in pulmonary fibrosis. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaba1972. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kathiriya JJ, et al. Human alveolar type 2 epithelium transdifferentiates into metaplastic KRT5(+) basal cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2022;24:10–23. doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00809-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jin S, et al. Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:1088. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21246-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chen YW, et al. A three-dimensional model of human lung development and disease from pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2017;19:542–549. doi: 10.1038/ncb3510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Suezawa T, et al. Disease modeling of pulmonary fibrosis using human pluripotent stem cell-derived alveolar organoids. Stem Cell Rep. 2021;16:2973–2987. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Raghu G, et al. Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with etanercept: an exploratory, placebo-controlled trial. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2008;178:948–955. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200709-1446OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Misharin AV, et al. Monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages drive lung fibrosis and persist in the lung over the life span. J. Exp. Med. 2017;214:2387–2404. doi: 10.1084/jem.20162152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gibbons MA, et al. Ly6Chi monocytes direct alternatively activated profibrotic macrophage regulation of lung fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011;184:569–581. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201010-1719OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Young LR, et al. Epithelial-macrophage interactions determine pulmonary fibrosis susceptibility in Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome. JCI Insight. 2016;1:e88947. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.88947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Singh A, et al. Nanoparticle targeting of de novo profibrotic macrophages mitigates lung fibrosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119:e2121098119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2121098119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Dong J, Ma Q. Osteopontin enhances multi-walled carbon nanotube-triggered lung fibrosis by promoting TGF-beta1 activation and myofibroblast differentiation. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2017;14:18. doi: 10.1186/s12989-017-0198-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lenga Y, et al. Osteopontin expression is required for myofibroblast differentiation. Circ. Res. 2008;102:319–327. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.160408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xu YD, et al. Release of biologically active TGF-beta1 by alveolar epithelial cells results in pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2003;285:L527–L539. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00298.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Knuppel L, et al. A novel antifibrotic mechanism of nintedanib and pirfenidone. inhibition of collagen fibril assembly. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2017;57:77–90. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0217OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Shull MM, et al. Targeted disruption of the mouse transforming growth factor-beta 1 gene results in multifocal inflammatory disease. Nature. 1992;359:693–699. doi: 10.1038/359693a0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Raghu, G., et al. A Phase IIb randomized study of an anti-alphavbeta6 monoclonal antibody in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 10.1164/rccm.202112-2824OC (2022). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 56.Sun, T. et al. TGFbeta2 and TGFbeta3 isoforms drive fibrotic disease pathogenesis. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, 10.1126/scitranslmed.abe0407 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 57.Rock JR, et al. Multiple stromal populations contribute to pulmonary fibrosis without evidence for epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:E1475–E1483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117988108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Muzumdar MD, Tasic B, Miyamichi K, Li L, Luo L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis. 2007;45:593–605. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Leveen P, et al. Induced disruption of the transforming growth factor beta type II receptor gene in mice causes a lethal inflammatory disorder that is transplantable. Blood. 2002;100:560–568. doi: 10.1182/blood.v100.2.560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.LeBleu VS, et al. Identification of human epididymis protein-4 as a fibroblast-derived mediator of fibrosis. Nat. Med. 2013;19:227–231. doi: 10.1038/nm.2989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Cheng HL, et al. Developmental defects and p53 hyperacetylation in Sir2 homolog (SIRT1)-deficient mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:10794–10799. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1934713100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Chung, M. I., Bujnis, M., Barkauskas, C. E., Kobayashi, Y. & Hogan, B. L. M. Niche-mediated BMP/SMAD signaling regulates lung alveolar stem cell proliferation and differentiation. Development145, 10.1242/dev.163014 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 63.Kiyokawa H, et al. Airway basal stem cells reutilize the embryonic proliferation regulator, Tgfbeta-Id2 axis, for tissue regeneration. Dev. Cell. 2021;56:1917–1929.e1919. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hasegawa K, et al. Fraction of MHCII and EpCAM expression characterizes distal lung epithelial cells for alveolar type 2 cell isolation. Respir. Res. 2017;18:150. doi: 10.1186/s12931-017-0635-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Gonzalez RF, Allen L, Gonzales L, Ballard PL, Dobbs LG. HTII-280, a biomarker specific to the apical plasma membrane of human lung alveolar type II cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2010;58:891–901. doi: 10.1369/jhc.2010.956433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Katsura H, et al. Human lung stem cell-based alveolospheres provide insights into SARS-CoV-2-mediated interferon responses and pneumocyte dysfunction. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27:890–904.e898. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Enomoto Y, et al. LTBP2 is secreted from lung myofibroblasts and is a potential biomarker for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Clin. Sci. 2018;132:1565–1580. doi: 10.1042/CS20180435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials, including Source Data. The raw images are available in the System Science of Biological Dynamics (SSBD) repository (URL: https://ssbd.riken.jp/repository/288/; 10.24631/ssbd.repos.2023.04.288). Our original sequencing data in this study are available at NCBI GEO under the accession numbers GSE211531 (RNA-seq) and GSE231445 (ChIP-seq). Previously published sequencing data that were reanalyzed are available under the accession number GSE13858519. GSE13291015, and GSE13277125. Source data are provided with this paper.