Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2023 Aug 24;9(9):e19355. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19355

Preparation for mice spaceflight: Indications for training C57BL/6J mice to adapt to microgravity effect with three-dimensional clinostat on the ground

Chenchen Song 1, Taisheng Kang 1, Kai Gao 1, Xudong Shi 1, Meng Zhang 1, Lianlian Zhao 1, Li Zhou 1,∗∗, Jianguo Guo 1,
PMCID: PMC10472007  PMID: 37662714

Abstract

Like astronauts, animals need to undergo training and screening before entering space. At present, pre-launch training for mice mainly focuses on adaptation to habitat system. Training for the weightless environment of space in mice has not received much attention. Three-dimensional (3D) clinostat is a method to simulate the effects of microgravity on Earth. However, few studies have used a 3D clinostat apparatus to simulate the effects of microgravity on animal models. Therefore, we conducted a study to evaluate the feasibility and effects of long-term treatment with three-dimensional clinostat in C57BL/6 J mice. Thirty 8-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice were randomly assigned to three groups: mice in individually ventilated cages (MC group, n = 6), mice in survival boxes (SB group, n = 12), and mice in survival boxes receiving 3D clinostat treatment (CS group, n = 12). The mice showed good tolerance after 12 weeks of alternate day training. To evaluate the biological effects of simulated microgravity, the changes in serum metabolites were monitored using untargeted metabolomics, whereas bone loss was assessed using microcomputed tomography of the left femur. Compared with the metabolome of the SB group, the metabolome of the CS group showed significant differences during the first three weeks and the last three weeks. The KEGG pathways in the late stages were mainly related to the nervous system, indicating the influence of long-term microgravity on the central nervous system. Besides, a marked reduction in the trabecular number (P < 0.05) and an increasing trend of trabecular spacing (P < 0.1) were observed to occur in a time-dependent manner in the CS group compared with the SB group. These results showed that mice tolerated well in a 3D clinostat and may provide a new strategy in pre-launch training for mice and conducting relevant ground-based modeling experiments.

Keywords: Microgravity, Three-dimensional clinostat (3D clinostat), Random positioning machine (RPM), Bone loss, Serum metabolomics, Animal model

1. Introduction

The complex environment of space, including microgravity, radiation, changes in circadian rhythm, and extreme temperatures, can impact several biological processes [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]]. Microgravity is one of the critical problems that astronauts face in space. Many studies [[7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]] have shown that long-term weightlessness can lead to various physiological and pathological changes, including in the immune, nervous, reproductive, and cardiovascular systems and in skeletal muscle tissues. To adapt to the weightless environment of space, astronauts need to go through a series of rigorous training before going into space, such as parabolic aircraft flights, immersion and head down tilt. Mice are the most commonly used experimental animals in space for their small size and thus increasing space utilization and the cost-efficiency ratio. Many space experiments using mice have been conducted aboard the Space Shuttles, such as ‘BION’, an unmanned biosatellite, and the International Space Station (ISS). Launched in 2013, the Russian Bion-M1 biosatellite accommodated 45 male mice in groups for 30 days [13]. Launched in 2009, 6 male mice housed individually in the Italian Mice Drawer System (MDS) were exposed for 91 days, the longest duration rodent experiment ever conducted in space [14]. Unfortunately, in the two Long-term experiments on mice in space, more than half of the animals died because of hardware malfunctions or unpredictable reasons. Although, with the improvement of habitat hardware, the survival rate of mice in space was improved, the effects of space special environment such as microgravity on the survival rate and survival state of mice should not be ignored [15]. During space launch, astronauts and experimental animals experienced a sharp change in gravity, from the normal 1 g Earth gravity to the 3–8 g hypergravity during launch, and the 10−4-10−3 g microgravity after entering space. The rapid change of gravity and the unprecedented space microgravity environment would cause acute stress injury to experimental animals. The good condition of spaceflight mice was the basis for the positive results of space animal experiments. Like astronauts, animals need to undergo training and screening before entering space. However, pre-launch training for mice at present mainly focuses on adaptation to habitat system. Training for the weightless environment of space in mice has not received much attention.

Currently, weightlessness studies are mainly selected by relying on animal models [16,17], and the rodent hindlimb unloading model is the most widely used [18,19] to study spatial effect. However, this model has certain limitations in that it applied locally and not to the whole animal [20]. Clinostats have invited the attention of researchers because experiments involving microgravity in space are expensive and conducted infrequently, and the time frame for producing a microgravity environment on ground is generally too short to meet the requirements of most biological experiments. A previous study has shown that the three-dimensional (3D) clinostat is a good method to simulate the effect of microgravity on ground, and the tested object experiences zero total force in the entire experimental process through random clinostat [21]. The clinostat is not like a drop tower that only provides a microgravity environment but it can also be used as an effect of microgravity simulation equipment [21]. Previous studies [[22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29]] have used the 3D clinostat to simulate the effect of microgravity on plants, cells, and Caenorhabditis elegans but not on mice. Compared with the classical tail suspension model, the 3D clinostat model could produce a whole-body microgravity simulation effect, and may better simulate the vestibular signal disorder as well as the resulting perception conflict and central system abnormalities. Besides, unlike humans, the microgravity space environment would have less significant effect on cerebral blood flow in mice as a four-limb landed animal. For microgravity environment adaptability training, 3D gyration model may be more suitable than tail suspension model. Therefore, we conducted a study to evaluate the feasibility and effects of long-term treatment with three-dimensional clinostat in C57BL/J mice, trying to establish a microgravity environment adaptation method and evaluate simulated microgravity effects in mice.

2. Methods

2.1. Structure of the 3D clinostat

The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, manufactured a 3D clinostat apparatus in accordance with the original design by Hoson [30], and its operation was controlled via a rotation control system (Fig. 1a and b).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(a) Three-dimensional clinostat and (b) the controller. (c) Mouse survival box (SB) pattern; 1: Activity area. 2: Rest area. 3: Food and water areas; (d) Adaptive training of the clinostat (CS) group on the 3D clinostat; (e) Mice in the CS group on the 3D clinostat during the study.

The clinostat is comprised of a base frame, a supporting frame, an outer frame, and an inter frame (Fig. 1a). This is similar to the 3D clinostat developed by Hoson [30]. The sample stage and illumination are placed on both sides of the inter-frame in parallel, and they are 170 mm away from the shaft. The inner frame is fixed on the outer frame, which rotates about the horizontal axis with its rotating axes perpendicular to each other. Additionally, the rotational motion of the two rotating frames is driven by stepper motors. A controller with a single-chip microcomputer regulates the motor rotational speed, direction, and running duration. A slip ring is used to perform all incoming and outgoing electrical wiring. Moreover, the rotating frames are the outer frame and inner frame. It can rotate independently and can be used to simulate the microgravity effect of larger plants, seeds, and microorganisms. Specific parameters: Loading platform: area, 400 mm × 300 mm; distance from the center, 170 mm; bearing capacity, 0–3 kg; and illumination, 400 mm × 300 mm. The sample stage can hold up to 12 sample containers with a diameter of 90 mm. Opposite the sample stage distance from the center point, 170 mm, removable. The lighting power is adjustable in the range of 0–50 w, and the light source is a white LED divided into two groups. The light is adjustable (5 cm under the light plate, 80–800 μmol/m2/s). The rotation modes are as follows: random rotation speed, 0–10 rpm; speed resolution, 0.1 rpm. The overall size of the 3D clinostat is 1000 mm × 912 mm × 1250 mm, and the total weight is 35 kg.

3. Mice and treatments

The Ethics Committee of the Laboratory of Animal Science of Peking Union Medical College approved all experimental procedures. The Animal Ethics is IACUC-20220415. Animal care was provided in accordance with institutional guidelines and all animal studies were performed in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines. 8-Week-old male C57BL/6 J mice were purchased from Beijing HFK Bioscience Co., Ltd and kept in the experimental room at temperature 22 ± 2 °C, humidity 40 ± 5%, under a 12-h light/dark cycle. The mice were randomly divided into three groups: mice in individually ventilated cages (MC group, n = 6), mice in survival boxes (SB group, n = 12), and mice in survival boxes receiving 3D clinostat treatment (CS group, n = 12). As the 3D clinostat rotates 360°, we took advantage of the burrowing habits of the mouse and designed a survival box to keep the mice fixed on the 3D clinostat (Fig. 1c). From Fig. 1c, represents the free movement area of the mouse, 2 represents the rest area of the mouse, 3 represents the food and water supply area. In the third area, we put feed and solid AGAR to provide water. Only one mouse was placed in one survival box; therefore, fighting and biting among mice were avoided.

The activity of the mice makes it impossible for it to be uniform, and the total force cannot be zero. However, binding or other ways to limit movement will result in stress injury to the mouse. When using a clinostat to simulate microgravity, the mice could drill into the survival box and stay in the rest area. It can be used as a mass point to ensure that the total force applied to the experimental animal is near zero and to perform simulated microgravity experiments in 3D clinostat safely and stably (Fig. 1d and e).

Before the study, we conducted adaptive training for the mice in the CS group to relieve stress. The adaptive training process involved the following: the mice in the CS group were placed on the 3D clinostat, and we provided standard pellet food and 2% agar gel (water supply) in the survival boxes. The CS group underwent adaptive training for 5 days and rotated for 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, and 12 h each day and rested for 2 days before starting the study. Meanwhile, the MC group was always placed in IVCs and the SB group was always placed in survival boxes without any treatment. Water and food were freely available, and all mice were observed daily.

3.1. Simulated microgravity

8-week-old mice were acclimated to the facility environment for 2 days and underwent adaptive training to 3D clinostat for 5 days. The formal experiments began at 9 weeks old. The CS group experienced simulated microgravity on clinostat for 1 day and rested for 1 day; the SB group was placed in the survival boxes in according with CS operation frequency; the MC group was always placed in the individually ventilated cages. The experiment lasted for 12 weeks. Left femur from the CS and/or SB groups were collected weekly. Serum and left femur from the MC group were collected every 2 weeks. The left femur was wrapped in saline-soaked gauze and stored at −20 °C for ex vivo microcomputed tomography analysis, and the serum was stored at −20 °C for metabolomics. The mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg) and blood samples were collected from inferior vena cava. After sample collection, the mice were sacrificed by cervical vertebra twisting.

3.2. Micro-CT imaging of bone

CT imaging was conducted using a Siemens INVEON scanner with the following settings: tube voltage, 60 kV; tube current, 400 μA; and exposure time, 800 m s over 360° rotation. The Feldkamp filtered back-projection algorithm was used to reconstruct the images. Images acquired from the scanner were viewed and analyzed using INVEON Workplace software.

4. Extraction of metabolites

To extract metabolites from serum samples, 400 μl of cold extraction solvent methanol/acetonitrile/H2O (2:2:1, v/v/v) was added to 100 μl of serum sample and adequately vortexed. After vortexing, the samples were incubated on ice for 20 min and then centrifuged at 14,000 g for 20 min at 4 °C. Finally, the samples were redissolved in 100 μl of acetonitrile/water (1:1, v/v) solvent for liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) analysis and transferred to LC vials.

4.1. LC–MS analysis

For the untargeted metabolomics of polar metabolites, extracts were analyzed using a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Sciex Triple TOF 6600) coupled to hydrophilic interaction chromatography via electrospray ionization by the Shanghai Applied Protein Technology Co. Ltd. The LC separation was on an ACQUIY UPLC BEH Amide column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7-μm particle size) (Waters, Ireland) using a gradient of solvent A (25-mM ammonium acetate and 25 mM ammonium hydroxide in water) and solvent B (acetonitrile). The gradient was 85% B for 1 min and was linearly reduced to 65% in 11 min, and then was reduced to 40% in 0.1 min and maintained for 4 min, and then increased to 85% in 0.1 min, with a 5-min re-equilibration period. The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min, the column temperature was 25 °C, the autosampler temperature was 5 °C, and the injection volume was 2 μl. The mass spectrometer was operated in both negative and positive ionization modes. The ESI source conditions were set as follows: ion source gas 1 (gas 1) as 60, ion source gas 2 (gas 2) as 60, curtain gas (CUR) as 30, source temperature: 600 °C, IonSpray Voltage Floating (ISVF) ± 5500 V. In auto MS/MS acquisition, the instrument was set to acquire over the m/z range 25 to 1000 Da, and the accumulation time for production scan was set at 0.005 s/spectra. The production scan was acquired using information-dependent acquisition with selected high sensitivity mode. The parameters were set as follows: the collision energy was fixed at 35 V with ±15 eV; declustering potential 60 V (+) and −60 V (−); exclude isotopes within 4 Da; candidate ions to monitor per cycle: 10.

4.2. Data analysis

The raw MS data (wiff. Scan files) were converted to MzXML files using ProteoWizard MS Convert before importing into freely available XCMS software. For peak picking, the following parameters were used: centWave m/z = 25 ppm, peak width = c (10, 60), prefilter = c (10,100). For peak grouping, bw = 5, mzwid = 0.025, and minfrac = 0.5 were used. Only the variables with more than 50% of the nonzero measurement values in the extracted ion features were kept in at least one group. MS/MS spectra identified metabolite compounds with an in-house database established with available authentic standards. After normalization to total peak intensity, the processed data were uploaded before importing into SIMCA-P (version 14.1, Umetrics, Umea, Sweden). They were subjected to multivariate data analysis, including Pareto-scaled Principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). Sevenfold cross-validation and response permutation testing were used to evaluate the robustness of the model.

4.3. Analysis of bioinformatics

For KEGG annotation of pathways, the metabolites were blasted against the online KEGG database to retrieve their COs and were subsequently mapped to pathways in KEGG.

4.4. Statistical analysis

The data are shown as means ± SEM. GraphPad Prism 9.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Two-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc test evaluated the significance of differences in the mouse body weight and bone parameters between groups. A difference was considered significant if the P-value was <0.05. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) was conducted based on the Bray–Curtis distance. The corresponding KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were applied based on Fisher's exact test, considering the total metabolites of each pathway as a background dataset. Only pathways with P-values <0.05 were considered significantly changed pathways.

5. Results

5.1. Effects of 3D clinostat on the body weight and general status in mice

A veterinarian having expertise in the medical care of mice evaluated the animals daily during the study. Through the course of the study mice were clinically normal, with no physical or behavioral abnormalities noted. The gain in body weight was similar for mice in all experimental groups, further demonstrating the lack of any observable differences in health status (Fig. 2a). Together, these findings suggest that mice adapt well to the 3D Clinostat without adverse health effects.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Effects of 3D clinostat on body weight and bone parameters in mice. (a) Weekly body weight chart of the mice. (b) NMDS analysis of metabolic pattern in mouse cage (MC) and survival box (SB) group. (c) R2 of permanova between 3D clinostat (CS) group and SB group mice metabolic patterns in different time regions. (d) NMDS analysis of differences characteristics of CS and SB group mice metabolic patterns in different time regions. Ⅰ: 1–3 weeks, Ⅱ: 4–6 weeks, Ⅲ: 7–9 weeks, Ⅳ: 10–12 weeks. *P < 0.05 (CS versus MC), #P < 0.00.05 (CS versus SB), $ P < 0.05 (SB versus MC).

5.2. Effects of 3D clinostat on the metabolic patterns in mice

Studies have shown [[31], [32], [33]] that microgravity changes metabolites in the body, and therefore we examined the metabolomics of serum. Serum specimens were subjected to untargeted metabolomics analysis to identify the hematic metabolic profiles among the groups tested. NMDS analysis showed that there were no significant differences between SB and MC groups (Fig. 2b). It indicated that survival boxes itself did not affect the metabolic pattern of C57BL/6 J mice.

To explore the effect of 3D clinostat, we performed analysis for metabolic patterns in the SB group and CS group in different time regions. NMDS analysis showed that compared with the SB group, stage Ⅰ and Ⅳ have a separation in the CS group (Fig. 2c and d), while stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ did not separate well between the SB and CS groups. Differences between groups were shown in Fig. 2b, our results showed that p value of the stage Ⅰ and Ⅳ was 0.1. Table 1 showed that the differential metabolites changed most significantly in the stage Ⅰ. Meanwhile, compared with the stage Ⅱ, the differential metabolites of the stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ were increasing with time-dependent. It suggested that after 3D clinostat treatment, mice have a stress response in the stage Ⅰ and need to adapt and the number of differential metabolites in mice increased with the time of microgravity simulation. We then analyzed the KEGG pathway, in which the differential metabolites known in the stage Ⅰ were enriched (Fig. 3). As expected, we found metabolic pathways associated with stress responses, including Retrograde endocannabinoid signaling.

Table 1.

Differential metabolite statistics.

Total metabolites
All Changed 3036 (0.199) 246 (0.016) 365 (0.023) 867 (0.056) 15,226
Up 1766 (0.115) 148 (0.009) 195 (0.012) 377 (0.024) 2486
Down 1270 (0.103) 98 (0.006) 170 (0.011) 490 (0.032) 2028
Matched Changed 233 (0.156) 21 (0.014) 30 (0.020) 56 (0.037) 1492
Up 150 (0.100) 16 (0.010) 12 (0.008) 35 (0.023) 213
Down 83 (0.055) 5 (0.003) 18 (0.012) 21 (0.014) 127

Note: The numbers outside the brackets represented the number of differential metabolites; the numbers in parentheses represented the ratio of differential metabolites to total metabolites.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Differential metabolites involved in enrichment analysis of signaling pathways in the stage Ⅰ.

Besides, there are 28 common differential metabolites between the stage Ⅰ and Ⅳ in the Venn diagram (Fig. 4a–c). Table 2 showed that the common differential metabolites mainly focus on the tumor, neurotoxicity and inflammation. Further, we performed pathway analysis in different stage using the KEGG metabolic library. Fig. 5 showed that there were clearly differences in different stages. In stage I, some metabolic related pathways were activated. In stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ, pathways activated in stage I were recovered along with several pathways downregulated. With the prolongation of the 3D clinostat processing time, 8 signaling pathways were observed to be activated in the stage Ⅳ, including 2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolism, Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation, Alcoholism, Amphetamine addiction, Cocaine addiction, Dopaminergic synapse, Melanogenesis and Prolactin signaling pathway, which may be related to the change of central nervous system. And pathway related to fatty acid biosynthesis was inhibited in stage IV. Notably, we found that 2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolism and Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation overlapped in the stage I and IV. These results suggested that during the early stage I, the mice mainly displayed acute and stress response to the rotation. After that, the mice gradually adapted to the situation during stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ and the acute and stress effects of microgravity were recovered. Further, with the extension of simulated microgravity time, the long-term effects gradually emerged, especially the changes related to the dopamine and central nervous system.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Venn of the differential metabolites. (a) Total differential metabolites (known). (b) Up-regulated differential metabolites (known). (c) Down-regulated differential metabolites (known). Ⅰ: 1–3 weeks, Ⅱ: 4–6 weeks, Ⅲ: 7–9 weeks, Ⅳ: 10–12 weeks.

Table 2.

The common differential metabolites between the stage I and stage IV.

Name fold change I fold change IV Function Related disease Reference
Ginsenoside re 2.96 1.64 nerve protection, anti-cancer cancer, neurodegeneration disease [34]
Hexadecanedioic acid, 3,3,14,14-tetramethyl- 2.49 0.7
Methylmalonic acid 2.43 1.3 drive tumor aggressiveness tumor [35]
6-phospho-d-gluconate 2.01 1.26 glycolysis intermediate systemic lupus erythematosus [36]
Kynurenic acid 1.94 4.45 nerve protection Alzheimer's disease [37]
L-Tyrosine 1.78 2.08 melanin formation substrate melanin [38]
Delsoline 1.57 1.3 gangliolysis muscle tension and overexertion [39]
Coproporphyrin i 1.47 0.81 biomarker of OATP1B Activity Rheumatoid Arthritis [40]
Cis,cis-muconic acid 1.02 0.84 C6 dicarboxylic acid platform chemical the production of drugs [41]
Propylene glycol propyl ether −0.32 −0.23 toxicity tumors [42]
Chlorhexidine −0.5 −0.74 antimicrobial gingivitis [43]
Pentadecanoic acid −0.61 −0.48 promoted glucose uptake type 2 diabetes [44]
Norharmane −0.67 −0.7 protective against neurodegenerative diseases Alzheimer's disease [45]
Oxindole −0.78 −0.79 kinase inhibitors cancer [46]
Gln-val −0.84 −0.89 melanoma cells to metastasize to the liver melanoma [47]
2,5-dimethoxy-4-propylphenethylamine −0.86 −0.79 induce neurotoxicity neuroinflammation [48]
Trimethylamine n-oxide −0.94 −0.77 inducing M1 macrophage polarization graft-versus-host disease [49]
Phosphatidylcholine lyso alkyl 16:0 −0.98 −0.98

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

KEGG pathway enriched with differential metabolites at all stages. Ⅰ: 1–3 weeks, Ⅱ: 4–6 weeks, Ⅲ: 7–9 weeks, Ⅳ: 10–12 weeks.

5.3. Effects of 3D clinostat on femur parameters in mice

Femur parameters were analyzed, including bone surface area/bone volume, bone volume/total volume, trabecular number, trabecular spacing, and trabecular thickness. No significant differences in femur parameters between SB and MC mice were observed (Fig. 6a–f). It suggested when mice were stimulated with the survival boxes, time-dependent bone volume/total volume, trabecular thickness, trabecular spacing, trabecular number, and bone surface area/bone volume were unaffected. However, when mice were rotated in the 3D clinostat to simulate the effect of microgravity, there were clear differences between the SB and CS groups in femur Parameters. Compared with the SB group, there was a declining trend in time-dependent trabecular numbers (P < 0.05) while trabecular spacing showed an increasing trend (P = 0.078) in the CS group (Fig. 6b and c). These results indicated that simulating microgravity with a 3D clinostat led to bone loss. The longer the simulation period of microgravity with a 3D clinostat, the more severe the bone loss.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Effects of 3D clinostat on bone parameters in mice. (a) Representative micro-CT images at stage Ⅳ. (b) Trabecular numbers. (c) Trabecular spacing. (d) Trabecular thickness. (e) Bone surface area/bone volume. (f) Bone volume/total volume. Ⅰ: 1–3 weeks, Ⅱ: 4–6 weeks, Ⅲ: 7–9 weeks, Ⅳ: 10–12 weeks. *P < 0.05, #P < 0.1.

6. Discussion

Weightlessness is inevitable on a space mission and contributes to a series of damaging effects. Economics and technology have limited our ability to study the effects of weightlessness in space. Therefore, models that simulate the effects of microgravity (such as hindlimb unloading models) have become the preferred tools for studying weightlessness. However, these models also have some limitations [20]. For example, weightlessness occurs when the entire object floats completely in space, whereas hindlimb unloading model with the remaining forelimb loading only simulates partial weightlessness [20]. This method may not make the subject accept the overall weightlessness.

In our study, we used a 3D clinostat to simulate the effects of microgravity. On a clinostat, an organism is in a gravitational field and is subjected to a constant gravity vector, but because of the rotation of the clinostat, the direction of the gravity vector acting on the organism continuously changes, and the vector sum generated by one rotation (360°) is equal to zero, i.e., zero gravity [21,50]. The direction of the gravity vector changes rapidly so that the organism does not experience gravity, and the result is an effect similar to that of a microgravity environment [21,51].

To adapt to the microgravity, astronauts need to undergo a range of adaptive training before going into space, for example, parabolic aircraft flights and head down tilt. With the development of space industry, more and more experimental animals go into space. As one of the main purposes of the current studies is to focus on the effects of microgravity on physiological function, at present, there is no systematic microgravity adaptation training program for laboratory animals. However, for some special experiments and long-term experiments, it is necessary to train the animals properly to adapt to the microgravity environment to improve their conditions and survival rate. For this purpose, mice were trained to live on a 3D clinostat. Theoretically, it is possible to simulate microgravity on the ground by processing samples with 3D clinostat. It has been used on plants, cells, and Caenorhabditis Elegans [[22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29]]. However, it was difficult for mice to keep immobile, considered as a mass point. Thus, we took advantage of the burrowing habits of the mouse and designed a survival box to keep the mice fixed on the 3D clinostat. Over a period of three months, the mice showed good tolerance without obvious injuries or abnormalities. It is suggested that using 3D clinostat to train mice is technically feasible.

Further, to explore the effects of simulated microgravity simulated by the 3D clinostat, we evaluated serum metabolomics and bone parameters. To exclude the effect of the SB itself alone, we analyzed the metabolomics of mice in the SB and MC groups, and the results showed no significant differences between the two groups (Fig. 2b). The results suggested that the SB would not interfere with our experimental results. For CS group mice, our results showed that mice treated with a 3D clinostat developed a stress response during the early stage Ⅰ, leading to a significant increase in the stage Ⅰ differential metabolites compared to other stages. Retrograde Endocannabinoid signaling is primarily affected. Studies showed [52] that CB1 receptor-endocannabinoid signaling was activated by stress and played a role in buffing or inhibiting the behavioral and endocrine effects of acute stress. Sachin Patel et al. found [53] that activation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors reduced anxiety-like behaviors in mice and further supported an anxiolytic role for endogenous cannabinoid signaling.

Subsequently, our results showed that KEGG signaling pathways activated in stage Ⅰ were recovered in the stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ, and the number of serum differential metabolites also decreased. It suggested that the mice gradually adapted to the 3D clinostat intervention in the stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ. Body weight results also supported this point. During long-term space operations [50], microgravity may affect intracranial physiological functions, such as intracranial pressure, spinal and neurocognitive performance, and brain edema induced by microgravity [54], resulting in neuro-ocular syndrome [51]. Irina Mikheeva et al. observed [55] that 30-day spaceflight had a significant effect on the structure of motoneurons of the trochlear nerve nucleus in mice. Xiao Wen Mao et al. found that the mice exposure to the spaceflight environment (Space Shuttle Atlantis, STS-135) could induce significant changes in protein expression related to neuronal structure and metabolic function [56]. The results from this study also showed that the nervous system was the most to be affected by long-term microgravity in the stage Ⅳ, that indicated by the activated KEGG pathways including Amphetamine addiction, Cocaine addiction, Dopaminergic synapse, Fatty acid biosynthesis, Melanogenesis and Prolactin signaling pathway. Consistent with it, long-lasting spaceflight (one month on the Russian Bion-M1 spacecraft) considerably affected the genetic control of the brain dopamine system in mice, while relatively short-lasting spaceflight (about 19 days on the biosatellites Cosmos 782 and 936) showed no significant changes in the dopamine level in rats [57,58]. The implication of the dopamine system in the regulation of movement, muscle tone and reward-related motivation suggests that the change of dopamine related signal pathways may contribute to the deleterious effect of spaceflight on skeletal muscle tone, locomotor activity and emotions that may alter in astronauts after long-term spaceflight. It is well known that mice as well as humans have vestibular organs in the inner ear. Movement of the clinostat would stimulate hair cells and lead to vestibular system disorder. Vestibular system has extensive connections with areas of the brain beyond the vestibulo-ocular and vestibulo-spinal reflexes, including motor control, multisensory integration, cognitive functions and emotional regulation [59]. It is reasonable to suppose that abnormal vestibular signals and sensory conflicts during rotation affected the function of the central nervous system. Adaptation of mice in 3D rotator may help mice adapt to vestibular perception abnormalities in space microgravity environment, just like the swivel chair training conducted by astronauts to prevent space motion sickness. Therefore, the mouse models built with 3D clinostat may provide an excellent model to explore the long-term effect of microgravity on nervous system. Besides, the results also suggest that it is very important to select appropriate training duration for 3D clinostat simulated microgravity, for example, 3 weeks for acute and stress effects, 4–9 weeks for short term effects without obvious stress reactions, and more than 10 weeks for long term and central nervous system related effects.

Our results also showed two overlapping metabolic pathways in the stage Ⅰ and Ⅳ: valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation and 2-oxocarboxylic acid metabolism. Valine, leucine, and isoleucine [60], also known as branched-chain amino acids, usually act as nitrogen carriers to assist in synthesizing other amino acids required for muscle formation. Branched-chain amino acids have both synthetic and antide composition effects, which can help prevent protein decomposition and muscle loss [60,61]. Frederico Gerlinger-Romero et al. found [62] that Beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (a leucine metabolite) can improve skeletal muscle function and protect bone from the harmful effects of fasting in Wister rats after fasting. 2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolism [[63], [64], [65]] was closely related to osteoarthritis, myocardial infarction and bronchial asthma. Naiqiang Zhu et al. demonstrated [64] that 2-oxocarboxylic acid metabolism was highly correlated with osteoarthritis and can be used as a biomarker for early diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation and 2-oxocarboxylic acid metabolism were potential targets for using 3D clinostat to simulate microgravity effects, and change the dietary supply of branched-chain amino acids may help mice or astronauts adapt to microgravity environment.

Multiple studies showed that weightlessness causes bone loss in humans and mice. Bone parameters (e.g. bone trabeculae) were reduced, leading to an increased fracture risk [[66], [67], [68]]. To investigate whether 3D clinostat induced bone loss in mice, we compared bone parameters by CT imaging. Similarly, our results indicate that there are no significant differences in bone parameters between the SB and MC groups, ruling out the influence of the SB alone (Fig. 6). However, The CS group mice using microgravity simulated by the 3D clinostat clearly reduced trabecular number and increased trabecular spacing with time-dependent (Fig. 6). It suggested that 3D clinostat could cause bone loss by simulated microgravity. Bone loss is related to bone formation and bone resorption. Bone formation has been observed to decrease in most space flight studies, and bone resorption showed increase in humans in space and rodent models [[69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76]]. Therefore, in our study, the decrease in trabecular number and increase in trabecular spacing may be due to the combined effect of decreased bone formation and increased bone resorption and it was time-dependent. Meanwhile, the bone effect seemed modest in the case of 3D clinostat, albeit small changes of trabecular number and trabecular spacing in the late stage. The modest bone loss is likely to be associated with the mechanical stimulation of the hind limb bones caused by the reflex grasping of the cage during the rotation process.

7. Conclusions

It was feasible to simulate the effect of microgravity on C57BL/6 J mice by 3D clinostat treatment. Bone loss (a reduction in the trabeculae number) agreed with previous studies. Additionally, serum metabolomes were changed with increasing 3D clinostat treatment time. The effects of microgravity simulated by a long time 3D clinostat are most affected in the nervous system. It may provide a new strategy in pre-launch training for mice to adapt to the microgravity environment in space and conducting relevant ground-based modeling experiments.

Declarations

Author contribution statement

Chenchen Song: Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.Taisheng Kang: Performed the experiments.

Kai Gao: Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.Xudong Shi: Analyzed and interpreted the data.

Meng Zhang: Performed the experiments.

Lianlian Zhao: Analyzed and interpreted the data.

Li Zhou: Conceived and designed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.

Jianguo Guo: Conceived and designed the experiments; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.

Data availability

The data that supports the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Funding

This research was supported by Aerospace Science and Technology Collaborative Innovation Center Project (BSAUEA5740600223), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Science (CIFMS, 2021-I2M-1–034), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (General Program, 82070103), the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFF0703400).

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the serum metabolome analysis provided by the Shanghai Applied Protein Technology Company.

Contributor Information

Li Zhou, Email: zhouli@cnilas.org.

Jianguo Guo, Email: guojianguo@cnilas.org.

References

  • 1.Smith K., Mercuri J. Microgravity and radiation effects on astronaut intervertebral disc health. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2021;92(5):342–352. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.5713.2021. Epub 2021/04/21. PubMed PMID: 33875067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kramer B.K., Mang J.F., Schubert R. The effect of microgravity on central aortic blood pressure. Am. J. Hypertens. 2018;31(11):1180–1182. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpy133. Epub 2018/08/24. PubMed PMID: 30137190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bevelacqua J.J., Welsh J., Mortazavi S.M.J. Comments on "prolonged microgravity affects human brain structure and function". AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41(2):E7. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6387. Epub 2020/01/18. PubMed PMID: 31948952; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7015207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ma L., Ma J., Xu K. Effect of spaceflight on the circadian rhythm, lifespan and gene expression of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2015;10(3) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121600. Epub 2015/03/24. PubMed PMID: 25798821; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4370389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brainard G.C., Barger L.K., Soler R.R., Hanifin J.P. The development of lighting countermeasures for sleep disruption and circadian misalignment during spaceflight. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2016;22(6):535–544. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000329. Epub 2016/09/09. PubMed PMID: 27607152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Buguet A. Sleep under extreme environments: effects of heat and cold exposure, altitude, hyperbaric pressure and microgravity in space. J. Neurol. Sci. 2007;262(1–2):145–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.06.040. Epub 2007/08/21. PubMed PMID: 17706676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Prasad B., Grimm D., Strauch S.M., Erzinger G.S., Corydon T.J., Lebert M., et al. Influence of microgravity on apoptosis in cells, tissues, and other systems in vivo and in vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(24) doi: 10.3390/ijms21249373. Epub 2020/12/16. PubMed PMID: 33317046; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7764784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hughson R.L., Helm A., Durante M. Heart in space: effect of the extraterrestrial environment on the cardiovascular system. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2018;15(3):167–180. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.157. Epub 2017/10/21. PubMed PMID: 29053152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sprugnoli G., Cagle Y.D., Santarnecchi E. Microgravity and cosmic radiations during space exploration as a window into neurodegeneration on Earth. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(2):157–158. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4003. Epub 2019/11/26. PubMed PMID: 31764952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hupfeld K.E., McGregor H.R., Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Seidler R.D. Microgravity effects on the human brain and behavior: dysfunction and adaptive plasticity. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2021;122:176–189. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.017. Epub 2021/01/18. PubMed PMID: 33454290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sun Y., Kuang Y., Zuo Z. The emerging role of macrophages in immune system dysfunction under real and simulated microgravity conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(5) doi: 10.3390/ijms22052333. Epub 2021/03/04. PubMed PMID: 33652750; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7956436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Akiyama T., Horie K., Hinoi E., Hiraiwa M., Kato A., Maekawa Y., et al. How does spaceflight affect the acquired immune system? NPJ microgravity. 2020;6:14. doi: 10.1038/s41526-020-0104-1. Epub 2020/05/16. PubMed PMID: 32411817; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7206142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Andreev-Andrievskiy A., Popova A., Boyle R., Alberts J., Shenkman B., Vinogradova O., et al. Mice in Bion-M 1 space mission: training and selection. PLoS One. 2014;9(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104830. Epub 2014/08/19. PubMed PMID: 25133741; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4136787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cancedda R., Liu Y., Ruggiu A., Tavella S., Biticchi R., Santucci D., et al. The Mice Drawer System (MDS) experiment and the space endurance record-breaking mice. PLoS One. 2012;7(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032243. Epub 2012/06/06. PubMed PMID: 22666312; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3362598 following conflicts: P.C., G.F. and C.T. are employed by the commercial company (Thales Alenia Space) appointed by ASI to develop and to build the MDS payload. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ronca A.E., Moyer E.L., Talyansky Y., Lowe M., Padmanabhan S., Choi S., et al. Behavior of mice aboard the international space station. Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1):4717. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40789-y. Epub 2019/04/13. PubMed PMID: 30976012; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6459880 personal financial interests as a stockholder of Novartis. S.M.C. declares no non-financial competing interests. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tou J.C., Grindeland R.E., Wade C.E. Effects of diet and exposure to hindlimb suspension on estrous cycling in Sprague-Dawley rats. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metabol. 2004;286(3):E425–E433. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00287.2003. Epub 2003/11/20. PubMed PMID: 14625203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Matsuda C., Kato T., Inoue-Suzuki S., Kikuchi J., Ohta T., Kagawa M., et al. Dietary intervention of mice using an improved Multiple Artificial-gravity Research System (MARS) under artificial 1 g. NPJ microgravity. 2019;5:16. doi: 10.1038/s41526-019-0077-0. Epub 2019/07/18. PubMed PMID: 31312718; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6614370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hezrony B.S., Speacht T.L., Donahue H.J., Lau A.G. Combined hind limb suspension and sRANK-L on bone strength in mice by finite element analysis: effects of anatomic model height. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual International Conference. 2020;2020:4844–4847. doi: 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9175729. Epub 2020/10/07. PubMed PMID: 33019075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen Z., Zhang Y., Zhao F., Yin C., Yang C., Wang X., et al. Recombinant irisin prevents the reduction of osteoblast differentiation induced by stimulated microgravity through increasing beta-catenin expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(4) doi: 10.3390/ijms21041259. Epub 2020/02/20. PubMed PMID: 32070052; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7072919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nday C.M., Frantzidis C., Jackson G., Bamidis P., Kourtidou-Papadeli C. Neurophysiological changes in simulated microgravity: an animal model. Neurol. India. 2019;67(Supplement):S221–S226. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.259128. Epub 2019/05/29. PubMed PMID: 31134913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yd J., Wn L., Lf W., Zy Z., Bm Z., Hj W. Several new type of clinostats. Space Med. Med. Eng. 2008;(4):368–371. doi: 10.16289/j.cnki.1002-0837.2008.04.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gao Y., Li S., Xu D., Wang J., Sun Y. Changes in apoptotic microRNA and mRNA expression profiling in Caenorhabditis elegans during the Shenzhou-8 mission. J. Radiat. Res. 2015;56(6):872–882. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrv050. Epub 2015/08/20. PubMed PMID: 26286471; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4628221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gao Y., Xu D., Zhao L., Zhang M., Sun Y. Effects of microgravity on DNA damage response in Caenorhabditis elegans during Shenzhou-8 spaceflight. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2015;91(7):531–539. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2015.1043754. Epub 2015/05/13. PubMed PMID: 25965668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gao Y., Xu D., Zhao L., Sun Y. The DNA damage response of C. elegans affected by gravity sensing and radiosensitivity during the Shenzhou-8 spaceflight. Mutat. Res. 2017;795:15–26. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.01.001. Epub 2017/01/16. PubMed PMID: 28088539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Aleshcheva G., Bauer J., Hemmersbach R., Slumstrup L., Wehland M., Infanger M., et al. Scaffold-free tissue formation under real and simulated microgravity conditions. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2016;119(Suppl 3):26–33. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12561. Epub 2016/10/30. PubMed PMID: 26826674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ikeda H., Souda H., Puspitasari A., Held K.D., Hidema J., Nikawa T., et al. Development and performance evaluation of a three-dimensional clinostat synchronized heavy-ion irradiation system. Life Sci. Space Res. 2017;12:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.lssr.2017.01.003. Epub 2017/02/19. PubMed PMID: 28212708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kiss J.Z., Wolverton C., Wyatt S.E., Hasenstein K.H., van Loon J. Comparison of microgravity analogs to spaceflight in studies of plant growth and development. Front. Plant Sci. 2019;10:1577. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01577. Epub 2019/12/24. PubMed PMID: 31867033; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6908503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Neelam S., Richardson B., Barker R., Udave C., Gilroy S., Cameron M.J., et al. Changes in nuclear shape and gene expression in response to simulated microgravity are LINC complex-dependent. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(18) doi: 10.3390/ijms21186762. Epub 2020/09/19. PubMed PMID: 32942630; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7555797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ho C.N.Q., Tran M.T., Doan C.C., Hoang S.N., Tran D.H., Le L.T. Simulated microgravity inhibits the proliferation of chang liver cells by attenuation of the major cell cycle regulators and cytoskeletal proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(9) doi: 10.3390/ijms22094550. Epub 2021/05/01. PubMed PMID: 33925309; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC8123698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hoson T., Kamisaka S., Miyamoto K., Ueda J., Yamashita M., Masuda Y. Vegetative growth of higher plants on a three-dimensional clinostat. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 1993;6(4):278–281. Epub 1993/12/01. PubMed PMID: 11541849. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jiang C., Guo D., Li Z., Lei S., Shi J., Shao D. Clinostat rotation affects metabolite transportation and increases organic acid production by Aspergillus carbonarius, as revealed by differential metabolomic analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019;85(18) doi: 10.1128/aem.01023-19. Epub 2019/07/14. PubMed PMID: 31300399; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6715838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tauber S., Lauber B.A., Paulsen K., Layer L.E., Lehmann M., Hauschild S., et al. Cytoskeletal stability and metabolic alterations in primary human macrophages in long-term microgravity. PLoS One. 2017;12(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175599. Epub 2017/04/19. PubMed PMID: 28419128; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5395169 not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen B., Guo J., Wang S., Kang L., Deng Y., Li Y. Simulated microgravity altered the metabolism of loureirin B and the expression of major cytochrome P450 in liver of rats. Front. Pharmacol. 2018;9:1130. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01130. Epub 2018/10/30. PubMed PMID: 30369879; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6194197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gao X.Y., Liu G.C., Zhang J.X., Wang L.H., Xu C., Yan Z.A., et al. Pharmacological properties of ginsenoside Re. Front. Pharmacol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.754191. Epub 2022/04/26. PubMed PMID: 35462899; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC9019721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kay E.J., Zanivan S. Methylmalonic acid: an age-related metabolite that drives tumour aggressiveness. Nat. Metab. 2022;4(4):412–413. doi: 10.1038/s42255-022-00540-w. Epub 2022/04/02. PubMed PMID: 35361957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Koga T., Sato T., Furukawa K., Morimoto S., Endo Y., Umeda M., et al. Promotion of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase 4 by GLUT1-dependent glycolysis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(5):766–772. doi: 10.1002/art.40785. Epub 2018/11/22. PubMed PMID: 30462889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tóth F., Cseh E.K., Vécsei L. Natural molecules and neuroprotection: kynurenic acid, pantethine and α-lipoic acid. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(1) doi: 10.3390/ijms22010403. Epub 2021/01/07. PubMed PMID: 33401674; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7795784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Slominski A., Zmijewski M.A., Pawelek J. L-tyrosine and L-dihydroxyphenylalanine as hormone-like regulators of melanocyte functions. Pigment cell & melanoma research. 2012;25(1):14–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2011.00898.x. Epub 2011/08/13. PubMed PMID: 21834848; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3242935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shao L., Jin Y., Fu H., Ma J., Wang X., Jin Y., et al. Pharmacokinetics and UPLC-MS/MS of delsoline in mouse whole blood. Journal of analytical methods in chemistry. 2018;2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/9412708. Epub 2018/11/09. PubMed PMID: 30405933; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6201488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ono H., Tanaka R., Suzuki Y., Oda A., Ozaki T., Tatsuta R., et al. Factors influencing plasma coproporphyrin-I concentration as biomarker of OATP1B activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021;110(4):1096–1105. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2375. Epub 2021/07/29. PubMed PMID: 34319605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Choi S., Lee H.N., Park E., Lee S.J., Kim E.S. Recent advances in microbial production of cis,cis-muconic acid. Biomolecules. 2020;10(9) doi: 10.3390/biom10091238. Epub 2020/08/29. PubMed PMID: 32854378; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7564838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Spencer P.J. New toxicity data for the propylene glycol ethers - a commitment to public health and safety. Toxicol. Lett. 2005;156(1):181–188. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.09.023. Epub 2005/02/12. PubMed PMID: 15705495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jones C.G. Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard? Periodontol. 2000. 1997;15:55–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1997.tb00105.x. Epub 1998/06/27. PubMed PMID: 9643233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fu W.C., Li H.Y., Li T.T., Yang K., Chen J.X., Wang S.J., et al. Pentadecanoic acid promotes basal and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in C2C12 myotubes. Food Nutr. Res. 2021;65 doi: 10.29219/fnr.v65.4527. Epub 2021/02/23. PubMed PMID: 33613155; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7869443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zawirska-Wojtasiak R., Fedoruk-Wyszomirska A., Piechowska P., Mildner-Szkudlarz S., Bajerska J., Wojtowicz E., et al. β-Carbolines in experiments on laboratory animals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(15) doi: 10.3390/ijms21155245. Epub 2020/07/30. PubMed PMID: 32722000; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7432475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dhokne P., Sakla A.P., Shankaraiah N. Structural insights of oxindole based kinase inhibitors as anticancer agents: recent advances. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021;216 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113334. Epub 2021/03/16. PubMed PMID: 33721669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kim W.H., Nomizu M., Song S.Y., Tanaka K., Kuratomi Y., Kleinman H.K., et al. Laminin-alpha1-chain sequence Leu-Gln-Val-Gln-Leu-Ser-Ile-Arg (LQVQLSIR) enhances murine melanoma cell metastases. Int. J. Cancer. 1998;77(4):632–639. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980812)77:4&#x0003c;632::aid-ijc25&#x0003e;3.0.co;2-6. Epub 1998/07/29. PubMed PMID: 9679769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kim Y.J., Ma S.X., Hur K.H., Lee Y., Ko Y.H., Lee B.R., et al. New designer phenethylamines 2C-C and 2C-P have abuse potential and induce neurotoxicity in rodents. Arch. Toxicol. 2021;95(4):1413–1429. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-02980-x. Epub 2021/01/31. PubMed PMID: 33515270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wu K., Yuan Y., Yu H., Dai X., Wang S., Sun Z., et al. The gut microbial metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide aggravates GVHD by inducing M1 macrophage polarization in mice. Blood. 2020;136(4):501–515. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019003990. Epub 2020/04/16. PubMed PMID: 32291445; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7378459 interests. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Swinney C.C., Allison Z. Spaceflight and neurosurgery: a comprehensive review of the relevant literature. World neurosurgery. 2018;109:444–448. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.062. Epub 2017/10/25. PubMed PMID: 29061459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wojcik P., Kini A., Al Othman B., Galdamez L.A., Lee A.G. Spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2020;33(1):62–67. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000778. Epub 2019/12/04. PubMed PMID: 31789708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hillard C.J. Stress regulates endocannabinoid-CB1 receptor signaling. Semin. Immunol. 2014;26(5):380–388. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2014.04.001. Epub 2014/06/03. PubMed PMID: 24882055; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4247817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Patel S., Hillard C.J. Pharmacological evaluation of cannabinoid receptor ligands in a mouse model of anxiety: further evidence for an anxiolytic role for endogenous cannabinoid signaling. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therapeut. 2006;318(1):304–311. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.101287. Epub 2006/03/30. PubMed PMID: 16569753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Galdamez L.A., Brunstetter T.J., Lee A.G., Tarver W.J. Origins of cerebral edema: implications for spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome. J. Neuro Ophthalmol. : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society. 2020;40(1):84–91. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000852. Epub 2019/10/22. PubMed PMID: 31633590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mikheeva I., Mikhailova G., Shtanchaev R., Arkhipov V., Pavlik L. Influence of a 30-day spaceflight on the structure of motoneurons of the trochlear nerve nucleus in mice. Brain Res. 2021;1758 doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147331. Epub 2021/02/05. PubMed PMID: 33539796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mao X.W., Sandberg L.B., Gridley D.S., Herrmann E.C., Zhang G., Raghavan R., et al. Proteomic analysis of mouse brain subjected to spaceflight. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;20(1) doi: 10.3390/ijms20010007. Epub 2018/12/24. PubMed PMID: 30577490; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6337482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kvetnansky R., Culman J., Serova L.V., Tigranjan R.A., Torda T., Macho L. Catecholamines and their enzymes in discrete brain areas of rats after space flight on biosatellites Cosmos. Acta Astronaut. 1983;10(5–6):295–300. doi: 10.1016/0094-5765(83)90080-2. Epub 1983/05/01. PubMed PMID: 11541559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Popova N.K., Kulikov A.V., Kondaurova E.M., Tsybko A.S., Kulikova E.A., Krasnov I.B., et al. Risk neurogenes for long-term spaceflight: dopamine and serotonin brain system. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015;51(3):1443–1451. doi: 10.1007/s12035-014-8821-7. Epub 2014/08/03. PubMed PMID: 25084757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Carriot J., Mackrous I., Cullen K.E. Challenges to the vestibular system in space: how the brain responds and adapts to microgravity. Front. Neural Circ. 2021;15 doi: 10.3389/fncir.2021.760313. Epub 2021/11/23. PubMed PMID: 34803615; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC8595211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nie C., He T., Zhang W., Zhang G., Ma X. Branched chain amino acids: beyond nutrition metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19(4) doi: 10.3390/ijms19040954. Epub 2018/03/24. PubMed PMID: 29570613; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5979320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ushakov A.S., Vlasova T.F., Miroshnikova E.B. Studies of amino acid metabolism in the muscles of rats flown aboard the biosatellite Cosmos 782. Life Sci. Space Res. 1979;17:231–234. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-023416-8.50034-9. Epub 1979/01/01. PubMed PMID: 12008711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gerlinger-Romero F., Guimarães-Ferreira L., Yonamine C.Y., Salgueiro R.B., Nunes M.T. Effects of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) on the expression of ubiquitin ligases, protein synthesis pathways and contractile function in extensor digitorum longus (EDL) of fed and fasting rats. J. Physiol. Sci. : JPS. 2018;68(2):165–174. doi: 10.1007/s12576-016-0520-x. Epub 2017/01/14. PubMed PMID: 28083734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Khan A., Choi Y., Back J.H., Lee S., Jee S.H., Park Y.H. High-resolution metabolomics study revealing l-homocysteine sulfinic acid, cysteic acid, and carnitine as novel biomarkers for high acute myocardial infarction risk. Metab., Clin. Exp. 2020;104 doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2019.154051. Epub 2019/12/25. PubMed PMID: 31874143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhu N., Zhang P., Du L., Hou J., Xu B. Identification of key genes and expression profiles in osteoarthritis by co-expressed network analysis. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2020;85 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2020.107225. Epub 2020/03/07. PubMed PMID: 32135469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Tian M., Chen M., Bao Y.L., Xu C.D., Qin Q.Z., Zhang W.X., et al. Sputum metabolomic profiling of bronchial asthma based on quadruple time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2017;10(10):10363–10373. Epub 2017/10/01. PubMed PMID: 31966372; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6965799. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Coulombe J.C., Senwar B., Ferguson V.L. Spaceflight-induced bone tissue changes that affect bone quality and increase fracture risk. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2020;18(1):1–12. doi: 10.1007/s11914-019-00540-y. Epub 2020/01/04. PubMed PMID: 31897866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Fu J., Goldsmith M., Crooks S.D., Condon S.F., Morris M., Komarova S.V. Bone health in spacefaring rodents and primates: systematic review and meta-analysis. NPJ microgravity. 2021;7(1):19. doi: 10.1038/s41526-021-00147-7. Epub 2021/06/03. PubMed PMID: 34075059; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC8169759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Cervinka T., Sievänen H., Hyttinen J., Rittweger J. Bone loss patterns in cortical, subcortical, and trabecular compartments during simulated microgravity. J. Appl. Physiol. 2014;117(1):80–88. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00021.2014. Epub 2014/05/09. PubMed PMID: 24812642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Vico L., Hargens A. Skeletal changes during and after spaceflight. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2018;14(4):229–245. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2018.37. Epub 2018/03/22. PubMed PMID: 29559713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sibonga J.D., Zhang M., Evans G.L., Westerlind K.C., Cavolina J.M., Morey-Holton E., et al. Effects of spaceflight and simulated weightlessness on longitudinal bone growth. Bone. 2000;27(4):535–540. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00352-5. Epub 2000/10/18. PubMed PMID: 11033449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Vico L., Chappard D., Palle S., Bakulin A.V., Novikov V.E., Alexandre C. Trabecular bone remodeling after seven days of weightlessness exposure (BIOCOSMOS 1667) Am. J. Physiol. 1988;255(2 Pt 2):R243–R247. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1988.255.2.R243. Epub 1988/08/01. PubMed PMID: 3407801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wronski T.J., Morey-Holton E.R., Doty S.B., Maese A.C., Walsh C.C. Histomorphometric analysis of rat skeleton following spaceflight. Am. J. Physiol. 1987;252(2 Pt 2):R252–R255. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1987.252.2.R252. Epub 1987/02/01. PubMed PMID: 3812763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Westerlind K.C., Turner R.T. The skeletal effects of spaceflight in growing rats: tissue-specific alterations in mRNA levels for TGF-beta. J. Bone Miner. Res. : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 1995;10(6):843–848. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650100603. Epub 1995/06/01. PubMed PMID: 7572306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lloyd S.A., Morony S.E., Ferguson V.L., Simske S.J., Stodieck L.S., Warmington K.S., et al. Osteoprotegerin is an effective countermeasure for spaceflight-induced bone loss in mice. Bone. 2015;81:562–572. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.08.021. Epub 2015/09/01. PubMed PMID: 26318907; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7937349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Vailas A.C., Zernicke R.F., Grindeland R.E., Kaplansky A., Durnova G.N., Li K.C., et al. Effects of spaceflight on rat humerus geometry, biomechanics, and biochemistry. Faseb. J. : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 1990;4(1):47–54. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.4.1.2295378. Epub 1990/01/01. PubMed PMID: 2295378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lafage-Proust M.H., Collet P., Dubost J.M., Laroche N., Alexandre C., Vico L. Space-related bone mineral redistribution and lack of bone mass recovery after reambulation in young rats. Am. J. Physiol. 1998;274(2):R324–R334. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1998.274.2.R324. Epub 1998/03/05. PubMed PMID: 9486288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES