Skip to main content
The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 2023 Jun 7;35(9):3160–3161. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koad163

Phase separation in flowering control: DCP5 and SSF co-regulate FLC by liquid-liquid phase separation

Ching Chan 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC10473213  PMID: 37282719

The floral transition, the switch from vegetative to reproductive development, represents an integrated output downstream of multiple environmental stimuli and intracellular signaling pathways in plants. FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) is one of the best-characterized targets delaying flowering (Boss et al. 2004). By associating FLC expression levels among a panel of Arabidopsis natural accessions, Wang et al. (2020) identified SISTER of FCA (SSF) as a naturally polymorphic regulator. SSF directly binds to the FLC promoter and regulates FLC transcription. To further explore the mechanism of SSF function, Wanyi Wang and colleagues (Wang et al. 2023) surveyed SSF interacting proteins and identified DECAPPING 5 (DCP5), a component of the processing body. SSF and DCP5 play opposite roles in regulating FLC transcription and hence flowering time.

Phase separation is a process by which biomolecules de-mix from the cellular environment independent of the membrane and assemble into biomolecular condensates. Super-resolution confocal microscopy revealed the characteristic spot-like spherical pattern of biomolecular condensates for both SSF-GFP and DCP5-GFP expressed in transgenic Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana. The fluorescence signals were recovered after photobleaching, indicating that the dense phase contains dynamic molecules that can be exchanged within the condensate and/or with the surroundings. Similarly, SSF-GFP and DCP5-mCherry recombinant proteins displayed liquid droplet patterns and the capability to recover from photobleaching. Moreover, the droplets of recombinant proteins can fuse together to form larger droplets—another characteristic of liquid-liquid phase separation (Laflamme and Mekhail 2020).

A common phenomenon in the protein composition of these membraneless compartments is the prevalence of low-complexity sequence domains or intrinsically disordered regions (Cuevas-Velazquez and Dinneny 2018). Low-complexity sequence domains/intrinsically disordered regions are protein regions with an over-representation of polar and nonstructuring residues. These regions provide a high degree of conformational flexibility and increase the accessibility for protein-protein interactions and the feasibility for post-translational modification. Prion-like domains (PrDs), which display disordered properties, were annotated in both SSF and DCP5. Deletion of the PrDs abolished SSF-GFP and DCP5-mCherry phase separation and the SSF-DCP5 interaction in planta. Complementation of ssf or dcp5 mutants by the corresponding deletion construct (SSFΔPrD/DCP5ΔPrD) did not rescue the mutant phenotypes (early flowering and reduced FLC transcript levels in ssf and delay flowering along with elevated FLC transcript levels in dcp5). Therefore, the PrD domains are critical for SSF and DCP5 function and phase separation. Interestingly, overexpression of DCP5 promoted SSF phase separation in Arabidopsis and N. benthamiana but not vice versa. Overall, the authors proposed that SSF acts as a protein scaffold to anchor on the FLC locus. This scaffold facilitates the interaction of other transcriptional regulators (such as DCP5) to fine-tune FLC expression (see Fig.).

Figure.

Figure.

SSF and DCP5 co-regulate FLC expression in flowering control. SSF and DCP5 form liquid droplets independently. SSF directly binds FLC chromatin and recruits RNA Pol II to promote FLC expression. SSF acts as a protein scaffold on FLC to recruit other regulatory factors. The SSF-DCP5 interaction inhibits FLC expression. Adapted from Wang et al. (2023) Figure 10.

The functional significance of biomolecular condensates highlights the complexity of intracellular organization beyond membrane-bound organelles. The independent assembly and disassembly processes at the right place and the right time in response to various environmental signals are intriguing. Further studies using large-scale proteomics and advanced imaging techniques are anticipated to further delineate the biomolecular properties of liquid-liquid phase separation in various plant developmental and physiological processes.

References

  1. Boss PK, Bastow RM, Mylne JS, Dean C. Multiple pathways in the decision to flower: enabling, promoting, and resetting. Plant Cell. 2004:16(suppl_1):S18–S31. 10.1105/tpc.015958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cuevas-Velazquez CL, Dinneny JR. Organization out of disorder: liquid–liquid phase separation in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018:45(Pt A):68–74. 10.1016/j.pbi.2018.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Laflamme G, Mekhail K. Biomolecular condensates as arbiters of biochemical reactions inside the nucleus. Commun Biol. 2020:3(1):773. 10.1038/s42003-020-01517-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang W, Wang C, Wang Y, Ma J, Wang T, Tao Z, Liu P, Li S, Hu Y, Gu A, et al. The P-body component DECAPPING5 and the floral repressor SISTER OF FCA regulate FLOWERING LOCUS C transcription in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2023:35(9):3303–3324. 10.1093/plcell/koad151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang Y, Tao Z, Wang W, Filiault D, Qiu C, Wang C, Wang H, Rehman S, Shi J, Zhang Y, et al. Molecular variation in a functionally divergent homolog of FCA regulates flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Commun. 2020:11(1):5830. 10.1038/s41467-020-19666-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES