Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2023 Aug 22:2023.08.22.554354. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2023.08.22.554354

Rise in frequency of lasR mutant Pseudomonas aeruginosa among keratitis isolates between 1993 and 2021

Robert M Q Shanks 1,*, Sarah Atta 1, Nicholas A Stella 1, Chollapadi V Sundar-Raj 1, John E Romanowski 1, Arman S Grewel 1, Hazel Q Shanks 1, Sonya M Mumper 1, Deepinder K Dhaliwal 1, Alex Mammen 1, Jake D Callaghan 1, Rachel C Calvario 1, Eric G Romanowski 1, Regis P Kowalski 1, Michael E Zegans 2,3, Vishal Jhanji 1
PMCID: PMC10473646  PMID: 37662319

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes severe vision threatening keratitis. LasR is a transcription factor that regulates virulence associated genes in response to the quorum sensing molecule N-3-oxo-dodecanoyl-L-homoserine lactone. P. aeruginosa isolates with lasR mutations are characterized by an iridescent high sheen phenotype caused by a build-up of 2-heptyl-4-quinolone. A previous study indicated a high proportion (22 out of 101) of P. aeruginosa keratitis isolates from India between 2010 and 2016 were sheen positive and had mutations in the lasR gene, and the sheen phenotype correlated with worse clinical outcomes for patients. In this study, a longitudinal collection of P. aeruginosa keratitis isolates from Eastern North America were screened for lasR mutations by the sheen phenotype and sequencing of the lasR gene. A significant increase in the frequency of isolates with the sheen positive phenotype was observed in isolates between 1993 and 2021. Extracellular protease activity was lower among the sheen positive isolates and a defined lasR mutant. Cloned lasR alleles from the sheen positive isolates were loss of function or dominant negative and differed in sequence from previously reported ocular lasR mutant alleles. Insertion elements were present in a subset of independent isolates and may represent an endemic source from some of the isolates. Retrospective analysis of patient information suggested significantly better visual outcomes for patients with infected by sheen positive isolates. Together, these results indicate an increasing trend towards lasR mutations among keratitis isolates at a tertiary eye care hospital in the United States.

Keywords: keratitis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, ocular infection, quorum sensing, transcription factor, protease

Introduction

The bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most frequent cause of contact lens associated microbial keratitis and is of concern because keratitis caused by P. aeruginosa has rapid progression and poor clinical outcomes(1, 2). P. aeruginosa keratitis isolates resistant to fluoroquinolones and other antibiotics typically used to treat keratitis have been reported (36). Microbial keratitis caused by antibiotic resistant P. aeruginosa isolates correlates with worse clinical outcomes including an increase in corneal perforations from 12% of cases with normal P. aeruginosa to 52% with multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa (1, 7). Beyond resistance, P. aeruginosa has numerous virulence factors associated with establishing corneal infections(8, 9). These include pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) such as lipopolysaccharide and flagellin(10, 11), a variety of proteases including elastases (LasA and LasB) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Small Protease (PASP)(8, 12), and the type III secretion system that are important for virulence in experimental models(8, 9, 13, 14). These virulence factors are highly regulated through multiple transcriptional regulators including the LasR quorum sensing master regulator(15). quorum sensing will mediate population density dependent collective responses(16). The most studied among these is the LasR transcription factor. LasR responds to quorum sensing molecule N-(3-oxododecanoyl) homoserine lactone, controls a large portion of the P. aeruginosa genome, and is an important regulator of pathogenesis in lung and burn infection models(1719), as it positively regulates a number of pro-virulence factors including elastase proteases LasA and LasB, and rhamnolipids,(16, 20).

A prior study on the keratitis isolates of P. aeruginosa from the Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial (SCUT) (21) reported a colony iridescent sheen positive phenotype in 22 of the 101 isolates taken during the course of the study from India(21). This sheen phenotype correlated with significantly worse visual outcomes. These included significantly reduced visual acuity and infiltrate/scar size for patients infected sheen isolates compared to typical P. aeruginosa(21). The basis for the sheen phenotype has been shown to be due to mutation of the lasR transcription factor gene (22). LasR is a positive regulator of the gene pqsH, which codes for an enzyme that converts 2-heptyl-4-quinolone (HHQ) to heptyl-3-hydroxy-4(1H)-quinone (PQS)(22). In the absence of LasR function, HHQ builds up in the cell and creates the sheen phenotype. PQS is an important signaling molecule known as Pseudomonas quinolone signal(23). Surprisingly only two nonsynonymous mutations in the lasR gene were detected in 21 out of 22 sequenced sheen positive isolates suggesting that the mutations were already present in strains endemic to the country (India). By contrast chronic lung infections, such as those associated with cystic fibrosis, P. aeruginosa are frequently observed to gain mutations in lasR (22, 24). In the airway, patients are thought to be initially infected by wild-type (WT) P. aeruginosa, and lasR mutants can then increase over time(25). Like keratitis patients, cystic fibrosis patients infected with lasR mutants have been recorded to experience worse disease progression compared to patients infected by wild-type P. aeruginosa (26). Together these prior studies suggest that sheen isolates are associated with worse clinical outcomes.

In the SCUT study, all of the sheen isolates tested were isolated between 2006–2010 and caused largely by isolates with one of two lasR mutations(21). This study sought to determine whether sheen isolates were a general phenomenon among P. aeruginosa keratitis isolates or a geographically isolated observation and if wide-spread whether the same mutant alleles of lasR were present and associated with worse visual outcomes. Here we found a concerning increase in lasR mutants among the keratitis isolates taken in a tertiary care hospital in the Eastern United States. Data suggests that the mutations were highly variable with one exception, being an insertion element present in several strains; moreover, retrospective analysis suggests that patients with lasR mutations had better visual outcomes contrary to the former study.

Materials and Methods

Microbiology

De-identified P. aeruginosa strains isolated from the corneas of patients with keratitis were retrieved from a clinical tissue bank which is used for validation of diagnostic testing and antibiotic evaluation. The P. aeruginosa isolates were collected from 1993 through 2021 by The Charles T. Campbell Ophthalmic Microbiology Laboratory at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and stored at −80°C. P. aeruginosa isolates were plated on tryptic soy agar with 5% sheep’s red blood cells and incubated for 18–20 hours at 37°C and sheen phenotype was established visually.

Molecular Biology

The lasR gene was deleted from strain PaC (27) using allelic exchange with plasmid pMQ30, as previously described (28). The plasmid was modified with a ∆lasR allele cloned from PA14 ∆lasR (21) to generate pMQ767. Primers to amplify the lasR region (approximately 500 bp upstream and downstream of the open reading frame) were 4835 and 4836 and listed in Table 1. The resultant strain was verified by PCR and whole genome sequencing. The lasR open reading frame was amplified by PCR and cloned into shuttle vector pMQ132 under control of the Escherichia coli lac promoter using yeast homologous recombination as previously described (29). Primers to amplify the lasR open reading frame were 3217 and 3218 (Table 1). Plasmids were sequenced at the University of Pittsburgh Genomics Core or PlasmidSaurus.

Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.

Primer name Primer sequence (5’ to 3’)
3217 ggataacaatttcacacaggaaacagctATGGCCTTGGTTGACGGTTTTCTTG
3218 atctgtatcaggctgaaaatcttctctcatccgccaaaGGAAAGCCAGGAAACTTTCTGG
4835 cgacgttgtaaaacgacggccagtgccaagcttgcatgccGCTCGGCCTGTTCTGTGTCG
4836 ggaaacagctatgaccatgattacgaattcgagctcGAGTGCGTCATAACCATCGATTTC

Protease Assays

Milk agar plates were made with brain heart infusion and skim milk as previously described (30). Bacteria were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours and zones of clearing were measured on at least three separate occasions. For more quantitative analysis azocasein was used as previously described (31).

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis isolates were determined to ciprofloxacin (CIP), tobramycin (TOB), and ceftazidime (CAZ) using E-tests (Fisher Scientific, LIOFILCHEM, MA) on Mueller-Hinton agar as previously described (32). The keratitis isolates tested, taken from the cornea, were chosen arbitrarily out of the deidentified strain bank. The isolates in question were collected anonymously from 2013 to 2022 by the Charles T. Campbell Ophthalmic Microbiology Laboratory and stored at −80°C. The antibiotic susceptibility was determined by comparing the MIC of each to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints (33).

Chart Review

Retrospective review of medical records of all patients diagnosed with culture-positive P. aeruginosa keratitis at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between 2017 and 2021 was performed. A retrospective review was performed on the medical records of all patients diagnosed with culture-positive Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pittsburgh and followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Clinical data were collected for each patient, including clinical features, treatment, and outcomes. Demographic features were recorded, including gender and age. Visual acuity was recorded at presentation and after resolution. The visual outcomes were BCVA on the Snellen chart and converted to LogMAR.

Statistical Analysis

Graph-pad Prism was used to perform Mann-Whitney and ANOVA analysis with Tukey’s post-test, chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests. P<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

An increase in sheen positive P. aeruginosa was observed among keratitis isolates from a North Eastern United States tertiary care facility between 1993–2021.

P. aeruginosa keratitis isolates between 1993–2021 were evaluated for sheen phenotypes on blood agar plates (Figure 1A). The isolate collection and storage approach remained consistent over that time period. A notable increase in sheen positive isolates was observed over the time frame going from 0% between 1993–1997 to 26.2% between 2018–2021 (Figure 1B). All time frames tested were significantly different from 1993–1997 by Fisher’s Exact and chi-square Test and (p<0.01).

Figure 1. P. aeruginosa keratitis isolates with a sheen phenotype are increasing over the last two decades.

Figure 1.

A. Appearance of sheen negative and positive P. aeruginosa keratitis isolates on blood agar. B. Frequency of PA keratitis isolates with sheen positive phenotype. *, 5 year periods are shown except for 2018–2021. n=399, n≥50 per time period. C. Correlation between contact lens (CL) use and sheen status. p=0.455.

Where possible, the contact lens use status of the patient was correlated with the sheen phenotype and no significant difference was observed (p=0.45 by Fisher’s Exact Test) with 23% sheen positive isolates from contact lens associated keratitis (19/84) and 31% sheen positive isolates from non-contact lens associated keratitis (9/29).

We also screened a small library of fluoroquinolone resistant isolates from the New York City area obtained before 2001 (27) and found that two out of six where sheen positive (16.7%), further suggesting that these sheen positive keratitis isolates are a general rather than geographically isolated phenomenon.

Sequence analysis indicates a variety of mutations and was suggestive of one endemic strain.

The lasR allele from a subset of arbitrarily chosen strains were cloned into a shuttle vector and sequenced. The prior study with patients from India reported multiple independent isolates with two specific LasR variants I215S (14/22) and P117L (7/22), and one having a missense mutation yielding V221L (1/22) (21). By contrast, our study did not find these mutations and found a wider variety of alterations in the lasR sequence. We cloned and sequenced the lasR open reading frame (ORF) from 27 strains including 4 from sheen negative isolates and 23 from sheen positive isolates (Table 2). Of the sheen positive strains, 1 had a wild-type lasR sequence, others had amino acid substitutions, deletions of insertions that created out of frame mutations, premature stop codons, and insertion elements. Strikingly, 4 of 6 with insertion elements had identical insertions at base pair 126 despite being found over 20 years.

Table 2. Sequence analysis of PA lasR gene (717 bp long).

Isolate Sheen Phenotype lasR Allele (relative to WT) 490
K129 Positive insertion element ISPst7 at bp 126 (isolated 1991) 491
K828 Positive deletion after AA 115, frame shift 492
K846 Positive truncation after S44 493
K944 Positive N55Y 494
K1001 Positive N55Y L148P 495
K1093 Positive P149S G191D 496
K1255 Positive S219F 498
K1322 Positive insertion element ISPst7 at bp 126 (isolated 2001) 499
K1471 Positive R180W 500
K1494 Positive insertion element ISPst7 at bp 126 (isolated 2003) 501
K1697 Positive insertion after bp 254, frame shift 502
K1713 Positive A105T 503
K2204 Negative WTa 504
K2333 Positive R180Q 505
K2361 Positive WT 506
K2386 Positive truncation after L151 507
K2523 Positive IS5 family insertion element at bp 126 508
K2634 Positive frame shift after P85 509
K2740 Positive A166G 510
K2942 Positive T193I 511
K2961 Positive IS630 family Insertion element at bp 599 512
K2970 Positive I200F 513
K2979 Positive insertion element ISPst7 at bp 126 (isolated 2017) 514
PAB Positive WT 516
PAC Negative WT 517
PAD Positive deletion of 13 base pairs at bp 113, frame shift 518
PAO1 Negative WT 519
PA14 Negative WT 520
a.

WT indicates no change from the PAO1/PA14 amino acid sequence.

Sheen positive keratitis isolates had increased susceptibility rates to a ceftazidime

It has been reported that lasR isolates have altered susceptibility to a variety of antibiotics (3436). To test whether sheen status had an impact on susceptibility to the major topical antibiotics for Pseudomonas keratitis (37), we evaluated minimum inhibitory concentrations from keratitis isolates (Table 3). Drugs from three different antibiotic classes were evaluated. There was no difference in the percent susceptible to the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin for sheen positive versus negative isolates (92.5% compared to 93.5% respectively, p=0.29 Fisher’s Exact test). For the aminoglycoside tobramycin, there was a non-significant trend toward a higher percentage of susceptible isolates in the sheen negative group which was 10% higher than the sheen positive group (p=0.23). While the cephalosporin ceftazidime is not used as commonly for keratitis, it has been used successfully used to treat keratitis and has been suggested as an alternative for treatment of aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone resistant isolates (6, 38, 39). For ceftazidime, the sheen negative isolates had a higher frequency of susceptibility than the sheen positive isolates (98.1% vs 85.3% respectively, p=0.01).

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis isolates to ceftazadime, ciprofloxacin, and tobramycin

N Median (µg/ml) Mode (µg/ml) MIC50
(µg/ml)
MIC90
(µg/ml)
Range Susceptibility (%)
Sheen +
ceftazidime 34 2 1.5 2 8 0.75 - >256 85.3
ciprofloxacin 41 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.5 0.064 – 1 92.5
tobramycin 41 1.5 1.5 1.5 3 0.064 – 8 20.0
Sheen
ceftazidime 103 2 1.5 2 8 0.75 – 16 98.1*
ciprofloxacin 123 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.5 0.047 – 1.5 93.5
tobramycin 123 1.5 1.5 1.5 3 0.047 – 5 30.6
*

significant difference between Sheen + and Sheen – strains by chi-square, p=0.01.

Sheen positive keratitis isolates are protease deficient

LasR is a known regulator of elastase B (lasB) and other proteases thought to aid the bacteria in microbial keratitis(40). The protease activity of arbitrarily chosen keratitis isolates (14 sheen positive and 60 sheen negative) was assessed by measuring the zone of clearance on milk agar plates (Figure 2A). The sheen negative isolates had a zone of 5.6 mm versus 2.7 mm for the sheen positive isolate (p<0.0001, Mann-Whitney test).

Figure 2. Secreted protease activity is reduced among sheen positive PA keratitis isolates and can be complemented.

Figure 2.

A. Secreted protease activity by PA keratitis isolates. The zone of clearance (mm) on milk plate assay is shown. Each data point indicates the mean zone of clearance for an individual isolate. Medians and IQ ranges are shown. *, p<0.001 by Mann-Whitney. B. Secreted protease activity measured by azocasein and normalized by bacterial density from sterile culture filtrates from the clinical isolate PAC (WT) and isogenic ΔlasR mutant and the mutant with wild-type lasR on a plasmid. The bacteria were grown in LB medium and were harvested at OD600=2. Asterisks indicate p<0.01 between indicated groups by ANOVA with Tukey's post-test, n=3, mean and SD are shown.

To test this further, we generated a lasR deletion mutation in strain PaC (27) which is a fluoroquinolone resistant keratitis isolate. The PaC ∆lasR mutant was more than 100-fold reduced in protease activity compared to the wild type as measured using azocasein and this defect could be complemented by adding the wild-type lasR gene back on a plasmid (Figure 2B).

The lasR alleles from sheen positive isolates were largely loss of function alleles.

While the sheen phenotype is linked to lasR loss of function mutations, the sheen phenotype can occur due to other mutations such as mutation of the pqsH gene which converts HHQ to PQS (41, 42). Several of the cloned lasR mutants were tested for function by expression in the PaC ∆lasR mutant followed by protease evaluation as a surrogate for LasR function (Figure 3A). Wild-type alleles from PA14 and K2361 restored wild-type levels of protease activity, whereas the lasR alleles cloned from sheen positive strains had highly reduced protease activity (Figure 3A).

Figure 3. Tested lasR alleles from sheen positive isolates were loss of function and generally not dominant negative.

Figure 3.

A-B. Protease activity in supernatants from overnight cultures (18–20h) grown in LB medium was measured using azocasein and normalized by culture density. n≥6, median and standard deviation is shown. A. The vector alone negative control (pMQ132), wild-type lasR plasmid (plasR-PA14) positive control, and candidate plasmids were expressed in the wild-type PaC to establish base level or PaC ΔlasR to determine lasR function. “N” indicates a lasR allele from a sheen negative strain. “C” indicates lasR from a sheen positive isolate with no amino acid changes in the ORF transcript. Asterisk indicates p<0.001 by ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test. B. As A, but plasmids were tested in the wild-type PaC to detect dominant negative activity. Asterisk indicates difference from PaC + vector by ANOVA, p<0.01.

Genes for the major two LasR variants I215S (14/22) and P117L (7/22) from the SCUT isolates were also cloned as above, moved into the PaC ∆lasR mutant and based on protease activity, both were loss of function mutations (Figure 3A). The PI117L mutant appeared to maintain some activity maintaining 16.6% of wild-type protease activity and 17-fold higher than the vector alone negative control, but was not significantly different than the vector alone negative control. The I215S allele allowed only 3.6-fold higher protease levels than the vector alone negative control.

The dominant negative status of the lasR alleles was also tested by expression in the wild-type PaC strain (Figure 3B). Notably, the K2961 allele strongly reduced protease activity in the PaC wild type, whereas the other tested lasR alleles did not significantly alter protease activity. The PaC strain with the lasR_K2961 allele expressed on a plasmid was remade to ensure that the effect was not artifactual and the reduced protease phenotype was again observed. A similar, although less severe reduction in protease activity was measured when the lasR_K2961 allele was expressed in the PA14 wild-type strain (Figure 3B). When the previously described lasR alleles from the India isolates were expressed at multicopy in the wild type bacteria, the P117L allele had no effect, but the I215S may have a dominant negative effect with a 43% reduction compared to the wild type expressing the PA14 lasR allele (Figure 3B). This difference was not significant by ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test, but a pairwise comparison by Mann-Whitney indicated significance (p=0.0095).

Clinical outcomes from keratitis isolates with and without sheen phenotype

Where possible the clinical outcomes of patients were determined from clinical records with n=49 for sheen negative isolates and n=19 for sheen positive. Of all of the evaluated variables only final average vision was significantly different (p=0.0106) (Table 4). Surprisingly, unlike the prior study evaluating lasR mutant associated keratitis (21), the average visual outcomes were favorable for patients infected with the sheen positive isolates. Though not significantly different, the most severe outcomes, corneal transplants and enucleation, were absent in the sheen positive infected eyes, further suggesting reduced virulence by the sheen positive isolates.

Table 4. Clinical outcomes from keratitis patients.

Sheen Negative (n=49) Sheen Positive (n=19) p-value
Age 56.4±21.1 years 49.3±23.6 years p=0.2322
Female 73.5% (36/49) 42.1% (8/19) p=0.0152
Symptom duration 3.5±2.5 days (N=47) 3.3±4.6 days (N=19) p=0.8446
Average Epi Defect Size 26.7±31.1 mm2 (N=44) 12.5±21.2 mm2 (N=16) p=0.0979
Average Infiltrate Size 25.0±31.3 mm2 (N=44) 14.0±21.0 mm2 (N=17) p=0.1861
Hypopyon present 51.1% (24/47) 57.9% (11/19) p=0.1180
Average Initial VA 1.70±0.9 LogMAR 1.73±0.9 LogMAR p=0.9165
Average Final VA 1.1±1.0 LogMAR 0.42±0.56 LogMAR p=0.0106
Average time to resolution 36.3±38.2 days 34.8±28.5 days p=0.8835
Management with Fluoroquinolone drops 85.7% (42/49) 89.5% (17/19) p=0.8824
Management with Fortified drops 83.7% (41/49) 73.7% (14/19) p=0.6806
Management with oral fluoroquinolone 46.9% (23/49) 36.8% (7/19) p=0.5744
Management with topical steroids 53.1% (26/49) 42.1% (8/19) p=0.5664
PKP 14.3% (7/49) 0% (0/19) p=0.1778
Enucleation 8.2% (4/49) 0% (0/19) p=0.5702

VA, visual acuity regarding logMAR values (lower indicates better visual acuity) PKP, penetrating keratoplasty (corneal transplant)

Discussion

This study has demonstrated an increase in sheen positive P. aeruginosa keratitis isolates in a tertiary care hospital in the Eastern United States. This suggests that the abundance of sheen positive isolates is a general rather than a regional phenomenon. The reason for the increase observed in this study was not clear. The clinical microbiologist that collected the samples maintained the same collection protocol over the period of isolate collection, so differences in this would not account for the increase in sheen isolates.

Another consideration was whether the sheen positive isolates from our study are lasR mutants. The majority (22 out of 24) of sheen isolates that were sequenced had changes in the lasR sequence and those tested did not code for functional proteins. Because only the open reading frames were cloned, other mutations that render the strain LasR-deficient could be missed, for example, promoter mutations. However, it is formally possible that in a small subset of the keratitis isolates, LasR-independent changes could be responsible for a subset of the sheen isolates. Therefore, we conclude that the majority if not all sheen positive keratitis isolates have defects in LasR function.

The Hammond study indicated worse visual outcomes for patients with sheen positive isolates (21), by contrast patients in this study had strikingly better visual acuity, as well as no incidence of the severe outcomes of enucleation and corneal transplantation that were present in the sheen negative infected patients. The reason for this discrepancy is not clear, but could possibly be due to the different strains or the specific mutations associated with strains isolated in the SCUT study. Moreover, the SCUT study used a standard protocol for timing and methodology for obtaining visual acuity measurements, which lends more weight to that analysis.

Nevertheless, the reduced severity observed in the clinical data from this study were consistent with a recent paper using a rabbit corneal infection model that demonstrated reduced corneal perforation and bacterial proliferation of a lasR deletion mutant of strain PA14 compared to an isogenic wild type suggesting that LasR promotes keratitis severity (43). Studies with mice show mixed results with strain PA01 with lasR deletion mutations. The Pier group reported that C3H/HeN mice with scarified corneas required fewer lasR mutant bacteria to cause keratitis compared to the wild type (44). Whereas the Willcox group used the same bacterial strains with BALB/c mice and found indistinguishable infection frequencies for both bacterial strains, but reported that bacterial proliferation and severity scores were reduced in eyes infected with the lasR mutant (44).

In conclusion, lasR mutant P. aeruginosa appear to be increasing among keratitis patients and this may be a world-wide phenomenon. The highly variable nature of the lasR mutations among isolates in our study does not indicate whether the strains mutated during infection or prior to infection in general. The exception being identification of multiple isolates with a mutation at base pair 126 which suggests the existence of a regional endemic strain. Interestingly, the identical insertion element was reported in the lasR gene from a P. aeruginosa isolated from a bean plant in Spain suggesting an environmental source (45). Whether these strains are more or less virulent is in question and more research is needed to determine the level of concern, however, our study suggests that the sheen positive lasR isolates are less pathogenic.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Deborah Hogan at Dartmouth Medical School for strains.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by National Institutes of Health grants R01EY027331 (to R.S.), CORE Grant P30 EY08098 to the Department of Ophthalmology, the Eye and Ear Foundation of Pittsburgh, and from an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY provided additional departmental funding.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The original information presented in this study are included in the article and further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

References

  • 1.Vazirani J., Wurity S. and Ali M. H.: Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Keratitis: Risk Factors, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes. Ophthalmology, 122(10), 2110–4 (2015) doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shen E. P., Hsieh Y. T., Chu H. S., Chang S. C. and Hu F. R.: Correlation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa genotype with antibiotic susceptibility and clinical features of induced central keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 56(1), 365–71 (2014) doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alexandrakis G., Alfonso E. C. and Miller D.: Shifting trends in bacterial keratitis in south Florida and emerging resistance to fluoroquinolones. Ophthalmology, 107(8), 1497–502 (2000) doi:doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00179-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bispo P. J. M., Sahm D. F. and Asbell P. A.: A Systematic Review of Multi-decade Antibiotic Resistance Data for Ocular Bacterial Pathogens in the United States. Ophthalmol Ther, 11(2), 503–520 (2022) doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00449-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Khan M., Ma K., Wan I. and Willcox M. D.: Ciprofloxacin resistance and tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ocular isolates. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 101819 (2023) doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2023.101819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rhee M. K., Kowalski R. P., Romanowski E. G., Mah F. S., Ritterband D. C. and Gordon Y. J.: A laboratory evaluation of antibiotic therapy for ciprofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Am J Ophthalmol, 138(2), 226–30 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fernandes M., Vira D., Medikonda R. and Kumar N.: Extensively and pan-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis: clinical features, risk factors, and outcome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 254(2), 315–22 (2016) doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3208-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hilliam Y., Kaye S. and Winstanley C.: Pseudomonas aeruginosa and microbial keratitis. J Med Microbiol, 69(1), 3–13 (2020) doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pearlman E., Sun Y., Roy S., Karmakar M., Hise A. G., Szczotka-Flynn L., Ghannoum M., Chinnery H. R., McMenamin P. G. and Rietsch A.: Host defense at the ocular surface. Int Rev Immunol, 32(1), 4–18 (2013) doi: 10.3109/08830185.2012.749400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Willcox M. D.: Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and inflammation during contact lens wear: a review. Optom Vis Sci, 84(4), 273–8 (2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fleiszig S. M. and Evans D. J.: The pathogenesis of bacterial keratitis: studies with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin Exp Optom, 85(5), 271–8 (2002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.O'Callaghan R., Caballero A., Tang A. and Bierdeman M.: Pseudomonas aeruginosa Keratitis: Protease IV and PASP as Corneal Virulence Mediators. Microorganisms, 7(9) (2019) doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7090281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Evans D. J. and Fleiszig S. M.: Why does the healthy cornea resist Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection? Am J Ophthalmol, 155(6), 961–970 e2 (2013) doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhu H., Conibear T. C., Bandara R., Aliwarga Y., Stapleton F. and Willcox M. D.: Type III secretion system-associated toxins, proteases, serotypes, and antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates associated with keratitis. Curr Eye Res, 31(4), 297–306 (2006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lee J. and Zhang L.: The hierarchy quorum sensing network in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Protein Cell, 6(1), 26–41 (2015) doi: 10.1007/s13238-014-0100-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Moradali M. F., Ghods S. and Rehm B. H.: Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lifestyle: A Paradigm for Adaptation, Survival, and Persistence. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 7, 39 (2017) doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lesprit P., Faurisson F., Join-Lambert O., Roudot-Thoraval F., Foglino M., Vissuzaine C. and Carbon C.: Role of the quorum-sensing system in experimental pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in rats. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 167(11), 1478–82 (2003) doi: 10.1164/rccm.200207-736BC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pearson J. P., Feldman M., Iglewski B. H. and Prince A.: Pseudomonas aeruginosa cell-to-cell signaling is required for virulence in a model of acute pulmonary infection. Infect Immun, 68(7), 4331–4 (2000) doi: 10.1128/iai.68.7.4331-4334.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rumbaugh K. P., Griswold J. A., Iglewski B. H. and Hamood A. N.: Contribution of quorum sensing to the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in burn wound infections. Infect Immun, 67(11), 5854–62 (1999) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kariminik A., Baseri-Salehi M. and Kheirkhah B.: Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing modulates immune responses: An updated review article. Immunol Lett, 190, 1–6 (2017) doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2017.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hammond J. H., Hebert W. P., Naimie A., Ray K., Van Gelder R. D., DiGiandomenico A., Lalitha P., Srinivasan M., Acharya N. R., Lietman T., Hogan D. A. and Zegans M. E.: Environmentally Endemic Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains with Mutations in lasR Are Associated with Increased Disease Severity in Corneal Ulcers. mSphere, 1(5) (2016) doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00140-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.D'Argenio D. A., Wu M., Hoffman L. R., Kulasekara H. D., Deziel E., Smith E. E., Nguyen H., Ernst R. K., Larson Freeman T. J., Spencer D. H., Brittnacher M., Hayden H. S., Selgrade S., Klausen M., Goodlett D. R., Burns J. L., Ramsey B. W. and Miller S. I.: Growth phenotypes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasR mutants adapted to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Mol Microbiol, 64(2), 512–33 (2007) doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05678.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Garcia-Reyes S., Soberon-Chavez G. and Cocotl-Yanez M.: The third quorum-sensing system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Pseudomonas quinolone signal and the enigmatic PqsE protein. J Med Microbiol, 69(1), 25–34 (2020) doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Smith E. E., Buckley D. G., Wu Z., Saenphimmachak C., Hoffman L. R., D'Argenio D. A., Miller S. I., Ramsey B. W., Speert D. P., Moskowitz S. M., Burns J. L., Kaul R. and Olson M. V.: Genetic adaptation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103(22), 8487–92 (2006) doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602138103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kohler T., Buckling A. and van Delden C.: Cooperation and virulence of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106(15), 6339–44 (2009) doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811741106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hoffman L. R., Kulasekara H. D., Emerson J., Houston L. S., Burns J. L., Ramsey B. W. and Miller S. I.: Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasR mutants are associated with cystic fibrosis lung disease progression. J Cyst Fibros, 8(1), 66–70 (2009) doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2008.09.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kowalski R. P., Pandya A. N., Karenchak L. M., Romanowski E. G., Husted R. C., Ritterband D. C., Shah M. K. and Gordon Y. J.: An in vitro resistance study of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin using keratitis isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ophthalmology, 108(10), 1826–9 (2001) doi:S0161-6420(01)00724-2 [pii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shanks R. M., Caiazza N. C., Hinsa S. M., Toutain C. M. and O'Toole G. A.: Saccharomyces cerevisiae-based molecular tool kit for manipulation of genes from gram-negative bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol, 72(7), 5027–36 (2006) doi:DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00682-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shanks R. M., Kadouri D. E., MacEachran D. P. and O'Toole G. A.: New yeast recombineering tools for bacteria. Plasmid, 62(2), 88–97 (2009) doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2009.05.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sokol P. A., Ohman D. E. and Iglewski B. H.: A more sensitive plate assay for detection of protease production by Pseudomanas aeruginosa. J Clin Microbiol, 9(4), 538–40 (1979) doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.4.538-540.1979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shanks R. M., Stella N. A., Arena K. E. and Fender J. E.: Mutation of crp mediates Serratia marcescens serralysin and global secreted protein production. Res Microbiol, 164(1), 38–45 (2013) doi:S0923-2508(12)00151-9 [pii] 10.1016/j.resmic.2012.10.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Harshaw N. S., Stella N. A., Lehner K. M., Romanowski E. G., Kowalski R. P. and Shanks R. M. Q.: Antibiotics Used in Empiric Treatment of Ocular Infections Trigger the Bacterial Rcs Stress Response System Independent of Antibiotic Susceptibility. Antibiotics, 10(9), 1033 (2021) doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10091033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Humphries R., Bobenchik A. M., Hindler J. A. and Schuetz A. N.: Overview of Changes to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, M100, 31st Edition. J Clin Microbiol, 59(12), e0021321 (2021) doi: 10.1128/JCM.00213-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Abisado-Duque R. G., Townsend K. A., McKee B. M., Woods K., Koirala P., Holder A. J., Craddock V. D., Cabeen M. and Chandler J. R.: An Amino Acid Substitution in Elongation Factor EF-G1A Alters the Antibiotic Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa LasR-Null Mutants. J Bacteriol, 205(6), e0011423 (2023) doi: 10.1128/jb.00114-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hoffman L. R., Richardson A. R., Houston L. S., Kulasekara H. D., Martens-Habbena W., Klausen M., Burns J. L., Stahl D. A., Hassett D. J., Fang F. C. and Miller S. I.: Nutrient availability as a mechanism for selection of antibiotic tolerant Pseudomonas aeruginosa within the CF airway. PLoS Pathog, 6(1), e1000712 (2010) doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Qi Q., Toll-Riera M., Heilbron K., Preston G. M. and MacLean R. C.: The genomic basis of adaptation to the fitness cost of rifampicin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Biol Sci, 283(1822) (2016) doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lin A., Rhee M. K., Akpek E. K., Amescua G., Farid M., Garcia-Ferrer F. J., Varu D. M., Musch D. C., Dunn S. P., Mah F. S., American C. Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern and P. External Disease: Bacterial Keratitis Preferred Practice Pattern(R). Ophthalmology, 126(1), P1–P55 (2019) doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dehghani A. R., Fazel F., Akhlaghi M. R., Ghanbari H., Ilanloo M. R. and Ahmadi-Azad D.: Cefazolin-Gentamicin versus Vancomycin-Ceftazidime Eye Drops for Bacterial Corneal Ulcers;a Randomized Clinical Trial. J Ophthalmic Vis Res, 4(1), 19–23 (2009) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Subedi D., Vijay A. K. and Willcox M.: Overview of mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an ocular perspective. Clin Exp Optom, 101(2), 162–171 (2018) doi: 10.1111/cxo.12621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gambello M. J. and Iglewski B. H.: Cloning and characterization of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasR gene, a transcriptional activator of elastase expression. J Bacteriol, 173(9), 3000–9 (1991) doi: 10.1128/jb.173.9.3000-3009.1991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Diggle S. P., Cornelis P., Williams P. and Camara M.: 4-quinolone signalling in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: old molecules, new perspectives. Int J Med Microbiol, 296(2–3), 83–91 (2006) doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2006.01.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.O'Connor K., Zhao C. Y., Mei M. and Diggle S. P.: Frequency of quorum-sensing mutations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from different environments. Microbiology (Reading), 168(12) (2022) doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Romanowski E. G., Stella N. A., Brazile B. L., Lathrop K. L., Franks J. M., Sigal I. A., Kim T., Elsayed M., Kadouri D. E. and Shanks R. M. Q.: Predatory bacteria can reduce Pseudomonas aeruginosa induced corneal perforation and proliferation in a rabbit keratitis model. Ocul Surf, 28, 254–261 (2023) doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2023.05.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Preston M. J., Seed P. C., Toder D. S., Iglewski B. H., Ohman D. E., Gustin J. K., Goldberg J. B. and Pier G. B.: Contribution of proteases and LasR to the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during corneal infections. Infect Immun, 65(8), 3086–90 (1997) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ruiz-Roldan L., Rojo-Bezares B., Lozano C., Lopez M., Chichon G., Torres C. and Saenz Y.: Occurrence of Pseudomonas spp. in Raw Vegetables: Molecular and Phenotypical Analysis of Their Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence-Related Traits. Int J Mol Sci, 22(23) (2021) doi: 10.3390/ijms222312626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES