Abstract
Neurons communicate with each other through electrochemical transmission at synapses. Microglia, the resident immune cells of the central nervous system, can prune these synapses through a variety of contact-dependent and -independent means. Microglial secretion of active sialidase enzymes upon exposure to inflammatory stimuli is one unexplored mechanism of pruning. Recent work from our lab showed that treatment of neurons with bacterial sialidases disrupts neuronal network connectivity. Here, we find that activated microglia secrete Neuraminidase-3 (Neu3) associated with fusogenic extracellular vesicles. Furthermore, we show Neu3 mediates contact-independent pruning of neurons and subsequent disruption of neuronal networks through neuronal glycocalyx remodeling. We observe that NEU3 is transcriptionally upregulated upon exposure to inflammatory stimuli, and that a genetic knock-out of NEU3 abrogates the sialidase activity of inflammatory microglial secretions. Moreover, we demonstrate that Neu3 is associated with a subpopulation of extracellular vesicles, possibly exosomes, that are secreted by microglia upon inflammatory insult. Finally, we demonstrate that Neu3 is both necessary and sufficient to both desialylate neurons and decrease neuronal network connectivity. These results implicate Neu3 in remodeling of the glycocalyx leading to aberrant network-level activity of neurons, with implications in neuroinflammatory diseases such as Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease.
Keywords: microglia, neuraminidase, neuronal network, Neuraminidase-3, neurons, voltage imaging, neuroinflammation, glycocalyx
Graphical Abstract.
Neuroinflammation induces secretion of the sialidase Neu3 via extracellular vesicles from microglia that prune neuronal synapses and disrupt neuronal communication.
Introduction.
The brain is made of a vast interconnected and interdependent network of neurons, communicating information through synapses. Microglia, the resident immune phagocytes of the central nervous system, prune these synapses through several mechanisms, including direct and complement-mediated phagocytosis.1–7 These activities are upregulated in the context of neuroinflammatory pathologies, including Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease.8–10 However, the specific mechanisms by which hyperinflammatory microglia mediate these effects remain unclear, especially in the context of how these actions impact neuronal networking and communication through synapses. Given that neurodegenerative diseases correlate with aberrant network-level neuronal activity,9,10 it is important to understand the molecular mechanisms by which inflammatory microglia regulate neuronal communication.
Neuroinflammation has been correlated with changes in the glycocalyx – the coating of sugars on cell surfaces – of both neurons and microglia.11–15 Sialic acids are a particular subset of bioactive sugars in the glycocalyx. They are known to modulate neuronal excitability and plasticity,7,16 and changes in sialylation state are associated with neuroinflammation and microglial activation.16–22 Upon exposure to inflammatory stimuli, microglia have been observed to release sialidase activity into the surrounding media, which effects desialylation,17,22,23 deposition of opsonizing factors,18,23 microglial activation,16,23 and phagocytosis of neurons.17,23 Additionally, our lab has recently identified sialylation state as a critical factor in maintaining neuronal excitability and network integration.21 Collectively, these observations point to the glycocalyx as a regulator of neuronal activity.
Herein, we tested the hypothesis that sialidases released by microglia could affect contact-independent neuronal pruning. We found that the peripheral membrane glycolipid sialidase Neuraminidase-3 (Neu3) is secreted by microglia upon activation by inflammatory stimuli. Neu3 was localized to a population of extracellular vesicles that are fusogenic with neurons. Using a voltage-sensing imaging dye, we found Neu3 is both necessary and sufficient to mediate neuronal pruning and the disconnection of neuronal networks. Based on these data, we propose a mechanism in which microglia secrete Neu3 to remodel neuronal glycocalyces to modulate neuronal connectivity. These results have implications for how neuroinflammation results in neuronal network dysfunction.
Results and Discussion.
Activated microglia upregulate NEU3 and require NEU3 to desialylate neuronal glycocalyces
We and others have observed that microglial secretions possess sialidase activity and are capable of desialylating model cell lines24 and primary neurons (Figure 1a,b). Notably, these effects can be pharmacologically inhibited with zanamivir, which has inhibitory activity for human sialidases.25 Of the four mammalian sialidases, three have reported expression in the brain.26 To identify the sialidase(s) secreted by activated microglia responsible for this activity, we activated BV-2 murine microglia using lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and assessed relative mRNA expression of sialidase genes using qPCR. We observed a 50% increase in NEU3 transcripts following activation (p=0.041) and statistically insignificant changes in NEU1 and NEU4 (p=0.11 and p=0.90, respectively) (Figure 1c). To investigate the role of the glycolipid sialidase Neu327 in desialylating neurons, we generated NEU3 (the gene encoding Neu3) knockout (KO) BV-2 microglia and compared the sialidase activity of wild-type (WT) and NEU3 KO BV-2 secretions (Figure S1). NEU3 KO conditioned media exhibited minimal sialidase activity compared to WT (p=0.043), as measured by Peanut Agglutinin (PNA) binding of terminal N-acetylgalactosamine exposed by desialylation on neuronal membranes (Figure 1d). Consistent with the observation that Neu3 is predominantly a glycolipid (e.g., ganglioside) sialidase,27–30 we did not observe significant changes in sialylated glycoproteins of neurons treated with conditioned media from WT versus NEU3 KO microglia (Table S1).
As prior studies have implicated Neu1 translocation and desialylation in cis as a critical component of microglial activation,14,15,23 we sought to determine whether the loss of secreted sialidase activity in NEU3 KO BV-2 cells was a consequence of impaired inflammatory activity. We observed that NEU3 KO cells had impaired autodesialylation in response to LPS treatment compared to WT as measured by periodate labeling of sialic acids (p=0.51 and =0.038, respectively), but that both WT and NEU3 KO cells upregulated TNF to similar levels in (WT, p=0.002; NEU3 KO, p=0.02) (Figure S2). Therefore, NEU3 KO cells are still able to secrete inflammatory signals. TNF secretion in both cell lines was inhibited by the pan-sialidase inhibitor deoxy-2,3-anhydroneuraminic acid (DANA), consistent with previous observations with Neu1.14,23 Given that the BV-2 microglia are still capable of secreting inflammatory molecules, the autodesialylation likely does not have a biological impact in this context. Moreover, these data implicate Neu3 as the secreted sialidase, rather than an upstream component.
Microglial secreted Neu3 is associated with extracellular vesicles that fuse with neurons
Neu3 has been shown to behave as a peripheral membrane protein,31 with recent studies demonstrating that the enzyme is S-acylated.32 Additionally, microglia are known to secrete extracellular vesicles (EVs) upon activation.33 Therefore, we hypothesized that Neu3 might be secreted in association with EVs. To investigate this hypothesis, we isolated EVs from resting and activated microglia conditioned media using commercial lectin-based isolation kits. We confirmed that we were isolating EVs based on proteomics of the surfaceome, which identified known EV proteins, but we were unable to detect Neu3 directly (Figure S3, Table S2). To confirm that Neu3 colocalizes with EVs, we inserted a 3xFLAG-tag at on the endogenous NEU3 gene by homology-directed recombination (Figure S4). We then performed an immunocapture bead assay in which magnetic beads were functionalized with anti-murine CD63 to capture EVs and incubated with microglia-conditioned medium. Captured EVs were analyzed with anti-FLAG and either anti-CD9 or anti-CD81, both of which are used as EV markers.34 We observed a FLAG-positive population of EVs, the relative population of which significantly increased upon LPS-stimulation, suggesting that microglial Neu3 is secreted via EVs upon immune stimulus (Figure 2a, S5).
To confirm that EV-resident Neu3 is responsible for the sialidase activity on neurons, we treated neurons with EV-enriched or EV-depleted microglia conditioned media. We observed that EV-enriched fractions demonstrated significantly increased sialidase activity compared to EV-depleted fractions (p=0.023, Figure 2b), suggesting that EVs are responsible for desialylation. Consistent with this, pharmacological inhibition of extracellular vesicle production with GW486935 decreased sialidase activity of the enriched fraction (p=0.014, Figure 2c). Furthermore, upon staining EVs with a membrane dye we observed robust dye transfer to neuronal membranes, indicating vesicle fusion with neurons (p=0.044, Figure 2d). These data suggest a model in which microglia expel extracellular vesicles containing Neu3, which fuse with neuronal membranes and cause desialylation of the extracellular leaflet.
Secreted Neu3 disrupts neuronal network integration in primary neurons
Our lab has recently demonstrated that desialylation of primary neurons in culture by the highly promiscuous Arthrobacter ureafaciens (Au) sialidase results in decreased cell surface sialic acids and neuronal network integration.21 We hypothesized that Neu3 would have a similar effect. To assay this, we performed voltage imaging of primary neurons in culture using BeRST1,36 a membrane-localized voltage-sensitive fluorophore (Figure 3a,b). This technique enables simultaneous high-quality measurements of membrane potential in larger groups of neurons compared to traditional electrophysiology, enabling studies of network connectivity by comparing when multiple neurons in a given field of view fire.36 We have previously used this method in combination with factor analysis to quantify neuronal network connectivity as the “shared variance” of the network.21 In brief, covariance in the firing activity of measured neurons may reflect variation in synaptic input (factors), while unexplained variance reflects the fraction of the neuron’s activity that arises spontaneously. It follows then that the ratio of shared variance to total variance measures how much of a neuron’s activity is network-driven.
Using voltage imaging, we found that neurons treated with enriched EVs from activated BV-2 microglia exhibited a markedly lower firing rate compared to resting BV-2 microglia (−1.7 Hz, p=0.048), an effect that could be pharmacologically rescued with GW4869 (Figure 3c). Analyzing the data using factor analysis to quantify network connectivity, as we have previously described,21 we found that neuronal networks treated with activated microglial EVs experienced a substantial 29% decrease in average per-neuron shared variance compared to EVs from resting microglia (p=0.015). This indicates that the integration of measured neurons into a network had been significantly disrupted by treatment. This effect was rescued by pharmacological inhibition of EV production with GW4869 (p=0.029) (Figure 3d). These results indicate that activated microglial EVs are necessary and sufficient to disrupt synaptic communication.
To isolate the effects of Neu3 over other potential regulatory components of microglial secreted EVs, we overexpressed Neu3 in HeLa cells, which have been previously described to secrete Neu3 on the exterior surface of microvesicles and exosomes upon overexpression of NEU3.37 We transiently transfected HeLa cells with plasmids encoding either wild-type Neu3 or a catalytically inactive point mutant (Y369F) (Figure S6) and enriched EVs from the conditioned media as we did with the BV-2 conditioned media. Using periodate labeling, we observed that these EV-enriched fractions were still capable of desialylating neuronal membranes (Figure S7), suggesting that Neu3 is the sialidase remodeling the neuronal glycocalyces in microglial secretions. Using voltage imaging, we observed that neither wild-type or Y369F Neu3 containing HeLa-derived EV’s caused significant changes in firing rate (WT: −0.26 Hz, p=0.58; Y369F: −0.14 Hz, p=0.65), indicating that the observed decrease in firing rate of neurons treated with EV’s from activated microglia is likely due to secreted factors besides of Neu3 (Figure 3e, S8). However, factor analysis revealed a 15% decrease in per-neuron shared variance between WT and Y369F-treated cultures (p=0.046), indicating a Neu3 activity-dependent loss of connectivity (Figure 3f). Congruent with this, pharmacological inhibition of Neu3 with DANA abrogated the effect of wild-type Neu3 on neuronal connectivity in culture but had no significant effect in Y369F-treated cultures (WT, p=0.028; Y369F, p=0.48; Figure 3f). This observation demonstrates that EV-associated Neu3 activity alone is sufficient to drive changes in neuronal communication, a previously unknown function of Neu3.
Conclusions
The prototypical sialic acid, 5-N-acetylneuraminic acid, was named based on the observed abundance of sialic acids on the external leaflet of neurons, particularly sialylated glycolipids known as gangliosides.38 Neu3 is a membrane-associated glycolipid sialidase28 that we speculated might play a role in regulating neuronal connectivity. The data herein present a new mechanism by which microglia regulate neuronal sialylation by secretion and transfer of Neu3 via extracellular vesicles. Moreover, we show that Neu3-mediated remodeling has a dramatic impact on the connectivity of neuronal networks, providing molecular detail for a contact-independent mechanism of neuronal pruning. These findings demonstrate a novel axis by which microglia and neurons communicate. Indeed, sialoglycans may serve as a mechanistic bridge between neuroinflammation and downstream changes in electrophysiology, which would position them as potential therapeutic targets for neurological disorders. The electrical mechanism of this rewiring, as well as other neuroinflammatory signals that lead to this effect, are exciting grounds for future research.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM058867. C.S.D. was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship DGE-114747 and a Stanford Interdisciplinary Gradate Fellowship affiliated with ChEM-H. N.M.R. was funded by National Institutes of Health Grant K99GM147304. Figure illustrations were created using BioRender.com.
Footnotes
Competing Interests.
C.R.B. is a co-founder and Scientific Advisory Board member of Lycia Therapeutics, Palleon Pharmaceuticals, Enable Bioscience, Redwood Biosciences (a subsidiary of Catalent), InterVenn Bio, GanNa Bio, OliLux Bio, Neuravid Therapeutics, Valora Therapeutics, and Firefly Bio, and is a member of the Board of Directors of Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and OmniAb. R.L.K. is a co-inventor on a patent related voltage-gated imaging dyes.
References.
- (1).Wu Y.; Dissing-Olesen L.; MacVicar B. A.; Stevens B. Microglia: Dynamic Mediators of Synapse Development and Plasticity. Trends Immunol. 2015, 36 (10), 605–613. 10.1016/j.it.2015.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Szepesi Z.; Manouchehrian O.; Bachiller S.; Deierborg T. Bidirectional Microglia–Neuron Communication in Health and Disease. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12 (September), 1–26. 10.3389/fncel.2018.00323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Cakir B.; Kiral F. R.; Park I. H. Advanced in Vitro Models: Microglia in Action. Neuron 2022, 110 (21), 3444–3457. 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Paolicelli R. C.; Sierra A.; Stevens B.; Tremblay M. E.; Aguzzi A.; Ajami B.; Amit I.; Audinat E.; Bechmann I.; Bennett M.; et al. Microglia States and Nomenclature: A Field at Its Crossroads. Neuron 2022, 110 (21), 3458–3483. 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Stephan A. H.; Barres B. A.; Stevens B. The Complement System: An Unexpected Role in Synaptic Pruning during Development and Disease. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 35, 369–389. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Zhang J.; Malik A.; Choi H. B.; Ko R. W. Y.; Dissing-Olesen L.; MacVicar B. A. Microglial CR3 Activation Triggers Long-Term Synaptic Depression in the Hippocampus via NADPH Oxidase. Neuron 2014, 82 (1), 195–207. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.01.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Klaus C.; Hansen J. N.; Ginolhac A.; Gérard D.; Gnanapragassam V. S.; Horstkorte R.; Rossdam C.; Buettner F. F. R.; Sauter T.; Sinkkonen L.; et al. Reduced Sialylation Triggers Homeostatic Synapse and Neuronal Loss in Middle-Aged Mice. Neurobiol. Aging 2020, 88, 91–107. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Cunningham C. Microglia and Neurodegeneration: The Role of Systemic Inflammation. Glia 2013, 61 (1), 71–90. 10.1002/glia.22350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Palop J. J.; Mucke L. Synaptic Depression and Aberrant Excitatory Network Activity in Alzheimer’s Disease: Two Faces of the Same Coin? NeuroMolecular Med. 2010, 12 (1), 48–55. 10.1007/s12017-009-8097-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Kulkarni A. S.; Burns M. R.; Brundin P.; Wesson D. W. Linking α-Synuclein-Induced Synaptopathy and Neural Network Dysfunction in Early Parkinson’s Disease. Brain Commun. 2022, 4 (4). 10.1093/braincomms/fcac165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Schedin-Weiss S.; Winblad B.; Tjernberg L. O. The Role of Protein Glycosylation in Alzheimer Disease. FEBS J. 2014, 281 (1), 46–62. 10.1111/febs.12590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Demina E. P.; Pierre W. C.; Nguyen A. L. A.; Londono I.; Reiz B.; Zou C.; Chakraberty R.; Cairo C. W.; Pshezhetsky A. V.; Lodygensky G. A. Persistent Reduction in Sialylation of Cerebral Glycoproteins Following Postnatal Inflammatory Exposure 11 Medical and Health Sciences 1109 Neurosciences. J. Neuroinflammation 2018, 15 (1), 1–14. 10.1186/s12974-018-1367-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Schnaar R. L.; Gerardy-Schahn R.; Hildebrandt H. Sialic Acids in the Brain: Gangliosides and Polysialic Acid in Nervous System Development, Stability, Disease, and Regeneration. Physiol. Rev. 2014, 94 (2), 461–518. 10.1152/physrev.00033.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Allendorf D. H.; Franssen E. H.; Brown G. C. Lipopolysaccharide Activates Microglia via Neuraminidase 1 Desialylation of Toll-like Receptor 4. J. Neurochem. 2020, 155 (4), 403–416. 10.1111/jnc.15024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Allendorf D. H.; Brown G. C. Neu1 Is Released From Activated Microglia, Stimulating Microglial Phagocytosis and Sensitizing Neurons to Glutamate. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2022, 16 (May), 1–13. 10.3389/fncel.2022.917884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Pluvinage J. V.; Haney M. S.; Smith B. A. H.; Sun J.; Iram T.; Bonanno L.; Li L.; Lee D. P.; Morgens D. W.; Yang A. C.; et al. CD22 Blockade Restores Homeostatic Microglial Phagocytosis in Ageing Brains. Nature 2019, 568 (7751), 187–192. 10.1038/s41586-019-1088-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Nomura K.; Vilalta A.; Allendorf D. H.; Hornik T. C.; Brown G. C. Activated Microglia Desialylate and Phagocytose Cells via Neuraminidase, Galectin-3, and Mer Tyrosine Kinase. J. Immunol. 2017, 1502532. 10.4049/jimmunol.1502532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Linnartz B.; Kopatz J.; Tenner A. J.; Neumann H. Sialic Acid on the Neuronal Glycocalyx Prevents Complement C1 Binding and Complement Receptor-3-Mediated Removal by Microglia. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32 (3), 946–952. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3830-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Ereño-Orbea J.; Sicard T.; Cui H.; Mazhab-Jafari M. T.; Benlekbir S.; Guarné A.; Rubinstein J. L.; Julien J. P. Molecular Basis of Human CD22 Function and Therapeutic Targeting. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8 (1), 1–11. 10.1038/s41467-017-00836-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Fernández-Arjona M. D. M.; Grondona J. M.; Fernández-Llebrez P.; López-Ávalos M. D. Microglial Activation by Microbial Neuraminidase through TLR2 and TLR4 Receptors. J. Neuroinflammation 2019, 16 (1), 1–14. 10.1186/s12974-019-1643-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Kulkarni R. U.; Wang C. L.; Bertozzi C. R. Subthreshold Voltage Analysis Demonstrates Neuronal Cell-Surface Sialic Acids Modulate Excitability and Network Integration. bioRxiv 2020, 2020.04.07.030866. [Google Scholar]
- (22).Isaeva E.; Lushnikova I.; Savrasova A.; Skibo G.; Holmes G. L.; Isaev D. Blockade of Endogenous Neuraminidase Leads to an Increase of Neuronal Excitability and Activity-Dependent Synaptogenesis in the Rat Hippocampus. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 32 (11), 1889–1896. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07468.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Allendorf D. H.; Puigdellívol M.; Brown G. C. Activated Microglia Desialylate Their Surface, Stimulating Complement Receptor 3-Mediated Phagocytosis of Neurons. Glia 2020, 68 (5), 989–998. 10.1002/glia.23757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Nomura K.; Vilalta A.; Allendorf D. H.; Hornik T. C.; Brown G. C. Activated Microglia Desialylate and Phagocytose Cells via Neuraminidase, Galectin-3, and Mer Tyrosine Kinase. J. Immunol. 2017, 198 (12), 4792–4801. 10.4049/jimmunol.1502532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Hata K.; Koseki K.; Yamaguchi K.; Moriya S.; Suzuki Y.; Yingsakmongkon S.; Hirai G.; Sodeoka M.; Von Itzstein M.; Miyagi T. Limited Inhibitory Effects of Oseltamivir and Zanamivir on Human Sialidases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52 (10), 3484–3491. 10.1128/AAC.00344-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Pshezhetsky A. V.; Ashmarina M. Keeping It Trim: Roles of Neuraminidases in CNS Function. Glycoconj. J. 2018, 35 (4), 375–386. 10.1007/s10719-018-9837-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Smutova V.; Albohy A.; Pan X.; Korchagina E.; Miyagi T.; Bovin N.; Cairo C. W.; Pshezhetsky A. V. Structural Basis for Substrate Specificity of Mammalian Neuraminidases. PLoS One 2014, 9 (9), 1–11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0106320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Albohy A.; Li M. D.; Zheng R. B.; Zou C.; Cairo C. W. Insight into Substrate Recognition and Catalysis by the Human Neuraminidase 3 (NEU3) through Molecular Modeling and Site-Directed Mutagenesis. Glycobiology 2010, 20 (9), 1127–1138. 10.1093/glycob/cwq077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Sandbhor M. S.; Soya N.; Albohy A.; Zheng R. B.; Cartmell J.; Bundle D. R.; Klassen J. S.; Cairo C. W. Substrate Recognition of the Membrane-Associated Sialidase NEU3 Requires a Hydrophobic Aglycone. Biochemistry 2011, 50 (32), 6753–6762. 10.1021/bi200449j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Albohy A.; Richards M. R.; Cairo C. W. Mapping Substrate Interactions of the Human Membrane-Associated Neuraminidase, NEU3, Using STD NMR. Glycobiology 2014, 25 (3), 284–293. 10.1093/glycob/cwu109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Zanchetti G.; Colombi P.; Manzoni M.; Anastasia L.; Caimi L.; Borsani G.; Venerando B.; Tettamanti G.; Preti A.; Monti E.; et al. Sialidase NEU3 Is a Peripheral Membrane Protein Localized on the Cell Surface and in Endosomal Structures. Biochem. J. 2007, 408 (2), 211–219. 10.1042/BJ20070503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Rodriguez-Walker M.; Daniotti J. L. Human Sialidase Neu3 Is S-Acylated and Behaves Like an Integral Membrane Protein. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7 (1), 1–13. 10.1038/s41598-017-04488-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Yang Y.; Boza-Serrano A.; Dunning C. J. R.; Clausen B. H.; Lambertsen K. L.; Deierborg T. Inflammation Leads to Distinct Populations of Extracellular Vesicles from Microglia. J. Neuroinflammation 2018, 15 (1), 1–19. 10.1186/s12974-018-1204-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Kumar D.; Gupta D.; Shankar S.; Srivastava R. K. Biomolecular Characterization of Exosomes Released from Cancer Stem Cells: Possible Implications for Biomarker and Treatment of Cancer. Oncotarget 2015, 6 (5), 3280–3291. 10.18632/oncotarget.2462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Kosaka N.; Iguchi H.; Yoshioka Y.; Takeshita F.; Matsuki Y.; Ochiya T. Secretory Mechanisms and Intercellular Transfer of MicroRNAs in Living Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285 (23), 17442–17452. 10.1074/jbc.M110.107821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Huang Y. L.; Walker A. S.; Miller E. W. A Photostable Silicon Rhodamine Platform for Optical Voltage Sensing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (33), 10767–10776. 10.1021/jacs.5b06644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Paolini L.; Orizio F.; Busatto S.; Radeghieri A.; Bresciani R.; Bergese P.; Monti E. Exosomes Secreted by Hela Cells Shuttle on Their Surface the Plasma Membrane-Associated Sialidase NEU3. Biochemistry 2017, 56 (48), 6401–6408. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (38).Klenk E. Neuraminsäure, Das Spaltprodukt Eines Neuen Gehirnlipoids. Hoppe. Seylers. Z. Physiol. Chem. 1941, 268 (1–2), 50–58. 10.1515/bchm2.1941.268.1-2.50. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Sanjana N. E.; Shalem O.; Zhang F. Improved Vectors and Genome-Wide Libraries for CRISPR Screening IPipet : Sample Handling Using a Tablet. Nat. Publ. Gr. 2014, 11 (8), 783–784. 10.1038/nmeth.3047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (40).Haney M. S.; Bohlen C. J.; Morgens D. W.; Ousey J. A.; Barkal A. A.; Tsui C. K.; Ego B. K.; Levin R.; Kamber R. A.; Collins H.; et al. Identification of Phagocytosis Regulators Using Magnetic Genome-Wide CRISPR Screens. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50 (12), 1716–1727. 10.1038/s41588-018-0254-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Pronobis M. I.; Deuitch N.; Peifer M. The Miraprep : A Protocol That Uses a Miniprep Kit and Provides Maxiprep Yields. 2016, No. Table 1, 1–12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0160509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (42).Brinkman E. K.; van Steensel B. Rapid Quantitative Evaluation of CRISPR Genome Editing by TIDE and TIDER. In CRISPR Gene Editing: Methods and Protocols; 2019; pp 29–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (43).Savic D.; Partridge E. C.; Newberry K. M.; Smith S. B.; Meadows S. K.; Roberts B. S.; Mackiewicz M.; Mendenhall E. M.; Myers R. M. CETCh-Seq : CRISPR Epitope Tagging ChIP-Seq of DNA-Binding Proteins. Genome Res. 2015, 1581–1589. 10.1101/gr.193540.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Wei W.; Riley N. M.; Yang A. C.; Kim J. T.; Terrell S. M.; Li V. L.; Garcia-Contreras M.; Bertozzi C. R.; Long J. Z. Cell Type-Selective Secretome Profiling in Vivo. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2021, 17 (3), 326–334. 10.1038/s41589-020-00698-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (45).HaileMariam M.; Eguez R. V.; Singh H.; Bekele S.; Ameni G.; Pieper R.; Yu Y. S-Trap, an Ultrafast Sample-Preparation Approach for Shotgun Proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2018, 17 (9), 2917–2924. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (46).Bausch-Fluck D.; Hofmann A.; Bock T.; Frei A. P.; Cerciello F.; Jacobs A.; Moest H.; Omasits U.; Gundry R. L.; Yoon C.; et al. A Mass Spectrometric-Derived Cell Surface Protein Atlas. PLoS One 2015, 10 (4), 1–22. 10.1371/journal.pone.0121314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (47).Leung K. K.; Wilson G. M.; Kirkemo L. L.; Riley N. M.; Coon J. J.; Wells J. A. Broad and Thematic Remodeling of the Surfaceome and Glycoproteome on Isogenic Cells Transformed with Driving Proliferative Oncogenes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020, 117 (14), 7764–7775. 10.1073/pnas.1917947117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (48).Wenger C. D.; Coon J. J. A Proteomics Search Algorithm Specifically Designed for High-Resolution Tandem Mass Spectra. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12 (3), 1377–1386. 10.1021/pr301024c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (49).Solntsev S. K.; Shortreed M. R.; Frey B. L.; Smith L. M. Enhanced Global Post-Translational Modification Discovery with MetaMorpheus. J. Proteome Res. 2018, 17 (5), 1844–1851. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (50).Bateman A. UniProt: A Worldwide Hub of Protein Knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47 (D1), D506–D515. 10.1093/nar/gky1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (51).Millikin R. J.; Solntsev S. K.; Shortreed M. R.; Smith L. M. Ultrafast Peptide Label-Free Quantification with FlashLFQ. J. Proteome Res. 2018, 17 (1), 386–391. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (52).Cox J.; Neuhauser N.; Michalski A.; Scheltema R. A.; Olsen J. V; Mann M. Andromeda: A Peptide Search Engine Integrated into the MaxQuant Environment. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10 (4), 1794–1805. 10.1021/pr101065j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (53).Tyanova S.; Temu T.; Cox J. The MaxQuant Computational Platform for Mass Spectrometry-Based Shotgun Proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 2016, 11 (12), 2301–2319. 10.1038/nprot.2016.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (54).Kulkarni R. U.; Wang C. L.; Bertozzi C. R. Analyzing Nested Experimental Designs—A User-Friendly Resampling Method to Determine Experimental Significance. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2022, 18 (5), 1–26. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.