Abstract
Apoptosis alteration is responsible for tumorigenesis and tumor resistance to therapies. The natural product Tanshinone IIA (Tan IIA) exhibits potent inhibitory effects against various tumors. However, the effect of Tan IIA on apoptosis and its underlying mechanism remains elusive in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Here, we demonstrated that Tan IIA dose-dependently suppressed cell viability and colony formation in CAL27, SCC4, and SCC25 cells. Moreover, Tan IIA inhibited Akt activation from inducing Foxo3a dephosphorylation and PUMA-mediated apoptosis. PUMA or Foxo3a knockdown compromised the inhibitory effect of Tan IIA on OSCC cells. Tan IIA administration inhibited CAL27-deprived xenograft tumor growth and increased PUMA expression in vivo. Tan IIA synergistically intensified the efficacy of CDDP/5-FU-based chemotherapy on OSCC cells. Overall, our results revealed that Tan IIA exerted potent antitumor effects via promoting PUMA-mediated apoptosis in OSCC cells.
Keywords: Tanshinone IIA, PUMA, oral squamous cell carcinoma
Introduction
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common human oral malignancy, accounting for approximately 90% of all oral cancer cases1, 2. The incidence and mortality have increased over the past decades, with an overall 5-year survival rate for OSCC ranging from 50% to 60%2-4. Currently, the therapeutic criterion for OSCC includes surgery, regional radiotherapy, and systemic chemotherapy5. However, approximately 50% of OSCC patients have poor prognosis1, 6. Thus, OSCC prevention and treatment must elucidate underlying mechanisms and identify novel antitumor agents.
Tanshinone IIA (Tan IIA) is a major functional compound extracted from Danshen (Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge), demonstrating a wide range of anticancer effects6, 7. Increasing evidence delineated that Tan IIA exhibited anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties8, 9. Tan IIA promoted autophagy-induced cell death in diverse forms of cancer cells6, 10. Administration of Tan IIA targeted Aurora B kinase to suppress tumor growth and overcome radioresistance in OSCC cells 11. Tan IIA suppressed HK2-mediated aerobic glycolysis in OSCC cells2, suggesting that Tan IIA is a promising antitumor agent against human cancers.
In this study, we determined the inhibitory effect of Tan IIA on OSCC cells and further unveiled the novel underlying mechanism of Tan IIA administration against OSCC.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and agents. CAL27, SCC4, and SCC25 cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). All cells were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin at 37°C with 5% CO2. All cells were subjected to routine checking for mycoplasma contamination every two months. Antibody against cleaved-caspase 3 (#9664), PUMA (#98672), p53 (#2527), Akt (#4691), p-Akt (#4060), Foxo3a (#12829), p-Foxo3a Ser253 (#9466), and β-actin (#3700) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Beverly, MA). Antibody against Ki67 (ab16667) was obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). The natural compound Tanshinone IIA was purchased from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX). Necrostatin-1, z-VAD-fmk, 3-methyladenine, chloroquine; Cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil were purchased from MedChemExpress (New Jersey, US).
MTS assay. MTS assay was performed according to the standard protocol12. The cultured cells were resuspended and seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 8x103 cells/well and were incubated at different time points. Cell viability was analyzed with MTS using the Cell Titer 96® Aqueous One Solution kit (Promega Corporation).
Soft Agar Assay. The soft agar assay was performed as described previously13. Briefly, the agar base was made with 3 mL of Eagle's basal medium supplemented with 0.6% agar and 10% FBS in a 6-well plate. Cells were collected and counted at 8x103 cells/mL concentration in 1 mL of Eagle's basal medium supplemented with 0.3% agar and 10% FBS overlaid into a 6-well plate with 0.6% agar base. The cells were routinely cultured for 14 days. The colony number was counted with the microscope.
Plate colony formation assay. The cultured cells were exposed to Tan IIA (0-5 μM), and were routinely incubated for 2 weeks in a 6-well plate (500 cells/well). When cells formed sufficiently large colonies, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at 37 ˚C. Cells were stained with 0.5% crystal violet for 5 min at 37 ˚C. The number of colonies was counted with a microscope.
Cell Transfection. Lentivirus transfection to generate Akt stable knockout cells. In brief, according to the manufacturer's protocol, OSCC cells were transfected with si-PUMA (sc-37153), si-Foxo3a (sc-37887), or siCtrl (sc-37007) purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX) using the Lipofectamine 2000 (11668019, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and subjected to following assays.
Immunoblotting. The immunoblotting (IB) was performed as described previously14. Briefly, Cells were lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) containing protease inhibitors to obtain whole-cell extract (WCE), whose concentration was determined by BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Equal amounts of protein (30 μg) were mixed with loading buffer, boiled at 95°C for 5 min, then subjected to SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and transferred onto a PVDF membrane. The membranes were incubated with the primary antibody overnight at 4°C after blocking with 5% non-fat milk at room temperature (RT) for 1 h. Finally, the secondary antibody anti-rabbit/mouse IgG HRP was added and incubated for 30 min at RT, and then the target protein was visualized by chemiluminescence.
Immunofluorescence (IF). The IF analysis was performed as described previously15. Briefly, CAL-27 cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (sc-281692; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) for 10 min, and permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X-100 (13444259; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 20 min. The slides were incubated with cleaved-caspase 3 antibody overnight at 4°C in a humidified chamber after blocking with 50% goat serum albumin. The next day, the fluorescence-labeled second antibody was added for 40 min at RT. DAPI was used for counterstaining. The stained cell images were obtained using the fluorescence microscope.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining. The IHC staining was performed as described previously16. Briefly, the tissue slides were dewaxed by immersion in xylene and rehydrated with gradient ethanol. The slides were immersed into boiling sodium citrate buffer (10 mM, pH 6.0) for antigen retrieval, followed by incubation with 3% H2O2 in methanol for 10 min to block endogenous peroxidase. After blocking with 50% goat serum albumin for 1h at RT, the slides were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C and then hybridized with secondary antibodies. Finally, the DAB Substrate kit (cat. no. 34002; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to visualize the target proteins.
Xenograft mouse model. All in vivo animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Central South University (Changsha, China). CAL27 cells (2 × 106) in 200 μl DMEM were harvested and subcutaneously inoculated in the right flank of 6-week-old athymic nude mice (n = 6) to generate xenograft models. The tumor volume and body weight of mice were recorded every 2 days. The tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into two groups when the tumor reached ~100 mm3. The compound-treated group was administrated Tanshinone IIA (low-dose group: 10 mg/kg every 2 days, high-dose group: 30 mg/kg every 2 days) by intraperitoneal injection, whereas the control group was administrated the vehicle control. Tumor volume was calculated as length × width2 × 0.5. The mice were euthanized at the endpoint, and the tumor tissues were dissected for IHC staining.
Statistical analysis. The results were analyzed using SPSS software (version 13.0; SPSS, Inc.) and presented as the mean ± SD. Significant differences between tested groups were analyzed by the Student's t-test or ANOVA. P<0.05 was considered as the criterion for statistically significant.
Results
Tan IIA inhibits the cell viability of OSCC cells
To determine the inhibitory effect of Tan IIA on OSCC cells, we first detected the cell viability of OSCC cells at indicated time points after different concentrations of Tan IIA treatment (0-5 μM). The MTS data indicated that Tan IIA significantly reduced cell viability dose-dependently in CAL27, SCC4, and SCC25 cells (Figure 1A-C). Furthermore, the colony formation ability of OSCC cells was examined. The results indicated that the colony numbers were markedly suppressed with Tan IIA treatment in CAL27, SCC4, and SCC25 cells (Figure 1D). Consistently, the plate colony formation assay revealed that Tan IIA dose-dependently inhibited the growth of OSCC cells. Exposure to a higher concentration of Tan IIA (2 and 5 μM) exhibited a more potent inhibitory effect on CAL27, SCC4, and SCC25 cells. Especially when the concentration of Tan IIA increased to 5 μM, the colony formation was blocked in tested OSCC cells (Figure 1E). Overall, these results suggest that Tan IIA dose-dependently attenuated the cell viability of OSCC cells.
Tan IIA induces PUMA-mediated apoptosis in OSCC cells
To explore the underlying mechanism that Tan IIA inhibited cell viability and proliferation of OSCC cells. We hypothesized that apoptosis, necroptosis, or autophagy might be implicated in the inhibitory effect of Tan IIA on OSCC cells. As shown in Figure 2A and 2B, the cell viability and live cells were increased moderately in Tan IIA-treated CAL27, SCC4, and SCC25 cells after incubation with RIPK1 kinase inhibitor Nec-1. While treated with Tan IIA and the pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fmk, cell viability and the live cell population were recovered significantly. On the other hand, treatment with Tan IIA and autophagy inhibitors 3-MA and CQ had no significant difference in OSCC cells compared with Tan IIA treatment alone. The results suggested that inhibition of apoptosis but not autophagy rescued Tan IIA-induced inhibitory effects on OSCC cells. The IB data showed that Tan IIA upregulated the protein level of cleaved-caspase 3 and PUMA in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2C-D). Moreover, the PUMA expression increased time-dependently following exposure to 5 μM Tan IIA (Figure 2E). Conversely, PUMA knockdown prominently suppressed caspase 3 activation (Figure 2F). The cell viability and colony formation ability significantly increased in CAL27 and SCC4 cells (Figure 2G-I), suggesting that PUMA deficiency abolished the inhibitory effects of Tan IIA on OSCC cells. These results indicate that PUMA was required for Tan IIA-induced apoptosis in OSCC cells.
Tan IIA promotes PUMA via Akt-Foxo3a pathway inhibition
To further determine the role of PUMA for Tan IIA-induced apoptosis, we detected PUMA and p53 expression in CAL27 and SCC4 cells. The IB data showed that Tan IIA markedly enhanced the protein level of PUMA and p53. Intriguingly, with Tan IIA treatment, PUMA expression had no significant decrease in p53-/- CAL27 and SCC4 cells, suggesting that Tan IIA upregulated PUMA in a p53-independent manner (Figure 3A). And then, we investigated whether Tan IIA exerted an effect on Akt. As shown in Figure 3b, exposure to different concentrations of Tan IIA (0-5 μM), the phosphorylation of Akt decreased dose-dependently (Figure 3B). Meanwhile, Akt knockdown could promote PUMA expression in CAL27 and SCC4 cells (Figure 3C). Conversely, ectopic expression of constitutively activated Akt (Myr-Akt) prominently reduced PUMA and restored Akt phosphorylation in the presence of Tan IIA (Figure 3D). In addition, blockage of Akt activation with Tan IIA and Akt inhibitor (MK2206) treatment overtly suppressed Foxo3a phosphorylation and increased PUMA expression in CAL27 and SCC4 cells (Figure 3E). However, despite exposure to Tan IIA, knockdown of Foxo3a suppressed PUMA and caspase 3 activation (Figure 3F). Consistent with that, the cell viability and colony formation significantly increased in CAL27 and SCC4 cells (Figure 3G-I), which suggested that Foxo3a deficiency compromised the inhibitory effect of Tan IIA on OSCC cells. These results showed that Tan IIA-induced PUMA-mediated apoptosis depended on the Akt-Foxo3a pathway.
Tan IIA suppresses tumor development of OSCC cells in vivo
We constructed a xenograft mouse to verify whether Tan IIA inhibited tumor development in vivo. CAL27-deprived xenograft tumors were exposed to low or high dosages of Tan IIA, respectively. The results showed that Tan IIA dose-dependently inhibited the tumor growth of CAL27-deprived xenografts compared with the vehicle control (Figure 4A). The tumor weight of the Tan IIA-treated group was sharply lower than that of the vehicle-treated group in a dose-dependent manner (Figures 4B and 4C). In addition, the body weight did not change significantly between the Tan IIA- and vehicle-treated groups (Figure 4D). IHC staining showed that Tan IIA dose-dependently reduced the population of Ki-67 positive cells and increased PUMA and cleaved-caspase 3 expression (Figure 4E-H). To further examine the toxicity of Tan IIA in vivo, HE analysis showed that Tan IIA administration had no specific cytotoxicity on certain vital organs, such as the heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney (Figure 4I). Overall, these results indicated that Tan IIA administration suppressed tumor development of OSCC cells in vivo.
Tan IIA intensifies the efficacy of CDDP/5-FU-based chemotherapy
Cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were the first-line and broad-spectrum chemotherapy for multiple cancers. We hypothesized that Tan IIA enhanced the efficacy of CDDP/5-FU-based chemotherapy on OSCC cells. The results showed that Tan IIA combined with CDDP increased the expression of PUMA and significantly suppressed cell viability compared with that of Tan IIA or CDDP treatment alone in CAL27 and SCC4 cells (Figure 5A and 5C). Consistently, a combination of Tan IIA and 5-FU exerted a similar effect on CAL27 and SCC4 cells (Figure 5B and 5D). Furthermore, Tan IIA combined CDDP prominently enhanced caspase 3 activity to induce apoptosis (Figure 5E-G). In addition, treatment with Tan IIA plus CDDP inhibited the growth of CAL27-deprived xenografts compared with that of Tan IIA or CDDP treatment alone (Figure 5H). Likewise, IHC staining revealed that Tan IIA combined with CDDP significantly reduced the population of Ki-67 positive cells and increased the protein level of PUMA (Figure 5I-J). Overall, these results suggest that Tan IIA intensified the efficacy of CDDP/5-FU-based chemotherapy on OSCC cells.
Discussion
Oral cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide17-19. As the most prevalent type of oral malignancy20, 21, about 50% of oral carcinoma cases are at advanced stages22-24. Apoptosis functions as a programmed cell death mechanism, effectively eliminating cancer cells to protect against cancer development25, 26. However, apoptosis dysregulation is a hallmark of cancer and contributes to tumorigenesis and drug resistance27-29. PUMA (p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis) belongs to the Bcl-2 family and induces apoptosis in several cancer cells30, 31. Excepting that p53 transcriptionally induces PUMA activation, Forkhead box O (FOXO) family member Foxo3a mediates PUMA induction32, 33. PUMA activation induces apoptosis in either a p53-dependent or -independent manner. Once expressed, PUMA interacts with anti-apoptotic proteins of the Bcl-2 family and directly activates the pro-apoptotic effectors Bax/Bak, leading to mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP), caspase cascades and cell apoptosis in various cancer cells31, 34, 35.
Tanshinone IIA (Tan IIA) is a natural compound extracted from Danshen8. Recently, Tan IIA has exhibited a wide range of potent antitumor efficacy against various cancers2, 36. Tan IIA suppresses various tumors, including leukemia37, gastric cancer38, non-small cell lung cancer39, colorectal cancer40, prostate cancer41, and hepatocellular carcinoma42. The mechanism study revealed that Tan IIA administration induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis to suppress angiogenesis and metastasis and enhance the antitumor efficacy of chemotherapies 2, 42-44. In our study, Tan IIA exerted a potent inhibitory effect on OSCC cells. Tan IIA dose-dependently attenuated cell viability and proliferation of OSCC cells (Figure 1A-E). Moreover, Qiu et al.6 revealed that Tan IIA treatment induced cell apoptosis and upregulated the expression of cleaved-caspase 3. Simultaneously, autophagy was initiated by Tan IIA. From this perspective, we inquired whether Tan IIA has a similar effect on CAL27, SCC4, and SCC25 cells. Intriguingly, under Tan IIA treatment with apoptosis inhibitors z-VAD-fmk, the cell viability and live cells increased to some extent in CAL27, SCC4, and SCC25 cells. In contrast, treatment with Tan IIA and autophagy inhibitors 3-MA and CQ had no significant difference in OSCC cells compared with Tan IIA treatment alone (Figure 2A-B). The results suggested that Tan IIA mediated apoptosis, not autophagy, to execute inhibitory effects on OSCC cells. Further study revealed that Tan IIA upregulated the protein level of cleaved-caspase 3 and PUMA in a dose and time-dependent manner (Figure 2C-E). Conversely, PUMA knockdown prominently suppressed caspase 3 activation (Figure 2F). In addition, PUMA is the downstream target of transcription factor Foxo3a32, 45. PI3K-mediated Akt activation leads to Foxo3a phosphorylation and cytoplasmic retention, thus preventing PUMA upregulation46, 47. We manifested that blockage of Akt activation sharply suppressed Foxo3a phosphorylation and increased PUMA expression in CAL27 and SCC4 cells. Our results substantiated that Tan IIA-induced apoptosis and PUMA upregulation leaned on the Akt-Foxo3a pathway. Moreover, MYC and PI3K-Akt signaling synergistically repressed Foxo3a-dependent PUMA expression48. It remains unknown whether Tan IIA exerts inhibitory effects on MYC or other apoptosis-associated proteins.
Natural products have been widely studied as vital therapeutic antitumor agents due to their limited toxicity49. In our study, Tan IIA dose-dependently inhibited the tumor growth of CAL27-deprived xenografts and had no apparent cytotoxic effect on vital organs. Meanwhile, chemoresistance is one of the major causes of treatment failure in OSCC50, 51. Cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are the first-line treatment for advanced OSCC patients. Unfortunately, over 30% of OSCC patients are intrinsically insensitive to CDDP/5FU-based chemotherapy4, 50, 52. However, Tan IIA combined with CDDP/5-FU significantly upregulated the level of PUMA and suppressed cell viability.
Collectively, our study manifested that Tan IIA promoted PUMA-induced apoptosis to exhibit a potent inhibitory effect on OSCC cells and to intensify the efficacy of CDDP/5-FU-based chemotherapy. This evidence indicated that Tan IIA might be a potential therapeutic agent for OSCC treatment.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Changsha (No. kq2208458), Hunan Provincial Department of Education (No. 22A0249), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (No. 2022JJ30630), the Department of Science and Technology of Hunan Province (No. 2021SK53301) and the Health Commission of Hunan Province (No. 202108051626).
Abbreviations
- Tan IIA
tanshinone IIA
- Nec-1
necrostatin-1
- z-VAD
z-VAD-fmk
- 3-MA
3-methyladenine
- CQ
chloroquine
- CDDP
cisplatin
- 5-FU
5-fluorouracil
- WT
wild type
- Foxo3a
forkhead box O3a
- Akt
protein kinase B
- PUMA
p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis
- PI3K
phosphoinositide 3-kinase
- MOMP
mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization
- HK2
hexokinase 2
- IB
immunoblotting
- IHC
immunohistochemistry
- IF
immunofluorescence
References
- 1.Lin X, Wu W, Ying Y, Luo J, Xu X, Zheng L. et al. MicroRNA-31: a pivotal oncogenic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Death Discov. 2022;8:140. doi: 10.1038/s41420-022-00948-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Li M, Gao F, Zhao Q, Zuo H, Liu W, Li W. Tanshinone IIA inhibits oral squamous cell carcinoma via reducing Akt-c-Myc signaling-mediated aerobic glycolysis. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:381. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2579-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Al Rawi N, Elmabrouk N, Abu Kou R, Mkadmi S, Rizvi Z, Hamdoon Z. The role of differentially expressed salivary microRNA in oral squamous cell carcinoma. A systematic review. Arch Oral Biol. 2021;125:105108. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Feng Y, Cao X, Zhao B, Song C, Pang B, Hu L. et al. Nitrate increases cisplatin chemosensitivity of oral squamous cell carcinoma via REDD1/AKT signaling pathway. Sci China Life Sci. 2021;64:1814–28. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1978-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mody MD, Rocco JW, Yom SS, Haddad RI, Saba NF. Head and neck cancer. Lancet. 2021;398:2289–99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01550-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Qiu Y, Li C, Wang Q, Zeng X, Ji P. Tanshinone IIA induces cell death via Beclin-1-dependent autophagy in oral squamous cell carcinoma SCC-9 cell line. Cancer Med. 2018;7:397–407. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Qi H, Chen Z, Qin Y, Wang X, Zhang Z, Li Y. Tanshinone IIA inhibits cell growth by suppressing SIX1-induced aerobic glycolysis in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 2022;23:184. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ansari MA, Khan FB, Safdari HA, Almatroudi A, Alzohairy MA, Safdari M. et al. Prospective therapeutic potential of Tanshinone IIA: An updated overview. Pharmacol Res. 2021;164:105364. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Khan FB, Singh P, Jamous YF, Ali SA, Abdullah, Uddin S, Multifaceted Pharmacological Potentials of Curcumin, Genistein, and Tanshinone IIA through Proteomic Approaches: An In-Depth Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022. 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Yun SM, Jung JH, Jeong SJ, Sohn EJ, Kim B, Kim SH. Tanshinone IIA induces autophagic cell death via activation of AMPK and ERK and inhibition of mTOR and p70 S6K in KBM-5 leukemia cells. Phytother Res. 2014;28:458–64. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li M, Liu H, Zhao Q, Han S, Zhou L, Liu W. et al. Targeting Aurora B kinase with Tanshinone IIA suppresses tumor growth and overcomes radioresistance. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:152. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-03434-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li W, Yu X, Tan S, Liu W, Zhou L, Liu H. Oxymatrine inhibits non-small cell lung cancer via suppression of EGFR signaling pathway. Cancer Med. 2018;7:208–18. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yu X, Li W, Xia Z, Xie L, Ma X, Liang Q. et al. Targeting MCL-1 sensitizes human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells to cisplatin-induced apoptosis. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:449. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3442-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li W, Yu X, Ma X, Xie L, Xia Z, Liu L. et al. Deguelin attenuates non-small cell lung cancer cell metastasis through inhibiting the CtsZ/FAK signaling pathway. Cell Signal. 2018;50:131–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2018.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu W, Li W, Liu H, Yu X. Xanthohumol inhibits colorectal cancer cells via downregulation of Hexokinases II-mediated glycolysis. Int J Biol Sci. 2019;15:2497–508. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.37481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yu X, Wang R, Zhang Y, Zhou L, Wang W, Liu H. et al. Skp2-mediated ubiquitination and mitochondrial localization of Akt drive tumor growth and chemoresistance to cisplatin. Oncogene. 2019;38:7457–72. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0955-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.He S, Chakraborty R, Ranganathan S. Proliferation and Apoptosis Pathways and Factors in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 18.Sasahira T, Kirita T. Hallmarks of Cancer-Related Newly Prognostic Factors of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2018. 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fan T, Wang X, Zhang S, Deng P, Jiang Y, Liang Y. et al. NUPR1 promotes the proliferation and metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells by activating TFE3-dependent autophagy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7:130. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-00939-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Peng QS, Cheng YN, Zhang WB, Fan H, Mao QH, Xu P. circRNA_0000140 suppresses oral squamous cell carcinoma growth and metastasis by targeting miR-31 to inhibit Hippo signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:112. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2273-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schinke H, Shi E, Lin Z, Quadt T, Kranz G, Zhou J. et al. A transcriptomic map of EGFR-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition identifies prognostic and therapeutic targets for head and neck cancer. Mol Cancer. 2022;21:178. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01646-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature. 2015; 517: 576-82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Liu S, Gao W, Lu Y, Zhou Q, Su R, Hasegawa T. et al. As a Novel Tumor Suppressor, LHPP Promotes Apoptosis by Inhibiting the PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18:491–506. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.66841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gong Y, Fan Z, Luo G, Yang C, Huang Q, Fan K. et al. The role of necroptosis in cancer biology and therapy. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:100. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1029-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Raudenská M, Balvan J, Masařík M. Cell death in head and neck cancer pathogenesis and treatment. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:192. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-03474-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Carneiro BA, El-Deiry WS. Targeting apoptosis in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:395–417. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0341-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fitzgerald MC, O'Halloran PJ, Connolly NMC, Murphy BM. Targeting the apoptosis pathway to treat tumours of the paediatric nervous system. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:460. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-04900-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hernández Borrero LJ, El-Deiry WS. Tumor suppressor p53: Biology, signaling pathways, and therapeutic targeting. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2021;1876:188556. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang L, Wang H, Li W, Zhong J, Yu R, Huang X. et al. Pazopanib, a novel multi-kinase inhibitor, shows potent antitumor activity in colon cancer through PUMA-mediated apoptosis. Oncotarget. 2017;8:3289–303. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhu Y, Tong X, Wang Y, Lu X. WTIP upregulates FOXO3a and induces apoptosis through PUMA in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Death Dis. 2021;13:18. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-04467-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wang J, Thomas HR, Li Z, Yeo NCF, Scott HE, Dang N. et al. Puma, noxa, p53, and p63 differentially mediate stress pathway induced apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:659. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-03902-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li M. The role of P53 up-regulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA) in ovarian development, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. Apoptosis. 2021;26:235–47. doi: 10.1007/s10495-021-01667-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Carlsson MJ, Vollmer AS, Demuth P, Heylmann D, Reich D, Quarz C. et al. p53 triggers mitochondrial apoptosis following DNA damage-dependent replication stress by the hepatotoxin methyleugenol. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:1009. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-05446-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fang ZY, Zhang M, Liu JN, Zhao X, Zhang YQ, Fang L. Tanshinone IIA: A Review of its Anticancer Effects. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:611087. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.611087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Teng Z, Xu S, Lei Q. Tanshinone IIA enhances the inhibitory effect of imatinib on proliferation and motility of acute leukemia cell line TIB-152 in vivo and in vitro by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Oncol Rep. 2020;43:503–15. doi: 10.3892/or.2019.7453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 38.Guan Z, Chen J, Li X, Dong N. Tanshinone IIA induces ferroptosis in gastric cancer cells through p53-mediated SLC7A11 down-regulation. Biosci Rep. 2020. 40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Gao F, Li M, Liu W, Li W. Inhibition of EGFR Signaling and Activation of Mitochondrial Apoptosis Contribute to Tanshinone IIA-Mediated Tumor Suppression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:2757–69. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S246606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhou L, Sui H, Wang T, Jia R, Zhang Z, Fu J. et al. Tanshinone IIA reduces secretion of pro-angiogenic factors and inhibits angiogenesis in human colorectal cancer. Oncol Rep. 2020;43:1159–68. doi: 10.3892/or.2020.7498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ketola K, Viitala M, Kohonen P, Fey V, Culig Z, Kallioniemi O. et al. High-throughput cell-based compound screen identifies pinosylvin methyl ether and tanshinone IIA as inhibitors of castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Mol Biochem. 2016;5:12–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chiu CM, Huang SY, Chang SF, Liao KF, Chiu SC. Synergistic antitumor effects of tanshinone IIA and sorafenib or its derivative SC-1 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:1777–85. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S161534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Guo R, Li L, Su J, Li S, Duncan SE, Liu Z. et al. Pharmacological Activity and Mechanism of Tanshinone IIA in Related Diseases. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020;14:4735–48. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S266911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Li S, Wu C, Fan C, Zhang P, Yu G, Li K. Tanshinone II A improves the chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells to doxorubicin by inhibiting β-catenin nuclear translocation. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2021;35:e22620. doi: 10.1002/jbt.22620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sun J, Cao Q, Lin S, Chen Y, Liu X, Hong Q. Knockdown of CALM2 increases the sensitivity to afatinib in HER2-amplified gastric cancer cells by regulating the Akt/FoxO3a/Puma axis. Toxicol In Vitro. 2023;87:105531. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2022.105531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li X, Jin L, Ma Y, Jiang Z, Tang H, Tong X. Xanthohumol inhibits non-small cell lung cancer by activating PUMA-mediated apoptosis. Toxicology. 2022;470:153141. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2022.153141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hollville E, Romero SE, Deshmukh M. Apoptotic cell death regulation in neurons. Febs j. 2019;286:3276–98. doi: 10.1111/febs.14970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Amente S, Zhang J, Lavadera ML, Lania L, Avvedimento EV, Majello B. Myc and PI3K/AKT signaling cooperatively repress FOXO3a-dependent PUMA and GADD45a gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:9498–507. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Han S, Li X, Gan Y, Li W. Licochalcone A Promotes the Ubiquitination of c-Met to Abrogate Gefitinib Resistance. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:5687832. doi: 10.1155/2022/5687832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Huang Z, Zhang Y, Li H, Zhou Y, Zhang Q, Chen R. et al. Vitamin D promotes the cisplatin sensitivity of oral squamous cell carcinoma by inhibiting LCN2-modulated NF-κB pathway activation through RPS3. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:936. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-2177-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cheng Y, Li S, Gao L, Zhi K, Ren W. The Molecular Basis and Therapeutic Aspects of Cisplatin Resistance in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:761379. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.761379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mohapatra P, Mohanty S, Ansari SA, Shriwas O, Ghosh A, Rath R. et al. CMTM6 attenuates cisplatin-induced cell death in OSCC by regulating AKT/c-Myc-driven ribosome biogenesis. Faseb j. 2022;36:e22566. doi: 10.1096/fj.202200808RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.