In the published article, there was an error regarding the affiliation for author Domitile Lourdeaux. Their affiliation was stated as “2 Institute for Creative Technologies, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States” but should be “1 Heudiasyc UMR 7253, Alliance Sorbonne Université, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CNRS, Compiègne, France”.
In the published article, there was also an error in Discussion and Limitations, Paragraph 9. The second sentence cited “(Rebenitsch and Owen, 2017)” but it should be “(Biener et al., 2022)”. The corrected paragraph appears below:
One major limitation of this study is that we concentrated on short-term VRISE. However, working in VR implies daily use, and a pre-print (Biener et al., 2022) documented VR work for 1 week. VR appears to be worse than PC working. Cybersickness is a concern, and some participants even dropped out of the study. The advantages and disadvantages of VR's long-term use are yet to be drawn. Following the present guidelines might help foster advantages, but they cannot delete disadvantages.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- Biener V., Kalamkar S., Nouri N., Ofek E., Pahud M., Dudley J. J., et al. (2022). Quantifying the effects of working in VR for one week. arXiv. 10.48550/arXiv.2206.03189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]