Skip to main content
PMC home page
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Vis Exp. 2021 Jun 9;(172):10.3791/62568. doi: 10.3791/62568

Utilizing In Vivo Postnatal Electroporation to Study Cerebellar Granule Neuron Morphology and Synapse Development

Urann Chan 1, Diwas Gautam 1, Anne E West 1
PMCID: PMC10476226  NIHMSID: NIHMS1923804  PMID: 34180898

Abstract

Neurons undergo dynamic changes in their structure and function during brain development to form appropriate connections with other cells. The rodent cerebellum is an ideal system to track the development and morphogenesis of a single cell type, the cerebellar granule neuron (CGN), across time. Here, in vivo electroporation of granule neuron progenitors in the developing mouse cerebellum was employed to sparsely label cells for subsequent morphological analyses. The efficacy of this technique is demonstrated in its ability to showcase key developmental stages of CGN maturation, with a specific focus on the formation of dendritic claws, which are specialized structures where these cells receive the majority of their synaptic inputs. In addition to providing snapshots of CGN synaptic structures throughout cerebellar development, this technique can be adapted to genetically manipulate granule neurons in a cell-autonomous manner to study the role of any gene of interest and its effect on CGN morphology, claw development, and synaptogenesis.

Introduction

Brain development is a prolonged process that extends from embryogenesis into postnatal life. During this time, the brain integrates a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli that sculpt the wiring of synapses between dendrites and axons to ultimately guide behavior. The rodent cerebellum is an ideal model system to study how synapses develop because the development of a single neuron type, the cerebellar granule neuron (CGN), can be tracked as it transitions from a progenitor cell to a mature neuron. This is due, in part, to the fact that a majority of the cerebellar cortex develops postnatally, which allows for easy genetic manipulation and cell labeling after birth1.

In mammals, CGN differentiation begins at the end of embryonic development when a subset of proliferative cells in the hindbrain migrates over the rhombic lip to form a secondary germinal zone on the surface of the cerebellum2, 3, 4. Although they are fully committed to a granule neuron progenitor (GNP) identity, these cells continue to proliferate within the outer portion of the external granule layer (EGL) until postnatal day 14 (P14). Proliferation of this layer results in a massive expansion of the cerebellum as these cells give rise exclusively to CGNs5. Once newborn CGNs exit the cell cycle in the EGL, they migrate inwards towards the internal granule layer (IGL), leaving behind an axon that will bifurcate and travel in the molecular layer of the cerebellum, forming parallel fibers that synapse onto Purkinje cells6. The position of these fibers within the molecular layer is dependent on the timing of cell-cycle exit.

CGNs that differentiate first leave their parallel fibers towards the bottom of the molecular layer, whereas the axons of CGNs that differentiate later are clustered at the top7, 8. Once the CGN cell bodies reach the IGL, they begin to elaborate dendrites and form synapses with nearby inhibitory and excitatory neurons. The mature dendritic tree of a CGN exhibits a stereotyped architecture with four main processes. Over the course of CGN maturation, the structures at the end of these dendrites form a claw that becomes enriched with postsynaptic proteins9, 10. These specialized structures, called dendritic claws, contain the majority of the synapses onto granule neurons and are important for receiving both excitatory inputs from mossy fiber innervations originating from the pons, as well as inhibitory inputs from local Golgi cells. Once fully configured, the synaptic connections of CGNs allow these cells to relay inputs from pre-cerebellar nuclei to Purkinje cells, which project out of the cerebellar cortex to the deep cerebellar nuclei.

In vivo postnatal electroporation of GNPs is advantageous over other labeling-based methods, such as viral infection and generation of transgenic mouse lines, because the expression of desired constructs can be achieved on a fast timeline, and the method targets a small population of cells, useful in studying cell-autonomous effects. This method has been used in prior studies to study morphological development of CGNs; however, these studies have focused on either a single time point or a short window of time9, 10, 11, 12, 13. This labeling method was paired with image analysis to document the changes in CGN morphology that occur across the entire time course of CGN differentiation over the first three weeks of postnatal life. These data reveal the dynamics of CGN dendrite development that underlie construction of cerebellar circuits.

Protocol

NOTE: All procedures were performed under protocols approved by Duke University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

1. DNA preparation for in vivo electroporation or IVE (1 day before surgery)

  1. Gather the following materials: purified DNA (0.5–25 μg per animal), 3 M sodium acetate, ethanol, Fast Green dye, ultrapure distilled water, phosphate buffer solution (PBS) (see the Table of Materials).

    NOTE: For DNA, a construct expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) under a human ubiquitin promoter was obtained from Addgene (FUGW, https://www.addgene.org/14883/). Any construct expressing GFP or another fluorescent protein under the control of a ubiquitous promoter should work. CGN-specific labeling with this technique is not dependent on the construct, but rather on the electroporation.

  2. Prepare DNA for electroporation by mixing the desired amount of DNA, 10% by volume of 3 M sodium acetate and 250% by volume of 100% ice-cold ethanol. Note that the DNA will precipitate out of solution immediately.

  3. Continue to precipitate the DNA mixture overnight at −20 °C or for an hour at −80 °C.

  4. Pellet precipitated DNA in a tabletop centrifuge at >16,000 × g and wash twice with 70% ethanol.

  5. Allow the DNA pellet to dry completely, and reconstitute in a 1x PBS + 0.02% Fast Green solution.

Name of Material/ Equipment Company Catalog Number Comments/Description
Betadine Purdue Production 67618–150-17
Cemented 10uL needle Hamilton 1701SN (80008) 33 gauge, 1.27 cm (0.5 in), 4 point style
Chicken anti-GFP Millipore Sigma AB16901 Our lab uses this antibody at a 1:1000 concentration
Cotton-tip applicator
Donkey anti-chicken Cy2 Jackson ImmunoResearch 703-225-155 Our lab uses this antibody at a 1:500 concentration
Ethanol (200 proof) Koptec V1016
Electroporator ECM 830 BTX Harvard Apparatus 45–0052
Fast Green FCF Sigma F7252–5G
FUGW plasmid Addgene 14883
Glass slides VWR 48311–703 Superfrost plus
Glycerol Sigma-Aldrich G5516
Heating pad Softheat
Hoescht 33342 fluorescent dye Invitrogen 62249
Imaris Bitplane
Isoflurane Patterson Veterinary 07–893-1389
Micro cover glass VWR 48382–138
Nail polish Sally Hansen Color 109
Normal goat serum Gibco 16210064
O.C.T. embedding compound Tissue-Tek 4583
Olympus MVX10 Dissecting Scope Olympus MVX10
P200 pipette reach tip Fisherbrand 02–707-138 Used for needle spacer
Parafilm Bemis PM-996
PBS pH 7.4 (10X) Gibco 70011–044
Simple Neurite Tracer FIJI https://imagej.net/Simple_Neurite_Tracer:_Basic_Instructions
Sucrose Sigma S0389
Surgical tools RWD Life Science Small scissors and tweezers
Triton X-100 Roche 11332481001
Tweezertrodes BTX Harvard Apparatus 45–0489 5 mm, platinum plated
Ultrapure distilled water Invitrogen 10977–015
Vectashield mounting media Vectashield H1000
Vetbond tissue adhesive 3M 1469SB
Zeiss 780 Upright Confocal Zeiss 780
Open in a new tab

2. In vivo electroporation of granule neuron progenitors in seven-day old postnatal mice

NOTE: All electroporation surgeries were performed in a sterile and highly ventilated surgical suite, and all personnel wore complete personal protective equipment including gloves, face mask, hair bonnet, gown, and shoe covers. Alternatively, the surgeries can be performed in a ventilated and sterile hood.

  1. Gather the following materials: DNA for electroporation, small surgical scissors, small surgical tweezers, customized Hamilton syringe, cotton-tip applicator, heating pad, betadine, 70% ethanol, 1x PBS, parafilm, tissue adhesive (n-butyl-ester cyanoacrylate), isoflurane, electroporator, and tweezer-type electrodes (see the Table of Materials).

  2. Cut a spacer from a sterilized loading tip to fit over the Hamilton syringe to limit the injection depth to 1.5 mm (Figure 1A,B). Secure the spacer with adhesive or parafilm.

  3. Anesthetize the P7 pup in an isoflurane chamber at a delivery rate of 0.8 L/min. Confirm full anesthesia by monitoring the animal for decreased respiration and a lack of a toe or tail pinch response (Figure 2A).

  4. Once the animal is fully anaesthetized, place the pups on a pedestal fitted with a nose cone, delivering constant 4% isoflurane at a delivery rate of 0.8 L/min. Clean the top of the pup’s head 3 times with a sterile swab of betadine then 70% ethanol, alternating between the two, to prepare the site. Allow the solution to dry before proceeding.

  5. Using a pair of sterilized scissors, make a small incision with one cut that spans the distance from the top to the base of the ears to reveal the hindbrain (Figure 2B).

  6. Locate the cerebellum (Figure 2C), insert the exposed tip of the Hamilton syringe through the skull, perpendicular to the brain, and inject 1.5 μL of DNA mixture into the cerebellar parenchyma by slowly pushing the back plunger of the syringe. After delivery of the DNA mixture, slowly pull the needle back to prevent back spills, and allow the DNA solution to diffuse for 30 s.

  7. Turn off the isoflurane, and place the pup on a 37 °C heating pad. Prepare the tweezer-type electrode for electroporation by dipping both ends into sterile 1x PBS.

    NOTE: Wetting the tweezer-type electrode will prevent contact burns on the skin of the pup during administration of the electrical pulses.

  8. Orient the tweezer-electrode above the site of injection with the plus end facing downwards and the negative end above the animal’s head (Figure 2D). Administer five electrical pulses from the electroporator with the following settings: 50 ms, 130 V, and 950 ms inter-pulse interval.

    NOTE: If needed, perform a test injection to ensure that the injection site is located on the cerebellar vermis (Figure 2E).

  9. Pinch the incision closed, and seal the wound with a non-toxic n-butyl-ester cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Clean the wound with 70% ethanol as any trace amount of blood increases the likelihood of parental infanticide and cannibalism.

  10. Allow the animal to recover on a 37 °C heating pad before returning the pup to the dam. Monitor the pup(s) every 30 min for at least 2 h after the surgery to ensure full recovery.

    NOTE: Infanticide by either parent is quite common. To prevent cannibalism, house the sire in a different cage before starting the electroporation, and always return cleaned and recovered pups (i.e., no bloodstain, fully mobile) to the original cage on the original bedding. Pups can also be wiped with droppings from the original cage to minimize the smell of blood. The use of a surrogate dam may be necessary if the original dam continues to cannibalize her pups.

Figure 1: Limiting injection depth to 1.5 mm using a spacer.

Figure 1:

Open in a new tab

(A) A 11.2 mm segment is cut off a loading pipette using a razor blade. (B) The spacer is fitted onto the tip of the Hamilton syringe (total length is 1.27 cm or 0.5 in) and secured with either adhesive or parafilm. The exposed tip should be 1.5 mm in length.

Figure 2: In vivo cerebellar electroporation of granule neuron progenitors in P7 wildtype mouse pups.

Figure 2:

Open in a new tab

(A) Pups are anesthetized with 4% isoflurane delivered at a rate of 0.8L/min to ensure anesthesia throughout the injection of the DNA solution. Isoflurane is delivered at a rate of 0.8 L/min. (B) After sterilizing the mouse 3 times with betadine and 70% ethanol, an incision is made that spans the distance of the ears, revealing the hindbrain. (C) A magnified image of a white demarcation on the cranium, a landmark for the injection site. DNA construct should be injected within 1 mm above the mark; dotted lines outline the demarcation, and black arrow denotes the injection site. The ridges of the cerebellar vermis may be visible and can be useful for finding the injection site. (D) Tweezer-type electrode orientation for efficient electroporation. Plus (+) end must be oriented downwards to pull negatively charged DNA into the cerebellar parenchyma prior to administration of electrical pulses. (E) Test injection of 1 μL of a 0.02% Fast Green dye shows injection is localized to the middle of the cerebellar vermis between lobules 5–7.

3. Immunohistochemistry of electroporated CGNs

  1. Gather the following materials: isoflurane, 1x PBS, 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), 30% sucrose, normal goat serum, non-ionic detergent, glass slides, glass coverslips, nail polish, mounting media, Hoechst nuclear dye, and appropriate primary and secondary antibodies (see the Table of Materials).

  2. Anesthetize the experimental animal with isoflurane, and confirm full anesthesia with a toe and tail pinch.

  3. Perform a trans-cardial perfusion by slowly injecting 1x PBS and 4% PFA into the left ventricle of the animal’s heart. Allow the blood to drain from the animal by cutting the vena cava.

  4. Fix the brain overnight by submerging it in 4% PFA at 4 °C. On the following day, quickly rinse the brain with 1x PBS, and transfer the brain into 30% sucrose in 1x PBS for cryoprotection for at least 24 h.

  5. If necessary, slice the brain in half along the rostral-caudal axis, and confirm expression of the transfected reporter construct using an upright fluorescent dissecting microscope.

    NOTE: Keep the brain submerged in 1x PBS in a small dish to prevent it from drying out.

  6. Mount the brain on a freezing microtome, slice 25 μm sagittal sections, and allow sections to unfold in a 1:1 mixture of 1x PBS and glycerol.

    NOTE: Sections can be stored in this cryoprotectant solution at −20 °C for long-term storage.

  7. Wash sections three times in 1x PBS for 10 min each to remove cryoprotectant, and block the tissue in 1x PBS + 10% normal goat serum + 0.2% non-ionic detergent on an orbital shaker at room temperature for 1 h.

  8. Prepare primary antibody solution: 1x PBS, 10% normal goat serum, 0.2% non-ionic detergent, and anti-GFP antibody, and centrifuge the solution for 5 min at >16,000 × g. Incubate sections in the antibody solution at 4 °C on an orbital shaker for 48 h.

  9. Wash off primary antibody solution for 15 min five times with 1x PBS + 0.2% non-ionic detergent.

  10. Prepare secondary antibody solution: 1x PBS, 10% normal goat serum, 0.2% non-ionic detergent, and an appropriate secondary antibody to detect GFP; centrifuge the solution at >16,000 × g. Incubate sections in the antibody solution on an orbital shaker at room temperature for 2–3 h. Protect the sections from light exposure to prevent bleaching.

  11. Wash off secondary antibody solution three times with 1x PBS + 0.2% non-ionic detergent for 15 min each time. Incubate sections in 1x PBS + Hoechst for 5 min to stain nuclei.

  12. Wash off Hoechst solution with 1x PBS + 0.2% non-ionic detergent and mount onto glass slides. Cover the sections with mounting media, coverslip the slides, and seal the slide with nail polish to prevent evaporation.

4. Morphological analyses of CGNs - three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and surface area and cellular volume

  1. Image single electroporated CGNs on a confocal microscope at 63x objective with a 2x zoom, taking z-stack images at 0.5 μm per stack. Image one cell per image window to allow for easy image analysis and reconstruction.

  2. Install the Simple Neurite Tracer plug-in for FIJI using the following link (https://imagej.net/Simple_Neurite_Tracer:_Basic_Instructions) to easily and efficiently trace the structure of electroporated CGNs in three-dimensional (3D) space.

    NOTE: There is an updated version of the plug-in (https://imagej.net/SNT).

  3. Analyze neurite length and dendritic claw formation in a blinded manner using Simple Neurite Tracer. Upload single-channel z-stack images of electroporated CGNs onto FIJI, and click on Plugins | Segmentation | Simple Neurite Tracer (Figure 3D).

  4. Access the drop-down menu, and select Create New 3D Viewer (Figure 3D).

  5. Scroll to the base of a dendrite, where it connects to the cell soma and start a path by clicking on the junction. Manually trace the path by clicking through the sections where the cell-fill signal is brightest, pressing [y] to keep the trace. Trace until the end of the dendrite if it does not contain a claw or until the base of the claw and confirm the path by pressing [f] (Figure 4D).

  6. Next, trace the claw by starting a path at the base of the structure and tracing until the end of the longest neurite. Trace secondary and tertiary branches by holding down [ctrl] on Windows or [alt] on a Mac OS and clicking the path. Confirm the path by pressing [f].

  7. Observe that measurements for the traces are visible on a separate window; add up all of the measurements of the claw branches (primary, secondary, tertiary) to obtain the total length for each claw.

  8. For analyzing surface area and cellular volume of electroporated CGNs, download Imaris cell analysis software (https://imaris.oxinst.com/).

    NOTE: FIJI can also be used to reconstruct cells in 3D from z-stack images using readily available and free plug-ins. Additionally, there is a volumetric rendering feature in Simple Neurite Tracer but Imaris was used for the reasons outlined below.

  9. Upload z-stack image of an electroporated CGN onto Imaris. Access the 3D-reconstruction toolkit by pressing Surpass.

  10. To reconstruct the CGN, press Surfaces, and select a region of interest that encompasses the entirety of the cell within the image window. Once finished, press the blue forward arrow at the bottom right corner under Create.

  11. If the image contains multiple channels for different signals, select the channel containing the electroporated CGN, and press the blue forward arrow.

  12. Using the slidebar, set a desired threshold that most accurately fits the signal of the electroporated cell. Zoom in closer to the surface of the cell to accurately determine the threshold. Once finished, press the double green arrow to reconstruct the cell and obtain the surface area and volume size from the metadata.

Figure 3: Immunohistochemical analysis and three-dimensional reconstruction of electroporated granule neurons.

Figure 3:

Open in a new tab

P7 CD-1 mice were electroporated with a construct expressing GFP. Brains were collected and subjected to immunohistochemistry, confocal microscopy, and 3D-reconstruction for morphological analysis. (A) Timeline from electroporation to image processing of a 10-DPI mouse. (B) Maximum projection image of a sagittal cross-section of electroporated cerebellum 10-DPI; white lines demarcate cerebellar layers, and scale bar is 25 μm. (C) Maximum projection image of a single electroporated granule neuron 10-DPI and the corresponding 3D trace, scale bar is 10 μm. (D) 3D-reconstructions were generated using the FIJI plugin Simple Neurite Tracer. All measurements were traced through the z-stack, following the cell-fill signal. Shaft and claw measurements were traced separately for every dendrite; dotted line denotes portion of dendrite within the current plane. Abbreviations: 3D = three-dimensional; GFP = green fluorescent protein; DPI = days post-injection; PSD-95 = postsynaptic density protein 95; GNPs = granule neuron progenitors; PFA = paraformaldehyde.

Figure 4: Analysis of granule neuron morphology during cerebellar development.

Figure 4:

Open in a new tab

(A) Maximum projection images of electroporated CGNs from 3-DPI to 14-DPI (postnatal age P10 to P21), nuclei (blue) and GFP (green); arrowheads indicate individual dendrite, and scale bar is 10 μm. (B) Average number of dendrites. (C) Average dendrite length measured from the base of the soma to the tip of the dendrite. (D) Fraction of dendrites that contain a claw; a value of 1.00 is 100%, i.e., all dendrites have claw. (E) Total length of dendritic claw. N > 30 cells per condition, collected from at least 4 animals per condition; all measurements were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and either a Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (B, C, and D) or a Tukey’s multiple comparison test (E), **** denotes significance with p <0.0001 across time; errors bars are S.E.M. Abbreviations: GFP = green fluorescent protein; DPI = days post-injection; PSD-95 = postsynaptic density protein 95; CGNs = cerebellar granule neurons; ANOVA = analysis of variance; S.E.M. = standard error of the mean.

Representative Results

To study the development of granule neuron morphology in vivo, a construct expressing GFP under the control of a human ubiquitin promoter (FUGW) was electroporated into the developing cerebellum of CD-1 mice and brains collected 3-, 5-, 7-, 10-, and 14-days post-injection (DPI). Sparse labeling of cells by electroporation in combination with confocal microscopy capture snapshots of CGNs during periods of dendritic pruning, growth, and maturation. To quantitatively analyze and track the growth of CGN synaptic structures, each dendrite was traced using the FIJI plugin Simple Neurite Tracer (SNT). SNT is an easy, fast, efficient, and readily available method to measure neurite and claw length in three-dimensional (3D) space. Conversely, Imaris was used for 3D-reconstruction of CGNs to obtain surface area and volume measurements because the program provides fast and accurate rendering of each cell, and its thresholding capabilities are able to isolate labeled cells from nearby labeled cell debris.

Newborn CGNs undergo an exuberant phase of dendritic growth followed by refinement from P10 to P14 (3- to 7-DPI) that results in the pruning of more than 50% of excess dendrites (Figure 4B). This event coincides with the gradual lengthening of the remaining arbors (Figure 4C) and the formation of claw-like structures at the end of each dendrite (Figure 4D), indicating that these developmental processes are happening concurrently. However, while claws are found on roughly 75% of dendrites by P14 (7-DPI), these structures continue to increase in size until P21 (14-DPI) (Figure 4E).

The changes in dendrite and claw morphology could reflect either an overall change in total cell size or a redistribution of cell membrane. To address this question, each labeled granule neuron was reconstructed in Imaris to quantify the total somatodendritic surface area and volume. CGN size remained relatively constant across development (Figure 5A,B), though at P14, CGNs exhibit a significant 20% decrease in volume compared to P10, P12, and P17 (3-, 5-, and 10-DPI) (Figure 5B). These data suggest that membrane recycling from retracted dendrites may be particularly important for permitting the enlargement of dendritic endings into claws and point to P14 (7-DPI) as a key time point in the transition from pruning to synapse development.

Figure 5: Analysis of granule neuron size during cerebellar development.

Figure 5:

Open in a new tab

Electroporated CGNs were reconstructed in Imaris to determine cellular size. (A-B) Surface area and volumetric analysis of granule neurons (i.e., cell soma and dendrites) during cerebellar development. N > 30 cells per condition, collected from at least 4 animals per condition. All measurements were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and a Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, ** denotes significance with p <0.005; errors bars are S.E.M. Abbreviations: DPI = days post-injection; CGNs = cerebellar granule neurons; ANOVA = analysis of variance; S.E.M. = standard error of the mean.

Discussion

Cerebellar granule neurons are the most abundant neurons in the mammalian brain, making up almost 60–70% of the total neuron population in the rodent brain1, 14. The cerebellum has been extensively utilized to elucidate mechanisms of cellular proliferation, migration, dendrite formation, and synapse development6, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. Moreover, decades of electrophysiological studies have helped to establish the role of granule neurons in long-term cerebellar plasticity, which underlies the circuit’s involvement in learned motor behaviors21, 22, 23. Thus, granule neurons are an excellent model system to interrogate key questions regarding synapse and circuit development.

The goal of this study is to highlight a technique that takes advantage of the cerebellum to track the morphology of a single neuron type in vivo. Electroporation of the cerebellum targets dividing cells; thus, it is technically capable of labeling both granule neuron progenitors and glial cells, although because granule neuron progenitors are so numerous, the electroporated population is largely neuronal even without the need for cell-type specific promoters. Additionally, this technique can be adapted to genetically manipulate genes in vivo to study their roles in CGN development. This can be achieved by transfection of a plasmid expressing either short-hairpin or small-interfering RNAs to knock down genes or a plasmid expressing Cre recombinase into a transgenic mouse strain to excise regions flanked by LoxP sites and knock out the intended gene of interest10, 24.

Electroporation has both strengths and weaknesses for genetic studies. It offers a faster method to manipulate genes compared to traditional transgenic strategies, although the spareness of the electroporation limits its utility for behavioral studies, which require large numbers of genetically modified cells to see effects. A second limitation is that it only reliably targets granule neurons between lobules 5 and 7, and this is due, in part, to how the cerebellum is oriented at the site of injection. However, within the electroporated region, this method yields a relatively large number of individually labeled cells, giving the potential for statistically robust measurements. For example, not only was it possible to follow dendrite development over time, but also subtle redistributions of membrane between the dendrites and claws could be measured, extending previously published data20. CGN claws are particularly interesting to study as enlargement of these dendritic structures provides additional real estate for granule neurons to form both excitatory connections with mossy fiber terminals and unipolar brush cells as well as inhibitory connections with nearby Golgi cells. Therefore, combining these dendritic measurements with immunohistochemical labeling of specific pre- and postsynaptic proteins could be useful to advance the study of cerebellar circuit formation and synapse maturation.

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by NIH grants R01NS098804 (A.E.W.), F31NS113394 (U.C.), and Duke University’s Summer Neuroscience Program (D.G.).

Footnotes

A complete version of this article that includes the video component is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/62568.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Altman J, Bayer SA Development of the cerebellar system : in relation to its evolution, structure, and functions. CRC Press; (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rahimi-Balaei M, Bergen H, Kong J, Marzban H Neuronal migration during development of the cerebellum. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 12, 484 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alder J, Cho NK, Hatten ME Embryonic precursor cells from the rhombic lip are specified to a cerebellar granule neuron identity. Neuron. 17 (3), 389–399 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hatten ME, Heintz N Mechanisms of neural patterning and specification in the developing cerebellum. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 18, 385–408 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ben-Arie N et al. Math1 is essential for genesis of cerebellar granule neurons. Nature. 390 (6656), 169–172 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Borghesani PR et al. BDNF stimulates migration of cerebellar granule cells. Development. 129 (6), 1435–1442 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Espinosa JS, Luo L Timing neurogenesis and differentiation: insights from quantitative clonal analyses of cerebellar granule cells. Journal of Neuroscience. 28 (10), 2301–2312 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Markwalter KH, Yang Y, Holy TE, Bonni A Sensorimotor coding of vermal granule neurons in the developing mammalian cerebellum. Journal of Neuroscience. 39 (34), 6626–6643 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shalizi A et al. PIASx is a MEF2 SUMO E3 ligase that promotes postsynaptic dendritic morphogenesis. Journal of Neuroscience. 27 (37), 10037–10046 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shalizi A et al. A Calcium-regulated MEF2 sumoylation switch controls poststynaptic differentiation. Science. 311 (5763), 1012–1017 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Konishi Y, Stegmuller J, Matsuda T, Bonni S, Bonni A Cdh1-APC controls axonal growth and patterning in the mammalian brain. Science. 303 (5660), 1026–1030 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Holubowska A, Mukherjee C, Vadhvani M, Stegmuller J Genetic manipulation of cerebellar granule neurons in vitro and in vivo to study neuronal morphology and migration. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (85), 51070 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yang Y et al. Chromatin remodeling inactivates activity genes and regulates neural coding. Science. 353 (6296), 300–305 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Herculano-Houzel S Coordinated scaling of cortical and cerebellar numbers of neurons. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy. 4, 12 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wilson PM, Fryer RH, Fang Y, Hatten ME Astn2, a novel member of the astrotactin gene family, regulates the trafficking of ASTN1 during glial-guided neuronal migration. Journal of Neuroscience. 30 (25), 8529–8540 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kokubo M et al. BDNF-mediated cerebellar granule cell development is impaired in mice null for CaMKK2 or CaMKIV. Journal of Neuroscience. 29 (28), 8901–8913 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schwartz PM, Borghesani PR, Levy RL, Pomeroy SL, Segal RA Abnormal cerebellar development and foliation in BDNF−/− mice reveals a role for neurotrophins in CNS patterning. Neuron. 19 (2), 269–281 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Segal RA, Pomeroy SL, Stiles CD Axonal growth and fasciculation linked to differential expression of BDNF and NT3 receptors in developing cerebellar granule cells. Journal of Neuroscience. 15 (7 Pt 1), 4970–4981 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhou P et al. Polarized signaling endosomes coordinate BDNF-induced chemotaxis of cerebellar precursors. Neuron. 55 (1), 53–68 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dhar M, Hantman AW, Nishiyama H Developmental pattern and structural factors of dendritic survival in cerebellar granule cells in vivo. Scientific Reports. 8 (1), 17561 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ito M Synaptic plasticity in the cerebellar cortex and its role in motor learning. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. 20 (Suppl 3), S70–74 (1993). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jorntell H, Hansel C Synaptic memories upside down: bidirectional plasticity at cerebellar parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapses. Neuron. 52 (2), 227–238 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nakanishi S Genetic manipulation study of information processing in the cerebellum. Neuroscience. 162 (3), 723–731 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chang CH et al. Atoh1 controls primary cilia formation to allow for SHH-triggered granule neuron progenitor proliferation. Developmental Cell. 48 (2), 184–199 e185 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES