Abstract
Cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Intestinal cancers may arise as a complication of IBD itself, while extra-intestinal cancers may arise due to some of the immunosuppressive therapies used to treat IBD. Colorectal cancer (CRC) and small bowel cancer risks remain elevated among persons with IBD as compared to age-and sex-matched members of the general population, and the lifetime risk of these cancers is strongly correlated to cumulative intestinal inflammatory burden. However, the cumulative risk of cancer, even among those with IBD is still low. Some studies suggest that IBD-CRC incidence has declined over the years, possibly owing to improved treatment standards and improved detection and management of early neoplastic lesions. Across studies of extra-intestinal cancers, there are generally higher incidences of melanoma, hepatobiliary cancer, and lung cancer and no higher incidences of breast cancer or prostate cancer, with equivocal risk of cervical cancer, among persons with IBD. While the relative risks of some extra-intestinal cancers are increased with treatment, the absolute risks of these cancers remain low and the decision to forego treatment in light of these risks should be carefully weighed against the increased risks of intestinal cancers and other disease-related complications with undertreated inflammatory disease. Quality improvement efforts should focus on optimized surveillance of cancers for which surveillance strategies exist (colorectal cancer, hepatobiliary cancer, cervical cancers, and skin cancers) and the development of cost-effective surveillance strategies for less common cancers associated with IBD.
Keywords: Crohn’s Disease, Cancer, Screening, Surveillance, Ulcerative Colitis
Key Points.
Colorectal cancer occurs 1.5–2 times more often in those with IBD than comparable members of the general population and is responsible for as much as 15% of IBD-related deaths.
Colorectal cancer risk is strongly associated with cumulative colorectal mucosal inflammatory burden encompassing IBD duration, extent of colorectal involvement, colitis severity, and frequency/chronicity of active disease.
Extra-intestinal cancers may complicate IBD treatment with chronic immunosuppressive therapies, due to reduced immune surveillance and/or a direct effect of the medications.
Thiopurines have been associated with increased risks of lymphoma and non-melanoma skin cancers. The risks of melanoma and cervical cancer in association with chronic immunosuppressive therapies remain uncertain.
Hepatobiliary cancer risk is significantly higher among those with IBD, particularly among persons with co-morbid primary sclerosing cholangitis. Emerging data also suggest a higher risk of lung cancer among those with IBD.
While the relative risks of certain cancers are increased in those with IBD, the absolute risks of those cancers remain low and should not be a deterrent to effective therapies to treat IBD.
Systematic cancer surveillance strategies currently exist for colorectal cancer, hepatobiliary cancers (if co-morbid primary sclerosing cholangitis), cervical cancers, and skin cancers. Cost-effective surveillance strategies do not currently exist for less common cancers, such as small bowel cancers.
Endoscopic surveillance and management of colorectal neoplasia have evolved considerably over the past 10–15 years, leading to higher rates of endoscopic resection of neoplastic lesions and lower rates of surgery. Surgery is now reserved for very high-risk neoplasia cases.
Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (those arising within three years of a colonoscopy) account for up to 50% of colorectal cancers in persons with IBD, which may be because of inadequate surveillance frequency, suboptimal colonoscopy quality, or altered tumour biology. Regular, high-quality surveillance colonoscopy is important to promote detection and management of neoplastic lesions and reduce the risk of missed cancers.
As people with IBD are living longer, gastroenterologists will experience a higher burden of individuals who develop cancer; this may impact treatment decisions/options. As the evidence accumulates, IBD care providers will need to revise their understanding of the implications of current IBD practice on cancer risk and accordingly modify preventive and treatment strategies across the spectrum of cancers observed in these individuals.
INTRODUCTION
Intestinal and extra-intestinal cancers can arise as complications of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and its treatments, respectively. Cancer is one of the most common causes of death in this population (1,2), and cancer prevention is one of the major goals of IBD management. To-date, the primary focus has been on the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). This focus may largely relate to the historical preponderance of CRC as compared to other cancers in individuals with IBD, which may have resulted from the absence of highly effective treatments for IBD until the early 2000s. Over the past 20 years, multiple classes of effective biologic and targeted therapies that induce mucosal healing have been introduced (3–17), and there have been paradigm shifts in how we use these therapies (see Murthy et al. in this volume). Additionally, improved endoscopic techniques to detect and remove early neoplastic lesions have altered the relative potential for disease-related versus treatment-related cancers. The evidence for the effect of this shift on cancer-related morbidity and mortality may take decades to realize. As the evidence accumulates, gastroenterologists and other IBD care providers will need to revise their understanding of the implications of current IBD practice on cancer risk and accordingly modify preventive and treatment strategies across the spectrum of cancers observed in these individuals. This change will become increasingly important for shared decision-making between providers and persons with IBD. In the present article, we review the epidemiology of cancer in people with IBD, the impact of current treatments on cancer risk, and existing cancer preventive strategies in clinical practice.
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CANCER IN IBD
The risk of some, but not all, cancers are increased among individuals with IBD. The most consistent evidence demonstrates increased risks of: (i) CRC among those with colonic involvement, varying with the extent, severity, and duration of colonic inflammation; (ii) small bowel cancer among those with Crohn’s disease; (iii) lymphoma and non-melanoma skin cancer among those treated with thiopurine medications; and (iv) to some extent, melanoma among those treated with anti Tumor Necrosis Factor (anti-TNF) biologic therapy. Children diagnosed with IBD have also been reported to have increased cancer risk in their adult life.
No increase in cancer risk has been reported with vedolizumab or ustekinumab, or with tofacitinib so far among individuals with IBD, although more data are required as these therapies are relatively recent additions to the IBD armamentarium. In addition, no increased risk of cancer with anti-TNF therapy after an index cancer diagnosis has been demonstrated, suggesting lengthy post-cancer drug holidays are unlikely to be necessary. Importantly, the absolute risk of cancers is small even for the cancers demonstrated to be increased with therapy, which is important information for shared decision-making between providers and persons with IBD.
In the following sections, we outline important studies that have influenced our understanding of the epidemiology of cancer in IBD, focusing on population-based studies (when available), and highlighting important Canadian studies on this topic. A summary of ranges of estimates of risks across studies included in this article is listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Summary of recent studies comparing the risk of cancers in people with and without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). When estimates from multiple studies are reported, data are presented as a range of effect estimates. When estimates come from a single study, they are reported as effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI)
Cancer type | Diagnosis at any age | Pediatric-onset | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Colorectal |
IBD, IRRs: 1.1–1.8 (18–20) OR: 1.78 (1.57, 2.02) (21) HR: 1.95 (1.65, 2.30) (22) CD, IRRs: 1.6–1.7 (18,23) UC, IRRs: 1.6–1.7 (18,23) |
IBD, IRR: 20.29 (17.20, 25.90) (24) | Most studies show statistically significant increased risk among persons with IBD. |
Small intestine |
IBD,
IRR: 7.4 (5.6, 9.8) (20) OR: 6.6 (4.7, 9.4) (21) CD, HR: 19.7 (10.5, 36.7) |
IBD, IRR: 16.2 (3.5, 74.7) (24) | Most studies show statistically significant increased risk among persons with IBD. |
Lymphoma |
IBD, IRRs: 1.4–2.0 (20) CD, IRR: 2.4 (1.8, 3.2) (25) |
IBD, IRR: 3.1 (1.9, 5.1) (24) | Meta-analyses showed statistically significant increased risk among persons with IBD, but many individual population-based studies were varied. |
Melanoma |
IBD, IRRs: 1.2–1.3 (20,26) OR: 0.9 (0.8, 1.1) (21) HR: 1.0 (0.7, 1.5) (27) CD, IRRs 1.4–1.8 (28,29) ORs: 1.1–5.2 (28) UC, IRRs: 1.1–1.2 (28) OR: 0.9 (0.8, 1.1) (28) |
IBD, IRR: 2.1 (1.3, 3.3) (24) | Studies show statistically significant increased risk among individuals with pediatric-onset IBD. |
Non-melanoma skin cancer |
IBD, IRRs: 1.5–1.6 (26,30) OR: 1.03 (0.97, 1.10) (21) CD, IRR: 2.3 (1.4, 3.8) (25) UC, IRR: 1.4 (1.1, 1.7) (25) |
IBD, IRR: 3.6 (2.0, 6.7) (24) | Most studies have shown a modest association of IBD with melanoma. |
Cervical |
IBD, OR: 0.7 (0.6, 0.8) (21) CD, IRRs: 1.3–1.6 (20,25,31) UC, IRRs: 0.6–1.0 (20,25) |
Inconsistent increased risk of cervical cancer. | |
Hepatobiliary |
IBD, IRR: 2.5 (1.8, 3.5) (20) OR: 7.4 (5.6, 9.8) (21) CD, IRRs: 1.8–5.2 (32) UC, IRRs: 0.7–5.6 (32–34) |
IBD, IRR: 55.5 (19.6, 157.0) (24) | Most studies show statistically significant increased risk among persons with IBD. |
Lung |
IBD, OR: 4.0 (3.5, 4.6) (21) CD, IRRs: 1.5–1.8 (20,25,33) UC, IRR: 0.4 (0.2, 0.7) (33) |
Studies generally show statistically significant increased risk among persons with Crohn’s disease but not ulcerative colitis. | |
Breast | IBD, IRR: 1.0 (0.9, 1.2) (20) OR: 0.7 (0.6, 0.8) (21) | Studies generally show no association between IBD and breast cancer. | |
Prostate | IBD, IRR: 1.0 (0.9, 1.2) (20) OR: 0.6 (0.6, 0.7) (21) | Studies generally show no association between IBD and risk of prostate cancer. |
Abbreviations: CD, Crohn’s disease; UC, ulcerative colitis.
Intestinal Cancers
Intestinal cancers arise in people with IBD as a result of cumulative carcinogenic DNA damage from chronic or recurrent bouts of bowel inflammation (35–38). Due to the high rate of colonic involvement in IBD (100% in ulcerative colitis, 70% in Crohn’s disease), CRC accounts for more than 95% of gastrointestinal tract malignancies in IBD and up to 15% of IBD-related deaths (2,39). Recognized disease-specific risk factors for CRC in those with IBD include longer disease duration (18,40–44), more extensive colorectal involvement (18,45), more severe colorectal inflammation (46–49), pseudopolyps (47) and chronic mucosal scarring (50), all of which are markers of cumulative colorectal inflammatory burden, which is now thought to be the most important factor overall (51,52). Other important CRC risk factors in persons with IBD include personal history of colorectal neoplasia (53,54), family history of CRC in a first-degree relative (55,56), and co-morbid primary sclerosing cholangitis (57). A normal colonoscopy (no inflammatory or neoplastic changes), particularly consecutive normal colonoscopies, is associated with a reduced risk of future advanced CRC (50,58).
Most population-based studies have reported CRC risk to be elevated among persons with IBD as compared to age- and sex-similar persons without IBD (18,20,21,23,59). A meta-analysis of population-based studies up to 2009 reported a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 1.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2, 2.2) for CRC among persons with IBD relative to the general population, which was similar across Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (18). High-risk groups were individuals with extensive colitis (SIR: 6.4; 95% CI: 2.4, 17.5) and diagnosis with IBD <30 years old (SIR: 7.2; 95% CI: 2.9, 17.8). Cumulative risks of CRC in this study were 1% and 2% after 10 and 20 years, respectively.
Since then, multiple population-based studies of CRC risk in IBD have been reported. A study from Northern California conducted between 1998 and 2010, based on the Kaiser Permanente database, reported SIRs for CRC among persons with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis of 1.6 (Crohn’s disease, 95% CI: 1.2, 2.0; ulcerative colitis, 95% CI: 1.3, 3.0) (23). Conversely, adjusting for age, sex and calendar time, a nationwide study from Denmark did not find an increased CRC risk in their IBD population as compared to non-IBD members from the general population (SIR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.95, 1.21) and actually reported a lower CRC risk in their IBD population by 1999–2008 (SIR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.80) (42). Unique characteristics of their cohort, including a high propensity for early colectomy, may have influenced their findings. Recent population-based studies from Canada have reported similarly increased risk for CRC among persons with IBD, as compared to age- and sex-matched controls without IBD (Ontario 2017–2020, SIR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.64, 1.95 (20); Alberta 2002–2018, OR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.57, 2.02 (21); Manitoba 1987–2012 (cases also matched to controls by area of residence, and analysis adjusted for prior history of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy, frequency of healthcare visits, and socioeconomic status), adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.95; 95% CI: 1.65, 2.30) (60). A meta-analysis of three population-based studies reported a pooled rate ratio (RR) of 20.29 for CRC (95% CI: 15.90, 25.90) among persons with pediatric-onset IBD as compared to similar persons without IBD; the higher relative risk in this study may relate to a low baseline CRC risk in a younger population as well as longer IBD duration in many individuals (24).
Several population-based studies have further reported a significant decline in CRC incidence over time among persons with IBD (20,42), although others have not (23,40,60). A meta-analysis of population-based studies conducted before 2009 reported a pooled CRC incidence of 2% by 20 years of disease (18), which is considerably lower than the earlier reported CRC incidence of 8% at 20 years across population-based and referral centre studies (44). A Danish national study reported a declining SIR for CRC in their IBD population between 1978 and 2008 (42). Conversely, a study from Northern California reported stable CRC incidence in their IBD cohort between 1998 and 2010 (23). A recent population-based study from Ontario reported that CRC incidence steadily declined between 1994 and 2020 among persons with ulcerative colitis (average annual percentage change [AAPC]: −1.95; 95% CI: −2.59, −1.30) but not among persons with Crohn’s disease (AAPC: −1.04; 95 % CI: −2.91, −0.87) (20). Notably, CRC incidence similarly declined among persons without IBD during this period, and the CRC RR in persons with IBD as compared to age- and sex-matched persons without IBD during the 2017–2020 period was similar to what has been reported in earlier studies, suggesting that factors unrelated to IBD treatment may have led to the observed decline.
CRC-related mortality has also been reported to be higher among persons with IBD across studies. The aHR for mortality among persons with IBD in a population-based study from Manitoba was 2.15 (95% CI: 1.60, 2.89) (60). Similarly, a study from Northern California between 1998 and 2008 reported standardized mortality ratios for CRC of 2.3 (95% CI: 1.6, 3.0) in individuals with Crohn’s disease and 2.0 (95% CI: 1.3, 2.7) among individuals with ulcerative colitis (23). A Danish medical registry study reported 5-year adjusted mortality RRs for persons with Crohn’s disease of 1.26 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.49) and ulcerative colitis of 1.14 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.27) (61). IBD was an independent risk factor for death after CRC diagnosis in studies from Japan (62) and Manitoba (63). CRC-related mortality was reported to have declined several-fold among persons with IBD between 1960 and 2004 in a population-based study from Sweden (40). Conversely, the study from Manitoba reported no decline in the aHR for CRC-related death between 1987–1993 and 2002–2012 periods in persons with IBD as compared to persons without IBD, matched by age, sex, and area of residence (60).
Small bowel carcinomas account for 1% to 5% of all gastrointestinal tract cancers in persons with Crohn’s disease and have been historically reported to occur at a 20–30-fold higher rate as compared to persons without IBD (64,65). A recent population-based study from Manitoba reported a hazard ratio (HR) for small bowel cancer of 19.7 (95% CI: 10.5, 36.7) among persons with Crohn’s disease, which was lower for those above 65 years of age (HR: 8.41; 95% CI: 3.05, 23.2) than among younger individuals (age <50, HR: 44.5; 95% CI: 9.88, 200; 50–64 HR: 30.3; 95% CI:10.0, 91.7), and highest for ileal adenocarcinoma (HR: 125.7; 95% CI: 16.6, 950.7). Estimates from Ontario (2017–2020) (20) and Alberta (2002–2018) (21) have reported RRs for small bowel cancer among persons with IBD of 7.39 (95% CI: 5.58, 9.79) and 6.59 (95% CI: 4.65, 9.35), respectively, as compared to matched controls. Among persons with pediatric-onset IBD, a meta-analysis of population-based studies reported a pooled RR of 16.20 (95% CI: 3.52, 74.66) for small bowel cancers. Importantly, the high relative rate for small bowel cancers may largely be due to the low baseline rate of small bowel cancers in the general population; similar to other cancers observed more frequently among persons with IBD, the absolute incidence of these cancers remains low.
Summary of Intestinal Cancer Epidemiology
CRC incidence continues to be 1.5–2 times higher among persons with IBD as compared to age- and sex-matched members of the general population; a risk ratio that has not appreciably changed over time. This ratio suggests that the observed downward trend in absolute CRC incidence in persons with IBD over the past three decades in several studies may be more related to changing genetic and/or environmental risk factors as opposed to changes in IBD treatment. Increased uptake of colonoscopy screening in society may have played a role in declining CRC risk over time. CRC-related mortality also remains roughly two times higher among persons with IBD as compared to persons without IBD who develop CRC suggesting either more aggressive tumour biology; a higher rate of advanced, incurable cancers at diagnosis among persons with IBD; or a direct effect of increased CRC incidence. Persons with IBD remain at substantially higher risk of developing small bowel cancer as compared to their non-IBD counterparts, likely due to greater difficulty in managing small bowel inflammation and the absence of screening strategies for detecting early small bowel neoplasms. However, the absolute risk of small bowel cancer remains exceedingly low; overall, intestinal cancer risk is likely to always be dominated by CRC risk. Strategies aimed at reducing the CRC potential of IBD, and at improving identification of individuals at higher risk of developing CRC to prioritize colonoscopy or surgery, will be required to attenuate the difference in CRC risk between persons with and without IBD.
Extra-Intestinal Cancers
Extra-intestinal cancers in persons with IBD may arise as a result of reduced immune surveillance in the setting of chronic immunosuppressive therapy or as a direct effect of such therapies. Thiopurines, for example, are photosensitizers and lead to development of mutagenic reactive oxygen species (66). The most commonly reported extra-intestinal cancers in those with IBD are lymphoma, melanoma, non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC), cervical cancer, and hepatobiliary cancers (67). In a recent meta-analysis of 15 studies, the overall risk of extra-intestinal cancers was found to be increased in persons with Crohn’s disease (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.26, 1.63) and ulcerative colitis (IRR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02,1.31) (25).
Lymphoma
Many population-based studies have not shown an overall association between IBD and lymphoma risk (68–70). However, a recent meta-analysis of 15 population-based studies reported an increased risk of hematologic malignancies among persons with Crohn’s disease (IRR, 2.40; 95% CI: 1.81, 3.18). A meta-analysis of three population-based studies further reported an increased risk for lymphoid cancer among persons with pediatric-onset IBD (pooled RR: 3.10; 95% CI: 1.88, 5.10) (24).
Thiopurine use (azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine) in persons with IBD has been consistently associated with an increased risk of lymphoma (71–73). In a recent meta-analysis of studies comparing persons with IBD receiving thiopurines to members of the general population, the SIR for lymphoma was 4.92 (95% CI: 3.10, 7.78), ranging from 2.80 (95% CI: 1.82, 4.32) in eight population studies to 9.24 (95% CI: 4.69, 18.2) in 10 referral studies (71). Population-based studies demonstrated an increased risk among current thiopurine users (SIR: 5.71; 95% CI: 3.72, 10.1) but no increased risk among former users (SIR: 1.42; 95% CI: 0.86, 2.34). The magnitude of risk only became significant after one year of cumulative exposure. Persons younger than 30 years of age had the highest relative risk (SIR: 6.99; 95% CI: 2.99, 16.4), whereas the absolute risk was highest in persons older than 50 years (28.24 cases per 10,000 PY, with a relative risk of 4.78). Males carried a greater lymphoma risk than females (males, SIR: 4.50; 95% CI: 3.71, 5.40; females, SIR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.69, 3.05).
A more recent French nationwide study of 189,289 adults with IBD followed for a median of 6.7 years reported a 2–3-fold higher risk of lymphoma in association with thiopurine (aHR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.96, 3.44) and anti-TNF (aHR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.60, 3.64) monotherapy, and a synergistic effect with combination therapy (aHR: 6.11; 95% CI: 3.46, 10.8). The aHR among those receiving combination therapy was 2.35 (95% CI: 1.31, 4.22) compared to thiopurine monotherapy and 2.53 (aHR: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.35, 4.77) compared to anti-TNF monotherapy (74). Notably, other studies have not found an independent association between anti-TNF therapy and lymphoma risk (75–77). To-date, there is no data supporting an increased lymphoma risk with other classes of biologic therapy.
Across Ontario (2017–2020), the SIR for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin’s lymphoma among persons with IBD, relative to age- and sex-matched controls, was found to be 1.43 (95% CI: 1.23, 1.65) and 1.95 (95% CI: 1.00, 3.81), respectively (20). For NHL, this risk increased over a 25-year period (AAPC: 2.26; 95% CI: 0.924, 3.62), whereas it remained unchanged in the general population (AAPC: −0.071; 95% CI: −0.486, 0.346). Across Alberta (2002–2018), the OR for hematologic malignancies was 1.37 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.56) for persons with IBD relative to age- and sex-matched controls (21). To what extent the higher rates of lymphoma in these populations were driven by immunosuppressive therapies is being actively investigated.
Furthermore, research with the DEVELOP registry has demonstrated a clear association between thiopurine use (but not biologic monotherapy) and lymphoma risk in children with IBD (78). While most thiopurine-related lymphomas are Epstein-Barr virus-associated B-cell lymphomas (72), young males have also been reported to develop fatal early post-mononucleosis B-cell lymphomas (if they are seronegative for Epstein-Barr virus prior to initiating thiopurine therapy) (72) and hepatosplenic T-cell lymphomas (γδ variant) following exposure to thiopurines (79).
Melanoma
Multiple studies have demonstrated a modest association of IBD with melanoma, although the impact of medical therapies on melanoma risk remains uncertain. A meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies between 1940 and 2009, comprising 172,837 persons with IBD, reported an increased risk of melanoma among persons with Crohn’s disease (seven studies, IRR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.17, 2.75) and ulcerative colitis (seven studies, IRR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.50) (28). The pooled incidence rate of melanoma was 27.5 per 100,000 PY (95% CI: 19.9, 37.0). A meta-analysis of four population-based cohorts reported a pooled IRR of 1.14 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.42) among persons with ulcerative colitis and 1.52 (95% C: 1.03, 2.23) among persons with Crohn’s disease (25). A meta-analysis of three population-based studies among persons with pediatric-onset IBD reported a pooled RR of melanoma of 2.05 (95% CI: 1.27, 3.29) (24).
A U.S. administrative claims database study comparing 108,579 people with IBD to matched controls without IBD between 1997–2009, similarly reported an IRR of 1.29 for melanoma among those with IBD (95% CI: 1.09, 1.53) (26). A nationwide Danish cohort registry study further reported an increased risk of melanoma among 13,756 people with Crohn’s disease between 1978 and 2010 (SIR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.0, 1.9) (29). Notably, more recent Canadian population-based studies have not reported an increased risk of melanoma among persons with IBD as compared to age- and sex-matched controls (Ontario [2017–2020], SIR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.857, 1.77 (20); Alberta [2008–2018], OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.75, 1.07 (21); Manitoba [1986–2018], HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.71, 1.53 (27)).
Most studies have not supported an increased risk of melanoma in association with thiopurine therapy (26,80,81). A meta-analysis of 13 studies in 149,198 persons with IBD reported a non-significant RR of 1.22 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.65) for melanoma in association with thiopurine use. However, several studies have demonstrated a slightly higher risk of melanoma in association with anti-TNF biologic therapy (26,27,82). A nested case–control study of a large IBD cohort based on U.S. claims data reported an increased odds of melanoma in users of biologic therapy of 1.88 (95% CI: 1.08, 3.29). However, a meta-analysis of eight cohort studies among 51,231 persons with IBD did not find a significant association between anti-TNF therapies and melanoma risk (83). A population-based study from Quebec also did not find an association between anti-TNF therapy and melanoma risk (84).
Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer
NMSC, mainly basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), are typically non-fatal cancers that are strongly linked to sun exposure. Studies using U.S. administrative health insurance claims data have reported a higher incidence of NMSC among persons with IBD compared with matched controls (IRR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.51, 1.78 (85); IRR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.40, 1.53 (26)). A recent population-based study from Manitoba also reported that the risks of BCC (HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.37, 1.70) and SCC (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.29, 2.01) were significantly increased in persons with IBD, except for SCC in ulcerative colitis (27). However, this study also reported an increased risk of BCC predating ulcerative colitis diagnosis (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.60). A meta-analysis of 15 population-based studies reported IRR of 1.36 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.71) and 2.28 (95% CI: 1.36, 3.81) in persons with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, respectively (25). A meta-analysis of three population-based studies in persons with pediatric-onset IBD reported a pooled RR of NMSC of 3.62 (95% CI: 1.97, 6.66) (24).
Most studies have reported an increased risk of NMSC in association with thiopurine therapies (26,27,81,84,85). A meta-analysis of 13 studies comprising 149,198 individuals with IBD reported an excess risk of NMSC associated with thiopurine use (RR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.48, 2.38). Deaths due to NMSC predominantly occur among individuals who continue thiopurines after NMSC diagnosis (86). The risk of NMSC with anti-TNF therapies remains unclear: Some studies have reported a marginally increased risk (27,82,85), while other studies have not (26,84).
Cervical Cancer
Studies describing the risk of cervical neoplasia in people with IBD have shown conflicting results, with some reporting increased risk (87–91), some reporting lower risk (21,59, 92–94), and others reporting no association (20,95). A Danish nationwide cohort study of women diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (n = 18,691) or Crohn’s disease (n = 8,717) between 1979 and 2011, matched to 1,508,334 women from the general population, reported that women with ulcerative colitis had increased risks of low-grade (IRR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.32) and high-grade (IRR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.25) squamous intraepithelial lesions, and women with Crohn’s disease had increased risks of low-grade SIL (IRR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.48), high-grade SIL (IRR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.13, 1.45) and cervical cancer (IRR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.27), compared with controls (91). However, a meta-analysis of three population-based studies reported no higher risk of cervical cancer among women with ulcerative colitis (IRR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.60, 1.51) or Crohn’s disease (IRR: 1.58; 95% CI: 0.90, 2.77) (25). Notably, most studies have not adjusted for differences in cervical cancer screening rates.
A population-based study from Ontario (2017–2020) reported no increased risk of cervical cancer among persons with Crohn’s disease (SIR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.829, 1.87) and a decreased risk of cervical cancer in persons with ulcerative colitis (SIR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.99) (20). A population-based study from Alberta (2002–2018) showed a decreased odds of cervical cancer among those with IBD (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.77) (21). An earlier population-based study from Manitoba reported no association between cervical abnormalities and ulcerative colitis (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.77, 1.38), and only showed an increase in risk in women with Crohn’s disease if they were exposed to 10 or more prescriptions of oral contraceptives (OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.54); this study adjusted for cervical cancer screening in the preceding five years (95).
In the Manitoba study, combined exposure to corticosteroids and immunosuppressants was associated with increased risk of cervical abnormalities (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.81) (95). A meta-analysis of eight studies comprising 77,116 individuals with IBD receiving immunosuppression further reported a 1.3-fold higher risk of cervical high-grade dysplasia among women with IBD as compared to healthy controls (OR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.23, 1.46) (96). Furthermore, a Danish cohort study of 341,758 individuals with autoimmune diseases reported an increased risk of cervical cancer among those who had received a high cumulative dose of azathioprine (HR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.2, 3.9) (97). The association between biologics and cervical neoplasia in people with IBD has not been extensively studied. One small study did not observe any cervical cancer cases among people exposed to anti-TNF therapy (94). Further research is required in this area.
Hepatobiliary Cancers
Hepatobiliary cancers in people with IBD are more likely to occur as a complication of co-morbid liver or biliary disease—particularly primary sclerosing cholangitis—than as a complication of IBD itself or its treatments. A population-based study from Manitoba reported a higher incidence of hepatobiliary cancers in both Crohn’s disease (IRR: 5.22; 95% CI: 0.96, 28.5) and ulcerative colitis (IRR: 3.96; 95% CI: 1.05, 14.9) (59). However, a subsequent meta-analysis of eight population-based cohort studies comprising 17,052 individuals with IBD reported an increased risk of hepatobiliary cancers only among persons with ulcerative colitis (SIR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.58, 4.22) (33). A Swedish national study also reported strong associations between bile duct cancers and ulcerative colitis (SIR: 5.6; 95% CI: 3.6, 8.4) (34).
A more recent meta-analysis of population-based studies reported pooled RRs of close to 3-fold for biliary tract cancers across three studies (ulcerative colitis, IRR: 2.93; 95% CI: 1.73, 4.96; Crohn’s disease, IRR: 2.93; 95% CI: 1.16, 7.41), but no increased risk of liver cancer across six studies (ulcerative colitis, IRR: 1.41; 95% CI: 0.99, 2.01; Crohn’s disease, IRR: 1.81; 95% CI: 0.88, 3.75). Strikingly, a meta-analysis of three population-based cohort studies in persons with pediatric-onset IBD reported a pooled RR of 55.45 (95% CI: 19.59, 156.99) for biliary tract cancers. Again, this heightened risk may largely relate to a lower baseline risk of biliary tract cancers in a younger population.
A recent population-based study from Ontario (2017–2020) reported a 2.5-fold increased risk of hepatobiliary cancers (SIR: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.84, 3.47) (20), which was similar in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, while a population-based study from Alberta reported a 7.4-fold increased risk (OR: 7.41; 95% CI: 5.58, 9.84) (21). There are no data on the risk of hepatobiliary cancers with biologic or other therapies in IBD.
Other Cancers
An earlier meta-analysis of population-based studies reported a higher incidence of lung cancer (SIR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.18, 2.81) and bladder cancer (SIR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.14, 3.63) among people with Crohn’s disease, and a lower incidence of lung cancer (SIR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.74) among people with ulcerative colitis—as compared to persons without IBD (33). A more recent meta-analysis of 15 population-based studies reported a slightly higher risk of lung cancer in persons with Crohn’s disease (IRR: 1.53; 95 % CI: 1.23, 1.91), but otherwise no increased risks of lung cancer in persons with ulcerative colitis or of breast, prostate, or urogenital cancers in persons with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis.
In a recent population-based study from Ontario, a weak association was observed between Crohn’s disease and lung cancer (SIR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.37, 1.96), but no association was observed between IBD and either breast cancer (SIR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.93, 1.15) or prostate cancer (SIR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.88, 1.19) (20). Across Alberta, people with IBD showed a 4-fold higher odds of lung cancer (OR: 4.01; 95% CI: 3.46, 4.64), but slightly lower odds of breast cancer (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.81) and prostate cancer (OR: 0.64; 95% CI; 0.57, 0.73), relative to age- and-sex-matched controls (21). They also reported substantially higher odds of pancreas (OR: 7.79; 95% CI: 5.53, 10.97), kidney (OR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.66, 2.52), and neurologic (OR: 4.58; 95% CI: 2.97, 7.04) cancers, but lower odds of bladder (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.87) and endometrial (OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.66) cancers.
Summary of Extra-Intestinal Cancer Epidemiology
Overall, the risks of extra-intestinal cancers appear to be higher among persons with IBD as compared to persons without IBD, which may be partly driven by chronic systemic inflammation and/or by the immunosuppressive therapies used to treat IBD. Whether individuals with IBD also have increased genetic susceptibility to these cancers remains unknown. Clear signals for increased cancer risks among persons with IBD exist for lymphoma and NMSC (primarily in association with thiopurine therapy), hepatobiliary cancers (mainly in association with co-morbid primary sclerosing cholangitis), and lung cancer. However, the risks of other extra-intestinal cancers have been variable across studies and require further elucidation. A multi-provincial Canadian population-based study aims to investigate the association between anti-TNF and thiopurine therapies and cancer risks in the IBD population. Of particular concern is the potential risk of fatal lymphomas in association with thiopurine therapies in young males. Until more data are available, practitioners should limit excess thiopurine exposure for people with IBD, particularly the elderly and young males, and to maintain vigilance in minimizing the risk of extra-intestinal cancers, such as through following appropriate screening measures and monitoring for early signs of cancer occurrence.
CANCER PREVENTION IN IBD
Screening for CRC
Prevention of CRC and CRC-related death have long been important goals in the management of IBD. Historical reports of widespread DNA damage in chronically inflamed colorectal mucosa (i.e., field cancerization) (35–37), a propensity towards irregular and indistinct growth patterns of colorectal neoplasia that could evade detection during colonoscopy (98–100), and high rates of missed CRC during colonoscopy (101–110), in conjunction with epidemiologic evidence of increased CRC incidence above the background risk beyond the first decade of disease among people with colonic IBD (18,43,44), have led to societal recommendations for lifelong intensive colonoscopy surveillance in persons with IBD affecting the colorectum, beginning at 8–10 years following disease diagnosis (111–115). Surveillance intervals of 1–5 years are now recommended for most people with colorectal IBD, guided by established CRC risk factors (116). A detailed summary of colonoscopy surveillance recommendations across multiple societies is provided in a review by Shah and Itzkowitz (117). While there is limited direct evidence of the utility of colonoscopy surveillance, the observed reduction in CRC incidence among people with IBD over time in some studies could, at least partly, be attributed to improved surveillance standards, with increased recognition and treatment of early colorectal neoplasia.
Updated guidance favours endoscopic management of all colorectal neoplasia with clearly delineated borders and without advanced features suggestive of invasive cancer or submucosal fibrosis, as well as continued endoscopic surveillance, as opposed to surgery, for individuals without high-risk neoplastic findings (multi-focal invisible dysplasia, invisible high-grade dysplasia, unresectable colorectal neoplasia) or difficult to surveille colons (116,118). Referral to an advanced endoscopist or a specialized centre for advanced endoscopic approaches is recommended for individuals with poorly delineated, invisible, or difficult-to-resect lesions prior to considering definitive surgery (116). Dye-spray chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy techniques are being increasingly advocated as primary screening and surveillance adjuncts to high-definition colonoscopy (116,119,120). While taking extensive non-targeted biopsies has been an adjunct to colonoscopy surveillance in IBD for many years, its utility for routine screening and surveillance is being increasingly questioned due to its low yield for detecting neoplasia and increasing evidence that most colorectal neoplasias are visible with modern endoscope technology (116,118,121).
Importantly, several studies have demonstrated high rates of post-colonoscopy CRC (CRC diagnosed within three years following a colonoscopy) among persons with IBD, ranging between 25% and 50% of all CRC diagnosed in this population across studies (63,122–124). To what extent these findings are due to altered biology of CRC in IBD versus missed colorectal neoplasms during colonoscopy is unknown. These findings highlight the importance of careful inspection during colonoscopy under optimized conditions for neoplasia detection and of appropriate management of identified neoplastic lesions by specialists who are trained to do so (116). It further highlights the importance of intensive colonoscopy surveillance in those with higher risk, and the need for non-invasive tests to detect CRC and CRC precursors in people with IBD.
There are inconsistent data regarding the chemopreventive benefits of IBD therapies, including 5-aminosalicylate acids therapies (125–127) and thiopurines (128–131). Thus, no firm recommendations exist for the use of these agents solely for the purposes of CRC prevention.
Screening for Small Bowel Cancer
There are no screening or surveillance recommendations for small bowel cancers in IBD due to the lower incidence as compared to CRC and perceived cost-ineffectiveness of routine screening (2,64). Fortunately, most small bowel cancer in Crohn’s disease occurs in the distal terminal ileum, which should be routinely inspected during colonoscopy performed for any reason in those with Crohn’s disease, offering some opportunity for small bowel surveillance (132).
Screening for Hepatobiliary Cancer
The American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) recommends screening for biliary tract and gall bladder cancers in the setting of co-morbid primary sclerosing cholangitis and IBD with ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography along with CA19-9 measurement every six months (133). Prophylactic cholecystectomy is further recommended for gallbladder polyps larger than eight mm to prevent the development of gallbladder cancer (133). The impact of these strategies on hepatobiliary cancer-associated mortality remains unknown.
Screening for Cervical Cancer
While it is unclear whether IBD or its treatments are truly associated with an increased risk of cervical cancer, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (134), ACG (135), and an expert panel (136) have recommended annual cervical cancer screening with Papanicolaou (Pap) tests for females with IBD receiving chronic immunosuppressive therapy. At a minimum, females with IBD should remain up to date with cervical cancer screening recommended for females in the general population. Traditionally rates of Pap testing have been lower among females with IBD on immunosuppressants (137). Being vaccinated against HPV (human papilloma virus) is recommended as per general population guidelines (135).
Screening for Skin Cancer
The ACG recommends that all persons with IBD undergo regular skin surveillance for NMSC if they are receiving thiopurine therapy, particularly if they are over the age of 50, as well as regular skin surveillance for melanoma, irrespective of receipt of immunosuppressive therapy (135). They further recommend that all individuals initiating or already taking chronic immunosuppressive therapy to be evaluated by a dermatologist, to tailor further evaluations based on individual risk, in addition to performing regular self-examinations, and also use sunscreen that is protective against UVA and UVB (ultraviolet A and B) light in addition to wearing sun protective clothing (135).
Summary of Cancer Screening Recommendations in IBD
At present, cancer screening recommendations in persons with IBD are best established for CRC and for biliary cancers in persons with co-morbid CRC, whereas guidance for other cancer screening is limited. It is reasonable for individuals with IBD, particularly those receiving chronic immunosuppressive therapy, to undergo regular skin exams and Pap testing with their family physician. The role of routine screening for small bowel cancers and lung cancers, as well as for other internal cancers, must weigh the benefits of screening against the risks and costs and should be individualized. Formal screening recommendations for these and other rare cancers in persons with IBD need to be developed. A summary of existing screening recommendations for IBD-relevant cancers is provided in Table 2.
Table 2.
Summary of available surveillance strategies for intestinal and extra-intestinal cancers in persons with IBD
Cancer type | Surveillance method | Surveillance frequency |
---|---|---|
Colorectal | Colonoscopy | 1–5 years, based on risk factors (116,117) |
Skin Cancers | Skin exam | Annual if receiving thiopurine therapy (135) |
Hepatobiliary | Ultrasound or MRCP, along with CA19-9 measurement | Every six months (133) |
Cervical | Papanicolaou test | Annual if receiving immunosuppressive therapy; otherwise maintain up-to-date with screening (134–136) |
BIOLOGIC/IMMUNOMODULATOR USE AFTER MALIGNANCY DIAGNOSIS
Data are limited on the use of immunosuppressive therapies after a cancer diagnosis. Immunomodulators are currently not recommended within 2–5 years after a cancer diagnosis (138). Mounting evidence from large retrospective studies shows no increased risk of relapse (or new cancer) with anti-TNF therapies or thiopurines (138–142), nor with vedolizumab or ustekinumab (143–145). Ongoing use of biologics and/or immunomodulators after malignancy should be individualized based on the type of cancer and type of immunosuppression and should be a shared decision in consultation with the treating oncologist and/or surgeon.
KNOWLEDGE GAPS AND FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS
Research in large cohorts with long-term follow-up is required to better understand cancer risks faced by those with IBD, particularly in relation to different classes of existing and emerging immunosuppressive therapies. Individual risk factors for treatment-related cancers need to be elucidated. Additionally, cancer risk from IBD itself needs to be distinguished from that related to IBD treatments.
A clearer understanding of the importance and optimal methods of cancer screening and prevention is needed. Better defined and more widely available screening and surveillance methods are required for extra-intestinal cancers. Cost-effective screening and surveillance methods are also needed for cancers that are not as easily identifiable in their early stages.
Better risk stratification tools to optimize colonoscopy delivery are also required to improve colorectal neoplasia detection in high-risk individuals and defer unnecessary colonoscopy in low-risk individuals.
A better understanding of the reasons underlying the high rate of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers and methods to reduce this occurrence is required.
PATIENT AND CAREGIVER PARTNER PERSPECTIVE
While the risk of developing cancer in persons living with IBD is small, there is still an increased risk of certain cancers that individuals with IBD need to be aware of. The risk of cancer can be associated with the disease itself or the medications used to treat IBD. Even though the prospect of being at a greater risk for cancer development can be worrying for some, patient partners welcome conversations with multidisciplinary providers regarding risk factors and recommended screening for cancers. Receiving this information can facilitate self-advocacy and informed, shared decision making about treatment options and disease management. Patient partners stressed the importance of cancer screening and surveillance to decrease the risk of cancer development or discovering the cancer in its early stages.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS AND KEY ADVOCACY OUTCOMES
Individuals with IBD receiving immunosuppressive therapies (especially thiopurines and anti-TNF therapies) should receive regular screening and surveillance for potential treatment-related cancers where screening protocols exist.
Lifelong excellent control of bowel inflammation is important to reduce colorectal cancer risk; physicians should have access to the best treatment to control inflammatory burden as required.
Beyond treating the underlying IBD, careful high-quality colonoscopy examinations remain the best strategy for CRC prevention and should be available to all individuals with colorectal IBD.
Research should be encouraged and funded to develop non-invasive markers of neoplasia in IBD.
Shared decision-making should inform treatment choices and cancer risks for IBD, weighing the risks of untreated inflammatory disease against the small, but potentially serious, risks of extra-intestinal cancers with immunosuppressive therapies. The difference between the absolute risks and relative risks of various cancers should be highlighted during these discussions.
For individuals with IBD who develop cancer, regular communication between gastroenterologists and oncologists should be encouraged to optimize management.
SUPPLEMENT SPONSORSHIP
This article appears as part of the supplement “The Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada in 2023”, sponsored by Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, and supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project Scheme Operating Grant (Reference number PJT-162393).
Contributor Information
Sanjay K Murthy, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital IBD Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
M Ellen Kuenzig, SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joseph W Windsor, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Priscilla Matthews, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Parul Tandon, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eric I Benchimol, SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Charles N Bernstein, Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; IBD Clinical and Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Alain Bitton, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre IBD Centre, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Stephanie Coward, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jennifer L Jones, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Health, and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Gilaad G Kaplan, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kate Lee, Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laura E Targownik, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Juan-Nicolás Peña-Sánchez, Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Noelle Rohatinsky, College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Sara Ghandeharian, Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Saketh Meka, Department of Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Roxana S Chis, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sarang Gupta, Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eric Cheah, Department of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, The Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Tal Davis, SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jake Weinstein, SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
James H B Im, SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Quinn Goddard, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Julia Gorospe, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jennifer Loschiavo, Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kaitlyn McQuaid, Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joseph D’Addario, Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ken Silver, Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robyn Oppenheim, Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Harminder Singh, Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; IBD Clinical and Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
FUNDING
Funding for this report was supported by AbbVie Corporation, Janssen Canada, Pfizer Canada, Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, Amgen Canada, and Takeda. None of the funders influenced the content of the report.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Sanjay Murthy has previously participated in advisory board meetings for AbbVie, Janssen, Takeda, Pfizer, Shire and Ferring and as a speaker at educational events sponsored by Janssen, AbbVie and Pfizer. Ellen Kuenzig is a member of the Scientific and Medical Advisory Council of Crohn’s and Colitis Canada. Eric Benchimol holds the Northbridge Financial Corporation Chair in Inflammatory Bowel Disease, a joint Hospital-University Chair between the University of Toronto, The Hospital for Sick Children, and the SickKids Foundation. He has acted as a consultant for the Dairy Farmers of Ontario and McKesson Canada for matters unrelated to medications used to treat inflammatory bowel disease. He is Past Chair of the Scientific and Medical Advisory Council of Crohn’s and Colitis Canada and Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (JCAG). Charles Bernstein is supported in part by the Bingham Chair in Gastroenterology. He is on Advisory Boards for AbbVie Canada, Amgen Canada, Bristol Myers Squibb, JAMP Pharmaceuticals, Lilly Canada, Janssen Canada, Pfizer Canada, Roche Canada, Sandoz Canada, Takeda Canada. He is a Consultant for Mylan Pharmaceuticals and Takeda. He has received educational grants from AbbVie Canada, Pfizer Canada, Takeda Canada, Janssen Canada, and Bristol Myers Squibb Canada. He is on the speaker’s panel for AbbVie Canada, Janssen Canada, Pfizer Canada, and Takeda Canada. Received research funding from AbbVie Canada, Amgen Canada, Pfizer Canada, Sandoz Canada. Alain Bitton has participated in advisory boards with AbbVie, Janssen, Takeda, McKesson, BioJamp, Bristol Myers Squibb Hoffman-LaRoche, Amgen. He has received research support from AbbVie. He is on the speaker’s panel for Janssen, Takeda, AbbVie and has participated in educational activities supported by Viatris, has received educational support from Fresenius Kabi, Amgen, and Takeda. Jennifer Jones has received honoraria for speaking and consulting for AbbVie, Janssen, Pfizer, Shire, and Takeda. She is the co-chair of the Scientific and Medical Advisory Council of Crohn’s and Colitis Canada. Gilaad Kaplan has received honoraria for speaking or consultancy from AbbVie, Janssen, Pfizer, and Takeda. He has received research support from Ferring, Janssen, AbbVie, GlaxoSmith Kline, Merck, and Shire. He has been a consultant for Gilead. He shares ownership of a patent: TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATORY DISORDERS, AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE, AND PBC. UTI Limited Partnership, assignee. Patent WO2019046959A1. PCT/CA2018/051098. 7 Sept. 2018. He is a member of the Scientific and Medical Advisory Council of Crohn’s and Colitis Canada. Kate Lee has received honoraria from AbbVie Corporation and Bristol Myers Squibb Canada. Laura Targownik has received research funding from AbbVie Canada, Takeda Canada, Sandoz Canada, Amgen Canada, Gilead Canada, Roche Canada and Pfizer Canada, and has been on Advisory Boards for Janssen Canada, AbbVie Canada, Takeda Canada, Pfizer Canada, Merck Canada, Roche Canada, Sandoz Canada, Organon Canada, Fresesnius Kabi Canada, Eli Lilly Canada, and Amgen Canada. She is a member of the Scientific and Medical Advisory Council of Crohn’s and Colitis Canada. Harminder Singh has been on advisory boards or consulted for Pendopharm, Amgen Canada, Roche Canada, Sandoz Canada, Takeda Canada, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Guardant Health Inc. and has received research funding for an investigator-initiated study from Pfizer. None: Joseph Windsor, Priscilla Matthews, Parul Tandon, Stephanie Coward, Juan-Nicolás Peña-Sánchez, Noelle Rohatinsky, Sara Ghandeharian, Saketh Meka, Roxana Chis, Sarang Gupta, Eric Cheah, Tal Davis, Jake Weinstein, James Im, Quinn Goddard, Julia Gorospe, Jennifer Loschiavo, Kaitlyn McQuaid, Joseph D’Addario, Ken Silver, & Robyn Oppenheim.
DATA AVAILABILITY
No new data were generated or analyzed in support of this review.
REFERENCES
- 1. Bernstein CN, Nugent Z, Targownik LE, Singh H, Lix LM.. Predictors and risks for death in a population-based study of persons with IBD in Manitoba. Gut 2015;64(9):1403–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Munkholm P. Review article: The incidence and prevalence of colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;18(Suppl 2):1–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Targan SR, Hanauer SB, Van Deventer SJ, et al. A short-term study of chimeric monoclonal antibody cA2 to tumor necrosis factor alpha for Crohn’s disease. Crohn’s Disease cA2 Study Group. N Engl J Med 1997;337(15):1029–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hanauer SB, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, et al. ; ACCENT I Study Group. Maintenance infliximab for Crohn’s disease: The ACCENT I randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359(9317):1541–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Rutgeerts P, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, et al. Infliximab for induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med 2005;353(23):2462–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, Enns R, et al. Adalimumab induction therapy for Crohn disease previously treated with infliximab: A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2007;146(12):829–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, et al. Adalimumab for maintenance of clinical response and remission in patients with Crohn’s disease: The CHARM trial. Gastroenterology 2007;132(1):52–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Sands BE, Anderson FH, Bernstein CN, et al. Infliximab maintenance therapy for fistulizing Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med 2004;350(9):876–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, Feagan BG, et al. Colectomy rate comparison after treatment of ulcerative colitis with placebo or infliximab. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(4):1250–60; quiz 1520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Sandborn WJ, Van AG, Reinisch W, et al. Adalimumab induces and maintains clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2012;142(2):257–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Marano C, et al. ; PURSUIT-SC Study Group. Subcutaneous golimumab induces clinical response and remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2014;146(1):85–95; quiz e14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Marano C, et al. ; PURSUIT-Maintenance Study Group. Subcutaneous golimumab maintains clinical response in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2014;146(1):96–109.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Feagan BG, Panaccione R, Sandborn WJ, et al. Effects of adalimumab therapy on incidence of hospitalization and surgery in Crohn’s disease: Results from the CHARM study. Gastroenterology 2008;135(5):1493–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lichtenstein GR, Yan S, Bala M, Blank M, Sands BE.. Infliximab maintenance treatment reduces hospitalizations, surgeries, and procedures in fistulizing Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2005;128(4):862–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Rutgeerts P, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, et al. Comparison of scheduled and episodic treatment strategies of infliximab in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2004;126(2):402–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Sandborn WJ, Su C, Panes J.. Tofacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med 2017;377(5):496–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Sandborn WJ, Su C, Sands BE, et al. Tofacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med 2017;376(18):1723–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Lutgens MW, van Oijen MG, van der Heijden GJ, Vleggaar FP, Siersema PD, Oldenburg B.. Declining risk of colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: An updated meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013;19(4):789–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Jess T, Simonsen J, Jørgensen KT, Pedersen BV, Nielsen NM, Frisch M.. Decreasing risk of colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 30 years. Gastroenterology 2012;143(2):375–81.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Murthy S, Kaplan G, Kuenzig E, et al. Temporal trends and relative risks of intestinal and extra-intestinal cancers in persons with inflammatory bowel diseases: A population-based study from a large Canadian province (Abstract). Gastroenterology 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Coward S, Murthy S, Singh H, Benchimol EI, Kuenzig ME, Kaplan GG.. Cancers associated with inflammatory bowel disease in Canada: A population-based analysis of cases and their matched controls (Abstract). Gastroenterology 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Singh H, Nugent Z, Lix L, Targownik L, Samadder NJ, Bernstein CN.. 1124 there is no decrease in the mortality from IBD associated colorectal cancers over 25 years: A population based analysis. Gastroenterology 2016;150(4):S226–7. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Herrinton LJ, Liu L, Levin TR, Allison JE, Lewis JD, Velayos F.. Incidence and mortality of colorectal adenocarcinoma in persons with inflammatory bowel disease from 1998 to 2010. Gastroenterology 2012;143(2):382–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Elmahdi R, Lemser CE, Thomsen SB, Allin KH, Agrawal M, Jess T.. Development of cancer among patients with pediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease: A meta-analysis of population-based studies. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5(3):e220595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Lo B, Zhao M, Vind I, Burisch J.. The risk of extraintestinal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;19(6):1117–38.e19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Long MD, Martin CF, Pipkin CA, Herfarth HH, Sandler RS, Kappelman MD.. Risk of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2012;143(2):390–9.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Narous M, Nugent Z, Singh H, Bernstein CN.. Risks of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers pre- and post-inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Singh S, Nagpal SJ, Murad MH, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease is associated with an increased risk of melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12(2):210–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kappelman MD, Farkas DK, Long MD, et al. Risk of cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: A nationwide population-based cohort study with 30 years of follow-up evaluation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12(2):265–73.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Long MD, Herfarth HH, Pipkin CA, Porter CQ, Sandler RS, Kappelman MD.. Increased risk for non-melanoma skin cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8(3):268–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Rungoe C, Simonsen J, Riis L, Frisch M, Langholz E, Jess T.. Inflammatory bowel disease and cervical neoplasia: A population-based nationwide cohort study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;13(4):693–700.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bernstein CN, Blanchard JF, Kliewer E, Wajda A.. Cancer risk in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based study. Cancer 2001;91(4):854–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Pedersen N, Duricova D, Elkjaer M, Gamborg M, Munkholm P, Jess T.. Risk of extra-intestinal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: Meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105(7):1480–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Castro FA, Liu X, Försti A, et al. Increased risk of hepatobiliary cancers after hospitalization for autoimmune disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12(6):1038–45.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Rubin CE, Haggitt RC, Burmer GC, et al. DNA aneuploidy in colonic biopsies predicts future development of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 1992;103(5):1611–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Lofberg R, Brostrom O, Karlen P, Ost A, Tribukait B.. DNA aneuploidy in ulcerative colitis: Reproducibility, topographic distribution, and relation to dysplasia. Gastroenterology 1992;102(4 Pt 1):1149–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Lyda MH, Noffsinger A, Belli J, Fischer J, Fenoglio-Preiser CM.. Multifocal neoplasia involving the colon and appendix in ulcerative colitis: Pathological and molecular features. Gastroenterology 1998;115(6):1566–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Lyda MH, Noffsinger A, Belli J, Fenoglio-Preiser CM.. Microsatellite instability and K-ras mutations in patients with ulcerative colitis. Hum Pathol 2000;31(6):665–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Gyde S, Prior P, Dew MJ, Saunders V, Waterhouse JA, Allan RN.. Mortality in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 1982;83(1 Pt 1):36–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Soderlund S, Brandt L, Lapidus A, et al. Decreasing time-trends of colorectal cancer in a large cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2009;136(5):1561–7; quiz 1818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Baars JE, Looman CW, Steyerberg EW, et al. The risk of inflammatory bowel disease-related colorectal carcinoma is limited: Results from a nationwide nested case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106(2):319–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Jess T, Simonsen J, Jorgensen KT, Pedersen BV, Nielsen NM, Frisch M.. Decreasing risk of colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 30 years. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(2):375–81.e1; quiz e13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Rutter MD, Saunders BP, Wilkinson KH, et al. Thirty-year analysis of a colonoscopic surveillance program for neoplasia in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2006;130(4):1030–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Eaden JA, Abrams KR, Mayberry JF.. The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis. Gut 2001;48(4):526–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Ekbom A, Helmick C, Zack M, Adami HO.. Ulcerative colitis and colorectal cancer. A population-based study. N Engl J Med 1990;323(18):1228–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Rutter M, Saunders B, Wilkinson K, et al. Severity of inflammation is a risk factor for colorectal neoplasia in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2004;126(2):451–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Velayos FS, LoftusEV, Jr., Jess T, et al. Predictive and protective factors associated with colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: A case-control study. Gastroenterology 2006;130(7):1941–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Rubin DT, Huo D, Kinnucan JA, et al. Inflammation is an independent risk factor for colonic neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis: A case-control study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;11(12):1601–8 e1-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Gupta RB, Harpaz N, Itzkowitz S, et al. Histologic inflammation is a risk factor for progression to colorectal neoplasia in ulcerative colitis: A cohort study. Gastroenterology 2007;133(4):1099–105; quiz 1340-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Rutter MD, Saunders BP, Wilkinson KH, et al. Cancer surveillance in longstanding ulcerative colitis: Endoscopic appearances help predict cancer risk. Gut 2004;53(12):1813–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Choi CR, Al Bakir I, Ding NJ, et al. Cumulative burden of inflammation predicts colorectal neoplasia risk in ulcerative colitis: A large single-centre study. Gut 2019;68(3):414–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Yvellez OV, Rai V, Sossenheimer PH, et al. Cumulative histologic inflammation predicts colorectal neoplasia in ulcerative colitis: A validation study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2021;27(2):203–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Fumery M, Dulai PS, Gupta S, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of colorectal cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis with low-grade dysplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;15(5):665–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 2009;136(3):832–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Askling J, Dickman PW, Karlen P, et al. Family history as a risk factor for colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2001;120(6):1356–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Nuako KW, Ahlquist DA, Mahoney DW, Schaid DJ, Siems DM, Lindor NM.. Familial predisposition for colorectal cancer in chronic ulcerative colitis: A case-control study. Gastroenterology 1998;115(5):1079–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Soetikno RM, Lin OS, Heidenreich PA, Young HS, Blackstone MO.. Increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56(1):48–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Ten Hove JR, Shah SC, Shaffer SR, et al. Consecutive negative findings on colonoscopy during surveillance predict a low risk of advanced neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease with long-standing colitis: Results of a 15-year multicentre, multinational cohort study. Gut 2019;68(4):615–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Bernstein CN, Blanchard JF, Kliewer E, Wajda A.. Cancer risk in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based study. Cancer 2001;91(4):854–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Singh H, Nugent Z, Lix L, Targownik L, Samadder NJ, Bernstein CN.. There is no decrease in the mortality from IBD associated colorectal cancers over 25 years: A population based analysis. Gastroenterology 2016;150:S226–7. [Google Scholar]
- 61. Ording AG, Horvath-Puho E, Erichsen R, et al. Five-year mortality in colorectal cancer patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease: A nationwide population-based cohort study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013;19(4):800–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Watanabe T, Konishi T, Kishimoto J, Kotake K, Muto T, Sugihara K.. Ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer shows a poorer survival than sporadic colorectal cancer: A nationwide Japanese study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;17(3):802–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Hansen TM, Nugent Z, Bernstein CN, Samadder NJ, Murthy SK, Singh H.. Characteristics of colorectal cancer and use of colonoscopy before colorectal cancer diagnosis among individuals with inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based study. PLoS One 2022;17(8):e0272158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Laukoetter MG, Mennigen R, Hannig CM, et al. Intestinal cancer risk in Crohn’s disease: A meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15(4):576–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Canavan C, Abrams KR, Mayberry J.. Meta-analysis: Colorectal and small bowel cancer risk in patients with Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;23(8):1097–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Ortiz-Rodríguez LA, Ortiz-Zayas G, Pollum M, Hoehn SJ, Jockusch S, Crespo-Hernández CE.. Intramolecular charge transfer in the azathioprine prodrug quenches intersystem crossing to the reactive triplet state in 6-mercaptopurine. Photochem Photobiol 2022;98(3):617–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Beaugerie L, Itzkowitz SH.. Cancers complicating inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med 2015;372(15):1441–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Lewis JD, Bilker WB, Brensinger C, Deren JJ, Vaughn DJ, Strom BL.. Inflammatory bowel disease is not associated with an increased risk of lymphoma. Gastroenterology 2001;121(5):1080–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Askling J, Brandt L, Lapidus A, et al. Risk of haematopoietic cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2005;54(5):617–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Vos AC, Bakkal N, Minnee RC, et al. ; Initiative on Crohn's and Colitis (ICC). Risk of malignant lymphoma in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: A Dutch nationwide study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;17(9):1837–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Kotlyar DS, Lewis JD, Beaugerie L, et al. Risk of lymphoma in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine: A meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;13(5):847–58.e4; quiz e48-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Beaugerie L, Brousse N, Bouvier AM, et al. ; CESAME Study Group. Lymphoproliferative disorders in patients receiving thiopurines for inflammatory bowel disease: A prospective observational cohort study. Lancet 2009;374(9701):1617–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Khan N, Abbas AM, Lichtenstein GR, Loftus EV, Bazzano LA.. Risk of lymphoma in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with thiopurines: A nationwide retrospective cohort study. Gastroenterology 2013;145(5):1007–1015.e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Lemaitre M, Kirchgesner J, Rudnichi A, et al. Association between use of thiopurines or tumor necrosis factor antagonists alone or in combination and risk of lymphoma in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. JAMA 2017;318(17):1679–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Siegel CA, Marden SM, Persing SM, Larson RJ, Sands BE.. Risk of lymphoma associated with combination anti-tumor necrosis factor and immunomodulator therapy for the treatment of Crohn’s disease: A meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7(8):874–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Herrinton LJ, Liu L, Weng X, Lewis JD, Hutfless S, Allison JE.. Role of thiopurine and anti-TNF therapy in lymphoma in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106(12):2146–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Nyboe Andersen N, Pasternak B, Basit S, et al. Association between tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists and risk of cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. JAMA 2014;311(23):2406–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Hyams JS, Dubinsky MC, Baldassano RN, et al. Infliximab not associated with increased risk of malignancy or hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2017;152(8):1901–14.e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Kotlyar DS, Osterman MT, Diamond RH, et al. A systematic review of factors that contribute to hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;9(1):36–41.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Chevaux JB, Bouvier AM, Carrat F, Beaugerie L.. Risk of melanoma in patients who receive thiopurines for inflammatory bowel disease is not increased. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107(9):1443–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Abbas AM, Almukhtar RM, Loftus EV, Lichtenstein GR, Khan N.. Risk of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer in ulcerative colitis patients treated with thiopurines: A nationwide retrospective cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 2014;109(11):1781–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. McKenna MR, Stobaugh DJ, Deepak P.. Melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer in inflammatory bowel disease patients following tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor monotherapy and in combination with thiopurines: Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2014;23(3):267–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Muller M, D’Amico F, Bonovas S, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L.. TNF inhibitors and risk of malignancy in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: A systematic review. J Crohns Colitis 2021;15(5):840–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Kopylov U, Vutcovici M, Kezouh A, Seidman E, Bitton A, Afif W.. Risk of lymphoma, colorectal and skin cancer in patients with IBD treated with immunomodulators and biologics: A Quebec Claims Database Study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2015;21(8):1847–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Long MD, Herfarth HH, Pipkin CA, Porter CQ, Sandler RS, Kappelman MD.. Increased risk for non-melanoma skin cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8(3):268–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Singh H, Bernstein CN.. Sorting Through the risks and benefits of thiopurine therapy for inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;17(11):2171–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Jess T, Winther KV, Munkholm P, Langholz E, Binder V.. Intestinal and extra-intestinal cancer in Crohn’s disease: Follow-up of a population-based cohort in Copenhagen County, Denmark. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;19(3):287–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Bhatia J, Bratcher J, Korelitz B, et al. Abnormalities of uterine cervix in women with inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12(38):6167–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Kane S, Khatibi B, Reddy D.. Higher incidence of abnormal Pap smears in women with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103(3):631–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Marehbian J, Arrighi HM, Hass S, Tian H, Sandborn WJ.. Adverse events associated with common therapy regimens for moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104(10):2524–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Rungoe C, Simonsen J, Riis L, Frisch M, Langholz E, Jess T.. Inflammatory bowel disease and cervical neoplasia: A population-based nationwide cohort study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;13(4):693–700.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Mir-Madjlessi SH, Farmer RG, Easley KA, Beck GJ.. Colorectal and extracolonic malignancy in ulcerative colitis. Cancer 1986;58(7):1569–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Mellemkjaer L, Johansen C, Gridley G, Linet MS, Kjaer SK, Olsen JH.. Crohn’s disease and cancer risk (Denmark). Cancer Causes Control 2000;11(2):145–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Hutfless S, Fireman B, Kane S, Herrinton LJ.. Screening differences and risk of cervical cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008;28(5):598–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Singh H, Demers AA, Nugent Z, Mahmud SM, Kliewer EV, Bernstein CN.. Risk of cervical abnormalities in women with inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based nested case-control study. Gastroenterology 2009;136(2):451–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Allegretti JR, Barnes EL, Cameron A.. Are patients with inflammatory bowel disease on chronic immunosuppressive therapy at increased risk of cervical high-grade dysplasia/cancer? A meta-analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2015;21(5):1089–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Dugué PA, Rebolj M, Hallas J, Garred P, Lynge E.. Risk of cervical cancer in women with autoimmune diseases, in relation with their use of immunosuppressants and screening: Population-based cohort study. Int J Cancer 2015;136(6):E711–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Tytgat GN, Dhir V, Gopinath N.. Endoscopic appearance of dysplasia and cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Cancer 1995;31A(7–8):1174–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Rutter MD. Importance of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in screening for CRC in patients with IBD. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 2014;24(3):327–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Rubio CA, Slezak P.. The unique pathology of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia in IBD. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 2014;24(3):455–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Bernstein CN, Shanahan F, Weinstein WM.. Are we telling patients the truth about surveillance colonoscopy in ulcerative colitis?. Lancet 1994;343(8889):71–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Connell WR, Talbot IC, Harpaz N, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal carcinoma complicating ulcerative colitis. Gut 1994;35(10):1419–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Jess T, LoftusEV, Jr., Velayos FS, et al. Incidence and prognosis of colorectal dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based study from Olmsted County, Minnesota. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2006;12(8):669–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Lim CH, Dixon MF, Vail A, Forman D, Lynch DA, Axon AT.. Ten year follow up of ulcerative colitis patients with and without low grade dysplasia. Gut 2003;52(8):1127–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Lindberg B, Persson B, Veress B, Ingelman-Sundberg H, Granqvist S.. Twenty years’ colonoscopic surveillance of patients with ulcerative colitis. Detection of dysplastic and malignant transformation. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996;31(12):1195–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Rosenstock E, Farmer RG, Petras R, SivakMV, Jr., Rankin GB, Sullivan BH.. Surveillance for colonic carcinoma in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 1985;89(6):1342–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Taylor BA, Pemberton JH, Carpenter HA, et al. Dysplasia in chronic ulcerative colitis: Implications for colonoscopic surveillance. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35(10):950–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Thomas T, Abrams KA, Robinson RJ, Mayberry JF.. Meta-analysis: Cancer risk of low-grade dysplasia in chronic ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;25(6):657–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Ullman T, Croog V, Harpaz N, Sachar D, Itzkowitz S.. Progression of flat low-grade dysplasia to advanced neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2003;125(5):1311–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Woolrich AJ, DaSilva MD, Korelitz BI.. Surveillance in the routine management of ulcerative colitis: The predictive value of low-grade dysplasia. Gastroenterology 1992;103(2):431–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ, et al. ; British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002). Gut 2010;59(5):666–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Farraye FA, Odze RD, Eaden J, et al. ; AGA Institute Medical Position Panel on Diagnosis and Management of Colorectal Neoplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. AGA medical position statement on the diagnosis and management of colorectal neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2010;138(2):738–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Kornbluth A, Sachar DB; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Ulcerative colitis practice guidelines in adults: American College Of Gastroenterology, Practice Parameters Committee. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105(3):501–23; quiz 524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Itzkowitz SH, Present DH.. Consensus conference: Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2005;11(3):314–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Leddin D, Hunt R, Champion M, et al. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Digestive Health Foundation: Guidelines on colon cancer screening. Can J Gastroenterol 2004;18(2):93–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Murthy SK, Feuerstein JD, Nguyen GC, Velayos FS.. AGA Clinical Practice update on endoscopic surveillance and management of colorectal dysplasia in inflammatory bowel diseases: Expert review. Gastroenterology 2021;161(3):1043–51.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Shah SC, Itzkowitz SH.. Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: Mechanisms and management. Gastroenterology 2022;162(3):715–30.e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Rubin DT, Ananthakrishnan AN, Siegel CA, Sauer BG, Long MD.. ACG clinical guideline: Ulcerative colitis in adults. Am J Gastroenterol 2019;114(3):384–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Magro F, Gionchetti P, Eliakim R, et al. ; European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation [ECCO]. Third European Evidence-based consensus on diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis. Part 1: Definitions, diagnosis, extra-intestinal manifestations, pregnancy, cancer surveillance, surgery, and ileo-anal pouch disorders. J Crohns Colitis 2017;11(6):649–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Bisschops R, East JE, Hassan C, et al. Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019. Endoscopy 2019;51(12):1155–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Laine L, Kaltenbach T, Barkun A, McQuaid KR, Subramanian V, Soetikno R; SCENIC Guideline Development Panel. SCENIC international consensus statement on surveillance and management of dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2015;148(3):639–51.e28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Schønfeldt Troelsen F, Sørensen HT, Pedersen L, Erichsen R.. Risk of a post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer diagnosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based cohort study. Endoscopy 2021;53(10):1023–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Wintjens DSJ, Bogie RMM, van den Heuvel TRA, et al. Incidence and classification of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers in inflammatory bowel disease: A Dutch population-based cohort study. J Crohns Colitis 2018;12(7):777–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Stjärngrim J, Ekbom A, Hammar U, Hultcrantz R, Forsberg AM.. Rates and characteristics of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer in the Swedish IBD population: What are the differences from a non-IBD population? Gut 2019;68(9):1588–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Zhao LN, Li JY, Yu T, Chen GC, Yuan YH, Chen QK.. 5-Aminosalicylates reduce the risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis: An updated meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9(4):e94208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Nguyen GC, Gulamhusein A, Bernstein CN.. 5-aminosalicylic acid is not protective against colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: A meta-analysis of non-referral populations. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107(9):1298–304; quiz 1297, 1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Xu X, Ciren Y, Feng B, Tao C, Xia Y, Liu Z.. Chemopreventive effects of 5-amino salicylic acids on inflammatory bowel disease-associated colonic cancer and colonic dysplasia: A meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8(2):2212–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Beaugerie L, Svrcek M, Seksik P, et al. ; CESAME Study Group. Risk of colorectal high-grade dysplasia and cancer in a prospective observational cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2013;145(1):166–75.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Jess T, Lopez A, Andersson M, Beaugerie L, Peyrin-Biroulet L.. Thiopurines and risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12(11):1793–800.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. van Schaik FD, van Oijen MG, Smeets HM, van der Heijden GJ, Siersema PD, Oldenburg B.. Thiopurines prevent advanced colorectal neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2012;61(2):235–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Pasternak B, Svanström H, Schmiegelow K, Jess T, Hviid A.. Use of azathioprine and the risk of cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Epidemiol 2013;177(11):1296–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Singh H, Nugent Z, Bernstein C, et al. Epidemiology of small bowel cancers: A population-based study (Abstract). Gastroenterology 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 133. Lindor KD, Kowdley KV, Harrison ME; Gastroenterology ACo. ACG clinical guideline: Primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110(5):646–59; quiz 660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Practice Bulletin No. 168: Cervical cancer screening and prevention. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128(4):e111–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Farraye FA, Melmed GY, Lichtenstein GR, Kane SV.. ACG clinical guideline: Preventive care in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112(2):241–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Moscicki AB, Flowers L, Huchko MJ, et al. Guidelines for cervical cancer screening in immunosuppressed women without HIV infection. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2019;23(2):87–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA, Bernstein CN.. Screening for cervical and breast cancer among women with inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;17(8):1741–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Annese V, Beaugerie L, Egan L, et al. ; ECCO. European evidence-based consensus: Inflammatory bowel disease and malignancies. J Crohns Colitis 2015;9(11):945–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Poullenot F, Seksik P, Beaugerie L, et al. ; le GETAID. Risk of incident cancer in inflammatory bowel disease patients starting anti-TNF therapy while having recent malignancy. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016;22(6):1362–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Waljee AK, Higgins PDR, Jensen CB, et al. Anti-tumour necrosis factor-α therapy and recurrent or new primary cancers in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, or psoriasis and previous cancer in Denmark: A nationwide, population-based cohort study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;5(3):276–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Shelton E, Laharie D, Scott FI, et al. Cancer recurrence following immune-suppressive therapies in patients with immune-mediated diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2016;151(1):97–109.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Beaugerie L, Carrat F, Colombel JF, et al. ; CESAME Study Group. Risk of new or recurrent cancer under immunosuppressive therapy in patients with IBD and previous cancer. Gut 2014;63(9):1416–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Poullenot F, Amiot A, Nachury M, et al. Comparative risk of incident cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease with prior non-digestive malignancy according to immunomodulator: A multicentre cohort study. J Crohns Colitis 2022;16(10):1523–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Hong SJ, Zenger C, Pecoriello J, et al. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab are not associated with subsequent cancer in IBD patients with prior malignancy. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2022;28(12):1826–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Vedamurthy A, Gangasani N, Ananthakrishnan AN.. Vedolizumab or tumor necrosis factor antagonist use and risk of new or recurrent cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease with prior malignancy: A retrospective cohort study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022;20(1):88–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were generated or analyzed in support of this review.