Abstract
Drugs targeting multiple stages of the Plasmodium vivax life cycle are needed to reduce the health and economic burdens caused by malaria worldwide. N-myristoyltransferase (NMT) is an essential eukaryotic enzyme and a validated drug target for combating malaria. However, previous PvNMT inhibitors have failed due to their low selectivity over human NMTs. Herein, we apply a structure-guided hybridization approach combining chemical moieties of previously reported NMT inhibitors to develop the next generation of PvNMT inhibitors. A high-resolution crystal structure of PvNMT bound to a representative selective hybrid compound reveals a unique binding site architecture that includes a selective conformation of a key tyrosine residue. The hybridized compounds significantly decrease P. falciparum blood-stage parasite load and consistently exhibit dose-dependent inhibition of P. vivax liver stage schizonts and hypnozoites. Our data demonstrate that hybridized NMT inhibitors can be multistage antimalarials, targeting dormant and developing forms of liver and blood stage.
Subject terms: Infection, Medicinal chemistry
Developing selective N-myristoyltransferase (NMT) inhibitors has been challenging. Here, the authors describe selective NMT inhibitors that can be used as multistage antimalarials, targeting dormant and developing forms of liver and blood stage.
Introduction
Human malaria is a mosquito-borne disease caused by five species of Plasmodium parasites. In 2020, there were approximately 241 million patients affected by malaria worldwide. Of those, 627,000 people died1. In sub-Saharan Africa, most cases of malaria and mortality are caused by Plasmodium falciparum, while Plasmodium vivax is globally ubiquitous and causes persistent infections2. P. vivax is highly prevalent in the Americas and Southeast Asia, accounting for 75% and 47% of all malaria cases in these regions, respectively3. Antimalarials currently available in the clinic include artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs), chloroquine phosphate, sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, mefloquine, primaquine phosphate, halofantrine, and quinine4. However, the emergence and persistence of resistance to almost all these drugs, and the threat of the continued robust spread of drug tolerance and resistance, necessitate the urgent development of new antimalarials5,6.
Multiple antimalarials and combination therapies that can be used as single-dose regimens are being developed pre-clinically and clinically. Ambitious efforts to eliminate malaria, such as those by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV), include approaches that could target multiple stages of the parasitic life cycle. Yet, the goal of malaria eradication remains unachieved, and several knowledge gaps still need to be addressed in the current pharmacopeia of antimalarial compounds. Antimalarials that are part of several classes are required in order to support a robust malaria eradication campaign. Specifically, candidate drugs targeting the asexual blood stage (target candidate profile [TCP]-1), anti-relapse/hypnozoites (TCP-3), liver schizonts (TCP-4), and transmission-blocking (TCP-5 and TCP-6) are essential for reducing malaria cases worldwide7,8. Accordingly, compounds that can achieve multiple objectives would be of particular interest.
Most current drugs do not successfully target the dormant liver stage form6, called hypnozoites, which are thought to be the source of all relapsing infections9. Hypnozoites are commonly observed in P. vivax and Plasmodium ovale infections. Unlike the developing schizont form of the parasite, hypnozoites remain in the liver for weeks, months, or even years and later reactivate, leading to relapse and symptomatic blood-stage infection. Between 20% and 100% of clinical presentations of P. vivax in humans result from hypnozoite relapse, depending on the location and intensity of transmission10,11. The current pharmacological options for the elimination of hypnozoites are limited to primaquine and tafenoquine, and the use of these drugs is hampered by their severe toxicity in individuals with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency6. Targeting regulatory proteins within the parasites that are essential for multiple stages of the complex life cycle, including the hypnozoite stage, might be the most robust approach to eliminating malaria.
N-myristoyltransferase (NMT) is an essential enzyme in eukaryotes that catalyzes the transfer of myristate from myristoyl-coenzyme A (myrCoA) to the N-terminal glycine residue of a nascent polypeptide at the ribosome12. Protein myristoylation generally aids in membrane localization as well as protein-protein interactions and stability by increasing the protein’s hydrophobicity13–16. We and other researchers have previously developed highly active Plasmodium NMT inhibitors (NMTis) with moderate selectivity over the human enzyme capable of killing the parasite, some of which have been demonstrated to eliminate Plasmodium liver stage and blood-stage parasites17–23. Pharmacological inhibition of NMT prevents the completion of blood-stage development of P. falciparum partly owing to the inhibition of the inner membrane complex formation24.
Two potential challenges involved in the development of inhibitors of PvNMT relate to hypnozoite sensitivity and selectivity over human NMTs. Whether similar phenotypic changes occur when NMT is targeted in hypnozoites is unknown. Recent transcriptome studies have shown a remarkable decrease in the number of expressed genes in hypnozoites compared to schizonts25–27. NMT is not actively expressed at high levels during this stage. Several potential NMT substrates20 are expressed, including some essential genes25–28. Thus, beyond NMT being essential in Plasmodium24,29, we hypothesize that inhibiting the NMT present in hypnozoites would inhibit several biochemical processes required for the viability of the dormant stage of P. vivax.
Although multiple Plasmodium NMT inhibitors have been identified, achieving high selectivity against human NMTs remains a major challenge because of the high degree of sequence homology between human and Plasmodium peptide binding sites, where all known inhibitors bind. For PvNMT, in particular, the set of residues contacting the inhibitors via their side chains is identical in sequence to the corresponding set of residues in human NMTs23. Despite this, early structure–activity-based studies identified a selective conformational state. A nonselective series and a selective series of inhibitors were shown to bind the side chain of an active site tyrosine in nonrotated and rotated conformations, respectively. A combination of mutagenesis of the tyrosine to alanine and SI measurements demonstrated that the rotated state is selective19. Inhibitor selectivity was then improved up to twenty-twofold20 but was difficult to improve further, which has been cited as a reason to deprioritize the targeting of parasitic NMT sites in antimalarial efforts30. In fact, because of the high degree of cross-reactivity with HsNMT1, some PvNMT inhibitors were recently repurposed to inhibit HsNMT1 for combating picornaviruses that utilize the host enzyme for N-myristoylation31. Using a chemical fragment merging scheme, compounds reaching picomolar affinities against HsNMT1 were designed.
In the present study, we applied a hybridization strategy to PvNMT inhibition intending to develop more selective compounds and test their in vitro activity in hypnozoites. The approach is based on a selective scaffold with appended moieties from inhibitors adopting distinct binding modes. We reasoned that such structural perturbations would be compatible with the binding site architecture but would likely introduce molecular stresses that PvNMT might better accommodate due to differences in conformational plasticity with the human NMTs. This approach yielded 11 compounds with selectivity indices (SIs) greater than 100, three exceeding 200, and two exceeding 250. A high-resolution crystal structure provides a molecular basis for the high selectivity, revealing a selective binding site architecture distinct from those of all previously published PvNMT-inhibitor complexes. Finally, selected PvNMTis were evaluated in schizont and hypnozoite infections of liver-stage P. vivax and blood-stage P. falciparum parasites, showing moderate parasiticidal activity in both stages, validating PvNMT as a multistage target.
Results
Design and synthesis of selective PvNMT inhibitors
PvNMT inhibitors DDD8564620 and IMP-100221 (Fig. 1a) were used as the starting point for a structure-based approach to develop more potent and selective PvNMTis. Both NMTis occupy different parts of the P. vivax NMT binding pocket, with excellent affinity and potency (Fig. 1b). Additionally, in the presence of IMP-1002, the binding site displays a selective side chain conformation of Tyr211. The molecular hybridization strategy involved appending different head and tail groups to a biaryl core that was also varied chemically. Specifically, head groups were linked to core group A and the tail groups to core group B (Fig. 1c). To target the selective state of Tyr211, the overall topologies of the hybrid compounds reflected that of IMP-1002, with the head and core groups attached to the same sites in the biaryl core.
In the tail region (Fig. 1c, highlighted in blue), the substituents were designed to interact with Ser31920,22. In the head region (Fig. 1c, highlighted in brown), the substituents were selected to interact ionically with the carboxylate of the C-terminal residue (Leu410), which plays an essential role in myristate transfer and is crucial to the inhibitor’s potency against Plasmodium NMT20,21. Figure 1d shows a particular hybrid compound (12e) that was designed and synthesized to dock into the crystal structure of PvNMT with the target hydrogen bonding and ionic interactions formed with Ser319 and Leu410.
Four compound series (12, 16, 26, and 30 series) were designed sequentially based on potency and selectivity profiles. All four series tested 1,3,5-trimethylpyrazole, 3,5-dimethylpyrazole, and pyridine moieties in the tail region. Chemical hybridization using the DDD85646 head group, which introduces a 4-atom spacer between N4 and the nearest core aryl group (unlike IMP-1002, in which 3 atoms separate the terminal amine and core) first yielded the compound 12 and 16 series. Docking calculations suggested that such compounds would be accommodated in the binding site, although we were motivated to determine the exact binding modes via X-ray crystallography. Polarity was varied within the compound 12 series at variable positions X, Y and R, and the site where nitrogen is incorporated was found to result in widely varying potencies and selectivities (Supplementary Fig. 2). Polarity was further explored in the compound 16 series through nitrogen insertion at the Z position (Supplementary Fig. 3). The most selective compound of these series (12b) possessed a phenyl group as core A and a pyridine group as core B, with a nitrogen atom at the X position (Supplementary Fig. 2). Increasing lipophilicity and bulkiness by appending a phenyl group to core B was tested in the compound 30 series to determine if the gains in selectivity in that region require ring polarity. The effect of the piperazine head group was tested via substitution with dimethylaminoethanol in the compound 26 and 30 series.
Piperazine-hybrid compounds
Supplementary Figs. 1–3 summarizes the synthetic routes used to prepare the hybrid compounds (12a–q and 16a–f). These structural fragments were prepared using a three-step synthesis strategy (Supplementary Fig. 1), with a condensation reaction as a key step. The synthesis of hybrid compounds 12a–q began with the formation of different blocks of aryl ethers (3–11) through a sulfonyl transfer32 or the Mitsunobu reaction33 (Supplementary Fig. 2). The intermediate blocks (3–11) were obtained from commercially available aryl-hydroxyl or pyridine-hydroxyl with pyrazoles 1 and 2 or with commercially available 3-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyridine. From these aryl-ether blocks, hybrid synthesis was accomplished in two steps (Supplementary Fig. 2). A Suzuki cross-coupling reaction was used to couple cores A and B together (Fig. 1c). This was followed by Boc-deprotection using 4 M HCl in dioxane to furnish compounds 12a–q in sufficient overall yields (60–91%). NMT activity was indirectly measured through the detection of free CoA by the thiol-reactive probe 7-diethylamino-3-(4′-maleimidylphenyl)-4-methylcoumarin (CPM)34 (Supplementary Fig. 4).
The enzymatic activities of the hybrid compounds 12a–q are summarized in Table 1. Five compounds in this series having either a 1,3,5-trimethylpyrazole (12a, 12b, and 12d) or pyridine (12g and 12j) tail group yielded a selectivity index (SI) of >145, computed as the ratio of IC50 values for the HsNMT1 and PvNMT (the value of 145 was the highest SI value obtained against PvNMT from our recent high throughput screening study18). Moreover, the three compounds bearing a 1,3,5-trimethylpyrazole tail group had IC50 values below 100 nM. Compounds 12a–c, which increase the core polarity over that of IMP-1002 by incorporating a nitrogen atom at positions X and Y, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 2), display an inverse relationship between potency and selectivity. However, compound 12b, which exhibits the highest selectivity among compounds in this subset and among series 12 compounds more generally (SI = 259), maintains high potency (IC50 = 80.2 nM). These results thus demonstrate that increasing selectivity without greatly compromising potency is achievable using the combinatorial design strategy, despite the high degree of active site conservation of PvNMT and HsNMT1.
Table 1.
Compound | PvNMT IC50 (nM)a | HsNMT IC50 (nM)a | SIb |
---|---|---|---|
12a | 36.8 | 5400 | 146.7 |
12b | 80.15 | 20,780 | 259.2 |
12c | 9.48 | 599 | 63.1 |
12d | 48.5 | 7440 | 153.4 |
12e | 15.8 | 124 | 7.8 |
12f | 15.9 | 699 | 43.9 |
16a | 9390 | – | – |
16b | 168 | 27,620 | 164.4 |
12g | 104 | 15,900 | 152.8 |
12h | 440.6 | >40,000 | 90.9 |
12i | 1540 | – | – |
12j | 124 | 27,360 | 220.6 |
12k | 3120 | – | – |
12l | 23.4 | 1710 | 73 |
16c | >40,000 | – | – |
16d | 3390 | – | – |
12m | 12,540 | – | – |
12n | 604 | 39,730 | 65.7 |
12o | 3116 | – | - |
12p | 368 | 23,080 | 62.7 |
12q | 73 | 1632 | 22 |
16e | 5070 | – | – |
16f | 14,033 | – | – |
aPvNMT and HsNMT IC50 values are shown as mean values of two or more determinations.
bEnzyme selectivity calculated as HsNMT IC50/PvNMT IC50.
Pyrimidine-based hybrid compounds yield mixed results
Compounds 16a–f were designed with a pyrimidine moiety as their core A (Fig. 1c) to increase the polarity of the hybrid compounds. The additional nitrogen, relative to related pyridines in the compound 12 series, corresponds to position Z in Supplementary Fig. 2. Structurally, this site is adjacent to the side chain of Tyr211, 4.4–4.5 Å from the hydroxyl group in the PvNMT complex with IMP-1002. To attach the piperazine head to this core, we reacted commercially available 2,4-dichloropyrimidine with Boc-protected-piperazine to generate compound 13 (Supplementary Fig. 3). Subsequent Suzuki coupling with the appropriate boronic acid yielded biaryl intermediates 14 and 15. The tail components were introduced via the Mitsunobu reaction, followed by Boc-deprotection using 4 M HCl in dioxane, to produce the pyrimidine hybrid compounds (16a–16f) in good yields.
In general, the introduction of a pyrimidine group in core A resulted in lower potencies (Table 1). However, compound 16b, having the same groups in the head and tail regions, was more selective over HsNMT (SI = 164) than 12e or 12f (SI = 7.8 and 43.9, respectively). Notably, fluorine substitution at the R site consistently improved potency in this series.
Dimethylaminoethanol head group shows an increased potency
With the goal of increasing potency against PvNMT, the piperazine head group was replaced with the 2-(dimethylamino)ethanol moiety. This increased the cLogP value by approximately 0.3–0.9 log units for the different compounds presented in Table 1. The protonatable nitrogen from the dimethylamino group was expected to form a favorable ionic interaction with the carboxylate group of the C-terminal residue. Supplementary Fig. 5 shows the synthetic route used to prepare this series of hybrid compounds (26a–i). The synthesis began with a Suzuki coupling reaction using the different blocks of aryl ethers (3–11) with the commercially available 3-hydroxyphenylboronic acid to form the biaryl scaffold (17–25). Finally, the commercially available 2-(dimethylamino)-ethanol moiety was reacted with a corresponding biaryl framework using the Mitsunobu reaction to produce the desired hybrid compounds (26a–i) in good overall yields.
The in vitro IC50 values of the hybrid compounds 26a–i are summarized in Table 2. The three compounds of this series having a 1,3,5-trimethylpyrazole group in the tail region (26a–26c) exhibited an SI of >115. Although the compounds with the dimethylaminoethanol group had higher cLogP values than the hybrids that had the piperazine group in the head region (12f vs. 26c or 12d vs. 26b), the affinity for PvNMT was similar to that of compounds with the 1,3,5-trimethylpyrazole group in the tail region with IC50 values below 100 nM (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 2.
Compound | PvNMT IC50 (nM)a | HsNMT IC50 (nM)a | SIb |
---|---|---|---|
26a | 266 | >40,000 | 153.8 |
26b | 83.2 | 9850 | 118.4 |
26c | 29.4 | 4790 | 162.3 |
26d | 14,800 | – | – |
26e | 12,760 | – | – |
26f | 622 | >40,000 | 62.3 |
26g | 19,400 | – | – |
26h | 1563 | – | – |
26i | 242 | 13,860 | 57 |
30a | 89 | 24,010 | 269.8 |
30b | 19,830 | – | – |
30c | 248 | >40,000 | 161 |
30d | 7210 | – | – |
30e | 2880 | – | – |
30f | 25,400 | – | – |
aPvNMT and HsNMT IC50 values are shown as mean values of two or more determinations.
bEnzyme selectivity calculated as HsNMT IC50/PvNMT IC50.
Naphthol as the core scaffold improves selectivity
Further synthetic modifications in core B were explored by introducing a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon such as naphthol. Through molecular docking of compound 12e (Fig. 1d), a space was observed in the pocket of the binding site, indicating that it was appropriate to introduce another ring in core B. The introduction of the naphthol group increased lipophilicity, improving potency and selectivity. For these hybrids, different groups of heterocycles were preserved, including the tail moiety and the piperazino-pyridine and 2-(phenoxy)-N,N-dimethyl-ethane-1-amine moiety as core A and the head moiety. To synthesize these compounds (30a–f), we employed the same reactions presented in Supplementary Figs. 1–3 and 5. Supplementary Fig. 6 displays the synthetic route used to prepare this series of hybrid compounds (30a–f) in good overall yields.
The introduction of a naphthol group into core B did not improve the enzymatic activity when the compounds carried dimethylaminoethanol (26b vs. 30b) in the head region. However, the affinity enhancement imparted by the piperazine group in the head region (30a vs. 30b) was accompanied by an improved selectivity (Table 2). Although compound 30a had less affinity for PvNMT than compound 12c, it showed a better degree of selectivity over HsNMT (SI = 269) than did all other hybrid compounds (Tables 1 and 2).
Compound 12b binds in a selective binding mode
We determined the X-ray co-crystal structure of PvNMT, myrCoA, and 12b at 1.65 Å resolution (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Table 1). Similar to other PvNMT inhibitors, 12b binds in a hydrophobic pocket within the peptide binding cleft formed by residues of the N- and C-terminal domains, including the Ab loop17,21,23. Comparison with the structure of inhibitor-free PvNMT shows that conformational changes occur throughout much of the substrate binding sites (Fig. 2a). The inhibitor binding site architecture is unique relative to those of all crystal structures of PvNMT and HsNMT1 thus far characterized, with Tyr211, His213, Phe226, and Leu410 displaying distinct conformations (Fig. 2b).
Compound 12b aligns closely with that of IMP-1002, reflecting the similarity of their chemical topologies, and its piperazine group binds in a similar location to that of DDD85646 (Fig. 3a, b). However, the N4 atom of the piperazine, which is spaced by four atoms from the core group, is misaligned with the corresponding amines of the hybrid precursors. As a result, N4 makes weaker electrostatic interactions with the C-terminal carboxylate group (separation distance of 4.0 Å) but is positioned more closely to Thr197, forming a hydrogen bond with the side chain hydroxyl group (Fig. 3c). Additionally, the core group stabilizes a highly rotated conformation of Tyr211, which is also observed in the IMP-1002-bound structure of PvNMT and proposed to represent a selective (S) state (Fig. 3d)18,19,21,35. This differs from the DDD85646-bound structure, which shows Tyr211 in a nonrotated conformation that corresponds to a nonselective state (N)20 (Fig. 3c). The 1,3,5-trimethylpyrazole tail group of 12b forms a hydrogen bond with Ser319, similar to that of IMP-1002 and as predicted from the docking calculations performed using 12e.
The nitrogen atom of the pyridine ring of 12b forms a hydrogen bond with an additional water molecule accommodated in this region of the binding site relative to that of IMP-1002. This difference, together with the misalignment of the piperazine with Leu410, is associated with an orientational change in the inhibitor and displacement of Tyr211 (Fig. 3d). The conformational changes permeate both the peptide and myrCoA binding sites. Phe226 is displaced to a position that sterically favors rotamer B of His213, whereas IMP-1002 binding favors rotamer A21 (Fig. 2b). The conformational differences at Phe226 are associated with larger structural changes at residues 217-247 that narrow the substrate binding cleft at pocket 8 to peptide excluding distances (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 7).
NMTis show minimal toxicity in human hepatoma cells
A major concern in developing Plasmodium NMT inhibitors is the potential toxicity in host cells due to cross-reactivity with human NMTs, given the structural overlap between the active site of Plasmodium and human NMTs17. Therefore, we assessed cytotoxicity in the human hepatoma HepG2 cell line. We required a PvNMT to HsNMT SI > 20 for further screening. HepG2 cells were exposed to the compounds at concentrations ranging from 1 to 20 µM for 48 h, and toxicity was assessed via live-dead staining. Staurosporine, a promiscuous kinase inhibitor and known inducer of cell death in HepG2 cells, was used as a positive control; as expected, it reduced the cell viability at 10–20 µM. None of the NMT-targeting compounds induced >30% cell death in the HepG2 cells, even at their highest concentration of 20 µM (Fig. 4a; Source Data file and Table 3).
Table 3.
Cytotoxicity | Blood stage | Liver stage | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Compound | HepG2 IC50 (µM) | P. falciparum NF54 IC50 (nM) | P. vivax schizonts IC50 (µM) | P. vivax hypnozoites IC50 (µM) |
12a | >20 | 810 | 3–3.8 | 5.7 |
12b | >20 | 470 | 2.3–4.6 | 1.7 |
12d | >20 | 800 | 3.3–4.3 | 4.7 |
12e | >20 | 360 | 3.4–3.7 | 1.2 |
12f | >20 | 610 | 3.3–4.3 | 1.5 |
12g | >20 | 600 | 2.2–3.1 | 1.2 |
12j | >20 | 1250 | 4.9–6.0 | 12 |
12l | >20 | 370 | 2.9–4.7 | 2.1 |
12q | >20 | 380 | 2.2–3.5 | 4.4 |
26b | >20 | 710 | 3.1–4.1 | 4.6 |
26c | >20 | 820 | 2.8–4.2 | 4.2 |
26i | >20 | 400 | 3.3–5.2 | 11 |
30a | >20 | 440 | 2.9–4.3 | 2.1 |
30c | >20 | 680 | 2.7–4.9 | 3.8 |
NMTis are active against blood-stage parasites
To assess whether any of the PvNMTis developed here could qualify as TCP-1 candidates, we assessed the effect of each compound on blood-stage P. falciparum parasites, as there is currently no well-established in vitro platform for screening P. vivax blood-stage parasites. Synchronized P. falciparum NF54 ring-stage parasites were treated for 72 h with each compound at various concentrations, ranging from 0.625 µM to 10 µM, and parasite DNA replication was measured using a fluorescent DNA binding dye (SYBR Green). The most active compounds against blood stage parasites had the pyridine moiety in core A and the p-fluorophenyl group in core B in the biaryl scaffold (12e, 12l, and 12i) (Fig. 4b–d, Source Data file). The relative IC50 values for each compound varied from 360 nM to 1.25 µM (Table 3).
NMTis are active against P. vivax liver-stage schizonts
We next evaluated the candidate compounds against liver-stage P. vivax (Fig. 5). P. vivax sporozoites were obtained from three independent patient isolates and cultured in primary human hepatocytes from a single donor lot using a 384-well microculture system as described previously36. Cells were infected and treated with NMTis at 20 µM beginning day 5 post-infection until day 8 when the infection rates were quantified by fluorescent microscopy. We defined schizonts as any liver-stage parasites that exhibited circumferential P. vivax Upregulated in Infectious Sporozoites—4 (PvUIS4) staining, had multiple nuclear masses, and were ≥10 µm in diameter (Fig. 4a).
We observed robust schizont infections in each of the three independent patient isolates (Fig. 5b, Source Data file) and found that all the tested compounds reduced the parasite load by at least 90% when administered at 20 µM (Fig. 5b and Table 3). Accordingly, we applied dose–response curves of all the tested NMTs on parasite isolates 2 and 3 over concentrations up to 20 µM (Fig. 5c, d, Source Data file). We observed similar kinetics for all inhibitors, with a gradual decrease in parasite load upon increasing the drug concentration. The IC50 values were calculated for each compound and ranged from 2.2 to 6 µM (Table 3). Nuclei were counted in each well using DAPI staining as a measure of toxicity (Supplementary Fig. 86, Supplementary Source data). We used the phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase inhibitor (PI4Ki), MMV390048, as a positive control for eliminating schizonts37,38. As expected, the PI4Ki dramatically reduced the number of schizonts per well. The most active compounds in this stage (12b and 12g) shared the same scaffold and the piperazine moiety in the tail region; both compounds showed an SI of >150 in the biochemical assay (Table 1).
NMTis are active against P. vivax liver stage hypnozoites
Finally, we evaluated the NMT-binding compounds against non-developing P. vivax hypnozoites. Hypnozoites were defined as parasites having a single nucleus, diameter of <10 µM, and exhibiting prominent staining for PvUIS4 at a point within the parasite periphery (termed the ‘prominence’)39 (Fig. 6A). Of the three parasite isolates, we used to infect primary human hepatocytes; two isolates exhibited robust numbers of P. vivax hypnozoites as defined by these criteria (Fig. 6B, Source Data file). We, therefore, evaluated the impact of all tested compounds on P. vivax hypnozoites using these two isolates. All tested compounds except 26i and 30c exhibited >90% inhibition of hypnozoites at 20 µM (Fig. 6C, Source Data file). Compound 30c exhibited >75% inhibition at 20 µM. The IC50 values were calculated for each compound and ranged from 1.2 to 12 µM (Fig. 6D and Table 3). Six compounds showed IC50 values < 2.1 µM in this stage, two of which (12b and 30a) had an SI of >250 in the enzymatic assay, both having the same group in the tail and head regions (Tables 1 and 2).
Interestingly, the efficacy of NMTis on schizont (Fig. 5) and hypnozoite (Fig. 6) P. vivax liver stage forms, as well as efficacy against P. falciparum asexual blood stages (Fig. 4), was strongly correlated (Fig. 6E). NMTs also exhibited consistent effects across P. vivax parasite isolates. Multiple comparison tests for each compound revealed no significant difference in the effect of NMTis on schizonts between isolates, except for compound 12q (Supplementary Table 2). A significant difference in the effect on hypnozoites between isolates was observed for compound 26i only. Notably, compound 26i was the only inhibitor that showed a significantly different effect on the two parasite forms, suggesting that PvNMT targeting compounds might form the basis for a drug that is effective against multiple life cycle stages of Plasmodium, and across evolved field isolates.
Discussion
The development of potent anti-malarial compounds that target the complete life cycle of Plasmodium is needed for eradication. As most of the currently licensed antimalarials target only the erythrocytic stage, expanding our antimalarial arsenal is crucial. Drugs that can effectively target the liver stage have been a particular challenge to develop. The liver stage is a clinically silent and obligatory developmental phase that occurs before parasites can infect erythrocytes and cause malaria symptoms. Targeting the hepatic stage is therefore highly desirable in the context of malaria eradication, not only because its asymptomatic nature makes it ideally suited for prophylactic intervention but also because the liver can serve as a reservoir for P. vivax hypnozoites, the dormant parasite forms that cause relapses long after the initial blood infection has been treated.
The enzyme NMT is expressed throughout the Plasmodium life cycle and is a promising target for antimalarial drug development. Schlott and colleagues showed that NMT inhibition disrupts at least 3 vital pathways of the parasite lifecycle: early schizont development, merozoite formation, and merozoite egress24. Despite this promise, the enzyme has been deprioritized as an anti-malarial target due to challenges in identifying parasite-selective inhibitors and a slow mechanism of action30. The impact of NMT inhibition on hypnozoites has not been fully investigated. Here we demonstrate that NMT inhibitors reduce the growth of P. vivax schizonts and hypnozoites derived from clinical isolates, making PvNMT a potential target for eliminating dormant forms of the parasite. Combining NMT inhibitors with fast-killing blood stage compounds is an attractive strategy for complete parasite elimination30.
To develop these selective inhibitors, we utilized a hybrid approach to combine previous inhibitor designs to maximize the affinity and selectivity of the parasite over the human enzyme. The combinatorial designs included three tail group moieties (1,3,5-trimethylpyrazole, 3,5-dimethylpyrazole, and pyridine) and two head group moieties (piperazine and dimethylaminoethanol), and the core region was varied extensively at four unique positions (Figs. 1c and 7a). The use of the piperazine head group (hybridization of IMP-1002 and DDD85646) was unique because of the longer, 4-atom spacer introduced between the terminal amine and core regions. Notably, docking calculations suggested that such designs can be accommodated by the binding site (Fig. 1d), and remarkably, six of these compounds analyzed in vitro displayed IC50 values against PvNMT of less than 90 nM and reached selectivity indices relative to human NMT1 above 115 (Fig. 7b). Moreover, six compounds displayed high efficiencies against both blood and liver stages of P. vivax (Fig. 7b). Compounds 12b and 30a belong to both groups and thus emerge as the most favorable lead inhibitors (Fig. 7b).
The high-resolution crystal structure of PvNMT bound to 12b demonstrates that a hybrid compound can bind within the active site. The high selectivity is likely attributed to the distinct way the core and head groups interface with the adjacent waters and polar sites near the carboxy terminus, which accompanies conformational changes that propagate throughout the peptide and myrCoA binding sites. The selectivity of compound 30a, the most selective inhibitor of the presently developed series, is also expected to leverage the adjacent water channel via the insertion of its naphthalene group. These two compounds, and close derivatives, should also be considered for selectivity analysis against P. falciparum NMT. There are presently no crystal structures of PfNMT available in the Protein Data Bank, but a comparison of amino acid sequences (UniProt accession codes Q8ILW6 and A5K1A2) shows only one amino acid replacement in the 12b binding site—a phenylalanine substitution at the PvNMT Tyr334 site. A key question is whether the same mechanisms leading to the high selectivities of 12b and 30a will act in the peptide binding cleft of PfNMT and if the phenylalanine substitution can have an additive effect.
Our study not only provides insights into how selective PvNMT inhibitors can be developed but also underscores the potential value of NMTis as antimalarial drugs. While several P. vivax targets have been identified, and strategies to interfere with the non-developing P. vivax hypnozoite form remain a major gap in drug development. Therefore, it is particularly impactful that the compounds we describe here target both developing and dormant liver forms of P. vivax. In conclusion, we have developed NMTis that show promise as multi-stage targeting antimalarials, and our work suggests P. vivax NMT may be a target for anti-relapse therapy.
Methods
Ethical statement
Plasmodium vivax infected blood was collected from patients attending malaria clinics in Tak and Yala provinces, Thailand, under the approved protocol by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University (MUTM 2018-016-03). Written Informed consent was obtained from each patient before sample collection.
Synthetic procedure and characterization of compounds
All the hybrid compounds were synthesized as described in Supplementary Methods, and the NMR spectra for the final compounds (12a–12q, 16a–16f, 26a–26i, and 30a–30f) are illustrated in Supplementary Figs. 9–84.
Docking of compound 12e into the binding pocket of PvNMT
The hybrid compound 12e was rendered in the form of 2D images using the ChemDraw Professional (Version 19.1.1.21) software package, converted to SDF format, and then prepared for docking using the Molecular Operating Environment (MOE 2019.01) software package. After loading the SDF files, it was processed as follows: the compound was energy-minimized, and partial charges were added (Amber10 forcefield) using QuickPrep. To prepare the receptor protein, the PvNMT PDB file (PDB: 6MB1) was loaded into MOE and processed using QuickPrep. The docking simulation was set up by setting the receptor to “receptor+solvent.” The SDF file containing the processed ligands to be docked was loaded. Ligand placement and refinement were performed using the Alpha PMI and rigid receptor methods, with 30 and 3 poses, respectively.
Cloning, expression, and purification of NMT enzymes
Cloning, expression, and purification were conducted as part of the Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease (SSGCID)40,41 following protocols described previously18,21,42,43. A region of the PvNMT gene encoding residues 27–410 with an N-terminus 6xHis sequence and PreScission cleavage site was codon optimized for expression in E. coli and cloned into a pET11a expression vector (GenScript) as described previously18,21. The N-terminal sequence is MGSSHHHHHHSAALEVLFQ/GP-ORF, where cleavage occurs between the glutamine and glycine residues. Plasmid DNA was transformed into chemically competent E. coli Rosetta 2 (DE3) pRARE cells. Cells were expression tested, and 4–12 liters of culture were grown using auto-induction media44 in the LEX bioreactor for 18-22 h at 18 °C. The expression clone was assigned the SSGCID target identifier PlviB.18219.a.FR2.GE44010 and is available at https://www.ssgcid.org/available-materials/ssgcid-proteins/. Protein was purified following a 5-step procedure as previously described18,21 consisting of Ni2+-affinity chromatography (IMAC), cleavage of the 6xHis-tag and pass over a second IMAC column to remove cleaved tag and protease. The eluted protein was purified further using an anion exchange HiTRAP Q HP 5 mL column. Peak fractions were concentrated to 5 mL and applied to a Superdex 75 10/300 column. The final buffer was composed of 0.3 M NaCl, 20 mM HEPES, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM TCEP, and pH 7.0. Fractions were analyzed on an SDS-PAGE gel, and fractions containing the target protein were concentrated and flash frozen, and stored at −80 °C until further use.
Crystallization and structure determination of P. vivax NMT
Purified PvNMT (residues 27–410) concentrated to 8 mg/mL was incubated with 1 mM myrCoA (MedChem101 LLC.) and compound 12b for 20 min at room temperature and set up in 96-well sitting drop crystallization screens JCSG + HT96 (Molecular Dimensions) and Morpheus HT96 (Molecular Dimensions). Crystals formed within 2 weeks in JCSG+ condition A1 composed of 0.2 M lithium sulfate, 0.1 M sodium acetate, and 50% PEG 400, pH 4.5. Crystals were harvested directly, and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen without cryo-protectant exchange. Frozen crystals were shipped to the Advanced Light Source (ALS), Berkeley National Laboratory as part of the Collaborative Crystallography program of ALS-ENABLE. Data were collected at beam line 8.2.2. Mounted crystals were maintained at 100 K and irradiated with X-rays having a wavelength of 1.00000 Å. Additional details are provided in Supplementary Table 1. Data were indexed and integrated with HKL200045 and scaled with XSCALE46. The structure was solved with Phaser47 using PDB 6NXG as a search model. The model was refined with iterative rounds of refinement with Phenix48 and manual model building in Coot49. The quality of the structure was checked with Molprobity50: 97.13% of the backbone torsional angles were determined to be in the favored regions of Ramachandran space, with the remaining angles in the allowed regions; 97.93% of the modeled residues displaying favored rotamers. The structure of 12b was validated through the aid of a 2Fo–Fc composite omit map computed using Phenix48 (Supplementary Fig. 8). Molecular graphics of the crystal structure were produced using Chimera51.
NMT activity assay
To measure the activity of the purified PvNMT, an assay was adapted from Goncalves et al.34. The assay buffer was prepared in a 4× stock solution consisting of 9.2 mM potassium phosphate, 69.7 mM sodium phosphate, 2 mM EDTA and 10% TritonX-100 at pH 7.0. Working stock solutions were made fresh, adding DMSO for final concentrations of either 1% or 5% DMSO. The PvNMT enzyme was diluted in an assay buffer containing 1% DMSO for a final concentration of 25 nM. Ten microlitres of the test compound or 10% (v/v) DMSO/water were dispensed into a 96-well plate (Greiner Bio-One) and 50 µL of the enzyme (in assay buffer containing 1% DMSO) was added for a final concentration of 25 nM per well. The plate was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The enzymatic reaction was initiated by adding 50 µL of reaction substrate containing 10 µM myrCoA and PfARF, as well as 8 µM CPM. Fluorescent readings were taken on a Spectra M2 plate reader (Molecular Devices) with excitation at 385 nm and emission at 485 nm. Fluorescent intensity was measured continuously in one-minute intervals for 45 min. Background fluorescence and noise were determined by replacing each constituent of the reaction individually with an assay buffer containing 1% DMSO, and values were deducted from experimental samples. The enzymatic reactions were set up with varying pHs (6.0–8.5) of the assay buffer to determine optimal reaction conditions with minimal background and off-target reactions. In lieu of compound, 10 µL of 10% DMSO/H2O was added to each well. The fluorescence signal was obtained continuously for 45 min. A linear reaction rate was observed during the first 30 min and used to determine all values. The synthetic peptide (PfARF) Gly-Leu-Tyr-Val-Ser-Arg-Leu-Phe-Asn-Arg-Leu-Phe-Gln-Lys-Lys-NH2 was purchased from Innopep (San Diego, California). 7-Diethylamino-3-(4′-Maleimidylphenyl)-4-Methylcoumarin (CPM) was purchased from Thermo Scientific Life Technologies (Grand Island, New York), and the co-factor myrCoA was purchased from Med Chem 101 LLC (Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania). IC50 calculations were calculated using Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc.).
HepG2 cytotoxicity assay
HepG2 (HB-8065) cells were obtained from ATCC. The viability of the HepG2 cell line following exposure to the compounds was determined by a Live/Dead cell assay kit (Invitrogen). Briefly, cells were added to a 96-well plate at a concentration of 5000 cells per well, excluding the exterior wells. Cells were exposed to the compounds at different concentrations ranging from 1 to 20 µM. Cells were washed every 24 h and supplemented with fresh doses of compounds. At 72 h post-treatment, 1 µM calcein-AM and 1 µM ethidium homodimer were added to the wells and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. After washing with PBS, the cells were visualized with fluorescent microscopy (Keyence BZ-X700).
P. falciparum blood stage assay
Sorbitol-synchronized P. falciparum NF54 ring-stage parasites were cultured at a parasitemia of 0.5% and hematocrit of 1.5% in a 96-well microtiter plate. Parasites were treated with each NMT inhibitor compound at 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5, or 10 µM for 72 h. Direct lysis of the blood cells to release the parasite DNA was performed by adding 100 μl of LBS buffer containing SYBR green I DNA binding dye to each well. Plates were incubated at −20 °C overnight for complete lysis, and fluorescence was measured at 485 nm (excitation) and 528 nm (emission). ICEstimator regression analysis (http://www.antimalarial-icestimator.net/) was used to obtain relative IC50 values for each compound.
Generation of P. vivax sporozoites
Plasmodium vivax-infected blood was collected from patients attending malaria clinics in Tak and Yala provinces, Thailand, under the approved protocol by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University (MUTM 2018-016-03). Written Informed consent was obtained from each patient before sample collection. The infected blood was washed once with RPMI1640 incomplete medium before being resuspended with AB serum to a final 50% hematocrit and fed to a female Anopheles dirus through membrane feeding. The engorged mosquitoes were maintained in a 10% sugar solution until used. The infected mosquitoes at day 14–21 post-feeding were used for harvesting sporozoites.
P. vivax liver stage assay
Plasmodium vivax liver stage assays were performed as described previously36. Cryopreserved primary human hepatocytes (Cat No. F00995-P) and hepatocyte culture medium (HCM) (InVitroGroTM CP Medium) were obtained from Bioreclamation IVT, Inc., (Baltimore, MD, USA). Briefly, we seeded 384-well plates with primary hepatocytes from a single donor lot at a density of 25,000 cells per well. We then infected the hepatocytes with 14,000 freshly hand-dissected sporozoites per well. Cells were exposed to the compounds at indicated concentrations from day 5 post-infection. We used Pi4K inhibitor MMV390048, at 20 µM, as a positive control to eliminate P. vivax liver schizonts. We then proceeded to feed cultures every day, replacing the compounds until day 8 post-infection. Cells were fixed with 4% PFA, permeabilized with 1% Triton X-100, blocked with 2% BSA, and stained with DAPI and PvUIS4 antibodies to detect schizonts and hypnozoites forms by confocal microscopy. For antibody dilutions, PvUIS4 (kind gift from Dr. Noah Sather, Seattle Children’s Research Institute) was diluted 1:250 and the secondary antibody was anti-mouse AlexaFluor-594 (Cat # A-11005; RRID: AB_2534073) diluted 1:1000. DAPI was diluted 1:2000. The images were processed, analyzed and outlier cells were removed using IMARIS (Bitplane Inc.) image analysis software.
Statistical analysis
A two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons tests (unpaired) was used to compare the effect of each NMTi on schizonts compared to DMSO controls and to compare the effect of each NMTi on schizonts between parasite isolates. Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (paired) was used to compare the effect of each NMTi on hypnozoites and schizonts within an isolate.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Noah Sather for the P. vivax UIS4 antibody and Dr. Dennis Kyle and Dr. Steven Maher for the PI4K inhibitor. This research used the Advanced Light Source resources, a DOE Office of Science User Facility under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. The ALS-ENABLE beamlines are supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, grant P30 GM124169-01. This project has been funded in part with Federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, and Department of Health and Human Services to support the Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease (SSGCID) under Contract No. HHSN272201700059C (P.J.M.). Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01AI155536 (B.L.S.), by a fellowship from Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education (CAPES), Brazil (STINT-PROJ-20181009558P) (D.R.H.), by the Swedish Research Council (2016-05627) and (2021-03667) (P.S. and M.G.), and by grant R21 AI 151344 from the National Institutes of Health (A.K. and E.K.K.G.).
Author contributions
Conceptualization: B.L.S., A.K., and M.G.; Methodology: D.R.H., K.V., M.G., W.R., J.S., B.L.S., and A.K.; Investigation: D.R.H., K.V., R.Z., M.F., B.S., E.K.K.G., W.R., J.S., and B.L.S.; Visualization: D.R.H., M.F., K.V., and E.K.K.G.; Funding acquisition: P.M., B.L.S., A.K., M.G., and P.S., Project administration: B.L.S., M.G., and A.K.; Supervision: B.L.S., M.G., and A.K., Writing—original draft: D.R.H., K.V., B.L.S., M.F., M.G., and A.K.; Writing—review & editing: all authors.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Gothenburg.
Data availability
The atomic coordinates and structure factor amplitudes of the crystal structure of PvNMT bound to myrCoA and 12b are available at the Protein Data Bank, accession code 8FBQ. The associated raw X-ray diffraction images have been deposited in the Integrated Resource for Reproducibility in Macromolecular Crystallography under accession code 8FBQ at https://proteindiffraction.org52. Protein expression plasmids of PvNMT, HsNMT1, and HsNMT2 are available at https://www.ssgcid.org/available-materials/ssgcid-proteins/ through a material transfer agreement (MTA). Source data are provided in this paper. The UniProt accession codes for PvNMT and PfNMT are A5K1A2 and Q8ILW6, respectively. The accession codes of all other PDB coordinate files referenced in this study are: 2YNC, 2YND, 2YNE, 3IU1, 3IU2, 3IWE, 3JTK, 4A95, 4B10, 4B11, 4B12, 4B13, 4B14, 4BBH, 4C2Y, 4C2Z, 4C68, 4CAE, 4CAF, 4UFV, 4UFW, 4UFX, 5G1Z, 5G22, 5MU6, 5O48, 5O4V, 5O6H, 5O6J, 5NPQ, 5O9S, 5O9T, 5O9U, 5O9V, 5UUT, 5V0W, 5V0X, 6B1L, 6FZ2, 6FZ3, 6FZ5, 6MB1, 6NXG, 6PAV, 6EHJ, 6QRM, 6SJZ, 6SK2, 6TW5, 6TW6, and 7RK3. Source data are provided in this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Diego Rodríguez-Hernández, Kamalakannan Vijayan.
Contributor Information
Alexis Kaushansky, Email: Alexis.Kaushansky@seattlechildrens.org.
Morten Grøtli, Email: grotli@chem.gu.se.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-41119-7.
References
- 1.Organization, W. H. World malaria report 2021. (2021).
- 2.Price RN, et al. Vivax malaria: neglected and not benign. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2007;77:79–87. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Organization, W. H. World malaria report 2018. (2018).
- 4.Tse EG, Korsik M, Todd MH. The past, present and future of anti-malarial medicines. Malar. J. 2019;18:93. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2724-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vijayan K, et al. Host-targeted Interventions as an exciting opportunity to combat malaria. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:10452–10468. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chu CS, White NJ. The prevention and treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria. PLoS Med. 2021;18:e1003561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Burrows J, et al. A discovery and development roadmap for new endectocidal transmission-blocking agents in malaria. Malar. J. 2018;17:462. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2598-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Burrows JN, et al. New developments in anti-malarial target candidate and product profiles. Malar. J. 2017;16:26. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1675-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Markus MB. Do hypnozoites cause relapse in malaria? Trends Parasitol. 2015;31:239–245. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2015.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Robinson LJ, et al. Strategies for understanding and reducing the Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium ovale hypnozoite reservoir in Papua New Guinean children: a randomised placebo-controlled trial and mathematical model. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.White M, Amino R, Mueller I. Theoretical implications of a pre-erythrocytic Plasmodium vivax vaccine for preventing relapses. Trends Parasitol. 2017;33:260–263. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2016.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schlott AC, Holder A, Tate EW. N-Myristoylation as a drug target in malaria: exploring the role of N-myristoyltransferase substrates in the inhibitor mode of action. ACS Infect. Dis. 2018;4:449–457. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schultz AM, Henderson LE, Oroszlan S, Garber EA, Hanafusa H. Amino terminal myristylation of the protein kinase p60src, a retroviral transforming protein. Science. 1985;227:427–429. doi: 10.1126/science.3917576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mumby SM, Heukeroth RO, Gordon JI, Gilman AG. G-protein alpha-subunit expression, myristoylation, and membrane association in COS cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1990;87:728–732. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.2.728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Matsubara M, Nakatsu T, Kato H, Taniguchi H. Crystal structure of a myristoylated CAP-23/NAP-22 N-terminal domain complexed with Ca2+/calmodulin. EMBO J. 2004;23:712–718. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Timms RT, et al. A glycine-specific N-degron pathway mediates the quality control of protein N-myristoylation. Science. 2019;365:eaaw4912. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw4912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bell AS, et al. Selective inhibitors of protozoan protein N-myristoyltransferases as starting points for tropical disease medicinal chemistry programs. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012;6:e1625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Harupa A, et al. Identification of selective inhibitors of Plasmodium N-myristoyltransferase by high-throughput screening. J. Med. Chem. 2020;63:591–600. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yu Z, et al. Design and synthesis of inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum N-myristoyltransferase, a promising target for anti-malarial drug discovery. J. Med. Chem. 2012;55:8879–8890. doi: 10.1021/jm301160h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wright MH, et al. Validation of N-myristoyltransferase as an antimalarial drug target using an integrated chemical biology approach. Nat. Chem. 2014;6:112–121. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schlott AC, et al. Structure-guided identification of resistance breaking antimalarial N-myristoyltransferase inhibitors. Cell Chem. Biol. 2019;26:991–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rackham MD, et al. Design and synthesis of high affinity inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax N-Myristoyltransferases directed by ligand efficiency dependent lipophilicity (LELP) J. Med. Chem. 2014;57:2773–2788. doi: 10.1021/jm500066b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Goncalves V, et al. Discovery of Plasmodium vivax N-myristoyltransferase inhibitors: screening, synthesis, and structural characterization of their binding mode. J. Med. Chem. 2012;55:3578–3582. doi: 10.1021/jm300040p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schlott AC, et al. Inhibition of protein N-myristoylation blocks Plasmodium falciparum intraerythrocytic development, egress and invasion. PLoS Biol. 2021;19:e3001408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bertschi NL, et al. Transcriptomic analysis reveals reduced transcriptional activity in the malaria parasite Plasmodium cynomolgi during progression into dormancy. Elife. 2018;27:e41081. doi: 10.7554/eLife.41081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Voorberg-van der Wel A, et al. comparative transcriptomic analysis of replicating and dormant liver stages of the relapsing malaria parasite Plasmodium cynomolgi. Elife. 2017;7:e29605. doi: 10.7554/eLife.29605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cubi R, et al. Laser capture microdissection enables transcriptomic analysis of dividing and quiescent liver stages of Plasmodium relapsing species. Cell Microbiol. 2017;19:e12735. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ashrafi K, Farazi TA, Gordon JI. A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae fatty acid activation protein 4 in regulating protein N-myristoylation during entry into stationary phase. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:25864–25874. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.40.25864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang M, et al. Uncovering the essential genes of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum by saturation mutagenesis. Science. 2018;360:eaap7847. doi: 10.1126/science.aap7847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Forte B, et al. Prioritization of molecular targets for antimalarial drug discovery. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021;7:2764–2776. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mousnier A, et al. Fragment-derived inhibitors of human N-myristoyltransferase block capsid assembly and replication of the common cold virus. Nat. Chem. 2018;10:599–606. doi: 10.1038/s41557-018-0039-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sach NW, et al. Synthesis of aryl ethers via a sulfonyl transfer reaction. Org. Lett. 2012;14:3886–3889. doi: 10.1021/ol301615z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tsunoda T, et al. Formation of heterocycles by the mitsunobu reaction stereoselective synthesis of (+)-α-skytanthine. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:2463–2466. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Goncalves V, et al. Fluorescence-based assay for N-myristoyltransferase activity. Anal. Biochem. 2012;421:342–344. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Brannigan JA, et al. Diverse modes of binding in structures of Leishmania major N-myristoyltransferase with selective inhibitors. IUCrJ. 2014;17:250–260. doi: 10.1107/S2052252514013001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Roth A, et al. A comprehensive model for assessment of liver stage therapies targeting Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:1837. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04221-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Posfai D, et al. Plasmodium vivax liver and blood stages recruit the druggable host membrane channel aquaporin-3. Cell Chem. Biol. 2020;27:719–727. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gural N, et al. In vitro culture, drug sensitivity, and transcriptome of Plasmodium Vivax hypnozoites. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23:395–406. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mikolajczak SA, et al. Plasmodium vivax liver stage development and hypnozoite persistence in human liver-chimeric mice. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:526–535. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Myler PJ, et al. The seattle structural genomics center for infectious disease (SSGCID) Infect. Disord. Drug Targets. 2009;9:493–506. doi: 10.2174/187152609789105687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Stacy R, et al. Structural genomics of infectious disease drug targets: the SSGCID. Acta Cryst. 2011;F67:979–984. doi: 10.1107/S1744309111029204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bryan CM, et al. High-throughput protein production and purification at the Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease. Acta Cryst. 2011;F67:1010–1014. doi: 10.1107/S1744309111018367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Choi R, et al. Immobilized metal-affinity chromatography protein-recovery screening is predictive of crystallographic structure success. Acta Cryst. 2011;F67:998–1005. doi: 10.1107/S1744309111017374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Studier FW. Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures. Protein Expr. Purif. 2005;41:207–234. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2005.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 1997;276:307–326. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kabsch W. XDS. Acta Cryst. 2010;D66:125–132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909047337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.McCoy AJ, et al. Crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2010;40:658–674. doi: 10.1107/S0021889807021206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Adams PD, et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Cryst. 2010;D66:213–221. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Cryst. 2010;D66:486–501. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chen VB, et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Cryst. 2010;D66:12–21. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909042073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pettersen EF, et al. UCSF Chimera a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004;25:1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Grabowski M, et al. The integrated resource for reproducibility in macromolecular crystallography: experiences of the first four years. Struct. Dyn. 2019;6:064301. doi: 10.1063/1.5128672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rackham MD, et al. Discovery of novel and ligand-efficient inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax N-myristoyltransferase. J. Med. Chem. 2013;56:371–375. doi: 10.1021/jm301474t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Thinon E, et al. Global profiling of co- and post-translationally N-myristoylated proteomes in human cells. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:4919. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Olaleye TO, et al. Peptidomimetic inhibitors of N-myristoyltransferase from human malaria and leishmaniasis parasites. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014;12:8132–8137. doi: 10.1039/c4ob01669f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yu Z, et al. Discovery of pyridyl-based inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum N-myristoyltransferase. Med. Chem. Commun. 2015;6:1767–1772. doi: 10.1039/c5md00242g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Goncalves V, et al. Structure-guided optimization of quinoline inhibitors of Plasmodium N-myristoyltransferase. Med. Chem. Commun. 2017;8:191–197. doi: 10.1039/c6md00531d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Castrec B, et al. Structural and genomic decoding of human and plant myristoylomes reveals a definitive recognition pattern. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2018;14:671–679. doi: 10.1038/s41589-018-0077-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kim S, et al. Blocking myristoylation of Src inhibits its kinase activity and suppresses prostate cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2017;77:6950–6962. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kersten C, et al. How to design selective ligands for highly conserved binding sites: a case study using N-myristoyltransferases as a model system. J. Med. Chem. 2020;63:2095–2113. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kosciuk T, et al. NMT1 and NMT2 are lysine myristoyltransferases regulating the ARF6 GTPase cycle. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1067. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14893-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dian C, et al. High-resolution snapshots of human N-myristoyltransferase in action illuminate a mechanism promoting N-terminal Lys and Gly myristoylation. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1132. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14847-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The atomic coordinates and structure factor amplitudes of the crystal structure of PvNMT bound to myrCoA and 12b are available at the Protein Data Bank, accession code 8FBQ. The associated raw X-ray diffraction images have been deposited in the Integrated Resource for Reproducibility in Macromolecular Crystallography under accession code 8FBQ at https://proteindiffraction.org52. Protein expression plasmids of PvNMT, HsNMT1, and HsNMT2 are available at https://www.ssgcid.org/available-materials/ssgcid-proteins/ through a material transfer agreement (MTA). Source data are provided in this paper. The UniProt accession codes for PvNMT and PfNMT are A5K1A2 and Q8ILW6, respectively. The accession codes of all other PDB coordinate files referenced in this study are: 2YNC, 2YND, 2YNE, 3IU1, 3IU2, 3IWE, 3JTK, 4A95, 4B10, 4B11, 4B12, 4B13, 4B14, 4BBH, 4C2Y, 4C2Z, 4C68, 4CAE, 4CAF, 4UFV, 4UFW, 4UFX, 5G1Z, 5G22, 5MU6, 5O48, 5O4V, 5O6H, 5O6J, 5NPQ, 5O9S, 5O9T, 5O9U, 5O9V, 5UUT, 5V0W, 5V0X, 6B1L, 6FZ2, 6FZ3, 6FZ5, 6MB1, 6NXG, 6PAV, 6EHJ, 6QRM, 6SJZ, 6SK2, 6TW5, 6TW6, and 7RK3. Source data are provided in this paper.