Abstract
Background:
Ostomy-related challenges in everyday life may negatively affect patients’ Quality of Life (QL), even long after ostomy surgery. Nurses provide care interventions that may have a significant effect on the patients’ QL. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to determine evidence of effective nursing interventions on the QL of patients with an ostomy.
Materials and Methods:
A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. English articles published from 2000 to 2021 were identified and retrieved from PubMed, Medscape, MedlinePlus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus, Wiley Online Library, ProQuest, ClinicalKey, SAGE, IRCT, and Cochrane. We assessed all included studies (18 articles) using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist.
Results:
Interventions reviewed in the study were categorized based on intervention, content of nursing intervention, training method, and target group of the nursing intervention. The nursing interventions involved natural treatments, self-care, and psychological support for patients. The training methods used in the studies included demonstration and lecture, mixed media presentation including PowerPoints, and Internet tools such as WeChat Applications. Some interventions were only presented to patients, caregivers, caregivers and patients together, or peer patients.
Conclusions:
According to the results of the present study, it is suggested that a regular care plan be used with the participation of families and patients from pre-operational to discharge along with nurses’ follow-ups and home care to promote the QL. A combination of self-care and psychological education can promote these patients’ QL.
Keywords: Nurses, ostomy, quality of life
Introduction
The formation of an ostomy and bowel resection are common procedures for people with colorectal cancer.[1] Ostomies may also be required in patients with bladder cancer, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn’s disease.[2] Patients with an ostomy may experience some ostomy-related physical problems after ostomy surgery such as change in defecation, loss of bowel movement control, involuntary gas and stool disposal, deterioration of bodily integrity,[3,4,5,6,7] stool leakage around the ostomy bag, unpleasant sounds and smells, ostomy bag inflation,[5,8] psychological problems such as a lack of self-esteem and self-confidence, depression,[7] stigma and fear of revealing ostomy,[9,10] and feeling of being dismembered.[11] Involuntary stool disposal into the ostomy bag gives a feeling of discomfort to the patient, and it also creates emotional changes that need adjustment. In addition to the effects of the ostomy bag on sexual and social relationships, the resumption or maintenance of relationships is hard for them.[12] The abovementioned problems may have a negative effect on patients’ Quality of Life (QL) because they affect their adjustment and rehabilitation process.[13]
QL is defined as the general well-being of a person or society in terms of health and happiness, rather than wealth.[14] It is also defined as a patient’s perceived health status considering the physical, psychological, social, and spiritual aspects of the health. Thus, research in relation to the QL and well-being of ostomy patients must address their physical health, psychological status, social relationships, and the spiritual aspects of their daily life. Over time, patients experience changes in their QL after ostomy surgery from initially negative to more positive with time and adaptation.[15] Ostomy influences all parts of patients’ life because they have to make some changes in their everyday activities, they have to dress differently, they have to adapt themselves to the new diet, and they have to change their lifestyle.[7,12] Ostomy-related challenges in everyday life such as restrictions on dressing, limitations on traveling, sexual problems, and self-care may negatively affect the patients’ QL, even long after the ostomy surgery.[16,17,18] One of main themes of a qualitative study was efforts to improve QL.[19] Because ostomy has various symptoms and types in different patients, they are considered as a heterogeneous group with different QLs. Therefore, some studies have shown lower QL in women than men,[20] elder patients,[21] and patients with skin problems.[18] Moreover, there is a relationship between QL, type of ostomy,[18] and the underlying disease that led to an ostomy.[6]
Effective communication and collaboration between district nursing teams and stoma specialist nurses are essential to support patients through the period of adaptation to life with a stoma.[2] These experienced professionals are experts who can provide a holistic approach to caring for patients by overseeing their physical and emotional well-being.[22] A qualitative, descriptive study indicated that patients with stoma require support from health care professionals in regaining control of their lives.[23] Specialist ostomy nurses are in contact with patients before, after, and during the medical process. They provide some care services before surgery such as stoma siting and presenting pre-surgery training, provide psychological support and educate patients during hospitalization, and visit patients in health centers or at home when they are discharged from the hospital. Nurses provide care interventions that may have a significant effect on the patients’ QL. Furthermore, it is necessary to verify the effective measures in this regard. In order to achieve a comprehensive guide, it is necessary to review and summarize the studies of effective interventions on the QL of patients with an ostomy; therefore, the purpose of the present study was to determine evidence of effective nursing interventions on the QL of patients with an ostomy.
Materials and Methods
This was a systematic review of experimental and quasi-experimental studies that have examined the effect of nursing interventions on the QL of patients with an ostomy. A systematic literature review was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.[24] To ensure a comprehensive search strategy, the PICOT framework guided our literature search. The components include the Population of interest (P), Issue of interest (I), Comparison of interest (C), Outcome of interest (O), and Timeframe (T).[25] Our search focused on patients with ostomy (colostomy, ileostomy, and urostomy) (P) using nursing interventions (I). The comparison of interest (C) was the intervention by the physician or other health care providers. The outcome (O) was the patient’s QL. We set a timeframe (T) for research published since 2000, which encompassed the last 21 years.
ProQuest, Science Direct, Web of Science, Medline (through PubMed), MedlinePlus, Scopus, Wiley Online Library, Clinical key, and SAGE electronic databases were independently searched by two nurse researchers (ZP and ZSM) to identify eligible publications [Figure 1]. The search was also carried out in the clinical trials register “IRCT, COCHRANE.” The initial literature search was performed on October 20, 2020, and the last search was run on December 26, 2020.
Figure 1.
The PRISMA flow diagram outlines the literature search
Original articles were identified through the search. The search keywords were “colostomy, nursing intervention in ostomy, quality of life, ileostomy, urostomy, health-related quality of life, stoma, Ostomies, patients with ostomy, interventions planned by nurse” using AND/OR operators. The search was also performed in the references of the selected articles. An example of the search strategy was as follows: (Quality of life OR Life Quality OR Health-Related Quality of Life OR HRQL OR QL) AND (Ostomy OR colostomy OR illeostomy OR stoma OR Ostomies OR urostomy OR Ostomate OR Patients with ostomy OR patient with ostoma) AND (nurse OR nurses role OR nursing intervention OR nursing implementation OR nursing plan).
The study inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) The study must be an experimental and quasi-experimental study, (b) it must be published between 2000 to 2021, (c) the main purpose of the study must be effective nursing intervention on the QL of patients with an ostomy, (d) the intervention has to be designed and executed by a nurse, (e) the study has to be carried out on patients with ostomy (colostomy, ileostomy, and urostomy), (f) it must be written in English, and (g) it must be available in full length. The exclusion criteria included articles written in different languages, review articles, and a lack of a nursing intervention. We developed a data extraction sheet. The data were extracted by two reviewers (ZP and ZSM). Any differences were discussed, and data were only included if a consensus was reached between the reviewers. To extract and summarize the information from the included studies, the reviewers conducted an in-depth review including the author, title, location, study type, the sample size and characteristics, intervention, and the results of the study. We used the JBI Critical Appraisal Tools to appraise the articles. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for randomized controlled trials includes 13 items,[26] and the checklist for quasi-experimental studies (non-randomized experimental studies) includes nine items.[26] As a result of the appraisal of the articles, all 18 articles were included in the systematic review.
Ethical considerations
This project was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, with the number “IR.MUMS.REC.1398.173.”
Results
Overview of Included Studies
A systematic review of 18 experimental and semi-experimental studies was carried out in the present study. Nursing interventions of the assessed studies included progressive muscle relaxation training,[27,28] self-efficacy intervention,[29] home visits as part of a new care pathway,[30] motivational interview,[31] family-centered training programs,[32,33] specialty practice nursing care,[34] determination of the location of the ostomy before surgery by an ostomy nurse specialist,[27] home care,[28] the Multimedia Educational Package,[11] the Ostomy Care Team Intervention,[29] hospital-family holistic care intervention,[30] lavender essential oil intervention,[35] Ostomy Telehealth for Cancer Survivors,[36] structured ostomy care training,[37] telemedicine in post-operative follow-up of STOMA patients,[38] and the Continuous Care Model Guidance.[39] The details of the interventions are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the included studies
Title | Author (year) | Location | Design | Sample size and characteristics | Intervention | Content of nursing intervention | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A pilot study on the effect of progressive muscle relaxation training of patients after stoma surgery | Cheung et al., 2001[40] | Hong Kong | randomized controlled trial | The resultant sample consisted of 18 patients. | Progressive Muscle Relaxation Training (PMRT) | Patients received 2 PMRT training sessions in addition to the standard treatment. They received an audio-recorded file of PMRT sessions, and they were asked to practice at home. PMRT included a 20-minute session of expansion and contraction of 10 muscle groups along with deep breaths. Two 40-minute sessions (a briefing session and a training session) were held after surgery to achieve the desired effects. They were asked to practice them at least 2 or 3 times a week and record them. | No significant differences were shown on overall QOL-colostomy scores (F=2.81; p=0.12) as well as the score on individual domains. Patients receiving PMRT reported significantly higher mean total WHO-QOL scores (28 items) (F=4.73; p 0.046) and higher scores on the physical domain/independence (F=6.68; p=0.02) and general perception of QoL domain (items 1 and 2 on the scale) (F=9.21; p=0.01). For all other domains of QoL, there were no significant differences between the control and experimental groups. |
The effect of progressive muscle relaxation training on anxiety and quality of life after stoma surgery in colorectal cancer patients | Cheung et al., 2003[41] | Hong Kong | randomized controlled trial | The required sample size was at least 32 individuals in each group. | PMRT | Patients received 2 PMRT training sessions in addition to the standard treatment. They received an audio-recorded file of PMRT sessions, and they were asked to practice at home. PMRT included a 20-minute session of expansion and contraction of 10 muscle groups along with deep breaths. Two 40-minute sessions (a briefing session and a training session) were held after surgery to achieve the desired effects. They were asked to practice them at least 2 or 3 times a week and record them. | The use of PMRT significantly decreased state anxiety and improved generic quality of life in the experimental group (P50:05), especially in the domains of physical health, psychological health, social concerns, and environment. Social relationships decreased in both groups. In relation to the disease-specific quality of life measure, differences were observed only in the 10-week assessment, with the experimental group reporting better quality of life compared to the control group at 10 weeks, but not over time. |
Home visits as part of a new care pathway (iaid) to improve quality of care and quality of life in ostomy patients: a cluster-randomized stepped-wedge trial | Sier et al., 2017[42] | Cluster-randomized trials | 210 patients 113 patients in the standard care pathway and 105 patients in the new care pathway | New care pathway | Home visits carried out (about 2 hours) by an ostomy therapist 3 weeks before hospital admission to inform patients and their family members about the surgical procedure and ostomy care after discharge from the hospital. | Although in the new pathway (NP) group more patients had stoma-related complications, QoL scores were significantly better (p<0.001). In the standard pathway (SP) group, more patients required extra care at home for their ostomy than in the NP group (60.6% vs. 33.7%, respectively; . | |
risk difference: 26.9%; 95% CI: 13.5–40.4%). Stoma revision was done more often in the SP group (n=11) than in the NP group (n=2) | |||||||
Effect of self-efficacy intervention on quality of life of patients with intestinal stoma | Xu et al., 2018[43] | China | Experimental | The 48 patients receiving treatment for permanent colostomy surgery were divided into control and intervention groups. | A 3-month self-efficacy intervention as well as routine nursing | The self-efficacy intervention included alternative experience, direct experience, social and psychological support, and adjustment of the alternative measures according to the patients’ feedback. Patients received the mentioned interventions as follows: once a week during the first month after surgery (total: 4 times), once per 2 weeks during the second month after surgery (total: 2 times), and a phone call in the third month after surgery. | The self-efficacy nursing intervention method improved self-efficacy and the quality of life of patients with intestinal stoma and is worthy of clinical utilization and application. |
Ostomy telehealth for cancer survivors: Design of the ostomy self-management Training (OSMT) randomized trial | Sun et al., 2018[36] | United States of America | Randomized trial | 162 cancer survivors with ostomies and their caregivers | OSMT | The curriculum was delivered in 4 group sessions administered by trained ostomy certified nurses (WOCNs) and peer ostomates. | The OSMT program has high potential to make a positive impact on the unique physical, psychological, social, and spiritual needs of cancer survivors living with a permanent ostomy. |
A prospective, experimental study to assess the effectiveness of home care nursing on the healing of peristomal skin complications and quality of life | Harputlu and Özsoy (2018)[28] | Turkey | A prospective, experimental study | 35 peoples with a colostomy or ileostomy and peristomal skin complications who were listed in 2 ostomy supplier databases | Home care visits | 6 home visits in a month as once per 5 days | The QOL scores achieved at the final assessment were significantly improved compared with the initial assessment. |
Effectiveness of a multimedia educational package for cancer patients with colostomy on their performance, quality of life, and body image | Qalawa and Moussa (2019)[11] | Damietta, Egypt | Quasi-experimental design | 26 patients with colostomy | Multimedia educational package | The multimedia educational package: consisted of 2 sections. The first consisted of the presentation of knowledge about the process of stoma formation, including the anatomy and physiology of stoma, definition, complications, and the clinical indications for stoma formation using PowerPoint. The second section focused on the practices related to the various central elements of stoma care, medication, diet, exercises, and self-examination of stoma. The researchers used graphics, posters, video, and pictures to demonstrate and reinforce the information and skills. | Statistically significant differences were observed in colostomized patients regarding all quality of life domains, except for the social domain, in the posttest and follow-up phases compared with the pretest phase (p=0.092). |
The impact of specialty practice nursing care on health-related quality of life in persons with ostomies | Coca et al., 2015[34] | Madrid, Spain | Multicenter, quasi-experimental, prospective, longitudinal study | 402 ostomy patients in health centers | Specialty practice nursing care | The ostomy nurse specialist provided training to patients in the wards. Pre-operative and post-operative training included comprehensive checking by the nurse, checking HRQOL including body images and sexual activity without the determination of ostomy location. Post-operative training included evaluation-based training, health, and care of the ostomy and its surrounding skin, care-centered training, ostomy bag replacement, dietary and nutritional recommendations, guidelines for preventing and identifying complications, discharging with support (telephonic or verbal) including emotional support to improve medical treatment, and evaluation and monitoring. | Patients who received specialized ostomy care experienced significant improvements in health-related quality of life compared to patients who did not receive this care. |
To investigate the impact of family-centered education on the quality of life of patients with stoma | Nasiri Ziba and Kanani, 2018[32] | Tehran, Iran | Non-randomized clinical trial (semi- experimental) | 61 subjects with gastrointestinal stomatitis and their companion (family members involved in the care process) | Family-centered education | Family members who collaborated in ostomy care participated in the training program. The ostomy care training program included 3 sessions of 39 to 45 minutes per 3 weeks. The purpose of the training program was to provide a training manual of sessions, group discussion, and question and answer sessions. | The results showed that the family-centered education approach can improve the quality of life of patients with gastric stoma. |
The effect of education with a family-centered and client-centered approach on the quality of life in patients with stoma | Nasiri Ziba and Kanani (2020)[33] | Tehran, Iran | Semi-experimental study | 60 individuals with colostomy and ileostomy | Family-centered education | Family members who collaborated in ostomy care participated in the training program. The ostomy care training program included 3 sessions of 39 to 45 minutes per 3 weeks. The purpose of the training program was to provide a training manual of sessions, group discussion, and question and answer sessions. | There was a significant difference in the quality of life score and score of the spiritual-psychological dimension after the intervention compared to before the intervention in the family-centered group. |
Effect of group motivational interviewing on quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer and permanent ostomy | Rajabipour et al., 2014[31] | Tehran, Iran | Quasi-experimental study | 70 patients with colorectal cancer and permanent ostomy | Group motivational interviewing | The motivational interview structure was extracted from the 5-session group intervention workbook of the motivational interview. Individuals attended the motivational interview as follows: a 12-individual group with the attendance of the researcher as a group leader, a psychologist familiar with motivational interviewing as a group facilitator, and an ostomy nurse specialist to answer patients’ questions about ostomy-related problems. | The implementation of “motivational interviewing” caused a significant difference in the quality of life of patients with colon cancer and permanent ostomy. Therefore, the implementation of this procedure improves the quality of life of patients with ostomy. |
The effect of pre-operative stoma site marking on quality of life | Cakir and Ozbayir (2018)[27] | Turkey | A non-randomized, quasi-experimental design | The study sample (n=60) included patients for whom a stoma was opened after a planned colorectal surgery. | Pre-operative stoma marking by CWOCN. | Determination of the location of the ostomy by an ostomy nurse specialist. | The study results demonstrated that patients who underwent stoma site marking reported higher HRQOL than those who did not. |
Effect of ostomy care team intervention on patients with ileal conduit | Zhou et al., 2019[29] | China | Randomized controlled trial | 46 patients who underwent radical cystectomy and creation of an ileal conduit | A nurse-led, multicomponent, structured intervention delivered by an ostomy care team | The ostomy care team comprised 1 WOC/enterostomal therapy nurse and 3 RNs with specialized training in ostomy care provided by the certified enterostomal therapy nurse. The multicomponent intervention included a health record for every individual that focused on the patient’s self-management, recovery from ostomy surgery, ostomy care skills, diet, psychosocial assessment, stomal or peristomal complications, and pouching problems. The educational intervention focused on ostomy self-management (pouching demonstration that included pouch removal, observation, cleaning, replacement of a new pouch, and the need for ongoing emotional support), the attendance of the lecture by at least 1 family member, a telephone call monthly from a member of the ostomy care team (to discuss challenges and assess family members’ involvement), and the ostomy support group (for patients and families). | The mean COHQOL-O score was significantly higher in the experimental group (154.48±16.01) compared to the control group (138.26±13.42), indicating a higher health-related quality of life in this group (p=0.001). |
Effects of hospital-family holistic care model on the health outcome of patients with permanent enterostomy based on the theory of ‘timing it right’ | Zhang et al., 2020[30] | China | A randomized controlled trial | 119 patients with permanent enterostomy were randomly divided into 2 groups, with 60 cases in the intervention group and 59 cases in the control group. | Routine care follow-up and hospital-family holistic care intervention based on ‘timing it right’ | The in-hospital interventions were implemented in the first 2 phases in the forms of one-on-one and face-to-face communication, lectures, bedside instruction and demonstration, video, etc., The out-of-hospital interventions were implemented in the last 3 phases in the forms of Internet tools such as WeChat, WeChat APP, and outpatient and telephone follow-ups. The interventions were completed by 4 nurses of the research team through explaining the nursing focus, providing psychological support at different stages of the disease, answering | After the intervention, there were significant differences in quality of life between the two groups at different observation points (p<0.01). The 3 evaluation indices of the intervention group increased with the migration of observation time points and were significantly better than those of the control group, especially the quality of life score (84.35±4.25 vs. 60.45±8.42; p<0.01). |
questions, and aiding patients. In the first month of phase 1, 2 phone calls were made per week and 1 clinic visit was conducted every 2 weeks. In the second month, 1 phone call was made per week and 1 clinic visit was conducted every 2 weeks. In the third month, 1 phone call was made every 2 weeks and 1 clinic visit was conducted every 3 weeks. In the fourth month, 1 phone call was made per month and 1 clinic visit was conducted per month. During the intervention process, adjustments were made according to the actual circumstances of the patient, and each intervention lasted 3040 minutes. | |||||||
Effects of lavender essential oil for colorectal cancer patients with permanent colostomy on elimination of odor, quality of life, and ostomy adjustment: A randomized controlled trial | Duluklu and Celik, 2019[35] | Turkey | Single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial | 15 patients in the experimental group and 15 in the control group | Patients in the experimental group used lavender essential oil in the ostomy bag for 1 month. | The implementation steps for the experimental group in the first assessment (at baseline) are listed as follows: • A drop of lavender essential oil was placed on the inside of the patients’ anterior arm, and patients were watched for development of a local reaction. • The patients were provided a training continuing for an average of 15 minutes by using the brochure that included information on how to apply 10 drops of lavender essential oil into the clean bag during colostomy bag exchange and spread the oil around the entire inner surface of the bag, and their routine practices regarding nutrition and stoma care. First, these steps were demonstrated by the researcher, and then, the patients were requested to perform the same steps under the supervision of the researcher. • One-month supply of lavender essential oil was provided to the patients in the experimental group. | As compared with the control group patients, the experimental group patients who used lavender essential oil in the ostomy bag experienced statistically significant less odor, a higher quality of life, and better adjustment to ostomy (all p<0.05). |
Studying the effect of structured ostomy care training on quality of life and | Khalilzadeh Ganjalikhani et al., 2019[37] | Kerman, Iran | Randomized clinical trial | 60 eligible participants were recruited from the ostomy clinic | The intervention group attended oral and practical training and a | A trained ostomy nurse (first author) provided structured oral and practical information about ostomy, worked with patients to teach them how to manage ostomy and perform self-care, answered their questions, and | The results showed a higher mean score in overall QOL (p=0.009) in the intervention group compared with the control group. The most significant increase was observed |
anxiety of patients with permanent ostomy | question and answer session by a trained ostomy nurse and received an ostomy information booklet in addition to their routine care. | evaluated their learning by asking questions. At the end of the session, patients received a training booklet including information about ostomy care, sexual relationship, travel, diet, rituals, physical activities, sport, familiarity with ostomy equipment and how to use it, and common and uncommon side effects of ostomy and how to manage them. After the group assignment, patients in the intervention group were invited by the first author to participate in a single-session practice training and workshop (2-hour meeting) including information about the properties of healthy skin and how to take care of skin, measure pouch size, detach and empty the pouch, change the two-piece pouches, prevent leakage, and how to use ostomy equipment (powder, belt, paste, and adhesive), which was explained and performed by an ostomy-specialist nurse (first author), in addition to asking and answering questions and practicing/performing procedures for patients. | in the psychological, social, and physical aspects, and the least was in the spiritual aspect, all of which improved after the intervention. After controlling the effects of confounding variables such as age, ostomy period, and number of children, the structured training program still had a positive effect on QOL. | ||||
Telemedicine in post-operative follow-up of stoma patients: A randomized clinical trial (the STOMPA trial) | Augestad et al., 2020[38] | Norway | Randomized clinical trial | A total of 110 patients were randomized to hospital (58 patients) or TC (52) follow-up, 64 patients (hospital: 38, TC: 26) were followed for more than 12 months, and 246 consultations (hospital: 151, TC: 95) were performed. | Telemedicine in post-operative follow-up (stoma nurses organized TC at 0–3, 6, 9, and more than 12 months) | Stoma nurses organized TC at 0–3 (defined as baseline), 6, 9, and over 12 months. Patients could withdraw from the study and be referred back to hospital follow-up at any time. Follow-up consultations were performed in both trial arms. A nurse-led TC stoma and wound school was established before the clinical trial; nurses with special training in the treatment of patients with wound and stoma problems developed the curriculum. Ten nurses from TC communities all over Northern Norway were recruited. These nurses were responsible for the practical arrangements of the TC at the district medical center (DMC). The stoma nurses were affiliated to the DMCs where the TC studios were performed. Stoma nurses in both trial arms consulted gastrointestinal surgeons when necessary. Guidelines for safety monitoring were | There were no differences in the QOL: EQ-5D™ index score (p=0.301) and EQ-5D™ visual analog scale (VAS) score (p=0.775), work/social function (p=0.822), sexuality/body image (p=0.253), and stoma function (p=0.074). Hospital follow-up performed better in the organization of care (staff collaboration, p=0.004; meeting the same individuals, p=0.003) and communication (surgeon being understandable, p<0.001; surgeon caring, p=0.003). TC did not increase the number of hospital consultations (p=0.684) and reduced the number of journeys of more than 8 hours (p=0.007). |
developed. Patients allocated to TC follow-up could be referred back to the university hospital at any time. | |||||||
The effects of continuous care model of information-based hospital-family integration on colostomy patients: A randomized controlled trial | Xia (2020)[39] | China | Single-blind, randomized, controlled trial | 160 subjects were recruited from the gastrointestinal surgery department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University | Continuous care model | (1) Hospital aspects: The hospital issued a self-management manual to patients within 24 hours of admission. The day before the colostomy operation, the patients and their families watched a video on colostomy care. The colostomy therapist provided an education program on colostomy care, assisted patients in reading the manual, and answered their questions. After the patient was discharged, the patient could contact the colostomy therapist through WeChat, blog, telephone, QQ, etc., The colostomy therapist made home visits to the patient to ensure the patient was correctly caring for the colostomy. (2) Family aspects: A caregiver, that is, the person responsible for helping the patient with colostomy care, was selected from the family. The caregiver was assisted in establishing effective communications with the colostomy therapist, so the caregiver could promptly inform the therapist of problems or changes in the patient’s condition by WeChat, blog, telephone, QQ, etc., In addition to taking care of the patient at home, caregivers were taught to observe and keep records of any changes in mood. They were also taught to keep records of any problems that occurred and the solutions used to deal with the problems. Caregivers and patients can communicate with the colostomy therapist in real time via social software, including when he/she is off work. | In comparison with those in the control group, the scores of somatic, role, and emotional functions (STF, RF, and EF) markedly increased and the scores of fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, anorexia, constipation, diarrhea, and economic difficulties (Fa, NV, Pa, Dy, In, An, Co, Di, and ED) decreased in the experimental group 1 month after discharge (p<0.0001) |
Interventions
The nursing interventions involved standard treatments that comprise verbal and written information related to pre-operative preparation; post-operative physical changes; ostomy care until discharge;[11,29,30,34,39,40,41] teleconsultation on months 0–3, 6, and 9 and over 12 months after the initial surgery;[38] visit by the ostomy therapist before surgery and at the time of admission;[42] home visit and appointment in an outpatient clinic;[28,39] recommendations for at least one appointment with Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses (WOCN); recommendation for at least one follow-up visit after surgery by the surgeon;[31,36,40] discharge by telephone or verbal support such as emotional support; providing support to promote medical treatment adherence, evaluation, and monitoring;[29,30,34] providing training booklets and written information;[31,36,37,40] providing the contact information of national and local ostomy support groups; providing the contact information of nutrition and physical therapists; providing the contact information of WOCN; and responding to the patient’s questions.[36] Dedicated care carried out by ostomy nursing specialists included stoma siting before surgery, counseling regarding ostomy surgery,[27,40,41,42] providing post-operative training and written information about ostomy care, choosing an ostomy bag, follow-up visit with the ostomy nurse up to 4–6 weeks after discharge from the ostomy care clinic,[40,41,42] motivational interview,[31] and inviting the patients to the ostomy support group quarterly.[29]
Content of nursing intervention
Nurses planned continuous and regular training.[29,30,31,32,33,36,42,43,44] The content of most interventions correlated to ostomy self-care,[11,29,32,33,34,36,37] equipment,[11,36,37] ostomy appliance, ostomy care and care of its surrounding skin,[11,32,33,36,37,42,44] social well-being concerns,[36,43] anxiety, social isolation or other signs of distress,[29] promotion of lifestyle programs, and provision of problem-solving methods based on ostomy care in trip.[32,33,36]
Training Method
The training methods used in these studies included demonstration and lecture,[29,30] mixed media presentation including PowerPoints, hand-operated equipment, ostomy bags and belts,[36] providing training booklets,[30,32,33,37] home care,[42] and Internet tools such as WeChat Application.[30] Moreover, some sessions were held with the problem-solving skill training method to solve the social problems of patients.[36]
Target group of the nursing intervention
Some interventions were only presented to the patients,[35,37,42,43] while some other interventions were only presented to the caregivers or commonly with patients[29,36,39] or in the form of common discussion between peer patients.[42] Caregivers of patients including spouses, daughters/sons, or a friend who provides the patient with the most ostomy care only participated in training sessions in one study,[36] and another study provided the patients’ family the opportunity to ask their questions in pre-operative home visits.[42] The other studies did not report any caregiver education.
Discussion
In the present study, the experimental and semi-experimental studies on nursing interventions concerning the QL of patients with an ostomy were verified. Nurses provide nursing interventions for patients with an ostomy during the pre-operative to post-operative period. It is important to maintain a constant training and to combine self-care with motivational training. Structured pre-operative ostomy education is feasible and sustainable and may be associated with improvement in ostomy adjustment and post-operative health-related QL.[45] In the study by Danielsen et al.,[46] the participants stated that education presented at the hospital did not entirely match their needs after they returned home and re-entered their communities. Rojanasarot evaluated the effect of a post-discharge support program that included education and counseling and reported that participation in the program reduced the likelihood of emergency department visits and hospital admission within 18 months of ostomy surgery.[47]
This study also found that psychological education and self-care education should receive equal attention. As patients experience disturbances such as changes in body image, anxiety, stigma, and social isolation when faced with an ostomy,[5,16] it is necessary to provide certain interventions such as relaxation training, supportive group therapy, Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT), emotional and social support, and general interactional skills like supportive communication, and listening and counseling can be applied to solve and prevent psychosocial problems.[16]
Another finding of this study was the participation of family caregivers in training. A study about family caregivers found that they received more help with ostomy care than with any other medical or nursing task, presumably because of the higher level of complexity associated with this type of care.[48] Yet, family caregivers still need more information and training regarding ostomy and peristomal skin care. Nurses must provide patients and caregivers with specialized information and resources before discharge so that they know what to expect when they return home, are knowledgeable about the products they will be using, are informed about how to manage an ostomy, and know when to contact a health care professional.[49] Andrew Zganjar et al.[45] indicated that the inclusion of partners/spouses in a group setting is key to maximizing education. The presence of one of the patients’ family members in training sessions is effective on ostomy care,[30,32,33,39] but we should also consider the patient’s dependence on that person in changing the ostomy bag, which requires further studies in this context. In one of the studies, peer educators found that the contact of patients with people similar to them facilitated the achievement of post-operative outcomes. Self-management and self-care interventions are effective on the QL of patients with an ostomy. The results proved that often, there is no psychological disorder in patients participating in ostomy care.[50]
According to the mentioned results, interacting with ostomy therapists may promote patients’ performance after surgery. Setting person or in-person meetings (telephonic or by smart communicational software) with the nurse provides patients the opportunity to ask their questions from a specialist caregiver or to share their problems with the nurse. Providing the training content in the form of a booklet or audio file helps patients to recall the trainings easily and practice them at home, although the mentioned studies did not determine the effect of these factors on the QL of patients. Today, health center policies emphasize home care and promote the QL of patients with an ostomy.
Despite the exhaustive electronic search, our study had several limitations. First, the limited number of the studies selected by the reviewers did not include gray literature. Second, the retrieved studies were limited to those published in English journals. Third, other studies with different methods, such as observational and analytical studies, were not included in the present study.
Conclusion
According to the results of the present study, the use of a regular care plan with the participation of families and patients is suggested from pre-operation to discharge along with nurses’ follow-ups and home care to promote the QL of patients with ostomy. A combination of self-care and psychological education can promote patients’ QL.
Financial support and sponsorship
Mashhad University of Medical Science
Conflicts of interest
Nothing to declare.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the authorities of Mashhad University of Medical Science for sponsoring the study (Number: 971683).
References
- 1.Ansen F, Van Uden-Kraan CF, Braakman JA, van Keizerswaard PM, Witte BI, Verdonck-De Leeuw IM. A mixedmethod study on the generic and ostomy-specific quality of life of cancer and non-cancer ostomy patients. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:1689–97. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2528-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.O’Flynn SK. Care of the stoma: Complications and treatments. Br J Community Nurs. 2018;23:382–7. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2018.23.8.382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vonk-Klaassen SM, de Vocht HM, den Ouden ME, Eddes EH, Schuurmans MJ. Ostomy-related problems and their impact on quality of life of colorectal cancer ostomates: A systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:125–33. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1050-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Erwin-Toth P, Stricker LJ, van Rijswijk L. Wound wise: Peristomal skin complications. Am J Nurs. 2010;110:43–8. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000368052.42234.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Simmons KL. A view from here: Psychosocial issues in colostomy care. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2014;41:55–9. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000438015.98357.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pittman J, Rawl SM, Schmidt CM, Grant M, Ko CY, Wendel C, et al. Demographic and clinical factors related to ostomy complications and quality of life in veterans with an ostomy. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008;35:493–503. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000335961.68113.cb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Andrade RS, de Medeiros LP, Freitas LS, Queiroz CG, de Mesquita Xavier SS, Lucena SKP, et al. Quality of life regarding people with an ostomy: Integrative review about related factors. Int Arch Med. 2016;9:1–13. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Richbourg L, Thorpe JM, Rapp CG. Difficulties experienced by the ostomate after hospital discharge. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2007;34:70–9. doi: 10.1097/00152192-200701000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Danielsen AK, Soerensen EE, Burcharth K, Rosenberg J. Learning to live with a permanent intestinal ostomy: Impact on everyday life and educational needs. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013;40:407–12. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182987e0e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Smith DM, Loewenstein G, Rozin P, Sherriff RL, Ubel PA. Sensitivity to disgust, stigma, and adjustment to life with a colostomy. J Res Pers. 2007;41:787–803. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Qalawa SAA, Moussa MMM. Effectiveness of a multimedia educational package for cancer patients with colostomy on their performance, quality of life &body image. Int J Nurs Sci. 2019;9:53–64. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zewude WC, Derese T, Suga Y, Teklewold B. Quality of life in patients living with stoma. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021;31:993–1000. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i5.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alenezi A, McGrath I, Kimpton A, Livesay K. Quality of life among ostomy patients: A narrative literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2021;30:3111–23. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Post MW. Definitions of quality of life: What has happened and how to move on. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014;20:167–80. doi: 10.1310/sci2003-167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Paszyńska W, Zborowska K, Czajkowska M, Skrzypulec-Plinta V. Quality of sex life in intestinal stoma patients-A literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20:2660. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032660. doi:10.3390/ijerph 20032660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ayaz-Alkaya S. Overview of psychosocial problems in individuals with stoma: A review of literature. Int Wound J. 2019;1:243–9. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sun V, Grant M, McMullen CK, Altschuler A, Mohler MJ, Hornbrook MC, et al. Surviving colorectal cancer: Long-term, persistent ostomy-specific concerns and adaptations. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013;40:61. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182750143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jansen F, van Uden-Kraan CF, Braakman JA, van Keizerswaard PM, Witte BI, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM. A mixed-method study on the generic and ostomy-specific quality of life of cancer and non-cancer ostomy patients. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:1689–97. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2528-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stavropoulou A, Vlamakis D, Kaba E, Kalemikerakis I, Polikandrioti M, Fasoi G, et al. “Living with a stoma”: Exploring the lived experience of patients with permanent colostomy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:8512. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Krouse RS, Herrinton LJ, Grant M, Wendel CS, Green SB, Mohler MJ, et al. Health-related quality of life among long-term rectal cancer survivors with an ostomy: Manifestations by sex. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4664. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.9502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Orsini R, Thong M, Van de Poll-Franse L, Slooter G, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Rutten H, et al. Quality of life of older rectal cancer patients is not impaired by a permanent stoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:164–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Carter P. Recognising the importance of stoma care nurse specialists. Br J Nurs. 2020;29:S4. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2020.29.6.S4. doi:10.12968/bjon. 2020.29.6. S4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Petersén C, Carlsson E. Life with a stoma-coping with daily life: Experiences from focus group interviews. J Clin Nurs. 2021;30:2309–19. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS med. 2009;6:e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Riva JJ, Malik KM, Burnie SJ, Endicott AR, Busse JW. What is your research question?An introduction to the PICOT format for clinicians. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2012;56:167–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L. Chapter 3: Systematic reviews of effectiveness. Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI. 2020 [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cakir SK, Ozbayir T. The effect of preoperative stoma site marking on quality of life. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34:149. doi: 10.12669/pjms.341.14108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Harputlu D, Özsoy S. A prospective, experimental study to assess the effectiveness of home care nursing on the healing of peristomal skin complications and quality of life. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2018;64:18–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhou H, Ye Y, Qu H, Zhou H, Gu S, Wang T. Effect of ostomy care team intervention on patients with ileal conduit. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2019;46:413–7. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang X, Gao R, Lin JL, Chen N, Lin Q, Huang GF, et al. Effects of hospital-family holistic care model on the health outcome of patients with permanent enterostomy based on the theory of 'Timing It Right'. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29:2196–208. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rajabipour E, Maddah S, Falahi Khoshknab M, Zarei F, Anaraki F. Effect of group motivational interviewing on quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer and permanent ostomy. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing (IJPN) 2014;2:58–68. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nasiri Ziba F, Kanani S. To Investigate the impact of family-centered education on the quality of life of patient with stoma. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2018;7:5215–9. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nasiri Ziba F, Kanani S. The effect of education with a family-centered and client-centered approach on the quality of life in patients with stoma. J Caring Sci. 2020;9:225. doi: 10.34172/jcs.2020.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Coca C, Fernández de Larrinoa I, Serrano R, García-Llana H. The impact of specialty practice nursing care on health-related quality of life in persons with ostomies. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2015;42:257–63. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Duluklu B, Çelik SŞ. Effects of lavender essential oil for colorectal cancer patients with permanent colostomy on elimination of odor, quality of life, and ostomy adjustment: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019;42:90–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sun V, Ercolano E, McCorkle R, Grant M, Wendel CS, Tallman NJ, et al. Ostomy telehealth for cancer survivors: Design of the Ostomy Self-Management Training (OSMT) randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018;64:167–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Khalilzadeh Ganjalikhani M, Tirgari B, Roudi Rashtabadi O, Shahesmaeili A. Studying the effect of structured ostomy care training on quality of life and anxiety of patients with permanent ostomy. Int Wound J. 2019;16:1383–90. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Augestad K, Sneve A, Lindsetmo R. Telemedicine in postoperative follow-up of STOMa PAtients: A randomized clinical trial (the STOMPA trial) Br J Surg. 2020;107:509–18. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Xia L. The effects of continuous care model of information-based hospital-family integration on colostomy patients: A randomized controlled trial. J Cancer Educ. 2020;35:301–11. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1465-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cheung Y, Molassiotis A, Chang A. A pilot study on the effect of progressive muscle relaxation training of patients after stoma surgery. Eur J Cancer Care. 2001;10:107–14. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2001.00256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cheung YL, Molassiotis A, Chang AM. The effect of progressive muscle relaxation training on anxiety and quality of life after stoma surgery in colorectal cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2003;12:254–66. doi: 10.1002/pon.638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sier M, Oostenbroek R, Dijkgraaf M, Veldink G, Bemelman W, Pronk A, et al. Home visits as part of a new care pathway (iAID) to improve quality of care and quality of life in ostomy patients: A cluster-randomized stepped-wedge trial. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:739–49. doi: 10.1111/codi.13630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Xu S, Zhang Z, Wang A, Zhu J, Tang H, Zhu X. Effect of self-efficacy intervention on quality of life of patients with intestinal stoma. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2018;41:341–6. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hansen-Turton T, Sherman S, King ES. Nurse-led health clinics: Operations, policy, and opportunities. J Nurs Regul. 2016;6:76. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zganjar A, Glavin K, Mann K, Dahlgren A, Thompson J, Wulff-Burchfield E, et al. Intensive preoperative ostomy education for the radical cystectomy patient. Urol Oncol. 2022;40:481–6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Danielsen AK, Soerensen EE, Burcharth K, Rosenberg J. Learning to live with a permanent intestinal ostomy: Impact on everyday life and educational needs. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013;40:407–12. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182987e0e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rojanasarot S. The impact of early involvement in a post discharge support program for ostomy surgery patients on preventable healthcare utilization. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2018;45:43–9. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Golpazir-Sorkheh A, Ghaderi T, Mahmoudi S, Moradi K, Jalali A. Family-centered interventions and quality of life of clients with ostomy. Nurs Res Pract. 2022;2022:9426560. doi: 10.1155/2022/9426560. doi:10.1155/2022/9426560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kirkland-Kyhn H, Martin S, Zaratkiewicz S, Whitmore M, Young HM. Ostomy care at home. Am J Nurs. 2018;118:63–8. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000532079.49501.ce. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rafii F, Naseh L, Yadegary M. Relationship between self-efficacy and quality of life in ostomates. Iran J Nurs. 2012;25:64–76. [Google Scholar]