ABSTRACT
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy has been accepted to treat a wide range of illnesses, including phantom limb pain, joint pain, low back pain, and cervical discomfort. TENS is not frequently used in dentistry, despite its potential advantages. 3, 4 Therefore, the rationale of present review is to discuss its dental applications in order to spread awareness of them among the dental profession.
KEYWORDS: Orofacial pain, pain, TMD, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
INTRODUCTION
Pain that is nociceptive, neuropathic, or musculoskeletal in nature is treated with a non-invasive analgesic technique called transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).[1] The TENS unit is a compact, frequently battery-operated device that seldom even fits in a pocket. It uses electrodes applied to the skin and connected to the device to address a specific treatment objective. The devices are allegedly titratable, allowing for a high level of user tolerance with the least negative effects. The gadget carries little overdose danger in comparison to numerous drugs. TENS devices frequently provide a wide range of adjustment, allowing the subjects to regulate pulse width, intensity, and frequency.[2]
Health professionals frequently utilize TENS to alleviate both acute and ongoing pain. Although TENS has potential benefits in dentistry, it is not widely employed.[3,4] Therefore, the goal of this article is to discuss its dental uses in order to increase knowledge of its dental applications among the dental community.
Parts of TENS Machine:
TENS unit: Electric pulses are produced by it. Two varieties are available: The “clinical” model: Dentists in the clinic utilize this, and it generates electricity by being connected to the building’s electrical outlet. The “Patient” model. Patients can carry this small, portable device in their pocket, attach it to their belt, or wear it as part of their clothing. As a power source, it contains a battery.[2]
Lead wires: These enable the electrodes and the TENS unit to connect electrically.[5]
Electrodes: By using electrodes, the TENS unit’s electric flow is transformed to an ionic current flow in live tissue. Implantation of electrodes within and outside the mouth is both conceivable. Extra-oral electrodes come in two varieties: With the aid of an electrically conductive gel, flexible electrodes composed of silicone rubber that has been impregnated with carbon are connected to the skin’s surface. To keep them in place, surgical tape is applied. Using cotton pads or sponges soaked in tap water, tin plate or aluminum electrodes that do not conform to the body are connected to the skin’s surface. The intra-oral electrodes are cotton roll electrodes, clamp electrodes, and sticky electrodes. The most popular electrode type today is sticky electrode.[6]
Clinical applications in dentistry
Alternative Dental Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients: The most frequently seen negative behavior in pediatric patients is dread of syringes or electrodes. TENS treatment has a good impact on pediatric patients’ behavior, which lowers anxiety levels by removing their “fear of needles” According to studies, TENS is preferred by youngsters over local anesthetics.[7,8] TENS was proven to be similarly effective as 2% lignocaine in recent trials by Dhindsa et al.[3] and Varadharaja et al.[9] when performing minor pediatric dental operations.
Temporomandibular Joint Disorder: The term “temporomandibular joint disorders” (TMDs) refers to a collection of illnesses that functionally impair the masticatory system, including the temporomandibular joint and the masticatory muscles. Numerous etiologies with particular treatments, such as TENS, have been established.[10]
TMD has been successfully treated by TENS, either alone or in conjunction with other methods. A pilot study was carried out on bruxism patients to assess the effectiveness of TENS and electromyographic bio-feedback. The researchers came to the conclusion that TENS was more efficient at reducing the electromyographic action of the masseter muscle, despite the fact that both therapies led to a relaxation of the muscles of mastication.[11]
Trigeminal Neuralgia: Trigeminal nerves that supply teeth, jaw, and face are frequently affected by trigeminal neuralgia. Despite the fact that the cause is typically unknown, numerous therapeutic options have been tested, including medication, alcohol injections, peripheral neurectomy, rhizotomy, and micro-vascular decompression. A new and promising treatment option for these patients is TENS.[12]
Myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome: A persistent pre-auricular ache that may be radiating and diffuse in nature is a hallmark of the myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome (MPDS). It typically includes clicking and uncomfortable or limited mouth opening. Considering that the disorder has a complex origin, it is challenging to pinpoint the starting point. By activating big peripheral A-delta fibers with the TENS unit, which closes the “gate” and blocks pain input from small C-fibers, active TENS therapy is applied to patients with MPDS to relieve pain. TENS is an effective, non-invasive treatment that can be used as an adjunct to traditional therapy for patients with MPDS. The findings of our study are promising, and TENS therapy has demonstrated better outcomes in the care of MPDS patients when compared to placebo TENS therapy.[13]
DISCUSSION
The early proponents of TENS for the management of chronic pain were Wall and Sweet. Later, it was successfully utilized to treat neuropathic pain syndromes, phantom limb pain, rib fracture pain, and knee osteoarthritis pain, among other types of pain.[12]
TENS uses endogenous pain inhibitory mechanisms, physiological blockade, and gate control theory as part of its analgesic action. The gate control hypothesis of pain is the most widely recognized theory to explain the mechanism of action of TENS. This theory proposes that the spinal cord’s substantia gelatinosa functions as a gate control system. It is believed that pre-synaptic inhibition of substantia gelatinosa cells in the dorsal horn is made possible by activation of vast myelinating fibers that serve touch, pressure, and vibration. This reduces the transmission of pain.[14]
The endogenous opioid theory showed that electrical stimulation of the peri-aqueductal gray region of the mid-brain results in analgesia that is comparable to morphine’s. Endorphins, which are found at various levels of the pain-control pathway, are a group of morphine-like chemicals that were finally discovered as a result of this. TENS may also boost endogenous opioid release in the spinal cord as a result of stimulating local spinal cord circuits or descending pain-inhibitory pathways, which is another idea for how TENS functions.[15]
CONCLUSION
For various pain conditions, such as trigeminal neuralgia, TMD, and MPDS, TENS should be regarded as a safe, straightforward, and first line of treatment. This is especially true in rural areas where there is a lack of procedural expertise for therapeutic management and in patients who have experienced adverse drug reactions, refuse to take medication, or cannot afford invasive surgical intervention.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Johnson M. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation:Mechanisms, clinical application and evidence. Rev Pain. 2007;1:7–11. doi: 10.1177/204946370700100103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kalra A, Urban MO, Sluka KA. Blockade of opioid receptors in rostral ventral medulla prevents antihyperalgesia produced by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001;298:257–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dhindsa A, Pandit IK, Srivastav N, Gugnani N. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of electronic dental anaesthesia with 2% lignocaine in various minor pediatric dental procedures:A clinical study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011;2:27–30. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.79305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Malamed SF, Quinn CL, Torgersen RT, Thompson W. Electronic dental anesthesia for restorative dentistry. Anesth Prog. 1989;36:195–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kasat V, Gupta A, Ladda R, Kathariya M, Saluja H, Farooqui AA. Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) in dentistry-A review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014;6:e562–8. doi: 10.4317/jced.51586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Quarnstrom F. Electronic dental anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 1992;39:162–77. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Baghdadi ZD. Evaluation of electronic dental anesthesia in children. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;88:418–23. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70055-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.teDuits E, Goepferd S, Donly K, Pinkham J, Jakobsen J. The effectiveness of electronic dental anesthesia in children. Pediatr Dent. 1993;15:191–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Varadharaja M, Udhya J, Srinivasan I, Sivakumar JSK, Karthik RS, Manivanan M. Comparative clinical evaluation of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator over conventional local anesthesia in children seeking dental procedures:A clinical study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014;6(Suppl 1):S113–7. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.137407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Awan KH, Patil S. The role of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the management of temporomandibular joint disorder. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16:984–6. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Núñez SC, Garcez AS, Suzuki SS, Ribeiro MS. Management of mouth opening in patients with temporomandibular disorders through low-level laser therapy and transcutaneous electrical neural stimulation. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006;24:45–9. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.24.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Singla S, Prabhakar V, Singla RK. Role of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation in the management of trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2011;2:150–2. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.83580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nimavat AV, Mathur A, Shah S, Desai S, Champaneri H, Chavda S. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy as compared to placebo transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy for the management of myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome patients:A clinical study. Int J Prev Clin Dent Res. 2019;6:59–61. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanism:A new theory. Science. 1965;150:971–9. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Reynolds DV. Surgery in the rat during electrical analgesia induced by focal brain stimulation. Science. 1969;164(3878):444–5. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3878.444. doi:10.1126/science.164.3878.444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]