Abstract
The proband was evaluated at 19 years of age because of primary amenorrhoea and, on chromosomal analysis, was found to have a 46,XY karyotype in 75% of her cells and 48,XY, +8, +21 in 25% of her cells. She appeared normal at birth and exhibited normal intellectual and physical development until puberty when secondary sexual differentiation failed. This young women showed none of the dysmorphic features associated with either trisomy 8 or trisomy 21. Her XY gonadal dysgenesis was manifested by late developmental problems of amenorrhoea, sexual infantilism, and gonadal neoplasia.
Full text
PDF


Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Boczkowski K., Teter J. Clinical, histological and cytogenic observations in pure gonadal dysgenesis. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1966 Apr;51(4):497–510. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.0510497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Channing C. P., Hillensjo T., Schaerf F. W. Hormonal control of oocyte meiosis, ovulation and luteinization in mammals. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1978 Nov;7(3):601–624. doi: 10.1016/s0300-595x(78)80011-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grosse K. P., Schwanitz G. Double autosomal trisomy: case report (48, XX, +18, +21) and review of the literature. J Ment Defic Res. 1977 Dec;21(4):299–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1977.tb01593.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Josso N., Picard J. Y., Tran D. The anti-Müllerian hormone. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1977;13(2):59–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohno S. Major regulatory genes for mammalian sexual development. Cell. 1976 Mar;7(3):315–321. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90160-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson M. G., Fujimoto A., Alfi O. S. Double autosomal trisomy and mosaicism for chromosomes no. 8 and no. 21. J Med Genet. 1974 Mar;11(1):96–101. doi: 10.1136/jmg.11.1.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolf U. XY gonadal dysgenesis and the H-Y antigen. Report on 12 cases. Hum Genet. 1979 Apr 5;47(3):269–277. doi: 10.1007/BF00321019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

