Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1998 Jun;36(6):1604–1607. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.6.1604-1607.1998

Virulence Properties of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli (STEC) Strains of Serogroup O118, a Major Group of STEC Pathogens in Calves

L H Wieler 1,2,*, Anja Schwanitz 1, Elke Vieler 1, Barbara Busse 1, H Steinrück 3, J B Kaper 2, G Baljer 1
PMCID: PMC104885  PMID: 9620385

Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains of serogroup O118 are the most prevalent group among STEC strains in diarrheic calves in Germany (L. H. Wieler, Ph.D. thesis, University of Giessen, 1997). To define their virulence properties, 42 O118 (O118:H16 [n = 38] and O118:H− [n = 4]) strains were characterized. The strains displayed three different Stx combinations (Stx1 [36 of 42], Stx1 and Stx2 [2 of 42], and Stx2 [4 of 42]). A total of 41 strains (97.6%) harbored a large virulence-associated plasmid containing hlyEHEC (hly from enterohemorrhagic E. coli). The strains’ adhesive properties varied in relation to the eukaryotic cells tested. Only 28 of 42 strains (66.7%) showed localized adhesion (LA) in the human HEp-2 cell line. In contrast, in bovine fetal calf lung (FCL) cells, the number of LA-positive strains was much higher (37 of 42 [88.1%]). The locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) was detected in 41 strains (97.6%). However, not all LEE-positive strains reacted positively in the fluorescence actin-staining (FAS) test, which indicated the attaching and effacing (AE) lesion. In HEp-2 cells, only 22 strains (52.4%) were FAS positive, while in FCL cells, the number of FAS-positive strains was significantly higher (38 of 42 [90.5%; P < 0.001]). In conclusion, the vast majority of the O118 STEC strains from calves (41 of 42 [97.6%]) have a high virulence potential (stx, hlyEHEC, and LEE). This virulence potential and the high prevalence of STEC O118 strains in calves suggest that these strains could be a major health threat for humans in the future. In addition, the poor association between results of the geno- and phenotypical tests to screen for the AE ability of STEC strains calls the diagnostic value of the FAS test into question.


Cattle are the main reservoir for Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains causing the hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) in humans (2, 3, 14, 23, 31). In Germany, 94.0% of all HUS-associated STEC strains (O157:H7, O157:H−, O26:H11, O26:H−, O111:H−, O2:H6, O8:H21, O69:H−, O119:H5, and rough:H11) display three virulence features: production of Stx, the ability to cause the attaching and effacing (AE) lesion, and production of enterohemorrhagic E. coli hemolysin (HlyEHEC) (4). The major route of STEC transmission is indirect, by contaminated food (4, 14, 31), but infections are also linked to direct transmission from animals to humans by contact (6, 24).

STEC strains cause diarrhea in calves, and this ability is mostly associated with strains that produce Stx1 only (STEC1) (12, 20, 26, 27, 30). Diarrhea is associated with the strains’ ability to cause AE lesions in epithelial cells (9, 21, 30). This ability is conferred by the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) (17, 18). STEC1 strains from calves harbor the LEE significantly more often than do STEC2 strains (P < 0.001) (26, 30). Therefore, STEC1 strains are considered more virulent for calves than STEC2 strains.

E. coli strains of serogroup O118 are the most prevalent STEC strains in calves in Belgium (20) and Germany (26, 30). To further define the virulence properties of these strains, we characterized 42 O118 STEC strains from calves. Our data revealed that O118 STEC strains have a high virulence potential. To our knowledge, only one case of HUS has so far been reported to be associated with an O118 STEC strain (5). However, the sorbitol-fermenting O118 STEC strain in human infections is not detected when only sorbitol-MacConkey agar is used for diagnosis. Given the high virulence potential of these strains (Stx+, LEE+, and HlyEHEC+), we speculate that O118 will be an emerging health threat to humans in the future.

(The results of this study were presented in part at the 97th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Miami, Fla., 4 to 7 May 1997.)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.

A total of 42 O118 STEC strains were isolated from 37 calves (32 diarrheic and 5 nondiarrheic) that were less than 16 weeks old from 30 farms in Germany during 1989 and 1996. Stool specimens were cultured on sorbitol-MacConkey, Gassner, and sheep blood agar (blood agar base supplemented with 10% defibrinated sheep blood [Merck]) (29). HlyEHEC was detected on blood agar plates containing 10% washed sheep erythrocytes (29). Putative E. coli colonies (6 to 35 colonies/sample) were randomly selected, subcultured on nutrient agar slants, and biochemically confirmed to be E. coli. O serotyping of E. coli was performed according to standard methods (19).

Reference strains utilized for the adhesion and the fluorescence actin-staining (FAS) test as well as for DNA hybridization were E. coli EDL933 (O157:H7), CL-8 (O157:H7), H19 (O26:H11), E32511/0 (O157:H−), and E2348/69 (O127:H6) (30).

DNA hybridization and PCR.

stx genes were detected by colony blot hybridization experiments with oligonucleotide probes 772 (stx1) and 849 (stx2) as previously described (27). Possession of the LEE was determined with LEE probes A to D as described by McDaniel et al. (17). The plasmid-encoded hlyEHEC was detected by PCR with oligonucleotide primers Ehly1 and Ehly5 and by Southern blot hybridization with DNA probe Ehly1-5 (29).

Cell culture assays.

To determine Stx production, all bacterial strains were tested on Vero cells (ATCC CRL 1587) as described previously (27). Adhesion to HEp-2 cells (ATCC CCL23) or fetal calf lung (FCL) cells was tested essentially as described previously (8, 30). FCL cells were prepared by trypsinization of lungs from 4- to 5-month-old bovine fetuses. Bacteria were recorded as adhesive when a cluster of at least 10 bacteria adhered per HEp-2 or FCL cell (30).

Accumulation of actin filaments was detected by the FAS test with a 6-h incubation (15, 30). Each strain was tested at least three times in each assay. The reaction intensity was rated by determination of the number of infected cells (as percentages). Any cell that showed at least one actin accumulation associated with bacteria was considered FAS positive (+, ++, +++, and ++++, ≤1%, >1 to ≤10%, >10 to ≤50%, and >50 to ≤100%, respectively).

Statistics.

Analyzed frequencies were compared by using the Pearson product-moment coefficient.

RESULTS

Serovars.

The 42 STEC strains of serogroup O118 displayed two different serovars. Most strains (38 of 42) were of serovar O118:H16; 4 strains were typed O118:H− (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Serovars, stx genotypes, LEE-associated genes, and adhesive and hemolytic properties of bovine Stx-producing E. coli of serogroup O118 (n = 42)

Serovar and strain Clinical status of calf stx gene hlyEHEC HlyEHEC Hybridization with LEE probes A to D Type of adhesion on:
Intensity of FAS reactivity ona:
HEp-2 cells FCL cells HEp-2 cells FCL cells
O118:H16
 GS1236-1b No diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA ++++ ++
 GS1232-1 No diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA +++
 GS1161-1b No diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA ++ ++
 GS1180-1 No diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA ++ ++
 GS1205-1 No diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA ++ +
 RW2303c Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA ++++ +++
 RW2126c Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA +++ +++
 RW2125d Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA +++ ++
 RW2173 Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA +++ +
 RW0136 Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA ++ ++++
 RW0203 Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA ++ +++
 GS1181-1 Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA ++ ++
 AS2169 Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA + +++
 340 Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA + ++
 RW2199 Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA + ++
 666/89 Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA + +
 RW2022 Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA + +
 RW2266 Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA +++
 RW1306e Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA ++
 RW1912 Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA +
 RW1362 Diarrhea stx1 + + Negative LA +
 RW2121 Diarrhea stx1 Negative LA
 RW1303f Diarrhea stx1 + + + Negative LA +
 RW1366 Diarrhea stx1 + + + Negative LA ++ ++
 RW1319 Diarrhea stx1 + + + Negative LA + ++
 RW1305 Diarrhea stx1 + + + Negative LA +
 RW1817 Diarrhea stx1 + + + Negative LA +
 RW1307e Diarrhea stx1 +g + + Negative LA +
 RW1318 Diarrhea stx1 + + + Negative Negative ++ +
 RW1299 Diarrhea stx1 + + + Negative Negative +
 RW1304f Diarrhea stx1 + + + Negative Negative +
 RW2017 Diarrhea stx1 + + + Negative Negative
 RW1365 Diarrhea stx1 + + Negative Negative ++
 RW2116 Diarrhea stx2 + + + LA LA +++
 RW2039 Diarrhea stx2 + + + LA LA +
 RW2136 Diarrhea stx2 + + + LA LA +
 RW2297d Diarrhea stx1/2 + + + LA LA ++ +++
 RW1911 Diarrhea stx1/2 + + + LA LA ++
O118:H−
 557/89 Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA + +
 RW2311 Diarrhea stx1 + + + LA LA
 RW1302 Diarrhea stx1 + + + Negative LA +++
 RW2030 Diarrhea stx2 + + + LA LA ++
a

Numbers of infected cells with actin accumulation. −, FAS negative; +, ≤1% of infected cells positive; ++, >1 to ≤10%; +++, >10 to ≤50%; and ++++, >50 to ≤100%. 

b

Strains GS1236-1 and GS1161-1 were isolated from the same animal. 

c

Strains RW2303 and RW2126 were isolated from the same animal. 

d

Strains RW2125 and RW2297 were isolated from the same animal. 

e

Strains RW1306 and RW1307 were isolated from the same animal. 

f

Strains RW1303 and RW1304 were isolated from the same animal. 

g

Strain RW1307 reacted negatively with PCR probe Ehly1-5 but positively with DNA probe Ehly1-Ehly5. 

Toxins.

The vast majority (40 of 42) of the strains harbored only a single stx gene (Table 1). A total of 36 strains were positive for stx1, 4 strains were stx2 positive, and only 2 strains harbored both toxin genes. Stx was always detected in the Vero cell assay. In addition, 41 strains harbored hlyEHEC, but the HlyEHEC phenotype was detected in only 39 of these 41 strains.

Adhesive properties.

The strains’ adhesive properties varied in relation to the eukaryotic cells tested. Only 28 strains (66.7%) showed localized adhesion (LA) in the human HEp-2 cell line. In contrast, in bovine FCL cells, the percentage of LA-positive strains was much higher (37 strains [88.1%]; Table 1).

With the exception of one strain (RW2121 [O118:H16, Stx1]), the strains reacted positively with all four LEE probes (LEE probes A to D). In contrast to these genotypical results, the number of strains that actually caused a positive FAS reaction was considerably lower. Only 22 (53.7%) of the 41 LEE-positive strains were FAS positive in HEp-2 cells. However, the number of FAS-positive strains increased remarkably (P < 0.001) when bovine FCL cells were used (38 strains [92.7%]; Table 1).

Most of the strains induced the AE lesion on a small percentage of the cells. An AE lesion on more than 50% of the cells was induced by only two strains on HEp-2 cells and by just one strain on FCL cells. This higher number of AE-positive bacterial strains in FCL cells was due mostly to an increase in strains that infected less than 10% of the cells. Thus, there was no difference in adhesion intensity between the two cell types (P > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

The finding that O118 strains are the most prevalent STEC strains in calves (26) and that 97.6% of the bovine strains of serogroup O118 possess a combination of all three STEC virulence factors (Stx, LEE, and hlyEHEC) which are associated with 94% of all HUS cases in Germany (4) has at least two implications for the epidemiology of STEC infections. Bovine STEC strains of serogroup O118 have to be considered (i) highly virulent for both humans and calves and (ii) a possible emerging health threat to humans in the future. Thus, the surveillance of food from bovine origin for STEC contamination in Germany should not only focus on the currently most relevant serovars (O157:H7, O157:H−, O26:H11, O26:H−, O111:H−, O2:H6, O8:H21, O69:H−, O119:H5, and rough:H11) but should include strains of serogroup O118.

Since AE-positive E. coli strains have been shown to cause diarrhea in calves (7, 9, 21, 30), it is tempting to speculate that the reason for the epidemiological association between isolation of O118 STEC strains and diarrhea (26, 30) is the strains’ ability to cause the AE lesion. Consistently, we recommend that the bacteriological diagnosis of neonatal calf diarrhea due to E. coli should focus not only on ETEC strains (13) but on Stx- and AE-positive E. coli strains additionally.

Although in calves a high percentage of STEC strains harbor the LEE-encoded eae (23, 30), only a small percentage of STEC isolates from adult cattle show this genotype (22, 23). The reason for this phenomenon is currently unknown. Presumably, the physiological differences in the intestinal environments between suckling calves and ruminating cattle play an important role. Before rumination, AE-positive STEC strains should have a colonization advantage in the intestinal tract. After rumination, AE ability may no longer be an advantage, since in the rumen a mucous membrane-specific adhesion is no longer necessary. Thus, the percentage of eae-positive STEC strains can decrease with age, although the total number of STEC strains shed may not change substantially. This assumption is supported by the fact that the number of eae-positive STEC strains peaks at an age of 3 to 4 weeks, while eae-negative STEC strains are increasingly shed at an age of 8 to 10 weeks (28).

Humans develop HC and HUS after infections with STEC-contaminated food mostly of bovine origin (14). The most important STEC serotype, O157:H7 (1, 14), is associated with large food-borne outbreaks. However, direct transmission from animals to humans is another mode of infection with STEC strains (6, 24). Outbreaks can occur when groups of children visit farms and are encouraged to touch the animals. In this respect, at least in Germany, the high virulence potential of O118 STEC strains could be a threat to children in the future but has not heretofore been recognized. To date, we are only aware of one case of O118-associated HUS (5). Future case control studies on the direct transmission mode must include all STEC strains and should not be limited to O157:H7 only.

The findings that only 53.7% of the LEE-positive bovine O118 STEC strains were AE positive when tested in the human HEp-2 cell line but that 92.7% were positive when bovine FCL cells were used indicate that the in vitro AE ability of bovine STEC strains is highly dependent on the particular cell used for testing. The weak correlation between possession of the LEE and AE phenotype in vitro is probably due to differences in gene expression. So far, the regulation of LEE-associated genes in STEC strains is only poorly understood (10). In our FAS test comparing human HEp-2 and bovine FCL cells, incubation temperature, time interval, and medium utilized were identical. Our results on the quantity of adhesion give no indication for a species-specific adhesion, since the intensities with which the bovine STEC strains adhered to the human and the bovine cells tested did not vary significantly (P > 0.005). Furthermore, it is not known to date whether bovine STEC strains harbor specific adhesins, i.e., fimbriae, that confer the first step in adhesion. The previously published differences in the C-terminal region of the adhesin intimin also do not hint at a species-specific adhesion mechanism (11, 16, 25, 30). In addition, the worldwide epidemiological finding that the vast majority of STEC serovars detected in bovines are also found in STEC-associated human diseases (31) argues against a species-specific adhesion mechanism.

The most important practical implication of the weak association between possession of the LEE and the in vitro AE ability of STEC strains is the idea that the FAS test with HEp-2 cells is not a suitable test to screen for the AE ability of these strains. An antibody-based assay (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and slide agglutination) of, e.g., intimin expression would be a more sensitive diagnostic procedure. Another practical aspect is the detection of HlyEHEC. Two hlyEHEC-positive strains did not show the hemolytic phenotype. This already previously observed weak phenotype (30) may be due to a low level of secretion of the hemolysin and warrants a highly critical screening in the diagnostic lab.

To this end, we are currently testing the clonal relationship of these O118 STEC strains to better understand whether they have emerged recently or whether they are endemic in calves.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by NIH grant AI 41325.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Aleksic S, Karch H, Bockemühl J. A biotyping scheme for Shiga-like (Vero) toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 and a list of serological cross-reactions between O157 and other gram-positive bacteria. Int J Med Microbiol Virol Parasitol Infect Dis. 1992;276:221–230. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(11)80009-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baljer G, Wieler L H, Bauerfeind R, Ludwig S-B, Mayr A. Nachweis von Vero- (Shiga-like-) toxinbildenden E. coli-Keimen (VTEC) mittels Zellkulturtest und DNA-Hybridisierung bei durchfallkranken Kälbern. Tieraerztl Umsch. 1990;2:71–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blanco M, Blanco J, Blanco J E, Gonzales E A, Gomes T A T, Zerbini L F, Yano T, Pestana de Castro A F. Genes coding for Shiga-like toxins in bovine verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) strains belonging to different O:K:H serotypes. Vet Microbiol. 1994;42:105–110. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(94)90010-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bockemühl J, Karch H. Zur aktuellen Bedeutung der enterohämorrhagischen Escherichia coli (EHEC) in Deutschland (1994–1995) Bundesgesundheitsblatt. 1996;39:290–296. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Caprioli A, Luzzi I, Rosmini F, Resti C, Edefonti A, Perfumo F, Farina C, Goglio A, Gianviti A, Rizzoni G. Community-wide outbreak of hemolytic-uremic syndrome associated with non-O157 verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli. J Infect Dis. 1994;169:208–211. doi: 10.1093/infdis/169.1.208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chalmers R M, Salmon R L, Willshaw G A, Cheasty T, Looker N, Davies I, Wray C. Vero-cytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 in a farmer handling horses. Lancet. 1997;349:1816. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)61697-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chanter N, Hall G A, Bland A P, Hayle A J, Pearsons K R. Dysentery in calves caused by an atypical strain of Escherichia coli (S102-9) Vet Microbiol. 1986;12:241–253. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(86)90053-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cravioto A, Gross R J, Scotland S M, Rowe B. An adhesive factor found in strains of Escherichia coli belonging to the traditional infantile enteropathogenic serotypes. Curr Microbiol. 1979;3:95–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dean-Nystrom E A, Bosworth B T, Cray W C, Moon H W. Pathogenicity of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in the intestines of neonatal calves. Infect Immun. 1997;65:1842–1848. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.5.1842-1848.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ebel F, Deibel C, Kresse A U, Guzman C A, Chakraborty T. Temperature- and medium-dependent secretion of proteins by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 1996;64:4472–4479. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.11.4472-4479.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gannon V P J, Rashed M, King R K, Thomas E J G. Detection and characterization of the eae gene of Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;31:1268–1274. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.5.1268-1274.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hall G A, Reynolds D J, Chanter N, Morgan J H, Parsons K R, Debney T G, Bland A B, Bridger J C. Dysentery caused by Escherichia coli (S102-9) in calves: natural and experimental disease. Vet Pathol. 1985;22:156–163. doi: 10.1177/030098588502200210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Holland R E. Some infectious causes of diarrhea in young farm animals. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990;3:345–375. doi: 10.1128/cmr.3.4.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Karmali M A. Infection by verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1989;2:15–38. doi: 10.1128/cmr.2.1.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Knutton S, Baldwin T, Williams P H, McNeish A S. Actin accumulation at sites of bacterial adhesion to tissue culture cells: basis of a new diagnostic test for enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 1989;57:1290–1298. doi: 10.1128/iai.57.4.1290-1298.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Louie M, de Azavedo J, Clarke R, Borczyk A, Lior H, Richter M, Brunton J. Sequence heterogeneity of the eae gene and detection of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli using serotype-specific primers. Epidemiol Infect. 1994;112:449–461. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800051153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McDaniel T K, Jarvis K J, Donnenberg M S, Kaper J B. A genetic locus of enterocyte effacement conserved among diverse enterobacterial pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:1664–1668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.5.1664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McDaniel T K, Kaper J B. A cloned pathogenicity island from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli confers the attaching and effacing phenotype on E. coli K-12. Mol Microbiol. 1997;23:399–407. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.2311591.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Orskov F, Orskov I. Serotyping of Escherichia coli. Methods Microbiol. 1984;14:43–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pohl P, Daube G, Lintermans P, Kaeckenbeeck A, Mainil J. Description de 70 souches d’Escherichia coli d’origine bovine possédant les gènes des vérotoxines. Ann Med Vet. 1991;135:267–272. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pospischil A, Mainil J G, Baljer G, Moon H W. Attaching and effacing bacteria in the intestines of calves and cats with diarrhea. Vet Pathol. 1987;23:330–334. doi: 10.1177/030098588702400407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Richter H, Klie H, Timm M, Gallien P, Steinrück H, Perlberg K-W, Protz D. Verotoxin-bildende E. coli (VTEC) im Kot von Schlachtrindern in Deutschland. Berl Muench Tieraertzl Wochenschr. 1997;110:121–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sandhu K S, Clarke R C, McFadden K, Brouwer A, Louie M, Wilson J, Lior H, Gyles C L. Prevalence of the eaeA gene in verotoxigenic Escherichia coli strains from dairy cattle in Southwest Ontario. Epidemiol Infect. 1996;116:1–7. doi: 10.1017/s095026880005888x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Trevena W B, Willshaw G A, Cheasty T, Wray C. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium and Workshop on Shiga Toxin (Verocytotoxin)-producing Escherichia coli infections. 1997. Associations between human infection with Vero cytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 and farm animal contact, abstr. V28/I. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Whittam, T. S., and A. E. McGraw. 1996. Clonal analysis of EPEC serogroups. Rev. Microbiol. 27(Suppl. 1):7–16.
  • 26.Wieler L H. Habilitation thesis. Giessen, Germany: Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wieler L H, Bauerfeind R, Baljer G. Characterization of Shiga-like toxin producing Escherichia coli (SLTEC) isolated from calves with and without diarrhoea. Int J Med Microbiol Virol Parasitol Infect Dis. 1992;276:243–253. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(11)80011-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wieler L H, Sobjinski G, Failing K, Baljer G. Abstracts of the 96th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1996. Cross-sectional study on Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections in dairy calves (1–12 weeks of age), abstr. P10. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wieler L H, Tigges M, Schäferkordt S, Ebel F, Djafari S, Schlapp T, Chakraborty T. The enterohemolysin phenotype of bovine Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli (SLTEC) is encoded by the EHEC-hemolysin gene. Vet Microbiol. 1996;52:153–164. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(96)00058-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wieler L H, Vieler E, Erpenstein C, Schlapp T, Steinrück H, Bauerfeind H, Byomi A, Baljer G. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) from bovines: association of adhesion with the carriage of eae and other genes. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:2980–2984. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.12.2980-2984.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.World Health Organization. World Health Organization report of the working group meeting on shiga-like toxin producing Escherichia coli (SLTEC), with emphasis on zoonotic aspects. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1994. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES