Abstract
Buildings use a significant percentage of the total energy consumed worldwide. Striving for energy conservation within buildings is of prime concern for researchers. Hence, scientists are aggressively exploring new energy storage and supply methods to reduce exorbitantly fluctuating energy demands and increase the share of renewable energy in building energy consumption. Solar systems that incorporate phase change materials (PCMs) for thermal storage have significant potential to serve in this context. These systems are not yet able to endure the significant energy demands, but they are being continually improved. The aim of this paper is to explore the existing solar PCM systems that are being studied or that are installed for use in indoor heating/cooling. As per the outcome of this systematic review, it has been observed that when coupled with solar thermal energy, the configuration of PCMs can either use passive or active techniques. Passive techniques are usually less efficient and more costly to implement in a building structure, resulting in active heat exchangers being widely implemented with better technical and economic results. At the same time, it has been observed that for most domestic buildings, organic PCMs with phase change temperatures of up to 42 °C and thermal conductivities of up to 0.56 W/m.K are most suitable for integration in solar thermal energy production. Hybrid systems are also commonly used for larger commercial buildings, in which the solar PCM system (SPCMS) provides a fraction of the total load. Additionally, the Stefan number is the most common technical parameter that is used to assess this performance, along with the effective thermal conductivity of the PCM after using enhancement techniques. The key economic indicator is annual savings per year, with most SPCMSs having a payback period of between 6 to 30 years. This review provides designers and researchers with key insights in terms of formulating a basis in the domain of coupling PCMs with solar thermal energy, especially within non-industrial buildings.
Keywords: solar, phase change materials (PCMs), indoor heating, indoor cooling, thermal storage, active systems, passive systems
1. Introduction
Worldwide energy consumption is increasing exponentially with the ever-increasing population and aggressive industrialization of recent years. We stand in an era where natural energy resources are depleting at an expeditious rate, and their demand is increasing exponentially. In industrial countries, one-third of total energy is consumed by HVAC systems only [1]. This leads researchers to devise methods for providing alternative energy resources for heating and cooling requirements. Numerous studies have been conducted on the use of renewable energies in an optimized manner to share the burden of energy consumption in buildings. Among all renewable energies, solar energy is the most researched because it is clean, renewable, easy to harness, and safe [2]. The energy from the sun can be directly employed to heat buildings or, alternatively, it can be concentrated on thermal collectors that, in turn, heat a carrying medium like water, carrying the heat through the system and supplying it to the desired location. The use of thermal collectors results in a higher absorption of solar energy when compared to direct heating and, hence, is preferred [3]. Solar thermal energy can also be harnessed for cooling systems as well. Selvaraj et al. [4] devised a vapor absorption cycle based on solar photovoltaic (PV) panels to compress a refrigerant thermally in the generator section of a vapor absorption cycle. Thus, a compressor, which is the component that carries the major load in a refrigeration cycle, was replaced by a renewable energy source to achieve clean and free cooling. The COP of the modified configuration was found to have increased by 0.04 in comparison to the commercial AC absorption refrigeration cycle, with a payback time of 10.2 years.
A significant amount of energy is consumed by buildings to provide thermal comfort for their inhabitants, and this contributes to serious climatic changes. Hence, there is an urgent need to reduce the thermal energy consumption of this residential sector. A significant research effort has been invested in achieving zero-energy buildings, and thermal energy storage (TES) seems to be the best way to achieve this goal by decoupling the demand and supply [5]. In today’s world, the usefulness of TES is well established, and it seems to provide an optimistic prospect towards achieving a low-carbon future. TES technology is described as an initiative towards a reduction in energy consumption in buildings. It aims to reduce the urban heating island (UHI) effects in cities and to increase energy efficiency and thermal comfort by balancing the energy demand between day and night [6]. Energy can be stored in either physical form or chemical form. Physically, energy is stored as sensible and latent energy, whereas thermochemical energy is released or absorbed when a chemical reaction occurs with the heat of a reaction. Sensible and latent heat storage is mostly considered for building applications, although thermochemical energy storage has been gaining a lot of interest recently. In sensible heat TES, heavy materials, such as concrete, stone, etc., are used to store significant amounts of thermal energy. On the other hand, a larger amount of energy per volume can be stored by using the phase transition of the storage materials (PCMs) in latent heat TES [7].
Due to the limited number of sunshine hours in a day, the working of solar systems is also restricted. As soon as the sunlight disappears, the system is deprived of its energy source, thus ceasing its operation at night. This problem can be addressed by integrating a thermal storage system with solar systems. Over the years, latent heat storage (LHS) has been the focus of study for thermal storage [8,9]. The concept of LHS is to incorporate a material that changes phase during its operating temperature range and releases/absorbs a large amount of latent energy, as per the requirement during the non-solar hours.
2. Configurations of SPCMS
An SPCMS refers to a system that concentrates sunlight on collector plates or drums to maximize the absorption of heat energy from the sun. This heat energy can be subsequently used to heat water or air or be directly used in a building. In PCM solar systems, solar energy is used to charge the PCM during the daytime so that this stored energy can compensate for energy requirements in the absence of sunlight at night. A general flow diagram of an SPCMS is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
General flow diagram of an SPCMS.
The basic principle of SPCMSs involves a solar radiation absorber employed to absorb the heat of the sun and, subsequently, transfer this heat to a PCM either directly or through a secondary medium, such as water. This heat transfer causes the PCM to melt down, which is known as charging the PCM. A charged PCM acts as a thermal storage battery. This thermal energy (stored as latent heat) of the PCM is utilized as per need to share the heating and cooling requirements of buildings, and this stage is known as the discharging of the PCM. The PCM-based thermal energy storage systems used in buildings come in two types: active or passive storage systems. Active systems involve auxiliary devices to help charge and discharge a storage tank. On the other hand, passive systems do not need such heat exchangers or forced fluid motion to extract heat or cold from the storage. The incorporation of PCMs into buildings can take two forms: (1) PCMs in building components, like walls, floors, ceilings, etc., and (2) PCMs in heat and cold storage. The former are the passive systems, whereas the latter are active systems [10].
For example, a solar PCM system employed for indoor temperature stabilization consists of a flat plate collector, a pump to circulate water in the tubes attached to the bottom side of the collector to heat the incoming water, and a heat exchanger to heat the air coming from inside of a room. Typically, a room having a volume of 50–100 m3 requiring a temperature increase up to 25 °C requires a flat plate collector with a surface area of 300–400 m3 that is capable of having irradiation in the range of 5–7 kWh/m2/day. The flat plate solar collector increases the temperature of the water by 50–90 °C. The PCM phase change temperature for indoor temperature stabilization is typically in the range of 20–100 °C, and its thermal conductivity is generally lower (0.1–0.6 W/m.K). The capacity of the pump to circulate water to the flat plate is normally in the range of 150–300 L.
Many researchers have also investigated the thermal characteristics of active and passive SPCMs simultaneously in a single configuration. Concentrated photovoltaic panels (CPVs) using PCMs were investigated for heating the circulating water through pipes for active and passive system configurations [11]. During the daytime, the panel temperature was reduced due to the melting of PCM, which increased the efficiency of the panels. Subsequently, the charged PCM was used to heat the water at night, thus doubling the advantage of this setup. A two-dimensional model was developed and numerically simulated for the CPV layers with the integrated cooling system. A nanofluid was employed as a heat transfer fluid (HTF) to improve the thermal characteristics of the system. The proposed system was reported to achieve a 60% reduction in the CPV average temperature when compared to the standard PCM-PV and water-cooled systems. Interestingly, the efficiency was increased by 224% after 20 min for the CPV systems. The maximum PCM temperature was maintained below the allowable temperature to avoid its performance deterioration. The use of a nanofluid as the HTF resulted in an increase in the CPV efficiency by 2.7% and a reduction of the PV maximum temperature and the PCM melting time by 4 °C and 12%, respectively. The effect of different arrangements of PCM plates in the water tank was found to be negligible. A comparison of active and passive SPCMSs in the weather conditions of New Zealand [12] demonstrated that an active system is a better option due to its enhanced heat transfer rate and the ability to extract/add heat on demand using control systems with a minimal input of energy. Two identical huts were prepared for the study; the first hut was equipped with wall-impregnated wallboards (passive approach), whereas the other hut was provided with active air-PCM heat storage units. The experimental facility was also equipped with an air-conditioner programmed to switch on at the upper limit of the comfort temperature. It was concluded that the active system prolonged the time taken by the cooling space to reach an upper level by two hours when compared to the corresponding passive system, and the energy difference between the two systems was found to be only 8%. Moreover, the active SPCM configuration was found to consume 22% less energy.
The scope of this review lies in exploring the different design approaches of SPCMS. Any efficient and effective techniques that could be used to improve thermal storage would also be investigated. Since the selection and quantity of a PCM is strongly dependent on the operating environmental conditions, the effect of several key performance factors would be enlightened in this regard, along with the optimization techniques of such systems. Finally, a comparison of the economics of using active and passive SPCMS will be elaborated, along with a critical analysis.
2.1. Active Arrangements
SPCMSs requiring auxiliary components for their operation and an external source of energy are referred to as active. This section includes a discussion regarding various design configurations, components/apparatus, and operating mechanisms, as well as the numerical and experimental techniques used to analyze these systems. Moreover, it also includes a thorough overview of various critical performance parameters (melting time, charging profile, etc.) for active SPCMSs. Table 1 contains a comprehensive review in this regard.
Table 1.
Summary of research into the active domain, characterized by numerical and experimental studies.
| Subject | Overview | Outcome | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCM storage for solar DHW |
|
|
[13,14] |
| DP-SAH equipped with capsules of PCM |
|
|
[15] |
| Solar double-slope PCM glazed roof |
|
|
[16] |
| Active-slab-containing PCM integrated into solar air collector |
|
|
[17] |
| Preheating of ventilation air using a solar PCM |
|
|
[1] |
| Hybrid PCM system using an active composite wall |
|
|
[18] |
| PCM-integrated solar chimney |
|
|
[19] |
| Dual-air-channel PCM system with solar wall |
|
|
[20] |
| Solar-aided PCM-based space heating |
|
|
[21] |
2.2. Passive Arrangements
The SPCMSs that do not require any auxiliary component or an external energy source for their operation are referred to as passive solar PCM systems (SPCMS) [22,23]. Passive systems involve the incorporation of PCMs into the walls, roofs, and windows of buildings, and unlike active systems, they do not have any auxiliary setup. Glazed roofs are used to better light a house but, at the same time, this cause thermal discomfort due to the thermal insulation of the glaze. This section includes the discussion of the operating mechanism and analysis techniques to study such systems both numerically and experimentally. Moreover, various areas of study, such as melting time and charging profile, are explored for passive SPCMSs. Table 2 lists a comprehensive review of the research studies for this type of SPCMS.
Table 2.
Summary of research into the passive domain, characterized by numerical and experimental studies.
| Subject | Overview | Outcome | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCM in gypsum Boards |
|
|
[24,25,26] |
| PCM in Concrete |
|
|
[27,28] |
| PCM in Bricks |
|
|
[29] |
| PCM based Free Cooling |
|
|
[30] |
| PCM Trombe wall |
|
|
[31,32,33] |
| PCM Shutter |
|
|
[34] |
| PCM after Mosaic Tiles |
|
|
[35] |
| Air-based Heating System |
|
|
[36] |
| PCM in Ceilings |
|
|
[37,38] |
| PCM in capasules |
|
|
[39,40] |
2.3. Type of PCMs Used in SPCMS
PCMs can be regarded as latent heat storage materials. These materials have higher values in terms of specific heat capacity, implying a high concentration of energy is stored per unit mass due to the phase change process (latent heat). One of the key advantages of using PCMs is that they can be employed in applications having small temperature differences while storing or retrieving energy. These undergo solid-liquid or liquid-gas phase transitions in a working range of temperatures. The volumetric transition during a liquid-gas phase transition is significantly higher than that of a solid-liquid PCM; hence, these are less suitable for building storage applications due to having limited available space.
Figure 2 shows a general classification of PCMs that is employed in solar thermal systems. The solid-liquid PCMs can be further categorized as inorganic, organic, and eutectic PCMs. Examples of organic latent heat storage materials are paraffin, glycol, fatty acids, sugar alcohols, etc., whereas hydrated salts, molten salts, aqueous solutions, water, and metals fall into the category of inorganic PCMs. Finally, eutectic PCMs are a mixture of two or more miscible pure PCM constituents having a single transition temperature. Different PCMs are studied as potential TES materials for temperature reductions within buildings.
Figure 2.
General classification of solid-liquid PCMs.
PCMs are best suited for thermal storage due to their low cost, easy preparation/availability, high latent heat in terms of fusion, flexible transition temperatures, high storage density, and isothermal operation [13]. The thermal properties of the PCMs commonly used in solar thermal applications are presented in Table 3. Several materials can serve as PCMs, such as paraffin waxes, salt hydrates, fatty acids, and sugar alcohols. Although salt hydrates and fatty acids have relatively higher thermal conductivity, they are chemically active and undergo incongruent melting. Therefore, paraffin waxes are widely used because they are cheap, readily available, and chemically stable [13]. Table 3 shows the thermal properties of commonly used PCMs in solar thermal applications. It can be clearly deduced from Table 3 that the thermal conductivity of commonly used PCMs is quite low. The low thermal conductivity of PCMs, resulting in low thermal performance, has been a major area of research in recent times.
Table 3.
Thermal properties of PCMs.
| PCM | Melting Temperature (°C) | Thermal Conductivity (W/m K) | Heat of Fusion (kJ/kg) | Density (kg/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyglycol E400 | 8 | 0.187 | 99.6 | 1125 |
| Paraffin C15 | 10 | - | 205 | - |
| n-Pentadecane | 10 | - | 193.9 | 770 |
| Caprylic acid (fatty acid) | 16 | 0.149 | 148.5 | 901 |
| Paraffin C16 | 16.7 | - | 237.1 | - |
| Glycerin (organic) | 17.9 | 0.143 | 198.7 | - |
| n-Heptadecane (organic) | 19 | 0.21 | 240 | 760 |
| OM 21 | 22 | 0.14 | 174 | 891 |
| HS 22 | 23 | 0.56 | 167.6 | 1540 |
| HS 24 | 26 | 0.55 | - | 1510 |
| Lactic acid | 26 | - | 184 | - |
| n-Octadecane | 28 | 0.148 | 244 | 774 |
| HS 29 | 29 | 0.382 | 190 | 1530 |
| OM 32 | 33 | 0.145 | 157 | 870 |
| Capric acid | 32 | 0.153 | 152.7 | 878 |
| Lauric acid | 42 | 0.147 | 178 | 870 |
| Paraffin C20 | 36.7 | - | 246 | - |
| OM 35 | 35 | 0.16 | 171 | 870 |
Different methods to increase the thermal conductivity of PCMSs have been investigated in the past by researchers to address this issue. Bodin et al. [41] experimentally investigated the use of carbon nanostructures in paraffin to enhance its thermal conductivity. Taunite carbon nanotubes were embedded in grade 2 paraffin. It was found that the heat conductance and heat capacity of the nano-modified paraffin were enhanced in comparison to the original paraffin. The use of nano-modified paraffin was also reported to improve the economic feasibility of heat pumps. Shchegolkov et al. [42] performed experiments to investigate the effect of modifying paraffin using multilayer carbon nanotubes with nickel-zinc ferrite. The range of measurements of the temperature field was from 20 to 75 °C. Other methods to improve the thermal conductivity of PCMs include the use of a graphite powder/matrix, internal fins, honeycomb fillers, and carbon fibers [43,44,45,46,47]. The details of these techniques are not in the scope of this review.
3. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for SPCMSs
SPCMSs have a lot of ground to cover when it comes to their performance. Therefore, comprehensive knowledge of the major critical parameters is indispensable. The subsequent sections discuss the technical and economic indicators responsible for a significant improvement in the performance of SPCMSs.
3.1. Technical/Thermophysical Indicators
In order to develop various efficient configurations for SPCMSs, the focus of researchers has shifted towards the optimization of these systems. This initiated a new paradigm towards efficient, low-cost, and clean energy systems. The idea adopted was to investigate the performance of SPCMSs by varying various parameters, such as the tube pitch, tube diameters, the angle of the solar collector, the thermophysical properties of the used PCM, etc. The following is a list of the most important technical and thermophysical performance indicators for SPCMSs.
Transition temperature of a PCM: The transition temperature of a PCM should be within the operating range of the system in an optimal manner [48]. The pull of heat during charging and the push of heat during discharging should be made equal by ensuring an equivalent ΔT between the phase change temperature and the supply and demand of the HTF. Generally, the applications involving heating requirements employ PCMs that have a phase change temperature in the range of 20–100 °C, except for solar thermal electricity, where a phase change temperature in the range of 400–1000 °C is required. On the other hand, cooling applications usually require a PCM with a phase change temperature in the range of −20–20 °C. PCMs with a phase transition temperature in the range of 21–28 °C are preferred for providing thermal comfort in residential buildings.
Density of a PCM: A high-density PCM is recommended when storing a higher energy content in a specified volume. In this way, the volume of the thermal storage can be reduced significantly [48]. The density difference between the solid and liquid phases should be kept minimal to avoid ullage, but this will reduce free convective heat transfer, especially during melting. The density of paraffin wax usually lies in the range of 800–900 .
Latent heat of fusion of a PCM: A higher value for the latent heat of fusion is preferred. A high latent heat results in more energy storage [49]. The latent heat of fusion for paraffin wax is between 200–300 kJ/kg, whereas for metallic PCMs, its value is found to be in the range of 25–100 kJ/kg.
Specific heat of a PCM: The specific heat of a PCM should also be high. A higher value for specific heat, again, corresponds to higher-density energy storage, which is desirable [48]. The entire objective of using PCMs is to maximize latent heat transfer while minimizing sensible heat transfer.
Thermal conductivity: The thermal conductivity of a PCM should be as high as possible. However, the main reason for the limited commercial success of PCMs both in active and passive setups is their inherently low thermal conductivity. Various techniques can be used to increase a PCM’s thermal conductivity, including the use of graphite powder, carbon nanotubes, graphene, honeycomb fillers, aluminum matrices, carbon fibers, nanoparticles, fins, and heat pipes [50]. For instance, the thermal conductivity of paraffin wax was found to increase from 0.21 W/m.K to 4.09 W/m.K when using a composite of paraffin with aluminum powder [50].
Inter tube distance in a PCM heat exchanger: Heat exchangers with several tubes are recommended to improve the thermal conductivity of SPCMSs. The distance between the tubes of such heat exchangers plays a significant role in overall thermal performance. Intuitively, as the distance between the tubes decreases, the system becomes more compact, resulting in better performance and increasing the area of contact between the HTF and PCM. This compactness not only reduces the loss of heat to the surrounding area but also generates space for more tubes [51].
Insulation of SPCMSs: The transfer of energy from the PCM to the desired medium occurs with the loss of energy to the surroundings. Minimizing such heat loss will result in the significantly better thermal performance of the system. Polyurethane and wood are commonly used for insulating a SPCMSs [52].
Circulation flow rate: Useful heat gain is found to increase with the increase in the flow rate of the HTF, which, consequently, causes an increase in heat transfer to the facility in which the system is employed [53]. Normally, HTF flows at a rate of 2–15 L/minute in a SPCMS.
Cascaded PCM arrangement: Using two PCMs with different transition temperatures results in higher thermal conductivity and, consequently, better performance [54,55]. This technique maintains a consistent ΔT between the HTF and the phase change temperatures of the PCM. An increase of approximately 5% was reported when using cascaded latent heat storage [55]. Usually, no more than three cascaded PCMs are used in an SPCM-based heat exchanger.
Internal fins: Another archetype for performance improvement comes in the form of an internal fin structure. The use of fins increases thermal conductivity by increasing the effective heat transfer area, thereby increasing the heat transfer rate. Numerical models are used to optimize the number of fins, their diameters, and the length of fins for better performance. Jia et al. [56] found an optimum length-to-radius ratio of 0.75. The authors used a total of six fins and found more than a 50% reduction in discharging time (3600 s using fins compared to 7700 s without using fins).
PCM layer thickness: PCM layer thickness is an essential indicator of an SPCMS design. PCMs with greater thicknesses tend to increase the overall volume of the system, whereas a small PCM thickness results in performance degradation. Therefore, optimal layer thickness must be carefully selected. Numerical-simulation-based techniques lead to such optimized PCM layer thicknesses [57]. A PCM thickness of 0.01 m was found to produce the best results under the operating conditions of the thermal system under investigation [57].
Solar irradiation and climatic conditions: Atmospheric conditions are one of the most critical parameters to be considered when designing SPCMSs because several parameters, such as transition temperature, the mass of a PCM, the estimated solar irradiation, etc., are dependent on the climate of a particular place [58].
Area of the solar collector: Based on climatic predictions and energy storage demand, the area of the installed solar collector is a key parameter to ensure that sufficient solar radiation will be absorbed and thermally stored for use during off-solar times [59,60].
An overview of these typical parameters for an active solar-based PCM system is presented in Figure 3:
Figure 3.
Typical characteristics of indoor temperature stabilization using solar PCMs.
The governing equations for the thermal analysis of an SPCMS are
| (1) |
| (2) |
| (3) |
where is taken as fluid velocity, μ (in kg/m.s) represents dynamic viscosity, (in N/m2) denotes the pressure, (in m/s2) represents gravity, Si (in N/m3) is taken as the source term, and ρ (in kg/m3) signifies the density. The buoyancy-forced flow of a PCM liquid is generated due to the melting process, which is an unsteady, incompressible laminar flow. Natural convection produces a density difference for the duration of the melting process because of the gravitational effects. The density discrepancy is estimated by applying Boussinesq’s correlation, which includes thermal expansion coefficient, β, (in 1/K) temperature difference, density changes , and the buoyancy source term . Furthermore, (W/m.k) signifies the thermal conductivity, (K) represents the temperature, and (kJ/kg) is the enthalpy in Equations (1)–(3).
In order to efficiently design a system, the aforementioned key indicators and generalized rules are extremely useful. Additionally, the thermal performance indicators that provide a potential design basis for researchers are also extremely valuable. Mazhar et al. [61] carried out an experimental investigation to enhance the performance of a PCM to harness grey water (GW) in domestic buildings. The most important indicator defining the performance of the PCM, known as the Stefan Number, was defined as
| (4) |
where Cp (in kJ/kg.K) is the specific heat at constant pressure, and Lf (in kJ/kg) is the latent heat of melting. A Stefan value equal to 1 indicates equal sensible and latent heat transfer, whereas a value closer to 0 depicts higher latent heat transfer, which is more desirable for an SPCMS. The same researcher also suggested that for the indoor heating/cooling applications of buildings, for an SPCMS, the objective is to minimize the ΔT between the maxima and minima temperatures of the indoor air. Afshan et al. [62] performed an experimental investigation to study the effect of the aspect ratio on the performance of a latent thermal storage unit for solar thermal applications. The experimental setup consisted of three cylindrical storage tanks with different aspect ratios (height to diameter) 320:330 mm for 1:1, 560:250 mm for 2:1, and 720:240 mm for 3:1. PCM balls were placed in the top 50 mm and bottom 50 mm spaces. When the water in the storage tank was stratified, the efficiency of the TES and solar collector system increased. The stratification of the water in tanks was produced by the difference in the density between the hot water and the cold water. The hot water flowed from the top side while the cold water entered from the bottom side. The Richardson number was primarily used to describe the stratification and was estimated by using Equations (5) and (6):
| (5) |
| (6) |
Here, vsf (in m/s) is the characteristic velocity of flow. It was concluded that stratification was influenced by the PCM balls in the storage tank irrespective of the aspect ratio used. The increase in the stratification level was found to increase the instantaneous heat transfer rate. The cumulative heat transfer decreased with the passage of time as the aspect ratio increased. The Richardson number also depicted the resistance of the PCM balls, and it increased throughout the charging process, especially in the case of an aspect ratio of 1:1.
3.2. Economic Indicators
Researchers are working incessantly on designing economically efficient systems for heating/cooling purposes. There has been a lot of research conducted on PCM-integrated systems that have been proven to be efficient in terms of saving energy. Kong et al. [18] experimentally analyzed a hybrid system of PCM wallboards with excellent thermal and mechanical properties that were integrated with a solar thermal system. The result showed a 44.16% reduction in daily energy consumption. Saafi and Daouas [63] employed a brick wall with PCM impregnated on both surfaces (the inside surface and the outside surface) to investigate the energy-saving potential of the system. The authors came up with the conclusion that the outside surface of the brick wall with the PCM resulted in an energy-efficient system. Several studies conducted on single- and multilayer PCM configurations showed that the multilayered layouts resulted in better energy saving than the single-layer layouts [64,65]. The local climate conditions also affect the energy-saving potential of a PCM-integrated building to some extent, with energy saving ranging from less than 1% [64] to up to 90% [66]. Sovetova et al. [67] assessed the energy efficiency performance of PCM-integrated residential buildings in eight different cities with 13 different PCMs with the help of Energy Plus software, version 7.3. The reduction in energy consumption in the targeted cities fluctuated in a range from 17.97% to 34.26%. Qu et al. [68] studied the influence of several critical parameters on energy savings when using PCM-integrated buildings in the summer season. It was found that a considerable energy-saving rate could be achieved (up to 34.8% in this case) with the proper selection of PCMs in accordance with the climatic conditions. Alam et al. [69] investigated the energy-saving potential of PCMs in eight major Australian cities, which represent six climate zones. The results showed 17–23% annual energy savings when using the system under investigation, depending on the local weather. Wang et al. [70] evaluated the performance of PCM wallboards in air-conditioned buildings during the summer and winter seasons. Different room locations on the middle floor of a building were studied. The results concluded that during the summer season, the east and the west walls have the highest energy-saving rates, and a 27.78% energy-saving rate can be achieved in the east wall model. During the winter season, the south wall has the highest efficiency, which can reach up to a maximum value of 96.2%. The PCM wall was reported to have the fastest payback period of 21.65 years. Zhao et al. [71] studied a solar heating system using a PCM storage tank and compared it with a conventional water tank heating system for comparison in terms of energy saving. The results showed a 34% increase in energy-saving capability. Devaux and Farid [72] studied PCM underfloor heating systems, and the analysis showed great potential in terms of peak load shifting. Overall, 32% and 42% for energy and cost savings were reported, respectively. Calise et al. [73] performed a dynamic simulation for an energy comparison between building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) and building-integrated photovoltaic/thermal (BIPV/T) collectors in TRNSYS. A payback period of 4.5 years was reported using the BIPV-based systems. This demonstrates that the BIPV-based system is more energy efficient than the BIPV/T-based systems. Researchers have used different tools to measure the economic impact of PCM solar systems. Calculations regarding energy savings, cost savings, electrical efficiency, payback period, etc., for different configurations of SPCMs have been reported in the literature and are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4.
Overview of typical energy and economic savings.
| PCM | Site | Energy Savings (kW/Year) | Payback Period (Year) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioPCM@ ™ M91 | Nicosia | 20.567 | 14.5 | [74] |
| PCM27 | Hong Kong | 3798.34 | 30.09 | [75] |
| PCM23 | Australia | 4833.33 | - | [75] |
| PCM29 | Iran | 2969.65 | 42 | [76] |
| PCM-enhanced insulation | Miami | 19,954 | 7 | [77] |
| TIM-PCM | Paris | 668.8 | 22 | [78] |
| n-hexadecane | Seoul | 326.36 | 6.88 | [79] |
| n-heptadecane | Seoul | 312.18 | 6.80 | [79] |
| n-octadecane | Seoul | 205.37 | 8.38 | [79] |
| 25# Paraffin | China | - | 3.32 | [18] |
| Dupon Energain | Aveiro | - | 41 | [80] |
| BioPCM® M51 | Aveiro | - | 18 | [80] |
| BioPCM® M91 | Aveiro | - | 26 | [80] |
4. Conclusions and Future Recommendations
SPCMSs promise a bright future in terms of providing clean and low-cost energy while enhancing the share of renewable energy in the energy mix of buildings. However, due to the low thermal conductivity of PCMs, SPCMSs have always been at a disadvantage, restricting their applicability, especially in passive configurations. In this spectrum, an encyclopedic review of the novel design concepts of active and passive SPCMSs is presented in this paper. A comprehensive discussion regarding the performance and economics of these systems is also presented, which has the potential to assist designers and researchers in making further improvements. When considering all the matrices of performance, savings, and applicability, it is concluded that active solar systems—despite having some energy-consuming components—provide better energy savings when compared to passive solar systems. The payback time for active SPCMs is usually below 10 years, whereas this is greater for passive configurations. The thermophysical properties of PCMs and the technical design parameters influencing the performance of SPCMSs were also deliberated. The debate of this paper established that SPCMSs have now been improved to such an extent that they can be used practically in domestic buildings to fulfill partial heat/cooling loads when used in combination with the status quo technologies. Nevertheless, these systems have immense ground to cover to compete with commercial electrical storage systems. In this regard, a few future recommendations are listed below:
The thermal conductivity of PCMs, despite obtaining several improvements through various techniques, is still the main constraint that limits the efficiency of SPCMSs and, thus, needs to be investigated further. Nano-modified PCMs, along with more efficient finned configurations, can be explored further to fully explore their potential for enhancing thermal characteristics.
Research should be conducted to a) increase the density of PCMs and b) decrease the volume of the system and, thus, increase energy storage for compact domestic applications linked with solar thermal energy.
The configuration and geometry of tubes exchanging heat with PCMs need to be explored further so that complete charging and discharging can be achieved within a shorter timespan without depositing hard water sediments over the long term, as has been observed in most studies.
Substantial energy savings can be achieved in buildings with PCM incorporation, as has been shown in this review. However, it is imperative to take great care when selecting a PCM for a particular application by considering their phase change temperature, thermal stability, and compatibility. Most importantly, it is vital to ensure the setup is not toxic or corrosive, as this would be in close contact with humans.
Due to unpredictable weather fluctuations, these systems should be tested under real conditions in pilot studies instead of simulated conditions for more accurate results.
Focused research on the prevention of energy losses should be performed, especially considering usage with fluctuating solar water temperatures.
The freezing of solar water at night under rare conditions, in which the temperatures are below subzero, is a major research gap that must be further investigated to mitigate operational risks.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the Brain Pool program of the Ministry of Science and by ICT through the National Research Foundation of Korea (RS-2023-00218940).
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Abbreviations and Nomenclature
| SPCMS | Solar PCM system |
| PCM | Phase change material |
| TES | Thermal energy storage |
| HVAC | Heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning |
| PTTS | Passive thermal storage system |
| DP-SAH | Double-pass solar air heater |
| CPV | Concentrated photovoltaic |
| HTF | Heat transfer fluid |
| DHW | Domestic hot water |
| Source term | |
| Density (kgm−3) | |
| Thermal expansion coefficient (K−1) | |
| T | Temperature (K) |
| k | Thermal conductivity (Wm−1 K −1) |
| h | Enthalpy (Jkg−1) |
| Cp | Specific heat (Jkg−1K−1) |
| Latent heat of fusion (kJkg−1) | |
| Source term for momentum | |
| t | Time (min, second) |
References
- 1.Hu Y., Heiselberg P.K., Johra H., Guo R. Experimental and numerical study of a PCM solar air heat exchanger and its ventilation preheating effectiveness. Renew. Energy. 2019;145:106–115. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhao J., Ji Y., Yuan Y., Zhang Z., Lu J. Seven Operation Modes and Simulation Models of Solar Heating System with PCM Storage Tank. Energies. 2017;10:2128. doi: 10.3390/en10122128. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jamar A., Majid Z., Azmi W., Norhafana M., Razak A. A review of water heating system for solar energy applications. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2016;76:178–187. doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.05.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Selvaraj D.A., Victor K. Design and Performance of Solar PV Integrated Domestic Vapor Absorption Refrigeration System. Int. J. Photoenergy. 2021;2021:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2021/6655113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Xu H., Sze J.Y., Romagnoli A., Py X. Selection of Phase Change Material for Thermal Energy Storage in Solar Air Conditioning Systems. Energy Procedia. 2017;105:4281–4288. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.898. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yang Y.K., Kim M.Y., Chung M.H., Park J.C. PCM cool roof systems for mitigating urban heat island—An experimental and numerical analysis. Energy Build. 2019;205:109537. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109537. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Souayfane F., Fardoun F., Biwole P.-H. Phase change materials (PCM) for cooling applications in buildings: A review. Energy Build. 2016;129:396–431. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mettawee E.-B.S., Assassa G.M. Experimental study of a compact PCM solar collector. Energy. 2006;31:2958–2968. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2005.11.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Iten D.C. Ph.D. Thesis. Coventry University; Coventry, UK: 2015. Air-Multiple PCMs for the Free Cooling and Ventilation of Buildings Air-Multiple PCMs for the Free Cooling and Ventilation of Buildings. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Meng E., Cai R., Sun Z., Yang J., Wang J. Experimental study of the passive and active performance of real-scale composite PCM room in winter. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2021;185:116418. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116418. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nasef H., Nada S., Hassan H. Integrative passive and active cooling system using PCM and nanofluid for thermal regulation of concentrated photovoltaic solar cells. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019;199:112065. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112065. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gholamibozanjani G., Farid M. A comparison between passive and active PCM systems applied to buildings. Renew. Energy. 2020;162:112–123. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kousksou T., Bruel P., Cherreau G., Leoussoff V., El Rhafiki T. PCM storage for solar DHW: From an unfulfilled promise to a real benefit. Sol. Energy. 2011;85:2033–2040. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2011.05.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Haillot D., Franquet E., Gibout S., Bédécarrats J.-P. Optimization of solar DHW system including PCM media. Appl. Energy. 2013;109:470–475. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Salih S.M., Jalil J.M., Najim S.E. Experimental and numerical analysis of double-pass solar air heater utilizing multiple capsules PCM. Renew. Energy. 2019;143:1053–1066. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mao Q., Yang M. Study on heat transfer performance of a solar double-slope PCM glazed roof with different physical parameters. Energy Build. 2020;223:110141. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Navarro L., de Gracia A., Castell A., Cabeza L.F. Experimental study of an active slab with PCM coupled to a solar air collector for heating purposes. Energy Build. 2016;128:12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kong X., Wang L., Li H., Yuan G., Yao C. Experimental study on a novel hybrid system of active composite PCM wall and solar thermal system for clean heating supply in winter. Sol. Energy. 2020;195:259–270. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.11.081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dordelly J.C.F., El Mankibi M., Roccamena L., Remion G., Landa J.A. Experimental analysis of a PCM integrated solar chimney under laboratory conditions. Sol. Energy. 2019;188:1332–1348. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.06.065. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ke W., Ji J., Xu L., Yu B., Tian X., Wang J. Numerical study and experimental validation of a multi-functional dual-air-channel solar wall system with PCM. Energy. 2021;227:120434. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120434. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Esen M. Thermal performance of a solar-aided latent heat store used for space heating by heat pump. Sol. Energy. 2000;69:15–25. doi: 10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00015-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Saffari M., de Gracia A., Ushak S., Cabeza L.F. Passive cooling of buildings with phase change materials using whole-building energy simulation tools: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017;80:1239–1255. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.139. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tyagi V.V., Buddhi D. PCM thermal storage in buildings: A state of art. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2007;11:1146–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Voelker C., Kornadt O., Ostry M. Temperature reduction due to the application of phase change materials. Energy Build. 2008;40:937–944. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.07.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jeong S.-G., Wi S., Chang S.J., Lee J., Kim S. An experimental study on applying organic PCMs to gypsum-cement board for improving thermal performance of buildings in different climates. Energy Build. 2019;190:183–194. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.02.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shukla N., Fallahi A., Kosny J. Performance characterization of PCM impregnated gypsum board for building applications. Energy Procedia. 2012;30:370–379. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.11.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shen Y., Liu S., Zeng C., Zhang Y., Li Y., Han X., Yang L., Yang X. Experimental thermal study of a new PCM-concrete thermal storage block (PCM-CTSB) Constr. Build. Mater. 2021;293:123540. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123540. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Entrop A.G., Brouwers H.J.H., Reinders A. Experimental research on the use of micro-encapsulated Phase Change Materials to store solar energy in concrete floors and to save energy in Dutch houses. Sol. Energy. 2011;85:1007–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2011.02.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mahdaoui M., Hamdaoui S., Msaad A.A., Kousksou T., El Rhafiki T., Jamil A., Ahachad M. Building bricks with phase change material (PCM): Thermal performances. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021;269:121315. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121315. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Muthuvelan T., Panchabikesan K., Munisamy R., Nibhanupudi K.M., Ramalingam V. Experimental investigation of free cooling using phase change material-filled air heat exchanger for energy efficiency in buildings. Adv. Build. Energy Res. 2018;12:139–149. doi: 10.1080/17512549.2016.1248487. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li S., Zhu N., Hu P., Lei F., Deng R. Numerical study on thermal performance of PCM Trombe Wall. Energy Procedia. 2019;158:2441–2447. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.317. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kośny J. PCM-Enhanced Building Components; An Application of Phase Change Materials in Building Envelopes and Internal Structures. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Duan S., Wang L., Zhao Z., Zhang C. Experimental study on thermal performance of an integrated PCM Trombe wall. Renew. Energy. 2021;163:1932–1941. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Silva T., Vicente R., Rodrigues F., Samagaio A., Cardoso C. Development of a window shutter with phase change materials: Full scale outdoor experimental approach. Energy Build. 2015;88:110–121. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.11.053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chan A. Energy and environmental performance of building façades integrated with phase change material in subtropical Hong Kong. Energy Build. 2011;43:2947–2955. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.07.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Choi Y., Mae M., Kim H.B. Thermal performance improvement method for air-based solar heating systems. Sol. Energy. 2019;186:277–290. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gutherz J.M., Schiler M.E. A Passive Solar Heating System for the Perimeter Zone of Office Buildings. Energy Sources. 1991;13:39–54. doi: 10.1080/00908319108908967. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mousavi S., Rismanchi B., Brey S., Aye L. PCM embedded radiant chilled ceiling: A state-of-the-art review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021;151:1601. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111601. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bouzennada T., Mechighel F., Filali A., Ghachem K., Kolsi L. Numerical investigation of heat transfer and melting process in a PCM capsule: Effects of inner tube position and Stefan number. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2021;27:101306. doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bouzennada T., Mechighel F., Ismail T., Kolsi L., Ghachem K. Heat transfer and fluid flow in a PCM-filled enclosure: Effect of inclination angle and mid-separation fin. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2020;124:105280. doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105280. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bodin N.B., Semenov A.S., Shchegolkov A.V., Shchegolkovand A.V., Popova A.A. Nanomodified heat accumulating mate-rials for energy saving in industrial processes. Eco. Env. Cons. 2016;22:2155–2162. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shchegolkov A., Dyachkova T., Semenov A. The heat storage material based on paraffin-modified multilayer carbon nanotubes with Nickel-zinc ferrite. IOP Conf. Series Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017;312:012023. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/312/1/012023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yu S., Jeong S.-G., Chung O., Kim S. Bio-based PCM/carbon nanomaterials composites with enhanced thermal conductivity. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 2014;120:549–554. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.09.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kenisarin M., Mahkamov K., Kahwash F., Makhkamova I. Enhancing thermal conductivity of paraffin wax 53–57 °C using expanded graphite. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 2019;200:110026. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Choi D.H., Lee J., Hong H., Kang Y.T. Thermal conductivity and heat transfer performance enhancement of phase change materials (PCM) containing carbon additives for heat storage application. Int. J. Refrig. 2014;42:112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2014.02.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mazhar A.R., Shukla A., Liu S. Numerical analysis of rectangular fins in a PCM for low-grade heat harnessing. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2020;152:106306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Luo J., Zou D., Wang Y., Wang S., Huang L. Battery thermal management systems (BTMs) based on phase change material (PCM): A comprehensive review. Chem. Eng. J. 2022;430:132741. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132741. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Javadi F., Metselaar H., Ganesan P. Performance improvement of solar thermal systems integrated with phase change materials (PCM), a review. Sol. Energy. 2020;206:330–352. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.05.106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Arıcı M., Bilgin F., Nižetić S., Karabay H. PCM integrated to external building walls: An optimization study on maximum activation of latent heat. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020;165:114560. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114560. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mettawee E.-B.S., Assassa G.M. Thermal conductivity enhancement in a latent heat storage system. Sol. Energy. 2007;81:839–845. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2006.11.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wang P., Yao H., Lan Z., Peng Z., Huang Y., Ding Y. Numerical investigation of PCM melting process in sleeve tube with internal fins. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016;110:428–435. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.12.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Baniassadi A., Sajadi B., Amidpour M., Noori N. Economic optimization of PCM and insulation layer thickness in residential buildings. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2016;14:92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2016.01.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chopra K., Tyagi V., Pandey A., Sharma R.K., Sari A. PCM integrated glass in glass tube solar collector for low and medium temperature applications: Thermodynamic & techno-economic approach. Energy. 2020;198:117238. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117238. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Velmurugan K., Kumarasamy S., Wongwuttanasatian T., Seithtanabutara V. Review of PCM types and suggestions for an applicable cascaded PCM for passive PV module cooling under tropical climate conditions. J. Clean. Prod. 2021;293:126065. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126065. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shamsi H., Boroushaki M., Geraei H. Performance evaluation and optimization of encapsulated cascade PCM thermal storage. J. Energy Storage. 2017;11:64–75. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2017.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Jia X., Zhai X., Cheng X. Thermal performance analysis and optimization of a spherical PCM capsule with pin-fins for cold storage. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019;148:929–938. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.11.105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Allouhi A., Msaad A.A., Amine M.B., Saidur R., Mahdaoui M., Kousksou T., Pandey A., Jamil A., Moujibi N., Benbassou A. Optimization of melting and solidification processes of PCM: Application to integrated collector storage solar water heaters (ICSSWH) Sol. Energy. 2018;171:562–570. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.096. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Barzin R., Chen J.J., Young B.R., Farid M.M. Application of weather forecast in conjunction with price-based method for PCM solar passive buildings—An experimental study. Appl. Energy. 2016;163:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lu S., Gao J., Tong H., Yin S., Tang X., Jiang X. Model establishment and operation optimization of the casing PCM radiant floor heating system. Energy. 2020;193:116814. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116814. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mehrpooya M., Hemmatabady H., Ahmadi M.H. Optimization of performance of Combined Solar Collector-Geothermal Heat Pump Systems to supply thermal load needed for heating greenhouses. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015;97:382–392. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.03.073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Mazhar A.R., Liu S., Shukla A. Numerical investigation of the heat transfer enhancement using corrugated pipes in a PCM for grey water harnessing. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2021;23:100909. doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2021.100909. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Afshan M.E., Selvakumar A., Velraj R., Rajaraman R. Effect of aspect ratio and dispersed PCM balls on the charging performance of a latent heat thermal storage unit for solar thermal applications. Renew. Energy. 2020;148:876–888. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.172. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Saafi K., Daouas N. Energy and cost efficiency of phase change materials integrated in building envelopes under Tunisia Mediterranean climate. Energy. 2019;187:115987. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.115987. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhu N., Wu M., Hu P., Xu L., Lei F., Li S. Performance study on different location of double layers SSPCM wallboard in office building. Energy Build. 2018;158:23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Jin X., Medina M.A., Zhang X. Numerical analysis for the optimal location of a thin PCM layer in frame walls. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016;103:1057–1063. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Heim D., Clarke J.A. Numerical modelling and thermal simulation of PCM & ndash; gypsum composites with ESP-r. Energy Build. 2004;36:795–805. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.01.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sovetova M., Memon S.A., Kim J. Thermal performance and energy efficiency of building integrated with PCMs in hot desert climate region. Sol. Energy. 2019;189:357–371. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.07.067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Qu Y., Zhou D., Xue F., Cui L. Multi-factor analysis on thermal comfort and energy saving potential for PCM-integrated buildings in summer. Energy Build. 2021;241:110966. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110966. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Alam M., Jamil H., Sanjayan J., Wilson J. Energy saving potential of phase change materials in major Australian cities. Energy Build. 2014;78:192–201. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wang H., Lu W., Wu Z., Zhang G. Parametric analysis of applying PCM wallboards for energy saving in high-rise lightweight buildings in Shanghai. Renew. Energy. 2020;145:52–64. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zhao J., Ji Y., Yuan Y., Zhang Z., Lu J. Energy-Saving Analysis of Solar Heating System with PCM Storage Tank. Energies. 2018;11:237. doi: 10.3390/en11010237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Devaux P., Farid M.M. Benefits of PCM underfloor heating with PCM wallboards for space heating in winter. Appl. Energy. 2017;191:593–602. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Calise F., Cappiello F.L., D’accadia M.D., Vicidomini M. Dynamic modelling and thermoeconomic analysis of micro wind turbines and building integrated photovoltaic panels. Renew. Energy. 2020;160:633–652. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Panayiotou G., Kalogirou S., Tassou S. Evaluation of the application of Phase Change Materials (PCM) on the envelope of a typical dwelling in the Mediterranean region. Renew. Energy. 2016;97:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Mi X., Liu R., Cui H., Memon S.A., Xing F., Lo Y. Energy and economic analysis of building integrated with PCM in different cities of China. Appl. Energy. 2016;175:324–336. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Solgi E., Memarian S., Moud G.N. Financial viability of PCMs in countries with low energy cost: A case study of different climates in Iran. Energy Build. 2018;173:128–137. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kosny J., Shukla N., Fallahi A. Cost Analysis of Simple Phase Change Material-Enhanced Building Envelopes in in Southern U.S. Climates. Report. 1 January 2013; Golden, Colorado. [(accessed on 25 July 2023)]. Available online: https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc838307/
- 78.Souayfane F., Biwole P.H., Fardoun F., Achard P. Energy performance and economic analysis of a TIM-PCM wall under different climates. Energy. 2019;169:1274–1291. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Yun B.Y., Park J.H., Yang S., Wi S., Kim S. Integrated analysis of the energy and economic efficiency of PCM as an indoor decoration element: Application to an apartment building. Sol. Energy. 2020;196:437–447. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.12.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Figueiredo A., Vicente R., Lapa J., Cardoso C., Rodrigues F., Kämpf J. Indoor thermal comfort assessment using different constructive solutions incorporating PCM. Appl. Energy. 2017;208:1208–1221. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.



