Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0291232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291232

Research on the mechanism of promoting coordinated development of ecological well-being in rural counties through industrial transformation

Fan Yang 1,*, Wanlin Qi 2, Jiaqi Han 3
Editor: Fuyou Guo4
PMCID: PMC10490857  PMID: 37682965

Abstract

The balanced development of ecological quality and residents’ well-being is an important factor in achieving sustainable economic development in rural counties. In order to promote the improvement of the coupling coordination degree between ecology and well-being in rural counties, this study explores the impact mechanism of industrial structural transformation and upgrading on the coupling of ecology and well-being in the Sichuan-Chongqing. A dual-fixed-space Durbin model is constructed to analyze the influence mechanism and spatial interaction effects of industrial transformation and upgrading on the coordination of ecology and well-being. The research indicates: (1) From 2010 to 2020, the overall coordination degree of ecology and well-being in the Sichuan-Chongqing rural counties has steadily increased, with higher coordination in the eastern region and lower coordination in the western region. The growth rate of coordination degree is faster in the east and slower in the west, with significant and increasing differences between the east and west. 2) The coupling coordination degree of ecology and well-being in the Sichuan-Chongqing rural counties has a strong positive spatial spillover effect. (3) The more reasonable the industrial structure, the higher the level of coordinated development in the local and surrounding rural counties. The higher the index of industrial advancement, the better the level of coordinated development locally, but the lower the level of coordinated development in the surrounding areas.

1 Introduction

With the rapid development of the socio-economic landscape, human activities have led to an exponential expansion in the demand for natural resources [1]. This has resulted in a continuous degradation of ecosystem services, directly or indirectly impacting human well-being (not only the well-being of residents, but that of all humanity) [2]. Since the definition of human well-being by the MA (2005) [3], scholars have started paying attention to the intrinsic connection between ecosystems and human well-being. The topic of how to alter the imbalanced state of ecosystems and harmonize the relationship between ecosystem services and human well-being has become a hot research area in academia [4, 5].

Ecosystem services are the source of human well-being, and even subtle changes in ecosystem services can lead to drastic changes in human well-being, which are particularly evident in ecologically vulnerable areas [6]. Hu et al. [7] proposed that ecosystem services contribute to human well-being at different levels. However, when ecosystems are damaged, they have a negative impact on human well-being. Qiu et al. [8] pointed out that the relationship between human well-being and ecosystem services is not a simple linear relationship but rather a complex and bidirectional relationship that exhibits dynamic changes over time and space. In order to better explore the degree of association and spatial evolution mechanisms between ecosystem services and human well-being, some scholars have utilized coupled coordination models to study their relationship. These researches are mostly conducted at the provincial or municipal level [9, 10], and preliminary spatial-temporal analyses of the coupled coordination relationship have been conducted. Some scholars have also investigated the impacts of different influencing factors on the coupled coordination relationship from the perspectives of policy formulation [11], socio-economic development [5], and other aspects. Their research methods mainly include correlation analysis [12], GWR models [13], GTWR models [14], and so on. The coupling coordination between ecosystems and residents’ well-being is closely related to the rationality of industrial structure and exhibits geographic spatial interaction effects, which are manifested in the form of "poverty traps" [15]. Industrial structure serves as a crucial link between human activities in modern society and ecosystems [16]. It plays an important role in promoting regional coordinated development, reducing regional economic disparities, and improving residents’ quality of life [17]. Industrial structure is an important dimension for studying the development status of industries, and it is typically measured by indicators such as the rationalization and intensification of industrial structure to assess its quality and evolutionary trends [18]. Industrial structure upgrading is a dynamic process that primarily refers to the transition of industrial structure from a lower level to a higher level. Industrial structure rationalization refers to the degree of coordination between industries and the efficient utilization of resources [19]. It is an important indicator for measuring the coupling degree between factor inputs and output structures [20]. Based on the aforementioned research, we can observe that there exists a challenging contradiction between ecological conservation and economic development. To mitigate this contradiction, a viable approach is industrial upgrading. However, achieving a well-founded industrial upgrading necessitates a comprehensive understanding of its impact mechanisms on both ecosystem services and economic development. Currently, there is limited research in the academic community addressing this aspect. Moreover, the spatial econometric model adopted in this study not only enables the exploration of relationships among variables but also investigates the interactive effects between regions. Presently, there is scarce research employing this model to investigate the spatial interaction effects of industrial upgrading. Through quantitative data analysis, it can offer scientific guidance and data support for high-quality and sustainable regional development.

Correctly managing the relationship between the transformation and upgrading of industrial structure in rural counties and the coordinated development of ecosystems and well-being, especially in poverty-stricken rural counties, is of significant importance for ensuring sustainable economic development in counties and building beautiful rural areas [21, 22]. In the 21st century, the production activities in the Sichuan-Chongqing region of China have rapidly developed, and the industrial structure has been continuously improved [23]. People’s living standards and sense of happiness have significantly increased while enjoying the benefits of the ecological environment. However, this development has also brought a series of problems, such as dwindling resources, environmental degradation, declining biodiversity, and large-scale industrial and population agglomeration [24]. The transformation and upgrading of industrial structure can promote the coordinated development of ecological quality and residents’ well-being in rural counties, fundamentally breaking through the established model of independent development in a single region and driving the development of impoverished areas. Whether the existing industrial structure in rural counties can match the development of ecosystems and well-being becomes an important aspect of sustainable economic development in the Sichuan-Chongqing region in the new era [25].

This paper is structured as follows: Sect. 2 provides mechanism analysis, variable selection, model setting, and research methods; Sect. 3 presents the empirical testing and results analysis; Sect. 4 concludes and discuss the findings, and provide policy recommendations.

2 Variable selection, model setting, and research methods

2.1 Mechanism analysis

The research on the coupling and coordination relationship between the well-being of rural residents and ecological quality in counties is essentially the search for a social operating model that promotes harmonious coexistence between humans and nature. These two systems are closely interconnected with complex interactive coupling relationships. Exploring the internal logic between them is the basis for identifying sustainable operating models and addressing some of the challenges in rural development in certain counties (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Analysis framework of the impact mechanism of ecological-well-being coupling coordination.

Fig 1

Improving the quality of life has been the fundamental goal of all human production activities since the establishment of human society. This article measures the development level of well-being among residents in the region from four dimensions: economic vitality, basic material needs, healthcare, and cultural education. Ecosystem services are the benefits that humans directly or indirectly derive from the natural environment, and they can be categorized into four types: provisioning services, regulating services, supporting services, and cultural services. Provisioning services (such as food and raw material production) have the most direct impact on residents’ well-being and economic development. They serve as the fundamental guarantee for residents’ engagement in economic activities in rural counties. Regulating services (such as climate regulation and hydrological regulation) create suitable environmental conditions for the operation of the rural economy and provide important support for residents’ health and safety [26]. Supporting services (such as soil preservation) indirectly influence social-economic development by maintaining nutrient cycles, limiting the exploitation of ecological resources due to potential governance costs. Cultural services (such as providing aesthetic landscapes) provide intangible cultural values for the development of the rural economy [27], promoting the development of cultural education and positive social relationships. The two systems have complex supply-demand relationships, and ecosystem services serve as the original capital for residents’ participation in social production. Excessive exploitation of natural resources can lead to unsustainable economic development, where the costs of governance exceed the value of the obtained resources. Exploring the driving factors behind the coupling and coordination degree of ecology and well-being can avoid sacrificing the development of one system at the expense of providing impetus for the development of the other system.

Industrial structural transformation and upgrading is one of the solutions to address the human-land contradiction. Exploring the inherent logic of the impact of industrial structural transformation and upgrading on ecological quality and residents’ well-being is a prerequisite for achieving industrial upgrading and sustainable economic development in rural counties. To ensure the rationality and scientific of the construction of the indicator system for industrial structural transformation and upgrading, as well as the selection of influencing factors, this study selects research variables based on existing theories and previous research findings, with the scientific guarantee of whether the model passes the significance level testing at the statistical level. The specific selection of indicators is as follows:

Industrial Rationalization [28]: According to the "H. Chenery development model", a healthy economic system exhibits regular changes in industrial structure as the economy continues to develop, gradually approaching the ideal economic structure during different stages of economic development. Currently, the rural counties in the Sichuan-Chongqing region are undergoing industrial adjustments aimed at reducing the proportion of the primary and secondary sectors while increasing the proportion of the tertiary sector. This can effectively bring the economic structure closer to the ideal standard for economic development. Therefore, in this study, industrial rationalization is used to measure the impact of the level of industrial rationalization in the Sichuan-Chongqing rural counties on the coupling and coordination degree of ecology and well-being.

Industrial Upgrading [28]: According to the Lewis-Clark theorem (which states that as economic development and per capita national income increase, labor first shifts from the primary sector to the secondary sector, and then to the tertiary sector). Economic development-induced industrial structural transformation and upgrading, under the same level of output, can reduce the economy’s dependence on natural resources, leading to improved ecological quality and subsequently affecting the coupling and coordination degree of regional ecology and economy. Therefore, in this study, industrial upgrading is used to measure the extent of industrial upgrading and its impact on the coupling and coordination degree of ecology and well-being.

Control Variables [29]: Due to the heterogeneity of the terrain in the Sichuan-Chongqing rural counties, there are fluctuations in rainfall, temperature, and vegetation types during the study period. Therefore, in this study, Temperature, Rain, and Potential transpiration are selected as control variables, and both spatial fixed effects and time fixed effects are introduced into the model.

2.2 Regional overview

The Sichuan-Chongqing region (Fig 2), located between 97 degrees 21 minutes to 108 degrees 33 minutes east longitude and 29 degrees 03 minutes to 34 degrees 19 minutes north latitude in southwestern China, marks the transitional zone between the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and the middle-lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Ranging from an elevation of 188 to 7556 meters, the region’s topography exhibits remarkable variations, with higher elevations to the west and lower to the east.

Fig 2. Administrative division, land use, and elevation map of the rural counties in Sichuan-Chongqing area.

Fig 2

*The image is sourced from (https://www.resdc.cn/), and was created using ArcGIS.

The complex landforms are defined by distinct features: the western area of Huaying Mountain-Bayue Mountain consists of hilly terrain, while the region between Huaying Mountain and Fangdou Mountain presents the parallel ridge-valley area in eastern Sichuan, known for its agricultural potential. In the north lies the Zhongshan area of Daba Mountain, a significant ecological zone, while the eastern, southeastern, and southern regions encompass mountainous areas of Wushan and Daluoshan, constituting a pattern referred to as "two hills, seven mountains, and three flat basins" [30].

These geographical features contribute to the diverse vegetation types and rich species resources of the region, affirming its role in biodiversity conservation and national ecological security. The rivers and mountains shape not only the physical landscape but also influence the socio-economic fabric of the rural counties in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River.

The unique position of this region implies that social-economic development is subject to severe ecological constraints. Acting as an ecological barrier in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River, it bears significant environmental pressures, while simultaneously serving as a catalyst for the economic development of the western region [31]. The challenge lies in balancing the ecological well-being with economic growth, as any imbalance can severely hinder sustainable development at the county level [32]. Thus, fostering the transformation and upgrading of the industrial structure in the Sichuan-Chongqing rural areas is vital for enhancing the coordinated development of the region, intricately weaving together the natural elements with social and economic dynamics.

2.3 Data sources

The research data mainly came from the China County Statistical Yearbook, statistical yearbooks of various cities, the Agricultural Statistical Yearbook, 30-meter precision land cover dataset (https://zenodo.org/), Geospatial Data Cloud (http://www.gscloud.cn/), National Meteorological Data Science Center (http://data.cma.cn/), etc. To ensure the validity of the samples, the following data processing was conducted in this study:

  1. Exclusion of samples with significant missing key data.

  2. For individual samples with missing values, the data was supplemented based on county statistical yearbooks, statistical bulletins, or linear interpolation methods.

  3. All the data are open-source, and readers can find the data used on the website.

2.4 Research methods

  • 1. Construction of Evaluation Indicator System for Coupling Coordination between Ecological Quality and Rural Resident Well-being

The coupling coordination between ecological quality and rural resident well-being refers to the mutual interaction and influence between the well-being of residents and the ecological system in terms of time scale or spatial scope. It involves the orderly evolution of elements within each system, achieving coordinated development and realizing the common advancement of residents’ living standards and environmental protection.

  • (1) Construction of Evaluation Indicator System for Rural Resident Well-being

The pursuit of a high quality of life by residents is a driving force for social development and a hot topic in today’s academic community. Drawing on existing research findings and approaches [10, 33, 34], and considering the criteria of scientific rigor, relevance, and consistency in indicator selection, this study employs the entropy weighting method to assess the overall well-being of rural residents in the Sichuan-Chongqing region from 2010 to 2020. The evaluation is based on four dimensions: economic stability, basic material conditions, healthcare and well-being, and cultural education. The specific indicators are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Evaluation indicator system table for residents’ well-being system.

Criterion Level Indicator Level Indicator Calculation
Economic vitality
-0.2441
General fiscal revenue(0.1140) Local fiscal revenue
(thousand yuan) (+)
General fiscal expenditure(0.0570) Local fiscal expenditure
(thousand yuan) (+)
Per capita GDP(0.0381) Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
per capita (in yuan/year) (+)
Urbanization rate(0.0320) Urban population/Total population (+)
Basic material needs
-0.1846
Effective irrigation area(0.1059) Annual actual irrigated area
(in hectares) (+)
Road mileage(0.0464) Total road mileage at the end of the year (in kilometers) (+)
Per capita grain production(0.0309) Annual grain production/Total population (in tons/person) (+)
Fertilizer application rate(0.0740) Annual total fertilizer usage (in tons) (+)
Rural electricity consumption(0.0756) Annual cumulative rural electricity consumption
(in kilowatt-hours) (+)
Vegetation coverage(0.0041) Vegetation coverage area/
Total area (+)
Healthcare
-0.2956
Number of hospital and clinic beds(0.0580) Total number of hospital beds at the end of the year (+)
Number of social welfare institutions(0.0797) Number of social welfare institutions at the
end of the year (+)
Number of hospitals and clinics(0.0255) Number of hospitals and health clinics at the
end of the year (+)
Number of social welfare institution beds(0.0652) Number of beds in social welfare institutions at the
end of the year (+)
Number of doctors(0.0672) Number of doctors at the
end of the year (+)
Cultural education
-0.1294
Number of regular secondary schools(0.0537) Number of secondary schools at the end of the year (+)
Number of regular primary schools(0.0728) Number of primary schools at the end of the year (+)
Average student-to-teacher ratio in primary schools(0.0006) Number of primary school students per primary
school teacher (-)
Average student-to-teacher ratio in junior high schools(0.0023) Number of secondary school students per secondary
school teacher (-)

Economic Vitality Indicators: The quality of residents’ lives is built upon a foundation of economic stability and vitality. In this study, the economic stability and development dynamics of the region are primarily assessed through indicators such as general public revenue, general public expenditure, per capita GDP, and urbanization rate. These indicators serve as measures of economic stability and growth potential in the area.

Basic Material Indicators: Basic material resources are essential for the living standards of rural residents. In this study, the level of basic material resources available or potentially accessible to the rural counties is measured using indicators such as effective irrigation area, road mileage, per capita grain production, fertilizer application rate, rural electricity consumption, and vegetation coverage. These indicators serve as measures of the level of basic material resources that are available or potentially accessible to the rural counties.

Healthcare Indicators: The level of healthcare plays a crucial role in the well-being of rural residents. In this study, the level of healthcare is measured using indicators such as the number of hospital and clinic beds, the number of beds in social welfare institutions, the number of social welfare institutions, the total number of hospitals, clinics, and doctors in the region. These indicators serve as measures of the healthcare level in the rural counties.

Cultural and Educational Indicators: The level of cultural and educational development reflects the access to educational resources and is an important component of the local talent cultivation and development potential. In this study, the cultural and educational well-being of rural residents is measured using indicators such as the number of primary and secondary schools and the average student-to-teacher ratio in primary and secondary schools. These indicators provide insights into the cultural and educational well-being of residents in the rural counties.

Finally, the indicators are integrated into the Rural Resident Well-being Index through the entropy weighting method.

  • (2) Ecological quality value assessment

Ecological quality refers to the natural environmental conditions and benefits that ecosystems form and maintain, which are essential for human survival. Assessing the ecological quality through the valuation of ecosystem services not only helps establish a foundation for ecological functional zoning and ecological construction planning but also provides scientific basis for the delineation of ecological functional zones and the planning of ecological construction. In order to explore the ecological development situation in the Sichuan-Chongqing rural areas, this paper adopts the value equivalent method proposed by Norah [35]. to assess the ecosystem service value of Sichuan-Chongqing rural areas from 2010 to 2020, and makes adjustments to the economic value of equivalent factors [36], using ecosystem service value as a measure of ecological quality development. The specific assessment method is as follows:

E=17×(P×Y)×q (1)
ESV=j=1mi=1nAiEij (2)
AESV=ESV=j=1mi=1nAiEiji=1nAi (3)

In the equation, E represents the ecosystem service value per unit area; P represents the average price of grain; Y represents the average yield of grain crops per unit area; q represents the value equivalent coefficient; ESV represents the total value of ecosystem services; Ai represents land use type; and AESV represents the per capita ecosystem service quantity. Among them, the per unit area ecosystem service value in the Yellow River Basin based on the correction coefficient is shown in Table 2 as follows:

Table 2. Ecosystem service value table for rural areas in Sichuan and Chongqing (CNY/hectare).

Primary Land Use Type Secondary Land Use Type Forest Grassland Farmland
Supply services Food production 888.756 1158.076 2693.2
Raw material production 8025.736 969.552 1050.348
Regulating services Gas regulation 11634.62 4039.8 1939.104
Climate regulation 10961.32 4201.392 2612.404
Hydrological regulation 11015.19 4093.664 2073.764
Waste management 4632.304 3555.024 3743.548
Supporting services Soil conservation 10826.66 6032.768 3959.004
Maintaining biodiversity 12146.33 5036.284 2747.064
Cultural services Providing aesthetic landscapes 5601.856 2343.084 457.844
Total 75732.78 31429.64 21276.28
Primary Land Use Type Secondary Land Use Type Wetland Waterbody Desert
Supply services Food production 969.552 1427.396 53.864
Raw material production 646.368 942.62 107.728
Regulating services Gas regulation 6490.612 1373.532 161.592
Climate regulation 36492.86 5547.992 350.116
Hydrological regulation 36196.61 50551.36 188.524
Waste management 38782.08 39994.02 700.232
Supporting services Soil conservation 5359.468 1104.212 457.844
Maintaining biodiversity 9937.908 9237.676 1077.28
Cultural services Providing aesthetic landscapes 12631.11 11957.81 646.368
Total 147506.6 122136.6 3743.548

In addition, due to the differences in the nature and standards of the indicators, direct comparisons are not possible. Therefore, this study used the range method to normalize the indicators ESV on a per unit area basis for the years 2010–2020.

PESV=PESViPESVminPESVmaxPESVmin (4)

In the equation, PESV represents the per ESV unit area; PESVi represents the per ESV unit area of the region i; PESVmax and PESVmin and represent the maximum and minimum values of the per ESV unit area within the study area respectively.

  • (3) The Ecological-Wellbeing Coupling Coordination Evaluation Model

The Ecological-Wellbeing Coupling Coordination Evaluation Model analyzes the relationship between residents’ quality of life and the coordination of ecological development. It uses the Coupling Coordination Degree Index to measure the degree of coordination between the two factors. Coupling degree refers to the interaction between different systems, while coordination degree reflects whether different systems are developing at the same level. The focus of this study is on the coordinated development of ecology and well-being. When both grow simultaneously, the result of the coupling coordination degree will also increase, meaning that they become more coordinated. This paper constructs the Ecological-Wellbeing Coupling Coordination Evaluation Model based on the indices of ecosystem services and residents’ well-being system. The specific details are as follows:

C=2U1U2U1+U2 (5)
T=αU1+βU2 (6)
D=C×T (7)

In the equation, C represents the coupling degree of the systems. A higher value of C indicates a higher level of coupling between the two systems, while a lower value indicates a lower level of coupling. U1 and U2 represent the indices of ecosystem services and residents’ well-being. T represents the comprehensive coordination index between residents and the ecosystem system. α and β represent the weights assigned to each system in the coordination degree model. Since ecological quality and residents’ well-being are equally important, so α = β = 0.5. D represents the coupling coordination degree. Additionally, this paper refers to the classification criteria for the levels of ecological-wellbeing coupling coordination obtained from Peng [37].

  • 2. Analysis of Factors Influencing Ecological-Wellbeing Coupling Coordination Degree

  • (1) Industrial Rationalization

This article uses the industrial rationalization to vertically examine the "quality" requirements in the process of industrial structure transformation and upgrading. It also employs the advancement of industrial upgrading examine the "quantity" requirements in the process of industrial structure transformation and upgrading. This approach ensures that the research conclusions are more comprehensive and reliable. Firstly, the industrial rationalization refers to the transformation of industrial structure from imbalance to balance. It involves adjusting the industrial structure while taking into account the sound operation of the social-economic system, ultimately achieving an upgrade in terms of "quality". The Theil index provides a good solution framework, and its formula is as follows:

TL=i=1n(YiY)ln(Yi/LiY/L) (8)

In China, there are three major industries, hence n denoted as 3. i representing specific industries, L representing employment numbers, and Y representing industrial output values. Since TL is a reverse indicator, the smaller the result, the more rational the industrial structure; a larger result indicates less rationality.

  • (2) Industrial Upgrading

Industrial upgrading refers to the process of changing the dominant industries and establishing a higher-level industrial structure. It is specifically reflected in the transition of dominant industries and changes in employment structure, indicating the improvement of industrial transformation in terms of "quantity". In calculating this index, the formula for calculating the industrial structure advancement index is as follows [38]:

θj=arccos(i=13(xi,jxi.0)(i=13(x2i,j)1/2(i=13(x2i.0)1/2)) (9)
TN=k=13j=1kθj (10)

In the given equation, i represents specific industries. Xi,0 is a set of three-dimensional vectors formed by the ratio of the i industry (tertiary industry) to GDP. θj represents the angle formed by the vector Xi,0 and vectors of each industry, where j = 1,2,3 is the angle between them. According to the above formula, a higher value of TN, calculated using the given formula, indicates a higher level of industrial structure advancement.

  • (3) Spatial Durbin Model

The Spatial Durbin Model is a significant extension of the traditional panel model, incorporating both the spatial lag of the dependent variable and spatial autocorrelation coefficients, enabling a comprehensive analysis of spatial interaction effects and impact effects. This utilization of the model reflects the complex spatial interdependence and connectivity in modern economic and social systems. Given the research objective of this paper, which aims to reveal the underlying mechanisms of how industrial transformation and upgrading can alleviate the inherent conflicts between local residents and the environment, this advanced analytical tool was specifically chosen. By constructing a fixed-effects Spatial Durbin Model, this study not only delves into the factors influencing the ecological-wellbeing coupling coordination degree in the rural counties of the Sichuan-Chongqing region but also meticulously examines the spatial interaction effects among these factors, uncovering deeper dynamic relationships. Such an approach not only enhances the precision and sensitivity of the analysis but may also provide a more solid foundation for future policy-making. The specific details are as follows:

Yit=ρWYit+βXit+λWXit+u1+u2+εit (11)

In the equation, Yit represents the dependent variable in the model. μ1 and μ2 represent the time fixed effects and spatial fixed effects. i and t represent the regional and yearly variables. Xit is the set of all independent variables. W is the spatial weight matrix. εit represents the error term. ρ, β and λ are coefficients.

3 Empirical testing and results analysis

3.1 Analysis of spatiotemporal evolution of ecological-wellbeing coupling coordination degree in the rural counties of Sichuan-Chongqing region

To explore the coordinated development of ecological quality and resident well-being in the rural counties of the Sichuan-Chongqing region during the period from 2010 to 2020, this section takes a dual perspective of time and space to reveal the evolving trends of ecological-wellbeing coupling coordination degree in the region. The specific analysis is as follows:

  • (1) Time Evolution Analysis

Based on Table 3, this paper presents the division of coordination levels and depicts the changes in the ecological-wellbeing coupling coordination rate and average coupling coordination degree in the rural counties of the Sichuan-Chongqing region (Fig 3). Additionally, it includes a Sankey diagram illustrating the transfer matrix of ecological-wellbeing coupling coordination degree in the region (Fig 4). In Fig 3, the blue line represents the average coupling coordination degree of all rural counties in the Sichuan-Chongqing region, while the green bars represent the coordination rate (the percentage of counties with a coupling coordination degree higher than 0.5 among all counties). During the study period, the average coupling coordination degree of the counties in the region increased from 0.4648 to 0.4997, with a total growth of 0.0325, indicating a growth rate of 7.5% and an average annual growth rate of 0.68%. The overall trend showed fluctuating growth. The coordination rate, which was 31.36% in 2010, rose to 48.64% in 2020. Over the span of 11 years, it increased by 17.28% with an average annual growth rate of 1.57%. The period from 2010 to 2017 experienced an accelerated growth phase, showing an exponential growth rate. From 2017 to 2020, the growth rate slowed down, gradually approaching convergence, and the overall coordination rate approached 50%, indicating that nearly half of the regions reached a coordinated level.

Table 3. The classification of coordination degree in the economic-ecological coupling coordination model.

coordination degree 0–0.09 0.10–0.19 0.20–0.29 0.30–0.39 0.40–0.49
coordination level extreme imbalance severe imbalance moderate imbalance mild imbalance on the brink of imbalance
coordination degree 0.50–0.59 0.60–0.69 0.70–0.79 0.80–0.89 0.90–1.00
coordination level tenuously coordinated primary coordination intermediate coordination good coordination high-quality coordination

Fig 3. Chart of coordination rate and average coupling coordination changes in the rural counties of the Sichuan-Chongqing region from 2010 to 2020.

Fig 3

Fig 4. Sankey diagram of transition matrix in the rural counties of the Sichuan-Chongqing region from 2010 to 2020.

Fig 4

In Fig 4, the data on the left side (eg: 5, 22, 38, and 1) represent the total number of transitions from low coordination levels to high coordination levels in the rural counties of the Sichuan-Chongqing region from 2010 to 2020. On the right side, it represents the total number of transitions from high coordination levels to lower coordination levels. Most of the transitions indicate an improvement in the coordination level of the counties, with only three counties experiencing a decrease in coordination level over the 11-year period. Out of the total transitions, 38 counties (townships) improved from being on the verge of disarray to achieving weak coordination, accounting for 55% of the total transitions. Twenty-four counties (townships) transitioned from a mild state of imbalance to other coordination levels. Twenty-two counties (townships) transitioned to a state of imminent disarray. Two counties (townships) were in a state of moderate imbalance. Five counties (townships) underwent significant optimization, transitioning from weak coordination to primary coordination. Only one county (township) experienced a continuous deterioration in coordination level, transitioning from moderate imbalance to extreme imbalance. Overall, the coordination level of the rural counties in the Sichuan-Chongqing region has shown improvement, with only three counties (townships) experiencing a decline in coordination level, while 66 counties (townships) have seen varying degrees of improvement in their coordination level.

  • (2) Spatial evolution analysis

This article selects the ecological-well-being coupling and coordination degree in the rural areas of Sichuan and Chongqing provinces in 2010, 2015, and 2020. The spatial evolution trend map is drawn using ArcGIS, as shown below (Fig 5). From the graph, it can be observed that the spatial distribution of the coupling and coordination degree in the rural areas of Sichuan and Chongqing provinces shows a pattern of higher values in the east and lower values in the west, indicating significant heterogeneity. Over the course of 11 years, there were substantial differences in the growth rates among different regions. The eastern region of Chongqing experienced the highest growth rate, with some townships and counties shifting from the range of (0.3–0.5) to (0.6–1.0). According to the transition matrix in Fig 4, most of the areas that transitioned from being on the brink of imbalance to barely coordinated counties or townships were concentrated in the eastern region of Chongqing. In the central region, there were numerous areas that transitioned from the range of (0.4–0.5) to (0.5–0.6), representing a shift from mild imbalance to basic coordination, mainly concentrated in the central region of Sichuan and Chongqing. The western region remained at a relatively low level of coordinated development over the 11-year period.

Fig 5. The spatial evolution trend map of the ecological-well-being coupling and coordination degree in the rural areas of Sichuan and Chongqing provinces in 2010, 2015, and 2020.

Fig 5

*The image is sourced from (https://www.resdc.cn/), and was created using ArcGIS.

Considering the land use distribution in Fig 1, it can be observed that the western region has higher altitudes and is mainly covered by forests and grasslands. It also has lower levels of transportation infrastructure, and the quality, quantity, and industrial development level of the population need continuous improvement. In contrast, the eastern and central regions are mainly flat and dominated by arable land and built-up areas. They have the basic conditions for the formation of industrial clusters. Therefore, the pace of industrial structural transformation in the eastern and central regions is faster than in the western region, resulting in the spatial pattern of higher values in the east and lower values in the west, as well as the trend of faster growth in the east and slower growth in the west.

3.2 The impact analysis of industrial transformation and upgrading in the rural areas of Sichuan and Chongqing provinces on the coupling and coordination degree of ecology and well-being

To further explore the impact mechanism of industrial structural transformation and upgrading on the coupling and coordination degree of ecology and well-being in the rural areas of Sichuan and Chongqing provinces, this study utilizes Formulas (810) to calculate the indices of industrial rationalization and industrial advancement as measures of the status of industrial structural transformation and upgrading. The rationalization and advancement indices are used as explanatory variables, while the coupling and coordination degree of ecology and well-being is taken as the dependent variable. Additionally, potential evapotranspiration, precipitation, and temperature are selected as control variables (Table 4) to construct an OLS (Ordinary Least Squares) model.

Table 4. Factors influencing the coupling and coordination degree of ecology and well-being in the rural areas of Sichuan and Chongqing provinces.

Variable Types Influencing Factors Unit Mean Standard Deviation
Explanatory Variables Industrial Rationalization 0.442 0.33
Industrial Upgrading 6.274 0.412
Control Variables Potential Evapotranspiration mm 1011 112.1
Precipitation mm 1096 250.1
Temperature °C 13.5 5.6
  • (1) Spatial Correlation Analysis and Model Selection

Based on the ecological-well-being coupling and coordination degree in the rural areas of Sichuan and Chongqing provinces, an OLS regression model has been constructed. However, there is a possibility of spatial auto-correlation in the residuals of the model. In this study, the Moran I test was conducted on the residuals of the model using MATLAB 2016 and the jplv7 spatial econometrics package developed by Elhorst. The results of the Moran I test are presented in Table 5:

Table 5. The Moran’s I test.

Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Moran I 0.0987 0.0898 0.0856 0.1003 0.1111 0.1020 0.1037 0.1188 0.1073 0.1098 0.1188
t 12.45 11.44 10.96 12.63 13.88 12.79 13.05 14.77 13.47 13.78 14.38
p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Based on the information provided, the Hausman test was used to determine whether fixed effects or random effects should be used in the model. Additionally, the LM (Lagrange Multiplier) test was conducted to identify the type of spatial effects present in the model. The results, as shown in Table 6, indicate that the OLS regression model is best represented by the Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) with double fixed effects. This model is used to analyze the influencing factors and spatial interaction effects on the coupling and coordination degree of ecology and well-being in the rural areas of Sichuan and Chongqing provinces at the township and county scale.

Table 6. Results of the various tests.

Spatial Fixed Effects Time Fixed Effects LM-error LM-lag robust LM-error
Coefficients 275.71 927.49 27.41 903.97 876.58
P 0 0 0 0 0
robust LM-lag LR_sar LR_sem Wald_sar Wald_sem
Coefficients 0.01 22.89 41.79 33.93 48.22
P 0.89 0 0 0 0
  • (2) Model Results Analysis

Based on Table 6, this study constructs a double fixed spatial Durbin model, and the regression results are as follows (Table 7):

Table 7. The regression results of the model.

Variable Name OLS SDM Direct Effect Indirect Effect Total Effect
Industrial Rationalization -0.0826*** -0.0503*** -0.0593*** -2.5248*** -2.5841***
Industrial Upgrading 0.0269*** 0.0182*** 0.0159*** -0.7275** -0.7116**
Potential Evapotranspiration -0.0001*** 0.0001 0.0001 0.0044 0.0045
Precipitation 0.0001*** 0.0001 -0.0001 -0.0002** -0.0002**
Temperature 0.0023*** -0.0078 -0.0156 -2.1131*** -2.1131***
W*Industrial Rationalization -0.0704***
W*Industrial Upgrading -0.0508***
W*Potential Evapotranspiration 0.0001
W*Precipitation -0.0002***
W*Temperature -0.0915***
Con 0.0519*
ρ 0.9519***
R2 0.3127 0.655

Note:

***, **, * denote statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels. W represents the spatial weight matrix based on geographic distance, con represents the constant term, and ρ represents the spatial auto-correlation coefficient.

  1. Ecological-Well-being Coupling Spillover Effect: The coefficient of the coupling degree ρ is significant and positive. An increase in the coupling degree in one region substantially enhances the coupling degree in the surrounding townships and counties, reflecting strong policy transmission and agglomeration effects in the rural areas of Sichuan and Chongqing. When these areas enhance their coordination level, neighboring regions with similar social structures and conditions benefit, ultimately improving the overall ecological-well-being coupling and coordination degree.

  2. Industrial Rationalization: Both the direct and indirect effects of industrial rationalization are significantly negative at a 1% level. This suggests that a decrease in the industrial rationalization index (indicating less rationalized industries) is associated with an increase in the ecological-well-being coupling and coordination degree of the local and surrounding townships and counties. The elasticities for the indirect effects are much larger than the direct effects (0.0593 and 2.5248). This implies that a more rationalized industry in the local area and its surrounding townships and counties leads to higher coordination levels. The impact of industrial rationalization on the surrounding areas is much greater than its impact on the local area. This can be attributed to the similarity in culture [39], strong population and capital mobility, and the high transmission of policies, social structures, and development patterns within the rural areas of Sichuan and Chongqing. As a result, the cumulative effect on the surrounding townships and counties, which have similar social structures and scales, is greater than the effect on the local township or county. Additionally, the transition of industrial structure in developing countries follows a common pattern [40]: priority is given to the development of agriculture and industry, followed by the optimization of surplus capacity and human resources in the tertiary sector. When the rural areas of Sichuan and Chongqing undergo the transition from the primary and secondary sectors to the tertiary sector, the industrial rationalization index decreases, leading to increased labor value-added and improved well-being for residents. The increased share of the tertiary sector also reduces the intensity of resource exploitation, gradually improving ecological quality and thereby enhancing the ecological-well-being coupling and coordination degree.

  3. Industrial Upgrading: The direct effect of industrial upgrading is significantly positive (0.0159), while the indirect effect (-0.7275) and total effect (-0.7116) are significantly negative. This indicates that a higher industrial upgrading index in a region is associated with a higher ecological-well-being coupling and coordination degree in the local area but a lower coupling degree in the surrounding townships and counties. The elasticity of the indirect effect is greater than that of the direct effect, similar to the reason behind the industrial rationalization results. The presence of a "brain drain" effect in high-paying technological industries in the local area is a factor causing the opposite effects of the direct and indirect effects [41]. A single township or county cannot develop high-tech industries with high technological levels. It requires the absorption of human capital and technological capital from the surrounding townships and counties to promote industrial upgrading and increase the value-added of products. High-tech industries also have a lower environmental impact, contributing to the increase in the ecological-well-being coupling and coordination degree. The surrounding townships and counties, which lose talent, capital, and technology, lack the necessary conditions for industrial upgrading and can only engage in non-high-tech production, leading to a lower level of coordinated development.

4 Discussion, conclusions, and policy recommendations

4.1 Discussion

In this study, we employed a coupling coordination model to systematically evaluate the spatiotemporal evolution of ecological quality and residents’ well-being coordination in the rural counties of the Sichuan-Chongqing region from 2010 to 2020. The findings revealed that there existed an east-west disparity in the level of coordination development within the region, with the eastern part experiencing faster growth while the western part exhibited slower progress. This observation aligns with the conclusions drawn by Wang [42], which can be attributed to variations in the overall regional governance investment. By constructing a dual fixed spatial Durbin model, we delved into the mechanisms and spatial interaction effects of industrial transformation and upgrading in the rural counties of the Sichuan-Chongqing region. Our analysis unveiled a robust spatial correlation within the region, and the coupling coordination of ecological well-being showcased a significant positive spatial spillover effect. This phenomenon could be attributed to the pronounced similarity in local cultures and the frequent interactions between regions, such that changes initiated in one area were often emulated by neighboring ones. The structural changes in one county indeed exerted considerable influence on the surrounding counties, facilitated by the common cultural, economic, and developmental patterns in the region. Both industrial rationalization and industrial upgrading exhibited robust spillover effects, though their mechanisms differed, leading to contrasting spatial spillover effects. Successful local transformation instances could be diffused to neighboring counties, enhancing the degree of ecological-well-being coordination in those areas. However, owing to limitations in technology, capital, and talent resources, only a subset of counties in the Sichuan-Chongqing region possessed the fundamental prerequisites for industrial upgrading. This process might trigger a suction effect, resulting in the outflow of talent, capital, and technology from the surrounding counties and thereby diminishing the well-being of their residents. However, this study also has some limitations, including:

  1. The correction coefficient for the value-equivalent coefficient of agricultural prices in this study was based on the average agricultural prices in the Sichuan-Chongqing rural counties, rather than separately calculating the correction coefficients for the two regions, which may reduce the accuracy of the correction.

  2. The selected study area focused on the rural counties of the Sichuan-Chongqing region, and due to limited data availability, the construction of the residents’ well-being index system only considered economic, material, cultural, and medical aspects.

  3. This study used a double fixed spatial Durbin model to explore the influence mechanism of industrial structural transformation and upgrading on the ecological-well-being coupling coordination in the Sichuan-Chongqing rural counties, but did not consider the spatial heterogeneity of the coordination and the obtained model represents an average model for the entire region.

4.2 Conclusions

Against the backdrop of industrial transformation in China, exploring methods to break away from unsustainable and low value-added production models is crucial for regions across the country. Quantitative research on the coordinated development and the impact mechanism of industrial structure on local coordination development in the rural counties of the Sichuan-Chongqing region is particularly important. The main conclusions of this study are as follows:

  1. From 2010 to 2020, the ecological-well-being coupling coordination in the rural counties of the Sichuan-Chongqing region showed overall stable growth. The coordination index exhibited an east-west disparity, with a faster growth rate in the east and a slower growth rate in the west. The east-west difference was significant and increased over the years.

  2. The ecological-well-being coupling coordination in the rural counties of the Sichuan-Chongqing region exhibited a strong positive spatial spillover effect. Priority should be given to developing certain areas, allowing them to utilize the spillover benefits and maximize policy effectiveness.

  3. The more rational the industrial structure, the higher the level of coordinated development in both the local and surrounding counties. A higher index of industrial upgrading indicated a better level of local coordination development but a lower level of coordination development in the surrounding areas.

4.3 Policy recommendations

Based on the analysis and conclusions of this study, the following policy recommendations are proposed:

  1. The spatial distribution of ecological-well-being coordinated development in the rural counties of the Sichuan-Chongqing region is uneven, and significant spatial spillover effects exist. It is necessary to adjust development priorities and focus on improving the coordination development level of certain counties in the western region of Sichuan and Chongqing (such as Luding County, Daofu County, etc.). These counties can serve as demonstration counties for the surrounding rural counties, driving their coordinated development together.

  2. The more rational the industrial structure in the rural counties of the Sichuan-Chongqing region, the higher the level of coordinated development. This indicates that there is a significant presence of agricultural and industrial structures in the study area. Therefore, appropriate support should be given to the development of the tertiary industry in rural counties, ensuring that they have the basic conditions for industrial structure transformation and upgrading. This will improve the well-being of rural residents, reduce environmental resource demands, and enhance the level of coordinated development in rural counties.

  3. The phenomenon of industrial upgrading in the rural counties of the Sichuan-Chongqing region having a suction effect is observed. This is primarily due to the overall shortage of talent, funds, and technology reserves in the entire Sichuan-Chongqing rural county region, resulting in the need to sacrifice the potential for industrial upgrading and coordinated development in surrounding rural counties. The government needs to increase financial investment, focus on talent cultivation and the introduction of advanced technology, and enable each county in the Sichuan-Chongqing rural county region to have the basic conditions for industrial upgrading.

Supporting information

S1 File

(XLSX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Liu F., Sim J., Sun H., Edziah B. K., Adom P. K., Song S., et al. (2022). Assessing the role of economic globalization on energy efficiency: Evidence from a global perspective. China Economic Review. 10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101897 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Smith Lisa M., Case Jason L., et al. (2013). Relating ecoystem services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a U.S. index. Ecological Indicators, 28, 79–90. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.032 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zoe L., Iain W., et al. (2018). Linkages between ecosystem services and human wellbeing: A Nexus Webs approach. Ecological Indicators, 93, 658–668. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.052 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Knight Sarah J., McClean Colin J., et al. (2022). The importance of ecological quality of public green and blue spaces for subjective well-being. Landscape and Urban Planning, 226, 0169–2046. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104510 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang P., Li X., et al. (2023). Relationship between ecosystem services and farmers’ well-being in the Yellow River Wetland Nature Reserve of China. Ecological Indicators, 146, 1470–160X, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109810 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rudman Seth M., Maayan Kreitzman., et al. (2017). Evosystem Services: Rapid Evolution and the Provision of Ecosystem Services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32, 403–415. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.02.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hu Z., Yang X., et al. (2021). Linking landcape patermn, ecosystem service value, and human wel-being in Xishuangbamna southvest China insights from a couping cordination mode. Global Ecology and Conservation, 27, 2351–9894. 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01583 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Qiu J., Yu D., et al. (2022). Influential paths of ecosystem services on human well-being in the context of the sustainable development goals. Science of The Total Environment, 852. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang Y., Mao Y., et al. (2021). Eco-efficiency, eco-technology innovation and eco-well-being performance to improve global sustainable development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 0195–9255. 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106580 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pedersen Eja., Stefan E.B Weisner., et al. (2019). Wetland areas’ direct contributions to residents’ well-being entitle them to high cultural ecosystem values. Science of The Total Environment, 646, 1315–1326. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang S., Zhu D., et al. (2017). Which countries are more ecologically efficient in improving human well-being? An application of the Index of Ecological Well-being Performance. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, 112–119. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kassouri Y., & Altıntaş H. (2020). Human well-being versus ecological footprint in MENA countries: A trade-off? Journal of Environmental Management, 263, 110405. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li J., Gong Y. et al. (2022). Spatio-temporal differentiation and policy optimization of ecological well-being in the Yellow River Delta high-efficiency eco-economic zone. Journal of Cleaner Production, 339, 0959–6526. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130717 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang S., Zhang Y., et al. (2021). Research on Spatial Unbalance and Influencing Factors of Ecological Well-Being Performance in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 9299. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang D., Wu l., et al. (2021). Ecology and environment of the Belt and Road under global climate change: A systematic review of spatial patterns, cost efficiency, and ecological footprints. Ecological Indicators, 131, 108237. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108237 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zheng J. Shao X., et al. (2021). The impact of the pilot program on industrial structure upgrading in low-carbon cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125868, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125868 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hao X., Li Y., et al. (2023). The role of digitalization on green economic growth: Does industrial structure optimization and green innovation matter? Journal of Environmental Management, 325, 116504. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang B., Han L., et al. (2021). The Impact of Regional Industrial Structure Upgrading on the Economic Growth of Marine Fisheries in China—The Perspective of Industrial Structure Advancement and Rationalization. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 693804. 10.3389/fmars.2021.693804 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tian Y & Pang J. (2023). What causes dynamic change of green technology progress: Convergence analysis based on industrial restructuring and environmental regulation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 66, 189–199. 10.1016/j.strueco.2023.05.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Duan W., Joseph D., et al. (2022). Industrial structure conditions economic resilience. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183, 121944. 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121944 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yang H., Gou X., et al. (2022). Research on the coordinated development of ecosystem services and well-being in agricultural and pastoral areas. Journal of Environmental Management, 304, 114300. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhao X., Sun H., et al. (2019). China’s rural human settlements: Qualitative evaluation, quantitative analysis and policy implications. Ecological Indicators, 105, 398–405. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhu B., Zhang T. (2021). The impact of cross-region industrial structure optimization on economy, carbon emissions and energy consumption: A case of the Yangtze River Delta. Science of The Total Environment, 778, 146089. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sun K., Liu C., et al. (2022). The impact of industrial structure on the environment pollution and its spatial-temporal differences in Henan, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 381, 135127. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135127 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang Q., Yang T., et al. (2023). Economic complexity and ecological footprint: The role of energy structure, industrial structure, and labor force. Journal of Cleaner Production, 412, 137389. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137389 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fitalew A., Maja V., et al., (2021). The economic values of global forest ecosystem services: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 189, 107145. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107145 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Daniel T., Muhar A., et al. (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(23), 8812–8819. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114773109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li D., Li T., Wu R., & Huang Z. (2023). Study on the impact of industrial structure upgrading on soil conservation in the Yellow River basin counties. Ecological Indicators. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110683 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Li D., Liang D., Li T., & Chen S. (2022). Ecological-economic coordination in the Yellow River basin: spatial and temporal evolution and driving mechanisms. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 10.1007/s10668-022-02859-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Deng C., Liu J., et al. (2021). Spatiotemporal dislocation of urbanization and ecological construction increased the ecosystem service supply and demand imbalance. Journal of Environmental Management, 288, 112478. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112478 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pringle Robert M. (2021). Ecology: A revolution in resource partitioning. Current Biology, 31, 1474–1476. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jenne C. A., & Cattell R.K. (1983). Structural change and energy efficiency in industry. Energy Economics, 5, 114–123. 10.1016/0140-9883(83)90018-X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yee S., Paulukonis E., et al. (2021). Projecting effects of land use change on human well-being through changes in ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling, 440, 109358. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tokarchuk O., Gabriele R., et al. (2017). Development of city tourism and well-being of urban residents. Tourism Economics, 23(2), 343–359. 10.1177/1354816616656272 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Norah C., Ricardo A., et al. (2019). Are Protected Areas undervalued? An asset-based analysis of Brazilian Protected Area Management Plans. Journal of Environmental Management, 249, 109347. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen W., Zeng J., et al. (2021). Coupling Analysis of Ecosystem Services Value and Economic Development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: A Case Study in Hunan Province, China. Remote Sens, 13, 1552. 10.3390/rs13081552 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Peng B., Sheng X., et al. (2020). Does environmental protection promote economic development? From the perspective of coupling coordination between environmental protection and economic development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 39135–39148. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09871-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chang D., Yeh L., et al. (2013). The Effects of Economic Development, International Trade, Industrial Structure and Energy Demands on Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development, 22(6), 377–390. 10.1002/sd.1555 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Segers T., Devisch O., et al. (2020). Conceptualizing demographic shrinkage in a growing region- Creating opportunities for spatial practice. Landscape and Urban Planning, 195, 103711. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103711 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sahoo M., & Sethi N. (2021). The dynamic impact of urbanization, structural transformation, and technological innovation on ecological footprint and PM2.5: evidence from newly industrialized countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 10.1007/s10668-021-01614-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pei Y., Zhu Y., et al. (2020). Industrial agglomeration and environmental pollution: based on the specialized and diversified agglomeration in the Yangtze River Delta. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(3), 4061–4085. 10.1007/s10668-020-00756-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang Q., & Wang L. (2020). The nonlinear effect of population aging, industrial structure, and urbanization on carbon emissions: A panel threshold regression analysis of 137 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 125381. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125381 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Fuyou Guo

25 Jul 2023

PONE-D-23-20262Research on the mechanism of promoting coordinated development of ecological well-being in rural counties through industrial transformationPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Yang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 08 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Fuyou Guo, (Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please ensure that you include a title page within your main document. We do appreciate that you have a title page document uploaded as a separate file, however, as per our author guidelines (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-title-page) we do require this to be part of the manuscript file itself and not uploaded separately.

Could you therefore please include the title page into the beginning of your manuscript file itself, listing all authors and affiliations.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

   "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript"

At this time, please address the following queries:

a) Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution. 

b) State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

c) If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

d) If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

"Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

5. We note that Figures 2 and 5 in your submission contain map/satellite images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (a) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (b) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 2 and 5 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.  

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

6. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 2 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

Additional Editor Comments:

Reviewer 1 Comments:

A dual-fixed-space Durbin model is constructed to analyze the influence mechanism and spatial interaction effects of industrial transformation and upgrading on the coordination of ecology and well-being. The paper discussed the mechanism of promoting coordinated development of ecological wellbeing in rural counties through industrial transformation.

The structure of the article is clear and the process is explained well here. However, it could be improved in some detail.

1.The abstract can be further refined. For example, the research results in the abstract can be summarized into three points.

2.The contributions of this paper require further clarification and improvement. It is suggested to further improve the innovation points.

3.Some of the statements are written without reference; try to add reference with every statement in your paper.

4. In the discussion part, the author should further explain the reasons for these results.

5. The overall quality of English is good, but need to be checked carefully again. I suggest the authors should look for an English native speaker to further check the language of the paper.

6. Some fresh paper can be used as ref. eg: Liu, F., Sim, J. Y., Sun, H., Edziah, B. K., Adom, P. K., & Song, S. (2023). Assessing the role of economic globalization on energy efficiency: Evidence from a global perspective. China Economic Review, 77, 101897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101897.

7.why nothing in the 3rd part of 2.3 Data sources?

Reviewer 2 Comments:

Abstract Suggestions:

1. The abstract provides a brief introduction to the research background and significance. However, it can be improved by providing more specific information about the research objectives, methodology, and key findings.

2. Clearly explain the research methods and data analysis techniques used in the study, highlighting their strengths and contributions to the research.

3. Include more specific information about the research findings, such as the results of the analysis, significant correlations, and key discoveries.

4. Emphasize the practical implications and policy recommendations derived from the research findings, highlighting their potential impact on promoting sustainable development in rural counties.

1. Introduction Suggestions:

1. Start the introduction by providing a more concise and clear statement of the research objective, clearly stating that this study aims to investigate the mechanisms by which industrial transformation in rural counties promotes the coordinated development of ecological well-being.

2. Provide a comprehensive overview of the challenges faced by rural counties in achieving sustainable development, such as the conflicts between economic growth and environmental protection, and the need to balance industrial development with ecological well-being.

3. Clearly state the research significance and potential contributions of the study, highlighting how the findings can provide valuable insights and guidance for policymakers and practitioners involved in rural development and ecological protection.

4. Provide a brief literature review to highlight the existing gaps in knowledge and how the current study addresses those gaps.

5. Clearly outline the structure of the paper, briefly summarizing the content of each section to give readers an overview of the organization of the article.

2. Variable Selection, Model Setting, and Research Methods Suggestions:

1. Emphasize the importance and relevance of the selected variables to the research topic and objectives, highlighting how they contribute to measuring the ecological well-being and the impact of industrial transformation.

2. Clearly describe the process of constructing the indicator system, including the selection of specific indicators, their measurement methods, and the rationale behind their inclusion.

3. Provide a more detailed explanation of the research methods, such as the coupling coordination evaluation model, spatial analysis techniques, and statistical procedures employed in the study.

4. Highlight the strengths and limitations of the chosen research methods, discussing their suitability for capturing the complex relationships between ecological well-being and industrial transformation.

2.2 Regional Overview Suggestions:

1. Provide a more detailed description of the geographical features and topography of the Sichuan-Chongqing region, including specific characteristics of mountains, rivers, and other natural elements that influence the ecological and socioeconomic dynamics.

2. Highlight the specific ecological constraints and pressures faced by rural counties in the region, such as the degradation of natural resources, environmental protection demands, and the need for ecosystem restoration.

3. Discuss the economic development status and role of the region in promoting economic growth in western China, emphasizing the challenges and opportunities for achieving sustainable development in rural counties.

2.3 Data Sources Suggestions:

1. Provide a more detailed description of the data sources used in the study, including specific datasets, their origins, and reliability.

2. Clearly explain the data processing procedures, including any data cleaning, aggregation, or interpolation techniques employed to ensure the quality and consistency of the data used in the analysis.

3. Discuss the validity and reliability of the data sources, highlighting any potential limitations or biases associated with the data and steps taken to address them.

2.4 Research Methods Suggestions:

1. Provide a more detailed explanation of the construction of the indicator system, including the specific criteria used for selecting indicators and the rationale behind their weighting.

2. Clearly explain the methodology used to evaluate the economic value of ecosystem services and its relevance to assessing ecological quality.

3. Describe the coupling coordination evaluation model in more detail, including the calculation formula, weight allocation, and interpretation of the coupling coordination degree index.

4. Provide a more comprehensive overview of the spatial Durbin model and its relevance to analyzing the spatial effects and interdependencies in the study.

3 Empirical Testing and Results Analysis Suggestions:

1. Provide a more detailed analysis of the temporal evolution of the coupling coordination degree, including specific trends, variations, and significant turning points.

2. Elaborate on the spatial distribution patterns of the coupling coordination degree, discussing any regional disparities and spatial clusters observed in the analysis.

3. Provide a more detailed analysis of the impact of industrial transformation and upgrading on the coupling coordination degree, including specific statistical results, effect sizes, and policy implications.

4. Discuss the implications of the model analysis results, emphasizing the key factors influencing the coordinated development of ecological well-being and providing insights for policymakers and practitioners.

4.1 Discussion Suggestions:

1. Provide a more detailed discussion of the temporal evolution analysis, interpreting the findings in the context of relevant theories and previous research. Discuss the implications of the observed trends and variations in the coupling coordination degree.

2. Discuss the spatial distribution patterns and regional disparities observed in the study, exploring the underlying factors and implications for policy interventions.

3. Highlight the key findings and their significance in advancing the understanding of the mechanisms driving the coordinated development of ecological well-being through industrial transformation.

4.2 Conclusions Suggestions:

1. Clearly summarize the main findings of the study, emphasizing the key factors and mechanisms influencing the coordinated development of ecological well-being in rural counties.

2. Provide a concise statement of the study's contributions and significance, highlighting the implications for sustainable rural development and ecological protection.

3. Offer suggestions for future research directions or areas that warrant further investigation, based on the limitations and knowledge gaps identified in the current study.

4.3 Policy Recommendations Suggestions:

1. Provide specific and actionable policy recommendations based on the research findings, addressing the challenges and opportunities identified in the study.

2. Justify each policy recommendation by linking it to the specific research results and the potential impacts on promoting the coordinated development of ecological well-being.

3. Discuss the practical implications and potential implementation strategies for the proposed policy recommendations, taking into account the local context and stakeholder involvement

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Abstract Suggestions:

1. The abstract provides a brief introduction to the research background and significance. However, it can be improved by providing more specific information about the research objectives, methodology, and key findings.

2. Clearly explain the research methods and data analysis techniques used in the study, highlighting their strengths and contributions to the research.

3. Include more specific information about the research findings, such as the results of the analysis, significant correlations, and key discoveries.

4. Emphasize the practical implications and policy recommendations derived from the research findings, highlighting their potential impact on promoting sustainable development in rural counties.

1. Introduction Suggestions:

1. Start the introduction by providing a more concise and clear statement of the research objective, clearly stating that this study aims to investigate the mechanisms by which industrial transformation in rural counties promotes the coordinated development of ecological well-being.

2. Provide a comprehensive overview of the challenges faced by rural counties in achieving sustainable development, such as the conflicts between economic growth and environmental protection, and the need to balance industrial development with ecological well-being.

3. Clearly state the research significance and potential contributions of the study, highlighting how the findings can provide valuable insights and guidance for policymakers and practitioners involved in rural development and ecological protection.

4. Provide a brief literature review to highlight the existing gaps in knowledge and how the current study addresses those gaps.

5. Clearly outline the structure of the paper, briefly summarizing the content of each section to give readers an overview of the organization of the article.

2. Variable Selection, Model Setting, and Research Methods Suggestions:

1. Emphasize the importance and relevance of the selected variables to the research topic and objectives, highlighting how they contribute to measuring the ecological well-being and the impact of industrial transformation.

2. Clearly describe the process of constructing the indicator system, including the selection of specific indicators, their measurement methods, and the rationale behind their inclusion.

3. Provide a more detailed explanation of the research methods, such as the coupling coordination evaluation model, spatial analysis techniques, and statistical procedures employed in the study.

4. Highlight the strengths and limitations of the chosen research methods, discussing their suitability for capturing the complex relationships between ecological well-being and industrial transformation.

2.2 Regional Overview Suggestions:

1. Provide a more detailed description of the geographical features and topography of the Sichuan-Chongqing region, including specific characteristics of mountains, rivers, and other natural elements that influence the ecological and socioeconomic dynamics.

2. Highlight the specific ecological constraints and pressures faced by rural counties in the region, such as the degradation of natural resources, environmental protection demands, and the need for ecosystem restoration.

3. Discuss the economic development status and role of the region in promoting economic growth in western China, emphasizing the challenges and opportunities for achieving sustainable development in rural counties.

2.3 Data Sources Suggestions:

1. Provide a more detailed description of the data sources used in the study, including specific datasets, their origins, and reliability.

2. Clearly explain the data processing procedures, including any data cleaning, aggregation, or interpolation techniques employed to ensure the quality and consistency of the data used in the analysis.

3. Discuss the validity and reliability of the data sources, highlighting any potential limitations or biases associated with the data and steps taken to address them.

2.4 Research Methods Suggestions:

1. Provide a more detailed explanation of the construction of the indicator system, including the specific criteria used for selecting indicators and the rationale behind their weighting.

2. Clearly explain the methodology used to evaluate the economic value of ecosystem services and its relevance to assessing ecological quality.

3. Describe the coupling coordination evaluation model in more detail, including the calculation formula, weight allocation, and interpretation of the coupling coordination degree index.

4. Provide a more comprehensive overview of the spatial Durbin model and its relevance to analyzing the spatial effects and interdependencies in the study.

3 Empirical Testing and Results Analysis Suggestions:

1. Provide a more detailed analysis of the temporal evolution of the coupling coordination degree, including specific trends, variations, and significant turning points.

2. Elaborate on the spatial distribution patterns of the coupling coordination degree, discussing any regional disparities and spatial clusters observed in the analysis.

3. Provide a more detailed analysis of the impact of industrial transformation and upgrading on the coupling coordination degree, including specific statistical results, effect sizes, and policy implications.

4. Discuss the implications of the model analysis results, emphasizing the key factors influencing the coordinated development of ecological well-being and providing insights for policymakers and practitioners.

4.1 Discussion Suggestions:

1. Provide a more detailed discussion of the temporal evolution analysis, interpreting the findings in the context of relevant theories and previous research. Discuss the implications of the observed trends and variations in the coupling coordination degree.

2. Discuss the spatial distribution patterns and regional disparities observed in the study, exploring the underlying factors and implications for policy interventions.

3. Highlight the key findings and their significance in advancing the understanding of the mechanisms driving the coordinated development of ecological well-being through industrial transformation.

4.2 Conclusions Suggestions:

1. Clearly summarize the main findings of the study, emphasizing the key factors and mechanisms influencing the coordinated development of ecological well-being in rural counties.

2. Provide a concise statement of the study's contributions and significance, highlighting the implications for sustainable rural development and ecological protection.

3. Offer suggestions for future research directions or areas that warrant further investigation, based on the limitations and knowledge gaps identified in the current study.

4.3 Policy Recommendations Suggestions:

1. Provide specific and actionable policy recommendations based on the research findings, addressing the challenges and opportunities identified in the study.

2. Justify each policy recommendation by linking it to the specific research results and the potential impacts on promoting the coordinated development of ecological well-being.

3. Discuss the practical implications and potential implementation strategies for the proposed policy recommendations, taking into account the local context and stakeholder involvement

Reviewer #2: A dual-fixed-space Durbin model is constructed to analyze the influence mechanism and spatial interaction effects of industrial transformation and upgrading on the coordination of ecology and well-being. The paper discussed the mechanism of promoting coordinated development of ecological wellbeing in rural counties through industrial transformation.

The structure of the article is clear and the process is explained well here. However, it could be improved in some detail.

1.The abstract can be further refined. For example, the research results in the abstract can be summarized into three points.

2.The contributions of this paper require further clarification and improvement. It is suggested to further improve the innovation points.

3.Some of the statements are written without reference; try to add reference with every statement in your paper.

4. In the discussion part, the author should further explain the reasons for these results.

5. The overall quality of English is good, but need to be checked carefully again. I suggest the authors should look for an English native speaker to further check the language of the paper.

6. Some fresh paper can be used as ref. eg: Liu, F., Sim, J. Y., Sun, H., Edziah, B. K., Adom, P. K., & Song, S. (2023). Assessing the role of economic globalization on energy efficiency: Evidence from a global perspective. China Economic Review, 77, 101897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101897.

7.why nothing in the 3rd part of 2.3 Data sources?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0291232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291232.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


18 Aug 2023

Response to Editor and Reviewers

To Reviewer 1:

Thank you very much for your review and suggestions on the article; they have been greatly beneficial to the paper. We have made systematic revisions based on the changes you provided, and we have marked the modified areas in red. The specific changes are as follows:

1.The abstract can be further refined. For example, the research results in the abstract can be summarized into three points.

We have revised the abstract, taking your suggestions into account, condensing and categorizing the conclusion into 3 points, and restructuring the abstract to include the research objectives, research methods, research content, and main conclusions. The revised content can be found on the first page of the article. Once again, thank you for your suggestions for revision. They have been very helpful to us.

2.The contributions of this paper require further clarification and improvement. It is suggested to further improve the innovation points.

Thank you for your suggestions. We found that our previous manuscript might not have adequately described the core innovative aspects of this paper, so we have made corrections to the sections that describe the innovations. We have emphasized the innovation in the methods, perspectives, and content of the research, and highlighted the necessity and high value of this study. The specific modifications can be found on the page 2 of the article. Once again, thank you for your suggestions for revising the article.

3.Some of the statements are written without reference; try to add reference with every statement in your paper.

Thank you for your comments. Indeed, we discovered that some sentences did not have appropriate references to support them, so we have added citations where we felt they were needed in the article. The specific additions can be found on page 1, page 3, and page 4. If there are any areas where you still feel something is missing, we would be happy to make further additions.

4. In the discussion part, the author should further explain the reasons for these results.

Thank you for your suggestion. In the original manuscript, we only described the phenomenon without delving into its possible underlying reasons. Following your advice, we have revised this section of the manuscript. By considering both the phenomenon and its historical context, we conducted a deeper analysis of the essence of the phenomenon. The results of this analysis can be found on Page 17.

5. The overall quality of English is good, but need to be checked carefully again. I suggest the authors should look for an English native speaker to further check the language of the paper.

Thank you for affirming the level of English in our manuscript. We indeed spent a considerable amount of time polishing the language. We have once again sought out a scholar whose native language is English to make revisions to the manuscript's English. If there are still places that are not well-written, we would be very pleased to make further revisions.

6. Some fresh paper can be used as ref. eg: Liu, F., Sim, J. Y., Sun, H., Edziah, B. K., Adom, P. K., & Song, S. (2023). Assessing the role of economic globalization on energy efficiency: Evidence from a global perspective. China Economic Review, 77, 101897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101897.

Thank you for your suggestion. We have updated the references in our manuscript. After consulting the literature you mentioned, we believe that it has a significant relationship with our research. The citation can be found on page 1. If you think there are other more suitable and recent references for this paper, we would be very pleased to make further updates.

7.why nothing in the 3rd part of 2.3 Data sources?

Yes, we made a mistake, and this section was erroneously deleted by us. We have corrected it and added back the complete information. Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

Thank you once again for taking the time to review and offer suggestions for our manuscript. Your valuable advice is crucial for us to enhance the quality of the article. We look forward to your next response. Please accept our most sincere blessings.

To Reviewer 2:

Thank you very much for your review and suggestions on the article; they have been greatly beneficial to the paper. We have made systematic revisions based on the changes you provided, and we have marked the modified areas in red. The specific changes are as follows:

About Abstract:

We have revised the abstract, taking your suggestions into account, condensing and categorizing the conclusion into 3 points, and restructuring the abstract to include the research objectives, research methods, research content, and main conclusions. The revised content can be found on the first page of the article. Once again, thank you for your suggestions for revision. They have been very helpful to us.

About Introduction

Thank you for your suggestions. We have identified many of the issues you pointed out in our introduction. Based on your recommendations for the manuscript, we have made the following modifications to the introduction:

(1) We have added some of the latest literature to make the logic of the article more coherent.

(2) We have rewritten the innovative points of the article, clarifying the objectives and advantages of the article, and emphasizing the importance of the research.

(3) We have revised the literature review to enrich this manuscript.

(4) We have made further language corrections to certain paragraphs, enhancing the readability of the article.

About Variable Selection, Model Setting, and Research Methods Suggestions:

Thank you for your suggestions. We have made certain revisions to this module:

(1) In addition to the original information about the data sources, we have included explanations for the accessibility of the data.

(2) We have provided detailed descriptions of the data processing methods and synthesis techniques.

(3) We have systematically explained the theoretical basis for the coupling coordination degree in the article.

(4) We have given a detailed overview of the application of the SDM model in the article.

About Regional Overview Suggestions:

Thank you for your suggestions. We have made certain revisions to this module:

We have provided a more detailed description and rewrite of the study area overview, taking into consideration not only the geographical features of the research area but also its economic conditions. We have emphasized the necessity of research in this region and the scarcity of county-level studies.

About Research Methods Suggestions:

Thank you for your suggestions. We have made certain revisions to this module:

(1) We have systematically described the spatiotemporal transformation trends of the coupling coordination degree.

(2) We have created a county-level transition matrix analysis diagram for the coupling coordination degree, exploring the transition status of the coordination.

(3) We have analyzed the reasons for the transition.

(4) We optimized the expression of the empirical conclusions and rewrote the impact mechanism for this module.

About Discussion Suggestions:

Thank you for your suggestion. In the original manuscript, we only described the phenomenon without delving into its possible underlying reasons. Following your advice, we have revised this section of the manuscript. By considering both the phenomenon and its historical context, we conducted a deeper analysis of the essence of the phenomenon. The results of this analysis can be found on Page 17.

About Conclusions and Policy Recommendations Suggestions

Thank you for your suggestions. We have made certain revisions to this module:

We have further revised the conclusion of the article, emphasizing the mechanism of impact, and we have also made corrections to the policy recommendations. Based on the model regression results, we have provided more appropriate policy suggestions. We have proposed policy recommendations to drive regional development through regional development and have provided suitable data support to ensure that the recommendations are trustworthy.

Thank you once again for taking the time to review and offer suggestions for our manuscript. Your valuable advice is crucial for us to enhance the quality of the article. We look forward to your next response. Please accept our most sincere blessings.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Fuyou Guo

24 Aug 2023

Research on the mechanism of promoting coordinated development of ecological well-being in rural counties through industrial transformation

PONE-D-23-20262R1

Dear Dr. Yang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Fuyou Guo, (Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewer 1 Comments :

Now the points are already addressed, the structure is ok, and the analysis is strong enough, so I suggest to accept it.

Reviewer 2 Comments :

I appreciate for the authors' revision. The existing paper has original content and worthy for publication in the journal. I can recommend it for a possible publication.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I appreciate for the authors' revision. The existing paper has original content and worthy for publication in the journal. I can recommend it for a possible publication.

Reviewer #2: Now the points are already addressed, the structure is ok, and the analysis is strong enough, so I suggest to accept it.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Fuyou Guo

31 Aug 2023

PONE-D-23-20262R1

Research on the mechanism of promoting coordinated development of ecological well-being in rural counties through industrial transformation

Dear Dr. Yang:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Associate professor Fuyou Guo

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE


Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES