Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0291392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291392

Are digital social media campaigns the key to raise stroke awareness in low-and middle-income countries? A study of feasibility and cost-effectiveness in Nepal

Christine Tunkl 1,*, Raju Paudel 2, Lekhjung Thapa 3, Patrick Tunkl 4, Pankaj Jalan 5, Avinash Chandra 6, Sarah Belson 7, Bikram Prasad Gajurel 8, Nima Haji-Begli 1, Sunanjay Bajaj 1, Jessica Golenia 1, Wolfgang Wick 1,9, Werner Hacke 1, Christoph Gumbinger 1
Editor: Ahmed Nasreldein10
PMCID: PMC10490866  PMID: 37682967

Abstract

Background

Stroke is a major global health problem and was the second leading cause of death worldwide in 2020. However, the lack of public stroke awareness especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Nepal severely hinders the effective provision of stroke care. Efficient and cost-effective strategies to raise stroke awareness in LMICs are still lacking. This study aims to (a) explore the feasibility of a social media-based stroke awareness campaign in Nepal using a cost-benefit analysis and (b) identify best practices for social media health education campaigns.

Methods

We performed a stroke awareness campaign over a period of 6 months as part of a Stroke Project in Nepal on four social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok) with organic traffic and paid advertisements. Adapted material based on the World Stroke Day Campaign and specifically created videos for TikTok were used. Performance of the campaign was analyzed with established quantitative social media metrics (impressions, reach, engagement, costs).

Results

Campaign posts were displayed 7.5 million times to users in Nepal. 2.5 million individual social media users in Nepal were exposed to the campaign on average three times, which equals 8.6% of Nepal’s total population. Of those, 250,000 users actively engaged with the posts. Paid advertisement on Facebook and Instagram proved to be more effective in terms of reach and cost than organic traffic. The total campaign cost was low with a “Cost to reach 1,000 users” of 0.24 EUR and a “Cost Per Click” of 0.01 EUR.

Discussion

Social media-based campaigns using paid advertisement provide a feasible and, compared to classical mass medias, a very cost-effective approach to inform large parts of the population about stroke awareness in LMICs. Future research needs to further analyze the impact of social media campaigns on stroke knowledge.

Introduction

Stroke is a major global health problem and is the second leading cause of death worldwide, with the highest burden of diseases in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) [1]. Though the clinical outcome of strokes can be significantly improved by rapid diagnosis and treatment, patients repeatedly arrive late to hospitals [2] whereby the time-dependent effect of treatment decreases the chance of a good outcome [3]. The lack of public awareness about stroke has been reported as one of the major factors for prehospital delay and hence the belated medical treatment [46].

In Nepal, recent studies demonstrated that knowledge on stroke in high-school students and in a rural population is insufficient [7, 8] with e.g. 55% of study participants believing in ayurvedic therapy to be effective in stroke care. The lack of awareness regarding stroke treatments and inadequate recognition of stroke symptoms have been identified as main factors contributing to delayed presentation at a tertiary care center [9] and therefore hampering the benefit of treatment.

In 2020, the Nepal Stroke Association and University Hospital Heidelberg initiated a project aiming to improve stroke care in Nepal and acknowledging the need to focus on public awareness of stroke. The term ‘stroke awareness’ refers mainly to stroke recognition, specifically its symptoms and the need for the correct emergency response [10]. Given the limited resources in low- and middle income countries (LMICs) it is therefore crucial to develop an approach which 1) reaches a large group of the population, 2) leads to a short- and long-term increase in stroke awareness and 3) is cost-effective [11].

The effectiveness of classical mass educational campaigns on a community’s stroke knowledge has proven to be low and does often not lead to a long-lasting change in help-seeking behavior [12, 13]. In the last decade, social media has emerged as a platform with an enormous outreach with more than five billion people worldwide owning a smartphone [14]. By facilitating information sharing opportunities and community-building, social media has become invaluable in marketing and a promising approach in health education [15]. Especially young adults have expressed their interest in receiving health information via social media platforms [16] and a review found that social media even has the ability to facilitate mass communication, health education and knowledge translation in LMICs. Therefore, newer innovative approaches have focused on children and young adults as the recipients of stroke education, assuming that those age groups will be the bystanders when a stroke happens and take the right help-seeking actions [17]. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that these groups will deliver the message to their family members [1719]. As social media covers a large audience of over 50% of the population in Nepal [20], we hypothesized that a social media campaign in Nepal is feasible to reach out the Nepalese people, might be effective in terms of knowledge acquisition by engaging the population and requires a lower financial input compared to classical mass media campaigns.

The objectives of this study were to (a) determine feasibility of a social media-based stroke awareness campaign in Nepal, (b) analyze the effectiveness of the campaign and (c) identify best practices for social media health education campaigns.

Addressing this question has the potential to provide innovative strategies for health education and could support the development of future interventions to increase awareness of stroke and other relevant health issues.

Materials and methods

We performed a non-controlled cohort-study based on exposure to advertising of stroke awareness materials on social media targeting users in Nepal.

Setting

Nepal is a LIMC with a population of approximately 29.1 million, and is ranked 143rd in the Human Development Index. The potential study population included the 13.7 million social media users in Nepal (equals 45.7% of the total population) [21]. We used Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and TikTok as at these platforms have the largest audience in Nepal [22]. Data published in the channel’s advertising resource indicated that Facebook had 12.3 million users, Instagram 2.3 million users, TikTok 2.2 million users and Twitter 417,000 users in early 2022 [22].

The study was performed continuously over a period of 24 weeks between January and June 2022 as part of the “Nepal Stroke Project”.

Content dissemination and study population

We used two different methods of content dissemination, which was organic traffic (on all four platforms) and paid-for promoted posts on Facebook and Instagram (Meta Network). Organic social media refers to free content, permanently seen in the account’s timeline, which is displayed to the account’s followers, to follower’s followers and to users who were “hashtagged” or who searched specifically for a post’s hashtag. Content of organic traffic on all four social media channels targeted network effects with initial dominance of Nepalese users and links to locations in Nepal aimed to disseminate the content mainly within the Nepalese population but was formally visible without any geographic restrictions.

Paid advertisements (ads) on Facebook and Instagram targeted users residing in Nepal over the age of 13, as specified by Meta Platforms Inc., without any further exclusion criteria. Ads containing creatives in English language were displayed to users who use social media in English and those in Nepali language to users with Nepali device settings. Paid-for promoted posts work on a “cost per click” (CPC) basis, whereby an allocated budget per post was set with the post being promoted to a specified target audience until the budget is reached.

The study size was determined by the output in terms of reach of a predefined action plan and a predefined budget limit for paid advertisement (for details see Table 1).

Table 1. Key performance indicators available per platform.

Metric Facebook® Instagram® TikTok® Twitter® Paid-Ads (Meta®)
Impression1 No No Yes Yes Yes
Reach2 Yes Yes No No Yes
Engagement3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link-Click4 No No No No Yes
Cost-Per-Click5 No No No No Yes

1 Impressions: Number of times a piece of content was displayed to a target audience.

2 Reach: Number of users exposed to a piece of content.

3 Engagement: Number of interactions the piece of content received from user, such as reactions, shares, comments, link clicks, 3-seconds video plays.

4 Link click: The number of clicks on links within an ad that users clicked on.

5 Cost per Click: The cost to pay for each click on an advertisement

Channels, content, informative website

The study was conducted using the Facebook and Instagram pages of the Nepal Stroke Project, the Twitter handle @nepalstrokeproject and the TikTok account @NepalStroke, which were all created in November 2021. An additional business account was used for Facebook and Instagram to enable paid-for advertisements and access data analytics not available for standard user accounts. While Facebook and Instragram were used to promote the World Stroke Day Campaign, Twitter was used exclusively for promoting project-specific information.

Content and creatives

We used the widely used FAST message (face, arms, speech, time), based on the Cincinnati Pre-Hospital Stroke Scale [23]. The FAST message is used in many countries worldwide and is the key message of the World Stroke Organization’s (WSO) World Stroke Day (WSD) Campaign (Fig 1). The FAST acronym has been translated into Nepali language and has been pretested in educational campaigns of the Nepal Stroke Association to ensure applicability in Nepal. Materials used in the campaign were mainly based on the 2021 WSD Campaign from WSO, which combines the FAST message with appealing slogans (e.g.: Minutes can save memories) and the Call to Action: Learn the signs, Say it’s a stroke and save #precious time. The used static and animated key visuals combine an emotional hook, call to action and symptom spotting. The key visuals are available with ten different images, covering different ethnicities (Fig 2) and additionally contain icons which are simple, genderless and without ethnicity (Fig 3).

Fig 1. Key visuals of social media campaign.

Fig 1

Fig 1 displays selected key visuals of the World Stroke Day Campaign. Republished from World Stroke Day Campaign under a CC BY license, with permission from World Stroke Organization, original copyright 2022.

Fig 2. Key images of social media campaign.

Fig 2

Fig 2 displays the key images of the World Stroke Day Campaign. Republished from World Stroke Day Campaign under a CC BY license, with permission from World Stroke Organization, original copyright 2022.

Fig 3. Iconography of the FAST message.

Fig 3

Fig 3 displays the iconography of the World Stroke Day Campaign. Republished from World Stroke Day Campaign under a CC BY license, with permission from World Stroke Organization, original copyright 2022.

All creatives have been translated into Nepali language and script by an expert team of Nepalese health workers and reviewed for linguistic and content correctness by professional translators. The creatives are supplied by own-designed posts with general facts on stroke and modifiable risk factors as well as posts to celebrate national festive events, inform about the project progress and building a community (Fig 4). All posts included a call to action to access the informative stroke website.

Fig 4. Self-designed creatives with general stroke knowledge.

Fig 4

Fig 4 shows an example of a self-designed post used for social media posts.

Special posts were designed for Twitter restricted to 160 characters and focusing on the text message. TikTok requires a different format with short videos of less than one minute, who were specially created by a professional TikTok creator in Nepali language and reviewed for content correctness by Nepalese stroke physicians.

Informative website

A website to provide evidence-based and comprehensive stroke knowledge, called “The Basics of Stroke”, was developed with the aim to explain basic stroke knowledge in plain English and Nepali language (i.e. risk factors, symptoms, treatment options). The content of the website was developed by a working group consisting of Nepalese and German stroke physicians, nurses and online marketing experts (https://nepalstrokeproject.org/the-basics-of-stroke/).

Course of action

A predefined action plan combining organic traffic for Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and TikTok and paid-for advertisements on Facebook and Instagram was developed by a marketing expert. For organic traffic it consisted of a less intensive run-in phase (month 1), a more intensive phase (month 2/3) with more posts per time-unit and a constant phase (starting in month 3). For cost minimization, paid advertisements were run at constant intervals. The editorial plan envisioned the following activities:

  • Posts on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter to be distributed by organic traffic

  • Two paid advertisements per month on Facebook and Instagram with each being promoted for seven to ten days including several days on social without advertisements.

  • Two videos per week on TikTok starting in April 2022.

Variables, data sources, data management

To assess the feasibility of the social media campaign we measured the following quantitative key performance indicators (KPI), which differ slightly between the platforms [24, 25] (Table 1):

  • Impressions: The number of times a piece of content was displayed to a target audience

  • Reach: The number of users exposed to a piece of content

  • Engagement: The number of interactions the piece of content received from user, such as reactions, shares, comments, link clicks, 3-seconds video plays.

  • Engagement rate: The ratio of engagements to impressions.

  • Link clicks: The number of clicks on links within an ad that users clicked on

  • Cost per mille (CPM): The cost to pay for 1,000 impressions on a social media platform

  • Cost per Click (CPC): The cost to pay for each click on an advertisement

Campaign performance for platforms and individual material performance was monitored by extracting data from Meta Business Manager, Twitter Analytics and TikTok Account Manager.

All data was entered into a database (Excel, Version 2019, Microsoft Corp, USA). Data was extracted at the end of the campaign (30/06/2022).

Statistical analysis

Feasibility of the campaign was explored through descriptive statistics of cumulative reach, impressions and engagement over time as measured from monitoring data on all platforms. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the campaign we analyzed the Cost-per-Click (CPC), Cost per mille (CPM) and the cost of working hours and preparation of material.

Best practices on social media-based health education were identified by a comparison of reach and engagement rate on different modalities (paid vs organic traffic) and different channels.

Ethical clearance

This study was approved by the Nepal Health Research Council (Reference number 66 / 703–2021 P). According to the terms of service and data policy of the Meta Platform, Twitter and TikTok all users have agreed into providing the analyzed information about e.g. hashtags, likes, views, time, frequency and duration of views [2628]. As we used only aggregated user analytics we did not need to obtain an additional vote from our local ethic committee (as to our local standards).

Results

Between January and June 2022, on average one post per week was broadcasted by organic traffic on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter, fourteen paid-for promoted posts ran on Facebook and Instagram and 28 short videos were posted on TikTok (see Table 2).

Table 2. Social media implementation plan.

Month Jan Feb March April May June
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Facebook® 1 1 2  1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Instagram® 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Tiktok® 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Twitter® 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Paid-Ads1 (Meta) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 Paid Ads: Paid advertisement on social media platforms in the Meta® network. Numbers indicate number of posts / month.

Basic demographic information on study population

Basic demographic information was only collected in the users exposed to paid advertisement, which however account for 97.9% of the study population. All users were residents of Nepal as specified by the prior defined inclusion criteria. In accordance with the sex distribution on Facebook and Instagram in Nepal, 44% of study participants were female and 56% were male. 69% of all exposed users were under the age of 35 (see Table 3).

Table 3. Basic demographics of users exposed to paid advertisements.

Reach1 (N) Reach (%) Link-clicks2 (N) Link-clicks (%)
(n = 2,411,505) (n = 257,990)
Age
 65+ 127,999 5.31 13,866 5.4
 55–64 91,647 3.80 10,318 4.0
 45–54 150,015 6.20 17,981 7.0
 35–44 373,246 15.50 40,237 15.6
 25–34 532,989 22.10 53,512 20.8
 18–24 524,797 21.80 36,792 14.3
 13–17 610,812 25.30 85,284 33.6
Sex
 Female 1,069,049 44.3 106,279 41.2
 Male 1,339,896 55.6 151,590 58.8
 Non classified 2,560 1.1 121 0.04

1 Reach: The number of users exposed to a piece of content.

2 Link click: The number of clicks on links within an ad that users clicked on.

Outreach

The social media campaign material was displayed more than seven million times (n = 7,513,952) on four different social media platforms (Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, Twitter) (Table 4).

Table 4. Key performance indicators of social media platforms.

Metric Facebook® Instagram® TikTok® Twitter® Paid-Ads (Meta®)
Impression1 8,219 6,753 139,481 6,722 7,352,777
Reach2 7,665 6,328 n.a. n.a. 2,411,505
Engagement3 790 190 5,738 378 n.a.
Link-Click4 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 257,999
Cost-Per-Click5 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 0.009 EUR

1 Impressions: Number of times a piece of content was displayed to a target audience.

2 Reach: Number of users exposed to a piece of content.

3 Engagement: Number of interactions the piece of content received from user, such as reactions, shares, comments, link clicks, 3-seconds video plays.

4 Link click: The number of clicks on links within an ad that users clicked on.

5 Cost per Click: The cost to pay for each click on an advertisement

The paid advertisements on Facebook and Instagram reached nearly 2.5 million unique users (n = 2,411,505) mainly in Nepal, equaling 8.6% of Nepal’s total population or 17.9% of all social media users in Nepal, and each user was exposed to the campaign on average three times.

Additionally, organic traffic on all platforms was viewed by a maximum number of 161,174 users but due to an overlap between different platforms and potential multiple views per users, we did not include these (additionally relatively small number) views in further analyses.

In total over a quarter million people (n = 265,095) interacted with our content as measured by likes, shares, comments or link clicks (0.9% of Nepal’s total population). The link click to the informative website as the most meaningful performance indicator [29] was achieved in 257,999 people in Nepal (Table 4).

KPI of organic versus paid-for traffic in social media-based awareness campaigns

The overall performance was significantly better in paid-for advertisements compared to organic traffic, though the number of posts on organic traffic was 5-fold higher (n = 77: Facebook n = 23, Instagram n = 21, TikTok n = 18, Twitter n = 15) compared to paid advertisements (n = 14) (Table 4). Paid-for advertisement resulted in 45 times more impressions than organic traffic (n = 7,352,777 versus 161,085 impressions). From all impressions achieved on four social media platforms (n = 7,513,952), 97.9% were contributed to paid-for advertisements. While 13,993 unique users were exposed to organic posts on Facebook and Instagram streams, a 172-fold higher number of users was exposed to paid-for advertisement on the same channels (n = 2,411,505). We assumed that active engagement with a post is associated with more gain in knowledge than only being displayed a post [29] and the overall campaign performance showed an active engagement with any posts in 265,095 users with 97.3% attributable to paid ads.

The engagement rate (number of engagements/ number of impressions) did not show a relevant difference between organic and paid traffic (4.4% on organic vs 3.5% on paid traffic). Interestingly, when considering only Facebook and Instagram, organic traffic achieved a high engagement rate of 6.5% on these platforms. Considering only organic traffic on all four platforms, TikTok performed the best in terms of impressions (n = 139,481) compared to Facebook (n = 8,219), Instagram (n = 6,753) and Twitter (n = 6,722). In terms of engagement rates on all platforms with organic traffic, Facebook had the best rate (Facebook: 9.6%; Instagram: 2.8%; Twitter: 5.6%, TikTok 4.1%), though achieving only a small number in absolute numbers (n = 790 engagements).

Cost analysis of organic and paid traffic

In total, we spent 3,474 EUR, reaching 8.6% of Nepal’s total population and engaging over a quarter million of people in Nepal using a social media-based approach.

All posts for organic traffic were free of charge and the creatives by World Stroke Day Campaign material were provided free of charge. TikTok required its own short video format, the costs for each video production were 20 EUR, which adds to a total of 1,130 EUR and a CPM of 7 EUR.

The total pre-defined budget for paid advertisements on Facebook and Instagram was 2,000 EUR with additional cost of a marketing specialists’ working time of 280 EUR for 14 posts (15 minutes time/ post). On average, 0.24 EUR were spent for each 1,000 impressions (cost-per-1,000 impressions, CPM) and 0.01 EUR was spent for each link-click to the informative website (CPC). Dissemination costs of advertisements were constant over time (see Table 5).

Table 5. Key performance indicators of paid advertisement on meta network.

Campaign name Language Channel Link-Clicks1 Reach2 Impression3 CPC4 in EUR Amount spent (EUR)
WSD5 - AV6: Lives; Mobility NP7 FB8, IN9 103,035 690,048 1,412,830 0.01 1,000
WSD—AV: Speech, Memories NP FB, IN 64,256 592,766 968,386 0.00 210
WSD—AV: Speech, Memories NP FB, IN 43,696 346,051 709,627 0.01 257.82
WSD Animated FAST icons NP FB, IN 23,747 726,509 1,404,574 0.01 209.99
Own creative: Signs of stroke EN10 FB, IN 8,173 375,040 647,619 0.01 93.52
Quiz (signs & symptoms) EN FB, IN 3,804 176,192 295,187 0.01 46.11
Quiz (signs & symptoms) EN FB, IN 3,284 63,488 287,536 0.01 49.02
Quiz (signs & symptoms) EN FB, IN 2,811 58,430 116,763 0.01 40
Quiz (signs & symptoms) NP FB, IN 1,520 15,910 21,502 0.00 5.8
Own creative: Facts on stroke EN IN 1,146 173,790 368,892 0.09 104.99
Quiz (signs & symptoms) NP FB, IN 996 66,352 74,629 0.01 10.32
Own creative: Facts on stroke EN IN 613 255,168 675,789 0.18 112.91
Quiz (facts on stroke) EN IN 548 54,800 78,239 0.04 23.38
Own creative: EN IN 361 131,520 291,204 0.11 40.84
project awareness
Total 257.990 2.411.505 7.352.777 0,0085 2204,7

Meta® paid advertisement report. Report period: Jan 1, 2022—Jun 30, 2022.

1 Link click: The number of clicks on links within an ad that users clicked on.

2 Reach: The number of users exposed to a piece of content.

3 Impressions: The number of times a piece of content was displayed to a target audience.

4 CPC: cost per click.

5 WSD: World Stroke Day.

6 AV: animated visuals.

7 NP: Nepali.

8 FB: Facebook®.

9 IN: Instagram®.

10 EN: English.

Discussion

Principal findings

Our cohort study demonstrates that a social media- based campaign with paid advertisement is feasible to reach and provoke reactions from a large proportion of the population in Nepal (reach: n = 2,425,498 users, i.e. 8.6% of the total population, engagement: n = 265,095 users, i.e. 0.9% of Nepal’s total population) on a low budget. In particular, the CPC of 0.01 EUR highlights that paid advertisements on social media may be a cost-effective method for public health awareness campaigns.

Feasibility of social-media based awareness campaigns

Our social media-based campaign on four different platforms (Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter) with additional paid advertisements on Facebook and Instagram exposed 8.6% of the country’s total population to stroke awareness material and achieved an active engagement of 250,000 people in Nepal, which equals 1% of the country’s whole population.

An advantage of social media- based health campaigns is their ability to provide tailored messages to the target audience. The digital items provided by the World Stroke Day (WSD) Campaign were essential in transmitting relevant stroke education to the audience in Nepal as depicted by a high engagement of a quarter million social media users in Nepal (n = 265,095). Engagement rates of 1–2% are in general considered a successful social media strategy [30] and our strategy using locally adapted WSD Campaign material achieved an engagement rate of 3.5%, indicating the strong outreach of our awareness program within the target population in Nepal.

Compared to print or mass media campaigns the time for campaign conception and implementation is short, as time consuming processes such as printing, and dissemination are not necessary [31]. Our paid advertisement campaign required only ten working hours of a marketing specialist to engage 2.5 million people, which is in line with other studies highlighting the benefit of digital approaches compared to traditional dissemination strategies [32].

Our sample size was limited by the a priori defined budget for paid advertisement, but even with this limited budget 18% of all social media users in Nepal were exposed to our campaign. We did not observe a decrease in engagement within the time course which leads to the assumption that we can potentially reach an even larger proportion of the general population if increasing the budget. Furthermore, social media platform analytic tools provide researchers the opportunity to instantly analyze the acceptance of the campaign and to constantly improve the campaign by testing different creatives. Overall, we found that social media is a feasible strategy to disseminate stroke awareness messages to a large audience within a short time-period.

Cost-effectiveness of social media–based stroke awareness campaigns

The vast majority of impressions (97.8%) and engagements (97.3%) are attributable to paid advertisements and we observed that paid-for advertisements enhanced the number of exposed users by the factor 172 on Facebook and Instagram compared to organic traffic only.

Nonetheless, it is even more remarkable that in Nepal, the cost of social media advertising is far below even the cost of advertising using print media.

During the campaign period of six months, we spent 2,204 EUR for paid advertisements to reach 2.5 million people in Nepal which resulted in a CPC of 0.01 EUR and CPM of 0.24 EUR.

In comparison, a newspaper article in a common Nepali newspaper is estimated to reach 20,000 readers and costs 1,000 EUR [33], resulting in a CPM of 50 EUR, which makes social media 200 times more cost-effective than traditional print media in terms of reaching out to the population. Estimated print media costs to expose one user are even five times higher (0.05 EUR) than the costs for paid advertisement on social media to actively engage (not only to expose) one user (0.01 EUR). Moreover, the costs to produce material for organic traffic on TikTok exceeded the cost of paid advertising (CPM 7 EUR vs CPM 0.24 EUR).

Yet, we have to note that CPC and CPM vary enormously between countries and industries (e.g. average Facebook CPC in Japan 1.6US$ vs 0.2 US$ in Indonesia, average Facebook CPC for healthcare is 1.32$) [34]. As our CPC was only 0.01 EUR, we assume that our results might be generalizable for lower middle-income countries, but not to high-income countries. Another reason for the very low CPC in our study might be the high quality of material used, attracting the attention of social media users. We did not investigate if higher engagement rates and lower costs per click could have been achieved due to tailoring the content to specific target (sub-)audiences.

Overall, paid-for advertising on social media may be a promising health education approach especially for lower middle-income countries and requires further assessment in international trials.

Findings in comparison with other analyses

Promising results in terms of high impressions on social media were observed in many public health studies [35, 36], however, stroke awareness campaigns have barely used social media so far. While the WSD Campaign provides comprehensive material for social media use (https://www.world-stroke.org/world-stroke-day-campaign), a recent systematic literature review [37] revealed that none of the thirteen identified stroke education studies has evaluated a social media–based approach.

In comparison with other health education studies using paid advertisement on social media, our study resulted in a high engagement rate of 3.5%. A smoking cessation campaign in Egypt led to 17 million impressions for a cost of 5,000 US$, but gained only 13,832 clicks [38] resulting in a > 35 higher cost per click ratio. We mainly attribute our high engagement rate to the appealing visuals of the WSD campaign as affirmative and sentimental content attracts more attention than fear-based approaches [39]. Costs per impression were lower than in other social-media campaigns for health education (also these were run earlier with overall lower prizes for advertisements). As these campaigns did not analyze temporal trends in advertisement costs we could not conclude if the higher cost-effectiveness of our campaign is a result of the cost optimization of a marketing expert.

Especially taking into account the high costs of mass media campaigns [40] and the high incidence of stroke worldwide, we postulate that social media can be the focus of stroke awareness campaigns as a more cost-effective and measurable approach to reach a larger target population. The impact of such programs on measurable stroke knowledge is unclear, and requires follow-up studies addressing this question.

Strengths and limitations

This is the first study demonstrating the feasibility of social media as a cost-effective measure for population engagement for stroke awareness in a low-and middle-income country such as Nepal. However, several strengths and limitations should be considered in interpreting the results of our analysis.

First, this analysis focuses on quantitative metrics without assessing the campaign’s impact on stroke knowledge. It has been shown elsewhere that being exposed to stroke awareness campaigns can improve knowledge [41, 42], but in this study we did not investigate the association between quantitative metrics and increased stroke knowledge–an important performance indicator [25], which was assessed in a (separately published) case-control study. Furthermore, our study design does not allow analysis on the influence of campaign exposure and assumed increase in stroke awareness on change of behavior in terms of adequate help-seeking behavior. It has previously been shown that increased stroke awareness results in more adequate behavior [42], but this analysis is not provided in our current study.

Second, our analysis indicates the superior cost-effectiveness of our social-media campaign compared to print and mass media. However, our results do not allow conclusions on the value of and audience’s attitude towards the campaign. This issue is going to be addressed by a qualitative survey on perception of social media-based stroke education.

Third, the social media-based approach is inevitably accompanied by a selection bias towards literate and affluent people. As our data of the study population is limited to age, gender and place of residence, our study does not allow further conclusions on the distribution of different strata of society reached. Based on the age distribution of Facebook users in Nepal [21], 70% of the exposed users were under the age of 35, which was in line with our target population of young adults as first responders.

Another minor limitation to be mentioned is the limited trackability of organic traffic and its overlap with the paid advertisement audience. While paid traffic was specified to only people residing in Nepal, approximately 10% of the social media users addressed by organic traffic were outside Nepal, totaling less than 0.3% of all engagements. As the social media environment is fragmented across different platforms, this can result in overestimation of the organically reached population by multiple countings. As less than 2% of the study population was reached organically, the impact on our study results is negligible in terms of the overall result. We used paid advertisement for Facebook and Instagram only, but our study excluded other relevant advertisement channels as YouTube, Google and TikTok as well as paid advertisement on Twitter or TikTok, which impedes a comparison between different channels.

Moreover, our campaign focused on stroke awareness material only, and we cannot assume that the results are equally transferable to other relevant health topics. Generalizability of the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of social media-based campaigns to other LMICs and other health topics requires further investigation.

Furthermore, most of the campaign material was provided for free by World Stroke Organisation. Creating (and testing) own materials would have increased the cost of the campaign and time required its implementation immensely. While we assume the quality of the material had a positive effect on the engagement of users, the user’s experience should be addressed in a qualitative survey.

Despite these limitations, our study demonstrates that a social media-based campaign with paid advertisement has the potential to inform large parts of the population in an LMIC about stroke with limited monetary and personal resources.

Future research

The results of our small study indicate the need for and possible effectiveness of further larger-scale stroke education campaigns in Nepal and other countries. A currently ongoing analysis of the campaigns’ impact on stroke knowledge is expected to highlight the relevance of social media as a health education channel. Future research should further focus on identification of materials with the highest acceptance within the target population and impact on knowledge.

Conclusion

Paid advertisements on social media are a cost-effective approach to expose the broad population to stroke awareness information in Nepal. 2.5 million people were reached with a with a high engagement rate and a low Cost-Per-Click of 0.01 EUR. In comparison, organic social media was found to be time consuming and does not achieve a comparable audience within a short time. Future studies are required which address whether exposure to stroke awareness advertisements leads to a measurable increase in knowledge of the warning signs of strokes and necessary subsequent actions.

Data Availability

The minimal dataset for this study is publicly available on https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Original_social_media_data/22816361. Additional data from the Social Media Business Accounts are available from the University Hospital Heidelberg (contact via neurologie@med.uni-heidelberg.de) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Funding Statement

This study is supported by Hospital Partnerships funding program of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH and received funding by the Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and the Else Kröner-Fresenius foundation (EKFS). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Feigin VL, Stark BA, Johnson CO, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet Neurology 2021; 20: 795–820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Faiz KW, Sundseth A, Thommessen B, et al. Prehospital delay in acute stroke and TIA. Emerg Med J 2013; 30: 669–674. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201543 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, et al. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 2014; 384: 1929–1935. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60584-5 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fladt J, Meier N, Thilemann S, et al. Reasons for Prehospital Delay in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Journal of the American Heart Association 2019; 8: e013101. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhu Y, Zhang X, You S, et al. Factors Associated with Pre-Hospital Delay and Intravenous Thrombolysis in China. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2020; 29: 104897. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104897 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kulkarni GB, Mahajan NP and Aravinda HR. Barriers to Thrombolysis at A Tertiary Care Public Hospital- A Prospective Observational Study from Southern Part of India. Neurol India 2022; 70: 972–977. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.349615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thapa L, Sharma N, Poudel RS, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of stroke among high school students in Nepal. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice 2016; 7: 504–509. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.188635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Silwal S KS, Sah BK. Knowledge on Stroke among Middle Aged Adult in a Community at Ratuwamai, Morang. Tribhuvan University Journal 2019; 33: 31–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nepal G, Yadav JK, Basnet B, et al. Status of prehospital delay and intravenous thrombolysis in the management of acute ischemic stroke in Nepal. BMC neurology 2019; 19: 155. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1378-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pontes-Neto OM, Silva GS, Feitosa MR, et al. Stroke awareness in Brazil: alarming results in a community-based study. Stroke 2008; 39: 292–296. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.493908 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Anugwom E. Health Promotion and Its Challenges to Public Health Delivery System in Africa. In: Anugwom EE, Awofeso, N (ed) Public Health in Developing Countries ‐ Challenges and Opportunities. London: IntechOpen, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hickey A, Mellon L, Williams D, et al. Does stroke health promotion increase awareness of appropriate behavioural response? Impact of the face, arm, speech and time (FAST) campaign on population knowledge of stroke risk factors, warning signs and emergency response. European Stroke Journal 2018; 3: 117–125. doi: 10.1177/2396987317753453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lecouturier J, Rodgers H, Murtagh MJ, et al. Systematic review of mass media interventions designed to improve public recognition of stroke symptoms, emergency response and early treatment. BMC Public Health 2010; 10: 784. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Poushter J, Bishop C and Chwe H. Social Media Use Continues to Rise in Developing Countries but Plateaus Across Developed Ones, https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2018/06/19/social-media-use-continues-to-rise-in-developing-countries-but-plateaus-across-developed-ones/ (2018).
  • 15.Stellefson M, Paige SR, Chaney BH, et al. Evolving Role of Social Media in Health Promotion: Updated Responsibilities for Health Education Specialists. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17 20200212. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Selkie EM, Benson M and Moreno M. Adolescents’ Views Regarding Uses of Social Networking Websites and Text Messaging for Adolescent Sexual Health Education. American Journal of Health Education 2011; 42: 205–212. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2011.10599189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Amano T, Yokota C, Sakamoto Y, et al. Stroke education program of act FAST for junior high school students and their parents. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 2014; 23: 1040–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.08.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Williams O, DeSorbo A, Noble J, et al. Child-Mediated Stroke Communication: findings from Hip Hop Stroke. Stroke 2012; 43: 163–169. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.621029/strokeaha.111.621029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Proios H, Baskini M, Keramydas C, et al. Can We Learn from Our Children About stroke? Effectiveness of a School-Based Educational Programme in Greece. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 2022; 31: 106544. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.NapoleonCat. Facebook users in Nepal, https://napoleoncat.com/stats/facebook-users-in-nepal/2021/01/ (2022, accessed 08 November 2022).
  • 21.Facebook users in Nepal ‐ January 2020, https://napoleoncat.com/stats/facebook-users-in-nepal/2020/01/ (accessed 26 May 2022).
  • 22.Kemp S. Digital 2022: Nepal ‐ datareportal–global digital insights, https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-nepal (2022, accessed 08 November 2022).
  • 23.Kothari RU, Pancioli A, Liu T, et al. Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale: reproducibility and validity. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 33: 373–378. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70299-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Neiger BL, Thackeray R, van Wagenen SA, et al. Use of social media in health promotion: purposes, key performance indicators, and evaluation metrics. Health Promotion Practice 2012; 13: 159–164. doi: 10.1177/1524839911433467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gräve J-F. What KPIs Are Key? Evaluating Performance Metrics for Social Media Influencers. Social Media + Society 2019; 5. doi: 10.1177/2056305119865475 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Network M. Terms of Service, https://www.facebook.com/legal/terms/plain_text_terms (2022, accessed January 25 2023).
  • 27.TikTok. Terms of Service, https://www.tiktok.com/legal/page/row/terms-of-service/en (2021, accessed January 25 2023).
  • 28.Twitter. Terms of Service, https://twitter.com/de/privacy (2022, accessed January 25 2023).
  • 29.Borah P and Xiao X. The Importance of ’Likes’: The Interplay of Message Framing, Source, and Social Endorsement on Credibility Perceptions of Health Information on Facebook. J Health Commun 2018; 23: 399–411. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1455770 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Express A. Your guide to social media engagement rates., https://www.adobe.com/express/learn/blog/what-is-a-good-social-media-engagement-rate#what-is-a-good-social-media-engagement-rate (2022, accessed 08 November 2022).
  • 31.Rutsaert P, Pieniak Z, Regan Á, et al. Social media as a useful tool in food risk and benefit communication? A strategic orientation approach. Food Policy 2014; 46: 84–93. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hundt B and Chen K. Abstract WP377: Stroke Awareness in the Age of Social Media. Stroke 2017; 48: AWP377. doi: 10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.wp377 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yogi B. The Himalayan at 1, http://archive.nepalitimes.com/news.php?id=9841#.Y2qUzS1XZN3 (2002, accessed 08 November 2022).
  • 34.ADCostly. Facebook Advertising Cost by Country/Area [2021 Update], https://adcostly.com/blog/facebook-advertising-cost-by-country-area (2021, accessed 08 November 2022).
  • 35.Baskerville NB, Azagba S, Norman C, et al. Effect of a Digital Social Media Campaign on Young Adult Smoking Cessation. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2015; 18: 351–360. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Latha K, Meena KS, Pravitha MR, et al. Effective use of social media platforms for promotion of mental health awareness. J Educ Health Promot 2020; 9: 124. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_90_20 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tan J, Ramazanu S, Liaw SY, et al. Effectiveness of Public Education Campaigns for Stroke Symptom Recognition and Response in Non-Elderly Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2022; 31: 106207. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106207 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hamill S, Turk T, Murukutla N, et al. I ‘like’ MPOWER: using Facebook, online ads and new media to mobilise tobacco control communities in low-income and middle-income countries. Tobacco Control 2015; 24: 306. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050946 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bail CA. Emotional Feedback and the Viral Spread of Social Media Messages About Autism Spectrum Disorders. American Journal of Public Health 2016; 106: 1173–1180. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rasura M, Baldereschi M, Di Carlo A, et al. Effectiveness of public stroke educational interventions: a review. Eur J Neurol 2014; 21: 11–20. doi: 10.1111/ene.12266 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Giorli E, Schirinzi E, Baldi R, et al. Planning a campaign to fight stroke: an educational pilot project in La Spezia, Italy. Neurological Sciences 2019; 40: 2133–2140. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-03963-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gandolfo C, Alberti F, Del Sette M, et al. Results of an educational campaign on stroke awareness in the 2032 Rotary District in Northern-Western Italy. Neurological Sciences 2020; 41: 411–416. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-04126-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ahmed Nasreldein

16 Mar 2023

PONE-D-23-01201Are digital social media campaigns the key to raise stroke awareness in low-and middle-income countries? A study of feasibility and cost-effectiveness in Nepal.PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Tunkl,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 30 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ahmed Nasreldein, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

"This study is supported by Hospital Partnerships funding program of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH and received funding by the Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and the Else Kröner-Fresenius foundation (EKFS)."

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section:  

"The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript."

Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.", as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now 

 This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

5. We note that Figures 1 and 2 includes an image of a [patient / participant / in the study]. 

As per the PLOS ONE policy (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-human-subjects-research) on papers that include identifying, or potentially identifying, information, the individual(s) or parent(s)/guardian(s) must be informed of the terms of the PLOS open-access (CC-BY) license and provide specific permission for publication of these details under the terms of this license. Please download the Consent Form for Publication in a PLOS Journal (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=8ce6/plos-consent-form-english.pdf). The signed consent form should not be submitted with the manuscript, but should be securely filed in the individual's case notes. Please amend the methods section and ethics statement of the manuscript to explicitly state that the patient/participant has provided consent for publication: “The individual in this manuscript has given written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) to publish these case details”. 

If you are unable to obtain consent from the subject of the photograph, you will need to remove the figure and any other textual identifying information or case descriptions for this individual.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Tunkl, et al report the results of a social media stroke awareness campaign in Nepal. They found that paid advertisements resulted in markedly more views/engagements than did organic traffic, and they found that the cost per 1000 views and cost per click were very low (<<<1 EUR). They conclude that social media campaigns are a feasible, cost-effective approach to stroke awareness campaigns in LMICs with the major limitation being that their study did not address whether the campaign was effective at increasing stroke knowledge or optimizing stroke-related behaviors. In general, this is a well-written manuscript of an important, creative and well-designed study. I have a few suggestions to further strengthen the results:

ABSTRACT

1.) Minor point - in the second sentence of the background, it states that lack of stroke awareness hinders the benefits of stroke treatment. I would suggest that lack of awareness does not impact the magnitude of benefit of the treatment. Rather, it hinders the effective provision of stroke treatment (meaning it reaches less people, not that it's less effective for the patients it reaches).

INTRODUCTION

1.) In the 2nd paragraph, it would be helpful to provide a bit of information about the studies that "allow one to assume" that stroke knowledge is low in Nepal.

2.) The authors note that traditional mass media campaigns are often ineffective at improving health knowledge or behavior. Yet, they state that their hypothesis that a social media campaign would be more cost effective than a classical mass media campaign. I would expect that part of the reason for investigating social media campaigns is that they may also be more effective, but this is not included in the author's hypotheses. The authors also allude to reasons why it seems they think a social media campaign may be more effective (targets younger people more and younger people may be more impacted by health education campaigns, etc.). It would make the Introduction stronger if the authors specifically stated any hypotheses as to why a social media campaign may be effective compared to classical mass media campaigns that have been previously shown to have limited effectiveness.

RESULTS

1.) It would be interesting to note whether there were any trends in increased organic traffic to your social media accounts during or right after the paid advertisements?

DISCUSSION

1.) Page 17, line 319 "saturation of engagement" - please define

2.) Page 19, line 340: Is this information on cost in the results section? I can't find it there. If not, would first introduce this in the Results section such that you are not introducing new data in the Discussion section.

3.) In the limitations section, the authors should address the limitations of their hypothesis that their social media campaign was so effective because of the "high quality" and "visually appealing" content. This may be, but users' experience was not assessed so there is no way to know this for certain. Depending on the structure of the planned qualitative survey, this could also be addressed in that work.

4.) Minor error, page 21, line 408 - in the limitations section, it is written "but we CAN assume that the results are equally transferrable to other relevant health topics." Based on the remainder of the paragraph, I believe the authors meant to say "cannot"

DATA POLICY

Of note, the authors do not have a statement regarding data availability within the manuscript.

Reviewer #2: Its an interesting paper which looked at the feasibility and reach of social media (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok) for stroke awareness campaigns in Nepal including the cost-benefit analysis.

I looked at twitter for the mentioned handle "@nepalstrokeproject" - but there is no such handle. Instead there is "@NepalStroke" handle which is named "Nepal Stroke Project". This account has 83 followers and it follows 139 people/accounts. The accounts earliest post is on 1/2/2023. Initial tweets had less than 10 likes and got first 10 likes in April 2022 and next >10 like post was the photograph of WSC on 28/10/22. I am not able to verify the views of earlier posts but the recent posts have around 200-300 views.

The authors mention that there is no option of knowing "reach" in twitter - but there is an option of knowing "views" (times a tweet was seen on twitter)

At least in twitter- I couldn't see any major campaign slides or videos from the "@NepalStroke" handle.

In the figure, the authors mention paid campaigns in May and June- but I am not able to see any post in May. Usually in twitter, it will show "promoted" for a paid campaign- but I am not able to see along with any posts.

I don't use Facebook or Instagram much- I think the paper must be reviewed by someone who used FB/Insta for academic purpose.

Overall, the concept is interesting and social media is the future of campaign strategies. The authors should clarify the twitter data if they chose to submit revision.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Deanna Saylor, MD, MHS

Reviewer #2: Yes: Venugopalan Y Vishnu

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0291392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291392.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


27 Jun 2023

Reviewer 1:

1. The abstract was modified according to your suggestions (p.2, line 26: "...the lack of public stroke awareness especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Nepal severely hinders the effective provision of stroke care."

2. We appreciate your feedback on the introduction and elaborated the section about prior studies in Nepal (p.4, ll. 56: "In Nepal, recent studies demonstrated that knowledge on stroke in high-school students and in a rural population is insufficient[7, 8] with e.g. 55% of study participants believing in ayurvedic therapy to be effective in stroke care. The lack of awareness regarding stroke treatments and inadequate recognition of stroke symptoms have been identified as main factors contributing to delayed presentation at a tertiary care center[9] and therefore hampering the benefit of treatment.")

3. We thank you for your comment. Accordingly, we modified the introduction and highlighted the assumed benefits of social media-based campaigns (p.4, ll. 72: "In the last decade, social media has emerged as a platform with an enormous outreach with more than five billion people worldwide owning a smartphone[14]. By facilitating information sharing opportunities and community-building, social media has become invaluable in marketing and a promising approach in health education[15]. Especially young adults have expressed their interest in receiving health information via social media platforms[16] and a review found that social media even has the ability to facilitate mass communication, health education and knowledge translation in LMICs.")

4. We completely agree with you, that the association between paid advertisements and engagement to organic posts would be interesting to study. As our study design intended parallel playout of organic and paid-for posts, our data do not allow to answer your questions.

5. We reformulated the sentence to improve understandability: p.18, l. 340: “We did not observe a decrease in engagement within the time course which leads to the assumption that we can potentially reach an even larger proportion of the general population if increasing the budget.”

6. We agree with your comment and added the information in the results section (p. 15, l. 303: "TikTok required its own short video format, the costs for each video production were 20 EUR, which adds to a total of 1,130 EUR and a CPM of 7 EUR.")

7. We put into perspective that the user’s experience yet needs to be assessed (p.22: ll. 440: "While we assume the quality of the material had a positive effect on the engagement of users, the user’s experience should be addressed in a qualitative survey.")

8. Thank you for reading carefully, the mistake was corrected (p. 22, l. 434: "... we cannot assume that the results are equally transferable to other relevant health topics").

REVIEWER 2:

- We corrected the Twitter Handle in the manuscript, which is @NepalStroke (p. 7, l. 145).

- We clarified in the manuscript, that Twitter was used for organic traffic only in contrast to paid-for advertisements on Facebook and Instagram. Further, we highlighted that Twitter was used solely for project-bound information. As correctly stated by the reviewer, Twitter did not reach high numbers of views and engagements, which we attribute to the fact that Twitter was used only for project-specific updates but not for promoting the World Stroke Day Campaign. (p. 7, ll. 148: "While Facebook and Instragram were used to promote the World Stroke Day Campaign, Twitter was used exclusively for promoting project-specific information."; p.9, ll. 193: A predefined action plan combining organic traffic for Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and TikTok and paid-for advertisements on Facebook and Instagram was developed by a marketing expert.").

- We emphasized in the “limitations” section that Twitter was not comparable to Facebook and Instagram in terms of reach/ engagement, as posts were not promoted with paid advertisements (p.22, ll. 431: "We used paid advertisement for Facebook and Instagram only, but our study excluded other relevant advertisement channels as YouTube, Google and TikTok as well as paid advertisement on Twitter or TikTok, which impedes a comparison between different channels.")

- As the reviewer correctly stated Twitter provides the number of “views”, which we mentioned in the paper as “impressions” according to Twitter’s definition of “view”. As Twitter counts the number of times a post is displayed, we can’t conclude that it was displayed to different people, which is the definition of “reach”.

Attachment

Submitted filename: 20230423_Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Ahmed Nasreldein

29 Aug 2023

Are digital social media campaigns the key to raise stroke awareness in low-and middle-income countries? A study of feasibility and cost-effectiveness in Nepal.

PONE-D-23-01201R1

Dear Dr. Tunkl,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ahmed Nasreldein, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All reviewer comments regarding this paper have been addressed adequately by the authors. I have no more comments

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Deanna Saylor

Reviewer #2: Yes: Venugopalan Y Vishnu

**********

Acceptance letter

Ahmed Nasreldein

31 Aug 2023

PONE-D-23-01201R1

Are digital social media campaigns the key to raise stroke awareness in low-and middle-income countries? A study of feasibility and cost-effectiveness in Nepal.

Dear Dr. Tunkl:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ahmed Nasreldein

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 20230423_Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The minimal dataset for this study is publicly available on https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Original_social_media_data/22816361. Additional data from the Social Media Business Accounts are available from the University Hospital Heidelberg (contact via neurologie@med.uni-heidelberg.de) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES