Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2023 Sep 3:2023.08.31.555785. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2023.08.31.555785

Tick hemocytes have pleiotropic roles in microbial infection and arthropod fitness

Agustin Rolandelli 1, Hanna J Laukaitis-Yousey 1, Haikel N Bogale 2,, Nisha Singh 1, Sourabh Samaddar 1, Anya J O’Neal 1,#, Camila R Ferraz 1, Matthew Butnaru 3,4, Enzo Mameli 3,5, Baolong Xia 3, M Tays Mendes 1, L Rainer Butler 1, Liron Marnin 1, Francy E Cabrera Paz 1, Luisa M Valencia 1, Vipin S Rana 6, Ciaran Skerry 1, Utpal Pal 6, Stephanie E Mohr 3, Norbert Perrimon 3,4, David Serre 1,2, Joao HF Pedra 1,*
PMCID: PMC10491215  PMID: 37693411

Abstract

Uncovering the complexity of systems in non-model organisms is critical for understanding arthropod immunology. Prior efforts have mostly focused on Dipteran insects, which only account for a subset of existing arthropod species in nature. Here, we describe immune cells or hemocytes from the clinically relevant tick Ixodes scapularis using bulk and single cell RNA sequencing combined with depletion via clodronate liposomes, RNA interference, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats activation (CRISPRa) and RNA-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We observe molecular alterations in hemocytes upon tick infestation of mammals and infection with either the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi or the rickettsial agent Anaplasma phagocytophilum. We predict distinct hemocyte lineages and reveal clusters exhibiting defined signatures for immunity, metabolism, and proliferation during hematophagy. Furthermore, we perform a mechanistic characterization of two I. scapularis hemocyte markers: hemocytin and astakine. Depletion of phagocytic hemocytes affects hemocytin and astakine levels, which impacts blood feeding and molting behavior of ticks. Hemocytin specifically affects the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathway, whereas astakine alters hemocyte proliferation in I. scapularis. Altogether, we uncover the heterogeneity and pleiotropic roles of hemocytes in ticks and provide a valuable resource for comparative biology in arthropods.

Keywords: Tick-Borne Diseases, Hemocytes, Hematophagy, Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum

Introduction

The evolution of arthropod immune systems is shaped by the environment, longevity, nutrition, microbial exposure, development, and reproduction (13). Yet, our current understanding of immunology is centered around Dipteran insects, which reflects an incomplete depiction of arthropod biological networks existing in nature (410). Divergent signaling modules prevail between Dipterans and other arthropods, highlighting the complex and dynamic features occurring across evolutionarily distant species. One example is the immune deficiency (IMD) pathway, a network analogous to the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) in mammals (11, 12). Some components of the canonical IMD pathway are not observed in arachnids, although this immune pathway remains functional and responsive to microbial infection (48). Another instance is the janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathway, which in flies is elicited by unpaired cytokine-like molecules (13), whereas in ticks host-derived interferon (IFN)-γ facilitates Dome1-mediated activation (9, 10). This biochemical network enhances tick blood meal acquisition and development while inducing the expression of antimicrobial components (9, 10). Thus, investigating the plasticity of immune networks in evolutionarily divergent organisms may reveal discrete aspects of arthropod biology.

Ticks are ancient arthropods that serve as major vectors of human and animal pathogens, including the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi and the rickettsial agent Anaplasma phagocytophilum (1416). Selective pressure caused by longevity (i.e., two to ten years in certain species), exclusive hematophagy in all life stages, long-term dispersal (adaptation to multiple environments) and exposure to an array of microbes, make ticks distinct from other hematophagous arthropods (17, 18). While it is acknowledged that the immune system plays an important role in vector competence, our understanding of the mechanisms by which immune resistance balances microbial infection in ticks remain fragmented (610).

Hemocytes are specialized arthropod immune cells that function in both cellular and humoral responses. These cells circulate through the hemolymph and are in contact with tissues within the arthropod body cavity (19). Historically, tick hemocytes have been categorized according to their cellular morphology and ultrastructural characteristics (20, 21). Although useful, this classification is incomplete because the ontogeny, plasticity, and molecular features of hemocytes during hematophagy and infection remain obscure. Here, we used bulk and single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) coupled with Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) activation, RNA interference (RNAi), RNA-fluorescence in situ hybridization (RNA-FISH), and immune cell depletion through treatment with clodronate liposomes to reveal distinct features of hemocyte clusters in the blacklegged tick. We identify marker genes for each hemocyte cluster, predict lineages, and unveil specific biological signatures related to immunity, proliferation, and metabolism during hematophagy. We further characterize an immune cluster that expresses hemocytin (hmc) and astakine (astk). Manipulation of phagocytic hemocytes and the expression of hmc or astk impacted bacterial acquisition, feeding and molting. Overall, we highlight the exquisite biology of ticks, demonstrate the canonical and non-canonical roles of immune cells in an obligate hematophagous ectoparasite, and provide a critical resource for comparative biology of arthropods.

Results

Blood feeding induces molecular signatures in I. scapularis hemocytes related to immunity, metabolism, and proliferation.

Ticks rely solely on blood as a source of essential metabolites, ingesting ~100 times their body mass per meal (22). During feeding, extensive modifications and tissue rearrangements are necessary to accommodate and digest such large volumes of blood (22). Given their strategic position as circulating cells in the hemolymph, we hypothesized that hemocytes sense and respond to physiological and microbial exposure during tick infestation on mammals. We optimized hemocyte isolation from I. scapularis nymphs, the clinically relevant stage in the blacklegged tick, and identified three common hemocyte morphotypes reported in the literature (Figures 1AB) (20, 21). Prohemocytes, considered the stem cell-like hemocyte population, were the smallest cells, with a round or oval shape of ~5–10 μm. The cytoplasm area was minute (high nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio) and homogeneous, with no apparent protrusions or granules (Figure 1B). Plasmatocytes varied in size (~15–30 μm) and shape (oval, ameboid-like, pyriform), and had cytoplasmic protrusions or pseudopodia-like structures. The cytoplasm was clear and had few dark-blue or violet stained granules or vacuoles. The nucleus was located near the center of the cell (Figure 1B). Granulocytes were ~10–20 μm round or oval shape cells. The position of the nucleus varied, appearing most often near the periphery of the cell. Their cytoplasm was filled with dark-blue or violet stained granules or vacuoles (Figure 1B). We then investigated the impact of blood-feeding on hemocytes originating from I. scapularis nymphs. We observed an increased quantity of total hemocytes upon mammalian feeding (Figure 1C). The percentage of plasmatocytes increased in engorged ticks, whereas we noticed a decline in the proportion of prohemocytes and granulocytes from unfed compared to repleted nymphs (Figure 1C). Altogether, we demonstrate the impact of hematophagy on the distribution of tick hemocyte morphotypes.

Figure 1: Blood-feeding induces alterations in I. scapularis hemocytes.

Figure 1:

(A) Schematic representation of the hemocyte collection procedure. (B) Three main morphological subtypes of I. scapularis hemocytes evaluated by bright field microscopy after staining. (C) Total number of hemocytes and morphotype percentages from unfed (ivory), partially fed (light blue) or engorged (dark blue) nymphs (n=13–40). (D) Functional enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) present in hemocytes from engorged ticks (blue; Up) compared to unfed ticks (red; Down). Fold enrichment of significant terms are depicted. Number of DEGs per category are shown in parentheses. (E) The expression of immune, metabolic and proliferative genes in hemocytes from unfed (ivory) and engorged (dark blue) ticks was evaluated by RT-qPCR (n=6–12; samples represent 40–80 pooled ticks). Results are represented as mean ± SD. At least three biological replicates were performed. Statistical significance was evaluated by (C) ANOVA or (E) an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. **p<0.01; ****p<0.0001. crq = croquemort; 4cl1 = 4-coumarate-CoA ligase 1; ahcy = adenosylhomocysteinase B; g6pc = glucose-6-phosphatase 2; impdh = inosine-5’-monophosphate dehydrogenase 1.

Next, we aimed to examine global transcriptional changes induced by hematophagy through bulk RNA-seq. We collected hemocytes from unfed and engorged nymphs and observed drastic changes in gene expression with a total of 6,134 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (Figure 1D; Supplementary Dataset 1). Hemocytes collected from unfed I. scapularis nymphs were enriched for housekeeping genes, such as mRNA transcription (e.g., RNA splicing, mRNA processing, histone modification), protein synthesis (e.g., peptide biosynthetic process, cellular protein modification process, ribosome biogenesis) and membrane receptor signaling pathways (e.g., transmembrane signaling receptor activity, G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, protein kinase activity) (Figure 1D; Supplementary Figure 1; Supplementary Dataset 2). Conversely, hemocytes originating from engorged ticks were enriched in gene signatures related to immunity, metabolic pathways, cell proliferation/growth, and arthropod molting/development (Figure 1D; Supplementary Figure 2; Supplementary Dataset 2). Key genes upregulated during feeding in hemocytes were independently validated through the detection of croquemort (crq), 4-coumarate-CoA ligase 1 (4cl1), adenosylhomocysteinase B (ahcy), glucose-6-phosphatase 2 (g6pc), and inosine-5’-monophosphate dehydrogenase 1 (impdh) via qRT-PCR (Figure 1E). Overall, the data indicate that I. scapularis hemocytes express a dynamic genetic program during hematophagy.

Defining I. scapularis hemocyte clusters by scRNA-seq.

To uncover whether the transcriptional changes observed through bulk RNA-seq is accompanied with heterogeneity among hemocytes, we performed scRNA-seq. We collected hemocytes from (1) unfed nymphs, (2) engorged nymphs fed on uninfected mice, and engorged nymphs fed on mice infected with either (3) the rickettsial pathogen A. phagocytophilum or (4) the Lyme disease spirochete B. burgdorferi. After stringent quality controls, we profiled a total of 20,432 cells (unfed = 4,630; engorged uninfected = 6,000; engorged A. phagocytophilum-infected = 6,287; engorged B. burgdorferi-infected = 3,515), with a median of 744 unique molecular identifiers (UMIs), 261 genes and 6.2% of mitochondrial transcripts per cell across conditions (Supplementary Figure 3). Consistent with the bulk RNA-seq results, the principal component analysis (PCA) identified distinct distributions between unfed and fed conditions, reinforcing the notion that significant cellular and/or transcriptional changes occur following a blood meal (Supplementary Figure 4).

Following unsupervised clustering, we identified seven clusters in unfed ticks and thirteen clusters in engorged nymphs (Supplementary Figure 5). Based on similarities in marker gene profiles, two clusters in the unfed and two clusters in the engorged datasets were merged (Supplementary Datasets 34). Thus, six and twelve clusters remained, respectively, with each cluster expressing a unique set of cell type-defining genes (Figure 2AC, Supplementary Datasets 56). One cluster in each dataset showed high expression of gut-associated genes cathepsinB, cathepsinD and boophilinH2 (Figure 2AC, Supplementary Dataset 56) and two additional clusters in the engorged dataset had gene expression profiles indicative of cuticle and salivary glands tissues (Figure 2AC, Supplementary Dataset 6). Therefore, these clusters were excluded from subsequent analysis. We assigned putative functions to the top 50 DEGs per cluster using information for tick genes in VectorBase, the sequence homology to D. melanogaster in FlyBase and the presence of functionally annotated protein domains in InterPro (Figure 2CE, Supplementary Dataset 56). We also performed functional enrichment analysis based on gene ontology (GO) using the entire list of DEGs for each cluster (Supplementary Dataset 78). Altogether, we defined five hemocyte clusters from unfed and nine clusters in engorged I. scapularis nymphs.

Figure 2: scRNA-seq uncovers hemocytes with immune, proliferative and metabolic signatures in I. scapularis.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) plot clustering of cells collected from the hemolymph of (A) unfed (4,630 cells) and (B) engorged (15,802 cells) I. scapularis nymphs. The engorged t-SNE contains cells from uninfected (6,000 cells), A. phagocytophilum-infected (6,287 cells) and B. burgdorferi-infected (3,515 cells) I. scapularis. (C) Dot plot of the top 5 marker genes present in clusters from engorged ticks. Average gene expression is demarked by intensity of color. Percent of gene expression within individual clusters is represented by the dot diameter. (D) Heatmap depicting expression of the top 20 marker genes present in hemocyte subtypes from engorged ticks. Representative genes per cluster are highlighted. (E) The top 50 marker genes from each hemocyte cluster were manually annotated using publicly available databases, such as VectorBase, FlyBase, and UniProt. The percentage of predicted functional categories, such as ncRNA/pseudogenes (yellow), protein synthesis (black), secreted/extracellular matrix (blue), unknown (orange), actin/cell rearrangement (brown), detoxification (white), cell proliferation/differentiation (grey), metabolism (green), hormone-related (purple), and immunity (red) are shown. (F) Pseudotime analysis defined six hemocyte lineages (arrows) in engorged ticks.

scRNA-seq uncovers hemocyte adaptations to hematophagy in I. scapularis.

The molecular features and differentiation process of tick hemocytes is currently unknown. Thus, based on GO enrichment and marker gene profiles, we were able to characterize clusters of hemocytes shared by both unfed and engorged ticks (Supplementary Figure 67, Supplementary Dataset 56). The Immune 1 cluster showed high expression of genes related to phagocytosis or cytoskeleton organization; coagulation and agglutination functions, such as lectins (hemocytin, techylectin-5A), chitin-binding and clotting proteins; and secreted proteins related to immunity, such as astakine, microplusin, mucins and cystatin domain peptides (Figure 2CE, Supplementary Dataset 56). The Immune 2 cluster displayed genes encoding secreted proteins involved in immunity, such as antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and clotting related peptides (Figure 2CE, Supplementary Dataset 56). The Proliferative 1 cluster was enriched with mitochondrial genes, characteristic of stem cells in ancient arthropods, such as crayfish (23). This cell cluster also had high expression of genes related to actin polymerization, cell proliferation and differentiation (Figure 2CE, Supplementary Dataset 56). The Proliferative 2 cluster displayed a high percentage of transcription factors, RNA binding proteins and genes related to actin dynamics. Marker genes for this cluster included several genes involved in hormone-related responses, suggesting they may be responsive to ecdysteroids synthesized after a blood meal (Figure 2CE, Supplementary Dataset 56). Lastly, both datasets had a Transitional cluster indicative of intermediate subtypes (Figure 2CE, Supplementary Dataset 56).

Four hemocyte clusters were only observed in engorged I. scapularis ticks. The Immune 3 cluster displayed an enrichment in secreted proteins and genes related to immune functions. This cluster was enriched for chitinases, matrix and zinc metalloproteinases, peptidases and actin binding proteins, which have roles related to wound healing or tissue rearrangement. Several glycine-rich proteins (GRPs), commonly associated with antimicrobial properties or structural proteins, were also present (Figure 2CE, Supplementary Dataset 56). The Immune 4 cluster showed an overrepresentation of genes related to protein degradation, immune function and cell proliferation (Figure 2CE, Supplementary Dataset 56). Thus, we posit that the Immune 4 cluster represents an intermediate state between the Immune 2 and the Proliferative 2 clusters. Two clusters displayed an enrichment for genes related to metabolic functions. The Metabolism 1 cluster represented genes involved in sulfonation of proteins, lipids and glycosaminoglycans, transmembrane solute transporter, nucleotide and protein metabolism (Figure 2CE, Supplementary Dataset 56). The Metabolism 2 cluster displayed genes related to detoxification, histamine binding, lipid metabolism, methionine metabolism and synthesis of juvenile hormone (Figure 2CE, Supplementary Dataset 56).

Based on these findings, we predicted hemocyte ontogeny using pseudotime analysis (Figure 2F). We found six trajectories considering the cluster Proliferative 1 as a stem cell-like subpopulation. Lineage 1 and 2 ended with the Immune 2 and Proliferative 2 clusters, respectively, with the Immune 4 cluster serving as an intermediate state. Lineages 3 and 4 gave rise to the Immune 3 and Immune 1 clusters, respectively. Finally, two lineage trajectories ended with the metabolic clusters, Metabolism 1 and Metabolism 2. Overall, our findings suggest the presence of an oligopotent subpopulation that differentiates into more specialized subtypes involved in immune and metabolic functions, a process evoked by hematophagy.

Bacterial infection of I. scapularis ticks alters the molecular profile of hemocytes.

The impact of bacterial infection on subtypes of tick hemocytes remains elusive. Thus, we collected hemocytes from I. scapularis nymphs fed on uninfected, A. phagocytophilum- or B. burgdorferi-infected mice and determined morphotype percentages. During A. phagocytophilum infection, a relative decrease in prohemocytes and increase in plasmatocytes was noted (Figure 3A). Only a slight decrease in the proportion of prohemocytes was observed during B. burgdorferi infection of ticks (Figure 3A). No difference in total hemocyte numbers was observed across infection conditions (Supplementary Figure 8). However, partitioning the engorged scRNA-seq datasets by treatments revealed a reduction in the Transitional cluster with an expansion in the Metabolism 1 cluster during B. burgdorferi infection (Figure 3BC). We next analyzed transcriptional changes at the cellular level in engorged uninfected nymphs and compared to engorged ticks infected with the rickettsial agent A. phagocytophilum or the Lyme disease spirochete B. burgdorferi. Hemocyte clusters were grouped according to three molecular programs: “Immune” (Immune 1–4), “Proliferative” (Proliferative 1–2 and Transitional) and “Metabolism” (Metabolism 1–2). We found 13 DEGs within Immune clusters, 322 DEGs among Proliferative clusters, and 109 DEGs between Metabolism clusters during A. phagocytophilum or B. burgdorferi infection (Figure 3D, Supplementary Dataset 9). Moreover, 42% (5 out of 12) of genes differentially expressed across all subtypes were marker genes of the Immune 1 cluster (Figure 3D). Collectively, both A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi affect the molecular signatures of hemocytes in fed I. scapularis nymphs.

Figure 3: Bacterial infection alters hemocyte subtypes and their molecular expression.

Figure 3:

(A) Hemocyte morphotypes in I. scapularis nymphs fed on A. phagocytophilum- (Ap, pink) or B. burgdorferi- (Bb, green) infected mice compared to uninfected [(−), dark blue] (n=10–16). Results are represented as mean ± SD. At least two biological replicates were performed. Statistical significance was evaluated by an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ****p<0.0001. ns= not significant. (B) t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) plot clustering of cells collected from the hemolymph of uninfected (6,000 cells), A. phagocytophilum- (6,287 cells) or B. burgdorferi-infected (3,515 cells) I. scapularis nymphs. (C) Percent of hemocyte clusters present in each experimental condition. (D) Venn diagram (left) depicting the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) during infection between clusters grouped by putative function (immune, proliferative or metabolic). Heatmap (right) representing the change in expression patterns of DEGs during infection shared between all 3 cluster groups. DEGs were determined using pairwise comparisons against uninfected. # = Immune 1 marker gene. (−) = Uninfected. Anaplasma = A. phagocytophilum. Borrelia = B. burgdorferi.

Hemocytin and astakine contribute to A. phagocytophilum infection in I. scapularis.

The findings described thus far suggested that the Immune 1 hemocyte cluster was an important subpopulation of cells affected by bacterial infection of ticks (Figure 3D). Therefore, we next focused on two marker genes from the Immune 1 hemocyte cluster: hemocytin and astakine (Figure 4A, Supplementary Dataset 56). Hemocytin is homologous to hemolectin in D. melanogaster and von Willebrand factors of mammals (2426). Hemocytin encodes for a large multidomain adhesive protein involved in clotting, microbial agglutination and hemocyte aggregation (2426). Conversely, astakine is a cytokine-like molecule present in chelicerates and crustaceans and is homologous to vertebrate prokineticins (2730). Astakine also induces hemocyte proliferation and differentiation of immune cells (2730). Hemocytin and astakine were broadly expressed in the Immune 1 cluster of I. scapularis hemocytes (Figure 4A). We confirmed the expression of hemocytin and astakine in fixed hemocytes collected from unfed ticks through RNA-FISH (Figure 4B). Like the scRNA-seq profile, a higher percentage of hemocytes exhibited dual expression of both markers, whereas a few cells expressed only one gene. Furthermore, we noted an upregulation of hemocytin and astakine in hemocytes collected from engorged ticks, which was also observed for other markers of the Immune 1 cluster by bulk RNA-seq (Figure 4C, Supplementary Dataset 10). These findings suggest that blood feeding expands this hemocyte subtype and/or upregulates the expression of its marker genes in I. scapularis ticks.

Figure 4: Hemocytin (hmc) and astakine (astk) affect A. phagocytophilum infection.

Figure 4:

(A) Expression of hmc (left) and astk (right) on t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) plots of hemocytes collected from engorged nymphs, with their highest expression denoted in the Immune 1 cluster (outlined). (B) RNA FISH of I. scapularis hemocytes probed for hmc (green), astk (red), and nuclei (DAPI). (C) Expression of hmc (left) and astk (right) in hemocytes from unfed (ivory) or engorged (dark blue) ticks were evaluated by RT-qPCR (n=6–9; samples represent 40–80 pooled ticks). (D) hmc (left) silencing efficiency and A. phagocytophilum burden (right) in IDE12 cells. Cells were transfected with hmc siRNA (si-hmc) or scrambled RNA (sc-hmc) for seven days prior to A. phagocytophilum infection (n=17–18). (E) hmc silencing efficiency (left) and bacterial acquisition (right) in ticks microinjected with si-hmc or sc-hmc fed on A. phagocytophilum-infected mice (n=10–11). (F) astk silencing efficiency (left) and A. phagocytophilum burden (right) in ISE6 cells. Cells were transfected with astk siRNA (si-astk) or scrambled RNA (sc-astk) for seven days prior to A. phagocytophilum infection (n=10–11). (G) astk silencing efficiency (left) and bacterial acquisition (right) in ticks microinjected with si-astk or sc-astk fed on A. phagocytophilum-infected mice (n=14–18). Bacterial burden was quantified by A. phagocytophilum 16srRNA (Ap16S) expression. Results are represented as mean ± SD. At least two biological replicates were performed. Statistical significance was evaluated by an (C-D, F-G) unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction or (E) Mann–Whitney U test. *p<0.05; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001.

Bulk RNA-seq of hemocytes originating from the tick Amblyomma maculatum showed differential expression of hemocytin and astakine during infection with the intracellular bacterium Rickettsia parkeri (31). Our scRNA-seq revealed downregulation of hemocytin and astakine expression during A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi infection (Figure 3D, Supplementary Dataset 9). We continued investigating the role of hemocytin and astakine during A. phagocytophilum infection of I. scapularis. We utilized small-interfering RNA (siRNA) to knockdown gene expression in tick cells and I. scapularis nymphs, as genome editing through CRISPR has only been introduced for morphological assessment in ticks (32). Accordingly, tick cells and I. scapularis nymphs were treated with siRNAs targeting hemocytin or astakine before infection with A. phagocytophilum. While we observed a significant increase in bacterial load in hemocytin-silenced treatments (Figure 4DE), a decrease in infection was measured after astakine silencing (Figure 4FG). Importantly, no differences in attachment were observed between conditions (Supplementary Figure 9). Overall, we observed contrasting effects of hemocytin or astakine on A. phagocytophilum infection, highlighting the complexity of the tick immune system.

Hemocytin affects the JNK pathway of I. scapularis.

Arachnids constitutively express AMPs in hemocytes (7, 33, 34). However, how immune signaling cascades are regulated in these species, including ticks, remains obscure. Given that we detected higher A. phagocytophilum load when we silenced hemocytin in ticks (Figure 4DE), we asked whether hemocytin affects immune signaling pathways in I. scapularis. We focused on the IMD and the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway, as previous reports indicated the involvement of these molecular networks during bacterial exposure (6, 7).

After transfection with siRNA targeting hemocytin, we found a decrease in JNK phosphorylation in hemocytin-silenced tick cells, without alteration in Relish cleavage (Figure 5AB). To complement our findings, we overexpressed hemocytin in tick cells through CRISPR activation (CRISPRa). CRISPRa has been widely used to enhance the expression of an endogenous locus, employing a catalytically inactive Cas9 (dCas9) fused with transcription activators and single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) that direct the modified enzyme to the promoter region of a gene of interest (35). However, so far none of the CRISPRa effectors has been tested in tick cell lines and no endogenous promoter has been identified for genetic expression of sgRNAs. We optimized reagents and developed a protocol to up-regulate hemocytin in ISE6 cells using two rounds of nucleofection with different expression plasmids: one expressing dCas9-VPR paired with neomycin resistance under the control of the CMV promoter and the second expressing either a sgRNA specific to the promoter region of hemocytin (hmc-sgRNA) or a scrambled sgRNA (sc-sgRNA) driven by an endogenous RNA polymerase III promoter (Figure 5C). Tick ISE6 cells were used as a platform for CRISPRa given the lower expression of hemocytin compared to IDE12 cells (Supplementary Figure 10). Strikingly, we detected a 277% increase in the expression of hemocytin in dCas9+ cells transfected with the hmc-sgRNA compared to dCas9+ cells transfected with the sc-sgRNA (Figure 5D). Importantly, we also noticed elevated levels of jun (the transcription factor for the JNK pathway) and jnk expression in the hmc-sgRNA treatment (Figure 5D).

Figure 5: Hemocytin (hmc) positively impacts the JNK pathway in I. scapularis.

Figure 5:

(A) Cells were transfected with hmc siRNA (si-hmc) or scrambled RNA (sc-hmc) (n=11–12). hmc silencing efficiency in IDE12 cells. (B) Representative western blot (left) of N-Rel and p-JNK during treatment with sc-hmc (lane 1) or si-hmc (lane 2). N-Rel and p-JNK protein expression was quantified (right) in si-hmc (blue) or sc-hmc (grey) IDE12 cells. For data normalization, values were divided by the scrambled control value. N-Rel values are normalized to Actin and p-JNK values are normalized to JNK. Western blot images show one representative experiment out of four. (C) Schematic of CRISPRa overexpression of hmc in ISE6 cells. (D) Expression of hmc (left) jnk (middle) and jun (right) in dCas9+ISE6 cells transfected with the hmc-sgRNA (blue) compared with the scrambled-sgRNA (grey) evaluated by RT-qPCR (n=9–10). (E) hmc (left), relish (middle) and jun (right) expression in ticks microinjected with hmc siRNA (si-hmc; blue) or scrambled RNA (sc-hmc; grey) fed on uninfected mice (n=17–19). Results are represented as mean ± SD. At least two biological replicates were performed. Statistical significance was evaluated by an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. N-Rel = cleaved Relish; p-JNK = phosphorylated JNK; JNK = c-Jun N-terminal kinase.

To corroborate our results in vivo, we microinjected unfed ticks with a scrambled control or siRNA targeting hemocytin and allowed them to feed on naïve mice. Upon repletion, we measured the expression of jun and relish. Consistently, we found that reduction in hemocytin expression led to a decrease in jun levels in ticks, without affecting relish expression (Figure 5E). Notably, the alteration in the JNK signaling pathway by hemocytin in ticks was unrelated to hemocyte proliferation, differentiation or phagocytosis (Supplementary Figures 1112). Overall, we uncovered a role for hemocytin in the activation of the JNK pathway in I. scapularis.

Astakine induces hemocyte proliferation and differentiation in I. scapularis.

We found that hematophagy induces hemocyte proliferation and differentiation (Figure 1C) while upregulating astakine expression (Figure 4C). Thus, we investigated whether astakine was directly implicated in the proliferation or differentiation of I. scapularis hemocytes. We microinjected increasing amounts of recombinant astakine (rAstk) in unfed nymphs and observed a dose-dependent increase in the total number of hemocytes (Figure 6A). Specifically, we measured a decrease in the percentage of prohemocytes and an increase in plasmatocytes (Figure 6B). These findings were in accordance with alterations observed during normal blood-feeding (Figure 1C). Interestingly, we also detected an increase in tick IDE12 cell numbers in vitro following treatment with rAstk, supporting a role of astakine in inducing cell proliferation in hemocyte-like cells (Supplementary Figure 13). To support these results, we then silenced astakine by microinjecting unfed nymphs with siRNA before feeding on uninfected mice. We recovered 41% less hemocytes and observed an increase in the percentage of prohemocytes with a decrease in plasmatocytes from engorged ticks when astakine was silenced (Figure 6CE). Collectively, we determined that astakine acts on hematopoietic processes in the ectoparasite I. scapularis.

Figure 6: Astakine (astk) induces hemocyte proliferation and differentiation in I. scapularis.

Figure 6:

(A) Total number of hemocytes collected from unfed I. scapularis nymphs microinjected with corresponding amounts of rAstk (orange) or bovine serum albumin (BSA; grey) as a control (n=14–24). (B) Percentage of hemocyte morphotypes present in unfed I. scapularis nymphs microinjected with 5ng rAstk (orange) compared to BSA controls (grey) (n=10). (C) astk silencing efficiency, (D) total number of hemocytes and (E) percentage of hemocyte morphotypes in engorged ticks previously microinjected with astk siRNA (si-astk; blue) or scrambled RNA (sc-astk; grey) and fed on uninfected mice (n=8–20). Results represent mean ± SD. At least two biological replicates were performed. Statistical significance was evaluated by (A) one-way ANOVA or (B-E) an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. rAstk=recombinant astakine.

Manipulation of hemocyte subtypes or marker genes affects tick physiology.

The non-canonical functions of hemocytes in arthropods are underappreciated. We observed an increased expression of genes and expansion of hemocyte subtypes involved in metabolism, cell proliferation and development following a blood meal (Figures 12), suggesting participation of these immune cells in the feeding or molting process. To investigate this observation, we manipulated hemocyte numbers in I. scapularis using clodronate liposomes (CLD), which have been used to deplete phagocytic hemocytes in flies, mosquitoes and, more recently, ticks (31, 36, 37). We found that the CLD treatment reduced the total number of hemocytes in nymphs (Figure 7A). We detected an increase in the proportion of granulocytes together with a decrease in the percentages of prohemocytes and plasmatocytes compared to ticks treated with empty liposomes (Figure 7B). These results indicated that CLD affects phagocytic hemocytes in I. scapularis.

Figure 7: Manipulation of hemocyte subtypes and their marker genes affects tick fitness.

Figure 7:

(A-D) Ticks were microinjected with clodronate (blue) or empty liposomes as a control (grey) and allowed to feed on uninfected mice. (A) Total number of hemocytes (n=9) and (B) morphotype percentages were determined in the hemolymph (n=8–9). (C) Weight of engorged nymphs (n=25–34) and (D) expression of hemocytin (hmc) and astakine (astk) in individual ticks was measured (n=18–20). (E) Weight of engorged nymphs post-microinjection with hmc siRNA (si-hmc; blue) or scrambled RNA (sc-hmc; grey) fed on uninfected mice (n=20–23). (F) Weight of engorged nymphs microinjected with astk siRNA (si-astk; blue) or scrambled RNA (sc-astk; grey) fed on uninfected mice (n=21–29). (G) Percentage of nymphs that molted to adults after treated with si-hmc or sc-hmc and (H) si-astk or sc-astk. Results are represented as (A-F) mean ± SD or as (G-H) a percentage of ticks that molted from the total recovered after feeding. At least two biological replicates were performed. Statistical significance was evaluated by (A-B, D) an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction, (C, E, F) Mann–Whitney U test or (G-H) by a Fisher exact test. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001.

To determine the contribution of tick hemocytes to the feeding process, we then used CLD to manipulate immune cell populations. Although no differences in attachment were observed (Supplementary Figure 14), engorged ticks treated with CLD weighed significantly less after feeding, suggesting that phagocytic hemocytes are vital for proper tick hematophagy (Figure 7C). Notably, expression of hemocytin and astakine was also decreased after CLD treatment, implying that the Immune 1 cluster is likely phagocytic (Figure 7D). Thus, we postulated that altering the expression of Immune 1 marker genes should impact tick hematophagy. Accordingly, we observed a significant decrease in weight in ticks silenced for hemocytin or astakine fed on either uninfected or A. phagocytophilum-infected mice, without differences in tick attachment (Figure 7EF; Supplementary Figure 15).

Given the close relationship between blood feeding and ecdysis in ticks, we next posited that hemocytin and/or astakine might be involved in molting of I. scapularis nymphs. To test this hypothesis, we microinjected nymphs with scRNA or siRNA targeting hemocytin or astakine and allowed them to engorge on naïve mice, and subsequently molt into adults. Molting success was significantly lower in both gene-silenced groups as compared to scrambled controls (Figure 7G). Overall, the data indicate that tick hemocyte subtypes and associated marker genes pleiotropically impact tick immunity, feeding and molting.

Discussion

The immune response against microbial infection has been extensively studied in Dipteran insects, but these species do not fully account for the variation in fundamental processes that exists in arthropods (410, 18). In this study, we expand on the previous morphological classification of tick hemocytes. We characterized hemocytes at single-cell resolution in combination with orthogonal approaches to uncover hemocyte subtypes and molecular markers in I. scapularis. The data revealed immune and metabolic alterations of tick hemocytes in response to blood feeding and microbial infection. In contrast to mosquitoes (3840), for I. scapularis ticks, we noticed the emergence of new hemocyte clusters and distinct biological signatures after hematophagy.

Hemocytes with immune-related roles exhibited overrepresentation of genes involved in peptide secretion, agglutination and clotting, extracellular matrix remodeling and protein degradation. Thus, it is conceivable that these clusters not only participate in antimicrobial responses, but also aid in the extensive internal remodeling of tissues needed during blood meal acquisition (22). We also uncovered hemocytes specialized towards cellular proliferation. These hemocytes expressed genes involved in ecdysteroid biosynthesis, which is essential for regulating molting and development (7, 41). Metabolic hemocytes were enriched in solute transport, lipid and protein metabolism, histamine binding and detoxification genes. These molecular features suggested an involvement in the feeding process by metabolizing nutrients and xenobiotics present in the blood meal.

Ticks have co-evolved a non-lethal relationship with A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi. Neither microbe typically results in morbidity or mortality in I. scapularis ticks (2, 3). Our work presents an opportunity for comparative biology in arthropods as to why tick infection with A. phagocytophilum or B. burgdorferi does not induce expansion of new hemocyte subtypes. Avoidance of strong cellular responses highlights the discrete balance between immunity and survival that has been evolutionarily conserved among hematophagous arthropods.

We established molecular programs in hemocytes associated with bacterial infection of I. scapularis. We mechanistically characterized two marker genes: hemocytin and astakine. Drosophila mutants for hemolectin, the ortholog of hemocytin in flies, display only mild phenotypic defects (24, 25). In contrast, silencing of hemocytin in ticks led to an elevated A. phagocytophilum infection during hematophagy independent of phagocytosis. Additionally, we uncovered that hemocytin positively affects the tick JNK pathway. Thus, we posit that hemocytin balances tick homeostatic processes during microbial infection and physiological alterations. Similar to what has been observed in crustaceans (27), we uncovered a function for astakine in hematopoiesis of ticks. Prior evidence suggested that blocking phagocytosis in hemocytes reduces A. phagocytophilum dissemination to other tick tissues (42). We found that silencing astakine resulted in a decreased A. phagocytophilum load in I. scapularis, which correlated with a diminished number of phagocytic hemocytes. Future studies determining the cellular source, receptors and signaling pathways of astakine will reveal mechanisms driving immune proliferation and differentiation in ticks.

Hemocytes are important for organogenesis and development, clearing of apoptotic cells and tissue communication (43, 44). We showed that alterations in hemocyte subtypes and astakine and hemocytin levels affected fitness in I. scapularis. Given the transcriptional profiles induced by feeding and the circulatory nature of hemocytes, we hypothesize that these cells are involved in the internal reorganization of tissues and organs needed during hematophagy. In contrast to astakine knockdown or the CLD treatment, hemocytin knockdown disrupted normal tick feeding without altering hemocyte numbers or their phagocytic capacity. As silencing hemocytin alters the JNK signaling network, we posit that the JNK pathway in ticks is implicated in organismal growth. We observed defects in tick molting when hemocyte subtypes and astakine and hemocytin levels were altered. As opposed to insects, Acari rely solely on the synthesis of ecdysteroids derived from cholesterol for molting (7, 41). Our results suggest the involvement of hemocytes in ecdysteroid synthesis and transport as homologs of most genes related to lipid metabolism were altered after a blood meal. Studying strict hematophagy in ticks enables the discovery of non-canonical roles of immune cells shaped by adaptations to prolonged feeding.

In summary, we leveraged the power of systems biology in combination with reductionist approaches to shed light on the complexity and dynamic attributes of biological processes associated with immune cells of an obligate hematophagous ectoparasite. Our findings uncovered canonical and non-canonical roles of tick hemocytes, which might have evolved as a consequence of evolutionary associations of I. scapularis with its vertebrate hosts and microbes they interact. In the future, small- and large-scale approaches described in this study could be adapted to serve as a foundation to construct an integrated atlas of the medically relevant tick I. scapularis.

Materials and Methods

Reagents and resources

All primers, reagents, resources, and software used in this study, together with their manufacturers information and catalog numbers are listed in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.

Cell lines

The I. scapularis IDE12 and ISE6 cell lines were obtained from Dr. Ulrike Munderloh at University of Minnesota. Cells were cultured in L15C300 medium supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma), 10% tryptose phosphate broth (TPB, Difco), 0.1% bovine cholesterol lipoprotein concentrate (LPPC, MP Biomedicals) at 34°C in a non-CO2 incubator. ISE6 cells were grown to confluency in capped T25 flasks (Greiner bio-one) and either seeded at 3×106 cells/well in 6-well plates (Millipore Sigma) or 3×105 cells/well in 24-well plates (Corning). IDE12 cells were also grown to confluency in T25 flasks and either seeded at 1×106 cells/well in 6-well plates (Millipore Sigma) or 3×105 cells/well in 24-well plates (Corning). The human leukemia cell line, HL-60, was obtained from ATCC and maintained in RPMI-1640 medium with L-Glutamine (Quality Biological) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gemini Bio-Products) and 1% GlutaMax (Gibco), in vented T25 flasks (CytoOne) at 37°C and 5% CO2. All cell cultures were confirmed to be Mycoplasma-free (Southern Biotech).

Bacteria, ticks, and mice.

A. phagocytophilum strain HZ was grown as previously described in HL-60 cells at 37°C, using RPMI medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% Glutamax (45). Bacterial numbers were calculated using the following formula: number of infected HL-60 cells × 5 morulae/cell × 19 bacteria/morulae × 0.5 recovery rate (46). To determine the percentage of infection, cells were spun onto microscope slides using a Epredia Cytospin 4 Cytocentrifuge (Thermo Scientific), stained using the Richard-Allan Scientific three-step staining (Thermo Scientific) and visualized by light microscopy using a Primo Star HAL/LED Microscope (Carl Zeiss). For in vitro experiments, bacteria were purified in L15C300 media by passing infected cells through a 27-gauge bent needle and centrifugation, as previously described (45). Isolated bacteria were inoculated onto tick cells at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 50 for 48 hours. For in vivo experiments, a total of 1×107 A. phagocytophilum-infected cells/mL was resuspended in 100 μL of 1X phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and intraperitonially injected into mice. Infection progressed for 6 days prior to tick placement.

B. burgdorferi B31 clone MSK5 (passage 3–5) was cultured in Barbour-Stoenner Kelly (BSK)-II medium supplemented with 6% normal rabbit serum (Pel-Freez) at 37°C. Before mouse infection, PCR plasmid profiling was performed as described elsewhere (47). To determine infectious inoculum, spirochetes were enumerated under a 40X objective lens using a dark-field microscope (Carl Zeiss Primo Star Microscope) by multiplying the number of bacteria detected per field × dilution factor × 106 (45, 47). For intradermal inoculation, spirochetes were washed, resuspended in 50% normal rabbit serum at a concentration of 1×106 B. burgdorferi/mL and anesthetized C3H/HeJ mice were injected with 100 μL of inoculum (1×105 total B. burgdorferi). Infected mice were maintained for at least 14 days prior to tick placement.

I. scapularis nymphs were obtained from Oklahoma State University and University of Minnesota. Upon arrival, ticks were maintained in a Percival I-30BLL incubator at 23°C with 85% relative humidity and a 12/10-hours light/dark photoperiod regimen. Age matched (6–10 weeks), male C57BL6 and C3H/HeJ mice were supplied by Jackson Laboratories or the University of Maryland Veterinary Resources. For all tick experiments, capsules were attached to the back of mice using a warmed adhesive solution made from 3 parts gum rosin (Millipore-Sigma) and 1 part beeswax (Thermo Scientific) 24 hours prior to tick placement. All experiments were done using C57BL6 mice, except for the ones including B. burgdorferi infection, in which the mice genetic background was homogenized to the C3H/HeJ. Mouse breeding, weaning and experiments were performed under guidelines from the NIH (Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW) assurance numbers A3200–01) and pre-approved by the Institutional Biosafety (IBC-00002247) and Animal Care and Use (IACUC-0119012) committee of the University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Hemocyte collection

Hemolymph was collected from I. scapularis nymphs in L15C300 + 50% FBS on ice from individual unfed, partially fed or engorged ticks placed on uninfected, A. phagocytophilum- or B. burgdorferi-infected mice, using non-stick RNAase-free 1.5 mL microtubes (Ambion) and siliconized pipet tips. Briefly, ticks were immobilized on a glass slide using double-sided tape (3M) and covered in a sphere of 10 μL of L15C300 + 50% FBS. Forelegs were incised at the tarsus, and forceps were used to gently apply pressure to the tick body to release hemolymph into the media. Enumeration of total hemocytes was determined for each tick using a Neubauer chamber. For differentiation of hemocyte morphotypes, 100 μL of L15C300 was added in a microtube for each tick before preparation on Fisherbrand Superfrost Plus microscope slides (Fisher Scientific) using a Epredia Cytospin 4 Cytocentrifuge (Thermo Scientific). Afterwards, hemocytes were stained using the Richard-Allan Scientific three-step staining (Thermo Scientific) and evaluated morphologically under a Primo Star HAL/LED Microscope (Carl Zeiss). Images were acquired using an Axiocam 305 color camera (Carl Zeiss) with the ZEN software (Carl Zeiss).

For RNA extraction, hemocytes were collected as mentioned above using PBS (4 μL for unfed and 6 μL for engorged ticks) instead of media. For each biological replicate, hemocytes from 80 unfed or 40 engorged ticks were pooled in 700 μL of TRIzol.

Bulk RNA sequencing

Three independent hemocyte collections were performed for each condition (unfed and engorged), as mentioned above. After collection, RNA was extracted from TRIzol following the manufacturer’s instruction with the addition of 1 μg of glycogen per sample. The RNA integrity (RIN) was assessed for each sample using a Eukaryote Total RNA Nano Chip Assay on a Bioanalyzer (Agilent). RIN values ranged between 7.6 to 9.4. Strand-specific, dual unique indexed libraries for sequencing on Illumina platforms were generated using the NEBNext® Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (New England Biolabs). The manufacturer’s protocol was modified by diluting adapters 1:30 and using 3 μL of this dilution. The size selection of the library was performed with SPRI-select beads (Beckman Coulter Genomics). Glycosylase digestion of the adapter and 2nd strand was performed in the same reaction as the final amplification. Sample input was polyA-enriched. Libraries were assessed for concentration and fragment size using the DNA High Sensitivity Assay on the LabChip GX Touch (Perkin Elmer). The resulting libraries were sequenced on a multiplexed paired end 100bp Illumina NovaSeq 6000 S4 flowcell, generating an average of 92 million read pairs per sample. RIN analysis, library preparation and sequencing were completed by Maryland Genomics at the Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine. One sample was excluded from subsequent analysis due to considerably smaller library size compared to the rest.

After sequencing, all reads were aligned to the I. scapularis genome (GCF_016920785.2_ASM1692078v2) using HISAT v2.0.4 (18, 48). Next, we potential PCR duplicates were removed by keeping only one of the read pairs mapped to the same genomic location of the same strand and then tallied the number of “unique reads” mapped to each annotated I. scapularis gene. The generated count matrix was used as input for differential expression analysis with edgeR v3.36.0 (49). During data normalization, only transcripts with at least 10 counts per million (cpm) in two or more samples were kept for downstream analysis. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were defined based on the following thresholds: (1) a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05, and (2) −0.5146<logFC>0.3785, corresponding to at least a 30% reduction or increase in gene expression. All sequencing reads were deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the BioProject accession PRJNA906572.

Single-cell RNA sequencing

For single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), hemocytes were collected from individual unfed, engorged, or A. phagocytophilum- or B. burgdorferi-infected ticks and pooled in 300 μL of L15C300 + 50% FBS (n= 90 for unfed and n=50 for engorged ticks). Cells were filtered through a 40 μm cell strainer (Millipore Sigma) and enriched for live cells using OptiPrep density gradient centrifugation (50). Briefly, 200–300 μL of the filtered solution was overlaid onto 2 mL of OptiPrep Density Gradient Medium (1.09 g/mL in 1X PBS; Sigma) and centrifugated at 1,000×g for 10 minutes at 4°C, using a swinging bucket without breaking. After centrifugation, 200 μL of the interphase was collected in a new microtube and spun at 1,000×g for 10 min at 4°C. Cells were concentrated in 30 μL of 1X PBS + 0.2 U RNasin® Plus Ribonuclease Inhibitor (Promega), from which 5 μL were used for measuring viability and cell numbers by trypan blue exclusion assay. The final concentration of cells ranged from 350 to 500 cells/μL, with viability ranging between 95.7% and 98.5%.

An estimated 5,000–7,000 cells per condition were loaded on a 10X Genomics Chromium controller and four individually barcoded 3’-end scRNA-seq libraries were prepared according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Each library was then sequenced on an Illumina high-output sequencer to generate a total of 816,376,790 75-bp paired-end reads. To process all scRNA-seq reads, a custom pipeline previously used to analyze single-cell data from Plasmodium parasites similar to 10X Genomics Cell Ranger software was adapted (51). First, only reads longer than 40 bp after trimming any sequences downstream of 3’ polyadenylation tails were kept. These reads were then mapped to the I. scapularis genome (GCF_016920785.2_ASM1692078v2) using HISAT version 2.0.4 (18, 48). Out of the mapped reads, “unique reads” were identified by keeping only one of the reads that had identical 16-mer 10X Genomics barcode, 12-mer unique molecular identifier, and mapped to the same genomic location of the same strand. Finally, the 10X Genomics barcodes were used to separate reads derived from each individual cell and count the number of unique reads mapped to each annotated I. scapularis gene (from transcription start site to 500 bp after the annotated 3’-end). All sequencing reads are deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the BioProject accession PRJNA905678 and the code for mapping is available through the GitHub website (https://github.com/Haikelnb/scRNASeq_Analysis)

The scRNA-seq libraries were combined into a single dataset using scran v1.26.2 (52). Genes containing “40s_ribosomal” and “60s_ribosomal” were removed from the entire dataset. Based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA), unfed and fed hemocyte samples were analyzed independently for downstream analyses. Low quality cells were removed with the following thresholds: less than 600 unique reads, less than 150 mapped genes, and 30% or higher mitochondrial transcripts. The remaining transcriptomes were normalized by first calculating size factors via scran functions quickCluster and computeSumFactors and computing normalized counts for each cell with logNormCounts function in scater v1.22.0 (53). For downstream analysis, highly variable genes were selected using getTopHVGs before performing PCA and t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) projections. Clustering was conducted using a kmeans value of 20. Differential gene expression between clusters was calculated using the find marker function in scran v1.26.2 (52). The R package slingshot v2.2.1 was used to perform pseudotime inference where trajectories began from the “Proliferative 1” cluster, based on predicted function (54). To determine differences in gene expression between each infected condition compared to the reference factor (uninfected), clusters were grouped based on annotated function (e.g. metabolism, proliferation, immune) and MAST v1.24.1 was used to test for significance under the Hurdle model adjusting for the cellular detection rate (55). The code for the analysis is available through the GitHub website (https://github.com/HLaukaitisJ/PedraLab_hemocyte_scRNAseq).

Functional annotation and enrichment analysis

Functional annotation and Gene Ontology Enrichment analysis were done through VectorBase, using the LOC number of all DEGs (bulk RNA-seq) or marker genes (scRNA-seq) as input, and the following parameters: (1) Organism: “Ixodes scapularis PalLabHiFi”; (2) Ontology: “Molecular Function” or “Biological Process”; (3) adjusted p-value cutoff (Benjamini) < 0.05 (56). Additionally, the putative function of the top 50 marker genes in each single cell cluster were manually assigned based on 10 categories (“ncRNA/Pseudogene”, “detoxification”, “secreted protein/extracellular matrix”, “metabolism”, “immunity”, “hormone related”, “cell proliferation/differentiation”, “protein synthesis”, “actin polymerization/cell rearrangement”, “unknown”). First, the protein coding sequence of each gene was retrieved from the NCBI website. Next, homologues from each gene were searched in the D. melanogaster genome using the BLAST tool from Flybase (57). If a match was found with an E value < 10−20, then the genes were assumed to have some (E value was between < 10−20 to 10−39) or complete (E value < 10−40) homology. The function of the I. scapularis gene was interpreted based on the description for D. melanogaster. Comparison to gene expression profiles in specific D. melanogaster hemocyte subtypes was assessed using the DRSC/TRiP Functional Genomics Resources dataset (50). Alternatively, if a high match to known D. melanogaster genes was not found, then the complete coding sequence of the I. scapularis gene was used to search for protein domains using InterPro and the functional information retrieved from Pubmed or UniProt (58, 59). Otherwise, the gene function was assigned as “unknown”.

RNA-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

The expression of specific genes in hemocytes was determined by RNA-FISH using the RNAScope-Multiplex Fluorescent Reagent Kit v2 Assay (Advanced Cell Diagnostics), following the manufacturer’s instructions with slight modifications. Briefly, hemocytes were pooled from five unfed ticks in microtubes containing 100 μL of L15C300. Then, cells were spun onto microscope slides using a Cytospin 2 and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Millipore-Sigma) for 20 minutes. After three washing steps with 1X PBS, two drops of hydrogen peroxide were applied to the samples for 10 minutes and washed three times with 1X PBS. Subsequently, two drops of Protease III were added to the cells and the samples incubated in the HybEZ Oven (Advanced Cell Diagnostics) for 30 minutes at 40°C. Samples were washed three times with 1X PBS before the addition of two drops of the following RNAScope probes (Advanced Cell Diagnostics): hemocytin RNA probe (regions 2778–3632 of XM_042287086.1) conjugated with C1, astakine probe (regions 47–800 of XM_040222953.1) conjugated with C2, actin5c probe (regions 2–1766 of XM_029977298.4) conjugated with C1 as a positive control and gfp probe (regions 12–686 of AF275953.1) conjugated with C1 as a negative control. Slides were incubated in a HybEZ Oven for two hours at 40°C. Samples were then washed three times with 1X PBS and stored overnight in 5X SSC buffer (Millipore Sigma). Next, slides were washed using 1X PBS and incubated with the AMP reagents as instructed by the manufacturer. To develop the probe signals, samples were washed three times with 1X PBS and three drops of the corresponding RNAscope Multiplex FLv2 HRP was added for 15 minutes at 40°C. Then, slides were washed again with 1X PBS and incubated with ~50 μL of 1:1500 dilution of Opal 520 and 570 dyes for hemocytin and astakine, respectively (Akoya Biosciences) before the addition of two drops of the RNAscope Multiplex FLv2 HRP blocker for 15 minutes at 40°C. Slides were counterstained with two drops of DAPI for 30 seconds and mounted using two drops of ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant (Thermo Scientific). Slides were allowed to dry overnight before examined under a Nikon W-1 spinning disk confocal microscope. For imaging, the following laser channels were used: 488 nm (GFP, plasma membrane), and 405 nm (DAPI), 488 nm (GFP, C1) and 561 nm (RFP, C2).

RNA interference

For in vitro experiments, small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and scrambled controls (scRNAs) designed for astikine and hemocytin were synthesized by Millipore Sigma with UU overhangs. IDE12 cells were seeded at 3×105 cells/well (24-well plate) for RNA extraction or the phagocytosis assay and 1×106 cells/well (6-well plate) for protein extraction. siRNAs were transfected into IDE12 cells using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Scientific) at 1 μg per mL. After 7 days, cells were either harvested or infected with A. phagocytophilum for 48 hours. For protein extraction, cells were washed with 1X PBS, resuspended in a solution of Radio-immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Merck Millipore) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and stored at −80°C. For RNA extraction, cells were harvested in TRIzol and stored at −80°C.

For in vivo experiments, siRNAs and scRNAs designed for astakine and hemocytin were synthesized using the Silencer siRNA Construction Kit (Thermo Scientific) with the primers listed in Supplementary Table 1, following the manufacturer’s instruction. Tick microinjections were performed using 40–60 ng of siRNA or scRNA per tick. Ticks were allowed to recover overnight before being placed on uninfected or A. phagocytophilum-infected mice. After placement, the percentage of ticks attached to mice was calculated. Fully fed ticks were collected 4 days post-placement, weighed, and either maintained in a humidified chamber for molting experiments or frozen at −80°C in 200 μL TRIzol for RNA extraction.

Phagocytosis assay

IDE12 were transfected with siRNA or scRNA designed for hemocytin, as previously described (7). Briefly, 7 days post-transfection, cells were re-plated at a density of 4×105 cells/well in a 24-well plate and left to adhere overnight. The following day, media was replaced with 500 μL of L15C300 containing a 1:10,000 dilution of FluoSpheres Carboxylate 1.0 μm beads (yellow-green, Invitrogen) for 24 hours. Cells were then washed five times with 1X PBS and fixed in 200 mL of 4% PFA for 20 minutes. Fluorescence and bright field microscopy images were acquired with an EVOS FL Digital Inverted Microscope (Advanced Microscopy Group) and merged using ImageJ software. Negative and positive cells for fluorescent microspheres and the average number of phagocytosed beads per cell were calculated from the number of green puncta detected in the total cells counted in each field (>100 cells). Two biological replicates were performed, with fields taken from three different wells per replicate.

Recombinant astakine

I. scapularis recombinant Astakine (rAstk) was produced by GeneScript, based on the coding sequence of the XM_040222953.1 astakine transcript (LOC8032444). For in vitro cell proliferation assays, 1×105 IDE12 cells/well were seeded in L15C300 complete medium (24-well plate). The following day, cells were treated with 0.05 μg/mL of rAstk for a total of 5 days. Cells were collected in a 1.5 mL microtube and 10 μL of the suspension was used for live cell counting using the trypan blue exclusion assay with a TC20 automated cell counter (Bio-Rad). BSA (0.05 μg/mL) was used as negative control. For in vivo experiments, nymphs were microinjected with 50 nL of PBS containing 0.05 ng, 0.5 ng or 5 ng of rAstk (2729). Afterwards, ticks were allowed to rest for 24 hours before hemolymph was collected, as described above. Microinjection of BSA (5 ng) was used as a negative control.

Clodronate depletion of phagocytic hemocytes

To determine the effect of phagocytic hemocytes in I. scapularis nymphs, we used clodronate liposomes (CLD) to deplete phagocytic cells (31, 36, 37). Ticks were immobilized on a glass slide using double-sided tape and microinjected (Nanojet III microinjector; Drummond Scientific) through the anal pore with 69 nL of either CLD (Standard macrophage depletion kit, Encapsula NanoSciences LLC) or control liposomes (LP) at a 1:5 dilution in 1X PBS. Ticks were allowed to recover overnight before placement on uninfected mice. Following collection, fully fed ticks were weighed and frozen at −80°C in 200 μL of TRIzol for RNA extraction.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)

Total RNA from cell lines or engorged ticks was isolated from samples preserved in TRIzol using the PureLink RNA Mini kit (Ambion). Total RNA from tick hemocytes was purified following the manufacturer’s instruction for TRIzol RNA extraction with the addition of 1 μg of glycogen (RNA grade, Thermo Scientific). For cDNA synthesis, 400–600 ng of RNA was used in the Verso cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific). To measure gene expression by qRT-PCR, 2X Universal SYBR Green Fast qPCR Mix (ABclonal) was used with the addition of 1 μL of cDNA per well and quantified using a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-rad). All genes of interest were amplified at 54°C, except for amplification of A. phagocytophilum 16S, which was run at 46°C. No-template controls were included to verify the absence of primer-dimers formation and/or contamination. Reactions on each sample and controls were run in duplicate. Gene expression was determined by relative quantification normalized to tick actin, using the primers listed in Supplementary Table 1.

Western blotting

To extract proteins, wells were washed with cold 1X PBS, and resuspended in 1X RIPA buffer (Merck Millipore) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Protein extracts were stored at −80°C and their concentration was estimated using Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (Thermo Scientific). For sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), equal amounts of protein were boiled in 6X Laemmli sample buffer (Alfa Aesar) containing 5% β-mercaptoethanol. The proteins were then transferred onto PVDF membranes (Biorad) and blocked for 1 hour using a solution of 5% skim milk prepared in 1X PBS and 0.1% Tween® 20 Detergent (PBS-T). Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C, followed by four washes in PBS-T and incubation with secondary antibodies for at least 1 hour at room temperature with gentle agitation. The blots were washed four times in PBST, incubated with enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrate solution for 1 minute (Millipore), and then imaged. A complete list of antibodies used can be found in Supplementary Table 2.

CRISPR activation (CRISPRa)

The SP-dCas9-VPR plasmid was a gift from George Church (Addgene plasmid, #63798). For expression of sgRNAs, the sgRNA for the hemocytin promoter (or a scrambled version of its sequence) was cloned between the BbsI sites of a derivative of the pLib8 vector (pLibTB.1_ISCW_025) under the control of an I. scapularis U6 promoter (ISCW025025) (Supplementary Figure 16). ISE6 cells (7×107 cells) were nucleofected with 15 μg of SP-dCas9-VPR plasmid using the buffer SF, pulse code EN150 (Lonza Biosciences) and subsequently incubated for 3 days. Following incubation, the cells were selected with neomycin (250 μg/mL) for 2 weeks. After antibiotic selection, the cells were nucleofected with 1 μg of the pLibTB.1_ISCW_025 vector containing the experimental or scrambled control sgRNA and were harvested 3 days later. Cells were collected in TRIzol for RNA extraction, as previously described.

Statistics

Statistical significance for quantitative variables was tested with an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction, Mann–Whitney U test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test when appropriate. Gaussian distribution was assessed using the D’Agostino-Pearson omnibus K2 test, and homogeneity of variance was determined by F-test when comparing two conditions or the Brown-Forsythe test when comparing three conditions. Statistical significance for categorical variables was assessed using Fisher’s exact test. GraphPad PRISM® (version 9.1.2) was used for all statistical analyses. Outliers were detected by a Grubbs’ Test, using the GraphPad Quick Cals Outlier Calculator. P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (2.5MB, pdf)
Supplement 2
media-2.xlsx (678.1KB, xlsx)
Supplement 3
media-3.xlsx (247.3KB, xlsx)
Supplement 4
media-4.xlsx (28.8KB, xlsx)
Supplement 5
media-5.xlsx (59.1KB, xlsx)
Supplement 6
media-6.xlsx (90.8KB, xlsx)
Supplement 7
media-7.xlsx (333.1KB, xlsx)
Supplement 8
media-8.xlsx (132.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 9
media-9.xlsx (245.5KB, xlsx)
Supplement 10
media-10.xlsx (77.4KB, xlsx)
Supplement 11
media-11.xlsx (13.2KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge members of the Pedra laboratory for providing insightful discussions and colleagues for manuscript feedback. We thank Jon Skare (Texas A&M University Health Science Center) for providing the B. burgdorferi B31 strain, clone MSK5; Ulrike G. Munderloh (University of Minnesota) for supplying ISE6 and IDE12 tick cells; Joseph Mauban (University of Maryland School of Medicine) for aiding in the microscopy analysis; Jonathan Oliver (University of Minnesota) for providing available I. scapularis ticks; Dana Shaw (Washington State University) and Adela Oliva Chavez (Texas A&M University) for information regarding cultures of B. burgdorferi and A. phagocytophilum; the University of Maryland, Baltimore Confocal Microscopy Core and the Maryland Genomics Core at the Institute for Genome Sciences for the services provided in microscopy and next generation sequencing, respectively. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to HJL-Y (T32AI162579), AJO (F31AI152215), LRB (F31AI167471), JHFP (R01AI134696, R01AI116523), JHFP and UP (P01AI138949), NP, SEM and JHFP (R21 AI168592). NP, SEM and JHF were also supported in-kind by the Fairbairn Family Lyme Research Initiative. NP is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Some images were created with BioRender.com. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the NIH, the Department of Health and Human Services, NIST, the Department of Commerce or the United States government.

Footnotes

Data and Code Availability

All sequencing reads for the bulk RNA sequences were deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the BioProject accession PRJNA906572. All scRNA sequences were deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the BioProject accession PRJNA905678. The codes for the scRNA sequence analysis are available through the GitHub websites: https://github.com/Haikelnb/scRNASeq_Analysis and https://github.com/HLaukaitisJ/PedraLab_hemocyte_scRNAseq. Reviewer tokens can be made available upon request.

Resource Availability

Further information and request for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be honored by the corresponding author: Joao HF Pedra (jpedra@som.umaryland.edu)

References

  • 1.Schwenke R. A., Lazzaro B. P., Wolfner M. F., Reproduction-immunity trade-offs in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 61, 239–256 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shaw D. K. et al. , Vector immunity and evolutionary ecology: The harmonious dissonance. Trends in Immunology 39, 862–873 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Samaddar S., Marnin L., Butler L. R., Pedra J. H. F., Immunometabolism in arthropod vectors: redefining interspecies relationships. Trends in Parasitology 36, 807–815 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Palmer W. J., Jiggins F. M., Comparative genomics reveals the origins and diversity of arthropod immune systems. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32, 2111–2129 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bechsgaard J. et al. , Comparative genomic study of arachnid immune systems indicates loss of βGRPs and the IMD pathway. J Evol Biol 29, 19 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shaw D. K. et al. , Infection-derived lipids elicit an immune deficiency circuit in arthropods. Nature Communications 8, 14401 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.O’Neal A. J. et al. , Croquemort elicits activation of the immune deficiency pathway in ticks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 120, e2208673120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McClure Carroll E. E. et al. , p47 licenses activation of the immune deficiency pathway in the tick Ixodes scapularis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116, 205–210 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rana V. S. et al. , Dome1-JAK-STAT signaling between parasite and host integrates vector immunity and development. Science 379, eabl3837 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Smith A. A. et al. , Cross-species interferon signaling boosts microbicidal activity within the tick vector. Cell Host & Microbe 20, 91–98 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lemaitre B. et al. , A recessive mutation, immune deficiency (imd), defines two distinct control pathways in the Drosophila host defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92, 9465–9469 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kleino A., Silverman N., The Drosophila IMD pathway in the activation of the humoral immune response. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 42, 25–35 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Harrison D. A., McCoon P. E., Binari R., Gilman M., Perrimon N., Drosophila unpaired encodes a secreted protein that activates the JAK signaling pathway. Genes & Development 12, 3252–3263 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bakken J. S., Dumler J. S., Human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 29, 341–355 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Eisen R. J., Eisen L., The blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis: an increasing public health concern. Trends in Parasitology 34, 295–309 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kurokawa C. et al. , Interactions between Borrelia burgdorferi and ticks. Nature Reviews Microbiology 18, 587–600 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Beati L., Klompen H., Phylogeography of ticks (Acari: Ixodida). Annual Review of Entomology 64, 379–397 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.De S. et al. , A high-quality Ixodes scapularis genome advances tick science. Nat Genet 55, 301–311 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hillyer J. F., Insect immunology and hematopoiesis. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 58, 102–118 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brinton L. P., Burgdorfer W., Fine structure of normal hemocytes in Dermacentor andersoni Stiles (Acari:Ixodidae). J Parasitol 57, 1110–1127 (1971). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dolp R. M., Biochemical and physiological studies of certain ticks (Ixodoidea). Qualitative and quantitative studies of hemocytes. Journal of Medical Entomology 7, 277–288 (1970). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Starck J. M. et al. , Morphological responses to feeding in ticks (Ixodes ricinus). Zoological Lett 4, 20 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Soderhall I., Fasterius E., Ekblom C., Soderhall K., Characterization of hemocytes and hematopoietic cells of a freshwater crayfish based on single-cell transcriptome analysis. iScience 25, 104850 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Goto A., Kadowaki T., Kitagawa Y., Drosophila hemolectin gene is expressed in embryonic and larval hemocytes and its knock down causes bleeding defects. Developmental Biology 264, 582–591 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lesch C. et al. , A role for hemolectin in coagulation and immunity in Drosophila melanogaster. Developmental and Comparative immunology 31, 1255–1263 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sukonthamarn P., Nanakorn Z., Junprung W., Supungul P., Tassanakajon A., Role of hemocytin from Litopenaeus vannamei in immune response against microsporidian, Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei. Fish Shellfish Immunol 136, 108710 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Söderhäll I., Kim Y. A., Jiravanichpaisal P., Lee S. Y., Söderhäll K., An ancient role for a prokineticin domain in invertebrate hematopoiesis. Journal of Immunology 174, 6153–6160 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li Y. et al. , A cytokine-like factor astakine accelerates the hemocyte production in Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 55, 179–187 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Benton J. L. et al. , Adult neurogenesis in crayfish: Identity and regulation of neural progenitors produced by the immune system. iScience 25, 103993 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ericsson L., Soderhall I., Astakines in arthropods-phylogeny and gene structure. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 81, 141–151 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Adegoke A., Ribeiro J. M. C., Brown S., Smith R. C., Karim S., Rickettsia parkeri hijacks tick hemocytes to manipulate cellular and humoral transcriptional responses. Frontiers in Immunology 14, 1094326 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sharma A. et al. , Cas9-mediated gene editing in the black-legged tick, Ixodes scapularis, by embryo injection and ReMOT Control. iScience 25, 103781 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fukuzawa A. H. et al. , The role of hemocytes in the immunity of the spider Acanthoscurria gomesiana. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 32, 716–725 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Baumann T. et al. , Ctenidins: antimicrobial glycine-rich peptides from the hemocytes of the spider Cupiennius salei. Cell Mol Life Sci 67, 2787–2798 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gilbert L. A. et al. , CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell 154, 442–451 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ramesh Kumar J., Smith J. P., Kwon H., Smith R. C., Use of clodronate liposomes to deplete phagocytic immune cells in Drosophila melanogaster and Aedes aegypti. Front Cell Dev Biol 9, 627976 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kwon H., Smith R. C., Chemical depletion of phagocytic immune cells in Anopheles gambiae reveals dual roles of mosquito hemocytes in anti-Plasmodium immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116, 14119–14128 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kwon H., Mohammed M., Franzen O., Ankarklev J., Smith R. C., Single-cell analysis of mosquito hemocytes identifies signatures of immune cell subtypes and cell differentiation. eLife 10, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Raddi G. et al. , Mosquito cellular immunity at single-cell resolution. Science 369, 1128–1132 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Severo M. S. et al. , Unbiased classification of mosquito blood cells by single-cell genomics and high-content imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115, E7568–E7577 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mari H. O., Steroid hormones in Acari, their functions and synthesis. Applied Entomology and Zoology 54, 323–338 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liu L. et al. , Ixodes scapularis salivary gland protein P11 facilitates migration of Anaplasma phagocytophilum from the tick gut to salivary glands. EMBO Reports 12, 1196–1203 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mase A., Augsburger J., Brückner K., Macrophages and their organ locations shape each other in development and homeostasis – a Drosophila perspective. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 9, 630272 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Stanley D., Haas E., Kim Y., Beyond cellular immunity: on the biological significance of insect hemocytes. Cells 12, 599 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Oliva Chavez A. S. et al. , Tick extracellular vesicles enable arthropod feeding and promote distinct outcomes of bacterial infection. Nature Communications 12, 3696 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yoshiie K., Kim H. Y., Mott J., Rikihisa Y., Intracellular infection by the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent inhibits human neutrophil apoptosis. Infection and Immunity 68, 1125–1133 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Labandeira-Rey M., Skare J. T., Decreased infectivity in Borrelia burgdorferi strain B31 is associated with loss of linear plasmid 25 or 28–1. Infection and Immunity 69, 446–455 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kim D., Langmead B., Salzberg S. L., HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods 12, 357–360 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Robinson M. D., McCarthy D. J., Smyth G. K., edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tattikota S. G. et al. , A single-cell survey of Drosophila blood. Elife 9, e54818 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bogale H. N. et al. , Transcriptional heterogeneity and tightly regulated changes in gene expression during Plasmodium berghei sporozoite development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118, e2023438118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lun A. T., Bach K., Marioni J. C., Pooling across cells to normalize single-cell RNA sequencing data with many zero counts. Genome Biology 17, 75 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lun A. T., McCarthy D. J., Marioni J. C., A step-by-step workflow for low-level analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data with Bioconductor. F1000Res 5, 2122 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Street K. et al. , Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genomics 19, 477 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Finak G. et al. , MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biology 16, 278 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Amos B. et al. , VEuPathDB: the eukaryotic pathogen, vector and host bioinformatics resource center. Nucleic Acids Research 50, D898–D911 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gramates L. S. et al. , FlyBase: a guided tour of highlighted features. Genetics 220, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Paysan-Lafosse T. et al. , InterPro in 2022. Nucleic Acids Research 51, D418–D427 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.UniProt C., UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Research 51, D523–D531 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (2.5MB, pdf)
Supplement 2
media-2.xlsx (678.1KB, xlsx)
Supplement 3
media-3.xlsx (247.3KB, xlsx)
Supplement 4
media-4.xlsx (28.8KB, xlsx)
Supplement 5
media-5.xlsx (59.1KB, xlsx)
Supplement 6
media-6.xlsx (90.8KB, xlsx)
Supplement 7
media-7.xlsx (333.1KB, xlsx)
Supplement 8
media-8.xlsx (132.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 9
media-9.xlsx (245.5KB, xlsx)
Supplement 10
media-10.xlsx (77.4KB, xlsx)
Supplement 11
media-11.xlsx (13.2KB, xlsx)

Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES