Abstract
Observational studies have reported associations between circulating biomarkers related to cardiovascular disease and the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the relationship between these biomarkers and survival remains controversial. We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis to investigate possible causal associations between cardiovascular disease biomarkers and hepatocellular carcinoma survival. Genetic risk scores, calculated using individual-level data from 866 cases of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma in Guangxi, were utilized as proxies for four cardiovascular disease biomarkers: C-reactive protein, Apolipoprotein A-1, Cystatin C, and Lipoprotein(a). Associations between the genetic scores and survival were analyzed using Cox regression. The inverse-variance weighted method was used to estimate the summary statistics for the biomarkers and survival. Considering the multiple comparisons, the statistical significance was set at P < 0.0125. We observed a significant risk signal between genetically increased Cystatin C levels and poorer survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HR for genetic scores = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02-1.64; HR for inverse-variance weighted = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.45-4.65). Furthermore, we found a causal relationship of genetically determined Cystatin C and Lipoprotein(a) level with the survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with embolus. Our findings indicated the causal effects of increased levels of Cystatin C and Lipoprotein(a) on poorer survival in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Keywords: Cardiovascular disease biomarkers, hepatocellular carcinoma, Mendelian randomization, survival
Introduction
Primary liver cancer (PLC) is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death Worldwide [1]. According to the World Health Organization, more than 1 million people will die of PLC, a serious threat to human health, by 2030 [1]. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common pathological type of PLC, accounting for 85% to 90% of all cases [2]. HCC has an insidious onset with no obvious early symptoms and is highly malignant, progressing rapidly. Although most patients can be treated with surgical resection, the rates of recurrence and mortality remain quite high. Therefore, the indicators that effectively reflect the prognosis of HCC patients undergoing liver resection may have significant guiding significance for further precise treatment of HCC patients. They also hold important value in reducing the mortality rate and prolonging the survival of patients with HCC.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) may be a risk factor for cancer incidence or mortality, independent of shared risk factors such as obesity, smoking, and diabetes [3,4]. However, the exact mechanisms underlying the association of CVD and cancer remain unclear. Recent investigations have proposed that certain molecules associated with CVD, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), Apolipoprotein A-1 (APOA1), Cystatin C (CysC), and Lipoprotein(a) [LP(a)], may play a role in the development of HCC through common pathways [5-8]. These pathways include such as inflammation, oxidative stress, adiposity, and fibrosis. For example, it has been reported that CRP may participate in tumor metastasis by regulating HIF-1α activity through the MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways [9]. Although multiple observational studies have suggested a close relationship between CVD markers and the disease process of HCC, there is no consistent conclusion regarding the direction of the associations between these CVD markers and the prognosis of HCC [6,7,10-15].
Mendelian randomization (MR) is an effective method for testing the causality between an exposure and an outcome. In this approach, genetic variants are primarily used as instrumental variables (IVs) to explore the causal relationship between exposure and outcome phenotypes [16]. The rationale for conducting MR analysis lies in the fact that it can overcome the limitations of observational studies, which are unable to establish causal inference [17]. By fully utilizing genetic data, MR defines biomarker levels based on genetic predispositions. MR can be used to evaluate the causal direction from the marker levels to the risk of disease outcome, while avoiding the influence of environmental effects. This provides a theoretical basis for the further selection of biomarkers with a clear causal direction. Therefore, we conducted two sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses in this study to identify CVD markers (exposure) that are causally associated with HCC survival (outcome).
Materials and methods
Genetic variant data on CVD biomarkers
We selected instrumental variables for analysis of the causal effects based on a suggestive significant association (P < 5×10-6) with cardiovascular disease-related circulating biomarkers, including CRP, APOA1, CysC, and LP(a). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associated with CRP level was selected from a GWAS of 10,112 individuals in the Biobank Japan Project [18]. The SNPs associated with APOA1, CysC, and LP(a) levels were selected from a GWAS of the UK biobank East Asian population [APOA1, n = 2325; CysC, n = 2573; LP(a), n = 2279] (https://pan.ukbb.broadinstitute.org/). The independent SNPs of CVD biomarkers were selected based on a linkage disequilibrium (LD) R2 < 0.001 and kb = 10000. The F-value is calculated and used to evaluate whether there is a weak instrumental variable bias. The F-value is calculated using the formula F-value = (βexposure)2/(SEexposure)2.
GWAS data for hepatocellular carcinoma
The GWAS data for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) survival was collected from 866 HBV-HCC patients who were recruited from Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital between July 2007 and December 2017. The patients were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria [19]. All 866 patients were followed up every three months for the first two years after discharge following hepatectomy, and every six months thereafter. The follow-up included information on subsequent treatment and death, with overall survival as the outcome event. The last follow-up was conducted in March 2020. Moreover, approval from the ethics committee and informed consent were obtained from the Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital. All 866 patients had 5 mL of peripheral blood extracted for DNA extraction. The process of DNA extraction, genotyping, quality control, and imputation can be found in an article we previously published [19].
Genetic risk score for CVD biomarker level
In order to predict the individual genetic levels of CRP, APOA1, CysC, and LP(a), we used the genotype data to construct the CVD biomarker genetic risk score (GRS) based on their associated SNPs. GRSs were calculated using the following formula:
Xij represents the number of alleles related to increased CVD biomarker levels for the jth SNP of the ith subject (where Xij can be 0, 1, or 2). Bj refers to the beta estimates for the jth SNP obtained from the exposure GWAS in the BBJ project or the UKB East Asia population. The GRS could be used as an instrumental variable to represent the weighted number of alleles associated with increased CVD biomarker levels. It can then be used to predict the CVD biomarker level of each individual included in the Mendelian randomization analysis. The genetic levels of CRP, APOA1, CysC, and LP(a) were represented by 9, 9, 6, and 5 SNPs, respectively (see Table S1).
Mendelian randomization analysis
Two-sample MR analysis was used to examine the causal relationships between CVD biomarker levels and overall survival in HCC. The causal effects were estimated using the GRS method with our SNP collections. Namely, individual-level data was aggregated into a univariate score (GRS) for survival analysis. Conducting survival analysis on GRS and HCC patients’ survival to infer the causal relationship between CVD biomarkers and HCC survival. We also utilized the inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR Egger, and MR-PRESSO methods for conducting sensitivity analysis on the summary statistics data. Additionally, we employed Egger regression to assess the presence of pleiotropic effects in the CVD biomarker SNPs.
Statistical analysis
Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze the association between GRS and overall survival of HCC. The models were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, drinking status, alpha fetoprotein (AFP) levels, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage, embolus status, and cirrhosis status. The optimal cutoff values for GRS levels were determined using the “surv_cutpoint” function from the “survminer” R package. These cutoff values were then used to classify patients with HCC into two groups: high level and low level. The results of the MR analysis were considered significant at a P value of less than 0.0125 (Bonferroni correction: P = 0.05/4). A p-value between 0.0125 and 0.05 was considered suggestive evidence for a potential causal association [17]. The MR analyses utilized the “TwoSampleMR” and “MRPRESSO” packages. The image was created using the “TwoSampleMR” package and GraphPad Prism 8.
Results
Basic characteristics
The basic characteristics of 866 HBV-HCC patients were presented in Table 1. We observed significant associations of age, BCLC stage, embolus status, and AFP level with the overall survival (OS) of the 866 HBV-HCC patients. The group of individuals under the age of 47, with BCLC B or C stage, embolus, and AFP levels greater than 400 ng/ml had significantly poorer survival compared to the other group with corresponding characteristics. Therefore, in the subsequent Mendelian randomization analysis, we conducted a stratified analysis among the aforementioned factors.
Table 1.
Characteristics and clinical features of patients
| Covariances | Death/Total | HR | 95% CI | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | < 471 | 233/434 | 1 | - | 0.036 |
| ≥ 47 | 186/432 | 0.81 | (0.66, 0.99) | ||
| Sex | Female | 42/106 | 1 | - | 0.176 |
| male | 377/760 | 1.26 | (0.90, 1.76) | ||
| Smoking | No | 268/545 | 1 | - | 0.475 |
| Yes | 151/321 | 0.91 | (0.71, 1.17) | ||
| Drinking | No | 292/614 | 1 | - | 0.541 |
| Yes | 127/252 | 1.08 | (0.84, 1.41) | ||
| BCLC | 0/A | 146/427 | 1 | - | < 0.001 |
| B/C | 273/439 | 1.98 | (1.56, 2.52) | ||
| Embolus | No | 260/636 | 1 | - | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 159/230 | 1.74 | (1.38, 2.21) | ||
| AFP (ng/ml) | ≤ 400 | 232/522 | 1 | - | 0.015 |
| > 400 | 187/344 | 1.29 | (1.05, 1.57) | ||
| Cirrhosis | No | 184/390 | 1 | - | 0.702 |
| Yes | 235/476 | 1.04 | (0.85, 1.26) | ||
HR, hazard ratio; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage; AFP, alpha fetoprotein.
The median age of this population.
GRS of CVD biomarker levels and HCC survival in the Southern Chinese population
We calculated the GRS of CRP, APOA1, CysC, and LP(a) using the hazard ratios (HRs) of each relevant SNP in additive models (see Tables S2, S3, S4 and S5). The optimal cutoff values for the GRS of CRP, APOA1, CysC, and LP(a) calculated using the Yoden Index are 0.869, 1.783, 1.311, and 0.275, respectively. According to the optimal cutoff, we divided the GRS into a binary variable (e.g., GRS < 0.869 or GRS ≥ 0.869, Table 2). The results of Egger regression analysis suggested that the instrumental variable of CRP rs12502614 exhibited directional pleiotropy (Egger-intercept = 0.305, P = 0.025). We evaluated the association between genetic CRP levels and HCC survival after removing rs12502614.
Table 2.
Mendelian randomization estimates for the causal effect of CVD biomarkers level on the overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma in the Southern Chinese population
| CVD biomarkers | Death/Total | HR1 | 95% CI | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRP | GRS | < 0.869 | 240/526 | 1 | 1 | / |
| ≥ 0.869 | 179/340 | 1.09 | 0.90-1.32 | 0.394 | ||
| IVW | 419/866 | 1.29 | 0.66-2.52 | 0.458 | ||
| MR Egger | 419/866 | 0.24 | 0.01-2.16 | 0.250 | ||
| MR-PRESSO | 419/866 | 1.29 | 0.79-1.79 | 0.354 | ||
| ApoA1 | GRS | < 1.783 | 344/724 | 1 | 1 | / |
| ≥ 1.783 | 75/142 | 1.21 | 0.94-1.55 | 0.146 | ||
| IVW | 419/866 | 1.03 | 0.74-1.44 | 0.858 | ||
| MR Egger | 419/866 | 0.69 | 0.11-4.36 | 0.697 | ||
| MR-PRESSO | 419/866 | 1.05 | 0.81-1.29 | 0.701 | ||
| CysC | GRS | < 1.311 | 85/212 | 1 | 1 | / |
| ≥ 1.311 | 334/654 | 1.29 | 1.02-1.64 | 0.035* | ||
| IVW | 419/866 | 2.60 | 1.45-4.65 | 0.001* | ||
| MR Egger | 419/866 | 2.53 | 0.85-7.53 | 0.169 | ||
| MR-PRESSO | 419/866 | 2.60 | 2.29-2.91 | 0.002* | ||
| LP(a) | GRS | < 0.275 | 186/411 | 1 | 1 | / |
| ≥ 0.275 | 233/455 | 1.21 | 1.00-1.47 | 0.056 | ||
| IVW | 419/866 | 1.23 | 0.86-1.76 | 0.259 | ||
| MR Egger | 419/866 | 1.09 | 0.58-2.03 | 0.810 | ||
| MR-PRESSO | 419/866 | 1.23 | 0.87-1.59 | 0.322 | ||
CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio; CRP, C-reactive protein; ApoA1, Apolipoprotein A-1; CysC, Cystatin C; LP(a), Lipoprotein(a); GRS, Genetic risk score; IVW, inverse-variance weighted; MR, mendelian randomization.
adjusted by age, sex, smoking status, drinking status, BCLC stage, embolus status, cirrhosis status, and AFP level in multivariate Cox regression analyses of GRS.
P < 0.05.
We found evidence of causal associations between CysC and overall survival in patients with HCC (Table 2). Genetically elevated CysC was associated with an increased risk of HCC mortality after adjusting for age, sex, smoking, drinking, BCLC, embolus, and AFP (GRS ≥ 1.311 vs. GRS < 1.311, HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02-1.64, P = 0.035). The analysis revealed a consistent relationship between genetic CysC levels and HCC mortality, as demonstrated by inverse-variance weighted regression (HR = 2.59, 95% CI = 1.49-4.51, P = 0.001) and MR-PRESSO (HR = 2.60, 95% CI = 2.29-2.91, P = 0.002) (Table 2). Although no significant result was found using the MR Egger regression approach, the scatter plot indicated that the results obtained from both methods (IVW and MR Egger) were consistent in their directions (Figure 1). We also observed trends indicating a higher risk of mortality in HCC patients with genetically elevated levels of CRP, APOA1, and LP(a). However, these associations did not reach statistical significance.
Figure 1.

Scatter plot of the effect of each SNP on Cystatin C level and hepatocellular carcinoma survival. Scatter plots show the per-allele association with HCC survival plotted against the per-allele association with CysC levels, with vertical and horizontal black lines showing the 95% CI for each SNP. The scatter plot is overlaid with the Mendelian randomization estimate (slope of solid line with dashed lines showing 95% CI) of the effect of CysC on HCC survival.
Modification effect on the association between genetic CVD biomarker levels and HCC survival
In order to investigate the modification effect of clinical features on the relationship between genetic CVD biomarker levels and overall survival in HCC, we conducted a stratified analysis. However, no interaction was found between these clinical features and the GRS (see Table S6). We found a causal effect of genetic CysC levels and suggestive evidence of potential causal effects of genetic LP(a) levels on overall survival in certain groups with HCC. The HCC patients with a genetically higher CysC level (GRS ≥ 1.311) had an increased risk of mortality compared to those with a lower CysC level (GRS < 1.311) in the age group < 47 years old [HR = 1.54 (95% CI = 1.10-2.15); P = 0.011], and in the group without embolus [HR = 1.38 (95% CI = 1.01-1.89); P = 0.042] (Figure 2A and 2E). The HCC patients with a genetically higher LP(a) level (GRS ≥ 0.275) had an increased risk of mortality compared to those with a lower LP(a) level (GRS < 0.275) in the group without embolus (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.05-1.72, P = 0.020) (Figure 2E). Although no significant associations were found in other subgroups, we observed consistent trends across all subgroups, with the same trends as discovered in the overall population (Figure 2B-D, 2F-H).
Figure 2.

Associations of stratified analyses of each genetic risk score of cardiovascular disease biomarkers on hepatocellular carcinoma overall survival by age (A: < 47 years old; B: ≥ 47 years old), BCLC stage (C: 0 or A stage; D: B or C stage), embolus status (E: Without embolus; F: With embolus), and AFP (G: ≤ 400 ng/ml; H: > 400 ng/ml). CRP, C-reactive protein; ApoA1, Apolipoprotein A-1; CysC, Cystatin C; LP(a), Lipoprotein(a).
Discussion
In this study, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis to examine the causal effects of CVD biomarkers on HCC survival. We utilized both individual data and summary data for our analysis. We constructed a weighted GRS as an instrumental variable, which is composed of genetic variants associated with CVD biomarkers that were identified in genome-wide association studies. Our findings mainly suggest a causal association of increased CysC levels and a potential causal association of LP(a) levels with reduced survival in HCC patients, particularly in those who are younger than 47 years or do not have embolus. The results from the summarized data (IVW & MR-PRESSO) agree with the trends observed in the two-stage regression analysis using individual-level genotype data (GRS). These results provide consistent evidence that an elevated CysC level is causally associated with survival in HCC patients.
CysC is a cysteine protease inhibitor encoded by the CST3 gene. It is produced and secreted into the blood by various cells. CysC regulates bone resorption, neutrophil chemotaxis, tissue inflammation, and resistance to bacterial and viral infections. As a CVD biomarker, CysC is involved in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndrome through inflammation [20]. However, the role of CysC as a biomarker in liver diseases and its pathogenic mechanism is still not fully elucidated. It has been reported that CysC is associated with the progression of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Previous studies have reported that serum CysC is closely related to the histological stage and the progression of chronic liver disease. It can be considered as a potential marker of liver fibrosis [21]. In addition, the serum CysC level was also reported as an independent predictor of mortality in patients with cirrhosis [22,23]. CysC is differentially expressed in a variety of tumors and plays a role in promoting or suppressing tumors [24-28]. However, the role of CysC in the process of HCC has not been fully understood. Recently, Ran [7] reported that the expression of CST3 in HCC tissues was significantly lower than that in adjacent tissues. Additionally, the serum CysC level of HCC patients were lower than that of the non-HCC population. In addition, Ran found that overexpression of CST3 inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of HCC cells. However, He et al. reported opposite results in patients with primary liver cancer but without distant metastasis [13]. By using immunohistochemistry, they discovered that the level of CysC in HCC tissue was higher compared to that of the adjacent non-tumor tissue, distant normal tissue, and cirrhosis tissue. They also reported that the serum CysC levels of primary hepatic carcinoma patients were higher than those of the normal control. Another study on CysC provided a possible explanation for the phenomenon mentioned above in terms of biological mechanisms. They reported that CysC could be secreted from Huh7 cells (a hepatoma cell line) into the extracellular environment, promoting HCC cell proliferation by activating the TLR4 downstream signaling pathway [29].
In stratified analysis, we found that genetically elevated CysC levels were causally associated with poorer survival in HCC patients without embolus, which is consistent with the conclusion reached by He et al. One possible explanation is that CysC is an endogenous inhibitor of cysteine protease, which may diminish the impact of cysteine cathepsin (Cat) during tumor invasion and metastasis [13]. During the processes of tumor invasion and metastasis, Cat B and other cathepsins mediate the degradation of the extracellular matrix [30-32]. CysC is the primary inhibitor of Cat B, which can prevent Cat B from damaging interstitial tissues and basement membranes, thereby limiting tumor invasion and metastasis [28,33]. Therefore, elevated CysC levels were associated with an increased risk of mortality in HCC patients without embolus, rather than in HCC patients with embolus. This reflects a modification effect of embolus status on the causal association between CysC and HCC survival. Moreover, we found that the causal association between CysC and HCC survival also existed in the population whose onset age was younger than 47 years old (median age of 866 HCC patients). This suggests that onset age could also modify the association between CysC and HCC survival. Therefore, elevated CysC levels were associated with an increased risk of mortality in HCC patients without embolus, rather than in HCC patients with embolus. This reflects a modification effect of embolus status on the causal association between CysC and HCC survival. Moreover, we found that the causal association between CysC and HCC survival also existed in the population whose onset age was younger than 47 years old (median age of 866 HCC patients). This suggests that onset age could also modify the association between CysC and HCC survival [8]. Gao et al. reported that Lp(a) levels in HCC patients were significantly lower than those in healthy individuals. They also found that HCC patients with low Lp(a) levels had higher recurrence rates and shorter survival times compared to those with high Lp(a) levels [12]. Tang et al. reported that the level of Lp(a) in HCC patients was significantly higher than that in patients with liver cirrhosis, and the level of Lp(a) increased with the progression of HCC stage [11]. The result of our study is consistent with Tang et al.’s, providing evidence for the causal association between increased Lp(a) levels and worse HCC survival. Lp(a) can promote the proliferation of malignant tumor cells by activating platelets to release the platelet-derived growth factor. At the same time, however, Lp(a) can inhibit the activation of plasminogen, leading to the formation of a fibrin network and thrombus in a local area. This can promote the adhesion of malignant tumor cells to specific parts of blood vessels [34,35], rather than allowing them to circulate freely in the bloodstream.
We applied Mendelian randomization to mitigate the bias of reverse causation when compared to traditional measures of CVD biomarkers after HCC occurrence. However, several limitations of this study should be discussed. First of all, the instrumental variables for CVD biomarkers were selected from the GWAS of the East Asian population. Therefore, there may be heterogeneity between the Guangxi population and the East Asian population. We conducted a heterogeneity test using summary data, which indicated no heterogeneity between the exposure GWAS and outcome GWAS populations. Additionally, all the P-values for the Q test were greater than 0.05. Secondly, the study has limited instrumental variables, which may result in a low explanatory power for the corresponding CVD biomarkers. This may impede our ability to uncover the causal associations between CRP or APOA1 and HCC survival in the current study. Finally, due to the limited sample size in this study, our findings need to be validated based on larger patient populations in the future.
In summary, our study clarifies the causal effect of CysC and suggests a potential causal effect of Lp(a) levels on HCC survival in the population of Guangxi. This finding offers new insights into the search for prognostic markers for hepatocellular carcinoma and provides clues for identifying common pathogenic mechanisms shared between cardiovascular diseases and cancer. CysC and Lp(a) may be used as biomarkers to indicate the survival of HCC patients, although this conclusion requires further validation in a larger population.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for Regional High Frequency Tumor, Ministry of Education (Grant Number: GKE-ZZ202104), the Promoting Project of Basic Capacity for Young and Middle-aged University Teachers in Guangxi (Grant Numbers: 2021KY0099, and 2021KY0112), the Youth Science Foundation of Guangxi Medical University (Grant Number: GXMUYSF202121), Guangxi medical and health appropriate technology opening and application project (S2021022), and Key Project of Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (2018GXNSFDA050012).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
Supporting Information
References
- 1.Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zucman-Rossi J, Villanueva A, Nault JC, Llovet JM. Genetic landscape and biomarkers of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:1226–1239. e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.de Boer RA, Meijers WC, van der Meer P, van Veldhuisen DJ. Cancer and heart disease: associations and relations. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21:1515–1525. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aboumsallem JP, Moslehi J, de Boer RA. Reverse cardio-oncology: cancer development in patients with cardiovascular disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e013754. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lau ES, Paniagua SM, Liu E, Jovani M, Li SX, Takvorian K, Suthahar N, Cheng S, Splansky GL, Januzzi JL Jr, Wang TJ, Vasan RS, Kreger B, Larson MG, Levy D, de Boer RA, Ho JE. Cardiovascular risk factors are associated with future cancer. JACC CardioOncol. 2021;3:48–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gao G, Dong F, Yan W. Clinical value of serum apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) detection in HBV-related liver cancer. J Med Res. 2017;46:109–112. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ran R. The Mechanism of Cystatin C in the development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. 2019. [Master’s degree in Laboratory Medicine, Wuhan University] https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/thesis/ChhUaGVzaXNOZXdTMjAyMzA3MjgxMDM1MzQSCUQwMjYxOTEyNxoIeHBpZDgzNGs%3D.
- 8.Lippi G, Targher G, Franchini M, Guidi GC. Biochemical correlates of lipoprotein(a) in a general adult population. Possible implications for cardiovascular risk assessment. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2009;27:44–47. doi: 10.1007/s11239-007-0171-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shen S, Gong J, Yang Y, Qin S, Huang L, She S, Yang M, Ren H, Hu H. Molecular mechanism of C-reaction protein in promoting migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro. Int J Oncol. 2017;50:1289–1298. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2017.3911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zamanian-Daryoush M, DiDonato JA. Apolipoprotein A-I and cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:265. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tang Y, Xu H, Liu X, Liu L, Li Y. Clinical significance of PF4, VEGF, HIF-1a and Lpα in sera of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Transfus Lab Med. 2017;19:478–481. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gao XH, Zhang SS, Chen H, Wang K, Xie W, Wang FB. Lipoprotein (a): a promising prognostic biomarker in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:5917–5924. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S164273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.He H, Lü RX, Xu J, Liang LB, Zhang MF, An ZM, Huang HJ. Preliminary study on the expression of cystatin C in primary liver cancer. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2013;44:920–923. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhao X, Luo J, Li B, Liu S, Li D. The association between preoperative serum C-reactive protein and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection-a retrospective study. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Peng C, Ye Y, Wang Z, Guan L, Bao S, Li B, Li W. Circulating microRNAs for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Liver Dis. 2019;51:621–631. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Smith GD, Ebrahim S. ‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:1–22. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Larsson SC, Traylor M, Malik R, Dichgans M, Burgess S, Markus HS CoSTREAM Consortium, on behalf of the International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Project. Modifiable pathways in Alzheimer’s disease: Mendelian randomisation analysis. BMJ. 2017;359:j5375. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kanai M, Akiyama M, Takahashi A, Matoba N, Momozawa Y, Ikeda M, Iwata N, Ikegawa S, Hirata M, Matsuda K, Kubo M, Okada Y, Kamatani Y. Genetic analysis of quantitative traits in the Japanese population links cell types to complex human diseases. Nat Genet. 2018;50:390–400. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0047-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Huang Q, Liu Y, Qiu M, Lin Q, Wei X, Zhou Z, Liang X, Li R, Chen W, Zhou X, Yu H. Potentially functional variants of MAP3K14 in the NF-κB signaling pathway genes predict survival of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Front Oncol. 2022;12:990160. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.990160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vizovišek M, Fonović M, Turk B. Cysteine cathepsins in extracellular matrix remodeling: extracellular matrix degradation and beyond. Matrix Biol. 2019;75-76:141–159. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ladero JM, Cárdenas MC, Ortega L, González-Pino A, Cuenca F, Morales C, Lee-Brunner A. Serum cystatin C: a non-invasive marker of liver fibrosis or of current liver fibrogenesis in chronic hepatitis C? Ann Hepatol. 2012;11:648–651. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Seo YS, Park SY, Kim MY, Kim SG, Park JY, Yim HJ, Jang BK, Park SH, Kim JH, Suk KT, Kim JD, Kim TY, Cho EY, Lee JS, Jung SW, Jang JY, An H, Tak WY, Baik SK, Hwang JS, Kim YS, Sohn JH, Um SH. Serum cystatin C level: an excellent predictor of mortality in patients with cirrhotic ascites. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33:910–917. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Allen AM, Kim WR, Larson JJ, Colby C, Therneau TM, Rule AD. Serum cystatin C as an indicator of renal function and mortality in liver transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2015;99:1431–1435. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tumminello FM, Flandina C, Crescimanno M, Leto G. Circulating cathepsin K and cystatin C in patients with cancer related bone disease: clinical and therapeutic implications. Biomed Pharmacother. 2008;62:130–135. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2007.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Leto G, Incorvaia L, Flandina C, Ancona C, Fulfaro F, Crescimanno M, Sepporta MV, Badalamenti G. Clinical impact of cystatin C/cathepsin L and follistatin/activin a systems in breast cancer progression: a preliminary report. Cancer Invest. 2016;34:415–423. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2016.1222416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Decock J, Obermajer N, Vozelj S, Hendrickx W, Paridaens R, Kos J. Cathepsin B, cathepsin H, cathepsin X and cystatin C in sera of patients with early-stage and inflammatory breast cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 2008;23:161–168. doi: 10.1177/172460080802300305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nakabayashi H, Hara M, Shimuzu K. Clinicopathologic significance of cystatin C expression in gliomas. Hum Pathol. 2005;36:1008–1015. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yan Y, Zhou K, Wang L, Zhou Y, Chen X, Fan Q. Expression of cystatin C and its effect on EC9706 cells in esophageal carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:10102–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chen W. Hepatocellular carcinoma cells-secreted Cystatin-C as TLR4 agonist. 2017. [Master’s degree in Biochemistry, National Yang-Ming University] https://hdl.handle.net/11296/y8357n.
- 30.Bakst RL, Xiong H, Chen CH, Deborde S, Lyubchik A, Zhou Y, He S, McNamara W, Lee SY, Olson OC, Leiner IM, Marcadis AR, Keith JW, Al-Ahmadie HA, Katabi N, Gil Z, Vakiani E, Joyce JA, Pamer E, Wong RJ. Inflammatory monocytes promote perineural invasion via CCL2-mediated recruitment and cathepsin B expression. Cancer Res. 2017;77:6400–6414. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yang KM, Bae E, Ahn SG, Pang K, Park Y, Park J, Lee J, Ooshima A, Park B, Kim J, Jung Y, Takahashi S, Jeong J, Park SH, Kim SJ. Co-chaperone BAG2 determines the pro-oncogenic role of cathepsin B in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Cell Rep. 2017;21:2952–2964. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gondi CS, Rao JS. Cathepsin B as a cancer target. Expert Opin Ther Target. 2013;17:281–291. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2013.740461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gashenko EA, Lebedeva VA, Brak IV, Tsykalenko EA, Vinokurova GV, Korolenko TA. Evaluation of serum procathepsin B, cystatin B and cystatin C as possible biomarkers of ovarian cancer. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2013;72:21215. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v72i0.21215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hancock MA, Boffa MB, Marcovina SM, Nesheim ME, Koschinsky ML. Inhibition of plasminogen activation by lipoprotein(a): critical domains in apolipoprotein(a) and mechanism of inhibition on fibrin and degraded fibrin surfaces. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:23260–23269. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M302780200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kim JS, Yu HK, Ahn JH, Lee HJ, Hong SW, Jung KH, Chang SI, Hong YK, Joe YA, Byun SM, Lee SK, Chung SI, Yoon Y. Human apolipoprotein(a) kringle V inhibits angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo by interfering with the activation of focal adhesion kinases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;313:534–540. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
