Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2023 Aug 12;15(8):e43356. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43356

Assessing Thrombocytopenia and Chronic Liver Disease in Southeast Asia: A Multicentric Cross-Sectional Study

Ramsha Sohail 1, Imran H Hassan 2, Mah Rukh 3, Muhammad Saqib 3,, Muhammad Iftikhar 3, Hassan Mumtaz 4,5,6,7
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC10493634  PMID: 37700968

Abstract

Background

This multicentric cross-sectional study aimed to examine the prevalence of thrombocytopenia (TCP) and investigate the various causes of chronic liver disease (CLD) across 15 Southeast Asian (India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh) tertiary care centers over a three-month period. The study focused on assessing the fibrosis index (FI) and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-sodium (Na) score's capacity to grade and predict the progression and outcomes of patients with already diagnosed CLD.

Methods

The cross-sectional study enrolled 377 CLD patients. The study utilized admission registries from 15 tertiary care hospitals in Southeast Asia, spanning from April 2023 to June 2023. Various descriptive variables were collected, including gender, tobacco use (specifically, chewed tobacco), underlying etiology, presence of anemia, leukopenia, pancytopenia, infectious state, and liver cirrhosis diagnosed via traditional ultrasonography. This study examined liver failure indicators, including alanine transaminase levels, compensation status, TCP, and liver transplant (LT) listing. The MELD-Na score was the focus of frequency and percentage analysis. MELD-Na and FI medians and standard deviations were provided.

Results

The study of 377 patients with CLD found that TCP was present in 4% of patients and leukopenia was present in 12% of patients. The risk of TCP was significantly higher in leukopenic patients (89.5%) than in non-leukopenic patients (52.5%) (p = 0.003). The most common CLD cause was undiagnosable (31%), followed by autoimmune (26%), hepatitis C virus (21%), hepatitis B virus (14%), and schistosomiasis (8%). The majority of patients (98%) had decompensated liver disease. Of the patients, 64% had TCP, while 36% did not. The illness severity indicators MELD score and FI had mean ± SD values of 16.89 ± 6.42 and 4.1 ± 1.06, respectively. Similarly, the prevalence of LT needs among traditional ultrasonography-diagnosed cirrhotic patients was 83.1%, compared to 59.6% among non-cirrhotic patients (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Leukopenia and TCP may be linked, which may affect CLD treatment and prognosis in this population. Non-invasive indicators like the FI and MELD-Na score can detect liver fibrosis and severity without invasive procedures, enhancing patient management. These findings highlight the need to improve early diagnosis methods for CLD in Southeast Asia and raise awareness among clinicians about effective diagnostic strategies for non-infectious causes of CLD.

Keywords: southeast asia, chronic liver disease, thrombocytopenia, southeastern, asia, ultrasonography, leukopenia, prognosis liver, end-stage liver disease

Introduction

Thrombocytopenia (TCP), which affects 6-78% of global chronic liver disease (CLD) sufferers, lowers “platelet count” below 150 x 109/L [1]. Platelets at 100,000-150,000/μL indicate mild TCP, while 50,000-100,000/μL indicate moderate TCP. Despite platelet count reductions, hemostasis management is safe. Monitoring and timely medical care for each patient reduce bleeding problems. CLD patients with mild or moderate TCP can receive appropriate treatment without complications [2].

In cases of moderate-to-severe TCP, there is no consensus on the optimal platelet count threshold that requires platelet transfusion [3,4]. However, a platelet count below 50,000/μL usually warrants transfusion. This conclusion assesses the risks and advantages of platelet transfusion in CLD patients with TCP, considering contradicting data. These guidelines need more research [5].

Encephalopathy and renal dysfunction are considered in this grading system. By considering these factors, medical experts can determine the urgency of action and the suitable prioritizing transplantation for advanced liver disease patients [6-8].

The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score predicts one-month death in cirrhotic patients following a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). The MELD score helps clinicians choose TIPS therapies by evaluating bilirubin, creatinine, and international normalized ratio. It predicts patient outcomes and guides advanced liver disease treatment [9]. Subsequently, the MELD-Na score was introduced by incorporating serum sodium levels, resulting in a modified version of the MELD score. This enhancement improved the accuracy of assessing disease severity and became valuable in organ allocation processes [10,11]. The fibrosis index (FI) was developed by Ohta et al. [12] to estimate the hepatic fibrosis histological stage [12]. This multicentric cross-sectional study aimed to examine the prevalence of TCP and investigate the various causes of CLD across 15 Southeast Asian (India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh) tertiary care centers over a three-month period. The study focused on assessing the FI and MELD-Na score's capacity to grade and predict the progression and outcomes of patients with already diagnosed CLD.

Materials and methods

A convenient sampling method was used for sample size calculation. The sample size was calculated using the Raosoft sample size calculator (available online from http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html), keeping a confidence level of 95% and a margin of error of 5%. The variable used for the base prevalence in the calculation was set to 27.71%, which was obtained from data abstracted from VizHub (https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/; accessed August 6, 2023), specifically provided by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, GBD 2019© 2023, University of Washington. The study utilized admission registries from 15 tertiary care hospitals in Southeast Asia, spanning from April 2023 to June 2023.

Inclusion criteria included the following: patients aged 18 years and above; patients diagnosed with CLD based on clinical, laboratory, and imaging criteria; patients who have undergone relevant diagnostic procedures and assessments to confirm the presence of CLD; patients with available medical records and admission data during the study period from April 2023 to June 2023; patients with documented platelet count results within the study duration.

Exclusion criteria included the following: patients below the age of 18 years; patients without a confirmed diagnosis of CLD; patients with acute liver failure or acute liver injury, not meeting the criteria for CLD; patients with missing or incomplete medical records or admission data during the study period; patients with a history of hematologic disorders (other than TCP) that could influence platelet counts; patients with a history of TCP unrelated to CLD (e.g., idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and drug-induced TCP); patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding during the study period; patients with severe comorbidities or conditions that might significantly impact their platelet count independent of CLD; patients who have received platelet transfusions or any interventions that may affect platelet count within the 30 days preceding the study.

A total of 377 CLD patients participated in a three-month multicenter, cross-sectional study. Various descriptive variables were collected, including gender, tobacco use (specifically, chewed tobacco), underlying etiology, presence of anemia, leukopenia, pancytopenia, infectious state, and liver cirrhosis diagnosed via traditional ultrasonography. This study examined liver failure indicators, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, compensation status, TCP, and liver transplant (LT) listing. The MELD-Na score was the focus of frequency and percentage analysis. MELD-Na and FI medians and standard deviations were provided. These findings illuminate liver disease severity and may help determine a patient's need for LT.

In addition, the study took into account the personal history of smokeless tobacco use (such as naswar or snus), which is known to be associated with oral cancer [13]. The survey included extensive general and systemic exams and blood testing. Clinical and radiological tests were used to diagnose decompensated CLD. Clinical parameters considered liver failure indicators, while radiological parameters identified hepatic cirrhosis using conventional ultrasonography. Portal hypertension and splenomegaly helped diagnose the illness. This thorough assessment of liver health ensured accuracy.

This study examined TCP in CLD patients and its connection with demographic and clinical factors. Researchers calculated 90% confidence intervals with 8% margins of error. The study also targeted 80% power to test a no-difference hypothesis. For strong analysis, statistical computations required 103 patients. Demographic and pathological variables based on thrombocyte count were compared. The researchers also examined the correlations between traditional ultrasonography-diagnosed liver cirrhosis and the FI. The median test is ideal for comparing medians across groups. This comprehensive approach allowed the researchers to examine TCP prevalence in CLD patients and its potential associations with clinical factors.

This study employed liver fibrosis stages F4 and F0-F3 to determine cirrhosis. This categorization reflects Desmet et al.'s histological liver fibrosis grading [14]. The MELD-Na score was also used to categorize LT candidates into "yes" and "no" groups [15]. The study used Kim et al.'s MELD-Na score and Ohta's FI formulae [12,16,17]. MDCalc's online portal used these formulae for patients' data. LT requires the MELD-Na score, which uses MELD and serum sodium levels to estimate disease severity. The FI quantifies liver fibrosis advancement. The study investigated LT candidates' MELD-Na scores and fibrosis stages using these methods and technologies. This information could help prioritize LT waiting list patients with advanced fibrosis and higher MELD-Na scores. The study's conclusions are more credible and reproducible since it uses formulas, grading criteria, and an online data portal [18].

The following formulas were employed to calculate non-invasive biomarkers for CLD: FI = 8 - 0.01 x platelets (109/L) - albumin (g/dL); MELD-Na = MELD - Na - [0.025 x MELD x (140 - Na)] + 140, with Na < 125 calculated as 125 and Na > 140 calculated as 140.

All aspects of the study were carried out in strict accordance with the guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study adhered to all ethical standards. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants before enrollment. Permission to publish the findings was also obtained.

Results

Results from the cross-sectional study revealed information regarding TCP and CLD. A separate analysis was conducted on data from different hospitals to assess whether heterogeneity in centers had any effect on results, but no significant difference was observed, hence all data have been reported in a consolidated form. Tables 1, 2 present a participant distribution by factor. These include gender, smokeless tobacco usage, underlying liver diseases, anemia, leukopenia, pancytopenia, elevated ALT levels, and TCP, which are evaluated in conjunction with compensatory status and ultrasonography-identified liver fibrosis. The median, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage for MELD-Na are detailed below, with FI and LT listings. This complete analysis helped to comprehend the research population by revealing participant distribution and characteristics. Out of the 377 participants with a median age of 51 years (range: 18-75 years of age), 58% were males and 42% were females. Furthermore, 49.05% were smokeless tobacco-using cases. The distribution is based on underlying etiology, anemia, leukopenia, pancytopenia, ALT, liver failure, splenic size, compensation, etiology’s infectious status, and traditional ultrasonography-diagnosed liver cirrhosis. Table 3 displays the median SD for MELD-Na and FI, i.e., 16.89 + 6.42 and 4.1 + 1.06, respectively. Table 3 indicates that 245 patients (65%) had MELD-Na scores > 14, signifying LT classification.

Table 1. Characteristics, both demographic and pathological, of the study population.

Operational definitions

Gender: The classification of individuals into male or female categories based on self-identified gender identity. Smokeless tobacco use: The act of consuming tobacco products (e.g., chewing tobacco and snuff) by placing them in the mouth or nasal cavity without burning them. Etiology: The cause or origin of a disease or medical condition. Undiagnosable: A condition or situation where the exact cause or diagnosis cannot be determined or identified despite medical evaluation and investigation. Autoimmune: Pertaining to a condition or disease resulting from the body's immune system attacking its own cells or tissues. Hepatitis C virus (HCV): A virus that infects the liver and can lead to hepatitis C infection. Hepatitis B virus (HBV): A virus that infects the liver and can lead to hepatitis B infection. Schistosomiasis: A parasitic disease caused by Schistosoma parasites, commonly found in contaminated water, that can affect various organs, including the liver. Anemia: A medical condition characterized by a lower-than-normal level of red blood cells or hemoglobin in the blood. Alanine aminotransferase: A liver enzyme that is used as a marker of liver health and function. Normal liver: A liver with no signs of significant abnormalities or diseases. Liver failure: A severe condition where the liver loses its ability to function properly. Traditional ultrasonography-diagnosed liver cirrhosis: Liver cirrhosis diagnosed using traditional ultrasonography imaging techniques. Splenic size: The size of the spleen, often measured in centimeters, to assess its enlargement or abnormality. Chronic liver disease etiology's infectious status: The current infectious status (presence or absence of infection) of the etiology or cause of chronic liver disease, such as HCV or HBV. Liver compensation: The liver's ability to maintain its functions despite the presence of certain liver diseases or conditions.

Characteristics   Frequency (n = 377) Percentage
Age (median) 51 years (range: 18-75 years) - -
Gender Male 218 58%
Female 159 42%
Smokeless tobacco use Yes 185 49.05%
No 192 51.95%
Etiology Undiagnosable 117 31%
Autoimmune 98 26%
Hepatitis C virus 79 21%
Hepatitis B virus 53 14%
Schistosomiasis 30 8%
Anemia Yes 241 64%
No 136 36%
Leukopenia Yes 45 12%
No 332 88%
Pancytopenia Yes 53 14%
No 324 86%
Alanine aminotransferase Raised 132 35%
Normal 245 65%
Liver failure Yes 41 11%
No 336 89%
Traditional ultrasonography-diagnosed liver cirrhosis Yes 53 14%
No 324 86%
Splenic size Enlarged 245 65%
Normal 132 36%
Etiology’s infectious status Yes 181 48%
No 196 52%
Compensation Compensated 8 02%
Decompensated 369 98%

Table 2. Distribution of thrombocytopenia.

The prevalence of thrombocytopenia
Thrombocytopenia Normal thrombocyte count
n (%) 95% CI n (%) 95% CI
241 64% 54%-66% 136 36% 26%-39%

Table 3. MELD score, fibrosis index, LT listing urgency, and conventional ultrasonography-diagnosed liver fibrosis.

Independent t-tests using Levene's test for variance equality and the McNemar test showed significance. This extensive investigation reveals the therapeutic implications and relationship between these elements.

MELD = Model for End-Stage Liver Disease; MELD-Na = Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium, LT = liver transplant; SD = standard deviation; FI = fibrosis index.

Variable Total (n = 377) MELD-Na score (mean + SD) p-value Fibrosis index (FI) (mean + SD) p-value Urgent LT posting based on MELD score, n (percent) p-value
Yes No
Ultrasonography has traditionally diagnosed liver fibrosis, n (percent) 246 16.89 + 6.42   4.01 + 1.03   65.2% 34.8%  
Cirrhotic liver (F4) 14% 20.22 + 6.03 0.019 4.00 + 1.13 0.99 84.5% 15.5% 0.01
Non-cirrhotic liver (F0-F3) 86% 16.46 + 7.89 4.02 + 1.06 62.9% 37.1%

Similarly, the prevalence of LT need among traditional ultrasonography-diagnosed cirrhotic patients was 84.5%, compared to 62.9% among non-cirrhotic patients (p = 0.001), as shown in Table 3.

Table 4 compares the effects of TCP on different circumstances. TCP prevalence in CLD and hepatic failure patients was examined. A total of 89.5% of leukopenic CLD patients had TCP while 55.8% of those with hepatic failure had TCP. The table divides cases into categories with and without TCP based on descriptive data, revealing probable links between TCP and specific health issues.

Table 4. Thrombocyte count determined patient demographic and pathological characteristics.

P-values were determined using the chi-square test of independence following the Pearson chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. The thrombocyte count is statistically significant when the p-value is less than 0.05.

Characteristics   Thrombocytopenia (n = 241) Normal thrombocyte count (n = 136) P-value
  n % n %  
Gender Male 154 64% 223 36% 0.21
Female 131 54.3% 246 45.7
Smokeless tobacco use Yes 168 69.6% 209 30.4% 0.06
No 127 52.9% 250 47.1%
Etiology Undiagnosable 134 55.7% 243 44.3% 0.90
Autoimmune 152 63.1% 225 36.9%
Hepatitis C virus 163 67.7% 214 32.3%
Hepatitis B virus 123 51% 254 49%
Schistosomiasis 239 63.5% 138 36.5%
Anemia Yes 255 67.7% 122 32.3% 0.08
No 187 49.7% 190 50.3%
Leukopenia Yes 216 89.5% 161 10.5% 0.003
No 198 52.5% 179 47.5%
Pancytopenia Yes 373 99% 4 1% 0.007
No 209 55.5% 168 44.5%
Alanine aminotransferase Raised 224 59.5% 153 40.5% 0.96
Normal 221 58.7% 156 41.3%
Liver failure No 210 55.8% 167 44.2% 0.003
Yes 214 56.8% 163 43.2%
Liver cirrhosis Yes 235 62.4% 142 37.6% 0.56
No 203 53.9% 174 46.1%
Splenic size Enlarged 228 60.4% 149 39.6% 0.89
Normal 227 60.1% 150 39.9%
Etiology’s infectious status Infectious 219 58.2% 163 41.8% 0.90
Non-infectious 233 61.7% 144 38.3%
Compensation Decompensated 220 58.4% 157 41.6% 0.67
Compensated 287 76% 90 24%

Discussion

This study's gender distribution of CLD patients matches earlier research, giving it credibility. The study examined smokeless tobacco use, a South Asian habit, and its connection with CLD and TCP. The researchers hypothesized that smokeless tobacco usage would not affect CLD or TCP in CLD patients. The desire to determine if smokeless tobacco use contributed to CLD or TCP aggravation in afflicted patients drove this idea. The study found no statistically significant difference between people who used smokeless tobacco and those who did not (p = 0.767). Smokeless tobacco usage may not have a correlation with CLD and TCP in the patients investigated.

In this study, the observed prevalence of decompensation in patients with CLD was found to be significantly higher compared to previously reported rates. This difference could potentially be attributed to a lower frequency of early CLD diagnoses in South Asia. While the annual occurrence of one or more decompensation manifestations, such as ascites, variceal bleeding, and hepatic encephalopathy, ranges from approximately 4% to 12% among cirrhotic patients in prior studies [12-16].

The bulk of CLD patients' etiologies were unknown, making 31% of cases undiagnosable. The majority of CLD patients globally have non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). NAFLD prevalence among CLD patients varies widely between locations, demonstrating its variability. Of CLD patients worldwide, 24% have NAFLD. Regional data show substantial disparities, nevertheless. Of African CLD patients, 13.5% have NAFLD. South America has a 30.5% frequency and the Middle East has 31.8%. Interestingly, 33.9% of CLD patients in Asia have NAFLD. These findings emphasize the need for a full knowledge of regional variances in NAFLD prevalence, pointing to possible lifestyle, nutrition, genetic, and environmental variables. Due to these varied prevalence rates, region-specific NAFLD therapy and prevention methods may be necessary [17,18].

TCP exhibited a high prevalence in both this study and previous global investigations [15]. In the current study, it was observed that 64% of the participants had TCP, with a 95% CI ranging from 54% to 66%. Other studies have reported even higher rates, indicating that 76% of CLD patients are affected by TCP [19]. This discrepancy is likely attributed to the delay or lack of early diagnoses of CLD [9,20,21].

Furthermore, the present study found no significant distinction in the median FI between participants diagnosed with cirrhosis via traditional ultrasonography and those without cirrhosis. Conventional ultrasonography is limited in its ability to detect advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis (F4 grade). Its reliance on liver parenchyma echogenicity and surface features may not identify major liver fibrotic alterations. Moreover, the study did not employ more advanced methods such as elastographic ultrasonography or elastographic MRI, which are known to provide more accurate assessments of liver fibrosis [22].

Platelet buildup in a portal hypertensive spleen causes TCP [23-30]. However, this analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of TCP between those with splenomegaly-associated CLD and those with normal spleen size (p = 0.89). People with CLD may develop TCP through a variety of mechanisms, as suggested by these findings. In addition, they emphasize the need for further research to better comprehend this syndrome.

This study's findings, along with those of other studies, suggest that the etiology of TCP is likely the result of the interaction of a number of factors. Additionally, neither conservative nor surgical techniques for treating portal hypertension have demonstrated the ability to reverse or cure TCP. Because TCP is a complication of portal hypertension, this is the case [23,24]. Additionally, TCP can be linked to various factors such as splenic sequestration, impaired platelet production due to viral hepatitis or alcohol toxicity, and the presence of anti-platelet antibodies [25-28,31-37].

The prevalence of TCP in CLD was observed in this study. The prevalence of TCP was 55.8% in patients with severe liver failure and 44.2% in those without. Gallus et al. [38] found 52% TCP prevalence in acute hepatitis and liver failure patients compared to 16% in those without liver failure. These data suggest a link between chronic and acute liver failure and TCP [29].

Conclusions

Southeast Asian researchers evaluated the global incidence of TCP in CLD patients. Interestingly, TCP prevalence in study participants was similar to global numbers. However, CLD patients in the region had a greater decompensation rate. Early diagnosis is crucial for CLD management. The study found no link between smokeless tobacco use and TCP in CLD patients; however, it recommended cohort studies. Such studies could reveal if smokeless tobacco causes or worsens CLD in this population. The study also noted diagnostic limits for non-infectious CLD. This needs greater attention to improve CLD detection and intervention, suggesting the need for programs aimed at enhancing clinician awareness of appropriate diagnostic strategies. Furthermore, the study proposed considering advanced techniques such as highly sensitive Doppler ultrasound and newer imaging modalities to improve the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Lastly, it emphasized the establishment of hepatology-specialized centers for LT and the implementation of an organized organ allocation system, including both deceased and living donation options, to address the needs of CLD patients effectively.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Maroof International Hospital issued approval ERC/09/07/23B. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Maroof International Hospital provided ethical approval for this study under reference ERC/09/07/23B on 2nd March 2023.

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.The pathophysiology of thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease. Mitchell O, Feldman DM, Diakow M, Sigal SH. Hepat Med. 2016;8:39–50. doi: 10.2147/HMER.S74612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease: physiopathology and new therapeutic strategies before invasive procedures. Gallo P, Terracciani F, Di Pasquale G, Esposito M, Picardi A, Vespasiani-Gentilucci U. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28:4061–4074. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vascular liver disorders, portal vein thrombosis, and procedural bleeding in patients with liver disease: 2020 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Northup PG, Garcia-Pagan JC, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. Hepatology. 2021;73:366–413. doi: 10.1002/hep.31646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Impact of platelet count on perioperative bleeding in patients with cirrhosis undergoing surgical treatments of liver cancer. Ronca V, Barabino M, Santambrogio R, et al. Hepatol Commun. 2022;6:423–434. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy. Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Early DS, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:707–718. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Br J Surg. 1973;60:646–649. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800600817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.A systematic review of the performance of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) in the setting of liver transplantation. Cholongitas E, Marelli L, Shusang V, Senzolo M, Rolles K, Patch D, Burroughs AK. Liver Transpl. 2006;12:1049–1061. doi: 10.1002/lt.20824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Patient selection in an era of donor liver shortage: current US policy. Wiesner RH. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;2:24–30. doi: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, Peine CJ, Rank J, ter Borg PC. Hepatology. 2000;31:864–871. doi: 10.1053/he.2000.5852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Changing prioritization for transplantation: MELD-Na, hepatocellular carcinoma exceptions, and more. Kalra A, Wedd JP, Biggins SW. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2016;21:120–126. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Serum sodium and survival benefit of liver transplantation. Sharma P, Schaubel DE, Goodrich NP, Merion RM. Liver Transpl. 2015;21:308–313. doi: 10.1002/lt.24063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Simple surrogate index of the fibrosis stage in chronic hepatitis C patients using platelet count and serum albumin level. Ohta T, Sakaguchi K, Fujiwara A, et al. Acta Med Okayama. 2006;60:77–84. doi: 10.18926/AMO/30729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Naswar (smokeless tobacco) use and the risk of oral cancer in Pakistan: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Khan Z, Suliankatchi RA, Heise TL, Dreger S. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019;21:32–40. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Classification of chronic hepatitis: diagnosis, grading and staging. Desmet VJ, Gerber M, Hoofnagle JH, Manns M, Scheuer PJ. Hepatology. 1994;19:1513–1520. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Review article: thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease and pharmacologic treatment options. Giannini EG. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23:1055–1065. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02889.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Prioritization for liver transplantation using the MELD score in Chile: inequities generated by MELD exceptions.: A collaboration between the Chilean Liver Transplant Programs, the Public Health Institute and the National Transplant Coordinator. Díaz LA, Norero B, Lara B, et al. Ann Hepatol. 2019;18:325–330. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2018.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hyponatremia and mortality among patients on the liver-transplant waiting list. Kim WR, Biggins SW, Kremers WK, et al. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1018–1026. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Walker G. MDCalc. MD Calc Website, Evidence-Based Medicine journal. 2023. https://www.mdcalc.com/ https://www.mdcalc.com/
  • 19.STROCSS 2021: strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery. Mathew G, Agha R. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103026. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2021;72:103026. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.The high burden of alcoholic cirrhosis in privately insured persons in the United States. Mellinger JL, Shedden K, Winder GS, et al. Hepatology. 2018;68:872–882. doi: 10.1002/hep.29887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Clinical states of cirrhosis and competing risks. D'Amico G, Morabito A, D'Amico M, Pasta L, Malizia G, Rebora P, Valsecchi MG. J Hepatol. 2018;68:563–576. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Competing risks and prognostic stages of cirrhosis: a 25-year inception cohort study of 494 patients. D'Amico G, Pasta L, Morabito A, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39:1180–1193. doi: 10.1111/apt.12721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Causes of death in people with liver cirrhosis in England compared with the general population: a population-based cohort study. Ratib S, Fleming KM, Crooks CJ, Walker AJ, West J. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1149–1158. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.The rate of decompensation and clinical progression of disease in people with cirrhosis: a cohort study. Fleming KM, Aithal GP, Card TR, West J. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:1343–1350. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04473.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease—meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Hepatology. 2016;64:73–84. doi: 10.1002/hep.28431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Prevalence, incidence, and outcome of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Asia, 1999-2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Li J, Zou B, Yeo YH, et al. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4:389–398. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30039-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, et al. Hepatology. 2001;33:464–470. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.22172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Prediction of liver cirrhosis, using diagnostic imaging tools. Yeom SK, Lee CH, Cha SH, Park CM. World J Hepatol. 2015;7:2069–2079. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i17.2069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Survival and prognostic factors in 366 patients with compensated cirrhosis type B: a multicenter study. Realdi G, Fattovich G, Hadziyannis S, et al. J Hepatol. 1994;21:656–666. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(94)80115-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Predictors and implications of severe hypersplenism in patients with cirrhosis. Liangpunsakul S, Ulmer BJ, Chalasani N. Am J Med Sci. 2003;326:111–116. doi: 10.1097/00000441-200309000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease. Afdhal N, McHutchison J, Brown R, et al. J Hepatol. 2008;48:1000–1007. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Effect of portacaval anastomosis on hypersplenism. Mutchnick MG, Lerner E, Conn HO. Dig Dis Sci. 1980;25:929–938. doi: 10.1007/BF01308044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Does transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) resolve thrombocytopenia associated with cirrhosis? Jabbour N, Zajko A, Orons P, Irish W, Fung JJ, Selby RR. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43:2459–2462. doi: 10.1023/a:1026634215918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hematological complications of alcoholism. Ballard HS. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1989;13:706–720. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1989.tb00408.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.A laboratory and thrombokinetic study of HCV-associated thrombocytopenia: a direct role of HCV in bone marrow exhaustion? Bordin G, Ballaré M, Zigrossi P, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8730475/ Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1995;13:0–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Thrombocytopenia associated with hepatitis C viral infection. Nagamine T, Ohtuka T, Takehara K, Arai T, Takagi H, Mori M. J Hepatol. 1996;24:135–140. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(96)80021-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Immune thrombocytopenic purpura in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Pockros PJ, Duchini A, McMillan R, Nyberg LM, McHutchison J, Viernes E. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2040–2045. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05845.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Coagulation studies in patients with acute infectious hepatitis. Gallus AS, Lucas CR, Hirsh J. Br J Haematol. 1972;22:761–771. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1972.tb05720.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES