Skip to main content
Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences logoLink to Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences
editorial
. 2023 Jul 8;18(6):1553–1554. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.06.008

Use of artificial intelligence in medical education: A strength or an infirmity

Shaur Sarfaraz a,, Zohaib Khurshid b, Muhammad S Zafar c,d
PMCID: PMC10494170  PMID: 37701848

In recent years, online applications embedding artificial intelligence (AI) have rapidly evolved and started ruling the minds of medical and healthcare students.1 Common AI applications (such as ChatGPT, OpenAI model) engaged more than one million users in a matter of just a few days.2 Undoubtedly, AI has a great contribution to aiding medical education by providing support in gaining knowledge, providing direction, and instant feedback to self-directed learners,3 thus increasing confidence and motivation for lifelong learning. For example, Virtual Assistants (such as Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant) are used to understand and respond to users' queries, perform tasks, and provide personalized recommendations.4 Similarly, Natural Language Processing (NLP) is used for applications such as chatbots, language translation, sentiment analysis, voice recognition, and speech-to-text applications.5 It enables machines to understand and communicate by generating human language. Moreover, AI is also used in adaptive learning platforms, intelligent tutoring systems, language learning apps, and automated grading systems, which personalize education and assist in students' assessments. In addition, AI is also used for a range of clinical applications in healthcare including medical imaging analysis, disease diagnosis, drug discovery, personalized medicine, and patient monitoring systems, which facilitates improving diagnostics, treatment planning, and patients’ outcomes.6

Although AI has numerous benefits, it also carries a few drawbacks. AI systems are trained on existing data, which can contain biases and discriminatory patterns. If not properly addressed, AI can perpetuate and amplify these biases, leading to unfair or misleading outcomes.7 Similarly, students may also get misguided by the information provided by AI applications as these systems may not be transparent, making it difficult to understand the evidence and grounds supporting certain conclusions or recommendations. In addition to this, AI may lead to complex ethical questions. Therefore, in healthcare education systems, students cannot solely depend on AI to determine solutions to difficult ethical dilemmas in their real-life practices.8

Currently, there are plenty of healthcare students who have started using AI applications in clinical practices to explore solutions for diseases considering it as a rapid and convenient source of information. However, this article emphasizes the need to understand that relying solely on AI for important tasks may lead to a reduced ability to evaluate information, and diminish critical thinking. Consequently, overreliance and blind dependency of medical students on AI may reduce their critical thinking and decision-making skills. This is a crucial time for educationist and regulatory bodies to seriously think of controlling the misuse of AI in the education system and regulate its use, restricting associated risks and potentiating its advantages for students.9 The reason for thinking so loud is that the AI is not in its mature state and lacks regulatory guidelines.

To conclude, AI has a brilliant future for healthcare education and clinical applications. However, we must consider various limitations and implementation issues associated with AI reported previously10 including student's mental health issues, social issues, and ethical issues. This is the time to promptly think and act about the above-mentioned issues, otherwise, it might be too late.

Source of funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval is not required for the letter to the editor.

Authors’ contribution

SS conceived the idea, and SR and ZK wrote the initial draft of the article, SS and MSZ critically revised the final draft. All authors have critically reviewed and approved the final draft and are responsible for the content and similarity index of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Taibah University.

References

  • 1.Paranjape K., Schinkel M., Nannan Panday R., Car J., Nanayakkara P. Introducing artificial intelligence training in medical education. JMIR Med Educ. 2019;5(2) doi: 10.2196/16048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Biswas Som. Role of chat GPT in education (February 25, 2023) https://ssrn.com/abstract=4369981 Available at SSRN:
  • 3.Lillehaug S.I., Lajoie S.P. AI in medical education—another grand challenge for medical informatics. Artif Intell Med. 1998;12(3):197–225. doi: 10.1016/S0933-3657(97)00054-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Perez-Pino A., Yadav S., Upadhyay M., Cardarelli L., Tadinada A. The accuracy of artificial intelligence–based virtual assistants in responding to routinely asked questions about orthodontics. Angle Orthod. 2023 doi: 10.2319/100922-691.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ayanouz S., Abdelhakim B.A., Benhmed M. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on networking, information systems & security. 2020. A smart chatbot architecture based NLP and machine learning for health care assistance; pp. 1–6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Iroda A., Diyora A. Artificial intelligence in medicine: benefits and drawbacks. Br View. 2021;6(1) doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5576509. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bickmore T.W., Trinh H., Olafsson S., O'Leary T.K., Asadi R., Rickles N.M., Cruz R. Patient and consumer safety risks when using conversational assistants for medical information: an observational study of Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(9) doi: 10.2196/11510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vincent-Lancrin S., van der Vlies R. OECD education working papers, No. 218. OECD Publishing; Paris: 2020. Trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) in education: promises and challenges. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Berendt B., Littlejohn A., Blakemore M. AI in education: learner choice and fundamental rights. Learn Media Technol. 2020;45(3):312–324. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2020.1786399. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Khan B., Fatima H., Qureshi A., Kumar S., Hanan A., Hussain J., Abdullah S. Drawbacks of artificial intelligence and their potential solutions in the healthcare sector. Biomed Mater Dev. 2023:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s44174-023-00063-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Taibah University

RESOURCES