Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Pediatr. 2023 Mar 12;23(8):1526–1534. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.03.002

Inequities in Time Spent Coordinating Care for Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs

Aditi Vasan 1,2,3, Michael Anne Kyle 4, Atheendar S Venkataramani 3,5, Chén C Kenyon 1,2,3, Alexander G Fiks 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC10495536  NIHMSID: NIHMS1882631  PMID: 36918094

Abstract

Objectives:

In the United States, caregivers of children and youth with special healthcare needs (CYSHCN) must navigate complex, inefficient health care and insurance systems to access medical care. We assessed for sociodemographic inequities in time spent coordinating care for CYSHCN and examined the association between time spent coordinating care and forgone medical care.

Methods:

This cross-sectional study used data from the 2018–2020 National Survey of Children’s Health, which included 102,740 children across all 50 states. We described time spent coordinating care for children with less complex SHCN (managed through medications) and more complex SHCN (resulting in functional limitations or requiring specialized therapies). We examined race-, ethnicity-, income-, and insurance-based differences in time spent coordinating care among CYSHCN and used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between time spent coordinating care and forgone medical care.

Results:

Over 40% of caregivers of children with more complex SHCN reported spending time coordinating their children’s care each week. CYSHCN whose caregivers spent >5 hours/week on care coordination were disproportionately Hispanic, low-income, and publicly insured or uninsured. Increased time spent coordinating care was associated with an increasing probability of forgone medical care: 6.7% for children whose caregivers who spent no weekly time coordinating care versus 9.4% for <1 hour; 11.4% for 1–4 hours; and 15.8% for >5 hours.

Conclusion:

Reducing time spent coordinating care and providing additional supports to low-income and minoritized caregivers may be beneficial for pediatric payers, policymakers, and health systems aiming to promote equitable access to health care for CYSHCN.

Keywords: Care coordination, children with special health care needs

Introduction

In the United States, parents and caregivers of children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) must navigate complex, inefficient health care and health insurance systems to access the medical care, therapies, and support services their children need to stay healthy.13 In addition to the time they spend directly caring for their children, these caregivers are often tasked with scheduling appointments, coordinating care across multiple providers and health systems, managing health insurance enrollment and renewals, and ensuring timely payment of premiums and co-payments. These tasks often involve “administrative burdens” – caregivers must interpret complex eligibility rules, complete confusing and sometimes redundant paperwork, and wait for responses from providers or insurance companies.4 The time caregivers spend navigating these burdens may take away from their ability to provide for their children and support their health.

Previous studies have found that patient- and caregiver-facing administrative burdens can negatively impact health by reducing access to health insurance, medical care, and health-protective social service programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.57 In a recent national survey of adults with health insurance, 73% reported performing at least one health care-related administrative task within the previous year, and 24% reported delaying or forgoing needed medical care as a result of these administrative tasks.8

Administrative burdens also have the potential to generate and perpetuate health disparities. Caregivers who are from minoritized groups may face a disproportionate share of health care related administrative burdens and may also have fewer resources to use in navigating these burdens.912 Understanding and addressing inequities in administrative burdens and their downstream impacts on health may therefore help promote equitable child health outcomes.

Low-income and minoritized caregivers of CYSHCN may be particularly vulnerable to health care-related administrative burdens. Prior studies have found that many caregivers of CYSHCN report suboptimal mental health and forgone family income related to their child’s health condition.13,14 Previous studies have also explored disparities in care coordination needs among caregivers of CYSHCN, with mixed results; one study using 2007 data found that caregivers of Black and Hispanic/Latinx children were more likely to report unmet care coordination needs,15 while another study using 2016 data found no significant association between child race and ethnicity and caregiver-reported care coordination needs.16 However, no prior studies have examined inequities in time spent arranging and coordinating care, which may be a more objective measure of care coordination burden than caregiver-reported unmet needs, and no previous studies have assessed the relationship between time spent coordinating care and probability of forgone health care.

In this study, we therefore aimed to use data from the 2018–2020 National Survey of Children’s Health, a nationally representative survey of caregivers of children ages 0–17 years, to (1) quantify weekly time spent coordinating care among caregivers of CYSHCN, (2) describe differences in time spent coordinating care for CYSHCN based on children’s race, ethnicity, insurance status, caregiver education level, household primary language, and household income, and (3) examine the association between time spent coordinating care and children’s access to needed medical care. We hypothesized that these analyses could reveal inequities in time spent coordinating care, highlight associations between time spent coordinating care and forgone health care, and thereby inform future interventions aimed at reducing care coordination burdens and ensuring equitable access to care.

Study Design and Methods

Data and Population

The National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) is administered annually by the Health Resources and Service Administration’s Maternal and Child Health Bureau.17 The NSCH includes non-institutionalized children ages 0–17 years in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, recruited using address-based sampling. The 2018–2020 NSCH surveys were self-administered on paper or online by the parent or guardian of a randomly selected child in each sampled household. Data were weighted to be nationally representative and adjusted for the sampling design. The combined 2018–2020 NSCH dataset was comprised of 102,740 children (weighted sample size = 73,113,505), including 24,041 CYSHCN (weighted sample size = 14,023,598). The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia institutional review board deemed this study exempt from the need for approval, given its use of publicly available deidentified data.

Time Spent Coordinating Care

Our primary variable of interest was families’ weekly time spent coordinating care. Time spent coordinating care was derived from a single NSCH survey item, “In an average week, how many hours do you or other family members spend arranging or coordinating health or medical care for this child?”.18 This question defines “arranging or coordinating health care” to include tasks such as making appointments and locating necessary health care services. Possible responses were, “None,” “Less than 1 hour a week,” “1–4 hours a week,” “5–11 hours a week,” and “11 or more hours a week.” In our multivariable logistic regression model, we combined the last two categories into a composite category, “5 or more hours per week.”

Presence and Complexity of Special Health Care Needs

We classified children in our study sample as having special health care needs using the CYSHCN screener.18 The first part of the screener asks whether a child has one of five different health-related needs: (1) use of a prescription medication; (2) above average use of medical, mental health, or educational services; (3) functional limitations compared with other children of the same age; (4) use or need of specialized therapies, such as physical therapy, occupational therapy, or speech therapy; and (5) treatment or counseling for emotional or developmental problems. Caregivers who endorse any of these needs are asked whether this need is due to a health condition, and if so, whether this condition has lasted or is expected to last for at least 12 months. Children who have one or more needs that are both related to a health condition and expected to last for at least 12 months are considered CYSHCN.

The NSCH further classifies CYSHCN into two sub-categories: (1) children with less complex needs, who have chronic conditions managed primarily through prescription medications; and (2) children with more complex needs, who meet one of the four other criteria above. Some prior analyses of NSCH data have additionally classified a subset of children with more complex needs as “children with medical complexity” based on their chronic conditions, health care utilization, and degree of functional limitations.1,13,19 We chose to use the predefined 2-category NSCH classification of complexity, similar to the approach used by Foster et al. and Bethell et al.14,20

Forgone Health Care

Forgone health care was coded as a binary variable and defined using a single NSCH survey item, “During the past 12 months, was there any time when this child needed health care but it was not received? By health care, we mean medical care as well as other types of care like dental care, vision care, and mental health services.”18 This outcome encompasses forgone medical, mental health, dental, and vision care.

Covariates

Child characteristics included in our analysis were age, caregiver-reported child race and ethnicity, biological sex, and insurance coverage. We recognize that race and ethnicity are social constructs and included these variables as covariates in our multivariable regression models because they may serve as proxies for the shared experiences of oppression and discrimination experienced by individuals in these groups, which may include the administrative burdens they face within and outside of health care systems.

As additional covariates, we selected several variables that we hypothesized might be associated with both time spent coordinating care and forgone medical care. We included complexity of health care needs, as children with increased medical complexity may require additional health care. We also adjusted for caregivers’ weekly time spent providing home health care, as we hypothesized that this may serve as an additional proxy for medical complexity. Time spent providing care was derived from a single NSCH survey item, “In an average week, how many hours do you or other family members spend providing health care at home for this child?”.18 This question defines “providing health care at home” to include tasks such as changing bandages and giving medications or therapies. Possible responses were, “None,” “Up to 1 hour a week,” “1–4 hours a week,” “5–11 hours a week,” and “11 or more hours a week.” In our multivariable logistic regression model, we combined the last two categories into a composite category, “5 or more hours per week.”

In addition, we adjusted for metropolitan (urban) versus non-metropolitan (rural) county of residence, as we hypothesized that residence in a rural county might be associated with both increased time spent on care coordination and increased rates of forgone medical care, since CYSHCN in these communities might need to travel farther to access care. Other household characteristics included as key covariates in our multivariable regression models were caregiver educational attainment, primary household language, and household income as a proportion of the federal poverty level. Caregiver race and ethnicity information were not available. Figure S1 shows our conceptual model for this study.

Statistical Analysis

We used descriptive statistics to examine time spent coordinating care among caregivers of children without SHCN, children with less complex SHCN, and children with more complex SHCN. We then restricted our sample to CYSHCN and used chi-squared tests to examine race, ethnicity, income, and insurance-based differences in time spent coordinating care. Lastly, we used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between time spent coordinating care and forgone child health care for CYSHCN, after adjusting for covariates, and estimated the average marginal effect of increased time coordinating care on forgone child health care. Average marginal effects reflect the incremental increased risk associated with a given characteristic and are sometimes preferred to odds ratios in analyses of binary dependent variables, as they are less sensitive to differences in model specification and may be more readily interpretable.21,22 Analyses were conducted using STATA version 16.0 and included adjustments for survey weights across multiple years and for multiply imputed income data, as per published NSCH guidelines.23

Results

Time Spent Coordinating Care for Children with Special Health Care Needs

More than 40% of caregivers of children with more complex SHCN and more than 10% of caregivers of children with less complex SHCN reported spending some time each week arranging or coordinating care for their children (Figure 1). Among caregivers of children with more complex needs, 23.6% reported spending up to an hour each week coordinating care, 13.3% spent 1–4 hours per week, 2.1% spent 5–11 hours a week, and 2.5% spent >11 hours per week. This corresponds to an estimated 464,000 children with more complex SHCN across the United States whose caregivers spend 5 or more hours a week on care coordination.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Distribution of weekly time spent coordinating care among caregivers of children with and without special health care needs. The results show the weighted proportion of caregivers of children with no special health care needs (SHCN), less complex SHCN, and more complex SHCN who reported spending no weekly time coordinating care and who reported spending up to 1 hour/week, 1–4 hours/week, 5–11 hours/week, or 11 or more hours a week arranging or coordinating health care for their children. Percentages and sample sizes above are weighted to represent the US population of children ages 0–17 years using NSCH survey weights.

Race, Ethnicity, Income, and Education-Based Differences in Time Spent on Care Coordination

As compared to all other CYSHCN, CYSHCN whose caregivers who spent >5 hours a week coordinating their care were disproportionately Hispanic (33.7% vs. 21.1%), publicly insured (50.0% vs. 36.7%) or uninsured (11.2% vs. 3.7%), and had a household income below the federal poverty level (38.9% vs. 23.1%) (Table 1). In addition, a greater proportion of these caregivers had had less than a high school education (11.8% vs. 6.9%) and spoke a primary language other than English (12.0% vs. 7.3%).

Table 1.

Child, Caregiver, and Household Demographic Characteristics by Time Spent Coordinating Care

All CYSHCN (Weighted n = 14,023,598) No weekly care coordination (Weighted n = 9,250,758) Up to 1 hour/week (Weighted n = 2,753,648) 1–4 hours/week (Weighted n = 1,425,050) > 5 hours/week (Weighted n = 216,835) p-value
Child Age
0–5 Years 17.6%
(16.6–18.8)
16.2%
(15.0–17.6)
17.8%
(15.6–20.1)
23.9%
(19.7–28.6)
25.9%
(18.4–35.1)
<0.001
6–11 Years 37.4%
(36.2–38.8)
38.2%
(36.6–39.8)
35.8%
(33.3–38.4)
35.3%
(31.1–39.8)
38.0%
(29.9–47.0)
12–17 Years 44.9%
(43.6–46.2)
45.6%
(43.9–47.2)
46.4%
(43.9–49.0)
40.8%
(36.0–45.8)
36.1%
(27.3–46.0)
Child Race and Ethnicity
Black 16.2%
(15.1–17.3)
16.5%
(15.2–17.8)
13.0%
(11.0–15.3)
18.5%
(14.9–22.8)
18.2%
(12.8–25.2)
<0.001
Hispanic 21.5%
(20.1–23.0)
21.3%
(19.5–23.2)
19.6%
(17.1–22.3)
23.1%
(18.1–28.9)
33.7%
(24.0–45.1)
White 52.8%
(51.4–54.2)
52.4%
(50.7–54.1)
58.9%
(56.1–61.6)
50.3%
(45.5–55.2)
33.4%
(26.6–40.9)
Multi-racial / Other 9.5%
(8.8–10.3)
9.8%
(8.9–10.7)
8.6%
(7.3–10.0)
8.1%
(6.4–10.2)
14.7%
(9.6 −21.7)
Child Insurance Status
Public 37.3%
(35.9–38.7)
36.2%
(34.5–38.0)
35.1%
(32.4–37.8)
43.5%
(38.7–48.5)
50.0%
(40.7–59.3)
<0.001
Private 50.7%
(49.4–52.1)
53.4%
(51.7–55.1)
52.6%
(49.9–55.3)
39.6%
(34.9–44.4)
22.9%
(16.3–31.0)
Public and Private 8.0%
(7.3–8.8)
6.2%
(5.5–7.0)
9.2%
(7.6–11.0)
14.9%
(11.5–19.1)
15.9%
(10.7–22.9)
Uninsured 4.0%
(3.4–4.6)
4.2%
(3.4–5.0)
3.1%
(2.3–4.3)
2.0%
(1.4–2.9)
11.2%
(6.8–17.8)
Highest Level of Caregiver Education
Less than high school 7.2%
(6.2–8.2)
7.5%
(6.3–9.0)
4.9%
(3.6–6.7)
6.5%
(4.3–9.6)
11.8%
(6.7–19.9)
0.007
High school or GED 20.5%
(19.3–21.8)
21.4%
(19.8–23.0)
17.8%
(15.7–20.3)
19.7%
(15.6–24.5)
18.3%
(13.4–24.5)
Some college or technical school 24.3%
(23.1–25.4)
24.1%
(22.8–25.5)
23.4%
(21.2–25.7)
26.0%
(22.0–30.4)
28.9%
(21.6–37.4)
College degree or more 48.1%
(46.7–49.4)
47.0%
(45.4–48.6)
53.8%
(51.2–56.5)
47.8%
(43.0–52.7)
41.0%
(31.7–50.9)
Primary Household Language
English 92.5%
(91.5–93.4)
92.2%
(90.8–93.4)
94.4%
(92.5–95.8)
92.6%
(89.1–95.1)
88.0%
(81.7–92.3)
0.063
Non-English 7.5%
(6.6–8.5)
7.8%
(6.6–9.2)
5.6%
(4.2–7.4)
7.4%
(4.9–10.9)
12.0%
(7.7–18.3)
Household Income as a Percentage of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL)
0–99% FPL 22.1%
(20.8–23.4)
21.3%
(19.8–22.8)
23.2%
(18.7–27.8)
34.2%
(14.9–53.6)
38.9%
(29.6–49.0)
<0.001
100–199% FPL 22.3%
(21.1–23.5)
22.9%
(21.4–24.4)
18.7%
(16.9–20.7)
25.4%
(21.3–29.9)
22.8%
(15.2–31.1)
200–399% FPL 26.5%
(25.4–27.6)
26.8%
(25.5–28.2)
26.1%
(24.1–28.3)
25.7%
(22.3–31.6)
20.5%
(14.2–28.5)
> 400% FPL 29.1%
(28.0–30.3)
29.1%
(27.7–30.5)
34.0%
(31.7–36.4)
24.9%
(21.5–28.5)
17.8%
(13.1–23.8)

Percentages reflect the proportion in each column. Values in parentheses indicate 95% confidence intervals for the corresponding proportion. This analysis was restricted to the 24,041 CYSHCN included in the 2018–2020 NSCH. Weighted sample sizes are shown in the top row. All percentages and sample sizes above are weighted to represent the US population of CYSHCN ages 0–17, using NSCH survey weights. Column 1 represents all CYSHCN, while columns 2–5 represent the subset of CYSHCN whose caregivers spent no weekly time on care coordination, up to 1 hour/week, 1–4 hours/week, or > 5 hours/week.

Association of Time Spent Coordinating Care with Forgone Health Care

In multivariable regression models, we found that increasing time spent coordinating care was associated with a greater probability of forgone child health care (Table 2). In our analysis of average marginal effects, we found that while CYSHCN whose caregivers spent no weekly time on care coordination had only a 6.7% probability of forgone health care, this probability increased to 11.4% when caregivers spent 1–4 hours/week on care coordination and to 15.8% when caregivers spent >5 hours a week coordinating care. Our analysis of odds ratios showed similar results; children of caregivers who spent more time coordinating their care had greater odds of forgone medical care (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–2.10 for up to 1 hour; aOR 1.83, 95% CI 1.09–3.07 for 1–4 hours; aOR 2.73, 95% CI 1.38–5.42 for >5 hours).

Table 2.

Association of Time Spent Coordinating Care with Forgone Child Health Care for CYSHCN

Adjusted Odds Ratio 95% CI Average Marginal Effect
Weekly Time Spent Coordinating Care
None Ref - 6.7%
Up to 1 hour 1.46 1.02, 2.10 9.4%
1 to 4 hours 1.83 1.09, 3.07 11.4%
5 or more hours 2.73 1.38, 5.42 15.8%
Weekly Time Spent Providing Health Care
None Ref - 7.4%
Up to 1 hour 1.26 0.74, 2.14 9.0%
1 to 4 hours 1.49 0.95, 2.32 10.4%
5 or more hours 1.35 0.81, 2.25 9.6%
Child Age
0–5 Ref - 5.9%
6–11 1.57 1.00, 2.46 8.9%
12–17 1.56 1.00, 2.41 8.8%
Child Sex
Female Ref - 8.0%
Male 1.10 0.84, 1.46 8.7%
Child Race and Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic White Ref - 7.9%
Non-Hispanic Black 0.84 0.59, 1.19 6.7%
Hispanic 1.35 0.87, 2.08 10.2%
Non-Hispanic Multi-racial / Other 1.16 0.74, 1.83 9.0%
Child’s Insurance
Private Ref - 7.7%
Public 0.97 0.63, 1.50 7.5%
Public and Private 1.31 0.75, 2.29 9.7%
Uninsured 3.05 1.84, 5.03 19.2%
Child’s Presence and Complexity of Special Health Care Needs
Less complex Ref - 4.5%
More complex 2.19 1.43, 3.36 9.2%
Highest Level of Caregiver Education
Less than high school Ref - 6.5%
High school or GED 1.18 0.63, 2.20 7.5%
Some college or technical school 1.85 1.00, 3.45 11.1%
College degree or more 1.14 0.63, 2.08 7.3%
Primary Household Language
English Ref - 8.3%
Non-English 0.98 0.45, 2.13 8.2%
Area of Residence
Metropolitan Statistical Area (Urban) Ref - 8.1%
Non-Metropolitan Statistical Area 0.81 0.58, 1.12 8.1%
Household Income as a Percentage of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL)
0–99% FPL Ref - 8.7%
100–199% FPL 1.16 0.76, 1.77 9.9%
200–399% FPL 1.01 0.64, 1.59 8.7%
> 400% FPL 0.67 0.38, 1.16 6.1%

Adjusted odds ratios presented above are from multivariable regression models including child age, race, sex, insurance status, presence and complexity of special health care needs, and time spent providing health care, as well as family income, primary household language, metropolitan or non-metropolitan statistical area of residence, and caregiver education level as covariates. Bolded adjusted odds ratios indicate statistical significance. Average marginal effects were obtained using the “margins” command in STATA and represent the predicted probability of forgone child health care corresponding to each covariate.

Other covariates associated with a greater probability of forgone healthcare in our regression model were having more complex special health care needs (9.2% vs. 4.5% for less complex needs) and lack of health insurance (19.2% vs. 7.7% for private health insurance). Increased time spent providing health care was not associated with a significantly greater probability of forgone care. Our observed association between weekly time spent on care coordination and forgone child health care persisted after adjusting for time spent providing health care and complexity of special health care needs, suggesting that these indicators of increased medical complexity could not fully explain the relationship between time spent coordinating care and forgone care.

Discussion

In this secondary analysis of a national survey, we found that over 10% of caregivers of less complex CYSHCN and over 40% of caregivers of more complex CYSHCN reported spending time coordinating care for their children each week. CYSHCN whose caregivers spent 5 or more hours a week arranging or coordinating care were disproportionately Hispanic, low-income, and publicly-insured or uninsured. After adjusting for demographic characteristics and indicators of medical complexity, we found that increased time spent coordinating care was associated with a greater probability of forgone health care among CYSHCN.

These results are consistent with a previous study showing that health care-related administrative burdens can lead to delayed or forgone health care in adults.8 Although we cannot demonstrate a causal relationship between time spent coordinating care and forgone health care in this cross-sectional study, it is possible that, as in this prior survey of adults, caregivers in our study sample either chose to or were forced to forgo care for their children because of difficulty with scheduling appointments, accessing providers, or coordinating payment of medical bills or insurance premiums.8 Our findings are also in line with prior studies showing that social service related administrative burdens can lead low-income children and adults to forgo participation in health-promoting public benefit programs.4,7,24

The ethnicity, income, and insurance-based differences in time spent coordinating care noted in this study suggest that health- and social service-related administrative burdens may be particularly difficult to navigate for those without systemic privilege and financial resources, as well as those without reliable and consistent insurance. Previous studies in adults and children have noted race, ethnicity, and insurance-based disparities in primary care appointment availability, time spent traveling to appointments, and time spent waiting to be seen in the emergency room or clinic.9,2527 Our study builds on this work, and on prior studies demonstrating disparities in caregiver-reported care coordination needs, both by using time spent coordinating care as a novel measure of caregiver burden and by using more recent 2018–2020 data, which may more closely reflect the current state of burdens faced by CYSHCN and their caregivers.15,16

Almost 40% of caregivers in our study who reported spending >5 hours a week on care coordination had household incomes below the federal poverty level. For these low-income caregivers, time spent coordinating their children’s care may impact their ability to maintain stable employment and provide for their families’ basic needs, placing their children at greater risk of poor health outcomes.14 Previous studies have shown that children with both chronic medical conditions and social needs such as food insecurity or housing instability have worse caregiver-reported health and increased acute care utilization as compared to children with chronic conditions or social risk factors alone.11,28,29

Our findings also point to particular challenges associated with caring for CYSHCN who are Medicaid-insured or uninsured. All Medicaid-insured families have to complete recertification paperwork at least once a year to ensure that their children continue to receive benefits, and because Medicaid eligibility is based on monthly household income, families with short-term income fluctuations may have to complete this paperwork multiple times each year.30 These recertification requirements can represent a substantial burden, particularly for caregivers of CYSHCN with birth-onset disabilities who should qualify for Medicaid throughout childhood regardless of their household income. Fortunately, the 2023 Consolidated Appropriations Act requires all states to implement 12-month continuous eligibility for all Medicaid and CHIP-insured children by 2024, and some states are exploring multi-year continuous eligibility for children, which could further decrease burdens associated with recertification.31,32 In addition to burdens related to recertification, some families may have difficulty finding providers who will accept their Medicaid-insured child for care; one recent study suggests that as many as one-third of all physicians contracted with Medicaid managed care plans see fewer than 10 Medicaid-insured patients a year.33

We observed greater inequities in care coordination burden based on ethnicity, insurance type, and household income, than on primary language and caregiver educational attainment. This finding may suggest that as compared to discrimination, poverty, and insurance-related administrative barriers, language and education barriers play less of a role in determining care coordination burden. Alternatively, this finding may reflect greater heterogeneity in care coordination burden among caregivers who speak languages other than English or have lower levels of educational attainment. Future studies could gather more detailed information on household language, caregiver education and health literacy, and more precisely describe care coordination burdens, in order to characterize these relationships more completely.

Taken together with previous studies showing that caring for a medically complex child is associated with forgone family income and worse caregiver mental health,13,14 our results suggest that health systems and payers may need to provide additional care coordination supports to ensure equitable access to care for low-income, publicly-insured, and minoritized caregivers of CYSHCN. Health systems may be able to mitigate care coordination burdens for CYSHCN in part by ensuring equitable access to patient portals and to telehealth primary and subspecialty care.34,35 At the payer level, interventions that simplify the process of applying for and renewing Medicaid and improve provider accessibility could reduce care coordination burdens.36 Streamlining Medicaid redetermination processes will be particularly important as the continuous coverage provision under the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency unwinds.37

Health systems and payers should also consider investing in community health worker programs that could support low-income and minoritized caregivers in meeting both their care coordination needs and their unmet social needs. Community health workers are trusted individuals who often share a background, demographic characteristic, and lived experiences with the patients and families they serve and are therefore optimally positioned to provide family-centered health care navigation support.38 Previous studies in both children and adults have shown that community health worker programs can improve patient-centered outcomes and quality of care while reducing acute care utilization, making them a worthwhile investment for pediatric health systems and payers serving CYSHCN.3941

Two recent federal policy innovations may also help guide and support state Medicaid agencies in improving care coordination supports for CYSHCN.42 The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation’s Integrated Care for Kids model, which began in 2020, aims to use cross-sector collaborations and care navigation to improve health outcomes for children with complex medical and social needs and to identify sustainable alternative payment models that support improved care coordination.43 The 2019 Advancing Care for Exceptional Kids (ACE Kids) Act, which went into effect in October 2022, allows state Medicaid agencies the option to reimburse for enhanced care coordination services provided through “health homes” created for children with complex chronic conditions.44 If implemented with a focus on health equity, these and other programs and policies aimed at reducing care coordination burdens could help ensure equitable access to care for CYSHCN.

Limitations and Future Directions

Our findings should be considered in the context of several limitations. First, the cross-sectional structure of this survey precludes us from making inferences about the causal nature and directionality of the relationship between time spent coordinating care and children’s access to care. Second, because we were limited by available NSCH data, which do not include detailed information about children’s diagnoses, we were unable to fully control for medical complexity, which is likely an important confounder of the relationship between time spent coordinating care and forgone health care. In addition, NSCH data are based on caregiver self-report and may therefore be impacted by recall bias.

Future longitudinal quantitative studies that assess time spent coordinating care and then examine subsequent patterns of health and health care utilization using both caregiver-reported and health system-level data could more precisely illuminate potential causal relationships, as well as how these relationships may vary based on caregivers’ income, race, ethnicity, primary language, and insurance status. In addition, future qualitative studies exploring caregivers’ perspectives on arranging and coordinating health care for their children could aid in the identification of specific opportunities for both downstream, family-level and upstream, systems-level interventions aimed at reducing these burdens.

Conclusion

More than 40% of caregivers of children with complex SHCN spend time coordinating their children’s care each week, and these burdens fall disproportionately on Hispanic, low-income, and publicly insured caregivers. Increased caregiver time spent coordinating care is associated with a greater probability of forgone medical care for CYSHCN. Health systems, payers, and policymakers should prioritize streamlining health care and health insurance systems and implementing innovative models of care coordination support in order to mitigate inequities in care coordination burdens and ensure equitable access to care for CYSHCN.

Supplementary Material

1

What’s New.

Children whose caregivers spend 5 or more hours/week arranging or coordinating their children’s care are disproportionately Hispanic, low-income, and publicly insured or uninsured. Increased time spent coordinating care is associated with greater probability of forgone health care among CYSHCN.

Funding/Support:

All phases of this study were supported by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality grant F32HS028555 to Dr. Vasan and National Institutes of Health grant K23HL136842 to Dr. Kenyon.

Role of Funder/Sponsor:

The AHRQ and NIH had no role in the design and conduct of the study.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures (includes financial disclosures): The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

References

  • 1.Kuo DZ, Cohen E, Agrawal R, Berry JG, Casey PH. A National Profile of Caregiver Challenges Among More Medically Complex Children With Special Health Care Needs. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(11):1020–1026. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kuo DZ, McAllister JW, Rossignol L, Turchi RM, Stille CJ. Care Coordination for Children With Medical Complexity: Whose Care Is It, Anyway? Pediatrics. 2018;141(Supplement_3):S224–S232. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1284G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Council on Children With Disabilities. Care Coordination in the Medical Home: Integrating Health and Related Systems of Care for Children With Special Health Care Needs. Pediatrics. 2005;116(5):1238–1244. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Herd Pamela, Moynihan Donald. How Administrative Burdens Can Harm Health. Health Affairs Health Policy Brief; 2020. doi: 10.1377/hpb20200904.405159 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sommers BD, Goldman AL, Blendon RJ, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. Medicaid Work Requirements — Results from the First Year in Arkansas. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(11):1073–1082. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1901772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sommers BD, Chen L, Blendon RJ, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. Medicaid Work Requirements In Arkansas: Two-Year Impacts On Coverage, Employment, And Affordability Of Care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020;39(9):1522–1530. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vasan A, Kenyon CC, Roberto CA, Fiks AG, Venkataramani AS. Association of Remote vs In-Person Benefit Delivery With WIC Participation During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA. Published online August 20, 2021. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.14356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kyle MA, Frakt AB. Patient administrative burden in the US health care system. Health Serv Res. 2021;56(5):755–765. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ray KN, Chari AV, Engberg J, Bertolet M, Mehrotra A. Disparities in Time Spent Seeking Medical Care in the United States. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(12):1983–1986. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ray V, Herd P, Moynihan D. Racialized Burdens: Applying Racialized Organization Theory to the Administrative State. J Public Adm Res Theory. Published online January 29, 2022:muac001. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muac001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Berry JG, Harris D, Coller RJ, et al. The Interwoven Nature of Medical and Social Complexity in US Children. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(9):891–893. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vasan A, Darko O, Fortin K, Scribano PV, Kenyon CC. Community Resource Connection for Pediatric Caregivers With Unmet Social Needs: A Qualitative Study. Acad Pediatr. Published online September 2021:S1876285921004538. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.09.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bayer ND, Wang H, Yu JA, Kuo DZ, Halterman JS, Li Y. A National Mental Health Profile of Parents of Children With Medical Complexity. Pediatrics. 2021;148(2):e2020023358. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-023358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Foster CC, Chorniy A, Kwon S, Kan K, Heard-Garris N, Davis MM. Children With Special Health Care Needs and Forgone Family Employment. Pediatrics. 2021;148(3):e2020035378. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-035378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Toomey SL, Chien AT, Elliott MN, Ratner J, Schuster MA. Disparities in unmet need for care coordination: the national survey of children’s health. Pediatrics. 2013;131(2):217–224. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Miller R, Tumin D, Hayes D, Uffman JC, Raman VT, Tobias JD. Unmet Need for Care Coordination Among Children with Special Health Care Needs. Popul Health Manag. 2019;22(3):255–261. doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.National Survey of Children’s Health - Data Resource Center for Child and Adolescent Health. Accessed April 30, 2022. https://www.childhealthdata.org/learn-about-the-nsch/NSCH
  • 18.National Survey of Children’s Health Questionnaires, Datasets, and Supporting Documents | MCHB. Accessed August 12, 2022. https://mchb.hrsa.gov/national-survey-childrens-health-questionnaires-datasets-supporting-documents
  • 19.Yu JA, McKernan G, Hagerman T, Schenker Y, Houtrow A. Identifying Children With Medical Complexity From the National Survey of Children’s Health Combined 2016–17 Data Set. Hosp Pediatr. 2021;11(2):192–197. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-0180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bethell CD, Blumberg SJ, Stein REK, Strickland B, Robertson J, Newacheck PW. Taking stock of the CSHCN screener: a review of common questions and current reflections. Acad Pediatr. 2015;15(2):165–176. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.10.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Norton EC, Dowd BE. Log Odds and the Interpretation of Logit Models. Health Serv Res. 2018;53(2):859–878. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Norton EC, Dowd BE, Maciejewski ML. Marginal Effects—Quantifying the Effect of Changes in Risk Factors in Logistic Regression Models. JAMA. 2019;321(13):1304. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.NSCH Survey Methodology - Data Resource Center for Child and Adolescent Health. Accessed August 9, 2022. https://www.childhealthdata.org/learn-about-the-nsch/methods
  • 24.Gray C Leaving benefits on the table: Evidence from SNAP. J Public Econ. 2019;179:104054. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104054 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ray KN, Amalavoyal CV, Engberg J, Bertolet M, Mehrotra A. Opportunity Costs of Ambulatory Medical Care in the United States. Am J Manag Care. 2015;21(8):567–574. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chou SC, Deng Y, Smart J, Parwani V, Bernstein SL, Venkatesh AK. Insurance Status and Access to Urgent Primary Care Follow-up After an Emergency Department Visit in 2016. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;71(4):487–496.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.08.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grande D, Zuo JX, Venkat R, et al. Differences in Primary Care Appointment Availability and Wait Times by Neighborhood Characteristics: a Mystery Shopper Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(9):1441–1443. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4407-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kuo DZ, Goudie A, Cohen E, et al. Inequities In Health Care Needs For Children With Medical Complexity. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(12):2190–2198. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Van Cleave J, Taft K, Ware A, Stille C. Assessing and Addressing Social Determinants of Health Among Children and Youth With Special Health Care Needs. Acad Pediatr. 2022;22(2, Supplement):S28–S33. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sommers BD. Why Millions Of Children Eligible For Medicaid And SCHIP Are Uninsured: Poor Retention Versus Poor Take-Up. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(Supplement 2):w560–w567. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023: Medicaid and CHIP Provisions Explained. Center For Children and Families. Published January 6, 2023. Accessed February 14, 2023. https://ccf.georgetown.edu/2023/01/05/consolidated-appropriations-act-2023-medicaid-and-chip-provisions-explained/ [Google Scholar]
  • 32.More States Move to Expand Continuous Eligibility for Children and Adults in Medicaid. Center For Children and Families. Published May 24, 2022. Accessed July 5, 2022. https://ccf.georgetown.edu/2022/05/24/more-states-move-to-expand-continuous-eligibility-for-children-and-adults-in-medicaid/ [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ludomirsky AB, Schpero WL, Wallace J, et al. In Medicaid Managed Care Networks, Care Is Highly Concentrated Among A Small Percentage Of Physicians. Health Aff (Millwood). 2022;41(5):760–768. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ray KN, Kahn JM. Connected Subspecialty Care: Applying Telehealth Strategies to Specific Referral Barriers. Acad Pediatr. 2020;20(1):16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Curfman A, McSwain SD, Chuo J, et al. Pediatric Telehealth in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era and Beyond. Pediatrics. 2021;148(3):e2020047795. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-047795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee VS, Blanchfield BB. Disentangling Health Care Billing: For Patients’ Physical and Financial Health. JAMA. 2018;319(7):661–663. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.McIntyre A, Shepard M. Automatic Insurance Policies — Important Tools for Preventing Coverage Loss. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(5):408–411. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2114189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brown O, Kangovi S, Wiggins N, Alvarado CS. Supervision Strategies and Community Health Worker Effectiveness in Health Care Settings. NAM Perspect. 2020: 10.31478/202003c. doi: 10.31478/202003c [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vasan A, Morgan JW, Mitra N, et al. Effects of a standardized community health worker intervention on hospitalization among disadvantaged patients with multiple chronic conditions: A pooled analysis of three clinical trials. Health Serv Res. 2020;55 Suppl 2:894–901. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kangovi S, Mitra N, Grande D, Long JA, Asch DA. Evidence-Based Community Health Worker Program Addresses Unmet Social Needs And Generates Positive Return On Investment: A return on investment analysis of a randomized controlled trial of a standardized community health worker program that addresses unmet social needs for disadvantaged individuals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020;39(2):207–213. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shreeve K, Woods ER, Sommer SJ, et al. Community Health Workers in Home Visits and Asthma Outcomes. Pediatrics. 2021;147(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-011817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.State Adoption of 12-Month Continuous Eligibility for Children’s Medicaid and CHIP. KFF. Published March 16, 2022. Accessed July 5, 2022. https://www.kff.org/health-reform/state-indicator/state-adoption-of-12-month-continuous-eligibility-for-childrens-medicaid-and-chip/ [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Alley DE, Ashford NC, Gavin AM. Payment Innovations to Drive Improvements in Pediatric Care—The Integrated Care for Kids Model. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(8):717. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Langer CS, Antonelli RC, Chamberlain L, Pan RJ, Keller D. Evolving Federal and State Health Care Policy: Toward a More Integrated and Comprehensive Care-Delivery System for Children With Medical Complexity. Pediatrics. 2018;141(Supplement_3):S259–S265. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1284K [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES