Skip to main content
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP logoLink to Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
. 2023;24(5):1701–1710. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.5.1701

Smoking Cessation, Quit Attempts and Predictive Factors among Vietnamese Adults in 2020

Ngoc Minh Luu 1,2, Thi Tuyet Hanh Tran 3,*, Ngoc Khue Luong 4, Thi Hai Phan 4, Van Can Phan 3, Quynh Long Khuong 3, Thuy Linh Nguyen 4, Tu Anh Duong 4, Jin-Kyoung Oh 2, Thi Hoang Lan Vu 3, Van Giap Vu 5, Van Minh Hoang 3
PMCID: PMC10495881  PMID: 37247291

Abstract

Objective:

This study aims to describe the updated smoking cessation and quit attempt rates and associated factors among Vietnamese adults in 2020.

Methods:

Data on tobacco use among adults in Vietnam in 2020 was derived from the Provincial Global Adult Tobacco Survey. The participants in the study were people aged 15 and older. A total of 81,600 people were surveyed across 34 provinces and cities. Multi-level logistic regression was used to examine the associations between individual and province-level factors on smoking cessation and quit attempts.

Results:

The smoking cessation and quit attempt rates varied significantly across the 34 provinces. The average rates of people who quit smoking and attempted to quit were 6.3% and 37.2%, respectively. The factors associated with smoking cessation were sex, age group, region, education level, occupation, marital status, and perception of the harmful effects of smoking. Attempts to quit were significantly associated with sex, education level, marital status, perception of the harmful effects of smoking, and visiting health facilities in the past 12 months.

Conclusions:

These results may be useful in formulating future smoking cessation policies and identifying priority target groups for future interventions. However, more longitudinal and follow-up studies are needed to prove a causal relationship between these factors and future smoking cessation behaviors.

Key Words: Smoking cessation, quit attempts, multilevel analysis, Vietnam, PGATS 2020

Introduction

Tobacco use is the leading cause of death in the world (Ghebreyesus, 2019). The majority of the global burden of tobacco-related death is concentrated in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (Sinha et al., 2018). According to the 2015 Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) results in Vietnam, approximately 45.3% of men and 1.1% of women currently smoke (Van Minh et al., 2017). Every year, approximately 40,000 people in Vietnam die as a result of tobacco-related diseases (Levy et al., 2006). In Vietnam, the estimated economic burden of smoking-related diseases is relatively high, accounting for 0.97% of the total GDP in 2011 (Hoang Anh et al., 2016).

Tobacco control is an essential component of any country’s public health strategy (Schreuders et al., 2018; Goodchild and Zheng, 2019). Stopping smoking at any time lowers the risk, slows the progression of smoking-related diseases, and extends the life expectancy. If effective interventions were widely implemented in low- and middle-income countries, hundreds of millions of premature tobacco-related deaths could be avoided (Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Cancer Control in Low- and Middle-Income Countries, 2007). As a result, smoking cessation, and tobacco addiction treatment can have a significant impact on lowering the disease burden and improving population health (Ezzati and Lopez, 2003). The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control was adopted by the World Health Assembly in 2003 to strengthen policies, programs, and strategies to prevent and reduce tobacco use. Vietnam implemented the Law on Prevention of Tobacco Harms in 2013, which aims to develop and implement multi-sectoral policies toward creating smoke-free environments and lowering the prevalence of non-communicable diseases (Vietnam National Assembly, 2012). Currently in Vietnam, several measures to support smoking cessation counselling recommended by WHO have also been implemented and have shown certain effectiveness (Jiang et al., 2019; Ngo et al., 2019). Besides the impact of tobacco control activities introduced by the Government as a smoke-free environment, increased taxes, banned advertising, and support for smoking cessation treatment counseling, many individual factors influence a smoker’s decision to change their behaviors. Previous studies have shown that smoking cessation is associated with sociodemographic factors such as older age (Li et al., 2010; Abdullah et al., 2015), a higher education level (Borland et al., 2010), less nicotine dependence (Reid et al., 2010), and perceived health as good or excellent (Abdullah et al., 2015). In addition, the attempt to quit is associated with higher monthly income (Reid et al., 2010), a higher education level (Reid et al., 2010; Myung et al., 2012), lower nicotine dependence, and perceptions of good or excellent health (Li et al., 2010).

Updating the smoking cessation rate, the percentage of smokers who have tried to quit smoking, and identifying characteristics of smokers who attempt or have succeeded in quitting smoking may aid in the development of anti-smoking policies. Several studies described smoking cessation, and quitting attempts and examined the associated factors in Vietnam (Huong et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2021). However, these studies used data from previous rounds of GATS in Vietnam in 2010 and 2015. Using the most up-to-date data on tobacco use in Vietnam, from the provincial Global Adult Tobacco Survey (PGATS, which uses the same GATS questionnaire but is conducted in each of Vietnam’s 34 provinces/cities) in 2020, this study aims to describe the updated smoking cessation and quit attempt rates and associated factors among Vietnamese adults in 2020.

Materials and Methods

Research Design and Location

Data on tobacco use among adults in Vietnam in 2020 was derived from the PGATS. The PGATS 2020 was carried out in 34 out of 63 provinces and cities in Vietnam, which received financial support from the Vietnam Tobacco Control Fund (VNTCF) under the Ministry of Health in 2020. The questionnaire was similar to those used in previous GATSs (Global Tobacco Surveillance Surveys) in Vietnam, which were conducted in 2010 and 2015.

Sample Size and Participants

The sample size was chosen to estimate key variables by sex and region in each province/city. The participants in the study were people aged 15 and older. Each province/city had a sample size of 2400 people (1200 were males, 1200 were females). A total of 81,600 people were surveyed across 34 provinces and cities. A list of administrative entities was created in each province based on economic status, and then one city/town and two districts with medium and underdeveloped economic status were selected using a simple random sampling. We chose two communes at random in each city/town/district; 600 homes were chosen at random from these communes (300 households each). In each district with a medium or underdeveloped economic status, 900 families were picked at random from three communes using the simple random sampling method. One member who was 15 years old or older in each household was chosen. If the to-be-selected member was male (or female), and the household had only one member who was 15 years old or older and fit the sex criteria, that member was chosen. If the household had more than one member who was 15 years old or older, the KISH method was applied to the selection process. If any selected household didn’t have members that meet the sex criteria, the nearest household was chosen for replacement. Any participant with mental health issues or other health conditions was excluded from the sample. With a response rate of 98.2 percent, there were 80,166 completed interviews.

Measures

Smoking cessation and attempts to quit smoking were the dependent variables. Smoking cessation was measured among ever smokers. Former smokers were defined as those who ever smoked and had not smoked in the previous 30 days. The definition of an attempt to quit smoking during the last 12 months in this study was based on individuals who were current smokers and had made at least one attempt to quit within the previous 12 months. Independent variables were social demographic characteristics and some other variables. The social demographic variables were sex, age group (15-24 years old, 25-44 years old, 45-64 years old, and 65+ years old), region of accommodation (urban, rural), marital status (single, widow/widower, separated, and married), and occupation (unemployed/ housekeeper/student/retiree, freelancer, knowledge workers). Other variables such as visiting health facilities in the past 12 months (No, Yes, visit and receive advice for quitting tobacco from healthcare workers); perception of harmful effects of smoking (No/Yes); and using electronic cigarettes or heated tobacco products (No/Yes) were used.

Data collection

Vietnam Tobacco Control Fund (VNTCF) of the Ministry of Health was the coordinating unit for this survey. VNTCF supported 34 provinces and cities in conducting the research. VNTCF cooperated with the Hanoi University of Public Health in terms of technical support, and field supervision during the implementation of the survey in 34 provinces and cities. All of the interviews were conducted in Vietnamese and using Galaxy tablets or smartphones for data collection. Data were transferred to the research headquarters for quality management, data monitoring, and data cleansing using REDCap.

Data analysis

The frequency distribution of the categorical variables was determined using descriptive analysis and weight was used. Weighting was performed step by step process using a weighting manual. Three steps can be described in brief as follows: create the base weight based on the product of each stage’s well-documented selection probability, adjust for the household non-responsive and individual non-response, and produce post-stratification adjustment to balance sample selection. As this study obtained data from 34 provinces across the country, multilevel analysis was appropriate to examine the associations between individual and province-level factors on smoking cessation and quit attempts (Nezlek, 2008). The independent variables were selected for the model using the Bayesian Model Averaging method, which is a statistical method for selecting important predictors in a regression model. It accounts for model uncertainty by assigning prior probabilities to each model, updating them using Bayesian inference based on the observed data, and obtaining posterior probabilities for each model. The method then estimates the average effect size of each predictor across all models, allowing the identification of the most important predictors while accounting for model uncertainty. In addition, variables that have been proven related to smoking cessation and quit attempts in previous studies or documents were also considered to be included in the model.

Research Ethics

The Ethics Committee of Hanoi University of Public Health approved this study under Decision No.318/2020/YTCC-HD3 dated July 30, 2020.

Results

According to Table 1, 49.1% of participants were males, while 50.9% were females. The majority of participants (42.9%) were between the ages of 25 and 44 and came from rural areas (63.9%). People with a secondary school education made up the largest proportion (31.3%), followed by those with a primary school education or lower (27.4%). Only 15.4% of those who took part had tertiary education. Nearly 60% of study participants worked as freelancers, while 4% were unemployed. The majority of the participants were married (73.9%).

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics of the Participants

Characteristic Weighted Unweighted number of adults
Percentage (95% CI) Number of adults (thousand)
Total 100 71,356 80,166
Sex
Male 49.1 (48.6-49.7) 35,056 40,071
Female 50.9 (50.3-51.4) 36,300 40,095
Age group (year)
15-24 18.4 (17.6-19.2) 13,113 9,478
25-44 42.9 (42.1-43.6) 30,582 32,356
45-64 28.8 (28.0-29.6) 20,514 31,078
65+ 10 (9.4-10.6) 7,119 7,224
Region of accommodation
Rural area 63.9 (54.2-72.5) 45,569 59,736
Urban area 36.1 (27.5-45.8) 25,786 20,430
Education level
Primary education or lower 27.4 (24.9-30.0) 19,489 25,696
Secondary school education 31.3 (30.1-32.6) 22,308 25,683
High school education 25.9 (24.3-27.7) 18,456 17,747
Tertiary education 15.4 (13.8-17.1) 10,945 10,840
Occupation
Unemployed 4 (3.6-4.3) 2,821 3,292
Housekeeper/Student/Retiree 22.5 (21.3-23.7) 16,018 15,978
Freelancer 59.4 (57.6-61.2) 42,366 50,482
Knowledge workers 14.1 (13.1-15.2) 10,072 10,330
Marital status
Single 21.3 (19.8-22.8) 15,128 11,486
Married 73.9 (72.4-75.4) 52,598 64,449
Divorced/ separated/ widow 4.8 (4.3-5.3) 3,426 4,044

Note: CI, confidence interval; Knowledge worker, civil servants, non-state-owned organization employees; Freelancer, workers who are not employed in state organizations or non-state-owned organizations; Unemployed, not currently in work, incapable to work.

Table 2 shows the demographic characteristics of participants by smoking status. The percentage of current smokers was 21.7% (43.0% among males, 1.7% among females), and that of former smokers was 6.3% (10.7% among males, 1.2% among females). The rate of smoking cessation was the highest in the group over 65 years old (11.5%), and lowest in the youngest age group 15-24 years old (2.6%). Regarding occupation, the unemployed had the highest smoking cessation rate (11.8%) compared to housekeepers/students/retirees, freelancers, and knowledge workers. 7.1% of participants who were married were former smokers, the highest percentage compared to the single or divorced/separated/widow group.

Table 2.

Demographic Characteristics of Participants by Smoking Status

Characteristic Weighted
Non-smokers (%) Former smokers (%) Current smokers (%)
Total 72 6.3 21.7
Sex
Male 46.3 10.7 43
Female 97.1 1.2 1.7
Age group (year)
15-24 84.4 2.6 13
25-44 71.8 4.7 23.5
45-64 65 9.3 25.7
65+ 70.3 11.5 18.3
Region of accommodation
Rural area 72.3 5.5 22.2
Urban area 71.4 7.9 20.7
Education level
Primary education or lower 68.5 6 25.5
Secondary school education 70.4 6.7 22.9
High school education 73.7 6 20.3
Tertiary education 78.8 6.6 14.6
Occupation
Unemployed 64.3 11.8 23.9
Housekeeper/Student/Retiree 90.2 4.5 5.3
Freelancer 64.4 7 28.6
Knowledge workers 77.3 5 17.7
Marital status
Single 77.7 4 18.3
Married 69.7 7.1 23.2
Divorced/ separated/ widow 81.3 4.9 13.8

Knowledge worker: civil servants, non-state-owned organization employees; Freelancer, workers who are not employed in state organizations or non-state-owned organizations; Unemployed, not currently in work, incapable to work.

Figure 1A depicts the variation in smoking cessation rates across Vietnam’s provinces. The smoking cessation rates ranged from 7.74% in Lai Chau province (northwest Vietnam) to 51.60% in Hanoi (the capital of Vietnam). The rates of attempts to quit described in Figure 1B ranged from 16.29% in Lai Chau province to 63.76% in Nam Dinh province (a province in the southern part of the Red River Delta region of northern Vietnam, located near Hanoi).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Smoking Cessation Rates and Attempts to Quit Rates in 34 Provinces/Cities

Table 3 shows the factors associated with smoking cessation, identified through multilevel logistic regression analysis, including sex (female: OR=3.10, 95%CI: 2.62-3.67), age group (45-64: OR=1.84, 95%CI: 1.46-2.31; 65+: OR=2.83, 95%CI: 2.21-3.65), region (urban area: OR=1.22, 95%CI: 1.21-1.33), an education level (Secondary school education: OR=1.27, 95%CI=1.15-1.40; High school education: OR=1.34, 95%CI=1.19-1.50; Tertiary education: OR=1.75, 95%CI=1.50-2.04), occupation (Freelancers: OR=0.58, 95%CI=0.49-0.69; Knowledge workers: OR=0.67, 95%CI=0.55-0.82), marital status (Married: OR=1.50, 95%CI=1.26-1.78); and Perception of harmful effects of smoking (Yes: OR=1.23, 95%CI=1.13-1.34).

Table 3.

Multilevel Logistic Regression for Smoking Cessation among Ever Smokers (Weighted n = 14,591,458)

Variables Weighted % Adjusted OR 95% CI p-value
Fixed-effects
Sex
Male 19.9 ref
Female 42.5 3.1 2.62-3.67 <0.001
Age group (year)
15-24 16.8 ref
25-44 16.6 0.9 0.72-1.13 0.382
45-64 26.6 1.84 1.46-2.31 <0.001
65+ 38.3 2.83 2.21-3.65 <0.001
Region of accommodation
Rural area 19.6 ref
Urban area 27.5 1.22 1.21-1.33 <0.001
Education level
Primary education or lower 18.9 ref
Secondary school education 22.7 1.27 1.15-1.40 <0.001
High school education 22.7 1.34 1.19-1.50 <0.001
Tertiary education 31.2 1.75 1.50-2.04 <0.001
Occupation
Unemployed 32.8 ref
Housekeepers/students/retired 45.5 1.21 0.99-1.46 0.056
Freelancers 19.5 0.58 0.49-0.69 <0.001
Knowledge workers 21.8 0.67 0.55-0.82 <0.001
Marital status
Single 18 ref
Married 23.3 1.5 1.26-1.78 <0.001
Divorced/ separated/ widow 25.9 1.21 0.92-1.59 0.172
Perception of harmful effects of smoking
No 22.4 ref
Yes 24.7 1.23 1.13-1.34 <0.001
Random-effects Estimate SE 95% CI
Variation 0.23 0.02 0.23-0.32

Note: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ref, reference group; SE, standard error; Knowledge worker, civil servants, non-state-owned organization employees; Freelancer, workers who are not employed in state organizations or non-state-owned organizations; Unemployed: not currently in work, incapable to work.

Table 4 illustrates the results from multilevel logistic regression for attempts to quit among current smokers. Attempts to quit were significantly associated with sex (female: OR=0.49, 95%CI=0.40-0.60), an education level (Secondary school education: OR=1.11, 95%CI=1.01-1.22; High school education: OR=1.28, 95%CI=1.13-1.42; Tertiary education: OR=1.33, 95%CI=1.13-1.55), marital status (Married: OR=1.15, 95%CI=1.01-1.32), perception of harmful effects of smoking (Yes: OR=1.53, 95%CI=1.41-1.67), visiting health facilities in past 12 months (Yes: OR=1.68, 95%CI=1.50-1.88; visit and receive advice for quitting tobacco from healthcare workers: OR=1.89, 95%CI=1.71-2.08).

Table 4.

Multilevel Logistic Regression for Attempts to Quit among Current Smokers (Weighted n = 11,414,823)

Variables Weighted % Adjusted OR 95% CI p-value
Fixed-effects
Sex
Male 40.9 ref
Female 25.1 0.49 0.40-0.60 <0.001
Age group (year)
15-24 33.1 ref
25-44 38.8 1.02 0.85-1.22 0.842
45-64 44 1.16 0.96-1.40 0.13
65+ 42 1.16 0.92-1.46 0.207
Region of accommodation
Rural area 39.7 ref
Urban area 41.3 0.99 0.91-1.08 0.9
Education level
Primary education or lower 37 ref
Secondary school education 40 1.11 1.01-1.22 0.032
High school education 42.9 1.28 1.13-1.42 <0.001
Tertiary education 42.9 1.33 1.13-1.55 <0.001
Occupation
Unemployed 35 ref
Housekeepers/students/retired 45 1.29 1.01-1.64 0.043
Freelancers 39.5 1.06 0.87-1.29 0.582
Knowledge workers 43.9 1.1 0.87-1.39 0.417
Marital status
Single 37.4 ref
Married 41.1 1.15 1.01-1.32 0.042
Divorced/ separated/ widow 34.1 1.08 0.83-1.39 0.577
Perception of harmful effects of smoking
No 31.1 ref
Yes 44.1 1.53 1.41-1.67 <0.001
Visiting health facilities in the past 12 months
No 35.4 ref
Yes 54 1.68 1.50-1.88 <0.001
Visit and receive advice for quitting tobacco from
healthcare workers
52.5 1.89 1.71-2.08 <0.001
Using electronic cigarettes or heated tobacco products
No 40.1 ref
Yes 44 1.05 0.81-1.35 0.723
Random-effects Estimate SE 95% CI
Variation 0.3 0.07 0.18-0.49

Note: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ref, reference group; SE, standard error; Knowledge worker: civil servants, non-state-owned organization employees; Freelancer, workers who are not employed in state organizations or non-state-owned organizations; Unemployed, not currently in work, incapable to work.

Discussion

According to our findings, the average proportion of people who have quit smoking in 34 provinces was 6.3% (10.7% for men and 1.2% for women), while the percentage of current smokers was 21.7% (43.0% for men and 1.7% for women). The average attempt rate to quitting smoking was 37.2% throughout the 34 provinces (40.9% for men and 25.1% for women). When comparing the findings of this study to previous studies, it appears that the attempt to quit smoking among men was lower than the 2010 Vietnam GATS data reported in Le et al. study (Huong et al., 2012). However, in contrast, the rate of attempts to quit smoking was higher among men compared to the 2015 GATS data reported in the study by Kim et al. in 2021 (Kim et al., 2021). It’s important to note that these differences could be due to dissimilar in the sampling methods and sample sizes used in each study. PGATS 2020 data only represented the participating provinces/cities, and as the result, was unable to be put under comparison with the results of GATS 2010 and GATS 2015. Despite these differences, the low success rate of smoking cessation efforts in Vietnam is a common theme across the studies. This suggests that tobacco cessation services in the country have not been well implemented, leaving many smokers without the support they require to quit smoking. In this study, the smoking cessation rates varied significantly across the 34 provinces. Lai Chau was the province with the lowest smoking cessation rate. Lai Chau province is one of Vietnam’s most sparsely populated areas. While these rates were relatively high in big cities such as Ho Chi Minh City, especially in Hanoi, this rate was 51.6%. Similarly, the average attempt rate to quitting smoking varied by province. This can be explained by the fact that provinces’ socioeconomic conditions may influence tobacco use and smoking cessation behaviors. Several studies have also found a strong link between adult smoking and socioeconomic status, especially in developing countries (Leinsalu et al., 2007; Wilkinson et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2012; Fernando et al., 2019). As a result, we used multi-level analysis in this study to identify factors related to smoking cessation status and smoking cessation efforts.

The results from the multi-level analysis show that the significant factors that predicted successful smoking cessation were sex, age, area, education level, occupation, marital status, and perception of the harmful effects of smoking. In our study, women had a higher success rate of quitting smoking than men. A qualitative review of 190 studies demonstrated that results from trials or prospective observational studies also showed that females have more difficulty quitting smoking than males, however, results from cross-sectional studies were inconsistent (Smith et al., 2016). Successful smoking cessation rates between men and women depend on the sociocultural environment and the time and location of the study (Tsai et al., 2008; Smith et al., 2016). Our study was also a cross-sectional study, besides that, female smoking in Vietnam is not common due to cultural and social norms. Thus, these reasons may lead to lower smoking rates and higher quit rates observed among women.

Age is a factor that plays a role in smoking cessation. In our study, the older age group was significantly associated with smoking cessation. This has also been demonstrated in previous studies in some countries in Asia (Hagimoto et al., 2010; Li et al., 2010; Abdullah et al., 2015). The environment in which people live has an impact on their smoking habits as well. In our study, people who lived in urban areas were more likely to quit smoking than those who lived in rural areas. More exposure to pro-tobacco marketing, living in a context where smoking is a societal norm, and poorer education and socioeconomic levels are all connected with rural and distant living, in addition to physical and social isolation (Passey et al., 2011; Cruz et al., 2019).

These study findings also demonstrate that smokers with lower levels of education have continuously lagged behind their higher-educated peers when it comes to quitting. The higher the level of education, the higher the rate of quitting smoking. When compared to smokers with higher education, smokers with lower education are more likely to live in areas or residences where tobacco is more available and accepted (Chuang et al., 2005; Ahern et al., 2009). Therefore, individuals are more likely to be surrounded by smokers in their families, social relationships, or workplaces, and they are more inclined to accept smoking as normal (Christakis and Fowler, 2008). This influences their chances of attempting to quit smoking. Even if individuals try to quit, the increased exposure to smoking signals makes them more likely to relapse (Shiffman et al., 1996; Chen et al., 2001).

According to our results, unemployed smokers, students, housekeepers, and retired people had a higher chance of quitting smoking successfully. This finding was consistent with the findings of a study of eight low-and middle-income countries in 2019 (Nargis et al., 2019). This may seem illogical given that tobacco is now prohibited in several workplaces. Smoking bans in the workplace do not apply to non-employed smokers (Farrelly et al., 1999). This can be explained that even though smoking bans have been enacted in several workplaces in Vietnam, compliance is still not very strict (Ministry of Health and Hanoi University of Public Health, 2020). Lack of job, and consequently lack of earnings, can increase the incentive to quit among these people by reducing the affordability of all items, including cigarettes.

Smoking cessation was found to be associated with being married. Some other studies also showed a similar association (Broms et al., 2004; Cho et al., 2008). One possible explanation for the link between marriage and smoking cessation is the spouse’s encouragement to quit smoking to improve future health and not negatively impact children. Furthermore, persons who are aware of tobacco’s detrimental consequences are more likely to successfully quit smoking.

Sex, education level, marital status, perception of harmful effects of smoking, and visiting health facilities in the past 12 months were the factors affecting attempts to quit smoking among current smokers in this study. With the recent appearance of combustible tobacco replacements such as e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products in Vietnam, we investigated the association between the use of these products and attempts to quit smoking. However, there was no statistically significant difference in smoking cessation attempts between non-users and users of these new types of products. Smokers with a higher level of education were more likely to have tried to quit smoking than smokers with a lower level of education (Gilman et al., 2008; Reid et al., 2010). The same was also found in the findings of our research. People with higher levels of education were more likely to have access to knowledge regarding the adverse effects of tobacco, therefore perception of the harmful effects of smoking tobacco also affects smoking cessation attempts. This association was also reported in our study and several previous studies (Costello et al., 2012). People who live with their spouses are more likely to try to quit smoking, which may also be due to their spouse’s encouragement.

Time to the first cigarette in the morning is one of the indicators for evaluating the nicotine dependence of smokers (Branstetter et al., 2020). Many studies have demonstrated that low levels of nicotine dependence affect quitting intention, and quitting intention is a strong predictor of quitting attempts. Another important factor that influences current smokers’ quitting efforts was visiting health facilities in the past 12 months. In our study, people who had visited a health facility in the past 12 months were more likely to attempt to quit smoking than those who did not. Moreover, those who received quit advice from healthcare workers during their visit showed even higher rates of quit attempts. This could be explained that health facilities often provide information and resources on smoking cessation, which can increase smokers’ motivation and confidence to quit. Smokers who visit health facilities may be more likely to receive advice or counseling from healthcare professionals, which has been shown to increase quit attempts (CDC, 2020). Additionally, visiting health facilities may be a sign of a smoker’s overall health awareness and engagement in healthcare. Smokers who are more proactive about their health and seek regular healthcare may be more likely to also prioritize quitting smoking as a way to improve their overall health. PGATS 2020 reported that 72.2% of current tobacco users received advice to quit smoking from health workers, which was the most common channel (Ministry of Health and Hanoi University of Public Health, 2020).

This research has provided some findings using a multi-level analysis approach to identify the link between smoking cessation, quit attempts, and several individual factors. This study, however, has some limitations. Firstly, because the study design was cross-sectional, we cannot prove a cause-and-effect relationship. Second, because our study only covers 34 of Vietnam’s 63 provinces, the results were not representative of the entire country. In addition, data collection was carried out separately in each province, which may lead to some inaccuracies between the data of provinces.

In conclusion, this study showed that the significant factors that predicted successful smoking cessation were sex, age, area, education level, occupation, marital status, and perception of the harmful effects of smoking. Sex, education level, marital status, perception of the harmful effects of smoking, and visiting health facilities in the past 12 months were the factors affecting the attempts to quit smoking among current smokers in our study. These results may be useful in formulating future smoking cessation policies, as well as in identifying priority target groups for future interventions. To successfully promote smoking cessation in Vietnam, interventions should focus on raising knowledge of the detrimental consequences of smoking, especially among individuals with lower levels of education. It is also vital to target certain demographic groups such as men, younger age groups, and unmarried people. Moreover, access to smoking cessation services and assistance is critical in rural regions, where smoking rates are generally greater. Healthcare facilities may help with this endeavour by offering information and counselling on the benefits of quitting smoking. Further study is needed to demonstrate a causal association between the highlighted factors and smoking cessation behaviors in order to refine interventions and make them more effective.

Author Contribution Statement

TTTH, PVC, HVM, LNK, PTH, NTL, DTA, KQL, VTHL and LNM conceived and designed the study, agreed with the results, conclusions, and came up with arguments for the manuscript. TTTH, LNK, PTH, NTL, DTA, PVC, KQL, VTHL, LNM, and HVM coordinated data collection and analyzed the data. LNM, TTTH, and HVM wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All the authors made critical revisions and agreed on the final versions of the manuscript. LNM, TTTH, LNK, PTH, VVG, JKO, and HVM reviewed the final manuscript and approved it for submission, which was done by TTTH.

Acknowledgements

The survey of tobacco use among adults in Vietnam in 2020 was successfully implemented with the valuable contribution from many organizations, including the WHO office in Vietnam, the Vietnam Tobacco Control Fund, Hanoi University of Public Health, and the proactive collaboration from CDC of 34 provinces and cities throughout the country. We also valued the collaboration and support of both governmental, non-governmental organizations, and experts in tobacco harm prevention in Vietnam.

Funding

This work was supported by Vietnam Tobacco Control Fund.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Abdullah AS, Driezen P, Quah AC, et al. Predictors of smoking cessation behavior among Bangladeshi adults: findings from ITC Bangladesh survey. Tob Induc Dis. 2015;13:23. doi: 10.1186/s12971-015-0050-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahern J, Galea S, Hubbard A, et al. Neighborhood smoking norms modify the relation between collective efficacy and smoking behavior. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;100:138–45. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borland R, Yong HH, Balmford J, et al. Motivational factors predict quit attempts but not maintenance of smoking cessation: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four country project. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12:4–11. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Branstetter SA, Muscat JE, Mercincavage M. Time to First Cigarette: A Potential Clinical Screening Tool for Nicotine Dependence. J Addict Med. 2020;14:409–14. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Broms U, Silventoinen K, Lahelma E, et al. Smoking cessation by socioeconomic status and marital status: the contribution of smoking behavior and family background. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6:447–55. doi: 10.1080/14622200410001696637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen PH, White HR, Pandina RJ. Predictors of smoking cessation from adolescence into young adulthood. Addict Behav. 2001;26:517–29. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00142-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cho HJ, Khang YH, Jun HJ, et al. Marital status and smoking in Korea: the influence of gender and age. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:609–19. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2249–58. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0706154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chuang YC, Cubbin C, Ahn D, et al. Effects of neighbourhood socioeconomic status and convenience store concentration on individual level smoking. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:568–73. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.029041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Costello MJ, Logel C, Fong GT, et al. Perceived risk and quitting behaviors: results from the ITC 4-country survey. Am J Health Behav. 2012;36:681–92. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.36.5.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cruz TB, Rose SW, Lienemann BA, et al. Pro-tobacco marketing and anti-tobacco campaigns aimed at vulnerable populations: A review of the literature. Tob Induc Dis. 2019;17:68. doi: 10.18332/tid/111397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ezzati M, Lopez AD. Estimates of global mortality attributable to smoking in 2000. Lancet. 2003;362:847–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14338-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Farrelly MC, Evans WN, Sfekas AE. The impact of workplace smoking bans: results from a national survey. Tob Control. 1999;8:272–7. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.3.272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fernando HN, Wimaladasa ITP, Sathkoralage AN, et al. Socioeconomic factors associated with tobacco smoking among adult males in Sri Lanka. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:778. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7147-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ghebreyesus TA. Progress in beating the tobacco epidemic. Lancet. 2019;394:548–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31730-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gilman SE, Martin LT, Abrams DB, et al. Educational attainment and cigarette smoking: a causal association? Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:615–24. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodchild M, Zheng R. Tobacco control and Healthy China 2030. Tob Control. 2019;28:409–13. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hagimoto A, Nakamura M, Morita T, et al. Smoking cessation patterns and predictors of quitting smoking among the Japanese general population: a 1-year follow-up study. Addiction. 2010;105:164–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02735.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoang Anh PT, Thu le T, Ross H, et al. Direct and indirect costs of smoking in Vietnam. Tob Control. 2016;25:96–100. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Huong LT, Minh HV, Giang KB, et al. Pattern of smoking cessation and its associated factors in Vietnam. Health. 2012;4:8. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jiang N, Siman N, Cleland CM, et al. Effectiveness of Village Health Worker-Delivered Smoking Cessation Counseling in Vietnam. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019;21:1524–30. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim GB, Pham DB, Phan HT, et al. Attempt to Quit Tobacco Smoking among Male Smokers in Vietnam and Predictive Factors: Findings from Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021;22:2061–7. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.7.2061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim YN, Cho YG, Kim CH, et al. Socioeconomic Indicators Associated with Initiation and Cessation of Smoking among Women in Seoul. Korean J Fam Med. 2012;33:1–8. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.2012.33.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Leinsalu M, Tekkel M, Kunst AE. Social determinants of ever initiating smoking differ from those of quitting: a cross-sectional study in Estonia. Eur J Public Health. 2007;17:572–8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckm030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Levy DT, Bales S, Lam NT, et al. The role of public policies in reducing smoking and deaths caused by smoking in Vietnam: results from the Vietnam tobacco policy simulation model. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:1819–30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li L, Borland R, Yong HH, et al. Predictors of smoking cessation among adult smokers in Malaysia and Thailand: findings from the International Tobacco Control Southeast Asia Survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12:34–44. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Myung SK, Seo HG, Cheong YS, et al. Association of sociodemographic factors, smoking-related beliefs, and smoking restrictions with intention to quit smoking in Korean adults: findings from the ITC Korea Survey. J Epidemiol. 2012;22:21–7. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20110026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nargis N, Yong HH, Driezen P, et al. Socioeconomic patterns of smoking cessation behavior in low and middle-income countries: Emerging evidence from the Global Adult Tobacco Surveys and International Tobacco Control Surveys. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0220223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nezlek JB. An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling for Social and Personality Psychology. Soc Personality Psychol Compass. 2008;2:842–60. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ngo CQ, Phan PT, Vu GV, et al. Impact of a Smoking Cessation Quitline in Vietnam: Evidence Base and Future Directions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019:16. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Passey ME, Gale JT, Sanson-Fisher RW. “It’s almost expected”: rural Australian Aboriginal women’s reflections on smoking initiation and maintenance: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2011;11:55. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Reid JL, Hammond D, Boudreau C, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in quit intentions, quit attempts, and smoking abstinence among smokers in four western countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12:20–33. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schreuders M, Lagerweij NA, van den Putte B, et al. To what extent and why adolescents do or do not support future tobacco control measures: a multimethod study in the Netherlands. Tob Control. 2018;27:596–9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shiffman S, Paty JA, Gnys M, et al. First lapses to smoking: within-subjects analysis of real-time reports. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64:366–79. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.2.366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sinha DN, Suliankatchi RA, Gupta PC, et al. Global burden of all-cause and cause-specific mortality due to smokeless tobacco use: systematic review and meta-analysis. Tob Control. 2018;27:35–42. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Smith PH, Bessette AJ, Weinberger AH, et al. Sex/gender differences in smoking cessation: A review. Prev Med. 2016;92:135–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tsai YW, Tsai TI, Yang CL, et al. Gender differences in smoking behaviors in an Asian population. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008;17:971–8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Van Minh H, Giang KB, Ngoc NB, et al. Prevalence of tobacco smoking in Vietnam: findings from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey 2015. Int J Public Health. 2017;62:121–9. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-0955-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wilkinson AV, Vasudevan V, Honn SE, et al. Sociodemographic characteristics, health beliefs, and the accuracy of cancer knowledge. J Cancer Educ. 2009;24:58–64. doi: 10.1080/08858190802664834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP are provided here courtesy of West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention

RESOURCES