Myocardial native T₁ mapping and extracellular volume quantification in asymptomatic female carriers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene mutations

Abstract

Background

Female carriers of dystrophin gene mutations (DMD-FC) were previously considered non-manifesting, but in recent decades, cardiomyopathy associated with muscular dystrophy and myocardial fibrosis has been described. Our study aimed to assess prospectively myocardial fibrosis in asymptomatic DMD-FC compared to a sex-matched control group (CG) with similar age distribution using native T₁ mapping and extracellular volume (ECV) quantification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.

Materials and methods

38 DMD-FC with verified genetic mutation and 22 healthy volunteers were included. Using CMR, native T₁ relaxation time and ECV quantification were determined in each group. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was assessed in all cases.

Results

There were 38 DMD-FC (mean age 39.1 ± 8.8 years) and 22 healthy volunteers (mean age 39.9 ± 12.6 years) imagined by CMR. The mean global native T₁ relaxation time was similar for DMD-FC and CG (1005.1 ± 26.3 ms vs. 1003.5 ± 25.0 ms; p-value = 0.81). Likewise, the mean global ECV value was also similar between the groups (27.92 ± 2.02% vs. 27.10 ± 2.89%; p-value = 0.20). The segmental analysis of mean ECV values according to the American Heart Association classification did not show any differences between DMD-FC and CG. There was a non-significant trend towards higher mean ECV values of DMD-FC in the inferior and inferolateral segments of the myocardium (p-value = 0.075 and 0.070 respectively).

Conclusion

There were no statistically significant differences in the mean global and segmental native T₁ relaxation times and the mean global or segmental ECV values. There was a trend towards higher segmental mean ECV values of DMD-FC in the inferior and inferolateral walls of the myocardium.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-023-02899-9.

Introduction

Duchenne (DMD) and Becker (BMD) muscular dystrophies are X-linked recessive disorders caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene. Progressive muscular wasting, weakness, respiratory failure, and cardiovascular diseases are caused by pathogenic variants in DMD patients [1, 2]. It has been found that cardiac complications play a relevant role in muscular dystrophies [3].

The most common form of cardiac involvement in muscular dystrophy is dilated cardiomyopathy [4, 5], presenting as an age-related progression of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis, which can be detected by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging [6].

Female carriers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene mutations (DMD- healthy patients) were previously considered non-manifesting [5]. However, in recent decades, it has become evident that DMD-FC can be affected similarly, albeit more mildly, than DMD patients (affected males) [7–10]. DMD-FC can present cardiac involvement, such as cardiomyopathy, associated with muscular dystrophy [11, 12]. Although DMD-FC are usually asymptomatic, they also can be affected, similarly to DMD patients, by myocardial fibrosis. A well-established technique for assessing myocardial fibrosis is late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). However, it is limited for identifying interstitial diffuse fibrotic changes in the myocardium [13]. Since it may precede the development of LV dysfunction [11], its assessment is crucial in DMD-FC.

Therefore, other CMR-based methods, such as native T₁ mapping and extracellular volume (ECV) quantification, might be more suitable for detecting diffuse myocardial fibrosis, as already-published studies in DMD/BMD patients have shown [14–18]. Also, there have been a few published reports about mildly elevated native T₁ relaxation time or elevated ECV values in DMD/BMD-FC [11, 19, 20].

This study aims to assess prospectively myocardial fibrosis in asymptomatic DMD-FC compared to a sex-matched control group (CG) with similar age distribution using native T₁ mapping and ECV quantification by CMR. Prior to now, there had been no direct comparison to CG.

Materials and methods

The demographically similar study population included 38 DMD-FC with verified genetic mutation and 22 healthy volunteers. The most common mutation was the deletion of 45–52 exons. The asymptomatic DMD-FC were defined based on clinical examination, and all completed the prepared questionnaire.

All eligible subjects who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (age over 18 years, signed informed consent, absence of CMR contraindications, and cardiovascular pathology besides dystrophic cardiomyopathies) were enrolled. The volunteers had no pathological findings on CMR, no anamnesis of cardiac disease, and no other pathological tests. Exclusion criteria for both groups included renal insufficiency (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²), CMR contraindications, or limited life expectancy.

The hematocrit was obtained on the same day that CMR was performed. Following the Declaration of Helsinki (2000) of the World Medical Association, the Faculty Hospital St. Anne’s Ethics Committee (reference number 55 V/2016) approved the study.

CMR acquisition

CMR was performed using a 1.5T scanner (Ingenia, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) according to our standard protocol. It was equipped with 5-element posterior and 32-element anterior phased-array receiver coils allowing for parallel acquisition techniques in the supine position with repeated breath-hold. Functional imaging using balanced turbo field echo (b-TFE) cine sequences included four-chamber, two-chamber, and LV outflow tract long-axis views and a short-axis (SAX) stack. Typical acquisition parameters were: field of view 320 × 280 mm, reconstruction matrix 256, slice thickness 8 mm, acquisition voxel size 1.7 × 1.7 × 8.0 mm, repetition time ≈ 3.2 ms, echo time ≈ 1.6 ms, and SENSE factor 1.7.

LGE images in all long-axis views and the SAX view were acquired 10 min after an intravenous bolus of 0.2 mmol/kg of the gadolinium-based contrast agent gadobutrol (Gadovist, Bayer-Schering Pharma, Germany) using an inversion recovery (IR-TFE) sequence, and, if uncertain, by phase-sensitive inversion recovery TFE (PSIR-TFE). Both two- and three-dimensional acquisitions were performed in mid-diastole. Typical parameters for the IR-TFE sequence were field of view 320 × 320 mm, reconstruction matrix 288, voxel size 1.6 × 1.7 × 10 mm, repetition time ≈ 4.1 ms, echo time ≈ 1.2 ms, and SENSE factor 2.5.

T₁ mapping was performed as described previously [17] using a Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery sequence (MOLLI) with a 5(3)3 scheme to measure native T₁ (pre-contrast) and a 4(1)3(1)2 scheme for T₁ post-gadolinium (15 min after contrast agent administration). MOLLI sequences were acquired at the mid-ventricular level in the SAX plane using typical imaging parameters (field of view 300 × 300 mm, reconstruction matrix 256, slice thickness 10 mm, acquisition voxel size 2.00 × 2.00 × 10.00 mm, time to repetition ≈ 2.2 ms, echo time ≈ 1.1 ms, flip angle 35°, SENSE factor 2).

MR data analysis

Two experienced readers (MLMP, TH) used cvi42 (release 5.13.9, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Calgary, Canada) to construct the native T₁ and post-gadolinium T₁ maps. They manually contoured the epi- and endocardial walls in the mid-ventricular slice of SAX using 10% of the myocardial wall as border cutting in both the native and the post-gadolinium images. Then, a motion correction algorithm (integrated into cvi42) was applied to register the images, and the software calculated pixel-by-pixel maps from these images. The ECV quantification was calculated according to (1-hematocrit) (1/T1myo,post – 1/T1myo,native)/(1/T1blood,post – 1/T1blood,native) for each segment, and the mean global ECV value was the average of the values in those segments [21]. The acronyms of the mentioned formula represent: the native and post-gadolinium T₁ values of the myocardium/blood before and after the application of the contrast agent.

Wall motion abnormalities were assessed qualitatively (visually) by an experienced cardiologist (RP) with 29 years of experience and a radiologist (VF) with 38 years of experience with CMR. LV functional and morphological parameters were calculated from the SAX stack using the summation-of-disc method following the recommendations on post-processing evaluation from the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) [22].

The radiologist (VF) and the cardiologist (RP) employed a semi-quantitative approach to determine the presence of LGE according to the American Heart Association (AHA) 17-segment model [23] in the IntelliSpace Portal workspace (version 11, Philips Healthcare). LGE was defined as positive if the visual enhancement was higher than the mean signal intensity of the reference myocardium, a remote or unaffected myocardial region within the same patient. A DMD-FC with LGE in at least one myocardial segment was considered LGE-positive. If no enhancement was observed, the DMD-FC was identified as LGE-negative.

Statistics

Variables in both groups were compared using the Student’s t-test for unpaired data. The normal distribution was checked by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and a visual inspection of histograms; in a case when the Student’s t-test revealed no difference, this meant the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was also used to check the identity of distributions of quantitative variables in both groups. The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

The power of the tests was considered for native T₁ relaxation time and ECV values to determine the magnitude of the effect that could be identified as statistically significant by the Student’s t-test. The following assumptions were used: α = 0.05; power = 0.8 (0.6, respectively); normal distribution; standard deviation corresponding with the actual distribution in the CG. As the nature of our study was explorative, we neither assumed nor performed any multiple testing corrections, which would increase the risk of type II error and decrease the power of the test.

The interobserver agreement of both native and post-gadolinium global T₁ relaxation time was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, two-way mixed-effects model), which was determined from eight randomly selected cases analysed by two readers (MLMP, TH).

All analyses were performed using Statistica (version 14.0. TIBCO Software Inc., 2020) and in R (v4.2.1) with RStudio IDE (v2022.7.1.554, RStudio, PBC) software. The value of α = 0.05 was used as a threshold for statistical significance throughout the analyses.

Results

38 DMD-FC (mean age 39.1 ± 8.8 years) and 22 healthy volunteers (mean age 39.9 ± 12.6 years) were included. There was no statistically significant difference between the LVEF of DMD-FC (65.7 ± 5.5%) and CG (68.4 ± 6.57%; p = 0.09). 5% of asymptomatic DMD-FC of our cohort had small hypokinesia of the apex and the inferolateral wall of LV. Also, 20% of DMD-FC had LGE that was detected on the inferolateral wall (4 DMD-FC) and inferior wall (3 DMD-FC) of LV, while LGE was absent in the CG.

The mean global native T₁ relaxation time was similar for DMD-FC and CG (1005.1 ± 26.3 ms vs. 1003.5 ± 25 ms; p-value = 0.81) (Fig. 1), as well as the mean global ECV value (27.92 ± 2.02% vs. 27.09 ± 2.89%; p-value = 0.20) (Fig. 2). The representative native and post-gadolinium T₁ maps are presented in Fig. 3 for DMD-FC and Fig. 4 for healthy volunteer. No statistically significant differences were detected between DMD-FC with LGE positive and LGE negative in the mean ECV segmental values. The ECV segmental quantification analysis, according to the AHA classification, did not show any differences for DMD-FC vs. CG. Although statistically non-significant, there was a trend towards higher mean ECV values in the inferior (p = 0.075) and inferolateral (p = 0.070) segments of the myocardium in DMD-FC. The detailed results are shown in Table 1. When the identical distribution of measured variables in DMD-FC and in CG was checked by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, it yielded a p-value > 0.10 in all cases, including mean global and segmental T₁ relaxation times and ECV values, age and LVEF.

Fig. 1.

The mean global native T₁ relaxation time values [ms] in DMD-FC and CG.

DMD- FC = Female carriers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene mutations; CG = Control group

Fig. 2.

The mean global extracellular volume values [%] in DMD-FC and CG.

DMD- FC = Female carriers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene mutations; CG = Control group

Fig. 3.

A representative picture of the native and post-gadolinium T₁ map of DMD-FC.

DMD-FC - Female carriers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene mutations

Fig. 4.

A representative picture of the native and post-gadolinium T₁ map of a healthy volunteer

Table 1.

Comparison of mean global and segmental native T₁ relaxation time and mean global and segmental ECV values and other parameters between DMD-FC and the CG

Parameter	DMD-FC (n = 38)	CG (n = 22)	P-value
Age [years]	39 ± 8.8	39.9 ± 12.6	0.76
BMI [kg/m 2 ]	23.8 ± 3.4	23.17 ± 3.9	0.64
LVEF [%]	65.6 ± 5.5	68.4 ± 6.57	0.33
Global native T 1  relaxation time [ms]	1005.1 ± 26.3	1003.5 ± 25.0	0.81
Native T 1  relaxation time [ms]: anterior segment	997.3 ± 33.7	1006.7 ± 35.9	0.31
Native T 1  relaxation time [ms]: anteroseptal segment	1001.5 ± 35.2	994.9 ± 26.9	0.45
Native T 1  relaxation time [ms]: inferoseptal segment	1013.8 ± 26.0	1004.5 ± 30.8	0.22
Native T 1  relaxation time [ms]: inferior segment	1008.7 ± 40.1	1003.5 ± 31.9	0.60
Native T 1  relaxation time [ms]: inferolateral segment	1012.5 ± 32.4	1012.4 ± 36.7	0.99
Native T 1  relaxation time [ms]: anterolateral segment	992.8 ± 32.0	1004.7 ± 37.0	0.19
Global ECV value [%]	27.93 ± 2.02	27.10 ± 2.89	0.20
ECV value: anterior segment	27.86 ± 2.35	26.90 ± 2.66	0.16
ECV value: anteroseptal segment	27.72 ± 2.10	27.62 ± 3.17	0.88
ECV value: inferoseptal segment	28.41 ± 2.21	27.73 ± 3.25	0.34
ECV value: inferior segment	28.26 ± 2.62	26.79 ± 3.65	0.075
ECV value: inferolateral segment	27.83 ± 2.94	26.30 ± 3.34	0.070
ECV value: anterolateral segment	27.63 ± 2.30	27.02 ± 3.12	0.39

Parameters are shown as mean ± standard deviation

BMI = body mass index; ECV = extracellular volume; DMD- FC = Female carriers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene mutations; CG = Control group; LVEF = left ventricle ejection fraction

Regarding the global native T₁ relaxation time, the sample size was sufficiently large to statistically prove a difference of 19 ms with a power of 80% and a difference of 15 ms with a power of 60%. In the case of ECV values, the sample size enabled the discrimination of values differing by 2.3% with a power of 80% and a difference of 1.8% with a power of 60%.

The values of ICC were 0.980 (95% CI: 0.921 to 0.995) for mean global native T₁ and 0.976 (95% CI: 0.906 to 0.994) for mean global T₁ post-gadolinium relaxation times, showing excellent interobserver reliability.

Discussion

There were no statistically significant differences in the mean global and segmental native T₁ relaxation times or the mean global and segmental ECV values in asymptomatic DMD-FC with normal LVEF compared to sex -matched CG with similar age distribution. Regarding the segmental values, although statistically non-significant, there was a trend towards higher mean ECV values in the inferior and inferolateral segments of the myocardium in DMD-FC in our study. This may be potentially of concern, as similar segments are affected as in DMD patients; however it should be noted that the magnitude of those differences is much smaller than of those observed between DMD patients and CG, as is evident in various cited studies [15, 16] including ours [17], which correspond to the typically affected regions in the muscular dystrophies.

Cardiac involvement, such as cardiomyopathy and the presence of LGE in typical localization, was recently described in DMD-FC [11, 12]. To date, there have been only 3 published works focused on native T₁ mapping and ECV quantification in DMD/BMD-FC [11, 19, 20], of which only one used a case-control design.

The first of the studies describes diffuse myocardial fibrosis assessed by ECV quantification in DMD/BMD-FC of gene mutations for muscular dystrophies [20]. Analysed were 5 DMD/BMD-FC ranging from 43.0 to 51.7 years. It showed elevated global ECV values of 37.4% in DMD/BMD-FC and BMD/DMD/myotonic dystrophic patients regardless of the presence of LGE. All 5 screened DMD/BMD-FC were older than DMD-FC in our study. Moreover, one of them had reduced LVEF, 2 of them were LGE positive, and there was also a combination of DMD and BMD-FC.

The second one [11] also reported mildly abnormal ECV values in DMD-FC.

The last study compared the DMD-FC to non-carrier female relatives and CG and found higher native T₁ relaxation time in DMD/BMD-FC compared to non-carriers and CG [19]; however this study did not assess the ECV quantification or regional differences in native T₁ relaxation time. While our study had sufficient power to reveal the differences in global native T₁ relaxation time with a size comparable to [19] and employed study subjects of a comparable age, it did not confirm the increase in native T₁ relaxation time found in this study.

The main contribution of our study compared to the mentioned studies [11, 12, 19, 20] is the evaluation of the diffuse fibrotic changes of the myocardium using native T₁ mapping and ECV quantification in a much larger cohort of DMD-FC, and with regards to CG. Moreover, we focused on the assessment of more than just the presence of LGE in the typical location or the described mildly elevated value of ECV or global native T₁ relaxation time. This is the first study that compares global and segmental native T₁ and ECV values between DMD-FC and CG in a case/control design.

LGE can aid in detecting the extent and the location of myocardial fibrosis. Additionally LGE can uncover incipient heart disease by its presence [14, 24]. Whereas native T₁ mapping and ECV quantification allow for the measurement of diffuse fibrosis that foregoes the mentioned LGE. These methods are also useful in detecting myocardial inflammation or any alteration of the extracellular space [14, 25].

Contrary to DMD-FC, many more studies have assessed native T₁ mapping and quantified ECV in DMD patients [16, 26, 27]. Although LGE positive DMD patients exhibited an increased global native T₁ relaxation time compared to CG, there was no difference between LGE negative DMD patients and CG [27]. Moreover, DMD patients had a significantly increased lateral myocardial native T₁ relaxation time compared to CG [28].

These results align with other authors who detected increased native T₁ relaxation time and ECV values in DMD patients. ECV quantification was regardless the ability to differentiate LGE negative DMD patients and CG [29].

Both native T₁ mapping and ECV quantification can identify the differences and regional abnormalities on the inferolateral wall of the LV between DMD patients and CG with or without LGE [21, 30–33]. Additionally, increased native T₁ relaxation time and reduced LVEF was reported in LGE positive DMD patients, evidencing a relationship between native T₁ relaxation time and LV function [28].

Based on our previous studies, all global LV strains and tissue Doppler parameters in asymptomatic DMD-FC were decreased compared to CG [34, 35]. Despite a preserved LVEF, subclinical changes in the LV systolic function were discovered in DMD-FC, including decreased global LV strains. However, their mean global and segmental native T₁ relaxation times and mean global and segmental ECV values were similar to sex- matched CG with similar age distribution. Furthermore, 20% of our DMD-FC cohort had LGE on the inferolateral wall of LV, which is typical localization for the extracellular volume expansion described in DMD patients [36, 37].

While the differences in native T₁ relaxation time and ECV quantification in symptomatic DMD patients are already known, our DMD-FC cohort did not have any cardiac symptoms.

Limitations

This work has some limitations. Some of them are related to the general limitations of native T₁ mapping [4, 38]. It is also limited by its sample size due to the rare occurrence of DMD disease. It is a single centre study. All the subjects involved in this study, were analysed under the same conditions: the images were acquired with the same equipment and protocol, and the analyses were assessed similarly. The healthy volunteers were not tightly selected, as they were considered healthy because of their lack of CMR-based evidence of cardiac problems. Any possible bias affected all the subjects equally. Although the interobserver agreement was excellent, it was determined only for the mean global native T₁ relaxation time and mean global ECV values. Future research is essential to validate the whole process’s reproducibility.

Conclusion

The mean global and segmental native T₁ relaxation times and mean global and segmental ECV values in asymptomatic DMD-FC with normal LVEF were similar to CG, as there was no statistically significant difference in any of the CMR-assessed parameters. Although non-significant, there was a trend towards higher mean ECV values of DMD-FC in inferior and inferolateral segments of the myocardium, which should be subjected to prospective assessment.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Abbreviations

AHA

American heart association

BMD

Becker muscular dystrophy

b-TFE

balanced - turbo field echo

CI

Confidence interval

CG

Control group

CMR

Cardiac magnetic resonance

DMD

Duchenne muscular dystrophy

DMD-FC

Female carriers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene mutations

ECV

Extracellular volume

EDV

End-diastolic volume

ESV

End-systolic volume

ICC

Intraclass correlation

IR-TFE

Inversion-recovery turbo field echo

LGE

Late gadolinium enhancement

LV

Left ventricle

LVEF

Ejection fraction of left ventricle

PSIR

Phase-sensitive inversion recovery

SAX

Short axis

SCMR

Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

SD

Standard deviation

T1myo,post

post-gadolinium T₁ values of myocardium

T1myo,native

native T₁ values of myocardium

T1blood,post

post-gadolinium T₁ values of blood

T1blood,native

native T₁ values of blood

Author’s contribution

RP, VK, and MP were the main contributors to the study; they also designed the study. The main role of LM was to write the manuscript. LJ and LO contributed to patient recruitment and inclusion, VF and TH supervised the CMR examinations, and VF and LO performed the clinical data analysis. MMP and TH performed the CMR data analysis, and JM performed the statistical analysis. All authors read, critically reviewed, and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the European Regional Development Fund - Project ENOCH (No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000868). This publication was written at Masaryk University as part of the project entitled “Novel imaging, computing and analytical methods in cardiovascular diseases diagnostics and monitoring” number MUNI/A/1462/2021 with the support of the Specific University Research Grant, as provided by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic in the year 2022.

Data Availability

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Data are located in controlled access data storage REDCap at St. Anne’s University Hospital (https://redcap.fnusa.cz/redcap/).

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2000) of the World Medical Association. Ethics Committee of the Faculty Hospital St. Anne’s (reference number 55 V/2016) approved the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the subjects and/or their legally authorised representative.

Consent for publication

no person´s personal data are published.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.