Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2023 Mar 20;86(3):1661–1675. doi: 10.1007/s00248-023-02204-y

Snow Microorganisms Colonise Arctic Soils Following Snow Melt

Lucie A Malard 1,2,, Benoit Bergk-Pinto 3,4, Rose Layton 3, Timothy M Vogel 3, Catherine Larose 3, David A Pearce 1,
PMCID: PMC10497451  PMID: 36939866

Abstract

Arctic soils are constantly subjected to microbial invasion from either airborne, marine, or animal sources, which may impact local microbial communities and ecosystem functioning. However, in winter, Arctic soils are isolated from outside sources other than snow, which is the sole source of microorganisms. Successful colonisation of soil by snow microorganisms depends on the ability to survive and compete of both, the invading and resident community. Using shallow shotgun metagenome sequencing and amplicon sequencing, this study monitored snow and soil microbial communities throughout snow melt to investigate the colonisation process of Arctic soils. Microbial colonisation likely occurred as all the characteristics of successful colonisation were observed. The colonising microorganisms originating from the snow were already adapted to the local environmental conditions and were subsequently subjected to many similar conditions in the Arctic soil. Furthermore, competition-related genes (e.g. motility and virulence) increased in snow samples as the snow melted. Overall, one hundred potentially successful colonisers were identified in the soil and, thus, demonstrated the deposition and growth of snow microorganisms in soils during melt.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00248-023-02204-y.

Keywords: Microbial colonisation, Airborne dispersal, Coalescence, Snow, Soils, Arctic ecosystems, Bacterial diversity

Introduction

The global invasion of organisms is a major threat to ecosystems and the associated biota [1]. For decades, research has focused on macroorganisms’ invasions [2, 3] with only recent interest on microbial invasions [46]. Recent investigations on soil microbial communities have shown clear biogeographic patterns [79] with some taxa presenting restricted distributions, highlighting the potential for endemicity and, as a result, the susceptibility of ecosystems to invasions [6, 1013]. In the Arctic, aerial transport is the primary source of new biological inputs. Microbiological invasions have been shown to occur in laboratory microcosms mimicking Arctic conditions [14], but the impacts of such invasions on natural resident communities are unclear.

Microbial colonisation consists of four sequential processes: the introduction of the invader, establishment, growth and spread, and the impact of the coloniser on the resident microbial community [4, 5]. A successful colonisation depends on the adaptability of the incoming taxon to the new habitat and the resistance to invasion from the colonised habitat [4, 5, 15]. Successful colonisers first have to adapt and survive local environmental conditions, which may not be favourable compared to their ecosystem of origin; then, they have to compete with the resident community for resources in the new ecosystem [4, 16]. Therefore, their invasive potential depends on effective adaptations increasing the likelihood of survival and competitive advantage. Generally, high growth rates, dispersal ability, phenotypic plasticity, and genetic diversity increase the chance of success of the invader [17]. The ability to exploit empty niches would also increase the chance of perennial colonisation. Key genes involved in the adaptation to local environmental conditions include genes associated with the stress response such as oxidative stress or heat shock, but also the cell wall structure or capsule synthesis [18, 19]. Genes increasing competition potential include antibiotic production or resistance, increased motility, or better resource utilisation [19, 20]. Being an r-strategist with high growth rates and short generation time is also hypothesised to increase the chances of successful colonisation [17, 2123], although, in extreme environments such as cold or nutrient limited systems, K-strategists may be better suited to tolerate the biotic/abiotic stressors and thus, more likely to successfully colonise. The chances of successful colonisation also depend on the resident microbial community and resource availability. For instance, high richness, diversity, and evenness decrease the chances of colonisation in temperate soils [15, 2428]. On the other hand, resource pulses, where a peak in nutrient availability occurs over a short period of time, increase the chances of successful colonisation by increasing resource availability and decreasing competition [16, 26].

Natural communities are constantly subjected to microbial invasions from a wide variety of sources. In the Arctic, these are generally limited to either airborne, marine, or animal sources. Aeolian transport of microorganisms, where organisms are aerosolised, transported in the air, and deposited in new environments, is the most universal dispersal pathway [29, 30]. By characterising and comparing microbial communities living in the air and in the ecosystem of interest, the potential for successful dispersal and colonisation can be inferred by assessing similarities in diversity [3134]. However, in the case where similarities are identified, whether the airborne microorganisms common to the ecosystem of interest might have travelled from distant habitats or have been aerosolised from the ecosystem of interest in the first place is difficult to determine.

Snow melt is a model that can be used to understand microbial colonisation in general and in the context of airborne dispersal [14]. Snow covers a minimum of 2 × 106 km2 and a maximum of 45 × 106 km2 of the Northern Hemisphere every year [35]. Snow influences the global climate through the albedo [36], but also locally through the insulation of soils to ambient environmental and climatic conditions [37]. In addition, the snow cover isolates the underlying soil from contact with microbes from outside sources for up to 10 months a year, as is the case in Svalbard [38]. Pristine snow is primarily seeded from the atmosphere and unique microbial communities develop within the snow over time [3941] and actively participate in nutrient cycling [42]. Once the snow starts melting, the run-off travels vertically on flat terrain to reach the frozen soil layer and infiltrate the soil when no ice layer exists [40, 43, 44]. Although the percolation rate will vary depending on local conditions, snow microorganisms inevitably encounter soil microbial communities at the end of the snow melt. The snowpack is a source of potential colonisers as it contains between 102 and 104 microbial cells per mL of melted snow [4547]. Snow melt also creates a peak in nutrient and solute availability in soils [40, 4850]. This resource pulse may facilitate the colonisation of soils by snow microorganisms. In the case of soils where the community is rich and diverse and colonisation may generally be difficult [15], the snow melt may be an opportunity for snow microorganisms to establish in a new habitat.

Using snow melt as a model for dispersal and deposition of microorganisms in soil, the aim of this study was to determine the colonisation potential of snow microorganisms by monitoring microbial communities of the melting snow and underlying soil during melt. We used 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to detect potential colonisers and observe shifts in community structure and shallow shotgun metagenome sequencing to assess functional potential and identify genes that might favour colonization.

Material and Methods

Sample Collection and Processing

Samples were collected during the snow melt in spring 2018 in Ny-Ålesund (78°56′N, 11°52′E), Svalbard (Fig. S1). The field site consisted of a 100 m2 perimeter, close to the laboratory of the AWIPEV research station, situated on the far south-end of the Ny-Ålesund village and bordered by Kongsfjorden, a 26-km-long and 3- to 8-km-wide fjord on the westcoast of Spitsbergen. Snow and soil sampling was conducted twice a week during the melt season, between May 1st and May 19th. Wearing Tyvek full body suits and gloves to avoid snow contamination, we dug snow pits using a sterilised Teflon shovel (Fig. 1) and collected snow and soil samples in 3-L sterile Whirl–Pak bags (Nasco, Fort Atkinson, WI, USA). Given that the snowpack underwent physical metamorphosis during the sampling period, the different snow layers changed over time. Snowpack stratigraphy could be assessed visually and by conducting hardness profiles. The surface layer was defined as the top layer of the snowpack (layer in contact with the atmosphere with the same hardness). The depth of the surface layer varied from 20 to 3 cm depending on the sampling date was generally composed of loosely packed snow and was exposed to the constant deposition of airborne microorganisms. The bulk snow samples constituted the underlying layers with a different hardness but were considered here as a single layer. Once at the bottom of the snow pit, 50 g of the underlying soil was collected within the first 15 cm using a sterilised trowel and 750 mL Whirl–Pak bags (Nasco) (Fig. 1). Overall, 6 sampling days with three sample types (surface snow, bulk snow, soil) were collected for a total of 18 samples (Table S1). Snow samples were processed immediately after collection. Samples were left to melt at room temperature and filtered onto nitrocellulose 0.22 µm filters (Merck Millipore, Germany) using a sterile filtration unit (Nalge Nunc International Corporation). The resulting filters were placed in sterile falcon tubes and stored at − 20 °C. Soil samples were stored at − 20 °C after collection.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Diagram of the sampling design. A snowpit was dug, and surface, bulk, and soil samples were collected. At each sampling event, a new pit was dug in a previously undisturbed area. The thickness of the surface and bulk snow layer fluctuated with snow melt and precipitation events

Weather Conditions During Snow Melt

The temperature (Fig. 2A), precipitation (Fig. 2B), and snow depth (Fig. 2C) variation were extracted from eKlima for the sampling period and 14 days prior. We sampled at six different times during the snowmelt: May 1st also known as day 1 (D1) was the baseline community where no major changes in snow conditions had occurred yet. Temperatures were below 0 °C, precipitation was low, and the snowpack was stable at 34 cm depth and up to 43 cm on April 29th. April 30th was the first day with temperatures above 0 °C, but the snow melt began on May 2nd when average temperatures reached 2.1 °C. Thus, at day 1 (D1), we sampled a stable snowpack. We also sampled on May 4th (D4), May 8th (D8), May 11th (D11), May 15th (D15), and May 19th (D19), which was the last day of the snow melt. We observed a peak of snow melt between day 4 and day 6, where 50% of the snowpack melted in 48 h and the snow depth went from 32 to 16 cm. This coincided with a peak in temperatures to over 6 °C. The snowpack stabilised between day 8 and day 16, with an increase in precipitation and average temperatures around 1 °C. The second peak in snow melt occurred between day 16 and day 19, with maximum temperatures reaching over 5 °C. This led to the complete melt of the remaining snowpack. May 19th was the last sampling day (D19) when the remaining snowpack measured 7 cm deep and melted by the end of the day. As the snowpack melted, the sampled layer thickness decreased over time. However, because of the changing density, the volume of melted snow (melt water) filtered remained relatively stable, around 1500 mL per sample, and, therefore, should have a minimal impact on the presented results. We should note that a study monitoring airborne microbial communities during the same time period recorded an algal bloom in Kongsfjorden [51], with the peak of the bloom on May 11th (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Ny-Alesund weather information before and during the sampling period for (A) air temperature (°C), (B) precipitation (mm), and (C) snow depth (cm). Grey areas indicate sampling days. The different phases of the phytoplankton bloom in Kongsfjorden are based on observations from Feltracco et al. [52]

DNA Extraction, Shallow Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing, 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing, and Bioinformatic Processing

Soil DNA was extracted from 0.25 g of each sample using the PowerSoil kit (Qiagen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), while snow DNA was extracted from the filters using the PowerWater kit (Qiagen) and following the manufacturers’ protocol. The metagenomic library was prepared using the Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit (Illumina, CA, USA) and following the manufacturers’ protocol. Libraries were cleaned using the AMPure XP beads (NEB) and were pooled and loaded on the MiSeq for sequencing. The adaptors were removed from the fastq files using cutadapt [53] and merged in QIIME [54] using FLASH [55]. Merged fastq files were uploaded on MG-RAST [56] and subjected to quality control, which included dereplication, removal of human related sequences, removal of ambiguous bases (> 5), and a quality phred score > 15. Once all metagenomes were processed on the MG-RAST server, reads were taxonomically annotated based on the NCBI RefSeq database (Pruitt et al., 2006) with a maximum e-value of 10−5, 80% identity, 30 bp overlapping length, and a minimum abundance of 5 reads. Reads were also functionally annotated by similarity searching against the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) database [57], with a maximum e-value of 10−5, 60% identity, 15 bp overlapping length, and a minimum abundance of 5 reads. The RAST subsystem classification assigns genes to functional roles, themselves grouped into subsystems. The taxonomic and gene abundance tables were analysed in R.

16S rRNA gene libraries were constructed using the universal primers 515F and 806R [52] to amplify the V4 region. Amplicons were generated using a high-fidelity Accuprime DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), purified using AMPure magnetic bead capture kit (Agencourt, Beckman Coulter, MA, USA), and quantified using a QuantIT PicoGreen fluorometric kit (Invitrogen). The purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar concentrations using a SequalPrep plate normalization kit (Invitrogen), and the final concentration of the library was determined using a SYBR green quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay. Libraries were mixed with Illumina-generated PhiX control libraries and our own genomic libraries and denatured using fresh NaOH and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq V2 (500 cycles). The resulting amplicons were processed using the DADA2 pipeline [58]. Forward and reverse read pairs were trimmed and filtered, with forward reads truncated at 230 base pairs (bp) and reverse reads at 200 bp, no ambiguous bases allowed, and each read required to have < 2 expected errors based on their quality scores. Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were independently inferred from the forward and reverse reads of each sample using the run-specific error rates. Reads were dereplicated, pairs were merged, and chimeras were removed. Taxonomic assignment was performed against the SILVA v128 database [59, 60] using the implementation of the RDP (ribosomal database project) naive Bayesian classifier [61]. It resulted in a total of 490,185 reads (27,235 reads/sample on average), assigned against 6934 ASVs.

Statistical Analyses

All statistical analyses were performed in the R environment using primarily a combination of the vegan [62] and phyloseq [63] packages, and figures were made with ggplot2 [64]. Weather information was extracted from the Norwegian Meteorological Institute eKlima database [65], which records and makes available daily weather information, including temperature, precipitation, and snow depth. The taxonomic and functional tables were extracted from MG-RAST and normalised by the number of reads of each sample to account for variation in read number (total sum scaling) and used to assess differences in composition and function using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). Linear models were built to investigate changes in community and functional composition with time. We used linear models to investigate changes in relative abundance of functions of interests (related to colonisation potential) with snow melt; only genes categories presenting some variations were retained.

Amplicon sequencing of bacterial communities was conducted to identify potentially colonising taxa. As it focuses on one group of organisms, the depth provides a more detailed insight into the community. However, due to the low biomass of the snow samples and higher potential for contamination during amplicon sequencing, the prevalence function from the decontam package [66] was used to remove contaminants. We had three extraction kit controls and three negative MiSeq controls to use for decontam. We ran the prevalence function with a threshold of 0.5 to identify as contaminants all sequences that were more prevalent in negative controls than in positive samples and identified 54 potential contaminants that were removed from further analyses.

Bacterial diversity was calculated using phyloseq, and, as for metagenomics, the table was normalised by total sum scaling to investigate community composition. To identify potential colonisers, we removed all ASVs uniquely present in the snow (surface and bulk) and those uniquely present in the soil. We also removed any ASV identified in the soil on the first day of sampling or first identified in the soil. While the absence of taxa may reflect the biases associated with molecular techniques or detection limit, the sequencing depth of each sample should have been sufficient, especially as the first and last soil samples had the deepest sequencing depth (Fig. S2). The remaining 596 ASVs were considered potential colonisers: absent from the soil on the first day of sampling but identified at least once at later stages and always identified in the snow. From these, colonisers were considered potentially successful colonisers if they were identified in at least two soil samples and were still present on the last day of sampling. Finally, based on the existing literature [22, 67, 68], potentially successful colonisers were classified by their most likely life strategy, either copiotrophs (r-strategists), oligotrophs (K-strategists), or unclear when no information was found in the literature (Table S2). We should note that some microbial phyla, such as Bacteroidetes or Actinobacteria, have been classified as both copiotrophs and oligotrophs in the literature. As a result, we selected the most common/recent classification found in the literature with this caveat in mind.

Data Availability

The metagenomes used for this manuscript are deposited on MG-RAST under the accession project number MPG89221 (Table S1). The amplicon sequences used in this manuscript are deposited at the European Nucleotide Archive under the BioProject accession number PRJNA564220.

Results

Microbial Communities Change with Snow Melt (Shotgun Metagenomics)

Overall, bacteria and eukarya dominated all the communities examined while archaea, viruses, and other sequences were virtually absent from the metagenomic dataset (Fig. S3). Putative eukaryotic sequences represented approximately 30% of the sequences across sampling days (Fig. S3). Surface snow eukaryotic community composition showed high variability, with communities on day 8 and day 15 clustering away from other days (Fig. 3A). Sequences annotated as Ascomycota (fungi), Basidiomycota (fungi), Streptophyta (green algae and plants), and Chlorophyta (green algae) largely dominated the dataset. In surface snow, the overall increase in Streptophyta and Ascomycota was associated to a decrease in Chlorophyta and Basidiomycota (Fig. 3C). Bulk snow communities formed two distinct clusters: the first three and the last three sampling days (Fig. 3A). These were characterised by the significant increase in Streptophyta (Charophyceae) from day 11 (Fig. 3C), the day of the phytoplankton bloom peak in Kongsfjorden. The relative abundance of Ascomycota remained relatively stable over time, while Basidiomycota and Chlorophyta relative abundances decreased over time (Fig. 3C). In comparison, the soil eukaryotic community was more stable, with Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Chlorophyta, and Streptophyta all well represented (Fig. 3A, C).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Eukaryotic and prokaryotic communities assessed via shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Significant (p < 0.05) linear regressions are displayed. A PCoA of the eukaryotic communities (Bray–Curtis dissimilarity) showing the stability of soil communities, the two clusters of bulk snow, and the variability of surface snow communities. B PCoA of the bacterial communities (Bray–Curtis dissimilarity) showing the stability of soil communities, the two clusters of bulk snow, and the variability of surface snow communities. C Eukaryotic community composition at the phylum level with phyla representing less than 1% of the community clustered together. D Bacterial community composition at the phylum level with phyla representing less than 1% of the community clustered together

Bacterial sequences represented approximately 70% of the sequences (Fig. S3) of the metagenomic dataset. As for the eukaryotes, the bacterial communities displayed high variability (Fig. 3B). Actinobacteria decreased over time, while Bacteroidetes significantly increased over time, driven by the increase in Flavobacteriia (Fig. 3D). In bulk snow, the community composition formed the same two clusters as the eukaryotic community (Fig. 3B). A shift in the community composition was observed from day 11 onward, driven by the sudden increase in the relative abundance of Betaproteobacteria and Bacteroidetes (Flavobacteria) (Fig. 3D). All other taxa decreased after this shift (such as Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Firmicutes), and some almost disappeared from the taxonomic profile (such as Planctomycetes and Verrucomicrobia). In the soil, no major shifts in diversity nor in community composition were observed (Fig. 3B, D).

Changes in the Functional Profile of Microbial Communities with Snow Melt (Shotgun Metagenomics)

The number of functional annotations increased in the snow over time but was stable in soil samples (Fig. 4A). The PCoA of the functional profile using the RAST subsystems highlighted some variations from one sample to the next without any clear clustering of the snow samples. On the other hand, soil samples and some of the snow samples clustered closely together, illustrating a similar functional profile over time (Fig. 4B). Overall, the most abundant subsystems identified across all sample types and sampling days were related to cell function and metabolism, such as amino acid, carbohydrate, fatty acid, or protein metabolism, and to proteosomes and ribosome function within the ‘clustering-based subsystem’ (Fig. 4C). The relative stability of housekeeping genes over time was a good indicator that any functional changes observed were likely the result of ecological changes, such as variations in environmental conditions, rather than the influence of the number of sequencing reads. In both, surface and bulk snow, we observed changes in genes (although not always significant) associated with iron acquisition, protein metabolism, membrane transport, motility, virulence, and stress response associated genes. Some of these genes are likely to influence the colonisation potential by playing a role in competition, adaptation, and survival.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Functional profile of communities assessed via shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Significant (p < 0.05) linear regressions are displayed. A The number of functional annotations at each sampling day. B PCoA of the functional profile (Bray–Curtis dissimilarity) showing the stability of soil communities, and the variation of the snow profiles. C Functional profile of each sample at level 1 of the RAST subsystems

For example, the relative abundance of genes associated with the stress response represented almost 5% of the functional profile and increased over time in bulk snow samples (Fig. 4C). Most changes in stress response genes were observed in bulk snow samples, with the increase of each category with time (Fig. 5). We identified an increase in genes protecting against oxidative stress, especially bacterial haemoglobins, and glutathione-related genes. We also identified ectoine and betaine biosynthesis genes, both compounds are used to protect against drought, salinity, temperature, or osmotic stress [69]. The relative abundance of these genes increased in bulk snow microorganisms at the end of snow melt. Genes associated with motility and chemotaxis represented approximately 2% of the functional profile and showed an increase in flagellar motility associated genes over time in bulk snow microorganisms (Fig. 5). At the level 1 of subsystem classification, genes associated with virulence, disease and defence accounted for approximately 5% of the profile and were primarily classified as ‘resistance to antibiotics and toxic compounds’ (Fig. 4C). Genes associated with cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance were the most abundant and were identified in all samples. Besides environmental resistance genes, antibiotic resistance genes were also common, and the most abundant was the multidrug resistance efflux pump, which was present in all samples. Genes associated with the resistance to fluoroquinolones and beta-lactamase were primarily observed in soils and were stable over time while, in snow samples, their relative abundance fluctuated over time (Fig. 5). We also observed an increase in adhesion genes in bulk snow samples.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Linear models based on the relative abundance of selected functional genes likely playing a role in colonisation and illustrating changes with sample type and sampling day

Other genes relevant to colonisation included genes associated with dormancy and sporulation although they represented < 1% of the functional profile and changes over time were not observed. Similarly, genes associated with the regulation and cell signalling represented approximately 1% of the functional profile while quorum sensing, and biofilm formation related genes were virtually absent from the profile (Fig. 4C).

Bacterial Colonisation of Soils During Snow Melt (Amplicon Sequencing)

In addition to shotgun metagenomics, we assessed the bacterial communities using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to identify potential bacterial colonisers. Overall bacterial diversity decreased over time in snow samples (linear model: R2 = 0.79, p = 0.018) (Fig. S4). The patterns of bacterial diversity and community composition using 16S were similar to the metagenomics results, with the same clusters identified in the PCoA (Fig. S4B). The changes in snow community composition were more striking using the 16S, especially in the bulk snow samples. Overall, there was a significant increase in Proteobacteria and decrease in all other phyla (Fig. S4C). The soil community remained stable overall. Using the amplicon data, we identified 596 ASVs considered as potential colonisers. They were first identified in the snow and subsequently observed in the soil at least once. Of these, 100 ASVs were considered potentially successful colonisers as they were identified in at least two soil samples and were still present on the last day of sampling (Fig. 6). We classified these ASV by their most likely life strategy [67, 68] and found that 65 of the 100 potentially successful colonisers were considered oligotrophs (K-strategists) (Fig. 6, Table S2).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Heatmap of the relative abundance of potentially successful colonisers where each row corresponds to an ASV ordered by class. The coloured bar indicates the taxonomy at the phylum level

Discussion

In this study, microbial communities in the snowpack and the soil were monitored to evaluate the colonisation potential. This was the first study to characterise microbial communities during snow melt and to monitor changes in the underlying soil community during snow melt in the field.

Based on the weather data, the snow melt lasted 19 days and represented a period of intense change for the microbial communities living in those ecosystems and was likely reflected in the taxonomic and functional profiles. Disturbances to the ecosystem have been shown to facilitate microbial colonisation [70], and therefore, the snow melt may be an opportunity for invading microorganisms to colonise the soil system. Furthermore, the snow melt has been previously characterised as a pulse in nutrient availability [40, 4850], and although nutrient fluxes were not measured, resource pulses have been shown to facilitate colonisation in temperate soils [26, 71, 72].

Invading Community

Due to the important role of snow cover on the climate by reflecting solar radiation (albedo) and the negative role of snow algae darkening the snow and decreasing the albedo [73, 74], a number studies have investigated and described eukaryotic communities in Arctic snow with a focus on algal communities [7578]. In this study, Chlorophyta and Streptophyta dominated the algal community with variable abundances over time. These taxa are commonly identified in Arctic snow [76, 77], and the abundance peaks after the onset of snow melt are characteristic of algal blooms [74]. Snow algae are essential to the ecosystem as they actively fix carbon and become sources of organic carbon available for heterotrophic organisms [74, 79]. This increase in available organic carbon may be reflected by the increase of bacterial r-strategists (which grow faster in presence of available carbon) in the communities following the putative algal bloom [21, 67]. Many Betaproteobacteria are often considered r-strategists with fast growth rates [67] and have been associated with algal blooms [77, 80]. The genus Massilia, from the family Oxalobacteraceae, was responsible for the sudden increase in Betaproteobacteria. Members of the Massilia genus are heterotrophic, aerobic, motile, mesophile with a lower growth limit of 2° C, and representative isolates have some resistance to antibiotics [81]. Therefore, they may be well adapted to compete and grow in the melting snowpack, especially considering their faster growth rates [82]. Bacteroidetes were also part of the shift in bacterial community composition, and while they have often been considered r-strategists [22, 67], it has recently been suggested that they should actually be classified as K-strategists [68]. Often associated with algal blooms [80], their relative abundance first decreased before a subsequent increase, a pattern similar to that identified by Lutz et al. [77] and positively correlated with the increased concentration of dissolved organic carbon due to algal blooms [77], providing further evidence to suggest that an algal bloom may have occurred during snow melt. While the shift in snow community composition might result from atmospheric deposition from the phytoplankton bloom occurring in Kongsfjorden at the same time and reflected by the increase in Oxalobacteraceae in the atmosphere [51], we cannot exclude the possibility of an algal bloom also occurring as the snow melted. A simultaneous decrease in Cyanobacteria relative abundance was observed (primarily classified as Nostoc) as the abundance of Betaproteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Chlorophyta, and Streptophyta increased. The decrease of Cyanobacteria may be due to the competition with other organisms, and in this case, heterotrophic bacteria, as has been previously reported in laboratory experiments [83, 84]. Indeed, as available organic matter increases, heterotrophic bacteria grow faster and use the limited phosphate resources, leaving the Cyanobacteria phosphate limited [83].

The large taxonomic shifts in bacterial populations observed on day 15 in the surface snow and from day 11 onward in bulk snow may have resulted from changes in environmental conditions. Increased temperatures, liquid water, and nutrient availability may have promoted the growth of certain taxa such as Betaproteobacteria (Oxalobacteraceae) and Bacteroidetes (Cytophagia, Flavobacteriia, and Sphingobacteria). The shift in taxonomy was reflected by some changes in the functional profile, essentially by an increase in iron acquisition, membrane transport, virulence, motility, and stress-associated genes, potentially influencing the colonisation potential by playing a role in competition, adaptation and survival.

Resident Community

The major changes observed in the snow eukaryotic communities over time were not reflected in the soil eukaryotic community. The soil bacterial community was dominated by Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria (mainly Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria). The 16S profile showed a peak in Firmicutes relative abundance on day 4, driven by the increase of Clostridia, commonly identified in Arctic soils [85, 86] and considered r-strategists with fast growth rates [22, 67], which may be favoured by the changing environmental conditions and out-compete some taxa. Overall, both the taxonomic and functional profiles remained relatively stable during the snow melt. In this study, the experiment stopped on the last day of the melt. During the snow melt, the soil community is still covered by the snowpack, remaining isolated from changes in environmental conditions such as increasing light and temperature. This may explain the low variation in soil communities observed. Soil communities have been shown to change after the melt as they become exposed to changing environmental conditions, plant growth, and increasing activity from macroorganisms [8789]. Furthermore, the low cell concentration in the snow compared to the soil [90] may have limited the detection of changes in community, especially if the deposited organisms died rapidly.

Colonisation Potential

A successful colonisation depends on the alpha diversity, ability to survive and compete of both, the invading and resident community [4]. The invaders need to be well adapted to the environmental conditions of the new ecosystem they are attempting to colonise. In this case, the snow microbial communities already lived in similar abiotic conditions, although with its share of differences (e.g. carbon availability or photochemistry), they should have already been better adapted to the soil ecosystem than microorganisms coming from elsewhere, increasing their chances of successful colonisation [4, 5]. Environmental resistance genes were identified such as cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance which may help adapt to the changing conditions. Furthermore, in the snow, we observed an increase in stress response genes such as bacterial haemoglobins and glutathione-related genes, both involved in the protection to oxidative stress [91, 92]. Osmotic stress was also likely occurring as we identified an increase in ectoine and betaine biosynthesis genes, both protecting against salinity, temperature or osmotic stress [60].

The invaders also need to be good competitors, which is particularly difficult to evaluate in natural, complex ecosystems such as soils. Genes involved with competition such as increased motility and virulence (such as adhesion) were observed. We also identified antibiotic resistance genes as well as resistance to fluoroquinolones and beta-lactamase genes. The increase of these genes in the snow communities may provide a competitive advantage by increasing the potential for a successful colonisation of the soil. The functional profile of the soil remained relatively stable over time with no apparent increase in competition genes. This may reflect the low pressure exerted by the invaders on the soil community, which may already be well protected by the stability and cellular abundance, limiting the risks of invasions.

While 596 ASVs were initially present in the snow only and later identified in the soil, 100 ASVs were considered potentially successful colonisers. Interestingly, the majority of these colonisers were considered K-strategists [22, 67] and is against the hypothesis that r-strategists are more likely to colonise due to faster growth rates [17]. K-strategists may have the advantage in the Arctic as they may be better adapted to survive stressful environmental condition and resource limitations [21, 22]. We should note that characterising life-strategy based on taxonomy remains difficult and largely inaccurate, highlighting the need for further fundamental research.

Overall, this study provides the first insights into the impact of snow melt on soil microbial communities. While we did record some likely invasions, we did not assess whether these potentially successful colonisers survived in the long run and the impact they may have had on the soil community. Laboratory microcosm experiments suggested that 15 days after the end of melt, only few ASVs successfully colonised the soil, primarily classified as r-strategists [14]. Therefore, whether these 100 ASVs were successful remains undetermined and while K-strategists may be favoured after the melt, r-strategists may be more successful in the long run. Furthermore, we should note that due to limited sequencing depth, the genes identified are likely coming from the most abundant organisms in the community investigated [33, 93]. These results are providing indications that colonisation likely occurs following snow melt but monitoring communities throughout the melt and the summer season, with increased replication of the sampling design and deeper sequencing should be conducted to assess whether invaders can permanently colonise and grow into the soil community and their impact on resident communities.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Alexandra Holland who participated in the field work and the Ny-Alesund research station for the field support. Samples were collected under the Research in Svalbard (RIS) project number 10965.

Author Contribution

LAM, DAP, TV, and CL designed the project. BBP, RL, and CL conducted the field work. LAM did the laboratory work, bioinformatic processing, and statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the European Commission’s Marie Sklowdowska Curie Actions program under project number 675546 MicroArctic and was also supported by a French Polar Institute (IPEV) research grant (MicroLife, Program 1192).

Data Availability

The 16S rRNA dataset is deposited at the European Nucleotide Archive under the BioProject accession PRJNA564220. The shotgun metagenomics dataset is deposited on MG-RAST under the accession mgp89221.

Code Availability

All codes for analysis can be obtained by contacting the corresponding author.

Declarations

Ethics Approval

This is an observational study, and therefore, no ethical approval was required.

Consent to Participate and Consent for Publication

No approval was required to accomplish the goals of this study because the experimental work was conducted with environmental microbial communities.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Contributor Information

Lucie A. Malard, Email: lucie.malard@unil.ch

David A. Pearce, Email: david.pearce@northumbria.ac.uk

References

  • 1.Mack RN, Simberloff D, Mark Lonsdale W, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl. 2000;10:689–710. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:BICEGC]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lonsdale WM. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology. 1999;80:1522–1536. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1522:GPOPIA]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Richardson DM, Pyšek P (2008) Fifty years of invasion ecology–the legacy of Charles Elton. vol. 14. Wiley Online Library, pp. 161–168
  • 4.Mallon CA, Van Elsas JD, Salles JF. Microbial invasions: the process, patterns, and mechanisms. Trends Microbiol. 2015;23:719–729. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kinnunen M, Dechesne A, Proctor C, Hammes F, Johnson D, Quintela-Baluja M, Graham D, Daffonchio D, Fodelianakis S, Hahn N. A conceptual framework for invasion in microbial communities. ISME J. 2016;10:2773–2779. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thakur MP, van der Putten WH, Cobben MM, van Kleunen M, Geisen S. Microbial invasions in terrestrial ecosystems. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17:621–631. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0236-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Põlme S, Kõljalg U, Yorou NS, Wijesundera R, Ruiz LV, Vasco-Palacios AM, Thu PQ, Suija A. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science. 2014;346:1256688. doi: 10.1126/science.1256688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Delgado-Baquerizo M, Oliverio AM, Brewer TE, Benavent-González A, Eldridge DJ, Bardgett RD, Maestre FT, Singh BK, Fierer N. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science. 2018;359:320–325. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Oliverio AM, Geisen S, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Maestre FT, Turner BL, Fierer N. The global-scale distributions of soil protists and their contributions to belowground systems. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaaax8787. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax8787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kleinteich J, Hildebrand F, Bahram M, Voigt AY, Wood SA, Jungblut AD, Küpper FC, Quesada A, Camacho A, Pearce DA. Pole-to-pole connections: similarities between Arctic and Antarctic microbiomes and their vulnerability to environmental change. Front Ecol Evol. 2017;5:137. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2017.00137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cox F, Newsham KK, Robinson CH. Endemic and cosmopolitan fungal taxa exhibit differential abundances in total and active communities of Antarctic soils. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21:1586–1596. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tedersoo L, Mikryukov V, Zizka A, Bahram M, Hagh-Doust N, Anslan S, Prylutskyi O, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Maestre FT, Pärn J. Global patterns in endemicity and vulnerability of soil fungi. Glob Change Bio. 2022;28(22):6696–6710. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ji M, Kong W, Jia H, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Zhou T, Liu X, Ferrari BC, Malard L, Liang C, Xue K. Polar soils exhibit distinct patterns in microbial diversity and dominant phylotypes. Soil Biol Biochem. 2022;166:108550. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108550. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Malard LA, Pearce DA (2022) Bacterial colonisation: from airborne dispersal to integration within the soil community. Front Microbio. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.782789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Jousset A, Schulz W, Scheu S, Eisenhauer N. Intraspecific genotypic richness and relatedness predict the invasibility of microbial communities. ISME J. 2011;5:1108–1114. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ma C, Liu M, Wang H, Chen C, Fan W, Griffiths B, Li H. Resource utilization capability of bacteria predicts their invasion potential in soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 2015;81:287–290. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Litchman E. Invisible invaders: non-pathogenic invasive microbes in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett. 2010;13:1560–1572. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01544.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Crits-Christoph A, Robinson CK, Ma B, Ravel J, Wierzchos J, Ascaso C, Artieda O, Souza-Egipsy V, Casero MC, DiRuggiero J. Phylogenetic and functional substrate specificity for endolithic microbial communities in hyper-arid environments. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:301. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Song H-K, Shi Y, Yang T, Chu H, He J-S, Kim H, Jablonski P, Adams JM. Environmental filtering of bacterial functional diversity along an aridity gradient. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37565-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Orsi WD, Edgcomb VP, Christman GD, Biddle JF. Gene expression in the deep biosphere. Nature. 2013;499:205–208. doi: 10.1038/nature12230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Andrews JH, Harris RF (1986) r-and K-selection and microbial ecology Advances in microbial ecology. Springer pp. 99–147
  • 22.Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB. Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology. 2007;88:1354–1364. doi: 10.1890/05-1839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kurkjian HM, Akbari MJ, Momeni B. The impact of interactions on invasion and colonization resistance in microbial communities. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17:e1008643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.van Elsas JD, Chiurazzi M, Mallon CA, Elhottovā D, Krištůfek V, Salles JF. Microbial diversity determines the invasion of soil by a bacterial pathogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109:1159–1164. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109326109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.De Roy K, Marzorati M, Negroni A, Thas O, Balloi A, Fava F, Verstraete W, Daffonchio D, Boon N. Environmental conditions and community evenness determine the outcome of biological invasion. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1–5. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mallon CA, Poly F, Le Roux X, Marring I, van Elsas JD, Salles JF. Resource pulses can alleviate the biodiversity–invasion relationship in soil microbial communities. Ecology. 2015;96:915–926. doi: 10.1890/14-1001.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Eisenhauer N, Schulz W, Scheu S, Jousset A. Niche dimensionality links biodiversity and invasibility of microbial communities. Funct Ecol. 2013;27:282–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02060.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vivant A-L, Garmyn D, Maron P-A, Nowak V, Piveteau P. Microbial diversity and structure are drivers of the biological barrier effect against Listeria monocytogenes in soil. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Smets W, Moretti S, Denys S, Lebeer S. Airborne bacteria in the atmosphere: presence, purpose, and potential. Atmos Environ. 2016;139:214–221. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Malard LA, Avila-Jimenez M-L, Schmale J, Cuthbertson L, Cockerton L, Pearce DA. Aerobiology over the Southern Ocean–implications for bacterial colonization of Antarctica. Environ Int. 2022;169:107492. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Herbold CW, Lee CK, McDonald IR, Cary SC. Evidence of global-scale aeolian dispersal and endemism in isolated geothermal microbial communities of Antarctica. Nat Commun. 2014;5:1–10. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Šantl-Temkiv T, Gosewinkel U, Starnawski P, Lever M, Finster K. Aeolian dispersal of bacteria in southwest Greenland: their sources, abundance, diversity and physiological states. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;94:fiy031. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiy031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Maccario L, Carpenter SD, Deming JW, Vogel TM, Larose C. Sources and selection of snow-specific microbial communities in a Greenlandic sea ice snow cover. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38744-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Archer SD, Lee KC, Caruso T, Maki T, Lee CK, Cary SC, Cowan DA, Maestre FT, Pointing S. Airborne microbial transport limitation to isolated Antarctic soil habitats. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:925–932. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0370-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lemke P, Ren J, Alley RB, Allison I, Carrasco J, Flato G, Fujii Y, Kaser G, Mote P, Thomas RH (2007) Observations: changes in snow, ice and frozen ground. Chapter 4
  • 36.Déry SJ, Brown RD (2007) Recent Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent trends and implications for the snow‐albedo feedback. Geophys Res Lett. 10.1029/2007GL031474
  • 37.Bonnaventure PP, Lamoureux SF. The active layer: a conceptual review of monitoring, modelling techniques and changes in a warming climate. Prog Phys Geogr. 2013;37:352–376. doi: 10.1177/0309133313478314. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Winther J-G, Bruland O, Sand K, Gerland S, Marechal D, Ivanov B, Gøowacki P, König M. Snow research in Svalbard—an overview. Polar Res. 2003;22:125–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Harding T, Jungblut AD, Lovejoy C, Vincent WF. Microbes in high Arctic snow and implications for the cold biosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:3234–3243. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02611-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Larose C, Dommergue A, Vogel TM. The dynamic arctic snow pack: an unexplored environment for microbial diversity and activity. Biology. 2013;2:317–330. doi: 10.3390/biology2010317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Malard LA, Šabacká M, Magiopoulos I, Mowlem M, Hodson A, Tranter M, Siegert MJ, Pearce DA. Spatial variability of Antarctic surface snow bacterial communities. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:461. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jones H. The ecology of snow-covered systems: a brief overview of nutrient cycling and life in the cold. Hydrol Process. 1999;13:2135–2147. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199910)13:14/15<2135::AID-HYP862>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gray D, Toth B, Zhao L, Pomeroy J, Granger R. Estimating areal snowmelt infiltration into frozen soils. Hydrol Process. 2001;15:3095–3111. doi: 10.1002/hyp.320. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Iwata Y, Hayashi M, Hirota T. Comparison of snowmelt infiltration under different soil-freezing conditions influenced by snow cover. Vadose Zone J. 2008;7:79–86. doi: 10.2136/vzj2007.0089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Amato P, Hennebelle R, Magand O, Sancelme M, Delort A-M, Barbante C, Boutron C, Ferrari C. Bacterial characterization of the snow cover at Spitzberg, Svalbard. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007;59:255–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00198.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang S, Yang G, Wang Y, Hou S. Abundance and community of snow bacteria from three glaciers in the Tibetan Plateau. J Environ Sci. 2010;22:1418–1424. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60269-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cameron KA, Hagedorn B, Dieser M, Christner BC, Choquette K, Sletten R, Crump B, Kellogg C, Junge K. Diversity and potential sources of microbiota associated with snow on western portions of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:594–609. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schmidt S, Lipson D. Microbial growth under the snow: implications for nutrient and allelochemical availability in temperate soils. Plant Soil. 2004;259:1–7. doi: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000020933.32473.7e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Edwards KA, McCulloch J, Kershaw GP, Jefferies RL. Soil microbial and nutrient dynamics in a wet Arctic sedge meadow in late winter and early spring. Soil Biol Biochem. 2006;38:2843–2851. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.04.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Buckeridge KM, Grogan P. Deepened snow increases late thaw biogeochemical pulses in mesic low arctic tundra. Biogeochemistry. 2010;101:105–121. doi: 10.1007/s10533-010-9426-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Feltracco M, Barbaro E, Hoppe CJ, Wolf KK, Spolaor A, Layton R, Keuschnig C, Barbante C, Gambaro A, Larose C. Airborne bacteria and particulate chemistry capture Phytoplankton bloom dynamics in an Arctic fjord. Atmos Environ. 2021;256:118458. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118458. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Walters W, Hyde ER, Berg-Lyons D, Ackermann G, Humphrey G, Parada A, Gilbert JA, Jansson JK, Caporaso JG, Fuhrman JA. Improved bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V4 and V4–5) and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial community surveys. Msystems. 2016;1:e00009–00015. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00009-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet journal. 2011;17:10–12. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7:335. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Magoč T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2957–2963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Meyer F, Paarmann D, D'Souza M, Olson R, Glass EM, Kubal M, Paczian T, Rodriguez A, Stevens R, Wilke A. The metagenomics RAST server–a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinform. 2008;9:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom. 2008;9:1–15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:7188–7196. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;41:D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:5261–5267. doi: 10.1128/aem.00062-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Dixon P. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J Veg Sci. 2003;14:927–930. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.McMurdie PJ, Holmes S (2013) phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PloS one 8(4):e61217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 64.Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp 189–201
  • 65.Norwegian Meteorological Institute (2015) eKlima
  • 66.Davis NM, Proctor DM, Holmes SP, Relman DA, Callahan BJ. Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data. Microbiome. 2018;6:226. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0605-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ho A, Di Lonardo DP, Bodelier PL. Revisiting life strategy concepts in environmental microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2017;93:fix006. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Finn DR, Bergk-Pinto B, Hazard C, Nicol GW, Tebbe CC, Vogel TM. Functional trait relationships demonstrate life strategies in terrestrial prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2021;97:fiab068. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiab068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Galinski EA, Trüper HG. Microbial behaviour in salt-stressed ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994;15:95–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1994.tb00128.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Liu M, Bjørnlund L, Rønn R, Christensen S, Ekelund F (2012) Disturbance promotes non-indigenous bacterial invasion in soil microcosms: analysis of the roles of resource availability and community structure. PloS one 7:e45306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 71.Li W, Stevens MHH. Fluctuating resource availability increases invasibility in microbial microcosms. Oikos. 2012;121:435–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19762.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Van Nevel S, De Roy K, Boon N. Bacterial invasion potential in water is determined by nutrient availability and the indigenous community. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013;85:593–603. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ganey GQ, Loso MG, Burgess AB, Dial RJ. The role of microbes in snowmelt and radiative forcing on an Alaskan icefield. Nat Geosci. 2017;10:754–759. doi: 10.1038/ngeo3027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Anesio AM, Lutz S, Chrismas NA, Benning LG. The microbiome of glaciers and ice sheets. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes. 2017;3:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41522-017-0019-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Maccario L, Vogel TM, Larose C. Potential drivers of microbial community structure and function in Arctic spring snow. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:413. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lutz S, Anesio AM, Raiswell R, Edwards A, Newton RJ, Gill F, Benning LG. The biogeography of red snow microbiomes and their role in melting arctic glaciers. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):11968. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lutz S, Anesio AM, Edwards A, Benning LG. Linking microbial diversity and functionality of arctic glacial surface habitats. Environ Microbiol. 2016;19(2):551–565. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Perini L, Gostinčar C, Anesio AM, Williamson C, Tranter M, Gunde-Cimerman N. Darkening of the Greenland Ice Sheet: Fungal abundance and diversity are associated with algal bloom. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:557. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Takeuchi N. Seasonal and altitudinal variations in snow algal communities on an Alaskan glacier (Gulkana glacier in the Alaska range) Environ Res Lett. 2013;8:035002. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Terashima M, Umezawa K, Mori S, Kojima H, Fukui M. Microbial community analysis of colored snow from an alpine snowfield in northern Japan reveals the prevalence of Betaproteobacteria with snow algae. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1481. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Baldani J, Rouws L, Cruz L, Olivares F, Schmid M, Hartmann A. The Family Oxalobacteraceae. In: Rosenberg E, DeLong E, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F, editors. The Prokaryotes: Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2014. pp. 919–974. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kurm V, Van Der Putten WH, De Boer W, Naus-Wiezer S, Hol WG. Low abundant soil bacteria can be metabolically versatile and fast growing. Ecology. 2017;98:555–564. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Drakare S. Competition between picoplanktonic cyanobacteria and heterotrophic bacteria along crossed gradients of glucose and phosphate. Microb Ecol. 2002;44:327–335. doi: 10.1007/s00248-002-1013-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Svercel M, Saladin B, van Moorsel SJ, Wolf S, Bagheri HC. Antagonistic interactions between filamentous heterotrophs and the cyanobacterium Nostoc muscorum. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jordan D, McNicol PJ. A new nitrogen-fixing Clostridium species from a high arctic ecosystem. Can J Microbiol. 1979;25:947–948. doi: 10.1139/m79-144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Malard LA, Pearce DA. Microbial diversity and biogeography in Arctic soils. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2018;10:611–625. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Lipson D, Schadt C, Schmidt S. Changes in soil microbial community structure and function in an alpine dry meadow following spring snow melt. Microb Ecol. 2002;43:307–314. doi: 10.1007/s00248-001-1057-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lipson DA, Schmidt SK, Monson RK. Carbon availability and temperature control the post-snowmelt decline in alpine soil microbial biomass. Soil Biol Biochem. 2000;32:441–448. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00068-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Broadbent AA, Snell HS, Michas A, Pritchard WJ, Newbold L, Cordero I, Goodall T, Schallhart N, Kaufmann R, Griffiths RI. Climate change alters temporal dynamics of alpine soil microbial functioning and biogeochemical cycling via earlier snowmelt. ISME J. 2021;15:2264–2275. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00922-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Malard L (2019) Microbial biogeography and colonisation in Arctic terrestrial ecosystems. University of Northumbria at Newcastle (United Kingdom)
  • 91.Cabiscol Català E, Tamarit Sumalla J, Ros Salvador J. Oxidative stress in bacteria and protein damage by reactive oxygen species. Int Microbiol. 2000;3(1):3–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Frey AD, Kallio PT. Bacterial hemoglobins and flavohemoglobins: versatile proteins and their impact on microbiology and biotechnology. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003;27:525–545. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00056-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Cattonaro F, Spadotto A, Radovic S, Marroni F (2018) Do you cov me? Effect of coverage reduction on metagenome shotgun sequencing studies. F1000Research 7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The metagenomes used for this manuscript are deposited on MG-RAST under the accession project number MPG89221 (Table S1). The amplicon sequences used in this manuscript are deposited at the European Nucleotide Archive under the BioProject accession number PRJNA564220.

The 16S rRNA dataset is deposited at the European Nucleotide Archive under the BioProject accession PRJNA564220. The shotgun metagenomics dataset is deposited on MG-RAST under the accession mgp89221.

All codes for analysis can be obtained by contacting the corresponding author.


Articles from Microbial Ecology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES