Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2023 Aug 31;19(8):e1011614. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011614

A single inactivating amino acid change in the SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 Mac1 domain attenuates viral replication in vivo

Taha Y Taha 1,2,#, Rahul K Suryawanshi 1,2,#, Irene P Chen 1,2,3,#, Galen J Correy 2,4,#, Maria McCavitt-Malvido 1,2, Patrick C O’Leary 2,5, Manasi P Jogalekar 2,5, Morgan E Diolaiti 2,5, Gabriella R Kimmerly 1, Chia-Lin Tsou 1, Ronnie Gascon 1, Mauricio Montano 1, Luis Martinez-Sobrido 2,6, Nevan J Krogan 2,7,8,9, Alan Ashworth 2,5,*, James S Fraser 2,4,*, Melanie Ott 1,2,3,10,*
Editor: Jacob S Yount11
PMCID: PMC10499221  PMID: 37651466

Abstract

Despite unprecedented efforts, our therapeutic arsenal against SARS-CoV-2 remains limited. The conserved macrodomain 1 (Mac1) in NSP3 is an enzyme exhibiting ADP-ribosylhydrolase activity and a possible drug target. To determine the role of Mac1 catalytic activity in viral replication, we generated recombinant viruses and replicons encoding a catalytically inactive NSP3 Mac1 domain by mutating a critical asparagine in the active site. While substitution to alanine (N40A) reduced catalytic activity by ~10-fold, mutations to aspartic acid (N40D) reduced activity by ~100-fold relative to wild-type. Importantly, the N40A mutation rendered Mac1 unstable in vitro and lowered expression levels in bacterial and mammalian cells. When incorporated into SARS-CoV-2 molecular clones, the N40D mutant only modestly affected viral fitness in immortalized cell lines, but reduced viral replication in human airway organoids by 10-fold. In mice, the N40D mutant replicated at >1000-fold lower levels compared to the wild-type virus while inducing a robust interferon response; all animals infected with the mutant virus survived infection. Our data validate the critical role of SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 Mac1 catalytic activity in viral replication and as a promising therapeutic target to develop antivirals.

Author summary

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and remains a public health issue worldwide. Despite unprecedented efforts to develop vaccines and therapeutics against SARS-CoV-2, our therapeutic arsenal remains limited to only a limited number of therapeutics due to the lack of validated viral drug targets. Here, we identify a potentially new drug target in SARS-CoV-2. The Mac1 domain is an evolutionarily conserved enzyme in coronaviruses that can remove ADP-ribose post-translational modifications from proteins thereby combating host innate immune responses. We generated SARS-CoV-2 with a single point mutation that renders the Mac1 domain catalytically inactive and demonstrated that this mutant virus is less fit in mini lungs in the dish (organoids) and in mice. This work paves the way for the development of novel therapeutics targeting the Mac1 catalytic activity as SARS-CoV-2 antivirals.

Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to be a major public health crisis due to the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants with enhanced transmissibility and immune escape [1]. As of April 2023, more than 760 million people have been infected and more than 6.9 million have died of COVID-19 [2]. Despite unprecedented efforts to develop safe and effective vaccines and therapeutics, our arsenal against SARS-CoV-2 remains limited to a few drugs, including remdesivir and molnupiravir targeting the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and nirmatrelvir (ritonavir-boosted as Paxlovid) targeting the viral main protease (MPro). While each of these drugs have shown efficacy in clinical studies [35], each is associated with certain drawbacks such as administration via intravenous route for remdesivir, rise of mutations with molnupiravir [6], and drug-drug interactions and resistance mutations of Paxlovid [5,79]. There is a critical need to develop novel antivirals targeting other viral proteins to facilitate combination, potentially synergistic, therapeutics and minimize development of drug resistance. Therefore, identification and validation of viral proteins other than the RdRp or MPro as therapeutic targets is necessary.

SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-stranded RNA virus in the coronaviridae family and the betacoronavirus genus, which also includes SARS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and murine hepatitis virus (MHV). The virus encodes several open reading frames including two large polyproteins 1a and 1ab (PP1a and PP1ab). These polyproteins contain 16 non-structural proteins (NSPs) that are essential components of the viral replicase complex. NSP3 is the largest viral protein and contains several domains including three macrodomains: Mac1, Mac2, and Mac3 [10]. Macrodomains are ubiquitous in nature across eukaryotes, prokaryotes, and archaea [11]. While Mac2 and Mac3 are catalytically inactive, Mac1 can bind ADP-ribosylated protein sidechains and catalyze the hydrolysis of these post-translational marks for a diverse set of protein targets [10,1214]. Macrodomains are found and conserved in over 150 viruses [11] and are structurally [15] and evolutionarily [16] related to cellular macrodomains, albeit with distinct functions [17]. Viral macrodomains play critical roles in the replication of alphaviruses and hepatitis E virus [18,19]. In coronaviruses (CoV), Mac1 within NSP3 is structurally conserved in several betacoronavirus lineages including lineage A (MHV), lineage B (SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2), and lineage C (MERS-CoV) [20] (S1 Fig). Collectively, the acquisition, conservation, and evolution of viral macrodomains suggests an evolutionarily conserved fitness advantage of these proteins.

The Mac1 of coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2, has ADP-ribosylhydrolase activity in vitro [20]. ADP-ribosylation is a ubiquitous post-translational modification that is “written” by poly-adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerases (PARPs) and is associated with a diverse array of biological consequences (reviewed in [21,22]), including DNA repair, signal transduction pathways, epigenetics and transcription, and many others. Importantly, PARPs have been shown to be important regulators of virus-host interactions and are integrated in many interferon (IFN) signaling pathways (reviewed in [23]). PARP7, PARP9, PARP12, and PARP14 directly enhance antiviral innate immune responses [2426] and are upregulated during MHV infection [27]. PARP7 has also been shown to play a proviral role in influenza A virus infection [28]. Notably, PARP14-induced ADP-ribosylation is reversed by SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 [29]. The acquisition of an ADP-ribosylhydrolase such as Mac1 in SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 can therefore be seen as a means for the virus to “erase” ADP-ribosylation marks and dampen the antiviral innate immune response. Indeed, previous studies in coronaviruses have demonstrated that the NSP3 Mac1 is necessary for pathogenesis and for robust viral replication [3033].

Previous studies have typically employed a mutant virus where the conserved asparagine residue at position 40 in the Mac1 active site (S1 Fig) is mutated to an alanine to render NSP3 Mac1 inactive. In MHV, the Mac1-deficient virus replicated to similar levels as the wild-type (WT) virus in vitro but was significantly attenuated in primary bone marrow-derived macrophages and in mice [30,31]. Interestingly, infection with Mac1-deficient MHV-A59 (hepatotropic) was associated with reduced IFN induction whereas infection with Mac1-deficient MHV-JHM (neurotropic) induced higher levels of IFN in mice [30,31]. The difference between two MHV strains that cause distinct disease pathologies indicates an important role in the host cell type in determining the function of the MHV Mac1. Similar experiments were conducted in SARS-CoV and showed comparable results where the mutant virus displayed replication defects only in mice, but not in cell culture models, and was associated with higher induction of IFN [32]. Collectively, these studies suggest a critical role for coronavirus NSP3 Mac1 in viral replication that may not be fully recapitulated in immortalized cell lines. SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 Mac1 has ~75% sequence conservation with SARS-CoV (S1 Fig) and has been shown to catalyze the hydrolysis of ADP-ribose moieties from a diverse set of targets [13,20]. Recently, Alhammad et al. generated a SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 deletion mutant (ΔOrf1a 1023–1192) and showed that the mutant has significantly attenuated IFN antagonism and replication in vivo [34]. The role of the NSP3 Mac1 catalytic activity in SARS-CoV-2 replication and pathogenesis remains unknown.

Here, we show that SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 Mac1 catalytic activity is necessary for robust viral replication in vivo and is a reasonable target for the development of novel therapeutics. To catalytically inactivate SARS-CoV-2 Mac1, we focused on mutating the conserved asparagine residue at position 40. Biochemical analysis of alanine and aspartic acid mutants at this residue demonstrated that while both mutants lack catalytic activity, the N40A mutant Mac1 is destabilized and inherently unstable in bacterial and mammalian cells. Using reverse genetics, we show that a SARS-CoV-2 replicon containing NSP3 Mac1 N40A mutation is slightly attenuated in cell culture models without affecting IFN induction, while a replicon and infectious virus containing N40D mutation were associated with higher IFN induction but show minimal replicative effects in immortalized cell lines. In primary airway organoids and in mice, the N40D virus is profoundly attenuated demonstrating the same dichotomy of phenotypes between in vitro and in vivo studies of Mac1-deficient CoVs. Our studies demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 is a critical viral enzyme for viral replication in vivo.

Results

Residue N40 is critical for the catalytic activity and protein stability of SARS-CoV-2 Mac1

SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 Mac1 is a MacroD-type macrodomain with high structural conservation with other CoV macrodomains despite sequence divergence (S1 Fig). To determine the role of Mac1 in SARS-CoV-2 replication, we wanted to generate Mac1 catalytic activity-deficient SARS-CoV-2 through point mutations that abrogate Mac1 catalytic activity. Several conserved residues in the active site [20], especially asparagine 40 (N40), have been utilized in previous studies of CoV to generate such mutant viruses [3033]. Mac1 N40 coordinates the distal ribose moiety in an ADP-ribosylated substrate and is critical for binding and catalytic activity [32,35]. To investigate the structural and functional contribution of N40 to binding and catalytic activity, we generated Mac1 N40A and N40D mutants that are both predicted to disrupt coordination of the distal ribose moiety and therefore significantly inhibit catalytic activity of Mac1. When expressed as an isolated Mac1 domain in bacteria, the soluble yield of N40A mutant was typically 20-fold lower compared with the WT and N40D Mac1 proteins (Fig 1A). This suggests that the N40A mutant is unstable or fails to fold efficiently. To determine the thermostability of the mutants in the absence or presence of ADP-ribose, we conducted differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) and found that the N40A mutant unfolds at a significantly lower temperature (34°C) compared with the WT (49°C) and N40D mutant (46°C) (Fig 1B and 1C). All variants were significantly stabilized by ADP-ribose, indicating that binding activity is not greatly compromised (Fig 1B and 1C). These data indicate that the N40A mutant may have an inherently unstable fold compared to the WT and N40D mutant, which could be responsible for the low stability and expression yield in bacteria. To determine whether this is also the case in mammalian cells, we generated lentiviral mammalian expression vectors of Strep-tagged isolated Mac1 domain and transduced A549 lung carcinoma cells. Western blot analysis of transduced cells revealed that the N40A mutant is expressed at significantly lower levels compared with the WT and N40D mutant (S2 Fig). Collectively, these data indicate that Mac1 tolerates an N40A mutation poorly, but it can accommodate an N40D mutation. Interestingly, such a profound effect of the N40A mutant on protein stability in the context of the entire NSP3 protein was not observed for SARS-CoV NSP3 Mac1 as it only resulted in ~16% reduction in NSP3 expression [32], which suggests different physicochemical properties of these proteins despite high structural similarity.

Fig 1. Expression and characterization of Mac1 N40A and N40D mutants in vitro.

Fig 1

A) Analysis of WT, Asn40Ala (N40A) and Asn40Asp (N40D) soluble expression in BL21(DE3) E. coli by size exclusion chromatography (HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 75 pg column) and SDS-PAGE (Coomassie stained). B) Thermostability of Mac1 mutants determined by differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF). Protein (2 μM) was incubated ± 1 mM ADP-ribose with SYPRO orange (10 μM). Apparent melting temperatures were calculated by DSFworld [66] using fitting model 1. Data are presented as the mean of four replicates. C) Difference in Tma for Mac1 incubated with ADP-ribose from 2 μM to 1 mM. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of four technical replicates. D) X-ray crystal structure of ADP-ribose bound to N40D. Difference electron density (mFO-DFC map) is shown prior to modeling ADP-ribose (blue mesh contoured at 8 σ). E) ADP-ribose binding is conserved between WT (teal sticks) and N40D (white sticks). Selected hydrogen bonds are shown for WT (red dashed lines) and N40D (black dashed lines). The D40 side chain is rotated ~80° relative to N40 and therefore does not form a hydrogen bond with the terminal ribose, however, a water molecule (purple sphere labeled W) creates a new hydrogen bond network. F) Western blot analysis of Mac1 activity with auto-MARylated PARP10 (residues 819–1007). MARylated PARP10 (0.5 μM) was incubated with Mac1 variants (20 μM) for 1 hour at room temperature prior to SDS-PAGE and transfer to nitrocellulose membrane and blotting with anti-MAR/PAR antibody (1:1000 dilution, Cell Signaling, 83732). G) Kinetic measurements of MARylated PARP10 hydrolysis by Mac1 variants (concentration indicated between parentheses) using NudT5/AMP-Glo to detect ADP-ribose [51,59]. H) Catalytic efficiency (kcat/KM) was determined by linear regression of data in G using GraphPad Prism. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three technical replicates.

To determine the binding pose of ADP-ribose for the Mac1 N40D mutant, we crystalized the N40D Mac1 mutant protein in the presence of ADP-ribose (Fig 1D and 1E). Relative to WT, the ADP-ribose bound conformation is conserved in the mutant, but the terminal dihedral of the D40 side chain is rotated ~80° relative to N40 and therefore does not form a hydrogen bond with the terminal ribose. This rotation is also observed in the apo structure of N40D (S3 Fig). Interestingly, in the structure of N40D Mac1 protein bound to ADP-ribose, we observe a water molecule (purple sphere labeled W in Fig 1E) forming a new hydrogen bond to the terminal ribose that mimics the interaction observed to the nitrogen of N40. To determine whether these subtle differences in binding affect Mac1 enzymatic activity, we conducted deMARylation assays with auto ADP-ribosylated PARP10 and the WT and mutant Mac1 proteins (Fig 1F). We found that all proteins were capable of deMARylation but the N40D mutant had lower deMARylation activity (Fig 1F). To quantify the catalytic activity of these proteins, we utilized the NudT5/AMP-Glo assay to measure ADP-ribose released by the enzymatic reaction using adjusted substrate concentrations (Fig 1G). Given the low activity of the mutants, a 10- and 100-fold excess of the N40A and N40D mutants, respectively, was used in the assay relative to the WT Mac1. Relative to WT Mac1 catalytic activity (kcat/KM = 0.37 μM-1 min-1), the N40A mutant had <10% activity (kcat/KM = 0.029 μM-1 min-1), while the N40D mutant had <1% activity (kcat/KM = 0.0026 μM-1 min-1) (Fig 1H). These data demonstrate that both mutants have significantly reduced Mac1 enzymatic activities with the N40D mutant having 10-fold and 100-fold lower enzymatic activity relative to the N40A mutant and the WT Mac1, respectively. Taken together, these data suggest that the Mac1 N40D mutant is a good surrogate for abolishing catalytic activity in a similar manner to an inhibitor, whereas the significant destabilization observed with the N40A mutant may render it difficult to interpret in the context of the multi-domain structure of NSP3.

The Mac1 N40D replicon has reduced ability to suppress innate immune responses in cell culture

Next, we introduced the N40A and N40D mutations into SARS-CoV-2 replicons to determine their impact on viral RNA replication in a rapid and safe manner [36]. The replicons express secreted nanoluciferase as a reporter au lieu of the Spike-coding sequence and can produce single-round infectious particles when supplied with a separate Spike expression vector (Fig 2A). Single-round infectious particles were generated for the ancestral (WA1) replicon and the two Mac1 N40A and N40D mutants. They were used to infect simian Vero cells overexpressing the ACE2 and TMPRSS2 entry factors (VAT) or human Calu3 lung adenocarcinoma cells naturally expressing both factors. We measured secreted nanoluciferase in the supernatant, which reflects intracellular viral RNA levels [36]. The N40D mutant resulted in a small but statistically significant 1.4- and a non-statistically significant 1.1-fold reduction in luciferase signal relative to the WT replicon in VAT and Calu3 cells, respectively, while the Mac1 N40A mutant showed a significant (5- and 13-fold) reduction (Fig 2B). Intracellular RNA was isolated from infected Calu3 cells, and both viral and host RNAs were measured by RT-qPCR. Viral RNA levels were similar between the WT and N40D mutant replicons, while the N40A mutant had a ~44-fold reduction in viral RNA levels relative to the WT replicon (Fig 2C). Measurement of a panel of four innate immune response genes (IFNb, ISG15, IL6, and STAT1) demonstrated higher induction in N40D-infected cells, especially levels of ISG15, IFNb and IL6, as compared to WT and N40A (Fig 2D). No such difference was observed with the N40A replicon despite the slight change in viral replication (Fig 2D). This result suggests that the modest replication deficit but lack of IFN and innate immune response genes induction of the N40A replicon could result from the observed Mac1 instability (S2 Fig) rather than a decrease in catalytic activity (Fig 1H). Therefore, we prioritized the N40D mutant in subsequent experiments to avoid the confounding destabilizing effect of the N40A mutation on Mac1.

Fig 2. SARS-CoV-2 replicon with Mac1 N40D mutation fails to suppress innate immune responses in cells.

Fig 2

A) Experimental workflow of the SARS-CoV-2 replicon system. SARS-CoV-2 WA1 and Mac1 domain mutant replicons were transfected along with a S and N expression vectors into BHK-21 cells. At 72 hours post-transfection, the supernatant containing single-round infectious particles is used to infect VAT and Calu3 cells in the presence or absence of exogenous IFN. At 72 hours post-infection, luciferase activity in the supernatants was used as a readout for viral RNA replication and innate immune response gene expression is measured by RT-qPCR. B) Luciferase readout of infected VAT and Calu3 cells with indicated replicons. Data are presented as mean +/- SD of three biological replicates conducted in triplicate. C) Intracellular viral RNA (N gene copies) of Calu3 cells in B was measured by RT-qPCR using a standard curve. Data are presented as mean +/- SD of three biological replicates conducted in triplicate. D) Relative expression of indicated innate immune response genes relative to GAPDH control and normalized to the -Spike control of each replicon in infected cells in B by RT-qPCR. Data are presented as mean +/- SD of three biological replicates conducted in triplicate. E) Calu3 cells were infected with indicated replicons in the presence of indicated IFNγ concentrations. Intracellular viral RNA (N gene copies) was measured by RT-qPCR using a standard curve. Data are presented as mean +/- SD of one biological replicate conducted in triplicate. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001; ****, p<0.0001 by two-sided Student’s T-test.

To determine if the observed increase in the innate immune response was too weak to suppress the N40D mutant replication, Calu3 cells were treated with varying doses of exogenous IFN gamma or beta (IFNγ or IFNβ, respectively) and then infected with single rounds of WT and N40D replicons. This treatment significantly decreased viral RNA levels of both replicons compared to replication levels in untreated cells as measured by RT-qPCR (Fig 2E and S4 Fig). The 10 and 100 ng/μL doses of IFNγ suppressed the Mac1 N40D replicon by 2.5- and 3-fold, respectively, more than the WT replicon (Fig 2E). At 1000 ng/μL IFNγ and all doses of IFNβ, activity of both replicons was suppressed to similar levels (Fig 2E and S4 Fig). Collectively, these data suggest a modest, but specific, effect of the Mac1 N40D mutation on reversing the suppression of innate immune responses in immortalized cell lines.

The Mac1 N40D infectious virus has a 10-fold replication deficit in human airway organoids

To determine whether the Mac1 catalytic activity plays a role in a full replicative infection cycle, we introduced the Mac1 N40D mutation into a WA1-based infectious clone. The clone was transfected into BHK-21 cells and then rescued and passaged over Vero TMPRSS2 cells to achieve high viral titers. After sequence verification, the plaque morphology of the viruses was determined using Vero TMPRSS2 cells; the WT and the N40D mutant showed similar plaque morphology (Fig 3A). The viruses were then used to infect Calu3 cells; at 48 hours after infection, particle production was measured by plaque assay while intracellular viral RNA and cytokine expression levels were measured by RT-qPCR. The N40D Mac1 mutant showed modestly (~2-fold) lower particle production and similar intracellular viral RNA levels compared with the WT virus suggesting a slightly attenuated phenotype (Fig 3B and 3C). Particle production was not significantly different between the N40D mutant and WT viruses over 72 hours post-infection and at multiple MOIs, except for mild enhancement of the mutant virus at 72 hours post-infection at MOI 0.1 (S5 Fig). Similar to the results from replicon experiments, the N40D mutant induced higher levels of innate immune response genes as compared to the WT virus (Fig 3D), underscoring the role of Mac1 catalytic activity in innate immune response antagonism.

Fig 3. SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 domain N40D mutant is attenuated in human airway organoids.

Fig 3

A) Plaque morphology of indicated viruses in VAT cells. The images were pseudocolored in grayscale to optimize plaque visualization. B) Viral particle release of infected Calu3 cells (MOI 0.01) with indicated viruses was measured at 48 hours post-infection by plaque assay on VAT cells. Data are presented as mean +/- SD of two biological replicates conducted in duplicate. C) Intracellular viral RNA (N gene copies) of Calu3 cells in B was measured by RT-qPCR using a standard curve. Data are presented as mean +/- SD of two biological replicates conducted in duplicate. D) Relative levels of ISG15, IFNb, IL6, and STAT1 in Calu3 cells in B normalized to uninfected cells were determined by RT-qPCR. Data are presented as mean +/- SD of two biological replicates conducted in duplicate. E) Experimental workflow of the generation of primary human lung organoids and infection with SARS-CoV-2. Clip art was created with BioRender.com with permission. F) Viral particle release of infected primary human lung organoids with indicated viruses was measured at indicated times post-infection by plaque assay on VAT cells. Data are presented as mean +/- SD of one biological replicate conducted in triplicate. G) Relative levels of ISG15, MX1, IFNb, IL6, and IFNa to 18s RNA in infected human airway organoids in F normalized to uninfected organoids were determined by RT-qPCR. Data are presented as mean +/- SD of one biological replicate conducted in triplicate. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001 by two-sided Student’s T-test.

It is possible that the modest phenotype of the N40D mutant observed in Calu3 cells is due to these cells not fully recapitulating the host environment during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Human lung organoids are stem-cell derived multi-cell type 3D structures that have intact innate immune responses and better recapitulate the environment during SARS-CoV-2 infection [37,38]. We tested the replicative capacity of the N40D mutant in differentiated human airway organoids (Fig 3E). While WT and Mac1 N40D mutant viruses produced similar levels of infectious particles at 24 hours post-infection, the Mac1 N40D mutant showed ~10-fold lower particle production at 48 and 72 hours post-infection (Fig 3F). Moreover, the expression of several innate immune response genes (ISG15, IFNb, IL6, MX1, and IFNa) was higher in organoids infected with the N40D mutant compared with the wild-type virus (Fig 3G). The observed fast viral clearance of the N40D mutant and the concomitant induction of innate immune response genes support the model that loss of IFN antagonism limits viral infection by the N40D mutant virus, especially at later time points after infection. These data are in contrast to previous work with SARS-CoV where the Mac1 catalytic activity-deficient virus replicated at low levels early post-infection compared to the WT virus suggesting potentially attenuated infectivity rather than viral clearance [33]. Collectively, these data demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 catalytic activity plays a critical role in viral replication in primary cells that is not fully recapitulated in immortalized cell lines.

SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 N40D mutant is significantly attenuated in vivo

To ascertain whether SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 catalytic activity plays a role in viral replication in vivo, we intranasally infected mice overexpressing the human ACE2 receptor (K18-hACE2) with WT and Mac1 N40D viruses (Fig 4A). In response to WT viral infection, K18-hACE2 mice typically develop significant weight loss and lowered body temperature and reach the humane endpoint by day 6 post-infection due to viral encephalitis [39,40]. In contrast, mice infected with the Mac1 N40D mutant did not experience any changes in weight or body temperature, and all mice survived 6 days post-infection (Fig 4B–4D). This data indicate that the SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 catalytic activity plays an essential role in viral pathogenesis in vivo.

Fig 4. SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 N40D mutant is attenuated in K18-hACE2 mice.

Fig 4

A) K18-hACE2 mice (5 mice per group per timepoint) were infected with 103 PFUs of WA1 and WA1 Mac1 N40D viruses intranasally. At 2, 4, and 6 days post-infection, the lung tissue was collected for viral particle abundance measurement by plaque assay (VAT) and viral RNA and innate immune response gene expression analysis by RT-qPCR. Clip art was created with BioRender.com with permission. B) Survival curve of mice infected in A. C) Change in body weight of mice infected in A. Data are shown as mean ± SD. D) Change in body temperature of mice infected in A. Data are shown as mean ± SD. E) Viral particle abundance in the lungs was measured by plaque assay (VAT). Data are presented as mean +/- SD. F) Viral RNA levels in the lungs were measured by RT-qPCR using a standard curve. Data are presented as mean +/- SD. G) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of lungs of mice infected in A. H) Total pathology scores of all infected mice lungs in G. Breakdown of scores is available in S7 Fig. I) Relative levels of IFNB1, ISG15, IL6, TNFa, IFNa4, CXCR4, CCL2, and MX1 to GAPDH were determined by RT-qPCR. Data are presented as mean +/- SD. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001; ****, p<0.0001 by two-sided Student’s T-test.

When viral particle production and tissue viral RNA levels were examined in the lungs, upper respiratory tract, and brain, the Mac1 N40D mutant had slightly higher particle production and viral RNA levels at 2 days post-infection but significantly less 4 days post-infection and undetectable levels 6 days post-infection in the lungs (Fig 4E and 4F). Similar decreases were observed in the upper respiratory tract albeit with overall lower viral particle production and tissue RNA levels as expected (S6A and S6B Fig). Notably, no infectious particles were recovered from the brain of animals infected with Mac1 N40D mutant virus, consistent with the 100% survival rate of the infected mice (S6C Fig). These data indicate efficient entry and replication early post-infection, but significantly faster clearance of the Mac1 N40D virus compared with the WT virus. These results are also consistent with other coronavirus studies, demonstrating a critical role of the Mac1 domain in viral replication in vivo [3033]. Lung histology of mice infected with the WT and Mac1 N40D virus showed SARS-CoV-2 infection-related pulmonary pathology [41] at 2 days post-infection characterized by inflammation and thickening of alveolar septa by infiltrating immune cells (Fig 4G). Interestingly, the lung pathology for the mice infected with the Mac1 N40D virus appeared mostly similar to that of the mice infected with the wild-type virus (Fig 4G). Independent pathology analysis revealed that the N40D mutant virus had higher pathology score at 2 days post-infection but similar scores at 4 and 6 days post-infection (Fig 4H). Specific pathology scoring of the vascular, bronchial and alveolar areas of the lung followed this trend (S7A–S7C Fig), except for alveolar inflammation which was higher in the wild-type virus compared with the N40D mutant (S7D Fig). The extent of inflammation in the different areas of the lung were also quantified and were higher at 4 and 6 days post-infection for the N40D mutant compared with the wild-type virus (S7E–S7G Fig). Collectively, the observed significant differences in survival (Fig 4B) and viral replication (Fig 4E and 4F) but similar histological findings (Fig 4G, 4H and S7 Fig) support the model that the N40D mutant virus can infect and replicate to robust levels and induce similar lung immune pathology, but is cleared quicker than the wild-type virus.

We also collected lung tissues from WT- and N40D-infected animals and extracted RNA for innate immune response genes expression analysis by RT-qPCR. We selected several genes implicated in SARS-CoV-2 clearance and pathogenesis, including IFNB1, ISG15, IL6, TNFa, IFNa4, CXCR4, CCL2, and MX1 [42]. At all assayed timepoints, Mac1 N40D viral infection was consistently associated with higher innate immune response gene expression relative to the WT virus (Fig 4I). The most highly induced gene was ISG15 at 2 and 4 days post-infection, while IFNa4 was highly induced at day 6 post-infection (Fig 4I). Notably, similar innate immune response gene upregulation was previously observed in SARS-CoV Mac1-deficient virus-infected mice [32]. Collectively, these data support the model that the SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 catalytic activity is an important suppressor of innate immune responses and thus critical for viral replication in vivo.

Discussion

The SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 domain represents an attractive drug target due to its catalytic ADP-ribosylhydrolase activity, its conserved structure, and its relative lack of observed mutations in emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants [43]. Here we identify–through biochemical and structural characterization–a single amino acid change within the active site (N40D) that diminishes the catalytic activity to <1% of WT activity while maintaining protein stability. This mutation, when introduced via reverse genetics into fully infectious viral clones or replicons, showed minimal effects on viral replication in immortalized cell lines while modestly inducing the IFN response. However, in primary lung organoids and in mice, we observed profound effects of the N40D mutation on viral replication and innate immunity induction, demonstrating that Mac1 is a critical virulence factor.

CoV Mac1 contains a conserved structure related to MacroD family of macrodomains [11,35]. Several residues in the active site coordinate the ADP-ribose group and have been shown to be critical for ADP-ribosyl substrate binding and catalysis [27]. One of the most critical residues is N40 which makes hydrogen bonds with the terminal ribose hydroxyl group and is conserved in all CoV macrodomains. Here we show that this position within the SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 domain does not tolerate mutation to alanine due to protein instability. These results contrast with SARS-CoV Mac1 where the A mutant appears to only modestly reduce the expression of NSP3 in infected cells [32]. While structurally conserved, the SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 sequence diverges by 25% from SARS-CoV, and this sequence difference may endow different physicochemical properties to the SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 domain as compared to other CoVs despite maintaining the ADP ribosylhydrolase activity and a well-conserved structural fold.

The CoV Mac1 catalytic activity has been shown to contribute to the suppression of innate immune responses during SARS-CoV and MHV-JHM infection [31,32]. Recently, a SARS-CoV-2 mutant lacking Mac1 expression showed significant attenuation in vivo and reduced IFN antagonism [34]. It is not entirely surprising that immortalized cell lines do not fully recapitulate the phenotype of SARS-CoV-2 WT and Mac1 N40D mutant in primary cells or mice. Previous studies with CoV either found no differences in cell culture between the WT and Mac1 catalytic activity-deficient viruses or required the use of in vivo models or the screening of several cell culture systems and primary cells to find a cell type in which differences were apparent [3032,34]. We used two different cell culture lines frequently used in SARS-CoV-2 research: Vero cells (engineered to overexpress ACE2 and TMPRSS2) and Calu3 cells. Vero cells lack IFN production [44] while Calu3 cells have intact IFN production and induction [45], and SARS-CoV-2 replication is dampened in Calu3 cells vs Vero cells due to this critical difference [46]. In neither of these cells, did the N40D mutant show much attenuation, as measured by quantification of viral particle production and intracellular viral RNA. In contrast, in primary human lung organoids and in K18-hACE2 mice, the N40D mutant was strongly attenuated and was associated with higher IFN induction. Our findings are reminiscent of what has been reported for other CoVs, and indicate that immortalized cells lines–even those like Calu3 deemed “IFN-competent” may not fully recapitulate innate immune responses during viral infection. Primary cells or in vivo models of infection are needed to fully characterize the functional role of certain viral proteins, including the Mac1 domain, in viral infection.

The N40D mutant virus yielded a dramatic survival phenotype in K18-hACE2 mice with all animals surviving while 100% of mice infected with the WT virus reached the humane endpoint. Infected K18-hACE2 mice usually die because of unnatural ACE2 overexpression on neurons and lethal encephalitis [41,47]. However, no infectious virus was recovered from the brains of animals infected with the N40D mutant, correlating with the attenuated viral titers recovered from the lungs of infected animals. It is possible that the Mac1 domain specifically supports neuronal replication of SARS-CoV-2 or that the IFN response when not effectively counterbalanced by the Mac1 domain’s catalytic activity is vigorous in infected neurons similarly to the Mac1-deficient MHV-JHM (neurotropic) which induced higher levels of IFN in mice [30,31]. Interestingly, the N40D mutant replicated slightly higher than the WT virus at 2 days post-infection in the lungs of infected mice, which correlated with the lack of significant IFN induction at this timepoint. It is possible that elevated ADP-ribosylation of substrates outside the IFN response may support viral replication before the IFN response becomes effectively induced.

Despite the dramatic differences in survival and significantly faster viral clearance of the N40D mutant in mice, histology analysis of infected lungs demonstrated similar lung immune infiltration and pathology between the WT and N40D mutant virus. These data support the model that the N40D mutant virus can infect and replicate to robust levels early post-infection and therefore induces similar lung immune pathology, but is cleared quicker than the wild-type virus due to potentially attenuated host innate immune response antagonism. Our results are in contrast to a recently published SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 Mac1 deletion mutant where significantly less lung pathology was reported [34]. However, the deletion mutant appears to replicate significantly less at all timepoints post-infection compared with the wild-type virus suggesting additional defects in infectivity or replication that are not observed with the catalytic activity N40D mutant virus.

Future studies will identify the cellular targets of the Mac1 domain and the mechanism of its critical role in the viral lifecycle. Indeed, the importance of Mac1 in the CoVs lifecycle has led several groups to develop inhibitors of Mac1 catalytic activity by crystallographic screening [48,49] and high throughput in vitro screening [5052]. However, the role of these compounds as potential SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics has not yet been tested in antiviral assays and will be investigated in future studies.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

All research conducted in this study complies with all relevant ethical regulations. All experiments conducted with replication-competent viruses were performed in a certified biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratory and experiments were approved by the Institutional Biosafety Committee of the University of California, San Francisco and the Gladstone Institutes. All protocols concerning animal use were approved (AN169239-01C) by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the University of California, San Francisco and the Gladstone Institutes and conducted in strict accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All human samples utilized for generating human airway organoids were de-identified, not used to conduct human subject research, and were therefore IRB exempt.

Cells

BHK-21 and A549 cells were obtained from ATCC and cultured in DMEM (Corning) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (GeminiBio), 1x glutamine (Corning), and 1x Penicillin-Streptomycin (Corning) at 37°C, 5% CO2. Calu3 cells were obtained from ATCC and cultured in Advanced DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 2.5% FBS, 1x GlutaMax, and 1x Penicillin-Streptomycin at 37°C and 5% CO2. Vero cells stably overexpressing human TMPRSS2 (Vero TMPRSS2) (gifted from the Whelan lab [53]), were grown in DMEM with 10% FBS, 1x glutamine,1x Penicillin-Streptomycin at 37°C and 5% CO2. Vero cells stably co-expressing human ACE2 and TMPRSS2 (VAT) (gifted from A. Creanga and B. Graham at NIH) were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1x Penicillin-Streptomycin, and 10 μg/mL of puromycin at 37°C and 5% CO2.

Plasmids

IDT gBlock gene fragments encoding WT and mutant SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 were cloned into a BamHI- and EcoRI-linearized pLVX-EF1alpha-nCoV2019-nsp13-2xStrep-IRES-Puro (Addgene, 141379) by Gibson Assembly Cloning reaction (NEB, 102715–912). Plasmids were validated by whole plasmid sequencing (Primordium). SARS-CoV-2 replicon and infectious clone plasmids were constructed as described previously [36]. Briefly, the N40A and N40D mutants were cloned by utilizing NEB HiFi DNA assembly kit onto the second fragment (W2) of the WA1 genetic background. The mutant plasmids were combined with the remaining nine fragments and assembled into the full BAC plasmid using Golden Gate assembly. The resulting plasmid was then maxiprepped and sequenced using Primordium Labs “Large” whole plasmid sequencing service. The Spike (S) and Nucleocapsid (N) expression vectors were described previously [54].

SARS-CoV-2 replicon assay

The SARS-CoV-2 replicon assay was conducted as described previously [36]. Briefly, the pBAC SARS-CoV-2 Δ Spike WT, N40A, or N40D plasmid (1 μg), was transfected into BHK-21 cells along with N and S expression vectors (0.5 μg each) in 24-well. The supernatant was replaced with fresh growth medium 12–16 hours post-transfection. The supernatant containing single-round infectious particles was collected and 0.45 μm-filtered 72 hours post-transfection. The supernatant was subsequently used to infect VAT cells (in 96-well plate) or Calu3 cells (in 24-well plate). The medium was refreshed 12–24 hours post-infection. To measure luciferase activity, an equal volume of supernatant from infected cells was mixed with Nano-Glo luciferase assay buffer and substrate and analyzed on an Infinite M Plex plate reader (Tecan).

Infectious clone virus rescue

pBAC SARS-CoV-2 WT (WA1) or N40D mutant constructs were directly cotransfected with an N expression vector into BHK-21 cells in 6-well plate. After 3 days, the supernatant was collected and used to infect Vero TMPRSS2 cells and passaged further to achieve high viral titer. All viruses generated and/or utilized in this study were NGS verified using the ARTIC Network’s protocol [55].

SARS-CoV-2 virus culture and plaque assay

SARS-CoV-2 infectious clones were propagated on Vero TMPRSS2 cells, sequence verified, and were stored at -80°C until use. For plaque assays, tissue homogenates and cell culture supernatants were analyzed for viral particle formation for in vivo and in vitro experiments, respectively. Briefly, VAT cells were plated and rested for at least 24 hours. Serial dilutions of inoculate of tissue homogenates or cell culture supernatants were added on to the cells. After the 1-hour absorption period, 2.5% Avicel (Dupont, RC-591) was overlaid. After 72 hours, the overlay was removed, the cells were fixed in 10% formalin for one hour, and stained with crystal violet for visualization of plaque formation.

Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

RNA was extracted from cells, supernatants, or tissue homogenates using RNA-STAT-60 (AMSBIO, CS-110) and the Direct-Zol RNA Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, R2052). RNA was then reverse-transcribed to cDNA with iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, 1708890). qPCR reaction was performed with cDNA and SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the CFX384 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). The tenth fragment of the infectious clone plasmid [36] was used as a standard for N gene quantification by RT-qPCR. All primer sequences utilized in this study are included in S1 Table.

K18-hACE2 mouse infection model

K18-hACE2 mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory and housed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled pathogen-free facility with 12-hour light/dark cycle and ad libitum access to water and standard laboratory rodent chow. Briefly, the study involved intranasal infection (1X103 PFU) of 6–8-week-old female K18-hACE2 mice with SARS-CoV-2 WA1 or N40D mutant virus. A total of 15 animals were infected for each virus and euthanized at 2, 4, and 6 days post-infection (5 mice per timepoint). The lungs and brains were processed for further analysis of virus replication.

Histology

Mouse lung tissues were fixed in 4% PFA (Sigma Aldrich, Cat #47608) for 24 hours, washed three times with PBS and stored in 70% ethanol. All the stainings were performed at Histowiz, Inc (Brooklyn, NY), using the Leica Bond RX automated stainer (Leica Microsystems) using a Standard Operating Procedure and fully automated workflow. Samples were processed, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 4μm. The slides were dewaxed using xylene and alcohol-based dewaxing solutions. Epitope retrieval was performed by heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) of the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue using citrate-based pH 6 solution (Leica Microsystems, AR9961) for 20 mins at 95°C. The tissues were stained for H&E, dried, coverslipped (TissueTek-Prisma Coverslipper), and visualized using a Leica Aperio AT2 slide scanner (Leica Microsystems) at 40X. All slides were interpreted by a board-certified pathologist. Quantification of alveolar septal, bronchial wall, and vascular wall thickness were done using Aperio ImageScope.

Cellular infection studies

Calu3 cells were seeded into 12-well plates. Cells were rested for at least 24 hours prior to infection. At the time of infection, medium containing viral inoculum was added on the cells. One hour after addition of inoculum, the medium was replaced with fresh medium. The supernatant and cells were harvested at 48 hours post-infection for downstream analysis.

Human airway organoid culture

Human airway organoids were generated from human lung tissue as previously described [37]. Briefly, the lung tissues were obtained from the Matthay lab (UCSF) and underwent enzymatic digestion to obtain single cells, which were then resuspended in Basement Membrane Extract (BME, R&D Systems). This single-cell mixture was plated into droplets, which were submerged in a specialized human airway organoid (HAO) medium consisting of 1 mM HEPES (Corning), 1x GlutaMAX (Gibco), 1x Penicillin-Streptomycin (Corning), 10% R-spondin1 conditioned medium, 1% B27 (Gibco), 25 ng/mL noggin (Peprotech), 1.25 mM N-acetylcysteine (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 mM nicotinamide (Sigma-Aldrich), 5 nM heregulin-β1 (Peprotech), and 100 μg/mL Primocin (InvivoGen) in DMEM. This HAO medium was also supplemented with 5 μM Y-27632, 500 nM A83-01, 500 nM SB202190, 25 ng/mL FGF7, and 100 ng/mL FGF10 (all obtained from Stem Cell Technologies). The HAO medium was refreshed bi-weekly, and the droplets were transferred into a single-cell suspension every two weeks to facilitate growth. To induce differentiation, the HAO medium was substituted with a mixture of HAO medium and PneumaCult-ALI Medium (Stem Cell Technologies) at a 1:1 ratio.

Human airway organoid infection

Differentiated organoids were plated in V-bottom plates (Greiner Bio-One) with each well containing 100,000 cells in HAO differentiation medium containing 2% BME. The organoids were then exposed to SARS-CoV-2 at MOI of 1. Following a 2-hour incubation with the inoculum, the supernatant was removed, and the cells were washed three times with PBS and fresh medium was added. The plates were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2. After incubation, the supernatants were collected for plaque assays and HAOs were harvested for RT-qPCR analysis at 24, 48, and 72 hours post-infection.

Mac1 expression and purification

SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 Mac1 (P43 construct, residues 3–169 [49]) was transformed into BL21(DE3) E. coli cells (NEB, C2527H) and grown overnight at 37°C lysogeny broth (LB) agar supplemented with carbenicillin (100 μg/mL). Expression starter cultures inoculated with a single colony (10 mL of LB supplemented with carbenicillin) were grown at 37°C for eight hours and were then used to inoculate large scale cultures (1 L of autoinduction media ZYM-5052 [56]. Each 1 L culture was assembled using the following stocks: 960 mL ZY (10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, prepared in water and autoclaved), 2 mL MgSO4 (1 mM, prepared in water and autoclaved), 1 mL FeCl3 (0.1 M, prepared in 100 mM HCl and sterile filtered), 20 mL 50xM (1.25 mM Na2HPO4, 1.25 mM KH2PO4, 2.5 mM NH4Cl, 0.5 mM Na2SO4), 20 mL 50x5052 (250 g/L glycerol, 25 g/L glucose, 100 g/L lactose monohydrate, prepared in water and autoclaved). Cultures were grown at 37°C until an optical density of 1, followed by growth at 20°C for 14 hours. Cells were collected by centrifugation (4000 g, 15 minutes, 4°C) and frozen at −80°C. Mac1 was purified and the His-tag cleaved with Tobacco Etch Virus (TEV) protease following the published protocol [49]. The purified protein was frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. Point mutations to Asn40 were introduced using Gibson assembly [57] and proteins were purified similarly to WT, except that the N40A mutant was frozen at 10 mg/mL.

PARP10 expression and purification

Human PARP10 (catalytic domain, residues 819–1007) with a TEV-cleavable His6-tag was synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies and cloned into a pET22b(+) vector using Gibson assembly. Protein was expressed similarly to Mac1, except the large-scale cultures were incubated at 18°C for 14 hours. Cells were resuspended in Ni–nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) binding buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol, and 0.5 mM Tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP), 0.2% Triton X-100 supplemented with TurboNuclease (5 U/mL; Sigma-Aldrich, T4330)) and lysed by sonication. Cell debris was collected by centrifugation (30,000 g, 30 minutes, 4°C), and the lysate was applied to a 5-mL HisTrap HP column (Cytiva, 17524802). The column was washed with 25 mL of binding buffer followed by 25 mL of 5% Ni-NTA elution buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 500 mM NaCl, 500 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol, and 0.5 mM TCEP) and then the protein was eluted with 100% elution buffer. Eluted protein was diluted to 1.6 mg/mL using TEV reaction buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 5% glycerol) with recombinantly expressed TEV protease [58] added at a 1:20 mass:mass ratio (Mac1:TEV) giving a total volume of 30 mL. The TEV cleavage reaction was incubated at 4°C for 16 hours in a 30 mL 10 kDa molecular weight cutoff dialysis cassette (ThermoFisher Scientific, 66830) dialyzing against 2 L TEV reaction buffer. Following TEV cleavage, the reaction was filtered (0.2 μm cellulose acetate), diluted to 60 mL using TEV reaction buffer and applied to a HisTrap HP column. The cleaved protein was washed off the column using 100% Ni-NTA binding buffer and further purified by size-exclusion chromatography using a HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 75 pg column (Cytiva, 28989333) equilibrated with SEC buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol and 0.5 mM TCEP). Protein concentration was determined by absorbance at 280 nm using an extinction coefficient of 13410 M-1 cm-1 calculated using the Protparam server (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/).

PARP10 auto-MARylation and Western blotting

Auto-MARylation of PARP10 was carried with reference to the previously published protocol [51]. Purified PARP10 was diluted to 20 μM using MARylation buffer (SEC buffer supplemented with 0.02% Triton X-100 and 200 μM β-NAD+ (Roche, NAD100-RO)). The MARylation reaction was incubated at 37°C for 1.5 hours, before filtering (0.2 μM cellulose acetate), concentration with a 10 kDa MWCO centrifugal concentrator (Amicon, UFC901024) and size-exclusion chromatography using a HiLoad 10/300 Superdex 75 pg column (Cytiva, 17517401) to separate the unreacted β-NAD+ (S8 Fig). Eluted fractions were concentrated to 4.2 mg/mL before being flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. Auto-MARylation of PARP10 was assessed by Western blot using an anti-MAR/PAR-antibody (Cell Signaling, 83732). Aliquots of PARP10 taken before and after reaction with β-NAD+ (70 μM, 7.5 μg) were boiled for 5 minutes at 95°C in SDS-PAGE loading dye, then separated by SDS-PAGE (Bio-Rad, 456–9036) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad, 1704158) using a Trans-Blot Turbo transfer system (Bio-Rad). The membrane was stained with Ponceau S (Cell Signaling, 59803S) before destaining with Tris buffered saline Tween-20 (TBST) and incubation for 1 hour with blocking buffer (TBST with 50 g/L blocking agent (Bio-Rad, 1706404)). The membrane was then incubated with primary antibody for 1 hour (1:1000 dilution in blocking buffer), washed with blocking buffer for 30 minutes, then incubated with secondary antibody for 1 hour (1:10000 dilution in blocking buffer, Cell Signaling, 7074S). The horse-radish peroxidase conjugated to the secondary antibody was detected by incubating the membrane with 2 mL chemiluminescence substrate (Bio-Rad, 1705062) for five minutes and then imaged using a ChemiDoc XRS+ imager (Bio-Rad). To assess the removal of ADP-ribose by Mac1, MARylated PARP10 (70 μM, 7.5 μg) was incubated with Mac1 (20 μM, 2.2 μg) for 1 hour at room temperature. Reactions were stopped by boiling in SDS-PAGE loading dye and blotting for ADP-ribose as described above.

NUDT5 expression and purification

Human NUDT5 (residues 1–219) was expressed from a pET21b vector containing a 3C-protease cleavage N-terminal His6 tag [59] using BL21(DE3) E. coli cells co-transformed with a pKJE7 plasmid expressing the chaperones DnaK, DnaJ and GrpE (Takara, 3340). Cells were grown overnight at 37°C on lysogeny broth (LB) agar supplemented with carbenicillin (100 μg/mL) and chloramphenicol (25 μg/mL). NUDT5 was expressed using autoinduction media with the same method as PARP10, except that media was supplemented with chloramphenicol (25 μg/mL) and chaperone expression was induced with 0.05% arabinose (5 mL of a 100 g/L stock), added when the cultures were cooled from 37°C to 18°C. To purify NUDT5, cells were resuspended in Ni-NTA binding buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 5% glycerol, and 0.5 mM TCEP supplemented with TurboNuclease (5 U/mL)) and lysed by sonication. Cell debris was collected by centrifugation, and the lysate was applied to a 5-mL HisTrap HP column. The column was washed with 25 mL of binding buffer followed by 25 mL of 5% Ni-NTA elution buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl, 300 mM imidazole, 5% glycerol, and 0.5 mM TCEP) and then eluted with 100% elution buffer. The wash and elution fractions were combined and concentrated to 12 mL using a 10 kDa centrifugal concentrator and desalted into 3C reaction buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 5% glycerol and 0.5 mM TCEP) using a HiPrep 26/10 desalting column. The sample was diluted to 1.5 mg/mL, and PreScission protease (Cytiva, 27084301) was added to a concentration of 20 U/mg NUDT5 and the reaction was incubated at 4°C overnight. The sample was further purified by anion exchange (AEX) chromatography using a HiTrap Q HP column (Cytiva, 17115401). First, the salt concentration of the sample was reduced to 100 mM using AEX no-salt buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 5% glycerol, 0.5 mM TCEP). Next, the sample was loaded onto the AEX column pre-equilibrated with AEX low-salt buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 0.5 mM TCEP). Bound protein was eluted with a gradient of 0-to-100% high-salt buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 1 M NaCl, 5% glycerol, 0.5 mM TCEP) over 75 mL. The flow through was concentrated and subjected to size-exclusion chromatography using a HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 200 pg column (Cytiva, 28989335) equilibrated with SEC buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl and 5% glycerol) (S9 Fig). Eluted fractions were concentrated to 4.3 mg/mL before being flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. The purified NUDT5 was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and the mass confirmed by LC-MS (S9 Fig) using a Waters Acquity LC connected to a Waters TQ detector with electrospray ionization. Briefly, NUDT5 was diluted to 10 μM using 150 mM NaCl and 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) and then 5 μL was injected onto a C4 column held at 40°C. The sample was separated with an initial wash of 95% solvent A (water with 0.1% formic acid) and 5% solvent B (acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid) for 1.5 min, followed by a linear gradient to 95% solvent B over 6.5 minutes, and a final wash with 95% solvent B for 2 min. All steps were run at 0.2 mL/min.

PARP10 solution assay

The ADP-ribosyl hydrolase activity of macrodomains was determined using the previously described method [59] with auto-MARylated PARP10 as substrate [51]. ADP-ribose produced by Mac1 is hydrolyzed by the NUDT5 phosphodiesterase to AMP, which is detected using the AMP-Glo assay kit (Promega, V5011). The activity of the recombinantly expressed NUDT5 with ADP-ribose was determined by serially diluting NUDT5 from 2 to 0.002 μM using PARP10 reaction buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM TCEP). NUDT5 (4 μL, 1 to 0.001 μM final concentration) was added to a white 384-well plate (Corning, 3824), and the reaction was initiated with 40 μM ADP-ribose (4 μL, 20 μM final concentration) (Sigma-Aldrich, A0752). After incubation at room temperature for 1 hour, the AMP concentration was quantified by incubation with AMP-Glo reagent I (8 μL) for 1 hour, followed by incubation with a 1:100 mixture of AMP-Glo reagent II and Kinase-Glo one solution (16 μL) for 1 hour. The plate was spun for 1 minute to remove bubbles, and luminescence was measured using a BioTek Synergy HTX plate reader. Values were corrected by subtracting a no-NUDT5 control and plotted as a function of NUDT5 concentration (S8 Fig). To quantify the amount of ADP-ribose generated by Mac1, a standard curve was prepared by serially diluting ADP-ribose from 20 to 0.4 μM using PARP10 reaction buffer. ADP-ribose (4 μL, 10 to 0.2 μM final concentration) was added to a 384-well plate and the reaction was initiated with 200 nM NUDT5 (4 μL, 100 nM final concentration) prepared using PARP10 reaction buffer. After incubation at room temperature for 1 hour, the concentration of AMP was determined as above. The plot of luminescence as a function of ADP-ribose concentration was non-linear at low concentrations of ADP-ribose, therefore the standard curve was fit with a four-parameter logistic equation by non-linear regression using GraphPad prism (S8 Fig).

Next, Mac1 and MARylated PARP10 were titrated to determine the MARylated PARP10 concentration and a suitable concentration of Mac1 to use in activity assays. Although the PARP10 concentration was estimated from absorbance at 280 nM, the concentration of ADP-ribose groups attached to PARP10 can be quantified by measuring the amount of ADP-ribose released upon treatment with excess Mac1. Wild type Mac1 was serially diluted from 4 to 0.004 μM and MARylated PARP10 was serially diluted from 40 to 2.5 μM, both using PARP10 reaction buffer. Mac1 (2 μL, 1 to 0.001 μM final concentration) was added to a 384-well plate along with 400 nM NUDT5 (2 μL, 100 nM final concentration) and the reaction was initiated with the serially diluted PARP10 (4 μL, 20 to 1.25 μM final concentration). After incubation at room temperature for 1 hour, the concentration of AMP was determined as above. Substrate depletion was observed at enzyme concentrations ~100 nM and higher, therefore a Mac1 concentration of 5 nM was selected to ensure that the single measurements of ADP-ribose concentration were taken when product formation was linear with respect to time (e.g. when less than 20% of the total substrate was consumed). The concentration of MARylated PARP10 was determined by converting luminescence values at the highest concentration of Mac1 (1 μM) into ADP-ribose concentration using the standard curve (S8 Fig). At this Mac1 concentration, all PARP-10 bound ADP-ribose is hydrolyzed to free ADP-ribose.

To determine the rate of Mac1 catalyzed hydrolysis of MARylated PARP10, a mixture of 10 nM Mac1 and 200 nM NUDT5 (4 μL, final concentration of 5 nM for Mac1 and 100 nM for NUDT5) was added to a 384-well plate. The reaction was initiated by adding serially diluted MARylated PARP10 (4 μL, 3.6 to 0.22 μM final corrected concentration) and the reaction was incubated at room temperature for 1 hour followed by AMP detection as above. Enzyme velocities in RLU/min were converted to nM ADP-ribose/min using the standard curve. The increase in enzyme velocity was linear with respect to substrate concentration, suggesting that the [substrate] << KM, which is consistent with the previously determined KM for Mac1 with a PARP10 derived peptide (163 μM). The catalytic efficiency of Mac1 (kcat/KM) was calculated dividing the slope of the substrate-velocity curve by the enzyme concentration, because at substrate concentration << KM the hydrolysis reaction is first order with respect to both substrate and enzyme concentration. The activity of the N40D/A mutants with auto-MARylated PARP10 were measured as above, however the enzyme concentrations were adjusted to give similar velocities to 5 nM Mac1 (N40D = 500 nM, N40A = 50 nM).

X-ray crystallography

Crystals of the N40D mutant in the P43 space group were grown at 292 K by microseeding with wild-type P43 crystals using sitting-drop vapor diffusion as described previously [49]. The reservoir solution contained 28% PEG 3000 and 100 mM CHES (pH 9.5). Crystals grew overnight and were vitrified directly in liquid nitrogen without additional cryoprotection. The structure with ADP-ribose bound was obtained by soaking a crystal in a solution of 20 mM ADP-ribose prepared in 32% PEG 3000 and 100 mM CHES (pH 9.5) for two hours at room temperature prior to vitrification in liquid nitrogen. X-ray diffraction data were collected at 100 K using beamline 8.3.1 of the Advanced Light Source. Data collection strategy and statistics are shown in S2 Table.

Phases were obtained by molecular replacement with Phaser [60] using a model of apo Mac1 derived from PDB code 7KQO with coordinates randomly shifted by 0.3 Å to remove model bias from the apo structure [61]. Refinement of the apo model was performed with phenix.refine [62] using default settings and five macrocycles at each step. Water molecules were added automatically in phenix.refine to peaks in the mFO−DFC map 3.5 σ or higher. Atomic displacement parameters (ADPs) were refined isotropically in the first two cycles of refinement and anisotropically in the remaining cycles. After three cycles of refinement and model building with Coot [63], hydrogens were added with Reduce [64] run through phenix.ready_set. Hydrogens were refined using a riding model, with their ADPs refined isotropically. The occupancy of all water molecules was refined in the final two stages of refinement. For the dataset obtained from a crystal soaked with 20 mM ADP-ribose, ligand binding was confirmed by inspection of mFO−DFC electron density maps, with restraints generated by phenix.elbow [65]. Refinement statistics are shown in S2 Table.

Differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF)

DSF experiments were performed according to the previously described protocol [49]. Briefly, ADP-ribose was dissolved in H2O to a final concentration of 200 mM, and serial 1:2 dilutions created a ten-point concentration series from 200 to 0.39 mM. DSF buffer was prepared by diluting SYRPO orange (Thermo Fisher Scientific, S6650) from 5000x to 10x in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.01% Triton X-100. The ADP-ribose concentration series was then diluted 1:100 with DSF buffer (2 μL + 198 μL DSF buffer) and 10 μL was aliquoted into a 384-well white PCR plate (Axygen, PCR-384-LC480-W-NF) and the plates were incubated in the dark for 20 minutes. Purified Mac1 or buffer was then added to each well (10 μL at 4 μM). Each well had a total of 20 μL that contained 2 μM protein (or buffer only), 5x SYPRO orange and 1 to 0.002 mM ADP-ribose (or water only). Each condition was repeated four times, while the no-ADP-ribose conditions were repeated eight times. The PCR plate was sealed with a Microseal ‘B’ seal (Bio-Rad, MSB1001) and spun to remove air bubbles. The temperature ramp was performed using a BioRad CFX 384 qPCR instrument with fluorescence monitored using the FRET channel from 25 to 95°C at a rate of 1°C/min. Plots of raw RFU values are shown in S10 Fig. Tma values were calculated online using DSFworld using fitting model 1 [66].

Generation of A549 Mac1-WT and mutant cell lines

Lentivirus was generated using standard protocols and supernatants were collected at 48 hours post-transfection, filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane and added to A549 cells 1:1 in complete media supplemented with 8 μg/mL polybrene. The media was changed after 24 hours and, after 48 hours, media containing 2 μg/mL puromycin was added. Cells were selected for 48 hours and then expanded without further selection.

Western blotting for SARS-CoV-2 Mac1

Cell lysates were prepared in Pierce RIPA Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 89901) containing protease inhibitor and PhosStop cocktails (Roche, 5892970001 and 4906845001, respectively), separated on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a PVDF membrane and probed. The following primary antibodies and dilutions were used: Strep Tag (Thermo Scientific, MA517282, 1:1000) and β-actin-HRP (Cell Signaling, 5125, 1:2000). Images were captured using the Azure c600 Western Blot Imaging System.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Alignment of Mac1 sequences from several betacoronaviruses.

The Mac1 sequences of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and MHV-A59 were obtained from uniport (P0DTC1, P0C6U8, K9N638, and P0C6V0, respectively) and aligned with Geneious Prime version 2022.2.1 using the Clustal Omega setting. Residues shaded in black are identical across all viruses, while residues shaded in grey are only partially conserved. The asparagine at position 40 that is critical for catalytic activity is indicated in a red rectangle.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Mac1 N40A protein is less stable in cells than are Mac1 WT or Mac1 N40D proteins.

Western blot analyses of cell lysates from A549 lung cancer cells lentivirally transduced with vectors expressing Strep-tagged Mac1 WT, Mac1 N40D or Mac1 N40A proteins. β-actin is shown as a loading control. The blot is representative of three independent replicates.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Structure of Mac1 N40D determined by X-ray crystallography in apo- and ADP-ribose-bound state.

(A) Alignment of apo- (PDB code 8SH6) and ADP-ribose-bound N40D (PDB code 8SH8) structures shows previously identified structural changes occurring upon ADP-ribose binding (e.g. Ala129 flip, Phe132 and Asn99 rotation, shown with orange arrows) [49]. Selected hydrogen bonds between ADP-ribose and the active site are shown with dashed black lines. Three water molecules are shown that form bridging interactions between ADP-ribose and active site residues (purple/blue spheres). (B) Alignment of apo- WT (PDB code 7KQO) and N40D structures shows that there are only minor structural changes in the active site. The 80° rotation of the aspartic acid side chain relative to the asparagine side chain is indicated with a black arrow. (C) Alignment of ADP-ribose-bound WT (PDB code 7KQP) and N40D (PDB code 8SH8) shows that ADP-ribose binding is highly conserved despite the N40D mutation (RMSD across the 36 ADP-ribose atoms of 0.12 Å). The bridging water that is unique to N40D is shown with a purple sphere. Two conserved bridging waters are shown with blue spheres.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. IFNβ treatment does not differentially suppress the replication of the SARS-CoV-2 replicon with Mac1 N40D mutation.

Calu3 cells were infected with indicated replicons in the presence of indicated IFNβ concentrations. Intracellular viral RNA (N gene copies) was measured by RT-qPCR using a standard curve. Data are presented as mean +/- SD of one biological replicate conducted in triplicate.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 domain N40D mutant replicates similarly compared with WT virus regardless of infectious dose.

Viral particle release of infected Calu3 cells at MOI 0.01 and MOI 0.1 with indicated viruses was measured at indicated timepoints post-infection by plaque assay on VAT cells. Data are presented as mean +/- SD of three biological replicates conducted in duplicate. **, p<0.01 by two-sided Student’s T test.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 N40D mutant is attenuated in K18-hACE2 mice.

A) Viral particle abundance in the upper respiratory tract of mice infected with WT or Mac1 N40D mutant viruses was measured by plaque assay in VAT cells. Data are presented as mean +/- SD. B) Viral RNA levels (N gene copies) in the upper respiratory tract were measured by RT-qPCR using a standard curve. Data are presented as mean +/- SD. C) Viral particle abundance in the brains of mice infected with WT or Mac1 N40D mutant viruses at 6 days post-infection was measured by plaque assay in VAT cells. Data are presented as mean +/- SD. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01 by two-sided Student’s T-test.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 N40D mutant has similar pathogenesis in K18-hACE2 mice to the wild-type virus.

Four pathology scoring criteria (A-D) were utilized to assess the pathogenesis of the wild-type and mutant viruses in K18-hACE2 mice. The total score encompassing these criteria is in Fig 4H. The extent of inflammation in the perivascular (E), peribronchial (F), and interstitial (G) areas was quantified by measuring the vascular wall, the bronchial wall, and the alveolar septal thickness, respectively. Data are presented as mean +/- SD. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001; ****, p<0.0001 by two-sided Student’s T-test.

(TIF)

S8 Fig. Purification and quantification of MARylated PARP10.

(A) Size exclusion chromatography (HiLoad 10/300 Superdex 75 pg column) of PARP10 with and without treatment with β-NAD+. The peaks eluting at ~18 mL are un-reacted β-NAD+ and/or hydrolyzed ADP-ribose. (B) SDS-PAGE (Biorad, 4569036) analysis of MARylated PARP10 with protein marker (ThermoFisher, 26616). Samples were boiled in SDS-PAGE loading dye for five minutes at 95°C and the gel was stained with Coomassie blue. (C) Titration of human NUDT5 phosphodiesterase with 20 μM ADP-ribose. AMP was detected using the AMP-Glo kit. Each condition was measured three times. (D) Log-log plot of the titration of ADP-ribose with 100 nM NUDT5. The highest three concentrations of ADP-ribose were fit using linear regression with GraphPad Prism (red line) and the remaining concentrations were fit to a four-parameter logistic equation using non-linear regression (gray line). Each condition was measured three times. (E) Titration of MARylated PARP10 and Mac1. Each plot shows the titration of Mac1 with a single concentration of MARylated PARP10. Each condition was measured twice, with the maximum luminescence determined by fitting a four-parameter logistic equation using non-linear regression (gray line). (F) ADP-ribose concentration generated by MARylated PARP10 hydrolysis plotted as a function of MARylated PARP10 concentration determined by absorbance at 280 nm. Data were fit by linear regression (gray line), with the line constrained to the X = 0, Y = 0 (the slope and standard error are indicated).

(TIF)

S9 Fig. Purification of human NUDT5.

(A) Size exclusion chromatography (HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 200 pg column) of NUDT5 in the final purification step. The monomeric fractions pooled are shaded orange. (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of purified NUDT5 with protein marker (ThermoFisher, 26616). Samples were boiled in SDS-PAGE loading dye for five minutes at 95°C and the gel was stained with Coomassie blue. (C) Mass spectrum of purified NUDT5 deconvoluted with the maximum entropy method (MaxEnt1). The observed mass is within 3 Da of the mass calculated from the amino acid sequence (24619 Da).

(TIF)

S10 Fig. Thermostability of WT, N40D and N40A mutants assessed by differential scanning fluorimetry with SYPRO orange.

(A) Plot showing apparent melting temperatures (Tma) for WT, N40D and N40A Mac1 as a function of ADP-ribose concentration. Tma values were calculated by DSFworld [66] using fitting model 1. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of four technical replicates. (B) Raw fluorescence curves used to calculate Tma values. Data are presented as the mean of four technical replicates.

(TIF)

S1 Table. RT-qPCR primers utilized in this study.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Data collection and refinement statistics for X-ray crystal structures reported in this work.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Whelan laboratory for providing the Vero cells overexpressing human TMPRSS2 and A. Creanga and B. Graham for the Vero cells overexpressing human ACE2 and TMPRSS2. We thank the Gladstone Histology and Light Microscopy Core and Dr. Blaise Ndjamen for assistance with the mice lung pathology analysis. We thank M. Matthay lab for providing lung tissues for generating human airway organoids. We thank Francoise Chanut for feedback on the manuscript. The synchrotron X-ray diffraction data used to determine Mac1 structures were collected at beamline 8.3.1 of the Advanced Light Source (ALS). The ALS, a U.S. DOE Office of Science User Facility under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231, is supported in part by the ALS-ENABLE program funded by the NIH, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, grant P30 GM124169-01.

Data Availability

All data supporting the findings of the present study are available in the article and supplementary figures and tables.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIAID Antiviral Drug Discovery (AViDD) grant U19AI171110 to N.J.K, F31 grant AI164671-01 to I.P.C.). We gratefully acknowledge support from the Roddenberry Foundation (M.O.), P. and E. Taft (M.O.) and the Pendleton Foundation (M.O.). M.O. is a Chan Zuckerberg Biohub – San Francisco Investigator. The funders did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Carabelli AM, Peacock TP, Thorne LG, Harvey WT, Hughes J, Consortium C-GU, et al. SARS-CoV-2 variant biology: immune escape, transmission and fitness. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023:1–16. Epub 2023/01/19. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00841-7 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9847462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard: World Health Organization; 2022. [cited 2022 9/17/2022]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beigel JH, Tomashek KM, Dodd LE, Mehta AK, Zingman BS, Kalil AC, et al. Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19—Final Report. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(19):1813–26. Epub 2020/05/24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007764 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7262788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jayk Bernal A, Gomes da Silva MM, Musungaie DB, Kovalchuk E, Gonzalez A, Delos Reyes V, et al. Molnupiravir for Oral Treatment of Covid-19 in Nonhospitalized Patients. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(6):509–20. Epub 2021/12/17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2116044 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8693688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hammond J, Leister-Tebbe H, Gardner A, Abreu P, Bao W, Wisemandle W, et al. Oral Nirmatrelvir for High-Risk, Nonhospitalized Adults with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(15):1397–408. Epub 2022/02/17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2118542 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8908851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Theo Sanderson RH, Donovan-Banfield I’ah, Peacock Thomas, Christopher Ruis. Identification of a molnupiravir-associated mutational signature in SARS-CoV-2 sequencing databases. medRxiv. 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jochmans D, Liu C, Donckers K, Stoycheva A, Boland S, Stevens SK, et al. The substitutions L50F, E166A and L167F in SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro are selected by a protease inhibitor in vitro and confer resistance to nirmatrelvir. bioRxiv. 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moghadasi SA, Heilmann E, Moraes SN, Kearns FL, von Laer D, Amaro RE, et al. Transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants with resistance to clinical protease inhibitors. bioRxiv. 2022. doi: 10.1101/2022.08.07.503099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hu Y, Lewandowski EM, Tan H, Morgan RT, Zhang X, Jacobs LMC, et al. Naturally occurring mutations of SARS-CoV-2 main protease confer drug resistance to nirmatrelvir. bioRxiv. 2022. doi: 10.1101/2022.06.28.497978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Neuman BW, Joseph JS, Saikatendu KS, Serrano P, Chatterjee A, Johnson MA, et al. Proteomics analysis unravels the functional repertoire of coronavirus nonstructural protein 3. J Virol. 2008;82(11):5279–94. Epub 2008/03/28. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02631-07 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2395186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rack JG, Perina D, Ahel I. Macrodomains: Structure, Function, Evolution, and Catalytic Activities. Annu Rev Biochem. 2016;85:431–54. Epub 2016/02/05. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014935 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li C, Debing Y, Jankevicius G, Neyts J, Ahel I, Coutard B, et al. Viral Macro Domains Reverse Protein ADP-Ribosylation. J Virol. 2016;90(19):8478–86. Epub 2016/07/22. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00705-16 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5021415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chea C, Lee DY, Kato J, Ishiwata-Endo H, Moss J. Macrodomain Mac1 of SARS-CoV-2 Nonstructural Protein 3 Hydrolyzes Diverse ADP-ribosylated Substrates. bioRxiv. 2023. Epub 2023/03/23. doi: 10.1101/2023.02.07.527501 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10028740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lei J, Kusov Y, Hilgenfeld R. Nsp3 of coronaviruses: Structures and functions of a large multi-domain protein. Antiviral Res. 2018;149:58–74. Epub 2017/11/13. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.11.001 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7113668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Malet H, Coutard B, Jamal S, Dutartre H, Papageorgiou N, Neuvonen M, et al. The crystal structures of Chikungunya and Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus nsP3 macro domains define a conserved adenosine binding pocket. J Virol. 2009;83(13):6534–45. Epub 2009/04/24. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00189-09 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2698539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Basta HA, Cleveland SB, Clinton RA, Dimitrov AG, McClure MA. Evolution of teleost fish retroviruses: characterization of new retroviruses with cellular genes. J Virol. 2009;83(19):10152–62. Epub 2009/07/25. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02546-08 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2748043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Neuvonen M, Ahola T. Differential activities of cellular and viral macro domain proteins in binding of ADP-ribose metabolites. J Mol Biol. 2009;385(1):212–25. Epub 2008/11/06. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.10.045 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7094737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Parvez MK. The hepatitis E virus ORF1 ’X-domain’ residues form a putative macrodomain protein/Appr-1”-pase catalytic-site, critical for viral RNA replication. Gene. 2015;566(1):47–53. Epub 2015/04/15. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.04.026 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7127128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Neuvonen M, Kazlauskas A, Martikainen M, Hinkkanen A, Ahola T, Saksela K. SH3 domain-mediated recruitment of host cell amphiphysins by alphavirus nsP3 promotes viral RNA replication. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(11):e1002383. Epub 2011/11/25. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002383 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3219718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Alhammad YMO, Kashipathy MM, Roy A, Gagne JP, McDonald P, Gao P, et al. The SARS-CoV-2 Conserved Macrodomain Is a Mono-ADP-Ribosylhydrolase. J Virol. 2021;95(3). Epub 2020/11/08. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01969-20 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7925111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kraus WL. PARPs and ADP-Ribosylation: 50 Years… and Counting. Mol Cell. 2015;58(6):902–10. Epub 2015/06/20. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.06.006 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4477203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hoch NC, Polo LM. ADP-ribosylation: from molecular mechanisms to human disease. Genet Mol Biol. 2019;43(1 suppl 1):e20190075. Epub 2020/01/14. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2019-0075 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7198025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fehr AR, Singh SA, Kerr CM, Mukai S, Higashi H, Aikawa M. The impact of PARPs and ADP-ribosylation on inflammation and host-pathogen interactions. Genes Dev. 2020;34(5–6):341–59. Epub 2020/02/08. doi: 10.1101/gad.334425.119 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7050484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Atasheva S, Frolova EI, Frolov I. Interferon-stimulated poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerases are potent inhibitors of cellular translation and virus replication. J Virol. 2014;88(4):2116–30. Epub 2013/12/18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03443-13 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3911523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Iwata H, Goettsch C, Sharma A, Ricchiuto P, Goh WW, Halu A, et al. PARP9 and PARP14 cross-regulate macrophage activation via STAT1 ADP-ribosylation. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12849. Epub 2016/11/01. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12849 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5095532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Welsby I, Hutin D, Gueydan C, Kruys V, Rongvaux A, Leo O. PARP12, an interferon-stimulated gene involved in the control of protein translation and inflammation. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(38):26642–57. Epub 2014/08/03. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.589515 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4176246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grunewald ME, Chen Y, Kuny C, Maejima T, Lease R, Ferraris D, et al. The coronavirus macrodomain is required to prevent PARP-mediated inhibition of virus replication and enhancement of IFN expression. PLoS Pathog. 2019;15(5):e1007756. Epub 2019/05/17. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007756 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6521996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yamada T, Horimoto H, Kameyama T, Hayakawa S, Yamato H, Dazai M, et al. Constitutive aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling constrains type I interferon-mediated antiviral innate defense. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(6):687–94. Epub 2016/04/19. doi: 10.1038/ni.3422 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rack JGM, Zorzini V, Zhu Z, Schuller M, Ahel D, Ahel I. Viral macrodomains: a structural and evolutionary assessment of the pharmacological potential. Open Biol. 2020;10(11):200237. Epub 2020/11/18. doi: 10.1098/rsob.200237 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7729036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Eriksson KK, Cervantes-Barragan L, Ludewig B, Thiel V. Mouse hepatitis virus liver pathology is dependent on ADP-ribose-1”-phosphatase, a viral function conserved in the alpha-like supergroup. J Virol. 2008;82(24):12325–34. Epub 2008/10/17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02082-08 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2593347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fehr AR, Athmer J, Channappanavar R, Phillips JM, Meyerholz DK, Perlman S. The nsp3 macrodomain promotes virulence in mice with coronavirus-induced encephalitis. J Virol. 2015;89(3):1523–36. Epub 2014/11/28. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02596-14 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4300739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fehr AR, Channappanavar R, Jankevicius G, Fett C, Zhao J, Athmer J, et al. The Conserved Coronavirus Macrodomain Promotes Virulence and Suppresses the Innate Immune Response during Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection. mBio. 2016;7(6). Epub 2016/12/15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01721-16 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5156301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kuri T, Eriksson KK, Putics A, Zust R, Snijder EJ, Davidson AD, et al. The ADP-ribose-1”-monophosphatase domains of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and human coronavirus 229E mediate resistance to antiviral interferon responses. J Gen Virol. 2011;92(Pt 8):1899–905. Epub 2011/04/29. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.031856-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yousef M. Alhammad SP, Roshan Ghimire, Joseph J. O’Connor, Kerr Catherine M., Pfannenstiel Jessica J, Debarati Chanda, Miller Caden A, Unckless Robert L, Sonia Zuniga, Luis Enjuanes, More Sunil, Rudragouda Channappanavar, Fehr Anthony R. SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 is required for IFN antagonism and efficient virus replication in mice. bioRxiv. 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Correy GJ, Kneller DW, Phillips G, Pant S, Russi S, Cohen AE, et al. The mechanisms of catalysis and ligand binding for the SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 macrodomain from neutron and x-ray diffraction at room temperature. Sci Adv. 2022;8(21):eabo5083. Epub 2022/05/28. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo5083 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9140965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Taha TY, Chen IP, Hayashi JM, Tabata T, Walcott K, Kimmerly GR, et al. Rapid assembly of SARS-CoV-2 genomes reveals attenuation of the Omicron BA.1 variant through NSP6. bioRxiv. 2023. Epub 2023/02/18. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.31.525914 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9934579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sachs N, Papaspyropoulos A, Zomer-van Ommen DD, Heo I, Bottinger L, Klay D, et al. Long-term expanding human airway organoids for disease modeling. EMBO J. 2019;38(4). Epub 2019/01/16. doi: 10.15252/embj.2018100300 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6376275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tindle C, Fuller M, Fonseca A, Taheri S, Ibeawuchi SR, Beutler N, et al. Adult stem cell-derived complete lung organoid models emulate lung disease in COVID-19. Elife. 2021;10. Epub 2021/09/01. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66417 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8463074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Suryawanshi RK, Chen IP, Ma T, Syed AM, Brazer N, Saldhi P, et al. Limited cross-variant immunity from SARS-CoV-2 Omicron without vaccination. Nature. 2022;607(7918):351–5. Epub 2022/05/19. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04865-0 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9279157 Therapeutics, Intellia Therapeutics and Mammoth Biosciences; a scientific advisory board member of Vertex, Caribou Biosciences, Intellia Therapeutics, eFFECTOR Therapeutics, Scribe Therapeutics, Mammoth Biosciences, Synthego, Algen Biotechnologies, Felix Biosciences, The Column Group and Inari; a director at Johnson & Johnson and Tempus; and has research projects sponsored by Biogen, Pfizer, AppleTree Partners and Roche. C.Y.C. is the director of the UCSF-Abbott Viral Diagnostics and Discovery Study; receives research support from Abbott Laboratories; and also receives support for SARS-CoV-2 research unrelated to this study from Mammoth Biosciences. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Oladunni FS, Park JG, Pino PA, Gonzalez O, Akhter A, Allue-Guardia A, et al. Lethality of SARS-CoV-2 infection in K18 human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 transgenic mice. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):6122. Epub 2020/12/02. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19891-7 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7705712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yinda CK, Port JR, Bushmaker T, Offei Owusu I, Purushotham JN, Avanzato VA, et al. K18-hACE2 mice develop respiratory disease resembling severe COVID-19. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17(1):e1009195. Epub 2021/01/20. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009195 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7875348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ann-Kathrin Reuschl LGT, Whelan Matthew V.X, Mesner Dejan, Ragazzini Roberta, Dowgier Giulia, Bogoda Nathasha, Turner Jane L. E, Furnon Wilhelm, Cowton Vanessa M, Giuditta de Lorenzo, Paola Bonfanti, Massimo Palmarini, Patel Arvind H., Jolly Clare, Towers Greg. J. Enhanced innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5. bioRxiv. 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hadfield J, Megill C, Bell SM, Huddleston J, Potter B, Callender C, et al. Nextstrain: real-time tracking of pathogen evolution. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(23):4121–3. Epub 2018/05/24. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty407 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6247931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Desmyter J, Melnick JL, Rawls WE. Defectiveness of interferon production and of rubella virus interference in a line of African green monkey kidney cells (Vero). J Virol. 1968;2(10):955–61. Epub 1968/10/01. doi: 10.1128/JVI.2.10.955-961.1968 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC375423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Menachery VD, Eisfeld AJ, Schafer A, Josset L, Sims AC, Proll S, et al. Pathogenic influenza viruses and coronaviruses utilize similar and contrasting approaches to control interferon-stimulated gene responses. mBio. 2014;5(3):e01174–14. Epub 2014/05/23. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01174-14 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4030454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lokugamage KG, Hage A, de Vries M, Valero-Jimenez AM, Schindewolf C, Dittmann M, et al. Type I Interferon Susceptibility Distinguishes SARS-CoV-2 from SARS-CoV. J Virol. 2020;94(23). Epub 2020/09/18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01410-20 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7654262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zheng J, Wong LR, Li K, Verma AK, Ortiz ME, Wohlford-Lenane C, et al. COVID-19 treatments and pathogenesis including anosmia in K18-hACE2 mice. Nature. 2021;589(7843):603–7. Epub 2020/11/10. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2943-z ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7855185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gahbauer S, Correy GJ, Schuller M, Ferla MP, Doruk YU, Rachman M, et al. Iterative computational design and crystallographic screening identifies potent inhibitors targeting the Nsp3 macrodomain of SARS-CoV-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120(2):e2212931120. Epub 2023/01/05. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212931120 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9926234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schuller M, Correy GJ, Gahbauer S, Fearon D, Wu T, Diaz RE, et al. Fragment binding to the Nsp3 macrodomain of SARS-CoV-2 identified through crystallographic screening and computational docking. Sci Adv. 2021;7(16). Epub 2021/04/16. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf8711 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8046379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sherrill LM, Joya EE, Walker A, Roy A, Alhammad YM, Atobatele M, et al. Design, synthesis and evaluation of inhibitors of the SARS-CoV-2 nsp3 macrodomain. Bioorg Med Chem. 2022;67:116788. Epub 2022/05/22. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2022.116788 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9093066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dasovich M, Zhuo J, Goodman JA, Thomas A, McPherson RL, Jayabalan AK, et al. High-Throughput Activity Assay for Screening Inhibitors of the SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 Macrodomain. ACS Chem Biol. 2022;17(1):17–23. Epub 2021/12/15. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.1c00721 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8691451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Roy A, Alhammad YM, McDonald P, Johnson DK, Zhuo J, Wazir S, et al. Discovery of compounds that inhibit SARS-CoV-2 Mac1-ADP-ribose binding by high-throughput screening. Antiviral Res. 2022;203:105344. Epub 2022/05/23. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2022.105344 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9119168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Case JB, Rothlauf PW, Chen RE, Liu Z, Zhao H, Kim AS, et al. Neutralizing Antibody and Soluble ACE2 Inhibition of a Replication-Competent VSV-SARS-CoV-2 and a Clinical Isolate of SARS-CoV-2. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28(3):475–85 e5. Epub 2020/08/01. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.06.021 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7332453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Syed AM, Taha TY, Tabata T, Chen IP, Ciling A, Khalid MM, et al. Rapid assessment of SARS-CoV-2-evolved variants using virus-like particles. Science. 2021;374(6575):1626–32. Epub 2021/11/05. doi: 10.1126/science.abl6184 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9005165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Emma Betteridge NP, Keith James, Jillian Durham, Josh Quick. COVID-19 ARTIC v3 Illumina library construction and sequencing protocol—short amplicons (275bp). Protocolsio. doi: dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bh4zj8x6 [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Studier FW. Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures. Protein Expr Purif. 2005;41(1):207–34. Epub 2005/05/26. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2005.01.016 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang RY, Venter JC, Hutchison CA 3rd, Smith HO. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods. 2009;6(5):343–5. Epub 2009/04/14. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1318 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tropea JE, Cherry S, Waugh DS. Expression and purification of soluble His(6)-tagged TEV protease. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;498:297–307. Epub 2008/11/07. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-196-3_19 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kasson S, Dharmapriya N, Kim IK. Selective monitoring of the protein-free ADP-ribose released by ADP-ribosylation reversal enzymes. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0254022. Epub 2021/07/01. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254022 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8244878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, Read RJ. Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr. 2007;40(Pt 4):658–74. Epub 2007/08/01. doi: 10.1107/S0021889807021206 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2483472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Correy GJ, Kneller DW, Phillips G, Pant S, Russi S, Cohen AE, et al. The mechanisms of catalysis and ligand binding for the SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 macrodomain from neutron and X-ray diffraction at room temperature. bioRxiv. 2022. Epub 2022/02/17. doi: 10.1101/2022.02.07.479477 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8845425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Afonine PV, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Moriarty NW, Mustyakimov M, et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2012;68(Pt 4):352–67. Epub 2012/04/17. doi: 10.1107/S0907444912001308 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3322595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66(Pt 4):486–501. Epub 2010/04/13. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2852313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Word JM, Lovell SC, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. J Mol Biol. 1999;285(4):1735–47. Epub 1999/01/26. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2401 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Moriarty NW, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD. electronic Ligand Builder and Optimization Workbench (eLBOW): a tool for ligand coordinate and restraint generation. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2009;65(Pt 10):1074–80. Epub 2009/09/23. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909029436 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2748967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Taia Wu JY, Zachary Gale-Day, Amanda Woo, Arundhati Suresh, Michael Hornsby, Gestwicki Jason E. Three Essential Resources to Improve Differential Scanning Fluorimetry (DSF) Experiments. bioRxiv. 2020. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Jacob S Yount, Sonja M Best

12 Jun 2023

Dear Dr. Ott,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "A single inactivating amino acid change in the SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 Mac1 domain attenuates viral replication and pathogenesis in vivo" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Jacob S. Yount

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Sonja Best

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: The manuscript "A single inactivating amino acid change in the SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 Mac1 domain attenuates viral replication and pathogenesis in vivo" by Tara et al described the characteristics of a loss-of-function mutation in NSP3 Mac1 domain of SARS-CoV-2 by using both in vitro and in vivo infection model. The study added some new facets of Mac1 domain in virus replication and anti-viral responses modification. However, the inappropriate description and interpretation of data diminished the convince of their findings.

Reviewer #2: In the manuscript entitled “A single inactivating amino acid change in the SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 Mac1 domain attenuates viral replication and pathogenesis in vivo” Taha, Suryawanshi, Chen, Correy et al examine the effects of inactivating point mutations in the macrodomain1 in NSP3 on viral replication and host responses to infection. Overall, they demonstrate that inactivation of N40 by substitution with alanine residues renders NSP3 unstable. On the other hand, mutation of N90 to aspartic acid ablated catalytic activity without affecting protein stability. The authors then implemented single-round replicon to demonstrate that NSP3 N90D induces increased host antiviral responses relative to the WT virus. The authors then employed infectious clones to demonstrate that N90D had decreased modestly in Calu3 and human airway organoids. Lastly, in vivo studies demonstrate that the N90D attenuates the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 relative to WA-1. These studies suggest that Mac1 of NSP3 is a virulence determinant as has been previously shown in other coronaviruses. Mechanistically, the authors suggest that this is due to an inability to counter the host antiviral response. This study is novel in demonstrating the relevance of the catalytic activity of AC1 in NSP3. However, the manuscript in its current form is too preliminary to support the hypothesis that antagonism of host IFN responses is the mechanism by which Mac1 contributes to SARS-CoV2 viral virulence rather than direct effects on viral replication.

Reviewer #3: The manuscript by Taha et al provides characterisation of the novel catalytic mutant of the coronavirus Mac1 domain enzyme (N40D) that is superior to the previously utilised N40A mutant. Importantly, the N40D virus replicates 1000 times less efficiently compared to the wild-type virus in mice. This mutant also induces an efficient interferon response. The presented data validate the SARS-CoV2 NSP3 Mac1 domain as a critical viral pathogenesis factor and a promising target to develop antiviral drugs. Altogether, this is an important, well-written and timely paper.

Reviewer #4: From the Introduction to the manuscript, SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 Mac1 has been shown to be “necessary for pathogenesis and for robust viral replication” (references cited in Introduction by authors 28-31; quotes are wording used by authors). Mac1 has been shown to be an ADP-ribosylhydrolase that can remove ADP-ribosylation and hence decrease ADP-ribosylation-dependent events/pathways. Mac1 has a conserved asparagine at position 40 in the active site. Mutation of asparagine to alanine results in inactivation of Mac1. Mac1 is found in the SARS-CoV family of viruses. Immortalized cell lines may not recapitulate the effects of Mac1. Deletion of Mac1 did not appear to affect in vitro activity but did affect in vivo activity. Mac1 deletion mutant was associated with reduced effects in vivo.

The investigators in this report focus on SARS-CoV-2 and show that Mac1 is critical in SARS-CoV-2 for viral replication and pathogenesis in vivo. They compare substitutions at the critical asparagine with either alanine or asparagine. Both substitutions decrease enzymatic activity of Mac1, with focus of the N40D mutant. The studies on N40D are detailed and well done, in terms of choice of model systems and structural analysis of the mutant Mac1. Different organ responses were observed, for reasons that are not addressed experimentally. The novelty of the report is more related to the detailed analysis of in vivo, in vitro and structure analyses.

It is not clear if the results change prior literature on the importance of Mac1 to pathogenesis of disease, and by inference Mac1 enzymatic activity.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: Major concerns:

1 The authors claimed that "The N40D mutant generated similar luciferase signals to the WT replicon in both VAT and Calu3 cells... (Fig. 2B).", as well as "This mutation, when introduced via reverse genetics into fully infectious viral clone or replicons, showed minimal effects on viral replication in immortalized cell lines while modestly inducing the IFN response". However, in Figure 2B, the authors showed significant difference in RLU signals between WA1 and WA1 Mac1 N40D (p<0.001), which can not be treated as "similar" or "mininal" and may affect the conclusion drawn from these data. In addition, the authors are strongly recommended to repeat these assays by using rescued virus carrying point mutations (especially N40D).

2 The authors need to be very careful and specific in wording "IFN signal". IFN signals can be comprised of diverse pathways demonstrating distinct functions during SARS-CoV-2 infection and should not be treated equally. In Fig. 2D, the authors showed that WA1 Mac1 N40D infection induced higher IFNb1 but did not affect the expression of STAT1, it is confusing that in subsequnt assays (Fig. 2E), the authors used IFN-gamma (more stat1-related) instead of IFN-beta to treat infection system. These assays need to be justified.

3 The authors claimed that "at 48 hours after infection, particle production was measured by plaque assays while intracellular viral RNA and cytokine expression levels were measured by RT-qPCR. The N40D Mac1 mutant showed modestly (~2-fold) lower particle production and intracellular viral RNA compared with the WT virus suggesting a slightly attenuated phenotype (Fig. 2C and 2D). Similar to the results from replicon experiments, the N40D mutant induced higher levels of IFN as compared to WT virus (Fig. 3D)", but did not showed any statistics outcome in corresponding figures.

4 The authors interpreted data shown in Fig. 3F as "loss of the IFN antagonism

limits viral infection by the mutant virus, especially at later time points after infection, and differs from previous work with SARS-CoV where the Mac1-deficient virus phenotype is apparent early post infection". The explanation is very confusing. In addition, the decrease of virus titer at 48 and 72 hours could not be attributed to less efficient infection. Instead, it showed the accelerated virus clearance to me.

5 The authors need to have independent pathologists check and score the lung pathogenic changes shown in Fig. 4G.

Reviewer #2: The in vitro data in its current state does not robustly support claims that the host antiviral response is the mechanism for the attenuation of N90D. Loss of NSP3 Mac 1 catalytic activity could be impacting viral replication directly.

1. Please clarify whether equivalent infectious doses used to infect cells with replicon and recombinant viruses. What is the proportion of cells that is infected/transduced by WT and N40D viruses? Does decreasing the infectious dose enhance the detection of the replication defect of the catalytic mutant?

2. In figure 2E the authors treat cells with IFN gamma to determine whether the cell intrinsic IFN induction could suppress the N40D mutant. IFN gamma is not synthesized by infected Calu3 cells, rather viral infection induces the expression of type I and/or type III IFNs. Thus, it would be more appropriate to contrast cell intrinsic IFN sensitivity to conclude that Mac1 is required to overcome antiviral immunity. Furthermore, the authors conclude that IFN gamma does not hinder WT infection at either 10or100ng/ml concentration, yet there is a two-log decrease N copy number. Have statistics been run on these data? Is this change significant given that there is only a ~2 fold change between mutants across doses? While this is cited in the figure legends, there is no indication of significance on the figure itself. If so, a Student’s t test is not an appropriate statistic for these comparisons (effect mutants and effects doses). A better way to determine whether the host antiviral response contributes to viral attenuation of N90D would be to infect IRF3-deficient cells and determine whether the 2-fold attenuation is conserved.

3. As the overall hypothesis of this study is that the host innate immune response is most competent in primary tissues, it is important to demonstrate that decreases in viral titers of Mac1 mutants is also concordant with increased antiviral and inflammatory responses in human organoids (Fig 3F). Are these changes more robust than the modest changes in gene expression seen in Calu3 cells? As the authors conclude that “It is possible that the modest phenotype of the N40D mutant observed in Calu3 cells is due to these cells not fully recapitulating the cellular environment during SARS-CoV-2 infection” and go on to further expand upon this concept in the discussion, the production of infectious virus should be measured at 72hrs post infection. The differences in infectious virus production in Calu-3 were similar to those observed at 48hrs in organoids. The sample size should also be increased in order to determine whether any of the changes in infectious virus production or gene expression are significant between viruses.

Reviewer #3: None.

Reviewer #4: No major issues noted on the conduct of the studies in the analysis of the role of N40D. The data are more relevant to basic understanding of Mac1 then to approaches for therapy. The investigators might want to change the Discussion to address this point.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: Minor concerns

The authors need to double-check the typos and figure indicators.

In "The N40D Mac1 mutant showed modestly (~2-fold) lower particle production and intracellular viral RNA compared with the WT virus suggesting a slightly attenuated phenotype (Fig. 2C and 2D).", the correlating figures should be 3B and 3C.

In "While WT and Mac1 N40D mutant viruses produced similar levels of infectious particles at 24 hours post infection, the Mac1 N40D mutant showed ~10-fold lower particle production at 48 and 72 hours post infection (Fig. 4B).", the correlating figures should be 3F.

Finally, the authors are suggested to re-write or divide some long sentences and make the points clearer.

Reviewer #2: Additional editing of the manuscript and statistical analysis is necessary to better understand experimental design and data interpretation.

1. The authors conclude in Figure 2B that the relative luciferase signals of WT and N90D mutant are similar, yet the statistical analysis suggest differences in the RLU between these two groups. The authors should clarify whether a modest decrease in infectious virus packaging was observed.

2. The authors identify IFNB1, IL-6, STAT1 and ISG15 as cytokines. Only IFNB1 and IL6 fit that description and STAT1 and ISG15 are best described as ISGs. Similarly in the date presented in Fig 4. MX1 is not a cytokine. Consider updating this.

3. Could the authors clarify the methodology for quantifying the relative expression of host innate immune genes across figures 2and 3? Are the changes in gene expression conserved when contrasting to a house keeping gene rather than a spike control? There could be differential cell death across mutants resulting in changes in gene detection.

4. The authors should revise the figure callouts and legends. Figure legend labels for Figure 4G and 4H are swapped. Refer to figures 3B and 3C in main text. Figure 3F is called out as figure 4B in main text.

5. Could the authors please clarify what is mean by the statement: “underscoring the specific effect of this mutation in the viral life cycle.” Is the specific effect innate immune activation?

6. How many animals does the data presented in figure correspond to for each infectious group (days post infection)? 5 each?

7. For figure 4G consider highlighting the area of the lung that was magnified and including images from replicate lungs. Quantification of lung pathology would increase rigor. Does N90D infect areas of the lung distinct from those targeted by WA-1?

Reviewer #3: Minor comments:

Introduction – ‘Specifically, PARP7, PARP9, PARP12 and PARP14 directly enhance antiviral innate immune responses (24-26) and are upregulated during MHV infection (27).’ – I don’t think PARP7 enhances antiviral responses, it’s quite the opposite.

Introduction – it would be very good to clearly mention that PARP14 is the main antiviral PARP acting against coronaviruses and that Mac1 reverses PARP14-mediated ADP-ribosylation (doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007756; doi: 10.1098/rsob.200237).

Supplementary Figure 1 – it would be good to label the catalytic residue in the figure.

Discussion – considering that the presented results greatly motivate further efforts in development of Mac1 inhibitors, it would be good to discuss more extensively the current literature describing attempts to develop such inhibitors.

Reviewer #4: Minor proofreading:

1. Introduction, paragraph 3, line 1, correct spelling of ADP-ribosylhydrolase not -layse.

2. In figure 1, a graph from figure 1H is present, but it is not discussed in text and within legend.

3. In figure 4, Figure 4 G and figure 4H, need to be switched from what is actually in the figure.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Jian Zheng

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here on PLOS Biology: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 1

Jacob S Yount, Sonja M Best

16 Aug 2023

Dear Dr. Ott,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'A single inactivating amino acid change in the SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 Mac1 domain attenuates viral replication in vivo' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Jacob S. Yount

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Sonja Best

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

Jacob S Yount, Sonja M Best

25 Aug 2023

Dear Dr. Ott,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "A single inactivating amino acid change in the SARS-CoV-2 NSP3 Mac1 domain attenuates viral replication in vivo," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Alignment of Mac1 sequences from several betacoronaviruses.

    The Mac1 sequences of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and MHV-A59 were obtained from uniport (P0DTC1, P0C6U8, K9N638, and P0C6V0, respectively) and aligned with Geneious Prime version 2022.2.1 using the Clustal Omega setting. Residues shaded in black are identical across all viruses, while residues shaded in grey are only partially conserved. The asparagine at position 40 that is critical for catalytic activity is indicated in a red rectangle.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Mac1 N40A protein is less stable in cells than are Mac1 WT or Mac1 N40D proteins.

    Western blot analyses of cell lysates from A549 lung cancer cells lentivirally transduced with vectors expressing Strep-tagged Mac1 WT, Mac1 N40D or Mac1 N40A proteins. β-actin is shown as a loading control. The blot is representative of three independent replicates.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Structure of Mac1 N40D determined by X-ray crystallography in apo- and ADP-ribose-bound state.

    (A) Alignment of apo- (PDB code 8SH6) and ADP-ribose-bound N40D (PDB code 8SH8) structures shows previously identified structural changes occurring upon ADP-ribose binding (e.g. Ala129 flip, Phe132 and Asn99 rotation, shown with orange arrows) [49]. Selected hydrogen bonds between ADP-ribose and the active site are shown with dashed black lines. Three water molecules are shown that form bridging interactions between ADP-ribose and active site residues (purple/blue spheres). (B) Alignment of apo- WT (PDB code 7KQO) and N40D structures shows that there are only minor structural changes in the active site. The 80° rotation of the aspartic acid side chain relative to the asparagine side chain is indicated with a black arrow. (C) Alignment of ADP-ribose-bound WT (PDB code 7KQP) and N40D (PDB code 8SH8) shows that ADP-ribose binding is highly conserved despite the N40D mutation (RMSD across the 36 ADP-ribose atoms of 0.12 Å). The bridging water that is unique to N40D is shown with a purple sphere. Two conserved bridging waters are shown with blue spheres.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. IFNβ treatment does not differentially suppress the replication of the SARS-CoV-2 replicon with Mac1 N40D mutation.

    Calu3 cells were infected with indicated replicons in the presence of indicated IFNβ concentrations. Intracellular viral RNA (N gene copies) was measured by RT-qPCR using a standard curve. Data are presented as mean +/- SD of one biological replicate conducted in triplicate.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 domain N40D mutant replicates similarly compared with WT virus regardless of infectious dose.

    Viral particle release of infected Calu3 cells at MOI 0.01 and MOI 0.1 with indicated viruses was measured at indicated timepoints post-infection by plaque assay on VAT cells. Data are presented as mean +/- SD of three biological replicates conducted in duplicate. **, p<0.01 by two-sided Student’s T test.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 N40D mutant is attenuated in K18-hACE2 mice.

    A) Viral particle abundance in the upper respiratory tract of mice infected with WT or Mac1 N40D mutant viruses was measured by plaque assay in VAT cells. Data are presented as mean +/- SD. B) Viral RNA levels (N gene copies) in the upper respiratory tract were measured by RT-qPCR using a standard curve. Data are presented as mean +/- SD. C) Viral particle abundance in the brains of mice infected with WT or Mac1 N40D mutant viruses at 6 days post-infection was measured by plaque assay in VAT cells. Data are presented as mean +/- SD. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01 by two-sided Student’s T-test.

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 N40D mutant has similar pathogenesis in K18-hACE2 mice to the wild-type virus.

    Four pathology scoring criteria (A-D) were utilized to assess the pathogenesis of the wild-type and mutant viruses in K18-hACE2 mice. The total score encompassing these criteria is in Fig 4H. The extent of inflammation in the perivascular (E), peribronchial (F), and interstitial (G) areas was quantified by measuring the vascular wall, the bronchial wall, and the alveolar septal thickness, respectively. Data are presented as mean +/- SD. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001; ****, p<0.0001 by two-sided Student’s T-test.

    (TIF)

    S8 Fig. Purification and quantification of MARylated PARP10.

    (A) Size exclusion chromatography (HiLoad 10/300 Superdex 75 pg column) of PARP10 with and without treatment with β-NAD+. The peaks eluting at ~18 mL are un-reacted β-NAD+ and/or hydrolyzed ADP-ribose. (B) SDS-PAGE (Biorad, 4569036) analysis of MARylated PARP10 with protein marker (ThermoFisher, 26616). Samples were boiled in SDS-PAGE loading dye for five minutes at 95°C and the gel was stained with Coomassie blue. (C) Titration of human NUDT5 phosphodiesterase with 20 μM ADP-ribose. AMP was detected using the AMP-Glo kit. Each condition was measured three times. (D) Log-log plot of the titration of ADP-ribose with 100 nM NUDT5. The highest three concentrations of ADP-ribose were fit using linear regression with GraphPad Prism (red line) and the remaining concentrations were fit to a four-parameter logistic equation using non-linear regression (gray line). Each condition was measured three times. (E) Titration of MARylated PARP10 and Mac1. Each plot shows the titration of Mac1 with a single concentration of MARylated PARP10. Each condition was measured twice, with the maximum luminescence determined by fitting a four-parameter logistic equation using non-linear regression (gray line). (F) ADP-ribose concentration generated by MARylated PARP10 hydrolysis plotted as a function of MARylated PARP10 concentration determined by absorbance at 280 nm. Data were fit by linear regression (gray line), with the line constrained to the X = 0, Y = 0 (the slope and standard error are indicated).

    (TIF)

    S9 Fig. Purification of human NUDT5.

    (A) Size exclusion chromatography (HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 200 pg column) of NUDT5 in the final purification step. The monomeric fractions pooled are shaded orange. (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of purified NUDT5 with protein marker (ThermoFisher, 26616). Samples were boiled in SDS-PAGE loading dye for five minutes at 95°C and the gel was stained with Coomassie blue. (C) Mass spectrum of purified NUDT5 deconvoluted with the maximum entropy method (MaxEnt1). The observed mass is within 3 Da of the mass calculated from the amino acid sequence (24619 Da).

    (TIF)

    S10 Fig. Thermostability of WT, N40D and N40A mutants assessed by differential scanning fluorimetry with SYPRO orange.

    (A) Plot showing apparent melting temperatures (Tma) for WT, N40D and N40A Mac1 as a function of ADP-ribose concentration. Tma values were calculated by DSFworld [66] using fitting model 1. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of four technical replicates. (B) Raw fluorescence curves used to calculate Tma values. Data are presented as the mean of four technical replicates.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. RT-qPCR primers utilized in this study.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Data collection and refinement statistics for X-ray crystal structures reported in this work.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Mac1 PLoSPath rebuttal_V4.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All data supporting the findings of the present study are available in the article and supplementary figures and tables.


    Articles from PLOS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES