Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2023 Aug 14;15(8):e43472. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43472

Successful Pre-Treatment Ovarian Fresh Tissue Transplantation in a Cervical Cancer Patient Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A Case Report

Marília A Bertolazzi 1,, Maria Luiza Nogueira Dias Genta 1, Filomena Carvalho 2, Edmund C Baracat 3, Jesus Paula Carvalho 4,5
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC10499302  PMID: 37711948

Abstract

Cervical cancer is one of the most frequent gynecological malignancies in Brazil, and most of the patients require pelvic radiotherapy as part of oncological treatment.

Pelvic radiotherapy induces ovarian premature insufficiency in pre-menopausal women. This condition impacts the life quality and increases the risk of osteoporosis, obesity, cardiovascular, and neurodegenerative diseases in the middle and long term.

Most of these patients have no access to hormonal replacement therapy. Techniques such as ovarian transposition have questionable results when aiming to preserve ovarian function. In this context, a promising alternative is the implantation of fresh ovarian tissue, outside the radiotherapy field, in the abdominal cavity (orthotopic implantation) or in other sites such as the forearm, breast, or subcutaneous tissue (heterotopic implantation).

Here we report a successful case of autologous implantation of fresh ovarian tissue in the inner thigh of a young patient with advanced cervical cancer, who was a candidate for concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Keywords: cancer radiotherapy, pelvic radiotherapy, hormonal therapy, premature ovarian insufficiency, uterine cervical cancer

Introduction

Cervical cancer is one of the most frequent gynecological malignancies in Brazil, with an incidence of more than 16,000 cases per year [1]. Three-quarters of the patients are diagnosed in the advanced stages (beyond stage IB2 - FIGO [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics] 2018) [2]. Early stage tumors are properly treated with surgery, while locally advanced tumors can be treated with a combination of surgery and radiotherapy or radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy. In our institution, of 292 cervical cancer patients treated between 2008 and 2012, 82.9% had indication of radiotherapy as part of the treatment [2].

The ovaries are sensitive to ionizing radiation. Doses such as 250-300 cGy can suppress ovarian function [3]. Radiotherapy for cervical cancer curative treatment induces irreversible ovarian insufficiency and harms the reproductive and hormonal functions, even in regimens with reduced radiation doses or planning based on intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Ovarian premature insufficiency has severe consequences in life quality, such as climacteric and genitourinary symptoms, sexual dysfunction, and increased risk of osteoporosis, obesity, cardiovascular, and neurodegenerative diseases in the middle and long term [4]. Young cervical cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy are the most impacted in terms of life quality when compared to other types of gynecological cancer survivors [5,6].

Ovarian transposition is a technique with questionable results when aiming to preserve ovarian function. Less than 40% of women maintain ovarian function for a long term when submitted to ovarian transposition before radiation therapy [7]. In this context, a promising alternative is the implantation of fresh ovarian tissue, outside the radiotherapy field, in the abdominal cavity (orthotopic implantation) or in other sites such as the forearm, breast, or subcutaneous tissue (heterotopic implantation) [8,9].

Here we report a successful case of autologous implantation of fresh ovarian tissue in the inner thigh of a young patient with advanced cervical cancer, candidate for concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Case presentation

A 26-year-old female patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix, FIGO stage IIIC1, underwent the procedure for autologous implantation of fresh ovarian tissue one week before the start of oncological treatment. Serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol before the procedure were 4.8 mUI/mL and 225 ng/dL, respectively.

The procedure began with laparoscopic unilateral right-side oophorectomy. We removed the ovary protected by endobag and then sectioned it into 1- to 2-mm-thick slices (Figure 1). One of the slices underwent anatomopathological examination.

Figure 1. Ovarian slices.

Figure 1

Through a horizontal incision of 2 cm on the inner face of the thigh (Figure 2), we created a space in the deep subcutaneous tissue below Scarpa's fascia and above the muscular plane. We placed five slices of ovarian tissue into this site and closed the adjacent subcutaneous and skin (Figure 3). We performed ultrasound examinations to assess the viability of the ovarian tissue. One week later, the patient began oncologic treatment, which included 25 sessions of pelvic radiotherapy with a total dose of 5,580 Gy associated with concomitant chemotherapy with cisplatin and four sessions of brachytherapy with a total dose of 2,800 Gy.

Figure 2. Location of the implant in the inner thigh.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Placing ovarian graft in the deep subcutaneous tissue.

Figure 3

Two months after the end of radiotherapy, the patient presented hot flashes, irritability, and anxiety symptoms. The serum FSH level increased to 79 mUI/mL. Four months after the end of radiotherapy and six months after implantation, the patient presented resolution of climacteric symptoms and normalization of FSH and estradiol levels. Six months after the end of radiotherapy, the serum levels of FSH and estradiol were 13 mIU/mL and 118 ng/dL, respectively. The reference value of FSH for premenopausal women is under 25 mUI/mL. Estradiol levels in menopausal women are under 28 ng/dL. The levels of FSH and estradiol pre-treatment and at two and six months after radiotherapy are summarized in Figures 4, 5.

Figure 4. FSH levels pre-treatment and at two and six months after radiotherapy.

Figure 4

FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone

Figure 5. Estradiol levels pre-treatment and at two and six months after radiotherapy.

Figure 5

Discussion

Several studies have shown that a minority of cervical cancer survivors receive adequate hormonal therapy. Only 13% of these patients receive a formal diagnosis of ovarian premature insufficiency and less than 40% receive some hormone replacement prescription. General practitioners distrust prescribing hormonal therapy and face challenges as a lack of medication in the public health system [10-13].

In this context, despite the potential to circumvent the problem in this group of patients, hormonal replacement is rarely maintained in the long term [6,11,12].

Preservation of the ovaries is possible in almost all cervical cancers, even in advanced stages. Squamous cell carcinoma, which accounts for more than 80% of these tumors, spreads by contiguity to the parametrium, pelvic, and aortic lymph nodes, and, as a rule, does not compromise the ovaries. The risk of ovarian metastases is shallow, and any impairment can be diagnosed during the intra-operative examination [14-17].

Removal of the ovaries outside the irradiation field (ovarian transposition) has been performed over time, with success rates ranging from 20% to 100% depending on the primary site and the type of tumor [18,19]. In this approach, the gonads and their vascular supply are fixed in a site behind or lateral to the uterus, above the iliac crest. However, it is difficult to guarantee that the gonads are outside the irradiation field, as it can vary according to the disease staging. Lv et al. [20] reported that in a series of 214 patients whose ovaries were transposed, only 32 (15%) were located outside the planned field of radiotherapy. Radiotherapy in cervical cancer is used in combination with cisplatin. Cisplatin, used at a lower than the therapeutic dose, has a radiosensitizing effect and, at these doses, is not considered deleterious to the germ cell [21].

To maintain the ovarian hormone function in the long term, in women with no desire or no conditions to preserve fertility, the implantation of fresh ovarian tissue seems to be a simple, low-cost, and feasible procedure. This is the first successful case report of autologous implantation of fresh ovarian tissue in a young woman with advanced cervical carcinoma. This procedure, however, needs a randomized trial to be validated as an alternative to ovarian transposition or hormone replacement therapy. A pilot study is underway at our service with a series of 20 cases.

Conclusions

Autologous fresh ovarian tissue transplantation to the subcutaneous tissue of the inner tight could be an acceptable alternative for maintaining ovarian hormone function in young patients with cervical cancer, who are candidates for treatment with pelvic radiotherapy. These women rarely maintain hormonal therapy after treatment for different reasons and are more exposed to side effects and repercussions of ovarian premature insufficiency. This procedure has several advantages over the ovarian transposition techniques, such as the safe distance of the transplanted ovarian tissue from the radiotherapy field, the readiness for follow-up of the graft with Doppler ultrasound, and the maintenance of hormone production in the long term. These characteristics make the technique relevant in clinical practice because cervical cancer affects predominantly low-income women. Autologous fresh ovarian tissue transplantation is a pilot study to evaluate the visibility of autologous fresh ovarian tissue transplantation in young patients. A randomized clinical trial is in course to evaluate this procedure in a cohort of patients.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. University of São Paulo Ethics Committee / Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa (CEP) da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo. issued approval 5.334.453. Scientific Committee for Research and Education Evaluation Report The following study “Autologous Heterotopic Fresh Ovarian Graft in Woman with LACC, Eligible for Pelvic Radiotherapy Treatment” obtained ethics approval by the University of São Paulo Ethics Committee. CCEP 5.334.453. Certificate of Presentation of Ethical Appreciation: 54996222.9.0000.0068 Responsible researcher: Jesus Paula Carvalho Executioner researcher: Marilia Albanezi Bertolazzi Further researcher: Maria Luiza Nogueira Dias Genta Received approval by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee.

References

  • 1.Incidence rates and temporal trends of cervical cancer relating to opportunistic screening in two developed metropolitan regions of Brazil: a population-based cohort study. Teixeira JC, Maestri CA, Machado HD, Zeferino LC, Carvalho NS. Sao Paulo Med J. 2019;137:322–328. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0306220719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Multiple HPV genotype infection impact on invasive cervical cancer presentation and survival. Nogueira Dias Genta ML, Martins TR, Mendoza Lopez RV, et al. PLoS One. 2017;12:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sequelae of lateral ovarian transposition in irradiated cervical cancer patients. Chambers SK, Chambers JT, Kier R, Peschel RE. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;20:1305–1308. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90242-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Approach to the patient with menopausal symptoms. Martin KA, Manson JE. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:4567–4575. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Long-term quality of life in gynecological cancer survivors. Gonçalves V. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:30–35. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328332e626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.A manifesto on the preservation of sexual function in women and girls with cancer. Lindau ST, Abramsohn EM, Matthews AC. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:166–174. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ovarian transposition before radiotherapy in cervical cancer patients: functional outcome and the adequate dose constraint. Yin L, Lu S, Zhu J, Zhang W, Ke G. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14:100. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1312-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Expectations and limitations of ovarian tissue transplantation. Donfack NJ, Alves KA, Araújo VR, Cordova A, Figueiredo JR, Smitz J, Rodrigues AP. Zygote. 2017;25:391–403. doi: 10.1017/S0967199417000338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Efficacy of ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation: lessons learned from 545 cases. Jadoul P, Guilmain A, Squifflet J, Luyckx M, Votino R, Wyns C, Dolmans MM. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1046–1054. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hormone replacement therapy after treatment for cervical cancer: are we adhering to standard of care? Rauh LA, Pannone AF, Cantrell LA. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;147:597–600. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Iatrogenic menopause after treatment for cervical cancer. Moss EL, Taneja S, Munir F, et al. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2016;28:766–775. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hormone replacement therapy and women with premature menopause--a cancer survivorship issue. King J, Wynne CH, Assersohn L, Jones A. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:1623–1632. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Women's perceptions of hormone replacement therapy: risks and benefits (1980-2002). A literature review. Buick DL, Crook D, Horne R. Climacteric. 2005;8:24–35. doi: 10.1080/13697130500062654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ovarian metastasis in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Shimada M, Kigawa J, Nishimura R, et al. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101:234–237. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ovarian metastasis in stage IB and II cervical adenocarcinoma. Natsume N, Aoki Y, Kase H, Kashima K, Sugaya S, Tanaka K. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;74:255–258. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ovarian preservation in locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery. Signorelli M, Bogani G, Chiappa V, et al. Minerva Ginecol. 2018;70:357–363. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04221-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Safety of ovarian preservation in women with stage I and II cervical adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study and meta-analysis. Chen J, Wang R, Zhang B, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:460. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Laparoscopic ovarian transposition before pelvic cancer treatment: ovarian function and fertility preservation. Moawad NS, Santamaria E, Rhoton-Vlasak A, Lightsey JL. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24:28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ovarian function after ovarian transposition and additional pelvic radiotherapy: a systematic review. Hoekman EJ, Broeders EA, Louwe LA, Nout RA, Jansen FW, de Kroon CD. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45:1328–1340. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Association between the location of transposed ovary and ovarian dose in patients with cervical cancer treated with postoperative pelvic radiotherapy. Lv XJ, Cheng XL, Tu YQ, Yan DD, Tang Q. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14:230. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1437-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pharmacologic ovarian preservation in young women undergoing chemotherapy. Chahvar ST, Al-Shawaf T, Tranquilli AL. Curr Med Chem. 2014;21:223–229. doi: 10.2174/09298673113206660293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES