Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology
. 2007 Nov 30;12(3):208–216. doi: 10.2188/jea.12.208

Change of the Smoking Behavior and Related Lifestyle Variables among Physicians in Fukuoka, Japan: A Longitudinal Study

Akihiko Kaetsu 1, Tetsuhito Fukushima 2, Masaki Moriyama 2, Takao Shigematsu 3
PMCID: PMC10499472  PMID: 12164322

Abstract

Two cross-sectional surveys of the entire membership of the Fukuoka Prefecture Medical Association were conducted in 1983 and 1990 using a self-administered questionnaire, and respondents were registered as the study cohort. In this investigation the trend of the actual prevalence of smoking among physicians and the relationship between their smoking cessation and living habits were studied. A decline in the actual prevalence of smoking was demonstrated among the 2,656 subjects who responded to both surveys (2,543 men and 113 women). To examine any relationship between lifestyle variables and smoking cessation after 1983, those who were smokers in 1983 (1,099 men and 7 women, total 1,106) were divided into two groups, according to whether or not they still smoked in 1990. Subjects who quit smoking accounted for a larger proportion of those physicians with any of the following life-style variables: earlier bedtimes, unawareness of mental stress, greater consumption of fresh vegetables and fruit, and less coffee consumption. Further observation of the relationship between smoking cessation and changes in lifestyle variables showed that there were more who quit smoking among those who became employed physicians, had an increase of the body mass index (BMI) and began to be aware of mental stress. These results suggested that, for physicians who smoked, it is a possibility that smoking was an important way of coping with stress, and thus pointed to the need to take mental-health measures to help physicians to stop smoking.

Keywords: physician, prevalence of smoking, lifestyle, longitudinal study

INTRODUCTION

The increasing mortality due to lung cancer and other smoking-related diseases in Japan1) is a result of the high prevalence of smoking among Japanese adults – the highest of all advanced countries2,3) – and planning effective measures for its reduction occupies an important place among Japan’s health policies4). In order to reduce the prevalence of smoking in the nation, the reduction of the prevalence of smoking among physicians is considered to be a vital measure. This led to our examination of smoking status in a group of physicians.

In our previous report, it was suggested that physicians, as a group, could relatively easily stop smoking. This was also inferred from other reports that indicated notable declines in the prevalence of smoking and a higher proportion of ex-smokers among physicians than in the general population5-10). Nevertheless, few studies followed up such physicians and demonstrated changes in their smoking status11). Very little investigation of possible factors that might have been related to smoking cessation was conducted. Observation of what kinds of lifestyle variables might influence the success of later cessation of smoking was made by means of follow-ups of subjects in intervention programs for quitting smoking in the general population and in the workplace12,13). Another report stated that differences in the success rate of smoking cessation appeared according to the psychological readiness of the smoker to quit14). However, it is questionable whether or not those findings are directly applicable to smoking cessation programs for physicians, who constitute a group of a special nature. In addition, if one considers the report that the smoking habit is more difficult to modify or dislodge than habits of exercise or eating15), it appears to be necessary to confirm that there have been alterations in daily habits that are regarded as predictors of smoking cessation. But very few reports have examined this16). This study aimed to find any factors that might serve as predictors in a physician’s lifestyle of whether he or she would later quit smoking. For this purpose, the relationship between the lifestyle variables of physicians at the time of the baseline survey and the later status of their smoking habit were examined. Further, the alterations in the lifestyle variables themselves were verified over the seven-year follow-up period and their correlations with changes in smoking status were observed. Smoking cessation programs for physicians are discussed on the basis of the results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Lifestyle surveys of the entire membership, as of both April 1, 1983 and April 1, 1990, of the Fukuoka Prefecture Medical Association were carried out in mid-1983 and mid-1990. The same self-administered questionnaire, which the subjects were requested to answer in their own names, was used in both surveys. The regional offices of the Medical Association carried out the distribution and collection of the questionnaires. In the baseline survey in 1983, 4,042 male physicians and 190 female physicians returned responses, totaling 4,232, for a gross return rate of 85%. In the follow-up survey in 1990, however, 3,565 (from 3,378 men and 187 women) were returned, giving a somewhat lower gross return rate of 63%. The number of subjects who responded in both surveys was 2,703 (2,584 men and 119 women), 64% of the baseline survey respondents (Table 1.). The details of survey method, items for lifestyle variables included in the questionnaire and the smoking status of the subjects were stated in our previous report.

Table 1. Age and sex distribution of respondents of both surveys.

Age Sex Total ( % )

Male Female
  -40 years 197 16 213 ( 8.0 )
 40-49 years 544 18 562 ( 21.2 )
 50-59 years 1,034 33 1,067 ( 40.2 )
 60-69 years 576 30 606 ( 22.8 )
 70+ years 192 16 208 ( 7.8 )
 Total 2,543 113 2,656 (100.0 )
Baseline
 Member 4,755 225 4,980
 respondents 4,042 190 4,232 ( 85.0 )
Follow-up
 Member 5,323 341 5,664
 respondents 3,378 187 3,565 ( 62.9 )

Age was classfied by the age at the baseline survey.

Of those who responded to both surveys, there were 2,656 physicians (2,543 men and 113 women) whose age, sex and smoking habits were known in both surveys. First, the McNemar’s test was performed to examine the significance of changes of smoking status in these subjects.

Next, for 1,106 subjects who were smokers at the time of the baseline survey (1,099 men and 7 women), the relations between the various lifestyle variables in the baseline survey – in particular, the possible predictive factors for physicians to quit smoking – and the smoking status at the time of the follow-up survey were examined. To determine statistical significance, the Mantel-Haenszel chi square test was used (p<0.05). Then, a univariate unconditional logistic regression analysis was done, in which each lifestyle factor was used as an independent variable, and abstention from smoking at the time of the follow-up survey as a dependent variable, and the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated. In addition, a step-wise multiple regression analysis with adjustment for age and sex was carried out on the items for which a statistically significant correlation was seen in a univariate unconditional logistic regression analysis.

Further, in relation to the various items examined in smokers at the time of the baseline survey, significance of changes that occurred between the two surveys were analyzed using the McNemar’s test. The SAS statistical software package, version 6.12 (SAS Institute, Caiy, NC) was employed for all statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Age and sex distributions of respondents to both surveys who are the subjects of analysis in the present study are shown in Table 1. The proportion of subjects were 64% of the baseline survey respondents.

There was a significant decline in the actual prevalence of smoking in all age groups after 1983, as Table 2 indicates.

Table 2. The change of smoking prevalence by sex and age, Baseline(1983) and Follow-up(1990) survey.

Sex Age N 1983 1990 Absolute
Change
(B-A)
Relative %
Change
(B-A)/A × 100
p


Smoker ( % )
(A)
Smoker ( % )
(B)
Male
  -40 years 197 106 53.8 84 42.6 -11.2 -20.8 **
 40-49 years 544 222 40.8 176 32.4 -8.5 -20.7 ***
 50-59 years 1034 469 45.4 373 36.1 -9.3 -20.5 ***
 60-69 years 576 240 41.7 161 28.0 -13.7 -32.9 ***
 70+ years 192 62 32.3 40 20.8 -11.5 -35.5 ***
 Total 2543 1099 43.2 834 32.8 -10.4 -24.1 ***
 
Female
  -40 years 16 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 - -
 40-49 years 18 1 5.6 0 0.0 -5.6 -100.0 -
 50-59 years 33 3 9.1 3 9.1 0.0 0.0 -
 60-69 years 30 2 6.7 2 6.7 0.0 0.0 -
 70+ years 16 1 6.3 1 6.3 0.0 0.0 -
 Total 113 7 6.2 6 5.3 -0.9 -14.3 -
 
Both combined
  -40 years 213 106 49.8 84 39.4 -10.3 -20.8 ***
 40-49 years 562 223 39.7 176 31.3 -8.4 -21.1 ***
 50-59 years 1067 472 44.2 376 35.2 -9.0 -20.3 ***
 60-69 years 606 242 39.9 163 26.9 -13.0 -32.6 ***
 70+ years 208 63 30.3 41 19.7 -10.6 -34.9 ***
 Total 2656 1106 41.6 840 31.6 -10.0 -24.1 ***

Age was classfied by the age at the baseline survey

N: No. of subjects. Smoker: Current smoker

p; **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001, statistically significant according to the McNemar test.

Of 1,106 smokers in the 1983 baseline survey, the proportion who had quit smoking by the time of the 1990 follow-up survey was analyzed for each of the 29 lifestyle variables examined in the previous report, and the results are presented in Table 3. The chi square test and univariate unconditional logistic regression analysis indicated significantly higher proportions of ex-smokers in relation to the following seven variables: age 60 years and over, the practice of internal medicine, earlier bedtime, no awareness of mental stress, regular physical activity, and daily consumption of fresh vegetables and of fruit. On the other hand, daily consumption of more than a cup of coffee was related to a significantly lower proportion of ex-smokers.

Table 3. The relationship between lifestyle variables and smoking cessation.

Variables N Quitters (%) p for
chi-square
Relative risk 95%CI
1. Personal characters
 Sex
  Male 1,099 330 30.0 1.00
  Female 7 2 28.6 p= 0.933 1.07 0.21 - 5.55
 Age
   -50 years 329 87 26.4 1.00
  50-59 years 472 124 26.3 1.01 0.73 - 1.39
  60+ years 305 121 39.7 p= 0.001 0.55 0.39 - 0.77
 Body Mass Index
  Under 22 410 116 28.3 1.00
  22 and over 696 216 31.0 p= 0.337 0.88 0.67 - 1.15
2. Physical conditions
 Subjective condition of health
  Not good 224 62 27.7 1.00
  Good 882 270 30.6 p= 0.393 0.87 0.63 - 1.20
 Heart disease
  No 1,084 323 29.8 1.63 0.69 - 3.85
  Yes 22 9 40.9 p= 0.261 1.00
 Peptic ulcer
  No 1,078 326 30.2 0.63 0.25 - 1.57
  Yes 28 6 21.4 p= 0.315 1.00
 Health check-ups
  No 513 160 31.2 1.00
  Yes 593 172 29.0 p= 0.430 1.11 0.86 - 1.44
 Customary medication
  No 503 153 30.4 0.97 0.75 - 1.25
  Yes 603 179 29.7 p= 0.791 1.00
3. Conditions of work
 Owner or employed
  Employed 182 46 25.3 1.00
  Owner 924 286 31.0 p= 0.127 0.76 0.53 - 1.08
 Specialty of medical practice
  Surgery 410 105 25.6 1.00
  Internal medicine 696 227 32.6 p= 0.014 0.71 0.54 - 0.93
 Number of working days
  Below 5 112 42 37.5 0.69 0.46 - 1.03
  6 and over 994 290 29.2 p= 0.069 1.00
 Number of patients
  Less than 40 328 93 28.4 1.12 0.84 - 1.49
  40 and over 778 239 30.7 p= 0.433 1.00
 Hours of consulting
  Less than 8 707 213 30.1 0.99 0.75 - 1.29
  8 and over 399 119 29.8 p= 0.916 1.00
4. Recreation
 Bedtime
  Before 12 709 236 33.3 0.64 0.48 - 0.84
  After 12 397 96 24.2 p= 0.002 1.00
 Duration of sleep
  -6 or 8+ 242 65 26.9 1.00
  6 to 8 864 267 30.9 p= 0.225 0.82 0.60 - 1.13
 Physical fatigue
  Aware 898 268 29.8 1.00
  Unaware 208 64 30.8 p= 0.793 0.96 0.69 - 1.33
 Mental stress
  Aware 807 224 27.8 1.00
  Unaware 299 108 36.1 p= 0.007 0.68 0.51 - 0.90
5. Exercise
 Current habit of exercise
  No 554 151 27.3 1.00
  Yes 552 181 32.8 p= 0.045 0.77 0.59 - 0.99
6. Food intake
 Miso soup (Misoshiru)
  Less than daily 585 174 29.7 1.00
  Daily 521 158 30.3 p= 0.833 0.97 0.75 - 1.26
 Japanese pickles (Tsukemono)
  Less than daily 481 141 29.3 1.00
  Daily 625 191 30.6 p= 0.654 0.94 0.73 - 1.22
 Bread
  Less than daily 716 209 29.2 1.00
  Daily 390 123 31.5 p= 0.416 0.90 0.69 - 1.17
 Milk
  Less than daily 707 199 28.1 1.00
  Daily 399 133 33.3 p= 0.071 0.78 0.60 - 1.02
 Fresh vegetables
  Less than daily 469 119 25.4 1.00
  Daily 637 213 33.4 p= 0.004 0.68 0.52 - 0.88
 Yellow and green vegetables
  Less than daily 746 213 28.6 1.00
  Daily 360 119 33.1 p= 0.126 0.81 0.62 - 1.06
 Fruit
  Less than daily 623 163 26.2 1.00
  Daily 483 169 35.0 p= 0.002 0.66 0.51 - 0.85
7. Beverage
 Coffee
  Less than daily 705 234 33.2 1.00
  Daily 401 98 24.4 p= 0.002 1.54 1.17 - 2.03
 Green tea
  Less than daily 133 36 27.1 1.00
  Daily 973 296 30.4 p= 0.429 0.85 0.57 - 1.27
 Alcohol - frequency
  Less than daily 496 140 28.2 1.00
  Daily 610 192 31.5 p= 0.241 0.86 0.66 - 1.11
 Alcohol - amount per day
  Under 1 go 532 159 29.9 1.00
  1 go and over 574 173 30.1 p= 0.927 0.99 0.76 - 1.28

p for chi-square was based on Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test.

Relative risk and 95% CI were based on univariate unconditional logistic regression analysis.

Seven lifestyle variables for which significant OR were seen with univariate unconditional logistic regression analysis were used as independent variables, and age and sex were employed as adjustment factors in step-wise multiple logistic regression analysis. Table 4 presents the following five variables showing a statistically significant relationship with quitting smoking: earlier bedtime, no awareness of mental stress, daily consumption of fresh vegetables, fruit, and daily consumption of one or more cups of coffee.

Table 4. Multiple logistic regression analysis for smoking cessation.

Variables Relative risk 95%CI
Bedtime
 Before 12 0.72 0.54 - 0.97
 After 12 1.00
Mental stress
 Aware 1.00
 Unaware 0.71 0.53 - 0.94
Fresh vegetables
 Not daily 1.00
 Daily 0.75 0.56 - 0.98
Fruit
 Not daily 1.00
 Daily 0.69 0.52 - 0.91
Coffee
 Not daily 1.00
 Daily 1.49 1.12 - 1.99

Relative risk and 95% CI were based on a step-wise multiple logistic regression analysis after adjusted for sex and age.

Table 5. The change of the lifestyle variables among smokers at baseline (1983) survey.

Variables Quitters Continue smokers


Baseline Second p Baseline Second p
Body Mass Index
 22 and over 65.1% 73.5% *** 62.0% 64.5% n.s.
Subjective condition of health
 Good 81.3% 60.2% *** 79.1% 73.8% **
Heart disease
 No 97.3% 88.6% *** 98.3% 96.0% **
Health check-ups
 Yes 51.8% 68.4% *** 54.4% 59.6% **
Customary medication
 No 46.1% 59.6% *** 45.2% 53.0% ***
Owner or employed
 Owner 86.1% 79.5% *** 82.4% 85.5% **
Number of working days
 Below 5 12.7% 23.8% *** 9.0% 14.2% ***
Number of patients
 Less than 40 28.0% 41.3% *** 30.4% 38.2% ***
Hours of consulting
 Less than 8 64.2% 78.6% *** 63.8% 76.1% ***
Bedtime
 Before 12 71.1% 78.9% *** 61.1% 65.2% **
Duration of sleep
 6 to 8 80.4% 73.2% * 77.1% 71.4% **
Mental stress
 Unaware 32.5% 26.2% * 24.7% 25.6% n.s.
Yellow and green vegetables
 Daily 35.8% 50.6% *** 31.1% 35.7% *
Alcohol - frequency
 Daily 57.8% 50.9% ** 54.0% 50.4% *
Alcohol - amount per day
 1 go and over 52.1% 46.4% * 51.8% 49.0% n.s.

n.s.; not significant, *;p<0.05,**;p<0.01,***;p<0.001

statistically significant according to the McNemar test.

To investigate the relationship of changes of lifestyle variables and smoking status, the smokers at the time of the baseline survey (1983) were divided into two groups, quitters and continuing smokers, according to their smoking status at the follow-up survey (1990). Changes of lifestyle variables in the period between the two surveys were observed and the rates of changes were, in general, larger in quitters than in continuing smokers. The lifestyle variables that showed significant changes among those who quit smoking after the baseline survey are listed in 5. Those with BMIs of 22 and over, owner-practitioners, and those with no awareness of mental stress showed the marked differences between the quitters and continuous smokers. The relationships between the changes in these variables and the discontinuation of smoking are given in Table 6. Increases in BMI to more than 22, change in conditions of work, and awareness of mental stress showed a significant correlation in multiple regression analysis.

Table 6. The relationship between the change of lifestyle variables, which showed different trend between quitters and continue smokers, and smoking cessation.

N Quitter Quit rate (%) OR 95%CI
Body Mass Index
 Decrease, Stable 986 286 29.0 1.00
 Increase 120 46 38.3 p= 0.035 0.66 0.44 - 0.98
 
Owner or employed
 Stabel, to be Owner 1061 304 28.7 1.00
 to be Employed 45 28 62.2 p= 0.001 0.31 0.17 - 0.59
 
Mental stress
 Stable, to be unaware 963 276 28.7 1.00
 to be aware 143 56 39.2 p= 0.011 0.65 0.45 - 0.94

P for chi-square was based on Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test. Odds ratios and 95% CI were based on unconditional logistic regression analysis after adjusted for sex and age.

DISCUSSION

Effect of gender in the present study

The present study analyzed the relationships of changes in lifestyle and in smoking status to the 8-year follow-up data for the physician cohort. It is considered necessary to take the sex gender of the subjects into account in the investigation of the habit of smoking17). However, this study used the entire body of data as a whole (men and women together) because its main concern was in the changes of lifestyle and smoking status among the subjects, and there were very few women physicians (0.1%, 7 of 1,106 smokers cohort) in the study cohort. Gender did not appear to have any effect on the study results.

What can be expected in the follow-up study

The previous study reported the relationship between lifestyle variables and current abstinence from smoking on the basis of the results of a cross-sectional survey of a group of physicians. In the present study, the relationships between lifestyle variables at the time of the baseline survey (1983) and smoking status at the follow-up survey (1990) were examined. Those subjects who were smokers in the baseline survey were divided according to their smoking status at the time of the follow-up survey into two groups, quitters and continuing smokers, and the lifestyle variables among quitters were compared with those among continuing smokers. In such an analysis, it was hoped that it would be possible to clarify what kind of relationships existed between lifestyle variables and changes in smoking habits.

Changes in the prevalence of smoking

The proportion of current smokers in each age group at the baseline survey and that in the follow-up survey were compared and significant decreases were observed in every age group. While the relative decline in the prevalence of smoking among physicians under 60 years of age was about 20%, that in the over-60s was more than 30%. An investigation on smoking among elderly people found that many of them quit smoking after the age of 6018). A similar tendency was observed among physicians.

Predictors of smoking cessation- When these variables are present, more physicians quit smoking.

In our previous, cross-sectional study, owner-practitioners showed a higher prevalence of smoking than employed physicians. In the present study, although the difference was not statistically significant, more owner-practitioners than employed physicians tended to discontinue smoking (OR=0.76, 95%CI: 0.53-1.08). There is a report that a person’s smoking habit is affected by the smoking status of those in his surroundings, such as family members, co-workers and others12). Many owner-practitioners in Japan are less affected in this way because there are, in general, few co-workers in their clinics with such close contact, and such a work environment may be of assistance in the process of smoking cessation19).

In the present study, a statistically significant relationship was found between a change in smoking behavior and the practice of internal medicine. This suggests that the working conditions in internal medicine are a factor in the discontinuation of smoking among physicians. One of the reasons for the discontinuation of smoking by a physician which is suggested in the literature, although with not such high priority, is related to the sense of professional responsibility that he or she ought to set an example of a healthy lifestyle for patients7,10). Sixty-two percent of the smoking physicians in the present study were internists who had the opportunities to consider such aspects of smoking. Although this factor was not selected as a statistically significant variable by multiple regression analysis after sex and age were used as adjustment factors, it is thought to be important and deserving of consideration in relation to smoking by physicians.

The statistically significant relationships between changes of smoking habit and bedtime, awareness of mental stress, consumption of fresh vegetables, fruit and coffee were seen in both univariate regression analysis and multiple regression analysis after adjustment for sex and age. Since most clinics and hospitals in Japan commence consultations about 9 a.m., the physician’s bedtime needs to be before midnight in order to ensure the 7-8 hours of daily sleep that was proposed by Breslow20). However, although duration of sleep showed no statistically significant relationship, a higher proportion of those who gave up smoking (OR=0.82, 95%CI: 0.60-1.13) were seen in the physicians who slept for 6-8 hours per day. Maintenance of regular sleep of suitable duration (one aspect of a healthy lifestyle) is thought to have an effect on quitting smoking.

In relation to mental stress, a significantly higher proportion of those who quit smoking was observed among physicians with unaware of mental stress than among those who were aware of stress. It has been demonstrated that continuing smoking or relapsing after discontinuing is affected by stress21,22). Also, in a study on smoking among nurses, it was reported that the more nurses smoke, the more they are stressed23). Since physicians tend to experience stress as long as they continue to practice24), it might prevent them from quitting smoking. However, most of the physicians surveyed (1,073 subjects, 97%) continue practicing, and their reasons for quitting smoking appeared to be that they were suffering neither from a disease nor from a declining physical condition, unlike the case of elderly people in the general population18). Regarding the change of drinking habits, 113 of the 610 smoking physicians who drank alcohol every day gave up daily drinking, but the proportion who quit drinking was less than 20%. This may suggest that smoking, which is more deleterious to the health than drinking, was abandoned purposefully and positively among physicians.

In the behavioral sciences, it is recommended to develop a habit of physical exercise as one method of overcoming the habit of smoking25). The results of univariate regression analysis suggested that this was an effective approach because smoking physicians who have the habit of taking regular exercise tended to quit smoking. However, physical exercise was not selected by multiple regression analysis after adjustments for sex and age as a statistically significant variable. If physical activity is considered as a method of coping with stress, a correlation between awareness of mental stress and exercise habits could be expected. In the present study, out of 807 physicians who are aware of being under stress, 392 physicians take regular exercise. On the other hand, 160 of 299 physicians who were not aware of having such stress also have the habit of exercising. In the chi square test, the relationship between mental stress and exercise as a habit was not significant (p=0.145). Considering the effects of physical activity together with the results of our cross-sectional study, exercise did not appear to act as an effective method of stress coping, since there were few physicians who both smoked and took regular exercise.

As for the changes in lifestyle variables, among those who quit smoking, there was a significant decrease in the proportion of physicians who unaware of mental stress, while among persistent smokers, this proportion showed no notable change, but just a slight increase. These findings suggested that discontinuance of smoking might bring an awareness of stress to the surface if smoking plays any role, consciously or not, as a means of coping with stress for smoking physicians.

The results suggest that relieving mental stress is effective in reducing the prevalence of smoking among physicians. It is hoped that any measure effective for stress coping for the benefit of the mental health of physicians will be developed so that the prevalence of smoking among physicians would decrease and result in a reduction in the prevalence of smoking among the local population as well as in the mortality due to smoking-related diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study led to the following conclusions:

1. Physicians who consume more fresh vegetables and fruits, limit their coffee drinking, and maintain a proper sleeping schedule-that is, more health-conscious in their own daily lives, smoke less or find it easier to stop smoking.

2. Mental stress was thought to be one of the causes of persistent smoking, and it is important from the standpoint of occupational health that methods be devised for terminating the habit.

3. It was realized that owner-practitioners showed lower prevalence of smoking and higher rate of smoking cessation. Physicians, as health professionals, are relatively health conscious and have a full recognition of the hazards of smoking. Owner-practitioners, especially, ought to be models of healthy lifestyle, both individually and as a group, for the local population, and so their smoking habits may have a major influence on the smoking of those around them.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to express our gratitude for kind cooperation of the Fukuoka Prefecture Medical Association in this study.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hara N, Nakanishi Y, Izumi M. Epidemiology of lung cancer in Japan. Nippon Rinsho, 2000; 58: 1005-1011. (in Japanese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ministry of Health and Welfare. Smoking and health, 2nd ed. Hokendojin-sha, 1993. (in Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Japan Tobacco Industry Incorporated. Nationwide tobacco smoking survey in 1999. Japan Tobacco Industry Incorporated, 1999. (in Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ministry of Health and Welfare. Promoting lifelong health and regional health. Annual report on health and welfare 1998-1999. Japan International Corporation of Welfare Services, Tokyo, 2000: 254-257.
  • 5.Sachs DP. Smoking habits of pulmonary physicians. N Engl J Med, 1983; 309: 799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nishizumi M. The change of smoking, drinking habits among physicians. J Health Welfare Stat, 1986; 33: 33-39. (in Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  • 7.The Medical Association of Chiba Prefecture. Summary report of survey on smoking. The Medical Association of Chiba Prefecture, 1989. (in Japanese)
  • 8.Nutbeam D, Catford J. Modifiable risks for cardiovascular disease among general practitioners in Wales. Public Health, 1990; 104: 353-361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nelson DE, Giovino GA, Emont SL, Brackbill R, Cameron LL, Peddicord J, Mowery PD. Trends in cigarette smoking among US physicians and nurses. JAMA, 1994; 271: 1273-1275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kawakami M, Nakamura S, Fumimoto H, Takizawa J, Baba M. Relation between smoking status of physicians and their enthusiasm to offer smoking cessation advice. Intern Med, 1997; 36: 162-165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Doll R, Peto R, Wheatley K, Gray R, Sutherland I. Mortality in relation to smoking: 40 years’ observations on male British doctors. BMJ, 1994; 309: 901-911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hymowitz N, Cummings KM, Hyland A, Lynn WR, Pechacek TF, Hartwell TD. Predictors of smoking cessation in a cohort of adult smokers followed for five years. Tob Control, 1997; 6(Suppl 2): S57-S62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Izuno T, Yoshida K, Shimada N, Muto T. An epidemiological study of health behavior and health consciousness in smoking behavior modification. Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi 1990; 37:308-314. (in Japanese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Prochaska JO, Goldstein MG. Process of smoking cessation. Implications for clinicians. Clin Chest Med, 1991; 12: 727-735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mulder M, Ranchor AV, Sanderman R, Bouma J, van den Heuvel WJ. The stability of lifestyle behaviour. Int J Epidemiol, 1998; 27: 199-207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abildsens AK, Sogaard AJ, Hafstad A. Who gives up smoking? Results from the health survey in Finnmark in 1977/78 and 1987/88. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 1998; 118: 2170-2175. (in Norwegian) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kato I, Tominaga S, Matsuoka I. Characteristics of life style of smokers and drinkers. Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi 1987; 34: 692-701. (in Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shichida K, Haga H, Nagai H, Suyama Y, Matsuzaki T, Hatano S, Shibata H, Koyano W. Reason of smoking cessation and health status in elderly people. Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi 1982; 29: 258. (in Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Abe MA. Japan’s clinc physicians and their behavior. Soc Sci Med, 1985; 20: 335-340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Breslow L, Enstrom JE. Persistence of health habits and their relationship to mortality. Prev Med, 1980; 9: 469-483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tunstall CD, Ginsberg D, Hall SM. Quitting smoking. Int J Addict, 1985; 20: 1089-1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Naquin MR, Gilbert GG. College students’ smoking behavior, perceived stress, and coping styles. J Drug Educ, 1996; 26: 367-376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Elkind AK. Do nurses smoke because of stress? J Adv Nurs, 1988; 13: 733-745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chambers R, Belcher J. Predicting mental health problems in general practitoners. Occup Med (Lond), 1994; 44: 212-216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sallis JF, Hill RD, Killen JD, Telch MJ, Flora JA, Girard J, Taylor CB, Fortmann SP. Efficacy of self-help behavior modification materials in smoking cessation. Am J Prev Med, 1986; 2: 342-344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Japan Epidemiological Association

RESOURCES