Abstract
In this work, density functional theory (DFT)-based calculations were performed to compute the physical properties (structural stability, mechanical behavior, and electronic, thermodynamic, and optical properties) of synthesized MAX phases Hf2SB, Hf2SC, Hf2SeB, Hf2SeC, and Hf2TeB and the as-yet-undiscovered MAX carbide phase Hf2TeC. Calculations of formation energy, phonon dispersion curves, and elastic constants confirmed the stability of the aforementioned compounds, including the predicted Hf2TeC. The obtained values of lattice parameters, elastic constants, and elastic moduli of Hf2SB, Hf2SC, Hf2SeB, Hf2SeC, and Hf2TeB showed fair agreement with earlier studies, whereas the values of the aforementioned parameters for the predicted Hf2TeC exhibit a good consequence of B replacement by C. The anisotropic mechanical properties are exhibited by the considered MAX phases. The metallic nature and its anisotropic behavior were revealed by the electronic band structure and density of states. The analysis of the thermal properties—Debye temperature, melting temperature, minimum thermal conductivity, and Grüneisen parameter—confirmed that the carbide phases were more suited than the boride phases considered herein. The MAX phase’s response to incoming photons further demonstrated that they were metallic. Their suitability for use as coating materials to prevent solar heating was demonstrated by the reflectivity spectra. Additionally, this study demonstrated the impact of B replacing C in the MAX phases.
1. Introduction
One of the most thoroughly investigated groups of transition-metal borides, carbides, or nitrides is denoted by the notation Mn+1AXn, where M is any of the transition-metal elements, A is an A-group element selected from columns 13–16 of the periodic table, and X denotes boron, carbon, or nitrogen.1,2 The properties of metals and ceramics are combined in MAX phase materials, which are exceptionally resistant to oxidation and corrosion, elastically rigid, have higher melting temperature, and are lightweight and machinable. They also have excellent electrical and thermal conductivity, are resistant to thermal shock, and have plasticity at high temperatures. They can therefore be utilized as a substitute for both ceramic and metal depending on the application. MAX phase materials have recently been used for various technological and industrial purposes, including in the nuclear industry and high-temperature applications, electric circuits, sensors, heat exchangers, metal-refining electrodes, and aerospace.3−7 Researchers and engineers are encouraged to theoretically or experimentally explore the MAX phase compounds because of their appealing features. Till now, more than 150 MAX phases made up of 32 elements have been identified.1,8
The combination of the strong covalent M–X bond and the weak metallic M–A bond is responsible for the combined characteristics (metal and ceramic) of MAX phases. The element and composition of M, A, and X (M = Ti, V, Cr, Ta, Zr, Hf, Nb, and so on; A = Al, S, Se, Sn, As, In, Ga; and X = N, C) can readily be changed, which allows for easy modification of the MAX phase’s physical and chemical characteristics. Especially, the substitution of the M and A sites is the best choice for the prediction of new MAX phases, such as (Sc, Ti, Cr, Zr, Nb, Mo, Hf, Ta)2AlC,9 (Ti, V, Nb, Zr, Hf)2SnC,10,11 (Ti, Zr, Hf)2SC,12,13 (Zr, Hf, Nb)2SC,14 V2(Al, Ga)C,2,15,16 Ti2(Zn, Al, In, Ga)C,17 and Cr2(Al, Ge)C.18 A mixture of A-site elements also demonstrated a synergistic impact of both atoms (increased physicochemical properties) were also shown in a number of investigations. For instance, Li et al. synthesized a series of V2(AxSn1–x)C phases (A = Fe, Co, Ni, Mn, or their mixture).19 They investigated the impact of alloying A-site elements on the magnetic properties.19 However, the majority of the variation in the X site was restricted to either carbon or nitrogen or a combination of the two.14 Boron has recently been added to this list.20 Rackl et al. have recently synthesized and studied the crystal structure, stability, chemical bonds, and elastic and electronic properties of prepared Zr2SB and Hf2SB MAX phase borides for the first time.20 The prepared Hf2SB MAX phase exhibits metallic character and Pauli paramagnetism. Additionally, density functional theory (DFT) calculations show that the ionic bonds are somewhat weaker than those of carbides, resulting in lower bulk moduli of this boride than for the comparable carbide.21 In another literature, the mechanical properties, elastic anisotropy, optical properties, dynamic stability, and thermal properties of Hf2SB and Hf2SC were investigated.14 Wang et al.22 synthesized Hf2SeC and compared it with Hf2SC; due to a longer bonding length of Hf–Se than Hf–S, a lower bonding energy and a softer structure of Hf2SeC are expected, which results in a larger thermal expansion coefficient (TEC) of Hf2SeC than that of Hf2SC. Similar results were also observed for Zr2SeC and Zr2SC.22 Zhang et al. theorized the stability and lattice characteristics of the Hf2SeB MAX phase in a different work, in which successful synthesis of this compound using the thermal explosion method in a spark plasma sintering furnace was reported.23 Recently, Zr2SeB and Hf2SeB, two MAX phases that were both thermodynamically and mechanically stable, were predicted by Zhang et al.24 They also synthesized these phases by thermal explosion technique in a spark plasma sintering furnace.
Since sulfur, selenium, and tellurium are in the same periodic table group with similar electronic structures, tellurium is also expected to be a potential A-site element of the ternary carbides and/or borides belonging to the MAX phase family. Zhang et al. brought the B-Te chemistry to light by synthesizing the first tellurium (Te)-containing layered ternary compound Hf2TeB using the thermal explosion method.25 The dynamical stability and mechanical properties of Hf2TeB have also been investigated by Zhou et al.26 Since the Hf2TeB MAX phase has yet to be completely investigated, more theoretical data, such as elastic anisotropy indices, thermodynamical properties, and optical properties, should be scrutinized. Knowledge of mechanical properties is important for structural materials, but the lack of information regarding mechanical anisotropy may restrict their use, as it (anisotropy) is related to direction-dependent plastic deformation, fracture propagation, and elastic instability. On the other hand, the Vickers hardness measures the ultimate mechanical strength of solids, which is a pre-requisite for application in any structural component. The ultimate use of MAX phase materials in high-temperature environments (such as thermal barrier coating materials) depends on the values of thermophysical parameters (Debye temperature, minimum thermal conductivity, melting temperature, Grüneisen parameter, etc.) that characterize the thermal properties of solids. The use of MAX phase materials in spaceships as coating materials to reduce solar heating depends on the value of the optical reflectivity. Thus, the study of thermal and optical properties is scientifically important to broaden the scope of Hf2TeB for potential uses. Motivated by the synthesis of Hf2TeB and based on our accumulated knowledge about the MAX phase chemistry, we assumed that Hf2TeC might be a potential member of the MAX phase family. Consequently, we investigated the stability of Hf2TeC for the first time by calculating the formation energy, phonon dispersion curve (dynamical stability), and elastic constants (mechanical stability). The aforementioned physical properties of Hf2TeC, as a new member of MAX phase materials, should also be explored to disclose its potential in various sectors of application. In addition, the effect of A-element replacing on the physical properties might be an interesting topic of MAX phases; consequently, the inclusion of the properties of previously studied MAX phases, Hf2SB,20 Hf2SC,27 Hf2SeB,23 and Hf2SeC,22,27 is also scientifically important.
Therefore, we aimed to perform a DFT-based study for the synthesized Hf2SC, Hf2SB, Hf2SeC, Hf2SeB, and Hf2TeB and newly predicted Hf2TeC. Hence, the structural, mechanical (including Vickers hardness and elastic anisotropy), electronic, thermal, and optical properties of Hf2AX [A = S, Se, Te; X = C, B] MAX phase compounds have been presented in this article.
2. Computational Methods
The scientific community in the areas of physics and materials engineering has shown a significant deal of interest in computer-based ab initio calculations utilizing the DFT.28,29 The Cambridge Serial Total Energy Package (CASTEP)30 code, which is based on the DFT, was used for the crystal geometry computations and characteristics analysis in the current study of MAX phases. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA), along with Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE),31 was used to describe the exchange–correlation energy. The ultrasoft pseudopotential suggested by Vanderbilt32 was chosen for calculating the electron–ion interaction. Ultrasoft pseudopotentials (USP) were introduced by Vanderbilt in 1990. The USP offers a possibility to resolve the problem of plane-wave convergence for transition metals with good accuracy. In USP, the norm-conservation constraint is relaxed and the difference in the charge densities calculated from the all-electron and pseudo-orbitals is described in terms of a small number of localized augmentation functions. This allows calculations to be performed with the lowest possible cutoff energy for the plane-wave basis set. The Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (BFGS) scheme33 was used to ensure geometry optimization. The pseudo-atomic calculations were performed, taking only valence electrons to reduce the core-electron effects. The crystal geometry was optimized and the physical properties were calculated using a k-point mesh of size 10 × 10 × 3 (Monkhorst–Pack schemes)34 and a cutoff energy of 500 eV. The convergence criteria were selected as follows: total energy: 5 × 10–6 eV/atom; maximum force: 0.01 eV/Å; maximum ionic displacement: 5 × 10–4 Å; and maximum stress: 0.02 GPa.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Structural Properties and Stability
Figure 1 depicts the crystal structure of ternary Hf2SB MAX phases that crystallize to a hexagonal structure [space group P63̅mmc] just like the other C- or N-containing MAX compounds.14,20−22,24,26,27,35 The investigated MAX phase compounds have two formula units, each of which has four atoms. The atomic positions of these MAX phase compounds are as follows: Hf atoms at 4f (0.3333, 0.6667, ZM), A atoms at 2d (0.3333, 0.6667, 0.75), and X atoms at 2a (0, 0, 0) sites. The other crystallographic data of Hf2SB (as a representative) are presented in the Supporting document.
Figure 1.
Crystal structure of the Hf2TeC compound.
The DFT-optimized lattice constants (a, c), c/a ratios, and internal parameters (zM) of the studied MAX boride and carbide phases are listed in Table 1, together with other available theoretical and experimental results. These DFT-optimized lattice constants (a and c) show good consistency with earlier experimental as well as theoretical studies, as can be shown in Table 1. Lattice constant c of the Hf2TeB phase is determined to have a maximum divergence from the experimental value of 1.74%. These agreements suggest that the current investigation is highly reliable. The Hf2TeC MAX phase is predicted for the first time; as a result, it was not possible to make a comparison with other previous reports for this particular carbide. This DFT-predicted result for Hf2TeC can be a useful reference work for designing future experimental as well as theoretical research works.
Table 1. Calculated Lattice Parameters (a and c), Internal Parameter (zM), c/a Ratio, and Formation Energy of Hf2AX [A = S, Se, Te; X = B, C] MAX Phase Compounds.
phase | a (Å) | % of deviation | c (Å) | % of deviation | zM | c/a | EF (eV/atom) | references |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hf2SB | 3.506 | 1.13 | 12.229 | 1.03 | 0.603 | 3.487 | –1.26 | this study |
3.467 | 12.104 | 0.604 | 3.491 | expt.20 | ||||
3.482 | 0.43 | 12.137 | 0.27 | 0.603 | 3.485 | theo.20 | ||
3.506 | 1.13 | 12.159 | 0.45 | 0.603 | 3.468 | theo.14 | ||
3.508 | 1.20 | 12.222 | 0.97 | 0.603 | 3.483 | theo.26 | ||
Hf2SC | 3.300 | 2.0 | 11.757 | 2.1 | 0.099 | 3.562 | –1.13 | this study |
3.369 | 12.017 | 0.600 | 3.566 | expt.20 | ||||
3.360 | 11.997 | 3.570 | expt.21 | |||||
3.424 | 1.63 | 12.184 | 1.39 | 0.600 | 3.558 | theo.14 | ||
3.369 | 0.01 | 11.993 | 0.19 | 0.101 | 3.560 | theo.22 | ||
Hf2SeB | 3.552 | 0.85 | 12.559 | 0.099 | 3.535 | –1.16 | this study | |
3.522 | 12.478 | 0.598 | 3.542 | expt.26 | ||||
3.550 | 0.79 | 12.573 | 0.599 | 3.541 | theo.26 | |||
Hf2SeC | 3.470 | 1.42 | 12.514 | 0.99 | 0.095 | 3.605 | –1.03 | this study |
3.422 | 12.391 | 3.621 | expt.24 | |||||
3.436 | 0.41 | 12.452 | 0.49 | 3.624 | theo.24 | |||
3.438 | 0.47 | 12.501 | 0.89 | 3.636 | theo.27 | |||
Hf2TeB | 3.629 | 0.68 | 13.355 | 1.74 | 0.591 | 3.679 | –0.86 | this study |
3.604 | 13.126 | 3.641 | expt.35 | |||||
Hf2TeC | 3.559 | 13.236 | 0.088 | 3.718 | –0.69 | this study |
The phonon dispersion curve (PDC) can be used to analyze a compound’s dynamic stability, vibrational contribution to the energy, and various phonon modes.36−39 As most of the MAX phases are synthesized at a higher thermal treatment (at a higher temperature), those materials may not be stable under all conditions. In order to check the dynamic stability of Hf2TeX (X = B,C), phonon dispersion curves (PDCs) have been calculated using the density functional perturbation theory (DFPT) within the linear-response method.14,40 The calculated phonon dispersion curves (PDCs) and total phonon density of states (PHDOS) of individual MAX phase compounds along the high-symmetry paths of the Brillouin zone (BZ) are displayed in Figure 2. The presence of only positive frequencies indicates the dynamical stability of the compound. As there are no negative frequencies detected in the PDCs of Hf2TeC, as displayed in Figure 2e, this MAX phase compound is predicted to be dynamically stable like its boride counterpart Hf2TeB (PDCs presented in Figure 2f). Dynamical stability is also observed for the other MAX phases and are presented in Figure 2a–d.
Figure 2.
PDCs and PHDOS of (a) Hf2SB, (b) Hf2SC, (c) Hf2SeB, (d) Hf2SeC, (e) Hf2TeB, and (f) Hf2TeC compounds. The dashed line (red) is at zero phonon frequency.
To further aid in comprehending the bands, the PHDOS of Hf2TeB and Hf2TeC are shown beside the PDCs. Figure 2 shows that all of the MAX phase carbides have a distinct gap between their transverse optical (TO) and longitudinal optical (LO) frequencies, but no gaps are evident for the MAX phase borides. The separation between LO (top) and TO (bottom) modes at the central G point is 2.2, 1.6, and 1.6 THz for Hf2SC, Hf2SeC, and Hf2TeC, respectively. Furthermore, for all of the MAX phases including carbides and borides, there is no phononic bandgap between the acoustic and low-energy optical phonon modes, but there is a pronounced phononic bandgap between high-energy and low-energy optical modes. Most importantly, at the Brillouin zone-center point (G) of the PDCs, the frequency of acoustic modes is zero in all of the MAX phases under study, which is another indication of the structural stability of the MAX phases under consideration.
The lattice dynamics of crystal is especially fascinating in terms of zone-center phonon modes. The 8 atoms that make up the 211 MAX phases give them a total of 24 phonon branches or vibration modes. There are 21 optical modes, and the remaining three are zero-frequency acoustic modes at the Γ-point. Six of these 21 optical modes are IR-active, seven are Raman-active, and the other eight are silent modes. The optical phonon modes with a Brillouin zone center can be expressed by the following groups:
![]() |
where IR-active modes are A2u and E1u, Raman-active modes are A1g, E1g, and E2g, and silent modes are B1u, B2g, and E2u.41,42
The obtained modes for the Hf2AX [A = S, Se, Te; X = C, B] phases in this study are in agreement with earlier theoretical investigations of the different 211 MAX phases. A specific vibrational frequency corresponds to each mode. Degenerate modes are those that occasionally have two or more modes with the same frequency but cannot be distinguished from one another. For this reason, Table S4 contains six IR-active modes and seven Raman-active modes for each phase.
3.1.1. Mechanical Properties
It is essential to study the elastic properties of a material to understand its mechanical behaviors, such as mechanical stability, ductility/brittleness, hardness, and machinability. The elastic constants (Cij) are key parameters in figuring out the mechanical properties of solids. Because they are connected to various solid-state phenomena, including inter-atomic bonding and phonon spectra, elastic constants of solids are very important. Elastic constants are also related to the Debye temperature, thermal expansion, and specific heat from a thermodynamic perspective. Therefore, before moving on to a material’s applications, it is highly enlightening to look into its elastic properties. In this study, we have explored the detailed elastic properties of Hf2TeB and Hf2TeC. The elastic properties of Hf2SB, Hf2SC, Hf2SeB, and Hf2SeC have already been investigated earlier14,20−22,24,26,27 and we have rechecked them also for further validation of our calculations. To the best of our knowledge, the elastic properties of Hf2TeC have not yet been documented in any literature. Moreover, the layered ternary carbide phase Hf2TeC is not yet synthesized. This study might be useful for designing and carrying out experimental and theoretical research on Hf2TeC as well as other unexplored MAX phase compounds. The calculated elastic properties with previous reports are listed in Table 2. The hexagonal system possesses five independent elastic constants; C11, C33, C44, C12, and C13. For a hexagonal system, the compound is said to be mechanically stable if it satisfies the stability conditions as presented by eq S2.
Table 2. Calculated Stiffness Constants (Cij), Bulk Modulus (B), Machinability Index (B/C44), Cauchy Pressure (CP), Shear Modulus (G), Young’s Modulus (Y), Poisson’s Ratio (ν), and Pugh Ratio (G/B) of Hf2AX [A = S, Se, Te; X = B, C] MAX Phase Compounds.
parameters | Hf2SB | Hf2SC | Hf2SeB | Hf2SeC | Hf2TeB | Hf2TeC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C11(GPa) | 285 | 350 | 232 | 287 | 182 | 257 |
286a | 344d | 243f | 308e | 206c | ||
285b | 311b | 244c | 287g | |||
265c | 330e | |||||
C33(GPa) | 298 | 371 | 274 | 305 | 243 | 277 |
296a | 369d | 281f | 314e | 232c | ||
298b | 327b | 281c | 306g | |||
305c | 345e | |||||
C44(GPa) | 130 | 176 | 120 | 130 | 107 | 112 |
122a | 175d | 119f | 135e | 107c | ||
130b | 149b | 119c | 130g | |||
125c | 150e | |||||
C12(GPa) | 81 | 98 | 98 | 77 | 77 | 81 |
79a | 116d | 90f | 93e | 71c | ||
81b | 97b | 90c | 77g | |||
100c | 100e | |||||
C13(GPa) | 92 | 118 | 88 | 97 | 83 | 92 |
84a | 138d | 97f | 105e | 85c | ||
92b | 121b | 87c | 98g | |||
90c | 118e | |||||
C55(GPa) | 130 | 176 | 120 | 130 | 107 | 112 |
C66(GPa) | 101 | 126 | 67c | 104 | 52c | 87 |
79f | ||||||
B(GPa) | 155 | 193 | 143 | 157 | 120 | 146 |
151a | 204d | 144f | 158g | 125c | ||
156b | 181b | 144c | ||||
B/C44 | 1.19 | 1.09 | 1.19 | 1.21 | 1.12 | 1.30 |
1.23a | 1.16d | 1.21f | 1.22g | 1.17c | ||
1.20b | 1.21b | 1.21c | ||||
CP(GPa) | –49 | –78 | –22 | –53 | –30 | –31 |
–49b | –52b | –29 | –53g | –36 | ||
G(GPa) | 111 | 142 | 89 | 112 | 73 | 97 |
111a | 134d | 95f | 113g | 81c | ||
112b | 120b | 95c | ||||
Y(GPa) | 268 | 344 | 222 | 273 | 183 | 238 |
267a | 330d | 233f | 273g | 199c | ||
270b | 295b | 233c | ||||
ν | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.22 |
0.20a | 0.23d | 0.23f | 0.21g | |||
0.21b | 0.23b | |||||
G/B | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.66 |
0.73a | 0.65d | 0.66f | 0.72g | 0.65c | ||
0.71b | 0.66b | 0.66c |
From Table 2, it can be observed that the studied MAX phase compounds are mechanically stable. This study provides the first demonstration of the mechanical stability of the Hf2TeB and Hf2TeC MAX phases using elastic constants. This prediction can be helpful for the experimental synthesis of unexplored ternary carbide MAX phase Hf2TeC. Moreover, these elastic constants offer important details regarding stiffness in different directions. The elastic constants C11 and C33 depict the stiffness against applied stress along [100] and [001] directions, respectively. From Table 2, it is revealed that the value of C33 > C11 for all of the studied MAX phases indicates that the c-axis has stronger deformation resistance than the a-axis. The fact that the value of C44 is less than C33 and C11 suggests that shear deformation is less difficult compared with that of axial deformation. The unequal values of C11, C33, and C44 (C11 ≠ C33 ≠ C44) imply different atomic arrangements and hence different bonding strengths along the a-axis, c-axis, and shear planes. The elastic constants C12 and C13 have lesser values compared with the other three elastic constants. Additionally, C12 and C13 have smaller values compared with those of the other three elastic constants. The stiffness constants C12 and C13 indicate the applied stress toward the a-axis along with uniaxial strain along the b-, and c-axis, respectively. The Cijs of Hf2TeC are higher than those of Hf2TeB. In comparison with other MAX phases, the Cijs of Hf2TeC are smaller than those of Hf2SB, Hf2SC, and Hf2SeC, but higher than those of Hf2SeB. However, with the exception of the C12 value for Hf2SeB and Hf2SeC, it is interesting to notice that the stiffness constant values of the carbide MAX phases are bigger than the corresponding boride MAX phases, indicating that the carbide phase is stiffer than its boride phase. Table 2 further shows that the stiffness constants in Hf2SC are larger than those in other MAX phases, while those in Hf2TeB are lower. This result suggests that among the studied compounds, Hf2SC is the hardest MAX phase and Hf2TeB is the softest MAX phase. The Cij of the predicted phases, Hf2TeC, should be compared with those of other Hf-based 211 carbides/borides. The C11{C33[C44]} found for Hf2TeC is 257{277[112]} GPa, which is higher than those of Hf2SeB [Table 2], Hf2TeB [Table 2], Hf2AlB [199 GPa],9 Hf2SiB [223 GPa],43 and Hf2PB [254 GPa].43,44
It is required to study the brittleness/ductility of material for a particular device application. The Cij values help to predict the ductile/brittle behavior of a material. The Cauchy pressure (CP), which is defined as the difference between the elastic constant values C12 and C14, is positive or negative depending on whether it represents the nature of ductility or brittleness.14,45 The negative value of CP indicates the brittle behavior of the titled compounds. This result has been checked further by calculating the Pugh ratio and Poisson’s ratio values using the computed elastic moduli.
The Voigt–Reuss–Hill (VRH) approximation schemes46,47 are widely used to calculate the three different elastic moduli: bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), and Young’s modulus (Y). The equations needed to calculate these elastic moduli are given in the supplementary file (eq S3).1,48 The higher (lower) value of B and other elastic moduli implies the hard (soft) nature of a material.24,49 From the tabulated values of B, G, and Y, it can be noticed that Hf2TeC is harder than Hf2TeB; in fact, Hf2TeB is the softest one among tabulated compounds herein. Like stiffness constants, elastic moduli of Hf2SC are also the largest, and Hf2SC is harder compared with other MAX phase compounds. This result strongly supports the calculation of the stiffness constants.
The machinability index
(μM),50 is a useful parameter
to predict the mechanical engineering
performance of a material, which can be obtained by using the value
of B and C44 with the
formula, . The higher (lower) value of μM signifies greater ease (difficulty) in making a desired shape
of a solid. The μM of Hf2TeC (1.30) is
larger than that of Hf2TeB (1.12). The stiffness constant
and elastic moduli of Hf2TeC are also larger compared with
those of Hf2TeB, confirming better suitability of Hf2TeC than Hf2TeB for tools applications. Among the
considered phases, the highest value (1.30) of μM is observed for Hf2TeC and the lowest value for Hf2SC. The ductile/brittle behavior of the studied MAX phases
has been investigated further using the Pugh ratio (G/B) and Poisson’s ratio. The required equation
to calculate the Poisson’s ratio is expressed by eq S4. The critical value of the brittle/ductile
boundary for the Pugh ratio (G/B) is 0.571,51 and it is 0.2652 for the Poisson’s ratio (ν). The
compound shows ductile (brittle) behavior, which possesses Pugh and
Poisson’s ratio values above (below) these critical values.
The studied MAX phases are all brittle in nature, which has been also
revealed from the CP calculation.
3.1.2. Mulliken Population Study
The atomic population analysis can be used to determine the charge transfer mechanism in a compound. As seen in Table S1, the negative charge of the atom indicates the electron receiver and the atom’s positive charge indicates the electron donor during compound formation. In the case of Hf2TeC and Hf2TeB, Hf and Te atoms donate the charge to C and/or B atoms. Moreover, the charge is transferred from Hf to S and B/C for Hf2SB and Hf2SC MAX phases. Like Hf2TeC and Hf2TeB phases, both Hf and Se also exhibited positive charge indicating the electron donor nature of Hf and Se atoms for Hf2SeC and Hf2SeB phases. It can be confirmed from the periodic nature of the electronic configurations that the metallic nature is increased from top to bottom in the same series of periodic table atoms. The charge transfer mechanism also confirms the existence of ionic behavior of the MAX phases.
The Mulliken bond overlap population (BOP) indicates the bonding and antibonding nature of the individual bond in the compound by the positive and negative values, respectively. The BOP value of zero indicates no significant interaction between the atoms involved in the bonding, while the higher value of BOP represents a higher degree of covalency of the bond. Table S2 shows a strong covalent bond between Hf–X (B, C) for all of the MAX phase compounds. Herein, it should be noted that the degree of covalency of the Hf–B bond is higher than that of the Hf–C bond, resulting in the higher bonding strength of the Hf–B bond. In conclusion, it can be predicted from the Mulliken population analysis that all of the MAX phases exhibited both ionic and covalent bonding nature.
3.1.3. Vickers Hardness
In Section 3.1.1, we have discussed several mechanical parameters including stiffness constants (Cij), bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), and Young’s modulus (Y) of individual MAX phase compounds. However, the intrinsic hardness of a material is completely different from those selected mechanical parameters though there may be a correlation among them.53 For this reason, in this study, we calculate the hardness (Vickers hardness, Hv) of all Hf2AX [A = S, Se, Te; X = C, B] compounds using the formula given in eq S7. The obtained results from the calculations are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. Calculated Mulliken Bond Number nμ, Bond Length dμ, Bond Overlap Population Pμ, Metallic Population Pμ′, Bond Volume Vbμ, and Bond Hardness Hv of μ-type Bond and Vickers Hardness Hv of Hf2AX [A = S, Se, Te; X = B, C] MAX Phase Compounds.
compounds | bond | nμ | dμ (Å) | Pμ | Pμ′ | Vbμ (Å3) | Hvμ (Gpa) | Hv (Gpa) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hf2SB | B–Hf | 4 | 2.390 | 1.44 | 0.01497 | 13.331 | 14.07 | 7.746 |
S–Hf | 4 | 2.700 | 0.81 | 19.221 | 4.265 | |||
Hf2SC | C–Hf | 4 | 2.236 | 1.26 | 0.00929 | 10.781 | 17.59 | 10.295 |
S–Hf | 4 | 2.600 | 0.92 | 16.949 | 6.025 | |||
Hf2SeB | B–Hf | 4 | 2.403 | 1.76 | 0.014 | 34.323 | 3.563 | 3.563 |
Hf2SeC | C–Hf | 4 | 2.335 | 1.48 | 0.007 | 32.632 | 3.270 | 3.270 |
Hf2TeB | B–Hf | 4 | 2.4277 | 1.79 | 0.01502 | 38.0875 | 3.046 | 3.046 |
Hf2TeC | C–Hf | 4 | 2.363 | 1.51 | 0.00757 | 36.306 | 2.792 | 2.792 |
From Table S2, the Mulliken bond overlap population confirmed that the Hf–X (X = B/C) covalent bonds are stronger than Hf–A (A = S/Se) in MAX phase compounds.14 Moreover, it has been found from Table S2 that Hf–B bonds are stronger than Hf–C for all MAX phases, which is an indication of enhanced mechanical properties of MAX phase borides compared with the carbides.36,53 The higher Hv of Hf2TeB (3.05 GPa) compared with Hf2TeC (2.79 GPa) supports the previous statement. Similarly, the Vickers hardness (Table 3) of Hf2SeB is also higher compared with that of carbides, Hf2SeC phase. The Vickers hardness of Hf2SC, on the other hand, is higher than that of Hf2SB. In this study, the calculated Vickers hardness values can be ranked as follows: Hf2SC (10.30 GPa) ≥ Hf2SB (7.75 GPa) ≥ Hf2SeB (3.56 GPa) ≥ Hf2SeC (3.27 GPa) ≥ Hf2TeB (3.05 GPa) ≥ Hf2TeC (2.79 GPa).
3.1.4. Elastic Anisotropy
Elastic anisotropy of a solid is important to study the direction-dependent bonding natures along different crystallographic directions. The knowledge of anisotropy indices provides significant information regarding possible microcracks under stress and unusual phonon modes. Therefore, a detailed exploration of anisotropy indices is required for practical applications of a material. The anisotropy factors of Hf2SB and Hf2SC have been investigated earlier.14 The detailed anisotropy indices of Hf2SeB, Hf2SeC, Hf2TeB, and Hf2TeC are yet to be investigated. Considering this, we have calculated the various anisotropy factors of these MAX phases along different crystallographic directions and tabulated those in Table S3.
The three different shear anisotropy indices (A1, A2, and A3) have been obtained using the well-known relations as presented in the supplementary file (eq S11). A value of Ai (i = 1, 2, 3) equal to 1 indicates an isotropic nature, otherwise anisotropic. The non-unit (1) values of Ai indicate the anisotropic behavior of the titled compounds. The bulk modulus anisotropy factors along the a- and c-axes, indicated as Ba and Bc, are found using the relations as presented in the supplementary file (eq S12).
The unequal values of Ba and Bc (Ba ≠ Bc) indicate an anisotropic nature. The observed values of Ba and Bc for Hf2SB and Hf2SC show notable deviation from the previous study, though other anisotropy factors show good agreement.14 The ratio of linear compressibility coefficients (kc/ka) is calculated using the relation given by eq S13.
The calculated values of kc/ka ratio listed in Table S3 deviate from unity, further ensuring the anisotropic nature of the studied MAX phases. The bulk modulus anisotropy factor (AB) and the shear modulus factor anisotropy (AG) are also estimated using eq S14. The universal anisotropic index (AU) is another indicator that is taken into account while analyzing anisotropy. Equation S15 is used to get the AU from the Voigt- and Reuss-approximated B and G.
The estimated values of AB, AG, and AU are listed in Table S3. The nonzero values of AB, AG, and AU notify the anisotropic nature of the studied MAX phases. From this study of different anisotropy factors, it can be concluded that all of the investigated MAX phase compounds are anisotropic in nature, and consequently their mechanical/elastic properties are also direction dependent.
3.2. Electronic Band Structure (EBS) and Density of States (DOS)
The knowledge of the electronic band structure (EBS) of a compound is required to understand its optical and electronic transport properties. The energy band structures of the MAX phases are calculated along the high-symmetry points in the k-space directions such as G–A–H–K–G–M–L–H within the BZ and are depicted in Figure S1. The horizontal red dashed line at zero of the energy scales indicates the Fermi level (EF). Figure S1 shows that the conduction and valance bands overlap at the EF for the studied phases, indicating their metallic nature. The electronic band structure reveals anisotropic conductivity since the dispersion curves in the basal plane and c-direction differ significantly from one another. Similar anisotropic conductivity for other MAX phases has been also reported in previous studies.21,27,54
The total and partial density of states (DOS) is investigated to get a clear perception of the electronic properties of the MAX phases under investigation. From Figure 3, it is obvious that the total DOS at the EF is finite, indicating the metallic feature of all of the MAX phases. Moreover, relative heights or the existence of a pseudo gap in the TDOS at EF indicate the presence of a stable covalent bond (stability of MAX phases) within the crystal structure.13 The obtained TDOS at the EF for Hf2SB, Hf2SC, Hf2SeB, Hf2SeC, Hf2TeB, and Hf2TeC are 3.5, 1.60, 3.5, 1.8, 3.7, and 1.7 states per eV, respectively. Thus, the change in the A (A = S, Se, or Te)-site element does not significantly affect the DOS value at the EF. However, the TDOS for the boride-based MAX phases is significantly higher compared with those of carbide-based MAX phases. Therefore, it is expected that the boride phase should exhibit higher electrical conductivity than the corresponding carbide counterpart.
Figure 3.
TDOS and partial density of states (PDOS) of (a) Hf2SB, (b) Hf2SC, (c) Hf2SeB, (d) Hf2SeC, (e) Hf2TeB, and (f) Hf2TeC compounds.
For more theoretical understanding, the DOS of individual atoms Hf, A (S, Se, Te), and X (B, C) in the MAX phase structures are calculated and presented in Figure 3. The DOS curves have been shown from −10 to 5 eV in order to better comprehend the electronic states of each atom at various energy levels. The TDOS peaks at lower energy range from −10 to −2 eV are mainly contributed by Hf-p, Hf-d, S-p, and C-p states. The Hf-p, Hf-d, and B-p states are largely responsible for the emergence of DOS in the valance band near EF (∼0 eV).
3.3. Thermal Properties
The MAX phase materials have the potential to be used in a variety of high-temperature technologies, including effective thermal barrier coatings, heating elements, and electrical connections.8 Therefore, in order to reveal their uses in various high-temperature technologies, a thorough investigation of the thermodynamic characteristics of MAX phase materials is required. Consequently, fundamental thermodynamic parameters such as Debye temperature (ΘD), minimum thermal conductivity (Kmin), melting temperature (Tm), and Grüneisen parameter (γ) have been explored in this study for the Hf2SB, Hf2SC, Hf2SeB, Hf2SeC, Hf2TeB, and Hf2TeC MAX phases. The required equations for calculating ΘD, Tm, Kmin, and γ are embedded in the supporting section (eqs S16–S19). Previously, the thermodynamic properties of Hf2SB,14,20 Hf2SC,14,21 and Hf2SeC27 have been reported. As far as we are aware, there is still no information available about the thermodynamic properties of the Hf2SeB, Hf2TeB, and Hf2TeC MAX phases.
The Debye temperature is connected to the lattice vibration, thermal expansion coefficient, specific heat, and melting point of the solid. It is termed as the maximum frequency mode of vibration in a solid. The calculation of ΘD using elastic moduli is specified as one of the standard approaches.55,56 The values of transverse sound velocity, vt, longitudinal sound velocity, vl, and averaged sound velocity, vm, are used to estimate ΘD using eq S16. The ΘD of Hf2TeC (366 K) is higher compared with that of Hf2TeB (321 K), which is in good agreement with the elastic properties results. However, the Debye temperature of Hf2TeC and Hf2TeB is much lower than that of other Hf-based chalcogenide MAX phases, among which Hf2SC exhibits the highest value of ΘD. In the case of Hf-based phases, the Debye temperature usually lowers in value in spite of their higher elastic moduli, which might be due to the higher molecular mass of Hf. For example, Bouhemadou et al.21 reported the ΘD values of Ti2SC, Zr2SC, and Hf2SC as 800, 603, and 463 K, respectively, whereas their elastic moduli are much closer in values.
The calculated values of ρ, vt, vl, vm, ΘD, Kmin, γ, and Tm are listed in Table 4. The carbide phases have higher values of ΘD compared with their boride counterparts as shown in Table 4.
Table 4. Calculated Crystal Density, Longitudinal, Transverse, and Average Sound Velocities (vl, vt, vm), Debye Temperature ΘD, Minimum Thermal Conductivity Kmin, Grüneisen Parameter γ, and Melting Temperature Tm of Hf2AX [A = S, Se, Te; X = B,C] MAX Phase Compounds.
phases | ρ (g/cm3) | νl (m/s) | νt (m/s) | νm (m/s) | ΘD (K) | Kmin (W/mK) | γ | Tm (K) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hf2SB | 10.196 | 5451 | 3299 | 3647 | 428 | 0.78 | 1.32 | 1656 |
ref (20) | 426 | |||||||
ref (14) | 10.198 | 5465 | 3309 | 3657 | 430 | 0.79 | 1.32 | 1656 |
Hf2SC | 12.005 | 5643 | 3439 | 3799 | 470 | 0.90 | 1.28 | 1960 |
ref (14) | 10.192 | 5784 | 3431 | 3800 | 454 | 0.85 | 1.60 | 1778 |
ref (21) | 11.290 | 5820 | 3442 | 3813 | 463 | |||
Hf2SeB | 10.805 | 4921 | 2870 | 3198 | 367 | 0.66 | 1.45 | 1461 |
Hf2SeC | 11.395 | 5185 | 3135 | 3465 | 406 | 0.74 | 1.32 | 1672 |
Hf2TeB | 10.797 | 4486 | 2600 | 2886 | 321 | 0.55 | 1.45 | 1264 |
Hf2TeC | 11.354 | 49 247 | 2923 | 3237 | 366 | 0.64 | 1.36 | 1540 |
The temperature at which a solid substance starts to melt is defined as melting temperature. Information on a material’s melting temperature is necessary for high-temperature applications. The melting temperature is estimated using elastic constants (elastic constants C11 and C33 are connected to uniaxial stress) with the help of a well-known expression as presented in the supporting file (eq S17). The calculated Tm of Hf2TeC is 3237 K, which is larger than Hf2TeB (2886 K), due to the higher Young’s modulus of Hf2TeC (238 GPa) compared with Hf2TeB (183 GPa). The knowledge of bonding strength can be known from the melting temperature because of its close relation with Young’s modulus. Thus, a higher Tm is expected for a solid with a higher Y and vice versa.57 A similar trend is also found for other chalcogenides presented here, in fact, it is also found in other systems, like Zr2AB2 (A = In, Tl).57 However, among the investigated MAX phases, Hf2SC has the highest melting temperature while Hf2TeB has the lowest.
It is essential to disclose the ability of a material to conduct heat energy for thermal device applications. The knowledge of minimum thermal conductivity, Kmin, is crucial for the high-temperature application of a material. Eq S18 was used to compute Kmin. As evident from Table 4, the Kmin of Hf2TeC (0.64 W/mK) is higher than that of Hf2TeB (0.55 W/mK). For application as a thermal barrier coating, a lower Kmin is expected and from this perspective, Hf2TeB might be more suitable than Hf2TeC. But, other parameters, such as elastic moduli (bonding strength), Debye temperature, melting temperature, etc., suggest that Hf2TeC should be more suitable for the high-temperature applications. A similar trend is also found for other boride and carbide phases considered here. The maximum value of Kmin is observed for Hf2SC and the minimum value for Hf2TeB.
The Grüneisen parameter (γ) is a significant indicator for analyzing anharmonic effects within the crystal. It was calculated using the Poisson’s ratio by using eq S19. According to Table 4, the estimated values of γ are seen to remain within the range of 0.85–3.53, as is typical for polycrystalline materials with the Poisson’s ratio in the range of 0.05–0.46.58 The present studied MAX phases exhibit low anharmonic effects as the values of γ close to the lower limit. It is also interesting to note that compared with their carbide counterparts, the boride phases exhibit a relatively higher anharmonic effect.
3.4. Optical Properties
The material response to incident photon energy and, consequently, electronic properties can be well understood by exploring the optical functions. The optical functions of Hf2SB and Hf2SC MAX phases have been studied earlier.14 To the best of our survey, the optical functions of Hf2SeB, Hf2SeC, Hf2TeB, and Hf2TeC MAX phases still need to be explored. To ascertain whether these various carbide and boride MAX phases are appropriate for particular optical applications, this study thoroughly explores those. The macroscopic electronic response of a material can fully be described by the complex dielectric function, ε(ω) = ε1(ω) + iε2(ω), where ε1(ω) is the real part and ε2(ω) is the imaginary part of the dielectric function. The imaginary part ε2(ω) of the dielectric function can be expressed as30,59
![]() |
where ω is the angular frequency of light, e is the electronic charge, û is the vector defining the polarization of the incident electric field, and ψKC and ψK are the conduction and valence band wave functions at K, respectively. By using the Kramers–Kronig relations, the imaginary portion ε2(ω) of the dielectric function can be used to deduce the real part ε1(ω) of eq S21. The refractive index, absorption coefficient, loss function, reflectivity, and photoconductivity can be determined from ε1(ω) and ε2(ω) using eqs S22–S27.
Figure 4a,b displays the real (ε1) and imaginary (ε2) parts of dielectric functions, respectively. A high negative value of the real part of the dielectric functions and a high imaginary part’s positive value of the dielectric function at zero energy are seen for all of the MAX phases, which is an expected behavior for a metallic system and consistent with the band structure results. The imaginary part of the dielectric function is directly associated with the optical absorption profile, and the imaginary part tends to have approximately zero value in the very high-energy region. The peaks in ε2(ω) are associated with electron transitions, which might be intra-band transitions (inside M-d states) and/or inter-band transitions owing to photon absorption. Reaching zero value from below [real part, ε1(ω)] and above [imaginary part, ε2(ω)] is also another indication of the system’s metallic nature. A similar pattern for the ε1(ω) and ε2(ω) of Ti3SiC2, the most widely studied MAX phase, is also reported.60 The dielectric function of Cr2GeC, Nb2AlC, Ti2AlC, Ti2AlN, Ti2SC, and Ti3GeC2 was also reported up to 5 eV, which also agrees well with the low-energy part of the present results.61 The Hf2SB shows the negligible value of the imaginary part above 12 eV, and all other MAX phases show above 20 eV, suggesting these MAX phases can be used as transparent materials in the high-energy region.
Figure 4.
Calculated (a) real part, ε1 of dielectric function, (b) imaginary part, ε2 of dielectric function, (c) refractive index, n, (d) extinction coefficient, k, (e) absorption coefficient, α, (f) optical conductivity, σ, (g) reflectivity, R, and (g) low-energy part of R of Hf2AX (A = S, Se, and Te; X = B, C) MAX phases as a function of photon energy.
The refractive index, n(ω), and extinction coefficients, k(ω), of the studied MAX phases have been displayed in Figure 4c,d, respectively. The n(ω) regulates the propagation velocity of electromagnetic radiation through a material, whereas k(ω) determines the amount of radiation attenuation while traversing the material. The static values of n(0) are 17.2, 11.7, 8.9, 8.4, 7.4, and 7.0 for Hf2SC, Hf2SB, Hf2TeB, Hf2SeB, Hf2SeC, and Hf2TeC. The static values of n(0) for the studied MAX phases follow the same order with the static value of reflectivity at zero photon energy, i.e., Hf2SC > Hf2SB > Hf2TeB > Hf2SeB > Hf2SeC > Hf2TeC. The k(ω) curves are observed to vary approximately similarly to the ε2(ω) as both of these parameters are related to the optical absorption.
Figure 4e shows the optical absorption profile of the studied MAX phases. The absorption coefficient (α) evaluates a material’s incident energy-absorbing ability. A higher value of the absorption coefficient indicates a higher absorbing capability of the material and vice versa. From Figure 4e, we can notice that the optical absorption initiates at zero photon energy for all of the MAX compounds, which increases with increasing photon energy. The maximum absorption peaks for these MAX phases are noticed within 7–15 eV of photon energies, which indicates that these compounds are good candidates for effective absorbing materials within this energy range (ultraviolent region). The Hf2TeC shows significantly higher optical absorption than its boride counterpart, Hf2TeB, which is also true for other systems, i.e., the carbides have a higher absorption coefficient compared with their counterpart boride phases. The absorption nature is approximately similar for all carbide and boride counterparts except for a little difference in the spectra positions and heights of the peaks.
The optical conductivity reflects the results of optical absorption analysis. Figure 4f illustrates the optical conductivity profile of the studied MAX phases. Additionally, for all MAX phases, optical conductivity begins at zero photon energy, supporting the metallic character of all MAX compounds. This result strongly supports the optical absorption and electronic band structure calculations of the studied MAX phases. A notable optical conductivity peak is noticed in these MAX compounds’ infrared to near-visible regions. Some other sharp conductivity peaks are also observed in the 5–10 eV of photon energies for all of the phases. All of the borides and carbides show approximately similar behavior with their corresponding counterpart, which also justifies the analysis of the optical absorption profile.
The reflectivity profile provides useful information about the suitability of a material as a reflector in a practical device. From Figure 4g, it can be observed that the reflectivity starts at zero photon energy with a value of 0.79, 0.71, 0.64, 0.62, 0.58, and 0.56 for Hf2SC, Hf2SB, Hf2TeB, Hf2SeB, Hf2SeC, and Hf2TeC MAX phases, respectively. According to Li et al.,60 MAX phase materials with reflectivity greater than 44% can be used as coating materials to protect spaceships from solar heating. It is noted that the reflectivity spectra of Hf2TeC exhibit a value higher than 44% up to 2.0 eV, while it is up to 1.85 eV for Hf2TeB (marked by red line in Figure 4h). Thus, Hf2TeC and Hf2TeB MAX phases are also expected to be used for the above-mentioned applications, in which the IR part and low-energy part of visible rays are expected to be reflected back from the surface where it is covered by Hf2TeC and Hf2TeB’s coating. As we know, the IR part of the solar radiation is mainly accountable for heat and heating surface. Like absorption coefficient and photoconductivity spectra, the carbide phases exhibit better reflectivity in the low-energy side compared with their counterpart’s boride phases. However, the maximum reflectivity peak is observed at about 12 eV of photon energy for Hf2SB as this boride phase shows lower absorption spectra near about this energy than other MAX phases. Very high reflectivity (above 90%) of Hf2SB in the energy range from 11 to 14 eV in the ultraviolet (UV) region suggests that this particular MAX phase boride can also be used selectively as an excellent reflector in this range.
4. Conclusions
Using the DFT-based CASTEP code, the physical characteristics of the MAX phases Hf2TeB and Hf2TeC have been calculated and compared with those of Hf2SB, Hf2SC, Hf2SeB, and Hf2SeC. The Te-containing carbide MAX phase Hf2TeC has been predicted for the first time in this study. The following concluding remarks can be made:
The predicted MAX carbide phase (Hf2TeC) is elastically and dynamically stable with negative formation energy.
The investigation of lattice parameters, elastic constants, and elastic moduli of Hf2SB, Hf2SC, Hf2SeB, Hf2SeC, and Hf2TeB reveals good consistency with previous reports.
The elastic constants and moduli of Hf2TeC are larger than those of Hf2TeB. Hf2SC is the stiffest, and the boride phase Hf2TeB is the softest MAX phase among the investigated materials. The predicted carbide phase Hf2TeC exhibits the highest value of machinability index (1.30) while the lowest value is found for Hf2SC (1.09). The various anisotropy factors and direction-dependent elastic moduli revealed the anisotropic nature of all of the studied phases.
The values of the melting temperature, minimum thermal conductivity, Grüneisen parameter, and Debye temperature suggest that Hf2TeC is more suitable than Hf2TeB for use in high-temperature technology; in fact, all carbide phases are more suitable than boride phases for the same. The larger value of the elastic constants in the carbide phases compared with their boride counterparts may be the cause of this trend. The maximum value of melting temperature is found for Hf2SC (1960 K) and the lowest value for Hf2TeB (1264 K) among the studied MAX phases. All of the MAX phases have low anharmonic characters. The borides exhibit a higher anharmonic effect compared with their carbide counterparts.
The study of optical functions, electronic band structure, and density of states ensures the metallic nature of all of the MAX phases under consideration. The reflectivity curve starts with 0.79, 0.71, 0.64, 0.62, 0.58, and 0.56 for Hf2SC, Hf2SB, Hf2TeB, Hf2SeB, Hf2SeC, and Hf2TeC MAX phases, respectively, at zero photon energy and remains high in the visible region. This reveals their appropriateness as coating materials to diminish solar heating. The carbide phases are expected to be more suitable than the borides.
The authors of this research article have high hopes that this work will aid in the designing of new MAX phase materials and exploring their intriguing features for applications in practical devices from different perspectives.
Acknowledgments
This work was carried out with the aid of a grant (grant number: 21–378 RG/PHYS/AS_G -FR3240319526) from UNESCO-TWAS and the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of UNESCO-TWAS, SIDA, or its Board of Governors.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c04283.
Equations used to investigate various properties of Hf2AX [A = S, Se, Te; X = B, C]; the crystallographic data of Hf2SB; Mulliken atomic and bond overlap populations (BOP); anisotropy indices; theoretical wave numbers ω and symmetry assignment of the IR-active and Raman-active modes; electronic band structures of Hf2AX [A = S, Se, Te; X = B, C] (PDF)
Author Contributions
J.I.: Writing—original draft. M.D.I.: Writing—original draft. M.A.A.: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, validation, project administration, writing—original draft, supervision. H.A.: Plotting figures, data calculations. A.H.: Plotting figures, data calculations. M.B.: Plotting figures, data calculations. M.M.H.: Writing—review and editing, validation. M.M.U.: Writing—review and editing, validation. S.H.N.: Formal analysis, writing—review and editing, validation.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Ali M. A.; Qureshi M. W. Newly Synthesized MAX Phase Zr2SeC: DFT Insights into Physical Properties towards Possible Applications. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 16892–16905. 10.1039/D1RA02345D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khatun M. R.; Ali M. A.; Parvin F.; Islam A. K. M. A. Elastic, Thermodynamic and Optical Behavior of V2AC (A = Al, Ga) MAX Phases. Results Phys. 2017, 7, 3634–3639. 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.09.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lei X.; Lin N. Structure and Synthesis of MAX Phase Materials: A Brief Review. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2022, 47, 736–771. 10.1080/10408436.2021.1966384. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Surucu G. Investigation of Structural, Electronic, Anisotropic Elastic, and Lattice Dynamical Properties of MAX Phases Borides: An Ab-Initio Study on Hypothetical M2AB (M = Ti, Zr, Hf; A = Al, Ga, In) Compounds. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 203, 106–117. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.09.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ali M. A.; Hossain M. M.; Hossain M. A.; Nasir M. T.; Uddin M. M.; Hasan M. Z.; Islam A.; Naqib S. H. Recently Synthesized (Zr1-XTix) 2AlC (0 ≤ X ≤ 1) Solid Solutions: Theoretical Study of the Effects of M Mixing on Physical Properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 743, 146–154. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.396. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ali M. A.; Hossain M. M.; Jahan N.; Islam A.; Naqib S. H. Newly Synthesized Zr2AlC, Zr2(Al0.58Bi0.42)C, Zr2(Al0.2Sn0.8)C, and Zr2(Al0.3Sb0.7)C MAX Phases: A DFT Based First-Principles Study. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2017, 131, 139–145. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.01.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rackl T.; Eisenburger L.; Niklaus R.; Johrendt D. Syntheses and Physical Properties of the MAX Phase Boride Nb2SB and the Solid Solutions Nb2SBxC1-x(X = 0–1). Phys. Rev. Mater. 2019, 3, 054001 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.054001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gonzalez-Julian J. Processing of MAX Phases: From Synthesis to Applications. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 104, 659–690. 10.1111/jace.17544. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Khazaei M.; Arai M.; Sasaki T.; Estili M.; Sakka Y. Trends in Electronic Structures and Structural Properties of MAX Phases: A First-Principles Study on M2AlC(M = Sc, Ti, Cr, Zr, Nb, Mo, Hf, or Ta), M2AlN, and Hypothetical M2AlB Phases. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2014, 26, 505503 10.1088/0953-8984/26/50/505503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao S.; Chen L.; Xiao H.; Huang J.; Li Y.; Qian Y.; Zheng T.; Li Y.; Cao L.; Zhang H.; Liu H.; Wang Y.; Huang Q.; Wang C. Phase Transformation and Amorphization Resistance in High-Entropy MAX Phase M2SnC (M = Ti, V, Nb, Zr, Hf) under in-Situ Ion Irradiation. Acta Mater. 2022, 238, 118222 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118222. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen L.; Li Y.; Chen K.; Bai X.; Li M.; Du S.; Chai Z.; Huang Q. Synthesis and Characterization of Medium-/High-Entropy M2SnC (M = Ti/V/Nb/Zr/Hf) MAX Phases. Small Struct. 2023, 4, 2200161 10.1002/sstr.202200161. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen K.; Chen Y.; Zhang J.; Song Y.; Zhou X.; Li M.; Fan X.; Zhou J.; Huang Q. Medium-Entropy (Ti, Zr, Hf)2SC MAX Phase. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 7582–7587. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.096. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xiong K.; Sun Z.; Zhang S.; Wang Y.; Li W.; You L.; Yang L.; Guo L.; Mao Y. A Comparative Study the Structural, Mechanical, and Electronic Properties of Medium-Entropy MAX Phase (TiZrHf)2SC with Ti2SC, Zr2SC, Hf2SC via First-Principles. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 19, 2717–2729. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.06.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ali M. A.; Hossain M. M.; Uddin M. M.; Hossain M. A.; Islam A. K. M. A.; Naqib S. H. Physical Properties of New MAX Phase Borides M2SB (M = Zr, Hf and Nb) in Comparison with Conventional MAX Phase Carbides M2SC (M = Zr, Hf and Nb): Comprehensive Insights. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 11, 1000–1018. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hossein-Zadeh M.; Ghasali E.; Mirzaee O.; Mohammadian-Semnani H.; Alizadeh M.; Orooji Y.; Ebadzadeh T. An Investigation into the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of V2AlC MAX Phase Prepared by Microwave Sintering. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 795, 291–303. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma P.; Singh K.; Pandey O. P. Investigation on Oxidation Stability of V2AlC MAX Phase. Thermochim. Acta 2021, 704, 179010 10.1016/j.tca.2021.179010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lu Y.; Khazaei M.; Hu X.; Khaledialidusti R.; Sasase M.; Wu J.; Hosono H. Facile Synthesis of Ti2AC (A = Zn, Al, In, and Ga) MAX Phases by Hydrogen Incorporation into Crystallographic Voids. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 11245–11251. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cabioch T.; Eklund P.; Mauchamp V.; Jaouen M.; Barsoum M. W. Tailoring of the Thermal Expansion of Cr2 (Alx, Ge1–x)C Phases. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2013, 33, 897–904. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.10.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y.; Lu J.; Li M.; Chang K.; Zha X.; Zhang Y.; Chen K.; Persson P. O.; et al. Multielemental single–atom-thick A layers in nanolaminated V2 (Sn, A) C (A= Fe, Co, Ni, Mn) for tailoring magnetic properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2020, 117, 820–825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rackl T.; Johrendt D. The MAX Phase Borides Zr2SB and Hf2SB. Solid State Sci. 2020, 106, 106316 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2020.106316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bouhemadou A.; Khenata R. Structural, Electronic and Elastic Properties of M2SC (M = Ti, Zr, Hf) Compounds. Phys. Lett. A 2008, 372, 6448–6452. 10.1016/j.physleta.2008.08.066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X.; Chen K.; Wu E.; Zhang Y.; Ding H.; Qiu N.; Song Y.; Du S.; Chai Z.; Huang Q. Synthesis and Thermal Expansion of Chalcogenide MAX Phase Hf2SeC. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 42, 2084–2088. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.12.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Q.; Zhou Y.; et al. Zr2SeB and Hf2SeB: Two New MAB Phase Compounds with the Cr2AlC-Type MAX Phase (211 Phase) Structure. J. Adv. Ceram. 2022, 11, 1764–1776. 10.1007/s40145-022-0646-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Q.; Zhou Y.; San X.; Li W.; Bao Y.; Feng Q.; Grasso S.; Hu C. Zr2SeB and Hf2SeB: Two New MAB Phase Compounds with the Cr2AlC-Type MAX Phase (211 Phase) Crystal Structures. J. Adv. Ceram. 2022, 11, 1764–1776. 10.1007/s40145-022-0646-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Q.; Zhou Y.; San X.; Wan D.; Bao Y.; Feng Q.; Grasso S.; Hu C. Thermal Explosion Synthesis of First Te-Containing Layered Ternary Hf2TeB MAX Phase. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 43, 173–176. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.09.051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou Y.; Xiang H.; Hu C. Extension of MAX Phases from Ternary Carbides and Nitrides (X = C and N) to Ternary Borides (X = B, C, and N): A General Guideline. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2023, 20, 803–822. 10.1111/ijac.14223. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ali M. A.; Waqas M. DFT Insights into the New Hf-Based Chalcogenide MAX Phase Hf2SeC. Vacuum 2022, 201, 111072 10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.111072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hohenberg P.; Kohn W. Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kohn W.; Sham L. J. Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Clark S. J.; Segall M. D.; Pickard C. J.; Hasnip P. J.; Probert M. I. J.; Refson K.; Payne M. C. First Principles Methods Using CASTEP. Z. Kristallogr. - Cryst. Mater. 2005, 220, 567–570. 10.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Perdew J. P.; Burke K.; Ernzerhof M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vanderbilt D. Soft Self-Consistent Pseudopotentials in a Generalized Eigenvalue Formalism. Phys. Rev. B 1990, 41, 7892. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer T. H.; Almlof J. General Methods for Geometry and Wave Function Optimization. J. Phys. Chem. A 1992, 96, 9768–9774. 10.1021/j100203a036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Monkhorst H. J.; Pack J. D. Special Points for Brillouin-Zone Integrations. Phys. Rev. B 1976, 13, 5188. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Born M.On the Stability of Crystal Lattices. I. In Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society; Cambridge University Press, 1940; Vol. 36, pp 160–172 10.1017/S0305004100017138. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chowdhury A.; Ali M. A.; Hossain M. M.; Uddin M. M.; Naqib S. H.; Islam A. K. Predicted MAX Phase Sc2InC: Dynamical Stability, Vibrational and Optical Properties. Phys. Status Solidi 2018, 255, 1700235 10.1002/pssb.201700235. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Y.; Wang J.; Liu Y.; Cui Y.; Ding G.; Wang X. Topological Phonons in Cs-Te Binary Systems. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 107, 24304. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.024304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Y.; Xie C.; Cui Y.; Wang X.; Wu W. Maximally Charged Single-Pair Multi-Weyl Point Phonons in P23-Type BeH2. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 107, 54310. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.054310. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ding G.; Wang J.; Yu Z.-M.; Zhang Z.; Wang W.; Wang X. Single Pair of Type-III Weyl Points Half-Metals: BaNiIO6 as an Example. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2023, 7, 14202. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.014202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ali M. A.; Nasir M. T.; et al. An Ab Initio Investigation of Vibrational, Thermodynamic, and Optical Properties of Sc2AlC MAX Compound. Chin. Phys. B 2016, 25, 103102 10.1088/1674-1056/25/10/103102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hadi M. A.; Christopoulos S. R.; Chroneos A.; Naqib S. H.; Islam A. K. DFT Insights into the Electronic Structure, Mechanical Behaviour, Lattice Dynamics and Defect Processes in the First Sc-Based MAX Phase Sc2SnC. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 14037 10.1038/s41598-022-18336-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Champagne A.; Bourdarot F.; Bourges P.; Piekarz P.; Pinek D.; Gélard I.; Charlier J.-C.; Ouisse T. Phonon Dispersion Curves in Cr2AlC Single-Crystals. Mater. Res. Lett. 2018, 6, 378–383. 10.1080/21663831.2018.1463298. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Aydin S.; Tatar A.; Ciftci Y. O. Some New Members of MAX Family Including Light-Elements: Nanolayered Hf2XY (X = Al, Si, P and YCombining Double Low LineB, C, N). Solid State Sci. 2016, 53, 44–55. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2015.10.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang H.; Tang Y.; Zhong X.; Zhang Y.; Song H.; Wang J.; Wang Q. The Electronic, Elastic and Thermodynamic Properties of Carbon- and Nitrogen-Doped Hf2PB: A Theoretical Approach. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 056507 10.1088/2053-1591/aadde5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pettifor D. G. Theoretical Predictions of Structure and Related Properties of Intermetallics. Mater. Sci. Technol. 1992, 8, 345–349. 10.1179/mst.1992.8.4.345. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Voigt W.Lehrbuch Der Kristallphysik: Teubner-Leipzig 1928.
- Hill R. The Elastic Behaviour of a Crystalline Aggregate. Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. A 1952, 65, 349. 10.1088/0370-1298/65/5/307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bouhemadou A. First-Principles Study of Structural, Electronic and Elastic Properties of Nb4AlC3. Braz. J. Phys. 2010, 40, 52–57. 10.1590/S0103-97332010000100009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Islam J.; Hossain A. A. Narrowing Band Gap and Enhanced Visible-Light Absorption of Metal-Doped Non-Toxic CsSnCl3 Metal Halides for Potential Optoelectronic Applications. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 7817–7827. 10.1039/C9RA10407K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun Z.; Music D.; Ahuja R.; Schneider J. M. Theoretical Investigation of the Bonding and Elastic Properties of Nanolayered Ternary Nitrides. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 71, 193402 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.193402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pugh S. F. XCII. Relations between the Elastic Moduli and the Plastic Properties of Polycrystalline Pure Metals. London, Edinburgh, Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 1954, 45, 823–843. 10.1080/14786440808520496. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Frantsevich I. N.; Voronov F. F.; Bakuta S. A.. Handbook on Elastic Constants and Moduli of Elasticity for Metals and Nonmetals Kiev: Naukova Dumka 1982.
- Sultana F.; Uddin M. M.; Ali M. A.; Hossain M. M.; Naqib S. H.; Islam A. K. M. A. First Principles Study of M2InC (M = Zr, Hf and Ta) MAX Phases: The Effect of M Atomic Species. Results Phys. 2018, 11, 869–876. 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.10.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ali M. A.; Naqib S. H. Recently Synthesized (Ti1–xMox)2AlC (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.20) Solid Solutions: Deciphering the Structural, Electronic, Mechanical and Thermodynamic Properties via Ab Initio Simulations. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 31535–31546. 10.1039/D0RA06435A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson O. L. A Simplified Method for Calculating the Debye Temperature from Elastic Constants. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1963, 24, 909–917. 10.1016/0022-3697(63)90067-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Islam J.; Hossain A. K. M. A. Investigation of Physical and Superconducting Properties of Newly Synthesized CaPd2P2 and SrPd2P2. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 868, 159199 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ali M. A.; Hossain M. M.; Uddin M. M.; Islam A. K. M. A.; Naqib S. H. Understanding the Improvement of Thermo- Mechanical and Optical Properties of 212 MAX Phase Borides Zr2AB2(A = In, Tl). J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 15, 2227–2241. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.09.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mikitishin S. I. Interrelationship of Poisson’s Ratio with Other Characteristics of Pure Metals. Soviet materials science: a transl. of Fiziko-khimicheskaya mekhanika materialov/Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR 1982, 18, 262–265. 10.1007/BF01150837. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Naher M. I.; Naqib S. H. An Ab-Initio Study on Structural, Elastic, Electronic, Bonding, Thermal, and Optical Properties of Topological Weyl Semimetal TaX (X = P, As). Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 5592 10.1038/s41598-021-85074-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li S.; Ahuja R.; Barsoum M. W.; Jena P.; Johansson B. Optical Properties of Ti3SiC2 and Ti4AlN3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 221907 10.1063/1.2938862. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rybka M.Optical Properties of MAX-Phase Materials: Linköping University 2010.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.