Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Sep 14;18(9):e0291546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291546

Identification of Cry toxin receptor genes homologs in a de novo transcriptome of Premnotrypes vorax (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Luisa-Fernanda Velásquez C 1, Pablo Emiliano Cantón 2, Alejandro Sanchez-Flores 3, Mario Soberón 2, Alejandra Bravo 2,*, Jairo A Cerón S 1
Editor: Sumita Acharjee4
PMCID: PMC10501650  PMID: 37708134

Abstract

The white potato worm Premnotrypes vorax (Hustache) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is one of the most destructive insect pests of potato crops in South America. Like many coleopteran insects, P. vorax shows low susceptibility to Cry insecticidal proteins produced by the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). However, the presence of Cry toxin receptors in the midgut of this this insect has never been studied. The main Cry-binding proteins described in other insect species are cadherin (CAD), aminopeptidase N (APN), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. In this study, we analyzed and validated a de novo assembled transcriptome of Illumina sequencing data to identify and to characterize homologs of Cry toxin receptors. We identified the protein sequences in P. vorax that show high identity with their orthologous sequences of the Cry toxin binding proteins in other coleopteran larvae such as APN, ALP, CAD and ABC transporter. This study provides preliminary identification of putative receptor genes of Cry proteins that would be useful for future studies involving biocontrol of this important potato crop pest.

Introduction

Colombia ranks 36th out of 183 countries that produce potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) worldwide with more than 60 varieties. The potato is the third most important crop and the average consumption in the country is 60 Kg per person per year [1]. Currently, this crop is a fundamental axis of the country’s economy involving 283 municipalities and more than 110,000 families, mainly in the regions of Boyacá, Cundinamarca, Antioquia and Nariño, which account for more than 85% of the total production of the country. In addition, potato is the crop that generates the greatest number of jobs in cold climate zones (more than 300,000 jobs) since in average 132,161 hectares of potatoes were harvested in the country, having a total national production of 2,751,837 tons [1, 2].

Among the insect pests that affect potato production is Premnotrypes vorax (Hustache) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) also known as white worm of the potato [3]. This is one of the 14 species of potato insect pests that form part of the complex known as “Andean potato weevils” (Fig 1). These insects are mainly distributed in South America, principally in Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela, and Peru [4]. P. vorax arrived in Colombia from Ecuador since 1920 at the Nariño region, and from there it was distributed through infected seeds to the most important potato crop regions in Colombia such as Boyacá, Antioquia and Santander [5].

Fig 1. Taxonomy of “Andean potato weevil” complex.

Fig 1

Adult insects of P. vorax feed on the plant leaves, but the most important damage with economic relevance is caused by the larvae, which feeds on the tubers, making galleries that affect the quality of the product showing external visible damage [6], resulting in up to 90% crop-loses due to the damaged tubers or to the complete crop destruction, especially when the larvae population is high [7]. It was reported that the life cycle of P. vorax can last up to nine months [8], indicating that it has only one or two generations per year. However, the average lifetime of adults is rather long since it last up to 138 ± 51.7 and 154 ± 50.7 days for males and females, respectively, allowing a very high reproduction rate, since females start oviposition at 14.4 ± 7.8 days after mating and continue up to 91.5 ± 43.0 days, with an average laid eggs of 101.3 ± 78.6 eggs and 9.6 ± 5.5 positions [4]. Historically, the control of this insect by indigenous farmers involves extended crops rotation, special separation between fields, use of plant barriers, and chemical control with highly toxic chemical insecticides such as carbamates, pyrethroids, organophosphates and carbofuran that are applied at the time of potato planting. However, usually these insecticide treatments fail to penetrate deep in the soil, where the potato tuber grows [6, 9]. In Colombia, more than US $22 million are spent each year for spraying insecticides against P. vorax [10]. In addition, it was reported that in most cases there is mismanagement in the doses and application frequencies of the chemical insecticides, increasing environmental pollution and health risks in both producers and consumers [11, 12].

An ecological alternative for insect pest control, that is compatible with the environment, is the use of bioinsecticides such as the insecticidal proteins produced by the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), since they are safe to humans, and completely biodegradable. Bt produce different kinds of insecticidal proteins, where Cry toxins, formerly known as three domain Cry toxins, represent the most widely used at the commercial level worldwide, against Lepidoptera, Diptera and Coleoptera insect pest [13]. Some of the Bt insecticidal proteins with high activity against coleopteran insects have been successfully used to protect different plants against main beetle pests either in insecticidal formulations or expressed them in transgenic crops [14]. For example, the Cry3 proteins have been reported to be active against Tenebrio molitor [15] and Leptinotarsa decemlineata [16, 17]. The Cry8Ab1 is active against Holotrichia oblita [18], while Cry8Ab1 and Cry8Ea1 are toxic against Holotrichia parallela [18, 19]. Cry1I, Cry3C, Cry7A, Cry8A, Cry8B, Cry14, Cry18, Cry26, Cry28, Gpp34 (formerly Cry34), Tpp35 (formerly Cry35) have been reported active against Xanthogaleruca luteola [20], Cry8Da against Popillia japonica [21], Cry3Bb against Diabrotica virgifera virgifera [22], Cry7Ab against Hanosepilachna vigiotioctomaculata [23] and Cry3Ba against Tribolium castaneum [24]. In the case of P. vorax it was reported that Cry3Aa at 70 μg/mL resulted in 57% mortality of the larvae after 5 days of treatment [25].

The high specificity displayed by Cry toxins resides in the high affinity interactions of Cry insecticidal proteins with their target receptor proteins, which are located on the apical membrane of the insect midgut epithelial cells. Several proteins have been identified in multiple insects as Cry toxin receptors, among them the aminopeptidase-N (APN) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) proteins that are covalently attached to epithelial membrane by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor. Also, some transmembrane proteins such as Cadherin (CAD) and ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABC transporters) subfamilies C2, B1, A2 are recognized as Cry toxin receptors [13]. After ingestion the Cry protoxins, the activated toxins interact with protein receptors that induce conformational changes in the Cry protein that finally insert into the target membrane forming pores, that cause osmotic shock in the midgut cells and death of the insect [13]. The interaction among Cry toxins and receptor proteins that are present in the midgut of insects is a key step in Cry toxicity. High levels of resistance to Cry proteins in different insect species are linked to alterations in Cry-receptors [26]. Insect resistance threatens sustainability of insecticides based on Cry proteins from Bt. For these reasons, the identification of Cry toxin receptors could be useful for stablishing resistance management strategies.

Here we performed a transcriptome study of P. vorax by RNA-seq technology, which is a powerful technique for description of transcripts and for the measurement of their expression levels. The information presented here will help in establishing genetic basis of putative protein receptors of Cry toxins in P. vorax for the development of biological strategies for the management of this important insect pest.

Material and methods

Total RNA extraction, library preparation and sequencing

A total of 20 P. vorax larvae collected from potato fields were used to dissect their midgut tissue (20 mg of midgut tissue) and separated in two Eppendorf tubes. The RNA was extracted from these midgut tissues by using the kit Agentcourt RNAdvance Cell v2 (Beckman Coulter) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were kept at -80 ºC until used. Total RNA was dissolved in DEPC treated water and quantified by Nanodrop 1000 (Thermo Scientific) and Qubit 2.0 system. The RNA integrity number (RIN) and concentration of eluted RNA were determined by Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies) system. All samples presented a RIN > 7 (8.5 and 8.8), indicating enough quality and integrity for library preparation. For sequencing, mRNA libraries were prepared from the total RNA using the Illumina TruSeq HT stranded mRNA sample preparation kit following the vendor’s protocol and obtaining an average library fragment size of 500 bp. The mRNA libraries were sequenced by using the HiSeq 2000/2500 platform with a paired end configuration of 300 cycles to generate pair-end reads of 150 bp. General statistics for the sequencing can be found in Table 1.

Table 1. General statistics for the sequencing, Trinity assembly, annotation, filtering and completeness evaluation.

Basic statistics
Sequencing yield (paired reads/Gbases) 383,552,246 / 115.83
Trinity predicted genes 232,969
Trinty reconstructed transcript isoforms 517,235
Total bases of reconstructed transcript isoforms 390.49 Mbases
N50 566 bases
Median transcript length 298 bases
Average transcript length 477.80 bases
Predicted ORFs 870,310
BUSCO completeness (%) 94.1
Filtering and completeness evaluation
Trinity genes with at least one annotation record 25,631
Trinity transcript isoforms with at least one annotation record 74,984
Total bases of reconstructed transcript isoforms 76.82 Mbases
N50 1,508 bases
Median transcript length 728 bases
Average transcript length 978 bases
Total ORFs after filtering 32,735

Preprocess, de novo assembly, annotation, and mapping

The sequencing quality was analyzed using the FASTQC software using default parameters. Due to the excellent quality, no reads were removed from the dataset and they were assembled using Trinity v2.6.5 [27] under default parameters. The statistics for the generated transcriptome are presented in Table 1. The resulting transcripts were used to predict open reading frames (ORFs) for the probable protein products using TransDecoder v5.3.0 [28] with default parameters. The ORFs were annotated using the Trinotate v3.1.1 [29] to integrate the results from BLASTx, and BLASTp against the UNIPROT databases provided with the software; the HMMSEARCH against the PFAMa database.

Completeness evaluation and transcriptome filtering

The software BUSCO v3.0.2 [30] was used to evaluate the completeness of the assembled transcriptome. In a nutshell, BUSCO performs a BLASTx search [31] using all transcripts against a database of conserved orthologous proteins from a certain taxonomic clade. For this analysis we used the arthropoda_odb9 database included with the software using the -m transcriptome parameter. The transcriptome filtering was performed based on the annotation results where transcripts having a transcript or ORF with BLASTx, BLASTp or PFAM result, were retained. In order to remove redundancy for further analysis (orthology and phylogenetics), the annotated ORFs were filtered using the CD-HIT program (v4.8.1) [32] using default parameters and a 50% identity threshold for clustering. The transcriptome sequencing data set including the raw and processed data were deposited at NCBI public repositories under the accession number PRJNA506951.

Orthology and phylogenetic analysis of the P. vorax transcriptome

An orthology analysis using the ProteinOrtho v6 software (with flags -cpus = 64 -ram = 462144 -p = BLASTp+ -singles) was performed with the P. vorax de novo transcriptome and the protein databases from other beetle pest species (NCBI id): T. molitor (GCA_907166875.3); T. castaneum (GCF_000002335.3); L. decemlineata (GCF_000500325.1); Sitophilus oryzae (GCF_002938485.1); Dendroctonus ponderosae (GCF_020466585.1); Anthonomus grandis grandis (GCF_022605725.1); D. virgifera virgifera (GCF_917563875.1). Proteins with a single ortholog in all species, with a predicted protein in P. vorax from a full transcript, with functional annotation, and a protein length between 70 and 350 amino acids, were selected for the phylogenetic analysis using the RAxML v8.2.12 software with the following parameters: raxmlHPC-PTHREADS-SSE3 -p 070378 -T 32 -m PROTCATIJTTF -# 100 -f a -x 070378. Additionally, UNIGENE annotations were done by using the NCBInr (nonredundant) database and BLASTx software. We performed local BLASTp queries of reported Cry-receptor genes in other insects with BlastStation v 2.75 (TM Software, Inc.), with default parameters, to find homologs in the expressed proteins of the filtered P. vorax midgut peptides, with the following sequences as queries: for CAD identification the T. molitor CAH1373803.1 (Gene Bank ID) was used; for ALP the Manduca sexta XP_030033710.2 protein; for APN the Plutella xylostella NP_001296022.1 protein sequence; for ABCC2 the Spodoptera frugiperda AUO38740.1 sequence; for ABCG1 the P. xylostella AJQ21779.1 sequence; and for the ABCB1 the D. virgifera XP_050514648.1 protein. The most likely putative Cry-receptor sequence was selected using E-value and identity percentage as criteria. The orthologous proteins previously identified as NCBI nr-annotated UNIGENE in the annotated assemblies of other coleopteran species such as A. grandis, D. ponderosae, D. virgifera, L. decemlineata, S. oryzae, T. molitor, and T. castaneum were also identified. For each putative P. vorax Cry receptor, multiple sequence alignments were performed with MUSCLE with all the previously identified orthologs in the selected coleopteran species. These multiple alignments were then used to build neighbor joining trees. Both MUSCLE and phylogeny trees were obtained with MEGA-X v. 10.2.2 [33], with default parameters.

Additional permits

No additional permits are required, since we are not working with humans or animals that are subject of ethical permits.

Results and discussion

Previously, the toxicity of Cry3Aa, Cry3Ba, Cry3Bb, Cry3Ca and Cry7Aa proteins was evaluated by means of a bioassay carried out on cubes of potato tubers impregnated with B. thuringiensis protoxins at 10 μg of protein/cm3 of diet. The data showed that all these proteins display low toxicity towards P. vorax, lower than 10% after three days [34, 35]. Gomez et al (2000) [25] found that at much higher doses (70 μg/ml) after five days of exposure to Cry3Aa protein, it showed moderate toxicity against P. vorax, supporting that the Cry3A toxin has low activity towards this insect [25]. Binding assays of Cry3Aa, Cry3Ba, Cry3Bb, Cry3Ca and Cry7Aa to brush border membrane vesicles (BBMV) obtained from P. vorax midgut tissue showed that Cry3Aa, Cry3Bb and Cry3Ca were able to bind to P. vorax BBMV, while Cry3Ba and Cry7Aa did not [35]. These data suggest that certain Cry toxins have receptors in P vorax. Finally, bioassays performed with protoxin proteins from some Cry3Aa mutants showed that mutants located in loops 1 and 3 of domain II (Cry3AaD354E mutant, and the triple Cry3AaR345A-ΔY350-ΔY351 mutant: both located in loop 1 and the triple Cry3AaQ482A-S484A-R485A mutant located in loop 3), showed reduced mortality suggesting that loops 1 and 3 of domain II may be involved in the binding interaction of Cry3Aa to the BBMV from P. vorax [36]. For these reasons, identification of putative receptor genes of Cry proteins by transcriptome sequencing analysis would be useful for future studies, regarding biocontrol of this important potato crop pest.

We used an RNA-seq approach to characterize the transcriptome of P. vorax. Total RNA was processed and sequenced using the Illumina technology. The quality control evaluation for the sequencing data was performed using FASTQC and the reconstruction and annotation of the transcriptome was achieved with the Trinity and Trinotate pipelines respectively. An assembly of 517,235 reconstructed transcripts, bearing 232,969 predicted genes (≥298 bp) was obtained, with an average transcript length of 477.8 bp. From the predicted transcripts, we found 870,310 ORFs with a BUSCO completeness of 94.1%. The predicted proteins were analyzed for functional annotation as described in Material and Methods section. With the annotation results, we filtered and clustered the ORFs retaining those with enough evidence of functional annotation and grouping them in clusters with at least 50% of amino acid identity level. (Material and Methods). After filtering, we found a total of 25,631 unigenes with an average mean size of 978 bp and 32,735 proteins. The statistics for the Trinity filtered version are depicted in Table 1.

With the filtered proteins, we performed and ortholog search against all predicted proteins from nine species from the Curculionidae family, with genomes available at the NCBI database and with parasitic relevance. We performed a comparative genomics analysis using 206 selected orthologous protein groups (see Material and methods) present in all species to determine how distant were P, vorax and other beetles with genomic information in order to find probable Cry-binding protein targets. In Fig 2, a clade for the Curculionidae family can be observed where P. vorax, A. grandis, D. ponderosae and S. oryzae are part of the same clade as expected from their taxonomy description. The nearest family to them was the Chrysomelidae and the Tenebrionidae family members (T. castaneum and T. molitor) acted as an outgroup.

Fig 2. Comparative phylogenetic genomics analysis using 206 orthologous proteins from the P. vorax transcriptome and other pest beetles.

Fig 2

To validate and identify putative homologous genes of Cry-binding proteins such as CAD, APN, ALP, as well as different ABC transporters, we performed a manual inspection the P.vorax proteins with a BLAST search results with the mentioned functional annotation. A putative CAD gene (TRINITY_DN97354_c5_g1_i3.p1) was found in the transcriptome data of P. vorax (Table 2). Similarly, APN, and ALPs putative proteins (TRINITY_DN90062_c0_g1_i16.p1 and TRINITY_DN95723_c2_g2_i13.p1, respectively) were identified. Finally different ABC transporters such as ABCC2, ABCG1 and ABCB1 were also identified (TRINITY_DN95792_c0_g1_i7.p1, TRINITY_DN86437_c0_g1_i16.p1 and TRINITY_DN90881_c0_g1_i10.p1, respectively). Their corresponding amino acid percentage of identity and BLAST scores are reported in Table 2. Overall, the sequence with highest identity to the previously reported Cry-binding proteins was ABCB1 with an identity of 62% and the sequence with lowest identity corresponded to ABCG1 with 27% value. Results from the BLAST analysis of all putative cry toxin receptors in the orthologous sequences in other annotated coleopteran genomes are shown in Supplementary S1 to S6 Tables. Information in these supplementary tables clearly show that the closest homologs to the cadherin, APN, ABCB1 and ABCC2 genes of P. vorax are those from D. ponderosae; for the ALP gene is from S. oryzae; and for the ABCG1 gene is from A. grandis. These data agree with the phylogenetic analysis shown in Fig 2.

Table 2. Candidate of Cry toxin-receptor genes in P. vorax through homology.

Reported receptor genes for Cry toxins were used to search for homologs by BLAST in the filtered P. vorax peptide annotation. For each candidate gene, orthologs were identified in the annotated assemblies of the coleopteran species.

Protein Species GenBank ID P. vorax ID P. vorax length aa BLAST bit Score BLAST % identity BLAST e-value Orthologs a
Cadherin Tenebrio molitor CAH1373803.1 TRINITY_DN97354_c5_g1_i3.p1 1704 533 32 8.20E-152 Tc_a, Tc_f, Dp_a, Dp_f, Tm, Ld, So, Dv
ALP Manduca sexta XP_030033710.2 TRINITY_DN95723_c2_g2_i13.p1 534 313 39 4.00E-86 Tc_f, Dp_a, Dp_f, Tm, So, Ag, Dv
APN2 Plutella xylostella NP_001296022.1 TRINITY_DN90062_c0_g1_i16.p1 951 409 30 1.00E-114 Tc_a, Dp_f, Tm, Ld, So, Dv
ABCC2 Spodoptera frugiperda AUO38740.1 TRINITY_DN95792_c0_g1_i7.p1 1346 1064 43 0 Tc_f, Dp_f, Tm, Ld, So, Ag, Dv
ABCG1 Plutella xylostella AJQ21779.1 TRINITY_DN86437_c0_g1_i16.p1 636 223 27 6.00E-59 Tc_a, Tc_f, Dp_a, Dp_f, Tm, So, Ag, Dv
ABCB1 Diabrotica virgifera XP_050514648.1 TRINITY_DN90881_c0_g1_i10.p1 1124 1443 62 5.00E-88 Tc_a, Tc_f, Dp_a, Dp_f, Tm, Ld, So, Ag, Dv

a Orthologous species are abbreviated as: Anthonomus grandis, Ag; Dendroctonus ponderosae, Dp; Diabrotica virgifera, Dv; Leptinotarsa decemlineata, Ld; Sitophilus oryzae, So; Tenebrio molitor, Tm; Tribolium castaneum, Tc.

We then searched for orthologous sequences in other annotated coleopteran genomes as shown also in Table 2, and performed phylogenetic analysis with these data. The resulting phylogenetic trees showed that CAD and APN sequences of P. vorax were clustered in the same branch with CAD and APN proteins derived from D. ponderosae indicating higher sequence identity with those proteins. D. ponderosae also known as the mountain pine beetle is a species of bark beetle native to western conifer forests found from Mexico up to central British Columbia USA. The principal method of control of this pest is with highly toxic chemical insecticides such as pyrethroids. CAD is a potential receptor in Coleopteran larvae since it was demonstrated that in D. virgifera and T. molitor the CAD binds to activated Cry3Aa and Cry3Bb [15, 16, 37].

The ALP protein from P. vorax was clustered in the same branch with ALPs isoforms from S. oryzae (Fig 3, Panels A, B and C). S. oryzae is a weevil that belongs to the Sitophilus genus. They are pests of stored grains, such as nut, or seed like rice, wheat, and maize. Freezing infected food below -17°C for three days, or heating food to 60°C for 15 min helps to kill the insects. In addition, it was described that S. oryzae is susceptible to Cry3Aa toxin [38]. ALP could also be a suitable receptor of Cry toxins in Coleopteran since it was shown that Cry1Ba toxin binds to A. grandis ALP, while Cry3Aa binds to T. molitor ALP [39, 40].

Fig 3. Phylogenetic trees showing the relationship of CAD, APN2, ALP, ABCC2, ABCG1 and ABCB1 sequences from P. vorax with sequences from other coleopteran insects.

Fig 3

Finally, in relation with ABC transporter proteins in all cases these proteins from P. vorax were clustered with corresponding proteins from S. oryzae, D. ponderosae and A. grandis (Fig 3, Panels D, E and F). A. grandis also known as boll weevil is a beetle that feeds on cotton buds and flowers. This is a mayor cotton pest in North and South America. Different chemical insecticides have been used for its control such as Calcium arsenate, dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) and organophosphates. This insect pest is susceptible to several Cry proteins such as Cry1Ia, Cry8Ka, Cry10Aa and Cry22Aa [4144]. ABC transporters as well as APN and CAD have been identified as binding proteins form Cry8Ea in H. parallela and H. oblita [45, 46].

Conclusions

The reconstructed transcriptome of P. vorax from larvae RNA, is currently the most complete genetic compendium, representing 94.1% of the expected genomic information for this species. The phylogenetic results obtained with the different putative Cry-receptors in P. vorax were consistent with the topology of the tree obtained from genomics analysis as shown in Fig 2, suggesting that the relationship between the probable Cry-binding proteins in P. vorax and other pest beetles is reliable, and they are good Cry target candidates. However, the experimental characterization and validation of these targets is needed to confirm that the proteins are present and their predicted functions can result in the interaction with different Cry toxins.

To our knowledge, this study represent a substantial and valuable novel transcriptomic data from P.vorax and identified homologous proteins to the reported Cry toxin receptors identified in other insect pests that would be useful for future functional studies and to overcome potential problems of insect resistance to Cry toxin insecticides. The information described in this study will be important knowledge for future research performed with this important potato pest.

Supporting information

S1 Table. BLAST results for TRINITY_DN97354_c5_g1_i3.p1 with cadherin orthologs.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. BLAST results for TRINITY_DN95723_c2_g2_i13.p1 with ALP orthologs.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. BLAST results for TRINITY_DN90062_c0_g1_i16.p1 with APN2 orthologs.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. BLAST results for TRINITY_DN90881_c0_g1_i10.p1 with ABCB1 orthologs.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. BLAST results for TRINITY_DN95792_c0_g1_i7.p1 with ABCC2 orthologs.

(DOCX)

S6 Table. BLAST results for TRINITY_DN86437_c0_g1_i16.p1 with ABCG1 orthologs.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Karel Estrada, Jerome Verleyen, and Veronica Jimenez-Jacinto for technical bioinformatic support and access to the high-performance computer cluster from the “Unidad de Secuenciación Masiva y Bioinformática” of the “Laboratorio Nacional de Apoyo Tecnológico a las Ciencias Genómicas, UNAM”.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and analyzed in this study can be found in the Bioproject number PRJNA506951. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Institute of Biotechnology from National University of Colombia (UNAL). Was funded by the Project 35953 (UNAL) (JCS) and the Colciencias scholarship 2014 (Resolution No. 038)(LFV). Also, to CONACyT 260481 (AB). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.SIOC. Minagricultura. Plan ordenamiento de la papa. Viceministerio de asuntos agropecuarios dirección de cadenas agrícolas y forestales Bogotá D. C. 2019; https://sioc.minagricultura.gov.co/Papa/Normatividad/Plan%20de%20Ordenamiento%20papa%202019-2023.pdf
  • 2.DANE-ENA. El cultivo de la papa, Solanum tuberosum alimento de gran valor nutritivo, clave en la seguridad alimentaria mundial. Boletín mensual: insumos y factores asociados a la producción agropecuaria. 2013; 15 https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/agropecuario/sipsa/insumos_factores_de_produccion_sep_2013.pdf
  • 3.Fedepapa. El cultivo de la Papa. Dirección de desarrollo sectorial sostenible. Federación Colombiana de Productores de papa. Federación Colombiana de Productores de Papa. Bogotá, Colombia. ISBN 958-97393-5-0 2004; https://redjusticiaambientalcolombia.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/guia-ambiental-para-el-cultivo-de-la-papa.pdf
  • 4.Pérez R, Garza J, Argüelles-Cárdenas J. Método de cría en laboratorio del gusano blanco de la papa Premnotrypes vorax (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Revista Corpoica–Cien Tec Agrop 2009;1: 16–23. doi: 10.21930/rcta.vol10_num1_art:124 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vélez R. Plagas agrícolas de impacto económico en Colombia: bionomía y manejo integrado. Editorial Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín, Colombia. ISBN:9586550818 1997; Pp 146–147.
  • 6.Pérez-Álvarez R, Garza J, Argüelles-Cárdenas J, Garramuño E. Distribución espacial de Premnotrypes vorax (Hustache) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) en cultivos de papa. Revista Corpoica-Ciencia y Tecnologia Agropecuaria. 2010;11: 11–20. doi: 10.21930/rcta.vol11_num1_art:190 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.CABI Plantwise Plus. Premnotrypexs vorax (Andean potato weevil). Technical Factseet 2019; https://plantwiseplusknowledgebank.org/doi/full/10.1079/pwkb.species.44044
  • 8.Calvache H. Aspectos biológicos y ecológicos del gusano blanco de la papa Premnotrypes vorax (Hustache). In: Valencia L, editor. Memorias del curso sobre control integrado de plagas de papa. Bogotá, Colombia: Centro Internacional de la Papa (CIP), Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario (ICA); 1986. pp. 18–24. https://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.12324/33322/6685_1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • 9.Alcazar J, Cisneros F. Taxonomy and bionomics of the Andean potato weevil complex: Premnotrypes sp. and related genera. Impact on a changing world. CIP. 1998; Program Rep. 1997–98: 141–151
  • 10.Perez W, Valverde MM, Barreto BM, Andrade-Piedra JL, Forbes GA. Pest and diseases affecting potato landraces and bred varieties grow in Peru under indigenous farming system. Revista Latinoamericana de la Papa 2015;19(2):29–41. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/69210 [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Crissman CC, Cole DC, Carpio F. Pesticide use and farm worker health in Ecuadorian potato production. Am. J. Agricul. Econ. 1994;76: 593–597. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yanggen D, Crissman C, Espinosa P. Los plaguicidas: impactos en producción, salud y medio ambiente en Carchi, Ecuador. (Yanggen, Crissman and Espinosa Ed) Ediciones Abya Yala. Quito, Ecuador 2003;198 pages/ ISBN 9789978222829
  • 13.Bravo A, Gill S, Sorberón M. Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry and Cyt toxins and their potential for insect control. Toxicon 2007;49: 423–435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Domínguez-Arrizabalaga M, Villanueva M, Escriche B, Ancín-Azpilicueta C, Caballero P. Insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis proteins against Coleopteran pests. Toxins. 2020;12: 430; doi: 10.3390/toxins12070430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fabrick J, Oppert C, Lorenzen MD, Morris K, Oppert B, Jurat-Fuentes JL. A novel Tenebrio molitor cadherin is a functional receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Aa toxin. J Biol Chem. 2009;284: 18401–18410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Park Y, Amir M, Abdullah F, Taylor M, Rahman K, Adang M. Enhancement of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Aa and Cry3Bb toxicities to Coleopteran larvae by a toxin-binding fragment of an insect Cadherin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75: 3086–3092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Van Frankenhuyzen K. Insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2009;101: 1–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang Y, Zheng G, Tan J, Li C, Cheng L. Cloning and characterization of a novel cry8Ab1 gene from Bacillus thuringiensis strain B-JJX with specific toxicity to scarabaeid (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) larvae. Microbiol Res. 2013;168: 512–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Guo Z, Kang S, Zhu X, Xia J, Wu Q, Wang S, et al. Down- regulation of a novel ABC transporter gene (Pxwhite) is associated with Cry1Ac resistance in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;59: 30–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nazarian A, Jahangiri R, Salehi Jouzani G, Seifinejad A, Soheilivand S, Bagheri O, et al. Coleopteran-specific and putative novel cry genes in Iranian native Bacillus thuringiensis collection. J Invertebr Pathol. 2009;102: 101–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yamaguchi T, Bando H, Asano S. Identification of a Bacillus thuringiensis Cry8Da toxin-binding glucosidase from the adult Japanese beetle, Popillia japónica. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2013;113: 123–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Soberón M, Gao Y, Bravo A. Bt Resitance: Characterization and strategies for GM crops producing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. Soberon M, Gao Y, and Bravo A, Editors. CABI Biotechnology Series, UK. 2015; 226 Pages/ ISBN 9781780644370
  • 23.Song P, Wang Q, Nangong Z, Su J, Ge D. Identification of Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) midgut putative receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal Cry7Ab3 toxin. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2012;109: 318–322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Contreras E, Schoppmeier M, Real MD, Rausell C. Sodium solute symporter and cadherin proteins act as Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Ba toxin functional receptors in Tribolium castaneum. J Biol Chem. 2013;288: 18013–18021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gomez S, Constanza-Mateus A, Hernandez J, Zimmermann B. Recombinant Cry3Aa has insecticidal activity against the andean potato weevil, Premnotrypes vorax. Biochem Biophysl Res Com 2000;279: 653–656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jurat-Fuentes JL, Heckel DG, Ferré J. Mechanisms of resistance to insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2021;66: 121–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29: 644–652. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassou M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, Bowden J, et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2013;8: 1494–512. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bryant DM, Johnson K, DiTommaso T, Tickle T, Couger MB, Payzin-Dogru D, et al. A Tissue-mapped axolotl de novo transcriptome enables identification of limb regeneration factors. Cell Rep. 2017; 18: 762–776. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Waterhouse RM, Seppey M, Simão FA, Manni M, Ioannidis P, Klioutchnikov G, et al. BUSCO Applications from Quality Assessments to Gene Prediction and Phylogenomics. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(3): 543–548. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25: 3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Weizhong L, Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006;22: 1658–1659. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz Ch, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018; 5:1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Martínez JW, Cerón J. Bacillus thuringiensis proteins toxicity evaluation against andean Potato Weevil Premnotrypes vorax Hustache. Agronomía Colombiana, 2002; 19: 89–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Martínez JW, Cerón J. Binding of Bacillus thuringiensis proteins with brush border membranes vesicles of the digestive tract of the Andean potato weevil Premnotrypes vorax (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Revista Colombiana de Entomología 2004; 30:51–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.López-Pazos SA., Martínez JW, Castillo AX, Cerón-Salamanca J. Presence and significance of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry proteins associated with the Andean weevil Premnotrypes vorax (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Int. J. Trop. Biol 2009; 57: 1235–1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zúñiga-Navarrete F, Gómez I, Peña G, Amaro I, Ortíz E, Becerril B, et al. Identification of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Aa toxin Domain II loop 1 as the binding site of Tenebrio molitor cadherin repeat CR12. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015;59: 50–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Johnson TM, Rishi AS, Nayak P. Sen SK. Cloning of a cryIIIA endotoxin gene of Bacillus thuringiensis var. tenebrionis and its transient expression in indica rice. J. Biosci. 1996;21: 673–685. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Martins ÉS, Monnerat RG, Queiroz PR, Dumas VF, Braz SV, de Souza Aguiar RW, et al. Midgut GPI-anchored proteins with alkaline phosphatase activity from the cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis) are putative receptors for the Cry1B protein of Bacillus thuringiensis. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010;40: 138–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zúñiga-Navarrete F, Gómez I, Peña G, Bravo A, Soberón M. A Tenebrio molitor GPI-anchored alkaline phosphatase is involved in binding of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Aa to brush border membrane vesicles. Peptides. 2013;41: 81–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Martins ÉS, Praça LB, Dumas VF, Silva-Werneck JO, Sone EH, Waga IC, et al. Characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates toxic to cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis). Biol. Control. 2007;40: 65–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Oliveira GR, Silva MC, Lucena WA, Nakasu EY, Firmino AA, Beneventi MA, et al. Improving Cry8Ka toxin activity towards the cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis). BMC Biotechnol. 2011;11: 85. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-11-85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Grossi-De-Sa MF, De Magalhaes MQ, Silva MS, Silva SMB, Dias SC, Nakasu EYT, et al. Susceptibility of Anthonomus grandis (Cotton Boll Weevil) and Spodoptera frugiperda (Fall Armyworm) to a Cry1Ia-type toxin from a Brazilian Bacillus thuringiensis strain. BMB Rep. 2007;40: 773–782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.de Souza Aguiar RW, Martins ÉS, Ribeiro BM, Monnerat RG. Cry10Aa protein is highly toxic to Anthonomus grandis Boheman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), an important insect pest in brazilian cotton crop fields. Bt Res. 2012;3: 20–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Shu C, Tan S, Yin J, Soberón M, Bravo A, Liu C, et al. Assembling of Holotrichia parallela (dark black chafer) midgut tissue transcriptome and identification of midgut proteins that bind to Cry8Ea toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015;99: 7209–7218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jiang J, Huang Y, Shu C, Soberón M, Bravo A, Liu C, et al. Holotrichia oblita midgut proteins that bind to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry8-Like toxin and assembly of the H. oblita midgut tissue transcriptome. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017;83: 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. BLAST results for TRINITY_DN97354_c5_g1_i3.p1 with cadherin orthologs.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. BLAST results for TRINITY_DN95723_c2_g2_i13.p1 with ALP orthologs.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. BLAST results for TRINITY_DN90062_c0_g1_i16.p1 with APN2 orthologs.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. BLAST results for TRINITY_DN90881_c0_g1_i10.p1 with ABCB1 orthologs.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. BLAST results for TRINITY_DN95792_c0_g1_i7.p1 with ABCC2 orthologs.

(DOCX)

S6 Table. BLAST results for TRINITY_DN86437_c0_g1_i16.p1 with ABCG1 orthologs.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed in this study can be found in the Bioproject number PRJNA506951. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.


Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES