Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1998 Aug;36(8):2223–2228. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.8.2223-2228.1998

Associations between Heat-Stable (O) and Heat-Labile (HL) Serogroup Antigens of Campylobacter jejuni: Evidence for Interstrain Relationships within Three O/HL Serovars

C J Jackson 1,*, A J Fox 1, D M Jones 1, D R A Wareing 2, D N Hutchinson 2
PMCID: PMC105019  PMID: 9665996

Abstract

A comparative examination of the heat-stable (O) and heat-labile (HL) serogrouping results for 9,024 sporadic human isolates of Campylobacter jejuni revealed conserved associations between specific O and HL antigens (O/HL serovars). Forty-nine percent of the isolates which grouped for both O and HL antigens belonged to one of three serovars: O 4 complex/HL 1 (17.9%), O 1/HL 2 (16.8%), or O 50/HL 7 (14.5%). Other common serovars were O 2/HL 4 (8.3%), O 6/HL 6 (8.1%), O 53/HL 11 (4.5%), O 19/HL 17 (3.3%), O 5/HL 9 (3.3%), O 9/HL 9 (3.2%), and O 23/HL 5 (3.1%). These 10 serovars accounted for 83.1% of the serogroupable isolates. A large number of strains (41.3%) could be typed by only one of the two methods or could not be serogrouped (11%). Strains belonging to three serovars, O 2/HL 4, O 50/HL 7, and O 23/HL 5, were further characterized by combining data from expressed features (O/HL serogroups, phage groups, and biotypes) with restriction fragment length polymorphism genotypes. These polyphasic data demonstrated that within each serovar, individual isolates showed substantial conservation of both genomic and phenotypic characteristics. The essentially clonal nature of the three serovars confirmed the potential of combined O and HL serogrouping as a practical and phylogenetically valid method for investigating the epidemiology of sporadic C. jejuni infection.


The gram-negative spirillum Campylobacter jejuni is a primary etiologic agent of human gastroenteritis. Most campylobacter infections appear to be sporadic rather than outbreak associated, and in a majority of cases, the original source of infection cannot be determined (10). Case-control studies (4, 17) have identified several risk factors associated with campylobacteriosis, including consumption of untreated water or milk, foreign travel, and the handling or consumption of raw or undercooked poultry. Other significant but unrecognized sources of infection may also exist.

A better understanding of the epidemiology of sporadic campylobacter infection is essential for the development of intervention measures to reduce human exposure to this pathogen. The subtyping of campylobacter isolates has been valuable in the epidemiological investigation of point source campylobacter outbreaks (15, 31) and provides a means for monitoring the transmission of C. jejuni from environmental reservoirs and animal hosts into the human food chain (27). Numerous phenotyping methods for C. jejuni have been described, all of which, to some degree, fulfill the requirements of stability, reproducibility, and discrimination necessary for epidemiological analysis. However, inconsistent strain associations occur when different phenotypic techniques are used to examine identical sets of isolates (30). The development of campylobacter genotyping methods has not substantially resolved these anomalies (1, 9, 28), although some uniformity between genetic and phenotypic analyses for the most common O serogroups of C. jejuni has been reported (14, 18, 29). Progress towards methodological standardization (39) and increased awareness of the mechanisms responsible for variation in subtyping characteristics (12) may improve the quality of epidemiological information derived from the use of multiple campylobacter typing schemes.

In this report, we describe serovars of C. jejuni identified by a comparison of heat-stable (O) and heat-labile (HL) serogrouping results from over 9,000 sporadic human campylobacter isolates. An integrated analysis of expressed features (O and HL serogroups, phage groups, and biotypes) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) genotypes was used to produce polyphasic strain profiles (41) for 52 strains from three common O/HL serovars of C. jejuni. The results of this comparative study revealed a number of novel features relevant to the epidemiology and population biology of this important enteropathogen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture media.

Campylobacter strains for serogrouping were submitted from 23 United Kingdom (UK) laboratories over the period of 1988 to 1992. All strains were random, sporadic human fecal isolates submitted as part of a UK passive campylobacter surveillance program. Serogroup and RFLP data were also included in this study from 124 systemic C. jejuni isolates (19) and 14 human isolates and 1 bovine isolate from C. Nicol (Enteric Reference Laboratory, Porirua, New Zealand). O and HL serogroup reference cultures were provided by J. L. Penner (33 strains) and H. Lior (12 strains), including C. jejuni NCTC 11168, which was the HL 4 strain.

Fifty-two isolates associated with three C. jejuni serovars (O 2/HL 4, O 50/HL 7, and O 23/HL 5) were further characterized by phage group, biotype, and RFLP. These strains included one bovine, four environmental, and eight serogroup reference strains. The remainder were sporadic fecal or systemic human isolates originating from 17 UK regional centers.

Cultures were stored at −70°C in brain heart infusion broth (Unipath Ltd.) containing 15% glycerol. Bacteria were grown on Columbia agar (Unipath Ltd.) supplemented with 5% (vol/vol) whole horse blood for 48 h at 37°C under microaerophilic conditions (5% CO2, 3% H2, 85% N2, 7% O2) in a Variable Atmosphere Incubator (Don Whitley Scientific Ltd.).

Strain characterization.

Serogrouping of 9,024 sporadic human isolates of C. jejuni was carried out at Manchester Public Health Laboratory over the period of 1988 to 1992 by using both the Penner (O) and Lior (HL) systems in accordance with standard methods (22, 33, 34). The panel of available typing sera tested for 33 O antigens associated with C. jejuni and a restricted set of 12 of the most common HL serogroups (HL types 1, 2, 4 to 9, 11, 17, 20, and 21). Frequent cross-reactions occurred between O antigens 4, 13, 16, 43, and 50, and strains agglutinating with any of these five antisera were classified within the O 4 complex. The program DataEase (DataEase International, Inc.) was used for the comparison of O and HL serogroup determinants, and multiple isolates from known outbreaks were excluded from the analysis. Significant associations (P < 0.001) between specific O and HL antigens were calculated by chi-square analysis. Identification to the species level, biotyping, and phage typing were performed at the Preston Public Health Laboratory by previously described methods (8, 35). The methods used for nucleic acid extraction, restriction endonuclease digestion, and RFLP analysis of C. jejuni have been published elsewhere (18).

RESULTS

Serovars of C. jejuni are characterized by associations between specific O and HL antigens.

Typing results for both the O and HL serogroup antigens were obtained for 4,294 (47.6%) of the 9,024 isolates tested. Thirteen of the 33 available O antisera, including the five cross-reacting epitopes of the O 4 complex, grouped 3,845 (89.5%) of these strains and 6,222 (69.0%) of the total number of isolates. The remaining 20 O antisera grouped 449 (10.5%) of the strains with both O and HL results, and 1,454 (16.1%) of the total number of isolates (data not shown). Three hundred forty-three isolates (3.8%) were typeable by the HL system but not by the O system, while a much larger proportion (3,382; 37.5%) were typed by O but not HL antisera. There were 999 strains (11.0%) which could not be typed by either scheme.

A comparison of the most frequently reported O serogroups and their corresponding HL results (Table 1) provided evidence of strong nonrandom (P <0.001) associations or linkage between specific O and HL serogroups. These serovar-like combinations were most marked in the O 6, O 23, and O 53 strains, which associated almost exclusively with HL 6, HL 5, and HL 11 antigens, respectively. Similarly, within the three most common O serogroups, O 1 and O 2 strains showed strong linkage to the HL 2 and HL 4 antigens. Three serovars, O 1/HL 2, O 4/HL 1, and O 50/HL 7, accounted for 1,856 (43.2%) of the 4,294 strains, and 10 serovars represented 3,128 (72.8%) of these isolates.

TABLE 1.

Serogrouping results for 8,010 (88.7%) of 9,024 sporadic human C. jejuni isolates obtained with 17 HS and 12 HL antiseraa

O serogroup No. of isolates in HL serogroup:
Total
1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 17 20 21 NT
1 81d 630c 3 1 2 9 1 3 2 8 0 14 244 998
2 10 13 314c 2 0 4 6 3 3 19 3 83 725 1,105
4 678c 33 8 4 5 548b,c 1 5 2 69 9 23 537 1,922
5 5 13 2 1 1 0 1 125c 36 7 0 3 216 410
6 1 0 1 0 303c 0 1 1 15 0 1 3 28 354
9 4 9 0 2 0 2 5 120c 23 9 1 16 223 414
11 4 5 0 0 1 4 80d 3 1 22 0 27 263c 410
15 3 0 1 1 0 2 1 3 9 1 0 2 139c 162
18 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 1 0 139c 151
19 2 1 1 0 0 22 1 1 0 124c 18 0 45 215
21 0 1 1 0 2 1 3 2 2 4 0 0 172c 188
23 0 0 2 117c 4 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 10 140
53 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 5 169c 1 1 0 19 199
NT 34 26 14 17 10 16 22 52 68 21 15 48 999 8,010
a

Five cross-reacting antigens (O 4, O 13, O 16, O 43, and O 50) were expressed by strains in the HS 4 serogroup. One thousand three hundred forty-two isolates (14.8%) were NT by the O system. The remaining 1,014 strains (11.2%) were characterized by using the following 16 additional O antisera: O 3, 151 strains; O 7, 9; O 8, 134; O 10, 197; O 17, 107; O 29, 43; O 35, 73; O 38, 7; O 40, 31; O 41, 24; O 42, 7; O 44, 26; O 45, 21; O 55, 121; O 58, 9; O 60, 23. 

b

O 4 complex strains associated with the HL 7 antigen frequently expressed the cross-reacting O 50 antigen. This strain cluster is referred to in the text as serovar O 50/HL 7. 

c

Significant (P < 0.001) conserved association between specific O and HL antisera. 

d

Secondary antigen association. 

Strains within the O 4 complex were associated with two HL antigens, HL 1 and HL 7. Most O 4 complex strains of serogroup HL 7 expressed the O 50 epitope in various combinations with the other cross-reacting antigens. These isolates were placed within serovar O 50/HL 7, a defined lineage within the O 4 complex strains characterized by the O 50 and HL 7 serogroup reference strains (see Table 3). However, reactions with the O 50 antigen were not exclusive to this serovar but were also found with many other O 4 complex strains.

TABLE 3.

Strain details and typing characteristics for 18 random C. jejuni isolates associated with serovar O 50/HL 7a

Laboratory no. Date of isolation Region Source Biotype Phage group RFLP type 16S ribotype
O 50b 1983 Toronto S/G 6020 NT 8 4
O 65 NKc NK S/G 6000 55 8 4
HL 7 1981 Ottawa S/G 6000 44 8 4
B/16023b 27/07/84 Manchester S 6000 44 8 4
C/23502b 01/10/93 NZ CDSCd B 6000 55 8 4
C/19584e 05/08/92 Poole H 6000 55 8 4
C/13383f 07/03/91 Southampton H 6000 44 8 4
C/12279 07/12/90 Blairmore H ND 55 8 4
B/1338 08/07/87 Cardiff S 6000 44 8 4
B/2841 14/12/88 Glasgow S 6000 55 8 4
P/3183 10/04/91 Aberdeen E 6000 55 8 4
P/3187 10/04/91 Eastbourne H 6000 44 8 4
C/14000 03/05/91 Dumfries H 6000 44 8 4
P/3827 23/05/91 Bath H 6000 44 8 4
B/8794 18/03/86 Manchester S 6010 55 8 4
B/8817 02/07/90 Manchester S 6010 44 8 4
P/3758 20/05/91 Poole H 6000 52 4 1
P/2587 14/02/91 Edinburgh H 6222 69 5 31
a

See Table 2, footnote a

b

Not Lior typed (HL ND) or NT by available Lior antisera. 

c

NK, not known. 

d

New Zealand bovine isolate. 

e

Expressed HL 20, an antigen atypical of this serovar. 

f

Expressed HL 1, an antigen atypical of this serovar. 

Within each O serogroup, a varying but often high proportion of isolates scored an HL nontypeable (HL NT) reaction. The Lior typing scheme recognizes in excess of 160 HL antigens for C. jejuni and C. coli, and only 12 of the most common ones were tested for in this study. For serogroups O 15, O 18, and O 21, greater than 95% of the strains were HL NT (Table 1), and these groups presumably agglutinate with individual homologous HL antisera that were not available in our panel. Some O serogroups did show a strong association with single HL antigens but also had a high proportion of HL NT results. For example, 28% of serogroup O 2 strains were serovar O 2/HL 4 and 65% were O 2/HL NT, while for O 11 isolates, 19.4% were serovar O 11/HL 8 and 64% were O 11/HL NT. An indeterminate but substantial proportion of these HL NT results may be due to factors such as antigenic loss or masking and autoagglutination, as well as the use of a restricted panel of HL antisera. Nontypeability was also experienced with the Penner system, but to a lesser extent (Table 1, row 14).

Strains of serogroups O 5 and O 9 showed concordance in the results for all 12 HL antisera, with strong linkage to the HL 9 antigen (30 and 28%, respectively) and to HL NT (53% each). The reasons for these similarities are unknown. Serogroup reference strains O 5 and HL 9 had identical biotypes and similar RFLP genotypes (18) but appeared to be unrelated to the O 9 serostrain.

Strains within three serovars of C. jejuni have many features in common.

The polyphasic strain characteristic (Preston biotype, phage group, 16S ribotype, and E3CJC2 RFLP type) of 52 random isolates of C. jejuni belonging to three serovars, O 2/HL 4, O 50/HL 7, and O 23/HL 5, are listed in Tables 2 to 4. These strains originated from different geographical areas within the UK and abroad and were isolated from a variety of sources over the period of 1980 to 1993.

TABLE 2.

Strain details and typing characteristics for 19 random C. jejuni isolates associated with serovar O 2/HL 4a

Laboratory no. Date of isolation Region Source Biotype Phage group RFLP type 16S ribotype
O 2 1980 Toronto S/G 6004 52 2 1
HL 4b 1981 London S/G 6010 52 2 1
P/3618 10/05/91 Manchester H 6004 52 2 1
C/4537 21/07/89 Birmingham S 6004 52 2 1
C/12950 30/01/91 Birmingham H 6004 52 2 1
C/12646 09/01/91 Hereford H 6004 52 2 1
P/2361 24/01/91 Southampton H 6004 75 2 1
C/4533 21/07/89 Birmingham S 6004 NT 2 1
C/18508 17/05/92 Newcastle H 6010 52 2 1
P/2987 16/03/91 Southampton H 6010 52 2 1
P/2164 09/01/91 Norwich H 6014 52 2 1
P/1962 13/12/90 Edinburgh H 6014 69 2 1
P/2248 17/01/91 Aberdeen H 6020 52 2 1
B/23383 11/10/84 Liverpool S 6020 52 2 1
P/3018 14/03/91 Aberdeen H 6024 52 2 1
P/2399 28/01/91 Cambridge H 6024 52 2 1
P/3666 13/05/91 Norwich H 6034 52 2 1
P/2255 01/17/91 Aberdeen H 6124 69 1 1
P/3546 05/02/91 Southampton H 6172 125 5 1
a

Strains belonging to three O/HL serovars of C. jejuni were characterized by biotyping, phage grouping, 16S ribotyping, and RFLP typing by using the E3CJC2 probe. Strain sources: B, bovine; E, environmental; H, human; S, systemic; S/G, serogroup reference culture. 

b

Strain HL 4 is NCTC 11168. 

TABLE 4.

Strain details and typing characteristics for 15 random C. jejuni isolates associated with serovar O 23/HL 5a

Laboratory no. Date of isolation Region Source Biotype Phage group RFLP type 16S ribotype
O 36 1983 Toronto S/G 6002 NT 9 13
HL 5 1981 Ottawa S/G 6000 NT 9 13
C/13871 18/04/91 Aberdeen H 6000 69 9 13
C/12632 09/01/91 Aberdeen H 6004 69 9 13
C/12784 23/1/91 Moray E 6004 69 9 13
C/13710 27/3/91 Turriff E 6004 69 9 13
C/12267 07/12/90 Aberdeen H 6006 69 9 13
C/18509 17/06/92 Newcastle H 6006 69 9 13
C/19785 21/08/92 Kettering H 6006 NT 9 13
C/13613 20/3/91 Aberdeen E 6674 NT 9 13
C/13461 11/03/91 Hereford H 6006 69 NDb ND
C/14195 23/05/91 Bath H 6004 69 ND ND
C/13918 24/04/91 Dumfries H 6044 69 ND ND
O 23c 1980 Toronto S/G 6020 NT 14 10
B/1916c 17/11/87 Worcester S 6135 76 36 2
a

See Table 2, footnote a

b

ND, not done. 

c

See Table 3, footnote b

Within each serovar, most isolates demonstrated strong conservation between the various expressed (phenotypic) and chromosomal (genetic) markers. Serovar O 2/HL 4 isolates (Table 2) were RFLP/ribotype 2/1 and associated strongly with phage group 52. Variable metronidazole resistance, 5-fluorouracil production, and elaboration of DNase characterized the biotypes (types 6004, 6010, 6014, 6020, and 6024). Isolates of serovar O 50/HL 7 (Table 3) were RFLP/ribotype 8/4 and expressed either very closely related phage group 44 or 55. This serovar was usually fully sensitive in resistotype tests and enzymatically unreactive (biotype 6000) but occasionally showed metronidazole or 5-fluorouracil resistance (biotypes 6010 and 6020).

Serovar O 23/HL 5 strains (Table 4) were characteristically RFLP/ribotype 9/13, phage group 69, and showed variable production of either hydrogen sulfide (H2S) or DNase (biotypes 6000, 6002, 6004, and 6006). Phenotype characteristics of three O 23/HL 5 isolates (C/13461, C/14159, and C/13918) have been included in this table, although RFLP typing of these strains was not done. The evident relationships between the serogroup, phage group, and biotype characteristics of these three strains and those of other isolates of this serovar provide substantive evidence of their clonal identity, even without recourse to genomic analysis.

Atypical variation of both expressed and genotypic characteristics occurs within serovars.

The cross-reacting O 23 and O 36 antigens are almost identical serologically and biochemically (7), and it was the latter serotype strain which showed the serovar characteristics. The O 23 serogroup reference strain and isolate B/1916 (Table 4) were clearly unrelated to other strains of this serovar. Although both possessed the O 23 antigen, the HL antigens of these strains were atypical, demonstrating the low predictive value of inferring interstrain relationships from O serogroup data alone. However, even within true O/HL serovars, atypical strain variation occurred. Two serovar O 2/HL 4 strains, P/2255 and P/3546 (Table 2), and two serovar O 50/HL 7 strains, P/3758 and P/2587 (Table 3), possessed E3CJC2/16S RFLP types, phage groups, and biotypes that were mostly dissimilar from those of the other strains of these serovars. More limited variation was seen with isolates C/13383 and C/19584 (Table 3), which shared the distinctive features of serovar O 50/HL 7 strains, except that the expected HL 7 antigen had been replaced with HL 1 and HL 20 epitopes, respectively.

DISCUSSION

A number of different phenotypic approaches to strain identification have been employed in attempts to resolve the epidemiology of sporadic campylobacter infection. The two most common systems involve serogrouping based on either O lipopolysaccharide or HL surface-associated antigens. In this report, we show that the O and HL epitopes exhibit strong nonrandom associations and that many UK strains can be allocated to specific serovars. A recent report has also demonstrated O/HL serogroup associations for sporadic campylobacter isolates from the United States (32), where the patterns of serovar occurrence are broadly similar to those in the UK. These data suggest that common prevalent strains may cause a majority of campylobacter infections in both of these developed nations. The similarities between certain North American serogroup reference strains and sporadic UK isolates (18) (Tables 2 to 4) provide further support for this hypothesis.

Evidence of clonal relationships within three serovars indicates that linkage between the O and HL epitopes may represent a practical epidemiological marker. It is not known why specific O and HL antigens occur in stable, preferred associations, nor why only a small number of serovars account for a majority of isolates from human infections. The possession of specific surface-expressed serogroup characteristics may confer a general fitness phenotype, enabling colonization of a wide range of hosts. Alternatively, certain antigenic combinations may act as particularly effective adhesins, enhance invasiveness, affect complement binding and serum resistance, or otherwise function as virulence factors.

The three serovars analyzed for polyphasic markers show conservation of phage group and, to a lesser extent, biotype characteristics. The coincidence of specific phage groups within serovars may be the result of linkage, with phage adsorption characteristics directly influenced by the epitope configuration of either the lipopolysaccharide or flagellar antigens. Both somatic, lipopolysaccharide-dependent phage adsorption and serogroup-specific flagellotropic phages have been demonstrated in other species (16, 26). However, there are no wholly exclusive associations between any phage group and any given O/HL serovar, indicating that phage lysis patterns do vary independently of serogroup. For example, phage group 69 is prevalent among serovar O 23/HL 5 strains but also includes two strains of serovar O 2/HL 4 and one serovar O 50/HL 7 strain.

The biotype markers are more heterogeneous than the phage groups within conserved cell lines. Selective pressure on individual strains as a result of human or veterinary antibiotic usage may account for some of the resistotype variability within serovars. Selection may be particularly important if only single point mutations are necessary to alter any of the five antibiotic resistance characteristics of the Preston biotyping scheme. Plasmid- or phage-mediated transfer of resistance determinants can cause independent variation in resistotypes, and plasmid carriage may also influence phage susceptibility (40). The relatively labile nature of markers from both the Preston biotype and phage type schemes results in their low correlation with clonality (2) and with other strain markers (30), although their high discrimination indices substantiate their usefulness for primary epidemiological investigations.

Clonal associations have been well characterized within several somatic (O-antigen) and flagellar (H-antigen) serovars of the gut pathogen Salmonella enterica (36, 37). Similarly, the polyphasic analysis of strains from three C. jejuni O/HL serovars shows that these groups represent cell lines of common descent. For each serovar, strains sharing genetic and phenotypic characteristics have been isolated from a variety of sources, at different time periods, and from unrelated geographical locations within the UK and abroad. A recent study using flagellin gene typing (25) showed that allelic variation at the flaA locus for common O and HL serogroups of C. jejuni in the United States segregates substantially in accordance with the serovar associations reported here. This provides further evidence for clonal relationships within O/HL serovars. Two serovars which could not be identified in our study due to the use of a restricted set of HL antisera are evident from these data (25). Serogroup O 15 shows clear linkage to HL 13 (flaA type 30), and serogroup O 11 is linked to HL 40 (flaA type 27). The subsidiary association of flaA type 27 with a second O 11 serovar, O 11/HL 8, is also supported by our results (Table 1, row 7).

The clonal groupings identified here embrace strains which do show some differences in either genetic or phenotypic characteristics. Such variable isolates still have a lineage in common, and strains which show broad overall identity but limited variations in phenotype or genotype may more accurately be described as forming a clone complex or clonal subgrouping (3). A similar descriptive was proposed in a recent pulsed-field gel electrophoresis study of HS 1 isolates of C. jejuni (29) to classify strains which showed minor RFLPs with otherwise identical macrorestriction profiles.

As with S. enterica, there is evidence of polyphyletic variation within C. jejuni serovars. Two isolates of serovar O 2/HL 4 (Table 2, strains P/2255 and P/3546) and two of serovar O 50/HL 7 (Table 3, strains P/3758 and P/2578) appear otherwise to be unrelated to the clonal strains of these serovars. Major intragenomic rearrangements of DNA (11, 20) or the chromosomal integration of lysogenic phage (21) could generate this type of atypical restriction pattern diversity within serovars. However, horizontal transfer of serogroup determinants between strains of different genetic backgrounds has been proposed as the primary mechanism for polyphyletic variation in Salmonella (36, 37) and may also be significant in Campylobacter (6, 42). Lateral gene transfer could also account for the replacement of the serovar-characteristic HL 7 antigen with HL 1 and HL 20 epitopes in strains C/13383 and C/19584 (Table 3). Lastly, the possibility of convergent evolution of similar antigens in different cell lines cannot be excluded. Interestingly, the relationship between the O 50 and O 65 serogroup strains reported here (Table 3) is borne out by the results of macrorestriction profile data for these two isolates (13). Evidently, strains with O antigens that do not serologically cross-react can be genotypically closely related.

A recent study of campylobacter population genetics using multilocus enzyme electrophoresis predicted a moderately high frequency of intraspecific recombination for C. jejuni and C. coli, implying that these species should not be clonal (5). However, a clonal population structure has recently been proposed for C. coli (38), and in this report, we provide evidence that serovars represent lineages of common descent in C. jejuni. The apparent absence of genetic barriers to intraspecific recombination in C. jejuni and C. coli (5) suggests that the provenance of such clonal groupings could be recent, possibly due to the rapid proliferation and spread of specific pathogenic strains (23). Large-scale point source outbreaks (24) are one mechanism by which this type of spread could occur. Additionally, modern intensive methods of animal husbandry have been strongly implicated in the recent emergence of several zoonotic pathogens.

In this study, we have demonstrated that many human isolates of C. jejuni show strong associations between specific O and HL antigens and that most strains within three common serovars share genetic and phenotypic characteristics. Further investigations are necessary to characterize the extent of clonal relationships within these and other campylobacter serovars. Where genotypic identities are substantially conserved, rapid and simple phenotypic methods may be the most appropriate means for subtyping within serovars. We conclude that serogrouping with combined O and HL antigens represents both a practical and a phenologically valid method for the epidemiological typing of sporadic isolates of C. jejuni.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Public Health Laboratory Service of England and Wales.

We acknowledge the considerable efforts of Enid Sutcliffe in serogrouping all sporadic campylobacter isolates and thank the many laboratories and clinicians who submitted strains for analysis.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Aarts H J M, van Lith L A J T, Jacob-Reitsma W F. Discrepancy between Penner serotyping and polymerase-chain reaction fingerprinting of campylobacter isolated from poultry and other animal sources. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1995;20:371–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.1995.tb01324.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Achtman M, Heuzenroeder M, Kusecek B, Ochman H, Caugant D, Selander R K, Väisanen-Rhen V, Korhonen T K, Stuart S, Ørskov F, Ørskov I. Clonal analysis of Escherichia coli O2:K1 isolated from diseased humans and animals. Infect Immun. 1986;51:268–276. doi: 10.1128/iai.51.1.268-276.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Achtman M, Hakenbeck R. Recent developments regarding the evolution of pathogenic bacteria. In: Hormaeche C E, Penn C W, Smyth C J, editors. Society for General Microbiology Symposium 49: Molecular Biology of Bacterial Infection—Current Status and Future Perspectives. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1992. pp. 13–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Adak G K, Cowden J M, Nicholas S, Evan H S. The Public Health Laboratory Service national case-control study of primary indigenous sporadic cases of campylobacter infection. Epidemiol Infect. 1995;115:15–22. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800058076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Aeschbacher M, Piffaretti J-C. Population genetics of human and animal enteric Campylobacter strains. Infect Immun. 1989;57:1432–1437. doi: 10.1128/iai.57.5.1432-1437.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alm R A, Guerry P, Trust T J. Significance of duplicated flagellin genes in Campylobacter. J Mol Biol. 1993;230:359–363. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aspinall G O, McDonald A G, Pang H. Structures of the O chains from lipopolysaccharides of Campylobacter jejuni serotypes O:23 and O:36. Carbohydr Res. 1992;231:13–30. doi: 10.1016/0008-6215(92)84003-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bolton F J, Holt A V, Hutchinson D N. Campylobacter biotyping scheme of epidemiological value. J Clin Pathol. 1984;37:677–681. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.6.677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Burnens A P, Wagner J, Lior H, Nicolet J, Frey J. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms among the flagellar genes of the Lior heat-labile serogroup reference strains and field strains of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Epidemiol Infect. 1995;114:423–431. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800052134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cowden J. Campylobacter: epidemiological paradoxes. Br Med J. 1992;305:132–133. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dworkin J, Blaser M J. Nested DNA inversion as a paradigm of programmed gene rearrangement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:985–990. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.3.985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Forbes J K, Fang Z, Pennington T H. Allelic variation in the Helicobacter pylori flagellin genes flaA and flaB: its consequences for strain typing schemes and population structure. Epidemiol Infect. 1995;114:257–266. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800057927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gibson J, Lorenz E, Owen R J. Lineages within Campylobacter jejuni defined by numerical analysis of pulsed-field gel electrophoretic DNA profiles. J Med Microbiol. 1997;46:157–163. doi: 10.1099/00222615-46-2-157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gibson J R, Fitzgerald C, Owen R J. Comparison of PFGE, ribotyping and phage-typing in the epidemiological analysis of Campylobacter jejuni serotype HS2 infections. Epidemiol Infect. 1995;115:215–225. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800058349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hutchinson D N, Bolton F J, Jones D M, Sutcliffe E M, Abbott J D. Application of three typing schemes (Penner, Lior, Preston) to strains of Campylobacter spp. isolated from three outbreaks. Epidemiol Infect. 1987;98:139–144. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800061847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Iino T. Genetics of structure and function of bacterial flagella. Annu Rev Genet. 1977;11:161–182. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.11.120177.001113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ikram R, Chambers S, Mitchell P, Brieseman M A, Ikram O H. A case-control study to determine risk-factors for campylobacter infection in Christchurch in the summer of 1992–3. N Z Med J. 1994;107:430–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jackson C J, Fox A J, Wareing D R A, Hutchinson D N, Jones D M. The application of genotyping techniques to the epidemiological analysis of Campylobacter jejuni. Epidemiol Infect. 1996;117:233–244. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800001400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jackson C J, Fox A J, Wareing D R A, Sutcliffe E M, Jones D M. Genotype analysis of human blood isolates of Campylobacter jejuni in England and Wales. Epidemiol Infect. 1997;118:81–89. doi: 10.1017/s0950268896007388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jiang Q, Hiratsuka K, Taylor D E. Variability of gene order in different Helicobacter pylori strains contributes to genome diversity. Mol Microbiol. 1996;20:833–842. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02521.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lina B, Bes M, Vandenesch F, Greenland T, Etienne J, Fleurette J. Role of bacteriophages in genomic variability of related coagulase-negative staphylococci. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1993;109:273–278. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(93)90032-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lior H, Woodward D L, Edgar J A, LaRoche L J, Gill P. Serotyping of Campylobacter jejuni by slide agglutination based on heat-labile antigenic factors. J Clin Microbiol. 1982;15:761–768. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.5.761-768.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Maynard Smith J, Smith N H, O’Rourke M, Spratt B G. How clonal are bacteria? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:4384–4388. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Morgan D, Gunnenberg C, Gunnell D, Healing T D, Lamerton S, Sollanpoor N, Lewis D A, White D G. An outbreak of campylobacter infection associated with the consumption of unpasteurized milk at a large festival in England. Eur J Epidemiol. 1994;10:581–585. doi: 10.1007/BF01719576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nachamkin I, Ung H, Patton C M. Analysis of HL and O serotypes of Campylobacter strains by the flagellin gene typing system. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:277–281. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.2.277-281.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ornellas E P, Stocker B A D. Relationship of lipopolysaccharide character to P1 sensitivity in Salmonella typhimurium. Virology. 1974;60:491–502. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(74)90343-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Orr K E, Lightfoot N F, Sisson P R, Harkis B A, Tweddle J L, Boyd P, Carroll A, Jackson C J, Wareing D R A, Freeman R. Direct milk excretion of Campylobacter jejuni in a dairy cow causing cases of human enteritis. Epidemiol Infect. 1995;114:15–24. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800051876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Owen R J, Fitzgerald C, Sutherland K, Borman P. Flagellin gene polymorphism analysis of Campylobacter jejuni infecting man and other hosts and comparison with biotyping and somatic antigen serotyping. Epidemiol Infect. 1994;113:221–234. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800051657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Owen R J, Sutherland K, Fitzgerald C, Gibson J, Borman P, Stanley J. Molecular subtyping scheme for serotypes HS1 and HS4 of Campylobacter jejuni. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:872–877. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.872-877.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Owen R J, Lorenz E, Gibson J. Application of the Mast resistotyping scheme to Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli. J Med Microbiol. 1997;46:34–38. doi: 10.1099/00222615-46-1-34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Patton C M, Wachsmuth I K, Evins G M, Kiehlbauch J A, Plikaytis B D, Troup N, Tompkins L, Lior H. Evaluation of 10 methods to distinguish epidemic-associated Campylobacter strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:680–688. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.4.680-688.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Patton C M, Nicholson M A, Ostroff S M, Ries A A, Wachsmuth I K, Tauxe R V. Common somatic O and heat-labile serotypes among Campylobacter strains from sporadic infections in the United States. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:1525–1530. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.6.1525-1530.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Penner J L, Hennessy J N. Passive hemagglutination technique for serotyping Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni on the basis of soluble heat-stable antigens. J Clin Microbiol. 1980;12:732–737. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.6.732-737.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Penner J L, Hennessy J N, Congi R V. Serotyping of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli on the basis of thermostable antigens. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1983;2:378–383. doi: 10.1007/BF02019474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Salama S M, Bolton F J, Hutchinson D N. Application of a new phage typing scheme to campylobacters isolated during outbreaks. Epidemiol Infect. 1990;104:405–411. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800047427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Selander R K, Beltran P, Smith N H. Evolutionary genetics of Salmonella. In: Selander R K, Clark A G, Whittam T S, editors. Evolution at the molecular level. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates; 1991. pp. 25–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Selander R K, Li J, Boyd E F, Wang F-S, Nelson K. DNA sequence analysis of the genetic structure of populations of Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli. In: Priest F G, Ramos-Cormenzana A, Tindall R, editors. Bacterial diversity and systematics. New York, N.Y: Plenum Press; 1994. pp. 17–49. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Stanley J, Linton D, Sutherland K, Jones C, Owen R J. High-resolution genotyping of Campylobacter coli identifies clones of epidemiologic and evolutionary significance. J Infect Dis. 1995;172:1130–1134. doi: 10.1093/infdis/172.4.1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tenover F C, Arbeit R D, Goering R V, Mickelsen P A, Murray B E, Persing D H, Swaminathan B. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2233–2239. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2233-2239.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Threlfall E J, Chart H. Interrelationships between strains of Salmonella enteritidis. Epidemiol Infect. 1993;111:1–8. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800056612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vandamme P, Pot B, Gillis M, De Vos P, Kersters K, Swings J. Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial systematics. Microbiol Rev. 1996;60:407–438. doi: 10.1128/mr.60.2.407-438.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wassenaar T M, Fry B N, van der Zeijst B A M. Variation of the flagellin gene locus of Campylobacter jejuni by recombination and horizontal gene transfer. Microbiology. 1995;141:95–101. doi: 10.1099/00221287-141-1-95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES