Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Sep 15;18(9):e0286936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286936

Estimated standard values of aerobic capacity according to sex and age in a Japanese population: A scoping review

Hiroshi Akiyama 1, Daiki Watanabe 2, Motohiko Miyachi 2,*
Editor: Yosuke Yamada3
PMCID: PMC10503723  PMID: 37713405

Abstract

Aerobic capacity is a fitness measure reflecting the ability to sustain whole-body physical activity as fast and long as possible. Identifying the distribution of aerobic capacity in a population may help estimate their health status. This study aimed to estimate standard values of aerobic capacity (peak oxygen uptake [V˙O2peak]/kg and anaerobic threshold [AT]/kg) for the Japanese population stratified by sex and age using a meta-analysis. Moreover, the comparison of the estimated standard values of the Japanese with those of other populations was performed as a supplementary analysis. We systematically searched original articles on aerobic capacity in the Japanese population using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and Google Scholar. We meta-analysed V˙O2peak/kg (total: 78,714, men: 54,614, women: 24,100) and AT (total: 4,042, men: 1,961, women: 2,081) data of healthy Japanese from 21 articles by sex and age. We also searched, collected and meta-analysed data from other populations. Means and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The estimated standard values of V˙O2peak/kg (mL/kg/min) for Japanese men and women aged 4–9, 10–19, 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, and 70–79 years were 47.6, 51.2, 43.2, 37.2, 34.5, 31.7, 28.6, and 26.3, and 42.0, 43.2, 33.6, 30.6, 27.4, 25.6, 23.4, and 23.1, respectively. The AT/kg (mL/kg/min) for Japanese men and women aged 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, and 70–79 years were 21.1, 18.3, 16.8, 15.9, 15.8, and 15.2, and 17.4, 17.0, 15.7, 15.0, 14.5, and 14.2, respectively. Herein, we presented the estimated standard values of aerobic capacity according to sex and age in a Japanese population. In conclusion, aerobic capacity declines with ageing after 20–29 years of age. Additionally, aerobic capacity is lower in the Japanese population than in other populations across a wide range of age groups. Standard value estimation by meta-analysis can be conducted in any country or region and for public health purposes.

Introduction

Aerobic capacity is a fitness measure that reflects the ability to sustain whole-body physical activity as fast and long as possible. Aerobic capacity is assessed by physiological indicators: maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2max), peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak), and anaerobic threshold (AT) [14]. V˙O2max is defined as the maximum observable oxygen uptake at which no further increase in oxygen uptake occurs despite increased exercise intensity [5]. V˙O2peak, the highest value of oxygen uptake achieved during an incremental exercise test, is widely used as a proxy indicator [6,7]. Wasserman et al. defined AT as the exercise intensity or oxygen uptake just before the initiation of anaerobic metabolism, causing an increase in blood lactate and hydrogen ion concentrations and/or breath gas parameters [4,810]. In contrast to V˙O2max and V˙O2peak, AT assessment does not require exercise up to exhaustion; thus, it has the advantage of minimising the burden on the participant and being unaffected by the participant’s motivation [4,8].

The American Heart Association has stated the need to establish a global standard of aerobic capacity (‘cardiorespiratory fitness’ in the original) and emphasised the importance of regular assessment of aerobic capacity as clinical vital signs [1113]. Several studies have reported that aerobic capacity is a strong predictor of all-cause and disease-specific mortality [12,1419] and have recommended maintaining or improving aerobic capacity [20]. To establish more realistic and practical reference values, there is no controversy about the need to understand the current status of the population, that is, to obtain standard values of aerobic capacity.

The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) established a reference value for aerobic capacity for health promotion based on substantial epidemiological evidence regarding the association between aerobic capacity and risk of disease or mortality (1st ed. published 2006, 2nd ed. published 2013) [21]. However, establishing reference values based on standard values (mean and standard deviation [SD]) for the healthy population is warranted [22] because the reference values should consider both the epidemiological evidence and the physiological background in the target population and feasibility. Although difficult in practice, the standard values should be identified by directly measuring aerobic capacity by sex and age from a large number (thousands or more) of randomly selected healthy individuals from the target population and assessing their mean and distribution.

The MHLW reference values for aerobic capacity were set based on a systematic review of epidemiological evidence, including much data from other countries, without comparing the levels of aerobic capacity in the Japanese and other populations. The classic review by Shvartz and Reibold (1990) implied that V˙O2peak/kg is lower in the Japanese than in other populations [23]. This observation underscores the necessity to compare the aerobic capacity between the Japanese and other populations. Suzuki et al. previously reported the reference interval of V˙O2peak/kg for the Japanese population [24,25]; nevertheless, they could not compare the aerobic capacity between the Japanese and other populations due to the absence of data from other populations.

Therefore, the primary aim was to integrate data from previous studies to estimate the standard values of aerobic capacity by sex and age in the Japanese population and to map them systematically. The secondary aim was to compare the estimated standard values of the Japanese with those of other populations.

Materials and methods

We conducted a scoping review, a methodical approach to literature analysis that effectively enables enhanced understanding of a specific focused topic through identifying and addressing knowledge gaps. The present scoping review was based on the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist, consisting of a five-step process. (1) identify research questions, (2) identify relevant articles, (3) select articles, (4) map the data, and (5) collate, summarize, and report results. The PRISMA Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist is shown in S1 File (S1 Checklist) [26,27]. The present study was exempted from review by the Waseda University Ethics Review Board because it is a literature study.

Search strategy

We systematically searched and meta-analysed articles for the Japanese population from 1950 to 2023 using PubMed and Ichushi-Web on January 1, 2023. We aimed to estimate standard values of aerobic capacity in the Japanese population; thus, we attempted to obtain data from articles considering the populations as far as possible (i.e. descriptive study). The search terms consisted of relevant terms, such as ‘Japanese’, ‘aerobic capacity’, ‘exercise test’, and ‘normal values’ (S1 Table in S1 File). Medical Subject Headings were also employed to ensure that potential articles were not missing from the systematic search. The grey literature search was conducted using the Google Scholar database to identify other articles published in English or Japanese that could not be located by the systematic search. A grey literature search is the process of identifying informal and hard-to-obtain publications such as conference papers and reports that are not widely available through traditional channels for research purposes. The grey literature was searched throughout the writing of the manuscript and was retrieved until January 1, 2023. These methods helped to collect a broad range of valuable Japanese articles that could not be adequately covered by systematic search alone. Moreover, we also conducted an umbrella review for the secondary aim, that is, to compare the estimated standard values of aerobic capacity in the Japanese and other populations. An umbrella review is an analysis that integrates multiple reviews and meta-analyses on a specific topic and presents a comprehensive conclusion of the existing evidence.

The search strategy for the other populations is shown in the Supplemental data (S2 Table in S1 File).

Eligibility criteria

The eligibility criteria included studies that reported aerobic capacity according to sex and age. The aerobic capacity indicators were V˙O2max, V˙O2peak, and AT. Generally, V˙O2max and V˙O2peak are different concepts that should not be confused [6,7]. However, in this study, we used studies that described both V˙O2max and V˙O2peak. The reasons for this are as follows. There were usually no differences between V˙O2max and V˙O2peak values, and if there were differences, they were small. A standard value estimated from V˙O2max alone data has a limited range of applications. The data, including V˙O2peak, can be generalised to individuals who symptomatically stopped the exercise test, that is, individuals who cannot be pushed to their physiological limits. It was difficult to decide between V˙O2max and V˙O2peak because much of the article does not adequately explain how to distinguish between the concepts of V˙O2max and V˙O2peak. V˙O2max requires several criteria to be met, including levelling off, and is part of the observed value of V˙O2peak. Therefore, in the present study, the standard values were expressed as the standard values of V˙O2peak. In addition, the present meta-analysis included data from both direct methods (measured using breath gas analysis during exercise test) and indirect methods (estimated using heart rate at several specific exercise intensities during sub-maximal exercise).

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) human studies; (2) studies measuring V˙O2max, V˙O2peak, or AT by exercise tests; (3) studies with a study period between 1 January 1950 and 1 January 2023; (4) studies in which data were reported by sex and age; and (5) studies in which the exercise mode was cycling or running, because large muscle groups are used and the amount of external load is easy to control. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies in which data were not reported by sex and age; (2) studies not in Japanese or English; (3) studies of individuals with serious diseases, such as angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; (4) studies for which the full text was not available despite requests for articles from the first author and library services; and (5) studies in which data were duplicated (in which case, the study with the more appropriate sample size/reported information was selected).

The eligibility criteria for the other populations are shown in the Supplemental data.

Study selection and data extraction

In primary screening, papers potentially containing information on the aerobic capacity of Japanese by sex and age were selected from titles and abstracts by two independent researchers (H.A. and M.M.). In the secondary screening, the same independent researchers perused the full text of the papers selected in the primary screening and selected those that precisely met the eligibility criteria. The papers handled during selection were managed using Mendeley Desktop (version 1.19.8) by the two researchers. From the papers selected in the secondary screening, data on (1) the first author’s name, (2) year of publication, (3) sex, (4) age, (5) exercise mode, and (6) means and distributions (SD, standard error, or confidence interval [CI]) of V˙O2peak/kg and the value of AT/kg were extracted. The ’/kg’ here means weight correction, not lean mass. If numerical data were not reported in the included study, we enquired about the numerical data from the corresponding author of the study. If the corresponding author did not respond, numerical data were extracted using WebPlotDigitizer version 4.5 (Ankit Rohatgi, Pacifica, CA, USA) [28] when figures were included in the study. In case of disagreements among the investigators regarding the extracted data, a final decision was made through discussion until a consensus was reached.

The study selection for the other populations is shown in the Supplemental data.

Data analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel for Windows (version 2206). We calculated V˙O2peak/kg (partly V˙O2max/kg) and AT/kg according to sex and age from the included studies by the simple mean and SD to avoid the impact of studies with a large sample size. In particular, the sample size of a study by Kono et al. (1997) was very large, accounting for 71% (55,521/78,714) of the total sample size in the present meta-analysis, which may affect the mean and SD [29]. In addition, Kono et al. estimated V˙O2peak/kg by an indirect method with a submaximal exercise test. Considering these factors, we used simple mean and SD instead of weighted values in the present meta-analysis.

All statistical analyses were stratified by sex and age group to estimate the standard values of aerobic capacity for the Japanese and other populations. Age group stratification was calculated using simple mean and 95% CI for each 10-year age group. Scatter plots were created using data on each aerobic capacity and age, and their correlations were examined. Their relationship is influenced by growth [30] and ageing [31]. Then, the slopes and intercepts of the association of age with V˙O2peak/kg and AT/kg for each age category (≤19 years, ≥20 years) were determined using a linear approximation model with the least squares method to consider these influences. The two age categories in both the Japanese and other populations were classified according to the Japanese adult criteria (legal age). Consequently, linear functional equations were developed to predict age-related changes in each aerobic capacity by sex in the Japanese and other populations. The coefficient of determination (R2) was used to assess how well the regression model explains the variables. In addition, considering the effect of the exercise mode on each indicator [32,33], we grouped the data into two exercise modes, ‘cycling’ or ‘running’, and calculated the mean and 95% CI for each indicator for each exercise mode.

Results

Accepted article and data extraction for the Japanese population

We obtained 62 candidate articles through a systematic search using PubMed and Ichushi-Web. Seventeen articles were excluded in the primary screening, 38 articles were excluded in the secondary screening (articles with missing required data = 20, articles comprising unhealthy individuals = 7, articles without full text = 4, articles not comprising Japanese individuals = 1, articles with duplication = 6), and 7 articles were accepted [3440]. The articles on aerobic capacity in the Japanese population were old, written in Japanese, and unavailable in the database. Thus, 14 articles were added through a grey literature search using Google Scholar [29,4153]. Consequently, 21 articles [29,3453] were included in the meta-analysis (Fig 1). Accepted articles and data extraction for other populations are shown in the Supplemental Data.

Fig 1. Flow diagram of the article search process.

Fig 1

Sixty-two articles were identified in the systematic search, 45 were selected in the evaluation by title and abstract (primary screening), and 7 were included in the evaluation by full-text close reading (secondary screening). Furthermore, the grey literature search was performed on the reference lists of the articles identified in the systematic search, finding additional 14 articles. Therefore, 21 articles were finally included and combined in meta-analysis.

The systematic search extracted descriptive statistics data of V˙O2peak/kg in Japanese from 22 studies on men (13 cycle, 59.1%; 9 run, 40.9%) and 17 studies on women (11 cycle, 64.7%; 6 run, 35.3%) and analysed 78,714 participants (54,614 men, 69.4%; 24,100 women, 30.6%) (S3 and S4 Tables in S1 File).

The systematic search extracted descriptive statistics data of AT/kg in Japanese from 9 studies on men (7 cycle, 77.8%; 2 run, 22.2%) and 8 studies on women (6 cycle, 75.0%; 2 run, 25.0%) and analysed 4,042 participants (1,961 men, 48.5%; 2,081 women, 51.5%) (S7 and S8 Tables in S1 File).

Relationship between the estimated standard values of V˙O2peak/kg and age for Japanese population

Tables 1 and 2 show the estimated standard values of V˙O2peak/kg by sex and age in Japanese population. S11 and S12 Tables in S1 File also show data for other populations. In addition, the relationship between the estimated standard value of V˙O2peak/kg (cycle and run combined) and age is shown in S2 Fig in S1 File. V˙O2peak/kg was the highest during the ages of 10–19 years in Japanese population regardless of sex and progressively declined with ageing after age 20–29 years (S2C and S2F Fig in S1 File, white circles). This study showed that V˙O2peak/kg declined by –7.0% for Japanese men and –6.5% for Japanese women for each decade after the age 20–29 years. In both Japanese men and women, the degree of decline in V˙O2peak/kg was greater during the ages of 20–29 years than during the ages of > 30–39 years (S2C and S2F Fig in S1 File, white circles). To calculate the rate of increase in V˙O2peak/kg with growth during the ages of 10–19 years and the rate of decline in V˙O2peak/kg with ageing after the ages of 20–29 years, linear regression equations with age and V˙O2peak/kg as variables were used (Table 3).

Table 1. Estimated standard values of weight-adjusted peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak/kg, mL/kg/min) and anaerobic threshold (AT/kg, mL/kg/min) for men in each age group of the Japanese population.

Men All Cycle Run
Age Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI
(years) (mL/kg/min) (mL/kg/min) (mL/kg/min)
V˙O2peak/kg
4–9 47.6 [45.5, 49.7] 49.0 [46.1, 51.9] 46.9 [44.4, 49.4]
10–19 51.2 [45.4, 57.0] 52.2 [44.2, 60.2] 49.3 [42.4, 56.2]
20–29 43.2 [39.8, 46.6] 41.4 [37.8, 45.0] 47.0 [41.4, 52.6]
30–39 37.2 [34.3, 40.1] 35.9 [32.7, 39.1] 39.1 [34.1, 44.1]
40–49 34.5 [32.1, 36.9] 33.5 [30.5, 36.5] 36.0 [32.1, 39.9]
50–59 31.7 [29.3, 34.1] 31.0 [27.9, 34.1] 33.0 [29.7, 36.3]
60–69 28.6 [26.3, 30.9] 27.1 [25.3, 28.9] 30.6 [26.6, 34.6]
70–79 26.3 [24.8, 27.8] 25.0 [24.5, 25.5] 27.3 [25.9, 28.7]
80–89 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
AT/kg
4–9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
10–19 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
20–29 21.1 [18.3, 23.9] 19.4 [18.9, 19.9] 24.6 [17.7, 31.5]
30–39 18.3 [16.7, 19.9] 17.2 [16.4, 18.0] 20.9 [18.1, 23.7]
40–49 16.8 [15.3, 18.3] 15.8 [15.0, 16.6] 20.3 [17.1, 23.5]
50–59 15.9 [14.5, 17.3] 14.9 [14.2, 15.6] 19.4 [18.5, 20.3]
60–69 15.8 [14.0, 17.6] 14.6 [13.5, 15.7] 20.2 [18.1, 22.3]
70–79 15.2 [11.4, 19.0] 13.5 [10.6, 16.4] 18.7 N/A
80–89 10.9 N/A 10.9 N/A N/A N/A

V˙O2peak/kg, weight-adjusted peak oxygen uptake; AT/kg, weight-adjusted anaerobic threshold; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; N/A, data not available for meta-analysis. The ’/kg’ here means weight correction, not lean mass.

Table 2. Estimated standard values of weight-adjusted peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak, mL/kg/min) and anaerobic threshold (AT/kg, mL/kg/min) for women in each age group of the Japanese population.

Women All Cycle Run
Age Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI
(years) (mL/kg/min) (mL/kg/min) (mL/kg/min)
V˙O2peak/kg
4–9 42.0 [38.1, 45.9] 43.0 [42.3, 43.7] 41.3 [34.3, 48.3]
10–19 43.2 [37.2, 49.2] 45.0 [36.3, 53.7] 40.4 [31.0, 49.8]
20–29 33.6 [30.3, 36.9] 32.1 [28.2, 36.0] 36.5 [30.7, 42.3]
30–39 30.6 [28.2, 33.0] 28.9 [27.3, 30.5] 34.0 [28.8, 39.2]
40–49 27.4 [25.5, 29.3] 26.0 [24.6, 27.4] 30.6 [26.4, 34.8]
50–59 25.6 [24.0, 27.2] 24.4 [23.1, 25.7] 28.2 [24.9, 31.5]
60–69 23.4 [21.4, 25.4] 21.7 [20.5, 22.9] 27.9 [25.2, 30.6]
70–79 23.1 [20.4, 25.8] 21.2 [20.5, 21.9] 25.1 [21.7, 28.5]
80–89 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
AT/kg
4–9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
10–19 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
20–29 17.4 [16.0, 18.8] 16.4 [15.8, 17.0] 19.4 [17.3, 21.5]
30–39 17.0 [15.7, 18.3] 16.2 [15.3, 17.1] 19.1 [18.3, 19.9]
40–49 15.7 [14.2, 17.2] 14.7 [13.6, 15.8] 18.6 [16.7, 20.5]
50–59 15.0 [13.4, 16.6] 14.0 [12.8, 15.2] 17.8 [15.4, 20.2]
60–69 14.5 [13.1, 15.9] 13.6 [12.4, 14.8] 17.2 [16.3, 18.1]
70–79 14.2 [9.7, 18.7] 12.1 [9.4, 14.8] 18.5 N/A
80–89 10.6 N/A 10.6 N/A N/A N/A

V˙O2peak/kg, weight-adjusted peak oxygen uptake; AT/kg, weight-adjusted anaerobic threshold; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; N/A, data not available for meta-analysis. The ’/kg’ here means weight correction, not lean mass.

Table 3. Equations for estimating the standard values of weight-adjusted peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak/kg, mL/kg/min) and anaerobic threshold (AT/kg, mL/kg/min) in each age group of the Japanese population.

Japanese population Age All Bicycle Run
Equation R2 Equation R2 Equation R2
V˙O2peak/kg
Men Japan ≤ 19 Y = 0.03x + 48.3 0.00 Y = -0.11x + 49.9 0.00 Y = 0.12x + 47.5 0.01
Japan ≥ 20 Y = -0.36x + 51.6 0.50 Y = -0.34x + 49.3 0.56 Y = -0.41x + 56.4 0.55
Women Japan ≤ 19 Y = -0.46x + 46.9 0.14 Y = -0.67x + 50.0 0.23 Y = -0.42x + 46.2 0.12
Japan ≥ 20 Y = -0.26x + 40.3 0.46 Y = -0.25x + 38.4 0.63 Y = -0.27x + 44.5 0.51
AT/kg
Men Japan ≤ 19 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Japan ≥ 20 Y = -0.12x + 22.8 0.34 Y = -0.11x + 21.3 0.71 Y = -0.10x + 25.4 0.35
Women Japan ≤ 19 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Japan ≥ 20 Y = -0.08x + 19.5 0.29 Y = -0.09x + 18.8 0.57 Y = -0.04x + 20.3 0.31

V˙O2peak/kg, weight-adjusted peak oxygen uptake; AT/kg, weight-adjusted anaerobic threshold; R2, coefficient of determination; N/A, data not available for meta-analysis. Y is V˙O2peak/kg or AT/kg, X is Age. The ’/kg’ here means weight correction, not lean mass.

In the comparison of the estimated standard values of V˙O2peak/kg by exercise mode, the values for Japanese men (mean, –1.8 mL/kg/min [–5.3%]; range, 2.9 to –5.6 [5.9 to –11.8%] mL/kg/min) and women (mean, –2.7 mL/kg/min [–9.7%]; range, 4.6 to –6.2 [11.4 to –22.2%] mL/kg/min) were lower for cycling than for running (Tables 1 and 2).

Relationship between the estimated standard values of AT/kg and age for the Japanese population

Tables 1 and 2 show the estimated standard values of AT/kg by sex and age in the Japanese population. In addition, the relationship between the estimated standard value of AT/kg (cycle and run combined) and age is shown in S3 Fig in S1 File. In the Japanese population, AT/kg was highest in both men and women aged 20–29 years and progressively declined with age (S3C and S3F Fig in S1 File). This study showed that AT/kg declined by –5.3% in Japanese men and –4.1% in Japanese women in each decade after 20–29 years of age. The linear regression equation between age and AT/kg is shown in Table 3.

In the comparison of the estimated standard values of AT/kg by exercise mode, the values for Japanese men (mean, –4.8 mL/kg/min [–23.3%]; range, –3.7 to –5.6 [–17.7 to –27.8%] mL/kg/min) and women (mean, –3.9 mL/kg/min [–21.4%]; range, –2.9 to –6.4 [–15.2 to –34.6%] mL/kg/min) were lower for cycling than for running (Tables 1 and 2).

Estimated standard values of V˙O2peak/kg and AT/kg for the other populations

As a second aim of this study, an umbrella review was conducted to estimate standard values of aerobic capacity in other populations. Please find supplementary materials (S5, S6 and S9-S13 Table in S1 File). The results are briefly summarised as follows. A total of 36 articles were included in the meta-analysis (S1 Fig in S1 File, combined with cycle and run). S11 and S12 Tables in S1 File show the estimated standard values of V˙O2peak/kg and AT/kg by sex and age in the other populations. In the comparison of the estimated standard values of V˙O2peak/kg between Japanese and other populations, the values for Japanese men (–2.6 mL/kg/min, –6.6%) and women (–1.7 mL/kg/min, –5.4%) were lower than those for the other populations (S2C and S2F Fig in S1 File). In the comparison of the estimated standard values of AT/kg between Japanese and other populations, Japanese men (–4.1 mL/kg/min, –19.5%) and women (–2.1 mL/kg/min, –11.9%) had lower values than the other populations (S3C and S2F Fig in S1 File).

Discussion

Main findings

The main findings of this study are as follows. First, the estimated standard values of V˙O2peak/kg and AT/kg declined with age in the Japanese population after age 20–29 years. Second, V˙O2peak/kg tended to be lower in Japanese men (–2.6 mL/kg/min, –6.6%) and women (–1.7 mL/kg/min, –5.4%) than in individuals from other populations. Third, AT/kg tended to be lower in Japanese men (–4.1 mL/kg/min, –19.5%) and women (–2.1 mL/kg/min, –11.9%) than in individuals from other populations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to estimate the standard values for V˙O2peak/kg and AT/kg by sex and age from previous studies for a large number of Japanese individuals and to compare the data with those from other populations.

Relationship between the estimated standard values of V˙O2peak/kg and age

This study showed that V˙O2peak/kg declined for Japanese men and women with ageing after the age of 20 years. However, the rate of decline in V˙O2peak/kg per decade was not uniform across all ages, with a relatively large drop between the ages of 15–29 years, followed by a relatively small decline after age 40 years (S2C and S2F Fig in S1 File, white circles). This result is consistent with the findings of Hawkins and Wiswell [54], who suggested that the rate of decline in V˙O2peak/kg varied across age groups. It was assumed that the sharp decline in V˙O2peak/kg during adolescence was caused by the interaction of two factors. One is the effect of the increase in body weight and fat resulting from growth and sexual characteristics during the 15–19 years and from the lifestyle changes associated with employment during age 20–29 years. The other is the effects of the decline in absolute V˙O2peak with ageing, which is discussed below.

Age-related decline in V˙O2peak is mainly caused by declines in maximal cardiac output (central factor) and lean body mass (peripheral factor) [54]. Age-related decline in maximal cardiac output is mainly due to a decline in peak heart rate [55]. The peak heart rate declined linearly at a rate of 7 beats/min per decade according to Tanaka et al.’s estimated equation (Y = 208–0.7 × age) [56]; the resting heart rate was constant (approximately 70 beats/min) [57]. From these data, the heart rate reserve (peak heart rate–resting heart rate) was calculated, and the average rate of decline in heart rate reserve per decade was estimated to be −6.2%. Therefore, the decline in V˙O2peak was mostly attributable to a decline in peak heart rate. One of the peripheral factors, muscle mass (lean body mass), especially lower limb muscle mass, has been reported to decline in Japanese men (30.9%) and women (28.5%) between the ages of 20 and 80 years (average decline of approximately 4% per decade) [58]. This decline in lower limb muscle mass, together with the above-mentioned decline in peak heart rate, a central factor, is thought to contribute to the age-related decline in V˙O2peak.

In the comparison of the estimated standard values of V˙O2peak/kg between Japanese and other populations, the values for Japanese men and women were lower than those of other populations. Shvartz and Reibold (1990) also reported that V˙O2peak/kg was lower in Japanese men (3%) and women (5%) than in individuals of other populations [23]. Considering that V˙O2peak/kg is more strongly related to lean body mass than to body weight [59], the difference in V˙O2peak/kg may have been influenced by the lower lean body mass and/or metabolic rate of the younger generation of Japanese individuals [58]. In addition, the World Health Organization has reported that the prevalence of physical inactivity are 27.5% worldwide and 35.5% in Japan (95% CI: 20.5–53.8%) [60]. It is speculated that this may also have led to the slightly lower value of the V˙O2peak/kg in Japanese rather than other populations.

Relationship between the estimated standard values of AT/kg and age

AT is one of the indicators observed to be submaximal in incremental exercise tests, in contrast to V˙O2peak, which requires maximal effort until exhaustion. Because AT can be measured and evaluated more safely and with less burden on the participant than V˙O2peak, it has been used in medical practice as a powerful predictor of mortality risk, especially in postoperative patients [61], organ transplant patients [62,63], and chronic heart failure patients [19]. However, available data on the standard values of AT in the general population are lacking.

This study showed that AT/kg declined in Japanese men (–5.3%) and women (–4.1%) each decade after 20–29 years of age. However, this age-related decline in AT/kg was not uniform and showed a different trend from the decline in V˙O2peak/kg (S3C and S3F Fig in S1 File, white circles). In both men and women, the rate of decline was linear from the ages 20–29 to 40–49 years and relatively slowed down subsequently. It is difficult to explain this observation, because the amount of AT/kg data was small (only approximately 4,000 participants), particularly in the 70–89 year group. Therefore, there is a need to accumulate further data on AT/kg to improve the validity of the estimated standard values of AT/kg.

The percentage of AT to V˙O2peak (AT/V˙O2peak) provides a physiological interpretation when assessing endurance characteristics [64] and is usually approximately 50% in healthy individuals [4,65,66]. In this study, the AT/V˙O2peak was calculated based on the estimated data of V˙O2peak/kg and AT/kg, although the data were not analysed and compared in the same individuals. The AT/V˙O2peak increased with ageing in this study (AT/V˙O2peak was 48.8, 49.2, 48.7, 50.2, 55.2 and 57.8% in men, and 51.8, 55.6, 57.3, 58.6, 62.0 and 61.5% in women, in the age groups 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69 and 70–79 years, respectively). These results are consistent with some previous studies [6769]. The reasons for this phenomenon may be explained by the facts that 1) the underlying physiological mechanisms of V˙O2peak and AT are different, therefore, the effects of ageing differ between them, and 2) AT has greater trainability than V˙O2peak in middle-aged and older individuals.

Previous studies suggest that maintaining the physiologically determinant factor of V˙O2peak as individuals age is challenging, whereas maintaining the physiologically determinant factor of AT is more achievable [69,70]. V˙O2peak depends on the ability of the respiratory and circulatory systems to transport oxygen and the ability of the skeletal muscle to utilise oxygen, whereas AT largely depends on the oxidative capacity of the skeletal muscle [64]. Several studies showed that respiratory and circulatory capacity steadily declined with ageing [7176], whereas the oxidative capacity of the skeletal muscle was relatively maintained with ageing [7784]. In summary, the effect of ageing was smaller for AT/kg (mainly dependent on peripheral factors) than for V˙O2peak/kg (dependent on central and peripheral factors), suggesting that AT/V˙O2peak increases with ageing.

Notably, beyond the differences in V˙O2peak (S2 Fig in S1 File), AT in Japanese men aged 20–69 years was markedly lower than that in other populations (S3 Fig in S1 File). The mechanisms contributing to this phenomenon are unknown. However, given that AT largely depends on the skeletal muscle’s oxidative capacity, the skeletal muscle mass or skeletal muscle’s oxidative capacity may differ between Japanese and other populations. Silva et al. (2010) reported that skeletal muscle mass decreases after 27 years of age, and that ethnic differences exist in this ageing phenomenon of skeletal muscle mass. They also reported that skeletal muscle mass is lowest in Asians, including Japanese; however, only women were included in their study [85]. Further research should be conducted on the mechanisms underlying AT differences between ethnic groups with data from both sexes.

Differences in exercise mode

Comparing the estimated standard values of V˙O2peak/kg and AT/kg by exercise mode, the Japanese population had lower V˙O2peak/kg and AT/kg values during cycling than running. Compared with running, cycling V˙O2peak/kg was lower for men (–5.3%) and women (–9.7%). These results are consistent with the findings of previous studies that reported a 5%–22% lower V˙O2peak/kg for cycling than running [8691]. In contrast, V˙O2peak/kg was lower for running than for cycling in Japanese men and women aged 4–9 and 10–19 years. Although the detailed reasons for this observation are beyond the scope of this review, it may be due to sampling bias rather than the physiological effects of the different exercises. Additionally, the reversal phenomenon of cycling and running may presumably be due to the small number of studies on the aerobic capacity of minors, and the inclusion of sports children in the studies using cycling (Tamiya, 1991) [34].

Compared with running, cycling AT/kg was lower for men (–23.3%) and women (–21.4%) in the Japanese population. Moreover, AT/kg was –11% to –16% lower in triathletes in cycling than in running [92]. The present study did not compare the effects of exercise mode on V˙O2peak/kg and AT/kg in the same individuals, which may indicate inter-individual differences.

Strengths and limitations

The strengths of this study are as follows. Based on large-scale data (V˙O2peak/kg for 78,714 and AT/kg for 4,042) collected from several studies, it was possible to evaluate the aerobic capacity of Japanese populations according to sex and age. The present data may be more representative of the population results because the mean and distribution of aerobic capacity were estimated from multiple surveys. The estimated standard value of aerobic capacity obtained in this study is expected to be utilised in research and education in the fields of public health, physical education, and sports.

A limitation of this study is that some biases cannot be completely excluded, such as the effect on values due to differences in research methods among the collected articles. First, it appears likely that the data collected in this study were obtained only from individuals with a high physical fitness level and high motivation to participate in physical fitness tests, regardless of their population. Second, the comparison of estimated standard values by age in this study was based on a cross-sectional analysis that may be affected by confounders and cohort effects and thus may not detect true age-related changes in aerobic capacity independent of these effects [93]. Finally, the estimated standard values of aerobic capacity of Japanese individuals in this study are based on data obtained during the past 40 years, between 1977 and 2013, which may be different from the current status of aerobic capacity of the Japanese population. Therefore, the estimated standard values of V˙O2peak/kg and AT/kg obtained in this study should be improved and validated based on further data accumulation in future studies.

Perspectives

Identifying the standard values of aerobic capacity within a population serves a twofold purpose: aiding in the evaluation of individuals’ health statuses and the formulation of effective health promotion strategies. Assessment of these factors requires population information, especially distribution. Furthermore, when devising reference values to guide health promotion initiatives, it becomes imperative to strike a balance between specific benefits and the rate at which the population adheres to these guidelines. Therefore, the standard values estimated from this study may contribute to assessing and developing health promotion strategies based on a more holistic understanding of the population, in addition to determining the aerobic capacity and health status of the Japanese population.

The literature research method used in this study can be used in Japan and in other populations worldwide. This research method can contribute to understanding the distribution of aerobic capacity in one’s own population, which is difficult to practice in a single study. As a result, it may be able to significantly contribute to understanding the health status of its own population.

Evaluation of aerobic capacity requires an exercise test in the laboratory, for which breath gas analysis is the standard method. Recently, attention has been focused on the development of wearable devices that estimate aerobic capacity based on data, such as pulse rate, acceleration, and distance travelled [94,95]. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the accuracy of these estimation methods [96,97] and accumulate further evidence to determine the standard values of aerobic capacity based on these estimation methods.

There is a need to update the estimated standard values based on the accumulation of the latest research data, because aerobic capacity may potentially change (unfortunately, probably decline) with long-term changes in lifestyle associated with the progress in science and technology.

Conclusions

This study estimated the standard values and distribution for aerobic capacity (V˙O2peak/kg and AT/kg) in the current Japanese population based on meta-analysis. These standard values may help to set and update the reference values for health promotion, because the reference values should reflect not only the epidemiological evidence but the physiological background in the target population and feasibility. The estimation of standard values by meta-analysis attempted in this paper can be conducted in any country or region and be used for public health purposes.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist.

(DOCX)

S1 File. S1-S13 Table, S1-S3 Fig., Supplemental Methods, and Supplemental Results.

(DOCX)

S2 File. Evidence table for studies of Japanese population.

(XLSX)

S3 File. Evidence table for studies of other population.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our appreciation to the authors of the studies included in this study and to all individuals involved in the data collection. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Abbreviations

V˙O2max

maximal oxygen uptake

V˙O2peak

peak oxygen uptake

AT

anaerobic threshold

95% CI

95% confidence interval

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Japan Science and Technology Agency, SPRING (Grant Number JPMJSP2128 to Hiroshi Akiyama) and Practical Research Project for Lifestyle-related Diseases Including Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes Mellitus from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (Grant Number 21FA1004 and 22FA1004 to Motohiko Miyachi). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Shephard RJ, Allen C, Benade AJ, Davies CT, Di Prampero PE, Hedman R, et al. The maximum oxygen intake. An international reference standard of cardiorespiratory fitness. Bull World Health Organ. 1968;38: 757–764. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5303329 / (Accessed 31th August 2023). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jones AM, Carter H. The effect of endurance training on parameters of aerobic fitness. Sports medicine. 2000;29: 373–386. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200029060-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bassett DR, Howley ET. Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32: 70–84. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200001000-00012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Stringer WW, Sietsema KE, Sun X-G, et al. Principles of exercise testing and interpretation: Including pathophysiology and clinical applications, fifth edition. 5th ed. DeStefano FR, editor. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011. Available: http://solution.lww.com/exercisetesting5e (Accessed 31th August 2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hill AV, Lupton Hartley. Muscular exercise, lactic acid, and the supply and utilization of oxygen. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 1923;os-16: 135–171. 10.1093/qjmed/os-16.62.135. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Green S, Askew C. VO2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not VO2max. J Appl Physiol. 2018;125: 229–232. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00850.2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Poole DC, Jones AM. Measurement of the maximum oxygen uptake VO2max: VO2peak is no longer acceptable. J Appl Physiol. 2017;122: 997–1002. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01063.2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wasserman K, Whipp BJ, Koyal SN, Beaver WL. Anaerobic threshold and respiratory gas exchange during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1973;35: 236–243. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1973.35.2.236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wasserman K. Breathing during exercise. N Engl J Med. 1978;298: 780–785. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197804062981408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wasserman K. The anaerobic threshold measurement to evaluate exercise performance. American Review of Respiratory Disease. 1984;129: 35–40. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1984.129.2P2.S35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ross R, Blair SN, Arena R, Church TS, Després JP, Franklin BA, et al. Importance of assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in clinical practice: A case for fitness as a clinical vital sign: A scientific statement from the american heart association. Circulation. 2016;134: e653–e699. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Harber MP, Kaminsky LA, Arena R, Blair SN, Franklin BA, Myers J, et al. Impact of cardiorespiratory fitness on all-cause and disease-specific mortality: Advances since 2009. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. 2017. pp. 11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kaminsky LA, Arena R, Beckie TM, Brubaker PH, Church TS, Forman DE, et al. The importance of cardiorespiratory fitness in the United States: the need for a national registry: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127: 652–662. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31827ee100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Blair SN, Kohl HW, Paffenbarger RS, Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality: A prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA. 1989;262: 2395–401. 10.1001/jama.262.17.2395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Blair SN, Kohl HW, Barlow CE, Gibbons LW, Paffenbarger RS, Macera CA. Changes in physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy and unhealthy men. JAMA. 1995;273: 1093–1098. 10.1001/jama.1995.03520380029031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med. 2002;346: 793–801. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mora S, Redberg RF, Cui Y, Whiteman MK, Flaws JA, Sharrett AR, et al. Ability of exercise testing to predict cardiovascular and all-cause death in asymptomatic women: a 20-year follow-up of the lipid research clinics prevalence study. JAMA. 2003;290: 1600–1607. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.12.1600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Clausen JSR, Marott JL, Holtermann A, Gyntelberg F, Jensen MT. Midlife cardiorespiratory fitness and the long-term risk of mortality: 46 years of follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72: 987–995. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gitt AK, Wasserman K, Kilkowski C, Kleemann T, Kilkowski A, Bangert M, et al. Exercise anaerobic threshold and ventilatory efficiency identify heart failure patients for high risk of early death. Circulation. 2002;106: 3079–3084. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000041428.99427.06 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Imboden MT, Harber MP, Whaley MH, Finch WH, Bishop DA, Fleenor BS, et al. The influence of change in cardiorespiratory fitness with short-term exercise training on mortality risk from the ball state adult fitness longitudinal lifestyle study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94: 1406–1414. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare of Japan. Physical Activity Reference for Health Promotion 2013 (in Japanese). 2013 [cited 7 Jul 2022]. Available: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/houdou/2r9852000002xple.html (Accessed 31th August 2023).
  • 22.Kaminsky LA, Myers J, Arena R. Determining cardiorespiratory fitness with precision: Compendium of findings from the FRIEND registry. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2019;62: 76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2018.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shvartz E, Reibold RC. Aerobic fitness norms for males and females aged 6 to 75 years: A review. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1990;61: 3–11. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2405832/ (Accessed 31th August 2023). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Suzuki M, Ishiyama I, Katamoto S, Sawada S S, Suto M, Odagiri Y, et al. The study on a minimum zone of VO2max as one of the determinants of health-related physical fitness in Japan (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine. 2008;57: 71–73. 10.7600/jspfsm.57.71. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Suzuki M, Ishiyama I. Reference interval of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) as one of determinants of health-related physical fitness in Japan. Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine. 2010;59: 75–86. 10.7600/jspfsm.59.75. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169: 467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372. 10.1136/bmj.n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Drevon D, Fursa SR, Malcolm AL. Intercoder reliability and validity of WebPlotDigitizer in extracting graphed data. Behav Modif. 2017;41: 323–339. doi: 10.1177/0145445516673998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kono K, Orimo A, Takeda S, Haraguchi T, Kurotani I, Mitsuhashi A. [Reconsideration of evaluation criteria for physical fitness tests of a working population—comparing conventional and new evaluation criteria (in Japanese)]. Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 1997;39: 27–37. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9138775/ (Accessed 31th August 2023). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Takken T, Bongers BC, Van Brussel M, Haapala EA, Hulzebos EHJ. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in pediatrics. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14: S123–S128. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201611-912FR [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schneider J. Age dependency of oxygen uptake and related parameters in exercise testing: an expert opinion on reference values suitable for adults. Lung. 2013;191: 449–458. doi: 10.1007/s00408-013-9483-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Myers J, Buchanan N, Walsh D, Kraemer M, McAuley P, Hamilton-Wessler M, et al. Comparison of the ramp versus standard exercise protocols. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17: 1334–1342. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80144-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hambrecht RP, Schuler GC, Muth T, Grunze MF, Marburger CT, Niebauer J, et al. Greater diagnostic sensitivity of treadmill versus cycle exercise testing of asymptomatic men with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70: 141–146. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)91265-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tamiya N. [Study of physical fitness in children, and its application to pediatric clinics and sports medicine (in Japanese)]. The Hokkaido journal of medical science. 1991;66: 849–867. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1783371/ (Accessed 31th August 2023). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kunitomi M, Takahashi K, Wada J, Suzuki H, Miyatake N, Ogawa S, et al. Re-evaluation of exercise prescription for Japanese type 2 diabetic patients by ventilatory threshold. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2000;50: 109–115. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(00)00170-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Suzuki M, Tanaka K, Sutoh M, Sawada S, Odagiri Y. [Reference interval of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) as one of the determinants of health-related physical fitness in Japan (in Japanese)]. Descente Sports Science. 2009;30: 3–14. Available: https://www.descente.co.jp/ishimoto/30/pdf/des30_01.pdf (Accessed 31th August 2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kuroda Y, Nishio S, Moriyama T, Haraguchi A, Wakui S. [Maximal oxygen uptake of persons who have no habitual exercise (in Japanese)]. Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine. 2011;60: 147–154. 10.7600/jspfsm.60.147. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sawada S S, Miyachi M, Tanaka S, Ishikawa-Takata K, Tabata I, Oida Y, et al. Reference values of the maximal oxygen uptake on “Exercise and Physical Activity Reference for Health Promotion 2006” and mortality: A cohort study among Japanese male workers (in Japanese). Research in Exercise Epidemiology. 2012;14: 29–36. 10.24804/ree.14.29. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Itoh H, Ajisaka R, Koike A, Makita S, Omiya K, Kato Y, et al. Heart rate and blood pressure response to ramp exercise and exercise capacity in relation to age, gender, and mode of exercise in a healthy population. J Cardiol. 2013;61: 71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ashikaga K, Itoh H, Maeda T, Itoh H, Ichikawa Y, Tanaka S, et al. Ventilatory efficiency during ramp exercise in relation to age and sex in a healthy Japanese population. J Cardiol. 2021;77: 57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yamaji K, Miyashita M. Oxygen transport system during exhaustive exercise in Japanese boys. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1977;36: 93–99. doi: 10.1007/BF00423116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ichikawa T, Miyashita M. Aerobic power of Japanese in relation to age and sex. Hung Rev Sports Med. 1980;21: 243–253. Available: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1573387449450013696 (Accessed 31th August 2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kobayashi K, Kitamura K, Matsui H. [Aerobic power of non-athletic and athletic men, ages 20 to 72 yr (in Japanese)]. Taiikugaku kenkyu. 1980;24: 313–323. 10.5432/jjpehss.KJ00003402490. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yoshizawa S, Ishizaki T, Honda H. [The studies on the development of aerobic work capacity of Japanese rural children and adolescents aged from 4 to 18 years (in Japanese)]. Taiikugaku kenkyu. 1983;28: 199–214. 10.5432/jjpehss.KJ00003392876. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Okita K. [Evaluation of cardio-pulmonary function on maximal exercise test in normal school children (in Japanese)]. 呼吸と循環. 1984;32: 1187–1193. 10.11477/mf.1404204553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kobayashi K, Sakurai S, Yagi N, Wakita H. [Effect of physical activities on aerobic power of young children ages 4 to 6 (in Japanese)]. Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine. 1984;33: 287. 10.7600/jspfsm1949.33.273. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kobayashi K, Sakurai S, Hiruta S, Wakita H, Yagi N, Sakurai K. Comparison of aerobic power of young children measured by treadmill and ground running. Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine. 1986;34: 516. 10.7600/jspfsm1949.34.321. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Murayama M. [Standard value of respiratory circulation index during exercise in Japanese people (in Japanese)]. Jpn Circ J. 1992;56: 1514–1523. Available: https://search.jamas.or.jp/link/ui/1994075465 (Accessed 31th August 2023).1291753 [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ichihara Y, Anno T., Okuma K, Yokoi M, Mizuno Y, Iwatsuka T, et al. [Significant relation between gas analysis data and coronary risk factors in the middle-aged and elderly Japanese (in Japanese)]. Japanese Journal of Multiphasic Health Testing and Service. 1994;21: 110–117. 10.7143/jhep1985.21.110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Miura K. [Ventilatory threshold in Japanese—as the basis for exercise prescription for health promotion—(in Japanese]). Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1996;43: 220–230. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8991498/ (Accessed 31th August 2023). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tamura S. [Ventilatory threshold and maximal aerobic power in cycle ergometry in general persons, in relation to age and habitual physical activity (in Japanese)]. Nagoya Journal of Health, Physical Fitness & Sports. 1997;25: 150–159. Available: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1573668924435657600 (Accessed 31th August 2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Suto M, Mitani Y, Suzuki M. [Critical and desirable levels of health-related physical fitness (HRPF) ㏌ men—Established levels based on health examination and risk factors caused by lifestyle habits—(in Japanese)]. Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine. 1999;48: 265–279. 10.7600/jspfsm1949.48.265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ohta T, Zhang J, Ishikawa K, Tabata I, Yoshitake Y, Miyashita M. [Peak oxygen uptake, ventilatory threshold and leg extension power in apparently healthy Japanese (in Japanese)]. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1999;46: 289–297. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10491860/ (Accessed 31th August 2023). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hawkins SA, Wiswell RA. Rate and mechanism of maximal oxygen consumption decline with aging: implications for exercise training. Sports Med. 2003;33: 877–888. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200333120-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Pandey A, Kraus WE, Brubaker PH, Kitzman DW. Healthy aging and cardiovascular function: Invasive hemodynamics during rest and exercise in 104 healthy volunteers. JACC Heart Fail. 2020;8: 111–121. 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tanaka H, Monahan KD, Seals DR. Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37: 153–156. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01054-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Peters CH, Sharpe EJ, Proenza C. Cardiac pacemaker activity and aging. Annu Rev Physiol. 2020;82: 21–43. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021119-034453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tanimoto Y, Watanabe M, Kono R, Hirota C, Takasaki K, Kono K. [Aging changes in muscle mass of Japanese]. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2010;47: 52–57. doi: 10.3143/geriatrics.47.52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Buskirk E, Taylor HL. Maximal oxygen intake and its relation to body composition, with special reference to chronic physical activity and obesity. J Appl Physiol. 1957;11: 72–78. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1957.11.1.72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6: e1077–e1086. 10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30357-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Moran J, Wilson F, Guinan E, McCormick P, Hussey J, Moriarty J. Role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a risk-assessment method in patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116: 177–191. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Epstein SK, Freeman RB, Khayat A, Unterborn JN, Pratt DS, Kaplan MM. Aerobic capacity is associated with 100-day outcome after hepatic transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2004;10: 418–424. doi: 10.1002/lt.20088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ney M, Haykowsky MJ, Vandermeer B, Shah A, Ow M, Tandon P. Systematic review: pre- and post-operative prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in liver transplant candidates. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;44: 796–806. doi: 10.1111/apt.13771 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Joyner MJ, Coyle EF. Endurance exercise performance: the physiology of champions. J Physiol. 2008;586: 35–44. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.143834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jones NL, Makrides L, Hitchcock C, Chypchar T, McCartney N. Normal standards for an incremental progressive cycle ergometer test. American Review of Respiratory Disease. 1985;131: 700–708. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3923878/ (Accessed 31th August 2023). doi: 10.1164/arrd.1985.131.5.700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hansen JE, Sue DY, Wasserman K. Predicted values for clinical exercise testing. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984;129: S49–55. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1984.129.2P2.S49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Cunningham DA, Nancekievill EA, Paterson DH, Donner AP, Rechnitzer PA. Ventilation threshold and aging. J Gerontol. 1985;40: 703–707. doi: 10.1093/geronj/40.6.703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Babcock MA, Paterson DH, Cunningham DA. Influence of ageing on aerobic parameters determined from a ramp test. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1992;65: 138–143. doi: 10.1007/BF00705071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Posner JD, Gorman KM, Klein HS, Cline CJ. Ventilatory threshold: measurement and variation with age. J Appl Physiol. 1987;63: 1519–1525. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1987.63.4.1519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Seffrin A, Vivan L, dos Anjos Souza VR, da Cunha RA, de Lira CAB, Vancini RL, et al. “Impact of aging on maximal oxygen uptake adjusted for lower limb lean mass, total body mass, and absolute values in runners.” Geroscience. 2023; 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s11357-023-00828-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Julius S, Amery A, Whitlock LS, Conway J. Influence of age on the hemodynamic response to exercise. Circulation. 1967;36: 222–230. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.36.2.222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Granath A, Jonsson B, Strandell T. Circulation in healthy old men, studied by right heart catheterization at rest and during exercise in supine and sitting position. Acta Med Scand. 1964;176: 425–446. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1964.tb00949.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Larsson L, Sjödin B, Karlsson J. Histochemical and biochemical changes in human skeletal muscle with age in sedentary males, age 22–65 years. Acta Physiol Scand. 1978;103: 31–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1978.tb06187.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Rodeheffer RJ, Gerstenblith G, Becker LC, Fleg JL, Weisfeldt ML, Lakatta EG. Exercise cardiac output is maintained with advancing age in healthy human subjects: cardiac dilatation and increased stroke volume compensate for a diminished heart rate. Circulation. 1984;69: 203–213. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.69.2.203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Tzankoff SP, Norris AH. Age-related differences in lactate distribution kinetics following maximal exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1979;42: 35–40. doi: 10.1007/BF00421102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Roman MA, Rossiter HB, Casaburi R. Exercise, ageing and the lung. Eur Respir J. 2016;48: 1471–1486. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00347-2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Rusko H, Rahkila P, Karvinen E. Anaerobic threshold, skeletal muscle enzymes and fiber composition in young female cross-country skiers. Acta Physiol Scand. 1980;108: 263–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1980.tb06532.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ivy JL, Withers RT, van Handel PJ, Elger DH, Costill DL. Muscle respiratory capacity and fiber type as determinants of the lactate threshold. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980;48: 523–527. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1980.48.3.523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Nilwik R, Snijders T, Leenders M, Groen BBL, van Kranenburg J, Verdijk LB, et al. The decline in skeletal muscle mass with aging is mainly attributed to a reduction in type II muscle fiber size. Exp Gerontol. 2013;48: 492–498. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2013.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Grevendonk L, Connell NJ, McCrum C, Fealy CE, Bilet L, Bruls YMH, et al. Impact of aging and exercise on skeletal muscle mitochondrial capacity, energy metabolism, and physical function. Nat Commun. 2021;12. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24956-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hütter E, Skovbro M, Lener B, Prats C, Rabøl R, Dela F, et al. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial impairment can be separated from lipofuscin accumulation in aged human skeletal muscle. Aging Cell. 2007;6: 245–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00282.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Rasmussen UF, Krustrup P, Kjaer M, Rasmussen HN. Human skeletal muscle mitochondrial metabolism in youth and senescence: no signs of functional changes in ATP formation and mitochondrial oxidative capacity. Pflugers Arch. 2003;446: 270–278. doi: 10.1007/s00424-003-1022-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Lanza IR, Befroy DE, Kent-Braun JA. Age-related changes in ATP-producing pathways in human skeletal muscle in vivo. J Appl Physiol. 2005;99: 1736–1744. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00566.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Zhang X, Kunz HE, Gries K, Hart CR, Polley EC, Lanza IR. Preserved skeletal muscle oxidative capacity in older adults despite decreased cardiorespiratory fitness with ageing. J Physiol. 2021;599: 3581–3592. doi: 10.1113/JP281691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Silva AM, Shen W, Heo M, Gallagher D, Wang Z, Sardinha LB, et al. Ethnicity-related skeletal muscle differences across the lifespan. Am J Hum Biol. 2010;22: 76–82. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Astrand PO, Saltin B. Maximal oxygen uptake and heart rate in various types of muscular activity. J Appl Physiol. 1961;16: 977–981. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1961.16.6.977 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hermansen L, Saltin B. Oxygen uptake during maximal treadmill and bicycle exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1969;26: 31–37. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1969.26.1.31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Faulkner JA, Roberts DE, Elk RL, Conway J. Cardiovascular responses to submaximum and maximum effort cycling and running. J Appl Physiol. 1971;30: 457–461. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1971.30.4.457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Miyamura M, Honda Y. Oxygen intake and cardiac output during maximal treadmill and bicycle exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1972;32: 185–188. 10.1152/jappl.1972.32.2.-b185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Keren G, Magazanik A, Epstein Y. A comparison of various methods for the determination of VO2max. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1980;45: 117–124. doi: 10.1007/BF00421319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kaminsky LA, Arena R, Myers J, Peterman JE, Bonikowske AR, Harber MP, et al. Updated reference standards for cardiorespiratory fitness measured with cardiopulmonary exercise testing: data from the fitness registry and the importance of exercise national database (FRIEND). Mayo Clin Proc. 2022;97: 285–293. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.08.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Price S, Wiecha S, Cieśliński I, Śliż D, Kasiak PS, Lach J, et al. Differences between treadmill and cycle ergometer cardiopulmonary exercise testing results in triathletes and their association with body composition and body mass index. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19: 3557. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Watanabe D, Murakami H, Gando Y, Kawakami R, Tanisawa K, Ohno H, et al. Association btween temporal changes in diet quality and concurrent changes in dietary intake, body mass index, and physical activity among japanese adults: A longitudinal study. Front Nutr. 2022;9: 753127. 10.3389/fnut.2022.753127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Muniz-Pardos B, Angeloudis K, Guppy FM, Keramitsoglou I, Sutehall S, Bosch A, et al. Wearable and telemedicine innovations for Olympic events and elite sport. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2021;61: 1061–1072. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34256539/ (Accessed 31th August 2023). doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12752-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ash GI, Stults-Kolehmainen M, Busa MA, Gaffey AE, Angeloudis K, Muniz-Pardos B, et al. Establishing a global standard for wearable devices in sport and exercise medicine: Perspectives from academic and industry stakeholders. Sports Medicine. 2021;51: 2237–2250. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01543-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Strain T, Wijndaele K, Dempsey PC, Sharp SJ, Pearce M, Jeon J, et al. Wearable-device-measured physical activity and future health risk. Nat Med. 2020;26: 1385–1391. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1012-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Molina-Garcia P, Notbohm HL, Schumann M, Argent R, Hetherington-Rauth M, Stang J, et al. Validity of estimating the maximal oxygen consumption by consumer wearables: a systematic review with meta-analysis and expert statement of the INTERLIVE network. Sports Med. 2022;52: 1577–1597. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01639-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Yosuke Yamada

13 Jul 2023

PONE-D-23-15750Estimated standard values of aerobic capacity according to sex and age in a Japanese population: a scoping reviewPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Miyachi,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 27 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yosuke Yamada

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

"YES-This work was supported by the National Research and Development Agency (JST), SPRING (Grant Number JPMJSP2128 to Hiroshi Akiyama) and Practical Research Project for Lifestyle-related Diseases including Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes Mellitus from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (Grant Number 21FA1004 and 22FA1004 to Motohiko Miyachi)."

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Please expand the acronym “JST” (as indicated in your financial disclosure) so that it states the name of your funders in full.

This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: General comments

The authors performed a meta-analysis to estimate the standard values of VO2peak and AT in the Japanese and other populations stratified by sex and age. The theme of the present study is potentially important. Overall, the statistical analyses and data reporting are appropriate. However, unfortunately the manuscript is not well written. This reviewer has a number of comments to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Specific comments

Page 2, line 29: The words “VO2peak/kg and AT/kg in other populations” suddenly appeared in the latter part of Abstract. The authors should explain beforehand on the aerobic capacity in the other population in the background, purpose, and methods sections.

Page 2, lines 31-32: Readers may misunderstand the conclusion sentence. Some readers may think that the decline in the aerobic capacity is lower (or smaller) in Japanese population than the other population when they read only abstract. Please revise the sentence to prevent the potential readers’ confusion.

Page 3, lines 50-55: To the reviewer’s understanding, epidemiological evidence regarding the association between aerobic capacity and disease risk or mortality risk is absolutely necessary to establish a reference value of aerobic capacity. This reviewer cannot understand the reason why the standard value of the aerobic capacity is absolutely needed to establish the reference value of aerobic capacity. Please explain the reason more clearly and concretely.

Page 4, lines 60-68: The reviewer could not clearly understand the rationales of the primary and secondary aims of the present study. It is even unclear that the authors are trying to explain on the primary or secondary aims in the first paragraph of page 4. The authors should clearly mention the rationales of the primary and secondary aims in this paragraph. The authors should focus on mentioning only the purpose of the present study in the last paragraph of the Introduction section.

Page 4, line 71: General readers who are not familiar with meta-analysis may have no idea about the terms “scoping review” as well as “grey literature search”, or “umbrella review”. Please explain more courteously on them in the Materials and methods section or other appropriate sections.

Page 4, lines: 60-61: The sentence is poorly written, and needs to be revised.

Page 5, lines 94-101: VO2max in the selected articles is directly measured by expired gas during maximal exercise test, or it is indirectly estimated by heart rate response during submaximal exercise test (e.g., using an equation of estimated maximum heart rate 220-age)? It is not clearly written whether the directly or indirectly measured VO2max or both are included (as VO2peak) in the present meta-analysis.

Page 6, 102-110: Are these criteria are the criteria for Japanese population or other population or both? The authors performed a meta-analysis of other populations than Japanese population as a secondary aim (one of the major aims of the present study), but they mentioned “studies not in Japanese” as a criterion (line 106).

Please be explicit not only about the eligibility criteria, but also the search strategy, study selection, data analysis for each of the Japanese population analysis and other population analysis.

Page 6, lines 109-110: The sentence is poorly written, and needs to be revised.

Page 6, lines 113-115: There is no description on the roles of the primary and secondary screening. There is also no explanation on the required conditions that articles pass the primary screening to the secondary screening. Please be explicit about that these primary and secondary screenings are used for Japanese population, other population, or both.

In addition, for example, the authors mentioned that “The following items were extracted: (1) first author’s name, (2) year of publication, (3) sex, (4) age, (5) exercise mode, and (6) means and distributions of VO2peak and AT (SD, standard error, and confidence interval [CI])”. Please be explicit about that this (and other each procedure) is conducted as the primary screening or secondary screening.

Page 7, line 127: VO2peak (or VO2max) is sometimes expressed as / kg lean body mass (LBM). The authors should clearly mention at least once that they used /kg body weight (not LBM) in the Materials and methods section (not only in footnotes of Tables and legends of Figures but also in the Methods section).

Page 7, lines 130-131: The reviewer could not understand the meaning of the sentence. Do you mean that the article (ref. 39) reported VO2peak and AT measured by indirect method? It is known that the VO2peak and AT measured by indirectly method are underestimated when they are compared with VO2peak and AT measured by directly method?

Page 7, lines 132-134: The authors showed VO2peak and AT data by 10-year age group in Tables 1 and 2. However, they suddenly explain on the categorization of ≤19 years or ≥20 years, before they explain about the 10-year age group categorization first. It is also unclear that these data analyses are applied to Japanese population or other population, or both populations. Data analysis section is poorly written and should be drastically revised to prevent readers’ confusion.

Page 7, lines 135-136: The authors mentioned “The slopes and intercepts of the mean and age for each indicator from each study were determined using…”. Is it correct? It should be “The slopes and intercepts of the association of age with VO2peak and AT for each age category (≦19 years, ≧20 years) were determined using…”.

Page 8, line 142: Please be explicit about that these are accepted articles and data extraction for Japanese population, or other population than Japanese, or both.

Page 10, Table 1: The authors may touch the possible reason why the VO2peak data measured by run are lower than VO2peak data measured by cycle in the age groups of 4-9 and 10-19 in the Materials and methods section or Discussion section.

Page 10, Table 1: The percentage of AT in VO2peak is approximately 50% in the age groups of young and middle-aged men (Table 1) and women (Table 2), but the percentage is apparently higher in older men and women (55-61% in Tables 1 and 2). To the reviewer’s knowledge, endurance athletes have a higher percentage of AT in VO2peak (>60%), but not in older people. How do the authors explain this phenomenon?

Page 13, lines 216-220: It is unclear that the VO2peak and AT data shown in S2 and S3 figures are measured by cycle, run, or combined with cycle and run.

Page 16, lines 273-279: Based on the AT data in the other age groups than 70–89-year group, it seems that the decrease in AT in Japanese population compared with other population (shown in S3 figure) is greater than the decrease in VO2peak in the Japanese population compared with other population (shown in S2 figure). How do the authors explain this interesting phenomenon?

Page 18, line 310: The authors stated that “identifying the distribution of aerobic capacity in population may help estimate their health status and develop a health promotion strategy” in Abstract. In addition, they mentioned that “estimated standard values may help set or update more practical reference values for health promotion in the Japanese population” in the conclusion. However, this reviewer could not clearly understand the reason why the estimated standard values may help set or update more practical reference values for health promotion in the Japanese population. Please describe more how the standard values of VO2peak and AT estimated by the present study actually contribute to the development of the reference value of the aerobic capacities for future health promotion, in this Perspectives section or other appropriate sections, more clearly and concretely.

Reviewer #2: Line 281.

VO2peak/kg is lower in Run than in Cycle for both males and females in their teens.

Perhaps this is a discrepancy arising from Tamiya's (1991) higher results for teenagers with Cycle.

The author should add a discussion of this result.

(No need to re-review.)

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Kojiro Ishii

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Review comments.docx

PLoS One. 2023 Sep 15;18(9):e0286936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286936.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


15 Aug 2023

We would like to thank the reviewers for reading the manuscript and providing their constructive comments. Our responses to the reviewers are listed in "Response to Reviewers" file and the corresponding corrections have been made in the "Revised Manuscript with Track Changes". The reviewers' comments (in black) are listed below, followed by our responses (in red).

Responses to Reviewer 1’s comments

Comment #1 (General comments): The authors performed a meta-analysis to estimate the standard values of VO2peak and AT in the Japanese and other populations stratified by sex and age. The theme of the present study is potentially important. Overall, the statistical analyses and data reporting are appropriate. However, unfortunately the manuscript is not well written. This reviewer has a number of comments to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Our response #1: We appreciate the constructive comments of the reviewer and have revised the manuscript accordingly. In addition, the revised manuscript was proofread by an English proofreading company. We hope these measures have helped improve the manuscript and enhance the reader's understanding.

Comment #2: Page 2, line 29: The words “VO2peak/kg and AT/kg in other populations” suddenly appeared in the latter part of Abstract. The authors should explain beforehand on the aerobic capacity in the other population in the background, purpose, and methods sections.

Our response #2: As per the reviewer’s suggestion, we have described the inclusion of aerobic capacity data from other populations in the background, purpose, and methods subsections of the Abstract. However, this information has been only briefly provided to avoid confusion among readers regarding the primary purpose of this meta-analysis, which was to obtain a standard value estimated of aerobic capacity in the Japanese population (Page 2, Lines 20, 23-24).

Comment #3: Page 2, lines 31-32: Readers may misunderstand the conclusion sentence. Some readers may think that the decline in the aerobic capacity is lower (or smaller) in Japanese population than the other population when they read only abstract. Please revise the sentence to prevent the potential readers’ confusion.

Our response #3: We have revised the sentence to avoid confusion among the readers (Page 2, Lines 31-32).

Comment #4: Page 3, lines 50-55: To the reviewer’s understanding, epidemiological evidence regarding the association between aerobic capacity and disease risk or mortality risk is absolutely necessary to establish a reference value of aerobic capacity. This reviewer cannot understand the reason why the standard value of the aerobic capacity is absolutely needed to establish the reference value of aerobic capacity. Please explain the reason more clearly and concretely.

Our response #4: We recognize that the determination of reference values must be based on epidemiological evidence regarding the association between aerobic capacity and risk of disease and mortality, as well as the physiological background of the target population and the feasibility. In other words, the target values in the guidelines need to be set in consideration of both the ideal (reference value) and the reality (standard value). For example, in the Dietary Reference Intakes for Japanese 2020, a value of adequate intake for sodium (salt equivalent) was set considering the epidemiological evidence, as well as recent trends in salt intake of the target population and the feasibility. Therefore, standard values representing the real-world scenario are needed to set reference values that can be achieved by a greater number of individuals in the target population. These reasons have been stated in the third paragraph of the Introduction (Page 3, Line 51 ~ Page 4, Line 59).

Comment #5: Page 4, lines 60-68: The reviewer could not clearly understand the rationales of the primary and secondary aims of the present study. It is even unclear that the authors are trying to explain on the primary or secondary aims in the first paragraph of page 4. The authors should clearly mention the rationales of the primary and secondary aims in this paragraph. The authors should focus on mentioning only the purpose of the present study in the last paragraph of the Introduction section.

Our response #5: The rationale for the primary and secondary aims have been stated in the third (Page 3, Line 51 ~ Page 4, Line 59) and fourth (Page 4, Line 60-67) paragraphs, respectively. In addition, we have revised the last paragraph of the Introduction section to only refer to the purpose of the present study (Page 4, Line 68-70).

Comment #6: Page 4, line 71: General readers who are not familiar with meta-analysis may have no idea about the terms “scoping review” as well as “grey literature search”, or “umbrella review”. Please explain more courteously on them in the Materials and methods section or other appropriate sections.

Our response #6: For general readers unfamiliar with the principles of meta-analysis, descriptions of "scoping review” (Page 4, Line 73~), "grey literature search” (Page 5, Line 89~) and "umbrella review” (Page 5, Line 95~) have been provided in the Materials and methods.

Comment #7: Page 4, lines 60-61: The sentence is poorly written, and needs to be revised.

Our response #7: We have simplified the sentences to clarify their meaning (Page 4, Lines 62-67).

Comment #8: Page 5, lines 94-101: VO2max in the selected articles is directly measured by expired gas during maximal exercise test, or it is indirectly estimated by heart rate response during submaximal exercise test (e.g., using an equation of estimated maximum heart rate 220-age)? It is not clearly written whether the directly or indirectly measured VO2max or both are included (as VO2peak) in the present meta-analysis.

Our response #8: The present meta-analysis included data from both direct (measurement by breath gas analysis during the exercise test) and indirect methods (estimation using heart rate at several specific exercise intensities during sub-maximal exercise). We have provided the relevant information in the ‘Eligibility criteria’ section (Page 6, Lines 111-114).

Comment #9: Page 6, 102-110: Are these criteria are the criteria for Japanese population or other population or both? The authors performed a meta-analysis of other populations than Japanese population as a secondary aim (one of the major aims of the present study), but they mentioned “studies not in Japanese” as a criterion (line 106). Please be explicit not only about the eligibility criteria, but also the search strategy, study selection, data analysis for each of the Japanese population analysis and other population analysis.

Our response #9: We have presented the eligibility criteria (Page 6, Line 100~), search strategy (Page 5, Line 81~), study selection (Page 7, Line 126~) and data analysis (Page 8, Line 142~) for only the Japanese population in the Methods. To simplify the manuscript, this information on other populations has been presented in Supplemental materials (Supplemental materials, Page 3, Lines 41 ~ Page 5, Line 91).

Comment #10: Page 6, lines 109-110: The sentence is poorly written, and needs to be revised.

Our response #10: We have revised the sentence. The intention here was to inform that 'studies with duplicate data were excluded' and that in studies with duplicate data, more appropriate studies were selected in terms of sample size and study information (Page 7, Lines 122-123).

Comment #11: Page 6, lines 113-115: There is no description on the roles of the primary and secondary screening. There is also no explanation on the required conditions that articles pass the primary screening to the secondary screening. Please be explicit about that these primary and secondary screenings are used for Japanese population, other population, or both. In addition, for example, the authors mentioned that “The following items were extracted: (1) first author’s name, (2) year of publication, (3) sex, (4) age, (5) exercise mode, and (6) means and distributions of VO2peak and AT (SD, standard error, and confidence interval [CI])”. Please be explicit about that this (and other each procedure) is conducted as the primary screening or secondary screening.

Our response #11: We have revised the sentences as follows (Page 7, Lines 127-134): In primary screening, papers potentially containing information on the aerobic capacity of Japanese by sex and age were selected from titles and abstracts by two independent researchers (H.A. and M.M.). In the secondary screening, the same independent researchers perused the full text of the papers selected in the primary screening and selected those that precisely met the eligibility criteria. The papers handled during selection were managed using Mendeley Desktop (version 1.19.8) between the two researchers. From the papers selected in the secondary screening, data on (1) first author’s name, (2) year of publication, (3) sex, (4) age, (5) exercise mode, and (6) means and distributions (SD, standard error, or confidence interval [CI]) of VO2peak/kg and the value of AT/kg were extracted. In addition, information on the role and process of primary and secondary screening in other populations was revised in Supplemental material (Supplemental material, Page 4, Lines 62-75).

Comment #12: Page 7, line 127: VO2peak (or VO2max) is sometimes expressed as /kg lean body mass (LBM). The authors should clearly mention at least once that they used /kg body weight (not LBM) in the Materials and methods section (not only in footnotes of Tables and legends of Figures but also in the Methods section).

Our response #12: We have revised the sentences in the Methods (Page 7, Line 134). In addition, we have revised the footnotes of all Tables, Figure legends, and Supplemental material.

Comment #13: Page 7, lines 130-131: The reviewer could not understand the meaning of the sentence. Do you mean that the article (ref. 39) reported VO2peak and AT measured by indirect method? It is known that the VO2peak and AT measured by indirectly method are underestimated when they are compared with VO2peak and AT measured by directly method?

Our response #13: We have revised the sentences for more clarity (Page 8, Lines 143-149): We calculated VO2peak/kg (partly VO2max/kg) and AT/kg according to sex and age from the included studies by simple mean and SD to avoid the impact of studies with a large sample size. In particular, the sample size of a study by Kono et al (1997) was very large, accounting for 71% (55,521/78,714) of the total sample size in the present meta-analysis, which may affect the mean values and SD. The article (ref. 39) reported VO2peak using indirect methods.

Comment #14: Page 7, lines 132-134: The authors showed VO2peak and AT data by 10-year age group in Tables 1 and 2. However, they suddenly explain on the categorization of ≤19 years or ≥20 years, before they explain about the 10-year age group categorization first. It is also unclear that these data analyses are applied to Japanese population or other population, or both populations. Data analysis section is poorly written and should be drastically revised to prevent readers’ confusion.

Our response #14: To prevent reader confusion, the data analysis description has been drastically revised (Page 8, Lines 150-159). We have first stated that the estimated standard values for each aerobic capacity were stratified by sex and age, and that further stratification by age was performed by 10-year age group categories in the data analysis. Then, we have described that the effect of ageing on each aerobic capacity (in both Japanese and other populations) was stratified into two categories based on Japanese adult norms (≤19 years or ≥20 years) and the data was analyzed.

Comment #15: Page 7, lines 135-136: The authors mentioned “The slopes and intercepts of the mean and age for each indicator from each study were determined using…”. Is it correct? It should be “The slopes and intercepts of the association of age with VO2peak and AT for each age category (≦19 years, ≧20 years) were determined using…”.

Our response #15: We appreciate the reviewer for the suggestion. We have revised the sentence accordingly (Page 8, Lines 154-156).

Comment #16: Page 8, line 142: Please be explicit about that these are accepted articles and data extraction for Japanese population, or other population than Japanese, or both.

Our response #16: We have clearly stated “Accepted article and data extraction for Japanese population” in the Manuscript (Page 9, Line 165~) and “Accepted article and data extraction for other populations” in Supplemental material (Supplemental material, Page 5, Line 94~).

Comment #17: Page 10, Table 1: The authors may touch the possible reason why the VO2peak data measured by run are lower than VO2peak data measured by cycle in the age groups of 4-9 and 10-19 in the Materials and methods section or Discussion section.

Our response #17: We have provided the following explanation in the first paragraph of the Discussion section under 'Differences in exercise mode': “In contrast, VO2peak/kg was lower for running than for cycling in Japanese men and women aged 4–9 and 10–19 years. Although the detailed reasons for this observation is beyond the scope of this review, it may be due to sampling bias rather than the physiological effects of the different exercises. Additionally, the reversal phenomenon of cycling and running may presumably be due to the small number of studies on the aerobic capacity of minors, and the inclusion of sports children in the studies using cycling (Tamiya, 1991) [34]” (Page 19, Line 338-346).

Comment #18: Page 10, Table 1: The percentage of AT in VO2peak is approximately 50% in the age groups of young and middle-aged men (Table 1) and women (Table 2), but the percentage is apparently higher in older men and women (55-61% in Tables 1 and 2). To the reviewer’s knowledge, endurance athletes have a higher percentage of AT in VO2peak (>60%), but not in older people. How do the authors explain this phenomenon?

Our response #18: As per the reviewer’s comment, we have described the reasons (Page 18, Line 308-326).

Comment #19: Page 13, lines 216-220: It is unclear that the VO2peak and AT data shown in S2 and S3 figures are measured by cycle, run, or combined with cycle and run.

Our response #19: Figures S2 and S3 show the combined running and cycling data. This has been described in the Manuscript (Page 10, Line 192; Page 14, Line 231; Page 32, Line 741; Page 33, Line 754) and Supplemental material (Supplemental material, Page 6, Lines 110-111; Page 7, Lines 126-127; Page 22, Line 204; Page 23, Line 216).

Comment #20: Page 16, lines 273-279: Based on the AT data in the other age groups than 70–89-year group, it seems that the decrease in AT in Japanese population compared with other population (shown in S3 figure) is greater than the decrease in VO2peak in the Japanese population compared with other population (shown in S2 figure). How do the authors explain this interesting phenomenon?

Our response #20: We appreciate the reviewer for the constructive suggestions. We have added the relevant sentences as follows (Page 18, Line 327 ~ Page 19, Line 335). “Interestingly, beyond the differences in VO2peak (S2 Fig), AT in Japanese men aged 20–69 years was markedly lower than that in other populations (S3 Fig). The mechanisms contributing to this phenomenon are unknown. However, given that AT largely depends on the skeletal muscle’s oxidative capacity, the skeletal muscle mass or skeletal muscle’s oxidative capacity may differ between Japanese and other populations. Silva et al. (2010) reported that skeletal muscle mass decreases after 27 years of age, and that ethnic differences exist in this ageing phenomenon of skeletal muscle mass. They also reported that skeletal muscle mass is lowest in Asians, including Japanese; however, only women were included in their study [84]. Further research should be conducted on the mechanisms underlying AT differences between ethnic groups with data from both sexes.”

Comment #21: Page 18, line 310: The authors stated that “identifying the distribution of aerobic capacity in population may help estimate their health status and develop a health promotion strategy” in Abstract. In addition, they mentioned that “estimated standard values may help set or update more practical reference values for health promotion in the Japanese population” in the conclusion. However, this reviewer could not clearly understand the reason why the estimated standard values may help set or update more practical reference values for health promotion in the Japanese population. Please describe more how the standard values of VO2peak and AT estimated by the present study actually contribute to the development of the reference value of the aerobic capacities for future health promotion, in this Perspectives section or other appropriate sections, more clearly and more concretely.

Our response #21: We have described in the first paragraph of the Perspectives (Page 21, Line 372~)” and in the Conclusions (Page 22, Line 393~) how the estimated standard values can help set and update the reference values. The introduction has also been revised to reflect this (Page 3, Line 54~). 

Responses to Reviewer 2’s comments

Comment #1: Line 281. VO2peak/kg is lower in Run than in Cycle for both males and females in their teens. Perhaps this is a discrepancy arising from Tamiya's (1991) higher results for teenagers with Cycle. The author should add a discussion of this result. (No need to re-review.)

Our response #1: We appreciate he reviewer for the constructive suggestions. We have provided the following explanation in the first paragraph of the Discussion section under 'Differences in exercise mode': “In contrast, VO2peak/kg was lower for running than for cycling in Japanese men and women aged 4–9 and 10–19 years. Although the detailed reasons for this observation is beyond the scope of this review, it may be due to sampling bias rather than the physiological effects of the different exercises. Additionally, the reversal phenomenon of cycling and running may presumably be due to the small number of studies on the aerobic capacity of minors, and the inclusion of sports children in the studies using cycling (Tamiya, 1991) [34]” (Page 19, Line 338-346).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_20230815.docx

Decision Letter 1

Yosuke Yamada

30 Aug 2023

PONE-D-23-15750R1Estimated standard values of aerobic capacity according to sex and age in a Japanese population: a scoping reviewPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Miyachi,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 14 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yosuke Yamada

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors suitably responded to most of the reviewer’s comments. The reviewer believes that the manuscript has been much improved. However, unfortunately, the authors failed in the revision of the Abstract. An abstract is most important, as is an article title.

The authors responded, “However, this information has been only briefly provided to avoid confusion among readers regarding the primary purpose of this meta-analysis, which was to obtain a standard value estimated of aerobic capacity in the Japanese population (Page 2, Lines 20, 23-24).” If so, they should clearly mention that the comparison of the estimated standard values of the Japanese with those of other populations was performed “as a secondary or supplementary analysis” in the Abstract. Why don’t they simply express so? A brief description does not necessarily mean a secondary description, and it is just a lack of sufficient explanation. The authors also mention that “This study aimed to estimate standard values of aerobic capacity (peak oxygen uptake [VO2peak]/kg and anaerobic threshold [AT]/kg) for the Japanese population stratified by sex and age using a meta-analysis and to compare them with those of other populations” in Abstract. This sentence may also confuse readers, because readers may misunderstand that comparing aerobic capacity with those of other populations is one of the two primary analyses.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Sep 15;18(9):e0286936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286936.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


31 Aug 2023

We would like to thank the editor and reviewers for reading the manuscript and providing their constructive comments. Our responses to the reviewers are listed in "Response to Reviewers" file and the corresponding corrections have been made in the "Revised Manuscript with Track Changes". The reviewers' comments (in black) are listed below, followed by our responses (in red).

Responses to Editor’s comments

Comment: Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Our response: We checked the reference list according to the editor's comments. The reference list does not include retracted papers. However, there were some cited references in Japanese papers that did not comply with PLOS ONE's submission guideline and ICMJE sample references. Therefore, we modified these cited references according to these guidelines.

Responses to Reviewer 1’s comments

Comment #1: The authors suitably responded to most of the reviewer’s comments. The reviewer believes that the manuscript has been much improved. However, unfortunately, the authors failed in the revision of the Abstract. An abstract is most important, as is an article title.

Our response #1: We appreciate the constructive comments of the reviewer and have revised the manuscript accordingly. We revised the abstract, which is as important as the article title. We hope the revised abstract will help readers better understand the subject.

Comment #2: The authors responded, “However, this information has been only briefly provided to avoid confusion among readers regarding the primary purpose of this meta-analysis, which was to obtain a standard value estimated of aerobic capacity in the Japanese population (Page 2, Lines 20, 23-24).” If so, they should clearly mention that the comparison of the estimated standard values of the Japanese with those of other populations was performed “as a secondary or supplementary analysis” in the Abstract. Why don’t they simply express so? A brief description does not necessarily mean a secondary description, and it is just a lack of sufficient explanation. The authors also mention that “This study aimed to estimate standard values of aerobic capacity (peak oxygen uptake [VO2peak]/kg and anaerobic threshold [AT]/kg) for the Japanese population stratified by sex and age using a meta-analysis and to compare them with those of other populations” in Abstract. This sentence may also confuse readers, because readers may misunderstand that comparing aerobic capacity with those of other populations is one of the two primary analyses.

Our response #2: As per the reviewer’s comment, we recognized that the revised abstracts were not well explained and adequately expressed. To avoid confusion among readers, we have revised that the comparison of estimated standard values between the Japanese and other populations was conducted 'as a supplementary analysis'. The revised sentence is: ‘Moreover, a comparison of the estimated standard values of the Japanese with those of other populations was performed as a supplementary analysis’ (Page 2, Lines 20-21).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_20230901.docx

Decision Letter 2

Yosuke Yamada

4 Sep 2023

Estimated standard values of aerobic capacity according to sex and age in a Japanese population: a scoping review

PONE-D-23-15750R2

Dear Dr. Miyachi,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Yosuke Yamada

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Congratulations!

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Yosuke Yamada

7 Sep 2023

PONE-D-23-15750R2

Estimated standard values of aerobic capacity according to sex and age in a Japanese population: a scoping review

Dear Dr. Miyachi:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Yosuke Yamada

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Checklist. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist.

    (DOCX)

    S1 File. S1-S13 Table, S1-S3 Fig., Supplemental Methods, and Supplemental Results.

    (DOCX)

    S2 File. Evidence table for studies of Japanese population.

    (XLSX)

    S3 File. Evidence table for studies of other population.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review comments.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_20230815.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_20230901.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES