Skip to main content
Animal Reproduction logoLink to Animal Reproduction
. 2023 Sep 4;20(2):e20230061. doi: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2023-0061

Importance of preovulatory estradiol on uterine receptivity and luteal function

George Allen Perry 1,*, Jaclyn Nicole Ketchum 1,2, Lacey Kay Quail 1,2
PMCID: PMC10503890  PMID: 37720725

Abstract

Animals that exhibited estrus had greater pregnancy success compared to animals that did not exhibit estrus before fixed-time AI (FTAI). Estradiol is synthesized in bovine ovarian follicles under gonadotropin regulation and can directly and indirectly regulate the uterine receptivity and luteal function. Estradiol concentrations at FTAI impacted oviductal gene expression and has been reported to play an important role in establishing the timing of uterine receptivity. These changes have been reported to impact uterine pH and sperm transport to the site of fertilization. After fertilization, preovulatory estradiol has been reported to improve embryo survival likely by mediating changes in uterine blood flow, endometrial thickness and changes in histotroph. Cows with greater estradiol concentrations at the time of GnRH-induced ovulation also had a larger dominant follicle size and greater circulating progesterone concentrations on day 7. Therefore, it is impossible to accurately determine the individual benefit of greater estradiol concentrations prior to ovulation and greater progesterone concentrations following ovulation to pregnancy establishment, as these two measurements are confounded. Research has indicated an importance in the occurrence and timing of increasing preovulatory concentrations of estradiol, but increasing estradiol concentrations by supplementation may not be sufficient to increase fertility. Increased production of estradiol by the preovulatory follicle may be required to enhance fertility through the regulation of sperm transport, fertilization, oviductal secretions, the uterine environment, and embryo survival.

Keywords: estradiol, uterus, corpus luteum, oviduct

Introduction

Estrous synchronization and AI remain an important and widely applicable reproductive biotechnology available for cattle (Seidel, 1995). However, time and labor deter its widespread utilization. With development of FTAI protocols, estrus detection is not necessary as a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist can cause ovulation (Ryan et al., 1998). Nevertheless, successful implementation of a FTAI protocol requires a large proportion of females to express estrus, as a positive relationship between estrus expression at time of insemination and pregnancy success has been established in both beef and dairy cattle (Vasconcelos et al., 2001; Perry et al., 2005; Lopes et al., 2007; Perry et al., 2007). Animals that exhibited estrus averaged 27% greater pregnancy success compared to animals that did not (Richardson et al., 2016). Furthermore, the technology of embryo transfer provides the opportunity to increase the quantity of genetically superior offspring in a shorter period of time (Lohuis, 1995; Hasler, 2014); however, for this technology to be successful, recipient females need to express estrus as pregnancy per embryo transfer (P/ET) are greater among estrual recipients (Baruselli et al., 2003; Bó and Cedeño, 2018).

Estradiol is synthesized in bovine ovarian follicles under gonadotropin regulation, described by the two cell-two gonadotropin model (Fortune and Quirk, 1988). Preovulatory estradiol has several physiological roles in pregnancy establishment, including the expression of estrus (Coe and Allrich, 1989), induction of the preovulatory gonadotropin surge (Chenault et al., 1975), facilitating the transport of sperm (Hawk and Cooper, 1975), and inducing endometrial progesterone receptors (Zelinski et al., 1982).

The role of estradiol in regulating fertility

Estrus

Estrus refers the time period when a female is sexually receptive. Standing estrus refers to the behavioral response of a female standing to be mounted by a male or another female. Initiation of estrus occurs due to increased circulating concentrations of estradiol when progesterone concentrations are low (Allrich, 1994). Among cattle, concentrations of estradiol peak approximately 36 hours before ovulation (Chenault et al., 1975), and increased preovulatory concentrations of estradiol have been correlated with increased pregnancy success (Perry et al., 2005). Furthermore, estrus expression, when compared to no estrus expression, reduced pregnancy loss from day 32 to day 60 following FTAI (Pereira et al., 2014). While expression of estrus contributes to the establishment of pregnancy, there has been no repeatability of expression of estrus reported (Richardson et al., 2016).

Oviduct

The oviductal environment is unique and governed by steroid hormones throughout the estrous cycle. Lipid and enzyme production by the oviductal epithelium increases in response to estradiol (Witkowska, 1979), and oviductal fluid during estrus also contains a sperm capacitation factor (Parrish et al., 1989). Perhaps most notably, oviductal glycoprotein secretion is maximized at estrus (Stanke et al., 1974; Malayer et al., 1988) in response to estradiol associating with its stromal receptor (Nancarrow and Hill, 1994). Estrus-associated glycoprotein is produced by both the ampulla and isthmus regions of the bovine oviduct (Boice et al., 1990), and interacts with spermatozoa (King and Killian, 1994) and oocytes (Wegner and Killian, 1991) in such a way that improves fertilization, cleavage rates, and blastocyst formation in a dose-dependent manner (Hill et al., 1996; Martus et al., 1998). Additionally, when cyclic ewes were ovariectomized, production of estrus-associated glycoprotein was abolished, but administration of estradiol benzoate (EB) restored estrus-associated glycoprotein production (Sutton et al., 1986).

In addition to changes in oviductal fluid, oviductal gene expression is different across the estrous cycle, such that expression of 37 genes related to protein secretion and modification were upregulated during estrus compared to diestrus in the oviduct of heifers (Bauersachs et al., 2003). More specifically, expression of Microsomal Prostaglandin E Synthase-1 (MPGES-1) mRNA, a member of the prostaglandin family known for regulation of ovulation, fertilization, and implantation (Lim et al., 1997) as well as oviductal contraction (Wijayagunawardane et al., 2001), was greater during periods of estrogen dominance compared to progesterone dominance in all regions of the bovine oviduct (Gauvreau et al., 2010). Additionally, loss of the oviductal estrogen receptor increases protease activity, which subsequently results in embryonic mortality within the first two days of pregnancy (Winuthayanon et al., 2015).

Estradiol concentrations at FTAI impact oviductal gene expression, such that 1386 and 61 genes were up- and down-regulated, respectively, at the ampullary-isthmic junction, while 349 and 202 genes were up- and down-regulated, respectively, in the isthmus of cows with increased circulating estradiol concentrations (Quail et al., 2021). More specifically, KEGG pathways associated with metabolism and hormone signaling were associated with up-regulated genes at the ampullary-isthmus junction, while up-regulated genes in the isthmus were associated with the cell adhesion KEGG pathway in cows with increased estradiol concentrations at FTAI (Quail et al., 2021).

Uterine environment

Estradiol has been reported to play an important role in establishing the timing of uterine receptivity (Ozturk and Demir, 2010). The uterine environment is necessary to fertilization, early embryo development, recognition of pregnancy, as well as conceptus elongation and attachment. During the estrous cycle, endometrial changes in composition and differentiation are regulated by estradiol, progesterone, and oxytocin (Spencer and Bazer, 2004), and the timing of these changes is critical to embryo survival. Thus, estradiol plays an important role in establishing the timing of uterine receptivity (Ozturk and Demir, 2010). In cattle, synchrony between the embryo and uterus must be ± 24 hours (Hasler, 2001).

Uterine gene expression

A study conducted by Zelinski et al. (1982) concluded that estradiol induces synthesis of endometrial cytoplasmic estrogen and progesterone receptors (Zelinski et al., 1982), which further supports work from (Koligian and Stormshak, 1977) concluding progesterone inhibited the replenishment of cytoplasmic estradiol receptors during the luteal phase in the ovine endometrium. More recently, it has been reported that progesterone receptors in the deep glandular epithelium, as well as endometrial estradiol receptor (ERα) mRNA, were up-regulated on day 15.5 in cows with elevated preovulatory estradiol concentrations (Bridges et al., 2012).

Differences also exist in endometrial and corpus luteum (CL) gene expression between estrual and nonestrual females, with endometrial transcripts related to prostaglandin synthesis (OTR and COX-2) as well as the immune system and cell adhesion (CXCL10, IGLL1, MX1, MX2, MMP19, MYL12A, and SLPI) influenced by the expression of estrus (Davoodi et al., 2016). Furthermore, the abundance of facilitative and sodium-dependent glucose transporters, which are responsible for altering the composition of uterine luminal fluid (ULF) and providing glucose to the developing conceptus, is impacted by estradiol, such that females with elevated preovulatory estradiol concentrations had a greater abundance of SLC2A1 and SLC5A1 in both intercaruncular and caruncular tissues (Northrop et al., 2018).

The TGF-β superfamily is involved in endometrial changes, placental development, and pregnancy maintenance (Jones et al., 2006). At estrus, there is also up-regulation of several genes involved in remodeling the extracellular matrix (Bauersachs et al., 2005), as well as changes in expression of inhibin A subunit (a member of the TGF-β signaling pathway) in the bovine intercaruncular area, suggesting the involvement of estradiol in coordinating endometrial remodeling (Ishiwata et al., 2003). Milk protein (SERPINA14) is expressed in the endometrium of ruminants during pregnancy, and is likely involved in nutrition of the embryo/fetus, embryonic/fetal growth, and suppression of the maternal immune system (Ing and Roberts, 1989). Expression of SERPINA14, as determined by Real-time RT-PCR, was greatest on the day of estrus, and was also up-regulated after stimulation with estradiol. Furthermore, detection of the SERPINA14 protein revealed the protein was localized to the glandular epithelium and was increased on the day of estrus (Ulbrich et al., 2009). This suggests a possible preparatory role for preovulatory estradiol in establishing a uterine environment that is conducive to pregnancy.

CLOCK genes regulate biological oscillations and the transcription of other genes in a tissue specific manner in response to changes in nutrient status, day length, and possibly other environmental influences (Albrecht, 2006). Decreased litter size, lower frequency of successful matings, and increased cycle length have been reported in ClockΔ19 (mice in which CLOCK is not functional) female mice (Chappell et al., 2003). When ClockΔ19 female mice were treated hormonally to induce ovulation and mated with fertile males, ClockΔ19 females produced fewer embryos than control females (Kennaway, 2005). From these results, it is possible that circadian clock gene defects at the level of the uterus may disrupt the synchrony between the uterine environment and the developing embryo. He et al. (2007) reported that Period 1 mRNA (part of the positive feedback loop of CLOCK) was expressed in the uterus of diestrus rats, and that both estradiol and progesterone stimulated uterine Period 1 mRNA expression in ovariectomized rats. Furthermore, Nakamura et al. (2005) reported that estradiol altered the normal circadian rhythms in the uterus. Therefore, the circadian clock genes may influence fertility at the uterine level.

Uterine pH

In estrual females, there was a transient decline in uterine pH from 36 hours prior to the onset of estrus until estrus. From the onset of estrus to approximately 6 hours after the onset of estrus, uterine pH increased rapidly. Neither the decrease in uterine pH prior to estrus, nor the rise after estrus was observed in females that did not express estrus (Perry and Perry, 2008a). Overall, females expressing estrus had a decreased uterine pH (pH = 6.72) compared to females that did not express estrus (pH = 7.0). The effect of preovulatory estradiol on uterine pH was evaluated in females that were or were not treated with 1 mg of estradiol cypionate (ECP) 36 hours prior to the final administration of GnRH in a CO-Synch protocol. Nonestrual females that did not receive ECP had an elevated uterine pH (7.0 ± 0.07) compared to estrual females that were not administered ECP (pH = 6.72 ± 0.10; P = 0.02) and nonestrual females that were administered ECP (6.81 ± 0.09; P = 0.06; Perry and Perry, 2008b). Bolzenius et al. (2016) reported that as uterine pH decreased at the time of FTAI, pregnancy rates increased. They also noted that NA+/H+ exchanger isoforms 1, 2, and 3 played a role in altering uterine pH during the onset of estrus (Bolzenius et al., 2016). Given that Jones and Bavister (2000) reported that as pH decreased, motility of bull sperm decreased and longevity increased, a transient change in uterine pH around estrus may provide a mechanism for increasing sperm longevity in the reproductive tract.

Hawk (1983) reported that in order for sperm to be efficiently transported in the female reproductive tract, females needed exposure to estradiol. At initiation of estrus, uterine pH was decreased which may have led to greater longevity of sperm through a transient decrease in motility (Wong et al., 1981). The peak in uterine pH observed 6 hours after estrus may play a role in aiding sperm transport, as Goltz et al., (1988) reported as pH increased, so did sperm motility (Goltz et al., 1988). Cows that initiated standing estrus had decreased uterine pH (6.78) and increased pregnancy success (52%) compared to cows that did not initiate standing estrus, but were induced to ovulate (6.96 and 38%, respectively). This increase in pregnancy success among cows that exhibited standing estrus is likely due to increased sperm transport to the site of fertilization (Larimore et al., 2015). In a FTAI scenario, the second administration of GnRH can induce ovulation approximately 30 hours after administration in the absence of elevated estradiol concentrations (Pursley et al., 1995; Vasconcelos et al., 1999), and sperm survival until ovulation may be compromised as the interval from insemination to ovulation is lengthened.

Fertilization

A review by Santos et al. (2004) reported fertilization failure in lactating beef and dairy cows was as high as 45%. A study in beef cows, where embryos were flushed from cows with high or low estradiol concentrations at the time of FTAI, revealed that cows with greater concentrations of estradiol at GnRH-induced ovulation were more likely to yield a fertilized embryo than an unfertilized oocyte (Jinks et al., 2013). Additionally, animals that exhibited estrus prior to FTAI had increased accessory sperm numbers and improved embryo quality compared to animals that did not exhibit estrus (Larimore et al., 2015). Although accessory sperm are not involved in fertilization, they represent sperm that were able to access the oviduct, undergo capacitation and the acrosome reaction, recognize and bind to the oocyte, and partially penetrate the zona pellucida (Dalton et al., 2006). The number of accessory sperm trapped in the zona pellucida has been positively associated with fertility (Hunter and Wilmut, 1984; Hawk and Tanabe, 1986; DeJarnette et al., 1992; Nadir et al., 1993), and are thought to be an indirect measure of both sperm transport and the availability of competent sperm competing for fertilization (DeJarnette et al., 1992).

Uterine blood flow

Endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine factors are all involved in the development and growth of the embryo and placenta. The bovine fetus receives nutrients through both hematotroph and histotroph. Hematotroph allows exchange of nutrients between fetal and maternal circulation (Bazer et al., 1990). When transrectal doppler ultrasonography was used to characterize uterine blood flow, circulating concentrations of estradiol were determined to be greatest on day -2 (day 0 = ovulation) and uterine blood flow was greatest on day -3 (Bollwein et al., 2000). Similarly, a positive correlation between circulating concentrations of estradiol and uterine blood flow as well as uterine artery diameter were determined following administration of EB (10 mg; Rawy et al., 2018). Blood flow increased two days prior to estrus, and remained elevated until the day after estrus, which corresponded with elevated estradiol concentrations (Ford and Chenault, 1981).

Uterine blood flow was similar in pregnant and nonpregnant cows up to 13 days post-mating, at which time blood flow to the gravid horn increased. From day 25 to day 30, blood flow increased to the gravid horn and decreased to the nongravid horn. Progesterone concentrations and uterine blood flow to the gravid horn was positively correlated. The increase in blood flow to the gravid horn, caused by the preimplantation conceptus, was similar to blood flow observed when estradiol was elevated (Ford and Chenault, 1981). The increase in blood flow may also increase the blood flow to the CL found on the ipsilateral ovary, thereby increasing progesterone secretion which would aid in maintaining pregnancy (Ford and Chenault, 1981).

Uterine endometrial thickness

Sugiura et al. (2018) reported that as progesterone concentrations decrease, endometrial thickness increased; however, estradiol may also play a role in sustaining and/or enhancing these changes, as endometrial thickness was strongly correlated with the Estradiol:Progesterone ratio after natural and induced estrus (Sugiura et al., 2018). Endometrial thickness was measured by transrectal ultrasonography in lactating Holstein cows administered the Ovsynch protocol. Thickness of the endometrium increased from 7 to 9.5 mm following prostaglandin administration, remained thick (> 9 mm) for two days, and then became thinner on both day 1 (8 mm) and 2 (7.4 mm) following the second administration of GnRH. Supplementing estradiol-17β (1mg) eight hours prior to the second administration of GnRH increased pregnancies to AI in females with thinner endometrium. However, in females that had an endometrial thickness measurement of > 8 mm 48 hours following prostaglandin administration, estradiol supplementation did not improve pregnancies to AI (Souza et al., 2011).

Histotroph

Uterine histotroph is composed of nutrients, growth factors, proteins, glucose, immunosuppressive agents, enzymes, and ions. It is secreted by the endometrium and is necessary for early conceptus growth/survival (Geisert et al., 1992; Gray et al., 2001). Any changes can greatly influence early embryonic viability. In particular, glucose is a major fuel source used by the conceptus for growth and development. Animals that exhibited estrus during a FTAI protocol had greater glucose concentrations in the ULF compared to nonestrual animals (Northrop et al., 2018). When administration of estrogen, corresponding with initiation of estrus, was omitted in ovariectomized, hormone-supplemented ewes, embryo survival following embryo transfer (Miller and Moore, 1976), uterine weight, uterine protein, RNA to DNA ratio, and the rate of protein synthesis were decreased (Miller et al., 1977).

Overall, cows that exhibited standing estrus around the time of FTAI had increased preovulatory concentrations of estradiol (Perry et al., 2005; Perry and Perry, 2008a; Perry and Perry, 2008b), decreased uterine pH (Perry and Perry, 2008a; Perry and Perry, 2008b), increased sperm transport (Larimore et al., 2015), and increased pregnancy success (Perry et al., 2005) compared to nonestrual cows. Consequently, preovulatory concentrations of estradiol may play a major role in the uterine environment as well as the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy.

Subsequent progesterone effects

Two of the most important factors involved in the establishment of pregnancy are the circulating estradiol concentration preceding GnRH-induced ovulation and circulating progesterone concentration on day 7 following ovulation (Atkins et al., 2013; Jinks et al., 2013). However, cows with greater estradiol concentrations at the time of GnRH-induced ovulation also have a larger dominant follicle size and greater circulating progesterone concentrations on day 7 (Jinks et al., 2013). Among dairy cows, cows that ovulated small follicles (10 to 15 mm) had decreased concentrations of progesterone on day 7 (Sartori et al., 2006) and cows that were AIed with decreased concentrations of progesterone on day 7 had decreased P/AI, but when embryos were transferred there was no relationship between concentrations of progesterone and P/ET (Sartori et al., 2006; Demetrio et al., 2007). Therefore, the direct impact of increase preovulatory estradiol likely occurs in the oocyte during final maturation or in early embryo development before day 7.

The preovulatory follicular environment is important for preparing follicular cells for luteinization and secretion of progesterone (McNatty et al., 1975). McNatty et al. (1979) suggested that development of a normal CL depends on a follicle meeting the following criteria: 1) an adequate number of granulosa cells, 2) an adequate number of luteinizing hormone (LH) receptors on the granulosa and theca cells, and 3) granulosa cells capable of synthesizing adequate amounts of progesterone following luteinization. Within granulosa cells, estradiol is reported to cause: 1) increased cellular proliferation (Goldenberg et al., 1972; Parrott and Skinner, 1998; Dupont et al., 2000), 2) formation of gap junctions (Merk et al., 1972; Burghardt and Anderson, 1981), 3) increased stimulatory action of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) on aromatase activity (Adashi and Hsueh, 1982; Zhuang et al., 1982; Reilly et al., 1996), 4) enhanced stimulation of progesterone synthesis following gonadotropin stimulation (Welsh et al., 1983; Fanjul et al., 1984), and 5) enhanced acquisition of LH receptors (Kessel et al., 1985; Farookhi and Desjardins, 1986; Wang and Greenwald, 1993). Furthermore, luteinized granulosa cells secreted increased progesterone when they were collected from follicles having increased estradiol concentrations compared to granulosa cells from follicles that had decreased estradiol concentrations (McNatty et al., 1979).

The relationship between pregnancy success and circulating concentrations of progesterone during early pregnancy in cattle is equivocal, as luteal secretion of progesterone is required for the survival of the embryo/fetus (McDonald et al., 1952). Several studies have reported elevated concentrations of progesterone in pregnant cows compared to nonpregnant cows beginning as early as day 4 (Butler et al., 1996) or day 6 (Henricks et al., 1971; Erb et al., 1976) after insemination. Furthermore, cows that had an earlier rise in progesterone had embryos that were more advanced developmentally, produced more interferon τ (INF-τ), and were capable of inhibiting the prostaglandin F release on day 16 after breeding (Kerbler et al., 1997; Mann et al., 1998; Mann and Lamming, 2001). Similarly, cows supplemented with progesterone during early gestation had advanced endometrial expression of several genes associated with uterine secretion and conceptus development (Forde et al., 2009; Forde et al., 2010). It is speculated that progesterone induces changes in endometrial gene expression, leading to changes in uterine histotroph composition (Spencer et al., 2008). Bartol et al. (1981) determined that protein accumulation within the uterine lumen is related to duration of progesterone stimulation. However, direct supplementation of progesterone following insemination has produced varying results. Some studies have reported a 10 to 60% increase in P/AI following progesterone supplementation (Robinson et al., 1989; Macmillan and Peterson, 1993), but others using sheep (Diskin and Niswender, 1989; Nephew et al., 1994) and cattle (Walton et al., 1990; Van Cleeff et al., 1991; Monteiro et al., 2015) have reported no benefit or even decreased P/ET (Monteiro et al., 2015) of progesterone supplementation on pregnancy success.

Atkins et al. (2013) reported that estradiol concentrations at GnRH-induced ovulation (day 0) affected day 27 P/ET of recipient cows independently of progesterone concentrations on day 7. Furthermore, work from our laboratory has reported that when ovulatory follicle size was controlled, there was no difference in day 10 CL weight, circulating concentrations of progesterone, or expression of luteal steroidogenic enzymes between cows exhibiting standing estrus and nonestrual cows (Fields et al., 2012). Plasma progesterone concentrations on day 7 (day 0 = induced ovulation) can be positively associated with the probability of pregnancy only when preovulatory estradiol concentrations were low. The association between plasma progesterone concentrations on day 7 and pregnancy was not observed when concentrations of preovulatory estradiol were high (Ciernia et al., 2021). Interestingly, on day 17, pregnant cows were reported to have greater progesterone concentrations compared to nonpregnant cows when females had: 1) decreased preovulatory estradiol and decreased subsequent progesterone, 2) decreased preovulatory estradiol and normal subsequent progesterone, or 3) increased preovulatory estradiol and decreased subsequent progesterone. However, among cows classified as having increased preovulatory estradiol and normal subsequent progesterone, progesterone concentrations on day 17 did not differ between pregnant and nonpregnant cows (Ciernia et al., 2021). Therefore, improved pregnancy success among cattle with elevated preovulatory concentrations of estradiol are likely independent of the impact of progesterone on the uterine environment during the subsequent estrous cycle.

Early embryo development and survival

When estrogen administration, corresponding with initiation of estrus, was omitted in ovariectomized, hormone-supplemented ewes, embryo survival following embryo transfer was decreased (Miller and Moore, 1976). In a recent study from our laboratory, ovariectomized cows received exogenous hormones to mimic the luteal phase and luteolysis, and then received either ECP, EB, or no treatment (CON) to mimic the preovulatory period. Ovulation was stimulated with administration of GnRH (100 µg; day 0), and embryos were transferred on day 7. Cows that received preovulatory estradiol exposure (ECP or EB) had greater pregnancy establishment and embryonic survival compared to animals not receiving preovulatory estradiol exposure (4%, 29%, and 21% for CON, EB, and ECP, respectively; (Madsen et al., 2015). Additionally, preovulatory estradiol has been reported to have a positive impact on conceptus development, such that cows exhibiting estrus have increased conceptus length compared to nonestrual cows on day 19 of gestation (Davoodi et al., 2016). Since a larger conceptus would occupy a greater amount of luminal space, INF-τ stimulated gene expression may be enhanced, which may be beneficial to pregnancy. Furthermore, in day 19 conceptuses of females expressing estrus, there were four genes that were differentially expressed (ISG15, PLAU, BMP15, and EEF1A1; Davoodi et al., 2016). These results indicate that changes in reproductive gene expression around the preimplantation period were favorable towards the elongating conceptus given the expression of estrus near FTAI.

Conclusion

These studies indicate not only an importance in occurrence and timing of increasing preovulatory concentrations of estradiol, but also and that increasing estradiol concentrations by supplementation may not be sufficient to increase fertility. Increased production of estradiol by the preovulatory follicle may be required to enhance fertility through the regulation of sperm transport, fertilization, oviductal secretions, the uterine environment, and embryo survival.

Acknowledgements

This work was partially funded by Multistate Hatch (project 9835).

Funding Statement

Financial support: This project was funded in part by the Multistate Hatch project 9835.

Footnotes

Financial support: This project was funded in part by the Multistate Hatch project 9835.

How to cite: Perry GA, Ketchum JN, Quail LK. Importance of preovulatory estradiol on uterine receptivity and luteal function. Anim Reprod. 2023;20(2):e20230061. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2023-0061

References

  1. Adashi EY, Hsueh AJ. Estrogens augment the stimulation of ovarian aromatase activity by follicle-stimulating hormone in cultured rat granulosa cells. J Biol Chem. 1982;257(11):6077–6083. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)65107-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albrecht U. Orchestration of gene expression and physiology by the circadian clock. J Physiol Paris. 2006;100(5-6):243–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2007.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allrich RD. Endocrine and neural control of estrus in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 1994;77(9):2738–2744. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77216-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Atkins JA, Smith MF, MacNeil MD, Jinks EM, Abreu FM, Alexander LJ, Geary TW. Pregnancy establishment and maintenance in cattle. J Anim Sci. 2013;91(2):722–733. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bartol FF, Thatcher WW, Lewis GS, Bliss EL, Drost M, Bazer FW. Effect of estradiol-17beta on PGF and total protein content in bovine uterine flushings and peripheral plasma concentration of 13, 14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF(2alpha) Theriogenology. 1981;15(4):345–358. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(81)90002-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baruselli PS, Marques MO, Carvalho NA, Berber RA, Valentim R, Carvalho AFD, Fo, Costa WP., No Follicular dynamics and pregnancy rate in embryo recipient (Bos taurus indicus x Bos taurus taurus) treated with” Ovsynch” protocol for fixed-time embryo transfer. Braz J Vet Res Anim Sci. 2003;40:96–106. doi: 10.1590/S1413-95962003000800003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bauersachs S, Blum H, Mallok S, Wenigerkind H, Rief S, Prelle K, Wolf E. Regulation of ipsilateral and contralateral bovine oviduct epithelial cell function in the postovulation period: a transcriptomics approach. Biol Reprod. 2003;68(4):1170–1177. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.010660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bauersachs S, Ulbrich SE, Gross K, Schmidt SE, Meyer HH, Einspanier R, Wenigerkind H, Vermehren M, Blum H, Sinowatz F, Wolf E. Gene expression profiling of bovine endometrium during the oestrous cycle: detection of molecular pathways involved in functional changes. J Mol Endocrinol. 2005;34(3):889–908. doi: 10.1677/jme.1.01799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bazer FW, Terqui M, Martinat-Butte F. Physiological limits to reproduction; Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production; 1990 Jul 23-27; Edinburgh, Scotland. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh; 1990. pp. 292–298. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bó GA, Cedeño A. Expression of estrus as a relevant factor in fixed-time embryo transfer programs using estradiol/progesterone-based protocols in cattle. Anim Reprod. 2018;15(3):224–230. doi: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0060. http://dx.doi.org/10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boice ML, Geisert RD, Blair RM, Verhage HG. Identification and characterization of bovine oviductal glycoproteins synthesized at estrus. Biol Reprod. 1990;43(3):457–465. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod43.3.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bollwein H, Meyer HH, Maierl J, Weber F, Baumgartner U, Stolla R. Transrectal doppler sonography of uterine blood flow in cows during the estrous cycle. Theriogenology. 2000;53(8):1541–1552. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00296-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bolzenius JK, Cushman RA, Perry GA. Expression of Na(+)/H(+) exchanger isoforms 1, 2, 3, and 4 in bovine endometrium and the influence of uterine pH at time of fixed-time AI of pregnancy success. Anim Reprod Sci. 2016;171:98–107. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bridges GA, Mussard ML, Pate JL, Ott TL, Hansen TR, Day ML. Impact of preovulatory estradiol concentrations on conceptus development and uterine gene expression. Anim Reprod Sci. 2012;133(1-2):16–26. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Burghardt RC, Anderson E. Hormonal modulation of gap junctions in rat ovarian follicles. Cell Tissue Res. 1981;214(1):181–193. doi: 10.1007/BF00235155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Butler WR, Calaman JJ, Beam SW. Plasma and milk urea nitrogen in relation to pregnancy rate in lactating dairy cattle. J Anim Sci. 1996;74(4):858–865. doi: 10.2527/1996.744858x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chappell PE, White RS, Mellon PL. Circadian gene expression regulates pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretory patterns in the hypothalamic GnRH-secreting GT1-7 cell line. J Neurosci. 2003;23(35):11202–11213. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-35-11202.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chenault JR, Thatcher WW, Kalra PS, Abrams RM, Wilcox CJ. Transitory changes in plasma progestins, estradiol, and luteinizing hormone approaching ovulation in the bovine. J Dairy Sci. 1975;58(5):709–717. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(75)84632-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ciernia LA, Perry GA, Smith MF, Rich JJ, Northrop EJ, Perkins SD, Green JA, Zezeski AL, Geary TW. Effect of estradiol preceding and progesterone subsequent to ovulation on proportion of postpartum beef cows pregnant. Anim Reprod Sci. 2021;227:106723. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2021.106723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Coe BL, Allrich RD. Relationship between endogenous estradiol-17 beta and estrous behavior in heifers. J Anim Sci. 1989;67(6):1546–1551. doi: 10.2527/jas1989.6761546x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dalton JC, Nadir S, Noftsinger M, Bame J, Saacke RG. Management factors associated with male fertility; Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle; 2006; Rapid City, United States. 2006. p. 279-290. [Google Scholar]
  22. Davoodi S, Cooke RF, Fernandes AC, Cappellozza BI, Vasconcelos JL, Cerri RL. Expression of estrus modifies the gene expression profile in reproductive tissues on day 19 of gestation in beef cows. Theriogenology. 2016;85(4):645–655. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. DeJarnette JM, Saacke RG, Bame J, Vogler CJ. Accessory sperm: their importance to fertility and embryo quality, and attempts to alter their numbers in artificially inseminated cattle. J Anim Sci. 1992;70(2):484–491. doi: 10.2527/1992.702484x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Demetrio DG, Santos RM, Demetrio CG, Vasconcelos JL. Factors affecting conception rates following artificial insemination or embryo transfer in lactating Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90(11):5073–5082. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Diskin MG, Niswender GD. Effect of progesterone supplementation on pregnancy and embryo survival in ewes. J Anim Sci. 1989;67(6):1559–1563. doi: 10.2527/jas1989.6761559x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dupont S, Krust A, Gansmuller A, Dierich A, Chambon P, Mark M. Effect of single and compound knockouts of estrogen receptors alpha (ERalpha) and beta (ERbeta) on mouse reproductive phenotypes. Development. 2000;127(19):4277–4291. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.19.4277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Erb RE, Garverick HA, Randel RD, Brown BL, Callahan CJ. Profiles of reproductive hormones associated with fertile and nonfertile inseminations of dairy cows. Theriogenology. 1976;5(5):227–242. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(76)90235-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fanjul LF, Ruiz de Galarreta CM, Hsueh AJ. Estrogen regulation of progestin biosynthetic enzymes in cultured rat granulosa cells. Biol Reprod. 1984;30(4):903–912. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod30.4.903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Farookhi R, Desjardins J. Luteinizing hormone receptor induction in dispersed granulosa cells requires estrogen. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1986;47(1-2):13–24. doi: 10.1016/0303-7207(86)90011-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fields SD, Gebhart KL, Perry BL, Gonda MG, Wright CL, Bott RC, Perry GA. Influence of standing estrus before an injection of GnRH during a beef cattle fixed-time AI protocol on LH release, subsequent concentrations of progesterone, and steriodogenic enzyme expression. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2012;42(1):11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2011.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ford SP, Chenault JR. Blood flow to the corpus luteum-bearing ovary and ipsilateral uterine horn of cows during the oestrous cycle and early pregnancy. J Reprod Fertil. 1981;62(2):555–562. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0620555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Forde N, Carter F, Fair T, Crowe MA, Evans AC, Spencer TE, Bazer FW, McBride R, Boland MP, O’Gaora P, Lonergan P, Roche JF. Progesterone-regulated changes in endometrial gene expression contribute to advanced conceptus development in cattle. Biol Reprod. 2009;81(4):784–794. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.074336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Forde N, Spencer TE, Bazer FW, Song G, Roche JF, Lonergan P. Effect of pregnancy and progesterone concentration on expression of genes encoding for transporters or secreted proteins in the bovine endometrium. Physiol Genomics. 2010;41(1):53–62. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00162.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Fortune JE, Quirk SM. Regulation of steroidogensis in bovine preovulatory follicles. J Anim Sci. 1988;66(Suppl 2):1–8. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gauvreau D, Moisan V, Roy M, Fortier MA, Bilodeau JF. Expression of prostaglandin E synthases in the bovine oviduct. Theriogenology. 2010;73(1):103–111. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Geisert RD, Morgan GL, Short EC, Jr, Zavy MT. Endocrine events associated with endometrial function and conceptus development in cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1992;4(3):301–305. doi: 10.1071/RD9920301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Goldenberg RL, Bridson WE, Kohler PO. Estrogen stimulation of progesterone synthesis by porcine granulosa cells in culture. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1972;48(1):101–107. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(72)90349-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Goltz JS, Gardner TK, Kanous KS, Lindemann CB. The interaction of pH and cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate on activation of motility in Triton X-100 extracted bull sperm. Biol Reprod. 1988;39(5):1129–1136. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod39.5.1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Gray CA, Taylor KM, Ramsey WS, Hill JR, Bazer FW, Bartol FF, Spencer TE. Endometrial glands are required for preimplantation conceptus elongation and survival. Biol Reprod. 2001;64(6):1608–1613. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod64.6.1608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hasler JF. Factors affecting frozen and fresh embryo transfer pregnancy rates in cattle. Theriogenology. 2001;56(9):1401–1415. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00643-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hasler JF. Forty years of embryo transfer in cattle: a review focusing on the journal Theriogenology, the growth of the industry in North America, and personal reminisces. Theriogenology. 2014;81(1):152–169. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hawk HW, Cooper BS. Improvement of sperm transport by the administration of estradiol to estrous ewes. J Anim Sci. 1975;41(5):1400–1406. doi: 10.2527/jas1975.4151400x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hawk HW, Tanabe TY. Effect of unilateral cornual insemination upon fertilization rate in superovulating and single-ovulating cattle. J Anim Sci. 1986;63(2):551–560. doi: 10.2527/jas1986.632551x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Hawk HW. Sperm survival and transport in the female reproductive tract. J Dairy Sci. 1983;66(12):2645–2660. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(83)82138-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. He PJ, Hirata M, Yamauchi N, Hattori MA. Up-regulation of Per1 expression by estradiol and progesterone in the rat uterus. J Endocrinol. 2007;194(3):511–519. doi: 10.1677/JOE-07-0172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Henricks DM, Lamond DR, Hill JR, Dickey JF. Plasma progesterone concentrations before mating and in early pregnancy in the beef heifer. J Anim Sci. 1971;33(2):450–454. doi: 10.2527/jas1971.332450x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Hill JL, Walker SK, Brown GH, Nancarrow CD. The effects of an estrus-associated oviductal glycoprotein on the in vitro fertilization and development of ovine oocytes matured in vitro. Theriogenology. 1996;46(8):1379–1388. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(96)00317-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hunter RH, Wilmut I. Sperm transport in the cow: peri-ovulatory redistribution of viable cells within the oviduct. Reprod Nutr Dev. 1984;24(5A):597–608. doi: 10.1051/rnd:19840508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ing NH, Roberts RM. The major progesterone-modulated proteins secreted into the sheep uterus are members of the serpin superfamily of serine protease inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 1989;264(6):3372–3379. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)94076-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ishiwata H, Katsuma S, Kizaki K, Patel OV, Nakano H, Takahashi T, Imai K, Hirasawa A, Shiojima S, Ikawa H, Suzuki Y, Tsujimoto G, Izaike Y, Todoroki J, Hashizume K. Characterization of gene expression profiles in early bovine pregnancy using a custom cDNA microarray. Mol Reprod Dev. 2003;65(1):9–18. doi: 10.1002/mrd.10292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Jinks EM, Smith MF, Atkins JA, Pohler KG, Perry GA, Macneil MD, Roberts AJ, Waterman RC, Alexander LJ, Geary TW. Preovulatory estradiol and the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy in suckled beef cows. J Anim Sci. 2013;91(3):1176–1185. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Jones JM, Bavister BD. Acidification of intracellular pH in bovine spermatozoa suppresses motility and extends viable life. J Androl. 2000;21(5):616–624. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Jones RL, Stoikos C, Findlay JK, Salamonsen LA. TGF-beta superfamily expression and actions in the endometrium and placenta. Reproduction. 2006;132(2):217–232. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.01076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kennaway DJ. The role of circadian rhythmicity in reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11(1):91–101. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kerbler TL, Buhr MM, Jordan LT, Leslie KE, Walton JS. Relationship between maternal plasma progesterone concentration and interferon-tau synthesis by the conceptus in cattle. Theriogenology. 1997;47(3):703–714. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00028-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kessel B, Liu YX, Jia XC, Hsueh AJ. Autocrine role of estrogens in the augmentation of luteinizing hormone receptor formation in cultured rat granulosa cells. Biol Reprod. 1985;32(5):1038–1050. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod32.5.1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. King RS, Killian GJ. Purification of bovine estrus-associated protein and localization of binding on sperm. Biol Reprod. 1994;51(3):34–42. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod51.3.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Koligian KB, Stormshak F. Progesterone inhibition of estrogen receptor replenishment in ovine endometrium. Biol Reprod. 1977;17(3):412–416. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod17.3.412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Larimore EL, Amundson OL, Bird SL, Funnell BJ, Kruse SG, Bridges GA, Perry GA. Influence of estrus at fixed-time artificial insemination on early embryonic development in beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2015;93(6):2806–2812. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-8892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Lim H, Paria BC, Das SK, Dinchuk JE, Langenbach R, Trzaskos JM, Dey SK. Multiple female reproductive failures in cyclooxygenase 2-deficient mice. Cell. 1997;91(2):197–208. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80402-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lohuis M. Potential benefits of bovine embryo-manipulation technologies to genetic improvement programs. Theriogenology. 1995;43(1):51–60. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(94)00016-N. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Lopes AS, Butler ST, Gilbert RO, Butler WR. Relationship of pre-ovulatory follicle size, estradiol concentrations and season to pregnancy outcome in dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci. 2007;99(1-2):34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.04.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Macmillan KL, Peterson AJ. A new intervagional progesterone releasing device for cattle (CIDR-B) for oestrous synchronisation, increasing pregnancy rates and the treatment of post-partum anestrus. Anim Reprod Sci. 1993;33(1-4):1–25. doi: 10.1016/0378-4320(93)90104-Y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Madsen CA, Perry GA, Mogck CL, Daly RF, MacNeil MD, Geary TW. Effects of preovulatory estradiol on embryo survival and pregnancy establishment in beef cows. Anim Reprod Sci. 2015;158:96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Malayer JR, Hansen PJ, Buhi WC. Secretion of proteins by cultured bovine oviducts collected from estrus through early diestrus. J Exp Zool. 1988;248(3):345–353. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402480313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Mann GE, Lamming GE, Fisher PA. Progesterone control of embryonic interferon tau production during early pregnancy in the cow. J Reprod Fertil. 1998;21:37. [Google Scholar]
  67. Mann GE, Lamming GE. Relationship between maternal endocrine environment, early embryo development and inhibition of the luteolytic mechanism in cows. Reproduction. 2001;121(1):175–180. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1210175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Martus NS, Verhage HG, Mavrogianis PA, Thibodeaux JK. Enhancement of bovine oocyte fertilization in vitro with a bovine oviductal specific glycoprotein. J Reprod Fertil. 1998;113(2):323–329. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1130323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. McDonald LE, Nichols RE, McNutt SH. Study of corpus luteum ablation and progesterone replacement therapy during pregnancy in the cow. Am J Vet Res. 1952;13:446–451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. McNatty KP, Hunter WM, McNeilly AS, Sawers RS. Changes in the concentration of pituitary and steroid hormones in the follicular fluid of human graafian follicles throughout the menstrual cycle. J Endocrinol. 1975;64(3):555–571. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0640555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. McNatty KP, Smith DM, Makris A, Osathanondh R, Ryan KJ. The microenvironment of the human antral follicle: interrelationships among the steroid levels in antral fluid, the population of granulosa cells, and the status of the oocyte in vivo and in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1979;49(6):851–860. doi: 10.1210/jcem-49-6-851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Merk FB, Botticelli CR, Albright JT. An intercellular response to estrogen by granulosa cells in the rat ovary; an electron microscope study. Endocrinology. 1972;90(4):992–1007. doi: 10.1210/endo-90-4-992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Miller BG, Moore NW, Murphy L, Stone GM. Early pregnancy in the ewe: effects of oestradiol and progesterone on uterine metabolism and on embryo survival. Aust J Biol Sci. 1977;30(4):279–288. doi: 10.1071/BI9770279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Miller BG, Moore NW. Effect of progesterone and oestradiol on endometrial metabolism and embryo survival in the ovariectomized ewe. Theriogenology. 1976;6(6):636. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(76)90078-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Monteiro PL, Jr, Nascimento AB, Pontes GC, Fernandes GO, Melo LF, Wiltbank MC, Sartori R. Progesterone supplementation after ovulation: effects on corpus luteum function and on fertility of dairy cows subjected to AI or ET. Theriogenology. 2015;84(7):1215–1224. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Nadir S, Saacke RG, Bame J, Mullins J, Degelos S. Effect of freezing semen and dosage of sperm on number of accessory sperm, fertility, and embryo quality in artificially inseminated cattle. J Anim Sci. 1993;71(1):199–204. doi: 10.2527/1993.711199x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Nakamura TJ, Moriya T, Inoue S, Shimazoe T, Watanabe S, Ebihara S, Shinohara K. Estrogen differentially regulates expression of Per1 and Per2 genes between central and peripheral clocks and between reproductive and nonreproductive tissues in female rats. J Neurosci Res. 2005;82(5):622–630. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Nancarrow CD, Hill JL. Co-culture, oviduct secretion and the function of oviduct-specific glycoproteins. Cell Biol Int. 1994;18(12):1105–1114. doi: 10.1006/cbir.1994.1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Nephew KP, Cardenas H, McClure KE, Ott TL, Bazer FW, Pope WF. Effects of administration of human chorionic gonadotropin or progesterone before maternal recognition of pregnancy on blastocyst development and pregnancy in sheep. J Anim Sci. 1994;72(2):453–458. doi: 10.2527/1994.722453x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Northrop EJ, Rich JJJ, Cushman RA, McNeel AK, Soares EM, Brooks K, Spencer TE, Perry GA. Effects of preovulatory estradiol on uterine environment and conceptus survival from fertilization to maternal recognition of pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 2018;99(3):629–638. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioy086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Ozturk S, Demir R. Particular functions of estrogen and progesterone in establishment of uterine receptivity and embryo implantation. Histol Histopathol. 2010;25(9):1215–1228. doi: 10.14670/HH-25.1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Parrish JJ, Susko-Parrish JL, First NL. Capacitation of bovine sperm by heparin: inhibitory effect of glucose and role of intracellular pH. Biol Reprod. 1989;41(4):683–699. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod41.4.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Parrott JA, Skinner MK. Developmental and hormonal regulation of keratinocyte growth factor expression and action in the ovarian follicle. Endocrinology. 1998;139(1):228–235. doi: 10.1210/endo.139.1.5680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Pereira MH, Rodrigues AD, Carvalho RJ, Wiltbank MC, Vasconcelos JL. Increasing length of an estradiol and progesterone timed artificial insemination protocol decreases pregnancy losses in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(3):1454–1464. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Perry GA, Perry BL. Effect of preovulatory concentrations of estradiol and initiation of standing estrus on uterine pH in beef cows. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2008;34(3):333–338. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2007.09.003. a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Perry GA, Perry BL. Effects of standing estrus and supplemental estradiol on changes in uterine pH during a fixed-time artificial insemination protocol. J Anim Sci. 2008;86(11):2928–2935. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1181. b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Perry GA, Smith MF, Lucy MC, Green JA, Parks TE, MacNeil MD, Roberts AJ, Geary TW. Relationship between follicle size at insemination and pregnancy success. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(14):5268–5273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501700102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Perry GA, Smith MF, Roberts AJ, MacNeil MD, Geary TW. Relationship between size of ovulatory follicle and pregnancy success in beef heifers. J Anim Sci. 2007;85(3):684–689. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Pursley JR, Mee MO, Wiltbank MC. Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2α and GnRH. Theriogenology. 1995;44(7):915–923. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(95)00279-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Quail LK, Cushman RA, Keel BN, Gonda MG, Perry GA. Preovulatory estradiol concentrations influence oviductal gene expression; Society for the Study of Reproduction Annual Meeting; 2021 Dec 15-18; St. Louis, United States. Reston: Society for the Study of Reproduction; 2021. p. MO2021. [Google Scholar]
  91. Rawy M, Mido S, Ali HE-S, Derar D, Megahed G, Kitahara G, Osawa T. Effect of exogenous estradiol Benzoate on uterine blood flow in postpartum dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci. 2018;192:136–145. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Reilly CM, Cannady WE, Mahesh VB, Stopper VS, De Sevilla LM, Mills TM. Duration of estrogen exposure prior to follicle-stimulating hormone stimulation is critical to granulosa cell growth and differentiation in rats. Biol Reprod. 1996;54(6):1336–1342. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod54.6.1336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Richardson BN, Hill SL, Stevenson JS, Djira GD, Perry GA. Expression of estrus before fixed-time AI affects conception rates and factors that impact expression of estrus and the repeatability of expression of estrus in sequential breeding seasons. Anim Reprod Sci. 2016;166:133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Robinson NA, Leslie KE, Walton JS. Effect of treatment with progesterone on pregnancy rate and plasma concentrations of progesterone in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 1989;72(1):202–207. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79098-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Ryan M, Mihm M, Roche JF. Effect of GnRH given before or after dominance on gonadotrophin response and fate of that follicle wave in postpartum dairy cows. J Reprod Fertil. 1998;21:61. [Google Scholar]
  96. Santos JE, Thatcher WW, Chebel RC, Cerri RL, Galvao KN. The effect of embryonic death rates in cattle on the efficacy of estrus synchronization programs. Anim Reprod Sci. 2004;82-83:513–535. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Sartori R, Gumen A, Guenther JN, Souza AH, Caraviello DZ, Wiltbank MC. Comparison of artificial insemination versus embryo transfer in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology. 2006;65(7):1311–1321. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.05.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Seidel GE. Reproductive biotechnologies for profitable beef production; Beef Improvement Federation 27th Research Symposium and Annual Meeting; 1995 May-Jun 31-3; Sheridan, WY, United States. Beef Improvement Federation; 1995. p. 28. [Google Scholar]
  99. Souza AH, Silva EP, Cunha AP, Gumen A, Ayres H, Brusveen DJ, Guenther JN, Wiltbank MC. Ultrasonographic evaluation of endometrial thickness near timed AI as a predictor of fertility in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology. 2011;75(4):722–733. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Spencer TE, Bazer FW. Uterine and placental factors regulating conceptus growth in domestic animals. J Anim Sci. 2004;82(E-Suppl):E4–13. doi: 10.2527/2004.8213_supplE4x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Spencer TE, Sandra O, Wolf E. Genes involved in conceptus-endometrial interactions in ruminants: insights from reductionism and thoughts on holistic approaches. Reproduction. 2008;135(2):165–179. doi: 10.1530/REP-07-0327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Stanke DF, Sikes JD, DeYoung DW, Tumbleson ME. Proteins and amino acids in bovine oviducal fluid. J Reprod Fertil. 1974;38(2):493–496. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0380493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Sugiura T, Akiyoshi S, Inoue F, Yanagawa Y, Moriyoshi M, Tajima M, Katagiri S. Relationship between bovine endometrial thickness and plasma progesterone and estradiol concentrations in natural and induced estrus. J Reprod Dev. 2018;64(2):135–143. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2017-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Sutton R, Nancarrow CD, Wallace AL. Oestrogen and seasonal effects on the production of an oestrus-associated glycoprotein in oviducal fluid of sheep. J Reprod Fertil. 1986;77(2):645–653. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0770645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Ulbrich SE, Frohlich T, Schulke K, Englberger E, Waldschmitt N, Arnold GJ, Reichenbach HD, Reichenbach M, Wolf E, Meyer HH, Bauersachs S. Evidence for estrogen-dependent uterine serpin (SERPINA14) expression during estrus in the bovine endometrial glandular epithelium and lumen. Biol Reprod. 2009;81(4):795–805. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.075184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Van Cleeff J, Drost M, Thatcher WW. Effects of postinsemination progesterone supplementation on fertility and subsequent estrous response on dairy heifers. Theriogenology. 1991;36(5):795–807. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(91)90345-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Vasconcelos JL, Sartori R, Oliveira HN, Guenther JG, Wiltbank MC. Reduction in size of the ovulatory follicle reduces subsequent luteal size and pregnancy rate. Theriogenology. 2001;56(2):307–314. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00565-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Vasconcelos JL, Silcox RW, Rosa GJ, Pursley JR, Wiltbank MC. Synchronization rate, size of the ovulatory follicle, and pregnancy rate after synchronization of ovulation beginning on different days of the estrous cycle in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology. 1999;52(6):1067–1078. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00195-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Walton JS, Halbert GW, Robinson NA, Leslie KE. Effects of progesterone and human chorionic gonadotrophin administration five days postinsemination on plasma and milk concentrations of progesterone and pregnancy rates of normal and repeat breeder dairy cows. Can J Vet Res. 1990;54(3):305–308. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Wang XN, Greenwald GS. Synergistic effects of steroids with FSH on folliculogenesis, steroidogenesis and FSH- and hCG-receptors in hypophysectomized mice. J Reprod Fertil. 1993;99(2):403–413. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0990403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Wegner CC, Killian GJ. In vitro and in vivo association of an oviduct estrus-associated protein with bovine zona pellucida. Mol Reprod Dev. 1991;29(1):77–84. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1080290112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Welsh TH, Jr, Zhuang L-Z, Hsueh AJW. Estrogen augmentation of gonadotropin-stimulated progestin biosynthesis in cultured rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology. 1983;112(6):1916–1924. doi: 10.1210/endo-112-6-1916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Wijayagunawardane MP, Miyamoto A, Taquahashi Y, Gabler C, Acosta TJ, Nishimura M, Killian G, Sato K. In vitro regulation of local secretion and contraction of the bovine oviduct: stimulation by luteinizing hormone, endothelin-1 and prostaglandins, and inhibition by oxytocin. J Endocrinol. 2001;168(1):117–130. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1680117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Winuthayanon W, Bernhardt ML, Padilla-Banks E, Myers PH, Edin ML, Lih FB, Hewitt SC, Korach KS, Williams CJ. Oviductal estrogen receptor alpha signaling prevents protease-mediated embryo death. eLife. 2015;4:e10453. doi: 10.7554/eLife.10453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Witkowska E. Reactivity of the epithelial cells of the bovine oviduct in vitro on the exogenic gonadotrophic and steroid hormones. Folia Histochem Cytochem. 1979;17(3):225–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Wong PY, Lee WM, Tsang AY. The effects of extracellular sodium on acid release and motility initiation in rat caudal epididymal spermatozoa in vitro. Exp Cell Res. 1981;131(1):97–104. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(81)90410-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Zelinski MB, Noel P, Weber DW, Stormshak F. Characterization of cytoplasmic progesterone receptors in the bovine endometrium during proestrus and diestrus. J Anim Sci. 1982;55(2):376–383. doi: 10.2527/jas1982.552376x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Zhuang L-Z, Adashi EY, Hsueh AJW. Direct enhancement of gonadotropin-stimulated ovarian estrogen biosynthesis by estrogen and clomiphene citrate. Endocrinology. 1982;110(6):2219–2221. doi: 10.1210/endo-110-6-2219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Animal Reproduction are provided here courtesy of Brazilian College of Animal Reproduction

RESOURCES