Abstract
In continuation of our previous efforts for the development of potent small molecules against brain cancer, herein we synthesized seventeen new compounds and tested their anti-gliomapotential against established glioblastoma cell lines, namely, D54MG, U251, and LN-229 as well as patient derived cell lines (DB70 and DB93). Among them, the carboxamide derivatives, BT-851 and BT-892 were found to be the most active leads in comparison to our established hit compound BT#9.The SAR studies of our hit BT#9 compound resulted in the development of two new lead compounds by hit to lead strategy. The detailed biological studies are currently underway. The active compounds could possibly act as template for the future development of newer anti-glioma agents.
Keywords: Anticancer, Anti-glioma agents, Hit to lead, Carboxamides, Glioblastoma, Magmas protein, Oxadiazoles, Oxadiazborole
Introduction
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a fatal aggressive brain tumor, which has a severe prognosis in spite of the first line chemotherapeutic drugs, surgery and radiation therapies.1,2 There is no effective second-line treatment at the time of recurrence. The patients’ survival is one to two years, with less than 5–10% of people living longer than five years.3,4 If the cancer is left untreated, survival is classically about three months. The failure of current therapies has multiple causes, including dysfunctional blood brain barrier, heterogeneous cell populations (including glioblastoma stem cells) which leads to treatment resistance and the risk of toxicity to the normal brain3. Consequently, there is an urgent need for the development of newer anti-glioblastoma agents because of dysfunctional blood brain barrier, development of treatment resistance and lack of effective treatment at the time of recurrence.5–7
Magmas is a J-like protein found in the mitochondrial matrix. It has been shown to be upregulated in several cancers including glioblastoma (GBM) and increasedexpressionhas been observed to have a protective effect against reactive oxygen species (ROS) mediated apoptosis in different cancers.8,9 In mammals, Magmas can form complexes with DnaJC19 and DnaJC15, J-protein subunits of the TIM23 (translocase of the inner membrane) trafficking complex.10 Magmas plays a crucial role in the survival of glioma and consequently Magmas inhibition may possibly be a prominent tool in the treatment of GBM patients.
Previously, we have synthesized a series of small molecule inhibitors and tested their anti-glioma potential.8,11 Delightfully, one of our hit compound BT#9, significantly exerted anti-cancer effect in glioma in vitro by inhibiting cell division, stimulating apoptosis, obstructing cell migration and invasion. Our outcomes also revealed that our hit compound BT#9, could probably cross the blood brain barrier and has a remarkable potential to be developed as a therapeutic lead.5,12
Inspired by having a promising hit (BT#9) in hand(Fig. 1), and in continuance of our efforts towards the development of small molecule inhibitors,13–15 we were prompted to synthesize new lead compounds by hit to lead strategy using Lipinski rule of five and other preclinical criteria.16–18 Consequently, the authors of this manuscript report the hit-to-lead optimization of BT#9 by synthesizing new BT#9 analogs and exploring the structure activity relationship (SAR) studies (Fig. 1). The guanidine part of BT#9 was interchanged by carboxamides, oxadiazoles and/or oxadiazaboroles. Herein, we have synthesized seventeen compounds and evaluated their anticancer effect on different GBM cell lines.
Fig. 1.

SAR studies of BT#9 and identification of two lead compounds BT-851 and BT892.
The synthesis of acid (5) is represented in Scheme 1. It was prepared according to our previous reported procedures.19,20 Initially, β-cyclocitral (1) was subjected to Grignard reaction by treating with methyl magnesium bromide with dry THF to yield alcohol (2) as yellow oil (Scheme 1). The alcohol gave satisfactory spectral data and was directly converted to wittig salt (3) by treatment with triphenylphosphinehy-drobromide in acetonitrile at 90 °C for 12 h. Recrystallization of (3) from hexane gave a white crystalline solid. Next, the witting salt was treated with methyl 4-formylbenzoate in DMF in the presence of Sodium tertbutoxide at room temperature for 24 h to furnish the precursor acid (5). Finally, the desired carboxamides were prepared in good yields by treating the acid (5) with corresponding amines in the presence of CDI, DMAP in Dimethylformamide at 90 °C for 16 h.
Scheme 1.

Synthesis of carboxamide derivatives.
Next, our goal was to synthesize oxadiazole derivatives from the acid (5) The synthesis of oxadiazole derivatives was accomplished by a known protocol21,10 is illustrated in Scheme 2. These compounds were synthesized by an amide coupling strategy by heating substituted commercially available amidoximes 8(a-e) and acid (5) in the presence of CDI in DMF for 20 h. After purification by silica-gel chromatography (Hexanes/EtOAc: 3:1) oxadiazole derivatives were obtained as solids in good yields.
Scheme 2.

Synthesis of oxadiazole derivatives (BT-859, BT-860, BT-861, BT-894 and BT-895).
Consequently, we were prompted to replace the acid functionality with cyano, amidoxime and oxadiazaborole to study the SAR. The synthetic Scheme is illustrated in Scheme 3. The witting salt (3) was treated with 4-cyanobenzaldehyde (10) in DMF in the presence of Sodium tertiarybutoxide at room temperature for 24 h to furnish BT-852.14 Next, the cyano compound, BT-852 was straightforwardly converted to amidoxime derivative, BT-853, by heating it with Hydroxylamine Hydrochloride in the presence of a base (DIPEA) in ethanol for 18 h.13 The next step, boron insertion was accomplished by heating BT-853 with phenyl boronic acid (13) in dry toluene in the presence of molecular sieves for 20 h at 110 °C to obtain the desired oxadiazoborole derivative, BT-854.22 All the synthesized compounds were confirmed by 1H NMR, 13C NMR and HRMS data.
Scheme 3.

Synthesis of BT-852, BT-853 and BT-854.
The synthesized compounds were screened against established glioblastoma cell lines, namely, D54MG, U251, and LN-229 as well as patient derived cell lines (DB70 and DB93) to assess cell viability using MTT assay and XTT assays.23 IC50 value of the synthesized compounds are represented in Table 1. In addition partition coefficient values (log P and C logP) have been calculated theoretically and are represented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Anticancer potential of synthesized compounds in established glioma cell lines and patient derived cell lines (IC50 value in μM).
|
|
D54MG- Glioblastoma cell line; U251- Human Glioblastoma cell line; LN229- Human Glioblastoma cell line; DB70- patient derived cell lines; DB93- patient derived cell lines; LogP-Partition coefficient; CLogP- Partition coefficient.
Among all the tested compounds, amide derivatives, BT-851 containing benzothiazole motif and BT-892 containing trifluoromethyl (-CF3) substitution exhibited significant cytotoxicity withIC50 values of 6.6 μM and 3.8 μM, respectively, against D54MG cellline (Table 1). In addition, BT-892 showed significant cytotoxicity with IC50value of 6.0 μM against U251 cell line in comparison BT#9 (IC50value of 5.0 μm). Moreover, BT-892 demonstrated significant cytotoxicity displaying IC50value of 5.9 μM against LN-229 cells, superior to our previous hit compound BT#9 with IC50value of 6.5 μm (Table 1; Fig. 2).Fascinatingly, one of the active compounds (BT-851) exhibited potent activity with IC50value of 6.6 μM and 3.5 μM against patient-derived cell lines DB70 and DB93, respectively (Table 1; Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.

Cell viability of established and primary patient GBM cells after inhibitor treatment. Cells were seeded overnight and treated the following day with indicated inhibitors for 3 days.
The biological results revealed that BT-851 containing benzothiazole motif and BT-892 containing (-CF3) substitution emerged as the most active lead compounds against glioma cell lines. Motivating results in patient-derived cell lines provided useful insight about their clinical implications for therapeutic use. The detailed biological studies are under progress.
In conclusion, we have synthesized seventeen-17 new compounds and tested their anticancer effect in comparison to our previously identified hit compound BT#9 against established glioblastomacell lines, namely, D54MG, U251, and LN-229 as well as patient-derived cell lines (DB70 and DB93). Among them, BT-851 and BT-892 emerged as potential lead compounds in D54MG and U251 cell lines. Gratifyingly, BT-851 demonstrated potent activity against patient derived cell lines (DB70 and DB93) supporting their clinical applications in the future. The detailed biological studies are currently underway. The SAR studies of our hit BT#9 compound resulted in the development of two new lead compounds by hit to lead strategy. The active compounds could possibly act as template for the future development of newer anti-glioma agents.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
B.D. acknowledges the NIH for support R01AI132614-01A1, R21AA027374-01, 1R01NS109423-01A1. D.A.B. and J.J.L are supported by the 1R01NS109423-01A1 from NINDS and the UCI Cancer Center Award [P30CA062203] from NCI. NL is supported by the NIH/NCATS Institute for Clinical and Translational Science TL-1 Award (TL1 TR001415). BD, MAS, and SD are thankful to N. Nandwana to synthesize some compounds.
Footnotes
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2023.129330.
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
References
- 1.Bleeker FE, Molenaar RJ, Leenstra S. Recent advances in the molecular understanding of glioblastoma. J Neurooncol. 2012;108:11–27. 10.1007/s11060-011-0793-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gallego O Nonsurgical treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Curr Oncol. 2015;22: e273–e281. 10.3747/co.22.2436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McKenney AS, Weg E, Bale TA, et al. Radiomic analysis to predict histopathologically confirmed pseudoprogression in glioblastoma patients. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022;8: 100916. 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Gittleman H, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2012–2016. Neuro Oncol. 2019;21:v1–v100. 10.1093/neuonc/noz150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Van Tellingen O, Yetkin-Arik B, De Gooijer M, Wesseling P, Wurdinger T, De Vries H. Overcoming the blood–brain tumor barrier for effective glioblastoma treatment. Drug Resist Updat. 2015;19:1–12. 10.1016/j.drup.2015.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shergalis A, Bankhead A 3rd, Luesakul U, Muangsin N, Neamati N. Current challenges and opportunities in treating glioblastoma. Pharmacol Rev. 2018;70: 412–445. 10.1124/pr.117.014944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thakur A, Faujdar C, Sharma R, Sharma S, Malik B, Nepali K. Glioblastoma: current status, emerging targets, and recent advances. J Med Chem. 2022;65:8596–8685. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Di K, Lomeli N, Bota DA, Das BC. Magmas inhibition as a potential treatment strategy in malignant glioma. J Neurooncol. 2019;141:267–276. 10.1007/s11060-018-03040-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Srivastava S, Sinha D, Saha P, Marthala H, D’silva P. Magmas functions as a ROS regulator and provides cytoprotection against oxidative stress-mediated damages. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1394–e. 10.1038/cddis.2014.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sinha D, Joshi N, Chittoor B, Samji P, D’Silva P. Role of Magmas in protein transport and human mitochondria biogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(7):1248–1262. 10.1093/hmg/ddq002. Epub 2010 Jan 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jubinsky PT, Short MK, Ghanem M, Das BC. Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel Magmas inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011;21:3479–3482. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.03.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Di K, Du S, Lepe J, Nandwana N, Das B, Bota D. EXTH-19. Evaluating the anti-tumor effect of a novel therapeutic agent, magmas inhibitor, in malignant glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22(Supplement_2):ii90–ii91. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Das BC, Nandwana NK, Ojha DP, Das S, Evans T. Synthesis of a boron-containing amidoxime reagent and its application to synthesize functionalized oxadiazole and quinazolinone derivatives. Tetrahedron Lett. 2022;92:153657. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2022.153657. Epub 2022 Jan 25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Das BC, Shareef MA, Das S, et al. Boron-containing heterocycles as promising pharmacological agents. Bioorg Med Chem.. 2022::116748 10.1016/j.bmc.2022.116748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Das BC, Nandwana NK, Das S, et al. Boron chemicals in drug discovery and development: synthesis and medicinal perspective. Molecules. 2022;27:2615. 10.3390/molecules27092615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:4–17. 10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hughes JP, Rees S, Kalindjian SB, Philpott KL. Principles of early drug discovery. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;162:1239–1249. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01127.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Strovel J, Sittampalam S, Coussens NP, et al. Early Drug Discovery and Development Guidelines: For Academic Researchers, Collaborators, and Start-up Companies. 2012. May 1 [Updated 2016 Jul 1]. In: Markossian S, Grossman A, Brimacombe K, et al. , editors. Assay Guidance Manual [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; 2004-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK92015/. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Das BC, Kabalka GW. Design and synthesis of (E)-4-((3-ethyl-2, 4, 4-trimethylcyclohex-2-enylidene) methyl) benzoic acid. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008;49:4695–4696. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Das BC, Mahalingam SM, Evans T, Kabalka GW, Anguiano J, Hema K. Design and synthesis of (E)-1-((3-ethyl-2, 4, 4-trimethylcyclohex-2-enylidene) methyl-4-substituted benzenes from 1-(2, 6, 6-trimethylcyclohex-1-enyl) ethanol. ChemCommun. 2009;16:2133–2135. 10.1039/B823063C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Das BC, Tang X-Y, Sanyal S, et al. Design and synthesis of 3, 5-disubstituted 1, 2, 4-oxadiazole containing retinoids from a retinoic acid receptor agonist. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:2433–2435. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dürüst Y, Akcan M, Martiskainen O, Siirola E, Pihlaja K. Synthesis of new thiophene, furan and pyridine substituted 1, 2, 4, 5-oxadiazaboroles. Polyhedron. 2008;27: 999–1007. 10.1016/j.poly.2007.11.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Riss TL, Moravec RA, Niles AL, et al. Cell Viability Assays. 2013. May 1 [Updated 2016 Jul 1]. In: Markossian S, Grossman A, Brimacombe K, et al. , editors. Assay Guidance Manual [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; 2004-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK144065/. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.
