Abstract
Referral in the health system is a systematic process for the optimal allocation of resources and improves the access of people in need of treatment services. Considering the vulnerability of the veterans and more medical needs in this group, this study aims to identify the components that affect veterans’ health services referral system. MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases, the international military studies website, and key journals in the field of veterans’ health services were searched with related keywords including “veteran,” “referral system,” and “health services” for the period from January 2000 to July 2022. Studies were screened and selected in accordance with the phases of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses(PRISMA) flow diagram 2020. Data extraction was done by two researchers independently and a thematic content analysis method was used to analyze the findings. Among 40,608 studies searched electronically and 16 studies searched manually, 19 studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. The research method applied here is a combination of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. The most important findings were extracted from the included studies and analyzed in three general categories: components related to the patient, service provider, and the structural-operational mechanisms of the referral system. The effective performance of the referral system for providing health services to veterans is influenced by the factors affecting components related to the patient, the service provider, and the structural-operational mechanisms of the referral system. Evaluating and improving each of these factors improve the performance of the referral system and provision of health services to veterans.
Keywords: Referral, veteran, veterans’ health
Introduction
Based on the complexity of the services provided, the national health system is usually organized into three levels of healthcare services, and in some countries, around four levels of care.[1] The referral is a process in which the healthcare service provider temporarily or permanently transfers the responsibility of providing service or care to a more specialized level.[2] A referral system connects all levels of the health system, supports health centers, and helps people get the most accessible and quality care possible. In the referral system, hospital facilities are used optimally and cost-effectively, and patients who need specialized services more can access them on time.[3,4]
Veterans include groups with disabilities and prisoners of war who suffered from health disorders due to serving in wars as well as military forces. Compared to the general population, these people are more prone to chronic diseases and severe mental disorders.[5,6] These health effects often increase as veterans get older, and are greater in veterans who have experienced heavy combat or imprisonment.[7] Considering the number of veterans in countries with veteran populations, this group is considered an important subgroup for public health interventions.[8] The United States, with a population of about 16 million veterans in 50 states,[9] has the largest number of centers providing health services to veterans. Research has shown that despite the federal government's efforts to expand access to healthcare and treatment for veterans, the treatment used by this group is less than what they need, and veterans have poorer health than civilians.[5,8]
Despite the diversity of healthcare services systems for veterans in different countries, if the specialized care system of this group cannot provide the services they need, they should be referred to the civilian healthcare system to receive specialized services.[10,11]
Until 2019, in the USA, the referral of veterans to receive healthcare services was managed by the TRICARE network, and currently, the referral of veterans to non-VA treatment centers is done by the Veterans Affair(VA) Community Care Network.[12,13] The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is an integrated healthcare system for veterans that serves as a vehicle for communicating primary care requests to specialist consultations and specialist recommendations to primary care.[14,15] When the VA fails to provide the required care, the veteran is referred to a non-VA service provider by a system called community care. By managing veterans’ referrals, community care enables veterans to continue receiving services and benefiting from healthcare facilities.[13,16]
Due to facilitating the process of patient referrals among healthcare providers, the referral system is considered an important component of quality clinical care.[3] Facilitation of the system operation and improvement of veterans’ access to essential services as an expected outcome requires the identification of effective components in the veterans’ referral system. The results of the researcher's preliminary studies on the term “veterans’ health service referral system” showed that in studies on the provision of health services to veterans, various components of the country's health system and the process of veterans’ referral have been examined. However, until the beginning of this study, a coherent and comprehensive investigation has not been conducted on the identification of effective components in the veterans’ health service referral system. Therefore, to understand the nature and structure of the effective health service referral system for veterans, this scoping review study was designed and conducted to identify the effective components of the health service referral system for veterans.
Materials and Method
Definition of a veteran healthcare referral system
As there is no well-established definition of the veterans’ health services referral system, this study defined veterans’ health services referral system as systematic processes for screening, diagnosis, purposeful evaluation, and if more specialized services are needed, transfer of veterans to higher levels of services in the healthcare system.[17]
Information source and literature search
Here, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Sciences, and ProQuest databases were electronically searched as information sources. Other sources of information, including Google Scholar and ScienceOpen, as well as the website of the international conference on war studies, militarism and military, and the key journals Plos One and Journal of General Internal Medicine, which had the most publications in the considered study area, were manually searched for the period from January 1, 2000 to July 1, 2022. Furthermore, to study the instructions and documents related to the veterans’ health services referral system, the official websites of the military health system (health.mil) and defense health agency (www.va.gov) were manually searched with relevant keywords. In Table 1, a sample search syntax in the PubMed database is presented. Veteran, “referral system,” and “health service” are three search components of the study.
Table 1.
Finalized search term in the PubMed database to identifying primary studies on veterans’ health services referral system
PubMed Search Syntax |
---|
((Veterans [tiab]) OR (“Veterans affairs”) OR (“Veterans’ health system” [tiab]) OR (“veterans health care” [tiab]) OR (veterans[tiab] AND “health care system” [tiab]) OR (veterans[tiab] AND “health care” [tiab]) OR (Veteran[tiab]) OR (“retrieved soldier”) OR (Vet) OR (“veterans’ health” [tiab]) OR (Health AND veterans[tiab])) AND ((“referral system” [tiab]) OR (Referral[tiab]) OR (Referrals[tiab]) OR (“Referral center”) OR (“Referral centers”) OR (“national referral system” [tiab])) AND ((“health service” [tiab]) OR (“Health Service” [tiab] AND Veterans[tiab]) OR (“Health Services” [tiab] AND Veterans[tiab]) OR (“Veterans Health Service” [tiab]) OR (Health) OR (“health care” [tiab]) OR (“primary health care”) OR (“secondary health care”)) AND ((“2000/01/01”[Date- Publication] : “3000”[Date- Publication])) |
Inclusion criteria
As the present study aimed to identify the components and factors affecting the veterans’ health services referral system, it covered all quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods studies done on the referral of veteran patients to receive health services (including referral system, referral process, referral challenges, and...). As the researchers focused on health services for veterans here, works that only studied the referral system for providing health services to spouses, children, and families of veterans were excluded. Furthermore, among the studies on providing health services to veterans and their families simultaneously, if a study met other inclusion criteria, only the challenges related to the veterans receiving health services were extracted.
In the selection of studies, no restrictions have been applied on the health services needed by veterans, and health is considered in its general sense as physical health, mental health, and rehabilitation of veterans, and only the referral-basedness of the service is a necessary factor for the selection of studies. Therefore, according to the definition chosen for the veterans’ health services referral system, self-referral-related studies were excluded from the retrieved studies in the search phase.
To avoid language bias, no language restrictions were applied in the search of studies, and to avoid publication bias in the retrieved studies, a variety of databases and search engines were used as research sources.
Screening and selection process
The studies retrieved via the database search, taking into account the numbers 12 to 15 resulting from the calculation of the relevant articles (NNR),[18] were entered into EndNote X9 Clarivate™, and after removing the duplicates with the Digital Object Identification capability of the EndNote software, and manual removal by checking similar studies, screening of studies was done by the main researcher through checking the title and abstract of the studies.
Then, in the stage of selecting the full text of the studies entered from the screening stage, two reviewers independently reviewed and selected the included studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The cases of disagreement between two reviewers were resolved through discussion with the research team and the final studies were selected.
Data items and data abstraction process
In the data extraction phase, two reviewers independently extracted the information related to the characteristics of the study and the answers to the research questions from the full text of the entered studies based on a predetermined form. Uncertainties were resolved in a group discussion. Table 2 is the information related to the characteristics of the studies that were extracted in this stage.
Table 2.
Included study characteristics in the review of factors affecting the referral system of veterans’ health services
Author(s), Year of publication, Study location | Study Populations (Care Recipient Group) | Aim of Study | Methodology | Outcome measures | Important Results | Conclusion and study suggestion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sellinger, et al., 2022, New England, USA.[19] | Veterans | Feasibility test and acceptability of treatment intervention and referral program in veterans’ pain management | Pilot study, Qualitative and Quantitative | Increased awareness of pain treatment options to offer veterans | Counselors for pain care | The screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for pain management intervention are feasible and acceptable among the pilot study of New England veterans |
Haber, et al. 2022, New York.[20] | Veteran staff member | Determination of the effective approach for smoking cessation treatment referrals at the primary care level | Clinical trial | Testing an opt-out system to increase smoking cessation treatment in veterans at the primary care level | Counseling Patient referral acceptance to treatment | The protocol suggests a system for treatment of tobacco cessation for veterans in VA primary care |
Bird 2022, USA.[12] | Veteran affair provider | Provision of better, less expensive healthcare and improvement of health outcomes for veterans | Grounded theory | Outcomes related to the treatment of veterans; including improvement of the patient’s health, functional status, and quality of life | - Coordination of VA providers with non-VA providers - Timeline to visit non-VA provider through a referral system |
The study recommends patient education on the use of telehealth messaging, renewed referrals by the same provider, and reduce patients’ wait time by reviewing the referral timelines process. |
Sanders, 2021, USA.[21] | Veteran affair provider | How can primary care providers help veterans communicate to receive services | Lesson learned | Facilitation of the provision of medical and psychiatric services to veterans | - Military screening - Risk level of the disease - possibility of recurrence - access restrictions |
The study suggests primary healthcare provider to prepared themselves for providing veterans’ health services and identify possible resources in their community to service provision of this population |
Buie 2021, USA[22] | Veterans with spinal cord injury disabilities | Improvement of the care provided to veterans with spinal cord injury disabilities | Qualitative method, content analysis | Identification of barriers and facilitators that highlight opportunities to improve the provision of care for veterans with spinal cord injury. | - Provider’s knowledge of how to refer - Role of VHA liaisons or counselors in referrals - Partnerships between VHA, private sector hospitals, and community organizations -Veterans’ awareness of SCI/D spinal cord injury disability services - Lack of access to referral services |
The study recommends providers’ awareness about the referral systems for care coordination; the availability of skilled facilities including skilled nursing facilities provides care promotion to veterans with spinal cord injuries. |
Hodgkin, et al. 2020, USA[23] | Patient of Veterans Health Administration | Follow-up of patients after the positive screening to measure the response rate to referral recommendations The proportion of patients who accepted the doctor’s advice and were referred for follow-up treatment. | Cross-sectional | Proportion of positively screened patients who were referred for follow-up treatment. | Referral acceptance | The study recommends health system support in reporting clinician action to referrals, and patient’s acceptance of treatment initiation for follow-up positive screening |
Gutt, et al. 2020, USA[24] | Physicians who make referrals for palliative RT at their respective VHA centers | Evaluation of referral patterns for radiotherapy in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) | Electronic survey | Improvement of the timeliness of radiotherapy treatment for those who refer to centers without radiotherapy equipment. | Patient’s ability to travel - Delay in receiving advice - Access to an oncologist - Concern about the number of treatments they should receive |
The study highlights the importance of the availability of on-site specialties services for timely consultation and treatment for veterans who need palliative radiation therapy |
Winchester, et al. 2019, USA[25] | Veteran | E-consultation study on reducing outpatient waiting time in referral management of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) | Prospective multiphase cohort study | Performance of more electronic consultations and reduction of patients’ waiting time | - Active referral management - Use of electronic consultation |
The study recommends electronic consultation to reduce patients waiting time |
Nevedal, et al. 2019, USA[26] | VA primary care providers | Understanding the experiences of veterans’ primary care providers in referring patients to specialists | Qualitative method | Focus on improving coordination of care between VA and community-based specialized service providers for veterans during their referral and treatment follow-up process | -Communication between the VA primary care providers and the private sector providers - VA primary care providers face challenges in tracking referrals to community specialists and in coordinating care |
The study suggests the information of choice referral program to solve the challenges of tracking veterans’ affairs referrals |
Sullivan, et al. 2018, USA[27] | Key informants | Examination of the challenges affecting the implementation of the veterans’ health management program | Qualitative method | Challenges related to human resources, infrastructure, resource allocation and geography, referrals and marketing, leadership support, team processes, and dynamics | - Case finding - Creation of consulting services - Creation of an electronic medical record to remind and track referrals - Facilitation of the referral process |
The study recommends effective communication among organizational processes during the program, providing infrastructures and programs based on organization priorities to improve implementation |
Possemato, et al., 2018, USA.[28] | Veteran | A description of how reforms can be implemented to improve interactions at the patient level and the primary care system for better patient health outcomes | Mixed method | Follow-up of referrals in the referral system | - Support system to track referrals - Management of telephone referrals and follow-up of patients to receive treatment |
The study suggests providers train with local adaptation education and evidence-based treatments to promote referrals and also highlights the role of peer support speculates to care management |
Zuchowski, et al. 2015, USA.[14] | VHA primary care providers | Challenges associated with referral and perceived by primary care providers to veterans | Mix methods, online cross-sectional survey & semi-structured interviews | Ease of communication reported by veterans’ primary care providers and recurring themes in participants’ descriptions of initial referral communication to specialized services. | Difficulty in communication for fixing appointments within a specific time frame and frequent rejection of referral requests due to rigid information requirements | The study suggests effective communication between primary care and specialists in veterans affaire to improve healthcare provided for veterans and highlights the electronic records as a communication tool in the referral system |
Allen, et al. 2012, Australia[29] | Veteran | Evaluation of mental health screening and clinical referral pathways in war veterans | Mixed method | An evaluated clinical pathway for the screening of mental health problems of veterans and appropriate referral if necessary | Communication between nurses and general practitioners was ineffective in mental health screening Clients’ and Carers’ Responses GPs response Nurses responses | The study recommends a structured clinical pathway to evaluate veterans’ mental healthcare needs for improved nursing care |
Hysong, et al. 2011, USA[30] | Primary Care Providers & subspecialties | A study of barriers, facilitators, and suggestions for improving communication and coordination of EHR-based referrals in an integrated healthcare system | Qualitative study | Identification of barriers, facilitators, and suggestions for improving the referral process based on the experience of research participants | - Coordination and interactive communication between primary care provider (PCP), specialist, and patient - Lack of an institutional referral policy, - Lack of standardization in specific referral procedures - Ambiguity in roles and responsibilities, - Insufficient resources to comply with and effectively respond to referral requests |
The study suggests clarification of primary care providers’ and specialists’ roles in the referral system and determining standard referral process across specialists and recommends adequate facilities for successfully transferring patients and follow-up. |
Claiborne, et al. 2010, USA[31] | Veteran | Study of practice patterns, screening guidelines, and referrals for evaluation and treatment | Mixed method | - Rate of VA primary care recipients screened with the AUDIT-C (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test). - Rate of referral of patients who screen positive for further evaluation for alcohol use disorders - Attitudes of PCP staff regarding response to patients with alcohol use disorders - Barriers and incentives to using VA guidelines for screening and referral for assessment and treatment of alcohol use disorders |
- Importance of the patterns of communication between primary and specialty care - Electronic consults - tracking system |
The study suggests identifying communication patterns between primary care and specialist care and the existence of electronic patient for complete screening and effective referral |
Hynes, et al. 2007, USA[15] | Veteran | A study of veterans’ access to medical care in two models of care, Medicare and Veterans Affairs (VA) services. | Retrospective, cross-sectional | Comparison of the benefits of Medicare and VA services for outpatients and inpatients in the veteran population | How to finance treatment costs | The study suggests veterans’ affairs and Medicare programs simultaneously to improve healthcare access for veterans |
Sales, et al., 2005, USA.[32] | Patients with acute coronary syndrome admitted to primary VHA (veteran health administration) hospitals | Studying the relationship between the degree of clinical integration of cardiovascular services and the transfer rate of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) from primary hospitals to specialized hospitals inside and outside the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system. | Prospective cohort | Simple structural components of care, such as a referral coordinator in a primary or tertiary care hospital, can influence the key process of care above and beyond patient characteristics. | Referral coordinators; Because they facilitate referral, transfer, and sometimes counseling for patients with various types of diseases or health problems. | The study suggests locating referral coordinators in veterans’ health administration hospitals to improve ACS patients’ transfer to tertiary health services |
Lee, et al., 2005, United Kingdom.[33] | Veterans | Examination of the clinical results of veterans in the referral system after one year | Cross-sectional survey | - Obtain better outcomes from referring veterans with chronic PTSD to service providers familiar with military culture and the effects of conflict - Dealing with veterans’ potential psychiatric problems by medical professionals familiar with military environment can improve outcomes. |
Follow-up of referred patients | The study suggests a timely diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder for successful treatment and general practitioners’ knowledge of military culture also understanding veterans’ potential problems can improve treatment process |
Kanter, et al. 2003, U.S[34] | Veteran | Comparison of three screening strategies in terms of patient flow, coverage, and patient characteristics with the usual care referral system | Randomized trial | Coverage of care in screening strategies | The best aid for referral and increased effective coverage is patient self-report | The study highlights the role of patients’ self-report surveys in-clinic in the efficiency of referral services coverage |
The study protocol registration DOI is https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PC6M9.
Synthesis
Since in reviewing the studies, we sought to identify the effective components and factors, the extracted data were qualitative. Therefore, the collected qualitative data were analyzed by the thematic content analysis method. In this way, first, the extracted data were coded according to the research question. In the next step, the codes were categorized based on similarity, and finally, the generated categories were organized into appropriate classes.
Result
Literature search
In the search phase, 40,608 studies were retrieved from a total of four databases. After removing duplicates, 3001 studies were screened based on their title and abstract. Among the 99 studies included in the selection stage, the full text of 98 studies was retrieved.
Moreover, the full text of 16 studies was retrieved from the manual search of other gray literature sources. After reviewing the full texts based on the inclusion criteria, 19 studies were eligible to enter the research. The search process until the selection of studies is reported in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses(PRISMA) flow diagram [Figure 1].
Figure 1.
The steps of searching until the selection of included studies in the PRISMA flow diagram 2020
Literature characteristics and assessment
Most of the included studies were conducted in the United States, and only one study was done in Australia and one study in England. In 12 studies, the research population was veterans, and in 7 studies, service providers to veterans were the population of research that was related to the provision of referral system services for veterans. The methodology of the studies included in this study was a combination of quantitative (8 studies), qualitative (5 studies), mixed (5 studies), and lesson-learned methods. Table 2 contains the specifications of the included studies and their most important findings.
Data synthesis finding
Components affecting the veterans’ health services referral system which were found based on the analysis of data extracted from the studies included in this research were classified into three categories including components related to veteran patients (referral acceptance, patient access to referral services, patient's medical condition), components related to the service provider (referral coordinators, provider response, provider knowledge, and participation in the referral system), and components related to the structural and operational mechanisms of referral system (providing adequate resources, referral services availability, providing safe care, effective communication and interaction, support network, defined structure for referral system) [Table 3].
Table 3.
Analysis of the findings of the studies included in the review of the effective components in the veterans’ health services referral system
Category | Subcategory | Examples of important factors |
---|---|---|
Patient (veteran) components | Referral acceptance | Veteran’s preference to use services |
Confidence in the referral system | ||
Patients’ access to services | No access to in-person services | |
Far distance of veteran’s residence and special health services | ||
Patients’ (veteran) medical condition | Patients’ risk level | |
Possibility of disease recurrence | ||
Provider components | Referral coordinators | A significant role of consultancy (e-consultants, telephone-based consultants, etc.) |
Treatment encouragement roll | ||
Health providers’ response | Difficulty in scheduling specialized services | |
Request rejection due to strict information requirements | ||
Providers’ knowledge and participation in the referral system | Service provider’s knowledge and perception of veterans’ medical problems | |
Cooperation with veteran affair health services | ||
Structural-Operational mechanisms | Providing resources | Health services financing |
Human resources supply | ||
Referral service availability | Adequacy of physical medical resources | |
Being close to the recipient (veterans) | ||
Providing safe care | Timely diagnosis | |
Tracking referred patients | ||
Communication and effective interaction | Determination of communication between primary healthcare and specialized level of healthcare | |
Determination of communication protocols | ||
Support network for referrals | Veterans’ support system | |
Referrals’ following system | ||
Defined structure for referral system | Development of standard procedures for referrals | |
Determination of referral mechanisms |
Patient (veteran) components
Referral acceptance
In this study, the veteran's acceptance of the referral was identified as one of the effective components in providing referral health services.[20,23] Based on the literature, factors such as the veteran's feeling of necessity to pursue treatment, confidence in the referral system, preference to use the referred services, and concern about the number of treatment sessions, affect the veteran's willingness to follow the referral system.[20,21,24]
Patients’ (veteran) access to services
A veteran's access to referral services allows the use of referred health services. In the included studies, the veteran's distance to specialized services, the accessibility of in-person services for veterans who live far from city centers and in rural areas, the ability to travel based on the physical conditions, the availability of transportation services, and financial considerations have all been taken into account in veteran's access to services.[12,21,22,28]
Patients’ (veteran) medical condition
In using referral services, the patient's medical condition is important so in patients with a high risk of disease or the possibility of disease recurrence, the waiting time to follow the referral process to receive services is one of the most important challenges.[12,21,24] Depending on the medical condition of the veteran, the type of service needed is different.[22] For example, veterans with disabilities and chronic diseases require many sessions of rehabilitation services.
Service provider components
In the current study, the service provider refers to general practitioners, specialists, consultants, nursing staff, and health and treatment staff in health services centers.
Referral coordinators
In the process of operationalizing the referral system, the role of referral coordinators is emphasized in in-person and electronic referrals. Numerous studies on referral and follow-up of veterans’ treatment highlighted the role of online and telephone counselors for screening, diagnosing, and informing veterans who did not have the opportunity to access medical centers in person.[14,19,20,22,25,28] Similarly, in the in-person visits to health centers, nursing staff and health liaisons, as coordinators of the referral system in health centers, play a role in the effective performance of the referral system.[22,27,32]
Service providers’ response
The provider's response to referrals is one of the important components of providing referral services. Rejection of referral requests, delay in appointment, difficulty in getting an appointment from specialists, and limitation of providing specialized services are among the factors that determine the importance of the role of the provider's response in the performance of the referral system.[12,14,28] Although in many studies, having an electronic file and registered disease records have been proposed as a solution to the information needs of the referral system for providing services, the information requirements are still one of the effective components in the referral system and a challenge for the service providers.[14,27,30]
Providers’ knowledge and participation in the referral system
The service provider's knowledge and awareness of the operation of the referral system and service provision in this system are effective in the amount of participation and service provision by the provider.[22] Furthermore, the perception of the patient's condition and awareness of the health problems of veterans and the health risks that threaten the military forces compared to civilians are effective components in providing services to this group of patients in the referral system.[33]
One of the challenges identified in the non-participation of providers in the referral system is the ambiguity in their roles and responsibilities in the referral system.[22,30] Therefore, participation in providing services to referred military veterans and patients, outside of the community referral system, requires determining the roles and responsibilities of the service provider towards this group.
Structural-operational mechanisms
Providing resources
Providing sufficient resources for referral is an important structural component in the operationalization of the health service referral system. Supply of human resources at the primary care level for screening, disease diagnosis, and counseling for referral to the specialized level, as well as a sufficient number of health and treatment centers, hospitals and specialized clinics, and treatment facilities involved in providing health services to veterans, are among the referral system's operational components.[28,27,30,32] In some studies, the financing of referral services is one of the obstacles to receiving services for referred patients. Therefore, the certainty of providing financial resources for referral can be an incentive for the service provider and a factor in facilitating veterans’ access to health services.[15,21]
Referral services availability
The analysis of the findings about the mechanisms that facilitate veterans’ access to referral services showed that in addition to the adequacy of resources and the proximity of referral services to veterans, the readiness of the treatment system to provide services is an important factor in minimizing the patient's waiting time to receive the service and the effective performance of the referral system.[12,14,21,22]
Providing safe care
Another effective component in the veterans’ health service referral system is providing safe care.[26] Timely diagnosis is an important factor in expediting referral for treatment and providing safe care. In military health systems, military screening is a factor that facilitates timely diagnosis.[19,21,27,28,29,34] Therefore, in the community of veterans and soldiers who have completed their service, the routine screening system is an effective component in the operationalization of the veterans’ referral system.[21,34]
Communication and effective interaction
To perform effectively, the referral system requires communication and mutual interaction between referral levels. In most of the studies included here, defined communication and effective interaction between primary and specialized care levels have been reported as necessary in the operation of the health service referral system.[14,27,30,31] In the referral system of veterans’ health services, it should be determined how the veteran service level is related to the community healthcare service and the national health service system when the facilities of the veterans and military care system cannot meet the veteran's needs.[12,26] Therefore, based on the findings of this research, the determination of communication protocols to define the communication of veterans’ referral process at the referral levels of the national health system is an effective component in veterans’ referral to receive health services.
Support network for referrals
In the presented definition, the referral system is a systemic process, and in the included studies, the support system for the referral system is considered an important factor in the effective and continuous performance of the referral system.[19] Supporting resources, creating a support network for veterans, and tracking and following up on the referrals were identified as effective factors in the support system for veterans’ health services referral system.[18,19,22,27,30,31,33]
Defined structure for referral system
Based on the findings of this research, the operational mechanisms of the health service referral system are implemented in the context of the structure defined for the veteran health service referral system. This structure includes the definition of standard procedures for the referral of veterans and the determination of referral clinical guidelines.[14,21,30] The defined structure for the referral of veterans resolves the ambiguities of the service provider regarding the referred cases, and in cases of disagreement on the patient referral and the uncertainty of the doctors about the initial levels of referral, the defined clinical guidelines provide evidence-based decisions.[29]
Conceptual model of data synthesis
Based on the analysis of the findings of the included studies, a conceptual model [Figure 2] is presented. In this model, the three main components of the patient, the service provider, and the structural-operational mechanisms of the referral system constitute the main components of the referral system. The factors identified in each component, if gathered together and move harmoniously, will be the effective performance force of that component and will ultimately help the effective performance of the referral system. Malfunctions or inefficiency of any of these components will ultimately affect the performance of the referral system.
Figure 2.
Conceptual model extracted from the analysis of the findings of a review study of the components affecting the referral system of veterans’ health services referral system
In this model, the component of operational-structural mechanisms is described as a central component that affects the performance of the two components of the patient and the service provider and establishes the relationship between the two components.
Discussion
Patient (veteran) components
Acceptance is a fundamental principle in the success of health service systems. The study on the model of patient acceptance to receive the services of the health referral system in Indonesia showed that in the personal dimension, the individual beliefs of the service recipient regarding the newness of his disease, the prevalence of the disease, trust in treatment, the benefits of starting treatment, and the barriers to accessing the referred services affect the individual's willingness to follow the referral system in the health center.[35,36,37] In the study of patient management between primary care and specialized care, the patient's acceptance facilitates the referral process.[38] Many people's lack of awareness of the need for diagnosis and follow-up treatment and limited access to specialists or the impossibility of receiving admission and appointments from specialists lead to the patient's preference not to visit health centers and adhere to the advice of consultants to follow the process of complementary treatment through the referral system.[37,38]
Provider components
The first step in the set of referral measures is counseling, the role of which in patient referral has been investigated in several studies. From their point of view, the consultant's examinations and communication of information to the referring physician is an important step in the successful implementation of the referral system.[39,40,41] In Nigeria, the inefficiency of the referral link between the primary, secondary, and specialized care levels has often led to unnecessary referrals to specialists, creating challenges in accessing specialized services and the inefficiency of the referral system in providing healthcare.[42] In a study on the efficient framework for improving the communication of primary and specialized care levels, the referral liaison was proposed.[43] Counseling programs in health centers also facilitate the acceptance of health referral services by informing the patient and encouraging him to pursue treatment.[44]
The evaluation of the service provider's knowledge and attitude towards the referral system and its relationship with the improvement of referral performance have been investigated in many studies.[45,46,47] The results of a study that was conducted in four health centers in north-central Nigeria regarding the knowledge, attitude, and perception of health workers about the referral system showed that the implementation of healthcare policies regarding referral and the optimal performance of the referral system has a significant relationship with the level of knowledge and awareness of the referral system.[48]
Access to the patient's information and medical records was identified as one of the important information requirements for providing quality advice and effective response to the referral service provider. The importance of information requirements is such that the lack of effective information communication between primary care providers and specialists in Kenya's health service referral system was identified as one of the biggest problems in the referral process.[1] The electronic file and electronic record keeping for the patient make it easy for the service provider to access the information and provide the possibility of online consultation for the referral system.[31]
Structural-Operational mechanisms
Among the structural-operational components identified in this review study, the provision of resources simultaneously with the accessibility of the resources has been reported to be effective in the operationalization of the veterans’ health services referral system. In developing countries, appropriate provision and allocation of health system resources to the health and treatment levels of society have been controversial issues in health system planning.[49,50] In most healthcare centers, the referral system encounters challenges like infrastructure, the number of health and treatment personnel, health information systems, and financial resources.[51] For example, the provision of health, medical, and human resources, especially in remote and rural areas in developing countries, has always been limited so in some developing countries, less than 50% of the employees needed to serve the rural population are available.[1]
Based on the present study, the provision of resources for the referral system without timely access to resources will not be effective in the operationalization of referrals to provide efficient services. Given the specific problems of the veterans’ group (disability, susceptibility to mental illnesses and chronic diseases, etc.), access to the resources allocated to the referral system was identified as an important challenge. In several studies, the examination of the adherence of chronic patients to referrals shows that the limitation of access to treatment resources and the financial limitations of the service recipient, and the long time spent to get an appointment with a specialist are obstacles to follow-up care referrals.[52,53,54] The findings of these studies suggest that successful referral of care requires overcoming these barriers.
Accessibility of referral care has various dimensions, for example, the patient must be able to refer to the referred center in terms of distance, receive treatment and care, cover the cost of healthcare and treatment, and easily commute to the treatment center.[55] The findings of the studies included in this research focused on the dimensions of availability, accessibility, affordability, acceptability, and adaptability in the effective functioning of the health service referral system for veterans. Here, the researcher describes the accessibility in all aspects of the challenge related to the patient component and identifies availability as the challenge of providing and allocating referral resources, which is related to the structural component.
The analysis of the findings of this study made it possible to provide safe care for veterans in the framework of the active referral system. The referral system, especially in cancers and chronic diseases, provides safe care through specialized clinical workflow and coordination of the service delivery system.[56] Screening, timely diagnosing, and guiding the patient on the path to treatment are the most important steps in the referral process to provide safe care.
The relationship between the care levels of the referral system should be defined in such a way that the referral facilities and personnel are ready to serve the patients and the provision of referral services can be implemented quickly and without the need for a long administrative process.[38,44] The study of a web-based referral system in Kenya showed that communication among referral levels led to the improvement of the referral process and reduced waiting time for receiving services.[1,57] Furthermore, the communication established for referral levels and the interaction of primary care providers with specialists facilitates effective information transfer among referral levels and the provision of safe care through decision-making based on patient information.[1]
Referral guidelines clarify and document various aspects of the referral process.[58] Based on the findings of the present study, it is necessary to develop protocols and guidelines for patients who are eligible to be referred to the national health service system from the military health service system. By following the instructions, cases of disagreement (including the time of referral, the conditions under which the patient should be referred to a specialist, diagnostic tests before referral, etc.) or the application of personal tastes in the implementation of the referral process are minimized.[59,60]
The study of effective referral systems shows that they all had similar performance in using clear and agreed referral guidelines, structured referral patterns, electronic patient records in the referral process, and screening and tracking referrals.[61] A referral tracking system is an important feature of a successful referral system. In this system, important information such as the patient's medical information, scheduled appointments with specialists, performed diagnostic services, etc., is sent to the referring unit to be informed of the clinical care, treatment course, and services provided to the patient.[62] This capability is the missing link in the referral systems of Iran.[61] In the current study, the findings of the included studies found the referral follow-up system to be effective in the veteran's willingness to follow up treatment.
In this review study, web-based referral systems and telehealth services including consultation, referral, and telephone follow-up to support the referral system were identified as the factors affecting veterans’ health services. This subject was evaluated in the Regula Mais Brasil project; the application of the telehealth strategy in supporting the referral of primary care to specialized care level. This strategy is effective in referral management and adherence to treatment for patients who have limited physical access to specialized care.[63]
Limitations
The design and implementation stages of this review study are set in the form of a protocol based on the guidelines provided in the scoping review articles,[64,65,66,67] but due to the limitations of the Prospero registration system in not publishing the protocols of the scoping review and systematic literature review studies, the protocol was not registered.
Conclusion
As a result of this review, three components of the patient, the service provider, and the structural-operational mechanisms of the referral system were identified to affect the provision of health services to veterans. The findings extracted from the included studies have described the constituent factors of each component that the efficiency of each factor will affect the performance of the referral system. To achieve providing effective and timely healthcare services for veterans during referrals, this study suggests considering three components and their constituent factors to make decisions, plans, and healthcare actions. Based on the results of this study, the effectiveness of the veterans’ referral process is influenced by the motivation and behavior of the patient, the provider's support of the referrer level and service delivery, and structural and operational factors such as providing resources, ease of access to services, and communication defined in the referral procedures.
Studying and evaluating each of the factors identified in this study can be effective in planning and improving the performance of the referral system to improve the process of serving veterans.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Kamau KJ, Onyango-Osuga B, Njuguna S. Challenges facing implementation of referral system for quality health care services in Kiambu County, Kenya. Health Syst Policy Res. 2017;4:1. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Akande TM. Referral system in Nigeria: Study of a tertiary health facility. Ann Afr Med. 2004;3:130–3. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tabish SA. Health Care in the New Millennium. Srinagar: SKIMS conference; 2008. Referral systems in health care. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Give C, Ndima S, Steege R, Ormel H, McCollum R, Theobald S, et al. Strengthening referral systems in community health programs: A qualitative study in two rural districts of Maputo Province, Mozambique. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:263. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4076-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McNish NL. Perceived Need for Care and Mental Health Service Use: The Moderating Effect of Race/Ethnicity and Military Veteran Status among a Population-based Sample of US Adults. University of Maryland Baltimore. 2022 [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rathmell SR, Ryan WG, Isbill SD, Norton MJ, Foster KR, Metz G, et al. Veterans and war. In: McQuistion HL, Sowers WE, Ranz JM, Feldman JM, editors. Handbook of Community Psychiatry. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2012. pp. 447–57. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Taylor MG, Ureña S, Kail BL. Service-related exposures and physical health trajectories among aging veteran men. Gerontologist. 2016;56:92–103. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hoerster KD, Lehavot K, Simpson T, McFall M, Reiber G, Nelson KM. Health and health behavior differences: U.S. military, veteran, and civilian men. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43:483–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.statistics Ncfvaa. Number of Projected Veterans by Urban and Rural in 50 States 8 April ed. Department of Veterans Affair: Office of Interprise Integration. 2021 [Google Scholar]
- 10.U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. How to become a VA community provider. Veterans Health Adminestration Office of Community Care. 2019:1–2. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wong ES, Liu CF. The relationship between local area labor market conditions and the use of Veterans Affairs health services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bird ST. Factors contributing to positive care in veteran healthcare centers: A grounded theory study. Ann Arbor: Northcentral University. 2022:114. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Morgan RO, Teal CR, Reddy SG, Ford ME, Ashton CM. Measurement in veterans affairs health services research: Veterans as a special population. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:1573–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00448.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zuchowski JL, Rose DE, Hamilton AB, Stockdale SE, Meredith LS, Yano EM, et al. Challenges in referral communication between VHA primary care and specialty care. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:305–11. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3100-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hynes DM, Koelling K, Stroupe K, Arnold N, Mallin K, Sohn MW, et al. Veterans’ access to and use of medicare and veterans affairs health care. Med Care. 2007;45:214–23. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000244657.90074.b7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Agency DH. Processes and Standards for Primary Care Empanelment and Capacity in Medical Treatment Facilities (MTFs) 2018 [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rubenstein LZ, Alessi CA, Josephson KR, Trinidad Hoyl M, Harker JO, Pietruszka FM. A randomized trial of a screening, case finding, and referral system for older veterans in primary care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:166–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01044.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Taljaard M, McGowan J, Grimshaw JM, Brehaut JC, McRae A, Eccles MP, et al. Electronic search strategies to identify reports of cluster randomized trials in MEDLINE: Low precision will improve with adherence to reporting standards. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sellinger JJ, Martino S, Lazar C, Mattocks K, Rando K, Serowik K, et al. The acceptability and feasibility of screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for pain management among new England veterans with chronic pain: A pilot study. Pain Pract. 2022;22:28–38. doi: 10.1111/papr.13023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Haber Y, Fu SS, Rogers E, Richter K, Tenner C, Dognin J, et al. A novel opt-in vs opt-out approach to referral-based treatment of tobacco use in Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care clinics: A provider-level randomized controlled trial protocol. Contemp Clin Trails. 2022;116:106716. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sanders W, Wright EC, Stern TA. Assessment, treatment, and referrals for military veterans with behavioral health challenges. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2021;23:21f02914. doi: 10.4088/PCC.21f02914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Buie RW. Provider Perspectives on the Coordination of Care for Spinal Cord Injured Veterans. Ann Arbor: University of Washington. 2021:39. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hodgkin D, Gao WW, Larson MJ, Drebing CE, Merrick EL, Pugatch M, et al. Referral to treatment after positive screens for unhealthy drug use in an outpatient veterans administration setting. J Addict Med. 2020;14:236–43. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gutt R, Malhotra S, Hagan MP, Lee SPH, Faricy-Anderson K, et al. Palliative radiotherapy within the veterans health administration: Barriers to referral and timeliness of treatment. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2020;108:E164. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Winchester DE, Wokhlu A, Vilaro J, Bavry AA, Park K, Choi C, et al. Electronic consults for improving specialty care access for veterans. Am J Manag Care. 2019;25:250–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nevedal AL, Wagner TH, Ellerbe LS, Asch SM, Koenig CJ. A qualitative study of primary care providers’ experiences with the veterans choice program. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34:598–603. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4810-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sullivan JL, Adjognon OL, Engle RL, Shin MH, Afable MK, Rudin W, et al. Identifying and overcoming implementation challenges: Experience of 59 noninstitutional long-term services and support pilot programs in the Veterans Health Administration. Health Care Manage Rev. 2018;43:193–205. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Possemato K, Johnson EM, Wray LO, Webster B, Stecker T. The implementation and testing of a referral management system to address barriers to treatment seeking among primary care veterans with PTSD. Psychol Serv. 2018;15:457–69. doi: 10.1037/ser0000150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Allen J, Annells M, Clark E, Lang L, Nunn R, Petrie E, et al. Mixed methods evaluation research for a mental health screening and referral clinical pathway. Worldsviews Evid Based Nurs. 2012;9:172–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2011.00226.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hysong SJ, Esquivel A, Sittig DF, Paul LA, Espadas D, Singh S, et al. Towards successful coordination of electronic health record based-referrals: A qualitative analysis. Implementation Sci. 2011;6:84. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Claiborne N, Videka L, Postiglione P, Finkelstein A, McDonnell P, Krause RD. Alcohol screening, evaluation, and referral for veterans. J Soc Work Pract Addict. 2010;10:308–26. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sales AE, Pineros SL, Magid DJ, Every NR, Sharp ND, Rumsfeld JS. The association between clinical integration of care and transfer of veterans with acute coronary syndromes from primary care VHA hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lee HA, Gabriel R, Bale AJ. Clinical outcomes of Gulf veterans’ medical assessment programme referrals to specialized centers for Gulf veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder. Mil Med. 2005;170:400–5. doi: 10.7205/milmed.170.5.400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kanter JW, Epler AJ, Chaney EF, Liu CF, Heagerty P, Lin P, et al. Comparison of 3 depression screening methods and provider referral in a veterans affairs primary care clinic. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;5:245–50. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v05n0601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Handayani PW, Saladdin IR, Pinem AA, Azzahro F, Hidayanto AN, Ayuningtyas D. Health referral system user acceptance model in Indonesia. Heliyon. 2018;4:e01048. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kuzu N, Ergin A, Zencir M. Patients’ awareness of their rights in a developing country. Public Health. 2006;120:290–6. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ajwang NWO. The influence of referral service on household access to healthcare services in Eldoret municipality, Kenya. 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference, AIIC 2013. 2013 [Google Scholar]
- 38.Senitan M, Alhaiti AH, Lenon GB. Factors contributing to effective referral systems for patients with non-communicable disease: Evidence-based practice. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2018;38:115–23. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cummins RO, Smith RW, Inui TS. Communication failure in primary care. Failure of consultants to provide follow-up information. JAMA. 1980;243:1650–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Qureshi N, Van Der Molen H, Schmidt HG, Al Habeeb T, Magzoub M. Criteria for a good referral system for psychiatric patients: The view from Saudi Arabia. East Mediterr Health J. 2009;15:1580–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Senitan M, Alhaiti AH, Gillespie J, Alotaibi BF, Lenon GB. The referral system between primary and secondary health care in Saudi Arabia for patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:4183604. doi: 10.1155/2017/4183604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rotimi-Williams B, Motunrayo MO, Olusola OA, Adegboyega ST. Web-based specialty care interface referral service system for outpatient-The development and implementation. Int J Sci Engineer Sci. 2018;2:19–25. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Thiong’o FK. Framework for the implementation of a patient electronic referral system: Case study of nairobi province. JKUAT Annual Scientific Conference. 2017 [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fyie K, Frank C, Noseworthy T, Christiansen T, Marshall DA. Evaluating the primary-to-specialist referral system for elective hip and knee arthroplasty. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20:66–73. doi: 10.1111/jep.12080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Al-Erian R, Mahfouz A, Alakija W, Al-Khozayem A. Referral system in the Asir Region, Saudi Arabia: Knowledge, attitude, and practice of physicians working in urban areas--A comparative study of governmental and private health sectors. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 1994;69:65–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Anwar MS, Shakaib B, Akhtar W, Yusufzai E, Zehra M, Munawar H, et al. Knowledge and practices of primary care physicians on the current referral system of diabetic retinopathy in Islamabad and Rawal-Pindi, Pakistan. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019;12:1885–92. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.12.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Talal S, Aldeen LD. Knowledge and practice of primary health care physicians about referral system in Baghdad. Iraqi Journal of Community Medcine. 2020;33:25–9. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Abodunrin OL, Akande TM, Osagbemi GK. Awareness and perception toward referral in health care: A study of adult residents in Ilorin, Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2010;9:176–80. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.68359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Daniels N, del Pilar Guzmán Urrea M, Rentmeester CA, Kotchian SA, Fontaine S, Hernández-Aguado I, et al. Resource allocation and priority setting. Public Health Ethics: Cases Spanning the Globe. Springer open. 2016:61–94. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lane H, Sarkies M, Martin J, Haines T. Equity in healthcare resource allocation decision making: A systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2017;175:11–27. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mastaneh Z, Mouseli L. Patients’ awareness of their rights: Insight from a developing country. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2013;1:143–6. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2013.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hui D, Hannon BL, Zimmermann C, Bruera E. Improving patient and caregiver outcomes in oncology: Team-based, timely, and targeted palliative care. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:356–76. doi: 10.3322/caac.21490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Fadul N, Elsayem A, Palmer JL, Del Fabbro E, Swint K, Li Z, et al. Supportive versus palliative care: What's in a name? A survey of medical oncologists and midlevel providers at a comprehensive cancer center. Cancer. 2009;115:2013–21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Agne JL, Bertino EM, Grogan M, Benedict J, Janse S, Naughton M, et al. Too many appointments: Assessing provider and nursing perception of barriers to referral for outpatient palliative care. Palliat Med Rep. 2021;2:137–45. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2020.0114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chen Y, Wu J. The Effect of the referral system on the accessibility of healthcare services: A case study of the wuhan metropolitan development zone. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:10441. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rakib NA. Department of Computer Science and Engineering. Dahaka, Bangladesh: BRAC University; 2016. Referral system–A mobile application that can provide health service manager or patient to choose nearest health facility for required services; p. 41. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ramdas P. A Framework for a Referral System for Health Service Delivery in Kwazulu-Natal. Province of Kwa Zulu-Natal Health Services. 2003 [Google Scholar]
- 58.Naseriasl M, Janati A, Amini A, Adham D. Referral system in rural Iran: Improvement proposals. Cad Saude Publica. 2018;34:e00198516. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00198516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jellema P, Van der Windt DA, Bruinvels DJ, Mallen CD, van Weyenberg SJ, Mulder CJ, et al. Value of symptoms and additional diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer in primary care: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;340:c1269. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hanh TTD, Ngoc LB, Hoa LN, Gong E, Tao X, Yan LL, et al. Improving prevention of cardiovascular diseases: Barriers and facilitators in primary care services in Vietnam. Int J Healthc Manag. 2021;14:1270–8. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Janati A, Amini A, Adham D, Naseriasl M. Referral system in Iran's health sector and world's leading countries. Res J Pharm Technol. 2017;10:1597–602. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kim Y, Chen AH, Keith E, Yee HF, Kushel MB. Not perfect, but better: Primary care providers’ experiences with electronic referrals in a safety net health system. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:614–9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0955-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gadenz SD, Basso J, de Oliviera PRBP, Sperling S, Zuanazzi MVD, Oliveira GG, et al. Telehealth to support referral management in a universal health system: A before-and-after study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21:1012. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07028-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Peters MD, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18:2119–26. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implementation. 2015;13:141–6. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–73. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]