Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2023 Aug 4;12(9):e00352-23. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00352-23

De novo genome sequence of endophytic biocontrol strain Bacillus sp. ST24 isolated from rice seed

Sabin Khanal 1, Sanjay Antony-Babu 2,, Xin-Gen Zhou 1,
Editor: David A Baltrus3
PMCID: PMC10508102  PMID: 37540016

ABSTRACT

In this study, we present the genome sequence of Bacillus sp. strain ST24, an endophytic bacterium isolated from rice seeds. The genome assembly comprises a total of 5,799,877 bp, with a GC content of 34.81%. Furthermore, our analysis revealed the presence of various genes associated with antibiotic production, as well as genes involved in polyketide biosynthesis and non-ribosomal polyketide-like clusters.

KEYWORDS: Bacillus, genomics, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis, phytobacteriology

ANNOUNCEMENT

Bacillus species are endospore-forming aerobic or facultatively anaerobic, Gram-positive bacteria known to be ubiquitous in the environment, with recognized antagonistic ability against diverse phytopathogens (1 - 4). Bacillus sp. ST24, an endophytic bacterium, was isolated from rice seeds collected from a research field in Beaumont, Texas. Approximately 20 g of seeds was ground in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer using a sterile mortar and pestle and plated on tryptic soy agar (TSA). Strain ST24 exhibited strong antagonistic activities against Rhizoctonia solani AG11 and R. solani AG4, the causative agents of rice seedling blight (5), in our in vitro dual-culture plate assays (6).

Genomic DNA extraction was performed using a Zymo Quick Fungal/Bacterial DNA kit following the manufacturer’s instructions, from pure isolated colonies that had been grown on TSA at 27°C for 48 h, suspended in PBS buffer, and adjusted to 108 cells/mL. DNA integrity was evaluated through electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel. The quality of the DNA was assessed in Quickdrop Micro-volume spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices), while quantification was performed using a Qubit double-stranded DNA high-sensitivity assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Illumina libraries were prepared using NEB Ultra II DNA Library Prep. Kit and genome sequencing were conducted by Novogene Corporation, Inc., using an Illumina-Novaseq 6000. Strain ST24 generated 9,70,156 paired end reads with insert size of 150 bp in length 220-fold genome coverage. Raw reads below Q30 were trimmed using TrimGalore v0.6.7 (7). High-quality reads were assembled de novo using MegaHit v.1.2.8 (8). All assembled reads were assembled into 53 contigs with 5,799,877 total bp. The largest contig and N50 value of the assembly were 1,153,785 and 462,236 bp, respectively. The GC content of the assembly was 34.81%. Pilon v. 1.23 (9) and Quast v. 5.0.2 (10) were used to improve and assess the quality of the genome, respectively. BUSCO (11) assessed the genome assembly at 99.2% complete with 95.2% complete and single-copy BUSCOs. Finally, the assembly was annotated using NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline (12). Genome annotation predicted 5,816 genes with 5,585 protein coding genes, 19 genes encoding rRNA, 45 genes encoding tRNA, 5 ncRNAs, and 1 gene encoding tmRNA. Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise stated.

The whole 16S rRNA gene of strain ST24 matched 100% with multiple B. cereus group through blast on EzTaxon server (13). The average nucleotide identify (ANI) (14) values for strain ST24 were 96.44% and 91.1% when compared to two B. cereus strains, ATCC 14579 and strain 30075, respectively. Additionally, the ANI values for strain ST24 were 96.38% and 96.39%, when compared to two B. thuringensis strains, ATCC 10792 and MYBT18246, respectively. Furthermore, the Type Genome Server (15) placed strain ST24 in the same species cluster with B. cereus ATCC 14579 and B. thuringensis ATCC 10792 but with different subspecies cluster.

Through the analysis of the genome of Bacillus sp. strain ST24, various genes associated with antimicrobial activities (1, 16, 17), siderophore production (18), phosphate solubilization (19), and 14 biosynthetic clusters (20, 21) were also detected using the antiSmash v.6.0 (22) (Table 1). Collectively, these findings suggest that Bacillus sp. strain ST24 holds promise as a potential biocontrol agent for managing seedling blight in rice.

TABLE 1.

Biosynthetic gene clusters predicted by antiSMASH 6.0 in Bacillus sp. strain ST24

Gene cluster Known cluster Similarity (%) Contig number Nucleotide bp a
From To
Betalactone Fengycin 40 28 93,427 118,665
CDPS b c 47 1 15,264
LAP d 16 155,987 179,493
NRP e + polyketide Zwittermicin A 81 43 37,965 168,927
NRPS f 26 202,102 249,259
28 11,431 76,286
28 260,001 307,017
NRPS-like 10 95,846 139,427
RiPP g -like 4 155,987 179,493
28 169,897 179,357
28 234,961 245,209
RRE h -containing 43 1 13,099
Siderophore Petrobactin 100 25 9,617 23,325
Terpene Molybdenum cofactor 17 33 29,614 51,467
a

Start and end nucleotide number for gene cluster.

b

tRNA-dependent cyclodipeptide synthases.

c

–, not available.

d

Linear azol(in)e-containing peptides.

e

Non-ribosomal peptide.

f

Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase.

g

Other unspecified ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide product.

h

RRE-element-containing cluster.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Portions of this research were conducted with the advanced computing resources provided by Texas A&M High Performance Research Computing.

This work was supported, in part, by Texas Rice Research Foundation (grants M2101762 and M2202432) and USDA-Hatch (TEX09714).

Contributor Information

Sanjay Antony-Babu, Email: sanjay@tamu.edu.

Xin-Gen Zhou, Email: xzhou@aesrg.tamu.edu.

David A. Baltrus, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA

DATA AVAILABILITY

Data can be assessed under Bioproject number PRJNA880562, with genome assembly at JAOSLI000000000 and raw reads at SRA: SRX17676681.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Fira D, Dimkić I, Berić T, Lozo J, Stanković S. 2018. Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species. J Biotechnol 285:44–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.07.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Saxena AK, Kumar M, Chakdar H, Anuroopa N, Bagyaraj DJ. 2020. Bacillus species in soil as a natural resource for plant health and nutrition. J Appl Microbiol 128:1583–1594. doi: 10.1111/jam.14506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Stein T. 2005. Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and specific functions. Mol Microbiol 56:845–857. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04587.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ferreira CMH, Soares HMVM, Soares EV. 2019. Promising bacterial genera for agricultural practices: an insight on plant growth-promoting properties and microbial safety aspects. Sci Total Environ 682:779–799. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gaire SP, Zhou X-G, Zhou Y, Shi J, Jo Y-K. 2023. Identification and distribution of fungal pathogens associated with seedling blight of rice in the Southern United States. Plant Pathology 72:76–88. doi: 10.1111/ppa.13645 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Huang X, Zhang N, Yong X, Yang X, Shen Q. 2012. Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani damping-off disease in cucumber with Bacillus pumilus SQR-N43. Microbiol Res 167:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2011.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Krueger F, James F, Ewels P, Afyounian E, Schuster-Boeckler B. 2021. FelixKrueger/TrimGlaore: v0.6.7-DOI via Zenodo (0.6.7). Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5127899 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Li D, Liu C-M, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam T-W. 2015. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31:1674–1676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. 2015. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kim M, Na H, Park SC, Jeon YS, Lee JH, Yi H, Won S, Chun J. 2012. Introducing EzTaxon: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:716–721. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.038075-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. 2016. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. Peerj Prepr 4:e1900v1. doi: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1900v1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. 2019. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 10:2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kevany BM, Rasko DA, Thomas MG. 2009. Characterization of the complete Zwittermicin A biosynthesis gene cluster from Bacillus cereus. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1144–1155. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02518-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Vanittanakom N, Loeffler W, Koch U, Jung G. 1986. Fengycin--a novel antifungal lipopeptide antibiotic produced by Bacillus subtilis F-29-3. J Antibiot 39:888–901. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.39.888 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Barbeau K, Zhang G, Live DH, Butler A. 2002. Petrobactin, a photoreactive siderophore produced by the oil-degrading marine bacterium Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus. J Am Chem Soc 124:378–379. doi: 10.1021/ja0119088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Rodríguez H, Fraga R, Gonzalez T, Bashan Y. 2022. Genetics of phosphate solubilization and its potential applications for improving plant growth-promoting bacteria. Plant Soil 287:15–21. doi: 10.1007/s11104-006-9056-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Janek T, Gudiña EJ, Połomska X, Biniarz P, Jama D, Rodrigues LR, Rymowicz W, Lazar Z. 2021. Sustainable surfactin production by Bacillus subtilis using crude glycerol from different wastes. Molecules 26:3488. doi: 10.3390/molecules26123488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sang MK, Kim EN, Han GD, Kwack MS, Jeun YC, Kim KD. 2014. Priming-mediated systemic resistance in cucumber induced by Pseudomonas azotoformans GC-B19 and Paenibacillus elgii MM-B22 against Colletotrichum orbiculare. Phytopathology 104:834–842. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-11-13-0305-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP, Medema MH, Weber T. 2021. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W29–W35. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data can be assessed under Bioproject number PRJNA880562, with genome assembly at JAOSLI000000000 and raw reads at SRA: SRX17676681.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES