Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2023 Jul 25;12(9):e00427-23. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00427-23

Genome sequences of 11 Alkalihalobacillus clausii, Bacillus safensis, and Escherichia coli bacteriophages isolated from bovine rumen and vagina

Gabriela Magossi 1, Devin B Holman 2, Kaycie N Schmidt 1, Scott A Hoselton 1, Samat Amat 1,
Editor: Kenneth M Stedman3
PMCID: PMC10508124  PMID: 37489918

ABSTRACT

Here, we present the coding-complete genomes of 11 lytic bacteriophages isolated from bovine ruminal fluid and vaginal swabs that can infect the bacterial hosts Alkalihalobacillus clausii, Bacillus safensis, and Escherichia coli.

KEYWORDS: bacteriophages, cattle

ANNOUNCEMENT

Eleven bacteriophages that can infect Alkalihalobacillus clausii, Bacillus safensis, and Escherichia coli were isolated from the ruminal fluid and vaginal swab samples of beef cattle. Cattle origin, sample collection, and bacterial host isolation were described previously (1, 2). For phage isolation, pooled ruminal fluid or vaginal swabs (n = 5 animals each pool) were suspended in phosphate buffered saline and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C. Supernatants were passed through a 0.22-µm filter and used for a spot assay. Overnight bacterial host cultures (100 µL) were inoculated into 3 mL of brain heart infusion (BHI) soft agar (0.5% agar) which was then poured on top of BHI agar plates. Then, 10 µL of the filtered supernatant was spotted on top agar and incubated overnight at 37°C with 5% CO2. Areas of lysis were transferred into 1 mL of SM buffer (G-Biosciences), centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 1 min. The supernatant was then filtered using a 0.22-µm filter and stored at 4°C. Next, 100 µL of overnight host bacterial culture and 100 µL of phage stock were added to 3 mL of soft BHI agar, poured onto BHI plates, and incubated overnight at 37°C with 5% CO2. Phages were purified by two successive rounds of plating with the bacterial hosts.

Genomic DNA from the phages was extracted using the Norgen Biotek Phage DNA isolation kit (Norgen Biotek, Thorold, ON, Canada) according to manufacturer’s instructions with an additional initial step in which DNase and proteinase K were used to remove host genetic material (3). Genomic libraries for all bacteriophages (except 1RFP6A and 3RFP5C_6) were prepared using the Qiagen FX DNA library prep kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument with the MiSeq v2 reagent kit (500 cycles; Illumina, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA). Genomic DNA from 1RFP6A and 3RFP5C_6 isolates was extracted using a bead beating lysis method with the Zymo Quick-DNA Miniprep kit (Zymo Research Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA), and genomic libraries were prepared using the Illumina DNA Prep kit with UDI 10 bp indices. Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument with an S4 flow cell (300 cycles). Quality control and adapter trimming for all genomes were performed using Trim Galore v. 0.6.10 (4) and assembled using Shovill v. 1.1.0 (https://github.com/tseemann/shovill). Qualities were assessed with QUAST (5), assemblies annotated with Pharokka v. 1.1.0 (6), and screened for virulence factors, antimicrobial resistance genes, and tRNAs with CARD (7), VFDB (8), and tRNA-scanSE v. 2.0.11 (9), respectively.

Bacteriophage genomes varied in size from 20,216 to 168,609 bp. Sequencing coverage was determined using the formula: coverage = (number of reads × read length)/genome length. None of the genomes contained CRISPRs, tmRNAs, virulence factors, or antimicrobial resistance genes. Genomes were compared to those in the GenBank database using BLASTn. Sequence similarity (% identity × % coverage) was used to determine taxonomy. The identities of ≥95%, 70%–95%, or <70% were considered as the same species, genus, or family, respectively (10) (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Sequencing summary and characteristics of 11 bacteriophages from ruminal fluid and vaginal swabs of healthy beef cattle

Phage Sample type Host GenBank accession number SRA accession number Coverage No. of reads Length (bp) GC content (%) Taxonomy
1RFP6A Ruminal fluid Escherichia coli SAMN35002581 SRR24524243 7872.907 1,217,433 46,700 44.12 Caudoviricetes phage
2RFP1A2_1 Ruminal fluid Escherichia coli O20:H8 SAMN35002582 SRR24524242 3640.33 645,720 88,335 38.95 Felixounavirus sp.
2RFP1C2_AA Ruminal fluid Escherichia coli O50:H5 SAMN35002583 SRR24524240 1530.901 416,365 135,443 43.69 Vequintavirus sp.
2RFP1E_AA Ruminal fluid Alkalihalobacillus clausii SAMN35002584 SRR24524239 13976.24 417,407 14,873 44.35 Caudoviricetes phage
2RFP1H_AA Ruminal fluid Escherichia coli O20:H8 SAMN35002585 SRR24524238 1773.773 314,631 88,335 38.94 Felixounavirus sp.
2RFP5B2_3 Ruminal fluid Bacillus safensis SAMN35002586 SRR24524237 6536.175 541,400 41,250 40.1 Caudoviricetes phage
2RFP8A_3 Ruminal fluid Bacillus safensis SAMN35002587 SRR24524236 16381.78 665,008 20,216 37.02 Salasmaviridae family phage
3RFP5C_2 Ruminal fluid Bacillus safensis SAMN35002588 SRR24524235 8174.731 432,243 26,332 41.06 Herelleviridae family phage
3RFP5E_6 Ruminal fluid Bacillus safensis SAMN35002589 SRR24524234 8794.385 4,325,964 148,554 39.04 Siophivirus sp.
TP167CBC_ERF3 Ruminal fluid Escherichia coli O171:H25 SAMN35002591 SRR24524233 3134.37 245,897 39,069 33.94 Tequatroviru nbeco
TP1813CBA_EVS2 Vaginal swab Escherichia coli O171:H25 SAMN35002592 SRR24524241 861.1041 291,546 168,609 35.41 Tequatrovirus sp.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This project was financially supported by the North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station as part of a start-up package for S.A.

Contributor Information

Samat Amat, Email: samat.amat@ndsu.edu.

Kenneth M. Stedman, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA

DATA AVAILABILITY

All raw genome sequences and draft genome assemblies have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive and GenBank, respectively, under the accession numbers listed in Table 1

REFERENCES

  • 1. Amat S, Holman DB, Schmidt K, Menezes ACB, Baumgaertner F, Winders T, Kirsch JD, Liu T, Schwinghamer TD, Sedivec KK, Dahlen CR. 2021. The nasopharyngeal, ruminal, and vaginal microbiota and the core taxa shared across these microbiomes in virgin yearling heifers exposed to divergent in utero nutrition during their first trimester of gestation and in pregnant beef heifers in response to mineral supplementation. Microbiology. doi: 10.1101/2021.06.03.446997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Magossi G, Holman DB, Gzyl KE, Schmidt KN, Hoselton SA, Amat S. 2023. Genome sequences of Alkalihalobacillus clausii, Bacillus safensis, Escherichia coli, and Pasteurella multocida isolates from the rumen, nasopharynx, vagina, and uterus of healthy beef cattle. Microbiol Resour Announc 12:e0127422. doi: 10.1128/mra.01274-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Jakočiūnė D, Moodley A. 2018. A rapid bacteriophage DNA extraction method. Methods Protoc 1:27. doi: 10.3390/mps1030027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Krueger F, James F, Ewels P, Afyounian E, Weinstein M, Schuster-Boeckler B, Hulselmans G. 2023. Felixkrueger/Trimgalore: V0.6.10 - add default decompression path. Zenodo [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bouras G, Nepal R, Houtak G, Psaltis AJ, Wormald P-J, Vreugde S. 2022. Pharokka: a fast scalable bacteriophage annotation tool | Bioinformatics | Oxford academic. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/39/1/btac776/6858464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7. Alcock BP, Huynh W, Chalil R, Smith KW, Raphenya AR, Wlodarski MA, Edalatmand A, Petkau A, Syed SA, Tsang KK, Baker SJC, Dave M, McCarthy MC, Mukiri KM, Nasir JA, Golbon B, Imtiaz H, Jiang X, Kaur K, Kwong M, Liang ZC, Niu KC, Shan P, Yang JYJ, Gray KL, Hoad GR, Jia B, Bhando T, Carfrae LA, Farha MA, French S, Gordzevich R, Rachwalski K, Tu MM, Bordeleau E, Dooley D, Griffiths E, Zubyk HL, Brown ED, Maguire F, Beiko RG, Hsiao WWL, Brinkman FSL, Van Domselaar G, McArthur AG. 2023. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D690–D699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Chen L, Yang J, Yu J, Yao Z, Sun L, Shen Y, Jin Q. 2005. VFDB: a reference database for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D325–8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lowe TM, Chan PP. 2016. tRNAscan-SE on-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W54–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Turner D, Adriaenssens EM, Tolstoy I, Kropinski AM. 2021. Phage annotation guide: guidelines for assembly and high-quality annotation. Phage (New Rochelle) 2:170–182. doi: 10.1089/phage.2021.0013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All raw genome sequences and draft genome assemblies have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive and GenBank, respectively, under the accession numbers listed in Table 1


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES