Skip to main content
International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology logoLink to International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
. 2023 Aug 15;14(4):76–86.

Periplasmic β-glucosidase BglX from E. coli demonstrates greater activity towards galactose-containing substrates

Lorna Ngo 1, Joshua Weimer 1, Li Sui 1, Tara Pickens 1, Nina V Stourman 1
PMCID: PMC10509532  PMID: 37736388

Abstract

Background: The diverse nature of carbohydrate structures and linkages requires a variety of enzymes responsible for sugar degradation. The E. coli periplasmic protein encoded by the bglX gene has been assigned to glycoside hydrolase family 3 and is predicted to function as a β-glucosidase. Objectives: We investigated the catalytic properties of the E. coli protein BglX and identified two functionally important amino acid residues. Methods: The bglX gene was cloned into a pET20b(+) vector, and three mutants, D111N, D287G, and E293Q, were generated using site-directed mutagenesis. Kinetic studies were performed on the wild-type and mutant enzymes. Results: Substrate specificity tests indicated that the BglX enzyme hydrolyzes β-glycosidic bonds in nitrophenyl-β-glycosides and demonstrates greater activity towards galactose-containing substrates compared to glucose derivatives. Monomeric glucose and galactose inhibit enzyme activity to a different degree in a substrate-dependent manner. In addition, BglX can hydrolyze lactose but not cellobiose, maltose, or laminarin. Subsequently, E. coli cells overexpressing active BglX have a growth advantage on minimal media supplemented with lactose as a carbon source. Mutation of D287 or D111 residues negatively affected the activity of BglX indicating their involvement in catalysis. Overexpression of BglX by E. coli cells did not increase biofilm formation. Conclusions: The low activity towards glucose-containing substrates and significantly elevated activity towards galactosides suggests that β-glucosidase activity may not be the primary function of the BglX enzyme.

Keywords: BglX, β-glucosidase, E. coli, periplasmic protein, enzyme activity

Introduction

Carbohydrates are important sources of nutrients for various organisms, including bacteria. Most saccharides found in nature are complex molecules. For example, they could be composed of several linked monomeric units or contain a carbohydrate bound to a non-carbohydrate moiety [1-3]. In order to release carbohydrates from these sources and utilize them as fuel, bacteria produce a variety of enzymes that differ in their specificities [4]. Enzymes capable of hydrolyzing the glycosidic bonds within sugar-containing compounds are known as glycoside hydrolases or glycosidases [5]. The large variety of enzymes belonging to the glycosidase superfamily is the result of the structural diversity of carbohydrates [6]. Due to their wide applications in medicine, biotechnology, food, and other industries, microbial glycoside hydrolases are thoroughly studied, with the search for novel enzymes triggering multiple metagenomic investigations [7,8].

Many glycosidases produced by bacteria are assigned to glycoside hydrolase family 3 (GH3). GH3 enzymes are specialized in hydrolyzing β (1→4) glycosidic bonds, removing a saccharide residue from the non-reducing end of a glycoside [9]. Most enzymes in the GH3 family are involved in the metabolism of glucose-containing compounds and are thus classified as β-glucosidases (EC 3.2.1.21) [10-12]. Cytosolic β-glucosidases are common, but some bacteria secrete glycosidases into the extracellular space [13]. In Gram-negative bacteria, β-glucosidases are also found in the periplasm, the space between the inner and outer membranes [14]. The bacterial periplasmic space is rich in degradative enzymes involved in defense and the supply of nutrients to the cell [15]. Periplasmic glycosidases in Gram-negative bacteria are implemented in the metabolism of osmoregulated periplasmic glucans (OPG) that aid in bacterial adaptation to changes in osmotic pressure [16,17]. Additionally, some periplasmic proteins are involved in the synthesis or degradation of cellulose, an integral component of bacterial biofilms [18,19].

Although monomeric glucose is the favored carbon source for E. coli [20], wild-type cells cannot consume β-glucosides. Under conditions of nutrient starvation, cell survival depends on mutations in the genome that activate cryptic systems which permit the organism to utilize available carbohydrates. The ability of E. coli to utilize β-glucosides as carbon sources has been attributed to proteins encoded within four operons - asc, bgl, blc, and chb [21]. Operon chb (formerly known as the cel operon [22]) allows bacteria to consume cellobiose, a glucose disaccharide produced from the degradation of cellulose [23]. Six proteins derived from this operon in wild-type E. coli are also involved in the processing of chitobiose, a glucosamine dimer formed during chitin hydrolysis [23]. Operon bgl contains a regulatory element and three structural genes responsible for the phosphorylation, uptake, and hydrolysis of phosphorylated β-glucosides [21]. The gene products of this operon are involved in the processing of aryl-β-glucosides, such as arbutin and salicin [24]. In addition, during the stationary phase, this operon is indirectly involved in regulating the transport of short peptides [25]. Septicemic E. coli strains contain the blc operon that encodes genes homologous to those of bgl [26]. Another cryptic operon, asc, contains structural genes for the transport and degradation of β-glucosides that are similar to those present in bgl. However, the two operons are regulated differently [27,28].

Identified outside of the cryptic operons in E. coli, the bglX gene encodes the constitutively expressed BglX enzyme that has been functionally assigned as a β-glucosidase [29]. The purified enzyme demonstrated activity towards o-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside but was not able to hydrolyze substrates containing fructose, xylulose, or N-acetylglucosamine in place of glucose [29]. The polypeptide sequence of BglX indicates the presence of an N-terminal signal peptide for transport into the periplasm. The periplasmic location of the enzyme implicates its role in providing glucose to the cell. However, neither elimination of the bglX gene nor overexpression of the BglX protein affected the growth of E. coli cells in the presence of the aromatic β-glucosides arbutin and salicin or the disaccharide cellobiose [29]. Thus, the exact physiological function of E. coli BglX remains unknown.

The main objectives of this study were to identify the catalytically important amino acid residues in the E. coli BglX protein and characterize its substrate specificity in order to elucidate the function of this enzyme.

Materials and methods

E. coli K-12 genomic DNA was from ATCC (Manassas, VA). Primers were custom ordered from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Restriction enzymes were from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA). The pET20b(+) vector was from EMB Chemicals, Inc. (Gibbstown, NJ). Competent cells BL21(DE3) were from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). Luria Bertani (LB) broth, ammonium sulfate, ampicillin, Coomassie brilliant blue, isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), potassium phosphate, sodium acetate, sodium chloride, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), streptomycin sulfate, and tris(hydroxyl-methyl) aminomethane (Tris) were from Amresco (Solon, OH). Cellobiose, lactose, o-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (oNPGlc), o-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (oNPGal), 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (MUGal), and Tryptic Soy Broth (TBS) were from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). D-Glucose, p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (pNPGlc), and 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (MUGlc) were from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). Maltose and D-galactose were from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA). Laminarin (laminaritriose) was purchased from Spectrum Biochemical Mfg. Corp. (New Brunswick, NJ). Q-Sepharose Fast Flow was purchased from GE Healthcare (Piscataway, NJ). Hydroxyapatite was from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA).

Cloning, expression, and purification of wild-type BglX

The bglX gene was PCR amplified from E. coli genomic DNA using primers containing recognition sites for the restriction enzymes NdeI and EcoRI. The sequences of the primers are presented in Table 1, and the mutation sites are underlined. The PCR product and expression vector pET20b(+) were digested with the same restriction enzymes, purified, and ligated, resulting in the pET20b(+)-bglX plasmid. This plasmid was transformed into BL21(DE3) E. coli cells for protein expression.

Table 1.

Primers for cloning bglX and generation of the mutants

Gene Primer Sequence (F - forward, R - reverse)
bglX F: AAAAATATGAAATGGCTATGTTCAGTAGGAATC
R: TTTGAATTCTTACAGCAACTCAAACTCGCCTTTC
D111N F: CTCTTTTCTTTGCTTACAACGTGCTGCACGGTCAGC
R: GCTGACCGTGCAGCACGTTGTAAGCAAAGAAAAGAG
D287G F: GGCATCACCGTTTCCGGTCACGGTGCAATCAAAG
R: CTTTGATTGCACCGTGACCGGAAACGGTGATGCC
E293Q F: CACGGTGCAATCAAACAGCTGATTAAACATGGCACG
R: CGTGCCATGTTTAATCAGCTGTTTGATTGCACCGTG

An overnight culture of BL21(DE3) cells containing pET20b(+)-bglX grown at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium with ampicillin (100 µg/mL) was diluted 100 times into fresh LB media containing ampicillin and grown at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm. Once the OD600 of the culture reached around 0.6-0.8, IPTG was added to the culture to a final concentration of 0.3 mM, and the culture continued to grow overnight. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6,000×g at 4°C for 10 min. The pellets were frozen at -20°C. The frozen pellets were resuspended completely in Tris buffer (10 mM, pH 7.0) containing 2 mM EDTA and sonicated for 30 seconds with one minute of cooling for a total of 6 cycles. The cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 11,000×g for 30 min, the supernatant was treated with streptomycin sulfate to a final concentration of 1% (w/v), and the precipitate was removed by centrifugation at 11,000×g for 20 min. Ammonium sulfate was added to the supernatant to 75% saturation, and the suspension was stirred for 30 min. The suspension was centrifuged at 11,000×g for 30 min. The pellets were dissolved in Tris buffer (20 mM, pH 7.4) and dialyzed overnight against the same buffer.

The dialyzed protein sample was loaded onto a Q Sepharose FF column which was equilibrated with Tris buffer (20 mM, pH 7.4). The proteins bound to the column were eluted with a linear gradient of 0-400 mM NaCl in 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4. Fractions with a high content of BglX based on SDS-PAGE analysis were pooled together and concentrated with an Amicon ultra centrifugal filter (MWCO 30 kDa) at 4,000×g. The concentrated protein sample was dialyzed against a 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8 overnight at 4°C and then loaded onto a hydroxyapatite column that was equilibrated with the same buffer. The protein was eluted with a linear gradient of potassium phosphate buffer (10-400 mM, pH 6.8). The fractions containing BglX were pooled and stored at -20°C. The protein concentrations were calculated from the absorbance of the protein solutions at 280 nm using the extinction coefficient value of 82,740 M-1cm-1.

Generation of BglX mutants

The pET20b(+)-bglX plasmid was used as a template to generate BglX mutants D111N, D287G, and E293Q using the QuikChange II site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The numbering of the mutated amino acid residues corresponds to their positions in the full-length BglX protein. The primers used for generation of the mutants are listed in Table 1; the sites of the mutations are underlined. All mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing, and the resulting plasmids were transformed into BL21(DE3) E. coli cells for expression of the mutant proteins. All proteins were expressed and purified following the procedures described for the wild-type BglX.

Enzyme activity assay with model substrates (pNPGlc, oNPGlc, oNPGal)

The chromogenic substrates pNPGlc, oNPGlc, and oNPGal were used to test the ability of BglX and its mutants to hydrolyze β-glycosidic bonds formed by glucose or galactose. All assays were conducted at room temperature and absorbance values were recorded using an Agilent 8453 Diode Array Spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). The reaction mixture containing 850 µL of Tris buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0) and 100 µL of substrate solution was used as a blank at 405 nm. The reactions were initiated by the addition of 50 µL of enzyme solution, and the change in absorbance was measured over 5 min. The protein concentrations were held constant (1-2 µM). Substrate concentrations were varied between 1 and 40 mM for oNPGlc, 0.05-15 mM for pNPGlc, and 0.01-3 mM for oNPGal. Reaction rates were calculated using extinction coefficients determined under the same experimental conditions: 10,440 M-1cm-1 for p-nitrophenol (pNP) and 3,055 M-1cm-1 for o-nitrophenol (oNP). The kinetic parameters were calculated by fitting the data to the Michaelis-Menten equation.

In-gel activity testing

Samples containing BglX or mutant proteins obtained after initial purification steps (ammonium sulfate precipitation and dialysis) were loaded onto a 10% native polyacrylamide gel in duplicate and electrophoresed under standard conditions. The resulting gel was cut in half, and one part was developed with Coomassie blue to detect protein positions. The other half was subjected to fluorometric analysis using either 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (MUGlc) or 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (MUGal). This portion of the gel was soaked for 15 min in sodium acetate buffer (100 mM, pH 5.0) with occasional shaking, followed by incubation at 37°C for 30-60 min with 10 mM MUGlc or MUGal dissolved in the same buffer. The zymograms were analyzed under UV light to detect enzyme activity based on the release of methylumbelliferone.

Enzyme activity assay with disaccharides (cellobiose, lactose, maltose)

The activity of BglX and its mutants towards the hydrolysis of the disaccharides lactose, maltose, and cellobiose was studied using the Glucose (GO) Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). First, 160 µL of Tris buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0), 20 µL of a 20 µM solution of BglX (or mutant), and 20 µL of a disaccharide solution at various concentrations (0.5-40 mM) were incubated at room temperature for 30 min in an Eppendorf tube. The reaction was stopped by heating the tube at 95°C for 3 min, and the precipitate was removed by centrifugation at 13,000×g for 3 min. Fifty microliters of the supernatant were added to a mixture of 900 µL of GO reagent (composed of glucose oxidase, horseradish peroxidase, and o-dianisidine) and 50 µL of water. After 30 min of incubation at room temperature, the absorbance of the solution was measured at 540 nm. The amount of free glucose was calculated from the calibration curve obtained under similar experimental conditions using standard glucose solutions. Control reactions in which the BglX protein solution was replaced with 20 µL of water were performed in a similar manner to evaluate the rate of uncatalyzed hydrolysis of the disaccharides. The kinetic parameters were calculated by fitting the data to the Michaelis-Menten equation.

BglX activity with laminarin

The ability of the BglX enzyme to hydrolyze laminarin was tested by mixing 50 µL of Tris buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0), 50 µL of laminarin solution to a final concentration of 40 mM, and a BglX solution in the same buffer to a final concentration of 10 µM in an Eppendorf tube. The reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature, and aliquots were spotted on a TLC (Thin Layer Chromatography) plate after 1, 14, 24, and 36 hours. The plate was developed using a mobile phase containing ethyl acetate:n-butanol:water (2:7:1). The plate was dried, sprayed with 5% (v/v) solution of concentrated sulfuric acid in ethanol, and heated on a hot plate. The sugar-containing compounds appeared as brown spots.

Inhibition of BglX activity by glucose and galactose

To test whether high concentrations of glucose or galactose could affect the activity of BglX and its mutants, inhibition studies were conducted. First, the reactions were performed without an inhibitor. In a 1-mL quartz cuvette, 850 µL of Tris buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0) and 100 µL of substrate solution (final concentration of 1.25 mM oNPGal or 5.0 mM pNPGlc) were mixed and used to blank the spectrophotometer at 405 nm. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 50 µL of a 20 µM solution of BglX (or mutants), and the change in absorbance was observed over 10 min. The reactions were repeated in a similar manner, except that the 100 µL of Tris buffer was replaced with the same volume of either a glucose or galactose solution (final concentration of 125 mM).

Effect of carbon source on the growth of E. coli cells overexpressing BglX or its mutants

Overnight cultures of BL21(DE3) E coli cells harboring pET20b(+)-bglX or pET20b(+) vectors carrying the mutated bglX gene were serially diluted (10-1-10-8) in either LB medium or minimal M9 medium (MM9) and plated on the corresponding agar plates supplemented with either glucose (0.4% w/v) or lactose (1.5% w/v). All plates also contained ampicillin (100 µg/mL). The plates were incubated at 37°C overnight, and bacterial growth was observed.

Biofilm formation assay

Overnight cultures of BL21(DE3) E. coli cells harboring pET20b(+), pET20b(+)-bglX or a vector carrying the mutated bglX gene grown in LB with ampicillin (100 µg/mL) were diluted 1:50 into fresh TSB media. After one hour of incubation, IPTG was added to a concentration of 0.3 mM. For each bacterial strain, 150 µL aliquots were distributed into eight wells of a 96 well-plate. Eight wells contained 150 µL aliquots of TSB medium that were later used to prepare a blank for absorbance measurements. Three plates were prepared in the same fashion. The plates were incubated at 37°C for three days. After incubation, the liquid was removed from the wells by inverting the plates. The plates were gently submerged in distilled water to eliminate loose cells, and then the water was removed by inverting and shaking the plates. For biofilm staining, 150 µL of 0.1% (m/v) aqueous solution of crystal violet was added into each well. The plates were incubated at room temperature for 15 min, the solution was removed by inverting the plates, and the wells were washed three times by submerging the plates in distilled water. After the water was removed, the plates were air-dried. To dissolve the stained biofilms, 150 µL of 30% (v/v) acetic acid was added into each well, and the plates were incubated at room temperature for 15 min with gentle shaking. For each plate, the eight wells containing the same E. coli strain were combined, and the absorbance of the pooled solutions was measured at 585 nm.

Statistical analysis

The data was analyzed in Microsoft Excel and presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). For biofilm formation, an independent t-test was employed to compare the absorbances of the control and the bacterial cells expressing various BglX proteins. The statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Expression of BglX protein and construction of mutants

The bglX gene encoding the full-length protein was cloned into the pET20b(+) expression vector. The BglX protein was subsequently overexpressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) cells and purified using ammonium sulfate precipitation and anion-exchange chromatography. The functional importance of the predicted catalytic residues in BglX was studied using site-directed mutagenesis. Three single mutants were constructed: D287G, D111N, and E293Q. The mutant proteins were overexpressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) cells and purified following the wild-type BglX purification protocol. The purity of the proteins after chromatographic purification was confirmed by SDS-PAGE (Figure S3).

Enzyme activities with model substrates

The enzymatic activities of the wild-type and mutant proteins with chromogenic model aryl-β-glycosides were evaluated. The turnover numbers (kcat), Michaelis constants (KM), and catalytic efficiencies (kcat/KM) are summarized in Table 2. The wild-type BglX demonstrated similar turnover numbers for both glucose-containing substrates; however, the KM for oNPGlc was significantly higher than the KM for pNPGlc. The E293Q mutant displayed a matching trend in kinetic parameters. Its catalytic constants for the two substrates were similar, although the values were lower compared to those for the wild-type. This mutant’s KM for the ortho-substituted phenol derivative was also higher than its KM for the para-substituted analog. Neither the D111N nor the D287G mutant had detectable activity towards these substrates. All four proteins were active in the hydrolysis of the β-glycosidic bond formed by D-galactose in oNPGal. The kcat of the wild-type enzyme for the reaction with oNPGal was two orders of magnitude greater compared to that for oNPGlc and at least five-fold higher than those of the mutants. Interestingly, the Michaelis constants for this substrate were lower than those for its glucose analog.

Table 2.

Enzyme activity with model substrates and lactose

Substrate Enzyme kcat (min-1) KM (mM) kcat/KM (mM-1min-1)
pNPGlc wt-BglX 1.02 ± 0.12 0.95 ± 0.08 1.07 ± 0.04
pNPGlc D287G NA NA NA
pNPGlc E293Q 0.46 ± 0.05 3.2 ± 0.3 0.14 ± 0.03
pNPGlc D111N NA NA NA
oNPGlc wt-BglX 1.08 ± 0.12 12.0 ± 1.0 0.090 ± 0.003
oNPGlc D287G NA NA NA
oNPGlc E293Q 0.47 ± 0.05 6.7 ± 1.8 0.070 ± 0.012
oNPGlc D111N NA NA NA
oNPGal wt-BglX 282 ± 30 0.21 ± 0.02 1343 ± 15
oNPGal D287G 22.8 ± 2.4 0.14 ± 0.02 163 ± 6
oNPGal E293Q 54.0 ± 0.6 0.21 ± 0.02 257± 21
oNPGal D111N 46.2 ± 4.8 0.51 ± 0.02 91 ± 6
Lactose wt-BglX 2.64 ± 0.24 6.8 ± 1.0 0.39 ± 0.02
Lactose D287G NA NA NA
Lactose E293Q 0.33 ± 0.05 6.7 ± 1.0 0.049 ± 0.001
Lactose D111N NA NA NA

NA: no activity.

In-gel activity testing

Two fluorogenic substrates were used in these studies: one containing glucose (MUGlc) and the other containing galactose (MUGal) (Figure 1). The results presented in Figure S1 demonstrate that the positions of the BglX protein bands on the gel correspond to the areas where the fluorescent compound, methylumbelliferone, was formed. In the experiment with MUGlc, only two fluorescent bands were observed - one from the wild-type and the other from the E293Q mutant. The wild-type BglX yielded a band with higher intensity. On the gel treated with MUGal, all four proteins showed formation of the fluorescent product, although the intensities of the bands varied between the proteins.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

In-gel activity of BglX and mutants. Two fluorogenic substrates were used to test in-gel enzymatic activity of BglX and its mutants: (A) 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (MUGlc) and (C) 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (MUGal), (B and D) show the protein load.

Inhibition studies

The effects of free D-glucose or D-galactose on BglX enzymatic activity towards either pNPGlc or oNPGal as a substrate were evaluated (Figure 2). In the presence of 125 mM galactose, the enzyme activity decreased by 30 to 50% regardless of the nature of the substrate. The effect of glucose, however, depended on the substrate used. Glucose at a concentration of 125 mM suppressed the enzymatic activity towards pNPGlc by almost 95%, while the reaction with oNPGal was inhibited by no more than 40%.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Percent of remaining enzyme activity in the presence of glucose and galactose. A. Enzyme activity was evaluated using 5.0 mM pNPGlc as a substrate, D287G and D111N had no detectable activity with this substrate; B. Enzyme activity was evaluated using 1.25 mM oNPGal as a substrate. Enzyme activity without an inhibitor was considered as 100%. The error bars illustrate the standard deviation from the mean (n = 3).

Activities with disaccharides and laminarin

The glycosidic bond specificity of BglX was evaluated using three disaccharides - cellobiose, maltose, and lactose. None of the BglX proteins were able to cleave the glycosidic bonds in cellobiose or maltose; however, the wild-type and the E293Q mutant hydrolyzed lactose. Their kinetic parameters are presented in Table 2. The Michaelis constants were quite similar, but the turnover number for the wild-type was an order of magnitude greater than that for the E293Q mutant. In addition to the disaccharides, the activity of the wild-type BglX towards the trisaccharide laminarin was assessed by incubating the enzyme and laminarin for up to 36 hours at room temperature. The release of free glucose was not observed.

Effect of carbon source on bacterial growth

The effect of overexpression of the wild-type BglX or the mutant enzymes on the growth of E. coli cells was tested by growing the cells on minimal media containing either D-glucose or lactose as carbon sources. All bacterial strains thrived on the agar plates with nutrient-rich LB media used as a control (Figure 3A). In addition, all cells demonstrated similar but slower growth rates on minimal media supplemented with glucose. In contrast, the bacterial cells showed differences in growth rates when lactose was added as the carbon source (Figure 3B). The cells overexpressing BglX formed more colonies at higher dilution than any other cells.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effect of carbon sources on bacterial growth. Ten-fold serially diluted bacterial strains overexpressing BglX or the mutant enzymes grown on agar plates: (A) Nutrient-rich LB media; (B) Minimal media supplemented with lactose.

Biofilm formation assay

To assess the possible involvement of BglX in the formation of biofilm, cells overexpressing the wild-type or mutant BglX were grown in a 96-well plate for several days, and the biofilm was stained with crystal violet. The absorbances of the dissolved biofilms at 585 nm shown in Figure 4 were a measurement of the biofilm quantities. The cells expressing BglX formed about the same amount of biofilm as the E. coli cells containing the empty pET20b(+) vector used as a control. There were no statistically significant differences in absorbances between the control and the cells expressing either wild-type BglX or the mutant proteins.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Evaluation of the amount of biofilm. Cells overexpressing BglX or mutants were grown for three days at 37°C in a 96-well plate containing TSB media. The wells were washed with water, and the biofilms were stained with crystal violet. After dissolving the stained films in acetic acid, the absorbance of the solutions was measured at 585 nm. The error bars illustrate the standard deviation from the mean (n = 3).

Discussion

The bglX gene in E. coli encodes BglX, a periplasmic protein consisting of 765 amino acid residues [29]. The first twenty amino acid residues at the N-terminus comprise a signal peptide for periplasmic delivery, and the cleavage of this fragment yields a functional protein of 81.3 kDa. The overproduction of a protein that requires transport into the periplasm could lead to so-called “jamming” of the secretion machinery [30]. In these cases, the transport system becomes overwhelmed with a large amount of protein, leaving some of it in the cytosol with the intact signal peptide. To circumvent this issue, we cloned a truncated version of the bglX gene encoding only the active portion of the protein into a pET20b(+) vector (primers’ sequence is shown in Table S1), and expressed the protein in BL21(DE3) cells. The cells demonstrated substantial production of truncated BglX based on SDS-PAGE analysis (Figure S2); however, this protein had no enzymatic activity. The lack of activity is most likely due to the inability of the protein to fold properly. In bacteria, the secretion of periplasmic proteins is accomplished by two main mechanisms - the Sec-pathway and the Tat-pathway [31]. In the first mechanism, a protein synthesized in the cytoplasm is taken into the periplasm where it is folded into the correct structure with the help of periplasmic Sec chaperones. In the second mechanism, the folded protein is translocated through the inner membrane. Apparently, BglX requires the assistance of chaperones to fold correctly in the periplasm. Since the truncated version of BglX yielded inactive protein, the full-length BglX was cloned into the expression vector allowing for the production of the functional enzyme.

Most known glucosidases contain two amino acid residues in the active site that are imperative for the cleavage of a glycosidic bond - one serves as a nucleophile and the other participates in acid-base catalysis [32-34]. The D287 residue has been predicted to function as a nucleophile in the active site of the BglX enzyme [29]. This residue is located within a conserved GXXXSDH/W motif [35]. The residue that might act as an acid-base catalyst, D111, was chosen after analysis of the BglX 3D-structure predicted by Phyre2 [36] using β-glucosidase from barley seed as a template [37]. It should be noted, though, that these two β-glucosidases have a low percentage of identity in their primary structures. D287 was substituted with a glycine residue, as its side-chain hydrogen atom is incapable of assisting in nucleophilic catalysis. D111 was replaced with asparagine; an amino acid with a comparably sized side chain that cannot donate and accept a proton like the carboxyl group of aspartate. One other residue of potential importance is E293. We proposed that this residue may be involved in forming interactions between the enzyme and a substrate. Here, E293 was mutated to glutamine.

Since BglX is predicted to function as a β-glucosidase, we first tested the substrates pNPGlc and oNPGlc which both contain a β-glycosidic bond formed by D-glucose. The activity of BglX towards these two substrates was quite low - the enzyme was only able to hydrolyze about one molecule of substrate per minute. For comparison, a periplasmic β-glucosidase from Rhodothermus marinus, DSM 4252, has a kcat with pNPGlc about 3,500-fold higher than that of E. coli BglX [38]. Obviously, the kinetic parameters of β-glucosidases vary significantly between various organisms. However, in most cases, the enzymes can convert up to three hundred molecules of their native substrates per second and usually exhibit KM values below 1 mM [10]. The mutations of D287 and D111 rendered the enzymes inactive towards glucose-containing substrates. The loss of activity by the D287G and D111N mutants confirmed the participation of these amino acid residues in the hydrolysis of aryl-glucosides. To our surprise, the mutants were able to hydrolyze the galactose-containing substrate oNPGal. All proteins demonstrated lower KM values and significantly higher turnover numbers with oNPGal than with its glucose analog. We confirmed these results by testing the in-gel enzymatic activity of BglX and its mutants. The intensities of the fluorescent bands with MUGal correlated with the catalytic efficiency data in the oNPGal kinetic assay. Overall, the activity decreased in the following order: wild-type > E293Q > D287G > D111N.

Next, we examined the enzymatic activity of BglX and its mutants in the presence of high concentrations of glucose or galactose. In general, the activity of glycosidases are affected by free monosaccharides in three ways: they may be inhibited, stimulated, or unaffected by high concentrations of those sugars [39,40]. We observed that glucose produced a significant inhibitory effect on enzymatic activity when pNPGlc was used as a substrate but only slightly reduced the activity towards oNPGal. High concentrations of galactose only moderately decreased the enzymatic activity of BglX and the mutants when either pNPGlc or oNPGal were used as substrates. These results combined with the retention of activity towards oNPGal by the D287G and D111N mutants suggest that glucose- and galactose-containing substrates may bind differently within the enzyme’s active site.

We evaluated three disaccharides as potential natural substrates for BglX. Cellobiose and maltose are composed of two glucose residues linked by a 1→4-glycosidic bond. In cellobiose, the glycosidic bond is in β-configuration, while maltose contains an α-glycosidic bond. Lactose consists of a galactose residue bonded to a glucose residue via a β (1→4)-glycosidic bond. Only lactose was hydrolyzed by the wild-type BglX and E293Q mutant. Both enzymes exhibited the same trends in kinetic parameters with lactose as those observed previously with oNPGal - very similar KM values and significantly higher kcat for the wild-type BglX. In agreement with the activity studies towards lactose, the cells that overexpressed the wild-type BglX had a noticeable growth advantage when plated on minimal media supplemented with lactose. The cells expressing E293Q mutant followed. The slow growth rates of the cells overexpressing the D111N and D287G mutants correlated with the inability of those mutants to hydrolyze lactose.

The ability of BglX to cleave a different type of glycosidic bond was assessed using laminarin, a trisaccharide of glucose residues connected via β (1→3) bonds [41]. A study of periplasmic BglX from P. aeruginosa demonstrated its activity with short gluco-oligosaccharides like sophorose and laminaritriose, containing β (1→2) and β (1→3) glycosidic bonds, respectively [42]. In contrast, incubation of the wild-type E. coli BglX with laminarin established that the enzyme was not able to cleave the β (1→3) bond. Another striking difference in the behavior of these two enzymes is that P. aeruginosa BglX is unable to hydrolyze lactose, while its E. coli analog has this ability. A more recent study on the adaptation of Caulobacter crescentus to osmotic stress showed the ability of its BglX to hydrolyze the β (1→2) bond in sophorose [43]. This bond specificity led to the hypothesis that the enzyme may participate in osmoregulation through the hydrolysis of OPG and/or biofilm synthesis and suggested that BglX works in collaboration with the esterase EstG to hydrolyze cyclic glucose structures [43]. The inactivation of the bglX genes by transposon insertion in P. aeruginosa [42] and avian pathogenic Escherichia coli [44] leads to decreased biofilm formation. We compared the sequences of the three BglX enzymes. The BglX enzyme from E. coli has about 62% sequence identity to the enzyme from P. aeruginosa and only 42% to BglX from Caulobacter. All three enzymes are active with the model substrate pNPGlc. Our analysis of biofilm formation by E. coli cells overexpressing the wild-type BglX or its mutants indicated no statistically significant difference between the cells. Consequently, the overexpression of BglX did not result in an increase in biofilm production. The lack of the overexpression effect may be explained if BglX relies on another enzyme(s) to modify the OPG before acting on them. Further investigation into the possibility of this specific enzymatic collaboration in E. coli cells is required.

Conclusions

In this study, we demonstrated the functional importance of two amino acid residues, D111 and D287, for E. coli BglX activity. Mutation of the D287 residue to glycine and D111 to asparagine completely abolished enzymatic activity towards β-glucosides; however, both mutants retained some activity towards β-galactosides. Glucose strongly inhibited enzymatic activity with glucose-containing substrates while it only moderately decreased activity towards compounds containing galactose. Galactose only slightly reduced activity, with no obvious differences between glucose- and galactose-containing substrates. Furthermore, BglX can hydrolyze lactose but not cellobiose or laminarin. Taken together, these observations suggest differences in the binding of gluco- and galactosaccharides within the active site of the BglX enzyme. Low activity with glucose-containing substrates suggests that β-glucosidase activity may not be the primary function of the BglX enzyme. Our results indicate that despite its functional prediction, E. coli BglX demonstrates higher activity towards β-galactosides compared to structurally related glucose derivatives, a finding that could further direct our search of this enzyme’s physiological role.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank many YSU students, especially Carol Ann Pitcairn, Korey Kihm, Justin Spatar, and Alexis Chiandussi for their help in the lab, Jennifer Moore for reviewing the manuscript, and the YSU Department of Chemical and Biological Sciences for providing supports for this research.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

Supporting Information

ijbmb0014-0076-f5.pdf (474.5KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Flint HJ, Scott KP, Duncan SH, Louis P, Forano E. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut. Gut Microbes. 2012;3:289–306. doi: 10.4161/gmic.19897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Durica-Mitic S, Göpel Y, Görke B. Carbohydrate utilization in bacteria: making the most out of sugars with the help of small regulatory RNAs. Microbiol Spectr. 2018;6 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.rwr-0013-2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Imperiali B. Bacterial carbohydrate diversity - a brave new world. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2019;53:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.04.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yip VL, Withers SG. Nature’s many mechanisms for the degradation of oligosaccharides. Org Biomol Chem. 2004;2:2707–13. doi: 10.1039/B408880H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Henrissat B, Davies G. Structural and sequence-based classification of glycoside hydrolases. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1997;7:637–44. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80072-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Berlemont R, Martiny AC. Genomic potential for polysaccharide deconstruction in bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:1513–19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03718-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Armstrong Z, Rahfeld P, Withers SG. Discovery of new glycosidases from metagenomic libraries. Methods Enzymol. 2017;597:3–23. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2017.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sathya TA, Khan M. Diversity of glycosyl hydrolase enzymes from metagenome and their application in food industry. J Food Sci. 2014;79:R2149–56. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Faure D. The family-3 glycoside hydrolases: from housekeeping functions to host-microbe interactions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:1485–90. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.4.1485-1490.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ketudat Cairns JR, Esen A. β-Glucosidases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010;67:3389–405. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0399-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bhatia Y, Mishra S, Bisaria VS. Microbial beta-glucosidases: cloning, properties, and applications. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2002;22:375–407. doi: 10.1080/07388550290789568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Srivastava N, Rathour R, Jha S, Pandey K, Srivastava M, Thakur VK, Sengar RS, Gupta VK, Mazumder PB, Khan AF, Mishra PK. Microbial beta glucosidase enzymes: recent advances in biomass conversation for biofuels application. Biomolecules. 2019;9:220. doi: 10.3390/biom9060220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kudo K, Watanabe A, Ujiie S, Shintani T, Gomi K. Purification and enzymatic characterization of secretory glycoside hydrolase family 3 (GH3) aryl β-glucosidases screened from Aspergillus oryzae genome. J Biosci Bioeng. 2015;120:614–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2015.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Han MJ. Exploring the proteomic characteristics of the Escherichia coli B and K-12 strains in different cellular compartments. J Biosci Bioeng. 2016;122:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2015.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Weiner JH, Li L. Proteome of the Escherichia coli envelope and technological challenges in membrane proteome analysis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1778:1698–713. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bontemps-Gallo S, Bohin JP, Lacroix JM. Osmoregulated periplasmic glucans. EcoSal Plus. 2017;7 doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0001-2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Meng J, Xu J, Chen J. The role of osmoregulated periplasmic glucans in the biofilm antibiotic resistance of Yersinia enterocolitica. Microb Pathog. 2020;147:104284. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Römling U, Galperin MY. Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products, and functions. Trends Microbiol. 2015;23:545–57. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tao S, Qingbin M, Zhiling L, Caiyu S, Lixin L, Lilai L. Comparative genomics reveals cellobiose hydrolysis mechanism of Ruminiclostridium thermocellum M3, a cellulosic saccharification bacterium. Front Microbiol. 2023;13:1079279. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1079279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Escalante A, Salinas Cervantes A, Gosset G, Bolívar F. Current knowledge of the Escherichia coli phosphoenolpyruvate-carbohydrate phosphotransferase system: peculiarities of regulation and impact on growth and product formation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;94:1483–94. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4101-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Harwani D. Regulation of gene expression: cryptic β-glucoside (bgl) operon of Escherichia coli as a paradigm. Braz J Microbiol. 2015;45:1139–44. doi: 10.1590/s1517-83822014000400003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Parker LL, Hall BG. Characterization and nucleotide sequence of the cryptic cel operon of Escherichia coli K12. Genetics. 1990;124:455–71. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Joseph AM, Sonowal R, Mahadevan S. A comparative study of the evolution of cellobiose utilization in Escherichia coli and Shigella sonnei. Arch Microbiol. 2017;199:247–257. doi: 10.1007/s00203-016-1299-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Desai SK, Nandimath K, Mahadevan S. Diverse pathways for salicin utilization in Shigella sonnei and Escherichia coli carrying an impaired bgl operon. Arch Microbiol. 2010;192:821–33. doi: 10.1007/s00203-010-0610-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Harwani D, Zangoui P, Mahadevan S. The β-glucoside (bgl) operon of Escherichia coli is involved in the regulation of oppA, encoding an oligopeptide transporter. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:90–9. doi: 10.1128/JB.05837-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Neelakanta G, Sankar TS, Schnetz K. Characterization of a beta-glucoside operon (bgc) prevalent in septicemic and uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:2284–93. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02621-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hall BG, Xu L. Nucleotide sequence, function, activation, and evolution of the cryptic asc operon of Escherichia coli K12. Mol Biol Evol. 1992;9:688–706. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ishida Y, Kori A, Ishihama A. Participation of regulator AscG of the beta-glucoside utilization operon in regulation of the propionate catabolism operon. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:6136–44. doi: 10.1128/JB.00663-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yang M, Luoh SM, Goddard A, Reilly D, Henzel W, Bass S. The bglX gene located at 47.8 min on the Escherichia coli chromosome encodes a periplasmic beta-glucosidase. Microbiology (Reading) 1996;142:1659–65. doi: 10.1099/13500872-142-7-1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dwyer RS, Malinverni JC, Boyd D, Beckwith J, Silhavy TJ. Folding LacZ in the periplasm of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2014;196:3343–50. doi: 10.1128/JB.01843-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Natale P, Brüser T, Driessen AJ. Sec- and Tat-mediated protein secretion across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane - distinct translocases and mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1778:1735–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McCarter JD, Withers SG. Mechanisms of enzymatic glycoside hydrolysis. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1994;4:885–92. doi: 10.1016/0959-440x(94)90271-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rye CS, Withers SG. Glycosidase mechanisms. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2000;4:573–80. doi: 10.1016/s1367-5931(00)00135-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li YK, Chir J, Chen FY. Catalytic mechanism of a family 3 beta-glucosidase and mutagenesis study on residue Asp-247. Biochem J. 2001;355:835–40. doi: 10.1042/bj3550835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dan S, Marton I, Dekel M, Bravdo BA, He S, Withers SG, Shoseyov O. Cloning, expression, characterization, and nucleophile identification of family 3, Aspergillus niger beta-glucosidase. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:4973–80. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.7.4973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kelley LA, Mezulis S, Yates CM, Wass MN, Sternberg MJ. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:845–58. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Varghese JN, Hrmova M, Fincher GB. Three-dimensional structure of a barley beta-D-glucan exohydrolase, a family 3 glycosyl hydrolase. Structure. 1999;7:179–90. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80024-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ara KZG, Månberger A, Gabriško M, Linares-Pastén JA, Jasilionis A, Friðjónsson ÓH, Hreggviðsson GO, Janeček Š, Nordberg Karlsson E. Characterization and diversity of the complete set of GH family 3 enzymes from Rhodothermus marinus DSM 4253. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1329. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58015-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Salgado JCS, Meleiro LP, Carli S, Ward RJ. Glucose tolerant and glucose stimulated β-glucosidases - A review. Bioresour Technol. 2018;267:704–713. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yang Y, Zhang X, Yin Q, Fang W, Fang Z, Wang X, Zhang X, Xiao Y. A mechanism of glucose tolerance and stimulation of GH1 β-glucosidases. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17296. doi: 10.1038/srep17296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zargarzadeh M, Amaral AJR, Custódio CA, Mano JF. Biomedical applications of laminarin. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;232:115774. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mahasenan KV, Batuecas MT, De Benedetti S, Kim C, Rana N, Lee M, Hesek D, Fisher JF, Sanz-Aparicio J, Hermoso JA, Mobashery S. Catalytic cycle of glycoside hydrolase BglX from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its implications for biofilm formation. ACS Chem Biol. 2020;15:189–196. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.9b00754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Daitch AK, Orsburn BC, Chen Z, Alvarez L, Eberhard CD, Sundararajan K, Zeinert R, Kreitler DF, Jakoncic J, Chien P, Cava F, Gabelli SB, Goley ED. EstG is a novel esterase required for cell envelope integrity in Caulobacter. Curr Biol. 2023;33:228–240. e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.11.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hu J, Gu Y, Lu H, Raheem MA, Yu F, Niu X, Zuo J, Yin H, Huang C, Song X, Tu J, Zhou W, Jiang W, Chen Z, Han X, Qi K. Identification of novel biofilm genes in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli by Tn5 transposon mutant library. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;38:130. doi: 10.1007/s11274-022-03314-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ijbmb0014-0076-f5.pdf (474.5KB, pdf)

Articles from International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES