Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 8;621(7979):511–515. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06507-5

Extended Data Fig. 4. Comparisons of MWL and FPL isolation processes.

Extended Data Fig. 4

a, The procedures of isolating MWL and FPL. b, Comparisons of isolation conditions. The MWL isolation method required time-consuming milling of wood into fine power and repeated solvent extractions, making it is an extremely energy-intensive and high-cost process. The FPL isolation method used larger particles, much less solvents, and shorter separation time, and yielded more lignin.