Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 13;621(7979):550–557. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06418-5

Extended Data Fig. 15. Comparison of stunting prevalence at birth with and without gestational age correction.

Extended Data Fig. 15

This figure includes the results from correcting at-birth Z-scores in the ki cohorts that measured gestational age (GA) for 37,218 measurements in 5 cohorts. The number in the parentheses following each cohort name indicates the prevalence of pre-term birth in each cohort. The corrections are using the Intergrowth standards and are implemented using the R growthstandards package (https://ki-tools.github.io/growthstandards/). Overall, the stunting prevalence at birth decreased slightly after correcting for gestational age, but the cohort-specific results are inconsistent. Observations with GA outside of the Intergrowth standards range (<168 or > 300 days) were dropped for both the corrected and uncorrected data. Prevalence increased after GA correction in some cohorts due to high rates of late-term births based on reported GA. Gestational age was estimated based on mother’s recall of the last menstrual period in the Jivita-3, IRC, and CMC-V-BCS-2002 cohorts, was based on the Dubowitz method (newborn exam) in the Keneba cohort and was based on ultrasound measurements in the PROBIT trial.